I used the RFCpol template to list an RFC with the specified new format, but it was not added to the RFCpol list. I fixed everything I could think of (see Template talk:RFCpol list#RFC not added to list for detail) but it's still not been added. What should I do to list? — Athaenara ✉ 01:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
please help
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Josh_Gibson#Josh_Gibson_homers_RFC 64.131.205.111 04:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
not sure.. it didn't show up on the RFC bio page :(
64.131.205.111 05:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
I've tagged a section on WT:U for RFC, and it hasn't been added. Docs seem to disagree as to whether the template call should use !! or | between arguments. This should perhaps be clarified somewhere? SamBC( talk) 19:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at this diff to see what's been lost this time. Pairadox 00:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that the RFC at Talk:Kiev/naming was not showing up on the list. Can you figure out what needs to be done to fix it? 199.125.109.78 06:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
added tag to Talk:Senator,_you're_no_Jack_Kennedy but it's not showing on the list. It says you are the person to report problems to. tia Dlabtot 22:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I think I'm the one who messed up the RfC bot with a mis-typed request.
Sorry about that, hope I didn't screw it up too much.
Horlo 02:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I set up a RfC on the Kiev:talk page.
I noticed somebody else tried setting one up after me.
I'm glad everything's under control again.
Horlo 02:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the whole RfC section, by the way.
Horlo 02:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
See above.-- Rmky87 01:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
The RFC bot is missing a <noinclude> tag from Template:RFCpol list. This causes the wiki-formatting to appear as plain text on WP:RFC/P, and makes it look different from the other RFC pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigma 7 ( talk • contribs) 04:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Good catch on the dead link on
this edit. Did you know about the archiveurl
and archivedate
parameters to {{
cite web}}?
Anomie 03:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!
You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.
Dr. Cash 04:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
can you help format my RFC at Satanic ritual abuse. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I have tried to add an RfC tag to the article 3rd US Infantry, can you please help? Thank you. - TabooTikiGod 13:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Googl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.
Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Tiggerjay 20:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Still haven't seen this one pop up on the list with the bot??? — BQZip01 — talk 04:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
You should be aware that there is a serious dissonance with policy RfC listings.
[1]
[2]Resolved. However, timestamps would still be nice. :o) Additionally, the template listings do not list the times, which would be convenient and helpful. Thanks!
Vassyana 18:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, this is my first article RfC, and I just can't seem to get it to work (i.e., show up on the WP:RFC/REL page). Probably am overlooking something obvious, but would sincerely appreciate your assistance since I've tried several times. thanks! Comesincolors 16:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I would ask that you look at the User Contribution history. Every time he gets reverted, he updates the section, and is clearly NPA. Removing it isn't vandalism, and he's ben advised by admins that its being done in poor taste. I am tired of editors being afraid of being referenced on his user page fro contradicting his edits. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 00:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Deletion gestapo. To answer your question, "and again" in German is "und noch Einmal" (lit., "and again another time"). -- GeĸrίtzĿ...•˚˚ 01:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, a few days ago I added a RfC tag to Talk:Javier Pérez de Cuéllar but so far it hasn't been added to the {{ RFCbio list}}. I must have done something wrong but I don't know what. Could you help me out? -- Victor12 02:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Me. too. I added an RfC tag to Talk:Apples_and_Pears but it hasn't appeared on the "media" RfC list. I, too, think I must have done something wrong. -- SocJan 07:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Just writing in because I followed a link to PageName, and it says you are the last person to edit the page. The page should probably redirect to Wikipedia:Vandalism or some similar page since it is the default vandalism page, instead of just going to a blank page. I would make the required edits, but it is protected. Just letting you know. :) Thanks! Cardsplayer4life 19:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I agree that red links are useful as they encourage other editors to create new articles. However, whenever I've nominated articles for " Good Article" status, I've inevitably been advised to remove such links or create stubs – even though there doesn't seem to be any specific requirement for red links to be removed. Therefore, if the " Oscar Pistorius" article is to achieve Good Article status at some stage, the red links may need to be removed. Cheers, Jacklee 21:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Heya Messed, you might be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Kurdish-Israeli relations. I'm sending a short note to people who were involved in this debate and a related debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdish-Chinese relations, to allow for maximum consensus. It would be great if you could review my deletion decision and make comments accordingly. Thanks! - Ta bu shi da yu 23:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I ask because I just put a RfC request here, but it doesn't appear here in the list of requests. Did I do something wrong? Not do something I was supposed to? (I'll watch this space for replies.) + ILike2BeAnonymous 00:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 ( talk) 02:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Is there a central page for RFCs? Maybe a category, or a navigation box? I am finding it difficult access the RFC tags and discussion, unless I stumble upon one. I am sure it is possible to make the RFCs more accessible and therefore more useful. Aditya( talk • contribs) 05:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I've added an RFCsci template to Talk:occam (programming language), however it hasn't appeared in the RFCsci page but it has appeared in the error list. I'm afraid I can't see anything wrong with the template syntax. Am I missing something? Letdorf 16:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC).
