![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Sitush, i may have done one or two mistakes but if you see my editing history, 70% of my edits have been dedicated to remove indic scripts from the wiki articles, Thankyou Ankush 89 ( talk) 10:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, can there may be atleast some exceptional indian articles which can contain the Indic Scripts in just a word or line in the initial only,for example a personality who devoted all his or her life towards the furtherance of that language or the state having the specified language as its official one? Ankush 89 ( talk) 13:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
dear user, kindly discuss on talk pages before doing drastic changes in article Marathwada, i'm undoing your edits on Marathwada and please come to talk page and make a consensus. No one owns the article. Thank you. -- Human3015 09:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, As discussed in the Randhawa edit section, you mentioned that HA Rose had no formal training and had an agenda, a point which I do not disagree with. However, I would like to know why an untrained historian like Rose is not supposed to be used as per Wikipedia guidelines but another untrained one, Khushwant Singh can be cited as a source. Singh was a journalist and a novelist. His works on Punjab are of an amateur interest and prove nothing of his competence as a researcher. Also, this particular article cited on the aforementioned Wiki is a newspaper opinion piece sort of work, one of the hundreds that he wrote and there are obviously no reliable sources cited for his claims. So, basic question is - given that this wiki article has no academic sources to back it claims, why is one amateur with no formal training is more acceptable than another?
Respected sitush sir
Bhuinhar Brahmins are separate community from Bhumihar Brahmins. Bhumihar does not remain brahmin but bhuinhar brahmin are brahmin, they are branch of kanyakubj brahmins,also about marriage relation between bhuihar brahmin and saryupareen brahmins i have mention is true. what now reference if anyone want i have clearly mention villages near south east of basti city their names are narsinghpur , Nagara similarly their are twelve villages.if you does not believed then come and check your self in basti.Marriages are made in heaven. please do not merged bhuinhar brahmins with bhumihar caste which also have brahmincal origin. their are saryuparin brahmins present in bhumihar caste.it does not mean that saryuparins are not brahmin. same apply for bhuinhar brahmins . if few bhuinhar brahmins are present in bhumihar caste it does not mean all bhuinhar brahmins are not brahmin. i have mention clear reason to not delete this page truly.
with regards Manas tiwari
Hi, Sitush I think you were involved with this articles talk page, there is some issue going on, I think you would be best neutral party to resolve can you look into it ? Shrikanthv ( talk) 05:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Anything here that can be sourced/salvaged? See also other edits by article creator. Given that they are a new user I didn't want to blanket revert just because their edits were unsourced and misformatted. Google books throws up some material, but not enough for me to source/rewrite the article. Maybe you have a better idea of where to look. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 02:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Ankush 89 ( talk) 16:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC) for indic scripts Please add some friendly language to your replies, you said no, no and you may not know my contributions to Article Solapur
Final mistake regarding Indic Scripts, If i do again any rubbish about this, u can take appropriate action against me Ankush 89 ( talk) 06:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For your particularly excellent work in developing Gurav from practically nothing into a fine article! WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, thanks for your note. What sort of reliable citations/references are acceptable plz? I am not entirely sure. There are several historical books and such sources that mention the Khattars' probable Rajput or Jatt ancestry but I would be grateful for your guidance/clarification, thanks. 39.54.138.91 ( talk) 12:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Hilda Khan , from Pakistan
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I had added a list of all Jatt Sikh castes which you have removed calling it trivial. If someone wants to read about jatt sikh people then I cant understand how the list of all jatt sikh surnames would be considered trivial
I am myself a jat sikh and I know about all those 100+ surnames. I can provide links to other websites but I dont think you would consider them given your unsually high rigid standards on common sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamaldeep1985 ( talk • contribs) 09:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Here is wiki page listing just surnames in punjab . Make it trivia too. I CAN FIND HUNDREDS OF PAGES WHICH TALK JUST ABOUT SURNAMES /info/en/?search=Category:Jat_clans_of_Punjab
An average newbie on wiki can have more common sense than wiki expert. Dont be soo arrogant about your prowess.
Are you going to make all surname pages trivia. Let me know your surname as well. I am sure I will be able to find a page here. Will u mark it trivia too ??
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamaldeep1985 ( talk • contribs) 10:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I do not understand why you keep on destroying this article even after it has been sited; I understand you concern about exaggerations and 'puffery' in tarikhs and gazetteers, however if something is true for several gazetteers or tarikhs how can you say it is true for the particular ones which I reference? You couldn't have read the whole source and tried verifying it. You then say 1876!; I did not know historical sources were not allowed on Wikipedia.
I believe that a avid Wikipedia editor like yourself would feel more obligated to find correct sources to back of questionable information than outright delete information that could be potentially correct but ill sourced.
I am a busy college student who has done a great amount of research on said topic, I am not a Wikipedia expert; instead of deleting all the information I add perhaps work with me on sourcing it correctly I would greatly appreciate that! - SAKhan2
For what it is worth, thanks for correcting my mistake on Croydon Fire Company. I legitimately didn't realize I had previously done a WP:PROD on that page. Had I realized that I would not have simply tried again. Thanks for assuming WP:GF!! :-) -- Zackmann08 ( talk) 16:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sitush, I have added my name in List of Yadav's and once Created My Own Wiki Page. As a user of wiki i think Wiki has been given me rights to do so. I am a living person and i hold a physical body on Earth. So why you everytime deletes my Log's and Article? Why dont you let me be a living person? Do you need a proof of my being Alive.. I hope you understand and won't do again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashuyadav974 ( talk • contribs) 13:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
You yourself had stated that WP:INDIC SCRIPTS does not apply to Hinduism articles and again you are changing your opinion and blaming me?? Ankush 89 ( talk) 15:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Exactly on the second half. Suggest amending the unnecessary start, before someone cites BLP, or lest it be used as ammunition by POV warriors. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 19:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sitush. If you have a moment, would you please review my edits, as well as others, at Churachandpur district? My only concern is that we are presenting information which is accurate and reliably sourced. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 23:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Namaskar Satush Samma tribe are the rulers of Sindh, Balochistan,Rajistan India, Punjab. They established Sammma dynasty under Jam Nizamudin (Jam Nindo) he belonged to Sindh , So there in the page/article about Sammma tribe is missing information about the Samma of Sindh. So therefore its requested you , don't delete it , I suggest you that you should research about samma tribe of Sindh as well so you can know the history of Samma ruler , samma dynasty, samma tribe , sammat as well and Rajput Sindhi. So put back SAmma of Sindh into Samma tribe. Hope you are getting me. thanks regards @JogiAsadMirwahi alias Jogi Don
He is sounding like a member of this cabal - Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/India_Against_Corruption_sock-meatfarm. What do you think? Is it possible to ask for a check user of some kind? AshLin ( talk) 11:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello sitush. I am extremely disappointed in you that you removed much history from article Khambi which took a long time to collect. Main source for the info on that page was from personally interviewing the elders from that village. There were no books written on the history of villages or towns of India/Pak prior to British occupation so i am not sure what sources you have in mind. The information there can be verified by the inhabitants of Khambi village if you wish to book a flight and go there to verify what was written in the article then you are welcome but i doubt you ever would. So kindly reinstate the info that you deleted or i shall do it on your behalf. Chaudhri ( talk) 17:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is being by Vanniyar caste members to promote false history of their caste. noboru karashima is wrongly quoted in many places. Vanniyar article itself has wrong information regading kadavan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sangitha rani111 ( talk • contribs) 03:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. None of the reference provided by these caste groups are verifiable or reliable. They manipulated the words of authors. Karashima quotes have been manipulated the most. If possible can you atleast correct Vanniyar and Pallava articles. I will be glad to provide any help in this regard. Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 04:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Noboru Karashima has clearly stated that present day caste should not be linked to its usage in 12 th and 13 th century inscriptions. He has clearly stated that medieval groups are different from present day communities.
http://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/439/files/2012/05/Karashima_paper_toronto_2012.pdf
Page 15 quotes in the bottom.
""As it is extremely difficult to define these groups appearing in the 12th- and 13th-century inscriptions, I here use this vague expression deliberately. A technical term for them may be jāti, as it is often used in inscriptions to indicate these groups, but we have to refrain from using this term also to avoid confusion with its present-day usage as employed by sociologists."" Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 04:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
YOu have removed all the contents of Rajpar page. Why you did it.-- Jogi don ( talk) 08:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
You have removed and added certain content on the page warangal where some of the deletion is acceptable but not entire one. You have reasoned that Bhadrakali and Thousand pillar temple are not located in the city and removed them from the article, this clearly proves that you edit few articles with zero knowledge. Those two temples are located in heart of the city, kindly you can google it. Meanwhile you added "sultanpur" as one of the old names of warangal, by this you wrote a new history to it. Festivals in culture section is also deleted reasoning as no proper source, what? do you expect a source justifying Dussera, Ramzan, Christmas etc are festivals? last but not least, stop writing reasons in such a way that you are the only one contributor of wikipedia and remaining are fools. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.101.16.8 ( talk) 17:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Re your message to me on 13 April. I'm sorry - I did remove the template as I thought I'd addressed the issue with my last edit in March by changing the source from my own research to the location of the original document in Bury Reference Library. As someone new to Wiki entries perhaps you could let me know what part of my entry doesn't comply with Wiki rules. Many thanks for your help. VictorianPainter ( talk) 12:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)VictorianPainter (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)VictorianPainter
I know nothing about the Indian clan system but I did accept Hayer clan at AfC. You have removed a number of references from the article that appear to be from reliable sources and then added a "notability" tag. I am unhappy with this and have replaced the references and removed your tag. Please explain. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I want to initially appreciate the push you are doing towards more reliable sources in ethnic and caste posts. It would be nice to see some clarification on why certain components of the article, such as demographics and geographic triangulations are not considered appropriate. I also find it odd why these sources are appropriate for the corollary articles, Maan and Bhullar, as well as other clan articles in your view -- I suspect it may the use of the citations? I know there's no need for a bias, but there does seem one where associated articles (and other clans) are allowed the same sources, links you must have noticed. Again, I am genuinely curious because it has certainly been difficult to find relevant, noteworthy texts. I am also bothered on why your suggestions wouldn't include using the citations but keeping the citations within the context of potential colonial bias. I think the history of clans, and how they were construed by colonizers is in itself important. A relevant example of this is the Tutsi page which does discuss how Belgians had their own interpretations of race. I appreciate your stance, especially in a sensitive area as caste, though I do think it may be preventing important, factual insight on the historical interpretation of caste. Jayrrtt ( talk) 05:18, 04 May 2015
Mr Sitush, you are over smart , you are ignorant of history,you have done a blunder , first you have removed all the contents of Sammma tribe page of Wikipedia, then I again with hardship have managed to write information of samma tribe. Now again you have reverted it . it's not fair , Samma tribe is definitely Samma are a Rajput clan of Sindhi Rajputs (Sindhi: سنڌي راجپوت) are Sindhi people belonging to the Rajput community and living in Sindh, Pakistan. Samma have been the rulers of Present day Pakistan including Sindh, Balochistan, Rajasthan India. you have done a blunder with History of Samma tribe as well as History of Sub-continent, History of Sindh. I hope its enough to realize you the seriousness of this issue which you have created , so now if you are astute and understand the seriousness of this you would refrain from doing such a blunder any more and you have to give back data of Samma tribe and Rajpar page as well. -- Jogi don ( talk) 04:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Mr.Satush give me explanation why you removed the previous content of Samma tribe ?. -- Jogi don ( talk) 06:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 05:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
We need you, Sitush .... ![]() |
I have just imposed an interaction ban on Lightbreather, prohibiting her from any interaction with you. The ban is one-way because in the latest incident the misconduct seems to have been primarily hers, but that is not an endorsement of your conduct. I strongly advise you to keep the greatest possible distance from Lightbreather. If there were further conflict between the two of you, I would have no hesitation in making the interaction ban two-way. I think it is in the best interests of the project that you both find something to focus on that is not each other. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Have nominated {{ Country data Mughal Empire}} for deletion. Informing you given our previous discussions and your input at article talk page. Abecedare ( talk) 18:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
I've suggested on Lightbreather's talk that an iban is between you and her is probably needed to wrap up all the loose ends. At the moment this is just a heads up rather than a formal notification of a discussion starting up. Best is NOT to comment on her talk about it. Roger Davies talk 17:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, you said on Roger's page that you are not willing to bring a case against Lightbreather. Would you be willing to collaborate on creating one? I agree with you that her behavior is disruptive and has not changed despite numerous warnings, etc, and I am prepared to begin gathering evidence. I do not interact much with the articles/topics in which she edits and instead see more of what has happened in WP-space. Karanacs ( talk) 18:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush,
You are reverting our page again as we have given right sources with correct links pertaining to those sources. We just want to keep our page up to date. Devanga is community that originated from karnataka and now common to all the 4 south indian states and it does not pertain to Andhra Pradesh only.Related ethnic group can be multiple for our community and not only Thogataveera. We want to build our community wiki page with lot of contents and appreciate each and every person to share his content in the common devanga wiki page without reverting our changes.
