![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
Hi Maestro2016! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 17:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC) |
I just unblocked you. Although you were being disruptive at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky, after further investigation, I can now see how you were provoked by the filer. There's no need for you to post anything further at the SPI. I'm dealing it with now, and in any event, Mario Maraschi is temporarily blocked for their disruption, which was much worse than yours. Thanks for your understanding.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Why you said this, i have nothing to do with him, so stop please, i'm doing a great work here, and you do it so, so why you want that i have troubles, i don't pretend nothing, but stop with this accusations, do your edits and stop, did you see what my name is? I'm "Just editing with a smile", and also you should just edit with a smile :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just editing with a smile ( talk • contribs) 06:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saúl Álvarez vs. Amir Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lemieux. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey there, 10 is the max number of Review scores on the Professional ratings table. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 06:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Like I Would, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Make My Love Go, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Maestro2016. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Gunga Jumna. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SoniaKovind ( talk) 11:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Stop adding inflated gross of films as per your own theories. Provide a reliable source, which says that a film has grossed as much. You are selectively adding inflated gross of films of your liking, particularly of Dilip Kumar, without any reliable source to back your claims. Wikipedia requires reliable sources otherwise it is just POV. SoniaKovind ( talk) 11:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
It is not about the "source" but content. I repeat again it is not ACTUAL adjusted gross, but a HYPOTHETICAL gross, using gold standard, which is not the norm. We do not have to "stick" with it, their is no compulsion. Unless their is a proper source, their is no need of adding an inflated, adjusted gross. SoniaKovind ( talk) 12:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bollywood and
Khans of Bollywood Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Stop adding your POV and deleting meaningful content from the pages, which suits your bias. Wikipedia is suppose to be neutral. Discuss before adding instead of reverting and edit wars. SoniaKovind ( talk) 08:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Lol...instead of this childish counter warning, use talk page for meaningful discussion. I am aware of reverting and edit-war, I warned you first. SoniaKovind ( talk) 08:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Warning you again, stop vandalism. Instead of blind reverts a and edit warring use talk page and discuss, you have been warned. SoniaKovind ( talk) 08:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Worldbruce. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
List of highest grossing Bangladeshi films, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
Worldbruce (
talk)
19:41, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding WP:Original research to the XXXX in film article such as you did here. How can you possibly know that Bobby ranks in fourth place if you don't know how much Papillon or The Way We Were made overseas? The reason only the US data is listed is because most of the worldwide data is missing. If the overseas grosses were known for all these film then these lists would include a worldwide chart like at 2017 in film. Composing your own chart is WP:Original research because it is impossible to determine the ranks from the data available. Betty Logan ( talk) 01:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
You copied text from one or more pages into
Economy of Bangladesh. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.
More generally, extensive copying is often a sign of failing to use summary style correctly. With summary style there may be some redundancy between the parent and child articles, but it usually isn't in the form of entire repeated sentences or paragraphs because the articles should be written at different levels of detail.
Attribution must be provided for Economy of Bangladesh, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication as well. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 19:27, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Please have a look at WP:HISTRH. Colonial-era history textbooks are obsolete: you should avoid using them as sources, wherever newer scholarly work is available. Several modern books cover the topic of Maratha-era atrocities: please use them as references instead. Quotes from British civil servants like V. A. Smith about the predecessors of the British have no place in Wikipedia articles, unless referenced with commentary in a modern scholarly work.
Also Jeneet Sorokhaibam's Chhatrapati Shivaji is plagiarized from Wikipedia: see Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources/Books that plagiarize Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 22:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bazaan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
— Cpt.a.haddock ( talk) (please ping when replying) 19:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Some of your edits to Industrial Revolution and The Great Divergence contain false and misleading statements and some are not in the correct section. Please use the Talk page to discuss edits that are counter to mainstream sources on this topic. Continuing to make controversial or false edits can result in you being blocked from editing these articles. Phmoreno ( talk) 17:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Phmoreno: Will you please link to the complaint. I have looked for it too and cannot find it. Maestro has a right to defend himself. Betty Logan ( talk) 20:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Maestro2016: @ Betty Logan: I am going to hold off on filing a complaint until I see if we can work this out. My first impression was that this was a POV problem, but it may be a case of careless treatment of sources and not understanding the leading works on the subject. Phmoreno ( talk) 21:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
I recommend that you add the relevant quotes from the sources that you cite: see, for example, citation 37 in the Peter Navarro article ( /info/en/?search=Peter_Navarro#Views_on_trade). That would make it easier for other editors to review your edits, and could avoid some of the conflicts that you're getting into. I, for instance, had to add quotes in my sources in the Navarro article to reduce edit warring. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 14:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
I made an image guide on how to do this, and it's really easy. Thanks. 115.164.91.208 ( talk) 14:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
On 21 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of highest-grossing films in India, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Baahubali 2: The Conclusion is the highest grossing film in India, with a domestic collection of over ₹12.53 billion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of highest-grossing films in India. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, List of highest-grossing films in India), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Maestro, re: this, it would be appreciated if you'd please not create links off of common concepts like a year. All wikilinks compete for reader attention, and generating solid walls of blue, especially for mundane ideas like a year. Nobody's going to read the lead and wonder, "what is this random number 2017?" because everyone that we're talking about a year. And anyway, we typically link to the primary topic, not a tangential idea like "2017 in film". If you want to drive readers to these tangential subjects, we have See also sections for that and various templates. Thanks, and regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, re: this, was there a specific reason you reorganized the critical response with positive reviews at the top? This tends to look like we're trying to bury negative response, which would obviously not be consistent with WP:NPOV, since it would tend make the film look like it received largely good reviews. After all, anyone who would read that section would probably just skim through the first few. Perhaps a stronger approach that would promote neutrality, would be to focus on specific aspects like direction, cinematography, acting, writing, and then organise the reviews around those ideas? Ex:
The film's cinematography received attention from critics, several of whom praised the wide sweeping shots used throughout the dance sequences. "Brilliant," said John Doe of ABC Times, who gave the film 3 stars out of 5. "I felt as though I was flying." Rory Sen of DEF Bugle wrote, "I was transported to the crisp verdant hills of Switzerland. The techniques used by Salman Croix were astounding." These sentiments were not felt by Roy Smythe of DEF Times who described the photography as "dizzying ... I thought I was going to throw up. However, the acting was spot on and I found Mamta Bloggs to be believable and adorable." Bloggs' portrayal of the street urchin was described as "hilarious and lovable. I wanted to adopt her. Bloggs had amazing chemistry with Hrithik Jones, who did an excellent job of eliciting tears as the kind-hearted businessman."
At least in this poorly-written example, we avoid top-loading the section with the good reviews. Thanks for your consideration, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Maestro, re: this, {{ INR}} has a built in linking function. You can activate it thusly: {{INR|link=yes}} This is slightly easier on the eyes than [[Indian rupee|{{INR}}]]. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey there, re: this, there was nothing personal about my reversion. Indian film articles, for whatever reason, attract a lot of excessive detail about genre, like here where Iru Mugan is described as a "science fiction action psychological thriller film" or this "action comedy-fantasy" or this "supernatural thriller drama film" or this "neo noir action crime thriller film". Anyway, you get the point. Per film MOS, we typically only care about primary genre, and a sub-genre if warranted. But typically we stick with a primary genre, preferably one that the majority of outlets are using to describe the film. Thriller or action would probably fit the bill for a general description, and then any other information that would further clarify the spy themes could be presented in another context. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you complete an article Neil Nitin Mukesh, what happened after Prem Ratan Dhan Payo and add his role i n Wazir how critic aid about his role, about his character in Indu Sarkar and his role in Golmaal Again, and he have been filming in Firrkie and about his Telugu debut in Saaho? Thank u! -- 92.100.20.242 ( talk) 11:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning to submit the article Madhumati for a GA review. I do need to expand its box office section for this, but am unable to find any sources for Soviet gross. Do you know of any such sources? Thanks, King Prithviraj II ( talk) 21:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
For having saved those India albums from very silly AfD noms. In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Maestro2016. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geunineart ( talk) 07:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Capitals00 ( talk) 14:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Maestro2016 In
this edit, I reverted the box office data you changed to 630 crore at
Bajrangi Bhaijaan. We need to avoid using multiple sources to try to cobble together meaning. We're really walking the line of
WP:SYNTHESIS, which states: "Do not combine material from multiple sources (or different parts of one source) to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. This would be improper editorial synthesis of published material to imply a new conclusion, which is original research performed by an editor here."
In this case, we're adding one source's proprietary method for estimating gross and adding it to another source's method for estimating gross. Further compounding the problem, was the choice of
bollywoodmoviereview.in. What do you know about this website? Who owns it? Who is the editor? What is their background? What makes them an expert in Indian film finances? What reliable sources care what this site thinks?