New York City Meetup
|
The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there!-- Pharos 20:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, there seems to be something wrong with the RFC template in the talk page o Talk:Nelly Furtado It does not show up in the RFC listing. I cannot find what is wrong. Thanks Topodegama 23:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Please can your bot not revert this personal attack, Rfc's should not be used to attack individual editors as this editor has chosen to do, SqueakBox 19:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I attempted to add an RfC to Talk:Gary Weiss, but I think I may have messed up the template. Can you fix? Thanks.-- Samiharris 23:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I want RFC on article campus watch but am not able to follow computer instructions please help I put a message on talk page of campus watch but could not activate/figure out how to use the bot thanks Bigleaguer 14:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I attempted to add an RfC to Talk:Ronald K. Maxwell. The page states it will be put on the RfC bio list automatically, but it has not appeared Pupluv 21:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, it seems that multiple RfC requests on the same page may confuse the bot. For example see Talk:Medical University of the Americas - Belize which has two Science RfCs at sections Request for Comment and RFC Oct 2007; and one Policy RFC at section RFC Oct 2007. The bot has put one entry in each of the Science and Policy RFC lists, however they both link to the first Science RFC in the article with the reason of that request. This means that the Policy RFC appears with the wrong reason in the Policy RFC list, and isn't correctly linked to from that list, and the second Sci RFC doesn't appear at all on the Sci RFC list. I've tried an interim fix in the talk page by putting message boxes in at each RFC template with links to the other RFC section, but this may be something that needs consideration in the RFC bot code. DMcMPO11AAUK/ Talk/ Contribs 01:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Things for bored insomniac wikipedians to do in the middle of the night - go through the RfC bot error log and fix all the broken rfc templates, then go through the rfc lists and "nowiki" any rfc templates in archived talk pages. DMcMPO11AAUK/ Talk/ Contribs 04:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
You've expressed an interest in the upcoming New York City Meetup for Saturday, November 3. I'd like to update you on an important change of schedule.
This will be in addition to the previously scheduled roving activities at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (this activity has also been cut short a bit) and at the Brooklyn Museum. For full details, see Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC. Ask any questions at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/NYC. Thank you.-- Pharos 21:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
After some thought, I've asked Alison. Business at the project is still painfully slow. Haven't seen you around much, by the way :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 00:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Good day, MessedRocker ;) just enquiring about the activity of the above case? Is it still active, and is a successful closure likely, and if so when? Cheers, Anthøny 14:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
{{ RFCxxx}} section=RfC: Is the deletion of entire Dragonball Z pages necesary just cause each point doesnt have a reference? This includes the main page and the links to the different sagas done primarily by User names DBZROCKS and Sesshomaru (suspected to a sock puppet of DBZROCKS) [3] This person or persons seem like he/they are not leting anyone else edit!! reason= Is deletion of entire pages necesary? !! time=00:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)}}
Hi. I made a Wiki Hello badge in case anyone's interested in using it for the Meetup. It's on the Meetup page. Nightscream 16:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I just can't tell what's wrong with the rfc template I added to Talk:People's Park (Berkeley). I would appreciate your help, thx. Dlabtot 20:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Here are a few updates in the realm of WikiProject Pharmacology:
Dr. Cash 22:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Friend, I tried to follow the steps to creat an RfC on the proposed speedy deletion of the article Gabrielle Roth, but I just didn't under stand them. Could you help me? As I say on the talk page, she is a well-known author, performer and teacher with three books published by major non-vanity presses, a good deal of press including two reviews of her work by the New York Times, over a dozen CDs and a few videos, and faculty membership in several prominent schools in her field. I am afraid that the editor proposing the deletion simply doesn't want to allow enough time for the existence of this article and this controversy to be known, and I don't know how to bring it to the attention of the general Wiki community within this short time. Could you help? Thanks in advance for whatever you may do. Rosencomet 21:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I added an RfC tag to Talk:Stephen Colbert but it's not being automatically updated on the RfC bio list. What did I do wrong? --David Shankbone 23:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
How do I tell the bot that the correct address is not Talk:Loudness war#Loudness_war_external_links but Talk:Loudness_war#RfC.2C_.22Loudness_War.22_external_links?
It's not redirecting to the right section and I can't change the list. Please help. Jrod2 09:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Mercury has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Mercury 01:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
A link in the RFCs at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Style issues seems to be broken. Could you take a look at it? Thanks. JKBrooks85 16:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I tried to make a link from the RFC/sci-page to Talk:Digital_Audio_Broadcasting#RfC:_Is_this_article_biased.3F, but it’s somehow seems to fail. Can you help me? I really wish to get a second opinion on the digital aduio broadcast article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ga-david.b ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I wanted to discuss the possibility of creating Slide.com which would redirect to Slide (website). The talk page does not exist. I would create it but I noticed it was deleted and I concluded it would be bad manners to create it without consulting you. Do you have an opinion on the matter? Just leave me a note by clicking here [4] or email_me.
Don't worry, I am not creating Slide.com without further conversation.
Have a nice weekend!
regards,
-- Kushal t 20:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Kushal t 20:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I cannot fill out template correctly. I do not understand the directions.
I do not understand the template.
{{RFCpolicy | secion=RfC:Should articles be verified and referenced !! reason=Editor removes tags without fixing the problem, as if [[WP:OWN]] !! time=~~~~}}
Please help! Mattisse 17:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey Messed. ;) following a small request on the MedCom's list, I'm here to ask for a quick update on the status of your case. How are things coming along? Do you see a resolution/closure coming up soon? Do you need some assistance in Mediating it? In your opinion, as Mediator, do you think the best course of action would be to close the case as stale?
I apologise for some over-lapping with my informal comment a little while back, by the way. If you wish, check here to reply to me privately.
