| ||||
![]() |
Archive 2 |
Archive 3
![]() |
Thanks for replying, yeah, I didn't notice that I'd put 'British' in lower case at the first letter. Thanks for correcting it and replying, I'm going to try and find out what happened to it now. Thanks.
Hi, somehow I ended up here from the ' Intermarriage between British peoples' page which I created, so I guess you must have something to do with its redirection / deletion. Could you tell me what was wrong with it? Was it the quality or is it because you don't agree with the subject? I'd be really grateful for an answer. Thanks Kentynet ( talk) 20:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Greetings...
Hello, This flag once was red, and welcome to Wikipedia!
The website you mention for Jewbuntu states at the top that "This isn't real. There is no Jewbuntu yet, and this site is a great 'what if'." So Jewbuntu is clearly not an existing linux distribution (or if it is, you need a better source). Ubuntu for mixed marriages and Jubuntu appear to be only mentioned on the Jewbuntu site, so these are also invalid additions. The Satanic edition seems ok, and I've readded it. Andareed ( talk) 05:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I was looking at the vandalism on the gen y page and you reverted the last one done. I took a far more radical approach and undid a lot of versions (including your undo), could you cast an eye over it and see if you agree with the changes I made (and whether others need making)? Thanks, BananaFiend ( talk) 09:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Dear Editor, this issue is being dealt in the edit war administrators section. You must notice that Suciindia is only reverting to the agreed versions by reputed editors like User: Soman. It is a puppet of User: Kuntan who was banned from wiki, who is causing trouble. This puppet is also abusive as you may see in the comments that he has made. Please refer to the edit war administrators page for the ongoing discussions. You will notice that most other editors have agreed to the stand of User: Suciindia regarding the issues dealt with. -- Suciindia ( talk) 21:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Since this is your discussion page, what is your personal take on Laughingman78 and his 'vandalism'? Beyond that what got you looking at the Marmion Academy website? I'm interested to hear your perspective. I find the Indian organization your page links to to be interesting, FWIW. DavidMSA ( talk) 07:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry about that. I haven't actually read the graphic novel of V For Vendetta but I have seen the film. I was of the impression that the role of High Chancellor was a combination of monarch and Prime-Minister. I assumed Susan (or Sutler) was the undisputed ruler of all Great Britain and as such an emperor. Oh by the way, I like cats too. -- Jupiter Optimus Maximus ( talk) 14:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Good good. Yes I mean to read the graphic novel. I've read the article on Susan and he seems a much creepier character than Sutler. On an unrelated but geeky note I must say that Sutler seemed quite introverted himself. I got the impression he was very self-centred (then again aren't most dictators). -- Jupiter Optimus Maximus ( talk) 00:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm a Christian syndicalist, and a long-time Wob. (Milw. General Organizing Branch; I.U. 660). -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Why are you calling me a banned user? I'm not. Mastcell is simply claiming this. Smockroker ( talk) 22:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I put V in this category because his face is never seen. Wilson from Home Improvement is in this category because his face is never seen even though he appears in every episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bosco13 ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Sure V for Vendetta is in Category:V for Vendetta, which is in Category:Vertigo titles, which is, of course, in Category:DC Comics titles. I don't have my TPB on-hand, but I don't recall it being published under the Vertigo imprint. Either way, it would be redundant of the self-titled category, even if it was moved up to DC Comics titles. - Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I've already warned Blakeusa, and others have dropped notes, so I've removed your 3rr warning to avoid a pile-on. Thanks for keeping an eye on the article! Acroterion (talk) 02:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know I have replied. ~ Ameliorate U T C @ 09:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Our IP edit warrior at Leo McGarry is back. What should we do about it? I'm leaving a message on his talk page urging him to stop, but can we take steps to protect the page and somehow get strong administrator intervention to make this user stop once and for all? -- Hnsampat ( talk) 11:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my page, Cheers Theterribletwins1111 ( talk) 11:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I fixed something that this user did on Glasgow, I see he (or she) has got a block. It looked to me like just adding images (in good faith). Forgive me I'm new here, but that seems a bit brutal Mcewan ( talk) 22:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Good work on this BTW - I wouldn't know where/how to start. I was surprised at how different things look depending upon the browser used. At work, (MS Explorer), the difference in margin was not so pronounced as on Firefox. I've captured a screen shot on my home PC, (Firefox), FYI. (The flags look as though they are both justified to the left of their respective cells, rather than being centred in each). Hope is of some use - keep up the good work! Regards
Endrick
Shellycoat
20:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Looks like User:He Scores ? and another new one ( User:Willy Blackwood) are sockpuppets of the Nimbley troll. I've blocked them. They have a distinctive tell. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 17:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Can not see the relavance of a supporters forum match report [1] in a reference to an old name for the city, when added into an existing reference (yes the term is used in the web article, but but forums are poor references generaly). if a valid reference it should be a separate one then. It looking like a case of adding a external link to a forum rather than a reference, was my reasoning behind removal. I leave you to review its format/relavance then - BulldozerD11 ( talk) 00:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello there! I hope all is well. I'm sorry that Nimbley struck again, but I commend you for maintaining WP:AGF and WP:BITE all the same.
This is an odd situation we're in. The kid (and he is only a child - 11/12 ish) just will not stop, and he has randomly generated ip addresses, which makes the blocking hard to sustain. Furthermore, I'm not sure there is any official word on how to deal with such an issue, but, from my experience alone, WP:RBI is a good one, and WP:TROLL can be helpful.
I'm reluctant to engage (again) with Nimbley as I've tried it in the past, but he just refuses to co-operate. I believe he may be somewhat congnatively impaired.</political correctness> -- Jza84 | Talk 21:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Dude, I'm the one at fault here? The anon has been blocked three times for edit warring, I have tried everything to gain consensus! I have had to ask for semi-protection again. I don't really see myself as the problem here. Surely I've been more than reasonable? The anon has made editing the article impossible. I should also note that I added an extra source to the MTV movie awards - which was reverted!
If you feel that I'm being unreasonable, then OK, I'll give up on that article and let the anon revert back to a crappy and unsourced article. - Tbsdy lives ( talk) 08:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
ye, but moore states that if the labour government won the elcetions, it would disarm britains nuclear supply, so that is contradictiory. if labour won, the uk would not have a relation to the events in the sotry. Moore later mentioned that the conservatives won, which favoured nuclear weapons. if we leave the statement, we have to mention that the conservatives won in the end. they were the ones who made decisions that made any relavence to what the story was about —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rightandright ( talk • contribs)
What wrong with the image i put in place of the dark one it shows the woman better than just her face and a mic -- 84.13.122.134 ( talk) 19:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
What? Im just asking a simple question ? -- 84.13.122.134 ( talk) 19:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Ok im sorry i just think the other picture is better than the one just now. I Am stopping now. -- 89.240.245.159 ( talk) 19:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Please say what you like but i have thought about it and it HAS GONE TO FAR so i PROMISE YOU IM STOPING. -- 89.240.245.159 ( talk) 19:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
i am not vandalising wikipedia i am simply typing FACT God save the Queen is the nation anthem of the united kingdom and the royal anthem of scotland
The current article doesnt exist so im replacing it with the original page. -- 89.243.104.75 ( talk) 16:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
It states on the X Factor wikiepdia page and his discgraphy page and pepople are saying that the album has sold 260,500 copies in total -- 78.151.74.102 ( talk) 17:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
This barnstar is to recognize your diligence in reverting and reporting all the edits done by indefinitely blocked user Nimbley6. Thank you for all your hard work. Alanraywiki ( talk) 19:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC) |
Hear hear! Thank you for keeping ahead of this. Kevin Forsyth ( talk) 20:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted the image on that article. Was the revert due to your preference to the prior image, or due to what looked like an edit war?
I can help guide the user who added it over to the talk page if needed; but it's not really a case of edit warring. They first tried two times to change the image link, which mangled the format so that no image was showing - that's what I reverted, I had thought they were just playing/testing. They then returned and correctly made the change to a new image - which to me seemed just as good of an image (lower quality, but showing more of the ship - so a trade-off), so I didn't touch it or say anything further. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 20:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
An image change in which you were involved is being discussed at Talk:RMS Queen Mary#Infobox image. Please join the discussion. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 20:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to ask you about this edit. It's great that you can add that kind of thing, I didn't know regular users could do that... Would you mind filling me in a bit on how? Where do you check the IPs for comparison?
Thanks – QuadrivialMind (talk) 23:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Only two editors are butting heads, though. If he was debating the merits of whether to include the link more explicitly within the body of the article itself, I could work with that. Instead he's dismissing it as a continuation of previous debates (that I had no part in), and therefore not even worthy of consideration on its own merits. That's the problem I wanted a third opinion on. Thank you for at least considering my idea, even if you disagree, but I needed another editor to note that debate only works when we listen to each other. What would be a more appropriate venue to ask for help? Westrim ( talk) 01:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Can I tempt you with Wikipedia:Rollback? May make reverting those Nimbleysocks a little bit easier. Let me know if it would help. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Norsefire-flag-comic.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, i noticed you have recently reverted a report i made with the edit summary "rv dispute, not vandalism", if you read here carefully and thoroughly it is clear to me they are playing fun&games. They are saying things such as "you are DodgeChris", i suggest they be blocked for 24 hours or so to teach them a lesson, i suggest first though you ask them yourself what they mean, this may also be helpful. 86.143.121.28 ( talk) 19:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the advice. I had a follow-up question at Talk:Jasenovac_i_Gradiška_Stara#Follow_up_question_re:_sources. Any opinion? -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I warned Lee setters ( talk · contribs) for a possible 3RR violation. You're also in danger of violating it as it's not strictly vandalism. I do have some sympathy though because he's obviously trying to force his own PoV without discussion. Let ne handle any more reverts. -- GraemeL (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
well i wish you would stop reverting my edits. if you clicked on the link i provided you will see that God save the Queen is the royal anthem of the United kingdom which includes Scotland. I am going to change it back and hopefully you wont delete it this time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee setters ( talk • contribs) 20:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Just to but in a bit here, it is true that the block was in the interest of fairness, hence the reduction, from my point of view it did appear to be simply a content dispute, if its the case that I misread the situation and it was vandalism, then I am really really sorry. Having said that, please do not let it put you off any future vandal reverting, in fact i believe GraemeL's advice is excellently put-- Jac16888 ( talk) 22:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up. StaticGull and I spent some time reverting that IP this morning...I figured he was probably a sock puppet as I have run into the same edits from similar IPs before, but it's good to know that he's a known sock puppet and can be reverted on sight. Cheers, — Politizer talk/ contribs 19:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Barack Obama, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Downzero ( talk) 11:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
You might want to check out User:United Kingdom & Northern Ireland. He shares a few similarities with Cyrusmileyhannana (another sock you blocked), including copy/pasting the UK article to his userpage (similar to CMH's posting of the Scotland article) and editing CMH's userpage (an odd thing for a new user to immediately jump to). Ironholds ( talk) 14:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
To me, one of the key differences is that you've got the articles in a sandbox page. While a sandbox doesn't give carte blanche, it's there for being a testbed, to try stuff without messing up a live page. At various times, I've had exit lists on my sandbox page. If all else fails, put an edit summary of "copied the content of (article name) to test new (section)", and it's sufficiently attributed.