Sourcing 101: We only care what reliable mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. I've restored the reference that was in the article circa late-October 2017. Regards,
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
23:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajrangi Bhaijaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sultanpur ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Ok, seriously, STOP THE EDIT-WAR OVER THIS and use the article talk page to get consensus. Anymore and I'll request the article be locked from anyone other than admins to force discussion. You both really should take this to the Original research noticeboard and get some outside advice. But no more reverts of this, please. Talk page or noticeboard. Ravensfire ( talk) 17:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war on Religious violence in India. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geunineart ( talk) 06:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Geunineart (
talk)
12:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Coffee //
have a ☕️ //
beans //
14:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Do you have plans for a GA? Yashthepunisher ( talk) 17:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey, with Cyphoidbomb's advice on the Raees talk page, I started a discussion about using multiple sources for film financials here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Using multiple sources for film gross figures. Your thoughts and suggestions on the best way forward would be appreciated! Ravensfire ( talk) 02:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Secret Superstar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Pls update Malayalam movies collection also Alfinjose ( talk) 13:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I saw your edits on Saba Qamar, its awesome however i want to add her image on her page which is available on commons but due to page protection i cant did it, thats why asking you please if you dont mind add her image and thats the image name "Saba Qamar.jpg" and you can check it, its her. Kironkhann ( talk) 08:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Yamaguchi先生. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Saba Qamar seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please also note that the image which was added to the Infobox has since been removed as a possible copyright violation. Regards,
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
20:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you make an article about movie Phamous starring Jackie Shroff? Thank you! -- 178.67.183.254 ( talk) 11:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahatma Gandhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruskin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
I noticed a lot of work has been done on viewership for Amir Khan over the last month. Thank you. I was wondering, I have been using BARB for a while myself, but there are certain figures, if too low on the weekly figures, they don't tend to show. Is there another way around this to view all figures? Thanks in advance. -- Mahussain06 ( talk) 13:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religious violence in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kangra and Sahi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Do you not think the LA Times is a better source than a blog quoting Hearn with numbers "off the top of my head"? 80.235.147.186 ( talk) 01:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey there. This is regarding this edit of yours where you said the gross is ₹89.324 crore, which has now been changed by some IPv6 to ₹199.55 crore over a series of edits. There is a discussion regarding how this figure was reached. Will you please tell us regarding your calculation? Thanks Vivek Ray ( talk) 07:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Just a heads up. It seems you may not be reviewing the citations at the Magic article and I suspect it may be from a misunderstanding of what ledes are. I'll direct you to MOS:LEAD so you can brush up on it again. Leads don't need to have citations generally speaking because what is in them is not disputed and is typically cited in the main body of the article. I'd recommend reviewing all the cited sources within the article before you go changing anything. If you have a disagreement with the lede, you should probably take it to the talk page first since most of what you are editing has been discussed previously. If you haven't read the talk page yet, then you have some work to do. Thanks! Leitmotiv ( talk) 21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the highest-grossing media franchises, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Miller ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello? XD I have a question regarding this, could you please tell me from where do you get the source for sales and all? 94.128.88.199 ( talk) 16:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey there, can you please give your inputs on a few issues here:
1.
Talk:List of highest-grossing films in India(
I,
II &
III)
2.
Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films
3.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force
Thanks in Advance. ~ Rajan51( talk) 16:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
However I look at it, this is unacceptable, especially in a sensitive subject like that. Please do not repeat. Thanks. Kleuske ( talk) 14:49, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I left a couple of questions on Talk:List of highest-grossing anime films just wondering if you or someone else could help answer it 4 me Fanoflionking 11:09, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for not explain things earlier. My biggest question would be why are you placing figures from 2017 rather than the newest things available? - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 00:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Hello! I, (
TheMasterGuru), would like to invite you to join
WikiProject YouTube! We're working on:
|
The article List of most-viewed YouTube channels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:LISTN, i.e. the list is not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
wumbolo
^^^
19:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed YouTube channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed YouTube channels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 13:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KSI vs. Logan Paul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, just wanted to let you know that the difference between this and the previous edit does not affect the page layout or anything in any way. It is essentially like adding an empty HTML span to a page (it does nothing/does not affect the page visually). -- TheSandDoctor Talk 17:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Please enter the table of paid broadcasts in the UK, the battles that took place on the new PPV channel ITV Box Office. --- AndreyAtanasov ( talk) 15:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bom Diggy (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, can you edit the Khabib Nurmagomedov article? I can't edit it myself due to page protection. There's misinformation in the " UFC 229 Nurmagomedov-McGregor post-fight incident" section. It says "McGregor was then attacked by two of Nurmagomedov's cornermen, Zubaira Tukhugov and Islam Makhachev." When in fact, Islam Makhachev wasn't even in the cage when Conor was attacked, he was in the crowd trying to help Khabib. The guy in the red shirt that was mistaken for Makhachev is Èsed Èmiragaev (Эсед Эмирагаев in russian), he attacked Conor from behind after McGregor attacked Abubakar Nurmagomedov. Èsed Èmiragaev is Khabibs older friend from childhood that accompanies Khabib everywhere, helps in his camp/other stuff, he also helps Khabibs dad with his MMA school. The strange thing about that is that Esed was very respectful towards Conor in every interview (and humble in general), so it's really unknown why he'd jump into the cage to attack Conor, I guess it's because McGregor punched Abubakar. Anyways, there's almost no information about this guy online, but I gave you a lot of it in this message. By the way, this guy was also involved in Khabib vs. Diaz brawl at WSOF tournament in 2015. Lastly, here's Esed Emiragaev's instagram [1]. I hope this helps and you correct the section, thanks in advance! Dmig2332 ( talk) 04:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Russian source article [2] Dmig2332 ( talk) 04:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
References
Hi Maestro2016. Good day. Notice you have edited a number of pages related to MMA events/fighters articles recently, for such I would like to welcome you to MMA Wikipedia community and thank you for your edits and contributions. You could add your name here if you want to participate as editor in WikiProject MMA. You might want to familiar yourself with WikiProject Mixed martial arts guidelines, Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability guidelines for fighters and MMA organizations / promotions. Let me know if anything I would help. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 04:27, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
I thank you for the improvements here. I lack in quality English but I see that you removed the word brawller. Okay, my bad, I didn't cite it. I'll add it back with reference after sometime. Enjoy! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 05:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dwayne Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Booker T ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Good Sagarkatla ( talk) 05:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The villain 53 cror
Sagarkatla ( talk) 05:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Historical period drama films set in Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padmavati ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Detective Pikachu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NPD ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Maestro2016. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited T-Series (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Greetings! I'm bothering you because you are a recent contributor to the Home video page. Might I ask you to weigh in at talk:Home video#First sentence? Thanks in advance for any response! Jeh ( talk) 09:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Police Story (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crime Story ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Due to your recent editing over the last couple of days at List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets, you have created a cite error in the references section, seen here, specifically reference number 98. Could you take a look and see if you can fix it. Article was listed at Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dead Man Walking ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
User:Maestro2016, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Maestro2016 and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:Maestro2016 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –
User
45
65
41
15:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
That doubleday book you use as a cite is full of misinformation. Just reading the text alone. "By the late 1970's Toho was making 2 films a year". If that applies to Godzilla then yeah its wrong. Toho stopped making Godzilla films by the mid-70s (1975) and the only time they made 2 Godzilla films in one year was 1964. Giantdevilfish ( talk) 17:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Some edits that you have made, including those to Hum Aapke Hain Koun..! are not updating the sources to match. Unless you add good sources, comparable to the ones already there, your edits will be reverted. Bollyjeff | talk 14:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
How about putting the two tables together in their own article instead of putting one in the musical films article and the other in the lists of musicals article? All the best, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pokémon (anime), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Bakazaka. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Aya Kamiki, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Bakazaka (
talk)
16:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
The News and others Sources provided are report from Toei Animation part owner of Dragon Ball IP and Shueisha the publisher of Dragon Ball and the 230-240 million copies world wide (2012 - 2016) directly comes from them. and other major sources supports the figure.
If you want to directly dispute the accuracy of those sources's reporting, then either take it to the reliable sources notice board or to WikiProject Anime and manga. However, until then, we must go with the figure that is directly stated by the source, which is the publisher/owner, as the official figure. Thank you.
619XXXX ( talk) 11:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Giving full range of figures seems good
and
http://www.toei-anim.co.jp/movie/2013_dragonballz/introduction/
http://corp.toei-anim.co.jp/en/press/detail.php?id=521
https://mantan-web.jp/article/20161012dog00m200016000c.html
Many major sources cites this figure which is consistent with the official figure
Personally i believe the figure is around 250-300 million
http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/product/NEOBK-2292571
Thank you:-) 619XXXX ( talk) 12:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Whoa, wait am not a sockpuppet and I use alternative account for different purposes, now i have been forced to use only one account for everything. even if i was a sockpuppet I don't understand why you are trying to disregard the compromise that you have already accepted, you are losing your credibility.
anyway back to the topic
Okay, now we can easily say 350M claim is just Circular reporting WP:CIRCULAR from 2008, and its just toei and its been 11 years but since then and there are have been many other primary and secondary sources which are consistent and supported with figures claimed by Shueisha and Toei which is 230M->240M->250M. so anyway you see those 350M reports doesn't follow WP:RS AGE and can't be used as source in the articles. and we also cannot use pirated copies sales WP:NOTRELIABLE, we can just make small reference side note as it was did in that japanese wiki. for example in Top selling books list, there is one book with given range of 100M to 300M as per primary and secondary sources but in a small reference note it says 'one source states the pirated copy sales is 1 Billion'. so to be rational we can only use the range 250M-280M, we can't just assume it to be 250M-300M or like the change you made 300M-350M which makes no sense when you yourself cite 280M, so stop pushing your opinions which could be interpreted as vandalism and also as per WP:RSC, Include that November 2018 book from Shueisha which cites 250 million worldwide as source (DRAGON BALL Shonen Jump Magazine Best Scene Top 10 (Shueisha Mook) [1] and lets comprimise with that, be rational and and revert your changes. Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 06:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
The problem with 280M local publisher report is just collection of disjointed links, it does not directly state 280M.