Kind regards,
Anthøny 19:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi - Are the bots working now to automatically add to RFC lists, and if so, how long should it take? I have RFCs for history and art on Talk: White House and manually added them to the lists, following the instructions - someone reverted, saying the bot will do it, but I don't see the bot doing it. I'm kind of confused at this point. Thanks for any enlightenment. Tvoz | talk 05:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason why the Talk:IRV#RFC isn't showing up on the list Template:RFCpol list? -- StrengthOfNations ( talk) 17:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
I award you this Working Man's Barnstar for honouring my plea for help via your bot, and in turn helping improve the accuracy of the encyclopedia. Thanks! Daniel 03:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC) |
Hi,
In order to clarify the RFC process, I tried to add a templatename parameter to Template:RFC tagging instructions, but I see that your bot just removes the extra information. Could this behavior be changed so that the template instructions can be more clear? — Remember the dot ( talk) 03:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Messedrocker. I have started a request for comment here, but it doesn't seem to get listed on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Policies. Could you please verify if there's anything wrong with the template? Thank you. Best regards, Hús ö nd 19:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
In response to [5], sorry for adding the GFDL as one of the protected pages administrators can edit. I did not know that administrators weren't supposed to edit it also.-- U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 03:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I have added two RfC templates to the article Urolagnia, but they don't seem to be appearing on the relevant pages. Have I messed it up in some way? Paul B ( talk) 17:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I added an RFC to the above article but it doesn't seem to have gone on the list. Would be kind to have a look and let me know if I have done something wrong? Pocopocopocopoco ( talk) 21:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
You should change it now :) – Gurch ( talk) 22:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure you're already aware from the cabal channel, but I've delisted your candidacy because of the recent ruling about minors. Please do run again when you become of age, and good luck. east.718 at 23:12, November 19, 2007
You're assistance is requested. Can you help? -
Mtmelendez (
Talk) 10:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
RFC can be found @ Talk:Yamashita's_gold#RFC:_Urban_Legend_or_Historical_Fact
Hope this is the right area to report this (probably something i goofed up) Jim ( talk) 19:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
You can choose to delete this, but I assure you that I'm not here with ill intent. You say a lot of things on IRC, some of which may be construed as being derogatory to others. My advice to you is not to do this. It can be fun to make fun of people who do silly things sometimes, but IRL, it really does create big problems. You're still young and may not realize this, but people really do think worse of you if you say bad things about others, even if you're just trying to make a joke. No particular incident in mind, but every time I've been on IRC, you've said something un-nice about someone else. Probably not the best thing to do as a pattern. Just friendly advice. Bye bye. Again, feel free to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.29.115.69 ( talk) 07:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
The User:RFC bot page states: "If the RFC is wrongly formatted, then it will not be listed! Instead, it will accumulate on list." Clicking the link gives me: "Safari can’t connect to the server. Safari can’t open the page “ http://tools.wikimedia.de/~messedrocker/RFC_bot_template_errors.txt” because it could not connect to the server “tools.wikimedia.de”." Is the server just down, or is there an error in the link somewhere? Geoffrey.landis ( talk) 18:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
--Oops, I just read the RFC_bot page again, and noticed it said that the page is updated at UTC midnight, and if the page doesn't exist, that means no errors as of that time.
Nevertheless, I'm puzzled that the RFC that I put up yesterday hasn't showed up on the list, and the history section for the RFC list is very odd-- yesterday before noon every item on the list was deleted, and then a little later all the items were put back on the list. Did the bot go down? Geoffrey.landis ( talk) 23:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I was listening to the latest Wikipedia Weekly. You said something along hte lines of "make censorships" in regards to the board publishing their notes and blacking out sensitive topics. The word you were looking for is "redact". See Sanitization (classified information) Raul654 ( talk) 21:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I guess you'll be back later? — Save_Us_ 229 03:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Season's greetings!
Could you look into this when you've got a moment?
Here you can see that it's updating the RFC pages to 0 RFCs, then back to a non-zero number a few minutes later. This has happened twice today. My guess is that the bot may be misinterpreting null pages or error messages resulting from the current server outages. -- Tony Sidaway 15:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I have been experiencing the same problems for a while. I put up
Asian fetish for RfC but it's not on the {{RfCsoc}}. I also put up
So Far from the Bamboo Grove for RfC, but it's not on its respective list either.
миражinred 02:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Sorry, that was mistake on my part.
миражinred 03:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, a couple of days ago I tried to make two RfCs here but they have not registered on the RfC pages .... I am concerned I somehow screwed up the template/request, though I cannot figure out how. Would you mind checking and correcting any mistake I made? Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 22:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I added a RFCHist template to Talk:Easter Rising at 19:33. [6] It still has not appeared on the list at 20:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC). Scolaire ( talk)
I've asked your robot several times [7] to stop altering the premise. That was before I realized it was a robot. Duh. Sorry about that. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 03:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
---|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "K"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "L"s through "O"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++ Lar: t/ c 00:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
...to the next New York City Meetup!
