Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. I will respond at your talk page unless you request otherwise. Thank you. Design copied from
User:Duja.
|
|
Just welcoming you back to wikipedia. Regards, Kebeta ( talk) 17:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Pozdravljajus. :) ( LAz17 ( talk) 16:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)).
Speedy deletion nomination of Glenn Henry
A tag has been placed on Glenn Henry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
— Zhernovoi (
talk) 23:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Rjecina, when you were banned last year ( here), the community consensus was actually for an indefinite ban. I went out on a limb in your favour when I chose to implement the ban decision merely through a one-year block [1], giving you a chance to come back. However, that was of course linked with the expectation that you would change your editing if you chose to come back. You would of course also still be under all the editing restrictions that were imposed on you prior to your ban.
Unfortunately, seeing the (few) edits you have made since returning, there is no improvement at all. You are right back with the same disruptive pattern. Making an unexplained POV edit on exactly the same issue you were blocked over last year [2], as the first thing on expiry of your block. Again no meaningful edit summary. Again in broken English, and no visible effort to get your grammar right at last. And then this [3] incomprehensible rant on a talk page.
Unfortunately, this leaves me no hope you will become a constructive contributor yet. On the basis of the ban decision from last year, which is still valid, I am therefore re-blocking you. This time it's indef. If you want to return, you will first have some explaining to do about how you plan to improve your editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- It is possible that we are having small mistake with this ban4life ?
- My thinking is that this edit summary (bye) has been OK, because that is my last edit on english wikipedia.
- About my broken english [4] it is possible only to say that interwiki spammer has accepted my incomprehensible rant and ended his spamming on sh wikipedia. You can read his statement:"Rijecina2: Don´t worry this will notbe a wiki problem. This discussion will help solve existing problems" [5]. Example of July spamiming on sh wikipedia you can look in this link.
- When this Juli it has become clear that I will become administrator on sh wikipedia I have started to write warnings on others wikipedia about interwiki spam or vandal problems (interwiki warning example on bosnian wiki from 9 August and I will continue to do this in the future. For me it is hard to imagine that this is disruptive conduct or that administrators (which I am on sh wiki) on other wiki must know good english to write interwiki warning on english wikipedia ?
- My proposition is to change definition of this ban4life in:
- "Requested by the user on sh.wikipedia as an unwanted SUL local account"
- and remove ban4life from user:Rjecina2 on english wikipedia so that I can contact administrators or vandals on english wiki about "small" interwiki problems on sh wiki which have started on english wiki-- Rjecina ( talk) 09:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Rjecina ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Reasons are writen on 23 August 2010, but Future Perfect is not responding (even on emails...). I can now add new reasons (meta, interwiki problems with sh wiki), but I do not see reasons. This account will be active (or user:Rjecina2) only for interwiki problems between english and sh wikipedia
Decline reason:
sh.WP will just have to find someone else to deal with interwiki issues, this reasoning does not adequately address the reasons for your block here. Being an admin on another project is in no way a free pass to do anything in particular here, and there is no good reason to unblock your alternate account as it is still you, and there was in fact strong support for a ban at ANI. I suggest that if you want to pursue this further you contact WP:BASC by email. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rjecina ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am blocked because of "disruptive conduct has resumed". Is the writing warnings to wikipedia users to end the interwiki vandalism on sh Wikipedia Disruptive conduct? If answer is yes then I am guilty, because this is reason behind ban (my only edit between april and september)
Decline reason:
And that shows you really don't get why you were blocked and why your behaviour is a problem here. Spartaz Humbug! 19:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination of Michael Kantakouzenos (died 1316) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kantakouzenos (died 1316) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kantakouzenos (died 1316) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Constantine ✍ 16:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. I will respond at your talk page unless you request otherwise. Thank you. Design copied from
User:Duja.
|
|
Just welcoming you back to wikipedia. Regards, Kebeta ( talk) 17:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Pozdravljajus. :) ( LAz17 ( talk) 16:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)).
Speedy deletion nomination of Glenn Henry
A tag has been placed on Glenn Henry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
— Zhernovoi (
talk) 23:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Rjecina, when you were banned last year ( here), the community consensus was actually for an indefinite ban. I went out on a limb in your favour when I chose to implement the ban decision merely through a one-year block [1], giving you a chance to come back. However, that was of course linked with the expectation that you would change your editing if you chose to come back. You would of course also still be under all the editing restrictions that were imposed on you prior to your ban.
Unfortunately, seeing the (few) edits you have made since returning, there is no improvement at all. You are right back with the same disruptive pattern. Making an unexplained POV edit on exactly the same issue you were blocked over last year [2], as the first thing on expiry of your block. Again no meaningful edit summary. Again in broken English, and no visible effort to get your grammar right at last. And then this [3] incomprehensible rant on a talk page.
Unfortunately, this leaves me no hope you will become a constructive contributor yet. On the basis of the ban decision from last year, which is still valid, I am therefore re-blocking you. This time it's indef. If you want to return, you will first have some explaining to do about how you plan to improve your editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- It is possible that we are having small mistake with this ban4life ?
- My thinking is that this edit summary (bye) has been OK, because that is my last edit on english wikipedia.
- About my broken english [4] it is possible only to say that interwiki spammer has accepted my incomprehensible rant and ended his spamming on sh wikipedia. You can read his statement:"Rijecina2: Don´t worry this will notbe a wiki problem. This discussion will help solve existing problems" [5]. Example of July spamiming on sh wikipedia you can look in this link.
- When this Juli it has become clear that I will become administrator on sh wikipedia I have started to write warnings on others wikipedia about interwiki spam or vandal problems (interwiki warning example on bosnian wiki from 9 August and I will continue to do this in the future. For me it is hard to imagine that this is disruptive conduct or that administrators (which I am on sh wiki) on other wiki must know good english to write interwiki warning on english wikipedia ?
- My proposition is to change definition of this ban4life in:
- "Requested by the user on sh.wikipedia as an unwanted SUL local account"
- and remove ban4life from user:Rjecina2 on english wikipedia so that I can contact administrators or vandals on english wiki about "small" interwiki problems on sh wiki which have started on english wiki-- Rjecina ( talk) 09:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Rjecina ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Reasons are writen on 23 August 2010, but Future Perfect is not responding (even on emails...). I can now add new reasons (meta, interwiki problems with sh wiki), but I do not see reasons. This account will be active (or user:Rjecina2) only for interwiki problems between english and sh wikipedia
Decline reason:
sh.WP will just have to find someone else to deal with interwiki issues, this reasoning does not adequately address the reasons for your block here. Being an admin on another project is in no way a free pass to do anything in particular here, and there is no good reason to unblock your alternate account as it is still you, and there was in fact strong support for a ban at ANI. I suggest that if you want to pursue this further you contact WP:BASC by email. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rjecina ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am blocked because of "disruptive conduct has resumed". Is the writing warnings to wikipedia users to end the interwiki vandalism on sh Wikipedia Disruptive conduct? If answer is yes then I am guilty, because this is reason behind ban (my only edit between april and september)
Decline reason:
And that shows you really don't get why you were blocked and why your behaviour is a problem here. Spartaz Humbug! 19:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination of Michael Kantakouzenos (died 1316) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kantakouzenos (died 1316) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kantakouzenos (died 1316) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Constantine ✍ 16:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!