250M is supported with WP:RS AGE and primary and secondary sources
280M is not the best WP:RELIABLE source, but worthy of a note, that's why we should give 250M-280M
meanwhile 350M & pirated copies as said above its clearly WP:NOTRELIABLE and 350M doesn't follow WP:RS AGE, remember its a 11 years old source, be rational. and you keep saying 300 million, when its just your assumption. we can't assume and decide these infos.
so yeah, understand that and use 250M-280M as the figure. Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 07:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
As per WP:RS AGE, those 2008 source can't be used even if it was toei since they have been changed the report after that been consistent for past 11 years and supported by many primary and secondary sources, and you say 2008-2019 ? when they are clearly just circular reporting like that 2014 book source (which cites 2007 here, clearly doesn't follow WP:RS AGE) and that 2019 source is clearly WP:NOTRELIABLE as concluded above based on its report about $23 billion franchise figure and even after 11 years reported as 350M? again doesn't follow WP:RS AGE, so stop citing that 2019 source or any other 11 year old source which are clearly inconsistent.
so as per WP:CALC, 250-280M range is the meaningful reflection of the acceptable sources.
and again as per WP:PAYWALL and WP:RSC you can also include that November Shueisha 2018 book from which cites 250 million worldwide as source (DRAGON BALL Shonen Jump Magazine Best Scene Top 10 (Shueisha Mook) [2] Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 07:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
as i said stop citing that 2019 source, which is WP:NOTRELIABLE, can you explain that source's figure of $23 billion franchise? and am not misinterpreting WP:RS AGE, its says 'new information, new discoveries or developments', there is no developments or new information in those 350M sources for the last 11 years, which makes it obviously to be unreliable. that said 230M->240M->250M is the bare minimum which is strongly supported from latest sources from both primary and secondary sources and 280 is just accumulated number, nowhere does any source directly state 280M, hence why 250-280 million is the most accurate range. (and you can reference a very large number of sources or just make 'see' note, this should not be a reason to not use those source)
anyway I am kinda exhausted now, we may need to resolve this later with WP:THIRDOPINION/ WP:RSN, so for now I'm willing to settle on 250-300 million. Thank you Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 09:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
and by the way I am adding this source - November 2018 "DRAGON BALL" jump best scene TOP 10 (Shueisha Mook) [3] as per WP:PAYWALL/ WP:RSC and here more clear images from the book stating 250M worldwide. See Full page See figures Thank you. Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 10:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing non-English films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Home entertainment ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding false grosses to the Dragon Ball pages please. They were correct as they were and now they need to be corrected again. You're putting a Japanese gross through a currency exchange and that is not how that works at all. Thanks. Scabab ( talk) 02:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if they're not up to date, they are official reported numbers. It is what the movie was reported to have grossed. Resurrection F was reported to have grossed $31 million, not $34 million. That is not what Box Office Mojo or The Numbers converted it to, that is what they were given. Your figure was never reported in anyway, is utterly false and something that you alone came up with by using a currency conversion site, just like how Broly might convert to $35.2 million but that is not what was reported. Scabab ( talk) 01:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
This policy prohibits the usage of indic scripts in articles, even in infoboxes, so please refrain from using indic scripts unless necessary. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 03:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajrangi Bhaijaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabir Khan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed YouTube channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed YouTube channels (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
15:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your edits in the films and wondered if by any chance the film Tsubasa Reservoir Chronicle the Movie: The Princess in the Birdcage Kingdom (yeah, long name...) made it to the box office. Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 20:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
do you knew if we can exepend Highest-grossing musical theatre productions anymore (maybe a nice round 50) Fanoflionking
i went with $100 million threshold if there any musicsl missing feel free to added. Fanoflionking
Hi there, re: this please avoid hyperbolic language like "flop" or "hit" or "blockbuster" or "super-hit" or "failure" or "disaster" or any of that stuff. Most quality articles do not try to label everything. For perspective, even though Rotten Tomatoes labels failures as "rotten", we virtually never use that labeling, because it's not only non-neutral, but it places an undue emphasis on the hyperbolic opinion of one source. Keep it neutral, please. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed and most-liked YouTube trailers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed and most-liked YouTube trailers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 ( talk) 07:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey there, re: this edit from 2017, I've somehow gotten dragged into defending your claim that T-Series engaged in piracy early in its inception. A user DecstarG complained on the talk page recently that they couldn't access the source you provided. In good-faith, in these edits, I tried to update the link you included by citing the actual published page (20) instead of the Google Books link. I also added a relevant quote from that link and then I added three other references, including a fairly large quotation that seemed to summarise clearly the various methods T-Series used to establish a money-making foothold. Some Anonymous editors have taken issue with the piracy claim and I've done my best to explain our content guidelines. If you have other thoughts about this content, I would hope you'd chime in, please. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dilbar (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nora ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Space Pirate Captain Harlock (film)? Thank you! -- 217.66.157.234 ( talk) 17:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you complete article Item number? Thank you! —- 217.66.156.110 ( talk) 11:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Space Pirate Captain Harlock and Galaxy Express 999? Thank you! —— 217.66.156.110 ( talk) 14:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
is it possibble to make Highest-grossing anime films and List of Highest-grossing anime films by year longer Fanoflionking
i think a top 50 for the main list will be fine (like the animted page or main page) as long as we can find sources for it, we should give it a go at least Fanoflionking
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Happy New Year (2014 film) and Mom (film), The Happy New Year of Shah Rukh, was released in China! Thank you! —- 92.100.212.105 ( talk) 09:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Dabangg and Hotel Salvation, which released in Japan and Raid (2018 film) was released in China? Thank you! -- 178.71.174.238 ( talk) 14:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
A few weeks ago I created the article Bungo Stray Dogs: Dead Apple, a movie by Bones. Apparently, it aired in multiple countries besides. Could you give it a look in regards to its box office? Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Puneeth Rajkumar? Thank you! -- 89.110.5.127 ( talk) 15:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update in 2.0 (film) will Release in China, and Barfi! was released in Japan, can you check an article The Balkan Line? Thank you! —- 78.37.250.104 ( talk) 09:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran was released in Japan, update box office gross of Kaabil and Half Ticket (2016 film) was released in China and Baaghi 2 was released in South Korea and Japan? Thank you! -- 92.100.211.154 ( talk) 15:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
you kept change The lion king gross form $968.5M to $986.2M changing the source form Box Office Mojo to The Numbers beacue you said it was realible (witch i never said it was not) but Disney issued an erratum to the gross for The Lion King, correcting its gross from $987.5 million to $968.5 million. [1]. so can you change all the pages you made this change to P+T Fanoflionking
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transistor count, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DDR2 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
HI!. You appear to be normalizing the dates in Template:Semiconductor manufacturing processes. Thanks! May I ask what your criterion is? Whatever it is, it's almost certainly better than the vague "pick some random one of the dates in the article" that we had been using. If you are comfortable with your criterion, I would appreciate it if you could please document it on the doc page of the template so that other editors will not be tempted to change the dates. - Arch dude ( talk) 01:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran was released in Japan, update box office gross of Kaabil and Half Ticket (2016 film) was released in China and Baaghi 2 was released in South Korea and Japan? Thank you! -- 178.66.108.7 ( talk) 12:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Regarding Spirited Away, the best source i found is someone who know a lot about the Japanese box office and he went and calculated the gross for the movie and with the weekly dollar-yen exchange and it was 249M usd( http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2240975#p2240975), Spirited Away didn't stay in theaters after 2002 and didn't have any big re-release and the BOM is only wrong in exchange rate so i think going with 249 is the best choice, what do you think ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AIGA997 ( talk • contribs) 14:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC) AIGA997 ( talk) 14:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro! Can you update Do Bigha Zamin which released in USSR, but only in China, and Kimi yo Fundo no Kawa o Watare, and Il Bisbetico Domato and Dance Dance (film) in USSR? Thank you! —- 89.110.17.254 ( talk) 09:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
1. Notifying you that the discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new answers. Ilias48rus ( talk) 17:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Your big move at this diff was among things reverted by me to get back before today's messy edit war. I did not review it, but it seems orthogonal; I'll leave it to you to decide whether to re-do it or discuss it. Dicklyon ( talk) 21:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
1. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new answers. And, now you're going to troll?, anyone i ask, who know English, understands the misunderstood by you sentence correctly. Ilias48rus ( talk) 23:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
2. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new answers. Ilias48rus ( talk) 23:52, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
3. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have the last new answer. Thanks for the responses. Ilias48rus ( talk) 00:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
4. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new comment. Ilias48rus ( talk) 01:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
5. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new comment. Ilias48rus ( talk) 10:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Can you help me expand the opening weekend and year charts on List of highest-grossing musicals page I started them a few weeks ago P+T Fanoflionking 11:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro! Can you update Do Bigha Zamin which released in USSR, but not only in China, and Dance Dance (film) in USSR? Thank you! -- 92.100.192.117 ( talk) 09:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Discrete cosine transform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio compression ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
(I know that you are aware of the discretionary sanctions, but it is a statutory requirement that you be re-notified after a year's lapse.) -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 21:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atalla.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
