This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 |
Hi, Fram! I created the page Dorea Academy, a school where my family goes to. It has it's address is available in Google Maps and it's social media account existing online. I wish to have the page for other people to know about the school's existence. ( talk)
Thanks much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilbert22ph ( talk • contribs) 08:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Farm! I created a page for Masjid 99 Kubah Makassar, which is a mosque, public place for Muslim worship. It has already been branded as a new landmark for city of Makassar for its unique architecture. But that article is deleted within an hour without being discussed! thanks, Reza ( talk)
Hi, Fram! Thanks for noticing the copyvio problem at Seaway 25. I had a look at other contribs of the same editor and saw a good deal of stuff that rang vague alarm bells ( this, for example), but nothing that I could verify to be problematic. If you happen to see any more bad edits from him/her, would you kindly let me know? Many thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram.
Having had no prior interaction with this user, I received a strange email from them this afternoon. Here is the full text:
Wikipedia <wiki@wikimedia.org> Unsubscribe 3:54 PM (3 hours ago) to SPECIFICO
Hello. I wanted to discuss with you a comment you made in an edit summary on the "Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory" article on August 22, 2021. You said "...when in fact they are unrelated to the Bidens..." which is extremely surprising since the title of the article actually says "Biden". Just by looking at the edit summary and not digging too deep into the article, I am questioning if you should continue to edit that article any further on Wikipedia. Trust me, I know how bad showing any political bias can be on Wikipedia. Heck, I fought admins tooth and nail and actually ended up having news articles put out about the big debate. But as a word of advice from an editor with less experience than you, but possibly more attention (Talking about the multiple news articles), try to keep your political bias out of editing and especially out of talk pages and edit summaries. It really does give a horrible vibe to others, even if it isn't indented.
This email was sent by user "Elijahandskip" on the English Wikipedia to user "SPECIFICO". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents.
The sender has not been given the recipient's email address, nor any information about the recipient's email account; and the recipient has no obligation to reply to this email or take any other action that might disclose their identity. If you respond, the sender will know your email address. For further information on privacy, security, and replying, as well as abuse and removal from emailing, see < /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Email>. To manage email preferences for user Elijahandskip please visit < /info/en/?search=Special:Mute/Elijahandskip>.
I replied that this should be raised on the article talk page rather than email. Then I looked at their user talk page and saw that they are topic-banned from this article, presumably leading to the use of email. I see that @ El C and Cullen328: and others have been inolved with this user's ban and subsequent violations of it. I'm just bringing this to your attention, in case you think any action is necessary. No need to respond, this is just FYI for you and those who've had some involvement with this editor. SPECIFICO talk 23:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram, I see you have proposed for deletion my new article about 02 003 and other class 02 shunters, I have made several big changes to 02 003 and I'm here to ask if that's enough in your mind to avoid deletion, if so I'll do the same modifications to the other 2 articles if not tell me what else I can add, Thank You
@ Fram:. You nominated Youth Institute of Technology for deletion. This is a physical computer training institute established by Government of Pakistan and Government of Punjab, Pakistan. While for a public Educational institution according to WP:NSCHOOL only WP:ORG and WP:GNG required. You can found this institute is listed on different government websites. While on the other hand, the previous version was different that was a private institute and established in 2017. But this institute is established in 2019 as a public institute by the local government. You can also check deletion log, (everybodywiki.com/Youth_Institute_of_Technology) everybodywiki and deletionpedia the previous version was created in 2018, owned by Youth Group Limited and Iftikhar Traders. I think this should stay on Wikipedia. BilalCheemaKhan ( talk) 09:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Underground Driving Motor 3701 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Note this nomnination also covers:
Thryduulf ( talk) 09:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Fram, please remove the messes you are adding to articles I have written, and remove the stuff you are putting on my talk page — Epipelagic ( talk) 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Since I mentioned you here regarding your work on the AC-template over-linking issue. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 11:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion, I'll have you know, I live near Kréintgeshaff, I've been there, it's labelled on the commune as a village, there is a regular school bus that serves just Kréintgeshaff and only Kréintgeshaff to provide the children who live there access to the public school in contern, it's adjacent to an indurstrial zone, it's notable, it's not just a farm N1TH Music ( talk) 16:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
I know the responsibility shouldn't be on you to move the process forwards, but thought I'd let you know that Bashereyre has explicitly announced departure, and since the ANI thread you started fizzled out, this leaves their 8000 creations in need of some kind of systematic review. Maybe we could do some sort of sample review of 100 creations to see exactly what problems we can expect at what frequencies. Not sure where the best venue is. — Bilorv ( talk) 23:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
- LouisAlain translated Kölnisches Stadtmuseum, - I had no time yet to check, It probably needs copy-editing and references, but I think it's a great gift. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Please clarify this reversion, and where else to put this noteworthy news. Deltaworkers ( talk) 16:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
he spells his name "Adrie" on his twitter, and it is spelled so on his dutch wikipedia page and in virtually all articles
Hello Fram, I'm working on splitting the German article on Vasari into one article on Vasari and a separate one on the Vite. Just like you some 14 years ago. With this edit, you soon changed the reflection of the original division (3 volumes, containing mostly biographies, those divided into 3 parts) into a 6-part division of the whole work. If you ask me, your 6-part division reflects neither the original division into 3 volumes nor the the original division of the biographies into 3 parts.
