![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi! Post here again because topic went to archive. I havent got an email yet. -- Base talk сontr. 19:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I thought it was an edit conflict (I believe that was the message I got when I hit "Save page") and clicked to move out of the editing window before I copied the post and thought it was gone forever. Don't know how you did it but thanks!-- Amadscientist ( talk) 02:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Rs chen 7754 16:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I just want to be sure you see the additional msg. I've left you on my talk page. Ladyof Shalott 20:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop. The only reason why I keep coming back here to deal with your bullshit is because you and your friends keep insisting on posting to my talkpage, resulting in an e-mail notification turning up in my inbox and reminding me that this fucktardery is still flapping in the wind. All of the other loose ends have been tied off except for your crazy obsession. In regards to the last ANI thread, and your subsequent posts to the closer's talkpage, do you not see any hypocrisy in complaining about a close to a thread about me complaining about a close? Or your posts elsewhere about how you're a forgiving and reasonable person and yet you continue to hound a user who has, for all intents and purposes, walked away from the fight? You have completely lost perspective.
So here's the deal: stop trying to bait me into objecting too strongly to your fucktardery and I won't need to come back. Deal? Leave me a talkback if you desperately want me to unretire. ˜ danjel [ talk | contribs ] 08:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bush Derangement Syndrome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush Derangement Syndrome (6th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yworo ( talk) 18:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, do you know why the counter doesn't work for Romanian language?
Thanks. — Ark25 ( talk) 19:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Όνομα: Λάμπης Καταγωγή: Μιλάνο, Ιταλία Ο Λάμπης γεννήθηκε το 1993 σε μια γωνιά της δοξασμένης Νέας Ιόρκης της Αμερικής, όπου και έζησε τους 3 πρώτους μήνες της ζωής του. Μισός Ιταλός μισός Έλληνας, γνωρίζει ελάχιστα την ιταλική γλώσσα, καθώς στο σπίτι μιλούσαν μόνο την ελληνική! Παρ όλα αυτά, η ιταλική φινέτσα και το γούστο του στα ρούχα είναι αυτά που τον χαρακτηρίζουν. Μάλιστα γνωρίζει προσωπικά τον Τζιόρτζιο Αρμάνι, με τον οποίο έχουν αναπτύξει φιλικές σχέσεις. Είναι από τους λίγους εκλεκτούς που έχουν μπει στο ατελιέ του Αρμάνι, όπου ρούχα σχεδιάστηκαν ειδικά και μόνο γι αυτόν. Μεγάλωσε και έζησε στο Κολωνάκι. Αυτό αποτέλεσε μεγάλο ατού στην δημιουργία μιας πολύπλευρης και βαθυστόχαστης προσωπικότητας που αναπτύσσεται διαρκώς και αναδεικνύει την ομορφιά και την ζωηρότητα του εσωτερικού κόσμου και της πραγματικά μαγευτικής ανθρώπινης ψυχής. Μεγάλη του αγάπη αποτέλεσε και η ηλεκτρολογία. Γι αυτό επέλεξε να σπουδάσει στην ΑΣΠΑΙΤΕ όπου και έγινε διάσημος ως Λάμπης ΑΣΠΑΙΤΕ. <<Είναι τιμή να τον έχουμε κοντά μας.Είναι και γαμώ.>> Αυτά είναι τα λόγια του προέδρου της σχολής κ. Χρυσουλάκη. <<Χύνω και μόνο που τον βλέπω>> τόνισε ο προΐστάμενος του τμήματος ηλεκτρολογίας κ. Χατζαράκης. <<Είναι εκχαίχιος αλλά να είχαμε μια προβαχίνα τώχα χα ήταν άλλο πχάμα!>> είπε με μελαγχολικό ύφος ο θαυμαστής και καθηγητής του κ. Σιδέρης. Δούλευε ως barman σε μεγάλα μαγαζιά όπως ο κουρέας, το πιο ιν μαγαζί σε όλη την Ελλάδα.Αν μια φράση είναι αυτή που τον χαρακτηρίζει τότε αυτή είναι "να την γαμήσω; να την βιάσω ή να την αφήσω να την βρει από κανάν άλλον;" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.58.150.168 ( talk) 15:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tom. I raised this [1] with KC earlier but she may be away. The issue has now been brought to Wikipedia:Ani#Men.27s_rights_movement_.28again.29 ANI. It's directly related to that edit war at Men's rights movement. I notified CSDarrow of the porbation months ago. He should be weel away of it and of the basic behaviour requirements of this site already-- Cailil talk 16:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
In case I didn't make it clear, I apologize for singling you out at block policy. My intention was not to impinge on your motives, but point out that it was the block of a vested contributor that brought this whole issue to light, as it were. I too believe in administrative accountability and oversight (not in a technical sense). It was inappropriate to single you and Hex out when there are many more editors (including myself) that got involved because the user that was blocked was vested as it were. Regards, Crazynas t 03:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
here is the latest posting at Men's Rights Movement from those types that you thought I was being mean to. " We have forgotten that before we called this date rape and date fraud, we called it exciting.” [71]. Of course they have learned that if it has a footnote it is okay. I know that you acted in good faith, ut I wanted you to see what crap they come up with. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 03:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TP, and thanks for your message. My apologies if I've caused a fuss, which is what I explicitly promised not to do if sysop-d. Whatever went on with the timing and transclusion and so on, I think the person that should ultimately held responsible for this unnecessary hoo-hah should be no-one else but me. -- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Need info on John Bedini. It seems wikipedia used to have some info on JB?
Can I access this info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.31.130 ( talk) 12:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
I had known something error had happened when I had entered a username which had had multi-byte characters.
When I watched
w:ja:Wikipedia:権限申請/巻き戻し者/みちまん/20130125, I recognized double-urlencoded usernames are needed.
This may well be caused by $name = urldecode($name);
in /home/tparis/public_html/pcount/index.php.
Please fix this bug.
Thanks. --
Burthsceh (
talk)
06:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I fixed (and then ate) your pie on WP:AN. When you didn't substitute the template, it kept picking up the name of the editor who did the last revision. So when I got to your pie, it said "Thumperward has given you a fresh pie!" and your signature on the comment. Mildly confusing, but yummy pie... =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 16:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, a few days ago Yhwhsks ( talk · contribs) added new information which had considerable WP:SYNTH and WP:UNDUE issues and was subsequently removed by three editors [2] [3] [4]. There seems to a consensus on the article talk page that the information should not be included, see Talk:Men's rights movement#Inappropriate edit warring and Talk:Men's rights movement#The paragraph re: Fiamengo talk. Yhwhsks is currently blocked for edit warring. Today, Memills ( talk · contribs) reinserted the disputed content. Memills knows that the article is on article probation, he was topic banned from the men's rights movement article and then blocked for violating the terms of his topic ban. This is yet another violation of the terms of the article probation.
Btw, I left the same note for KC. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 19:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
It isn't every day someone creates an AN thread that it is enjoyable to be a part of. Well done! Automatic Strikeout ( T • C) 21:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC) |
Tom, is there a way to get a query of new registered accounts between specified dates? Specifically a query I can run, or do I have to go through you or a tool? (Not implying you are a tool)
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
23:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thanks for your help re north west tasmania - cheers sats 14:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a new user and found that my page was deleted according to A7. My question is why was my post not significant? The company I attempted to list has a large significance to the state of WI in relation to anyone interested in finance & real estate. Is there some advice you can give me for this so that I can create better posts that don't get deleted? I appreciate your time and service. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ry10coo ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you have plans to run a PHP bot?— cyberpower ChatOffline 23:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I am Anunad Singh from Hindi wikipedia. My account was blocked yesterday and I am not able to edit even my talk pages. I do not know what to do in this condition to appeal for unblocking. I found the English wiki page for it and appealed there.
But the box there did NOT accept my user name which is in Hindi alphabets. So I entered it by transliterating it as 'Anunad' . I received your email that you are not finding an account named 'Anunad'.
So, let me clarify that my account is on Hindi wiki with the name
अनुनाद सिंह. Please help. Thanking you..
-- Anunad Singh — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
117.240.114.131 (
talk)
03:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Would you please review my request at WP:RFP/R? I submitted my request on 19 March and still there is no response from admins. Please check it. Thanks. Zheek ( talk) 16:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
For your good humor on request for bureacratship. T4B ( talk) 20:38, 22 March 2013 (UTC) |
Since it doesn't rise to the level of disruption as a faulty use of your vs. you're, the committee of the sooper sekrit typo patrol has decided to only issue a warning here; especially since it is such a common mistake. (vs. commonS. :)) — Ched : ? 00:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Sardar Iqbal SIngh was a Member of Paliament in India. He contested for Indian National Congress from the Lokh Sabha Ferozepur constituency in Punjab. Iqbal Singh won the Lokh Sabha seat 4 times, first in 1954, then in 1957 , again in 1962 and lastly in 1967. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guneev ( talk • contribs) 14:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
you blocked me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHY!?!?!?!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.180.182.206 ( talk) 16:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
04:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, this is The Wikimon and I have a query... What does that Replication Tag on my Edit Counter mean??? And kudos for an awesome and supremely inspirational User Page!!!! I'm gonna learn to make a good one from you and probably beat yours (just kidding)!!! The Wikimon ( talk) 12:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Those are some pretty vicious attacks attacks that you've pointed out. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 01:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, you issued a topic ban against User:Carptrash for his remarks about redlinked editors but you did not do anything about Memills' characterization of editors as an "anti-MRM patrol duty contingent" or CSDarrow's remark (more like personal attack) that encyclopedic balance eluded me. Memills and CSDarrow were sanctioned for precisely this kind of behavior and I'll admit that I do not understand your decision to sanction Carptrash and not sanction Memills and CSDarrow for what I consider more long-standing and obvious violations of the terms of the article probation. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 01:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
"unprofessional?" And just who are the professionals here? Carptrash ( talk) 02:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Just when we thought we were rid of him, he shows up at an ANI thread and accuses me of OWNership. I thought we were rid of this guy; at the very least, I thought he wasn't supposed to pop up and make random accusations of me, you, or Epeefleche p b p 06:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I seem to have encountered an error, as the edit counter says I don't exist... which obviously I do... -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 15:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
A self motivated person. Born in October,02 1979 at Howrah. Completed Graduation from The Institute of Electronics and Telecommunication in the year 2009 from New Delhi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.234.14.161 ( talk) 07:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey, when using the edit counter for Wikidata, can you change the colour of edits made to the "Translation" namespace? They're currently red, the same as for the main namespace. Thanks, Frigid Ninja 14:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 18:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Just saw your edit summary after replying. Please redact or give context to your completely inappropriate comment. -- Onorem ♠ Dil 22:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I just happened to notice your comment on ANI from yesterday, where you said "I saw a hot 17 yr old girl downtown the other day. I'd hit it." Now, I know you were being deliberately provocative to make a point, but can I ask that you reconsider using language like "I'd hit it" (or, for that matter, commenting on women's hotness) on-wiki? It's a very lad mag, objectifying sort of way to refer to people, especially in a conversation that's semi-related to sexual victimization. Even in service of making a sarcastic point, it still brings the "female types not welcome here, we're busy judging whether we'd 'hit' you or not" temperature of the place up a notch. I know that wasn't what you were going for, at all, so I wanted to draw your attention to how it can feel to a woman who reads it. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 20:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Just a note to say that I was impressed by your advice on AN/I to LGR re: Viriditas. Worth remembering, not just in the specific case, but generally as well. Well done. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 17:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I think you have done some nice things with this page but I am concerned that you seem to be trying to strip all links to websites about this topic - people who look up this page are naturally going to be interested in finding other websites on this topic and the only link you have left in is to Nova Roma - which is not the only website on this topic. I am in no way affiliated with the Cultus Deorum page, however I do think it is a good website which is why I included it under External Links. I really think it is very important, for the people who are interested practising contemporary Roman polytheism, that this entry include links to external websites on this topic.
So that you know - probably the best websites on the Religio Romana are: - https://sites.google.com/site/cultusdeorumromanorum/ - http://novaroma.org/nr/Cultus_deorum_Romanorum
Note that Nova Roma is an organisation that aims to recreate the structure of the Roman Republic, with the Religio Romana being part of this structure. Another organisation that aims to recreate the structure of the Roman state is the Res Publica Romana at respublica-romana.com. Note that many people who are on the path of the Roman way to the Gods are unaffiliated with either Nova Roma or the Res Publica Romana - worthy though these organisations are.
The best Religio Romana blogs, imo, are: - http://www.patheos.com/blogs/religioromana/ - http://romanpagan.blogspot.com/ - http://lases.blogspot.it/ - http://romanpolytheist.wordpress.com/ - http://goldentrail.wordpress.com/
Excellent free online translations of ancient Roman literature are available at: - http://www.naderlibrary.com/ (scroll down to classics) - http://poetryintranslation.com/index.html#Latin: - http://sacred-texts.com/cla/index.htm (scroll down to Roman)
For more resources on the Roman way to the Gods see: - https://sites.google.com/site/cultusdeorumromanorum/english/beginner-s-guides/beginners-guide-study - http://novaroma.org/nr/Reading_list_for_the_cultus_deorum - http://romanpagan.blogspot.com.au/2012/12/pagan-resources.html - http://religioandpietas.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/research-sources-for-cultus-deorum.html
I hope you will be considerate of the people who are genuinely on this path - and allow links to information about this path online to remain on wikipedia. Note again - I am not affiliated with Cultus Deorum.
