This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Hi Bradv. ArbClerkBot doesn't seem to be up right now. Would it be possible to look into that? If you lack capacity to look into it, that's also totally understandable. It may also be helpful to add a technically-minded member of the clerk team to the maintainers of the bot.
Hope you're doing well, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 17:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
The Userpage Barnstar | ||
I love the design of your user page. It's just so elegantly minimal and pleasing to look at. Macbrew ( talk) 02:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Bradv,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, @ Bradv: I was partially blocked for problematic COI editing and wanted to check with you first before asking to be unblocked. The reason I would like to be unblocked is so I can directly edit a project I am working on that involves the California Historical Landmarks in Santa Clara County. There are many corrections that need to be made on this page as well as the landmark articles that, in several cases, do not point to the correct article and/or have no information about the landmark, e.g. the site of invention of the first commercially practicable integrated circuit. I admit that I did some problematic COI editing and I promise not to do it again. I enjoy doing the research and working on meaningful Wikipedia articles. Please let me know what you think? Greg Henderson ( talk) 17:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Hello Bradv:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
I see you blocked this user. Are you able to restore Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jijo Antony (2nd nomination) which they closed as no consensus? CNMall41 ( talk) 21:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, so it turns out you weren't even in that bit of discussion, sorry again—I was actually replying to User:SarekofVulcan, who mentioned NewYorkBrad in his comment, and of course I misread it as being yours. Slightly convoluted, but a fooolish mix up on my part. ——Serial 12:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block you placed on my Wikipedia account. I believe the block was issued due to my attempts to revert edits made by a user engaging in ethno-centric bias, specifically in relation to the representation of Tunisian ethnicity, language, and Berber ancestry.
I understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view on Wikipedia and strive to adhere to its policies. In this case, my intention was to ensure that the information presented accurately reflects the diversity of perspectives and historical facts regarding Tunisian heritage.
The user in question has been systematically removing sourced content that acknowledges the non-Arabic aspects of Tunisian ethnicity and language, as well as information about Berber ancestry or other non-arab ancestry or language elements. This raises concerns about the impartiality and accuracy of the content being presented on Wikipedia.
I believe my efforts to revert these edits were in line with Wikipedia's commitment to providing unbiased and verifiable information. My actions were not intended to disrupt the platform but rather to uphold the principles of neutrality and inclusivity that are essential to Wikipedia's credibility.
I kindly request a review of the block on my account, taking into consideration the context of the edits in question and my commitment to upholding Wikipedia's content policies. I am more than willing to engage in constructive discussions, provide additional sources, and work collaboratively to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of the content related to Tunisian ethnicity and language. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to a resolution that promotes the integrity and objectivity of Wikipedia.
Sincerely, asmodim Asmodim ( talk) 22:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Bradv :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
A special BurnStar for U.
❤
GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I saw you reviewed two of my shrine articles. I have two other pending ones Draft:Tashima Shrine and Draft:Sumiyoshi Shrine (Iki City). Could you look over them and fix Tashima Shrine with AWB if you have it?
I have a few other drafts pending too that are not shrines
Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 06:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Most Braddiest Brad | |
For being the most BarfVD ever. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC) |
I just want to say that it is because of admin power moves such as these, that people like me who have spent an entire DECADE working towards improving Wikipedia want to quit for good. You speak about "thousands of people [...] working tirelessly to help improve the encyclopedia and achieve its vision" in your user page. What has been the point of my working tirelessly for a decade to achieve this, so that I can be demeaned and blocked without consequence for reverting spam? Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 06:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi bradv, the ANI thread closed before I could respond to your final comment to me [1], so I am following up here. Overall, I regret not being more proactive about seeking more editor participation with the content side of the dispute - I filed a request at RFPP and then a report at ANEW, but I could have also gone to BLPN and/or pursued other content-related dispute resolution options, and I could have used the disputed inline template.
I appreciate your responses to my replies to your requests for an explanation at ANI about why I thought a BLP exemption applied, because this interaction emphasizes how controversial BLP exemptions for 3RR can be. One aspect of our interaction that I found particularly helpful is the clarification of how a credible claim of a BLP exemption may seem apparent, but if it requires an essay of explanation, then it can be considered 'controversial.'
