![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
I did not realize that the link was banned on Wikipedia I thought it was a good link for the Constitution of the United States — Preceding unsigned comment added by Constitutionus ( talk • contribs) 11:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jack, Jeetendra25 ( talk) 08:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC) Hope you are doing good.
Wanted to check Why did you delete the page Dial4242 which was created by me. I am the owner of this ambulance service start-up. In india ambulance are very difficult to get and hence this startup has been formed. There are numerous cases where people have died because of not getting an ambulance. This si something we changing and a page on wikipedia will be helpful for lot of ambulance users. I hope you understand the same and reconsider your deletion. Also if this violates certain guidelines, I will be happy to change them. Kinldy let me know how to go about the sameCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
Hi, Just received a message ( User_talk:SidhardhRamesh#Copyright_problem:_Humayoon_Shams_Khan). I got the same texts from his Facebook About section ( FB About) and another page, and I found that it was there in Imdb also only after you message me. So what should I do now? Edit that section or remove the texts which matches in the imdb page or any other? Pls help. SidhardhRamesh 💬 11:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jack Frost, you just nominated a page for deletion RentSeeker Inc. I request you to please check all references again. It might be possible few references i missed. However for your information, Rentseeker is a notable company in Canada. The notability is justified on various trusted news websites such as Huffpost, Daily Hive, CTV News, Global News, RenX, Torontostoreys and others. These resources are reliable and independent of the subject and not the press releases. It is also listed on BBB. JPKSingh ( talk) 11:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, Jack Frost. I used text regarding Iron Vision system from /info/en/?search=Merkava#Iron_Vision_helmet-mounted_display_system . Can I delete also this text from Merkava article in Wiki?-- Swadim ( talk) 04:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This page /info/en/?search=Merkava#Iron_Vision_helmet-mounted_display_system appears to be a direct copy from oruzhie.info/en/tanks/6-tank-merkava-mk-4-technical-specifications-the-weight-dimensions.-- Swadim ( talk) 10:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jack Frost! I just wanted to message you and ask if you've heard from the ACC team regarding your application to be a tool user. Have you heard from anyone? I'm just getting online and back after being busy with work and other life matters, so I apologize for the delay checking in with you about it. Please let me know (ping me in your response here so that I'll receive a notification); I'll be happy to check on your application if you haven't heard anything and if it's still pending. :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 17:33, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Since you were involved in the first time this article was deleted, I thought I'd bring it to your attention once again as the rationale is identical. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
There are now 800 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the
NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some
really cool awards.
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rosguill ( talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Arthistorian1977 ( talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | DannyS712 ( talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA ( talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Boleyn ( talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Ymblanter ( talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Cwmhiraeth ( talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
I think Vasily Sokolovskiy is an {{ R from alternative transliteration}} rather than an {{ R from misspelling}}, as you've tagged it. However I don't really know anything about romanisation of Russian, and have never understood the point of redirect categories, so I thought perhaps you're more clued-up on one or both of those topics than me. Any thoughts? Keep up the good work, – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 13:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I was hoping you could give me some suggestions as to how to improve my page. I have read the "What Wikipedia is Not" and I don't believe I created a page that goes against any of these items. I also have referenced other wiki pages like Snickerdoodle, Thumbprint Cookie, Chocolate Chip Cookie, Apple Pie, Brownies, etc and cannot figure out why those qualify and this does not. Do I have to remove certain references? Though I don't think it is promoting a particular company. I thought maybe Pillsbury, but it isn't a Pillsbury recipe, it is just the historic competition that the Cookie was created from is under their name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfarren23 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Jack Frost. I will work on this. The explanation was very helpful! And if you have any pointers when you get time, feel free to send across!! I appreciate you taking the time to help guide me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfarren23 ( talk • contribs) 12:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear Jack, My recent Draft on El Nukoya was nominated for speedy deletion for violation of Copyright. Can you kindly specifically note the parts that violated this right and also tips on how to improve it for subsequent submission. Funmilola Olojotuyi ( talk) 14:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Funmilola Olojotuyi
Thank you so much for this. I will keep in touch. Funmilola Olojotuyi ( talk) 14:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Funmilola Olojotuyi
Since you have been involved in the recent discussion on talk:Kim_Hee-chul#Personal_life_section, I’m contacting you to please add either your support or rejection in the vote Talk:Kim_Hee-chul#Keep_or_remove. I think you are the last one from the initial discussion that still has not provided his/her opinion. ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 ( talk)
Hi Jack. I was looking through the AfDs that were closed today and I noticed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wide Eyes which was eligible for a soft delete. In these scenarios please do not do a non-administrative relist (more is said at WP:RELISTBIAS). Thanks and best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
American political history is under told. This should be keptis something which deserves little to no weight. Normally in a situation where 1 week after nomination you have the nom and two keeps I would relist. If you are interested in working deletion some of the other XfD forums are more open to non-administrative actions than AfD - or alternatively you could always consider a Request for adminship. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Sorry for all the notifications. Barkeep49 ( talk)
Thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and approved your request.