Thanks, Arun — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.22.238.216 ( talk) 06:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I was having trouble in regards to editing this article. I deleted a sentence that wasn't backed by sources yet explained why it should be deleted, nevertheless, there was a consensus conflict in regards to the article and tried to prove my point in the article's talk page and provided sources that are not WP:CIRCULAR that explain why the sentence should be removed but no one seems to have even read the sources [1]. I provided sources as asked even though for anyone who reads history knows the point I was trying to prove. I gave my reasons and sources but somehow no one seems to have read what I posted and dismissed me as s nuisance. I would appreciate your help greatly. ( N0n3up ( talk) 22:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC))
Ur Activities in Palli/Vanniyar related articles very biased. i have been following you more than year. Karashima Noboru Clearly Mentioned that Kadavas Belonged to Palli the Modern Day Vanniyar, and also sambuvarayar, I also Provided the Inscription Evidence stating Kadavas and Sambuvarayas as Palli. So Do not Assume and Manipulate History with your Own Opinion. And Your not a Historian on such things you never provided any references or source for your reverts over Palli/Vanniyar related articles Premthanjavur ( talk) 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Please provide proper reference that Kadavas and Sambuvarayas are not Palli/ Vanniyar. I wont accept your own opinion which is biased.
Premthanjavur (
talk) 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I mentioned your interactions with the user in an ANI thread I started on User:Eshwar.om. Link. Abecedare ( talk) 04:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
I think merging the two pages makes sense, given that that the main Kayastha page has a lot of sourced information about Bengali Kayasthas - the current Bengali Kayastha page seems dangling and extraneous by comparison.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melotown ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
As if we don't have enough to do, we need to deal with this pedantry. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 07:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
So what's exactly wrong in synthesis. Entire Wikipedia is a kind of synthesis, isn't it? Except for Gyan source, everything else looks fine with my edit. Please explain why did you remove it. Further, the empire actually relied on Marathi people for its armed forces - back then India was not 'one single state'. It was indeed an ethnic Marathi empire. User:Amit20081980 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Situs, Greetings. This is Chandra Bhan Prasad, and Mr Vipin Sodhi assists me in my Office in IT related stuff. My intro "Fond of English the Dalit Goddess........" is my Official intro and not 'Indian journalist". Please ensure that my official intro goes on the Wiki page, or else, remove my page. Warmly Chandra Bhan Prasad pioneercbp@yahoo.com cbhanp at Twitter.
Vipinsodhi87 ( talk) 08:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Well, this is the first edit I made to the Ajit Singh of Marwar article. "This would have also meant raising Ajit Singh as a Muslim, a plan that the Rathor family was not keen on. [1]" While this does lack an ISBN number, it does give the publisher. I do not recall if I had a physical copy of the book, or was using a version on google books, although I would guess the former. I do not have the book currently, so I can't say if the citations corresponded to the pages right or if they were in error or what. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
References
@ Abecedare: I presume that you have access to Richards. Can you make sense of the bit at the bottom of p. 254? It says
Ajit Singh, the Rathor prince, had survived to become the acknowledged ruler of Marwar and holder of a 3,500/3,000 rank as a reluctant Mughal amir.
Acknowledged by whom? It seems unlikely that Aurangzeb did. And the rank makes no sense at all, almost as if it is a typo from some Indic script. - Sitush ( talk) 08:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey, since you have been reading up on the Mughals lately you may be able to mediate the recent disputes at Mughal–Maratha Wars. Haven't had time to look into the article content to even determine the central issues, but given the subject area wouldn't be surprised if the article needs a clean-up or even a overhaul. Abecedare ( talk) 02:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Sitush need your help on Lead section of vanniyar article. I have provided references but I am not sure how to add these in the article lead section. details provided on Talk page. Thanks Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)sangitharani
Could you see this one User_talk:Titodutta#Help_to_write_the_exact_review_of_an_article.? She contacted me on Twitter after facing some problems on Wikipedia. What she wants is— to improve the article, specially the "critical reception" section. She thinks the "critical reception" highlights only 1 bad review. After requesting a few times, she has now made a list of reliable refs. I have looking for a reliable person where I can send this lady to get help. See if you can help this user. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 21:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
PS. I may go to Mexico Wikimania this year. More news will follow. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 21:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for defending me on my talk page about my ANI reporting of a particular individual. At least I'm not the only one who realises. — Calvin999 19:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
you have one message on my talk page.thank you Eshwar.om Talk tome 05:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
I fear I may have inadvertently undone your edit in a Twinkle rollback. Could you double-check. please? It was not intentional; it's just a busy page. Scr★pIron IV 05:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Some friendly response once and a while, as an elixir against all the "fanmail" you receive. Best regards,
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
20:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I have just found Category:India political party shortname templates which contains a whole slew of templates that are far longer in name than the outcome when they are transcluded. I wondered if you have any idea what these might be about? Fiddle Faddle 08:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
There could be a number of reasons why the society cares about British Asianness among its writers. Being diaspora, they could be combining cultural influences. Being minorities, they could be facing discrimination, in which case those that defeated the discrimination would be notable. I don't know. The society makes those decisions. We don't. As a wise man once told me, "We are at least theoretically in a cocooned environment here and we should revel in that space." Cheers, Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush
I see you did some edits to
Kunwar Prithvi Singh Chauhan. I went there to 'un-thumb' the info box picture, and made a few other copy edits,
here, removing un/poorly sourced BLP info, adding maintenanc
e templates etc. Some IPs have reverted me like
here. Do you think my edits are fair?
220
of
Borg
15:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Since you've edited this article, probably you have some content knowledge. There has been a dispute between User:Delibzr and User:Xtremedood on this article and a few other places. One report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Delibzr reported by User:Xtremedood (Result: Both warned) and there is another at WP:AE#Xtremedood. Any idea who is more likely to be right? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 16:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Removing impotent content is a service to the encyclopedia IMO. [3] Bishonen | talk 12:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC).
Please provide refrence indicating that the states of Haryana and Punjab have non-negligible population of Rabaris. ShamusHarper ( talk) 00:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I see that you've amended the page. Thanks for cooperating. ShamusHarper ( talk) 18:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey Sitush! You made some edits on the Playtime Is Over (mixtape) page that I reverted, and then you put back. I'm fairly new to editing, and I think I may have misunderstood the changes you made, which is why I undid them -- sorry about that. In particular, I don't quite understand what a mirror is. I did some googling but came up empty. Would you mind explaining that, and how that relates to the edits you made? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soyrice ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia guidelines mentioning use of "local language" in lead of City names. read here] on Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cities.-- Human3015 talk • 04:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Because of the unusual number of potential participants with interaction bans in the Lightbreather case, the committee has made special arrangements to enable i-banned editors to post and respond evidence about each other. These are as follows:
1. All i-bans and associated restrictions are suspended for the purpose of participating on the /Evidence page. This suspension extends solely and exclusively to the /Evidence page but some tolerance will be given on the /Evidence talk page to link to material on the /Evidence page.
2. For simplicity, and for the purposes of this case only, one-way i-bans are regarded as two-way i-bans.
3. Threaded interactions of any description between participants are prohibited on both the /Evidence and the /Evidence talk pages.