Regards and best wishes, Ragnii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnii ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Given the past year, you have went through a lot. If you ever feel close to burnout, please let me know.— cyberpower ChatOnline 18:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() You are invited to join
WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of
breakfast-related topics. |
---|
Hi there,
I am the one who inserted EVERY SINGLE REFERENCE in this entry for Roman polytheistic reconstructionism - if you go through the edit history you will see that for yourself. I am not a spammer and my edit history speaks for itself. I am very concerned you are pushing a Christian agenda here ...
Regards, Ragnii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnii ( talk • contribs) 21:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is " Roman reconstructionist pagan". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 01:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis. I just need your help, because my Edit Counter says I don't exist. What do I do? The Wikimon ( talk) 12:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi -- I notice you've been active in nominating at RfA over the past year, and would like to invite you to join the WikiProject for Nominators, which aims to support editors interested in nominating there. We'd be glad of your expertise in getting this new project off the ground. Apologies for the talk-page spamming if you've already seen this message a dozen times. Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 00:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page? It is a museum in Ottawa, Ontario...absolutely notable! I haven't finished with it yet! It is featured in many other places on Wiki. Look up Vanier, Ontario. Is there a chance I could get a Canadian or Ontarian admin who can be in charge of this instead?! Herecomestheslaughter ( talk) 19:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you put down there was no explanation of significance! The whole article explained that. It is part of the Museum Network of Ottawa, Ontario. How can that not be significant? Herecomestheslaughter ( talk) 19:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
http://www.ottawamuseums.com/vanier-museopark.aspx— Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs)
http://www.museumsontario.ca/museum/Museoparc-Vanier-Museopark
This is a real museum part of the City of Ottawa— Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs)
I don't understand. How is it not significant? Most museums in Ottawa have Wiki Pages, so what makes this one so different? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia already has taken notice. Like I said, look up the page for Vanier, Ontario. I just did the press review for 2012, I could send you links all day
http://www.expressottawa.ca/Actualites/2012-05-16/article-2981042/Rendez-vous-aux-Cafes-citoyens/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I believe this one is an article, not a press release
http://www.emcottawaeast.ca/20130314/News/Vanier+sugar+shack+getting+ready+for+maple+festival%2C+New+activities%2C+programs+for+all+ages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:24, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a very popular French news source: http://www3.tfo.org/videos/00190852/soiree-benerfice-au-profit-du-museoparc-vanier-et-hommage-a-mme-meilleur
http://www.radio-canada.ca/sujet/visuel/2012/11/02/001-nouveau-cadre-vanier.shtml (This is a BIG one in terms of news sources) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This one is: http://www.racontemoiottawa.com/en/37 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a government site: http://www.pro.rcip-chin.gc.ca/GetMember.do?lang=en&id=guaekg&ens=cnRsTGFuZz1lbg== — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This article is about the Museopark and is an independent source: http://www.expressottawa.ca/Actualit%C3%A9s/2012-03-05/article-2915582/Un-nouveau-site-Internet-pour-le-Museoparc/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I believe I found the perfect link!: http://www.expressottawa.ca/Culture/Festivals-et-evenements/2012-02-29/article-2911674/Un-tresor-a-decouvrir/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 20:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
In this post it links me to Special:Contributions/Interlaker for some reason, not my own. Ranze ( talk) 19:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Please reserve your "probation warnings" to those who have demonstrated more than a passing interest in the article, and preferably within the last couple of days. ·ʍaunus· snunɐw· 01:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review
Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe
listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. —
Ched
ZILLA
10:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
But I had to wait until I ran into someone I knew well enough that they would chuckle at the ironic humor rather than get mad. Being able to do this has made my day TP. — Ched ZILLA 10:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for welcoming me. LatinWolf (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
I still don't know why else you would say that, but I guess it's not that big a deal if you didn't mean it that way. I'll give you this virtual cold one, and if we ever come across each other at a meetup, maybe we can get a real cold one. :) Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 20:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! |
Hi TParis/Archive 10, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{ subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 20:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi TP. I noticed a bit of an odd UTRS issue today (which I've just raised at the Village Pump here). As a tool admin there, I'm assuming you can see a little bit more than me; are you able to shed any light on the problem? Yunshui 雲 水 09:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
What language are you using for your toolserver apps? I'm still waiting for my account to get approved (come on DaB!) but in the meantime have built a few python interfaces. I thought it might be interesting to create a git or hg repository and start sharing a collaborative toolset.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
17:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Add new wiki please: uk.wikivoyage, he.wikivoyage -- RLuts (talk) 10:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
What language. Careful or you might get banned.
Too
Carptrash (
talk)
15:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I was doing some digging and I think I see what has caused some of the recent resurgence of the problem at the Men's rights movement page. There is a very very long (and tedious) history of off-site campaigns in relation to this topic area. Apparently some bloggers got wind of this initiative [5] and have made various posts about it claiming wikipedia articles are inaccurate because of it. See it on avoiceformen.com at the 'Anita Sarkeesian and the feminist war on facts' post (which I can't link to due to spam filter) and reddit [6]. Apparently though this might have been caused by wikipediocracy [7]. Just though it'd be useful for you see this-- Cailil talk 23:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Just advising you of this
[10]. I'm not sure if you intended to include the topic of men's rights 'broadly construed' or not in your ban of Carptrash (the probation covers more than just the page), but it's the same behaviour just on another page. That said the IP is just as bad.
Also something I've noticed about the SPAs and IPs in that area that attack Carptrash, they tend to refer to him as a she. You can see this from Yhwhsks on the men's rights movement talk page
[11]. There comes a point where that kind of behaviour is indicative of something other than a mistake. Carptrash should be rising above it but they are being poked with a stick--
Cailil
talk
16:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Rgambord ( talk · contribs) has been deleting comments (including mine) from Talk:Men's rights movement and now this. "You should be ashamed of yourself" and "people like you disgust me" is a personal attack. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 17:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
A while back you potentially discussed moving to labs. She we continue the discussion?— cyberpower ChatOnline 23:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Is "labs" the new wikimedia toolserver project?
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
11:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm leaving wikipedia (for good) but I wanted to come back to point out that your reasons cited http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Rgambord&oldid=551848171 for banning me don't actually... exist. What you said didn't actually... happen. Might be wise to actually fact-check before you go (ab)using administrator powers. Thanks! (jerk) Rgambord ( talk) 21:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I can't believe commons doesn't have a pic of
jerk sauce so this will have to do.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
02:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Here is the alpha 2 copy.— cyberpower ChatOffline 22:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi TP, I've never seen anyone say that ArbCom restrictions have to remain on user talk pages. [13] Usually once an editor has read something they're free to remove it. Do you have a link to whichever policy/guideline says that's not allowed with ArbCom restrictions? SlimVirgin (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if you could help me with a page move real quick. I was looking at Category:United States Air Force careers just now and wanted to establish some consistency with the article titles by moving U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations to United States Air Force Office of Special Investigations so I was wondering if you wouldn't mind deleting the United States... page for me to make way for the move. I'd really appreciate it! Cheers, — - dain omite 23:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
TP, My submission to RSN was to establish if the sources were reliable for representing the opinions the SPLC, not that the views in of themselves were reliable. The response I got was actually different to what I had proposed, I thought they were Goldwags opinions. I don't have a counter to the reasons they gave. I did this to pin the argument down and not have the goal posts moved on me. Which is starting to happen already. I have not mentioned RSN in the argument I outlined, and I have only briefly mentioned it in response to Viriditas. CSDarrow ( talk) 15:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Did you delete the whole section for Museoparc in the Vanier article?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.70.26.203 ( talk) 16:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry this has been a few month in coming; I got tired of logging on to disappointment. I do appreciate it though. -- Kendrick7 talk 02:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Spam_attack_on_Evolutionary_psychology Killer Chihuahua 07:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I have some information for setting up the tools to work on labs once SQL is ready. Can you send me an email. I need to send you a file.— cyberpower ChatLimited Access 17:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I saw your comment here and wanted to point you to my user essay " Not in charge" for your thoughts. -- Lexein ( talk) 01:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TParis. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CSDarrow ( talk) 11:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
You are always welcome to email me. — Ched : ? 08:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Regarding the conversation we've talked about a few times... I stumbled across Commons:Bundesarchiv and I was in awe at the possibilities and I just hope everything could possibly go as smoothly as this seems to have been. But yeah, I'm not sure if you've come across that as well but I thought you would think it's nifty. — - dain omite 06:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to hear you didn't get the spot. I know I opposed but it really did surprise me when the other individual was chosen over you. It really didn't surprise me that they chose one of their own clerks but it doesn't really give the Arbcom a good impression when they do that sort of thing after the community said no to them being in Arbcom a few months ago. For what its worth I would have much, much rather you got it. Kumioko ( talk) 01:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
to check into an edit counter somethingoranother and to find at some point that I was directed to your talk page. Small world. My question is, on the pie chart generated by the counter there is a blue section called "wikipedia." What does this section measure? I have quesses, but am happy just asking one who knows. Come to think about it, you might hear about this again. Or not Carptrash ( talk) 16:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Paris,
You have deleted a page of notable company Advanced International Translations, which does a lot to translation community, e.g. runs Langmages - Social Network for Translators and Translation Agencies. I guess this is a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Langexpert ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for quick answer. I see the discussion points are very poor-grounded, something like "I have found only 2 press-releases" (while I see hundreds of them in Google). Please, advise on what is the procedure for refuting discussion points, relisting, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Langexpert ( talk • contribs) 14:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry I acted out of line the other day. The fast pace of the editing on Talk:Men's rights movement led to a lot of confusion on my part as to who I was talking to and what had been said. I allowed myself to overreact to one editor's insulting comments, and then made the honest mistake of thinking I was talking to that editor without taking the time to double check the user-name. That led to a significant argument, and as soon as I realised my mistake I attempted to apologize, but it was only taken as a further attack and led to AN/I. So, again, sorry I called you a jerk. I felt that I had been unfairly treated and overreacted because of it. I appreciate that you take the time to moderate (literally) the forum on that page. Obviously there are not going to be editors who hold a neutral point of view on the topic, and it can be very polarizing, since most editors are probably bringing in existing disagreement and animosity from other spheres into wikipedia. Both sides think they are right, that the scientific evidence backs up their beliefs, and that the other side is totally ignorant and hateful; that's the beauty of humanities, I suppose. If wikipedia editors had to talk face to face, I imagine it would be more difficult to demonize one another. Rgambord ( talk) 05:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I've deployed my tool to wikitech
[14]. If you are interested in gearing up on wmflabs, let me know as I've recently gone through the headache of setting up a decent workflow.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
15:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
I streamlined the process a bit. Once you have a project created, try following
this guide to create a stub application.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
19:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, you might be interested in the ARBCOM case concerning Apostle12 [15] Rgambord ( talk) 08:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Telling someone they're banned from one article, and then making a log-entry that says entire topic can only lead to misunderstandings. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Back towards the beginning of the year sometime, I had talked a bit with Worm about a few things. I'm not sure if I'm just more aware of things than I had been in the past, or if I just felt this years transition was more .. ummmm ... robust than usual. I've even had the impression at times that some of the arbs are a bit <trying to think of a good word again> ... concerned about the current culture. My observation at the time was that it often seemed that the right hand didn't know what the left hand was doing, so I started this and was evolving to User:Ched/Arb/Agenda but it sort of lost steam as I got side-tracked on other things. I almost deleted both, but Worm said to hold on to that thought - so perhaps I'll get back to him on it in the near future. Not directly related I know, but I had noticed your comment to Iri and it certainly caught my attention. Best of luck with it. — Ched : ? 00:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
TParis, apologies for getting behind in responding to comments around the project. One of the places I wanted to comment was where your concern about AUSC appointments was posted, and I have responded to you here to publicly discuss my own actions in relation to your candidacy. Risker ( talk) 01:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
The edit counter's replag for Wikidata is over eight days, the entire month of May thus far. When I go here I get the message "Caution: Replication lag is high, changes newer than 1 weeks, 1 days, 21 hours, 35 minutes, 21 seconds may not be shown.". Is there any way to fix this? Sven Manguard Wha? 15:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
(I always want to say "Tom" .. or "Tim" or something - but I don't recall ever seeing anything on that) .. Anyyyyyway. Regarding that Arb RfC, (and I know it's a work in progress and a long way from being a final draft), I wanted to mention something. Back at the beginning of the year when the new arbs took their seats, I talk briefly with User:Worm That Turned. My thinking was about transparency and communication things. I even went so far as to draft User:Ched/Arb/Agenda, but never really followed up on it. In fact I was going to delete the whole thing until Dave said "hang on" .. there might be something there". Anyway, I never really got back to either that idea or even to Dave, but I thought It may be something that could be incorporated into your RfC. I have to say I'm really impressed with how some of the arbs as individuals have been trying to communicate to the community, but my thinking is that often we don't see what they're doing. So I thought perhaps if there was some page aside from the "formal" boards the arbs use where they could say "I'll be working on this" or "I'll be away for a week", or "We're dealing with xyz". Not really for the community to edit the page (although the talk page might be useful), but more where the arbs and community could check in to see what's going on in regards to their particular area of interest. So anyway ... if that's something you wanted to work into your RfC, it's just a thought. Feel free to ping me any time sir. And thanks again for all you do ... both as a wikipedian, and as a true hero to my favorite country. :) — Ched : ? 20:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TParis! You might want to check out the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Dicklyon. In the course of closing that discussion there is some talk about sanctions for Born2cycle, and your closure of the earlier AN discussion about B2C was mentioned by Glrx. I'm just letting you know in case you want to observe the discussion, or if you might want to comment on how your closure applies to the current situation. -- MelanieN ( talk) 06:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
According to [18], I don't exist. Other accounts seem ok. Any reason for this? An optimist on the run! 10:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I am working on an article about a guy who, in WW2 taught "recognition" classes in the military. What is a term that I can use that could be linked to a wikipedia article that could explain to the interested just what that would have meant? Or might still mean? Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 14:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I created Koepckekassike as a new article in the German Wiki. If I click here it is not listed. Why? ( 79.225.70.182 ( talk) 09:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC))
To find a percentage of a number it is really simple. For example if you are finding 56 percent of 230 all you do is times them by each other then divide by 100. Simple! Hope this helpful to you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaael.123 ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Paper Wasps have been described as masters of engineering.As its name suggests,the paper wasp builds and maintains its compound nest out of a special kind of paper which manufactures itself. The insects collects fibres of plants and from dead wood and from all kinds of places. It them chews the cellulose-rich material,adding a sticky high protein saliva. When applied,the resulting paste dries to form a light firm,yet,tough paper. Moreover,the saliva has special properties that enable the paper to generate and absorb heat ,thus maintaining the right temperature in the brood comb on cool days. The wasp builds its nest mouthful by mouthful. The finished product is waterproof paper umbrella-covered cluster of hexagonal cells combining strength and efficiency. Wasps that live in wetter areas simply add more oral secretion because of its water resistant properties. The insects selects sites that offer some kind of protective overhang. From this,they suspend their downward facing nests by a stalk or petiole. Moreover,paper wasps do on harm to the environment,unlike our papermaking processes,which pollute air,water and land. Understandably,architects and researchers are studying paper wasp's products with a view to designing superior building materials that are light weight,strong,more flexible and biodegradable. WHAT DO YOU THINK? Did an insect with brain roughly the size of two grains of sand figure out papermaking and architecture by itself? Or are its chemical and mechanical engineering skills evidence of design? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Otu Wuddah ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
I thought the decision you made about my behavior in February was fair, especially the part about where I am to be given a chance to stop engaging in a discussion where I'm being tendentious (as a warning from an uninvolved admin) before I'm blocked or penalized in any way. However, this implied agreement between WP administration and me appears to not be recognized by at least one other admin. See here:
Thanks. -- B2 C 21:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis – I thought I'd respond here since I'm probably at or beyond my limit in the AE.
