![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The Arab joint list was named הרשימה המשותפת(The joint list) - both in Hebrew and in Arabic, and have registered as such. Here is the vedio from the actual event - when they are read by their name, while registering: [1] -- 82.166.116.68 ( talk) 20:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Number 57. Sorry for the inconvenience. The numbers I typed are correct, I will cite the corresponding source. Regards, -- Fadesga ( talk) 22:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
No.57, did you happen to notice in your close of Talk:Shady_Grove_Station#Requested_move_23_December_2014 that the move review that it was on hold for is still open, and that several of the "support" statements either supported lowercase explicitly or supported going with WP:USSTATION, the new guideline? Why not close the open MR instead, so we can move forward in a more orderly way, and take up the needed discussion of whether the word "Station" appearing on a sign makes it part of the official name of a station, overriding the official published station name list? Dicklyon ( talk) 23:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You recent closure of the move request for Google Play Movies was premature. I was not watching the discussion and as a result, I could not reply to User:CookieMonster755's comment, which is obviously invalid. The number of Google Search results is not the appropriate the method to tell the popularity of a name. And of course, in this case, a search for Google Play Movies includes all the results one gets for Google Play Movies & TV!
This was supposed to be an obvious and non-controversial move. Google Play Movies & TV is the official as well as the most used name for the product. The following notable third-party sources that establish this claim: TechCrunch, The Next Web, and Lifehacker. The links to the app pages ( Android, iOS, and Chrome) show the official name of the product.
The Google Play Movies & TV redirect (originally created to point to Google Play by User:Y2kcrazyjoker4) should be deleted and this page should be moved there. SD0001 ( talk) 14:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm confused as to why you are contesting the result of the RM that you yourself closed in favour of scope expansion. It seems to be quite clear. The participants asked to broaden the scope of the article to all 2014 clashes in Odessa. I provided the information, the sources, and wrote the broadened article, as requested. It only makes sense for the 2 May incident to have its own sub-article, given its significance. I'm drafting the December 2014 article as we speak. I shall hopefully have it up-and-running by the end of the day. You did an excellent job assessing consensus in that discussion. I'm much obliged to you. RGloucester — ☎ 21:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Please see the lastest Talk:Zombie. This move was not agreed upon, in fact the opposite was in favor leaning towards a complete merge. Thanks. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 00:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Right. Thanks for the reply. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 01:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for moving the page Something New (song) to Something New (Girls Aloud song)! You're a big help! Paul Badillo ( talk) 21:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Shawn Christian IS British. According to Wiki: "British people, or Britons, archaically known as Britishers, are nationals or natives of the United Kingdom, British Overseas Territories, Crown Dependencies; and their descendants." As you can see on the British Overseas Territories Pitcairn Islands is a British Overseas Territory. JanderVK ( talk) 23:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I went through the list of articles you've created one by one and see if the book is listed in the references. You've created A LOT of articles in the last year and half! :D -- Katie Chan (WMUK) ( talk) 15:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Please explain why you closed the move request for Walter White (Breaking Bad) when several good arguments in support of it were included, and no consensus has been reached in favor of not moving the page? Thank you. Chunk5Darth ( talk) 00:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jewish locality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Settlement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Number 57, I am here become I read the move review which stated that I should speak with yourself first regarding the RM. As you can see here [2] and here [3], there was no consensus and the RM seems to have involved canvassing. Clearly there was no consensus in this issue so please could you advise how to proceed. Regards Mbcap ( talk) 15:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, "Hof Aza" is Hebrew and has almost no recognition among English speakers. In fact that article doesn't even mention "Hof Aza" (though it could mention the regional council of that name). Simply for the sake of clarity, wouldn't Hof Aza, Gaza Strip be better? Zero talk 07:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Walter White (Breaking Bad). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Not sure if you saw this since the notification from step 3 got missed. PaleAqua ( talk) 23:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of War in Afghanistan (2001–14). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Mbcap ( talk) 15:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Star Wars (film). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 21:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comorian legislative election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey, there is a consensus to use a full name; one chose "Bak", and other chose "Pak". Nevertheless, that shouldn't prevent using Chinglish name, right? -- George Ho ( talk) 21:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Would you let someone else close the RM. You can vote if you please. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:50, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not going to ask for a revert, but you really should have started a discussion before moving so many articles. wctaiwan ( talk) 22:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
COuld not keep my promise of "few weeks", but now it should be possible to continue! To make it easier for me to get into the topic again, could you sum up what kind of progresses you made during the almost two years, and where information is still lacking?-- Antemister ( talk) 17:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayman Odeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi buddy - noted you made a form of revert to the article. Just hope to clarify some stuff to avoid misunderstandings:
If you have more inputs that can contribute to the content of the article, I will be the most glad to work together :)
Mr Tan ( talk) 11:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Number57. I want to ask you whether you can accept the inclusion of this section to List of Presidents of Israel? User Arminden added it today, so please inform him about your opinion at User talk:Arminden#Main biographical data. -- Sundostund ( talk) 23:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manuel Trajtenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordoba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I hope you're doing well.'
Do you support what some editors have been doing which is to include " Two-state solution" under ideology in the infoboxes of certain Israeli parties? I don't deny that those parties support it, but I'm wondering if that's the right place for it.
Also, there was recent vandalism on Likud. Not sure if you or someone should give a warning. -- Precision123 ( talk) 18:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for undeleting Derek Foran. I'm amused that you were the original prodder. Can you undelete the talk page as well - or is there nothing of value.
Also I was looking at the recently created Danny Ward (footballer, born 1993). The edit history is a complete disaster, as it seems to have years of User:Danny 93 unrelated Sandbox edits which User:Dudek1337 moved into Mainspace; the approximately 100 edits before [4] are entirely unrelated and should be back in the sandbox. Also the previous 2 deleted (January 19 and February 22) versions haven't got their edit history restored. Is that something you can fix, or should I contact another admin or go to WT:FOOTY. Nfitz ( talk) 16:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bezalel Smotrich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disengagement plan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
You recently participated in a move request discussion at Talk:Mandrake (plant). I have posted a follow-up request at Talk:Mandragora officinarum if you are interested in participating. — AjaxSmack 00:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Boston Town.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Eynesbury Rovers FC.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Nikkimaria ( talk) 05:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
You just closed a RM Talk:Taylor Hayes (pornographic actress) with no consensus, but it has been moved again. Additionally the same User:Erpert appears to be tag-teaming on the subject of removing "pornographic" which is the stable disambiguator in the Category:American female pornographic film actors with another user User:Scalhotrod at Talk:April O'Neil (pornographic actress) and has just made a non-admin close there which evidently fails the consensus criteria for a non-admin close. Additionally I note that there is a male actor of the same name in a minor role in a film article. In ictu oculi ( talk) 07:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
WP:PRECISE and pornographic film actresses". Thank you. (This thread is not a complaint against you; I'm just trying to straighten something out.) Erpert
blah, blah, blah...
07:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Number 57, do you know what the naming policy is for the election pages of the 3 royal boroughs in London. Cheers. Doc77can ( talk) 17:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi #57. For info, I think the only template that is missing is the one for Surrey. If you have the time, I'd appreciate if you could create it. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your effort in the restructuring of the table and the article there. The results last night were the preliminary results declared by the committee, and could be reached by clicking the brown box in the middle saying "19 Nisan 2015 Cumhurbaşkanlığı Seçim Sonuçları" (the results for districts can still only be reached from there through a zip file). Now, with some very minor corrections, they have been apparently moved to a proper page here, down where it says "İlanlar", in the word document titled "19 Nisan 2015 Cumhurbaşkanlığı Seçim Sonuçları". -- GGT ( talk) 16:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I think fully-protecting would send out the wrong message, however I will add the matter to my watchlist to monitor as a neutral party, and I will invite those who have edited recently, and those who took part in the RFC you linked me to, to begin a new discussion on the template talk page. Giant Snowman 19:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
I was having a disagreement with User:Jeppiz as to whether my added sentences violated WP:NOTNEWS . Kahlon saying he would decide "after all the votes are counted" is redundant. Coalition talks have been in play since March 25, and Netanyahu recently got an extension until May 6. The overwhelming reason a government wouldn't be formed by then and hasn't formed yet (disagreements with Kahlon) should also be noted.
These are the important facts to this entry and I hope that you can agree with me in talking sense into User:Jeppiz. Only conceivable violation of WP:NOTNEWS would be point 2, but given that "information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate", more information regarding the coalition as they affect the outcome of the election would fall under that umbrella.
Ferociouslettuce ( talk) 17:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you added full election results, replacing the template that is now unused. Then I noticed you did the same earlier for several election pages (e.g. [5]) for no reason whatsoever. Either there should be a template, which is then used, or there should be no template at all. The current situation you caused where there are unused templates and separate results on the articles is quite counter-productive to be fair. In the case of the Finnish election, I created a template because it appears to be common practice to have such templates. So please either revert your changes to the previous situation, or there should be wider community discussion on whether to have templates for results. Thank you, SPQRobin ( talk) 14:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your edit on the article of Denston, Suffolk. I am still in the process of changing the page to become more informative about the parish and both its past and present statistics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmithGE96 ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
is there a way to set an infobox to align to the left?
User:GNEbandit User talk:GNEbandit 22:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
If i set it in a wiki table...that could go on the left? User:GNEbandit User talk:GNEbandit 22:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Ok User:GNEbandit User talk:GNEbandit 22:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Why are you removing the Gozo 1973 referendum from the template? If the template is "for national votes only", why are local council elections included? -- Xwejnusgozo ( talk) 15:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Movement for Democracy and Progress (Comoros), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moroni. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cocos (Keeling) Islands status referendum, 1984, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cocos (Keeling) Islands status referendum, 1984. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 09:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Walknack. In Egyptian parliamentary election, 1976, I have taken the percentage with the calculator (295:360×100 = 81.9) and the voters (81.9% of 3,803,973 = 3,115,453). Fort the runner partis, I can correct it. Thanks for You caution. -- Walknack ( talk) 12:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi again! Yes, I have calculated various political parties percentage. I will search for locate the parties' percentage. -- Walknack ( talk) 19:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I am going to contact the club via email and see if they are still called March Town United or renamed to simply March Town. For now, please revert my changes that state that it is called March Town for now. Good888 ( talk) 12:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Why have you decided to delete historical data from Sport London e Benfica and described it as a cleanup? All the information provided including finishing runners up etc. shows the club's history. Cleanup des not mean delete the information provided by myself, the club's secretary.