Your 6-part division has later been adopted in the German and other Wikipedia articles on the Vite or Vasari. Can you tell me, is there a reason why you introduced a 6-part division? Is there a source on which it is based? -- Lektor w ( talk) 08:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Art galleries disestablished in 2004 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
I feel like this explains a lot -- they were a Wikipedia editor for 5 months in 2020, now they seem to be only a Wikipedia-as-a-forum user. -- JBL ( talk) 11:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey User talk:Farm I saw your contribution you have very good experience about wiki draft reviewing and can make decision as per wiki guidelines. Could you check a draft if you have time. २ तकर पेप्सी ( talk) 21:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm inviting you to give feedback on a WP essay of mine about pearl-clutching. I've seen you participate at ANI and would like your thoughts on whether you support or oppose such an essay. No obligation to review it, but thank you for your time if you do. –– FormalDude talk 12:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
You might be interested in... :)
No such user ( talk) 08:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1960 establishments in the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your attention on this article. Can you expand on your rationale for draftifying this article? I notice in the comments you mention that he is best known for things for which the charges were dropped? From what I can tell, this is incorrect - he is best known for things for which he was never charged, since they are arguably not actually a crime in the UK. He is best known for confronting public officials in relation to the COVID19 pandemic which he believes is a hoax. That's not illegal, but it almost certainly is antisocial. -- Salimfadhley ( talk) 13:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
The sports link template is used on over 29000 athlete page see Template:Sports_links I don't no why you don't want it used on one specific athlete page. Yachty4000 22:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Fram! Is there anything I can do to assist? It looks like the whole thing is turning into a Sisyphean whack-a-mole. They're move-warring all over the place. Unfortunately, I am not a page mover, and I don't want to leave redirects that shouldn't be there in first place. – Austronesier ( talk) 19:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Why have you removed approx. 100 "Wikimedia list article" descriptions from articles? They should all be changed to "Wikipedia list article," not removed. Chicdat ( talk) 10:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1960 in the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Globally the sport is known as simply football, but obviously that would cause confusion with American Football. I can however refute anyone calling it Associate football, apart from Americans probably. Like i said when American football and Spherical-ball football are compared, the term "European football" is most prefered. Source 1 Source 2 Source 3
Yes i have also stumbled across Association Football countless times but the vast majority of the population arent aware of the term, including myself before. If soccer was put in brackets because it is used by the minority, then Associate Football is virtually unheard of in the Spherical-ball football world. This has already been raised in the page [ [1]]. However if there is still a disagreement then i think "Football (FIFA)" would be probably the most appropriate and better choice than Associate Football. Cheers -- LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 16:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a reason we still have clubs that start with AFC. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 19:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Fram: Hey, there. I wanted to let you know there is a discussion going about reopening the discussion you started on SNG:Sports talk page about the removal of Davis and Fed cup from the sports notability guidelines. I am inviting to share your opinion on why you started the removal discussion, in the first place, since there is Your input would be much appreciated. Best, Qwerty284651 ( talk) 00:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
I do not consider the work I am doing on titles of nobility to be "useless", when there is a singleton holder. Maybe you do. I think you should at least consider the set-index situation on a page such as Robinson baronets. There is a clear need to create set indices for these big aggregated pages. Typically up to 90% of the information on those pages is unreferenced.
The ontological situation is that the title is different from the person: often the title may exist for only a short part of a life. Charles Matthews ( talk) 10:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
At WP:SIA it says "The criteria for creating, adding to, or deleting a set index article should be the same as for a stand-alone list." At WP:SAL it says ( WP:CSC)
"Lists are commonly written to satisfy one of the following sets of criteria:
- Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own non- redirect article in the English Wikipedia."
On the face of it, there is an issue there, and so I'd think we're in the third case, Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group.
I actually don't think the argument is very strong here, that the title must be merged. Duplication of content seems to be regulated operationally, by WP:PAM, rather than by a guideline. In any case it is not a case of "so obviously necessary and appropriate that no one is expected to object", per WP:PAM.
Charles Matthews ( talk) 11:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
To be clear: I was unable to create a Wikidata item for the title. That was a temporary situation.
It seems to me that an AfD, therefore whether the title is a notable topic in itself, is not great for a topic that occurs in many reference works. Template:Infobox hereditary title has many fields. Charles Matthews ( talk) 11:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1588 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1612 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1616 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1781 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
Hello @ Fram:, I translate the pages on the Turkish Wikipedia site in accordance with En Wiki. I delete some parts when creating the page. It's not for advertising purposes, I don't have a connection with the person. Please make arrangements to help me.-- Alpdenizo ( talk) 13:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hii I'm star user I'm created this page it's a true page don't have any fake contents kindly remove the deletion tag and please give support this page Star user4 ( talk) 10:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
First, thanks for moving my page. I didn't know about the no subpages in mainspace. Just to be sure, as this is my first time making a subpage outside my own space, is there any question about it that I should know? Rules on what should, or should not be, in subpages? Gah4 ( talk) 10:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi ...I just uploadet at photo "Seated Woman# to the article: Elisa Maria Boglino , and I need help to Speedy Delete it as quick as possible , as all the text about copyright should not have been published. Could you please help me with this? HNBS ( talk) 21:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Hi...it is ok now HNBS ( talk) 22:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1618 establishments in Ukraine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