I appreciate the clarification of your ANI remedy. If indeed there's no active monitoring by admins of B2C's behavior, then it seems that the remedy boils down to having editors continue to report disruptive behavior to administrators who may then choose to act. Forgive me, but I don't see that this varies materially from what was happening before, nor how it amounts to an effective deterrent. (One difference I do see is that the remedy limits investigating administrators to only very weak and localized sanctions – at the very most only barring B2C from participating in the remainder of a single discussion that he's already disrupted to the point of administrative intervention.)
In your summation you explicitly stated your willingness to "revisit and revert" your decision based on others' feedback. Given what I've seen since its implementation, and what I've recently learned from you about how it's actually meant to work, I'm afraid I must offer as feedback my view that the remedy as it stands is insufficient and doesn't adequately address the problem, for reasons already elaborated by myself (and others). Please understand that I don't mean this as criticism – it's merely my response to your stated willingness to reconsider your decision based on users' responses.
I ask that you to please accept this feedback without sarcasm or defensiveness, in the same spirit of helpfulness and collaboration that I offer it, and consider allowing the remedy to be revised as others have proposed. Thanks! ╠╣uw [ talk 00:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to try again for my entry on Comedy Masala, which you deleted last year. It's become much more notable. Can I make a new submission? Gchuva ( talk) 04:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Dear Travel partner or well wisher
Warm Greeting from Nepal!!!
Whilst, i would like to express my topic about "traveltoursinnepal" Which will be very utmost experience those who are traveling to Nepal.Nepal, itself always welcoming & warm greet wherever they are from as their choice & wherever they would like to visit... . We Nepalese people would like to respect our valued clients with our happiest smiling wherever they are even like can be a remote area of Nepal or can be a mountain region,Terai region. We are proudly say that, it's Nepal always loving their guest as a God while you never expect these kinda of respect in the world .We (Nepalese people expect that,Please come to visit our Country Nepal as like your heaven of earth even we are very poor but we aren't... . We have a top of the world Mountain called Mt. Everest,greenery,respect people,smiling faces can be attraction to you during the tour in Nepal.There are lot of things to see around Nepal.You can come to visit for tour in nepal,Trekking in Nepal, Mountaineering In Nepal, Rafting in Nepal,Safari tour in Nepal as well as Hindus/Buddhist/Muslim/Christian/jain tour in Nepal.We are proud to share our experience about village tourism,Eco- tourism, responsible tourism as well as many more.. You just remember our country to Nepal . Nepal,it's richest for culture,World Heritage sites in Nepal.You could be explore Pashupatianth temple,Boudhnath Stupa,Shyambhunath Stupa,Patan Durbar Square, Bhaktapur Durbar Square,Kathmandu Durbar Square, Lumbini as well.
Thanks in advance to explore or searching us to visit Nepal.
Regards Ramchandra Adhikari Lazimpat 2, Kathmandu Nepal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.199.167.42 ( talk) 07:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
13:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thank you for all you do. — Ched : ? 05:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I don't know, maybe someone already have written about this bug. My list of articles -- link. Click on the №5 (at this moment) article "R U Mine?". It's reffer to http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_U_Mine, but must to http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_U_Mine%3F. Correct, please -- Morganvolter ( talk) 14:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Good as gold! |
Hi, TParis. During your time here, you've done a lot of good and served quite well as one of our more respected administrators. You've pitched in at various places and been a credit to the community. However, because today is Memorial Day, I've taken the unusual step of also considering your off-wiki actions in presenting you with the Golden Editor Award. As a fellow American, I would like to thank you for your service in the Air Force, which in my opinion is a whole lot more meaningful than your service here. v/r -- AutomaticStrikeout ? 13:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
-
dain
omite is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
I set up a project for the tools. If you create an account on Wikitech, I can add you to it, and then we can begin migrating some of it to labs and get it ready.— cyberpower ChatLimited Access 13:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
— cyberpower ChatOnline 22:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis,
you wanted to add WP:AFCH to that tool. Any chance you add that? mabdul 05:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
22:56, 27 May 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+58) . . N Talk:Dot bzh (Placing WPAFC project banner (AFCH)) (current) 22:56, 27 May 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+50) . . N Dot bzh (Created via Articles for Creation (you can help!) (AFCH)) (current)
Hey, Tparis. Did your account expire on Toolserver, or would you happen to know why the edit counter and whatnot aren't working? Thanks! Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 00:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Question: So, in "my preferences" it says I have totaled 12,200 some odd edits, and the old edit counter said more than that ... now the edit counter says I only have 11,837 and no deleted edits. Is something wrong here, or have I just done less than I thought? Go Phightins ! 01:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know there might be a possible problem with the tool. When I look up the edit count or my account it seems to work pretty well and fast. When I look up my old account of Kumioko it just comes up with a white screen. I'm not sure if this is due to the high edit count (about 400, 000) or because the userpage redirect to my current one. Anyway, just wanted to let you know. Kumioko ( talk) 16:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
/home/tparis
:drwxr-xr-- 31 tparis users 2048 Apr 10 19:19 /home/tparis
users
group, to traverse this directory to reach /home/tparis/public_html
. To fix this: chmod a+x /home/tparis
. If this doesn't work, please ask on #wikimedia-toolserver
.TP, would you (or maybe another admin stalker?) mind editting
Template:User edits and adding the new URL so the edit counter userbox works again? I would if I could but it's under full protection.
— -
dain
omite
00:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting to delete the history of the page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Lyc%C3%A9e_Franco-Libanais Since it has been modified from external persons and they contained unwanted pages. Kindly inform us when it will be done, and can it be done also for the english version of the same page? In case you need additional information, please let me know. I will check this page tomorrow. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 16:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, If you check the history, you will find the reason because there were students who modified the pages and wrote bad things about the school (ex: the school is a prison) and insulted the manager and so on and it's upon my management request that I am asking you as an administrator to delete the history. In case you need any additional information, please let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 19:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
It's good to see that you're currently (or have already migrated) migrating X!'s tools to Wikimedia Labs, which means these tools won't be unreliable anymore. But what about your tools, such as Top Edits and Is X an Admin? Do you plan to move them to Labs? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, I was wondering if you could check the edit history over at Mens Rights Movement there appears to be some edit-warring and 1RR violations going on. I'd take it to ANEW but I'm not the most familiar at filling out that form. Thanks.-- Kyohyi ( talk) 13:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I guess I don't see changing wording after an editor has willfully misrepresented what a source is saying as being "reverting". To me, reverting would be tossing out the whole edit based on the fact that the editor has intentionally changed the meaning of the source to reflect his (her?) POV. But it is comforting to know that folks are watching this closely. Carptrash ( talk) 16:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting to delete the history of the page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Lyc%C3%A9e_Franco-Libanais because it contains bad words and insults about the school and the manager. Please let me know how to proceed. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.12.173 ( talk) 05:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
You should restore the PrimeFaces article. I mean the article in User:Arjant/PrimeFaces. Here ( [19]) you can see it is a Java component library with certain relevance. The unique with more than one hundred components (point 1) and the most used by developers (point 7). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliuken ( talk • contribs) 17:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting to delete the history of the page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Lyc%C3%A9e_Franco-Libanais since it contains bad words from students and insults to the manager of the school. We have claimed to block this page from updates but how can we do to delete the history? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 05:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for your reply but both the french and english version have been hacked and we must do that for both history. Can you please do it for French version and then guide me to a link where I can ask to do the same for the English version? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 18:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I didn't mean to override you, but I zapped that just as you declined the speedy. That guy has been creating strings of redirects from future films. They were discussed at WP:WikiProject Film#Creating redirects to future films. and he was told that it was not appropriate until there was enough sourced information to say something about the film in the target (director's) article. In this case there was nothing in the target. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 13:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello there! I believe you deleted this page under CSD G13. The user's asking for the contents. Could you leave him a message here? Also, out of curiosity: I thought it was a copyvio...why was it deleted under G13? Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 16:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Those were some unnecessary and out of line comments at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#VisualEditor disabled. Please realize there is a long line of people wanting to use a bat on Oliver. If Oliver takes a bat to himself, we will lose out on the joy that bashing Oliver to a pulp would bring. Of course. me being 3rd in line has nothing to do with it. Bgwhite ( talk) 23:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
An answer to your comment, "I don't understand why the level of sourcing is higher for this subject than what is required by policy". This is the explanation: it's the article itself that demands a higher-than-normal standard. From the lede of List of Freemasons (A - D): "Standards of "proof" for those on this list may vary widely; some figures with no verified lodge affiliation are claimed as Masons if reliable sources give anecdotal evidence suggesting they were familiar with the "secret" signs and passes, but other figures are rejected over technical questions of regularity in the lodge that initiated them. Where available, specific lodge membership information is provided; where serious questions of verification have been noted by other sources, this is also indicated." All the sources provided so far fall well below this standard.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 16:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I really do not know ... For someone to say that either a Masonic lodge or lodges should be the name of the registry is written to a summary at the end of the meetings. Ataturk documents that we've got such a document does not exist. But while some of Europe Masonic historians Mason Mustafa Kemal listings are included in these masons. But I do not have such a document, unless there is? Do not know 'have to say.
I don't really know. For someone to say that a masonic lodge should have their registry written at the end of their meetings [Unintelligible sentence]. The Ataturk documents that we've got say such a document does not exist [Referring to the unintelligible sentence]. But some historians believe Mustafa Ataturk is listed in these registries. But I do not have such a document; if it exists. I don't know what to say.
