![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
hello, Thebiguglyalien! i had a quick question regarding this article and the associated blurb. both the blurb and article lead mention that cleveland participated in the movement to get the u.s. involved in world war i, but i was unable to find a citation for this statement, either in the article lead or the body. did i somehow miss it? the assertion is believable, though i was surprised that it does not appear to be sourced. dying ( talk) 04:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you today for the article, introduced: "Frances Cleveland was first lady of the United States during the presidencies of Grover Cleveland. She became an instant celebrity after marrying the sitting president in the White House, and her popularity may have surpassed even his."! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Killer toy you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
MyCatIsAChonk (
talk) (
not me) (
also not me) (
still no)
11:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Killer toy you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Killer toy for comments about the article, and
Talk:Killer toy/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
GhostRiver --
GhostRiver (
talk)
16:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Lucretia Garfield you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammielh --
Sammielh (
talk)
11:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
History of the United States (1776–1789) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:History of the United States (1776–1789) for comments about the article, and
Talk:History of the United States (1776–1789)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Lingzhi.Renascence --
Lingzhi.Renascence (
talk)
05:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the feedback and reviewing of the When I Die article!!! I'm eternally grateful lol. Ty. Chchcheckit ( talk) 09:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 6 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
11:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Centre-left politics you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
DimensionalFusion --
DimensionalFusion (
talk)
01:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Centre-left politics you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Centre-left politics for comments about the article, and
Talk:Centre-left politics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
DimensionalFusion --
DimensionalFusion (
talk)
19:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Thebiguglyalien. How you doing? In the talk page of Batal Hajji Belkhoroev I replied to your concerns ( 1, 2) but it's seems you didn't see them. Could you check them and answer? Best regards, WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 16:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 7 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Fritzmann2002 --
Fritzmann2002 (
talk)
00:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Thebiguglyalien.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC) |
Just to clarify, because that section was hatted, that I was not implying bias on your part, and to be honest I don't believe you would be the type to be too convinced by location as an indicator of notability. I will admit I was venting again about ITN bias in a general sense and was out of line. My WP:N point still stands but that's not something I really feel like would be productive to discuss at length. No hard feelings! DarkSide830 ( talk) 20:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
On 3 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Katalin Rényi, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 11:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iron Man, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Rhodes and Franklin Richards.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), and Cwmhiraeth ( talk)
![]() |
Hey there! I haven't seen you name around and wanted to say hello. I saw you on the Wikicup newsletter; keep up the great work! People that work on-wiki as hard as you do are very inspiring. Panini! • 🥪 19:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
Hi there—just wanted to express my thanks again for your GA review of the KNP Complex Fire article and your patience re: my working to complete it. Your feedback was immensely helpful and I'm sure it was a good bit of work, too! I see you have done a lot of work in the GA nomination/review arena and I hope you know it's appreciated. Have a great week. Penitentes ( talk) 21:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you recently added a recentism tag to concert abuse. I don’t think the tag is needed or justified for the following reasons, and I would like to remove it. Here’s why:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Iron Man you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Chiswick Chap --
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
17:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Hope you are doing well. Since you have reviewed many GA nominations, i was wondering if you can review mine. The GAN article i am referring to is Wii U GamePad. Cheers. Summerslam2022 ( talk) 18:07, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind me switching the lead image. Not sure if I'll be able to get it to FP, but do think this is better and clearer than what we had. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 8.5% of all FPs. 03:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited War Machine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cable.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
In light of the events from seven months ago on WP:YEARS, I suggest you give this a read if International Notability ever returns: User:InvadingInvader/Against international notability InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 20:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia|We really appreciate that you reviewed 41 GANs during the drive. Due in part to your efforts, the backlog of unreviewed nominations was reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.}}
(
t ·
c)
buidhe
07:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Half Barnstar |
Just letting you know I value and respect your opinion, no matter if we agree or not. Curbon7 ( talk) 04:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Martha Washington you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Martha Washington and
Talk:Martha Washington/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
19:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The article
Martha Washington you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Martha Washington for comments about the article, and
Talk:Martha Washington/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
20:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. You've reverted me on Far-left politics and then toned down the claim that far-left and far-right politics "overlap significantly" to that they "overlap in some areas". Regardless of emphasis, this is an exceptional claim that would be best backed up with multiple sources. Have a nice day. – Vipz ( talk) 13:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
It's a massive timesink when an editor comes to a talk page with The Truth and then works backward from it, trying to find sources that justify their beliefs rather than finding the best sources and summarizing them. I sensed some of that in this discussion.This is called confirmation bias. Our entire interaction was based on me pointing out issues with sourcing and synthesis and you dismissing them because I've not provided sources for other statements ("personal opinions") I made, then when I went out to provide sources for previously posted statements, tacitly accusing me of confirmation bias. Messages towards me I feel weren't worded in the most " assume good faith" way, but that's another story. Hope to hear back, have a nice day again. – Vipz ( talk) 12:32, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Maria Stromberger you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ppt91 --
Ppt91 (
talk)
19:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Comments like this do nothing to bring down the temperature of the discussion and are likely to be seen as personal attacks. Such accusations are not appropriate to levy without a lick of evidence.