By contrast, User:United Kingdom & Northern Ireland was putting the content on his user page. Compound that with the username mirroring the name of the article, and I felt the content was inappropriate to be there. On reflection, the GFDL violation was probably trivial, since it's pretty clear where the content came from and how to check the contribution history there. It just made a stronger policy-based justification for deletion than it being confusing. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Different Beat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat. Thank you. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Dancing To A Different Beat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing To A Different Beat. Thank you. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
The result of each was speedy-delete:Vandalism/bad-faith contribution, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing To A Different Beat. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 19:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Would you have a look at User:Ricky_Oliver. Disruptive pattern on Northern Ireland and a user page that looks just like Spainton with similar interests. -- Snowded TALK 18:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Another one I think User: Closeupon recently created, scottish singers, deleted admin change on previous socks? Enjoy Bristol by the way - on holiday? -- Snowded TALK 07:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Let´s just walk through a simple scenerio shall we? John or Mary doe of 13 years of age are doing a school report on an idea that came from their discovery that by placing "kinks" in their garden hose they can make water shoot out much faster. They go to wikipedia since their parents allow that content as its "ok" an ecylocpedia. They enter the words "kink" and arrive at the kink.com wikipedia. Then as the page was before they are invited to a whole different subject than kinks in hoses and make a click on "ana cruzes" link and arrive at a explicit porn page with the title "Im the bitch that your mother warned you about...", well you know with nice pornographic pictures that show and tell all. His/her father happens to be a badass attorney and is quite offended when john/jane doe shows what they discovered in wikipedia. So under many laws, not withstanding, the "Communications deceny act" or the "contemporary community standards" laws or "corruption of a minor", a case is launched agaisnt wikipedia and its editors. Turns out since the editors have the ability to "speak for wikipedia" by approving or disapproving changes etc to content that they themselves not only represent wikipedia but also are not free from personal liability in this matter end up forking the bill for a 100 million plus lawsuit. It seems there is a strange US law that states that all "indecent" material as porno that is hosted on the web on US servers, has to have a simple warning on the home page that the person who is about to visit this site must be over 18 years of age.. etc.. Strange but I didnt see that in any of the 100 plus porn star wikipedias. So the 6 million dollars that wikipedia is trying to raise may not be enough to withstand the lawsuits that will come from the open and blatant access to porn to minors which the wiki "porno portal" path is embarking. All the cute and bold phrases that "wiki doesnt censors" and "they are notable" probable wont mean a whole lot when this "porno portal" of wikipedia ends up exposing wikipedia and its editors to all kinds of civil (oh and criminal) liability from the jane and john does that unfortunately end up on porn pages by doing simple research projects etc.. Dont forget that wikiporn, like any other porn will run agaisnt really ugly laws in the US and about 50 other countries world wide who really dont jive on minors having access to graphic porn. Good luck. [User:webman1000|webman1000]] ( talk) 18:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)<sig>webman1000</sig>
There's no more drama on that article's talkpage, 'cause I no longer post there. GoodDay ( talk) 20:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. The best thing to do is to file it under the case of the suspected puppeteer, in this case ikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nimbley6. However, I left a note for a clerk to merge them, so hopefully it will be taken care of soon. Thanks. -- Avi ( talk) 16:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Haha, yeah, I'm in pretty much the same boat...I don't care too much either way and I don't even really understand the political stuff surrounding this, but I've just gotten the impression that we should revert any of these trolling edits. I also thought this might be Nimbley6, but I figured I should AGF it for now (mainly because in my other run-ins with Nimbley6 I don't remember him/her using edit summaries at all) and if this user starts again then maybe I can get a little more stern. — Politizer talk/ contribs 17:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
I've given it another tweek to clarify it a little better. What do you think? Titch Tucker ( talk) 20:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed that you removed the link to the When You Believe article, because it's not the same song. Well, I did some Googling and discovered it's actually a cover of that song. And the When You Believe article does have a section regarding the cover, so I think it's fair to link to the article, but more specifically to that section (which is something I did recently, if you'll look through the history). I wanted to explain why it was linked though, as I had the same question myself, and the IP editor who keeps putting it in, hasn't really explained most of their edits, nor do they use edit commentary, so I know it's confusing to try to figure out what they're doing. Have a good day! Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 17:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Another question. What shall we do about the repeated "sales" numbers that keep being placed into the article? My tendency has been to remove them, since they're not cited, and I can find no record of them as being verified. However, the IP editor keeps putting them back in (surprise, surprise). Should we just leave them in with fact tags? Even though they've been there before, and no effort was made to cite them, so I don't have much hope that citations will appear anytime soon. (I don't want to edit war, this is getting quite ridiculous.) (Feel free to reply here, I'll put your page on my watchlist.) 20:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC) (Forgot to sign, oops, this was me, just FYI, though you seem to have figured that out. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 22:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC))
You marked him as a suspected sockpuppet of a banned user. According to his contribution history, he also made an edit to Template:Michelle McManus which I reverted for unrelated reasons. The alleged puppetmaster was known for editing articles related to Ms. McManus under alleged sockpuppets. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 22:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for resuming my contribution on Freddie Mercury article. It seems there are articles where any non-adoring edit is a devastation, who cares if supported by references: up to now, because of that edit, I've been pointed as vandal, POV editor and other. More, that kind of lists are commonly reported in music articles....
have a good work.
-- Blues1911 PostOfficeBox 18:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Michelle McManus discography, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle McManus discography. Thank you. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, May i just point out to you that Michelle's album sold 300,000 copies there fore having a Platinum certification according to this site [3]. Also Leon's Album has a Gold Certification according to the very same sight and has sold 142,200 copies in the United Kingdom according to Music Week. Thanks -- Lastbroken ( talk) 17:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm not certain. I'd suggest asking on WT:SPI. -- Avi ( talk) 18:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
The draw allocation for the first semi-final and second semi-final just occurred, I just forgot to label the tables, no worries. Evilperson 20 ( talk) 12:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Could you explain this edit? The categories removed (that you replaced) are redundant as noted in the edit summary. "Scottish singers" is a parent-cat of "Scottish pop singers", for example.
Cheers, This flag once was red propaganda deeds 16:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
You call my Neil Armstrong edits vandalism? I'm just expressing my opinion you jerk off. And it's only on the discussions page. Why is that ever vandalism? Just because some one doesn't buy into this disgusting Apollo hoax and take these stupid retards' word for it that this thing actually happened they are vandals now and everything they write has to be deleted at once? That's real democratic, free-thinking, open-minded and really in line with the ideals America, land of the free and home of the brave allegedly stand on. Good luck with that. -- 124.182.249.199 ( talk) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
hello! "This flag once was red" (sorry for my english) can you read the blog "wikipedia"at the myspace official of amy? she has some problems with this article .she want some help! http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=13406488&blogID=469200727 thanks lecybersurfeur —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lecybersurfeur ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Where is the right place to request a cross-wiki sockpuppet investigation? I suspect English Wikipedia editors en:User:78.150.249.189/ t/ c and en:User:78.144.226.100/ t/ c are IP sockpuppets of banned english Wikipedia editor en:User:Nimbley6/ t/ c/ socks/ maybe. I also suspect he is brand-new commons user commons:user:Ificouldlistentoyou/ t/ c.
Reasons for thinking these are the same people:
It is possible this is more than one person, and that each of the two IP addresses is independently connected with Ificouldlistentoyou somehow. If that is the case, it would exonerate 78.144.226.100 as the banned user nimbley6, however, it would mean we have two disruptive editors, nimbley6 and 86.144.136.133, not just one.
Edits related to previous Nimbly6-sock en-frequented articles:
Edits related to 86.144.136.133/
en talk/
en contribs, another disruptive editor from the same country as Nimbly6:
Other edits with no ties I can see to Nimbly6 or 86.144.136.133:
Edits I have not investigated:
davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 03:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I have been impressed by your intelligent and polite comments re. Neil Armstrong being "the first person to set foot on the moon." I see, similarly, 1 -2 people have kept up a relentless reversal on the astronaut Stuart Roosa page, saying he was one of only 24 men to go to the moon, when it fact (just as with Armstrong) it is more accurate to say one of 24 people in this instance. Would you be willing to keep an eye on this page so that this person / these people don't keep undoing good work - especially as they never give an explanation? Thank you. SpaceHistory101 ( talk) 22:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
"May year August self please stop with the week puns?!"
I humbly defer to the honorable gentleperson from the once red flag. :-D (I just had to comment there though, I saw "forced march", and instinctively cringed, remembering the 15-miler back in BCT. My feet ached for three days afterwards...) Edit Centric ( talk) 10:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
You might want to look at edits by First Of All ( talk · contribs)/blocked Nimbley6 sock, 92.4.71.142 ( talk · contribs), 86.3.234.246 ( talk · contribs), 81.104.128.143 ( talk · contribs) on Scottish-related articles. Some may need reverting. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 00:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi I must have been writing my edit summary while you were removing some of the "porn"s. My revert also fixed a misleading redirect. Thanks! Verbal chat 13:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Annie Lennox. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
RolandR (
talk)
17:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
WHAT ARE YOU SEARCHING FOR EXACTLY, I SAY THAT BECAUSE YOU ARE BLOCKING A NEW USER WITHOUT REASON. THERE IS NO REASON AND YOU GOTTA STOP THIS CIRCUS FAST. YOU HEAR ? MarshVeld ( talk) 19:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me, amically. MarshVeld ( talk) 19:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey there, please in any form, Im needing your help, I edited recently the Northern Ireland article without errors or something wrong and it was reverted by a bad user, I need your intervention about thats all my edits are only "organizing images" so there is no reason to REVERT. I need you and Thanks. MarshVeld ( talk) 20:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Amy Macdonald (singer) is on my watchlist, since it seems to be a target for unencyclopedic changes. So I was interested in the reason for your reverts of the "See also" material: "rv How is a list of countries relevant? Even links piped so as to masquerade as something relevant is still not relevant." I looked at the links and immediately agreed with you. But this brings up another question. Would those links be any more important to the article if there actually were dediciated Wiki articles: "List of people who have reached Number one in Denmark" "List of people who have reached Number one in..."? These types of lists seem to be perpetually misused, and often so incomplete as to be misleading -- and yet if complete, might well have thousands of names. What difference, exactly, does it make (except to marketing managers) if a singer has reached "Number One" in the Cayman Islands for two days? Thoughts? Piano non troppo ( talk) 01:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Apologies. I wasn't trying to vandalise the article; only adding info based on what I found on a celebrity fan forum. -- Litherlandsand ( talk) 11:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey - thanks for pointing to this WP topic. I'd never heard of it, but that's what I've been trying to say in the foie gras article about "exotic". Bob98133 ( talk) 19:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
So, User:GreyPoint, what do you reckon? Another one? Canterbury Tail talk 18:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Home-Made Barnstar | |
For your great work in dealing with Nimbley6 and his force of sockpuppets. Acalamari 21:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC) |
A few tablespoon worth of the narcotic, in a diluted solution = You give a few table spoon of carfentanil, prepared as a diluted solution.
A few tablespoons of a diluted solution of the narcotic = You give a few tablespoon of a diluted solution of carfentanil, containing an unspecified amount of carfentanil.
The dosage of carfentanil for that purpose would be a sub-milligram quantity!
(If you think both sentences have the same meaning, I may respectfully ask, where you studied, and what.) 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 17:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I would prefer, if the admins were a little less cocky with retired academics. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 17:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
As an executive I would fire you for such kind of executive summaries. Executives are normally not complete idiots, and don't want to hear cocky half-sentences as a summary. Trust me. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 20:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Interesting:
You try to bracket the sentence ...tablespoon's worth of the narcotic in a solution in a RIGHT ASSOCIATIVE WAY?
-That means you parse that BOTTOM UP reducing from the right side on the longest match? -You are not greedy? -Are you a Floyd production parser?
AND
You have difficulties to decode an IMPLIED SUBJUNCTIVE FORM? As an executive I would...
are you a native speaker of Hebrew/other semitic language (or MAYBE less likely Russian) or a robot? (see above)
Of course we have different opinions about honesty. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 03:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
No trolling. But I really saw that you bracketed right-to-left. And you missed the implied subjunctive form. That could mean that you are native speaker of a language which builds associativity in a different way than English and has the kind of ambiguity you mentioned in the Carfentanil exchange. And it could mean you are a native speaker of a language which builds subjunctive forms in a different way than English does. My first guess after looking it up was Hebrew or Russian.
Or it could mean that you are a sophisticated bot or use a translation tool which has difficulties. (English is a foreign language to me too) I described what kind of parser would arrive at the same misunderstandings we had.
