Welcome to my discussion page. I prefer having all the conversations on the same place, so I mostly answer here. If you decide to send me a mail, please remind me here to check my mailbox, just in case. --
Tone. |
Archives |
---|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It seems quite unproductive trying to remind people that ITN is for posting articles with new developments, such as a sporting championship watched by millions, even if it doesn't personally relate to them. – Muboshgu ( talk) 21:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Tone, for what it's worth, I understand why you thought you should close the discussion of mainpaging the college football playoff, but I agree with Muboshgu that it was premature to do so. Actually, by my count, there were 12 editors who had commented in support of posting (whether or not they led off with a bolded "Support") and 9 who had opposed. If the call had to be made right then, there was a majority for posting (I don't think consensus on ITN requires a massive supermajority a la RfA). While a handful of editors were indeed repeating themselves unproductively, new points were still being made, and the discussion had been open for a shorter period of time than many other ITN discussions.
I attempted this morning to revive the discussion post your close, but was reverted, and I didn't have the time or patience to seek a more formal reopening—partly because the time had probably passed; I was offline yesterday during the bulk of the discussion); and partly because you didn't seem to be online to consult with; and partly because I was busy in the offline world today, and partly because there's a certain editor I am tired of dealing with. But if it matters, I don't think the discussion should have been closed when it was, and I do think the item should ultimately have been posted. Best regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 02:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Regarding the above, I was actually interested in your (Tone's) thoughts about what I posted, not so much someone else's ... and I'd still be interested. But I guess we can just file it under old news if you prefer to. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 19:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
I went ahead and carried out the deletions you prescribed in your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Olympians and cyclists and weightlifters at World Championships. Since you asked about batch deletion, Twinkle has a function that does just that. It's quite useful. :) Regards, – Juliancolton | Talk 03:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The article List of members of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Randykitty (
talk)
19:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of members of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty ( talk) 22:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
This page already in the Portuguese and Spanish versions of Wikipedia and I don't believe that they viole the rules and terms of the site!
Saviochristi ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I'd already closed the FAC by the time you had replied to me. I think there were a few too many issues to keep this open. However, if you can address the issues out of FAC and make sure that Victoria and Syek88 are happy and would not oppose, I can waive the usual two-week wait. For bookkeeping purposes, when you open the new FAC, link this comment by me and also include a diff of the changes made since the end of the FAC, and for the sake of transparency, your notification of Sportomanokin. I'd also recommend notifying those who commented, especially Victoria and Syek, with a neutral notice when you re-open. That should make it run much more quickly and smoothly second time. Sarastro1 ( talk) 22:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that members of the Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing regularly hold a holy mass in front of The Temple of Corruption? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).
On 17 April 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Emma Morano, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 20:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
hey. since you reverted the edit again, i d like to ask you, whats with all the other articles of eu nations where this image is used? i think, either in every article this argument should be taken into account and hence the images been taken out, or in this case also in slovenias article the image can be staying. whats your comment on that?-- Joobo ( talk) 19:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Five years now! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
?fuzzy=1
to the URL, as with
Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.On 17 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marjan Šarec, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marjan Šarec started his career as a comedian, but was later elected Mayor of Kamnik and recently announced his candidacy for President of Slovenia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marjan Šarec. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Marjan Šarec), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 12:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Hello Tone,
Sorry to disturb you with this question. My name is Alex Romanchykov and I work at BeLight Software company as the Product and Marketing manager. We produce software for Mac, Windows and iOS since 2003 (in January, next year, we will celebrate our 15th Anniversary). We are the creators of many popular applications such as Live Home 3D (ex Live Interior 3D), Art Text, Swift Publisher and more. These programs are constantly at the top charts of Mac App Store and Windows Store. Several our applications already reached the mark of 1,000,000 downloads. Some time ago our company page was deleted from Wikipedia (16:07, 28 December 2009 Tone (talk | contribs) deleted page BeLight Software ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeLight Software). As I understand, the users and the guy who wrote an article had a vivid discussion which resulted in the page deletion. Eight years passed, the company gained the reputation of a big contributor to a world of applications and yet still not a word about us or our products on Wikipedia. We're in some sort of Limbo here and can not escape from it. Is there a way to whitelist the page? We are ready to provide any necessary updated information and references.
Thanks for your attention.