Your cleanup goes as far as to place an incorrect fact which states that the club left the league while at Hanwell Town. This is incorrect. If you read my update, the club was at Haringey Borough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.110.209 ( talk) 11:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I can be contacted on info@sportlondonebenficafc.co.uk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagle1981 ( talk • contribs) 11:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Number 57. I notice that you have deleted this page on the grounds that you are "not sure that parish council elections are noteworthy". It would have been appreciated if you had notified me as the page's creator that you were proposing deleting it. I do not know of any principle that applies to Salisbury City Council, or its elections, which is different from the general notability guidance of WP:N. This election is adequately covered in reliable sources independent of the subject and I should be grateful if you would reinstate it and then propose its deletion as an Afd, if you feel that is justified. Moonraker ( talk) 08:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Number 57, I didn't recognize that you were redoing the Ministry of Economy (Israel) article. I am sorry for my error.-- Anonymoustofu ( talk) 20:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, @ Number 57: I am not sure what happened with the format problem. On my Galaxy 8 note I had red text layout problems with the edit in question. Right now I am on my PC and I agree it looks perfect with the edit added back. The Galaxy 8 is a runabout I use / leave at work so I can't comment on how it looks on that platform. Very odd as I have never seen the layout look off with this type of info before. FeatherPluma ( talk) 00:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, i saw you rechange
partii naleraq as "Centrist" party, but they are
Far left party.
But i follow the politic in
Greenland, apparently they are not.
They support
Planned economy and opposing
Free market.
They are siding with
Socialistic
Inuit ataqatigiit party as oppossitions against
Siumut,
Demokraatit and
Atassut.
Otto Nathanielsen (
talk)
04:25, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thanks glad we got wikipedians like you who support peace on both sides and not like this freaks who delete every facts that people say but i need to do me a favor in this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menachem_Begin and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herut this freaks delete what i said only cuz it does not fit their opinions you can please block them or tell them you understand in this subject and they should stop please? they got really annoy me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.246.133.184 ( talk) 20:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
fine than i glad you know hebrew take a look on the hebrew wikipedia of begin it is saying " המפלגה אימצה קו שנחשב אז ימני קיצוני, ובין היתר תבעה את החזרה מההסכמה לתוכנית החלוקה. סיסמתה תאמה את קו אצ"ל, "שתי גדות לירדן, זו שלנו זו גם כן"" http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%97%D7%9D_%D7%91%D7%92%D7%99%D7%9F#.D7.9E.D7.A0.D7.94.D7.99.D7.92_.22.D7.97.D7.A8.D7.95.D7.AA.22_.D7.95.D7.A8.D7.90.D7.A9_.D7.94.D7.90.D7.95.D7.A4.D7.95.D7.96.D7.99.D7.A6.D7.99.D7.94 which is regulated like the wiki in english about begin you right but not about the herut. so please tell them to stop or block them i know you got a lot of power on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.121.88 ( talk) 21:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC) oh and i want you to report this user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RolandR ok he delete every thing that is not fit to his opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.121.88 ( talk) 21:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC) please please be a good man and report him for blocking please you seem like a good guy. or if you do not want to involved tell me how im report him he deleting facts by his opinion please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.12.140.114 ( talk) 23:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
To continue the discussion we were having from Salisbury City Council elections. I agree with you that sometimes it may be possible for an editor to be too close to a subject to have a clear enough perspective. (though I don't know anything about soccer to understand your example) On the whole I don't think this is too much of a problem if there are other editors able to add that perspective based on their own interest/experience with articles in that subject area. I assume that you also hold this view which is why you thoughtfully invited people like me from the UK politics project into the discussion. From my experience there are editors who come into AfD discussions by other routes, such as other AfD dicscussions. There are editors who seem to essentially join these discussions offering little more than some understanding of wikipedia policy guidelines. This seemed to be the case with MelanieN who clearly expressed things from a perspective demonstrating no particular understanding of the subject area. A quick research on the editor confirmed their areas of interest and recent activity. I will repeat again, the nationality of the editor should be irrelevant and if you believe that I infer the opposite, then there really isn't a lot more I can say. Graemp ( talk) 16:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Mentioned you at ANI re: Herut. I'm probably misreading something, sorry. - Sitush ( talk) 21:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I will be reporting you for edit warring with me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Number 57. With this edit you show the result of the move as 'RESULT'. Probably you meant to say 'Moved.' Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 15:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why you deleted it. Archway ( talk) 21:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Following the outcome of the AfD for Salisbury City Council election, 2009, would you please now reinstate Salisbury City Council election, 2013? As previously discussed, the issues are the same. Moonraker ( talk) 20:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent close at Talk:MacBook#Requested move 30 April 2015. Is it okay if I move the alternate approach subsection out of the archive box? Even though many of the !voters ( myself included ) disagreed with the proposed move, given the comments both at the talk for that page and Talk:MacBook (2015 version) it is likely that alternate compromise approach to deal with how the articles on the MacBook brand vs models is likely to reach a consensus. PaleAqua ( talk) 16:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hallo. You moved the article Clotilde, Princess of Venice and Piedmont to Clotilde Courau (February 2015), but didnt move the talk page. The talk page havent been edited since, so I ask you to move talk:Clotilde, Princess of Venice and Piedmont to talk:Clotilde Courau too. Christian75 ( talk) 19:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of British Guiana general election, 1906, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: British Guiana general election, 1911. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 13:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
According to these articles from reputable sources; including one from the website of soccer's governing body in America, the US Soccer Federation; the San Francisco City FC vs Cal FC game was in the play-in round. Since they lost the play-in game, they never technically qualified for the tournament itself. http://www.ussoccer.com/stories/2015/04/25/22/43/150425-usoc-play-in-round-games-recap http://www.centerlinesoccer.com/2015/4/25/8497959/us-open-cup-play-in-game-2015-san-francisco-city-fc-cal-fc-kezar-stadium-record-crowd There also isn't a play-in round listed as part of the tournament on the its page on the USSF site. http://www.ussoccer.com/lamar-hunt-us-open-cup Crusty4545 ( talk) 18:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
... for moving Śramaṇa. Ogress smash! 20:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm not an unreasonable person. I'm able to change my mind. And I'm willing to accept defeat. I'm quite willing to follow consensus (even if I disagree with it). My understanding is that you are saying that consensus was established in the four previous AFDs cited in the Hyde AfD rationale. These are 1, 2, 3, and 4. However both 3 and 4 are for Conference North teams, not Conference National. There were only 6 different editors supporting delete between the 2 Conference National AFDs - with 3 more chiming in at Hyde. However with a small number of editors, does this really reflect consensus? Most importantly, in none of those cases was WP:GNG explored. Beyond those AFDs, I can't find much discussion. I've seen several comments that we have consensus that seasons articles for the first 4 tiers are notable, but the 5th isn't. But where have we clearly established this. The last (and only) discussion I can find on that appears to conclude otherwise? Nfitz ( talk) 18:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Would be nice if you asked me why I made the move before reverting it. I explained my change in the talk page, please add your remarks there. DGtal ( talk) 22:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
You were the last person to delete Kilian Elkinson, previously discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilian Elkinson. He got a cap last week in a friendly against Puerto Rico [6] recognized by FIFA [7]/ It looks like there's been 3 previous versions. If you undelete them all, I can try and piece something together out of them. I'd normally go to the person who closed the AFD, but they are currently semi-retired. Thanks, Nfitz ( talk) 23:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Recognize when no means no. Your idea of what Wikipedia should be or do may be completely different from what the community believes. Sometimes "no" means "I don't understand", but more often, it means "we understand, and the answer is still no." If you're in the minority, recognize and remember this fact. Don't continue to press for your desires against clearly expressed community-wide consensus. Doing so will just make yourself look like a child who thinks, "No, you may not have a cookie" means "I must not have yelled 'COOKIE!' loud enough for my parents to hear me."
@ Nfitz: This is not "a bad prod here and there", otherwise I and other football editors would not be so frustrated by your behaviour. Number 5 7 22:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Good move. Do you mind repairing the double redirects [8] from " Restavec" to the current version and update the spelling on the page? Thanks. Cheers! Savvyjack23 ( talk) 06:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Shoot my apologies. I thought you had proposed the move. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 07:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 08:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Please remain civil and not add obscenities to edit summaries as you did here and also this could be seen as a personal attack. Please assume good faith. Thank You for your time. TeaLover1996 (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your edit of Meimad, here are some Google search results numbers:
So I don't think it's wrong to say "the Meimad movement was founded 1 June 1988 ..." — Anomalocaris ( talk) 20:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Google search results:
Most of these results are not sentences with "founded 1 June YYYY", but many are, including some very British examples.
The Securities Exchange of Barbados was founded 1 June 1987.
Bearskin LTD was founded 1 June 2013, in Birmingham UK.
The Yacht Club, as it was first known, was founded 1 June 1815 at the Thatched House Tavern in London.
Founded 1 June 1815 at the Thatched House, St. James' Street, and two meetings were held annually, one in the spring at the Thatched House, the other at the Medina Hotel, East Cowes.