This is a film trilogy that was released in early 2019 in Japan_ Psycho-Pass: Sinners of the System. By any chance if you have time, could you add its box office result? Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check Dance Dance (film) in USSR? Thank you! -- 178.71.161.212 ( talk) 13:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I am in the middle of doing a draft witch you might be interested in helping me develop Draft:List of films by Box office admissions Fanoflionking 10:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Since you know so much about the history, you might consider working on the Federico Faggin article, which is mostly over-polished by a dedicated IP editor. I tend to avoid it since he's my ex-boss. Dicklyon ( talk) 20:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. Dicklyon ( talk) 02:00, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro 2016! Can you check an article Il Bisbetico Domato and Raja Jani, which became popular in Soviet Union? Thank you! -- 178.71.206.156 ( talk) 19:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran in Japan and 2.0 (film) in China will release in September 7 and was released in Russia? Thank you! -- 178.71.206.156 ( talk) 19:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I saw you are doing good work to the passivation article. If you would like, I can try to make time to setup a better photo than the one I included on the page. I have citric and nitric acid to work with, and can do a variety of concentrations and lengths of time. I can also try to induce a passivation failure if higher quality photos are needed there. Let me know if there is anything I can help you with in that regard. I also would not be hurt at all if you do not like the photo I included in the article and you removed it. Kees08 (Talk) 07:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
The Box office information you added in May 2019 seems to have been throwing errors ever since you added it. Could you remove or simplify it please or find some way to correct your errors. -- 109.76.134.165 ( talk) 12:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Ah, I see. If they're not changing the rules they're breaking the templates. Please also note MOS:SMALLFONT. Avoid using smaller font sizes in elements that already use a smaller font size, such as Infoboxes. -- 109.76.134.165 ( talk) 20:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with List of films by Box office admissions I am planning to move it to the main space tomorrow evening is there any last minute thing you want to do before I do go ahead and make them. Also thanks you for helping with this page. Fanoflionking 08:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
Ali H. Nayfeh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CC by-NC-SA 3.0 is not a compatible license. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
11:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran in Japan and 2.0 (film) in China will release in September 7 was released in Russia? Thank you! -- 178.66.114.9 ( talk) 12:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Munni Badnaam Hui, Ooh La La of The Dirty Picture, Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube? Thank you! -- 178.66.114.9 ( talk) 12:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan, Dheevara (song) and Manohari in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube and can you check 1234 Shille Hodi views? Thank you! -- 92.100.202.71 ( talk) 07:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Maestro2016 reported by User:Gotitbro (Result: ). Thank you.
Gotitbro (
talk)
19:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4Gamer.net, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan, Dheevara (song) and Manohari in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube and can you check 1234 Shille Hodi views? Thank you! -- 95.55.105.86 ( talk) 06:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Your recent edits for “Katie Hopkins”!were removed again. For a start, excessive references and citations are not allowed on an article, especially in the introduction. 3 sources are enough and maximum. Far rights commentator is stated in introduction already, no need to put it in first sentence as a career as it is a summary and not her main profession. Too much wording in first sentence with your edit. If you want this changed then please do not change it again and instead start a discussion in the “talk” section on the article. Almostangelic123 ( talk) 01:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Also I am not doubting your contributions are well sourced but the sources are only describing her as a far rights commentator and not expressing that it is one of her full time professions. Your sourcing was also very excessive. Almostangelic123 ( talk) 01:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camera phone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resolution ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan, Dheevara (song) and Manohari and 1234 Shille Hodi in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube? Thank you! -- 95.55.106.2 ( talk) 16:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Can you help expend Anime Box office admissions? Fanoflionking 13:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update box office of Dhoom 3 in Japan and South Korea and 2.0 (film) in China and Russia? Thank you! -- 95.55.106.2 ( talk) 15:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multi-channel length, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SRAM ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Please note that disambiguation pages like INAS are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
Thank you. Leschnei ( talk) 23:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dolby Digital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio compression ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Algebraic code-excited linear prediction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algebraic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Class-D amplifier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watts ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Do you know if it is possible to create a timeline of highest-grossing anime films Fanoflionking 08:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I think we go back as far as possible with worldwide gross than just mention that “until year X only Japanese gross are reported after year X foreign gross started to be reported and film X is the first film to out gross film Y” Fanoflionking 12:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi. A topic about internet censorship in iran needs to become update on Wikipedia. Please add "How Iranian people access to block websites and use social medias" Wikipedia needs your attention to become better place. Thank you. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Iran Omid6578 ( talk) 14:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Online gaming ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
If you learn how and when to use an en dash, like in metal–oxide–semiconductor where it separates parallel layers, I won't have to follow you around fixing those so much. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Power MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Computer hardware, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battery ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
It seems that some others find too much detail being added to articles that are not supposed to have that much detail. I also slightly wonder about WP:COI, though in many other cases I have not noticed it when others did. Could you say a little bit about what you actually do that might be CoI? In most cases, there are more specific article where the details might apply. Gah4 ( talk) 00:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bullet train ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I might’ve accidentally erased some of your edits on the Maratha invasions of Bengal while reinserting a huge amount of text that was removed (unjustly IMO). I tried to reinsert your edit, but might’ve removed some content you entered by mistake. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B054:FEF0:9DE4:4E36:A270:534 ( talk) 03:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
i wondering if you can help expend List of most expensive Anime films Fanoflionking 22:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update box office of Dhoom 3 in Japan and South Korea and 2.0 (film) in Russia and Japan? Thank you! -- 95.54.103.156 ( talk) 12:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
I starting a new page Highest grossing Comedy films and just wonder if you would like to help out on it. Fanoflionking 17:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove discussion templates until their is a consensus to the topic at hand.
Andrzejbanas (
talk)
02:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adult-oriented rock ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
@Maestro2016 i staring working on a new page just wonder if you want to help out it is List of animated films by Box office admissions Fanoflionking 16:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
I see that you have found a lot of sources about FFVII's materials. There is something that I've been looking and it's possible design or promotional information regarding Cloud's Hardy Daytona. According to the wiki, it's a direct reference to a real brand known as Harley Davidson. However, I can't find anything about other than merchandising. There is material about Cloud's bike from the Compilation bikes, Fenrir, so I wondered if any magazine explained something about the Daytona considering how it was a given a minigame for the cellphones. Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cyberpunk works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minority Report ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
so with super Mario bros 3 there is super Mario advance 3 which is the exact same game. Also there is advance 2 super Mario world which is the same as super Mario world. but what about games like super Mario all stars which are just the NES super Mario bros in 16 bit should those count as sales of each game that was on them? Should these count in the numbers for best selling games of all time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.182.179.111 ( talk) 15:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
While yest it did make that 100 million mark Tetris EA shouldn't be counted as most of it time on the ios and google stores it was 99 cents meaning you add this game means you have to add games like angry birds in which would same very unfair to games that did really well at the 60 dollar price tag because all the best selling games would be cheap mobile games — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.182.179.111 ( talk) 15:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Japanese live-action films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Witcher 3 sold over 50 m cookies, not only 27 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.47.131.109 ( talk) 10:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Maestro2016, you stated in your edit summary here that you were undoing two edits by User:Ottoshade, but based on this edit, I take it that you were trying to undo my edit as well. In the future, please make sure that you clearly identify all of the edits that you're targeting when you revert a page to an earlier version. -- Drevolt ( talk) 04:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chen Zhen (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fearless ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I saw you substantially expanded this page recently. Can you please expand the subgenre sections like Action-adventure and Action-drama with sources? Otherwise, someone like Andrzejbanas will mercilessly delete them, not realising there are many incoming links which will then become broken links. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Do you by any chance have any connection to the authors of this Bez and Pirovano paper I've seen added in many places? Nemo 12:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
An "editor" who apparently believes Galland didn't insert the orphan tales, but "restored" them from "earlier European versions" from the "original Arabic text" has been attacking the lede of this one. Please, I think I need some help maintaining the facts here. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 20:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Please stop changing the headquarters on the Sony Interactive Entertainment page. The source link ( https://www.sie.com/en/corporate.html) clearly defines the headquarters as the San Mateo location and NOT the Japan location. Thank you. 69.36.132.253 ( talk) 05:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Regarding your recent update to the PUBG player count, I believe this number of 734 million is only the mobile downloads/gamers. This is discussed on the Sensor Tower page. It doesn't include the player count from PC and console versions of PUBG. A more complete and accurate number is 804 million [1]. I have yet to find a credible source that has this information on 1 page.
could you help expend Streaming service provider P+T Fan Of Lion King 🦁 ( talk) 19:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC) 19:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.
This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.