Kind Regrads, Alex Romanchykov Product and Marketing Manager BeLight Software www.belightsoft.com www.livehome3d.com AlexR10 ( talk) 15:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
195.138.66.188 ( talk) 08:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, you just closed a discussion with comments which does not seem appropriate. Infobox templates should be viewed on the basis of parameters not on the basis of names. You stated that the religious building and monastery are different hence no concensus. This is against the views expressed by community at WP:INFOCOL and MOS:IB. Kindly clarify the issue. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 12:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.
To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.
We really appreciate your input!
Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.
For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative ( talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
THere is an ANI thread "odd discussion an BLP noticeboard" that involves outing issues, I have contacted you as you are the most recently active admin. Tornado chaser ( talk) 18:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Church of St. Michael, Črna Vas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Slovenian architect Jože Plečnik used concrete sewer pipes for construction of the Church of St. Michael? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Church of St. Michael, Črna Vas. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Church of St. Michael, Črna Vas), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
I was about to create a page called Tangara School for Girls and received this message.
A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted.
If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below.
15:25, 12 October 2007 Tone (talk | contribs) deleted page Tangara School for Girls (content was: '{{dated prod|concern = Article asserts nothing. Fails WP:N and WP:ORG|month = October|day = 6|year = 2007|time = 17:08|timestamp = 20071...')
Can you please elaborate? Thank you! Hymnodist.2004 ( talk) 10:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Slovenian railway referendum, 2017 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sounder Bruce 00:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Hello! Your submission of Slovenian railway referendum, 2017 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 23:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
On 7 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Slovenian railway referendum, 2017, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that only 20.5 percent of registered Slovenians turned out to vote in a 2017 railway referendum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Slovenian railway referendum, 2017. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Slovenian railway referendum, 2017), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, if I may, for the Template:In the news I would like to suggest this news: [1], [2], it is a very important subject and it would be good if it gains in visibility. Thanks, Drow ( talk) 20:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey Tone, I was wondering if you'd be able to take a look at a couple of open FLC reviews I have? Of course, more than happy to reciprocate if you have anything that needs a review right now? My lists are:
Anything you'd be able to do to even have a look at just one would be much appreciated. Cheers, The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Hello, Tone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of World Heritage Sites in Bosnia and Herzegovina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vrbas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
On 10 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jernej Šugman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Slovenian actor Jernej Šugman starred in Shakespeare's Hamlet twice, first in the titular role and the second time as King Claudius? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jernej Šugman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Jernej Šugman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not be lazy! Use citeweb or citenews instead of bare URLs. Thanks. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
I was a bit surprised by your speed of response here. A "new account" is no good, but nominations from an IP three minutes later are fine? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 00:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
So, the bit about her hair is the only thing left uncited in the article. I found this video of her changing hairstyles, but I don't think that's good enough (and it's a little creepy). Should we just take the line about her hair out? Cheers, MAINEiac4434 ( talk) 21:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you deleted Mårts, can you please read what I said in the talk page? It doesn't really meet the criteria for G6.
But also, as explained in the talk page, if you think Wikipedia would be better off with this page, can you undelete it and then I'll make a redirect to the page mentioned in the talk page and add a section to that page?
Thanks! DrVogel ( talk) 17:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by
Bobo.03 at the
University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.41% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 11:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2014 Olympics ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.Hello! Your submission of Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 20:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
My name is Sonia, and I write for The Washington Post. I'm interested in pursuing a story about Wikipedia users who update/edit pages detailing specific histories of the Academy Awards (e.g. "List of black Academy Award winners and nominees," "90th Academy Awards"). I believe you might have edited a similar page recently, perhaps during the ceremony. People who are simply curious often end up on these informative pages, and I believe our readers might find it interesting to hear the story behind the quick edits — are there some Wikipedia users who wait for the awards to be announced and then update the pages immediately? How do you keep track of all the history? And so on.
If you'd be interested in chatting with me, please let me know as soon as possible. I can be reached at sonia.rao@washpost.com.
Thanks! Sonia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soniarao23 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
On 13 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that biathlete Jakov Fak won a silver medal for Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, having previously won a bronze medal for Croatia in Vancouver? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Ritchie333 ( talk) 00:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Portal:Slovenia/Things you can do, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Slovenia/Things you can do and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Slovenia/Things you can do during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac ( talk) 21:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
Hi, Tone. I'm just posting to let you know that List of World Heritage Sites in Slovenia – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
On 24 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Attica wildfires, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 22:40, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).