4. Similar arrangements apply to /Workshop page and the /Workshop talk page.
The original announcement can be found here. For the Arbitration Committee, -- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I've already revoked my request for merge in the source page, forgot to remove from Reddy page. Fine, thank you.-- Vin09 ( talk) 08:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
greetings - perhaps you could update my page some time? (Michael Axworthy) 31.54.90.1 ( talk) 09:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Michael, if you ever have the time then you'd probably be pretty useful as a contributor to Iranian articles etc. You've just got to get your head round the arcane policies of this place. - Sitush ( talk) 09:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
FYI, I picked up our previous discussion about Shakya at that article's talk page. – Greg Pandatshang ( talk) 00:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush,
I had created the page Rajendra Pareek and I see you have made lot of amends and also reduced the external sources. Well I am just a beginner on Wikipedia and will not contest what you have done but I can certainly tell you that I am related to him and the information provided by me is the first hand information. I also see you have deleted the names of kids and few other changes. You are also seeking citation on his his being second son. All this information is not in public domain. Somebody has to put this in public domain & I did that. Now do you want me blog this info & then you provide that as an external source of info, that is your choice. Also Sikar & Sikar district & Sikar (Rajasthan Assembly constituency) are not exactly same. I also have exact details of Votes he won/lost etc. will that be helpful. Also most of his sources are hindi news/website. will that also be considered here ? I need your unbiased help in putting up this page. Thanking you in advance. I am learning how to use the wiki (so pardon me for my errors) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekpurohit ( talk • contribs) 12:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Thakur_Sitaramdas_Omkarnath
This page was started by Abhishek Bose. Ample external links were given, along with Book refernces, website links, magazine issues. Initially, warning was given that too many links are not recommended. Then, external links were reduced. Now, the warning message wants more 'reliable, secondary sources about the topic'? I am also trying to add information to this page. please guide us what is to be done exactly. Arkaghosh6 ( talk) 19:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Thakur Sitaramdas Omkarnath was a Preacher who influenced devotees from India and abroad. Most of the books written by him and about him are local publications [without ISBN Code]. Thus, 'The Gurus of India' and 'Cloudburst of Thousand Suns' are referred to frequently. can we use blogs and personal webpages as reference? Arkaghosh6 ( talk) 05:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks again. Independent sources like international reviews, pages on other prophets, newspaper refernces have been quoted, as you know. Other references wiil be cited as and when possible. The book 'Gurus of India' was a very famous publication, and it has many descriptions of Sitaram's widespread influence. Your guidance and necessary intervention is solicitted. Arkaghosh6 ( talk) 15:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Saw your work on Emereo Publishing and the thread at WP:RSN. It's good to know there are people out there cleaning up problems like that. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 15:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC) |
a quorum of ten or more adult Jews" in Shiva (Judaism) becomes "
a minimum number of 10 either further grown up Jews" in the Emereo book, Shiva 362 Success Secrets, which does not even mention wikipedia. Sneaky and incompetent. Abecedare ( talk) 18:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
PS. Abecedare ( talk) 17:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
I am working on a translation project with @ Dr. Blofeld:. Can you explain why you reverted my edits when it is clear I am working on the file without attempting to talk with me about it? If you have issues with one of the sources, fine, we can discuss it, but to completely discount every source is unreasonable. SusunW ( talk) 17:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Emereo and imdb aren't RS and Network website is questionable but the expansion is good. Please restore and then sourcing can be replaced/improved.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Trout slap to Blofeld (maybe?) and Sitush for biting a newbie dedicated to learning about wikipedia and sincerely trying to improve the encyclopedia! Unlike some other "new" editors we all know, SusunW is a very good and truly new editor who is working hard to learn how to edit. Let's support people like her! Montanabw (talk) 07:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Perhaps Sitush or a wiki page stalker here could kindly explain to Montanabw that Emereo publishing and sourcing like "ll Flynn Handbook - Everything You Need to Know about Errol Flynn" which she readded are not reliable sources and mirror wikipedia? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
And this is exactly why the dramaover at ArbCom needs to stop, and why certain parties need to lose their editing privileges. I don't actually know any of you, and I haven't had the pleasure of working with you (yet) - but since I have been here, I have tried to fathom the politics of this place. If I were to be associated with a group of editors, I would choose each of you. All contributors, who care about the content of the articles, and don't seek out the nonsense. Even so, the garbage dumped into the drama boards spills over into individual emotions, builds frustrations, and makes decent people lose their focus. We make mistakes. So, as a stranger with good intentions, I want to offer all a word of encouragement, pour you each the libation of your choice, and let you know that you are doing good stuff. I hope SusunW will forgive the mistakes that come along with being real human beings, all of us under presure from somewhere. CHEERS! Scr★pIron IV 18:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Rajiv_Malhotra article is ripe with self referencing to sell books. Know you will love this one...
Thereandnot ( talk) 05:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
It source is http://www.agarwalsamajtirupur.in/history.php. I being naive don't know much about wikipadia. The facts are 100% correct as I myself being agarwal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.60.146.136 ( talk) 12:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi sitush please talk on talks page many thanks. I have added the idian census as of 2001 to give credable population figures many thanks, Smith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smith012 ( talk • contribs) 10:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I noticed you removed VRML 93 from the article on Andreas Raab becuase the publisher is not reliable. I'll note that the book is still for sale at Amazon, Barnes and Noble and is even available as a Kindle edition. Even if Emero is not a reliable publisher does it make sense to fault the author that uses them to publish? Shouldn't the author, inclusion in and current sales of the book count more then the publisher? Itsmeront ( talk) 16:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
I would note that the author also publishes with other publishers: [ Jack McLaughlin] Itsmeront ( talk) 16:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Just saw your tireless work on the page "List of Schools In Mumbai". It takes real courage and determination to convert all links into citations. EVen though you used ReFill, still.
However, I feel that Links would do the community better since Wikipedia cannot accommodate (and is not supposed/meant to) all the important information about every school. Additionally not every on-editor knows how to follow links from the Cites. ( They would find it easier to click the text in the article )
So just wanted to give you a heads up that based on the article-response, we may have to revert to the linked list again. Ill take care of the bare-links. ( Truly hats off for that! )
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Hats off to you for converting all bare-links to Embedded links on List of Schools In Mumbai. thank you for your contribution to WikiProject India and Wikiproject India - Education Anonymousbananas ( talk) 06:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC) |
Uhm, bro, i was kinda working on the edit you just reverted? Whats up? I was tabling the entire content.
Why are you reverting edits in such a manner Sitush ( talk · contribs)? Anonymousbananas ( talk) 10:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey Sitush ( talk · contribs) So lets admit we've had a bit of a rocky time recently, but lets also admit we both would want to see this Schools in India sphere of Wikipedia cleaned and tidied up. I see you're working effortlessly and tirelessly, so uptil the point consensus builds on the overall structure, lets jot down some to-do points which we can take care of right away and split em up?
Also as a general trivia question, how long does it usually take for consensus to build in such discussions?
Ive also left a word on the noticeboard discussion, let me know what you think. Anonymousbananas ( talk) 11:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Best, Voceditenore ( talk)
Hello Sitush. I hope that you are doing well. I recently posted to WP:RS/N regarding the viability of FILMIBEAT.COM as a source for biographical articles and wanted to request your input. Please see filmibeat.com a reliable source for WP:BLP articles? at your convenience should you wish to comment. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 19:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Since you know a lot about Indian history, there seems to be that they are a lot of issues even I can not fix but I researched a little bit but would you please fully check Maharana Pratap for any issues. Thank you, Gameroffun ( talk) 00:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
The article Joseph Crook has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TeaLover1996
(talk)
05:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I scanned through Wikipedia:Overcategorization - please point me to the relevant part of the rule in this case? I can add the citations re Hick's art collecting if that is what you are missing? Regards Rstory ( talk) 11:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you have access to Cambridge journals online? If so I'd be interested in looking at The Scottish Kayaks and the ‘Finn-men’ Richerman (talk) 12:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
The Austrian branch is dissolved. -- House1630 ( talk) 11:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I've blocked the new account at Talk:Rajput as well. At first I thought I'd assume good faith, that it was as it might be a friend, but nooo... I'll save that for a better cause. Now we wait four days for the sleepers to show up, I suppose. I'm probably violating WP:BEANS by saying that, but what the heck, that character has been around the block and then some. He knows all about it. Bishonen | talk 15:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC).
Please go through the article Malik_Jat_clan, by contents it simply seems to be copied from an article from promotional site, even the infobox is simply a copy of the article Kadiyan. I am unable to decide the further course of action.-- MahenSingha (Talk) 20:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, you're a person who sees value in User:Darkness Shines' work and you've commented in the current thread at WP:AE#Darkness Shines. But it looks to me that the various attempts to limit him with restrictions so he can do good work without getting into trouble are all failing. As an example, why not check out what he's done since BASC lifted his ban in late March. He was given special permission to work on Female infanticide in India, but his edits there led to a downward spiral and an edit war. That's the article he was proposing to take to GA. Arbcom thought they would give him one more chance and a special list of unblock conditions. If we go by the literal text of the conditions, he has violated them. Can you see any way to resolve the dispute at Female infanticide in India? Read the entire talk page at Talk:Female infanticide in India if you think this is all due to pestering by User:Future Perfect at Sunrise. (The GA review at Talk:Female infanticide in India/GA1 is also worth a look, though it may be clouded somewhat by the dispute with FPAS). Should we restore DS's ban from that article, and hope he'll be able to do good work somewhere else? If you or I were arguing whether the baby-thrown-in-the-Ganges image was well enough attested, we'd probably just set it aside and move on. It seems that DS can't do that. It looks like he is running out of places to actually do good work without shooting himself in the foot. I am hoping you will reflect on Female infanticide as an instructive example, because if nobody can see a way forward there, it's unclear how DS can be rescued for productive work anywhere. The topics he likes are usually controversial. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 23:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush. I mentioned the aptness of the banner at the top of this page with respect to yet another lame brouhaha at ANI [4]. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 13:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) Sitush, I believe you may be mixing Paul Barlow with somebody else (or possibly relying on some isolated experience/comments). I have edited with and seen both of your editing for several years, and both of you are in the "remove junk information; use solid sources" camp. The discussion above seems to have simply polarized the rhetoric to the point that it does not really represent what either of you (or I, for that matter) do in practice. Abecedare ( talk) 16:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Possibly, in which case I apologise. On my phone away from home excuse any types
I've reverted you at Eric's page. It just seemed to be a very weird comment: didn't make a lot of sense, came from someone who hasn't been editing much and almost certainly isn't known to Eric, and who professes an interest in the gender stuff that is at the heart of recent problems.-- ChristopheT ( talk) 17:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
What do you think about this newish article?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Do whatever you believe is right in your heart of hearts, my friend, but please be careful about drawing in someone previously uninvolved, who has been a dedicated and kind and helpful content creator for many years. Attacking her for a single comment to get at the other editor would be highly unfortunate and inadvisable. Please do not go there. Thank you for considering my words. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
And what relevance is this to anything here, Tutelary?
I'm very much a proponent of software solutions to common issues on Wikipedia. I have a large amount of items on my watchlist, and I generally don't look back to the day beforehand even if I skip a day due to real life stress or other real life factors. As a result, I can sometimes miss the 'X administrator blocked Y person' on my watchlist. With that userscript, however, their user page and talk page and their username where they've signed is greyed out and crossed out because they are blocked. It is useful for that purpose. Have you ever been in that particular situation? If not, sorry for it being of little relevance to you. I also meant absolutely no ill will by posting it on Eric's talk page. If you need further clarification or explanation, please ask.
Tutelary (
talk)
21:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey stalkers, do any of you know of someone who could clean up the image here for use at Hulme Hall, Hulme? There is some quite severe bleeding from the scanning process. - Sitush ( talk) 09:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Sitush need your help. Vanniyar is trying to create a false history. Many articles seem to be their caste propaganda and false history. Kindly monitor these article and guide me further. I have made edits. Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Kadava dynasty
Malayamān
Chozhanar
Udayarpalayam
Mazhavaraayas
Vanniyar
most of these articles have references which are not verifiable or mention something else. Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Sitush I have made the following additions in vanniyar article "the Vanniyar filed a claim in Pondicherry to prove they were not a low caste as traditionally considered"
Rise of the Plebeians?: The Changing Face of the Indian Legislative Assemblies
edited by Christophe Jaffrelot
Rural Society in Southeast India
By Kathleen Gough ( cambdridge university ).
Please add these references. I am still learning how to make references in article. Thanks Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Burton Stein himself considers the vanniyars as low peasant caste.