You guys are simply overexcited about vandals and trolls. My favorite hobby is learning about linguistic and machine parsing. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 11:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
For a translation tool with difficulties your answers are too well-formed. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 12:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
For somebody with such a semantic deficit too. Besides: My favorite story is "Alice in Wonderland" by Lewis Caroll. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 12:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
What it has to do with each other are the cards 70.137.182.228 ( talk) 09:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
40 lashes ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Joe Taliban ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
You might want to put back you ANI post, as this character keeps coming back. The most recent was Joe Taliban. Maybe with enough of this nonsense going on, they can do a "hard block" or whatever, and pre-empt the next new one(s). Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 11:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
...for coming to my defense. I've mentioned that guy Parappa664 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on WP:ANI. He seems mighty familiar with wikipedia for a newbie. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Since you helped out with the third opinion at Talk:Jasenovac_i_Gradiška_Stara#Lyrics back in November, I'm wondering if you had any opinion on the article as written. As I noted before, an internet news tabloid for the Croatian version and a site with a clear bias for the translation are not the ideal sources (and frankly the attitude of the IP address indicates someone who's been here before). -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 21:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism from this IP, but there's little point leaving a message about it on an IP talk page that is used by, I believe, around 4000 students using the University of Nottingham's SNS service. The person who actually did it is not going to get the message, and I did instead. Thanks.-- 128.243.253.111 ( talk) 00:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
That's the second time today that one of Liebman's socks has come after me. The price of glory. Thanks for reverting. I turned him over to AIV, as usual. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 19:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
link BGC ( talk) 12:27, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, i see. Fair enough. I've been away and only scanned over the history, so you make a good point. It's actually a good idea, i've got a couple of discogs i'm watching and geez they're terrible, the amount of fake chart peaks that are added, it's disgraceful. Thanks for the message. k-i-a-c ( hitmeup - the past) 12:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
I just redirected the page. There is no need for a discussion because there are no sources supporting it (that i know of) and it is obvious that the other name is the official name. The page was already moved, so the history was saved. This seems like a desperate attempt by an ip to make the page under the name he wants. Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 17:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
hi , how do? im new to wikipedia and not really sure how this site works. im trying to improve sandi thoms page, my efforts have so far been thwarted. the page as it stands is a hateful, negative, slanderous, out of date and untrue smear campaign.
i wish to represent her in a true and fair light. i am leaving edit summaries as i go, making minor changes here n there and major changes also. i wish to remove a lot of text that is already there, it is wholly negative and one sided and not at all a balanced objective, neutral perspective of this artist. there is a lot of cited and referenced material there, but it is all negative press, it has been very well researched in an effort to tarnish this person.
if wiki truly is supposed to be neutral and objective, please look at the page as it stands and then my improvements before deleting them.
can i ask you, do you work for wikipedia? is the sandi thom page on your watch list and thats why you were alerted to my changes ? as i say, im a brand new user and some user tips would be appreciated.
please dont delete my work, if you have reservations about the rules of the game and weher i am breaking them or not, please consult me first.
many thanks
Daschund ( talk) 11:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello again. Ive tried to re-word a lot of the sections that Daschund has taken pains to say is lies and slander even with verification. id be grateful if you could give it a once over just to confirm neutrallity. Skinnylizzy ( talk) 19:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm so proud of myself taking it on the chin, not like me at all! (quietely curses) Jack forbes ( talk) 22:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
...for your support and kind words. RfA. "Request for Arrows". And I got quite a few points, from the sincere Opposers, and will work on doing better. I understand the "u" in colour, favour, etc. What I don't get is why "forecastle", which I kind of like the sound of as a fully-pronounced word, comes out "folks'll". Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 02:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Admin, please check the SUCI page that you once commented on. I found your comments on it. There is a sockpuppet of User:Kuntan who is active again and is mutilating the pages. Please intervene. I am new one, so I am yet to find my ways around. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 14:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Can you help me do that. Here are the suspected sockpuppets Sockpuppet of User: Kuntan, Anonymous User with IP address 59.91.253.113, 59.91.253.110, 59.91.254.63, 59.91.254.38, 59.91.253.112, 59.91.253.70, 59.91.253.225, 59.91.254.94, 59.91.254.8. He was silent for some months now and again sprang up suddenly. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 15:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Editor, I am not removing anything from his edits. I am just moving them to another place where critisims can be placed. And all the more an analysis about a party is not an party ideology. He dragged me into this any ways. I have posted a request as you suggested. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 16:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I will refrain from this...-- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 17:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
SUCI is a cult and and extreme fringe group. The article has been the site of group account edits and nasty show of herd consciousness by the cult members. It resulted in the banning of all those accounts. You should be aware of this. Please don't waste your efforts on sub-human ideological cults. Don't take my words for it. Just Google and read the newspaper reports appearing in reliable papers. 59.91.253.27 ( talk) 17:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
It is strange that this man is trying to call a party as a fringe group. At least he should know that they were the ones behind movements such as Nandigram (through which I know them), Singur and several such movements that happened in south India including Vizhinjam port movement, Chengara struggle and Moolampally movement; to name a few. At least it has more supporters that several other parties in India. User: Soman tried to convience this person, but he was also abusive at him. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 17:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
This world is not perfect, so you should archive soon. --♪♫ The New Mikemoral talk contribs 23:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. Canderson7 ( talk) 00:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! Remember me? You participated in the discussion last time around and I thought you might want to pitch in. I've rewritten the article at User:Abd/TurnKey Linux and added reliable sources (the non-english sources are in the talk page). I also opened a RfC but so far no one has commented. Could you take a look and give me some feedback? Thanks! LirazSiri ( talk) 08:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm confused. I flagged Club Mahindra Holidays for CSD using twinkle. My contributions show that twinkle put the warning template on the creating users talk User_talk:IndianCorporates. It's still on there. I hadn't contributed to your talk until I tried to apologise. Err. Any ideas? -- Chzz ► 16:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
(Of course, if I have done anythhing wrong, then I'm very sorry)
OK, that makes sense now! Phew. Thanks;
Yes, speedy was declined. I would normally now submit if for AfD, as I do think it's pure promotional stuff. The admin declined because it has references, but if you look at the refs, they're not great. Weak sources, passing mentions, that sort of thing. However, if you intend to try and fix it up a bit, I'm quite happy to leave that for a while and see if it can improve - if I have a bit of time, I'll even try and improve it myself. So, I'll make a little note of it, and I will probably review it in a week or two. Fair enough? Thanks again, -- Chzz ► 16:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I think I have become a hate figure for from Ayn Rand supported in the US - thanks for clearing up the latest bit of vandalism -- Snowded ( talk) 18:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Hiya,
I agree wit you totally that the phorm article shoudl not be taking sides, but i just feel that the additions was taking sides yes, but the acutally conent when edited would not be taking sides as it merely say a flaw of the system that phorm wish to use. If you feel that it should still be remove since you kindly explained to me why you remove it i wont change it back as i agree with you on the point of the article not taking sides, but i did try to edit it to be more neutral.-- Andrewcrawford ( talk) 15:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello again. I wonder if you could add the footnote to the infobox concerning the limited powers of the PM and Queen as voted for in the straw poll. I hope you don't think I'm being cheeky here, but I do think you did a good job when giving examples of possible footnotes earlier. Cheers! Jack forbes ( talk) 15:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, much appreciated erm, what do I call you? This flag? once was red? Or do you prefer the more formal This flag once was red? I don't want to get it wrong. ;) Jack forbes ( talk) 15:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
TFOWR it is then. And thanks. Jack forbes ( talk) 16:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Two things, I completely agree with the fact that this should not be cited to Bosnian as my lyrics website (not blog, as it happens to appear as) does not state that it is in fact Bosnian. I am trying to get this verified by Regina as I write for esctime.com also and we will resolve this issue as soon as possible. For now, put the language as Serbian, cited to Diggiloo Thrush. Please reply on my page. ńăŧħăń - ŧăłķ 20:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
No need to apologize for "spam." Thank you for taking and interest in this article. From my brief encounters with it, it seems to be something of a battleground between folks with very strong opinions about the company both ways. It's always a good idea for steady hands to help right the ship. Sadly, concerning the notability of the article or what should be added to bring the article up in quality, I can't really offer an informed opinion. I have no knowledge of the subject matter. My only involvement was to remove obviously POV statements. From a cursory reading, however, it does seem much improved with regards to sourcing. The company does seem to be large/notable enough to merit inclusion on Wiki. My vote, if it came to it, would be to keep it. If I had to be nitpicky, some of the language in the "New Business Ventures" section does seem like it might have been taken from company literature. Overall, though, the article seems to be moving in the right direction. Monkey Bounce ( talk) 10:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Please see the talk page on Kate Nash. The references that have been put in place are generic artist entries, where the info is based on other articles. These incorrect birth details have been removed from Wikipedia numerous times, but have been copied onto other sites which take their info from Wikipedia and aren't updated.
92.11.165.113 ( talk) 16:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem. Wikipedia seems to be a hot bed for people targetting articles on people with Irish backgrounds and putting false Irish places of birth on them - which isn't exactly helpful. I have no doubt it will be changed back, using the same generic artist profile as a reference.
92.11.165.113 ( talk) 16:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
...for reverting and turning in the latest pair of Liebman socks. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 23:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I would be happy to discuss the case with you. The first MS case had two different accusations. One on tying of WMP with the Windows OS and the other on levering of dominance from the OS market to the WGSOS market. The document I linked to in the main thread is an early draft of my LLM Dissertation ( http://croesy.web.nowhere-else.org/web/Dissertation.pdf ). I can't find the final version, I will hunt about. To be honest I didn't look at the tying accusation on WMP in the dissertation. From a competition law perspective it is not interesting/controversial. I believe a similar logic will be used by the Commission/ECJ in the new investigation into Internet Explorer. I find the accusation of levering of dominance between markets much more interesting and the response of the Commission to the abuse fascinating! The remedy of the Commission made no sense legally or economically, and yet the Court of First Instance pretty much rubber-stamped it. Anyway I more than willing to discuss anything else about the case and the potential Internet Explorer case. Lwxrm ( talk) 18:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 01:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
All I will say is that it should present facts supported by credible references. Anything less than that does not belong on the Wikipedia. Timeshare as a concept has attracted flak from all quarters. Perhaps, it is due to the wrongs done by a few companies who fleeced the public and vanished with the loot. However, you ought to be mindful of the fact that if you have chosen to put the company information on Wikipedia, users are going to edit it and anything, criticism or praise, backed by references deserves to be displayed on the page. This is the nature of Wikipedia, and perhaps this what makes it so unique.
Caccophonix ( talk) 17:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I think you are unduly worried about the page. Wikipedia is a community of wise people. Let the community take over from here. As of now, the page is there but if the community decided to delete the page, then so be it. You have done your bit and one person can do only so much. effort.
Caccophonix ( talk) 18:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words.
Caccophonix ( talk) 16:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
On calm reflection I agree this was jarring in the context of the article. I've left it alone. However, you may wish to consider that in the context of the BoE's long history it was a "relevant" event. Particularly when you combine it with unprecedented Weimar Republic levels of "quantitative easing". Something is up. I humbly suggest that every single day has been "historic" for the Old Lady in her 315th year. She's beginning to show her age. Who knows, she may be showing signs of brain cancer :-) - CrisisFeedsLeviathan ( talk) 08:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
You seem to have a user thingy in a different colour. How do you do that? Please reply on my talk page. Other question: Do you know the instrument in the background that is played all the way through on Love Sex Magic? Please reply on this one on my talk page too. Thanks. Andrew R ( talk) 10:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
One more question: Are you allowed to use one or more accounts unabusively? Just wondering, as I need to ½ disguise my tracks from one particular vandal who believes I wrote about them. Andrew R ( talk) 10:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, what I meant was your signiture. Andrew R ( talk) 10:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Question 2: Have you ever been RFA'D? I would be happy to nominate you. [[Andrew RACK]] ( talk) 17:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I think my edit summary explains it all. If we are going to include a sentence in the article that says the video has received more than X number of views and more than X number of comments, it should be ok for an editor to update it to include more accurate information. If we don't want to keep these running tallies going, the sentence should be removed altogether. Howver, I personally don't want the sentence removed, because that information is interesting. 98.220.43.195 ( talk) 17:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Are you editing an encyclopedia or helping vested interests add random tidbits? 117.204.80.233 ( talk) 17:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I have no objection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.204.80.233 ( talk) 17:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
It is apparent that this User:117.204.80.233 is a puppet of User:Kuntan. Please see the discussion between me and User:Abd in my talk page. All the text that he removed are cited with third party material (news paper clips) as I see it. So he has no reason to remove. It is certainly vandalism -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 18:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Did you notice that this User:Kuntan has come up with a new user name; the name of the Kerala State Secretary of [[SUCI].-- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 11:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Just to clarify. The main youtube video(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lp0IWv8QZY) is over 30 million(currently 33 million). Total for all online videos of her performance ( http://www.viralvideochart.com/dailymotion/susan_boyle_on_britain_got_talent?id=x8ymn0) is currently 70 million. The Washington Post gave us some figures yesterday. SunCreator ( talk) 10:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi.