Hello! I refer you to this action: 15:25, 12 October 2007 Tone (talk | contribs) deleted page Tangara School for Girls (content was: '{{dated prod|concern = Article asserts nothing. Fails WP:N and WP:ORG|month = October|day = 6|year = 2007|time = 17:08|timestamp = 20071...') Can you please confirm whether the article you deleted was about the sister school of Redfield College (New South Wales)? If so, I wonder if you'd please reconsider this action given that Redfield has an article? Thank you! XP-93 ( talk) 11:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of World Heritage Sites in Albania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Illyrian and Venetian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi @ Tone:, please go back to Mirka Mora and the ITN nomination for that article and have another look. Can you now support the nomination after User:JennyOz has kindly provided references for almost all the exhibitions listed as you suggested? Thank you... Jamesmcardle (talk) 13:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear Tone Sir,
my article got nominated for deletion because when I start the article at that time have not added news/media sources and after 2 days a have added media sources link in the page and have also discussed over the talk page but before any final improvement article gone deleted so this time I need the suggestion too about source and writing Kindly help me to improve the article of a Bhojpuri Actor Sudip Pandey. if there is a possible way to create or recreation and improvement kindly give you feedback and suggestions to do batter.
Kind Regards Bablu Baghel User talk:Bablu Baghel
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.Hi, you closed the AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sha'biyat_Naslah which had 2½ delete votes and 2½ keep votes. Do you have any problems if I were to create a new page which redirects to Al Naslah? I don't care about the deleted page's history, just the redirect. Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 17:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I want to republish the page with more details., Kindly grant me the permission link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
```` I have deleted this article by myself, as per your suggestion i will make one new draft space for that article.. if I tried to create draft space any issue will occur? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Tone
I understand that you may have been the administrator who decided to delete my page, " Robert Florczak." This is disappointing, since it was one of a number of sites that give valuable visibility to my work. I myself didn't create the page, and, frankly, I'm not even sure who did; it may have been my late agent many years ago. Nevertheless, it has always been valuable to me and I'm interested in how the page might be reconsidered for reposting.
As I understand it, much of the reasoning for the deletion was non-citation of sources for the information within the article. Is this correct? If it is, what types of citations would be required and would the submission of them at this point aid in the reposting of the page? As I recall, there was almost nothing on my page that couldn't be fairly easily sourced (though how one actually verifies having studied under a certain noted professor is a bit difficult to establish). Sadly, there is also much new information that could have been added to the page.
I'm new to this whole process, but the page was personally important, as I mentioned, so please let me know if there is anything I can do to have it resurrected.
Respectfully,
Robert Florczak 2003:6:3145:4348:390A:735B:5626:9FB3 ( talk) 10:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC) robert@robertflorczak.com
Thank you for your response, Tone (I hope this is how too properly respond) I understand the conflict of interest issue, but is a "non-involved editor" someone in-house at Wiki that would put the page together for me if I submitted all data and citations? In the meantime, I will look through the information pages you recommend.
Thank you,
Robert 2003:6:3145:4348:390A:735B:5626:9FB3 ( talk) 10:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, Tone. Will do.
Robert 2003:6:3145:4348:5DA:791A:399F:B162 ( talk) 10:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Did you intend to delete List of Loose Women episodes after closing the AFD? I see that you deleted the talk page, and removed the link from Loose Women, but not deleted the page itself. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 09:38, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, you closed this as delete but haven't actually deleted it. Could you please take a look? Thanks, Reyk YO! 12:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Is it not a better option to merge "List of placental mammals, List of monotremes and marsupials, List of mammal genera" (all them hierarchical) and let "List of mammal species" (alphabetical).
Where is the info? https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_mammal_species&redirect=no
Thanks Cloud forest ( talk) 08:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
i delete this article by myself, as per your idea I will start to create one new draft space for that article. If I try to recreate draft space for that? any problem will occur for re creation ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 13:16, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Tone,
I work for Adam Barber, we see the notability debate and we see he lost it.
Adam has a few international projects releasing this month, October and we were hoping you would move the deletion of Adam Barber into a Draft:Adam Barber while we wait for the appropriate third party press releases. That way we could properly cite his new work that may meet notability requirements and at a later time ask for another review.