I was pleased to come across Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1078#User:Bashereyre. While I didn't realize the extent of his editing errors you pointed out, I remain astonished at the quantity of low-quality substubs of non-notable clergymen he created. It seems he single-handedly created 90% of Wikipedia's articles on priests, deans, and archdeacons, with a semi-closed ecosystem of lists, templates, and biographies on people often sourced only to chronologies, with no coverage of any substance, e.g. Joseph (Dean of Armagh) and Meiler a Búrc. There's certainly no guideline establishing automatic notability for these types of positions. Just wondering if you had any thoughts about somehow addressing these other than impossible one-by-one AFDs? Reywas92 Talk 04:50, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Fram, about the article The ewer with the head of a rooster, I like to inform you that I brought it from Wikipedia French, “ Aiguière à tête de coq”. My fault that I forgot to put the interlanguage ‘French’ tag on it and I’m not able to do that while the word draft is in the title. ّ May I ask if you could turn the title back to its original position so I can correct the tag. I appreciate your cooperation. Alex-h ( talk) 15:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, recently you nominated the school stub page Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Kaymkulam. As per WP:A7 the educational institutions are excluded. Awaiting the response. Onmyway22 talk 13:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, Fram. Thanks for showing interest in my articles. I see that in Elisabeth Glantzberg you added "Authority control (arts)|country=SV". I would be happy to use such details myself. Where can I find info about what can be added?-- Ipigott ( talk) 16:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your much better explanation on the talk page there. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 17:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Dear Fram. You recently left a couple of messages on my board and removed all the stubs I had just created to populate the article List of world records in life saving. Could you please be more specific when you say "before you create further articles, indicate how these (and similar ones) meet our notability guidelines". Where would be the appropriate place for me to have that conversation? I am struggling to understand how to move forward as I started the development of that page by first creating a well documented bio of one of the athletes who has extensive visibility and coverage on multiple fronts, but ended up being blocked because of my first hand knowledge of the subject and the page was demoted to draft with a violation warning. So I then moved on to create very short stubs of other world records holders who I do not know personally and with the aim of leaving other editors the responsibility of further development. As we know that didn't get approved either. I mean, there are sports that do not receive as much visibility as others, but that does not mean they don't deserve to be included in an encyclopedia. What is the right way for me to expand this very much underdeveloped topic? And if in the end we disagree on its merit, what are the procedures to include other editors in the conversation? Thanks Creiamo ( talk) 17:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! I appreciate the honesty of your response as well as the leads. It might be a lost crusade, but I strongly believe that Wikipedia should use its power to break this vicious cycle rather than feed it. In my view people perceive the governing body of any sport to be the most reliable source available so that should be enough to get the ball rolling... Creiamo ( talk) 00:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hoping you know an answer to a random question.
This article displays two short descs: a local en-WP one (Abandoned village in Panama
) and one oddly ungrammatical one pulled from text in Infobox Settlement (Depopulated in Colón, Panama
). I'm guessing the second of these is actually drawn from Wikidata, to which the Infobox seems linked. If so and given your Wikidata knowledge, would you know a way of disabling this second short desc without having to delete the infobox itself? If not no problems as I'll keep asking around elsewhere. --
Euryalus (
talk)
04:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Automatically generated descriptions within templates should set the second parameter as noreplace so they do not override any short descriptions specifically added to the transcluding article.(which Module:Settlement short description is doing). So I dunno what's going on here, at a glance. Not sure if any of @ Galobtter and Trialpears have time to check on this? ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 14:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This article displays two short descsthat's only because you're using custom styles that expose additional shortdescs. The system only recognises one shortdesc per article, which in this case would have been "Abandoned ..." (though I haven't checked) per what PR says. If that's the case, there is no issue. – SD0001 ( talk) 07:58, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Fram,
I see you tagged this page for deletion but it seems like content that is also contained in Murder of Chen Shijun if you wanted to review this article, too. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Template:Year in country category/old has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Only 6 teams participated in that edition. I am going to add squad details of other 2 teams. User_talk:Silverdragon3002
A tag has been placed on Category:1590s establishments in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1596 in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1870 in Gaelic games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Coming from this, you did a good job by nabbing the article in time, in my honest opinion I do not believe the article to be a genuine one, I may be wrong but that is my honest opinion. Thanks once more Fram. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to do a lot more of this kind of cleanup (or if you want to join me in my private, futile rage against royaltycruft editors from 6+ years ago) just check out all my contribs with edit summaries like "rem forum, blog, and image refs" and you'll find a shitload of now-unsourced sections in nobility biographies that could be removed. My favorite thing in the world is going through the "Titles and Honors" of modern holders of defunct-for-150-years fourth-tier princeships, manually replacing with {{CN}} all the Alamy and Pinterest pictures of the subject allegedly wearing some incestuous order as identified by royalty forum members that Mimich cited in 2012, reaching the end of a subsection, and realizing there are now no sources and I could've just placed {{unreferenced section}} instead... JoelleJay ( talk) 18:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
On 4 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Grand Jojo, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 07:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Years of the 16th century in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1590s in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram I just want to know why you are nominating my articles for deletion?? JJking56 ( talk) 12:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Can you help me on an issue I raised in ANI/SPI? Thanks. NewManila2000 ( talk) 14:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Cargo Connect should not be a redirect due to its relativity to the subject. The First Lego League Challenge page states hardly anything on the subject and should not be changed yearly due to the change of fll season. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MommaMia1231 ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Fram, I had some minor input into the Great Iran Flood and prematurely curated it through before you placed it in draft. In hindsight, I should have checked the mirrored source more carefully but the NY times ref had me sold. I had also done a quick google search before hitting review and had quite a few sources pop up. Anyway I've added a few additional sources in now and would like your opinion as to whether you think the article is ready for the mainspace now. Best Regards. Hughesdarren ( talk) 01:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Fram! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
19:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anouk Geurts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
StickyWicket ( talk) 11:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
I agree with you that there is information that should not have been on
Adan Santiago Goc-ong Igut and should not have been to the point that some of it required suppression. But
WP:G10 requires that it be [[entirely negative in tone and unsourced
and there clearly was information that was neutral and was sourced, if to imdb which is obviously not OK. But that doesn't, in my view, provide some G10 loophole for an entire page. I see
Liz has since deleted it as G4, which I'm going to presume was appropriate and why I commented that I hadn't considered any other CSD. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
17:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Alalch Emis ( talk) 20:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, you suggested some helpfull improvements to my articel, thanks for that. But there is no point in putting every articel written by me in to Draft-Space. The last articel Sajid Mir was so obvers relevant and meets all criteria of Wikipedia, that your attitude is very unproductiv. Please cool down. -- Outdoor-Bro ( talk) 12:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fram,
I am considering declining the... oops
I must admit that, knowingly at risk of WP:POINTY-ness, I was going to mention all the articles it could possibly be "what links here"-d to.