Furthermore, how about some self-reflection? You frequently edit in AMPOL as well, but I guess you're holier than the rest of us. –– FormalDude (talk) 00:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Anaximenes of Miletus you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Phlsph7 --
Phlsph7 (
talk)
08:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
Julia Gardiner Tyler you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler and
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Alanna the Brave --
Alanna the Brave (
talk)
23:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
The article
Julia Gardiner Tyler you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler for comments about the article, and
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Alanna the Brave --
Alanna the Brave (
talk)
13:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Births in 2001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
MirrorPlanet ( talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
On 30 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iron Man, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stan Lee modeled Tony Stark after 20th-century business magnate Howard Hughes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iron Man. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Iron Man), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede 66 00:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Thebiguglyalien. Thank you so much for reviewing Batal Hajji Belkhoroev and giving it GA status. I have another candidate for GA status, Fyappiy, which been more than a month a candidate with no review being done so I was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it? WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 21:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Barbara Bush you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Barbara Bush and
Talk:Barbara Bush/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk)
18:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Barbara Bush you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Barbara Bush for comments about the article, and
Talk:Barbara Bush/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk)
18:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Rose Cleveland you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Generalissima --
Generalissima (
talk)
07:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Thebiguglyalien,
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We chose to reach out to you because you have been highly active on various discussion pages .
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Thank you for your consideration.
-- Jonathan at CornellNLP ( talk) 17:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
How long should we give them to respond? So far they somewhat ignored you, and have completely ignored my longer review. A week or two then close with a delist? I am not competent to edit the page. Ldm1954 ( talk) 11:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown and
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
05:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown for comments about the article, and
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
15:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello – Regarding your feedback on the GA nomination on Josef Hoop, I have added more secondary sources for the points in the article, but I have kept some primary sources that serve to back up the main points and connect them together (i.e. how this is relevant to Hoop and his career). So my question is, how much can I exactly get away with? Thanks. TheBritinator ( talk) 13:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I see that earlier today you added nine new harv/sfn no-target errors to this article. They all relate to Vlastos's book, which was first published in 1995 (print version), with an eBook version published in 2022. The short-form cites all point to 1995, but the full cite in the biblio listing states 2022, hence the errors. Normally I would fix these no-target errors myself, but I can't tell which version you used for your editing. See Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. -- NSH001 ( talk) 19:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Would you consider splitting your second comment, about reactions and analysis, in a separate section, so that it can be discussed separately from the timeline issue. Thanks. Talk:2023_Israel–Hamas_war#Article_length_and_timeline_format fgnievinski ( talk) 04:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
I removed the PROD tag from Gregory Cousins, since a proposed deletion was previously contested in March 2016. No objection to taking this to AfD. • Gene93k ( talk) 09:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Cesária Évora you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
16:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leucippus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abdera and Elea.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Leucippus you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
HistoryofIran --
HistoryofIran (
talk)
16:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
On 19 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mandate (politics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that no single political party has a mandate in a coalition government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mandate (politics). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Mandate (politics)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Kusma ( talk) 00:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
Leucippus you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Leucippus for comments about the article, and
Talk:Leucippus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
HistoryofIran --
HistoryofIran (
talk)
15:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Because I have not done anything to this page in a long time, I will revamp it due to me knowing more knowledge about citations and knowing what is credible (reliable) or not. While I was looking at the 10th millennium BC for reference, I noticed that some of the information there talks about dates that are even earlier than the 10th millennium BC probably because at the time The Great Shaker thought that the 11th millennium BC or earlier millennium pages will never exist which has been proven wrong. This makes me a bit confused because it would be a bit weird for the 11th millennium BC to talk specifically about dates from 11,000 BC to 10,001 BC while 10th millennium BC talks about events that are earlier as well. Because of this, I'm not sure what to do right now, but I just want to see your thoughts about this since you helped me a bit while I was working on that page a year ago. FerdinandLovesLegos ( talk) 20:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you have redirected numerous standalone mass stabbing articles, seemingly without discussion or consensus. Would you care to comment on this? Thanks, WWGB ( talk) 06:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grnrchst --
Grnrchst (
talk)
11:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Zeno of Elea you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
L'OrfeoGreco --