Best Devatos ( talk) 01:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the only reliable source of information containing a proper list of episodes for the game grumps youtube series. I am currently slowly working my way through all of the past episodes of this series, and now there is no way to check what episodes to watch next and what episodes I have missed due to the deletion of this page. The only other website out there, the game grumps wiki, is not kept up-to-date on its full episode list page, and thus does not contain a similar list. I ask that this page be restored in that there was quite literally no good reason for its deletion. There is no drawback to leaving the page up. Please reconsider, and allow this information to remain accessible to all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadekitsune ( talk • contribs) 13:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
I would greatly appreciate receiving some form of backup of the content so that I could view it and rehost it elsewhere if possible. Also, the game grumps youtube channel itself at https://www.youtube.com/user/GameGrumps does have all of the videos listed, albeit out of order and difficult to sort through as opposed to an easily legible list such as was on the deleted page. It also requires a lot of scrolling and/or searching to find the video in question. However, they are all logged therein and can thus be verified as a result to be accurate. Verifying that a serial of a particular listed series does in fact exist, would be as simple as entering it into the search bar on the youtube channel webpage. Please do send me the content as well if it is not to be rehosted. Thank you. Jadekitsune ( talk) 19:22, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Sure, that should work! I'm not entirely familiar with how wikipedia is set up, but as long as I can access it that's fine by me! Jadekitsune ( talk) 17:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Hi Tone. Would you change your close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visonic to "redirect to Tyco International#Visonic" and undelete the history since I merged information about Visonic to Tyco International#Visonic. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 20:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
I used the site regurlarly for checks of the development status of the engine. There's no counterpart in the regular Vulkan-articles. Plz rollback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C1:C3D9:EE00:C9C1:8BE4:E032:11B ( talk) 15:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was a few hours premature, was it not? (There have been a few AfDs overturned recently on this basis, so I have been following the timing more closely). Newimpartial ( talk) 14:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Before I bring this to deletion review, I would like to ask why you closed this as keep. There are only two arguments for keep, the award argument (which doesn't seem to be supported by Wikipedia policy and is really just WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) and GNG, which I believe was successfully rebutted. Bearcat also admitted that the article's sources do not pass GNG or NTV. So I'm confused why this was closed as keep and not just relisted or closed as delete. Thank you for your time. – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 22:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to my discussion page. I prefer having all the conversations on the same place, so I mostly answer here. If you decide to send me a mail, please remind me here to check my mailbox, just in case. --
Tone. |
Archives |
---|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It seems quite unproductive trying to remind people that ITN is for posting articles with new developments, such as a sporting championship watched by millions, even if it doesn't personally relate to them. – Muboshgu ( talk) 21:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Tone, for what it's worth, I understand why you thought you should close the discussion of mainpaging the college football playoff, but I agree with Muboshgu that it was premature to do so. Actually, by my count, there were 12 editors who had commented in support of posting (whether or not they led off with a bolded "Support") and 9 who had opposed. If the call had to be made right then, there was a majority for posting (I don't think consensus on ITN requires a massive supermajority a la RfA). While a handful of editors were indeed repeating themselves unproductively, new points were still being made, and the discussion had been open for a shorter period of time than many other ITN discussions.
I attempted this morning to revive the discussion post your close, but was reverted, and I didn't have the time or patience to seek a more formal reopening—partly because the time had probably passed; I was offline yesterday during the bulk of the discussion); and partly because you didn't seem to be online to consult with; and partly because I was busy in the offline world today, and partly because there's a certain editor I am tired of dealing with. But if it matters, I don't think the discussion should have been closed when it was, and I do think the item should ultimately have been posted. Best regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 02:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Regarding the above, I was actually interested in your (Tone's) thoughts about what I posted, not so much someone else's ... and I'd still be interested. But I guess we can just file it under old news if you prefer to. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 19:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
I went ahead and carried out the deletions you prescribed in your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Olympians and cyclists and weightlifters at World Championships. Since you asked about batch deletion, Twinkle has a function that does just that. It's quite useful. :) Regards, – Juliancolton | Talk 03:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The article List of members of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Randykitty (
talk)
19:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of members of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty ( talk) 22:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
This page already in the Portuguese and Spanish versions of Wikipedia and I don't believe that they viole the rules and terms of the site!