You may now access the interface here pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarize yourself with the process.
Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.
Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.
Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked as "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Account creator.
Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Jack Frost, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 ( talk)MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.
To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey
Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767 talk! 22:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! stwalkerster ( talk) 20:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
..like the Royal Artillery call their roughly-battalion-sized units, "regiments". Buckshot06 (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:
Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.
Hello Jack Frost. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that
there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (
CSD A1) and/or content (
CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at
7 Networks Worldwide. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as
patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may
drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (
G10), patent nonsense (
G1), copyright violations (
G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (
G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.
Passenger
pigeon (
talk)
09:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for leaving the welcome message on my wikipedia talk page. I am new on Wikipedia and I really appreciated your feedback. As it is mentioned in your post, I just wanted to ask you if you could please review my draft for approval again? Because I did not acknowledge the fact that my username could cause a COI, I changed it. I am a master student in public policy and I have been personally interested in creating the content that you read; and as you will be able to see, there has been another reviewer who has also seen my draft after you and mentioned that the "prose and refs are mostly fine". I hope you could help me, thank you in advance for all the help! ( StarkRules ( talk) 08:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC))
Just as a heads up, someone posted this on your user page when it should have gone to your talk page. I reverted it but just wanted to let you know about it in case you wanted to talk with them. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:47, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Yeswolf (talk) 06:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
I know the previous submission and the deleted page were lacking information. I have secured the services of someone who fully understands how to write a proper Wikipedia article, complete with references/footnotes (or whatever they are called) but we need the old page restored so we can replace it with the new article once it is written.
FYI -- I am an established Hollywood character actor working in the industry for over 30 years who has appeared on over 100 television shows and in a variety of movies. I am a member of the Screen Actors Guild, the American Federation of Radio and Television Artists, Actor's Equity Association, the American Guild of Variety Artists, and the Television Academy (producers of the Emmy's) -- please note, an actor does NOT get in any of these organizations, particularly the Television Academy, without extensive credits and career exposure.
Even TV Guide cites me as a "celebrity" <ref> https://www.tvguide.com/celebrities/van-epperson/276086/<ref>.
Among my credits, I have appeared in three different Star Trek series (the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, & Enterprise) and am one of less than a handful of actors who has appeared in both the Star Trek and Doctor Who universes (I made an appearance on the Doctor Who spinoff series Torchwood). <ref> https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0258371/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1<ref>
In 2016, both the MIRROR and the SUN newspapers in London, England cited me as one of only three actors ranked as "3rd place for the most underrated television actor ***OF ALL TIME***" <ref>www.VanEpperson.com/press<ref>, based on research that compared the all time top TV shows with a list of actors to see who had appeared on them more than any other actors (again, you can see that article on my website at <www.VanEpperson.com/press>. I am also a respected acting coach, acting teacher, and personal mentor for actors in Hollywood. Yeswolf (talk) 06:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, how are you? thanks. Why do you think I work at aivo? Im not. Plus, I only want to put the same article in english, would you do it correctly? I will not going to read or get into a wiki editor to do it, if this doesnt work, I will never come back and I will never recommend to be a contributor of wikipedia. My reason? simple: keep it simple.
best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drawinstoned ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi and tks jack frost, but if you read the article in spanish (already published) I only want to put those words on english, just that. Not even trying to sell anything or add more words, just put the exactly same article in english. As a matter in fact, all wikipedia shall do that with spanish articles. If is that complicated, just forget it.
thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drawinstoned ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear friend as i am Indian and coming from this community i have knowledge about religion of koli people. And also in data of government of india, religion of koli people is Hinduism.And you also known that in Hindu this caste exist. This caste is not exist in any other religion like islam , Christian and other.and if you think koli hindu convert into islam then they will also loss identity of Hinduism and free from using it caste system.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:830d:66a:8dc8:a6f:7576:61bf ( talk • contribs) 13:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Jack, saw your comment on the page about the article being taken down. It said 'Helped'.