To be honest I didn't give it much thought, just seemed to roll off the keyboard and didn't strike me as being peculiar or odd - perhaps it should... Just looked at Gender-specific_pronoun#Ships_and_countries - perhaps I'm just being old-fashioned. By all means revert to "it" if you wish. Regards Endrick Shellycoat 10:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
It is long since we talked. If you aren't the stuff the suci boy is made of just hear me for once. Check the course that article on that minuscule party underwent on pedia. See what those ideology-blinded accounts tried to throw in and what I attempted to weed out. Do you believe in NPOV or in red flag? 59.91.254.32 ( talk) 17:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.91.254.32 ( talk) 17:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Would be thankful if you could provide me information about tagging an article. Where can I find the list of tags that are used while editing an article?
Caccophonix ( talk) 17:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Got It.
Caccophonix ( talk) 18:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
At 7th Studio Album, I have opened a vote on the discussion page, regarding whether the article should be kept and deleted. I encourage you to make a vote and state your reasons. -- Sky Attacker ( talk) 00:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you man :) 85.197.21.80 ( talk) 16:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Mind if I copy your I-don't-speak-Polish user box? During my half-year in Warsaw, my favorite Polish phrase was, Czy mówisz po angielsku? (Do you speak English?)
I'm curious how you managed to edit an article on Polish Wikipedia.
Sca ( talk) 15:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Re this. Yep, I recall watching that live myself. Whilst I'm not a reliable source, I'm sure someone has published that transcript or quoted it somewhere. Cheers, Nja 247 10:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Whoa, hold on there cowboy! The only edit I've made to 2009 Christmas specials (Doctor Who) is this one, in which I reinstated an HTML comment removed by an IP. Ironically, the HTML comment reads "Please don't add companions without a reliable source" ;-)
Cheers, This flag once was red propaganda deeds 12:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
for fixing that List of YouTube celebrities table i tried but i could not figure it out. Cheers Kyle1278 19:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I agree with you whole-heartedly that the red-link was extremely confusing. I was just getting ready to mark it with the "under discussion" template, when I saw your edit. I don't know how the original editor will react, however. Stay tuned! -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 22:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Be RFA'D yet? I am a changed person since last month and would like to also apologise to every editor I have upset. A bloke called Andrew Convos My Messies 08:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey there,
Sorry to bother you, but I am still not sure if this is appropriate since you usually get "This is not an article and so does not come under our jurisdiction", kinda thing. Sometimes I just go soddit and think well at least that gets someone's attention who is usually quick to grumble help. Like, since both seem to have equal weight the only argument really seems to be which of them goes.
SimonTrew (
talk)
13:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
You suck! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.213.180 ( talk) 15:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
You should listen to me because I'm Barack Obama —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.213.180 ( talk) 20:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Not sure why you haven't joined already! Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 16:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Let's mark it resolved and just keep an eye on it for a couple. I have both users contribs open on tabs to keep an eye on them and they look like they are behaving. If they get out of line, they can always post back to the ANI post even after it is resolved....so let's mark it resolved. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 13:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps you can help. I an having ALOT of trouble with him adding copyrighted information, under OTRS ticket #2008091610055854, to List of television stations in North America by media market. He has threatened many times to continue. I have emailed User:Swatjester who has seen the OTRS ticket inside and out and has blocked Theaveng previously and now with his misuse of templates and edit-warring Compact fluorescent lamp is there something you can do to stop him...at least for a couple hours? Thanks... NeutralHomer • Talk • 15:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the accident deletion, I re-added it. Also, think about creating pages beginning with User:This flag once was read/ and copy & paste each months messages into your recently made archive. I'm sure you already know how to do this!
Thanks,
I Seek To Help & Repair! (
talk)
00:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
When I went on your page I was like... WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! Happy Archiving! :)
I Seek To Help & Repair! (
talk)
00:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, I will take care of those notices ! Wow Scotland ! ( talk) 13:12, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I've posted a question for you about the SPI case for Nimbley6. Could you respond when you have the chance? Thanks. Icestorm815 • Talk 22:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I sometimes go through my contributions to see the status of my edits, and I just noticed that you reverted someone who reverted me on Leo McGarry. With the thousands of Mc sort keys I've been changing to Mac, I'm actually surprised at how infrequently I've been reverted, in spite of my explanatory edit summary. Anyways, I just wanted to say thanks. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 09:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi flag!
I thought i should let you know that i copied over a comment you made on this AFD to a relevant SSP case as evidence supplied by other users. It was a perceptive comment indicating that the user is indeed a likely vandal. I hope you won't mind that i did not ask in advantage for permission for this copyover.
With kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
"Wow Scotland !" has been blocked of a sockpuppet of Historian19. The edits look quite difficult to revert due to the amount of edits since, would you like to revert anything back that is problematic? Thank you. O Fenian ( talk) 20:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for offering its very kind of you, when you put a signature in does that take over from your username when you type a comment? Willski72 ( talk) 08:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
for all your spontaneous help and for the help you have given others looking at your talkpage! Willski72 ( talk) 13:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
To elaborate, for helping a lost user in the barren wilderness of Wikipedia, i was torn between this one and the humour one (for your quips etc!). Plus of course all the help you appear to have given others! Willski72 ( talk) 13:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
You deserve it! Willski72 ( talk) 13:59, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. I Seek To Help & Repair! ( talk) 05:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I see you prodded this, but that's a speedy deletion candidate ( WP:CSD#G8). Please respond on my talk page if you have any objection to the speedy deletion. - Dank ( push to talk) 16:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
so what do i have to do to keep my article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vh1-fac ( talk • contribs) 19:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your recent edit to the article, please keep in mind that the {{Rating}} template is only to used for reviews that actually use star ratings. Please see Template:Rating and WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews for further information. just64helpin ( talk) 12:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my
"RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (
Ceoil,
Noroton and
Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read
Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. ~~~~~ |
![]() |
Yes, I saw you around recently and was remembering our work together, I should not be talking to the IP really as he is a block evading sock User:HarveyCarter who used to come a lot disrupting Brown and saying he was autistic, but I can't be bothered with tagging him today, good to see you. Off2riorob ( talk) 19:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Just wanted to tell you that User:Ariana310 has also summarized his points at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ahmed_shahi. Tajik ( talk) 19:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Protection is a good thing. If you get any more disruption from unconfirmed accounts we can protect your user pages. Off2riorob ( talk) 22:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I can tie it to Opal, because it is almost certainly Special:Contributions/89.240.131.49. Anything you can show me to tie it tighter to Nimbley6? There has to be more than one Wikipedia editor using Opal.— Kww( talk) 23:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Brown-do you think we should get it fully protected? Off2riorob ( talk) 16:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/gordon-brown-resigns-skys-adam-boulton-loses-it-with-alistair-campbell totally amusing. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
He totally lost it didn't he. I agree the Tories had only one good option and that ws a majority and now the situation is sinking in. (its exciting and amusing to watch them all scheming) Good morning. The alt text was removed without explanation in an edit by pointer, I just replaced what I could find. I think we added it for the GAR. Some people don't like it but I think for removal at least a discussin is in order. Off2riorob ( talk) 13:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
I seem to be getting into trouble since you've returned, so I'll blame it all on you. Joking aside - I'm about to get in an edit war I don't want. Am trying to explain to an editor that material copied verbatim requires quotation marks, and that material cited to a source must be in the source. Fancy having a look over my shoulder? The article is Quicksilver and the issue is (somewhat) explained on the close paraphrasing and source verification threads of the talkpage. Won't be worried if you don't want to get into it. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 ( talk) 19:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I tried Wikipedia:Third opinion. Joe Chill ( talk) 19:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Ever considered requesting adminship? Feel free to tell me to bugger off if you're not interested ;). Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
That Brown has quit, according to sources . looks like he will be off to see the queen soon. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Report is from the standard http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23832558-david-cameron-its-decision-time-for-lib-dems.do , Yes your right it needs to wait until the actual moment. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
(set to resign) tonight. It is going to happen, expect Brown to make an announcement around 6 00. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Good luck, I have to go off line in twenty minutes and will not be back till 21 00. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry mate - I was trying to undo someone who had jumped the gun, but accidentally undid a different version instead. I should have been more careful. -- Dizzy hiss ( talk) 19:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
David_Cameron. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Melonite
19:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
No you haven't but thanks for reasoning. Pointer1 ( talk) 23:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Once does not equal "several". Reversion does not equal explanation! Pointer1 ( talk) 23:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Cheers! — e. ripley\ talk 17:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Strange description? "Head and shoulders of a smiling man in a suit and striped tie with dark, greying hair and rounded face with square jaw" ... they don't like that alt text do they, hehe. Off2riorob ( talk) 15:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
[5] were you aware that it was impossible to edit the English Wikipedia from Ireland? I certainly was not.. O Fenian ( talk) 18:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
No worries - I've access to a good library system so check references when it looks like numbers are fudged (Offline references are easily misquoted). I stuck some journal refs on the talk page of the article (unlinked as my access system is in the url by default, so my links wouldnt work for anyone but me.). To support my position anyway, I found this one online, [ [6]] which has the author of the disputed reference quoting at least 50,000 deaths. Not 3 million. Good work on leading the discussion - I'm a scientist, so get impatient when people push unsupported views. Cheers Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 16:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Dear Sir/Madam/Kittycat:
Sincerely, -- WaltCip ( talk) 21:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I wasn't hinting. I don't mind the light green, but the garish green is ugly. Didn't even realize you had green, but the red is nice. Truthkeeper88 ( talk) 19:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
To whom it may concern
I'd like to apologise for that immature edit about user EOGUY, however I do have a complaint; if you are monitoring misconduct by users of wikipedia and flagging their edits; then why was user EOGUY allowed to edit the page of Abdur Razzaq (politician) and subsequently tarnish the name of an honourable individual. He edited that page and changed the contents from its factual write up to personal opinion and a lot of us have found it offensive to find out that he discredited a respected individual in that fashion.
I have edited the contents as best I could and can also back it up with documentary evidence for everything that I have written. I would also appreciate it if the same warning that was sent to me is sent to user EOGUY.
Sincerely,
Fahim Razzaq —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahim.razzaq ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, am new to wiki so ya could use the help. Thanks again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahim.razzaq ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea what people are talking about. About all I ever do is correct misspelled words.
EoGuy ( talk) 22:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Glenn Beck is some rabble rouser and on his show a couple of days ago he asked his supporters to be active on the internet against this Maurice Strong person, I don't know the ins and outs but its got global warming and other conspiracy type issues, the Strong article was attacked the other day and is semi protected there is also a comment on the BLPN for eyes. Off2riorob ( talk) 22:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit per WP:AT. The standard name of that body of water is Persian Gulf, which is what the title of the main article is. You can not change the standard name though piping or otherwise, NPOV does not apply when it comes to standard common geographical names in English. What you are doing is a violation of Wikipedia guidelines and polices on the geographical namings. Please do not repeat this in the future. Kurdo777 ( talk) 06:49, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it seems there is quite a backlog on the SPI page today. Thanks for dropping by. Lucy is quite a character! Bksimonb ( talk) 11:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate your good will to settle the disagreements with Ahmed shahi ( talk · contribs), but as long as he continues his extremely disruptive behavior as in the Pashtun people and Ghurids articles, I do not have any hope that a consensus can be reached. Most of all, because he keeps ignoring already discussed decisions and consensuses. I am really tired of reverting his nonsense, and except me, nobody else even dares to correct his POV and falsifications of academic sources. Tajik ( talk) 13:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
A favour please.
Is this guy notable I am considering AFD, a Muslim scholar, citations appear self promotional? Off2riorob ( talk) 13:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I forgot the main bit... Husain_Kadodia Off2riorob ( talk) 13:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Any opinion? Off2riorob ( talk) 17:49, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for looking, I sent him to AFD to see what the community think, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Husain_Kadodia Off2riorob ( talk) 18:26, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
You have mail. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I've set up User:HJ Mitchell/Interaction ban and asked the two editors to review it and sign their agreement, on which condition I've unblocked Tajik. Any thoughts? Btw, I like the editnotice! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank You 86.21.103.180 ( talk) 20:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC) Peace and Love
Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 15:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
Your above exchange with WalterClip, and your comments here has proven you have a good sense of humor. Therefore, you get this shiny star as a reminder to never lose it. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC) |
Why does it say age i56? I thought that was the length of time in days between archives? The page about clue bot thre is worth a read, paramaters and such if I can find it. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:30, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
| ||||
![]() |
Archive 2 |
Archive 3
![]() |
Thanks for replying, yeah, I didn't notice that I'd put 'British' in lower case at the first letter. Thanks for correcting it and replying, I'm going to try and find out what happened to it now. Thanks.