New York City Meetup
|
In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at
Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 01:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, are you an admin? I noticed that you removed the admin thingy from your userpage, but you have admin logs. Did you give up the tools? Sorry, just curious. Regards, Keilana talk (recall) 22:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
See: Talk:Fifth Beatle. Unless I messed up the syntax. Could you help out a bit? Thanks! -- Jayron32| talk| contribs 13:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I have tagged the Talk:Brazilian waxing page for RfC. But, it's not showing on the Template:RFCsoc list page. May be I didn't do it right. Could you check on what happened? Aditya( talk • contribs) 12:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I assume this removal [8] was an error due to the RfC block below it...if not, it certainly shouldn't be marked minor. JJL ( talk) 18:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(music)#Rfc:_C4_International_concert_tour hasn't shown up at Template:RFCpolicy_list yet. Anything I did wrong? Cagey Millipede ( talk) 21:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
See: Talk:United Kingdom. I could have got the code wrong, but I've checked it and it looks OK now. Could someone help me out please? Dan1980 ( talk | stalk) 22:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, Messedrocker, I was looking for any past article RfCs on Animal testing. Howe could I check to see if any have been done? I had a look in the Talk:Animal testing archives, but couldn't find anything. Tim Vickers ( talk) 22:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I filed an RFC as seen here and it still hasn't shown up on either list. Any help would be appreciated. AniMate 04:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
BetacommandBot has been blocked by a dev for a week for abusing system resources Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Vital_tasks. Since he'd taken over most of the RfC notifications, and RfC is an important part of the WP:DR process, can you bring User:RFC bot back online for a week to fill the gap? Thanks. MBisanz talk 04:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you have participated Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder ( talk) ( Contrib) 18:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Messedrocker, just letting you know I've sent an email (via the English Wikipedia email function) to you with details about your Working Group wiki login details. Be sure to change your password once you log in, for security reasons! If there's any problems with the login (passwords, username not working, or anything), fire me an email and I'll try and sort them out for you. Cheers, Daniel ( talk) 04:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Messedrocker. You may wish to see a discussion regarding Category:Wikipedians open to constructive criticism, a category that you are in, at User categories for discussion (UCFD). -- Iamunknown 23:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Messedrocker (love the name!) Mangojuice directed me to your page after I inquired about a delay in the updating of listings of RfCs by the bot. The page in question is Talk:Palestinian archaeology. I'm pretty sure its listed properly. Can you do anything about the delay? Thanks a bunch. Tiamut talk 20:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing my RFC Kardashev scale, it's very nice of you to take the time. I admit, I was having a bit of a time getting it to work correctly. Thanks again-- Sparkygravity ( talk) 04:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Just a happy Birthday message to you, Harej, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
-- Nadir D Steinmetz 00:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
As you made an edit to the incident listed in the Administrators notice board, it is requested that you confirm the details of the incident here (section 1.1.2)
This is as the incident is used as the basis of an argument and needs to be confirm by persons familar with the event
Regards -- User:Mitrebox talk 2008-02-22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.11.244.78 ( talk) 07:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Me and several other editors have been drafting an RfC on JzG here. We listed an effort by you to influence his behavior in the past but don't necessarily expect you to be one of the certifiers for the RfC. But, if you'd to look it over and tell us if you think anything that we listed is unfair or inaccurate before we post it, that would be very helpful. Thank you. Cla68 ( talk) 01:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi -- is the RFCBot still updating Template:RFChist list? The page hasn't been updated since the 20th, & there's been a few changes in items wanting to be listed. Thanks -- llywrch ( talk) 22:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
A user conduct RfC involving the actions of JzG ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) in which you have been mentioned is about to go live and will be found at WP:RFC/U shortly. Viridae Talk 11:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I have just noticed a lot of bare URLs at the endnotes section in the Antipsychiatry article. Do you know how to run a bot to convert them (instead of doing it manually)? — Cesar Tort 17:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:ARD article notice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 02:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Active ban discussion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 03:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
that's the label I've given to our experimental skypecast scheduled for March 4th 1am UTC (god knows what time that is for you - sorry!) - check out the page, because I've put a few details there (and been cheeky enough to note you down as a participant). I hope it works out for you to join - and I've got my fingers crossed for the technology too....
I'll be on IRC beforehand anyways to set it up etc. - and I look forward to it!
cheers, Privatemusings ( talk) 09:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).
Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
You're also invited to subscribe to the public
Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on
the invite list.
BrownBot (
talk) 03:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for being part of the inaugural NotTheWikipediaWeekly - it's all online now and I know some folk are giving it a listen.. I'm looking forward to further feedback, and thank you again for your involvement! Privatemusings ( talk) 06:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, not sure what happened here but I'm pretty sure it wasn't whatever was supposed to happen. diff Figured you should know about that. Star dust 8212 04:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
According to the history page for the {{ RFChist}} template, RFC bot hasn't added anything to it since 09:45, 20 February 2008 UTC.
Talk:Pelasgians#RfC: Pelasgians Albanian section was posted about an hour ago ( diff) but has not been added to the list. Any idea when it might be added? — Athaenara ✉ 23:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Why did you remove the RFC at Teachings of Prem Rawat?~Yes, it is old but nobody replied so it is still pending and hence should not be removed. Andries ( talk) 20:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
It's been three weeks or more. The bot deleted the RFC for Sexual harassment in education. This may be a good thing. By now, we've forgotton why we were arguing in the first place and the conflicting editors have wandered off. The article looks like the devil, but what the heck? Putting it back up seems useless if there is no one around who is willing to furnish a third party. How about a waiver to go into mediation? Student7 ( talk) 01:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Is the bot not handling RFChist? There are requests outstanding but nothing has been added to RFChist list for more than 3 weeks. Sbowers3 ( talk) 19:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I've started drafting a user conduct RfC that you might be interested in here. There's a lot of evidence to sift through and present, so I think it will take awhile to get it put together. If you'd like to participate, please feel free to do so. Cla68 ( talk) 07:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
User:The Placebo Effect has suggested that we could do some audio interviews that would be adapted into an episode of the WikipediaWeekly. Since you're a WikipediaWeekly regular, I thought maybe you would be interested in helping. If this is a possibility, you must register by 8 PM Thursday, and then please get back to me. I've also asked prominent Wikinewsie User:David Shankbone, who I know has a digital recorder and has interviewed a lot of public figures for Wikinews. By the way, there should be quite a media presence there already ( Wall Street Journal, WNYC, maybe The New Yorker, Columbia University student TV news, maybe a notable blogger).-- Pharos ( talk) 07:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Kim is starting the lectures on April 6th around 15:00 UTC (although that is apparently open to discussion). Just a reminder (are you going to talk on that date? I dunno what the set up is, but I'm sure you can propose your own date, or something like that. Might want to talk to him about that, though; I just joined up to listen :-p) Xavexgoem ( talk) 14:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I dont know but, the bot placed a template on WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008, {{RFC error}}. Is this an error? See here. Rk OR To N 22:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[9]-- Filll ( talk) 02:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
#wikipedia-en-lectures @ 15:00 UTC today, yay. Xavexgoem ( talk) 14:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
I used the RFCpol template to list an RFC with the specified new format, but it was not added to the RFCpol list. I fixed everything I could think of (see Template talk:RFCpol list#RFC not added to list for detail) but it's still not been added. What should I do to list? — Athaenara ✉ 01:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
please help
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Josh_Gibson#Josh_Gibson_homers_RFC 64.131.205.111 04:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
not sure.. it didn't show up on the RFC bio page :(
64.131.205.111 05:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
I've tagged a section on WT:U for RFC, and it hasn't been added. Docs seem to disagree as to whether the template call should use !! or | between arguments. This should perhaps be clarified somewhere? SamBC( talk) 19:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at this diff to see what's been lost this time. Pairadox 00:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that the RFC at Talk:Kiev/naming was not showing up on the list. Can you figure out what needs to be done to fix it? 199.125.109.78 06:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
added tag to Talk:Senator,_you're_no_Jack_Kennedy but it's not showing on the list. It says you are the person to report problems to. tia Dlabtot 22:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I think I'm the one who messed up the RfC bot with a mis-typed request.