Meet me on IRC?— cyberpower ChatOnline 17:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I have noticed the edit counter no longer reflects the deleted edits. Is this a bug to be fixed or has this become a lost capability? :) John Cline ( talk) 20:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Is there any way to use the Top Namespace Edits tool for other wikis than the English Wikipedia? (in the edit counter you can choose the project) If not, would it be possible to change that? Regards -- Chricho ∀ ( talk) 15:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you copy the sitenotice.php file from /data/project/xtools/public_html, on labs, and place it in /home/tparis/public_html, on toolserver, for me?— cyberpower ChatOnline 17:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Excuse he but e=why did you delete my article on Robert Cluett? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boiboy69 ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
The lead for Tops in Blue needs either an update or possibly some slight rewriting. Tops in Blue was formed in 1953 and they have been performing for 57 years (60 years?). I was going to change 57 to 60, then thought it might be wise to discuss with you. If you changed it to "they have been performing for more than 60 years", the article would not require updating once a year. What do you think of the idea? By the way, they really are The Tops! I have seen them perform many times. Thank you for writing the article. Thank you for your service to our country! GBU and yours. From a very proud United States Air Force Veteran (disabled). I sign almost everything "Respectfully". This time I will follow your Talk Page guidelines. Very Respectfully, Tiyang ( talk) 03:53, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
08:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
It's a sock of Technoquat ( talk · contribs), pure DUCK, CU will confirm - the user page of the socks are almost always the first edit, and almost always C&P from another user's page or an online biography from someone's home page etc. Then the MO is simply trolling at noticeboards and/or other users - Help Desk mainly in the past, not really seen much at ANI before. Number 57 ( talk · contribs) was just the unlucky target this time, many other editors ( AndyTheGrump ( talk · contribs) comes to mind) have also been targeted in the past for no real reason. I think even Jimbo Wales ( talk · contribs) got hit a few weeks back. Giant Snowman 16:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Although, as I said, I'd look into evidence more thoroughly if the subject actually came up, based on what I know right now I think I wouldn't support equal topic bans for both users. Arzel has been a POV warrior, unmitigated by contributions to articles or by attempts to get along well with others, over a broad range of political subjects for as long as I've known him and I'd hope for a long-term topic ban from politics, broadly defined. Casprings is quick on the revert button at the article, but has also done legitimate content creation and made a number of good-faith attempts to address the concerns of others, so if a topic ban is to be imposed on him, a shorter one that targets this article and related ones might be better. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 01:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hey Tom, dunno if you saw my apology for being snarky the other day, had a crappy day and was just miffed. Sorry again. Darkness Shines ( talk) 14:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. A few days ago (22 June, 21:28) you semi-protected my Talk page. Thanks for that, it saves me a lot of work. However, now the vandalism is spilling over to my userpage. So if you wouldn't mind.... Cheers, Yintan 21:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
I am not an inactive account creator. It's only been maybe a couple of weeks since I used it. I am a moderately active account creator. Please restore my flag. ● Thane — formerly Guðsþegn 21:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind hitting reset and having both the ANI and RfC closed. If you feel you would be of any assistance in helping to find compromise on the talk page, I would welcome that. Casprings ( talk) 01:48, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, TParis! Could you please take a look at this edit and see if it's possible to hide it? It is a gross, disturbing personal attack. Surtsicna ( talk) 22:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I phrased it as a hypothetical at AN because I viewed it as a systemic question, and because I did not want to duplicate an open discussion on a particular user. I didn't see an e-mail address for you, so I'll provide the links to the examples on which I based the question here: the archived ANI report is here and the recently-retrieved-from-the-archive ANI report is here. Even as recently as yesterday, interactions with others get results like this edit summary [22]. Yet the report has been open since June 21 with no action taken. So, that's the background context on which I based the hypothetical question. Regards -- Taroaldo ✉ 03:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Per your suggestion to read your article on ANI Advice: I read about three lines of it, looked at the photo and the caption, and decided that reading any more was a waste of time. Above, here on your talk page, you have written "Please assume good faith in my edits". There's no good faith in your article, and there was no good faith in you jumping to conclusions regarding my reverts at the Dimensionaut article. Even after I tried to explain things had already been dealt with, you returned with more evidence that you weren't going to even consider having good faith with me. Directing me to your insulting and dismissive article was lack of good faith. Especially considering one of the opening statements. "If you want your thread to be successful so you can obliterate your enemies". Apparently, you wanted me to read that article based on your assumption I see Spanglej as an enemy who should be obliterated. How insulting. And completely wrong. It's no wonder new editors in Wikipedia are at an all time low and others are leaving post haste. It's the kind of crappy attitude and bad faith you display in the article as well as what you barfed at me in ANI that makes Wikipedia appear to be a very unfriendly place. I understand that Administrators get cranky and have seen a lot of garbage from various editors over time -- that would certainly lead to a callous attitude. But not everyone deserves that callousness. Good faith is quickly becoming a joke and just words (maybe it's already at that point). Your article is clear evidence of it, sad to say. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 02:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
I haven't seen you there in a while. I know you've been busy with real life, but I was wondering if I can quickly chat with you over there. :-)— cyberpower ChatOnline 14:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Eat this! MONGO 18:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
MalnadachBot has given you a tall pint! Pints promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tall pint, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Here you go.
†
|
And because I am German, how about some Amber Weizen?— cyberpower ChatOffline 03:39, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Please, wait until your fellow admins explain you what was wrong with the “ANI notice”. Glad to have acquaintance with you ;) but now it’s night in my city, sorry. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 19:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Can you look at this? It was declined by the same admin who started the AN. And look at the bogus reason for the decline. The reverts were on my talk page. I'd like it decided, but I'd be totally satisfied if you or another admin would simply educate the reported editor on the following three simple things: (1) That 5 reverts in an hour is edit warring. The edtior's excuse is that because it was 3 reverts of one item and 2 of another, it doesn't count as edit warring. (2) That a user editing their own talk page is not vandalism. They insist that my relocating the IP template on my talk page qualifies as vandalism. (3) That an IP template is not, as he described it, an "established vandal static IP address maintenance template". How/why are editors like this allowed to perform functions like that when they clearly don't know what they're doing? Haha. The editor refuses to read the relevant policies on 3RR, NOT3RR, and vandalism. So if you could set them straight, that would be great. I don't even care about the ANEW being decided if you could do that (although it should have been decided). Thanks. -- 76.189.109.155 ( talk) 14:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, you got the talk page, but the user page has the same content. Rgrds. -- 64.85.214.47 ( talk) 15:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, I gotta run and am not very smart--so could you maybe hat all the comments on Kiefer's question below your own remark? I think that's fair. Drmies ( talk) 18:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
TP, you can hat it if you want. I don't know how. But contrary to what you said ("This probably felt good to say"), it is very much the opposite. I'd think you of all people would understand that. But there's no way I'm going to stand by at look at all this trash-talking about me, and a list of quotes presented in a hostile manner, and not respond. And with the huge number of assaults on me, it clearly can't be responded to in a brief manner. In terms of those who wanted to sanction and humiliate me, it makes absolutely no difference one way or the other whether I respond or not. None of them will ever change their minds no matter what I say. You do realize that, right? And, as I said, I will not be editing anyway once this is over. You are not afraid to stand up to a hostile crowd. And neither am I. I've done nothing that warrants any sanctions, let alone these ridiciulous ones being proposed, so I want my thoughts on the record. -- 76.189.109.155 ( talk) 18:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
And don't forget, the outcome of the discussion (as far as the creators are concerned) was pre-determined. Sort of like professional wrestling. But mostly like a kangaroo court. ;) -- 76.189.109.155 ( talk) 18:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
TP -- I just wanted to drop a short note to thank you for your service. It probably shouldn't take a holiday like today to elicit such a message, but thank you none the less. Lettik ( talk) 13:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you were in the
Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles category. Is there any stipulations to what one could request a copy of? I was hoping to gnab a copy of
BoltWire. Purely for science reasons... :p Happy Independence Day. — -
dain
omite
21:05, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi TP. You are more than welcome to comment here. But do read it carefully first - some people have already tried turning it into a pre-debate on the issue which not even the draft itself is intended to address! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 23:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
I was about to just revert your posting, but I'm going to give you the opportunity to do it yourself. At ITN/C, people generally will comment on the notability of the story (as I did). But there is an understanding that, regardless of how newsworthy the story is, it needs to be updated. The Asiana Airlines Flight 214 article is not yet up to quality standards. I'm sure, with some time, it will be, but we need to wait for that. So, I request that you please remove the item from ITN until it's a bit more informative. -- tariqabjotu 20:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
To look into this, something you have seen earlier(it will come down to that again), and you at least seem to know what to do - noticing the earlier close of an ANI involving similar background of issues. A m i t ❤ 18:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Congrats on your 20,000th edit. :-)— cyberpower ChatLimited Access 23:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, could you add in your .htaccess a redirect from all X! tools in your Toolserver home to Tool Labs' new location, as Magnus did with his tools? This will help prevent linkrot. Regards, Nemo 11:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
"TParis has mounted a spirited defence and has some supporters, and he has a point that there has been some baiting of the IP; but on the principal issue he has not made many converts. I find that there is a consensus for Proposal 2."
The closer wrote "on the principal issue he has not made many converts", but didn't specify what that issue was. Also, the closer seems to be focused on how many "supporters" and "converts" your arguments gained, isn't that head counting? Also, isn't it the burden of those wanting to impose sanctions, to demonstrate their case? Your arguments examined for solid evidence and diffs offered to support sanctions, and you found them lacking. So what solid arguments, evidence, or diffs swayed the closer in favor of Proposal 2 sanctions? The only plurality I saw smacked of clear prejudice (for example, arguments like "Dennis's patience", and Kudpung's contributions, having nothing to do with arguments for or against sanctions -- just pure ad hominem, or off-topic). So I have no idea what the closer "tallied". Do you? Thanks, Ihardlythinkso ( talk) 01:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
@TParis, right, understood, but the "diffs" offered by the sanctioning side were crap, and I thought evaluation of the thread was suppposed to be made by quality of the arguments, not a count of !votes!? User 76 said he doesn't intend to edit, and with an AN like that, I can see why he would not want to return. (Contrawise, more logic and less "lynch" might have impressed him enough to perhaps want to return as contributing editor, someday.)
On another topic, the close by Admin Toddst1, where he was both INVOLVED and the sanction drafter, was amazing abuse of admin power to watch. So you did a good thing by going to his Talk and bitching at him for it. (Notice in addition how he tried to put the responsibility for his closing action on *you*.) Without your going to his user Talk, I would have done it myself. (Questioning his circumventing policy.) And surely he would have treated me, as a mere content contributor not an admin, even more rudely than he treated you. There is *no doubt* that admin knew he was breaching protocol as well as standard simple WP policy, but he just didn't give a fuck. (His opinion and foresight, presumaby, are omniscient.) Pure and simple example of abuse by an Admin. If that admin doesn't give a rip about WP policy, what other policies does he feel his opinions and wants supercede?? When or how can the community deal with a rogue admin such as this?? Thx, Ihardlythinkso ( talk) 04:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I've been wondering that myself? More specifically, since I've always known you to act responsibly, I'm wondering why you participated in such an exchange? In your case, as far as I know, it seems our of character ... inquiring minds want to know how/why this sort of thing happens, because it is disgusting regardless of the particulars involved. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
What do you think about this? Please help expand/correct. A m i t ❤ 18:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I think it's time for migration of UTRS to labs. → Aza Toth 20:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm contacting you related to the N8VEM article. This article was removed on June 6, 2012. If I understand the process, I think you were the administrator that finalized the deletion of the article after review. I also understand that it is most appropriate to contact you as the first step to request reinstatement based on new developments.
There has recently been significant new public exposure of the N8VEM project and I am suggesting that the article be reinstated to allow for it to be updated and reconsidered. Among the new exposure is a series of print media articles in a well-known, long running publication (Circuit Cellar).
Thank you for your consideration.
Wayne Warthen 15:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wayne Warthen ( talk • contribs)
Ish dar ian 02:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I see you're on a temporary WikiBreak, so I hope you can respond to this when you're back. I was suggesting if you could add to the article revision statistics tool the percentage of edits in an article by a particular user (similar to this tool, but showing everyone's statistics for a particular user, instead of just one user). Also, the Wikimedia Labs version of the edit counter links to wiki.org instead of Wikipedia. Hope that helped. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 16:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement is |
Cape (geography) |
---|
![]()
Cape of Good Hope (left) and
Cape Hangklip (right) in South Africa
|
Please be bold and help improve it! |
posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
It definitely has issues. I would recommend a redirect/merge to the book, Why We Fight: Moral Clarity and the War on Terrorism or a new merge to William J. Bennett#Political viewpoints. It might be helpful to bring up the issue with its creator, User:Populus. Viriditas ( talk) 04:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry TParis, I didn't intend to spam you (per revision history for this page). Just intended to send an invite for TAFI, in efforts to recruit for the project. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:31, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
This is just a heads up that I redacted the word "clearly" in the Men's Right's movement log here. It was brought up in the ANI as the two admins involved had an objection to it as insulting and I didn't recall much opposition by you to their argument about how they perceived the word so I didn't feel it's be controversial to redact it.--v/r - T P 18:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Why have you deleted the page "Tobin Koshy"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobinkoshy ( talk • contribs) 09:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
unfortunately, i do not have IRC access at the moment.
when using the editcount tool from hewiki, we see the count and the diagram, but at the top of the page there is some script error report:
Warning: syntax error, unexpected '=' in Unknown on line 33 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 79 Warning: syntax error, unexpected '=' in Unknown on line 33 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 79
דוד שי - {#tool#} - X!'s tools
peace - קיפודנחש (aka kipod) ( talk) 14:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm saluting to you, soldier! <o How can I fix some bugs in X's tools at tool labs? Is there a repo anywhere (preferrably git/gerrit)? — Wizardist t +c 11:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Sharihareswara (WMF) suggested that I post this error on your talk page. It was affecting me and other users that for whom I was running count queries. The problem seems to be repaired now but perhaps you can use this information in the future. Thanks for your good work!
Warning: mysql_connect(): Can't connect to MySQL server on 'enwiki.labsdb' (110) in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 62 Warning: mysql_select_db() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 63 Warning: mysql_real_escape_string() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 117 Warning: mysql_query() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 83 Warning: mysql_errno() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 85 Warning: mysql_error() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 100 Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 129 Warning: mysql_real_escape_string() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 117 Warning: mysql_query() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 83 Warning: mysql_errno() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 85 Warning: mysql_error() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 100 Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 129 Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/pcount/counter.php on line 119 Warning: mysql_real_escape_string() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 117 Warning: mysql_query() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 83 Warning: mysql_errno() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 85 Warning: mysql_error() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 100 Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/pcount/counter.php on line 198
-
tucoxn\
talk
23:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
You are correct that there was no baiting when you blocked me. There was only Your gross negligence and abuse of admin tools. Joefromrandb ( talk) 20:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
00:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Your unconscionable hubris will be your downfall. With the simple sword of truth will I vanquish ye. Indeed, woe unto ye, for I wax terrible, wielding the blade, ready to smite. LudicrousTripe ( talk) 12:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
|
There is no bacon available, so it will have to be Wikicaffeine instead of "wake up and smell the bacon". Think of this as your last meal, for my wrath descends upon ye even as we speaketh. LudicrousTripe ( talk) 18:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for your comment at the ANI thread I started, I'm glad my clarification helped. Do you think RFC/U would be a better venue, and do you think it would allow me to explain in greater detail why some of these edits are poor? (eg. "edit 1 fabricates a claim that isn't in the source, here's what the source actually says" - "edit 2 engages in original research by bringing in sources that don't relate to the topic"?) – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 19:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi! Post here again because topic went to archive. I havent got an email yet. -- Base talk сontr. 19:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I thought it was an edit conflict (I believe that was the message I got when I hit "Save page") and clicked to move out of the editing window before I copied the post and thought it was gone forever. Don't know how you did it but thanks!-- Amadscientist ( talk) 02:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Rs chen 7754 16:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I just want to be sure you see the additional msg. I've left you on my talk page. Ladyof Shalott 20:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop. The only reason why I keep coming back here to deal with your bullshit is because you and your friends keep insisting on posting to my talkpage, resulting in an e-mail notification turning up in my inbox and reminding me that this fucktardery is still flapping in the wind. All of the other loose ends have been tied off except for your crazy obsession. In regards to the last ANI thread, and your subsequent posts to the closer's talkpage, do you not see any hypocrisy in complaining about a close to a thread about me complaining about a close? Or your posts elsewhere about how you're a forgiving and reasonable person and yet you continue to hound a user who has, for all intents and purposes, walked away from the fight? You have completely lost perspective.