Hi, somehow I ended up here from the ' Intermarriage between British peoples' page which I created, so I guess you must have something to do with its redirection / deletion. Could you tell me what was wrong with it? Was it the quality or is it because you don't agree with the subject? I'd be really grateful for an answer. Thanks Kentynet ( talk) 20:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Greetings...
Hello, This flag once was red, and welcome to Wikipedia!
The website you mention for Jewbuntu states at the top that "This isn't real. There is no Jewbuntu yet, and this site is a great 'what if'." So Jewbuntu is clearly not an existing linux distribution (or if it is, you need a better source). Ubuntu for mixed marriages and Jubuntu appear to be only mentioned on the Jewbuntu site, so these are also invalid additions. The Satanic edition seems ok, and I've readded it. Andareed ( talk) 05:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I was looking at the vandalism on the gen y page and you reverted the last one done. I took a far more radical approach and undid a lot of versions (including your undo), could you cast an eye over it and see if you agree with the changes I made (and whether others need making)? Thanks, BananaFiend ( talk) 09:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Dear Editor, this issue is being dealt in the edit war administrators section. You must notice that Suciindia is only reverting to the agreed versions by reputed editors like User: Soman. It is a puppet of User: Kuntan who was banned from wiki, who is causing trouble. This puppet is also abusive as you may see in the comments that he has made. Please refer to the edit war administrators page for the ongoing discussions. You will notice that most other editors have agreed to the stand of User: Suciindia regarding the issues dealt with. -- Suciindia ( talk) 21:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Since this is your discussion page, what is your personal take on Laughingman78 and his 'vandalism'? Beyond that what got you looking at the Marmion Academy website? I'm interested to hear your perspective. I find the Indian organization your page links to to be interesting, FWIW. DavidMSA ( talk) 07:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry about that. I haven't actually read the graphic novel of V For Vendetta but I have seen the film. I was of the impression that the role of High Chancellor was a combination of monarch and Prime-Minister. I assumed Susan (or Sutler) was the undisputed ruler of all Great Britain and as such an emperor. Oh by the way, I like cats too. -- Jupiter Optimus Maximus ( talk) 14:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Good good. Yes I mean to read the graphic novel. I've read the article on Susan and he seems a much creepier character than Sutler. On an unrelated but geeky note I must say that Sutler seemed quite introverted himself. I got the impression he was very self-centred (then again aren't most dictators). -- Jupiter Optimus Maximus ( talk) 00:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm a Christian syndicalist, and a long-time Wob. (Milw. General Organizing Branch; I.U. 660). -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Why are you calling me a banned user? I'm not. Mastcell is simply claiming this. Smockroker ( talk) 22:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I put V in this category because his face is never seen. Wilson from Home Improvement is in this category because his face is never seen even though he appears in every episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bosco13 ( talk • contribs) 08:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Sure V for Vendetta is in Category:V for Vendetta, which is in Category:Vertigo titles, which is, of course, in Category:DC Comics titles. I don't have my TPB on-hand, but I don't recall it being published under the Vertigo imprint. Either way, it would be redundant of the self-titled category, even if it was moved up to DC Comics titles. - Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 20:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I've already warned Blakeusa, and others have dropped notes, so I've removed your 3rr warning to avoid a pile-on. Thanks for keeping an eye on the article! Acroterion (talk) 02:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know I have replied. ~ Ameliorate U T C @ 09:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Our IP edit warrior at Leo McGarry is back. What should we do about it? I'm leaving a message on his talk page urging him to stop, but can we take steps to protect the page and somehow get strong administrator intervention to make this user stop once and for all? -- Hnsampat ( talk) 11:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my page, Cheers Theterribletwins1111 ( talk) 11:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I fixed something that this user did on Glasgow, I see he (or she) has got a block. It looked to me like just adding images (in good faith). Forgive me I'm new here, but that seems a bit brutal Mcewan ( talk) 22:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Good work on this BTW - I wouldn't know where/how to start. I was surprised at how different things look depending upon the browser used. At work, (MS Explorer), the difference in margin was not so pronounced as on Firefox. I've captured a screen shot on my home PC, (Firefox), FYI. (The flags look as though they are both justified to the left of their respective cells, rather than being centred in each). Hope is of some use - keep up the good work! Regards
Endrick
Shellycoat
20:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Looks like User:He Scores ? and another new one ( User:Willy Blackwood) are sockpuppets of the Nimbley troll. I've blocked them. They have a distinctive tell. :) -- Jza84 | Talk 17:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Can not see the relavance of a supporters forum match report [1] in a reference to an old name for the city, when added into an existing reference (yes the term is used in the web article, but but forums are poor references generaly). if a valid reference it should be a separate one then. It looking like a case of adding a external link to a forum rather than a reference, was my reasoning behind removal. I leave you to review its format/relavance then - BulldozerD11 ( talk) 00:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello there! I hope all is well. I'm sorry that Nimbley struck again, but I commend you for maintaining WP:AGF and WP:BITE all the same.
This is an odd situation we're in. The kid (and he is only a child - 11/12 ish) just will not stop, and he has randomly generated ip addresses, which makes the blocking hard to sustain. Furthermore, I'm not sure there is any official word on how to deal with such an issue, but, from my experience alone, WP:RBI is a good one, and WP:TROLL can be helpful.
I'm reluctant to engage (again) with Nimbley as I've tried it in the past, but he just refuses to co-operate. I believe he may be somewhat congnatively impaired.</political correctness> -- Jza84 | Talk 21:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Dude, I'm the one at fault here? The anon has been blocked three times for edit warring, I have tried everything to gain consensus! I have had to ask for semi-protection again. I don't really see myself as the problem here. Surely I've been more than reasonable? The anon has made editing the article impossible. I should also note that I added an extra source to the MTV movie awards - which was reverted!
If you feel that I'm being unreasonable, then OK, I'll give up on that article and let the anon revert back to a crappy and unsourced article. - Tbsdy lives ( talk) 08:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
ye, but moore states that if the labour government won the elcetions, it would disarm britains nuclear supply, so that is contradictiory. if labour won, the uk would not have a relation to the events in the sotry. Moore later mentioned that the conservatives won, which favoured nuclear weapons. if we leave the statement, we have to mention that the conservatives won in the end. they were the ones who made decisions that made any relavence to what the story was about —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rightandright ( talk • contribs)
What wrong with the image i put in place of the dark one it shows the woman better than just her face and a mic -- 84.13.122.134 ( talk) 19:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
What? Im just asking a simple question ? -- 84.13.122.134 ( talk) 19:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Ok im sorry i just think the other picture is better than the one just now. I Am stopping now. -- 89.240.245.159 ( talk) 19:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Please say what you like but i have thought about it and it HAS GONE TO FAR so i PROMISE YOU IM STOPING. -- 89.240.245.159 ( talk) 19:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
i am not vandalising wikipedia i am simply typing FACT God save the Queen is the nation anthem of the united kingdom and the royal anthem of scotland
The current article doesnt exist so im replacing it with the original page. -- 89.243.104.75 ( talk) 16:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
It states on the X Factor wikiepdia page and his discgraphy page and pepople are saying that the album has sold 260,500 copies in total -- 78.151.74.102 ( talk) 17:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
This barnstar is to recognize your diligence in reverting and reporting all the edits done by indefinitely blocked user Nimbley6. Thank you for all your hard work. Alanraywiki ( talk) 19:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC) |
Hear hear! Thank you for keeping ahead of this. Kevin Forsyth ( talk) 20:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted the image on that article. Was the revert due to your preference to the prior image, or due to what looked like an edit war?
I can help guide the user who added it over to the talk page if needed; but it's not really a case of edit warring. They first tried two times to change the image link, which mangled the format so that no image was showing - that's what I reverted, I had thought they were just playing/testing. They then returned and correctly made the change to a new image - which to me seemed just as good of an image (lower quality, but showing more of the ship - so a trade-off), so I didn't touch it or say anything further. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 20:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
An image change in which you were involved is being discussed at Talk:RMS Queen Mary#Infobox image. Please join the discussion. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 20:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to ask you about this edit. It's great that you can add that kind of thing, I didn't know regular users could do that... Would you mind filling me in a bit on how? Where do you check the IPs for comparison?
Thanks – QuadrivialMind (talk) 23:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Only two editors are butting heads, though. If he was debating the merits of whether to include the link more explicitly within the body of the article itself, I could work with that. Instead he's dismissing it as a continuation of previous debates (that I had no part in), and therefore not even worthy of consideration on its own merits. That's the problem I wanted a third opinion on. Thank you for at least considering my idea, even if you disagree, but I needed another editor to note that debate only works when we listen to each other. What would be a more appropriate venue to ask for help? Westrim ( talk) 01:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Can I tempt you with Wikipedia:Rollback? May make reverting those Nimbleysocks a little bit easier. Let me know if it would help. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Norsefire-flag-comic.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, i noticed you have recently reverted a report i made with the edit summary "rv dispute, not vandalism", if you read here carefully and thoroughly it is clear to me they are playing fun&games. They are saying things such as "you are DodgeChris", i suggest they be blocked for 24 hours or so to teach them a lesson, i suggest first though you ask them yourself what they mean, this may also be helpful. 86.143.121.28 ( talk) 19:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the advice. I had a follow-up question at Talk:Jasenovac_i_Gradiška_Stara#Follow_up_question_re:_sources. Any opinion? -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I warned Lee setters ( talk · contribs) for a possible 3RR violation. You're also in danger of violating it as it's not strictly vandalism. I do have some sympathy though because he's obviously trying to force his own PoV without discussion. Let ne handle any more reverts. -- GraemeL (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
well i wish you would stop reverting my edits. if you clicked on the link i provided you will see that God save the Queen is the royal anthem of the United kingdom which includes Scotland. I am going to change it back and hopefully you wont delete it this time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee setters ( talk • contribs) 20:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Just to but in a bit here, it is true that the block was in the interest of fairness, hence the reduction, from my point of view it did appear to be simply a content dispute, if its the case that I misread the situation and it was vandalism, then I am really really sorry. Having said that, please do not let it put you off any future vandal reverting, in fact i believe GraemeL's advice is excellently put-- Jac16888 ( talk) 22:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up. StaticGull and I spent some time reverting that IP this morning...I figured he was probably a sock puppet as I have run into the same edits from similar IPs before, but it's good to know that he's a known sock puppet and can be reverted on sight. Cheers, — Politizer talk/ contribs 19:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Barack Obama, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Downzero ( talk) 11:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
You might want to check out User:United Kingdom & Northern Ireland. He shares a few similarities with Cyrusmileyhannana (another sock you blocked), including copy/pasting the UK article to his userpage (similar to CMH's posting of the Scotland article) and editing CMH's userpage (an odd thing for a new user to immediately jump to). Ironholds ( talk) 14:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
To me, one of the key differences is that you've got the articles in a sandbox page. While a sandbox doesn't give carte blanche, it's there for being a testbed, to try stuff without messing up a live page. At various times, I've had exit lists on my sandbox page. If all else fails, put an edit summary of "copied the content of (article name) to test new (section)", and it's sufficiently attributed.