I wanted to know how I can get the article back up so it meets Wikipedia's requirements please?
Can you help me with getting it back up into a form where it's acceptable please?
Celestina007 ( talk) 21:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of military brats. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 2601:199:4181:E00:917:9F8:2A7:8420 ( talk) 22:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
First of all, thanks for accepting my submission, and for cleaning the article up a bit. I do have a few questions for you (mostly about your edits). Not biggies, but if you get the time to answer, it would be much appreciated.
I'm not trying to be a pain in the arse here! I'm just trying to judge my own contribution against yours and get some sense for some of the changes you made. Other changes (and corrections to my typos!) seem great to me. :) Oh, and I'm not trying to protect 'my' article, either!
Cheers. -- 82.21.97.70 ( talk) 11:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
(Post removed)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This is for your valuable efforts on contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 11:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC) |
Could you find me on IRC when you have a few minutes? I might not be fully around, but I should be around shortly after. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:54, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the concern the content of this page is well referenced while some users like Haider Khan10 who seem to be from this tribe want to change the origin of the this tribe according to their wishes as Afghans. They don't have any substantial proof to their claim but keep changing and editing different Wikipedia pages to enlist this community as Afghans. Something I fail to understand why. Swatis are race of Dihgan origin and got Pashtunized but this group of editors want to change the fact. Please keep a look on this page as these guys have been making edits to other Wikipedia pages also to substantiate their claim. Regards Azmarai76 ( talk) 08:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac ( talk) 01:12, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Have now:
{{
Samuel Johnson}}
. And the two on
Special:WhatLinksHere/Talk:Life of Samuel Johnson (1787) are still redlinks because the old talk page hasn't been redirected to the new talk page yet. As
WP:POSTMOVE says: even when leaving a redirect, links in infoboxes and navboxes should be cleaned up; and when suppressing redirects you definitely need to check WhatLinksHere and fix them. Page moves also tend to break
WP:DISPLAYTITLE (because display titles must resolve to the actual page name, which has just changed) so that's usually a good thing to check too. --
Xover (
talk)
10:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey,
Just FYI, we overlapped on some of those recent moves. Looks like you moved one after I moved if (The Profitable Arte of Gardening). I'll let you resolve it so we don't overlap again :).
Thanks! -- Dane talk 03:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for moving Filmax for me, sorry we were treading on each others' toes at WP:RM/TR. I'll check farther from now for whether "International" is actually part of its founding name, but Filmax seems to be the COMMONNAME.... sorry to have trodden on your toes so I will stand off of WP:RM/TR and of course now I can start the discussion on the talk page as usual. Thank you once again. 178.164.132.118 ( talk) 07:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
As far as I can ascertain,
Fantastic Factory is just a trading name of Filmax and has been for about twenty years, so that is a candidate for
WP:MERGE would you not say? ImDB which of course is not of itself
WP:RS has it as "Fantastic Factory (Filmax)" and in looking up the various horror movies' credits they all actually credit Filmax, which makes sense as the legal entity. At {
http://www.filmax.com/filmax/aviso-legal filmax.com under legal, in Spanish], Filmax is a trading name of "CASTELAO PICTURES, S.L." ("S.L." is just "Inc." or "Co." or "Ltd", and we haven't an article for th holding company
Castelao, at least not when I checked, so perhaps that could do with an R to Filmax as {{
R with possibilities}}
but I am not sure about that since we've hardly anything to say about them). We certainly have nothing to say about Fantastic Factory except what ImDB says, but I'm in Hungary so my search will be biased and other editors might find better sources - as it stands I'd propose a merge of that one into
Filmax, what would you suggest?