Founded 1 June 2012
So I still don't think it's wrong to say "the Meimad movement was founded 1 June 1988 ..." in any variety of English. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 21:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
You created Makhar on 8 July 2007 as a redirect to Democratic Choice. The current Democratic Choice dates to 1 April 2013 and is a disambiguation page. I suspect you want Makhar to redirect to Democratic Choice (Israel), but it's not obvious why, as that word does not appear in that article. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 08:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Please don't reverse the changes in the Malaysian election templates. The full template contains all the necessary information needed to find the information. Lazybugger13 ( talk) 19:03, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for getting back to you later than I want to. I've been busy at work and still am not satisfied with your explanation in regards to the changes in the Malaysian election template. Like I said that conformity with other election templates with other countries are not suitable for Malaysia election articles. We have different state elections from previous years, states like Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore which it would be easier to have these links in the main template. We also have links for various by-elections for state and parliamentary level elections which would be easier for people to access. I would like to gain some consensus in issue, otherwise I feel I would not want to use the current Malaysian election template in its current form which has no proper links to local and state elections. I would just create a new template for elections that have taken place after 2000 and discard this current template. Thank you and I hope we can reach an amicable solution to this. Lazybugger13 ( talk) 14:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Evemahmoud. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Malayan state elections, 1959, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Evemahmoud ( talk) 21:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your editing. Reply to your question, I hope that this link would be useful for you - http://www2.pmo.gov.my/election/ Alexander Iskandar ( talk) 22:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
If you cannot really understand the content in Malay language, you may use Google Translate if necessary. Alexander Iskandar ( talk) 22:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Alexander Iskandar. Nice to meet you, Number 57. Alexander Iskandar ( talk) 22:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for drawing my attention to WP:ELCITE. Like many other editors, I sometimes use citation templates in External links sections, always omitting the access date, as called for by this style guide. I will remember that "a concise description of the contents and a clear indication of its source is more important than the actual title of the page." Cheers! — Anomalocaris ( talk) 18:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
...for your support over at my RfA. I shall do my best to be worthy of it. Figured I'd been here long enough that it was about time I gave it a shot. :-) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 05:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
I saw this member Qed237. He changes boards beacuse of what he thinks and hears which is absurd. I showed actual facts from the FIFA site about Serbia not being listed two times champions beacuse at the time in 1987 it was Yugoslavia and not Serbia who won the title. His arguments are that according to him (In football it is widely considered that Serbia is replacing Yugoslavia) without giving any source to it. He is basically using his own views as sources i mean come on.... I saw that you are an admin and that you have faced absurd problems with same person as well. Is there any possibility to report him or has wikipedia stoop so low? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borovine ( talk • contribs) 23:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
From where did you get the author name and date for the citation in Development and Peace (political party): Jonathan Edelstein (5 January 2003). "Bring back Flatto-Sharon".? — Anomalocaris ( talk) 10:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
I just checked other languages, and there has been no activity in other languages since the last round. (There are some articles where our friend made the last change, no one has reverted, and there it sits—but I'm not prepared to challenge policy on such matters in wiki communities where I don't speak the language. There are also a couple of places where others decided to go in that direction themselves. Whatever.) If you see a second stab at it, will you put in a checkuser? StevenJ81 ( talk) 22:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I think the move should have been towards "Odias". Both the supporters explicitly supported move to "Odias". Khestwol ( talk) 22:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thank you for defending my articles that were put up for deletion. Not only that but you're tireless contribution to players in the 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup! Wikipedia and I thank you! Da Drewster 03:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC) |
You are not adding clarity in your reversions of edits that are adding clarity and consistency in use of pronouns in articles on Israeli political parties. If you persist, there will be discussions on talk pages and we have seen how these go. Cheers!— Anomalocaris ( talk) 16:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Number 57! The edit war will probably never stop unless it is somehow acknowledged in the article that even though Komorowski officially ran as an independent candidate − having renounced his PO (Civic Platform) membership before being sworn in for his first term − he did have official PO support during the campaign.( Source) It can be as simple as writing "Bronisław Komorowski (independent, supported by PO)". Do you think this can be done? Is there a way for the templates used in the article to handle this? — Kpalion (talk) 14:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
OK, I've made the the change as you suggested. Let's hope this will make everybody happy now. I'd suggest to wait and see if this solution works before making any more drastic moves like semiprotection or user blocking. After all, the IP user did have a point, as probably in most voters' eyes Komorowski's link to PO was obvious and he wasn't treated as a really independent candidate. Thanks for your help! — Kpalion (talk) 15:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I was just looking at the source. It says they were called "Gold Bellies" or "Golden Belly". Why didn't it say just "Gold Belly"? The list is all singular except "Gold Bellies". (I'm just concerned that another editor will pull the hook over sourcing.) Yoninah ( talk) 21:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Montserratian general election, 1970, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1970 general elections in Montserrat saw Percival Austin Bramble's Progressive Democratic Party defeat the ruling Montserrat Labour Party, led by his father William Henry Bramble? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Montserratian general election, 1970. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Massey Ferguson 35, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the original version of the Massey Ferguson 35 released in the UK was known as the "Gold Belly" due to its distinctive colour scheme? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Massey Ferguson 35. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
. Buster Seven Talk 21:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
I have reverted your multiple movings of pages related to elections in Republic of China (Taiwan) because of the uncertain and controversial political status of Taiwan, and the use of “Republic of China” conforms to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese). While I understand why you moved those pages, the elections are officially titled with “Republic of China” ( Chinese: 中華民國總統、副總統選舉) (and it is named so in the Chinese Wikipedia), had electoral districts from areas that are not considered as part of “Taiwan” by virtually anyone, and a Taiwanese election may easily mean an election for Province of Taiwan, Republic of China. If you feel this move is inappropriate, and there is a consensus that articles pertaining to politics in this region should change to use the name “Taiwan”, please start a discussion on relevant talk pages and move after reaching a consensus.
In cases where there had already been a community discussion about renaming the page and the proposal was already rejected, I would suggest to start another move proposal first.
As per WP:NC-GAL#Elections and referendums, the article title should use “Demonym type election, date (subdivision)”, instead of the Wikipedia article name pertaining to the specific country. Alex Mattrick | ゆうせい 04:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, there is a move request at Talk:AZ Alkmaar#Requested move 21 July 2015 that you might be interested in. Qed237 (talk) 11:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Could you please take a look at Avi Rikan? Something very strange is happening with that bio; he is constantly changing clubs. (I´m afraid I know nothing about football, I have it "watched" because a "certain friend" of mine (Grapw) typically changes "West Bank" to "Israel"....) Cheers, Huldra ( talk) 23:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Re {{
Lancashire elections}}
, if articles have the wrong names, the solution is to rename the articles. It's not difficult. Until they have been renamed, breaking links to the articles is pointless. --
Dr Greg
talk
21:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colin Cameron (Malawian politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zomba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Alexiulian25 ( talk) 14:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Thank you for the message in Qed237 conversation, sometimes I need help in my articles, because my English is not perfect, I improve English wikipedia by transleting or from romanian / spanish sources, so if you are interested in football you can also improve. thank you ! Go go England. p.s. My plan is to move in Great Britan also. Alexiulian25 ( talk) 14:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Category:1932 establishments in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! ( talk) 09:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
You didn't check the past RM? There wasn't a support on the renaming. -- George Ho ( talk) 22:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Number 57.
Can you please elaborate on the rationale for your decision in closing Talk:America (disambiguation)#Requested move 10 July 2015 as a consensus to move?
Thank you for your time in addressing the multiple arguments that were presented in the discussion and were the basis of your decision. Diego ( talk) 17:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Is there a chance that you will provide your assessment of each argument that opposed the reasons stated in support of the move, and how you weighted them in their relation to the previous consenus established by policy and previous move requests, so that we can review your close of the discussion? Diego ( talk) 12:20, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 31 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elections in Guyana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in elections in Guyana, the nominee of the party that receives the most votes becomes President, even if the opposition win more seats (as happened in 2011)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elections in Guyana. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 15:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) ( talk) 08:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
You have deleted the above page.
Please explain why this was done ?
A query on this and two other pages were raised and I responded with several reasons why the pages should be allowed to remain.
I have no idea why a previous page of the same name was created and delete last year
I received compliments from monitors on the quality of these pages.........
I have not heard why anyone believes why these pages should not exist beyond the fact the team must be notable.... well in the country of Guernsey.... Guernsey FC is very notable.... and I have outlined several points in this area. You do not delete Gibraltar, Luxembourg, or other smaller country football teams.
You permit amateur as well as professionals.... so that is not a reason to delete it.
I await your response.
regards
Thanks for moving sub-articles of Myanmar. It would be great if you discussed in Talk:Myanmar#Demonym of Myanmar before mass move. I've stopped moving Burmese to Myanmar/Myanma yesterday and asked other editors' opinion. Thank you. PhyoWP *click 11:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi man,
What do you think about the Regavim source. Right now, only the Palestinian narrative is present. Reading RS I believe it can fall under "Biased or opinionated sources" which requires attribution but otherwise can be present. Settleman ( talk) 17:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this page and maybe help improve it? [9] ( Lilic ( talk) 20:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Green Party (Slovakia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party of the Democratic Left. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Re your RM close at Talk:Burkinabé. Every single editor support some move from the current title. Can you just use your wisdom and the power of your office and pick one of the two options or either leave the discussion open for another admin to close? Thanks. — 21:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear Num. 57,
Thank you very much for helping me edit Tamar's page. I have just started editing on Wikipedia and I hope to edit the pages of more female Knesset members. I noticed that you deleted various paragraphs pertaining to Zandberg actual work in the city council and Knesset. I was wondering why you consider that puffery? As a frequent Wikipedia user, I think that such information is what I would look for in an entry on a politician.