Saviochristi ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I'd already closed the FAC by the time you had replied to me. I think there were a few too many issues to keep this open. However, if you can address the issues out of FAC and make sure that Victoria and Syek88 are happy and would not oppose, I can waive the usual two-week wait. For bookkeeping purposes, when you open the new FAC, link this comment by me and also include a diff of the changes made since the end of the FAC, and for the sake of transparency, your notification of Sportomanokin. I'd also recommend notifying those who commented, especially Victoria and Syek, with a neutral notice when you re-open. That should make it run much more quickly and smoothly second time. Sarastro1 ( talk) 22:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that members of the Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing regularly hold a holy mass in front of The Temple of Corruption? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Trans-Universal Zombie Church of the Blissful Ringing), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).
On 17 April 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Emma Morano, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 20:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
hey. since you reverted the edit again, i d like to ask you, whats with all the other articles of eu nations where this image is used? i think, either in every article this argument should be taken into account and hence the images been taken out, or in this case also in slovenias article the image can be staying. whats your comment on that?-- Joobo ( talk) 19:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Five years now! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
?fuzzy=1
to the URL, as with
Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.On 17 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marjan Šarec, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marjan Šarec started his career as a comedian, but was later elected Mayor of Kamnik and recently announced his candidacy for President of Slovenia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marjan Šarec. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Marjan Šarec), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 12:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Hello Tone,
Sorry to disturb you with this question. My name is Alex Romanchykov and I work at BeLight Software company as the Product and Marketing manager. We produce software for Mac, Windows and iOS since 2003 (in January, next year, we will celebrate our 15th Anniversary). We are the creators of many popular applications such as Live Home 3D (ex Live Interior 3D), Art Text, Swift Publisher and more. These programs are constantly at the top charts of Mac App Store and Windows Store. Several our applications already reached the mark of 1,000,000 downloads. Some time ago our company page was deleted from Wikipedia (16:07, 28 December 2009 Tone (talk | contribs) deleted page BeLight Software ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeLight Software). As I understand, the users and the guy who wrote an article had a vivid discussion which resulted in the page deletion. Eight years passed, the company gained the reputation of a big contributor to a world of applications and yet still not a word about us or our products on Wikipedia. We're in some sort of Limbo here and can not escape from it. Is there a way to whitelist the page? We are ready to provide any necessary updated information and references.
Thanks for your attention.
Kind Regrads, Alex Romanchykov Product and Marketing Manager BeLight Software www.belightsoft.com www.livehome3d.com AlexR10 ( talk) 15:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
195.138.66.188 ( talk) 08:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, you just closed a discussion with comments which does not seem appropriate. Infobox templates should be viewed on the basis of parameters not on the basis of names. You stated that the religious building and monastery are different hence no concensus. This is against the views expressed by community at WP:INFOCOL and MOS:IB. Kindly clarify the issue. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 12:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.
To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.
We really appreciate your input!
Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.
For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative ( talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
THere is an ANI thread "odd discussion an BLP noticeboard" that involves outing issues, I have contacted you as you are the most recently active admin. Tornado chaser ( talk) 18:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Church of St. Michael, Črna Vas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Slovenian architect Jože Plečnik used concrete sewer pipes for construction of the Church of St. Michael? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Church of St. Michael, Črna Vas. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Church of St. Michael, Črna Vas), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
I was about to create a page called Tangara School for Girls and received this message.
A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted.
If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below.
15:25, 12 October 2007 Tone (talk | contribs) deleted page Tangara School for Girls (content was: '{{dated prod|concern = Article asserts nothing. Fails WP:N and WP:ORG|month = October|day = 6|year = 2007|time = 17:08|timestamp = 20071...')
Can you please elaborate? Thank you! Hymnodist.2004 ( talk) 10:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Slovenian railway referendum, 2017 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sounder Bruce 00:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Hello! Your submission of Slovenian railway referendum, 2017 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 23:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
On 7 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Slovenian railway referendum, 2017, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that only 20.5 percent of registered Slovenians turned out to vote in a 2017 railway referendum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Slovenian railway referendum, 2017. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Slovenian railway referendum, 2017), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, if I may, for the Template:In the news I would like to suggest this news: [1], [2], it is a very important subject and it would be good if it gains in visibility. Thanks, Drow ( talk) 20:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey Tone, I was wondering if you'd be able to take a look at a couple of open FLC reviews I have? Of course, more than happy to reciprocate if you have anything that needs a review right now? My lists are:
Anything you'd be able to do to even have a look at just one would be much appreciated. Cheers, The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Hello, Tone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of World Heritage Sites in Bosnia and Herzegovina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vrbas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
On 10 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jernej Šugman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Slovenian actor Jernej Šugman starred in Shakespeare's Hamlet twice, first in the titular role and the second time as King Claudius? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jernej Šugman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Jernej Šugman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not be lazy! Use citeweb or citenews instead of bare URLs. Thanks. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
I was a bit surprised by your speed of response here. A "new account" is no good, but nominations from an IP three minutes later are fine? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 00:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
So, the bit about her hair is the only thing left uncited in the article. I found this video of her changing hairstyles, but I don't think that's good enough (and it's a little creepy). Should we just take the line about her hair out? Cheers, MAINEiac4434 ( talk) 21:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed you deleted Mårts, can you please read what I said in the talk page? It doesn't really meet the criteria for G6.