L'OrfeoGreco (
talk)
21:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thebiguglyalien. Thank you for your work on 1960s in Bulgaria. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of War Machine titles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Dan arndt (
talk)
09:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Nona Gaprindashvili you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
10:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
Priscilla Cooper Tyler you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler and
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
12:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Mary Harrison McKee you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee and
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
14:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Mary Harrison McKee you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee for comments about the article, and
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
22:42, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Priscilla Cooper Tyler you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler for comments about the article, and
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
23:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Military dictatorship you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Military dictatorship for comments about the article, and
Talk:Military dictatorship/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Pbritti --
Pbritti (
talk)
19:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Content Creativity Barnstar | |
Your work on Military dictatorship, exemplified by your patience and proactive action during its GA review, are characteristic of the finest Wikipedia has to offer. Thank you! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 19:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Louisa Adams you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Louisa Adams and
Talk:Louisa Adams/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Simongraham --
Simongraham (
talk)
11:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Louisa Adams you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Louisa Adams for comments about the article, and
Talk:Louisa Adams/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Simongraham --
Simongraham (
talk)
01:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Firefangledfeathers --
Firefangledfeathers (
talk)
01:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work,
BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
The article
2001 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:2001 for comments about the article, and
Talk:2001/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Freedom4U --
Freedom4U (
talk)
12:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Autocracy you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ljleppan --
Ljleppan (
talk)
16:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Theatrical mask has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 7 § Theatrical mask until a consensus is reached. ―
Blaze Wolf
Talkblaze__wolf
15:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Amazing work- impressed by the progress you've made on the First Ladies topic, while still revising many important articles! Great job MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) ( not me) ( also not me) ( still no) 12:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
hello, Thebiguglyalien! i had a quick question regarding this article and the associated blurb. both the blurb and article lead mention that cleveland participated in the movement to get the u.s. involved in world war i, but i was unable to find a citation for this statement, either in the article lead or the body. did i somehow miss it? the assertion is believable, though i was surprised that it does not appear to be sourced. dying ( talk) 04:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you today for the article, introduced: "Frances Cleveland was first lady of the United States during the presidencies of Grover Cleveland. She became an instant celebrity after marrying the sitting president in the White House, and her popularity may have surpassed even his."! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:17, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Killer toy you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
MyCatIsAChonk (
talk) (
not me) (
also not me) (
still no)
11:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Killer toy you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Killer toy for comments about the article, and
Talk:Killer toy/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
GhostRiver --
GhostRiver (
talk)
16:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Lucretia Garfield you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammielh --
Sammielh (
talk)
11:41, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
History of the United States (1776–1789) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:History of the United States (1776–1789) for comments about the article, and
Talk:History of the United States (1776–1789)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Lingzhi.Renascence --
Lingzhi.Renascence (
talk)
05:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the feedback and reviewing of the When I Die article!!! I'm eternally grateful lol. Ty. Chchcheckit ( talk) 09:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 6 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
11:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Centre-left politics you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
DimensionalFusion --
DimensionalFusion (
talk)
01:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Centre-left politics you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Centre-left politics for comments about the article, and
Talk:Centre-left politics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
DimensionalFusion --
DimensionalFusion (
talk)
19:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Thebiguglyalien. How you doing? In the talk page of Batal Hajji Belkhoroev I replied to your concerns ( 1, 2) but it's seems you didn't see them. Could you check them and answer? Best regards, WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 16:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 7 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Fritzmann2002 --
Fritzmann2002 (
talk)
00:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Thebiguglyalien.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC) |
Just to clarify, because that section was hatted, that I was not implying bias on your part, and to be honest I don't believe you would be the type to be too convinced by location as an indicator of notability. I will admit I was venting again about ITN bias in a general sense and was out of line. My WP:N point still stands but that's not something I really feel like would be productive to discuss at length. No hard feelings! DarkSide830 ( talk) 20:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
On 3 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Katalin Rényi, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 11:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iron Man, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Rhodes and Franklin Richards.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), and Cwmhiraeth ( talk)