Thanks and best, Dez Daphiez ( talk) 20:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Regarding this discussion: was it your intention to follow-up on this and nominate the other subcategories of ‹The template Cat is being considered for merging.› Category:Comoros? Right now the majority still use "of/in Comoros". One format or the other should be used, not a mix of both. And right now the guidelines still say to use "of/in Comoros" for category names. If they all change to "of/in the Comoros", the guideline could be changed quite easily. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA3 is now open and evidence can be submitted until September 8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.90.5.221 ( talk) 09:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for improving the flow and format of this page after I expanded it, as well as updating the population data. However I want to understand why you removed some of the detail such as the Eshchar scout group, which is an important feature integral to the ideology of the place, as well as the reference to the official website which supported what I wrote? I have made some limited revisions and would be interested in your view. On a separate issue there is maybe a discussion to be had about the name as rendered in English. The spelling "Eshhar" is used on Google maps but hardly anywhere else in reality. "Eshchar" (which redirects to the page when entered into the Wiki search) is used by the village itself, on road signs, although not by the CBS. The side panel gives it as the "official" spelling, although I am not sure what is the source for that. That is why I added it as an alternative spelling. Lastly, I didn't change the un-referenced claim that the members of the garin came from Chicago in particular, but I do not believe it is right. Few of the original group remain and, from talking to the remaining "veterans" it doesn't appear to be the case. I have put a question on the talk page to see if we can either reference or correct this. -- Mlevitt1 ( talk) 07:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for that, very helpful. However I still do not understand why you removed some of the detail about the Eshchar scout group, which is an important feature integral to the ideology of the place, as much so (and for the same reasons) as the attempt to set up the mixed religious-secular school. Is it for lack of a reference? None of the other information is referenced apart from the school. I understand your point about "unencyclopedic language" - I am trying to find a way to express that it was not just a (potentially failed) initial ambition to establish Eshhar for the purpose of religious and secular living together in harmony, it continues to be heterogeneous. As I live there, I can tell you that is the case, but it is hard to reference, other than from the Eshhar website. Is this not enough? Mlevitt1 ( talk) 11:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I come from the UK and even in the 1970s when I was a kid, scouts were a minority interest, so I see where you are coming from. But in Israel it is very notable. Youth movements in the Jewish world, both inside and outside Israel, have historically been of huge importance, and continue to be so, and together with compulsory army service have a huge impact on the youth and thus on the country and its communities: many of the villages (though not Eshhar) were established by youth groups. Particularly in small communities, from kibbutzim and moshavim to community settlements and co-operatives like Eshhar, but also in cities, youth movements play a huge role, and there is a huge variety available in terms of ideology, religiosity, politics etc. There are some 60,000 Jewish and over 25,000 Arab scouts in 160 troupes, and that's just the scout movement. A good article is at http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/Youth.html - maybe there should be a Wiki article about it (maybe there is, didn't have chance to check). The fact that Eshchar, having first established its own unaffiliated youth group, chose to affiliate to the nonpartisan Scout movement, only the second group in the country to bring together religious and secular in one troupe, reflecting the ideology of the village. Have I convinced you it is probably more deserving of mention than the facilities?! This therefore connects both to the issue of the mixed school, and the ideology which established the village. These are live matters, and the legal structure of the village ensures that they are kept so (if residents wish it) - as with any other community settlement. See the introduction of the WP Community settlement (Israel), which makes clear that the whole purpose of these settlements is ideology - they are unlike any English town or village. Unless Wikipedia is simply a geography resource, there is no point to an entry for such a settlement unless it concentrates on the ideology, as no-one can buy property here unless they sign up to it! Therefore again, I believe it is of interest to the reader to know whether the original ideology pertains to this day, or has been abandoned. Can we agree a wording to this effect? Perhaps changing the sentence "The aim was to create a community in which religious and secular could live together" to read "The aim, which continues today, was to create a community in which religious and secular could live together?" Mlevitt1 ( talk) 14:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the rewording. Regarding scouts, I'm not sure that % of the whole population (as opposed to youth) is meaningful, but assuming this was the parameter for both the UK and Israeli percentages you quote then fair enough! But this is not about scouts per se but youth movements, of which there are many. It is about the highly important role that youth movements play in Israeli society (you must be aware of this if you lived here), along with the choice that different communities make as to which they offer which reflects their ideology. It isn't about numbers, but even so, if Scouts alone attracts 1% then we can assume that by the time you add in just the popular movements like Bnei Akiva (another 70,000), Betar (14,500), HaNoar HaOved VeHaLomed, Ezra, Ariel, Religious scouts, Magshimey Herut etc it is more significant. In Eshchar there are something like 200 kids now and among those of scout age there are literally about 5 who aren't members. If you can't agree to the inclusion of my original brief sentence (The Eshhar Scouts, in which a majority of the village's children take part, is the second troupe in Israel to bring together religious and secular Jews, and the only one in the North of Israel) then maybe I should put this on the article's talk page and see if there is a concensus? Mlevitt1 ( talk) 16:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
You misspelled Myanmar: Myanma constitutional referendum, 2008; Myanma general election, 2015; Myanma by-elections, 2014; those are the ones I noticed. Ogress smash! 21:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
It's fine - sorry for stepping into it. I've been holding off for a while, but it looked like everything was square, so I went for it.
I can help you out - if you can point me to which categories, specifically, need to be rolled back I can take care of it myself. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 19:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I can't find a capacity for The New Lawn. It was recently changed by a user, without sourcing where he received this information. I'm not sure what to use as the capacity, as I'm working on fixing the grammar and improving the article's status. Leeds United FC fan ( talk) 14:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Westmarch may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi - if you're going to undo changes made to pages (as with the Dulwich Hamlet F.C. page today), please ensure you revert to the correct, most recent version. You risk losing a lot of good work by others by not doing so. Thank you.
82.12.249.66 ( talk) 16:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
With regards to your response, I appreciate the reversions made due to my errors. It would perhaps be useful if you had the good grace to acknowledge the same. I corrected your error with regards to the squad update date, and also the alphabetic ordering of the squad - don't think you spotted that one. I'd suggest that as an administrator, you should keep a closer eye on the changes you make. You could be leaving errors on multiple pages with your apparent lack of attention to detail.
With regards to the deliberate changes, please confirm why you removed the 'bits' from the notable players section. I'd suggest that a player representing a national team is notable.
82.12.249.66 ( talk) 22:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
The England C team (not "England amateur" team as you suggest - the article on the England C team confirms that "Currently, the majority of selected players are full-time professionals with Conference Premier league clubs") represents England at non-league level. Players representing England C are therefore notable, as they are selected as the best players available at that level. And for a player to be picked for the England C team from a non-league team at the 7th step of the pyramid is, I would suggest, particularly notable.
By your rationale, is it only notable to play for the senior men's national football first team? What about national B teams? Or national team age groups - U21, U20, U19 etc? And what about the England women's national football team? Which, historically, has featured amateur and semi-professional players? Does such an approach not risk being accused of elitism or sexism?
As such, I would suggest that your reasoning is flawed, and on that basis, would request that you revert your edits.
82.12.249.66 ( talk) 21:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forfarshire Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glebe Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I appreciate the work you're doing to make/improve the article. However, I am a little disappointed in the edit reverts without at least discussing some of the changes first for consensus.
I disagree with this revision, and the notion that it is pointless duplicate table. There is merit to showing the People's Partnership consolidated vote totals somewhere in the article. It was displayed this way in the 2010 version of the page, and they formed the previous government. From an encyclopedic point of view, their consolidated vote totals and seat counts is relevant. In the media, this consolidated amount is frequently reported. Perhaps it is duplicate to show it as another table and it could be put in a paragraph/sentence, but please consider talking about changes that remove information. I'm trying to be reasonable and not engage in an edit war over this. -- R45 talk! 11:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
[ [10]] 120.62.18.210 ( talk) 12:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm definitely not a fan of that either and would support removing that function from the template. However, at least that page lists the most recent poll from every firm. I don't see why polls need to be included in the infobox in the first place but setting that aside there also seems to be a lot of selective and/or abusive use of the function. For example, on the pages for Australian elections editors are including only the most recent poll in the infobox no matter what firm its from. To make things worse, it doesn't even list what firm its from in the infobox! Example of this here (its done on all Australian election pages just look at the template at the bottom.)
Like I said though, I don't see the purpose of the function anyways. Even when there's a fair sample of polls and they're properly identified (as in the article you linked) they're just repeated a little farther down with equal or more context and/or information. So, over all, I don't see the point of the function and it seems frequently abused anyways. Also, I think its ugly (although YMMV.) -- 4idaho ( talk) 21:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Gibraltar is non-sovereign. This means it is part of another sovereign state. The United Kingdom is a sovereign state. Gibraltar is part of the sovereign state of the United Kingdom, but not part of the actual United Kingdom. Nevertheless, I will add the page to a separate category. AusLondonder ( talk) 23:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
First of all, great work on your various historical Scottish football ground articles; but I have a concern about the original Cathkin Park, which I've brought up on the article talk page. Jellyman ( talk) 16:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nigerien General Council election, 1946−47, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upper Volta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there 57, regarding my entry for the Sekshon Pagá, it is the only professional league on the island. That is what the opening statement is saying in Papiamentu of the PDF document that I shared. The second tier is amateur level. It is a small country, and none of the clubs on the island have their own stadiums. But the top tier is considered fully professional, which is the only professional football league on the island. The salaries are not high, but neither is the cost of living on the Island. Please let me know if there is any other criteria involved besides the fact that the players who compete in the league are paid for it, and are thus considered professional athletes in their own right. Should it only be considered Semi-professional, then I will move my entry to the list below it, but I would just like to better understand what qualifies a league as fully professional, I am simply going off ofthe opening statement in the year end review of the Federation, which claims just that. Thank you in advance for the clarification. ( Subzzee ( talk) 13:47, 23 September 2015 (UTC))
Thanks for uploading File:Aharon Yariv.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm DGG. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Referendums in the Netherlands, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 23:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Godmanchester Rovers FC.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Why did you during your so-called "cleanup" remove so much central info about the municipal structure and party system from the Åland election article? It makes it a lot less useful. Basically just an empty shell.-- Batmacumba ( talk) 21:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
I reverted your good-faith edit changing the article's name because every source I have found on the event refers to it as an election, and so the title should reflect that under WP:COMMONNAME. Regards Plazak ( talk) 03:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swiss federal election, 2015, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jura and Council of States. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I have seen you created a page with players of Faur București, this is very nice, thank you, and I also see you did many edits in football articles and I was wondering if you want to help a bit to develop Romanian Football ?
Things we want to improve are Cupa Romaniei - Romanian Cup - to create the missing seasons - and to create a few more teams. And also Liga II, the second league, I edit there now, I improved the main page, and also are missing seasons to create, and maybe a few teams to create. Have a look and tell me your opinion.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 17:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi! @ Number 57: Thanks for contributing to Lagos!
![]() |
You are invited to participate in
WikiProject Lagos, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about
Lagos. |
Eruditescholar ( talk) 00:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 9 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article New Logie Green, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New Logie Green is the only stadium outside Glasgow to have hosted a Scottish Cup final? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/New Logie Green. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 20:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:NCDAB: "Natural disambiguation is generally preferable to parenthetical disambiguation". Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 11:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for defending my article and backing it up with news sources. Much love! Ashkaan232 ( talk) 23:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Number 57. I was thinking about what you wrote a while back in your evidence to WP:ARBPIA3 - in particular, that you wrote this: "...via frequent reports at WP:AE and WP:SPI."
Does that imply that you think some of the AE bans and SPIs were unjustified? Perhaps innocent editors incorrectly identified and banned as socks? AnotherNewAccount ( talk) 19:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johnstone F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Association. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi N57. For your info. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Why referendum and not plebiscite? -- Danrolo ( talk) 20:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
HI , can u see know this article List of members of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament (2013–). Kurdistantolive ( talk) 12:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I had not thought of doing that! It is indeed extremely useful. — Ynhockey ( Talk) 17:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
I have seen you created a page with players of Faur București, this is very nice, thank you, and I also see you did many edits in football articles and I was wondering if you want to help a bit to develop Romanian Football ?