Please read bottom of page 19 Saints, Goddesses and Kings: Muslims and Christians in South Indian Society ...
https://books.google.com/books?id=xjoeAAAAIAAJ&q=vanniyar+caste+burton+stein&dq=vanniyar+caste+burton+stein&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Fm9uVeicG8epogTxzYPABg&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAg
THE INDIAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HISTORY REVIEW by Burton Stein
Kindly add this reference for "the Vanniyar filed a claim in Pondicherry to prove they were not a low caste as traditionally considered" Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 03:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
![]() |
Cedric! |
Xanthomelanoussprog ( talk) 08:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC) |
Did you see this? I'm genuinely shocked. No way I would have imagined that so many of the users I had been interacting with all over India/Hinduism pages, esp. User:Bladesmulti, were all socks of User:AmritasyaPutra. @ RegentsPark, Joshua Jonathan, and Kautilya3: did any of you have prior suspicions of sockpuppetry (not just some POV editing)? Abecedare ( talk) 17:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
LOL!!! Yes, before I'm going to read any further: I've stated right in the beginning that I suspected Blades to be a sock. And OccultZone has also been mentioned more than a year ago already in connection to Blades. And I noticed, when Blades proposed some of my stuff to be deleted, that OccultZone joined-in right-away, which really surprised and annoyed me. I've also written oce - or did I just think that? - "Blades, if you're ever going to be blocked, don't come back as a sockpuppet." I've also wondered why Blades was so interested in sockpuppets. So, I'm going to read further now. Did I really read "OccultZone" here? By the way, I've had three menties; the third one was a sock. Blades too? Cheers, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 20:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
It's interesting to read this discussion again Talk:Hinduism/Archive_30#R_f_c_:_Should_we_revert_to_a_former_version.3F. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
1, 2, 3 Cosmic Emperor 05:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, err, I mean Cedric. There is a case even worse than OccultZone's and the admin who got caught out for COI... Certain IAC socks and their terroristic actions towards editors. That's putting you and others thru hell. The username Cedric is free for use. It wouldn't be sockpuppeting because Cedric and you don't communicate too well. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitush what happened to the Article "Cheramar Christians"I ave written? Why didn't you write to me n talk page if the article was not good or violated or anything. I just what to know what happened to Article "Cheramar Christians?"--Peter Thomas Olickal 17:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Also, please see Wikipedia:Signatures--your signature needs to include a link to your user or talk page. Thank you, Drmies ( talk) 18:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sitush, Let me ask you, the article "Pulayar" What is the reality or information regarding the actual Pulayar caste people of Kerala? No historical lineage, existence, evolvement, present status, reformation, Pulaya kings, the different clans of Pulayas, names, Conversion to christianity about 85% of Kerala's Pulayars took place during 18th to 19th centuries, no information about it, real pulaya culture/songs/sorcery/beliefs nothing. Really check it one time and then compare the Article I wrote I wrote. As you asked, it was written by me. The information I got from web, was given links. And I read the books which I mentioned in references, they are there in my shelf. YOu know.
Now I understood one thing, the articles which are entered by your team are "reliable", for your are a group. I checked the page creator of "Pulayar" from a foreign country. How much information that person can get about a group of people who are far from there living in south India? Impossible!!! When I wrote the first Article Rajamudy, your team said no much reference, I added. Now when I added enough and real references and links, you bare saying "too much", what is the point of truth. At least you could have talked the deletion of the article to me on my talk page, but you did not. Sorry the Wikipedia, I thought really trustworthy and truthful source of information. Thank you very much a hundred times for keeping my two articles in Wikipedia, really thanks, if you need please delete that also.You said that you cannot verify the article, si ti the reason deleting the articles? And simply saying sorry. If Wikipedia needs resourceful, real, reliable and descriptive articles, you might have kept my article. So May God bless you and your efforts in Wikipedia!!!
Appreciating "Houn" an editor of Wikipedia who edited, corrected and guided me with politeness and also to whom I shared about my article "Cheramar Christians", I may stop adding articles to Wikipedia.
Sitush, please I humbly request you that please don't redirect "Cheramar Christians", please because it is utterly wrong, you may redirect "Cheramar" no worng it is correct, but "Cheramar Christians are not Pulayars. Since you look forward for truthfulness and reliability, please don't make mistakes. You may delete "Cheramar Christians" words, it will be more good than keeping a mistake. You may check or ask to anyone what I said is correct or not. Or else please check my article "Cheramar Christians" if you have a copy, Castes of Kerala, as per Govt. of Kerala, you will see the mistake. Thank You.
--Peter Thomas Olickal 18:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Olickal Peter Thomas (
talk •
contribs)
Dear Sitush, the sentence which you said that I have copied, I haven't copied from anywhere, it is my own sentence. There might be mistakes in grammar or forming the sentence. You may please understand, such mistakes or sentences which you feel are not good and unreliable, might have deleted or removed and the rest may be published or kept back. Cheramars are same as Pulayas or they are categorized as Pulayas only, when it comes to Hinduism. And due to caste system and suffering they embraced Christianity and thus they are included in Cheramar Christian category, in which they are not at all Scheduled Castes (SCs), they are BCs. This is the real issues in behind why CHeramars are suffering. You do not know the real fact, and so you make statements like that.
You just think about the other high caste christian groups from Kerala, their articles are included in Wikipedia, the way they liked, for they are influential and highly educated. No article or even the word "Cheramar Christians" in Wikipedia until I came with the idea. Even you said about the article "Pulayar"; did a word about Cheramar Christians? No, then how can you say that it is reliable and truthful? Now about 85% of the Kerala's Pulayars are Christians; to say from SC to BC and forms the majority population of Christianity in Kerala. But you will not get their total population and numbers, since they are scattered to all the Christian groups. Let me point to you clearly, I am being one among them crores of Cheramar Christians, my father being worked for them since the independence of India in 1947 onwards to 55 years, I have all the books and writings related to Pulayas and Cheramars in my home. Then you say that I have copied. And I am a person who worked and works with UNDP, European Union, UN Agencies, World Bank and number of foreign funding agencies and many Government Projects in India, preparing project proposals, feasibility studies, Reporting. Hence, if not much, to a small extent, I know how to write or form explanation about a community or caste or a social group.
I request you to keep the article after deleting all the unreliable sources or ask me to do. Its a humble request, because there is no mention about the Kerala's most populated community in the world's biggest encyclopedia, You may check my claim. Still the real work force of Kerala. If you think that what I plead here is genuine, please do it, so that helping them from lifting to a self-esteem that will boost the next generation. Since they were considered little is written about them in history, only only foreign, clearly Portuguese, Dutch, British travellers, historians and writers written more about them. Now you understand and keep the article or at least the first paragraph which I wrote to make an identity of them in the encyclopedia. You may keep yourself, instead of my article. I really felt deeply in heart that why everyone hurt the community or in their unlucky condition. Please you may write about them as you had written about "Pulayas". Thanking You. With a hope in your magnanimity ............................. --Peter Thomas Olickal 03:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olickal Peter Thomas ( talk • contribs)
I thought you and the good doctor would love to read this; prose that would leave Chaucer dumbfounded. — Spaceman Spiff 18:36, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey all, on the subject of tortured prose and pov, take a look at this version of yet another Indian criminal-politician and compare with how the article is shaping up now. If the original was the work of one person, I'd be inclined to block them. - Sitush ( talk) 11:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sitush sir i want to give you information that please Edit some thing like in Bhumihar Wikipedia that they are two divisions of Bhumihar 1- Bhuinhar brahmins in Eastern uttarpradesh and babhan in magadh Bihar.
please change
In Bihar, they are also known as Babhan [5]
and they have also been called Bhuinhar .
to
they called babhan in magadh Bihar and also called as Bhuinhar in Purvanchal uttarpradesh.
please also edit in Brahmin Wikipedia
that bhumihar Brahmin Regarded as brahmin in murshidabad & maldah district of Bengal and in Nepal where BHuinhar brahmins migrated ancient tly. in purvanchal and magadh Bihar they claim brahmin but other communities does not belive. their must be two parts done bhumihar brahmins are regarded as brahmin must but only bhumihar must not.
thank you sir bhumihars must be divided — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahmrishi Diwakar Rai Bhuinhar Brahmin ( talk • contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
If necessary you may wish to contact the editor at the talk page (and ping the editor concerned). If that does not work, you may wish to go to Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard to seek help. WP:3RR 3-revert rule exists in Wikipedia which prevents the same editor from making more than 3 reverts in 24 hours, and the exemption under policy for BLP is potentially controversial, so it's best to not use such exemption.
Thanks, — Andrew Y talk contrib 12:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
hi, What is the deal with you?? Avanti was the old name of Ujjain. So ya there will be some similarity. But what about other part of the article, Geography, climate and Introduction. Why are you deleting them. they were not from that page. And untill you can come up with better content for the Ujjain page. Plz don't delete it. There are more than 30 links on that page for peace sake. And BTW FYI Ujjain is not municipality its Municipal Corporation!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roshan08.08 ( talk • contribs) 13:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
This discussion may be of interest to you:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Cyrus_Pallonji_Mistry
You may also wish to see this:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Cyrus_Pallonji_Mistry Soham321 ( talk) 10:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
That's an issue with that CSE.
I generally add additional words like "Prem Kumar Dhumal 1944", "Prem Kumar Dhumal Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha" etc. All Google search operators should works like -, "" --
Tito Dutta (
talk)
15:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitush either you keep the content intact or remove the page itself, we dont want our readers to read your version of the story and your 'assumption' of what Niyogi is.
What i observed is you like to quote western authors and refer them as very authentic and Indian references as wrong. You should check the refered sites and their owners who have Phds and yet its not enough for you since its not coming by someone from America or West. This is not acceptable and I reject edits, theyre totally unwanted
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptahill ( talk • contribs) 20:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Hai Sitush, Its me and let me request you one thing regarding the "Article" Cheramar Christians, Can I come with an utterly new article in all sense as Wikipedia wants on Cheramar Christians? If possible let me correct my mistakes and learn to do something new. Please talk to me. Peter Thomas 19:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)--Peter Thomas 19:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olickal Peter Thomas ( talk • contribs)
Hello, if you have the time then would you please have a look at the page I created on Bihari Rajputs. I would really appreciate if you could point out any problems you can see. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suijai ( talk • contribs) 11:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
There is no a caste named "Christian Pulayrs" anywhere, if you do not know particularly what you talk, better keep silence. please correct it so to do not make serious mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.0.20 ( talk) 15:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, one of the members added a notability tag to the Bihari Rajputs with the reasoning being that it's a statewise breakdown of a caste. However they failed to do so for Punjabi Rajputs, Rajputs of Gujarat and Sindhi Rajputs despite them also being in a similar vein. Could you please look into this. I would also like to add that Bihari Rajputs are the eastern most Rajput community with their own customs, culture and history so I think it's fair they have there own space on this website. Thanks. Suijai ( talk) 10:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
No problem, I'd appreciate your input when you have the time. Thanks. Suijai ( talk) 11:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitaula (surname) page is notably fine. If you meant me to add more references for the article, I will try; or else the article is perfect to be in the Wikipedia.Mr. Sitush, I believe you are a good editor, but this edit is not that necessary. It has got good links and references as per my vision.And yes, What is a reliable source in your vision? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niush Sitaula ( talk • contribs) 04:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Sitush, i may have done one or two mistakes but if you see my editing history, 70% of my edits have been dedicated to remove indic scripts from the wiki articles, Thankyou Ankush 89 ( talk) 10:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, can there may be atleast some exceptional indian articles which can contain the Indic Scripts in just a word or line in the initial only,for example a personality who devoted all his or her life towards the furtherance of that language or the state having the specified language as its official one? Ankush 89 ( talk) 13:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
dear user, kindly discuss on talk pages before doing drastic changes in article Marathwada, i'm undoing your edits on Marathwada and please come to talk page and make a consensus. No one owns the article. Thank you. -- Human3015 09:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, As discussed in the Randhawa edit section, you mentioned that HA Rose had no formal training and had an agenda, a point which I do not disagree with. However, I would like to know why an untrained historian like Rose is not supposed to be used as per Wikipedia guidelines but another untrained one, Khushwant Singh can be cited as a source. Singh was a journalist and a novelist. His works on Punjab are of an amateur interest and prove nothing of his competence as a researcher. Also, this particular article cited on the aforementioned Wiki is a newspaper opinion piece sort of work, one of the hundreds that he wrote and there are obviously no reliable sources cited for his claims. So, basic question is - given that this wiki article has no academic sources to back it claims, why is one amateur with no formal training is more acceptable than another?