In its current shape, it's not ready for mainspace. Do think a better outcome all round would be WP:DRAFTIFY-ing?
What to you think? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Thankyou for nominating the article on Alice Walker (fencer) for deletion. The number of articles that we have on Olympians that do not meet our inclusion criteria that have existed since October 2021 is quite staggering. It also surprises me we have not seen more nominations on this matter, but it is probably best people double and triple check before moving forward. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
This page KANTO – National Agent Data was requested so I do not understand why you would immediately need to delete it. Deletion does not seem appropriate for the moment. This page is important giving additional background information to the Wikidata item KANTO (Q104089764) and the wikidata property KANTO ID (P8980) THere are links to pages providing addtional information which was not copied to Wikipedia. Saarik ( talk) 17:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
hi Fram, a kitten for the civility you (and others:)) showed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Walker (fencer).
Coolabahapple (
talk)
14:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello dear admin you asked speedy deletion for my first article. I Beg you to leave that and let me add what is allowed on wikipedia give me just one week please on knees Imcherokeedazz ( talk) 11:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello dear admin you asked speedy deletion for my first article. I Beg you to leave that and let me add what is allowed on wikipedia give me just one week please on knees Imcherokeedazz ( talk) 11:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram, how you doing? The article "List of abandoned properties in Hayden, Arizona" should not be in "Speedy Deletion" because the content in the Hayden, Arizona article was originally written by me. I have tried to include some of my images there, however a certain editor continued to remove them. That is why I wrote this article and used the information which I had created in the first place. Thank you and take care. Tony the Marine ( talk) 16:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
for catching my page in the wrong space. DGG ( talk ) 00:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Can you please justify your edit? Excellenc1 ( talk) 11:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Thankyou for your well thought out deletion nominations. Especially the one for Maxwell Burns. The fact that that article in particular ever existed shows me that Wikipedia has a real big problem with articles being created on people who were not even remotely close to being notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I have to admit that I am downright shocked the extent to which some editors are willing to go to save an article on a child who died before that age of 5. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hii..Greetings!! Recently i have made changes in articles as per you suggested. Now it's very simple to read and have removed extra write- up as per your suggestion. Please have a look. Please publish I made so much efforts and research. It's about a classic Newspaper. Thank you so much 2409:4040:E0A:A9B9:7735:6B55:3DE3:A317 ( talk) 17:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
I added some data & refs in the Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd, now it is qualify the notablity. I want u to remove deletion template from thata article. Success think ( talk) 19:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
I would advise (although I know full well that you may decide against taking my advice) against making any further edits to this page. I have several times been on the receiving end of this editor's goalpost-moving bludgeoning (twice having been taken to AfD) and whatever I say has come nowhere near persuading him that his first knee-jerk opinion was wrong, however good and however numerous the sources that I find. I'm amazed that such an incompetent editor has been allowed to continue for years. I think it's that he's so incompetent that nobody can understand what he is saying, but instead of admitting that people are pretending that they do understand and thinking that there's more than randomness in it. Phil Bridger ( talk) 17:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram. On the AN discussion, I have changed my statement to remove the “official” part of the 3RR rule being broken. Would you be willing to change your reply, “If you want to accuse people of "officially" and "unofficially" (???) breaking 3RR, you better provide evidence or retract your claims. Incorrect accusations only reflect badly on the accuser” as the statement being referred to has been altered. Thank you and have a good day! Elijahandskip ( talk) 18:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Just a quick fyi that you've misgendered that candidate, I would have fixed it for you but I didn't want to look all pointy. :) valereee ( talk) 10:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Fram - I do not have a 'copy' of the article to access. How can you make one available so that I can alter and copy paste it on our Researching the Life and Times of Robert Burns Club (N0.2262) Facebook site? A lot of work went into writing it. Rosser Gruffydd 11:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't want to drag our conversation at that RfA further off topic, so I hope you don't mind if I continue here. I'm all for high standards of fact checking for Main Page content; a question is whether that needs to be balanced with the wishes for sufficient throughput that are connected to having a nice editing game that encourages editors. There's also the question how to have a collegial atmosphere where people treat each other with kindness while still not allowing nonsense on the Main Page. Hooks of the form "Did you know that X was the first Y to do Z" are notorious for being easy to verify with "reliable" sources while still failing to be true (as your aviator example; really, people should have stopped to think and check), so they require people paying attention to detail who actually try to fact check instead of just providing a tick. Still, my feeling is that DYK standards have been improving in practice, and it might be helpful (and possible) to formally ask for higher quality articles and higher quality reviews. But I'm usually too optimistic in such matters (and I have no hard data to back up my observations other than "far fewer DYK articles get deleted as copyvios than in 2006", which isn't exactly a high standard). Do you have a suggestion how to improve things? — Kusma ( talk) 12:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram, I'm the creator of the article of American actor Steve Clark (actor), I now that you placed a tag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because you noticed that the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate. Just for you to now that the actor has 319 credits on his career, also in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Clark (actor) John Pack Lambert ( talk) said that it shoud be deleted because it lacked of reliable sources providing signifant coverage with Find-a-grave and IMDb sources not been reliable, it should be noted that I put them only as temporary sources until I found more reliable, which I already did and I already replaced the Find-a-grave and IMDb sources with more reliable sources that proves a signifant coverage. It should also be noted that this article is still under construction and I'm also fixing some other minor problems. I already write my reasons and my proofs of why this article should not be deleted on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Clark (actor) to which you haven't closed yet, so would it be possible please that you to close the discussion and remove the Speedy deletion nomination tag from the article? Latyelcop ( talk) 10:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Please find a way to be more agreeable at XRV. Your ultra-hostile approach is doing a lot to kill that board (remember the last time you were there?). Seriously, I know this is something a lot of people have asked you before, and I'm going to ask you again. You are very good at spotting problems. Please find a way to raise problems without setting everything around you on fire. Take a class or read a book on communication or just ask someone you know and whose opinion you value for some advice. Because it really, really does harm when the temperature is always set to boil. Levivich 14:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello dear Fram,
I figured out that you moved the page (Dutch architects projects in Education category), so i have started to categorize the dutch architects according to their projects in Education design and i would like to submit this . i noticed that even i need to change the title name. may you please help me to improve the content ?how and what should i add or which title can be suitabe ?thank you in advnace.