178.164.132.118 (
talk)
13:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks your first. Fahim Saleh article I saw your are close XDF [1] article nomination. I strongly believe that is eligible for "Speedy keep" i don't know why you close it before any admin close this discussion. i don't agree your argument look like result keep. 42.0.4.225 ( talk) 15:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Acknowledging that AfD is not a vote, and after weighting each editor's arguments accordingly; there is a clear and overwhelming consensus that the article should be kept.There are criteria for a Speedy Keep result which outline when this decision may be made, and it is my view that this discussion was not eligible for a Speedy Keep result. It is also worth noting that there is fundamentally no difference between a Speedy Keep and Keep result, except that a discussion may be closed as Speedy Keep prior to the end of the discussion period (typically 7 days). Please do let me know if you have any questions. Jack Frost ( talk) 01:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Please move the page back to Henry Jones, Sr.. This is a fictional character named with the comma, not a biography which is what MOS:Jr pertains to. Dicklyon knew this would be controversial, as would any other fictional character moves based on MOS:JR (I didn't check if any others have been moved, if so, please revert). Thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 20:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I see you moved “NXT TakeOver: XXV” to “NXT TakeOver XXV”. The problem is you moved it to a page that redirects it back to the original page. If you can override the redirect, that would be great. Also the talk page and page history should be moved as well. Thanks so much. OldSkool01 ( talk) 02:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Jack Frost,
I received your notice and have added a COI Declaration on my user page to clarify the connections to myself and the article on Robert T. McCowan.
With my inexperience being a factor, I invite you to review the article in question and offer any feedback in distinguishing myself as a neutral party, even with my COI connections.
The article contains extensive sourcing and neutrality, so the only area I see that may create an issue is my use of some quotes?
My goal on wikipedia as a new contributor will be to highlight figures in my state who have not yet been noted.
JRM86 ( talk) 11:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Please help me on protecting this page as some users want to change the origin of this tribe from Dehqan to Pashtuns, Bettanis or Afghans. Regards. Azmarai76 ( talk) 11:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " White Rabbit Radio".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 13:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Organised crime in New Zealand".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello sir,
I just wanted to request you regarding editing of the page called 'Karna'. I don't know why but no amount of proofs being submitted or anything is making the admin change it. He/she seems to be editing anything. Is there anything that can be done or we have to deal with it and proofs don't matter?
( Dinesh2069 ( talk) 05:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC))
Hello sir,
Actually no. Karna page has been edit locked for a long time. Actually I gave constructive and correct edits for pages like Bhima whicbwere reverted like it's false information. Kindly help me out. I also gave information about Karna on talk page but no admin seems to be interested in reading it. Kindly look into it. It appears unethical to keep wrong information even after the right one is provided. I don't ask for much. Just want to make some edits to Karna page. He is even called rapist' in that which is wrong. Please help me out. Dinesh2069 ( talk) 19:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack, thanks for your review. You said, "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". If my topic is an advertisement, what other companies are on Wikipedia? Also, my references are independent and reliable. There are tons of blog links on Wikipedia. I am so sorry but you are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamitdmr ( talk • contribs)
Thank you, I'll edit by taking into account what you say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamitdmr ( talk • contribs)
Hello Jack Frost. We are authorized by the client to edit their wiki page and already made the disclosure on the user page. Therefore, we would like to amend the page as soon as possible. Thank you.
Hi, thanks for your recent help with the move of la Rochefoucauld to La Rochefoucauld. Now I've encountered the same situation again. I want to move DeWitt Clinton to the correct spelling De Witt Clinton, but De Witt Clinton already exists as a redirect back to the incorrect spelling DeWitt Clinton, so I get a conflict. Is there a civilized way I can make this change myself, as a non-admin, or do I need to go through the administrative process again? Thanks in advance for your advice. Eleuther ( talk) 06:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost. We are authorized by the client to edit their wiki page and already made the disclosure on the user page. Therefore, we would like to amend the page as soon as possible. Thank you. MemePR HK ( talk) 03:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Rafic_Hariri — Preceding unsigned comment added by RayonR ( talk • contribs) 11:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I want to see imfo or watcth the video
Scuff Joe ( talk) 13:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
I'd suggest moving the page back yourself to its previous title. I think you can do this, as the only author, fingers crossed. Even though that might seem pointless, it will maintain the history and hence the attribution within the article before (and while) it was a redirect. An admin might be reluctant to delete an article with substantive history just because you moved it to a title that you don't like. Then you'll be left with a fresh redirect with no history at the unwanted title, blank it and ask for it to be speedily-deleted. If you're lucky, an admin might spot what has happened and do it all for you. Lithopsian ( talk) 20:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost,
What were all of these moves about? The redirect page ended up where it was originally before you started moving it around. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
I did not realize that the link was banned on Wikipedia I thought it was a good link for the Constitution of the United States — Preceding unsigned comment added by Constitutionus ( talk • contribs) 11:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jack, Jeetendra25 ( talk) 08:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC) Hope you are doing good.