![]() |
Hey there! I haven't seen you name around and wanted to say hello. I saw you on the Wikicup newsletter; keep up the great work! People that work on-wiki as hard as you do are very inspiring. Panini! • 🥪 19:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
Hi there—just wanted to express my thanks again for your GA review of the KNP Complex Fire article and your patience re: my working to complete it. Your feedback was immensely helpful and I'm sure it was a good bit of work, too! I see you have done a lot of work in the GA nomination/review arena and I hope you know it's appreciated. Have a great week. Penitentes ( talk) 21:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you recently added a recentism tag to concert abuse. I don’t think the tag is needed or justified for the following reasons, and I would like to remove it. Here’s why:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Iron Man you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Chiswick Chap --
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
17:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Hope you are doing well. Since you have reviewed many GA nominations, i was wondering if you can review mine. The GAN article i am referring to is Wii U GamePad. Cheers. Summerslam2022 ( talk) 18:07, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind me switching the lead image. Not sure if I'll be able to get it to FP, but do think this is better and clearer than what we had. Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 8.5% of all FPs. 03:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited War Machine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cable.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
In light of the events from seven months ago on WP:YEARS, I suggest you give this a read if International Notability ever returns: User:InvadingInvader/Against international notability InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 20:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia|We really appreciate that you reviewed 41 GANs during the drive. Due in part to your efforts, the backlog of unreviewed nominations was reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.}}
(
t ·
c)
buidhe
07:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Half Barnstar |
Just letting you know I value and respect your opinion, no matter if we agree or not. Curbon7 ( talk) 04:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Martha Washington you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Martha Washington and
Talk:Martha Washington/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
19:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
The article
Martha Washington you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Martha Washington for comments about the article, and
Talk:Martha Washington/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
20:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. You've reverted me on Far-left politics and then toned down the claim that far-left and far-right politics "overlap significantly" to that they "overlap in some areas". Regardless of emphasis, this is an exceptional claim that would be best backed up with multiple sources. Have a nice day. – Vipz ( talk) 13:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
It's a massive timesink when an editor comes to a talk page with The Truth and then works backward from it, trying to find sources that justify their beliefs rather than finding the best sources and summarizing them. I sensed some of that in this discussion.This is called confirmation bias. Our entire interaction was based on me pointing out issues with sourcing and synthesis and you dismissing them because I've not provided sources for other statements ("personal opinions") I made, then when I went out to provide sources for previously posted statements, tacitly accusing me of confirmation bias. Messages towards me I feel weren't worded in the most " assume good faith" way, but that's another story. Hope to hear back, have a nice day again. – Vipz ( talk) 12:32, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Maria Stromberger you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ppt91 --
Ppt91 (
talk)
19:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Comments like this do nothing to bring down the temperature of the discussion and are likely to be seen as personal attacks. Such accusations are not appropriate to levy without a lick of evidence.
Furthermore, how about some self-reflection? You frequently edit in AMPOL as well, but I guess you're holier than the rest of us. –– FormalDude (talk) 00:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Anaximenes of Miletus you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Phlsph7 --
Phlsph7 (
talk)
08:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
Julia Gardiner Tyler you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler and
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Alanna the Brave --
Alanna the Brave (
talk)
23:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
The article
Julia Gardiner Tyler you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler for comments about the article, and
Talk:Julia Gardiner Tyler/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Alanna the Brave --
Alanna the Brave (
talk)
13:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Births in 2001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
MirrorPlanet ( talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
On 30 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iron Man, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stan Lee modeled Tony Stark after 20th-century business magnate Howard Hughes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iron Man. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Iron Man), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede 66 00:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Thebiguglyalien. Thank you so much for reviewing Batal Hajji Belkhoroev and giving it GA status. I have another candidate for GA status, Fyappiy, which been more than a month a candidate with no review being done so I was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it? WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 21:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Barbara Bush you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Barbara Bush and
Talk:Barbara Bush/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk)
18:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Barbara Bush you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Barbara Bush for comments about the article, and
Talk:Barbara Bush/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk)
18:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Rose Cleveland you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Generalissima --
Generalissima (
talk)
07:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Thebiguglyalien,
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We chose to reach out to you because you have been highly active on various discussion pages .
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Thank you for your consideration.