Respected sitush sir
Bhuinhar Brahmins are separate community from Bhumihar Brahmins. Bhumihar does not remain brahmin but bhuinhar brahmin are brahmin, they are branch of kanyakubj brahmins,also about marriage relation between bhuihar brahmin and saryupareen brahmins i have mention is true. what now reference if anyone want i have clearly mention villages near south east of basti city their names are narsinghpur , Nagara similarly their are twelve villages.if you does not believed then come and check your self in basti.Marriages are made in heaven. please do not merged bhuinhar brahmins with bhumihar caste which also have brahmincal origin. their are saryuparin brahmins present in bhumihar caste.it does not mean that saryuparins are not brahmin. same apply for bhuinhar brahmins . if few bhuinhar brahmins are present in bhumihar caste it does not mean all bhuinhar brahmins are not brahmin. i have mention clear reason to not delete this page truly.
with regards Manas tiwari
Hi, Sitush I think you were involved with this articles talk page, there is some issue going on, I think you would be best neutral party to resolve can you look into it ? Shrikanthv ( talk) 05:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Anything here that can be sourced/salvaged? See also other edits by article creator. Given that they are a new user I didn't want to blanket revert just because their edits were unsourced and misformatted. Google books throws up some material, but not enough for me to source/rewrite the article. Maybe you have a better idea of where to look. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 02:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Ankush 89 ( talk) 16:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC) for indic scripts Please add some friendly language to your replies, you said no, no and you may not know my contributions to Article Solapur
Final mistake regarding Indic Scripts, If i do again any rubbish about this, u can take appropriate action against me Ankush 89 ( talk) 06:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For your particularly excellent work in developing Gurav from practically nothing into a fine article! WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, thanks for your note. What sort of reliable citations/references are acceptable plz? I am not entirely sure. There are several historical books and such sources that mention the Khattars' probable Rajput or Jatt ancestry but I would be grateful for your guidance/clarification, thanks. 39.54.138.91 ( talk) 12:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Hilda Khan , from Pakistan
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I had added a list of all Jatt Sikh castes which you have removed calling it trivial. If someone wants to read about jatt sikh people then I cant understand how the list of all jatt sikh surnames would be considered trivial
I am myself a jat sikh and I know about all those 100+ surnames. I can provide links to other websites but I dont think you would consider them given your unsually high rigid standards on common sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamaldeep1985 ( talk • contribs) 09:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Here is wiki page listing just surnames in punjab . Make it trivia too. I CAN FIND HUNDREDS OF PAGES WHICH TALK JUST ABOUT SURNAMES /info/en/?search=Category:Jat_clans_of_Punjab
An average newbie on wiki can have more common sense than wiki expert. Dont be soo arrogant about your prowess.
Are you going to make all surname pages trivia. Let me know your surname as well. I am sure I will be able to find a page here. Will u mark it trivia too ??
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamaldeep1985 ( talk • contribs) 10:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I do not understand why you keep on destroying this article even after it has been sited; I understand you concern about exaggerations and 'puffery' in tarikhs and gazetteers, however if something is true for several gazetteers or tarikhs how can you say it is true for the particular ones which I reference? You couldn't have read the whole source and tried verifying it. You then say 1876!; I did not know historical sources were not allowed on Wikipedia.
I believe that a avid Wikipedia editor like yourself would feel more obligated to find correct sources to back of questionable information than outright delete information that could be potentially correct but ill sourced.
I am a busy college student who has done a great amount of research on said topic, I am not a Wikipedia expert; instead of deleting all the information I add perhaps work with me on sourcing it correctly I would greatly appreciate that! - SAKhan2
For what it is worth, thanks for correcting my mistake on Croydon Fire Company. I legitimately didn't realize I had previously done a WP:PROD on that page. Had I realized that I would not have simply tried again. Thanks for assuming WP:GF!! :-) -- Zackmann08 ( talk) 16:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sitush, I have added my name in List of Yadav's and once Created My Own Wiki Page. As a user of wiki i think Wiki has been given me rights to do so. I am a living person and i hold a physical body on Earth. So why you everytime deletes my Log's and Article? Why dont you let me be a living person? Do you need a proof of my being Alive.. I hope you understand and won't do again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashuyadav974 ( talk • contribs) 13:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
You yourself had stated that WP:INDIC SCRIPTS does not apply to Hinduism articles and again you are changing your opinion and blaming me?? Ankush 89 ( talk) 15:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Exactly on the second half. Suggest amending the unnecessary start, before someone cites BLP, or lest it be used as ammunition by POV warriors. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 19:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sitush. If you have a moment, would you please review my edits, as well as others, at Churachandpur district? My only concern is that we are presenting information which is accurate and reliably sourced. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 23:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Namaskar Satush Samma tribe are the rulers of Sindh, Balochistan,Rajistan India, Punjab. They established Sammma dynasty under Jam Nizamudin (Jam Nindo) he belonged to Sindh , So there in the page/article about Sammma tribe is missing information about the Samma of Sindh. So therefore its requested you , don't delete it , I suggest you that you should research about samma tribe of Sindh as well so you can know the history of Samma ruler , samma dynasty, samma tribe , sammat as well and Rajput Sindhi. So put back SAmma of Sindh into Samma tribe. Hope you are getting me. thanks regards @JogiAsadMirwahi alias Jogi Don
He is sounding like a member of this cabal - Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/India_Against_Corruption_sock-meatfarm. What do you think? Is it possible to ask for a check user of some kind? AshLin ( talk) 11:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello sitush. I am extremely disappointed in you that you removed much history from article Khambi which took a long time to collect. Main source for the info on that page was from personally interviewing the elders from that village. There were no books written on the history of villages or towns of India/Pak prior to British occupation so i am not sure what sources you have in mind. The information there can be verified by the inhabitants of Khambi village if you wish to book a flight and go there to verify what was written in the article then you are welcome but i doubt you ever would. So kindly reinstate the info that you deleted or i shall do it on your behalf. Chaudhri ( talk) 17:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is being by Vanniyar caste members to promote false history of their caste. noboru karashima is wrongly quoted in many places. Vanniyar article itself has wrong information regading kadavan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sangitha rani111 ( talk • contribs) 03:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. None of the reference provided by these caste groups are verifiable or reliable. They manipulated the words of authors. Karashima quotes have been manipulated the most. If possible can you atleast correct Vanniyar and Pallava articles. I will be glad to provide any help in this regard. Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 04:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Noboru Karashima has clearly stated that present day caste should not be linked to its usage in 12 th and 13 th century inscriptions. He has clearly stated that medieval groups are different from present day communities.
http://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/439/files/2012/05/Karashima_paper_toronto_2012.pdf
Page 15 quotes in the bottom.
""As it is extremely difficult to define these groups appearing in the 12th- and 13th-century inscriptions, I here use this vague expression deliberately. A technical term for them may be jāti, as it is often used in inscriptions to indicate these groups, but we have to refrain from using this term also to avoid confusion with its present-day usage as employed by sociologists."" Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 04:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
YOu have removed all the contents of Rajpar page. Why you did it.-- Jogi don ( talk) 08:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
You have removed and added certain content on the page warangal where some of the deletion is acceptable but not entire one. You have reasoned that Bhadrakali and Thousand pillar temple are not located in the city and removed them from the article, this clearly proves that you edit few articles with zero knowledge. Those two temples are located in heart of the city, kindly you can google it. Meanwhile you added "sultanpur" as one of the old names of warangal, by this you wrote a new history to it. Festivals in culture section is also deleted reasoning as no proper source, what? do you expect a source justifying Dussera, Ramzan, Christmas etc are festivals? last but not least, stop writing reasons in such a way that you are the only one contributor of wikipedia and remaining are fools. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.101.16.8 ( talk) 17:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Re your message to me on 13 April. I'm sorry - I did remove the template as I thought I'd addressed the issue with my last edit in March by changing the source from my own research to the location of the original document in Bury Reference Library. As someone new to Wiki entries perhaps you could let me know what part of my entry doesn't comply with Wiki rules. Many thanks for your help. VictorianPainter ( talk) 12:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)VictorianPainter (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)VictorianPainter
I know nothing about the Indian clan system but I did accept Hayer clan at AfC. You have removed a number of references from the article that appear to be from reliable sources and then added a "notability" tag. I am unhappy with this and have replaced the references and removed your tag. Please explain. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 05:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I want to initially appreciate the push you are doing towards more reliable sources in ethnic and caste posts. It would be nice to see some clarification on why certain components of the article, such as demographics and geographic triangulations are not considered appropriate. I also find it odd why these sources are appropriate for the corollary articles, Maan and Bhullar, as well as other clan articles in your view -- I suspect it may the use of the citations? I know there's no need for a bias, but there does seem one where associated articles (and other clans) are allowed the same sources, links you must have noticed. Again, I am genuinely curious because it has certainly been difficult to find relevant, noteworthy texts. I am also bothered on why your suggestions wouldn't include using the citations but keeping the citations within the context of potential colonial bias. I think the history of clans, and how they were construed by colonizers is in itself important. A relevant example of this is the Tutsi page which does discuss how Belgians had their own interpretations of race. I appreciate your stance, especially in a sensitive area as caste, though I do think it may be preventing important, factual insight on the historical interpretation of caste. Jayrrtt ( talk) 05:18, 04 May 2015
Mr Sitush, you are over smart , you are ignorant of history,you have done a blunder , first you have removed all the contents of Sammma tribe page of Wikipedia, then I again with hardship have managed to write information of samma tribe. Now again you have reverted it . it's not fair , Samma tribe is definitely Samma are a Rajput clan of Sindhi Rajputs (Sindhi: سنڌي راجپوت) are Sindhi people belonging to the Rajput community and living in Sindh, Pakistan. Samma have been the rulers of Present day Pakistan including Sindh, Balochistan, Rajasthan India. you have done a blunder with History of Samma tribe as well as History of Sub-continent, History of Sindh. I hope its enough to realize you the seriousness of this issue which you have created , so now if you are astute and understand the seriousness of this you would refrain from doing such a blunder any more and you have to give back data of Samma tribe and Rajpar page as well. -- Jogi don ( talk) 04:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Mr.Satush give me explanation why you removed the previous content of Samma tribe ?. -- Jogi don ( talk) 06:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 05:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
We need you, Sitush .... ![]() |
I have just imposed an interaction ban on Lightbreather, prohibiting her from any interaction with you. The ban is one-way because in the latest incident the misconduct seems to have been primarily hers, but that is not an endorsement of your conduct. I strongly advise you to keep the greatest possible distance from Lightbreather. If there were further conflict between the two of you, I would have no hesitation in making the interaction ban two-way. I think it is in the best interests of the project that you both find something to focus on that is not each other. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Have nominated {{ Country data Mughal Empire}} for deletion. Informing you given our previous discussions and your input at article talk page. Abecedare ( talk) 18:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
I've suggested on Lightbreather's talk that an iban is between you and her is probably needed to wrap up all the loose ends. At the moment this is just a heads up rather than a formal notification of a discussion starting up. Best is NOT to comment on her talk about it. Roger Davies talk 17:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, you said on Roger's page that you are not willing to bring a case against Lightbreather. Would you be willing to collaborate on creating one? I agree with you that her behavior is disruptive and has not changed despite numerous warnings, etc, and I am prepared to begin gathering evidence. I do not interact much with the articles/topics in which she edits and instead see more of what has happened in WP-space. Karanacs ( talk) 18:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush,
You are reverting our page again as we have given right sources with correct links pertaining to those sources. We just want to keep our page up to date. Devanga is community that originated from karnataka and now common to all the 4 south indian states and it does not pertain to Andhra Pradesh only.Related ethnic group can be multiple for our community and not only Thogataveera. We want to build our community wiki page with lot of contents and appreciate each and every person to share his content in the common devanga wiki page without reverting our changes.