Wanted to check Why did you delete the page Dial4242 which was created by me. I am the owner of this ambulance service start-up. In india ambulance are very difficult to get and hence this startup has been formed. There are numerous cases where people have died because of not getting an ambulance. This si something we changing and a page on wikipedia will be helpful for lot of ambulance users. I hope you understand the same and reconsider your deletion. Also if this violates certain guidelines, I will be happy to change them. Kinldy let me know how to go about the sameCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
Hi, Just received a message ( User_talk:SidhardhRamesh#Copyright_problem:_Humayoon_Shams_Khan). I got the same texts from his Facebook About section ( FB About) and another page, and I found that it was there in Imdb also only after you message me. So what should I do now? Edit that section or remove the texts which matches in the imdb page or any other? Pls help. SidhardhRamesh 💬 11:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jack Frost, you just nominated a page for deletion RentSeeker Inc. I request you to please check all references again. It might be possible few references i missed. However for your information, Rentseeker is a notable company in Canada. The notability is justified on various trusted news websites such as Huffpost, Daily Hive, CTV News, Global News, RenX, Torontostoreys and others. These resources are reliable and independent of the subject and not the press releases. It is also listed on BBB. JPKSingh ( talk) 11:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, Jack Frost. I used text regarding Iron Vision system from /info/en/?search=Merkava#Iron_Vision_helmet-mounted_display_system . Can I delete also this text from Merkava article in Wiki?-- Swadim ( talk) 04:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This page /info/en/?search=Merkava#Iron_Vision_helmet-mounted_display_system appears to be a direct copy from oruzhie.info/en/tanks/6-tank-merkava-mk-4-technical-specifications-the-weight-dimensions.-- Swadim ( talk) 10:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jack Frost! I just wanted to message you and ask if you've heard from the ACC team regarding your application to be a tool user. Have you heard from anyone? I'm just getting online and back after being busy with work and other life matters, so I apologize for the delay checking in with you about it. Please let me know (ping me in your response here so that I'll receive a notification); I'll be happy to check on your application if you haven't heard anything and if it's still pending. :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 17:33, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Since you were involved in the first time this article was deleted, I thought I'd bring it to your attention once again as the rationale is identical. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
There are now 800 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the
NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some
really cool awards.
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rosguill ( talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Arthistorian1977 ( talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | DannyS712 ( talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA ( talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Boleyn ( talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Ymblanter ( talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Cwmhiraeth ( talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
I think Vasily Sokolovskiy is an {{ R from alternative transliteration}} rather than an {{ R from misspelling}}, as you've tagged it. However I don't really know anything about romanisation of Russian, and have never understood the point of redirect categories, so I thought perhaps you're more clued-up on one or both of those topics than me. Any thoughts? Keep up the good work, – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 13:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I was hoping you could give me some suggestions as to how to improve my page. I have read the "What Wikipedia is Not" and I don't believe I created a page that goes against any of these items. I also have referenced other wiki pages like Snickerdoodle, Thumbprint Cookie, Chocolate Chip Cookie, Apple Pie, Brownies, etc and cannot figure out why those qualify and this does not. Do I have to remove certain references? Though I don't think it is promoting a particular company. I thought maybe Pillsbury, but it isn't a Pillsbury recipe, it is just the historic competition that the Cookie was created from is under their name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfarren23 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Jack Frost. I will work on this. The explanation was very helpful! And if you have any pointers when you get time, feel free to send across!! I appreciate you taking the time to help guide me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfarren23 ( talk • contribs) 12:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear Jack, My recent Draft on El Nukoya was nominated for speedy deletion for violation of Copyright. Can you kindly specifically note the parts that violated this right and also tips on how to improve it for subsequent submission. Funmilola Olojotuyi ( talk) 14:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Funmilola Olojotuyi
Thank you so much for this. I will keep in touch. Funmilola Olojotuyi ( talk) 14:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Funmilola Olojotuyi
Since you have been involved in the recent discussion on talk:Kim_Hee-chul#Personal_life_section, I’m contacting you to please add either your support or rejection in the vote Talk:Kim_Hee-chul#Keep_or_remove. I think you are the last one from the initial discussion that still has not provided his/her opinion. ~~ CherryPie94 🍒🥧 ( talk)
Hi Jack. I was looking through the AfDs that were closed today and I noticed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wide Eyes which was eligible for a soft delete. In these scenarios please do not do a non-administrative relist (more is said at WP:RELISTBIAS). Thanks and best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
American political history is under told. This should be keptis something which deserves little to no weight. Normally in a situation where 1 week after nomination you have the nom and two keeps I would relist. If you are interested in working deletion some of the other XfD forums are more open to non-administrative actions than AfD - or alternatively you could always consider a Request for adminship. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Sorry for all the notifications. Barkeep49 ( talk)
Thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and approved your request.