By contrast, User:United Kingdom & Northern Ireland was putting the content on his user page. Compound that with the username mirroring the name of the article, and I felt the content was inappropriate to be there. On reflection, the GFDL violation was probably trivial, since it's pretty clear where the content came from and how to check the contribution history there. It just made a stronger policy-based justification for deletion than it being confusing. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Different Beat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat. Thank you. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Dancing To A Different Beat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing To A Different Beat. Thank you. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
The result of each was speedy-delete:Vandalism/bad-faith contribution, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing To A Different Beat. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 19:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Would you have a look at User:Ricky_Oliver. Disruptive pattern on Northern Ireland and a user page that looks just like Spainton with similar interests. -- Snowded TALK 18:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Another one I think User: Closeupon recently created, scottish singers, deleted admin change on previous socks? Enjoy Bristol by the way - on holiday? -- Snowded TALK 07:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Let´s just walk through a simple scenerio shall we? John or Mary doe of 13 years of age are doing a school report on an idea that came from their discovery that by placing "kinks" in their garden hose they can make water shoot out much faster. They go to wikipedia since their parents allow that content as its "ok" an ecylocpedia. They enter the words "kink" and arrive at the kink.com wikipedia. Then as the page was before they are invited to a whole different subject than kinks in hoses and make a click on "ana cruzes" link and arrive at a explicit porn page with the title "Im the bitch that your mother warned you about...", well you know with nice pornographic pictures that show and tell all. His/her father happens to be a badass attorney and is quite offended when john/jane doe shows what they discovered in wikipedia. So under many laws, not withstanding, the "Communications deceny act" or the "contemporary community standards" laws or "corruption of a minor", a case is launched agaisnt wikipedia and its editors. Turns out since the editors have the ability to "speak for wikipedia" by approving or disapproving changes etc to content that they themselves not only represent wikipedia but also are not free from personal liability in this matter end up forking the bill for a 100 million plus lawsuit. It seems there is a strange US law that states that all "indecent" material as porno that is hosted on the web on US servers, has to have a simple warning on the home page that the person who is about to visit this site must be over 18 years of age.. etc.. Strange but I didnt see that in any of the 100 plus porn star wikipedias. So the 6 million dollars that wikipedia is trying to raise may not be enough to withstand the lawsuits that will come from the open and blatant access to porn to minors which the wiki "porno portal" path is embarking. All the cute and bold phrases that "wiki doesnt censors" and "they are notable" probable wont mean a whole lot when this "porno portal" of wikipedia ends up exposing wikipedia and its editors to all kinds of civil (oh and criminal) liability from the jane and john does that unfortunately end up on porn pages by doing simple research projects etc.. Dont forget that wikiporn, like any other porn will run agaisnt really ugly laws in the US and about 50 other countries world wide who really dont jive on minors having access to graphic porn. Good luck. [User:webman1000|webman1000]] ( talk) 18:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)<sig>webman1000</sig>
There's no more drama on that article's talkpage, 'cause I no longer post there. GoodDay ( talk) 20:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. The best thing to do is to file it under the case of the suspected puppeteer, in this case ikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nimbley6. However, I left a note for a clerk to merge them, so hopefully it will be taken care of soon. Thanks. -- Avi ( talk) 16:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Haha, yeah, I'm in pretty much the same boat...I don't care too much either way and I don't even really understand the political stuff surrounding this, but I've just gotten the impression that we should revert any of these trolling edits. I also thought this might be Nimbley6, but I figured I should AGF it for now (mainly because in my other run-ins with Nimbley6 I don't remember him/her using edit summaries at all) and if this user starts again then maybe I can get a little more stern. — Politizer talk/ contribs 17:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
I've given it another tweek to clarify it a little better. What do you think? Titch Tucker ( talk) 20:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed that you removed the link to the When You Believe article, because it's not the same song. Well, I did some Googling and discovered it's actually a cover of that song. And the When You Believe article does have a section regarding the cover, so I think it's fair to link to the article, but more specifically to that section (which is something I did recently, if you'll look through the history). I wanted to explain why it was linked though, as I had the same question myself, and the IP editor who keeps putting it in, hasn't really explained most of their edits, nor do they use edit commentary, so I know it's confusing to try to figure out what they're doing. Have a good day! Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 17:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Another question. What shall we do about the repeated "sales" numbers that keep being placed into the article? My tendency has been to remove them, since they're not cited, and I can find no record of them as being verified. However, the IP editor keeps putting them back in (surprise, surprise). Should we just leave them in with fact tags? Even though they've been there before, and no effort was made to cite them, so I don't have much hope that citations will appear anytime soon. (I don't want to edit war, this is getting quite ridiculous.) (Feel free to reply here, I'll put your page on my watchlist.) 20:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC) (Forgot to sign, oops, this was me, just FYI, though you seem to have figured that out. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 22:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC))
You marked him as a suspected sockpuppet of a banned user. According to his contribution history, he also made an edit to Template:Michelle McManus which I reverted for unrelated reasons. The alleged puppetmaster was known for editing articles related to Ms. McManus under alleged sockpuppets. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 22:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for resuming my contribution on Freddie Mercury article. It seems there are articles where any non-adoring edit is a devastation, who cares if supported by references: up to now, because of that edit, I've been pointed as vandal, POV editor and other. More, that kind of lists are commonly reported in music articles....
have a good work.
-- Blues1911 PostOfficeBox 18:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Michelle McManus discography, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle McManus discography. Thank you. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, May i just point out to you that Michelle's album sold 300,000 copies there fore having a Platinum certification according to this site [3]. Also Leon's Album has a Gold Certification according to the very same sight and has sold 142,200 copies in the United Kingdom according to Music Week. Thanks -- Lastbroken ( talk) 17:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm not certain. I'd suggest asking on WT:SPI. -- Avi ( talk) 18:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
The draw allocation for the first semi-final and second semi-final just occurred, I just forgot to label the tables, no worries. Evilperson 20 ( talk) 12:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Could you explain this edit? The categories removed (that you replaced) are redundant as noted in the edit summary. "Scottish singers" is a parent-cat of "Scottish pop singers", for example.
Cheers, This flag once was red propaganda deeds 16:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
You call my Neil Armstrong edits vandalism? I'm just expressing my opinion you jerk off. And it's only on the discussions page. Why is that ever vandalism? Just because some one doesn't buy into this disgusting Apollo hoax and take these stupid retards' word for it that this thing actually happened they are vandals now and everything they write has to be deleted at once? That's real democratic, free-thinking, open-minded and really in line with the ideals America, land of the free and home of the brave allegedly stand on. Good luck with that. -- 124.182.249.199 ( talk) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
hello! "This flag once was red" (sorry for my english) can you read the blog "wikipedia"at the myspace official of amy? she has some problems with this article .she want some help! http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=13406488&blogID=469200727 thanks lecybersurfeur —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lecybersurfeur ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Where is the right place to request a cross-wiki sockpuppet investigation? I suspect English Wikipedia editors en:User:78.150.249.189/ t/ c and en:User:78.144.226.100/ t/ c are IP sockpuppets of banned english Wikipedia editor en:User:Nimbley6/ t/ c/ socks/ maybe. I also suspect he is brand-new commons user commons:user:Ificouldlistentoyou/ t/ c.
Reasons for thinking these are the same people:
It is possible this is more than one person, and that each of the two IP addresses is independently connected with Ificouldlistentoyou somehow. If that is the case, it would exonerate 78.144.226.100 as the banned user nimbley6, however, it would mean we have two disruptive editors, nimbley6 and 86.144.136.133, not just one.
Edits related to previous Nimbly6-sock en-frequented articles:
Edits related to 86.144.136.133/
en talk/
en contribs, another disruptive editor from the same country as Nimbly6:
Other edits with no ties I can see to Nimbly6 or 86.144.136.133:
Edits I have not investigated:
davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 03:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I have been impressed by your intelligent and polite comments re. Neil Armstrong being "the first person to set foot on the moon." I see, similarly, 1 -2 people have kept up a relentless reversal on the astronaut Stuart Roosa page, saying he was one of only 24 men to go to the moon, when it fact (just as with Armstrong) it is more accurate to say one of 24 people in this instance. Would you be willing to keep an eye on this page so that this person / these people don't keep undoing good work - especially as they never give an explanation? Thank you. SpaceHistory101 ( talk) 22:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
"May year August self please stop with the week puns?!"
I humbly defer to the honorable gentleperson from the once red flag. :-D (I just had to comment there though, I saw "forced march", and instinctively cringed, remembering the 15-miler back in BCT. My feet ached for three days afterwards...) Edit Centric ( talk) 10:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
You might want to look at edits by First Of All ( talk · contribs)/blocked Nimbley6 sock, 92.4.71.142 ( talk · contribs), 86.3.234.246 ( talk · contribs), 81.104.128.143 ( talk · contribs) on Scottish-related articles. Some may need reverting. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 00:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi I must have been writing my edit summary while you were removing some of the "porn"s. My revert also fixed a misleading redirect. Thanks! Verbal chat 13:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Annie Lennox. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
RolandR (
talk)
17:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
WHAT ARE YOU SEARCHING FOR EXACTLY, I SAY THAT BECAUSE YOU ARE BLOCKING A NEW USER WITHOUT REASON. THERE IS NO REASON AND YOU GOTTA STOP THIS CIRCUS FAST. YOU HEAR ? MarshVeld ( talk) 19:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me, amically. MarshVeld ( talk) 19:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey there, please in any form, Im needing your help, I edited recently the Northern Ireland article without errors or something wrong and it was reverted by a bad user, I need your intervention about thats all my edits are only "organizing images" so there is no reason to REVERT. I need you and Thanks. MarshVeld ( talk) 20:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Amy Macdonald (singer) is on my watchlist, since it seems to be a target for unencyclopedic changes. So I was interested in the reason for your reverts of the "See also" material: "rv How is a list of countries relevant? Even links piped so as to masquerade as something relevant is still not relevant." I looked at the links and immediately agreed with you. But this brings up another question. Would those links be any more important to the article if there actually were dediciated Wiki articles: "List of people who have reached Number one in Denmark" "List of people who have reached Number one in..."? These types of lists seem to be perpetually misused, and often so incomplete as to be misleading -- and yet if complete, might well have thousands of names. What difference, exactly, does it make (except to marketing managers) if a singer has reached "Number One" in the Cayman Islands for two days? Thoughts? Piano non troppo ( talk) 01:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Apologies. I wasn't trying to vandalise the article; only adding info based on what I found on a celebrity fan forum. -- Litherlandsand ( talk) 11:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey - thanks for pointing to this WP topic. I'd never heard of it, but that's what I've been trying to say in the foie gras article about "exotic". Bob98133 ( talk) 19:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
So, User:GreyPoint, what do you reckon? Another one? Canterbury Tail talk 18:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Home-Made Barnstar | |
For your great work in dealing with Nimbley6 and his force of sockpuppets. Acalamari 21:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC) |
A few tablespoon worth of the narcotic, in a diluted solution = You give a few table spoon of carfentanil, prepared as a diluted solution.
A few tablespoons of a diluted solution of the narcotic = You give a few tablespoon of a diluted solution of carfentanil, containing an unspecified amount of carfentanil.
The dosage of carfentanil for that purpose would be a sub-milligram quantity!
(If you think both sentences have the same meaning, I may respectfully ask, where you studied, and what.) 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 17:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I would prefer, if the admins were a little less cocky with retired academics. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 17:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
As an executive I would fire you for such kind of executive summaries. Executives are normally not complete idiots, and don't want to hear cocky half-sentences as a summary. Trust me. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 20:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Interesting:
You try to bracket the sentence ...tablespoon's worth of the narcotic in a solution in a RIGHT ASSOCIATIVE WAY?
-That means you parse that BOTTOM UP reducing from the right side on the longest match? -You are not greedy? -Are you a Floyd production parser?
AND
You have difficulties to decode an IMPLIED SUBJUNCTIVE FORM? As an executive I would...
are you a native speaker of Hebrew/other semitic language (or MAYBE less likely Russian) or a robot? (see above)
Of course we have different opinions about honesty. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 03:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
No trolling. But I really saw that you bracketed right-to-left. And you missed the implied subjunctive form. That could mean that you are native speaker of a language which builds associativity in a different way than English and has the kind of ambiguity you mentioned in the Carfentanil exchange. And it could mean you are a native speaker of a language which builds subjunctive forms in a different way than English does. My first guess after looking it up was Hebrew or Russian.
Or it could mean that you are a sophisticated bot or use a translation tool which has difficulties. (English is a foreign language to me too) I described what kind of parser would arrive at the same misunderstandings we had.