Things we want to improve are Cupa Romaniei - Romanian Cup - to create the missing seasons - and to create a few more teams. And also Liga II, the second league, I edit there now, I improved the main page, and also are missing seasons to create, and maybe a few teams to create. Have a look and tell me your opinion.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 20:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I understand, what elections did you talk about ? You said that you rescue articles, maybe you can help and rescue 2 articles of mine about Spanish Football: Copa del Rey Topscorers by Season and Copa del Rey Topscorers I will be very grateful. Thank you ! -- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 21:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The Arab joint list was named הרשימה המשותפת(The joint list) - both in Hebrew and in Arabic, and have registered as such. Here is the vedio from the actual event - when they are read by their name, while registering: [1] -- 82.166.116.68 ( talk) 20:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Number 57. Sorry for the inconvenience. The numbers I typed are correct, I will cite the corresponding source. Regards, -- Fadesga ( talk) 22:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
No.57, did you happen to notice in your close of Talk:Shady_Grove_Station#Requested_move_23_December_2014 that the move review that it was on hold for is still open, and that several of the "support" statements either supported lowercase explicitly or supported going with WP:USSTATION, the new guideline? Why not close the open MR instead, so we can move forward in a more orderly way, and take up the needed discussion of whether the word "Station" appearing on a sign makes it part of the official name of a station, overriding the official published station name list? Dicklyon ( talk) 23:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You recent closure of the move request for Google Play Movies was premature. I was not watching the discussion and as a result, I could not reply to User:CookieMonster755's comment, which is obviously invalid. The number of Google Search results is not the appropriate the method to tell the popularity of a name. And of course, in this case, a search for Google Play Movies includes all the results one gets for Google Play Movies & TV!
This was supposed to be an obvious and non-controversial move. Google Play Movies & TV is the official as well as the most used name for the product. The following notable third-party sources that establish this claim: TechCrunch, The Next Web, and Lifehacker. The links to the app pages ( Android, iOS, and Chrome) show the official name of the product.
The Google Play Movies & TV redirect (originally created to point to Google Play by User:Y2kcrazyjoker4) should be deleted and this page should be moved there. SD0001 ( talk) 14:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm confused as to why you are contesting the result of the RM that you yourself closed in favour of scope expansion. It seems to be quite clear. The participants asked to broaden the scope of the article to all 2014 clashes in Odessa. I provided the information, the sources, and wrote the broadened article, as requested. It only makes sense for the 2 May incident to have its own sub-article, given its significance. I'm drafting the December 2014 article as we speak. I shall hopefully have it up-and-running by the end of the day. You did an excellent job assessing consensus in that discussion. I'm much obliged to you. RGloucester — ☎ 21:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Please see the lastest Talk:Zombie. This move was not agreed upon, in fact the opposite was in favor leaning towards a complete merge. Thanks. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 00:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Right. Thanks for the reply. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 01:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for moving the page Something New (song) to Something New (Girls Aloud song)! You're a big help! Paul Badillo ( talk) 21:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Shawn Christian IS British. According to Wiki: "British people, or Britons, archaically known as Britishers, are nationals or natives of the United Kingdom, British Overseas Territories, Crown Dependencies; and their descendants." As you can see on the British Overseas Territories Pitcairn Islands is a British Overseas Territory. JanderVK ( talk) 23:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I went through the list of articles you've created one by one and see if the book is listed in the references. You've created A LOT of articles in the last year and half! :D -- Katie Chan (WMUK) ( talk) 15:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Please explain why you closed the move request for Walter White (Breaking Bad) when several good arguments in support of it were included, and no consensus has been reached in favor of not moving the page? Thank you. Chunk5Darth ( talk) 00:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jewish locality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Settlement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Number 57, I am here become I read the move review which stated that I should speak with yourself first regarding the RM. As you can see here [2] and here [3], there was no consensus and the RM seems to have involved canvassing. Clearly there was no consensus in this issue so please could you advise how to proceed. Regards Mbcap ( talk) 15:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, "Hof Aza" is Hebrew and has almost no recognition among English speakers. In fact that article doesn't even mention "Hof Aza" (though it could mention the regional council of that name). Simply for the sake of clarity, wouldn't Hof Aza, Gaza Strip be better? Zero talk 07:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Walter White (Breaking Bad). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Not sure if you saw this since the notification from step 3 got missed. PaleAqua ( talk) 23:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of War in Afghanistan (2001–14). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Mbcap ( talk) 15:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Star Wars (film). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 21:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comorian legislative election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey, there is a consensus to use a full name; one chose "Bak", and other chose "Pak". Nevertheless, that shouldn't prevent using Chinglish name, right? -- George Ho ( talk) 21:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Would you let someone else close the RM. You can vote if you please. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:50, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not going to ask for a revert, but you really should have started a discussion before moving so many articles. wctaiwan ( talk) 22:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
COuld not keep my promise of "few weeks", but now it should be possible to continue! To make it easier for me to get into the topic again, could you sum up what kind of progresses you made during the almost two years, and where information is still lacking?-- Antemister ( talk) 17:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayman Odeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi buddy - noted you made a form of revert to the article. Just hope to clarify some stuff to avoid misunderstandings:
If you have more inputs that can contribute to the content of the article, I will be the most glad to work together :)
Mr Tan ( talk) 11:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Number57. I want to ask you whether you can accept the inclusion of this section to List of Presidents of Israel? User Arminden added it today, so please inform him about your opinion at User talk:Arminden#Main biographical data. -- Sundostund ( talk) 23:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manuel Trajtenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordoba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I hope you're doing well.'
Do you support what some editors have been doing which is to include " Two-state solution" under ideology in the infoboxes of certain Israeli parties? I don't deny that those parties support it, but I'm wondering if that's the right place for it.
Also, there was recent vandalism on Likud. Not sure if you or someone should give a warning. -- Precision123 ( talk) 18:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for undeleting Derek Foran. I'm amused that you were the original prodder. Can you undelete the talk page as well - or is there nothing of value.
Also I was looking at the recently created Danny Ward (footballer, born 1993). The edit history is a complete disaster, as it seems to have years of User:Danny 93 unrelated Sandbox edits which User:Dudek1337 moved into Mainspace; the approximately 100 edits before [4] are entirely unrelated and should be back in the sandbox. Also the previous 2 deleted (January 19 and February 22) versions haven't got their edit history restored. Is that something you can fix, or should I contact another admin or go to WT:FOOTY. Nfitz ( talk) 16:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bezalel Smotrich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disengagement plan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
You recently participated in a move request discussion at Talk:Mandrake (plant). I have posted a follow-up request at Talk:Mandragora officinarum if you are interested in participating. — AjaxSmack 00:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Boston Town.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Eynesbury Rovers FC.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Nikkimaria ( talk) 05:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
You just closed a RM Talk:Taylor Hayes (pornographic actress) with no consensus, but it has been moved again. Additionally the same User:Erpert appears to be tag-teaming on the subject of removing "pornographic" which is the stable disambiguator in the Category:American female pornographic film actors with another user User:Scalhotrod at Talk:April O'Neil (pornographic actress) and has just made a non-admin close there which evidently fails the consensus criteria for a non-admin close. Additionally I note that there is a male actor of the same name in a minor role in a film article. In ictu oculi ( talk) 07:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
WP:PRECISE and pornographic film actresses". Thank you. (This thread is not a complaint against you; I'm just trying to straighten something out.) Erpert
blah, blah, blah...
07:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Number 57, do you know what the naming policy is for the election pages of the 3 royal boroughs in London. Cheers. Doc77can ( talk) 17:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi #57. For info, I think the only template that is missing is the one for Surrey. If you have the time, I'd appreciate if you could create it. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your effort in the restructuring of the table and the article there. The results last night were the preliminary results declared by the committee, and could be reached by clicking the brown box in the middle saying "19 Nisan 2015 Cumhurbaşkanlığı Seçim Sonuçları" (the results for districts can still only be reached from there through a zip file). Now, with some very minor corrections, they have been apparently moved to a proper page here, down where it says "İlanlar", in the word document titled "19 Nisan 2015 Cumhurbaşkanlığı Seçim Sonuçları". -- GGT ( talk) 16:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I think fully-protecting would send out the wrong message, however I will add the matter to my watchlist to monitor as a neutral party, and I will invite those who have edited recently, and those who took part in the RFC you linked me to, to begin a new discussion on the template talk page. Giant Snowman 19:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
I was having a disagreement with User:Jeppiz as to whether my added sentences violated WP:NOTNEWS . Kahlon saying he would decide "after all the votes are counted" is redundant. Coalition talks have been in play since March 25, and Netanyahu recently got an extension until May 6. The overwhelming reason a government wouldn't be formed by then and hasn't formed yet (disagreements with Kahlon) should also be noted.
These are the important facts to this entry and I hope that you can agree with me in talking sense into User:Jeppiz. Only conceivable violation of WP:NOTNEWS would be point 2, but given that "information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate", more information regarding the coalition as they affect the outcome of the election would fall under that umbrella.
Ferociouslettuce ( talk) 17:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you added full election results, replacing the template that is now unused. Then I noticed you did the same earlier for several election pages (e.g. [5]) for no reason whatsoever. Either there should be a template, which is then used, or there should be no template at all. The current situation you caused where there are unused templates and separate results on the articles is quite counter-productive to be fair. In the case of the Finnish election, I created a template because it appears to be common practice to have such templates. So please either revert your changes to the previous situation, or there should be wider community discussion on whether to have templates for results. Thank you, SPQRobin ( talk) 14:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your edit on the article of Denston, Suffolk. I am still in the process of changing the page to become more informative about the parish and both its past and present statistics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmithGE96 ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
is there a way to set an infobox to align to the left?
User:GNEbandit User talk:GNEbandit 22:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
If i set it in a wiki table...that could go on the left? User:GNEbandit User talk:GNEbandit 22:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Ok User:GNEbandit User talk:GNEbandit 22:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Why are you removing the Gozo 1973 referendum from the template? If the template is "for national votes only", why are local council elections included? -- Xwejnusgozo ( talk) 15:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Movement for Democracy and Progress (Comoros), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moroni. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cocos (Keeling) Islands status referendum, 1984, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cocos (Keeling) Islands status referendum, 1984. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 09:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Walknack. In Egyptian parliamentary election, 1976, I have taken the percentage with the calculator (295:360×100 = 81.9) and the voters (81.9% of 3,803,973 = 3,115,453). Fort the runner partis, I can correct it. Thanks for You caution. -- Walknack ( talk) 12:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi again! Yes, I have calculated various political parties percentage. I will search for locate the parties' percentage. -- Walknack ( talk) 19:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I am going to contact the club via email and see if they are still called March Town United or renamed to simply March Town. For now, please revert my changes that state that it is called March Town for now. Good888 ( talk) 12:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Why have you decided to delete historical data from Sport London e Benfica and described it as a cleanup? All the information provided including finishing runners up etc. shows the club's history. Cleanup des not mean delete the information provided by myself, the club's secretary.