You may now access the interface here pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarize yourself with the process.
Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.
Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.
Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked as "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Account creator.
Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Jack Frost, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 ( talk)MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.
To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey
Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767 talk! 22:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! stwalkerster ( talk) 20:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
..like the Royal Artillery call their roughly-battalion-sized units, "regiments". Buckshot06 (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:
Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.
Hello Jack Frost. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that
there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (
CSD A1) and/or content (
CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at
7 Networks Worldwide. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as
patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may
drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (
G10), patent nonsense (
G1), copyright violations (
G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (
G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.
Passenger
pigeon (
talk)
09:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for leaving the welcome message on my wikipedia talk page. I am new on Wikipedia and I really appreciated your feedback. As it is mentioned in your post, I just wanted to ask you if you could please review my draft for approval again? Because I did not acknowledge the fact that my username could cause a COI, I changed it. I am a master student in public policy and I have been personally interested in creating the content that you read; and as you will be able to see, there has been another reviewer who has also seen my draft after you and mentioned that the "prose and refs are mostly fine". I hope you could help me, thank you in advance for all the help! ( StarkRules ( talk) 08:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC))
Just as a heads up, someone posted this on your user page when it should have gone to your talk page. I reverted it but just wanted to let you know about it in case you wanted to talk with them. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:47, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Yeswolf (talk) 06:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
I know the previous submission and the deleted page were lacking information. I have secured the services of someone who fully understands how to write a proper Wikipedia article, complete with references/footnotes (or whatever they are called) but we need the old page restored so we can replace it with the new article once it is written.
FYI -- I am an established Hollywood character actor working in the industry for over 30 years who has appeared on over 100 television shows and in a variety of movies. I am a member of the Screen Actors Guild, the American Federation of Radio and Television Artists, Actor's Equity Association, the American Guild of Variety Artists, and the Television Academy (producers of the Emmy's) -- please note, an actor does NOT get in any of these organizations, particularly the Television Academy, without extensive credits and career exposure.
Even TV Guide cites me as a "celebrity" <ref> https://www.tvguide.com/celebrities/van-epperson/276086/<ref>.
Among my credits, I have appeared in three different Star Trek series (the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, & Enterprise) and am one of less than a handful of actors who has appeared in both the Star Trek and Doctor Who universes (I made an appearance on the Doctor Who spinoff series Torchwood). <ref> https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0258371/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1<ref>
In 2016, both the MIRROR and the SUN newspapers in London, England cited me as one of only three actors ranked as "3rd place for the most underrated television actor ***OF ALL TIME***" <ref>www.VanEpperson.com/press<ref>, based on research that compared the all time top TV shows with a list of actors to see who had appeared on them more than any other actors (again, you can see that article on my website at <www.VanEpperson.com/press>. I am also a respected acting coach, acting teacher, and personal mentor for actors in Hollywood. Yeswolf (talk) 06:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, how are you? thanks. Why do you think I work at aivo? Im not. Plus, I only want to put the same article in english, would you do it correctly? I will not going to read or get into a wiki editor to do it, if this doesnt work, I will never come back and I will never recommend to be a contributor of wikipedia. My reason? simple: keep it simple.
best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drawinstoned ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi and tks jack frost, but if you read the article in spanish (already published) I only want to put those words on english, just that. Not even trying to sell anything or add more words, just put the exactly same article in english. As a matter in fact, all wikipedia shall do that with spanish articles. If is that complicated, just forget it.
thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drawinstoned ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear friend as i am Indian and coming from this community i have knowledge about religion of koli people. And also in data of government of india, religion of koli people is Hinduism.And you also known that in Hindu this caste exist. This caste is not exist in any other religion like islam , Christian and other.and if you think koli hindu convert into islam then they will also loss identity of Hinduism and free from using it caste system.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:830d:66a:8dc8:a6f:7576:61bf ( talk • contribs) 13:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Jack, saw your comment on the page about the article being taken down. It said 'Helped'.