But also, as explained in the talk page, if you think Wikipedia would be better off with this page, can you undelete it and then I'll make a redirect to the page mentioned in the talk page and add a section to that page?
Thanks! DrVogel ( talk) 17:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by
Bobo.03 at the
University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.41% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 11:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2014 Olympics ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.Hello! Your submission of Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 20:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
My name is Sonia, and I write for The Washington Post. I'm interested in pursuing a story about Wikipedia users who update/edit pages detailing specific histories of the Academy Awards (e.g. "List of black Academy Award winners and nominees," "90th Academy Awards"). I believe you might have edited a similar page recently, perhaps during the ceremony. People who are simply curious often end up on these informative pages, and I believe our readers might find it interesting to hear the story behind the quick edits — are there some Wikipedia users who wait for the awards to be announced and then update the pages immediately? How do you keep track of all the history? And so on.
If you'd be interested in chatting with me, please let me know as soon as possible. I can be reached at sonia.rao@washpost.com.
Thanks! Sonia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soniarao23 ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
On 13 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that biathlete Jakov Fak won a silver medal for Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, having previously won a bronze medal for Croatia in Vancouver? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Slovenia at the 2018 Winter Olympics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Ritchie333 ( talk) 00:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Portal:Slovenia/Things you can do, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Slovenia/Things you can do and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Slovenia/Things you can do during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac ( talk) 21:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
Hi, Tone. I'm just posting to let you know that List of World Heritage Sites in Slovenia – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
On 24 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Attica wildfires, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 22:40, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).
Hello! I refer you to this action: 15:25, 12 October 2007 Tone (talk | contribs) deleted page Tangara School for Girls (content was: '{{dated prod|concern = Article asserts nothing. Fails WP:N and WP:ORG|month = October|day = 6|year = 2007|time = 17:08|timestamp = 20071...') Can you please confirm whether the article you deleted was about the sister school of Redfield College (New South Wales)? If so, I wonder if you'd please reconsider this action given that Redfield has an article? Thank you! XP-93 ( talk) 11:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of World Heritage Sites in Albania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Illyrian and Venetian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi @ Tone:, please go back to Mirka Mora and the ITN nomination for that article and have another look. Can you now support the nomination after User:JennyOz has kindly provided references for almost all the exhibitions listed as you suggested? Thank you... Jamesmcardle (talk) 13:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear Tone Sir,
my article got nominated for deletion because when I start the article at that time have not added news/media sources and after 2 days a have added media sources link in the page and have also discussed over the talk page but before any final improvement article gone deleted so this time I need the suggestion too about source and writing Kindly help me to improve the article of a Bhojpuri Actor Sudip Pandey. if there is a possible way to create or recreation and improvement kindly give you feedback and suggestions to do batter.
Kind Regards Bablu Baghel User talk:Bablu Baghel
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.Hi, you closed the AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sha'biyat_Naslah which had 2½ delete votes and 2½ keep votes. Do you have any problems if I were to create a new page which redirects to Al Naslah? I don't care about the deleted page's history, just the redirect. Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 17:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I want to republish the page with more details., Kindly grant me the permission link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
```` I have deleted this article by myself, as per your suggestion i will make one new draft space for that article.. if I tried to create draft space any issue will occur? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Tone
I understand that you may have been the administrator who decided to delete my page, " Robert Florczak." This is disappointing, since it was one of a number of sites that give valuable visibility to my work. I myself didn't create the page, and, frankly, I'm not even sure who did; it may have been my late agent many years ago. Nevertheless, it has always been valuable to me and I'm interested in how the page might be reconsidered for reposting.