Your cleanup goes as far as to place an incorrect fact which states that the club left the league while at Hanwell Town. This is incorrect. If you read my update, the club was at Haringey Borough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.110.209 ( talk) 11:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I can be contacted on info@sportlondonebenficafc.co.uk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagle1981 ( talk • contribs) 11:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Number 57. I notice that you have deleted this page on the grounds that you are "not sure that parish council elections are noteworthy". It would have been appreciated if you had notified me as the page's creator that you were proposing deleting it. I do not know of any principle that applies to Salisbury City Council, or its elections, which is different from the general notability guidance of WP:N. This election is adequately covered in reliable sources independent of the subject and I should be grateful if you would reinstate it and then propose its deletion as an Afd, if you feel that is justified. Moonraker ( talk) 08:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Number 57, I didn't recognize that you were redoing the Ministry of Economy (Israel) article. I am sorry for my error.-- Anonymoustofu ( talk) 20:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, @ Number 57: I am not sure what happened with the format problem. On my Galaxy 8 note I had red text layout problems with the edit in question. Right now I am on my PC and I agree it looks perfect with the edit added back. The Galaxy 8 is a runabout I use / leave at work so I can't comment on how it looks on that platform. Very odd as I have never seen the layout look off with this type of info before. FeatherPluma ( talk) 00:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, i saw you rechange
partii naleraq as "Centrist" party, but they are
Far left party.
But i follow the politic in
Greenland, apparently they are not.
They support
Planned economy and opposing
Free market.
They are siding with
Socialistic
Inuit ataqatigiit party as oppossitions against
Siumut,
Demokraatit and
Atassut.
Otto Nathanielsen (
talk)
04:25, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thanks glad we got wikipedians like you who support peace on both sides and not like this freaks who delete every facts that people say but i need to do me a favor in this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menachem_Begin and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herut this freaks delete what i said only cuz it does not fit their opinions you can please block them or tell them you understand in this subject and they should stop please? they got really annoy me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.246.133.184 ( talk) 20:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
fine than i glad you know hebrew take a look on the hebrew wikipedia of begin it is saying " המפלגה אימצה קו שנחשב אז ימני קיצוני, ובין היתר תבעה את החזרה מההסכמה לתוכנית החלוקה. סיסמתה תאמה את קו אצ"ל, "שתי גדות לירדן, זו שלנו זו גם כן"" http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%97%D7%9D_%D7%91%D7%92%D7%99%D7%9F#.D7.9E.D7.A0.D7.94.D7.99.D7.92_.22.D7.97.D7.A8.D7.95.D7.AA.22_.D7.95.D7.A8.D7.90.D7.A9_.D7.94.D7.90.D7.95.D7.A4.D7.95.D7.96.D7.99.D7.A6.D7.99.D7.94 which is regulated like the wiki in english about begin you right but not about the herut. so please tell them to stop or block them i know you got a lot of power on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.121.88 ( talk) 21:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC) oh and i want you to report this user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RolandR ok he delete every thing that is not fit to his opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.121.88 ( talk) 21:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC) please please be a good man and report him for blocking please you seem like a good guy. or if you do not want to involved tell me how im report him he deleting facts by his opinion please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.12.140.114 ( talk) 23:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
To continue the discussion we were having from Salisbury City Council elections. I agree with you that sometimes it may be possible for an editor to be too close to a subject to have a clear enough perspective. (though I don't know anything about soccer to understand your example) On the whole I don't think this is too much of a problem if there are other editors able to add that perspective based on their own interest/experience with articles in that subject area. I assume that you also hold this view which is why you thoughtfully invited people like me from the UK politics project into the discussion. From my experience there are editors who come into AfD discussions by other routes, such as other AfD dicscussions. There are editors who seem to essentially join these discussions offering little more than some understanding of wikipedia policy guidelines. This seemed to be the case with MelanieN who clearly expressed things from a perspective demonstrating no particular understanding of the subject area. A quick research on the editor confirmed their areas of interest and recent activity. I will repeat again, the nationality of the editor should be irrelevant and if you believe that I infer the opposite, then there really isn't a lot more I can say. Graemp ( talk) 16:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Mentioned you at ANI re: Herut. I'm probably misreading something, sorry. - Sitush ( talk) 21:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I will be reporting you for edit warring with me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Number 57. With this edit you show the result of the move as 'RESULT'. Probably you meant to say 'Moved.' Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 15:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why you deleted it. Archway ( talk) 21:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Following the outcome of the AfD for Salisbury City Council election, 2009, would you please now reinstate Salisbury City Council election, 2013? As previously discussed, the issues are the same. Moonraker ( talk) 20:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent close at Talk:MacBook#Requested move 30 April 2015. Is it okay if I move the alternate approach subsection out of the archive box? Even though many of the !voters ( myself included ) disagreed with the proposed move, given the comments both at the talk for that page and Talk:MacBook (2015 version) it is likely that alternate compromise approach to deal with how the articles on the MacBook brand vs models is likely to reach a consensus. PaleAqua ( talk) 16:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hallo. You moved the article Clotilde, Princess of Venice and Piedmont to Clotilde Courau (February 2015), but didnt move the talk page. The talk page havent been edited since, so I ask you to move talk:Clotilde, Princess of Venice and Piedmont to talk:Clotilde Courau too. Christian75 ( talk) 19:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of British Guiana general election, 1906, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: British Guiana general election, 1911. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 13:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
According to these articles from reputable sources; including one from the website of soccer's governing body in America, the US Soccer Federation; the San Francisco City FC vs Cal FC game was in the play-in round. Since they lost the play-in game, they never technically qualified for the tournament itself. http://www.ussoccer.com/stories/2015/04/25/22/43/150425-usoc-play-in-round-games-recap http://www.centerlinesoccer.com/2015/4/25/8497959/us-open-cup-play-in-game-2015-san-francisco-city-fc-cal-fc-kezar-stadium-record-crowd There also isn't a play-in round listed as part of the tournament on the its page on the USSF site. http://www.ussoccer.com/lamar-hunt-us-open-cup Crusty4545 ( talk) 18:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
... for moving Śramaṇa. Ogress smash! 20:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm not an unreasonable person. I'm able to change my mind. And I'm willing to accept defeat. I'm quite willing to follow consensus (even if I disagree with it). My understanding is that you are saying that consensus was established in the four previous AFDs cited in the Hyde AfD rationale. These are 1, 2, 3, and 4. However both 3 and 4 are for Conference North teams, not Conference National. There were only 6 different editors supporting delete between the 2 Conference National AFDs - with 3 more chiming in at Hyde. However with a small number of editors, does this really reflect consensus? Most importantly, in none of those cases was WP:GNG explored. Beyond those AFDs, I can't find much discussion. I've seen several comments that we have consensus that seasons articles for the first 4 tiers are notable, but the 5th isn't. But where have we clearly established this. The last (and only) discussion I can find on that appears to conclude otherwise? Nfitz ( talk) 18:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Would be nice if you asked me why I made the move before reverting it. I explained my change in the talk page, please add your remarks there. DGtal ( talk) 22:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
You were the last person to delete Kilian Elkinson, previously discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilian Elkinson. He got a cap last week in a friendly against Puerto Rico [6] recognized by FIFA [7]/ It looks like there's been 3 previous versions. If you undelete them all, I can try and piece something together out of them. I'd normally go to the person who closed the AFD, but they are currently semi-retired. Thanks, Nfitz ( talk) 23:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Recognize when no means no. Your idea of what Wikipedia should be or do may be completely different from what the community believes. Sometimes "no" means "I don't understand", but more often, it means "we understand, and the answer is still no." If you're in the minority, recognize and remember this fact. Don't continue to press for your desires against clearly expressed community-wide consensus. Doing so will just make yourself look like a child who thinks, "No, you may not have a cookie" means "I must not have yelled 'COOKIE!' loud enough for my parents to hear me."
@ Nfitz: This is not "a bad prod here and there", otherwise I and other football editors would not be so frustrated by your behaviour. Number 5 7 22:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Good move. Do you mind repairing the double redirects [8] from " Restavec" to the current version and update the spelling on the page? Thanks. Cheers! Savvyjack23 ( talk) 06:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Shoot my apologies. I thought you had proposed the move. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 07:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 08:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Please remain civil and not add obscenities to edit summaries as you did here and also this could be seen as a personal attack. Please assume good faith. Thank You for your time. TeaLover1996 (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your edit of Meimad, here are some Google search results numbers:
So I don't think it's wrong to say "the Meimad movement was founded 1 June 1988 ..." — Anomalocaris ( talk) 20:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Google search results:
Most of these results are not sentences with "founded 1 June YYYY", but many are, including some very British examples.
The Securities Exchange of Barbados was founded 1 June 1987.
Bearskin LTD was founded 1 June 2013, in Birmingham UK.
The Yacht Club, as it was first known, was founded 1 June 1815 at the Thatched House Tavern in London.
Founded 1 June 1815 at the Thatched House, St. James' Street, and two meetings were held annually, one in the spring at the Thatched House, the other at the Medina Hotel, East Cowes.