I wanted to know how I can get the article back up so it meets Wikipedia's requirements please?
Can you help me with getting it back up into a form where it's acceptable please?
Celestina007 ( talk) 21:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of military brats. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 2601:199:4181:E00:917:9F8:2A7:8420 ( talk) 22:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
First of all, thanks for accepting my submission, and for cleaning the article up a bit. I do have a few questions for you (mostly about your edits). Not biggies, but if you get the time to answer, it would be much appreciated.
I'm not trying to be a pain in the arse here! I'm just trying to judge my own contribution against yours and get some sense for some of the changes you made. Other changes (and corrections to my typos!) seem great to me. :) Oh, and I'm not trying to protect 'my' article, either!
Cheers. -- 82.21.97.70 ( talk) 11:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
(Post removed)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This is for your valuable efforts on contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 11:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC) |
Could you find me on IRC when you have a few minutes? I might not be fully around, but I should be around shortly after. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:54, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the concern the content of this page is well referenced while some users like Haider Khan10 who seem to be from this tribe want to change the origin of the this tribe according to their wishes as Afghans. They don't have any substantial proof to their claim but keep changing and editing different Wikipedia pages to enlist this community as Afghans. Something I fail to understand why. Swatis are race of Dihgan origin and got Pashtunized but this group of editors want to change the fact. Please keep a look on this page as these guys have been making edits to other Wikipedia pages also to substantiate their claim. Regards Azmarai76 ( talk) 08:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac ( talk) 01:12, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Have now:
{{
Samuel Johnson}}
. And the two on
Special:WhatLinksHere/Talk:Life of Samuel Johnson (1787) are still redlinks because the old talk page hasn't been redirected to the new talk page yet. As
WP:POSTMOVE says: even when leaving a redirect, links in infoboxes and navboxes should be cleaned up; and when suppressing redirects you definitely need to check WhatLinksHere and fix them. Page moves also tend to break
WP:DISPLAYTITLE (because display titles must resolve to the actual page name, which has just changed) so that's usually a good thing to check too. --
Xover (
talk)
10:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey,
Just FYI, we overlapped on some of those recent moves. Looks like you moved one after I moved if (The Profitable Arte of Gardening). I'll let you resolve it so we don't overlap again :).
Thanks! -- Dane talk 03:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for moving Filmax for me, sorry we were treading on each others' toes at WP:RM/TR. I'll check farther from now for whether "International" is actually part of its founding name, but Filmax seems to be the COMMONNAME.... sorry to have trodden on your toes so I will stand off of WP:RM/TR and of course now I can start the discussion on the talk page as usual. Thank you once again. 178.164.132.118 ( talk) 07:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
As far as I can ascertain,
Fantastic Factory is just a trading name of Filmax and has been for about twenty years, so that is a candidate for
WP:MERGE would you not say? ImDB which of course is not of itself
WP:RS has it as "Fantastic Factory (Filmax)" and in looking up the various horror movies' credits they all actually credit Filmax, which makes sense as the legal entity. At {
http://www.filmax.com/filmax/aviso-legal filmax.com under legal, in Spanish], Filmax is a trading name of "CASTELAO PICTURES, S.L." ("S.L." is just "Inc." or "Co." or "Ltd", and we haven't an article for th holding company
Castelao, at least not when I checked, so perhaps that could do with an R to Filmax as {{
R with possibilities}}
but I am not sure about that since we've hardly anything to say about them). We certainly have nothing to say about Fantastic Factory except what ImDB says, but I'm in Hungary so my search will be biased and other editors might find better sources - as it stands I'd propose a merge of that one into
Filmax, what would you suggest?