Sorry about that, hope I didn't screw it up too much.
Horlo 02:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I set up a RfC on the Kiev:talk page.
I noticed somebody else tried setting one up after me.
I'm glad everything's under control again.
Horlo 02:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the whole RfC section, by the way.
Horlo 02:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
See above.-- Rmky87 01:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
The RFC bot is missing a <noinclude> tag from Template:RFCpol list. This causes the wiki-formatting to appear as plain text on WP:RFC/P, and makes it look different from the other RFC pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigma 7 ( talk • contribs) 04:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Good catch on the dead link on
this edit. Did you know about the archiveurl
and archivedate
parameters to {{
cite web}}?
Anomie 03:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!
You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.
Dr. Cash 04:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
can you help format my RFC at Satanic ritual abuse. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I have tried to add an RfC tag to the article 3rd US Infantry, can you please help? Thank you. - TabooTikiGod 13:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Googl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.
Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Tiggerjay 20:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Still haven't seen this one pop up on the list with the bot??? — BQZip01 — talk 04:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
You should be aware that there is a serious dissonance with policy RfC listings.
[1]
[2]Resolved. However, timestamps would still be nice. :o) Additionally, the template listings do not list the times, which would be convenient and helpful. Thanks!
Vassyana 18:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, this is my first article RfC, and I just can't seem to get it to work (i.e., show up on the WP:RFC/REL page). Probably am overlooking something obvious, but would sincerely appreciate your assistance since I've tried several times. thanks! Comesincolors 16:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I would ask that you look at the User Contribution history. Every time he gets reverted, he updates the section, and is clearly NPA. Removing it isn't vandalism, and he's ben advised by admins that its being done in poor taste. I am tired of editors being afraid of being referenced on his user page fro contradicting his edits. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 00:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Deletion gestapo. To answer your question, "and again" in German is "und noch Einmal" (lit., "and again another time"). -- GeĸrίtzĿ...•˚˚ 01:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, a few days ago I added a RfC tag to Talk:Javier Pérez de Cuéllar but so far it hasn't been added to the {{ RFCbio list}}. I must have done something wrong but I don't know what. Could you help me out? -- Victor12 02:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Me. too. I added an RfC tag to Talk:Apples_and_Pears but it hasn't appeared on the "media" RfC list. I, too, think I must have done something wrong. -- SocJan 07:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Just writing in because I followed a link to PageName, and it says you are the last person to edit the page. The page should probably redirect to Wikipedia:Vandalism or some similar page since it is the default vandalism page, instead of just going to a blank page. I would make the required edits, but it is protected. Just letting you know. :) Thanks! Cardsplayer4life 19:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I agree that red links are useful as they encourage other editors to create new articles. However, whenever I've nominated articles for " Good Article" status, I've inevitably been advised to remove such links or create stubs – even though there doesn't seem to be any specific requirement for red links to be removed. Therefore, if the " Oscar Pistorius" article is to achieve Good Article status at some stage, the red links may need to be removed. Cheers, Jacklee 21:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Heya Messed, you might be interested in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Kurdish-Israeli relations. I'm sending a short note to people who were involved in this debate and a related debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdish-Chinese relations, to allow for maximum consensus. It would be great if you could review my deletion decision and make comments accordingly. Thanks! - Ta bu shi da yu 23:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I ask because I just put a RfC request here, but it doesn't appear here in the list of requests. Did I do something wrong? Not do something I was supposed to? (I'll watch this space for replies.) + ILike2BeAnonymous 00:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 ( talk) 02:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Is there a central page for RFCs? Maybe a category, or a navigation box? I am finding it difficult access the RFC tags and discussion, unless I stumble upon one. I am sure it is possible to make the RFCs more accessible and therefore more useful. Aditya( talk • contribs) 05:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
I've added an RFCsci template to Talk:occam (programming language), however it hasn't appeared in the RFCsci page but it has appeared in the error list. I'm afraid I can't see anything wrong with the template syntax. Am I missing something? Letdorf 16:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC).