So here's the deal: stop trying to bait me into objecting too strongly to your fucktardery and I won't need to come back. Deal? Leave me a talkback if you desperately want me to unretire. ˜ danjel [ talk | contribs ] 08:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bush Derangement Syndrome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush Derangement Syndrome (6th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yworo ( talk) 18:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, do you know why the counter doesn't work for Romanian language?
Thanks. — Ark25 ( talk) 19:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Όνομα: Λάμπης Καταγωγή: Μιλάνο, Ιταλία Ο Λάμπης γεννήθηκε το 1993 σε μια γωνιά της δοξασμένης Νέας Ιόρκης της Αμερικής, όπου και έζησε τους 3 πρώτους μήνες της ζωής του. Μισός Ιταλός μισός Έλληνας, γνωρίζει ελάχιστα την ιταλική γλώσσα, καθώς στο σπίτι μιλούσαν μόνο την ελληνική! Παρ όλα αυτά, η ιταλική φινέτσα και το γούστο του στα ρούχα είναι αυτά που τον χαρακτηρίζουν. Μάλιστα γνωρίζει προσωπικά τον Τζιόρτζιο Αρμάνι, με τον οποίο έχουν αναπτύξει φιλικές σχέσεις. Είναι από τους λίγους εκλεκτούς που έχουν μπει στο ατελιέ του Αρμάνι, όπου ρούχα σχεδιάστηκαν ειδικά και μόνο γι αυτόν. Μεγάλωσε και έζησε στο Κολωνάκι. Αυτό αποτέλεσε μεγάλο ατού στην δημιουργία μιας πολύπλευρης και βαθυστόχαστης προσωπικότητας που αναπτύσσεται διαρκώς και αναδεικνύει την ομορφιά και την ζωηρότητα του εσωτερικού κόσμου και της πραγματικά μαγευτικής ανθρώπινης ψυχής. Μεγάλη του αγάπη αποτέλεσε και η ηλεκτρολογία. Γι αυτό επέλεξε να σπουδάσει στην ΑΣΠΑΙΤΕ όπου και έγινε διάσημος ως Λάμπης ΑΣΠΑΙΤΕ. <<Είναι τιμή να τον έχουμε κοντά μας.Είναι και γαμώ.>> Αυτά είναι τα λόγια του προέδρου της σχολής κ. Χρυσουλάκη. <<Χύνω και μόνο που τον βλέπω>> τόνισε ο προΐστάμενος του τμήματος ηλεκτρολογίας κ. Χατζαράκης. <<Είναι εκχαίχιος αλλά να είχαμε μια προβαχίνα τώχα χα ήταν άλλο πχάμα!>> είπε με μελαγχολικό ύφος ο θαυμαστής και καθηγητής του κ. Σιδέρης. Δούλευε ως barman σε μεγάλα μαγαζιά όπως ο κουρέας, το πιο ιν μαγαζί σε όλη την Ελλάδα.Αν μια φράση είναι αυτή που τον χαρακτηρίζει τότε αυτή είναι "να την γαμήσω; να την βιάσω ή να την αφήσω να την βρει από κανάν άλλον;" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.58.150.168 ( talk) 15:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tom. I raised this [1] with KC earlier but she may be away. The issue has now been brought to Wikipedia:Ani#Men.27s_rights_movement_.28again.29 ANI. It's directly related to that edit war at Men's rights movement. I notified CSDarrow of the porbation months ago. He should be weel away of it and of the basic behaviour requirements of this site already-- Cailil talk 16:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
In case I didn't make it clear, I apologize for singling you out at block policy. My intention was not to impinge on your motives, but point out that it was the block of a vested contributor that brought this whole issue to light, as it were. I too believe in administrative accountability and oversight (not in a technical sense). It was inappropriate to single you and Hex out when there are many more editors (including myself) that got involved because the user that was blocked was vested as it were. Regards, Crazynas t 03:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
here is the latest posting at Men's Rights Movement from those types that you thought I was being mean to. " We have forgotten that before we called this date rape and date fraud, we called it exciting.” [71]. Of course they have learned that if it has a footnote it is okay. I know that you acted in good faith, ut I wanted you to see what crap they come up with. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 03:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TP, and thanks for your message. My apologies if I've caused a fuss, which is what I explicitly promised not to do if sysop-d. Whatever went on with the timing and transclusion and so on, I think the person that should ultimately held responsible for this unnecessary hoo-hah should be no-one else but me. -- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Need info on John Bedini. It seems wikipedia used to have some info on JB?
Can I access this info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.31.130 ( talk) 12:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
I had known something error had happened when I had entered a username which had had multi-byte characters.
When I watched
w:ja:Wikipedia:権限申請/巻き戻し者/みちまん/20130125, I recognized double-urlencoded usernames are needed.
This may well be caused by $name = urldecode($name);
in /home/tparis/public_html/pcount/index.php.
Please fix this bug.
Thanks. --
Burthsceh (
talk)
06:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I fixed (and then ate) your pie on WP:AN. When you didn't substitute the template, it kept picking up the name of the editor who did the last revision. So when I got to your pie, it said "Thumperward has given you a fresh pie!" and your signature on the comment. Mildly confusing, but yummy pie... =) -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 16:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, a few days ago Yhwhsks ( talk · contribs) added new information which had considerable WP:SYNTH and WP:UNDUE issues and was subsequently removed by three editors [2] [3] [4]. There seems to a consensus on the article talk page that the information should not be included, see Talk:Men's rights movement#Inappropriate edit warring and Talk:Men's rights movement#The paragraph re: Fiamengo talk. Yhwhsks is currently blocked for edit warring. Today, Memills ( talk · contribs) reinserted the disputed content. Memills knows that the article is on article probation, he was topic banned from the men's rights movement article and then blocked for violating the terms of his topic ban. This is yet another violation of the terms of the article probation.
Btw, I left the same note for KC. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 19:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
It isn't every day someone creates an AN thread that it is enjoyable to be a part of. Well done! Automatic Strikeout ( T • C) 21:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC) |
Tom, is there a way to get a query of new registered accounts between specified dates? Specifically a query I can run, or do I have to go through you or a tool? (Not implying you are a tool)
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
23:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thanks for your help re north west tasmania - cheers sats 14:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a new user and found that my page was deleted according to A7. My question is why was my post not significant? The company I attempted to list has a large significance to the state of WI in relation to anyone interested in finance & real estate. Is there some advice you can give me for this so that I can create better posts that don't get deleted? I appreciate your time and service. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ry10coo ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you have plans to run a PHP bot?— cyberpower ChatOffline 23:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I am Anunad Singh from Hindi wikipedia. My account was blocked yesterday and I am not able to edit even my talk pages. I do not know what to do in this condition to appeal for unblocking. I found the English wiki page for it and appealed there.
But the box there did NOT accept my user name which is in Hindi alphabets. So I entered it by transliterating it as 'Anunad' . I received your email that you are not finding an account named 'Anunad'.
So, let me clarify that my account is on Hindi wiki with the name
अनुनाद सिंह. Please help. Thanking you..
-- Anunad Singh — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
117.240.114.131 (
talk)
03:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Would you please review my request at WP:RFP/R? I submitted my request on 19 March and still there is no response from admins. Please check it. Thanks. Zheek ( talk) 16:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
For your good humor on request for bureacratship. T4B ( talk) 20:38, 22 March 2013 (UTC) |
Since it doesn't rise to the level of disruption as a faulty use of your vs. you're, the committee of the sooper sekrit typo patrol has decided to only issue a warning here; especially since it is such a common mistake. (vs. commonS. :)) — Ched : ? 00:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Sardar Iqbal SIngh was a Member of Paliament in India. He contested for Indian National Congress from the Lokh Sabha Ferozepur constituency in Punjab. Iqbal Singh won the Lokh Sabha seat 4 times, first in 1954, then in 1957 , again in 1962 and lastly in 1967. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guneev ( talk • contribs) 14:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
you blocked me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHY!?!?!?!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.180.182.206 ( talk) 16:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
04:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, this is The Wikimon and I have a query... What does that Replication Tag on my Edit Counter mean??? And kudos for an awesome and supremely inspirational User Page!!!! I'm gonna learn to make a good one from you and probably beat yours (just kidding)!!! The Wikimon ( talk) 12:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Those are some pretty vicious attacks attacks that you've pointed out. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 01:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, you issued a topic ban against User:Carptrash for his remarks about redlinked editors but you did not do anything about Memills' characterization of editors as an "anti-MRM patrol duty contingent" or CSDarrow's remark (more like personal attack) that encyclopedic balance eluded me. Memills and CSDarrow were sanctioned for precisely this kind of behavior and I'll admit that I do not understand your decision to sanction Carptrash and not sanction Memills and CSDarrow for what I consider more long-standing and obvious violations of the terms of the article probation. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 01:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
"unprofessional?" And just who are the professionals here? Carptrash ( talk) 02:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Just when we thought we were rid of him, he shows up at an ANI thread and accuses me of OWNership. I thought we were rid of this guy; at the very least, I thought he wasn't supposed to pop up and make random accusations of me, you, or Epeefleche p b p 06:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I seem to have encountered an error, as the edit counter says I don't exist... which obviously I do... -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 15:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
A self motivated person. Born in October,02 1979 at Howrah. Completed Graduation from The Institute of Electronics and Telecommunication in the year 2009 from New Delhi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.234.14.161 ( talk) 07:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey, when using the edit counter for Wikidata, can you change the colour of edits made to the "Translation" namespace? They're currently red, the same as for the main namespace. Thanks, Frigid Ninja 14:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GA bot during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 18:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Just saw your edit summary after replying. Please redact or give context to your completely inappropriate comment. -- Onorem ♠ Dil 22:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I just happened to notice your comment on ANI from yesterday, where you said "I saw a hot 17 yr old girl downtown the other day. I'd hit it." Now, I know you were being deliberately provocative to make a point, but can I ask that you reconsider using language like "I'd hit it" (or, for that matter, commenting on women's hotness) on-wiki? It's a very lad mag, objectifying sort of way to refer to people, especially in a conversation that's semi-related to sexual victimization. Even in service of making a sarcastic point, it still brings the "female types not welcome here, we're busy judging whether we'd 'hit' you or not" temperature of the place up a notch. I know that wasn't what you were going for, at all, so I wanted to draw your attention to how it can feel to a woman who reads it. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 20:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Just a note to say that I was impressed by your advice on AN/I to LGR re: Viriditas. Worth remembering, not just in the specific case, but generally as well. Well done. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 17:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I think you have done some nice things with this page but I am concerned that you seem to be trying to strip all links to websites about this topic - people who look up this page are naturally going to be interested in finding other websites on this topic and the only link you have left in is to Nova Roma - which is not the only website on this topic. I am in no way affiliated with the Cultus Deorum page, however I do think it is a good website which is why I included it under External Links. I really think it is very important, for the people who are interested practising contemporary Roman polytheism, that this entry include links to external websites on this topic.
So that you know - probably the best websites on the Religio Romana are: - https://sites.google.com/site/cultusdeorumromanorum/ - http://novaroma.org/nr/Cultus_deorum_Romanorum
Note that Nova Roma is an organisation that aims to recreate the structure of the Roman Republic, with the Religio Romana being part of this structure. Another organisation that aims to recreate the structure of the Roman state is the Res Publica Romana at respublica-romana.com. Note that many people who are on the path of the Roman way to the Gods are unaffiliated with either Nova Roma or the Res Publica Romana - worthy though these organisations are.
The best Religio Romana blogs, imo, are: - http://www.patheos.com/blogs/religioromana/ - http://romanpagan.blogspot.com/ - http://lases.blogspot.it/ - http://romanpolytheist.wordpress.com/ - http://goldentrail.wordpress.com/
Excellent free online translations of ancient Roman literature are available at: - http://www.naderlibrary.com/ (scroll down to classics) - http://poetryintranslation.com/index.html#Latin: - http://sacred-texts.com/cla/index.htm (scroll down to Roman)
For more resources on the Roman way to the Gods see: - https://sites.google.com/site/cultusdeorumromanorum/english/beginner-s-guides/beginners-guide-study - http://novaroma.org/nr/Reading_list_for_the_cultus_deorum - http://romanpagan.blogspot.com.au/2012/12/pagan-resources.html - http://religioandpietas.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/research-sources-for-cultus-deorum.html
I hope you will be considerate of the people who are genuinely on this path - and allow links to information about this path online to remain on wikipedia. Note again - I am not affiliated with Cultus Deorum.
Regards and best wishes, Ragnii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnii ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Given the past year, you have went through a lot. If you ever feel close to burnout, please let me know.— cyberpower ChatOnline 18:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() You are invited to join
WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of
breakfast-related topics. |
---|
Hi there,
I am the one who inserted EVERY SINGLE REFERENCE in this entry for Roman polytheistic reconstructionism - if you go through the edit history you will see that for yourself. I am not a spammer and my edit history speaks for itself. I am very concerned you are pushing a Christian agenda here ...