Founded 1 June 2012
So I still don't think it's wrong to say "the Meimad movement was founded 1 June 1988 ..." in any variety of English. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 21:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
You created Makhar on 8 July 2007 as a redirect to Democratic Choice. The current Democratic Choice dates to 1 April 2013 and is a disambiguation page. I suspect you want Makhar to redirect to Democratic Choice (Israel), but it's not obvious why, as that word does not appear in that article. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 08:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Please don't reverse the changes in the Malaysian election templates. The full template contains all the necessary information needed to find the information. Lazybugger13 ( talk) 19:03, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for getting back to you later than I want to. I've been busy at work and still am not satisfied with your explanation in regards to the changes in the Malaysian election template. Like I said that conformity with other election templates with other countries are not suitable for Malaysia election articles. We have different state elections from previous years, states like Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore which it would be easier to have these links in the main template. We also have links for various by-elections for state and parliamentary level elections which would be easier for people to access. I would like to gain some consensus in issue, otherwise I feel I would not want to use the current Malaysian election template in its current form which has no proper links to local and state elections. I would just create a new template for elections that have taken place after 2000 and discard this current template. Thank you and I hope we can reach an amicable solution to this. Lazybugger13 ( talk) 14:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Evemahmoud. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Malayan state elections, 1959, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Evemahmoud ( talk) 21:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your editing. Reply to your question, I hope that this link would be useful for you - http://www2.pmo.gov.my/election/ Alexander Iskandar ( talk) 22:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
If you cannot really understand the content in Malay language, you may use Google Translate if necessary. Alexander Iskandar ( talk) 22:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Alexander Iskandar. Nice to meet you, Number 57. Alexander Iskandar ( talk) 22:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for drawing my attention to WP:ELCITE. Like many other editors, I sometimes use citation templates in External links sections, always omitting the access date, as called for by this style guide. I will remember that "a concise description of the contents and a clear indication of its source is more important than the actual title of the page." Cheers! — Anomalocaris ( talk) 18:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
...for your support over at my RfA. I shall do my best to be worthy of it. Figured I'd been here long enough that it was about time I gave it a shot. :-) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 05:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
I saw this member Qed237. He changes boards beacuse of what he thinks and hears which is absurd. I showed actual facts from the FIFA site about Serbia not being listed two times champions beacuse at the time in 1987 it was Yugoslavia and not Serbia who won the title. His arguments are that according to him (In football it is widely considered that Serbia is replacing Yugoslavia) without giving any source to it. He is basically using his own views as sources i mean come on.... I saw that you are an admin and that you have faced absurd problems with same person as well. Is there any possibility to report him or has wikipedia stoop so low? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borovine ( talk • contribs) 23:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
From where did you get the author name and date for the citation in Development and Peace (political party): Jonathan Edelstein (5 January 2003). "Bring back Flatto-Sharon".? — Anomalocaris ( talk) 10:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
I just checked other languages, and there has been no activity in other languages since the last round. (There are some articles where our friend made the last change, no one has reverted, and there it sits—but I'm not prepared to challenge policy on such matters in wiki communities where I don't speak the language. There are also a couple of places where others decided to go in that direction themselves. Whatever.) If you see a second stab at it, will you put in a checkuser? StevenJ81 ( talk) 22:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I think the move should have been towards "Odias". Both the supporters explicitly supported move to "Odias". Khestwol ( talk) 22:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thank you for defending my articles that were put up for deletion. Not only that but you're tireless contribution to players in the 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup! Wikipedia and I thank you! Da Drewster 03:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC) |
You are not adding clarity in your reversions of edits that are adding clarity and consistency in use of pronouns in articles on Israeli political parties. If you persist, there will be discussions on talk pages and we have seen how these go. Cheers!— Anomalocaris ( talk) 16:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Number 57! The edit war will probably never stop unless it is somehow acknowledged in the article that even though Komorowski officially ran as an independent candidate − having renounced his PO (Civic Platform) membership before being sworn in for his first term − he did have official PO support during the campaign.( Source) It can be as simple as writing "Bronisław Komorowski (independent, supported by PO)". Do you think this can be done? Is there a way for the templates used in the article to handle this? — Kpalion (talk) 14:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
OK, I've made the the change as you suggested. Let's hope this will make everybody happy now. I'd suggest to wait and see if this solution works before making any more drastic moves like semiprotection or user blocking. After all, the IP user did have a point, as probably in most voters' eyes Komorowski's link to PO was obvious and he wasn't treated as a really independent candidate. Thanks for your help! — Kpalion (talk) 15:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I was just looking at the source. It says they were called "Gold Bellies" or "Golden Belly". Why didn't it say just "Gold Belly"? The list is all singular except "Gold Bellies". (I'm just concerned that another editor will pull the hook over sourcing.) Yoninah ( talk) 21:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Montserratian general election, 1970, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1970 general elections in Montserrat saw Percival Austin Bramble's Progressive Democratic Party defeat the ruling Montserrat Labour Party, led by his father William Henry Bramble? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Montserratian general election, 1970. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Massey Ferguson 35, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the original version of the Massey Ferguson 35 released in the UK was known as the "Gold Belly" due to its distinctive colour scheme? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Massey Ferguson 35. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.
. Buster Seven Talk 21:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
I have reverted your multiple movings of pages related to elections in Republic of China (Taiwan) because of the uncertain and controversial political status of Taiwan, and the use of “Republic of China” conforms to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese). While I understand why you moved those pages, the elections are officially titled with “Republic of China” ( Chinese: 中華民國總統、副總統選舉) (and it is named so in the Chinese Wikipedia), had electoral districts from areas that are not considered as part of “Taiwan” by virtually anyone, and a Taiwanese election may easily mean an election for Province of Taiwan, Republic of China. If you feel this move is inappropriate, and there is a consensus that articles pertaining to politics in this region should change to use the name “Taiwan”, please start a discussion on relevant talk pages and move after reaching a consensus.
In cases where there had already been a community discussion about renaming the page and the proposal was already rejected, I would suggest to start another move proposal first.
As per WP:NC-GAL#Elections and referendums, the article title should use “Demonym type election, date (subdivision)”, instead of the Wikipedia article name pertaining to the specific country. Alex Mattrick | ゆうせい 04:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, there is a move request at Talk:AZ Alkmaar#Requested move 21 July 2015 that you might be interested in. Qed237 (talk) 11:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Could you please take a look at Avi Rikan? Something very strange is happening with that bio; he is constantly changing clubs. (I´m afraid I know nothing about football, I have it "watched" because a "certain friend" of mine (Grapw) typically changes "West Bank" to "Israel"....) Cheers, Huldra ( talk) 23:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Re {{
Lancashire elections}}
, if articles have the wrong names, the solution is to rename the articles. It's not difficult. Until they have been renamed, breaking links to the articles is pointless. --
Dr Greg
talk
21:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colin Cameron (Malawian politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zomba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Alexiulian25 ( talk) 14:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Thank you for the message in Qed237 conversation, sometimes I need help in my articles, because my English is not perfect, I improve English wikipedia by transleting or from romanian / spanish sources, so if you are interested in football you can also improve. thank you ! Go go England. p.s. My plan is to move in Great Britan also. Alexiulian25 ( talk) 14:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Category:1932 establishments in Saint Kitts-Nevis-Anguilla, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! ( talk) 09:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
You didn't check the past RM? There wasn't a support on the renaming. -- George Ho ( talk) 22:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Number 57.
Can you please elaborate on the rationale for your decision in closing Talk:America (disambiguation)#Requested move 10 July 2015 as a consensus to move?
Thank you for your time in addressing the multiple arguments that were presented in the discussion and were the basis of your decision. Diego ( talk) 17:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Is there a chance that you will provide your assessment of each argument that opposed the reasons stated in support of the move, and how you weighted them in their relation to the previous consenus established by policy and previous move requests, so that we can review your close of the discussion? Diego ( talk) 12:20, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 31 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elections in Guyana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in elections in Guyana, the nominee of the party that receives the most votes becomes President, even if the opposition win more seats (as happened in 2011)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elections in Guyana. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich ( talk) 15:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) ( talk) 08:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
You have deleted the above page.
Please explain why this was done ?
A query on this and two other pages were raised and I responded with several reasons why the pages should be allowed to remain.
I have no idea why a previous page of the same name was created and delete last year
I received compliments from monitors on the quality of these pages.........
I have not heard why anyone believes why these pages should not exist beyond the fact the team must be notable.... well in the country of Guernsey.... Guernsey FC is very notable.... and I have outlined several points in this area. You do not delete Gibraltar, Luxembourg, or other smaller country football teams.
You permit amateur as well as professionals.... so that is not a reason to delete it.
I await your response.
regards
Thanks for moving sub-articles of Myanmar. It would be great if you discussed in Talk:Myanmar#Demonym of Myanmar before mass move. I've stopped moving Burmese to Myanmar/Myanma yesterday and asked other editors' opinion. Thank you. PhyoWP *click 11:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi man,
What do you think about the Regavim source. Right now, only the Palestinian narrative is present. Reading RS I believe it can fall under "Biased or opinionated sources" which requires attribution but otherwise can be present. Settleman ( talk) 17:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this page and maybe help improve it? [9] ( Lilic ( talk) 20:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Green Party (Slovakia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party of the Democratic Left. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Re your RM close at Talk:Burkinabé. Every single editor support some move from the current title. Can you just use your wisdom and the power of your office and pick one of the two options or either leave the discussion open for another admin to close? Thanks. — 21:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Dear Num. 57,
Thank you very much for helping me edit Tamar's page. I have just started editing on Wikipedia and I hope to edit the pages of more female Knesset members. I noticed that you deleted various paragraphs pertaining to Zandberg actual work in the city council and Knesset. I was wondering why you consider that puffery? As a frequent Wikipedia user, I think that such information is what I would look for in an entry on a politician.