And then I reviewed the July 2022 " Making WP:3RRNO point 7 more specific" discussion in the WT:Edit warring Archive, and I think it not only reinforces all of this but also adds depth related to the implementation and purpose of the policy. So I hope this follow up helps provide some reassurance about my improved understanding of the 3RRBLP threshold. Thank you, Beccaynr ( talk) 04:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
If I'd known the sock would out themselves so publicly, I wouldn't have spent as much time on the SPI filing. Thanks for the good work b! Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 03:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
❄️ Happy holidays! ❄️
Hi Brad! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. (The trees happened to be especially tall in this one.) I always appreciate your insights and contributions. Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers,{{u| Sdkb}} talk 06:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
This is to inform you that I made a report against you here /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironcladded ( talk • contribs) 06:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Due to budget and procrastination limitations, we've only had time to review the first ~39% of the scripts since last issue. Help us out here! Aaron Liu ( talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
I was just at the User:Worm That Turned talk page and read your mention of the EotW/Eddie award and how it helped you stay on board. For you to mention it after all these years gives me great enjoyment and a sense of awareness that the award accomplishes what it was intended to do. It means so much for me to hear that... at a time when I am thinking of slowing down or handing it on to the next caretaker. Thanks for the boost of encouragement. Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 06:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
I saw that you closed the previous previous SPI on this editor, after it had been pending for some time. I was wondering if you would be open to closing the current one as well, as it has also been pending for a while after CU had commented. 33ABGirl ( talk) 09:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
I want to bring your attention to several IP's where the editing pattern is similar to the user account on the current event portal for a certain day. The IP's are 82.34.33.245, 185.177.200.54, and 2A00:23C4:B18A:2E01:96E6:F7FF:FE2B:63E4. These are the ones I found so far and have been recent since I opened that casepage. I wanted to bring this to your attention since you blocked and closed the page. I've been reverting the edits due to their suspicious similarities. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 2:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Another one is 76.146.66.26. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 24th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. Uh-huh, we're finally covering the good ones among the rest! Aren't you excited? Remember to include a link in double brackets to the script's .js page when you install the script, so that we can see who uses the script in WhatLinksHere! The ScriptInstaller gadget automatically does this. Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
After earthly attempts at improving the original have failed...
Unfortunately, this section has remained nearly identical. Help us out here!
Yes, we're just doing 'em as we go now. Thanks for reading through this looong issue, if you did! I'm sure this'll send a record for the longest issue ev-ah. You may need to wait even longer for the last issue, as our reserve of old-y and goodie scripts have ran out... We encourage you to try and do some of the requests or improvement tasks. See you in Summer, hopefully!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Hi Bradv. ArbClerkBot doesn't seem to be up right now. Would it be possible to look into that? If you lack capacity to look into it, that's also totally understandable. It may also be helpful to add a technically-minded member of the clerk team to the maintainers of the bot.
Hope you're doing well, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 17:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
The Userpage Barnstar | ||
I love the design of your user page. It's just so elegantly minimal and pleasing to look at. Macbrew ( talk) 02:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello Bradv,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, @ Bradv: I was partially blocked for problematic COI editing and wanted to check with you first before asking to be unblocked. The reason I would like to be unblocked is so I can directly edit a project I am working on that involves the California Historical Landmarks in Santa Clara County. There are many corrections that need to be made on this page as well as the landmark articles that, in several cases, do not point to the correct article and/or have no information about the landmark, e.g. the site of invention of the first commercially practicable integrated circuit. I admit that I did some problematic COI editing and I promise not to do it again. I enjoy doing the research and working on meaningful Wikipedia articles. Please let me know what you think? Greg Henderson ( talk) 17:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Hello Bradv:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
I see you blocked this user. Are you able to restore Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jijo Antony (2nd nomination) which they closed as no consensus? CNMall41 ( talk) 21:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, so it turns out you weren't even in that bit of discussion, sorry again—I was actually replying to User:SarekofVulcan, who mentioned NewYorkBrad in his comment, and of course I misread it as being yours. Slightly convoluted, but a fooolish mix up on my part. ——Serial 12:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block you placed on my Wikipedia account. I believe the block was issued due to my attempts to revert edits made by a user engaging in ethno-centric bias, specifically in relation to the representation of Tunisian ethnicity, language, and Berber ancestry.
I understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view on Wikipedia and strive to adhere to its policies. In this case, my intention was to ensure that the information presented accurately reflects the diversity of perspectives and historical facts regarding Tunisian heritage.
The user in question has been systematically removing sourced content that acknowledges the non-Arabic aspects of Tunisian ethnicity and language, as well as information about Berber ancestry or other non-arab ancestry or language elements. This raises concerns about the impartiality and accuracy of the content being presented on Wikipedia.
I believe my efforts to revert these edits were in line with Wikipedia's commitment to providing unbiased and verifiable information. My actions were not intended to disrupt the platform but rather to uphold the principles of neutrality and inclusivity that are essential to Wikipedia's credibility.