I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that you need to be crossed. S Philbrick (Talk) 18:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
Hi Maestro2016! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 17:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC) |
I just unblocked you. Although you were being disruptive at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky, after further investigation, I can now see how you were provoked by the filer. There's no need for you to post anything further at the SPI. I'm dealing it with now, and in any event, Mario Maraschi is temporarily blocked for their disruption, which was much worse than yours. Thanks for your understanding.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Why you said this, i have nothing to do with him, so stop please, i'm doing a great work here, and you do it so, so why you want that i have troubles, i don't pretend nothing, but stop with this accusations, do your edits and stop, did you see what my name is? I'm "Just editing with a smile", and also you should just edit with a smile :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just editing with a smile ( talk • contribs) 06:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saúl Álvarez vs. Amir Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lemieux. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey there, 10 is the max number of Review scores on the Professional ratings table. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 06:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Like I Would, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Make My Love Go, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Maestro2016. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Gunga Jumna. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SoniaKovind ( talk) 11:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Stop adding inflated gross of films as per your own theories. Provide a reliable source, which says that a film has grossed as much. You are selectively adding inflated gross of films of your liking, particularly of Dilip Kumar, without any reliable source to back your claims. Wikipedia requires reliable sources otherwise it is just POV. SoniaKovind ( talk) 11:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
It is not about the "source" but content. I repeat again it is not ACTUAL adjusted gross, but a HYPOTHETICAL gross, using gold standard, which is not the norm. We do not have to "stick" with it, their is no compulsion. Unless their is a proper source, their is no need of adding an inflated, adjusted gross. SoniaKovind ( talk) 12:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Bollywood and
Khans of Bollywood Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Stop adding your POV and deleting meaningful content from the pages, which suits your bias. Wikipedia is suppose to be neutral. Discuss before adding instead of reverting and edit wars. SoniaKovind ( talk) 08:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Lol...instead of this childish counter warning, use talk page for meaningful discussion. I am aware of reverting and edit-war, I warned you first. SoniaKovind ( talk) 08:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Warning you again, stop vandalism. Instead of blind reverts a and edit warring use talk page and discuss, you have been warned. SoniaKovind ( talk) 08:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Worldbruce. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
List of highest grossing Bangladeshi films, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
Worldbruce (
talk)
19:41, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding WP:Original research to the XXXX in film article such as you did here. How can you possibly know that Bobby ranks in fourth place if you don't know how much Papillon or The Way We Were made overseas? The reason only the US data is listed is because most of the worldwide data is missing. If the overseas grosses were known for all these film then these lists would include a worldwide chart like at 2017 in film. Composing your own chart is WP:Original research because it is impossible to determine the ranks from the data available. Betty Logan ( talk) 01:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
You copied text from one or more pages into
Economy of Bangladesh. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.
More generally, extensive copying is often a sign of failing to use summary style correctly. With summary style there may be some redundancy between the parent and child articles, but it usually isn't in the form of entire repeated sentences or paragraphs because the articles should be written at different levels of detail.
Attribution must be provided for Economy of Bangladesh, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication as well. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 19:27, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Please have a look at WP:HISTRH. Colonial-era history textbooks are obsolete: you should avoid using them as sources, wherever newer scholarly work is available. Several modern books cover the topic of Maratha-era atrocities: please use them as references instead. Quotes from British civil servants like V. A. Smith about the predecessors of the British have no place in Wikipedia articles, unless referenced with commentary in a modern scholarly work.
Also Jeneet Sorokhaibam's Chhatrapati Shivaji is plagiarized from Wikipedia: see Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources/Books that plagiarize Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 22:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bazaan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
— Cpt.a.haddock ( talk) (please ping when replying) 19:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Some of your edits to Industrial Revolution and The Great Divergence contain false and misleading statements and some are not in the correct section. Please use the Talk page to discuss edits that are counter to mainstream sources on this topic. Continuing to make controversial or false edits can result in you being blocked from editing these articles. Phmoreno ( talk) 17:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Phmoreno: Will you please link to the complaint. I have looked for it too and cannot find it. Maestro has a right to defend himself. Betty Logan ( talk) 20:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Maestro2016: @ Betty Logan: I am going to hold off on filing a complaint until I see if we can work this out. My first impression was that this was a POV problem, but it may be a case of careless treatment of sources and not understanding the leading works on the subject. Phmoreno ( talk) 21:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
I recommend that you add the relevant quotes from the sources that you cite: see, for example, citation 37 in the Peter Navarro article ( /info/en/?search=Peter_Navarro#Views_on_trade). That would make it easier for other editors to review your edits, and could avoid some of the conflicts that you're getting into. I, for instance, had to add quotes in my sources in the Navarro article to reduce edit warring. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 14:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
I made an image guide on how to do this, and it's really easy. Thanks. 115.164.91.208 ( talk) 14:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
On 21 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of highest-grossing films in India, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Baahubali 2: The Conclusion is the highest grossing film in India, with a domestic collection of over ₹12.53 billion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of highest-grossing films in India. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, List of highest-grossing films in India), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Maestro, re: this, it would be appreciated if you'd please not create links off of common concepts like a year. All wikilinks compete for reader attention, and generating solid walls of blue, especially for mundane ideas like a year. Nobody's going to read the lead and wonder, "what is this random number 2017?" because everyone that we're talking about a year. And anyway, we typically link to the primary topic, not a tangential idea like "2017 in film". If you want to drive readers to these tangential subjects, we have See also sections for that and various templates. Thanks, and regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, re: this, was there a specific reason you reorganized the critical response with positive reviews at the top? This tends to look like we're trying to bury negative response, which would obviously not be consistent with WP:NPOV, since it would tend make the film look like it received largely good reviews. After all, anyone who would read that section would probably just skim through the first few. Perhaps a stronger approach that would promote neutrality, would be to focus on specific aspects like direction, cinematography, acting, writing, and then organise the reviews around those ideas? Ex:
The film's cinematography received attention from critics, several of whom praised the wide sweeping shots used throughout the dance sequences. "Brilliant," said John Doe of ABC Times, who gave the film 3 stars out of 5. "I felt as though I was flying." Rory Sen of DEF Bugle wrote, "I was transported to the crisp verdant hills of Switzerland. The techniques used by Salman Croix were astounding." These sentiments were not felt by Roy Smythe of DEF Times who described the photography as "dizzying ... I thought I was going to throw up. However, the acting was spot on and I found Mamta Bloggs to be believable and adorable." Bloggs' portrayal of the street urchin was described as "hilarious and lovable. I wanted to adopt her. Bloggs had amazing chemistry with Hrithik Jones, who did an excellent job of eliciting tears as the kind-hearted businessman."
At least in this poorly-written example, we avoid top-loading the section with the good reviews. Thanks for your consideration, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Maestro, re: this, {{ INR}} has a built in linking function. You can activate it thusly: {{INR|link=yes}} This is slightly easier on the eyes than [[Indian rupee|{{INR}}]]. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey there, re: this, there was nothing personal about my reversion. Indian film articles, for whatever reason, attract a lot of excessive detail about genre, like here where Iru Mugan is described as a "science fiction action psychological thriller film" or this "action comedy-fantasy" or this "supernatural thriller drama film" or this "neo noir action crime thriller film". Anyway, you get the point. Per film MOS, we typically only care about primary genre, and a sub-genre if warranted. But typically we stick with a primary genre, preferably one that the majority of outlets are using to describe the film. Thriller or action would probably fit the bill for a general description, and then any other information that would further clarify the spy themes could be presented in another context. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you complete an article Neil Nitin Mukesh, what happened after Prem Ratan Dhan Payo and add his role i n Wazir how critic aid about his role, about his character in Indu Sarkar and his role in Golmaal Again, and he have been filming in Firrkie and about his Telugu debut in Saaho? Thank u! -- 92.100.20.242 ( talk) 11:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning to submit the article Madhumati for a GA review. I do need to expand its box office section for this, but am unable to find any sources for Soviet gross. Do you know of any such sources? Thanks, King Prithviraj II ( talk) 21:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
For having saved those India albums from very silly AfD noms. In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Maestro2016. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geunineart ( talk) 07:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Capitals00 ( talk) 14:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Maestro2016 In
this edit, I reverted the box office data you changed to 630 crore at
Bajrangi Bhaijaan. We need to avoid using multiple sources to try to cobble together meaning. We're really walking the line of
WP:SYNTHESIS, which states: "Do not combine material from multiple sources (or different parts of one source) to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. This would be improper editorial synthesis of published material to imply a new conclusion, which is original research performed by an editor here."
In this case, we're adding one source's proprietary method for estimating gross and adding it to another source's method for estimating gross. Further compounding the problem, was the choice of
bollywoodmoviereview.in. What do you know about this website? Who owns it? Who is the editor? What is their background? What makes them an expert in Indian film finances? What reliable sources care what this site thinks?