Regards, Ragnii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnii ( talk • contribs) 21:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is " Roman reconstructionist pagan". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 01:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis. I just need your help, because my Edit Counter says I don't exist. What do I do? The Wikimon ( talk) 12:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi -- I notice you've been active in nominating at RfA over the past year, and would like to invite you to join the WikiProject for Nominators, which aims to support editors interested in nominating there. We'd be glad of your expertise in getting this new project off the ground. Apologies for the talk-page spamming if you've already seen this message a dozen times. Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 00:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page? It is a museum in Ottawa, Ontario...absolutely notable! I haven't finished with it yet! It is featured in many other places on Wiki. Look up Vanier, Ontario. Is there a chance I could get a Canadian or Ontarian admin who can be in charge of this instead?! Herecomestheslaughter ( talk) 19:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you put down there was no explanation of significance! The whole article explained that. It is part of the Museum Network of Ottawa, Ontario. How can that not be significant? Herecomestheslaughter ( talk) 19:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
http://www.ottawamuseums.com/vanier-museopark.aspx— Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs)
http://www.museumsontario.ca/museum/Museoparc-Vanier-Museopark
This is a real museum part of the City of Ottawa— Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs)
I don't understand. How is it not significant? Most museums in Ottawa have Wiki Pages, so what makes this one so different? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia already has taken notice. Like I said, look up the page for Vanier, Ontario. I just did the press review for 2012, I could send you links all day
http://www.expressottawa.ca/Actualites/2012-05-16/article-2981042/Rendez-vous-aux-Cafes-citoyens/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I believe this one is an article, not a press release
http://www.emcottawaeast.ca/20130314/News/Vanier+sugar+shack+getting+ready+for+maple+festival%2C+New+activities%2C+programs+for+all+ages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:24, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a very popular French news source: http://www3.tfo.org/videos/00190852/soiree-benerfice-au-profit-du-museoparc-vanier-et-hommage-a-mme-meilleur
http://www.radio-canada.ca/sujet/visuel/2012/11/02/001-nouveau-cadre-vanier.shtml (This is a BIG one in terms of news sources) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This one is: http://www.racontemoiottawa.com/en/37 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a government site: http://www.pro.rcip-chin.gc.ca/GetMember.do?lang=en&id=guaekg&ens=cnRsTGFuZz1lbg== — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
This article is about the Museopark and is an independent source: http://www.expressottawa.ca/Actualit%C3%A9s/2012-03-05/article-2915582/Un-nouveau-site-Internet-pour-le-Museoparc/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 19:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
I believe I found the perfect link!: http://www.expressottawa.ca/Culture/Festivals-et-evenements/2012-02-29/article-2911674/Un-tresor-a-decouvrir/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herecomestheslaughter ( talk • contribs) 20:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
In this post it links me to Special:Contributions/Interlaker for some reason, not my own. Ranze ( talk) 19:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Please reserve your "probation warnings" to those who have demonstrated more than a passing interest in the article, and preferably within the last couple of days. ·ʍaunus· snunɐw· 01:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review
Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe
listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. —
Ched
ZILLA
10:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
But I had to wait until I ran into someone I knew well enough that they would chuckle at the ironic humor rather than get mad. Being able to do this has made my day TP. — Ched ZILLA 10:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for welcoming me. LatinWolf (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
I still don't know why else you would say that, but I guess it's not that big a deal if you didn't mean it that way. I'll give you this virtual cold one, and if we ever come across each other at a meetup, maybe we can get a real cold one. :) Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 20:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC) |
|
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! |
Hi TParis/Archive 10, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{ subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 20:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi TP. I noticed a bit of an odd UTRS issue today (which I've just raised at the Village Pump here). As a tool admin there, I'm assuming you can see a little bit more than me; are you able to shed any light on the problem? Yunshui 雲 水 09:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
What language are you using for your toolserver apps? I'm still waiting for my account to get approved (come on DaB!) but in the meantime have built a few python interfaces. I thought it might be interesting to create a git or hg repository and start sharing a collaborative toolset.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
17:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Add new wiki please: uk.wikivoyage, he.wikivoyage -- RLuts (talk) 10:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
What language. Careful or you might get banned.
Too
Carptrash (
talk)
15:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I was doing some digging and I think I see what has caused some of the recent resurgence of the problem at the Men's rights movement page. There is a very very long (and tedious) history of off-site campaigns in relation to this topic area. Apparently some bloggers got wind of this initiative [5] and have made various posts about it claiming wikipedia articles are inaccurate because of it. See it on avoiceformen.com at the 'Anita Sarkeesian and the feminist war on facts' post (which I can't link to due to spam filter) and reddit [6]. Apparently though this might have been caused by wikipediocracy [7]. Just though it'd be useful for you see this-- Cailil talk 23:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Just advising you of this
[10]. I'm not sure if you intended to include the topic of men's rights 'broadly construed' or not in your ban of Carptrash (the probation covers more than just the page), but it's the same behaviour just on another page. That said the IP is just as bad.
Also something I've noticed about the SPAs and IPs in that area that attack Carptrash, they tend to refer to him as a she. You can see this from Yhwhsks on the men's rights movement talk page
[11]. There comes a point where that kind of behaviour is indicative of something other than a mistake. Carptrash should be rising above it but they are being poked with a stick--
Cailil
talk
16:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Rgambord ( talk · contribs) has been deleting comments (including mine) from Talk:Men's rights movement and now this. "You should be ashamed of yourself" and "people like you disgust me" is a personal attack. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 17:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
A while back you potentially discussed moving to labs. She we continue the discussion?— cyberpower ChatOnline 23:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Is "labs" the new wikimedia toolserver project?
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
11:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm leaving wikipedia (for good) but I wanted to come back to point out that your reasons cited http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Rgambord&oldid=551848171 for banning me don't actually... exist. What you said didn't actually... happen. Might be wise to actually fact-check before you go (ab)using administrator powers. Thanks! (jerk) Rgambord ( talk) 21:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I can't believe commons doesn't have a pic of
jerk sauce so this will have to do.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
02:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Here is the alpha 2 copy.— cyberpower ChatOffline 22:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi TP, I've never seen anyone say that ArbCom restrictions have to remain on user talk pages. [13] Usually once an editor has read something they're free to remove it. Do you have a link to whichever policy/guideline says that's not allowed with ArbCom restrictions? SlimVirgin (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if you could help me with a page move real quick. I was looking at Category:United States Air Force careers just now and wanted to establish some consistency with the article titles by moving U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations to United States Air Force Office of Special Investigations so I was wondering if you wouldn't mind deleting the United States... page for me to make way for the move. I'd really appreciate it! Cheers, — - dain omite 23:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
TP, My submission to RSN was to establish if the sources were reliable for representing the opinions the SPLC, not that the views in of themselves were reliable. The response I got was actually different to what I had proposed, I thought they were Goldwags opinions. I don't have a counter to the reasons they gave. I did this to pin the argument down and not have the goal posts moved on me. Which is starting to happen already. I have not mentioned RSN in the argument I outlined, and I have only briefly mentioned it in response to Viriditas. CSDarrow ( talk) 15:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Did you delete the whole section for Museoparc in the Vanier article?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.70.26.203 ( talk) 16:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry this has been a few month in coming; I got tired of logging on to disappointment. I do appreciate it though. -- Kendrick7 talk 02:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Spam_attack_on_Evolutionary_psychology Killer Chihuahua 07:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I have some information for setting up the tools to work on labs once SQL is ready. Can you send me an email. I need to send you a file.— cyberpower ChatLimited Access 17:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I saw your comment here and wanted to point you to my user essay " Not in charge" for your thoughts. -- Lexein ( talk) 01:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TParis. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CSDarrow ( talk) 11:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
You are always welcome to email me. — Ched : ? 08:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Regarding the conversation we've talked about a few times... I stumbled across Commons:Bundesarchiv and I was in awe at the possibilities and I just hope everything could possibly go as smoothly as this seems to have been. But yeah, I'm not sure if you've come across that as well but I thought you would think it's nifty. — - dain omite 06:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to hear you didn't get the spot. I know I opposed but it really did surprise me when the other individual was chosen over you. It really didn't surprise me that they chose one of their own clerks but it doesn't really give the Arbcom a good impression when they do that sort of thing after the community said no to them being in Arbcom a few months ago. For what its worth I would have much, much rather you got it. Kumioko ( talk) 01:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
to check into an edit counter somethingoranother and to find at some point that I was directed to your talk page. Small world. My question is, on the pie chart generated by the counter there is a blue section called "wikipedia." What does this section measure? I have quesses, but am happy just asking one who knows. Come to think about it, you might hear about this again. Or not Carptrash ( talk) 16:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Paris,
You have deleted a page of notable company Advanced International Translations, which does a lot to translation community, e.g. runs Langmages - Social Network for Translators and Translation Agencies. I guess this is a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Langexpert ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for quick answer. I see the discussion points are very poor-grounded, something like "I have found only 2 press-releases" (while I see hundreds of them in Google). Please, advise on what is the procedure for refuting discussion points, relisting, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Langexpert ( talk • contribs) 14:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry I acted out of line the other day. The fast pace of the editing on Talk:Men's rights movement led to a lot of confusion on my part as to who I was talking to and what had been said. I allowed myself to overreact to one editor's insulting comments, and then made the honest mistake of thinking I was talking to that editor without taking the time to double check the user-name. That led to a significant argument, and as soon as I realised my mistake I attempted to apologize, but it was only taken as a further attack and led to AN/I. So, again, sorry I called you a jerk. I felt that I had been unfairly treated and overreacted because of it. I appreciate that you take the time to moderate (literally) the forum on that page. Obviously there are not going to be editors who hold a neutral point of view on the topic, and it can be very polarizing, since most editors are probably bringing in existing disagreement and animosity from other spheres into wikipedia. Both sides think they are right, that the scientific evidence backs up their beliefs, and that the other side is totally ignorant and hateful; that's the beauty of humanities, I suppose. If wikipedia editors had to talk face to face, I imagine it would be more difficult to demonize one another. Rgambord ( talk) 05:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I've deployed my tool to wikitech
[14]. If you are interested in gearing up on wmflabs, let me know as I've recently gone through the headache of setting up a decent workflow.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
15:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
I streamlined the process a bit. Once you have a project created, try following
this guide to create a stub application.
little green rosetta
(talk)
central scrutinizer
19:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, you might be interested in the ARBCOM case concerning Apostle12 [15] Rgambord ( talk) 08:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Telling someone they're banned from one article, and then making a log-entry that says entire topic can only lead to misunderstandings. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Back towards the beginning of the year sometime, I had talked a bit with Worm about a few things. I'm not sure if I'm just more aware of things than I had been in the past, or if I just felt this years transition was more .. ummmm ... robust than usual. I've even had the impression at times that some of the arbs are a bit <trying to think of a good word again> ... concerned about the current culture. My observation at the time was that it often seemed that the right hand didn't know what the left hand was doing, so I started this and was evolving to User:Ched/Arb/Agenda but it sort of lost steam as I got side-tracked on other things. I almost deleted both, but Worm said to hold on to that thought - so perhaps I'll get back to him on it in the near future. Not directly related I know, but I had noticed your comment to Iri and it certainly caught my attention. Best of luck with it. — Ched : ? 00:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
TParis, apologies for getting behind in responding to comments around the project. One of the places I wanted to comment was where your concern about AUSC appointments was posted, and I have responded to you here to publicly discuss my own actions in relation to your candidacy. Risker ( talk) 01:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
The edit counter's replag for Wikidata is over eight days, the entire month of May thus far. When I go here I get the message "Caution: Replication lag is high, changes newer than 1 weeks, 1 days, 21 hours, 35 minutes, 21 seconds may not be shown.". Is there any way to fix this? Sven Manguard Wha? 15:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
(I always want to say "Tom" .. or "Tim" or something - but I don't recall ever seeing anything on that) .. Anyyyyyway. Regarding that Arb RfC, (and I know it's a work in progress and a long way from being a final draft), I wanted to mention something. Back at the beginning of the year when the new arbs took their seats, I talk briefly with User:Worm That Turned. My thinking was about transparency and communication things. I even went so far as to draft User:Ched/Arb/Agenda, but never really followed up on it. In fact I was going to delete the whole thing until Dave said "hang on" .. there might be something there". Anyway, I never really got back to either that idea or even to Dave, but I thought It may be something that could be incorporated into your RfC. I have to say I'm really impressed with how some of the arbs as individuals have been trying to communicate to the community, but my thinking is that often we don't see what they're doing. So I thought perhaps if there was some page aside from the "formal" boards the arbs use where they could say "I'll be working on this" or "I'll be away for a week", or "We're dealing with xyz". Not really for the community to edit the page (although the talk page might be useful), but more where the arbs and community could check in to see what's going on in regards to their particular area of interest. So anyway ... if that's something you wanted to work into your RfC, it's just a thought. Feel free to ping me any time sir. And thanks again for all you do ... both as a wikipedian, and as a true hero to my favorite country. :) — Ched : ? 20:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TParis! You might want to check out the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Dicklyon. In the course of closing that discussion there is some talk about sanctions for Born2cycle, and your closure of the earlier AN discussion about B2C was mentioned by Glrx. I'm just letting you know in case you want to observe the discussion, or if you might want to comment on how your closure applies to the current situation. -- MelanieN ( talk) 06:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
According to [18], I don't exist. Other accounts seem ok. Any reason for this? An optimist on the run! 10:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I am working on an article about a guy who, in WW2 taught "recognition" classes in the military. What is a term that I can use that could be linked to a wikipedia article that could explain to the interested just what that would have meant? Or might still mean? Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 14:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I created Koepckekassike as a new article in the German Wiki. If I click here it is not listed. Why? ( 79.225.70.182 ( talk) 09:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC))
To find a percentage of a number it is really simple. For example if you are finding 56 percent of 230 all you do is times them by each other then divide by 100. Simple! Hope this helpful to you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaael.123 ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Paper Wasps have been described as masters of engineering.As its name suggests,the paper wasp builds and maintains its compound nest out of a special kind of paper which manufactures itself. The insects collects fibres of plants and from dead wood and from all kinds of places. It them chews the cellulose-rich material,adding a sticky high protein saliva. When applied,the resulting paste dries to form a light firm,yet,tough paper. Moreover,the saliva has special properties that enable the paper to generate and absorb heat ,thus maintaining the right temperature in the brood comb on cool days. The wasp builds its nest mouthful by mouthful. The finished product is waterproof paper umbrella-covered cluster of hexagonal cells combining strength and efficiency. Wasps that live in wetter areas simply add more oral secretion because of its water resistant properties. The insects selects sites that offer some kind of protective overhang. From this,they suspend their downward facing nests by a stalk or petiole. Moreover,paper wasps do on harm to the environment,unlike our papermaking processes,which pollute air,water and land. Understandably,architects and researchers are studying paper wasp's products with a view to designing superior building materials that are light weight,strong,more flexible and biodegradable. WHAT DO YOU THINK? Did an insect with brain roughly the size of two grains of sand figure out papermaking and architecture by itself? Or are its chemical and mechanical engineering skills evidence of design? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Otu Wuddah ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
I thought the decision you made about my behavior in February was fair, especially the part about where I am to be given a chance to stop engaging in a discussion where I'm being tendentious (as a warning from an uninvolved admin) before I'm blocked or penalized in any way. However, this implied agreement between WP administration and me appears to not be recognized by at least one other admin. See here:
Thanks. -- B2 C 21:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis – I thought I'd respond here since I'm probably at or beyond my limit in the AE.