I kindly request a review of the block on my account, taking into consideration the context of the edits in question and my commitment to upholding Wikipedia's content policies. I am more than willing to engage in constructive discussions, provide additional sources, and work collaboratively to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of the content related to Tunisian ethnicity and language. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to a resolution that promotes the integrity and objectivity of Wikipedia.
Sincerely, asmodim Asmodim ( talk) 22:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Bradv :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
A special BurnStar for U.
❤
GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I saw you reviewed two of my shrine articles. I have two other pending ones Draft:Tashima Shrine and Draft:Sumiyoshi Shrine (Iki City). Could you look over them and fix Tashima Shrine with AWB if you have it?
I have a few other drafts pending too that are not shrines
Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 06:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Most Braddiest Brad | |
For being the most BarfVD ever. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC) |
I just want to say that it is because of admin power moves such as these, that people like me who have spent an entire DECADE working towards improving Wikipedia want to quit for good. You speak about "thousands of people [...] working tirelessly to help improve the encyclopedia and achieve its vision" in your user page. What has been the point of my working tirelessly for a decade to achieve this, so that I can be demeaned and blocked without consequence for reverting spam? Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 06:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi bradv, the ANI thread closed before I could respond to your final comment to me [1], so I am following up here. Overall, I regret not being more proactive about seeking more editor participation with the content side of the dispute - I filed a request at RFPP and then a report at ANEW, but I could have also gone to BLPN and/or pursued other content-related dispute resolution options, and I could have used the disputed inline template.
I appreciate your responses to my replies to your requests for an explanation at ANI about why I thought a BLP exemption applied, because this interaction emphasizes how controversial BLP exemptions for 3RR can be. One aspect of our interaction that I found particularly helpful is the clarification of how a credible claim of a BLP exemption may seem apparent, but if it requires an essay of explanation, then it can be considered 'controversial.'
And then I reviewed the July 2022 " Making WP:3RRNO point 7 more specific" discussion in the WT:Edit warring Archive, and I think it not only reinforces all of this but also adds depth related to the implementation and purpose of the policy. So I hope this follow up helps provide some reassurance about my improved understanding of the 3RRBLP threshold. Thank you, Beccaynr ( talk) 04:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
If I'd known the sock would out themselves so publicly, I wouldn't have spent as much time on the SPI filing. Thanks for the good work b! Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 03:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
❄️ Happy holidays! ❄️
Hi Brad! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. (The trees happened to be especially tall in this one.) I always appreciate your insights and contributions. Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers,{{u| Sdkb}} talk 06:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
This is to inform you that I made a report against you here /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironcladded ( talk • contribs) 06:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Due to budget and procrastination limitations, we've only had time to review the first ~39% of the scripts since last issue. Help us out here! Aaron Liu ( talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
I was just at the User:Worm That Turned talk page and read your mention of the EotW/Eddie award and how it helped you stay on board. For you to mention it after all these years gives me great enjoyment and a sense of awareness that the award accomplishes what it was intended to do. It means so much for me to hear that... at a time when I am thinking of slowing down or handing it on to the next caretaker. Thanks for the boost of encouragement. Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 06:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
I saw that you closed the previous previous SPI on this editor, after it had been pending for some time. I was wondering if you would be open to closing the current one as well, as it has also been pending for a while after CU had commented. 33ABGirl ( talk) 09:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
I want to bring your attention to several IP's where the editing pattern is similar to the user account on the current event portal for a certain day. The IP's are 82.34.33.245, 185.177.200.54, and 2A00:23C4:B18A:2E01:96E6:F7FF:FE2B:63E4. These are the ones I found so far and have been recent since I opened that casepage. I wanted to bring this to your attention since you blocked and closed the page. I've been reverting the edits due to their suspicious similarities. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 2:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Another one is 76.146.66.26. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 24th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. Uh-huh, we're finally covering the good ones among the rest! Aren't you excited? Remember to include a link in double brackets to the script's .js page when you install the script, so that we can see who uses the script in WhatLinksHere! The ScriptInstaller gadget automatically does this. Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
After earthly attempts at improving the original have failed...
Unfortunately, this section has remained nearly identical. Help us out here!
Yes, we're just doing 'em as we go now. Thanks for reading through this looong issue, if you did! I'm sure this'll send a record for the longest issue ev-ah. You may need to wait even longer for the last issue, as our reserve of old-y and goodie scripts have ran out... We encourage you to try and do some of the requests or improvement tasks. See you in Summer, hopefully!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)