Sourcing 101: We only care what reliable mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. I've restored the reference that was in the article circa late-October 2017. Regards,
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
23:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajrangi Bhaijaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sultanpur ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Ok, seriously, STOP THE EDIT-WAR OVER THIS and use the article talk page to get consensus. Anymore and I'll request the article be locked from anyone other than admins to force discussion. You both really should take this to the Original research noticeboard and get some outside advice. But no more reverts of this, please. Talk page or noticeboard. Ravensfire ( talk) 17:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war on Religious violence in India. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geunineart ( talk) 06:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Geunineart (
talk)
12:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Coffee //
have a ☕️ //
beans //
14:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Do you have plans for a GA? Yashthepunisher ( talk) 17:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey, with Cyphoidbomb's advice on the Raees talk page, I started a discussion about using multiple sources for film financials here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Using multiple sources for film gross figures. Your thoughts and suggestions on the best way forward would be appreciated! Ravensfire ( talk) 02:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Secret Superstar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Pls update Malayalam movies collection also Alfinjose ( talk) 13:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I saw your edits on Saba Qamar, its awesome however i want to add her image on her page which is available on commons but due to page protection i cant did it, thats why asking you please if you dont mind add her image and thats the image name "Saba Qamar.jpg" and you can check it, its her. Kironkhann ( talk) 08:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Yamaguchi先生. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Saba Qamar seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please also note that the image which was added to the Infobox has since been removed as a possible copyright violation. Regards,
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
20:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you make an article about movie Phamous starring Jackie Shroff? Thank you! -- 178.67.183.254 ( talk) 11:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahatma Gandhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruskin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
I noticed a lot of work has been done on viewership for Amir Khan over the last month. Thank you. I was wondering, I have been using BARB for a while myself, but there are certain figures, if too low on the weekly figures, they don't tend to show. Is there another way around this to view all figures? Thanks in advance. -- Mahussain06 ( talk) 13:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religious violence in India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kangra and Sahi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Do you not think the LA Times is a better source than a blog quoting Hearn with numbers "off the top of my head"? 80.235.147.186 ( talk) 01:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey there. This is regarding this edit of yours where you said the gross is ₹89.324 crore, which has now been changed by some IPv6 to ₹199.55 crore over a series of edits. There is a discussion regarding how this figure was reached. Will you please tell us regarding your calculation? Thanks Vivek Ray ( talk) 07:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Just a heads up. It seems you may not be reviewing the citations at the Magic article and I suspect it may be from a misunderstanding of what ledes are. I'll direct you to MOS:LEAD so you can brush up on it again. Leads don't need to have citations generally speaking because what is in them is not disputed and is typically cited in the main body of the article. I'd recommend reviewing all the cited sources within the article before you go changing anything. If you have a disagreement with the lede, you should probably take it to the talk page first since most of what you are editing has been discussed previously. If you haven't read the talk page yet, then you have some work to do. Thanks! Leitmotiv ( talk) 21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of the highest-grossing media franchises, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Miller ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello? XD I have a question regarding this, could you please tell me from where do you get the source for sales and all? 94.128.88.199 ( talk) 16:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey there, can you please give your inputs on a few issues here:
1.
Talk:List of highest-grossing films in India(
I,
II &
III)
2.
Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films
3.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force
Thanks in Advance. ~ Rajan51( talk) 16:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
However I look at it, this is unacceptable, especially in a sensitive subject like that. Please do not repeat. Thanks. Kleuske ( talk) 14:49, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I left a couple of questions on Talk:List of highest-grossing anime films just wondering if you or someone else could help answer it 4 me Fanoflionking 11:09, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for not explain things earlier. My biggest question would be why are you placing figures from 2017 rather than the newest things available? - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 00:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Hello! I, (
TheMasterGuru), would like to invite you to join
WikiProject YouTube! We're working on:
|
The article List of most-viewed YouTube channels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:LISTN, i.e. the list is not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
wumbolo
^^^
19:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed YouTube channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed YouTube channels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 13:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KSI vs. Logan Paul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, just wanted to let you know that the difference between this and the previous edit does not affect the page layout or anything in any way. It is essentially like adding an empty HTML span to a page (it does nothing/does not affect the page visually). -- TheSandDoctor Talk 17:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Please enter the table of paid broadcasts in the UK, the battles that took place on the new PPV channel ITV Box Office. --- AndreyAtanasov ( talk) 15:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bom Diggy (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, can you edit the Khabib Nurmagomedov article? I can't edit it myself due to page protection. There's misinformation in the " UFC 229 Nurmagomedov-McGregor post-fight incident" section. It says "McGregor was then attacked by two of Nurmagomedov's cornermen, Zubaira Tukhugov and Islam Makhachev." When in fact, Islam Makhachev wasn't even in the cage when Conor was attacked, he was in the crowd trying to help Khabib. The guy in the red shirt that was mistaken for Makhachev is Èsed Èmiragaev (Эсед Эмирагаев in russian), he attacked Conor from behind after McGregor attacked Abubakar Nurmagomedov. Èsed Èmiragaev is Khabibs older friend from childhood that accompanies Khabib everywhere, helps in his camp/other stuff, he also helps Khabibs dad with his MMA school. The strange thing about that is that Esed was very respectful towards Conor in every interview (and humble in general), so it's really unknown why he'd jump into the cage to attack Conor, I guess it's because McGregor punched Abubakar. Anyways, there's almost no information about this guy online, but I gave you a lot of it in this message. By the way, this guy was also involved in Khabib vs. Diaz brawl at WSOF tournament in 2015. Lastly, here's Esed Emiragaev's instagram [1]. I hope this helps and you correct the section, thanks in advance! Dmig2332 ( talk) 04:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Russian source article [2] Dmig2332 ( talk) 04:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
References
Hi Maestro2016. Good day. Notice you have edited a number of pages related to MMA events/fighters articles recently, for such I would like to welcome you to MMA Wikipedia community and thank you for your edits and contributions. You could add your name here if you want to participate as editor in WikiProject MMA. You might want to familiar yourself with WikiProject Mixed martial arts guidelines, Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability guidelines for fighters and MMA organizations / promotions. Let me know if anything I would help. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 04:27, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
I thank you for the improvements here. I lack in quality English but I see that you removed the word brawller. Okay, my bad, I didn't cite it. I'll add it back with reference after sometime. Enjoy! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 05:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dwayne Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Booker T ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Good Sagarkatla ( talk) 05:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
The villain 53 cror
Sagarkatla ( talk) 05:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Historical period drama films set in Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padmavati ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Detective Pikachu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NPD ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Maestro2016. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited T-Series (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Greetings! I'm bothering you because you are a recent contributor to the Home video page. Might I ask you to weigh in at talk:Home video#First sentence? Thanks in advance for any response! Jeh ( talk) 09:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Police Story (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crime Story ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Due to your recent editing over the last couple of days at List of highest-grossing Indian films in overseas markets, you have created a cite error in the references section, seen here, specifically reference number 98. Could you take a look and see if you can fix it. Article was listed at Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dead Man Walking ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
User:Maestro2016, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Maestro2016 and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
User:Maestro2016 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –
User
45
65
41
15:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
That doubleday book you use as a cite is full of misinformation. Just reading the text alone. "By the late 1970's Toho was making 2 films a year". If that applies to Godzilla then yeah its wrong. Toho stopped making Godzilla films by the mid-70s (1975) and the only time they made 2 Godzilla films in one year was 1964. Giantdevilfish ( talk) 17:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Some edits that you have made, including those to Hum Aapke Hain Koun..! are not updating the sources to match. Unless you add good sources, comparable to the ones already there, your edits will be reverted. Bollyjeff | talk 14:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
How about putting the two tables together in their own article instead of putting one in the musical films article and the other in the lists of musicals article? All the best, -- Ssilvers ( talk) 00:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pokémon (anime), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Bakazaka. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Aya Kamiki, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Bakazaka (
talk)
16:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
The News and others Sources provided are report from Toei Animation part owner of Dragon Ball IP and Shueisha the publisher of Dragon Ball and the 230-240 million copies world wide (2012 - 2016) directly comes from them. and other major sources supports the figure.
If you want to directly dispute the accuracy of those sources's reporting, then either take it to the reliable sources notice board or to WikiProject Anime and manga. However, until then, we must go with the figure that is directly stated by the source, which is the publisher/owner, as the official figure. Thank you.
619XXXX ( talk) 11:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Giving full range of figures seems good
and
http://www.toei-anim.co.jp/movie/2013_dragonballz/introduction/
http://corp.toei-anim.co.jp/en/press/detail.php?id=521
https://mantan-web.jp/article/20161012dog00m200016000c.html
Many major sources cites this figure which is consistent with the official figure
Personally i believe the figure is around 250-300 million
http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/product/NEOBK-2292571
Thank you:-) 619XXXX ( talk) 12:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Whoa, wait am not a sockpuppet and I use alternative account for different purposes, now i have been forced to use only one account for everything. even if i was a sockpuppet I don't understand why you are trying to disregard the compromise that you have already accepted, you are losing your credibility.
anyway back to the topic
Okay, now we can easily say 350M claim is just Circular reporting WP:CIRCULAR from 2008, and its just toei and its been 11 years but since then and there are have been many other primary and secondary sources which are consistent and supported with figures claimed by Shueisha and Toei which is 230M->240M->250M. so anyway you see those 350M reports doesn't follow WP:RS AGE and can't be used as source in the articles. and we also cannot use pirated copies sales WP:NOTRELIABLE, we can just make small reference side note as it was did in that japanese wiki. for example in Top selling books list, there is one book with given range of 100M to 300M as per primary and secondary sources but in a small reference note it says 'one source states the pirated copy sales is 1 Billion'. so to be rational we can only use the range 250M-280M, we can't just assume it to be 250M-300M or like the change you made 300M-350M which makes no sense when you yourself cite 280M, so stop pushing your opinions which could be interpreted as vandalism and also as per WP:RSC, Include that November 2018 book from Shueisha which cites 250 million worldwide as source (DRAGON BALL Shonen Jump Magazine Best Scene Top 10 (Shueisha Mook) [1] and lets comprimise with that, be rational and and revert your changes. Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 06:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
The problem with 280M local publisher report is just collection of disjointed links, it does not directly state 280M.