You guys are simply overexcited about vandals and trolls. My favorite hobby is learning about linguistic and machine parsing. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 11:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
For a translation tool with difficulties your answers are too well-formed. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 12:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
For somebody with such a semantic deficit too. Besides: My favorite story is "Alice in Wonderland" by Lewis Caroll. 70.137.147.62 ( talk) 12:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
What it has to do with each other are the cards 70.137.182.228 ( talk) 09:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
40 lashes ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Joe Taliban ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
You might want to put back you ANI post, as this character keeps coming back. The most recent was Joe Taliban. Maybe with enough of this nonsense going on, they can do a "hard block" or whatever, and pre-empt the next new one(s). Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 11:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
...for coming to my defense. I've mentioned that guy Parappa664 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on WP:ANI. He seems mighty familiar with wikipedia for a newbie. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Since you helped out with the third opinion at Talk:Jasenovac_i_Gradiška_Stara#Lyrics back in November, I'm wondering if you had any opinion on the article as written. As I noted before, an internet news tabloid for the Croatian version and a site with a clear bias for the translation are not the ideal sources (and frankly the attitude of the IP address indicates someone who's been here before). -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 21:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism from this IP, but there's little point leaving a message about it on an IP talk page that is used by, I believe, around 4000 students using the University of Nottingham's SNS service. The person who actually did it is not going to get the message, and I did instead. Thanks.-- 128.243.253.111 ( talk) 00:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
That's the second time today that one of Liebman's socks has come after me. The price of glory. Thanks for reverting. I turned him over to AIV, as usual. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 19:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
link BGC ( talk) 12:27, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Ahh, i see. Fair enough. I've been away and only scanned over the history, so you make a good point. It's actually a good idea, i've got a couple of discogs i'm watching and geez they're terrible, the amount of fake chart peaks that are added, it's disgraceful. Thanks for the message. k-i-a-c ( hitmeup - the past) 12:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
I just redirected the page. There is no need for a discussion because there are no sources supporting it (that i know of) and it is obvious that the other name is the official name. The page was already moved, so the history was saved. This seems like a desperate attempt by an ip to make the page under the name he wants. Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 17:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
hi , how do? im new to wikipedia and not really sure how this site works. im trying to improve sandi thoms page, my efforts have so far been thwarted. the page as it stands is a hateful, negative, slanderous, out of date and untrue smear campaign.
i wish to represent her in a true and fair light. i am leaving edit summaries as i go, making minor changes here n there and major changes also. i wish to remove a lot of text that is already there, it is wholly negative and one sided and not at all a balanced objective, neutral perspective of this artist. there is a lot of cited and referenced material there, but it is all negative press, it has been very well researched in an effort to tarnish this person.
if wiki truly is supposed to be neutral and objective, please look at the page as it stands and then my improvements before deleting them.
can i ask you, do you work for wikipedia? is the sandi thom page on your watch list and thats why you were alerted to my changes ? as i say, im a brand new user and some user tips would be appreciated.
please dont delete my work, if you have reservations about the rules of the game and weher i am breaking them or not, please consult me first.
many thanks
Daschund ( talk) 11:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello again. Ive tried to re-word a lot of the sections that Daschund has taken pains to say is lies and slander even with verification. id be grateful if you could give it a once over just to confirm neutrallity. Skinnylizzy ( talk) 19:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm so proud of myself taking it on the chin, not like me at all! (quietely curses) Jack forbes ( talk) 22:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
...for your support and kind words. RfA. "Request for Arrows". And I got quite a few points, from the sincere Opposers, and will work on doing better. I understand the "u" in colour, favour, etc. What I don't get is why "forecastle", which I kind of like the sound of as a fully-pronounced word, comes out "folks'll". Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 02:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Admin, please check the SUCI page that you once commented on. I found your comments on it. There is a sockpuppet of User:Kuntan who is active again and is mutilating the pages. Please intervene. I am new one, so I am yet to find my ways around. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 14:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Can you help me do that. Here are the suspected sockpuppets Sockpuppet of User: Kuntan, Anonymous User with IP address 59.91.253.113, 59.91.253.110, 59.91.254.63, 59.91.254.38, 59.91.253.112, 59.91.253.70, 59.91.253.225, 59.91.254.94, 59.91.254.8. He was silent for some months now and again sprang up suddenly. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 15:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear Editor, I am not removing anything from his edits. I am just moving them to another place where critisims can be placed. And all the more an analysis about a party is not an party ideology. He dragged me into this any ways. I have posted a request as you suggested. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 16:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I will refrain from this...-- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 17:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
SUCI is a cult and and extreme fringe group. The article has been the site of group account edits and nasty show of herd consciousness by the cult members. It resulted in the banning of all those accounts. You should be aware of this. Please don't waste your efforts on sub-human ideological cults. Don't take my words for it. Just Google and read the newspaper reports appearing in reliable papers. 59.91.253.27 ( talk) 17:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
It is strange that this man is trying to call a party as a fringe group. At least he should know that they were the ones behind movements such as Nandigram (through which I know them), Singur and several such movements that happened in south India including Vizhinjam port movement, Chengara struggle and Moolampally movement; to name a few. At least it has more supporters that several other parties in India. User: Soman tried to convience this person, but he was also abusive at him. -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 17:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
This world is not perfect, so you should archive soon. --♪♫ The New Mikemoral talk contribs 23:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. Canderson7 ( talk) 00:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! Remember me? You participated in the discussion last time around and I thought you might want to pitch in. I've rewritten the article at User:Abd/TurnKey Linux and added reliable sources (the non-english sources are in the talk page). I also opened a RfC but so far no one has commented. Could you take a look and give me some feedback? Thanks! LirazSiri ( talk) 08:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm confused. I flagged Club Mahindra Holidays for CSD using twinkle. My contributions show that twinkle put the warning template on the creating users talk User_talk:IndianCorporates. It's still on there. I hadn't contributed to your talk until I tried to apologise. Err. Any ideas? -- Chzz ► 16:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
(Of course, if I have done anythhing wrong, then I'm very sorry)
OK, that makes sense now! Phew. Thanks;
Yes, speedy was declined. I would normally now submit if for AfD, as I do think it's pure promotional stuff. The admin declined because it has references, but if you look at the refs, they're not great. Weak sources, passing mentions, that sort of thing. However, if you intend to try and fix it up a bit, I'm quite happy to leave that for a while and see if it can improve - if I have a bit of time, I'll even try and improve it myself. So, I'll make a little note of it, and I will probably review it in a week or two. Fair enough? Thanks again, -- Chzz ► 16:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I think I have become a hate figure for from Ayn Rand supported in the US - thanks for clearing up the latest bit of vandalism -- Snowded ( talk) 18:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Hiya,
I agree wit you totally that the phorm article shoudl not be taking sides, but i just feel that the additions was taking sides yes, but the acutally conent when edited would not be taking sides as it merely say a flaw of the system that phorm wish to use. If you feel that it should still be remove since you kindly explained to me why you remove it i wont change it back as i agree with you on the point of the article not taking sides, but i did try to edit it to be more neutral.-- Andrewcrawford ( talk) 15:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello again. I wonder if you could add the footnote to the infobox concerning the limited powers of the PM and Queen as voted for in the straw poll. I hope you don't think I'm being cheeky here, but I do think you did a good job when giving examples of possible footnotes earlier. Cheers! Jack forbes ( talk) 15:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, much appreciated erm, what do I call you? This flag? once was red? Or do you prefer the more formal This flag once was red? I don't want to get it wrong. ;) Jack forbes ( talk) 15:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
TFOWR it is then. And thanks. Jack forbes ( talk) 16:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Two things, I completely agree with the fact that this should not be cited to Bosnian as my lyrics website (not blog, as it happens to appear as) does not state that it is in fact Bosnian. I am trying to get this verified by Regina as I write for esctime.com also and we will resolve this issue as soon as possible. For now, put the language as Serbian, cited to Diggiloo Thrush. Please reply on my page. ńăŧħăń - ŧăłķ 20:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
No need to apologize for "spam." Thank you for taking and interest in this article. From my brief encounters with it, it seems to be something of a battleground between folks with very strong opinions about the company both ways. It's always a good idea for steady hands to help right the ship. Sadly, concerning the notability of the article or what should be added to bring the article up in quality, I can't really offer an informed opinion. I have no knowledge of the subject matter. My only involvement was to remove obviously POV statements. From a cursory reading, however, it does seem much improved with regards to sourcing. The company does seem to be large/notable enough to merit inclusion on Wiki. My vote, if it came to it, would be to keep it. If I had to be nitpicky, some of the language in the "New Business Ventures" section does seem like it might have been taken from company literature. Overall, though, the article seems to be moving in the right direction. Monkey Bounce ( talk) 10:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Please see the talk page on Kate Nash. The references that have been put in place are generic artist entries, where the info is based on other articles. These incorrect birth details have been removed from Wikipedia numerous times, but have been copied onto other sites which take their info from Wikipedia and aren't updated.
92.11.165.113 ( talk) 16:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem. Wikipedia seems to be a hot bed for people targetting articles on people with Irish backgrounds and putting false Irish places of birth on them - which isn't exactly helpful. I have no doubt it will be changed back, using the same generic artist profile as a reference.
92.11.165.113 ( talk) 16:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
...for reverting and turning in the latest pair of Liebman socks. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 23:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I would be happy to discuss the case with you. The first MS case had two different accusations. One on tying of WMP with the Windows OS and the other on levering of dominance from the OS market to the WGSOS market. The document I linked to in the main thread is an early draft of my LLM Dissertation ( http://croesy.web.nowhere-else.org/web/Dissertation.pdf ). I can't find the final version, I will hunt about. To be honest I didn't look at the tying accusation on WMP in the dissertation. From a competition law perspective it is not interesting/controversial. I believe a similar logic will be used by the Commission/ECJ in the new investigation into Internet Explorer. I find the accusation of levering of dominance between markets much more interesting and the response of the Commission to the abuse fascinating! The remedy of the Commission made no sense legally or economically, and yet the Court of First Instance pretty much rubber-stamped it. Anyway I more than willing to discuss anything else about the case and the potential Internet Explorer case. Lwxrm ( talk) 18:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 01:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
All I will say is that it should present facts supported by credible references. Anything less than that does not belong on the Wikipedia. Timeshare as a concept has attracted flak from all quarters. Perhaps, it is due to the wrongs done by a few companies who fleeced the public and vanished with the loot. However, you ought to be mindful of the fact that if you have chosen to put the company information on Wikipedia, users are going to edit it and anything, criticism or praise, backed by references deserves to be displayed on the page. This is the nature of Wikipedia, and perhaps this what makes it so unique.
Caccophonix ( talk) 17:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
I think you are unduly worried about the page. Wikipedia is a community of wise people. Let the community take over from here. As of now, the page is there but if the community decided to delete the page, then so be it. You have done your bit and one person can do only so much. effort.
Caccophonix ( talk) 18:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words.
Caccophonix ( talk) 16:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
On calm reflection I agree this was jarring in the context of the article. I've left it alone. However, you may wish to consider that in the context of the BoE's long history it was a "relevant" event. Particularly when you combine it with unprecedented Weimar Republic levels of "quantitative easing". Something is up. I humbly suggest that every single day has been "historic" for the Old Lady in her 315th year. She's beginning to show her age. Who knows, she may be showing signs of brain cancer :-) - CrisisFeedsLeviathan ( talk) 08:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
You seem to have a user thingy in a different colour. How do you do that? Please reply on my talk page. Other question: Do you know the instrument in the background that is played all the way through on Love Sex Magic? Please reply on this one on my talk page too. Thanks. Andrew R ( talk) 10:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
One more question: Are you allowed to use one or more accounts unabusively? Just wondering, as I need to ½ disguise my tracks from one particular vandal who believes I wrote about them. Andrew R ( talk) 10:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, what I meant was your signiture. Andrew R ( talk) 10:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Question 2: Have you ever been RFA'D? I would be happy to nominate you. [[Andrew RACK]] ( talk) 17:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I think my edit summary explains it all. If we are going to include a sentence in the article that says the video has received more than X number of views and more than X number of comments, it should be ok for an editor to update it to include more accurate information. If we don't want to keep these running tallies going, the sentence should be removed altogether. Howver, I personally don't want the sentence removed, because that information is interesting. 98.220.43.195 ( talk) 17:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Are you editing an encyclopedia or helping vested interests add random tidbits? 117.204.80.233 ( talk) 17:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I have no objection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.204.80.233 ( talk) 17:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
It is apparent that this User:117.204.80.233 is a puppet of User:Kuntan. Please see the discussion between me and User:Abd in my talk page. All the text that he removed are cited with third party material (news paper clips) as I see it. So he has no reason to remove. It is certainly vandalism -- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 18:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Did you notice that this User:Kuntan has come up with a new user name; the name of the Kerala State Secretary of [[SUCI].-- Radhakrishnansk ( talk) 11:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Just to clarify. The main youtube video(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lp0IWv8QZY) is over 30 million(currently 33 million). Total for all online videos of her performance ( http://www.viralvideochart.com/dailymotion/susan_boyle_on_britain_got_talent?id=x8ymn0) is currently 70 million. The Washington Post gave us some figures yesterday. SunCreator ( talk) 10:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi.