Thanks, Arun — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.22.238.216 ( talk) 06:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I was having trouble in regards to editing this article. I deleted a sentence that wasn't backed by sources yet explained why it should be deleted, nevertheless, there was a consensus conflict in regards to the article and tried to prove my point in the article's talk page and provided sources that are not WP:CIRCULAR that explain why the sentence should be removed but no one seems to have even read the sources [1]. I provided sources as asked even though for anyone who reads history knows the point I was trying to prove. I gave my reasons and sources but somehow no one seems to have read what I posted and dismissed me as s nuisance. I would appreciate your help greatly. ( N0n3up ( talk) 22:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC))
Ur Activities in Palli/Vanniyar related articles very biased. i have been following you more than year. Karashima Noboru Clearly Mentioned that Kadavas Belonged to Palli the Modern Day Vanniyar, and also sambuvarayar, I also Provided the Inscription Evidence stating Kadavas and Sambuvarayas as Palli. So Do not Assume and Manipulate History with your Own Opinion. And Your not a Historian on such things you never provided any references or source for your reverts over Palli/Vanniyar related articles Premthanjavur ( talk) 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Please provide proper reference that Kadavas and Sambuvarayas are not Palli/ Vanniyar. I wont accept your own opinion which is biased.
Premthanjavur (
talk) 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I mentioned your interactions with the user in an ANI thread I started on User:Eshwar.om. Link. Abecedare ( talk) 04:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
I think merging the two pages makes sense, given that that the main Kayastha page has a lot of sourced information about Bengali Kayasthas - the current Bengali Kayastha page seems dangling and extraneous by comparison.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melotown ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
As if we don't have enough to do, we need to deal with this pedantry. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 07:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
So what's exactly wrong in synthesis. Entire Wikipedia is a kind of synthesis, isn't it? Except for Gyan source, everything else looks fine with my edit. Please explain why did you remove it. Further, the empire actually relied on Marathi people for its armed forces - back then India was not 'one single state'. It was indeed an ethnic Marathi empire. User:Amit20081980 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Situs, Greetings. This is Chandra Bhan Prasad, and Mr Vipin Sodhi assists me in my Office in IT related stuff. My intro "Fond of English the Dalit Goddess........" is my Official intro and not 'Indian journalist". Please ensure that my official intro goes on the Wiki page, or else, remove my page. Warmly Chandra Bhan Prasad pioneercbp@yahoo.com cbhanp at Twitter.
Vipinsodhi87 ( talk) 08:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Well, this is the first edit I made to the Ajit Singh of Marwar article. "This would have also meant raising Ajit Singh as a Muslim, a plan that the Rathor family was not keen on. [1]" While this does lack an ISBN number, it does give the publisher. I do not recall if I had a physical copy of the book, or was using a version on google books, although I would guess the former. I do not have the book currently, so I can't say if the citations corresponded to the pages right or if they were in error or what. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
References
@ Abecedare: I presume that you have access to Richards. Can you make sense of the bit at the bottom of p. 254? It says
Ajit Singh, the Rathor prince, had survived to become the acknowledged ruler of Marwar and holder of a 3,500/3,000 rank as a reluctant Mughal amir.
Acknowledged by whom? It seems unlikely that Aurangzeb did. And the rank makes no sense at all, almost as if it is a typo from some Indic script. - Sitush ( talk) 08:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey, since you have been reading up on the Mughals lately you may be able to mediate the recent disputes at Mughal–Maratha Wars. Haven't had time to look into the article content to even determine the central issues, but given the subject area wouldn't be surprised if the article needs a clean-up or even a overhaul. Abecedare ( talk) 02:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Sitush need your help on Lead section of vanniyar article. I have provided references but I am not sure how to add these in the article lead section. details provided on Talk page. Thanks Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)sangitharani
Could you see this one User_talk:Titodutta#Help_to_write_the_exact_review_of_an_article.? She contacted me on Twitter after facing some problems on Wikipedia. What she wants is— to improve the article, specially the "critical reception" section. She thinks the "critical reception" highlights only 1 bad review. After requesting a few times, she has now made a list of reliable refs. I have looking for a reliable person where I can send this lady to get help. See if you can help this user. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 21:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
PS. I may go to Mexico Wikimania this year. More news will follow. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 21:04, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for defending me on my talk page about my ANI reporting of a particular individual. At least I'm not the only one who realises. — Calvin999 19:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
you have one message on my talk page.thank you Eshwar.om Talk tome 05:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
I fear I may have inadvertently undone your edit in a Twinkle rollback. Could you double-check. please? It was not intentional; it's just a busy page. Scr★pIron IV 05:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Some friendly response once and a while, as an elixir against all the "fanmail" you receive. Best regards,
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
20:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I have just found Category:India political party shortname templates which contains a whole slew of templates that are far longer in name than the outcome when they are transcluded. I wondered if you have any idea what these might be about? Fiddle Faddle 08:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
There could be a number of reasons why the society cares about British Asianness among its writers. Being diaspora, they could be combining cultural influences. Being minorities, they could be facing discrimination, in which case those that defeated the discrimination would be notable. I don't know. The society makes those decisions. We don't. As a wise man once told me, "We are at least theoretically in a cocooned environment here and we should revel in that space." Cheers, Kautilya3 ( talk) 09:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush
I see you did some edits to
Kunwar Prithvi Singh Chauhan. I went there to 'un-thumb' the info box picture, and made a few other copy edits,
here, removing un/poorly sourced BLP info, adding maintenanc
e templates etc. Some IPs have reverted me like
here. Do you think my edits are fair?
220
of
Borg
15:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Since you've edited this article, probably you have some content knowledge. There has been a dispute between User:Delibzr and User:Xtremedood on this article and a few other places. One report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Delibzr reported by User:Xtremedood (Result: Both warned) and there is another at WP:AE#Xtremedood. Any idea who is more likely to be right? Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 16:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Removing impotent content is a service to the encyclopedia IMO. [3] Bishonen | talk 12:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC).
Please provide refrence indicating that the states of Haryana and Punjab have non-negligible population of Rabaris. ShamusHarper ( talk) 00:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I see that you've amended the page. Thanks for cooperating. ShamusHarper ( talk) 18:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey Sitush! You made some edits on the Playtime Is Over (mixtape) page that I reverted, and then you put back. I'm fairly new to editing, and I think I may have misunderstood the changes you made, which is why I undid them -- sorry about that. In particular, I don't quite understand what a mirror is. I did some googling but came up empty. Would you mind explaining that, and how that relates to the edits you made? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soyrice ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia guidelines mentioning use of "local language" in lead of City names. read here] on Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cities.-- Human3015 talk • 04:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Because of the unusual number of potential participants with interaction bans in the Lightbreather case, the committee has made special arrangements to enable i-banned editors to post and respond evidence about each other. These are as follows:
1. All i-bans and associated restrictions are suspended for the purpose of participating on the /Evidence page. This suspension extends solely and exclusively to the /Evidence page but some tolerance will be given on the /Evidence talk page to link to material on the /Evidence page.
2. For simplicity, and for the purposes of this case only, one-way i-bans are regarded as two-way i-bans.
3. Threaded interactions of any description between participants are prohibited on both the /Evidence and the /Evidence talk pages.