250M is supported with WP:RS AGE and primary and secondary sources
280M is not the best WP:RELIABLE source, but worthy of a note, that's why we should give 250M-280M
meanwhile 350M & pirated copies as said above its clearly WP:NOTRELIABLE and 350M doesn't follow WP:RS AGE, remember its a 11 years old source, be rational. and you keep saying 300 million, when its just your assumption. we can't assume and decide these infos.
so yeah, understand that and use 250M-280M as the figure. Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 07:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
As per WP:RS AGE, those 2008 source can't be used even if it was toei since they have been changed the report after that been consistent for past 11 years and supported by many primary and secondary sources, and you say 2008-2019 ? when they are clearly just circular reporting like that 2014 book source (which cites 2007 here, clearly doesn't follow WP:RS AGE) and that 2019 source is clearly WP:NOTRELIABLE as concluded above based on its report about $23 billion franchise figure and even after 11 years reported as 350M? again doesn't follow WP:RS AGE, so stop citing that 2019 source or any other 11 year old source which are clearly inconsistent.
so as per WP:CALC, 250-280M range is the meaningful reflection of the acceptable sources.
and again as per WP:PAYWALL and WP:RSC you can also include that November Shueisha 2018 book from which cites 250 million worldwide as source (DRAGON BALL Shonen Jump Magazine Best Scene Top 10 (Shueisha Mook) [2] Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 07:48, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
as i said stop citing that 2019 source, which is WP:NOTRELIABLE, can you explain that source's figure of $23 billion franchise? and am not misinterpreting WP:RS AGE, its says 'new information, new discoveries or developments', there is no developments or new information in those 350M sources for the last 11 years, which makes it obviously to be unreliable. that said 230M->240M->250M is the bare minimum which is strongly supported from latest sources from both primary and secondary sources and 280 is just accumulated number, nowhere does any source directly state 280M, hence why 250-280 million is the most accurate range. (and you can reference a very large number of sources or just make 'see' note, this should not be a reason to not use those source)
anyway I am kinda exhausted now, we may need to resolve this later with WP:THIRDOPINION/ WP:RSN, so for now I'm willing to settle on 250-300 million. Thank you Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 09:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
and by the way I am adding this source - November 2018 "DRAGON BALL" jump best scene TOP 10 (Shueisha Mook) [3] as per WP:PAYWALL/ WP:RSC and here more clear images from the book stating 250M worldwide. See Full page See figures Thank you. Wiki KuthiVaiyans ( talk) 10:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing non-English films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Home entertainment ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding false grosses to the Dragon Ball pages please. They were correct as they were and now they need to be corrected again. You're putting a Japanese gross through a currency exchange and that is not how that works at all. Thanks. Scabab ( talk) 02:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if they're not up to date, they are official reported numbers. It is what the movie was reported to have grossed. Resurrection F was reported to have grossed $31 million, not $34 million. That is not what Box Office Mojo or The Numbers converted it to, that is what they were given. Your figure was never reported in anyway, is utterly false and something that you alone came up with by using a currency conversion site, just like how Broly might convert to $35.2 million but that is not what was reported. Scabab ( talk) 01:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
This policy prohibits the usage of indic scripts in articles, even in infoboxes, so please refrain from using indic scripts unless necessary. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 03:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajrangi Bhaijaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabir Khan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed YouTube channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed YouTube channels (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
15:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your edits in the films and wondered if by any chance the film Tsubasa Reservoir Chronicle the Movie: The Princess in the Birdcage Kingdom (yeah, long name...) made it to the box office. Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 20:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
do you knew if we can exepend Highest-grossing musical theatre productions anymore (maybe a nice round 50) Fanoflionking
i went with $100 million threshold if there any musicsl missing feel free to added. Fanoflionking
Hi there, re: this please avoid hyperbolic language like "flop" or "hit" or "blockbuster" or "super-hit" or "failure" or "disaster" or any of that stuff. Most quality articles do not try to label everything. For perspective, even though Rotten Tomatoes labels failures as "rotten", we virtually never use that labeling, because it's not only non-neutral, but it places an undue emphasis on the hyperbolic opinion of one source. Keep it neutral, please. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed and most-liked YouTube trailers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed and most-liked YouTube trailers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 ( talk) 07:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey there, re: this edit from 2017, I've somehow gotten dragged into defending your claim that T-Series engaged in piracy early in its inception. A user DecstarG complained on the talk page recently that they couldn't access the source you provided. In good-faith, in these edits, I tried to update the link you included by citing the actual published page (20) instead of the Google Books link. I also added a relevant quote from that link and then I added three other references, including a fairly large quotation that seemed to summarise clearly the various methods T-Series used to establish a money-making foothold. Some Anonymous editors have taken issue with the piracy claim and I've done my best to explain our content guidelines. If you have other thoughts about this content, I would hope you'd chime in, please. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dilbar (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nora ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Space Pirate Captain Harlock (film)? Thank you! -- 217.66.157.234 ( talk) 17:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you complete article Item number? Thank you! —- 217.66.156.110 ( talk) 11:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Space Pirate Captain Harlock and Galaxy Express 999? Thank you! —— 217.66.156.110 ( talk) 14:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
is it possibble to make Highest-grossing anime films and List of Highest-grossing anime films by year longer Fanoflionking
i think a top 50 for the main list will be fine (like the animted page or main page) as long as we can find sources for it, we should give it a go at least Fanoflionking
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Happy New Year (2014 film) and Mom (film), The Happy New Year of Shah Rukh, was released in China! Thank you! —- 92.100.212.105 ( talk) 09:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Dabangg and Hotel Salvation, which released in Japan and Raid (2018 film) was released in China? Thank you! -- 178.71.174.238 ( talk) 14:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
A few weeks ago I created the article Bungo Stray Dogs: Dead Apple, a movie by Bones. Apparently, it aired in multiple countries besides. Could you give it a look in regards to its box office? Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check an article Puneeth Rajkumar? Thank you! -- 89.110.5.127 ( talk) 15:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update in 2.0 (film) will Release in China, and Barfi! was released in Japan, can you check an article The Balkan Line? Thank you! —- 78.37.250.104 ( talk) 09:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran was released in Japan, update box office gross of Kaabil and Half Ticket (2016 film) was released in China and Baaghi 2 was released in South Korea and Japan? Thank you! -- 92.100.211.154 ( talk) 15:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
you kept change The lion king gross form $968.5M to $986.2M changing the source form Box Office Mojo to The Numbers beacue you said it was realible (witch i never said it was not) but Disney issued an erratum to the gross for The Lion King, correcting its gross from $987.5 million to $968.5 million. [1]. so can you change all the pages you made this change to P+T Fanoflionking
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transistor count, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DDR2 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
HI!. You appear to be normalizing the dates in Template:Semiconductor manufacturing processes. Thanks! May I ask what your criterion is? Whatever it is, it's almost certainly better than the vague "pick some random one of the dates in the article" that we had been using. If you are comfortable with your criterion, I would appreciate it if you could please document it on the doc page of the template so that other editors will not be tempted to change the dates. - Arch dude ( talk) 01:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran was released in Japan, update box office gross of Kaabil and Half Ticket (2016 film) was released in China and Baaghi 2 was released in South Korea and Japan? Thank you! -- 178.66.108.7 ( talk) 12:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Regarding Spirited Away, the best source i found is someone who know a lot about the Japanese box office and he went and calculated the gross for the movie and with the weekly dollar-yen exchange and it was 249M usd( http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2240975#p2240975), Spirited Away didn't stay in theaters after 2002 and didn't have any big re-release and the BOM is only wrong in exchange rate so i think going with 249 is the best choice, what do you think ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AIGA997 ( talk • contribs) 14:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC) AIGA997 ( talk) 14:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro! Can you update Do Bigha Zamin which released in USSR, but only in China, and Kimi yo Fundo no Kawa o Watare, and Il Bisbetico Domato and Dance Dance (film) in USSR? Thank you! —- 89.110.17.254 ( talk) 09:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
1. Notifying you that the discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new answers. Ilias48rus ( talk) 17:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Your big move at this diff was among things reverted by me to get back before today's messy edit war. I did not review it, but it seems orthogonal; I'll leave it to you to decide whether to re-do it or discuss it. Dicklyon ( talk) 21:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
1. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new answers. And, now you're going to troll?, anyone i ask, who know English, understands the misunderstood by you sentence correctly. Ilias48rus ( talk) 23:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
2. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new answers. Ilias48rus ( talk) 23:52, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
3. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have the last new answer. Thanks for the responses. Ilias48rus ( talk) 00:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
4. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new comment. Ilias48rus ( talk) 01:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
5. Notifying you that the relevant discussion at the Talk:Random-access memory have a new comment. Ilias48rus ( talk) 10:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Can you help me expand the opening weekend and year charts on List of highest-grossing musicals page I started them a few weeks ago P+T Fanoflionking 11:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro! Can you update Do Bigha Zamin which released in USSR, but not only in China, and Dance Dance (film) in USSR? Thank you! -- 92.100.192.117 ( talk) 09:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Discrete cosine transform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio compression ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
(I know that you are aware of the discretionary sanctions, but it is a statutory requirement that you be re-notified after a year's lapse.) -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 21:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atalla.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