178.164.132.118 (
talk)
13:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks your first. Fahim Saleh article I saw your are close XDF [1] article nomination. I strongly believe that is eligible for "Speedy keep" i don't know why you close it before any admin close this discussion. i don't agree your argument look like result keep. 42.0.4.225 ( talk) 15:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Acknowledging that AfD is not a vote, and after weighting each editor's arguments accordingly; there is a clear and overwhelming consensus that the article should be kept.There are criteria for a Speedy Keep result which outline when this decision may be made, and it is my view that this discussion was not eligible for a Speedy Keep result. It is also worth noting that there is fundamentally no difference between a Speedy Keep and Keep result, except that a discussion may be closed as Speedy Keep prior to the end of the discussion period (typically 7 days). Please do let me know if you have any questions. Jack Frost ( talk) 01:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Please move the page back to Henry Jones, Sr.. This is a fictional character named with the comma, not a biography which is what MOS:Jr pertains to. Dicklyon knew this would be controversial, as would any other fictional character moves based on MOS:JR (I didn't check if any others have been moved, if so, please revert). Thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 20:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I see you moved “NXT TakeOver: XXV” to “NXT TakeOver XXV”. The problem is you moved it to a page that redirects it back to the original page. If you can override the redirect, that would be great. Also the talk page and page history should be moved as well. Thanks so much. OldSkool01 ( talk) 02:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Jack Frost,
I received your notice and have added a COI Declaration on my user page to clarify the connections to myself and the article on Robert T. McCowan.
With my inexperience being a factor, I invite you to review the article in question and offer any feedback in distinguishing myself as a neutral party, even with my COI connections.
The article contains extensive sourcing and neutrality, so the only area I see that may create an issue is my use of some quotes?
My goal on wikipedia as a new contributor will be to highlight figures in my state who have not yet been noted.
JRM86 ( talk) 11:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Please help me on protecting this page as some users want to change the origin of this tribe from Dehqan to Pashtuns, Bettanis or Afghans. Regards. Azmarai76 ( talk) 11:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " White Rabbit Radio".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 13:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost,
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Organised crime in New Zealand".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello sir,
I just wanted to request you regarding editing of the page called 'Karna'. I don't know why but no amount of proofs being submitted or anything is making the admin change it. He/she seems to be editing anything. Is there anything that can be done or we have to deal with it and proofs don't matter?
( Dinesh2069 ( talk) 05:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC))
Hello sir,
Actually no. Karna page has been edit locked for a long time. Actually I gave constructive and correct edits for pages like Bhima whicbwere reverted like it's false information. Kindly help me out. I also gave information about Karna on talk page but no admin seems to be interested in reading it. Kindly look into it. It appears unethical to keep wrong information even after the right one is provided. I don't ask for much. Just want to make some edits to Karna page. He is even called rapist' in that which is wrong. Please help me out. Dinesh2069 ( talk) 19:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack, thanks for your review. You said, "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". If my topic is an advertisement, what other companies are on Wikipedia? Also, my references are independent and reliable. There are tons of blog links on Wikipedia. I am so sorry but you are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamitdmr ( talk • contribs)
Thank you, I'll edit by taking into account what you say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamitdmr ( talk • contribs)
Hello Jack Frost. We are authorized by the client to edit their wiki page and already made the disclosure on the user page. Therefore, we would like to amend the page as soon as possible. Thank you.
Hi, thanks for your recent help with the move of la Rochefoucauld to La Rochefoucauld. Now I've encountered the same situation again. I want to move DeWitt Clinton to the correct spelling De Witt Clinton, but De Witt Clinton already exists as a redirect back to the incorrect spelling DeWitt Clinton, so I get a conflict. Is there a civilized way I can make this change myself, as a non-admin, or do I need to go through the administrative process again? Thanks in advance for your advice. Eleuther ( talk) 06:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello Jack Frost. We are authorized by the client to edit their wiki page and already made the disclosure on the user page. Therefore, we would like to amend the page as soon as possible. Thank you. MemePR HK ( talk) 03:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Rafic_Hariri — Preceding unsigned comment added by RayonR ( talk • contribs) 11:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I want to see imfo or watcth the video
Scuff Joe ( talk) 13:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
I'd suggest moving the page back yourself to its previous title. I think you can do this, as the only author, fingers crossed. Even though that might seem pointless, it will maintain the history and hence the attribution within the article before (and while) it was a redirect. An admin might be reluctant to delete an article with substantive history just because you moved it to a title that you don't like. Then you'll be left with a fresh redirect with no history at the unwanted title, blank it and ask for it to be speedily-deleted. If you're lucky, an admin might spot what has happened and do it all for you. Lithopsian ( talk) 20:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Jack Frost,
What were all of these moves about? The redirect page ended up where it was originally before you started moving it around. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)