As I understand it, much of the reasoning for the deletion was non-citation of sources for the information within the article. Is this correct? If it is, what types of citations would be required and would the submission of them at this point aid in the reposting of the page? As I recall, there was almost nothing on my page that couldn't be fairly easily sourced (though how one actually verifies having studied under a certain noted professor is a bit difficult to establish). Sadly, there is also much new information that could have been added to the page.
I'm new to this whole process, but the page was personally important, as I mentioned, so please let me know if there is anything I can do to have it resurrected.
Respectfully,
Robert Florczak 2003:6:3145:4348:390A:735B:5626:9FB3 ( talk) 10:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC) robert@robertflorczak.com
Thank you for your response, Tone (I hope this is how too properly respond) I understand the conflict of interest issue, but is a "non-involved editor" someone in-house at Wiki that would put the page together for me if I submitted all data and citations? In the meantime, I will look through the information pages you recommend.
Thank you,
Robert 2003:6:3145:4348:390A:735B:5626:9FB3 ( talk) 10:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, Tone. Will do.
Robert 2003:6:3145:4348:5DA:791A:399F:B162 ( talk) 10:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Did you intend to delete List of Loose Women episodes after closing the AFD? I see that you deleted the talk page, and removed the link from Loose Women, but not deleted the page itself. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 09:38, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, you closed this as delete but haven't actually deleted it. Could you please take a look? Thanks, Reyk YO! 12:29, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Is it not a better option to merge "List of placental mammals, List of monotremes and marsupials, List of mammal genera" (all them hierarchical) and let "List of mammal species" (alphabetical).
Where is the info? https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_mammal_species&redirect=no
Thanks Cloud forest ( talk) 08:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
i delete this article by myself, as per your idea I will start to create one new draft space for that article. If I try to recreate draft space for that? any problem will occur for re creation ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 13:16, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai Information Updater ( talk • contribs) 05:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Tone,
I work for Adam Barber, we see the notability debate and we see he lost it.
Adam has a few international projects releasing this month, October and we were hoping you would move the deletion of Adam Barber into a Draft:Adam Barber while we wait for the appropriate third party press releases. That way we could properly cite his new work that may meet notability requirements and at a later time ask for another review.
Best Devatos ( talk) 01:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the only reliable source of information containing a proper list of episodes for the game grumps youtube series. I am currently slowly working my way through all of the past episodes of this series, and now there is no way to check what episodes to watch next and what episodes I have missed due to the deletion of this page. The only other website out there, the game grumps wiki, is not kept up-to-date on its full episode list page, and thus does not contain a similar list. I ask that this page be restored in that there was quite literally no good reason for its deletion. There is no drawback to leaving the page up. Please reconsider, and allow this information to remain accessible to all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadekitsune ( talk • contribs) 13:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
I would greatly appreciate receiving some form of backup of the content so that I could view it and rehost it elsewhere if possible. Also, the game grumps youtube channel itself at https://www.youtube.com/user/GameGrumps does have all of the videos listed, albeit out of order and difficult to sort through as opposed to an easily legible list such as was on the deleted page. It also requires a lot of scrolling and/or searching to find the video in question. However, they are all logged therein and can thus be verified as a result to be accurate. Verifying that a serial of a particular listed series does in fact exist, would be as simple as entering it into the search bar on the youtube channel webpage. Please do send me the content as well if it is not to be rehosted. Thank you. Jadekitsune ( talk) 19:22, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Sure, that should work! I'm not entirely familiar with how wikipedia is set up, but as long as I can access it that's fine by me! Jadekitsune ( talk) 17:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Hi Tone. Would you change your close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visonic to "redirect to Tyco International#Visonic" and undelete the history since I merged information about Visonic to Tyco International#Visonic. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 20:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
I used the site regurlarly for checks of the development status of the engine. There's no counterpart in the regular Vulkan-articles. Plz rollback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C1:C3D9:EE00:C9C1:8BE4:E032:11B ( talk) 15:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
The result was a few hours premature, was it not? (There have been a few AfDs overturned recently on this basis, so I have been following the timing more closely). Newimpartial ( talk) 14:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Before I bring this to deletion review, I would like to ask why you closed this as keep. There are only two arguments for keep, the award argument (which doesn't seem to be supported by Wikipedia policy and is really just WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) and GNG, which I believe was successfully rebutted. Bearcat also admitted that the article's sources do not pass GNG or NTV. So I'm confused why this was closed as keep and not just relisted or closed as delete. Thank you for your time. – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 22:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)