4. Similar arrangements apply to /Workshop page and the /Workshop talk page.
The original announcement can be found here. For the Arbitration Committee, -- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I've already revoked my request for merge in the source page, forgot to remove from Reddy page. Fine, thank you.-- Vin09 ( talk) 08:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
greetings - perhaps you could update my page some time? (Michael Axworthy) 31.54.90.1 ( talk) 09:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Michael, if you ever have the time then you'd probably be pretty useful as a contributor to Iranian articles etc. You've just got to get your head round the arcane policies of this place. - Sitush ( talk) 09:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
FYI, I picked up our previous discussion about Shakya at that article's talk page. – Greg Pandatshang ( talk) 00:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush,
I had created the page Rajendra Pareek and I see you have made lot of amends and also reduced the external sources. Well I am just a beginner on Wikipedia and will not contest what you have done but I can certainly tell you that I am related to him and the information provided by me is the first hand information. I also see you have deleted the names of kids and few other changes. You are also seeking citation on his his being second son. All this information is not in public domain. Somebody has to put this in public domain & I did that. Now do you want me blog this info & then you provide that as an external source of info, that is your choice. Also Sikar & Sikar district & Sikar (Rajasthan Assembly constituency) are not exactly same. I also have exact details of Votes he won/lost etc. will that be helpful. Also most of his sources are hindi news/website. will that also be considered here ? I need your unbiased help in putting up this page. Thanking you in advance. I am learning how to use the wiki (so pardon me for my errors) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekpurohit ( talk • contribs) 12:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Thakur_Sitaramdas_Omkarnath
This page was started by Abhishek Bose. Ample external links were given, along with Book refernces, website links, magazine issues. Initially, warning was given that too many links are not recommended. Then, external links were reduced. Now, the warning message wants more 'reliable, secondary sources about the topic'? I am also trying to add information to this page. please guide us what is to be done exactly. Arkaghosh6 ( talk) 19:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Thakur Sitaramdas Omkarnath was a Preacher who influenced devotees from India and abroad. Most of the books written by him and about him are local publications [without ISBN Code]. Thus, 'The Gurus of India' and 'Cloudburst of Thousand Suns' are referred to frequently. can we use blogs and personal webpages as reference? Arkaghosh6 ( talk) 05:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks again. Independent sources like international reviews, pages on other prophets, newspaper refernces have been quoted, as you know. Other references wiil be cited as and when possible. The book 'Gurus of India' was a very famous publication, and it has many descriptions of Sitaram's widespread influence. Your guidance and necessary intervention is solicitted. Arkaghosh6 ( talk) 15:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Saw your work on Emereo Publishing and the thread at WP:RSN. It's good to know there are people out there cleaning up problems like that. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 15:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC) |
a quorum of ten or more adult Jews" in Shiva (Judaism) becomes "
a minimum number of 10 either further grown up Jews" in the Emereo book, Shiva 362 Success Secrets, which does not even mention wikipedia. Sneaky and incompetent. Abecedare ( talk) 18:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
PS. Abecedare ( talk) 17:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
I am working on a translation project with @ Dr. Blofeld:. Can you explain why you reverted my edits when it is clear I am working on the file without attempting to talk with me about it? If you have issues with one of the sources, fine, we can discuss it, but to completely discount every source is unreasonable. SusunW ( talk) 17:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Emereo and imdb aren't RS and Network website is questionable but the expansion is good. Please restore and then sourcing can be replaced/improved.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Trout slap to Blofeld (maybe?) and Sitush for biting a newbie dedicated to learning about wikipedia and sincerely trying to improve the encyclopedia! Unlike some other "new" editors we all know, SusunW is a very good and truly new editor who is working hard to learn how to edit. Let's support people like her! Montanabw (talk) 07:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Perhaps Sitush or a wiki page stalker here could kindly explain to Montanabw that Emereo publishing and sourcing like "ll Flynn Handbook - Everything You Need to Know about Errol Flynn" which she readded are not reliable sources and mirror wikipedia? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
And this is exactly why the dramaover at ArbCom needs to stop, and why certain parties need to lose their editing privileges. I don't actually know any of you, and I haven't had the pleasure of working with you (yet) - but since I have been here, I have tried to fathom the politics of this place. If I were to be associated with a group of editors, I would choose each of you. All contributors, who care about the content of the articles, and don't seek out the nonsense. Even so, the garbage dumped into the drama boards spills over into individual emotions, builds frustrations, and makes decent people lose their focus. We make mistakes. So, as a stranger with good intentions, I want to offer all a word of encouragement, pour you each the libation of your choice, and let you know that you are doing good stuff. I hope SusunW will forgive the mistakes that come along with being real human beings, all of us under presure from somewhere. CHEERS! Scr★pIron IV 18:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Rajiv_Malhotra article is ripe with self referencing to sell books. Know you will love this one...
Thereandnot ( talk) 05:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
It source is http://www.agarwalsamajtirupur.in/history.php. I being naive don't know much about wikipadia. The facts are 100% correct as I myself being agarwal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.60.146.136 ( talk) 12:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi sitush please talk on talks page many thanks. I have added the idian census as of 2001 to give credable population figures many thanks, Smith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smith012 ( talk • contribs) 10:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I noticed you removed VRML 93 from the article on Andreas Raab becuase the publisher is not reliable. I'll note that the book is still for sale at Amazon, Barnes and Noble and is even available as a Kindle edition. Even if Emero is not a reliable publisher does it make sense to fault the author that uses them to publish? Shouldn't the author, inclusion in and current sales of the book count more then the publisher? Itsmeront ( talk) 16:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
I would note that the author also publishes with other publishers: [ Jack McLaughlin] Itsmeront ( talk) 16:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Just saw your tireless work on the page "List of Schools In Mumbai". It takes real courage and determination to convert all links into citations. EVen though you used ReFill, still.
However, I feel that Links would do the community better since Wikipedia cannot accommodate (and is not supposed/meant to) all the important information about every school. Additionally not every on-editor knows how to follow links from the Cites. ( They would find it easier to click the text in the article )
So just wanted to give you a heads up that based on the article-response, we may have to revert to the linked list again. Ill take care of the bare-links. ( Truly hats off for that! )
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Hats off to you for converting all bare-links to Embedded links on List of Schools In Mumbai. thank you for your contribution to WikiProject India and Wikiproject India - Education Anonymousbananas ( talk) 06:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC) |
Uhm, bro, i was kinda working on the edit you just reverted? Whats up? I was tabling the entire content.
Why are you reverting edits in such a manner Sitush ( talk · contribs)? Anonymousbananas ( talk) 10:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey Sitush ( talk · contribs) So lets admit we've had a bit of a rocky time recently, but lets also admit we both would want to see this Schools in India sphere of Wikipedia cleaned and tidied up. I see you're working effortlessly and tirelessly, so uptil the point consensus builds on the overall structure, lets jot down some to-do points which we can take care of right away and split em up?
Also as a general trivia question, how long does it usually take for consensus to build in such discussions?
Ive also left a word on the noticeboard discussion, let me know what you think. Anonymousbananas ( talk) 11:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Best, Voceditenore ( talk)
Hello Sitush. I hope that you are doing well. I recently posted to WP:RS/N regarding the viability of FILMIBEAT.COM as a source for biographical articles and wanted to request your input. Please see filmibeat.com a reliable source for WP:BLP articles? at your convenience should you wish to comment. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 19:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Since you know a lot about Indian history, there seems to be that they are a lot of issues even I can not fix but I researched a little bit but would you please fully check Maharana Pratap for any issues. Thank you, Gameroffun ( talk) 00:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
The article Joseph Crook has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TeaLover1996
(talk)
05:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I scanned through Wikipedia:Overcategorization - please point me to the relevant part of the rule in this case? I can add the citations re Hick's art collecting if that is what you are missing? Regards Rstory ( talk) 11:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Do you have access to Cambridge journals online? If so I'd be interested in looking at The Scottish Kayaks and the ‘Finn-men’ Richerman (talk) 12:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
The Austrian branch is dissolved. -- House1630 ( talk) 11:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I've blocked the new account at Talk:Rajput as well. At first I thought I'd assume good faith, that it was as it might be a friend, but nooo... I'll save that for a better cause. Now we wait four days for the sleepers to show up, I suppose. I'm probably violating WP:BEANS by saying that, but what the heck, that character has been around the block and then some. He knows all about it. Bishonen | talk 15:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC).
Please go through the article Malik_Jat_clan, by contents it simply seems to be copied from an article from promotional site, even the infobox is simply a copy of the article Kadiyan. I am unable to decide the further course of action.-- MahenSingha (Talk) 20:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, you're a person who sees value in User:Darkness Shines' work and you've commented in the current thread at WP:AE#Darkness Shines. But it looks to me that the various attempts to limit him with restrictions so he can do good work without getting into trouble are all failing. As an example, why not check out what he's done since BASC lifted his ban in late March. He was given special permission to work on Female infanticide in India, but his edits there led to a downward spiral and an edit war. That's the article he was proposing to take to GA. Arbcom thought they would give him one more chance and a special list of unblock conditions. If we go by the literal text of the conditions, he has violated them. Can you see any way to resolve the dispute at Female infanticide in India? Read the entire talk page at Talk:Female infanticide in India if you think this is all due to pestering by User:Future Perfect at Sunrise. (The GA review at Talk:Female infanticide in India/GA1 is also worth a look, though it may be clouded somewhat by the dispute with FPAS). Should we restore DS's ban from that article, and hope he'll be able to do good work somewhere else? If you or I were arguing whether the baby-thrown-in-the-Ganges image was well enough attested, we'd probably just set it aside and move on. It seems that DS can't do that. It looks like he is running out of places to actually do good work without shooting himself in the foot. I am hoping you will reflect on Female infanticide as an instructive example, because if nobody can see a way forward there, it's unclear how DS can be rescued for productive work anywhere. The topics he likes are usually controversial. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 23:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush. I mentioned the aptness of the banner at the top of this page with respect to yet another lame brouhaha at ANI [4]. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 13:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) Sitush, I believe you may be mixing Paul Barlow with somebody else (or possibly relying on some isolated experience/comments). I have edited with and seen both of your editing for several years, and both of you are in the "remove junk information; use solid sources" camp. The discussion above seems to have simply polarized the rhetoric to the point that it does not really represent what either of you (or I, for that matter) do in practice. Abecedare ( talk) 16:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Possibly, in which case I apologise. On my phone away from home excuse any types
I've reverted you at Eric's page. It just seemed to be a very weird comment: didn't make a lot of sense, came from someone who hasn't been editing much and almost certainly isn't known to Eric, and who professes an interest in the gender stuff that is at the heart of recent problems.-- ChristopheT ( talk) 17:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
What do you think about this newish article?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Do whatever you believe is right in your heart of hearts, my friend, but please be careful about drawing in someone previously uninvolved, who has been a dedicated and kind and helpful content creator for many years. Attacking her for a single comment to get at the other editor would be highly unfortunate and inadvisable. Please do not go there. Thank you for considering my words. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
And what relevance is this to anything here, Tutelary?
I'm very much a proponent of software solutions to common issues on Wikipedia. I have a large amount of items on my watchlist, and I generally don't look back to the day beforehand even if I skip a day due to real life stress or other real life factors. As a result, I can sometimes miss the 'X administrator blocked Y person' on my watchlist. With that userscript, however, their user page and talk page and their username where they've signed is greyed out and crossed out because they are blocked. It is useful for that purpose. Have you ever been in that particular situation? If not, sorry for it being of little relevance to you. I also meant absolutely no ill will by posting it on Eric's talk page. If you need further clarification or explanation, please ask.
Tutelary (
talk)
21:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey stalkers, do any of you know of someone who could clean up the image here for use at Hulme Hall, Hulme? There is some quite severe bleeding from the scanning process. - Sitush ( talk) 09:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Sitush need your help. Vanniyar is trying to create a false history. Many articles seem to be their caste propaganda and false history. Kindly monitor these article and guide me further. I have made edits. Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Kadava dynasty
Malayamān
Chozhanar
Udayarpalayam
Mazhavaraayas
Vanniyar
most of these articles have references which are not verifiable or mention something else. Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Sitush I have made the following additions in vanniyar article "the Vanniyar filed a claim in Pondicherry to prove they were not a low caste as traditionally considered"
Rise of the Plebeians?: The Changing Face of the Indian Legislative Assemblies
edited by Christophe Jaffrelot
Rural Society in Southeast India
By Kathleen Gough ( cambdridge university ).
Please add these references. I am still learning how to make references in article. Thanks Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 02:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
Burton Stein himself considers the vanniyars as low peasant caste.