Thanks and best, Dez Daphiez ( talk) 20:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Regarding this discussion: was it your intention to follow-up on this and nominate the other subcategories of ‹The template Cat is being considered for merging.› Category:Comoros? Right now the majority still use "of/in Comoros". One format or the other should be used, not a mix of both. And right now the guidelines still say to use "of/in Comoros" for category names. If they all change to "of/in the Comoros", the guideline could be changed quite easily. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA3 is now open and evidence can be submitted until September 8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.90.5.221 ( talk) 09:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for improving the flow and format of this page after I expanded it, as well as updating the population data. However I want to understand why you removed some of the detail such as the Eshchar scout group, which is an important feature integral to the ideology of the place, as well as the reference to the official website which supported what I wrote? I have made some limited revisions and would be interested in your view. On a separate issue there is maybe a discussion to be had about the name as rendered in English. The spelling "Eshhar" is used on Google maps but hardly anywhere else in reality. "Eshchar" (which redirects to the page when entered into the Wiki search) is used by the village itself, on road signs, although not by the CBS. The side panel gives it as the "official" spelling, although I am not sure what is the source for that. That is why I added it as an alternative spelling. Lastly, I didn't change the un-referenced claim that the members of the garin came from Chicago in particular, but I do not believe it is right. Few of the original group remain and, from talking to the remaining "veterans" it doesn't appear to be the case. I have put a question on the talk page to see if we can either reference or correct this. -- Mlevitt1 ( talk) 07:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for that, very helpful. However I still do not understand why you removed some of the detail about the Eshchar scout group, which is an important feature integral to the ideology of the place, as much so (and for the same reasons) as the attempt to set up the mixed religious-secular school. Is it for lack of a reference? None of the other information is referenced apart from the school. I understand your point about "unencyclopedic language" - I am trying to find a way to express that it was not just a (potentially failed) initial ambition to establish Eshhar for the purpose of religious and secular living together in harmony, it continues to be heterogeneous. As I live there, I can tell you that is the case, but it is hard to reference, other than from the Eshhar website. Is this not enough? Mlevitt1 ( talk) 11:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I come from the UK and even in the 1970s when I was a kid, scouts were a minority interest, so I see where you are coming from. But in Israel it is very notable. Youth movements in the Jewish world, both inside and outside Israel, have historically been of huge importance, and continue to be so, and together with compulsory army service have a huge impact on the youth and thus on the country and its communities: many of the villages (though not Eshhar) were established by youth groups. Particularly in small communities, from kibbutzim and moshavim to community settlements and co-operatives like Eshhar, but also in cities, youth movements play a huge role, and there is a huge variety available in terms of ideology, religiosity, politics etc. There are some 60,000 Jewish and over 25,000 Arab scouts in 160 troupes, and that's just the scout movement. A good article is at http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/Youth.html - maybe there should be a Wiki article about it (maybe there is, didn't have chance to check). The fact that Eshchar, having first established its own unaffiliated youth group, chose to affiliate to the nonpartisan Scout movement, only the second group in the country to bring together religious and secular in one troupe, reflecting the ideology of the village. Have I convinced you it is probably more deserving of mention than the facilities?! This therefore connects both to the issue of the mixed school, and the ideology which established the village. These are live matters, and the legal structure of the village ensures that they are kept so (if residents wish it) - as with any other community settlement. See the introduction of the WP Community settlement (Israel), which makes clear that the whole purpose of these settlements is ideology - they are unlike any English town or village. Unless Wikipedia is simply a geography resource, there is no point to an entry for such a settlement unless it concentrates on the ideology, as no-one can buy property here unless they sign up to it! Therefore again, I believe it is of interest to the reader to know whether the original ideology pertains to this day, or has been abandoned. Can we agree a wording to this effect? Perhaps changing the sentence "The aim was to create a community in which religious and secular could live together" to read "The aim, which continues today, was to create a community in which religious and secular could live together?" Mlevitt1 ( talk) 14:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the rewording. Regarding scouts, I'm not sure that % of the whole population (as opposed to youth) is meaningful, but assuming this was the parameter for both the UK and Israeli percentages you quote then fair enough! But this is not about scouts per se but youth movements, of which there are many. It is about the highly important role that youth movements play in Israeli society (you must be aware of this if you lived here), along with the choice that different communities make as to which they offer which reflects their ideology. It isn't about numbers, but even so, if Scouts alone attracts 1% then we can assume that by the time you add in just the popular movements like Bnei Akiva (another 70,000), Betar (14,500), HaNoar HaOved VeHaLomed, Ezra, Ariel, Religious scouts, Magshimey Herut etc it is more significant. In Eshchar there are something like 200 kids now and among those of scout age there are literally about 5 who aren't members. If you can't agree to the inclusion of my original brief sentence (The Eshhar Scouts, in which a majority of the village's children take part, is the second troupe in Israel to bring together religious and secular Jews, and the only one in the North of Israel) then maybe I should put this on the article's talk page and see if there is a concensus? Mlevitt1 ( talk) 16:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
You misspelled Myanmar: Myanma constitutional referendum, 2008; Myanma general election, 2015; Myanma by-elections, 2014; those are the ones I noticed. Ogress smash! 21:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
It's fine - sorry for stepping into it. I've been holding off for a while, but it looked like everything was square, so I went for it.
I can help you out - if you can point me to which categories, specifically, need to be rolled back I can take care of it myself. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 19:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I can't find a capacity for The New Lawn. It was recently changed by a user, without sourcing where he received this information. I'm not sure what to use as the capacity, as I'm working on fixing the grammar and improving the article's status. Leeds United FC fan ( talk) 14:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Westmarch may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi - if you're going to undo changes made to pages (as with the Dulwich Hamlet F.C. page today), please ensure you revert to the correct, most recent version. You risk losing a lot of good work by others by not doing so. Thank you.
82.12.249.66 ( talk) 16:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
With regards to your response, I appreciate the reversions made due to my errors. It would perhaps be useful if you had the good grace to acknowledge the same. I corrected your error with regards to the squad update date, and also the alphabetic ordering of the squad - don't think you spotted that one. I'd suggest that as an administrator, you should keep a closer eye on the changes you make. You could be leaving errors on multiple pages with your apparent lack of attention to detail.
With regards to the deliberate changes, please confirm why you removed the 'bits' from the notable players section. I'd suggest that a player representing a national team is notable.
82.12.249.66 ( talk) 22:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
The England C team (not "England amateur" team as you suggest - the article on the England C team confirms that "Currently, the majority of selected players are full-time professionals with Conference Premier league clubs") represents England at non-league level. Players representing England C are therefore notable, as they are selected as the best players available at that level. And for a player to be picked for the England C team from a non-league team at the 7th step of the pyramid is, I would suggest, particularly notable.
By your rationale, is it only notable to play for the senior men's national football first team? What about national B teams? Or national team age groups - U21, U20, U19 etc? And what about the England women's national football team? Which, historically, has featured amateur and semi-professional players? Does such an approach not risk being accused of elitism or sexism?
As such, I would suggest that your reasoning is flawed, and on that basis, would request that you revert your edits.
82.12.249.66 ( talk) 21:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forfarshire Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glebe Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I appreciate the work you're doing to make/improve the article. However, I am a little disappointed in the edit reverts without at least discussing some of the changes first for consensus.
I disagree with this revision, and the notion that it is pointless duplicate table. There is merit to showing the People's Partnership consolidated vote totals somewhere in the article. It was displayed this way in the 2010 version of the page, and they formed the previous government. From an encyclopedic point of view, their consolidated vote totals and seat counts is relevant. In the media, this consolidated amount is frequently reported. Perhaps it is duplicate to show it as another table and it could be put in a paragraph/sentence, but please consider talking about changes that remove information. I'm trying to be reasonable and not engage in an edit war over this. -- R45 talk! 11:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
[ [10]] 120.62.18.210 ( talk) 12:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm definitely not a fan of that either and would support removing that function from the template. However, at least that page lists the most recent poll from every firm. I don't see why polls need to be included in the infobox in the first place but setting that aside there also seems to be a lot of selective and/or abusive use of the function. For example, on the pages for Australian elections editors are including only the most recent poll in the infobox no matter what firm its from. To make things worse, it doesn't even list what firm its from in the infobox! Example of this here (its done on all Australian election pages just look at the template at the bottom.)
Like I said though, I don't see the purpose of the function anyways. Even when there's a fair sample of polls and they're properly identified (as in the article you linked) they're just repeated a little farther down with equal or more context and/or information. So, over all, I don't see the point of the function and it seems frequently abused anyways. Also, I think its ugly (although YMMV.) -- 4idaho ( talk) 21:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Gibraltar is non-sovereign. This means it is part of another sovereign state. The United Kingdom is a sovereign state. Gibraltar is part of the sovereign state of the United Kingdom, but not part of the actual United Kingdom. Nevertheless, I will add the page to a separate category. AusLondonder ( talk) 23:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
First of all, great work on your various historical Scottish football ground articles; but I have a concern about the original Cathkin Park, which I've brought up on the article talk page. Jellyman ( talk) 16:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nigerien General Council election, 1946−47, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upper Volta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there 57, regarding my entry for the Sekshon Pagá, it is the only professional league on the island. That is what the opening statement is saying in Papiamentu of the PDF document that I shared. The second tier is amateur level. It is a small country, and none of the clubs on the island have their own stadiums. But the top tier is considered fully professional, which is the only professional football league on the island. The salaries are not high, but neither is the cost of living on the Island. Please let me know if there is any other criteria involved besides the fact that the players who compete in the league are paid for it, and are thus considered professional athletes in their own right. Should it only be considered Semi-professional, then I will move my entry to the list below it, but I would just like to better understand what qualifies a league as fully professional, I am simply going off ofthe opening statement in the year end review of the Federation, which claims just that. Thank you in advance for the clarification. ( Subzzee ( talk) 13:47, 23 September 2015 (UTC))
Thanks for uploading File:Aharon Yariv.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm DGG. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Referendums in the Netherlands, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 23:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Godmanchester Rovers FC.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Why did you during your so-called "cleanup" remove so much central info about the municipal structure and party system from the Åland election article? It makes it a lot less useful. Basically just an empty shell.-- Batmacumba ( talk) 21:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
I reverted your good-faith edit changing the article's name because every source I have found on the event refers to it as an election, and so the title should reflect that under WP:COMMONNAME. Regards Plazak ( talk) 03:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swiss federal election, 2015, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jura and Council of States. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I have seen you created a page with players of Faur București, this is very nice, thank you, and I also see you did many edits in football articles and I was wondering if you want to help a bit to develop Romanian Football ?
Things we want to improve are Cupa Romaniei - Romanian Cup - to create the missing seasons - and to create a few more teams. And also Liga II, the second league, I edit there now, I improved the main page, and also are missing seasons to create, and maybe a few teams to create. Have a look and tell me your opinion.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 17:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi! @ Number 57: Thanks for contributing to Lagos!
![]() |
You are invited to participate in
WikiProject Lagos, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about
Lagos. |
Eruditescholar ( talk) 00:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | On 9 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article New Logie Green, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New Logie Green is the only stadium outside Glasgow to have hosted a Scottish Cup final? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/New Logie Green. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 20:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:NCDAB: "Natural disambiguation is generally preferable to parenthetical disambiguation". Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 11:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for defending my article and backing it up with news sources. Much love! Ashkaan232 ( talk) 23:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Number 57. I was thinking about what you wrote a while back in your evidence to WP:ARBPIA3 - in particular, that you wrote this: "...via frequent reports at WP:AE and WP:SPI."
Does that imply that you think some of the AE bans and SPIs were unjustified? Perhaps innocent editors incorrectly identified and banned as socks? AnotherNewAccount ( talk) 19:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johnstone F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Association. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi N57. For your info. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Why referendum and not plebiscite? -- Danrolo ( talk) 20:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
HI , can u see know this article List of members of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament (2013–). Kurdistantolive ( talk) 12:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I had not thought of doing that! It is indeed extremely useful. — Ynhockey ( Talk) 17:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
I have seen you created a page with players of Faur București, this is very nice, thank you, and I also see you did many edits in football articles and I was wondering if you want to help a bit to develop Romanian Football ?
Things we want to improve are Cupa Romaniei - Romanian Cup - to create the missing seasons - and to create a few more teams. And also Liga II, the second league, I edit there now, I improved the main page, and also are missing seasons to create, and maybe a few teams to create. Have a look and tell me your opinion.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 20:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I understand, what elections did you talk about ? You said that you rescue articles, maybe you can help and rescue 2 articles of mine about Spanish Football: Copa del Rey Topscorers by Season and Copa del Rey Topscorers I will be very grateful. Thank you ! -- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 21:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)