-- Jonathan at CornellNLP ( talk) 17:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
How long should we give them to respond? So far they somewhat ignored you, and have completely ignored my longer review. A week or two then close with a delist? I am not competent to edit the page. Ldm1954 ( talk) 11:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown and
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
05:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown for comments about the article, and
Talk:It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SNUGGUMS --
SNUGGUMS (
talk)
15:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello – Regarding your feedback on the GA nomination on Josef Hoop, I have added more secondary sources for the points in the article, but I have kept some primary sources that serve to back up the main points and connect them together (i.e. how this is relevant to Hoop and his career). So my question is, how much can I exactly get away with? Thanks. TheBritinator ( talk) 13:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I see that earlier today you added nine new harv/sfn no-target errors to this article. They all relate to Vlastos's book, which was first published in 1995 (print version), with an eBook version published in 2022. The short-form cites all point to 1995, but the full cite in the biblio listing states 2022, hence the errors. Normally I would fix these no-target errors myself, but I can't tell which version you used for your editing. See Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. -- NSH001 ( talk) 19:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Would you consider splitting your second comment, about reactions and analysis, in a separate section, so that it can be discussed separately from the timeline issue. Thanks. Talk:2023_Israel–Hamas_war#Article_length_and_timeline_format fgnievinski ( talk) 04:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
I removed the PROD tag from Gregory Cousins, since a proposed deletion was previously contested in March 2016. No objection to taking this to AfD. • Gene93k ( talk) 09:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Cesária Évora you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
16:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leucippus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abdera and Elea.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Leucippus you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
HistoryofIran --
HistoryofIran (
talk)
16:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
On 19 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mandate (politics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that no single political party has a mandate in a coalition government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mandate (politics). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Mandate (politics)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Kusma ( talk) 00:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
Leucippus you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Leucippus for comments about the article, and
Talk:Leucippus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
HistoryofIran --
HistoryofIran (
talk)
15:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Because I have not done anything to this page in a long time, I will revamp it due to me knowing more knowledge about citations and knowing what is credible (reliable) or not. While I was looking at the 10th millennium BC for reference, I noticed that some of the information there talks about dates that are even earlier than the 10th millennium BC probably because at the time The Great Shaker thought that the 11th millennium BC or earlier millennium pages will never exist which has been proven wrong. This makes me a bit confused because it would be a bit weird for the 11th millennium BC to talk specifically about dates from 11,000 BC to 10,001 BC while 10th millennium BC talks about events that are earlier as well. Because of this, I'm not sure what to do right now, but I just want to see your thoughts about this since you helped me a bit while I was working on that page a year ago. FerdinandLovesLegos ( talk) 20:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you have redirected numerous standalone mass stabbing articles, seemingly without discussion or consensus. Would you care to comment on this? Thanks, WWGB ( talk) 06:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grnrchst --
Grnrchst (
talk)
11:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Zeno of Elea you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
L'OrfeoGreco --
L'OrfeoGreco (
talk)
21:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thebiguglyalien. Thank you for your work on 1960s in Bulgaria. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of War Machine titles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Dan arndt (
talk)
09:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Nona Gaprindashvili you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
10:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
Priscilla Cooper Tyler you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler and
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
12:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Mary Harrison McKee you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee and
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
14:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Mary Harrison McKee you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee for comments about the article, and
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
22:42, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Priscilla Cooper Tyler you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler for comments about the article, and
Talk:Priscilla Cooper Tyler/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vacant0 --
Vacant0 (
talk)
23:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Military dictatorship you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Military dictatorship for comments about the article, and
Talk:Military dictatorship/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Pbritti --
Pbritti (
talk)
19:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Content Creativity Barnstar | |
Your work on Military dictatorship, exemplified by your patience and proactive action during its GA review, are characteristic of the finest Wikipedia has to offer. Thank you! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 19:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Louisa Adams you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Louisa Adams and
Talk:Louisa Adams/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Simongraham --
Simongraham (
talk)
11:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Louisa Adams you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Louisa Adams for comments about the article, and
Talk:Louisa Adams/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Simongraham --
Simongraham (
talk)
01:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Firefangledfeathers --
Firefangledfeathers (
talk)
01:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work,
BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
The article
2001 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:2001 for comments about the article, and
Talk:2001/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Freedom4U --
Freedom4U (
talk)
12:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Autocracy you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ljleppan --
Ljleppan (
talk)
16:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Theatrical mask has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 7 § Theatrical mask until a consensus is reached. ―
Blaze Wolf
Talkblaze__wolf
15:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Amazing work- impressed by the progress you've made on the First Ladies topic, while still revising many important articles! Great job MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) ( not me) ( also not me) ( still no) 12:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)