For the reason on my semi retirement please see User:Andrewcrawford
if you-ever want to talk just google wjmdem you will most likly find me somewhere — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjmdem ( talk • contribs) 15:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I have suggested this to be moved. Please see Talk:Brave Heart#Move?. Simply south.... .. cooking letters for just 7 years 19:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Remember I suggested to you on the Gladiators (1992 series) talk page about how each episode summary should be. Well here is another suggestion! This is the first episode of the second series. the coloured boxes represent the colour of the shirt and the shorts the contender wore. The coloured fonts represent the colour of the line around the contenders shirt and the italic squares on the sides of the contenders shirt and shorts. Underneath the wikitables, in the After ? events, the coloured letters represents the colour of the shirt and the shorts the contender wore and the coloured numbers represent the colour of the line around the contenders shirt and the italic squares on the sides of the contenders shirt and shorts.
|
|
What do you think? Wonderwizard ( talk) 11:32, November 8th 2014 (UTC)
Hey, I've just added you to the inactive participants list on the mentioned project above. If you would like to rejoin the project at any point, Just add your name to the list of active participants. Thanks, TF { Contribs } 14:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
hi, i'd like to see a substantial rewrite at system load. please see my comments at the talk page
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I see that you commented at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/London_Buses_route_153. You may be interested in commenting at this new Article for Deletion nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53. Best wishes, jcc ( tea and biscuits) 09:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jungle Junction (series 1) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Junction (series 1) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 13:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jungle Junction (series 2) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Junction (series 2) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 13:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Special Agent Oso (series 2) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me 12:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Special Agent Oso (series 1) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me 12:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
For the reason on my semi retirement please see User:Andrewcrawford
if you-ever want to talk just google wjmdem you will most likly find me somewhere — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjmdem ( talk • contribs) 15:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I have suggested this to be moved. Please see Talk:Brave Heart#Move?. Simply south.... .. cooking letters for just 7 years 19:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Remember I suggested to you on the Gladiators (1992 series) talk page about how each episode summary should be. Well here is another suggestion! This is the first episode of the second series. the coloured boxes represent the colour of the shirt and the shorts the contender wore. The coloured fonts represent the colour of the line around the contenders shirt and the italic squares on the sides of the contenders shirt and shorts. Underneath the wikitables, in the After ? events, the coloured letters represents the colour of the shirt and the shorts the contender wore and the coloured numbers represent the colour of the line around the contenders shirt and the italic squares on the sides of the contenders shirt and shorts.
|
|
What do you think? Wonderwizard ( talk) 11:32, November 8th 2014 (UTC)
Hey, I've just added you to the inactive participants list on the mentioned project above. If you would like to rejoin the project at any point, Just add your name to the list of active participants. Thanks, TF { Contribs } 14:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
hi, i'd like to see a substantial rewrite at system load. please see my comments at the talk page
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I see that you commented at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/London_Buses_route_153. You may be interested in commenting at this new Article for Deletion nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53. Best wishes, jcc ( tea and biscuits) 09:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jungle Junction (series 1) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Junction (series 1) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 13:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jungle Junction (series 2) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Junction (series 2) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 13:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Special Agent Oso (series 2) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me 12:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Special Agent Oso (series 1) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me 12:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)