New York City Meetup
|
The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there!-- Pharos 20:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, there seems to be something wrong with the RFC template in the talk page o Talk:Nelly Furtado It does not show up in the RFC listing. I cannot find what is wrong. Thanks Topodegama 23:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Please can your bot not revert this personal attack, Rfc's should not be used to attack individual editors as this editor has chosen to do, SqueakBox 19:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I attempted to add an RfC to Talk:Gary Weiss, but I think I may have messed up the template. Can you fix? Thanks.-- Samiharris 23:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I want RFC on article campus watch but am not able to follow computer instructions please help I put a message on talk page of campus watch but could not activate/figure out how to use the bot thanks Bigleaguer 14:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I attempted to add an RfC to Talk:Ronald K. Maxwell. The page states it will be put on the RfC bio list automatically, but it has not appeared Pupluv 21:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, it seems that multiple RfC requests on the same page may confuse the bot. For example see Talk:Medical University of the Americas - Belize which has two Science RfCs at sections Request for Comment and RFC Oct 2007; and one Policy RFC at section RFC Oct 2007. The bot has put one entry in each of the Science and Policy RFC lists, however they both link to the first Science RFC in the article with the reason of that request. This means that the Policy RFC appears with the wrong reason in the Policy RFC list, and isn't correctly linked to from that list, and the second Sci RFC doesn't appear at all on the Sci RFC list. I've tried an interim fix in the talk page by putting message boxes in at each RFC template with links to the other RFC section, but this may be something that needs consideration in the RFC bot code. DMcMPO11AAUK/ Talk/ Contribs 01:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Things for bored insomniac wikipedians to do in the middle of the night - go through the RfC bot error log and fix all the broken rfc templates, then go through the rfc lists and "nowiki" any rfc templates in archived talk pages. DMcMPO11AAUK/ Talk/ Contribs 04:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
You've expressed an interest in the upcoming New York City Meetup for Saturday, November 3. I'd like to update you on an important change of schedule.
This will be in addition to the previously scheduled roving activities at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (this activity has also been cut short a bit) and at the Brooklyn Museum. For full details, see Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC. Ask any questions at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/NYC. Thank you.-- Pharos 21:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
After some thought, I've asked Alison. Business at the project is still painfully slow. Haven't seen you around much, by the way :) Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 00:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Good day, MessedRocker ;) just enquiring about the activity of the above case? Is it still active, and is a successful closure likely, and if so when? Cheers, Anthøny 14:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
{{ RFCxxx}} section=RfC: Is the deletion of entire Dragonball Z pages necesary just cause each point doesnt have a reference? This includes the main page and the links to the different sagas done primarily by User names DBZROCKS and Sesshomaru (suspected to a sock puppet of DBZROCKS) [3] This person or persons seem like he/they are not leting anyone else edit!! reason= Is deletion of entire pages necesary? !! time=00:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)}}
Hi. I made a Wiki Hello badge in case anyone's interested in using it for the Meetup. It's on the Meetup page. Nightscream 16:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I just can't tell what's wrong with the rfc template I added to Talk:People's Park (Berkeley). I would appreciate your help, thx. Dlabtot 20:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Here are a few updates in the realm of WikiProject Pharmacology:
Dr. Cash 22:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Dear Friend, I tried to follow the steps to creat an RfC on the proposed speedy deletion of the article Gabrielle Roth, but I just didn't under stand them. Could you help me? As I say on the talk page, she is a well-known author, performer and teacher with three books published by major non-vanity presses, a good deal of press including two reviews of her work by the New York Times, over a dozen CDs and a few videos, and faculty membership in several prominent schools in her field. I am afraid that the editor proposing the deletion simply doesn't want to allow enough time for the existence of this article and this controversy to be known, and I don't know how to bring it to the attention of the general Wiki community within this short time. Could you help? Thanks in advance for whatever you may do. Rosencomet 21:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I added an RfC tag to Talk:Stephen Colbert but it's not being automatically updated on the RfC bio list. What did I do wrong? --David Shankbone 23:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
How do I tell the bot that the correct address is not Talk:Loudness war#Loudness_war_external_links but Talk:Loudness_war#RfC.2C_.22Loudness_War.22_external_links?
It's not redirecting to the right section and I can't change the list. Please help. Jrod2 09:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Mercury has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Mercury 01:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
A link in the RFCs at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Style issues seems to be broken. Could you take a look at it? Thanks. JKBrooks85 16:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I tried to make a link from the RFC/sci-page to Talk:Digital_Audio_Broadcasting#RfC:_Is_this_article_biased.3F, but it’s somehow seems to fail. Can you help me? I really wish to get a second opinion on the digital aduio broadcast article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ga-david.b ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I wanted to discuss the possibility of creating Slide.com which would redirect to Slide (website). The talk page does not exist. I would create it but I noticed it was deleted and I concluded it would be bad manners to create it without consulting you. Do you have an opinion on the matter? Just leave me a note by clicking here [4] or email_me.
Don't worry, I am not creating Slide.com without further conversation.
Have a nice weekend!
regards,
-- Kushal t 20:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Kushal t 20:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I cannot fill out template correctly. I do not understand the directions.
I do not understand the template.
{{RFCpolicy | secion=RfC:Should articles be verified and referenced !! reason=Editor removes tags without fixing the problem, as if [[WP:OWN]] !! time=~~~~}}
Please help! Mattisse 17:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey Messed. ;) following a small request on the MedCom's list, I'm here to ask for a quick update on the status of your case. How are things coming along? Do you see a resolution/closure coming up soon? Do you need some assistance in Mediating it? In your opinion, as Mediator, do you think the best course of action would be to close the case as stale?
I apologise for some over-lapping with my informal comment a little while back, by the way. If you wish, check here to reply to me privately.