Amir.mansour1370 ( talk) 12:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Medaillon and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Medaillon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. PoundTales ( talk) 14:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram. Regarding this MfD, associated with [[ this AfD, I hope I was not too annoying and can be forgiven given that the right outcome was reached soon enough. As someone mentioned, there is a history of namespace page moves to allow a choice of XfD making trouble. I think it is important to keep certain processes, XfD and draftifications working right (“working right” is open for debate), and apologise if taking this line was a frustration. I wanted to note that I agree that BLPCRIME is important, and that had’ve your MfD nomination not been preceded by the namespace move, the rationale would have been good for me for deletion from draftspace. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 11:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Why should Timeline of Watertown, New York get deleted if Timeline of Briarcliff Manor is just fine despite being 4 times smaller? Lallint⟫⟫⟫ Talk 15:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Note that http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/yard/yf854.htm is a direct copy of the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships - - see also https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/l/littlehales-ii.html. Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Posting public domain text as if they are their own words is still a clear no-go of course. I see on their talk page quite a few earlier warnings both for copyvio and for copying without attribution... Fram ( talk) 18:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
It looks like there's a problem with copyvios.toolforge.org. For example, League of Free Youth currently gives me Violation Unlikely 0.0%. Assuming good faith that the tagging is correct, this implies the tool is broken. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1957 establishments in Swaziland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Greetings Fram, issues have been raised regarding Church of Our Lady of Zvonik. I was informed recently that I needed to attributed to the section used from the larger article and embed it within the text so this was not willful noncompliance. I had just not got round to it being a full-time educator. I will add however that it is not bizarre that I used a section from Trpimir I of Croatia in the article as he authorised a charter, that documents his decision to build a church and the first Benedictine monastery in Rižinice, between the towns of Klis and Solin... Solin is near Split and the section was in reference to a bishop being appointed to oversee churches in Split, like St. Martins. Since then, I have expanded the section because right now editing Wikipedia is the most vital thing anyone can do (insert sarcasm). Therefore can you please reinstate the page? I never look for phrase or support on this platform (hell knows I never do) but having long term health issues it would be nice not to just be treated like moron or retard every time I make a mistake, if I did that in my professional capacity I would be sacked! and rightly so! I do think administrators and senior editors need to recognise that not everyone is familiar with every rule, bylaw and convention on this platform and a bit of understanding would not go amiss. Thank you. The Emperor of Byzantium ( talk) 12:09, 27 Feb 2022 (UTC)
I got your talk page message. I actually don't remember making that edit. As a matter of fact, I do not even remember visiting that page. I am very familiar with WP:DRAFTNOCAT, and I know for a fact that your edits were constructive. I must have misclicked something on Redwarn without realizing it. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 11:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Fram,
Do you remember this editor? Well, I just ran into a new account, TableSalt43. But they are not in any way similar, totally different editing interests. Do you think this was just an unfortunate username choice? Liz Read! Talk! 02:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
I declined the G12 on HMS Petunia (K79) (after trimming further the account of the ship's loss) as there is enough free-content left on the page after the copyvio stuff has been excised as to still be worth preserving - I have also left a note on the article talk page to attribute the stuff copied from Flower-class corvette. Whether it needs some revdel of the history is a different question. Of more concern are that this does not appear to be an isolated page - is this CCI territory? Nigel Ish ( talk) 16:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fram, you might wish to take a look at WP:ANI#Unprofessional behaviour.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
I was searching about some industrial projects in India in internet and later I got this. I found it very interesting and attractive so I though to make a page on it. But couldn't find more information I don't know that is this a real company or fraud company. Please tell now what to do. - Thank You User:BangsMetala — Preceding undated comment added 15:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Should Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case say "autopatrolled tight" instead of "Right"? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 02:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
that was awkward... Didn't even think to check the provenance of it. Early diffs of the other page might need RD1, but I can deal with that. Primefac ( talk) 09:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Have you considered writing an essay summing up the kinds of cleanup you find yourself doing around issues of Wikidata in (English) Wikipedia? I see that more than one section of this talk page has to do with that, and I think it could be helpful for editors who contribute to one or both projects. Arlo James Barnes 17:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Fram, I'm JosetheTenderEngine, creator of page 1959-60 Cornwall Combination , and because you put it to deletion, quickly deleting is not cool, since it's hard to find information about this tournament other than Cornwallcomboleague, just because the article is incomplete, tournaments as this only has this site I mentioned to find, I thought about putting an image, but as images of this tournament are hard to find, I won't put images, what I suffered to do because I did it 3 times in a row I couldn't.I've done other pages like 1939-40 Serie da Galicia and 2016-17 División de Honor, even though they're already complete. Jose the Tender Engine ( talk) 22:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm dropping by on behalf of Parsedan who left a concerned message on my talk page about a page he recently created ( Jeanne II d'Albret) being removed and redirected without any discussion or even alerting the author of the page. I don't claim to be an expert in notability guidelines, but I was concerned because the editor is clearly acting in good faith, has a solid track record, and is genuinely concerned about the correct way to voice his opinion without causing strife. Despite that, their article was removed without any consensus or even a heads-up, with the only explanation given for the removal being an edit summary. Anyways, I wanted to give you a heads up that I'm going to start a discussion at Arthur III, Duke of Brittany. Even if the article isn't notable, I feel like the author deserves an explanation as to why; even speedy deletion nominations give an alert to the editor and can be contested. Thanks, Fritzmann ( message me) 03:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{ ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