Please read bottom of page 19 Saints, Goddesses and Kings: Muslims and Christians in South Indian Society ...
https://books.google.com/books?id=xjoeAAAAIAAJ&q=vanniyar+caste+burton+stein&dq=vanniyar+caste+burton+stein&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Fm9uVeicG8epogTxzYPABg&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAg
THE INDIAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HISTORY REVIEW by Burton Stein
Kindly add this reference for "the Vanniyar filed a claim in Pondicherry to prove they were not a low caste as traditionally considered" Sangitha rani111 ( talk) 03:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Sangitha rani111
![]() |
Cedric! |
Xanthomelanoussprog ( talk) 08:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC) |
Did you see this? I'm genuinely shocked. No way I would have imagined that so many of the users I had been interacting with all over India/Hinduism pages, esp. User:Bladesmulti, were all socks of User:AmritasyaPutra. @ RegentsPark, Joshua Jonathan, and Kautilya3: did any of you have prior suspicions of sockpuppetry (not just some POV editing)? Abecedare ( talk) 17:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
LOL!!! Yes, before I'm going to read any further: I've stated right in the beginning that I suspected Blades to be a sock. And OccultZone has also been mentioned more than a year ago already in connection to Blades. And I noticed, when Blades proposed some of my stuff to be deleted, that OccultZone joined-in right-away, which really surprised and annoyed me. I've also written oce - or did I just think that? - "Blades, if you're ever going to be blocked, don't come back as a sockpuppet." I've also wondered why Blades was so interested in sockpuppets. So, I'm going to read further now. Did I really read "OccultZone" here? By the way, I've had three menties; the third one was a sock. Blades too? Cheers, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 20:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
It's interesting to read this discussion again Talk:Hinduism/Archive_30#R_f_c_:_Should_we_revert_to_a_former_version.3F. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
1, 2, 3 Cosmic Emperor 05:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitush, err, I mean Cedric. There is a case even worse than OccultZone's and the admin who got caught out for COI... Certain IAC socks and their terroristic actions towards editors. That's putting you and others thru hell. The username Cedric is free for use. It wouldn't be sockpuppeting because Cedric and you don't communicate too well. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitush what happened to the Article "Cheramar Christians"I ave written? Why didn't you write to me n talk page if the article was not good or violated or anything. I just what to know what happened to Article "Cheramar Christians?"--Peter Thomas Olickal 17:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Also, please see Wikipedia:Signatures--your signature needs to include a link to your user or talk page. Thank you, Drmies ( talk) 18:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sitush, Let me ask you, the article "Pulayar" What is the reality or information regarding the actual Pulayar caste people of Kerala? No historical lineage, existence, evolvement, present status, reformation, Pulaya kings, the different clans of Pulayas, names, Conversion to christianity about 85% of Kerala's Pulayars took place during 18th to 19th centuries, no information about it, real pulaya culture/songs/sorcery/beliefs nothing. Really check it one time and then compare the Article I wrote I wrote. As you asked, it was written by me. The information I got from web, was given links. And I read the books which I mentioned in references, they are there in my shelf. YOu know.
Now I understood one thing, the articles which are entered by your team are "reliable", for your are a group. I checked the page creator of "Pulayar" from a foreign country. How much information that person can get about a group of people who are far from there living in south India? Impossible!!! When I wrote the first Article Rajamudy, your team said no much reference, I added. Now when I added enough and real references and links, you bare saying "too much", what is the point of truth. At least you could have talked the deletion of the article to me on my talk page, but you did not. Sorry the Wikipedia, I thought really trustworthy and truthful source of information. Thank you very much a hundred times for keeping my two articles in Wikipedia, really thanks, if you need please delete that also.You said that you cannot verify the article, si ti the reason deleting the articles? And simply saying sorry. If Wikipedia needs resourceful, real, reliable and descriptive articles, you might have kept my article. So May God bless you and your efforts in Wikipedia!!!
Appreciating "Houn" an editor of Wikipedia who edited, corrected and guided me with politeness and also to whom I shared about my article "Cheramar Christians", I may stop adding articles to Wikipedia.
Sitush, please I humbly request you that please don't redirect "Cheramar Christians", please because it is utterly wrong, you may redirect "Cheramar" no worng it is correct, but "Cheramar Christians are not Pulayars. Since you look forward for truthfulness and reliability, please don't make mistakes. You may delete "Cheramar Christians" words, it will be more good than keeping a mistake. You may check or ask to anyone what I said is correct or not. Or else please check my article "Cheramar Christians" if you have a copy, Castes of Kerala, as per Govt. of Kerala, you will see the mistake. Thank You.
--Peter Thomas Olickal 18:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Olickal Peter Thomas (
talk •
contribs)
Dear Sitush, the sentence which you said that I have copied, I haven't copied from anywhere, it is my own sentence. There might be mistakes in grammar or forming the sentence. You may please understand, such mistakes or sentences which you feel are not good and unreliable, might have deleted or removed and the rest may be published or kept back. Cheramars are same as Pulayas or they are categorized as Pulayas only, when it comes to Hinduism. And due to caste system and suffering they embraced Christianity and thus they are included in Cheramar Christian category, in which they are not at all Scheduled Castes (SCs), they are BCs. This is the real issues in behind why CHeramars are suffering. You do not know the real fact, and so you make statements like that.
You just think about the other high caste christian groups from Kerala, their articles are included in Wikipedia, the way they liked, for they are influential and highly educated. No article or even the word "Cheramar Christians" in Wikipedia until I came with the idea. Even you said about the article "Pulayar"; did a word about Cheramar Christians? No, then how can you say that it is reliable and truthful? Now about 85% of the Kerala's Pulayars are Christians; to say from SC to BC and forms the majority population of Christianity in Kerala. But you will not get their total population and numbers, since they are scattered to all the Christian groups. Let me point to you clearly, I am being one among them crores of Cheramar Christians, my father being worked for them since the independence of India in 1947 onwards to 55 years, I have all the books and writings related to Pulayas and Cheramars in my home. Then you say that I have copied. And I am a person who worked and works with UNDP, European Union, UN Agencies, World Bank and number of foreign funding agencies and many Government Projects in India, preparing project proposals, feasibility studies, Reporting. Hence, if not much, to a small extent, I know how to write or form explanation about a community or caste or a social group.
I request you to keep the article after deleting all the unreliable sources or ask me to do. Its a humble request, because there is no mention about the Kerala's most populated community in the world's biggest encyclopedia, You may check my claim. Still the real work force of Kerala. If you think that what I plead here is genuine, please do it, so that helping them from lifting to a self-esteem that will boost the next generation. Since they were considered little is written about them in history, only only foreign, clearly Portuguese, Dutch, British travellers, historians and writers written more about them. Now you understand and keep the article or at least the first paragraph which I wrote to make an identity of them in the encyclopedia. You may keep yourself, instead of my article. I really felt deeply in heart that why everyone hurt the community or in their unlucky condition. Please you may write about them as you had written about "Pulayas". Thanking You. With a hope in your magnanimity ............................. --Peter Thomas Olickal 03:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olickal Peter Thomas ( talk • contribs)
I thought you and the good doctor would love to read this; prose that would leave Chaucer dumbfounded. — Spaceman Spiff 18:36, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey all, on the subject of tortured prose and pov, take a look at this version of yet another Indian criminal-politician and compare with how the article is shaping up now. If the original was the work of one person, I'd be inclined to block them. - Sitush ( talk) 11:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sitush sir i want to give you information that please Edit some thing like in Bhumihar Wikipedia that they are two divisions of Bhumihar 1- Bhuinhar brahmins in Eastern uttarpradesh and babhan in magadh Bihar.
please change
In Bihar, they are also known as Babhan [5]
and they have also been called Bhuinhar .
to
they called babhan in magadh Bihar and also called as Bhuinhar in Purvanchal uttarpradesh.
please also edit in Brahmin Wikipedia
that bhumihar Brahmin Regarded as brahmin in murshidabad & maldah district of Bengal and in Nepal where BHuinhar brahmins migrated ancient tly. in purvanchal and magadh Bihar they claim brahmin but other communities does not belive. their must be two parts done bhumihar brahmins are regarded as brahmin must but only bhumihar must not.
thank you sir bhumihars must be divided — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brahmrishi Diwakar Rai Bhuinhar Brahmin ( talk • contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
If necessary you may wish to contact the editor at the talk page (and ping the editor concerned). If that does not work, you may wish to go to Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard to seek help. WP:3RR 3-revert rule exists in Wikipedia which prevents the same editor from making more than 3 reverts in 24 hours, and the exemption under policy for BLP is potentially controversial, so it's best to not use such exemption.
Thanks, — Andrew Y talk contrib 12:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
hi, What is the deal with you?? Avanti was the old name of Ujjain. So ya there will be some similarity. But what about other part of the article, Geography, climate and Introduction. Why are you deleting them. they were not from that page. And untill you can come up with better content for the Ujjain page. Plz don't delete it. There are more than 30 links on that page for peace sake. And BTW FYI Ujjain is not municipality its Municipal Corporation!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roshan08.08 ( talk • contribs) 13:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
This discussion may be of interest to you:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Cyrus_Pallonji_Mistry
You may also wish to see this:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Cyrus_Pallonji_Mistry Soham321 ( talk) 10:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
That's an issue with that CSE.
I generally add additional words like "Prem Kumar Dhumal 1944", "Prem Kumar Dhumal Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha" etc. All Google search operators should works like -, "" --
Tito Dutta (
talk)
15:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitush either you keep the content intact or remove the page itself, we dont want our readers to read your version of the story and your 'assumption' of what Niyogi is.
What i observed is you like to quote western authors and refer them as very authentic and Indian references as wrong. You should check the refered sites and their owners who have Phds and yet its not enough for you since its not coming by someone from America or West. This is not acceptable and I reject edits, theyre totally unwanted
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptahill ( talk • contribs) 20:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Hai Sitush, Its me and let me request you one thing regarding the "Article" Cheramar Christians, Can I come with an utterly new article in all sense as Wikipedia wants on Cheramar Christians? If possible let me correct my mistakes and learn to do something new. Please talk to me. Peter Thomas 19:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)--Peter Thomas 19:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olickal Peter Thomas ( talk • contribs)
Hello, if you have the time then would you please have a look at the page I created on Bihari Rajputs. I would really appreciate if you could point out any problems you can see. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suijai ( talk • contribs) 11:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
There is no a caste named "Christian Pulayrs" anywhere, if you do not know particularly what you talk, better keep silence. please correct it so to do not make serious mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.0.20 ( talk) 15:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, one of the members added a notability tag to the Bihari Rajputs with the reasoning being that it's a statewise breakdown of a caste. However they failed to do so for Punjabi Rajputs, Rajputs of Gujarat and Sindhi Rajputs despite them also being in a similar vein. Could you please look into this. I would also like to add that Bihari Rajputs are the eastern most Rajput community with their own customs, culture and history so I think it's fair they have there own space on this website. Thanks. Suijai ( talk) 10:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
No problem, I'd appreciate your input when you have the time. Thanks. Suijai ( talk) 11:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Sitaula (surname) page is notably fine. If you meant me to add more references for the article, I will try; or else the article is perfect to be in the Wikipedia.Mr. Sitush, I believe you are a good editor, but this edit is not that necessary. It has got good links and references as per my vision.And yes, What is a reliable source in your vision? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niush Sitaula ( talk • contribs) 04:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)