This is a film trilogy that was released in early 2019 in Japan_ Psycho-Pass: Sinners of the System. By any chance if you have time, could you add its box office result? Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check Dance Dance (film) in USSR? Thank you! -- 178.71.161.212 ( talk) 13:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I am in the middle of doing a draft witch you might be interested in helping me develop Draft:List of films by Box office admissions Fanoflionking 10:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Since you know so much about the history, you might consider working on the Federico Faggin article, which is mostly over-polished by a dedicated IP editor. I tend to avoid it since he's my ex-boss. Dicklyon ( talk) 20:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. Dicklyon ( talk) 02:00, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro 2016! Can you check an article Il Bisbetico Domato and Raja Jani, which became popular in Soviet Union? Thank you! -- 178.71.206.156 ( talk) 19:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran in Japan and 2.0 (film) in China will release in September 7 and was released in Russia? Thank you! -- 178.71.206.156 ( talk) 19:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I saw you are doing good work to the passivation article. If you would like, I can try to make time to setup a better photo than the one I included on the page. I have citric and nitric acid to work with, and can do a variety of concentrations and lengths of time. I can also try to induce a passivation failure if higher quality photos are needed there. Let me know if there is anything I can help you with in that regard. I also would not be hurt at all if you do not like the photo I included in the article and you removed it. Kees08 (Talk) 07:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
The Box office information you added in May 2019 seems to have been throwing errors ever since you added it. Could you remove or simplify it please or find some way to correct your errors. -- 109.76.134.165 ( talk) 12:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Ah, I see. If they're not changing the rules they're breaking the templates. Please also note MOS:SMALLFONT. Avoid using smaller font sizes in elements that already use a smaller font size, such as Infoboxes. -- 109.76.134.165 ( talk) 20:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with List of films by Box office admissions I am planning to move it to the main space tomorrow evening is there any last minute thing you want to do before I do go ahead and make them. Also thanks you for helping with this page. Fanoflionking 08:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
Ali H. Nayfeh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CC by-NC-SA 3.0 is not a compatible license. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
11:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you check Sanju, Padmaavat, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Enthiran in Japan and 2.0 (film) in China will release in September 7 was released in Russia? Thank you! -- 178.66.114.9 ( talk) 12:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Munni Badnaam Hui, Ooh La La of The Dirty Picture, Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube? Thank you! -- 178.66.114.9 ( talk) 12:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan, Dheevara (song) and Manohari in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube and can you check 1234 Shille Hodi views? Thank you! -- 92.100.202.71 ( talk) 07:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Maestro2016 reported by User:Gotitbro (Result: ). Thank you.
Gotitbro (
talk)
19:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4Gamer.net, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan, Dheevara (song) and Manohari in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube and can you check 1234 Shille Hodi views? Thank you! -- 95.55.105.86 ( talk) 06:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Your recent edits for “Katie Hopkins”!were removed again. For a start, excessive references and citations are not allowed on an article, especially in the introduction. 3 sources are enough and maximum. Far rights commentator is stated in introduction already, no need to put it in first sentence as a career as it is a summary and not her main profession. Too much wording in first sentence with your edit. If you want this changed then please do not change it again and instead start a discussion in the “talk” section on the article. Almostangelic123 ( talk) 01:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Also I am not doubting your contributions are well sourced but the sources are only describing her as a far rights commentator and not expressing that it is one of her full time professions. Your sourcing was also very excessive. Almostangelic123 ( talk) 01:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camera phone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resolution ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you add current views of Chikni Chameli, Fevicol Se and Maahi Ve featuring Zareen Khan, Dheevara (song) and Manohari and 1234 Shille Hodi in List of most-viewed Indian music videos on YouTube? Thank you! -- 95.55.106.2 ( talk) 16:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Can you help expend Anime Box office admissions? Fanoflionking 13:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update box office of Dhoom 3 in Japan and South Korea and 2.0 (film) in China and Russia? Thank you! -- 95.55.106.2 ( talk) 15:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multi-channel length, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SRAM ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Please note that disambiguation pages like INAS are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
Thank you. Leschnei ( talk) 23:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dolby Digital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio compression ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Algebraic code-excited linear prediction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algebraic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Class-D amplifier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watts ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Do you know if it is possible to create a timeline of highest-grossing anime films Fanoflionking 08:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I think we go back as far as possible with worldwide gross than just mention that “until year X only Japanese gross are reported after year X foreign gross started to be reported and film X is the first film to out gross film Y” Fanoflionking 12:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi. A topic about internet censorship in iran needs to become update on Wikipedia. Please add "How Iranian people access to block websites and use social medias" Wikipedia needs your attention to become better place. Thank you. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Iran Omid6578 ( talk) 14:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Online gaming ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
If you learn how and when to use an en dash, like in metal–oxide–semiconductor where it separates parallel layers, I won't have to follow you around fixing those so much. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Power MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Computer hardware, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battery ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
It seems that some others find too much detail being added to articles that are not supposed to have that much detail. I also slightly wonder about WP:COI, though in many other cases I have not noticed it when others did. Could you say a little bit about what you actually do that might be CoI? In most cases, there are more specific article where the details might apply. Gah4 ( talk) 00:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOSFET, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bullet train ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I might’ve accidentally erased some of your edits on the Maratha invasions of Bengal while reinserting a huge amount of text that was removed (unjustly IMO). I tried to reinsert your edit, but might’ve removed some content you entered by mistake. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B054:FEF0:9DE4:4E36:A270:534 ( talk) 03:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
i wondering if you can help expend List of most expensive Anime films Fanoflionking 22:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear Maestro2016! Can you update box office of Dhoom 3 in Japan and South Korea and 2.0 (film) in Russia and Japan? Thank you! -- 95.54.103.156 ( talk) 12:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
I starting a new page Highest grossing Comedy films and just wonder if you would like to help out on it. Fanoflionking 17:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove discussion templates until their is a consensus to the topic at hand.
Andrzejbanas (
talk)
02:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adult-oriented rock ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
@Maestro2016 i staring working on a new page just wonder if you want to help out it is List of animated films by Box office admissions Fanoflionking 16:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
I see that you have found a lot of sources about FFVII's materials. There is something that I've been looking and it's possible design or promotional information regarding Cloud's Hardy Daytona. According to the wiki, it's a direct reference to a real brand known as Harley Davidson. However, I can't find anything about other than merchandising. There is material about Cloud's bike from the Compilation bikes, Fenrir, so I wondered if any magazine explained something about the Daytona considering how it was a given a minigame for the cellphones. Cheers. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of cyberpunk works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minority Report ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
so with super Mario bros 3 there is super Mario advance 3 which is the exact same game. Also there is advance 2 super Mario world which is the same as super Mario world. but what about games like super Mario all stars which are just the NES super Mario bros in 16 bit should those count as sales of each game that was on them? Should these count in the numbers for best selling games of all time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.182.179.111 ( talk) 15:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
While yest it did make that 100 million mark Tetris EA shouldn't be counted as most of it time on the ios and google stores it was 99 cents meaning you add this game means you have to add games like angry birds in which would same very unfair to games that did really well at the 60 dollar price tag because all the best selling games would be cheap mobile games — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.182.179.111 ( talk) 15:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Japanese live-action films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Witcher 3 sold over 50 m cookies, not only 27 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.47.131.109 ( talk) 10:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Maestro2016, you stated in your edit summary here that you were undoing two edits by User:Ottoshade, but based on this edit, I take it that you were trying to undo my edit as well. In the future, please make sure that you clearly identify all of the edits that you're targeting when you revert a page to an earlier version. -- Drevolt ( talk) 04:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chen Zhen (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fearless ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
I saw you substantially expanded this page recently. Can you please expand the subgenre sections like Action-adventure and Action-drama with sources? Otherwise, someone like Andrzejbanas will mercilessly delete them, not realising there are many incoming links which will then become broken links. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Do you by any chance have any connection to the authors of this Bez and Pirovano paper I've seen added in many places? Nemo 12:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
An "editor" who apparently believes Galland didn't insert the orphan tales, but "restored" them from "earlier European versions" from the "original Arabic text" has been attacking the lede of this one. Please, I think I need some help maintaining the facts here. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 20:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Please stop changing the headquarters on the Sony Interactive Entertainment page. The source link ( https://www.sie.com/en/corporate.html) clearly defines the headquarters as the San Mateo location and NOT the Japan location. Thank you. 69.36.132.253 ( talk) 05:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Regarding your recent update to the PUBG player count, I believe this number of 734 million is only the mobile downloads/gamers. This is discussed on the Sensor Tower page. It doesn't include the player count from PC and console versions of PUBG. A more complete and accurate number is 804 million [1]. I have yet to find a credible source that has this information on 1 page.
could you help expend Streaming service provider P+T Fan Of Lion King 🦁 ( talk) 19:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC) 19:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.
This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.
I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that you need to be crossed. S Philbrick (Talk) 18:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)