Happy template editing! Primefac ( talk) 10:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Although it is very odd, in the WP:WPNAMES space, it seems people rely on articles that in other spaces would not be considered WP:RS. I saw your edit at Charleston (name). I understand full well what RS is about. However, researching names seems to be a different science. Is it reasonable that in certain fields standards could be different.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
I request that you voluntarily and speedily withdraw Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States federal judges who died in active service. It is premised on a factual error, and one that is dispelled by a source in the article. If you will not withdraw the nomination, please withdraw the factually incorrect claim that this is a "fairly common occurrence", or provide a source supporting your claim, since it is currently counterfactual to a source that has now been provided. BD2412 T 08:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, im Jose the Engine(the old Jose the Tender Engine)i need to make more wrc rally articles, the Tour de Corse work,i need to focus on pages that will be relevant (I need to stop with regional championship articles because I realized it doesn't work) well, I have to stop with articles from regional division seasons, (I realized that deleting less relevant article makes sense) Jose the Engine ( talk) 22:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
I have noticed that you have removed {{ Charles}} when you remove references. I don't think this makes sense, but am open to your explanation.- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
This is not a contest towards the deletion, however I was wondering if my recent edits of adding the sources of le Parisien and le Monde would be sufficient to remove the deletion contest for Berceuses (radio station.
Thanks! Pohjamadesse1 ( talk) 11:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Museums disestablished in 1855 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Template:BLP unsourced has been nominated for merging with Template:Unreferenced. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 21:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Crooked Cop Air and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 5#Crooked Cop Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for bringing this article to articles for deletion. It led to improvements on the page that may not have happened otherwise. Vahvistus ( talk) 19:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for bringing this article to articles for deletion. It led to improvements on the page that may not have happened otherwise. Vahvistus ( talk) 19:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello you posted this into drafts and said something about the population being for the county. But I got the info from Census here [5]. It is the population for the area. What else needs to be done to bring this live? Turnoffthat ( talk) 09:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
I was going to add in more infomation about the flags because these lists needs a revamp. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 14:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 |
Hi, Fram! I created the page Dorea Academy, a school where my family goes to. It has it's address is available in Google Maps and it's social media account existing online. I wish to have the page for other people to know about the school's existence. ( talk)
Thanks much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilbert22ph ( talk • contribs) 08:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Farm! I created a page for Masjid 99 Kubah Makassar, which is a mosque, public place for Muslim worship. It has already been branded as a new landmark for city of Makassar for its unique architecture. But that article is deleted within an hour without being discussed! thanks, Reza ( talk)
Hi, Fram! Thanks for noticing the copyvio problem at Seaway 25. I had a look at other contribs of the same editor and saw a good deal of stuff that rang vague alarm bells ( this, for example), but nothing that I could verify to be problematic. If you happen to see any more bad edits from him/her, would you kindly let me know? Many thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram.
Having had no prior interaction with this user, I received a strange email from them this afternoon. Here is the full text:
Wikipedia <wiki@wikimedia.org> Unsubscribe 3:54 PM (3 hours ago) to SPECIFICO
Hello. I wanted to discuss with you a comment you made in an edit summary on the "Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory" article on August 22, 2021. You said "...when in fact they are unrelated to the Bidens..." which is extremely surprising since the title of the article actually says "Biden". Just by looking at the edit summary and not digging too deep into the article, I am questioning if you should continue to edit that article any further on Wikipedia. Trust me, I know how bad showing any political bias can be on Wikipedia. Heck, I fought admins tooth and nail and actually ended up having news articles put out about the big debate. But as a word of advice from an editor with less experience than you, but possibly more attention (Talking about the multiple news articles), try to keep your political bias out of editing and especially out of talk pages and edit summaries. It really does give a horrible vibe to others, even if it isn't indented.
This email was sent by user "Elijahandskip" on the English Wikipedia to user "SPECIFICO". It has been automatically delivered and the Wikimedia Foundation cannot be held responsible for its contents.
The sender has not been given the recipient's email address, nor any information about the recipient's email account; and the recipient has no obligation to reply to this email or take any other action that might disclose their identity. If you respond, the sender will know your email address. For further information on privacy, security, and replying, as well as abuse and removal from emailing, see < /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Email>. To manage email preferences for user Elijahandskip please visit < /info/en/?search=Special:Mute/Elijahandskip>.