Kind regards,
Anthøny 19:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi - Are the bots working now to automatically add to RFC lists, and if so, how long should it take? I have RFCs for history and art on Talk: White House and manually added them to the lists, following the instructions - someone reverted, saying the bot will do it, but I don't see the bot doing it. I'm kind of confused at this point. Thanks for any enlightenment. Tvoz | talk 05:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason why the Talk:IRV#RFC isn't showing up on the list Template:RFCpol list? -- StrengthOfNations ( talk) 17:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
I award you this Working Man's Barnstar for honouring my plea for help via your bot, and in turn helping improve the accuracy of the encyclopedia. Thanks! Daniel 03:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC) |
Hi,
In order to clarify the RFC process, I tried to add a templatename parameter to Template:RFC tagging instructions, but I see that your bot just removes the extra information. Could this behavior be changed so that the template instructions can be more clear? — Remember the dot ( talk) 03:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Messedrocker. I have started a request for comment here, but it doesn't seem to get listed on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Policies. Could you please verify if there's anything wrong with the template? Thank you. Best regards, Hús ö nd 19:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
In response to [5], sorry for adding the GFDL as one of the protected pages administrators can edit. I did not know that administrators weren't supposed to edit it also.-- U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 03:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I have added two RfC templates to the article Urolagnia, but they don't seem to be appearing on the relevant pages. Have I messed it up in some way? Paul B ( talk) 17:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I added an RFC to the above article but it doesn't seem to have gone on the list. Would be kind to have a look and let me know if I have done something wrong? Pocopocopocopoco ( talk) 21:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
You should change it now :) – Gurch ( talk) 22:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure you're already aware from the cabal channel, but I've delisted your candidacy because of the recent ruling about minors. Please do run again when you become of age, and good luck. east.718 at 23:12, November 19, 2007
You're assistance is requested. Can you help? -
Mtmelendez (
Talk) 10:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
RFC can be found @ Talk:Yamashita's_gold#RFC:_Urban_Legend_or_Historical_Fact
Hope this is the right area to report this (probably something i goofed up) Jim ( talk) 19:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
You can choose to delete this, but I assure you that I'm not here with ill intent. You say a lot of things on IRC, some of which may be construed as being derogatory to others. My advice to you is not to do this. It can be fun to make fun of people who do silly things sometimes, but IRL, it really does create big problems. You're still young and may not realize this, but people really do think worse of you if you say bad things about others, even if you're just trying to make a joke. No particular incident in mind, but every time I've been on IRC, you've said something un-nice about someone else. Probably not the best thing to do as a pattern. Just friendly advice. Bye bye. Again, feel free to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.29.115.69 ( talk) 07:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
The User:RFC bot page states: "If the RFC is wrongly formatted, then it will not be listed! Instead, it will accumulate on list." Clicking the link gives me: "Safari can’t connect to the server. Safari can’t open the page “ http://tools.wikimedia.de/~messedrocker/RFC_bot_template_errors.txt” because it could not connect to the server “tools.wikimedia.de”." Is the server just down, or is there an error in the link somewhere? Geoffrey.landis ( talk) 18:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
--Oops, I just read the RFC_bot page again, and noticed it said that the page is updated at UTC midnight, and if the page doesn't exist, that means no errors as of that time.
Nevertheless, I'm puzzled that the RFC that I put up yesterday hasn't showed up on the list, and the history section for the RFC list is very odd-- yesterday before noon every item on the list was deleted, and then a little later all the items were put back on the list. Did the bot go down? Geoffrey.landis ( talk) 23:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I was listening to the latest Wikipedia Weekly. You said something along hte lines of "make censorships" in regards to the board publishing their notes and blacking out sensitive topics. The word you were looking for is "redact". See Sanitization (classified information) Raul654 ( talk) 21:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
I guess you'll be back later? — Save_Us_ 229 03:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Season's greetings!
Could you look into this when you've got a moment?
Here you can see that it's updating the RFC pages to 0 RFCs, then back to a non-zero number a few minutes later. This has happened twice today. My guess is that the bot may be misinterpreting null pages or error messages resulting from the current server outages. -- Tony Sidaway 15:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I have been experiencing the same problems for a while. I put up
Asian fetish for RfC but it's not on the {{RfCsoc}}. I also put up
So Far from the Bamboo Grove for RfC, but it's not on its respective list either.
миражinred 02:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Sorry, that was mistake on my part.
миражinred 03:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, a couple of days ago I tried to make two RfCs here but they have not registered on the RfC pages .... I am concerned I somehow screwed up the template/request, though I cannot figure out how. Would you mind checking and correcting any mistake I made? Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 22:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I added a RFCHist template to Talk:Easter Rising at 19:33. [6] It still has not appeared on the list at 20:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC). Scolaire ( talk)
I've asked your robot several times [7] to stop altering the premise. That was before I realized it was a robot. Duh. Sorry about that. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 03:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
---|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "K"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "L"s through "O"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++ Lar: t/ c 00:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
...to the next New York City Meetup!