I appreciate the clarification of your ANI remedy. If indeed there's no active monitoring by admins of B2C's behavior, then it seems that the remedy boils down to having editors continue to report disruptive behavior to administrators who may then choose to act. Forgive me, but I don't see that this varies materially from what was happening before, nor how it amounts to an effective deterrent. (One difference I do see is that the remedy limits investigating administrators to only very weak and localized sanctions – at the very most only barring B2C from participating in the remainder of a single discussion that he's already disrupted to the point of administrative intervention.)
In your summation you explicitly stated your willingness to "revisit and revert" your decision based on others' feedback. Given what I've seen since its implementation, and what I've recently learned from you about how it's actually meant to work, I'm afraid I must offer as feedback my view that the remedy as it stands is insufficient and doesn't adequately address the problem, for reasons already elaborated by myself (and others). Please understand that I don't mean this as criticism – it's merely my response to your stated willingness to reconsider your decision based on users' responses.
I ask that you to please accept this feedback without sarcasm or defensiveness, in the same spirit of helpfulness and collaboration that I offer it, and consider allowing the remedy to be revised as others have proposed. Thanks! ╠╣uw [ talk 00:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to try again for my entry on Comedy Masala, which you deleted last year. It's become much more notable. Can I make a new submission? Gchuva ( talk) 04:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Dear Travel partner or well wisher
Warm Greeting from Nepal!!!
Whilst, i would like to express my topic about "traveltoursinnepal" Which will be very utmost experience those who are traveling to Nepal.Nepal, itself always welcoming & warm greet wherever they are from as their choice & wherever they would like to visit... . We Nepalese people would like to respect our valued clients with our happiest smiling wherever they are even like can be a remote area of Nepal or can be a mountain region,Terai region. We are proudly say that, it's Nepal always loving their guest as a God while you never expect these kinda of respect in the world .We (Nepalese people expect that,Please come to visit our Country Nepal as like your heaven of earth even we are very poor but we aren't... . We have a top of the world Mountain called Mt. Everest,greenery,respect people,smiling faces can be attraction to you during the tour in Nepal.There are lot of things to see around Nepal.You can come to visit for tour in nepal,Trekking in Nepal, Mountaineering In Nepal, Rafting in Nepal,Safari tour in Nepal as well as Hindus/Buddhist/Muslim/Christian/jain tour in Nepal.We are proud to share our experience about village tourism,Eco- tourism, responsible tourism as well as many more.. You just remember our country to Nepal . Nepal,it's richest for culture,World Heritage sites in Nepal.You could be explore Pashupatianth temple,Boudhnath Stupa,Shyambhunath Stupa,Patan Durbar Square, Bhaktapur Durbar Square,Kathmandu Durbar Square, Lumbini as well.
Thanks in advance to explore or searching us to visit Nepal.
Regards Ramchandra Adhikari Lazimpat 2, Kathmandu Nepal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.199.167.42 ( talk) 07:35, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
13:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thank you for all you do. — Ched : ? 05:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I don't know, maybe someone already have written about this bug. My list of articles -- link. Click on the №5 (at this moment) article "R U Mine?". It's reffer to http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_U_Mine, but must to http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_U_Mine%3F. Correct, please -- Morganvolter ( talk) 14:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Good as gold! |
Hi, TParis. During your time here, you've done a lot of good and served quite well as one of our more respected administrators. You've pitched in at various places and been a credit to the community. However, because today is Memorial Day, I've taken the unusual step of also considering your off-wiki actions in presenting you with the Golden Editor Award. As a fellow American, I would like to thank you for your service in the Air Force, which in my opinion is a whole lot more meaningful than your service here. v/r -- AutomaticStrikeout ? 13:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
-
dain
omite is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
I set up a project for the tools. If you create an account on Wikitech, I can add you to it, and then we can begin migrating some of it to labs and get it ready.— cyberpower ChatLimited Access 13:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
— cyberpower ChatOnline 22:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis,
you wanted to add WP:AFCH to that tool. Any chance you add that? mabdul 05:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
22:56, 27 May 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+58) . . N Talk:Dot bzh (Placing WPAFC project banner (AFCH)) (current) 22:56, 27 May 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+50) . . N Dot bzh (Created via Articles for Creation (you can help!) (AFCH)) (current)
Hey, Tparis. Did your account expire on Toolserver, or would you happen to know why the edit counter and whatnot aren't working? Thanks! Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 00:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Question: So, in "my preferences" it says I have totaled 12,200 some odd edits, and the old edit counter said more than that ... now the edit counter says I only have 11,837 and no deleted edits. Is something wrong here, or have I just done less than I thought? Go Phightins ! 01:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know there might be a possible problem with the tool. When I look up the edit count or my account it seems to work pretty well and fast. When I look up my old account of Kumioko it just comes up with a white screen. I'm not sure if this is due to the high edit count (about 400, 000) or because the userpage redirect to my current one. Anyway, just wanted to let you know. Kumioko ( talk) 16:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
/home/tparis
:drwxr-xr-- 31 tparis users 2048 Apr 10 19:19 /home/tparis
users
group, to traverse this directory to reach /home/tparis/public_html
. To fix this: chmod a+x /home/tparis
. If this doesn't work, please ask on #wikimedia-toolserver
.TP, would you (or maybe another admin stalker?) mind editting
Template:User edits and adding the new URL so the edit counter userbox works again? I would if I could but it's under full protection.
— -
dain
omite
00:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting to delete the history of the page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Lyc%C3%A9e_Franco-Libanais Since it has been modified from external persons and they contained unwanted pages. Kindly inform us when it will be done, and can it be done also for the english version of the same page? In case you need additional information, please let me know. I will check this page tomorrow. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 16:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, If you check the history, you will find the reason because there were students who modified the pages and wrote bad things about the school (ex: the school is a prison) and insulted the manager and so on and it's upon my management request that I am asking you as an administrator to delete the history. In case you need any additional information, please let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 19:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
It's good to see that you're currently (or have already migrated) migrating X!'s tools to Wikimedia Labs, which means these tools won't be unreliable anymore. But what about your tools, such as Top Edits and Is X an Admin? Do you plan to move them to Labs? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, I was wondering if you could check the edit history over at Mens Rights Movement there appears to be some edit-warring and 1RR violations going on. I'd take it to ANEW but I'm not the most familiar at filling out that form. Thanks.-- Kyohyi ( talk) 13:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I guess I don't see changing wording after an editor has willfully misrepresented what a source is saying as being "reverting". To me, reverting would be tossing out the whole edit based on the fact that the editor has intentionally changed the meaning of the source to reflect his (her?) POV. But it is comforting to know that folks are watching this closely. Carptrash ( talk) 16:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting to delete the history of the page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Lyc%C3%A9e_Franco-Libanais because it contains bad words and insults about the school and the manager. Please let me know how to proceed. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.12.173 ( talk) 05:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
You should restore the PrimeFaces article. I mean the article in User:Arjant/PrimeFaces. Here ( [19]) you can see it is a Java component library with certain relevance. The unique with more than one hundred components (point 1) and the most used by developers (point 7). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliuken ( talk • contribs) 17:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting to delete the history of the page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Lyc%C3%A9e_Franco-Libanais since it contains bad words from students and insults to the manager of the school. We have claimed to block this page from updates but how can we do to delete the history? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 05:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for your reply but both the french and english version have been hacked and we must do that for both history. Can you please do it for French version and then guide me to a link where I can ask to do the same for the English version? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.21.12 ( talk) 18:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I didn't mean to override you, but I zapped that just as you declined the speedy. That guy has been creating strings of redirects from future films. They were discussed at WP:WikiProject Film#Creating redirects to future films. and he was told that it was not appropriate until there was enough sourced information to say something about the film in the target (director's) article. In this case there was nothing in the target. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 13:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello there! I believe you deleted this page under CSD G13. The user's asking for the contents. Could you leave him a message here? Also, out of curiosity: I thought it was a copyvio...why was it deleted under G13? Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 16:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Those were some unnecessary and out of line comments at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#VisualEditor disabled. Please realize there is a long line of people wanting to use a bat on Oliver. If Oliver takes a bat to himself, we will lose out on the joy that bashing Oliver to a pulp would bring. Of course. me being 3rd in line has nothing to do with it. Bgwhite ( talk) 23:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
An answer to your comment, "I don't understand why the level of sourcing is higher for this subject than what is required by policy". This is the explanation: it's the article itself that demands a higher-than-normal standard. From the lede of List of Freemasons (A - D): "Standards of "proof" for those on this list may vary widely; some figures with no verified lodge affiliation are claimed as Masons if reliable sources give anecdotal evidence suggesting they were familiar with the "secret" signs and passes, but other figures are rejected over technical questions of regularity in the lodge that initiated them. Where available, specific lodge membership information is provided; where serious questions of verification have been noted by other sources, this is also indicated." All the sources provided so far fall well below this standard.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 16:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I really do not know ... For someone to say that either a Masonic lodge or lodges should be the name of the registry is written to a summary at the end of the meetings. Ataturk documents that we've got such a document does not exist. But while some of Europe Masonic historians Mason Mustafa Kemal listings are included in these masons. But I do not have such a document, unless there is? Do not know 'have to say.
I don't really know. For someone to say that a masonic lodge should have their registry written at the end of their meetings [Unintelligible sentence]. The Ataturk documents that we've got say such a document does not exist [Referring to the unintelligible sentence]. But some historians believe Mustafa Ataturk is listed in these registries. But I do not have such a document; if it exists. I don't know what to say.