I replied that this should be raised on the article talk page rather than email. Then I looked at their user talk page and saw that they are topic-banned from this article, presumably leading to the use of email. I see that @ El C and Cullen328: and others have been inolved with this user's ban and subsequent violations of it. I'm just bringing this to your attention, in case you think any action is necessary. No need to respond, this is just FYI for you and those who've had some involvement with this editor. SPECIFICO talk 23:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram, I see you have proposed for deletion my new article about 02 003 and other class 02 shunters, I have made several big changes to 02 003 and I'm here to ask if that's enough in your mind to avoid deletion, if so I'll do the same modifications to the other 2 articles if not tell me what else I can add, Thank You
@ Fram:. You nominated Youth Institute of Technology for deletion. This is a physical computer training institute established by Government of Pakistan and Government of Punjab, Pakistan. While for a public Educational institution according to WP:NSCHOOL only WP:ORG and WP:GNG required. You can found this institute is listed on different government websites. While on the other hand, the previous version was different that was a private institute and established in 2017. But this institute is established in 2019 as a public institute by the local government. You can also check deletion log, (everybodywiki.com/Youth_Institute_of_Technology) everybodywiki and deletionpedia the previous version was created in 2018, owned by Youth Group Limited and Iftikhar Traders. I think this should stay on Wikipedia. BilalCheemaKhan ( talk) 09:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Underground Driving Motor 3701 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Note this nomnination also covers:
Thryduulf ( talk) 09:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Fram, please remove the messes you are adding to articles I have written, and remove the stuff you are putting on my talk page — Epipelagic ( talk) 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Since I mentioned you here regarding your work on the AC-template over-linking issue. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 11:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion, I'll have you know, I live near Kréintgeshaff, I've been there, it's labelled on the commune as a village, there is a regular school bus that serves just Kréintgeshaff and only Kréintgeshaff to provide the children who live there access to the public school in contern, it's adjacent to an indurstrial zone, it's notable, it's not just a farm N1TH Music ( talk) 16:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
I know the responsibility shouldn't be on you to move the process forwards, but thought I'd let you know that Bashereyre has explicitly announced departure, and since the ANI thread you started fizzled out, this leaves their 8000 creations in need of some kind of systematic review. Maybe we could do some sort of sample review of 100 creations to see exactly what problems we can expect at what frequencies. Not sure where the best venue is. — Bilorv ( talk) 23:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
- LouisAlain translated Kölnisches Stadtmuseum, - I had no time yet to check, It probably needs copy-editing and references, but I think it's a great gift. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Please clarify this reversion, and where else to put this noteworthy news. Deltaworkers ( talk) 16:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
he spells his name "Adrie" on his twitter, and it is spelled so on his dutch wikipedia page and in virtually all articles
Hello Fram, I'm working on splitting the German article on Vasari into one article on Vasari and a separate one on the Vite. Just like you some 14 years ago. With this edit, you soon changed the reflection of the original division (3 volumes, containing mostly biographies, those divided into 3 parts) into a 6-part division of the whole work. If you ask me, your 6-part division reflects neither the original division into 3 volumes nor the the original division of the biographies into 3 parts.
Your 6-part division has later been adopted in the German and other Wikipedia articles on the Vite or Vasari. Can you tell me, is there a reason why you introduced a 6-part division? Is there a source on which it is based? -- Lektor w ( talk) 08:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Art galleries disestablished in 2004 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
I feel like this explains a lot -- they were a Wikipedia editor for 5 months in 2020, now they seem to be only a Wikipedia-as-a-forum user. -- JBL ( talk) 11:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Hey User talk:Farm I saw your contribution you have very good experience about wiki draft reviewing and can make decision as per wiki guidelines. Could you check a draft if you have time. २ तकर पेप्सी ( talk) 21:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm inviting you to give feedback on a WP essay of mine about pearl-clutching. I've seen you participate at ANI and would like your thoughts on whether you support or oppose such an essay. No obligation to review it, but thank you for your time if you do. –– FormalDude talk 12:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
You might be interested in... :)
No such user ( talk) 08:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1960 establishments in the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your attention on this article. Can you expand on your rationale for draftifying this article? I notice in the comments you mention that he is best known for things for which the charges were dropped? From what I can tell, this is incorrect - he is best known for things for which he was never charged, since they are arguably not actually a crime in the UK. He is best known for confronting public officials in relation to the COVID19 pandemic which he believes is a hoax. That's not illegal, but it almost certainly is antisocial. -- Salimfadhley ( talk) 13:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
The sports link template is used on over 29000 athlete page see Template:Sports_links I don't no why you don't want it used on one specific athlete page. Yachty4000 22:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Fram! Is there anything I can do to assist? It looks like the whole thing is turning into a Sisyphean whack-a-mole. They're move-warring all over the place. Unfortunately, I am not a page mover, and I don't want to leave redirects that shouldn't be there in first place. – Austronesier ( talk) 19:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Why have you removed approx. 100 "Wikimedia list article" descriptions from articles? They should all be changed to "Wikipedia list article," not removed. Chicdat ( talk) 10:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1960 in the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Globally the sport is known as simply football, but obviously that would cause confusion with American Football. I can however refute anyone calling it Associate football, apart from Americans probably. Like i said when American football and Spherical-ball football are compared, the term "European football" is most prefered. Source 1 Source 2 Source 3
Yes i have also stumbled across Association Football countless times but the vast majority of the population arent aware of the term, including myself before. If soccer was put in brackets because it is used by the minority, then Associate Football is virtually unheard of in the Spherical-ball football world. This has already been raised in the page [ [1]]. However if there is still a disagreement then i think "Football (FIFA)" would be probably the most appropriate and better choice than Associate Football. Cheers -- LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 16:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
There is a reason we still have clubs that start with AFC. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 19:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Fram: Hey, there. I wanted to let you know there is a discussion going about reopening the discussion you started on SNG:Sports talk page about the removal of Davis and Fed cup from the sports notability guidelines. I am inviting to share your opinion on why you started the removal discussion, in the first place, since there is Your input would be much appreciated. Best, Qwerty284651 ( talk) 00:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
I do not consider the work I am doing on titles of nobility to be "useless", when there is a singleton holder. Maybe you do. I think you should at least consider the set-index situation on a page such as Robinson baronets. There is a clear need to create set indices for these big aggregated pages. Typically up to 90% of the information on those pages is unreferenced.