New York City Meetup
|
In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at
Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 01:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, are you an admin? I noticed that you removed the admin thingy from your userpage, but you have admin logs. Did you give up the tools? Sorry, just curious. Regards, Keilana talk (recall) 22:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
See: Talk:Fifth Beatle. Unless I messed up the syntax. Could you help out a bit? Thanks! -- Jayron32| talk| contribs 13:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I have tagged the Talk:Brazilian waxing page for RfC. But, it's not showing on the Template:RFCsoc list page. May be I didn't do it right. Could you check on what happened? Aditya( talk • contribs) 12:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I assume this removal [8] was an error due to the RfC block below it...if not, it certainly shouldn't be marked minor. JJL ( talk) 18:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(music)#Rfc:_C4_International_concert_tour hasn't shown up at Template:RFCpolicy_list yet. Anything I did wrong? Cagey Millipede ( talk) 21:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
See: Talk:United Kingdom. I could have got the code wrong, but I've checked it and it looks OK now. Could someone help me out please? Dan1980 ( talk | stalk) 22:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, Messedrocker, I was looking for any past article RfCs on Animal testing. Howe could I check to see if any have been done? I had a look in the Talk:Animal testing archives, but couldn't find anything. Tim Vickers ( talk) 22:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I filed an RFC as seen here and it still hasn't shown up on either list. Any help would be appreciated. AniMate 04:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
BetacommandBot has been blocked by a dev for a week for abusing system resources Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Vital_tasks. Since he'd taken over most of the RfC notifications, and RfC is an important part of the WP:DR process, can you bring User:RFC bot back online for a week to fill the gap? Thanks. MBisanz talk 04:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you have participated Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder ( talk) ( Contrib) 18:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Messedrocker, just letting you know I've sent an email (via the English Wikipedia email function) to you with details about your Working Group wiki login details. Be sure to change your password once you log in, for security reasons! If there's any problems with the login (passwords, username not working, or anything), fire me an email and I'll try and sort them out for you. Cheers, Daniel ( talk) 04:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Messedrocker. You may wish to see a discussion regarding Category:Wikipedians open to constructive criticism, a category that you are in, at User categories for discussion (UCFD). -- Iamunknown 23:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Messedrocker (love the name!) Mangojuice directed me to your page after I inquired about a delay in the updating of listings of RfCs by the bot. The page in question is Talk:Palestinian archaeology. I'm pretty sure its listed properly. Can you do anything about the delay? Thanks a bunch. Tiamut talk 20:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing my RFC Kardashev scale, it's very nice of you to take the time. I admit, I was having a bit of a time getting it to work correctly. Thanks again-- Sparkygravity ( talk) 04:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Just a happy Birthday message to you, Harej, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
-- Nadir D Steinmetz 00:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
As you made an edit to the incident listed in the Administrators notice board, it is requested that you confirm the details of the incident here (section 1.1.2)
This is as the incident is used as the basis of an argument and needs to be confirm by persons familar with the event
Regards -- User:Mitrebox talk 2008-02-22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.11.244.78 ( talk) 07:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Me and several other editors have been drafting an RfC on JzG here. We listed an effort by you to influence his behavior in the past but don't necessarily expect you to be one of the certifiers for the RfC. But, if you'd to look it over and tell us if you think anything that we listed is unfair or inaccurate before we post it, that would be very helpful. Thank you. Cla68 ( talk) 01:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi -- is the RFCBot still updating Template:RFChist list? The page hasn't been updated since the 20th, & there's been a few changes in items wanting to be listed. Thanks -- llywrch ( talk) 22:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
A user conduct RfC involving the actions of JzG ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) in which you have been mentioned is about to go live and will be found at WP:RFC/U shortly. Viridae Talk 11:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I have just noticed a lot of bare URLs at the endnotes section in the Antipsychiatry article. Do you know how to run a bot to convert them (instead of doing it manually)? — Cesar Tort 17:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:ARD article notice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 02:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Active ban discussion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 03:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
that's the label I've given to our experimental skypecast scheduled for March 4th 1am UTC (god knows what time that is for you - sorry!) - check out the page, because I've put a few details there (and been cheeky enough to note you down as a participant). I hope it works out for you to join - and I've got my fingers crossed for the technology too....
I'll be on IRC beforehand anyways to set it up etc. - and I look forward to it!
cheers, Privatemusings ( talk) 09:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).
Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
You're also invited to subscribe to the public
Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on
the invite list.
BrownBot (
talk) 03:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for being part of the inaugural NotTheWikipediaWeekly - it's all online now and I know some folk are giving it a listen.. I'm looking forward to further feedback, and thank you again for your involvement! Privatemusings ( talk) 06:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, not sure what happened here but I'm pretty sure it wasn't whatever was supposed to happen. diff Figured you should know about that. Star dust 8212 04:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
According to the history page for the {{ RFChist}} template, RFC bot hasn't added anything to it since 09:45, 20 February 2008 UTC.
Talk:Pelasgians#RfC: Pelasgians Albanian section was posted about an hour ago ( diff) but has not been added to the list. Any idea when it might be added? — Athaenara ✉ 23:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Why did you remove the RFC at Teachings of Prem Rawat?~Yes, it is old but nobody replied so it is still pending and hence should not be removed. Andries ( talk) 20:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
It's been three weeks or more. The bot deleted the RFC for Sexual harassment in education. This may be a good thing. By now, we've forgotton why we were arguing in the first place and the conflicting editors have wandered off. The article looks like the devil, but what the heck? Putting it back up seems useless if there is no one around who is willing to furnish a third party. How about a waiver to go into mediation? Student7 ( talk) 01:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Is the bot not handling RFChist? There are requests outstanding but nothing has been added to RFChist list for more than 3 weeks. Sbowers3 ( talk) 19:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I've started drafting a user conduct RfC that you might be interested in here. There's a lot of evidence to sift through and present, so I think it will take awhile to get it put together. If you'd like to participate, please feel free to do so. Cla68 ( talk) 07:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
User:The Placebo Effect has suggested that we could do some audio interviews that would be adapted into an episode of the WikipediaWeekly. Since you're a WikipediaWeekly regular, I thought maybe you would be interested in helping. If this is a possibility, you must register by 8 PM Thursday, and then please get back to me. I've also asked prominent Wikinewsie User:David Shankbone, who I know has a digital recorder and has interviewed a lot of public figures for Wikinews. By the way, there should be quite a media presence there already ( Wall Street Journal, WNYC, maybe The New Yorker, Columbia University student TV news, maybe a notable blogger).-- Pharos ( talk) 07:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Kim is starting the lectures on April 6th around 15:00 UTC (although that is apparently open to discussion). Just a reminder (are you going to talk on that date? I dunno what the set up is, but I'm sure you can propose your own date, or something like that. Might want to talk to him about that, though; I just joined up to listen :-p) Xavexgoem ( talk) 14:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I dont know but, the bot placed a template on WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008, {{RFC error}}. Is this an error? See here. Rk OR To N 22:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[9]-- Filll ( talk) 02:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
#wikipedia-en-lectures @ 15:00 UTC today, yay. Xavexgoem ( talk) 14:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)