To be honest I didn't give it much thought, just seemed to roll off the keyboard and didn't strike me as being peculiar or odd - perhaps it should... Just looked at Gender-specific_pronoun#Ships_and_countries - perhaps I'm just being old-fashioned. By all means revert to "it" if you wish. Regards Endrick Shellycoat 10:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
It is long since we talked. If you aren't the stuff the suci boy is made of just hear me for once. Check the course that article on that minuscule party underwent on pedia. See what those ideology-blinded accounts tried to throw in and what I attempted to weed out. Do you believe in NPOV or in red flag? 59.91.254.32 ( talk) 17:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.91.254.32 ( talk) 17:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Would be thankful if you could provide me information about tagging an article. Where can I find the list of tags that are used while editing an article?
Caccophonix ( talk) 17:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Got It.
Caccophonix ( talk) 18:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
At 7th Studio Album, I have opened a vote on the discussion page, regarding whether the article should be kept and deleted. I encourage you to make a vote and state your reasons. -- Sky Attacker ( talk) 00:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you man :) 85.197.21.80 ( talk) 16:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Mind if I copy your I-don't-speak-Polish user box? During my half-year in Warsaw, my favorite Polish phrase was, Czy mówisz po angielsku? (Do you speak English?)
I'm curious how you managed to edit an article on Polish Wikipedia.
Sca ( talk) 15:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Re this. Yep, I recall watching that live myself. Whilst I'm not a reliable source, I'm sure someone has published that transcript or quoted it somewhere. Cheers, Nja 247 10:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Whoa, hold on there cowboy! The only edit I've made to 2009 Christmas specials (Doctor Who) is this one, in which I reinstated an HTML comment removed by an IP. Ironically, the HTML comment reads "Please don't add companions without a reliable source" ;-)
Cheers, This flag once was red propaganda deeds 12:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
for fixing that List of YouTube celebrities table i tried but i could not figure it out. Cheers Kyle1278 19:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I agree with you whole-heartedly that the red-link was extremely confusing. I was just getting ready to mark it with the "under discussion" template, when I saw your edit. I don't know how the original editor will react, however. Stay tuned! -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 22:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Be RFA'D yet? I am a changed person since last month and would like to also apologise to every editor I have upset. A bloke called Andrew Convos My Messies 08:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey there,
Sorry to bother you, but I am still not sure if this is appropriate since you usually get "This is not an article and so does not come under our jurisdiction", kinda thing. Sometimes I just go soddit and think well at least that gets someone's attention who is usually quick to grumble help. Like, since both seem to have equal weight the only argument really seems to be which of them goes.
SimonTrew (
talk)
13:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
You suck! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.213.180 ( talk) 15:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
You should listen to me because I'm Barack Obama —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.213.180 ( talk) 20:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Not sure why you haven't joined already! Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 16:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Let's mark it resolved and just keep an eye on it for a couple. I have both users contribs open on tabs to keep an eye on them and they look like they are behaving. If they get out of line, they can always post back to the ANI post even after it is resolved....so let's mark it resolved. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 13:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps you can help. I an having ALOT of trouble with him adding copyrighted information, under OTRS ticket #2008091610055854, to List of television stations in North America by media market. He has threatened many times to continue. I have emailed User:Swatjester who has seen the OTRS ticket inside and out and has blocked Theaveng previously and now with his misuse of templates and edit-warring Compact fluorescent lamp is there something you can do to stop him...at least for a couple hours? Thanks... NeutralHomer • Talk • 15:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the accident deletion, I re-added it. Also, think about creating pages beginning with User:This flag once was read/ and copy & paste each months messages into your recently made archive. I'm sure you already know how to do this!
Thanks,
I Seek To Help & Repair! (
talk)
00:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
When I went on your page I was like... WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! Happy Archiving! :)
I Seek To Help & Repair! (
talk)
00:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, I will take care of those notices ! Wow Scotland ! ( talk) 13:12, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I've posted a question for you about the SPI case for Nimbley6. Could you respond when you have the chance? Thanks. Icestorm815 • Talk 22:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I sometimes go through my contributions to see the status of my edits, and I just noticed that you reverted someone who reverted me on Leo McGarry. With the thousands of Mc sort keys I've been changing to Mac, I'm actually surprised at how infrequently I've been reverted, in spite of my explanatory edit summary. Anyways, I just wanted to say thanks. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 09:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi flag!
I thought i should let you know that i copied over a comment you made on this AFD to a relevant SSP case as evidence supplied by other users. It was a perceptive comment indicating that the user is indeed a likely vandal. I hope you won't mind that i did not ask in advantage for permission for this copyover.
With kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
"Wow Scotland !" has been blocked of a sockpuppet of Historian19. The edits look quite difficult to revert due to the amount of edits since, would you like to revert anything back that is problematic? Thank you. O Fenian ( talk) 20:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for offering its very kind of you, when you put a signature in does that take over from your username when you type a comment? Willski72 ( talk) 08:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
for all your spontaneous help and for the help you have given others looking at your talkpage! Willski72 ( talk) 13:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC) |
To elaborate, for helping a lost user in the barren wilderness of Wikipedia, i was torn between this one and the humour one (for your quips etc!). Plus of course all the help you appear to have given others! Willski72 ( talk) 13:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
You deserve it! Willski72 ( talk) 13:59, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. I Seek To Help & Repair! ( talk) 05:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I see you prodded this, but that's a speedy deletion candidate ( WP:CSD#G8). Please respond on my talk page if you have any objection to the speedy deletion. - Dank ( push to talk) 16:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
so what do i have to do to keep my article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vh1-fac ( talk • contribs) 19:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your recent edit to the article, please keep in mind that the {{Rating}} template is only to used for reviews that actually use star ratings. Please see Template:Rating and WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews for further information. just64helpin ( talk) 12:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my
"RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (
Ceoil,
Noroton and
Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read
Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. ~~~~~ |
![]() |
Yes, I saw you around recently and was remembering our work together, I should not be talking to the IP really as he is a block evading sock User:HarveyCarter who used to come a lot disrupting Brown and saying he was autistic, but I can't be bothered with tagging him today, good to see you. Off2riorob ( talk) 19:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Just wanted to tell you that User:Ariana310 has also summarized his points at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ahmed_shahi. Tajik ( talk) 19:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Protection is a good thing. If you get any more disruption from unconfirmed accounts we can protect your user pages. Off2riorob ( talk) 22:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I can tie it to Opal, because it is almost certainly Special:Contributions/89.240.131.49. Anything you can show me to tie it tighter to Nimbley6? There has to be more than one Wikipedia editor using Opal.— Kww( talk) 23:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Brown-do you think we should get it fully protected? Off2riorob ( talk) 16:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
http://www.wordmagazine.co.uk/content/gordon-brown-resigns-skys-adam-boulton-loses-it-with-alistair-campbell totally amusing. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
He totally lost it didn't he. I agree the Tories had only one good option and that ws a majority and now the situation is sinking in. (its exciting and amusing to watch them all scheming) Good morning. The alt text was removed without explanation in an edit by pointer, I just replaced what I could find. I think we added it for the GAR. Some people don't like it but I think for removal at least a discussin is in order. Off2riorob ( talk) 13:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
I seem to be getting into trouble since you've returned, so I'll blame it all on you. Joking aside - I'm about to get in an edit war I don't want. Am trying to explain to an editor that material copied verbatim requires quotation marks, and that material cited to a source must be in the source. Fancy having a look over my shoulder? The article is Quicksilver and the issue is (somewhat) explained on the close paraphrasing and source verification threads of the talkpage. Won't be worried if you don't want to get into it. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 ( talk) 19:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
I tried Wikipedia:Third opinion. Joe Chill ( talk) 19:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Ever considered requesting adminship? Feel free to tell me to bugger off if you're not interested ;). Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
That Brown has quit, according to sources . looks like he will be off to see the queen soon. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Report is from the standard http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23832558-david-cameron-its-decision-time-for-lib-dems.do , Yes your right it needs to wait until the actual moment. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
(set to resign) tonight. It is going to happen, expect Brown to make an announcement around 6 00. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Good luck, I have to go off line in twenty minutes and will not be back till 21 00. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry mate - I was trying to undo someone who had jumped the gun, but accidentally undid a different version instead. I should have been more careful. -- Dizzy hiss ( talk) 19:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
David_Cameron. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Melonite
19:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
No you haven't but thanks for reasoning. Pointer1 ( talk) 23:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Once does not equal "several". Reversion does not equal explanation! Pointer1 ( talk) 23:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Cheers! — e. ripley\ talk 17:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Strange description? "Head and shoulders of a smiling man in a suit and striped tie with dark, greying hair and rounded face with square jaw" ... they don't like that alt text do they, hehe. Off2riorob ( talk) 15:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
[5] were you aware that it was impossible to edit the English Wikipedia from Ireland? I certainly was not.. O Fenian ( talk) 18:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
No worries - I've access to a good library system so check references when it looks like numbers are fudged (Offline references are easily misquoted). I stuck some journal refs on the talk page of the article (unlinked as my access system is in the url by default, so my links wouldnt work for anyone but me.). To support my position anyway, I found this one online, [ [6]] which has the author of the disputed reference quoting at least 50,000 deaths. Not 3 million. Good work on leading the discussion - I'm a scientist, so get impatient when people push unsupported views. Cheers Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 16:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Dear Sir/Madam/Kittycat:
Sincerely, -- WaltCip ( talk) 21:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I wasn't hinting. I don't mind the light green, but the garish green is ugly. Didn't even realize you had green, but the red is nice. Truthkeeper88 ( talk) 19:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
To whom it may concern
I'd like to apologise for that immature edit about user EOGUY, however I do have a complaint; if you are monitoring misconduct by users of wikipedia and flagging their edits; then why was user EOGUY allowed to edit the page of Abdur Razzaq (politician) and subsequently tarnish the name of an honourable individual. He edited that page and changed the contents from its factual write up to personal opinion and a lot of us have found it offensive to find out that he discredited a respected individual in that fashion.
I have edited the contents as best I could and can also back it up with documentary evidence for everything that I have written. I would also appreciate it if the same warning that was sent to me is sent to user EOGUY.
Sincerely,
Fahim Razzaq —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahim.razzaq ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, am new to wiki so ya could use the help. Thanks again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahim.razzaq ( talk • contribs) 20:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea what people are talking about. About all I ever do is correct misspelled words.
EoGuy ( talk) 22:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Glenn Beck is some rabble rouser and on his show a couple of days ago he asked his supporters to be active on the internet against this Maurice Strong person, I don't know the ins and outs but its got global warming and other conspiracy type issues, the Strong article was attacked the other day and is semi protected there is also a comment on the BLPN for eyes. Off2riorob ( talk) 22:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit per WP:AT. The standard name of that body of water is Persian Gulf, which is what the title of the main article is. You can not change the standard name though piping or otherwise, NPOV does not apply when it comes to standard common geographical names in English. What you are doing is a violation of Wikipedia guidelines and polices on the geographical namings. Please do not repeat this in the future. Kurdo777 ( talk) 06:49, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it seems there is quite a backlog on the SPI page today. Thanks for dropping by. Lucy is quite a character! Bksimonb ( talk) 11:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate your good will to settle the disagreements with Ahmed shahi ( talk · contribs), but as long as he continues his extremely disruptive behavior as in the Pashtun people and Ghurids articles, I do not have any hope that a consensus can be reached. Most of all, because he keeps ignoring already discussed decisions and consensuses. I am really tired of reverting his nonsense, and except me, nobody else even dares to correct his POV and falsifications of academic sources. Tajik ( talk) 13:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
A favour please.
Is this guy notable I am considering AFD, a Muslim scholar, citations appear self promotional? Off2riorob ( talk) 13:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I forgot the main bit... Husain_Kadodia Off2riorob ( talk) 13:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Any opinion? Off2riorob ( talk) 17:49, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for looking, I sent him to AFD to see what the community think, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Husain_Kadodia Off2riorob ( talk) 18:26, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
You have mail. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I've set up User:HJ Mitchell/Interaction ban and asked the two editors to review it and sign their agreement, on which condition I've unblocked Tajik. Any thoughts? Btw, I like the editnotice! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank You 86.21.103.180 ( talk) 20:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC) Peace and Love
Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 15:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
Your above exchange with WalterClip, and your comments here has proven you have a good sense of humor. Therefore, you get this shiny star as a reminder to never lose it. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC) |
Why does it say age i56? I thought that was the length of time in days between archives? The page about clue bot thre is worth a read, paramaters and such if I can find it. Off2riorob ( talk) 16:30, 18 May 2010 (UTC)