Meet me on IRC?— cyberpower ChatOnline 17:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I have noticed the edit counter no longer reflects the deleted edits. Is this a bug to be fixed or has this become a lost capability? :) John Cline ( talk) 20:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Is there any way to use the Top Namespace Edits tool for other wikis than the English Wikipedia? (in the edit counter you can choose the project) If not, would it be possible to change that? Regards -- Chricho ∀ ( talk) 15:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you copy the sitenotice.php file from /data/project/xtools/public_html, on labs, and place it in /home/tparis/public_html, on toolserver, for me?— cyberpower ChatOnline 17:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Excuse he but e=why did you delete my article on Robert Cluett? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boiboy69 ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
The lead for Tops in Blue needs either an update or possibly some slight rewriting. Tops in Blue was formed in 1953 and they have been performing for 57 years (60 years?). I was going to change 57 to 60, then thought it might be wise to discuss with you. If you changed it to "they have been performing for more than 60 years", the article would not require updating once a year. What do you think of the idea? By the way, they really are The Tops! I have seen them perform many times. Thank you for writing the article. Thank you for your service to our country! GBU and yours. From a very proud United States Air Force Veteran (disabled). I sign almost everything "Respectfully". This time I will follow your Talk Page guidelines. Very Respectfully, Tiyang ( talk) 03:53, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
08:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
It's a sock of Technoquat ( talk · contribs), pure DUCK, CU will confirm - the user page of the socks are almost always the first edit, and almost always C&P from another user's page or an online biography from someone's home page etc. Then the MO is simply trolling at noticeboards and/or other users - Help Desk mainly in the past, not really seen much at ANI before. Number 57 ( talk · contribs) was just the unlucky target this time, many other editors ( AndyTheGrump ( talk · contribs) comes to mind) have also been targeted in the past for no real reason. I think even Jimbo Wales ( talk · contribs) got hit a few weeks back. Giant Snowman 16:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Although, as I said, I'd look into evidence more thoroughly if the subject actually came up, based on what I know right now I think I wouldn't support equal topic bans for both users. Arzel has been a POV warrior, unmitigated by contributions to articles or by attempts to get along well with others, over a broad range of political subjects for as long as I've known him and I'd hope for a long-term topic ban from politics, broadly defined. Casprings is quick on the revert button at the article, but has also done legitimate content creation and made a number of good-faith attempts to address the concerns of others, so if a topic ban is to be imposed on him, a shorter one that targets this article and related ones might be better. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 01:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hey Tom, dunno if you saw my apology for being snarky the other day, had a crappy day and was just miffed. Sorry again. Darkness Shines ( talk) 14:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. A few days ago (22 June, 21:28) you semi-protected my Talk page. Thanks for that, it saves me a lot of work. However, now the vandalism is spilling over to my userpage. So if you wouldn't mind.... Cheers, Yintan 21:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
I am not an inactive account creator. It's only been maybe a couple of weeks since I used it. I am a moderately active account creator. Please restore my flag. ● Thane — formerly Guðsþegn 21:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind hitting reset and having both the ANI and RfC closed. If you feel you would be of any assistance in helping to find compromise on the talk page, I would welcome that. Casprings ( talk) 01:48, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, TParis! Could you please take a look at this edit and see if it's possible to hide it? It is a gross, disturbing personal attack. Surtsicna ( talk) 22:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I phrased it as a hypothetical at AN because I viewed it as a systemic question, and because I did not want to duplicate an open discussion on a particular user. I didn't see an e-mail address for you, so I'll provide the links to the examples on which I based the question here: the archived ANI report is here and the recently-retrieved-from-the-archive ANI report is here. Even as recently as yesterday, interactions with others get results like this edit summary [22]. Yet the report has been open since June 21 with no action taken. So, that's the background context on which I based the hypothetical question. Regards -- Taroaldo ✉ 03:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Per your suggestion to read your article on ANI Advice: I read about three lines of it, looked at the photo and the caption, and decided that reading any more was a waste of time. Above, here on your talk page, you have written "Please assume good faith in my edits". There's no good faith in your article, and there was no good faith in you jumping to conclusions regarding my reverts at the Dimensionaut article. Even after I tried to explain things had already been dealt with, you returned with more evidence that you weren't going to even consider having good faith with me. Directing me to your insulting and dismissive article was lack of good faith. Especially considering one of the opening statements. "If you want your thread to be successful so you can obliterate your enemies". Apparently, you wanted me to read that article based on your assumption I see Spanglej as an enemy who should be obliterated. How insulting. And completely wrong. It's no wonder new editors in Wikipedia are at an all time low and others are leaving post haste. It's the kind of crappy attitude and bad faith you display in the article as well as what you barfed at me in ANI that makes Wikipedia appear to be a very unfriendly place. I understand that Administrators get cranky and have seen a lot of garbage from various editors over time -- that would certainly lead to a callous attitude. But not everyone deserves that callousness. Good faith is quickly becoming a joke and just words (maybe it's already at that point). Your article is clear evidence of it, sad to say. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 02:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
I haven't seen you there in a while. I know you've been busy with real life, but I was wondering if I can quickly chat with you over there. :-)— cyberpower ChatOnline 14:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Eat this! MONGO 18:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC) |
![]() |
MalnadachBot has given you a tall pint! Pints promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tall pint, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Here you go.
†
|
And because I am German, how about some Amber Weizen?— cyberpower ChatOffline 03:39, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Please, wait until your fellow admins explain you what was wrong with the “ANI notice”. Glad to have acquaintance with you ;) but now it’s night in my city, sorry. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 19:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Can you look at this? It was declined by the same admin who started the AN. And look at the bogus reason for the decline. The reverts were on my talk page. I'd like it decided, but I'd be totally satisfied if you or another admin would simply educate the reported editor on the following three simple things: (1) That 5 reverts in an hour is edit warring. The edtior's excuse is that because it was 3 reverts of one item and 2 of another, it doesn't count as edit warring. (2) That a user editing their own talk page is not vandalism. They insist that my relocating the IP template on my talk page qualifies as vandalism. (3) That an IP template is not, as he described it, an "established vandal static IP address maintenance template". How/why are editors like this allowed to perform functions like that when they clearly don't know what they're doing? Haha. The editor refuses to read the relevant policies on 3RR, NOT3RR, and vandalism. So if you could set them straight, that would be great. I don't even care about the ANEW being decided if you could do that (although it should have been decided). Thanks. -- 76.189.109.155 ( talk) 14:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, you got the talk page, but the user page has the same content. Rgrds. -- 64.85.214.47 ( talk) 15:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi TParis, I gotta run and am not very smart--so could you maybe hat all the comments on Kiefer's question below your own remark? I think that's fair. Drmies ( talk) 18:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
TP, you can hat it if you want. I don't know how. But contrary to what you said ("This probably felt good to say"), it is very much the opposite. I'd think you of all people would understand that. But there's no way I'm going to stand by at look at all this trash-talking about me, and a list of quotes presented in a hostile manner, and not respond. And with the huge number of assaults on me, it clearly can't be responded to in a brief manner. In terms of those who wanted to sanction and humiliate me, it makes absolutely no difference one way or the other whether I respond or not. None of them will ever change their minds no matter what I say. You do realize that, right? And, as I said, I will not be editing anyway once this is over. You are not afraid to stand up to a hostile crowd. And neither am I. I've done nothing that warrants any sanctions, let alone these ridiciulous ones being proposed, so I want my thoughts on the record. -- 76.189.109.155 ( talk) 18:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
And don't forget, the outcome of the discussion (as far as the creators are concerned) was pre-determined. Sort of like professional wrestling. But mostly like a kangaroo court. ;) -- 76.189.109.155 ( talk) 18:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
TP -- I just wanted to drop a short note to thank you for your service. It probably shouldn't take a holiday like today to elicit such a message, but thank you none the less. Lettik ( talk) 13:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you were in the
Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles category. Is there any stipulations to what one could request a copy of? I was hoping to gnab a copy of
BoltWire. Purely for science reasons... :p Happy Independence Day. — -
dain
omite
21:05, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi TP. You are more than welcome to comment here. But do read it carefully first - some people have already tried turning it into a pre-debate on the issue which not even the draft itself is intended to address! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 23:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
I was about to just revert your posting, but I'm going to give you the opportunity to do it yourself. At ITN/C, people generally will comment on the notability of the story (as I did). But there is an understanding that, regardless of how newsworthy the story is, it needs to be updated. The Asiana Airlines Flight 214 article is not yet up to quality standards. I'm sure, with some time, it will be, but we need to wait for that. So, I request that you please remove the item from ITN until it's a bit more informative. -- tariqabjotu 20:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
To look into this, something you have seen earlier(it will come down to that again), and you at least seem to know what to do - noticing the earlier close of an ANI involving similar background of issues. A m i t ❤ 18:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Congrats on your 20,000th edit. :-)— cyberpower ChatLimited Access 23:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, could you add in your .htaccess a redirect from all X! tools in your Toolserver home to Tool Labs' new location, as Magnus did with his tools? This will help prevent linkrot. Regards, Nemo 11:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
"TParis has mounted a spirited defence and has some supporters, and he has a point that there has been some baiting of the IP; but on the principal issue he has not made many converts. I find that there is a consensus for Proposal 2."
The closer wrote "on the principal issue he has not made many converts", but didn't specify what that issue was. Also, the closer seems to be focused on how many "supporters" and "converts" your arguments gained, isn't that head counting? Also, isn't it the burden of those wanting to impose sanctions, to demonstrate their case? Your arguments examined for solid evidence and diffs offered to support sanctions, and you found them lacking. So what solid arguments, evidence, or diffs swayed the closer in favor of Proposal 2 sanctions? The only plurality I saw smacked of clear prejudice (for example, arguments like "Dennis's patience", and Kudpung's contributions, having nothing to do with arguments for or against sanctions -- just pure ad hominem, or off-topic). So I have no idea what the closer "tallied". Do you? Thanks, Ihardlythinkso ( talk) 01:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
@TParis, right, understood, but the "diffs" offered by the sanctioning side were crap, and I thought evaluation of the thread was suppposed to be made by quality of the arguments, not a count of !votes!? User 76 said he doesn't intend to edit, and with an AN like that, I can see why he would not want to return. (Contrawise, more logic and less "lynch" might have impressed him enough to perhaps want to return as contributing editor, someday.)
On another topic, the close by Admin Toddst1, where he was both INVOLVED and the sanction drafter, was amazing abuse of admin power to watch. So you did a good thing by going to his Talk and bitching at him for it. (Notice in addition how he tried to put the responsibility for his closing action on *you*.) Without your going to his user Talk, I would have done it myself. (Questioning his circumventing policy.) And surely he would have treated me, as a mere content contributor not an admin, even more rudely than he treated you. There is *no doubt* that admin knew he was breaching protocol as well as standard simple WP policy, but he just didn't give a fuck. (His opinion and foresight, presumaby, are omniscient.) Pure and simple example of abuse by an Admin. If that admin doesn't give a rip about WP policy, what other policies does he feel his opinions and wants supercede?? When or how can the community deal with a rogue admin such as this?? Thx, Ihardlythinkso ( talk) 04:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I've been wondering that myself? More specifically, since I've always known you to act responsibly, I'm wondering why you participated in such an exchange? In your case, as far as I know, it seems our of character ... inquiring minds want to know how/why this sort of thing happens, because it is disgusting regardless of the particulars involved. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 16:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
What do you think about this? Please help expand/correct. A m i t ❤ 18:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I think it's time for migration of UTRS to labs. → Aza Toth 20:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm contacting you related to the N8VEM article. This article was removed on June 6, 2012. If I understand the process, I think you were the administrator that finalized the deletion of the article after review. I also understand that it is most appropriate to contact you as the first step to request reinstatement based on new developments.
There has recently been significant new public exposure of the N8VEM project and I am suggesting that the article be reinstated to allow for it to be updated and reconsidered. Among the new exposure is a series of print media articles in a well-known, long running publication (Circuit Cellar).
Thank you for your consideration.
Wayne Warthen 15:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wayne Warthen ( talk • contribs)
Ish dar ian 02:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I see you're on a temporary WikiBreak, so I hope you can respond to this when you're back. I was suggesting if you could add to the article revision statistics tool the percentage of edits in an article by a particular user (similar to this tool, but showing everyone's statistics for a particular user, instead of just one user). Also, the Wikimedia Labs version of the edit counter links to wiki.org instead of Wikipedia. Hope that helped. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 16:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement is |
Cape (geography) |
---|
![]()
Cape of Good Hope (left) and
Cape Hangklip (right) in South Africa
|
Please be bold and help improve it! |
posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
It definitely has issues. I would recommend a redirect/merge to the book, Why We Fight: Moral Clarity and the War on Terrorism or a new merge to William J. Bennett#Political viewpoints. It might be helpful to bring up the issue with its creator, User:Populus. Viriditas ( talk) 04:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry TParis, I didn't intend to spam you (per revision history for this page). Just intended to send an invite for TAFI, in efforts to recruit for the project. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
15:31, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
This is just a heads up that I redacted the word "clearly" in the Men's Right's movement log here. It was brought up in the ANI as the two admins involved had an objection to it as insulting and I didn't recall much opposition by you to their argument about how they perceived the word so I didn't feel it's be controversial to redact it.--v/r - T P 18:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Why have you deleted the page "Tobin Koshy"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobinkoshy ( talk • contribs) 09:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
unfortunately, i do not have IRC access at the moment.
when using the editcount tool from hewiki, we see the count and the diagram, but at the top of the page there is some script error report:
Warning: syntax error, unexpected '=' in Unknown on line 33 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 79 Warning: syntax error, unexpected '=' in Unknown on line 33 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 75 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/project/xtools/public_html/phptemp/PHPtemp.php on line 79
דוד שי - {#tool#} - X!'s tools
peace - קיפודנחש (aka kipod) ( talk) 14:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm saluting to you, soldier! <o How can I fix some bugs in X's tools at tool labs? Is there a repo anywhere (preferrably git/gerrit)? — Wizardist t +c 11:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Sharihareswara (WMF) suggested that I post this error on your talk page. It was affecting me and other users that for whom I was running count queries. The problem seems to be repaired now but perhaps you can use this information in the future. Thanks for your good work!
Warning: mysql_connect(): Can't connect to MySQL server on 'enwiki.labsdb' (110) in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 62 Warning: mysql_select_db() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 63 Warning: mysql_real_escape_string() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 117 Warning: mysql_query() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 83 Warning: mysql_errno() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 85 Warning: mysql_error() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 100 Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 129 Warning: mysql_real_escape_string() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 117 Warning: mysql_query() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 83 Warning: mysql_errno() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 85 Warning: mysql_error() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 100 Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 129 Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /data/project/xtools/public_html/pcount/counter.php on line 119 Warning: mysql_real_escape_string() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 117 Warning: mysql_query() expects parameter 2 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 83 Warning: mysql_errno() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 85 Warning: mysql_error() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/counter_commons/Database.php on line 100 Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /data/project/xtools/public_html/pcount/counter.php on line 198
-
tucoxn\
talk
23:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
You are correct that there was no baiting when you blocked me. There was only Your gross negligence and abuse of admin tools. Joefromrandb ( talk) 20:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
00:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Your unconscionable hubris will be your downfall. With the simple sword of truth will I vanquish ye. Indeed, woe unto ye, for I wax terrible, wielding the blade, ready to smite. LudicrousTripe ( talk) 12:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
|
There is no bacon available, so it will have to be Wikicaffeine instead of "wake up and smell the bacon". Think of this as your last meal, for my wrath descends upon ye even as we speaketh. LudicrousTripe ( talk) 18:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for your comment at the ANI thread I started, I'm glad my clarification helped. Do you think RFC/U would be a better venue, and do you think it would allow me to explain in greater detail why some of these edits are poor? (eg. "edit 1 fabricates a claim that isn't in the source, here's what the source actually says" - "edit 2 engages in original research by bringing in sources that don't relate to the topic"?) – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 19:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)