The ontological situation is that the title is different from the person: often the title may exist for only a short part of a life. Charles Matthews ( talk) 10:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
At WP:SIA it says "The criteria for creating, adding to, or deleting a set index article should be the same as for a stand-alone list." At WP:SAL it says ( WP:CSC)
"Lists are commonly written to satisfy one of the following sets of criteria:
- Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own non- redirect article in the English Wikipedia."
On the face of it, there is an issue there, and so I'd think we're in the third case, Short, complete lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group.
I actually don't think the argument is very strong here, that the title must be merged. Duplication of content seems to be regulated operationally, by WP:PAM, rather than by a guideline. In any case it is not a case of "so obviously necessary and appropriate that no one is expected to object", per WP:PAM.
Charles Matthews ( talk) 11:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
To be clear: I was unable to create a Wikidata item for the title. That was a temporary situation.
It seems to me that an AfD, therefore whether the title is a notable topic in itself, is not great for a topic that occurs in many reference works. Template:Infobox hereditary title has many fields. Charles Matthews ( talk) 11:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1588 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1612 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1616 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1781 in Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 17:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
Hello @ Fram:, I translate the pages on the Turkish Wikipedia site in accordance with En Wiki. I delete some parts when creating the page. It's not for advertising purposes, I don't have a connection with the person. Please make arrangements to help me.-- Alpdenizo ( talk) 13:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Hii I'm star user I'm created this page it's a true page don't have any fake contents kindly remove the deletion tag and please give support this page Star user4 ( talk) 10:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
First, thanks for moving my page. I didn't know about the no subpages in mainspace. Just to be sure, as this is my first time making a subpage outside my own space, is there any question about it that I should know? Rules on what should, or should not be, in subpages? Gah4 ( talk) 10:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi ...I just uploadet at photo "Seated Woman# to the article: Elisa Maria Boglino , and I need help to Speedy Delete it as quick as possible , as all the text about copyright should not have been published. Could you please help me with this? HNBS ( talk) 21:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Hi...it is ok now HNBS ( talk) 22:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1618 establishments in Ukraine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
I was pleased to come across Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1078#User:Bashereyre. While I didn't realize the extent of his editing errors you pointed out, I remain astonished at the quantity of low-quality substubs of non-notable clergymen he created. It seems he single-handedly created 90% of Wikipedia's articles on priests, deans, and archdeacons, with a semi-closed ecosystem of lists, templates, and biographies on people often sourced only to chronologies, with no coverage of any substance, e.g. Joseph (Dean of Armagh) and Meiler a Búrc. There's certainly no guideline establishing automatic notability for these types of positions. Just wondering if you had any thoughts about somehow addressing these other than impossible one-by-one AFDs? Reywas92 Talk 04:50, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Fram, about the article The ewer with the head of a rooster, I like to inform you that I brought it from Wikipedia French, “ Aiguière à tête de coq”. My fault that I forgot to put the interlanguage ‘French’ tag on it and I’m not able to do that while the word draft is in the title. ّ May I ask if you could turn the title back to its original position so I can correct the tag. I appreciate your cooperation. Alex-h ( talk) 15:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, recently you nominated the school stub page Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Kaymkulam. As per WP:A7 the educational institutions are excluded. Awaiting the response. Onmyway22 talk 13:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, Fram. Thanks for showing interest in my articles. I see that in Elisabeth Glantzberg you added "Authority control (arts)|country=SV". I would be happy to use such details myself. Where can I find info about what can be added?-- Ipigott ( talk) 16:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your much better explanation on the talk page there. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 17:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Dear Fram. You recently left a couple of messages on my board and removed all the stubs I had just created to populate the article List of world records in life saving. Could you please be more specific when you say "before you create further articles, indicate how these (and similar ones) meet our notability guidelines". Where would be the appropriate place for me to have that conversation? I am struggling to understand how to move forward as I started the development of that page by first creating a well documented bio of one of the athletes who has extensive visibility and coverage on multiple fronts, but ended up being blocked because of my first hand knowledge of the subject and the page was demoted to draft with a violation warning. So I then moved on to create very short stubs of other world records holders who I do not know personally and with the aim of leaving other editors the responsibility of further development. As we know that didn't get approved either. I mean, there are sports that do not receive as much visibility as others, but that does not mean they don't deserve to be included in an encyclopedia. What is the right way for me to expand this very much underdeveloped topic? And if in the end we disagree on its merit, what are the procedures to include other editors in the conversation? Thanks Creiamo ( talk) 17:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! I appreciate the honesty of your response as well as the leads. It might be a lost crusade, but I strongly believe that Wikipedia should use its power to break this vicious cycle rather than feed it. In my view people perceive the governing body of any sport to be the most reliable source available so that should be enough to get the ball rolling... Creiamo ( talk) 00:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hoping you know an answer to a random question.
This article displays two short descs: a local en-WP one (Abandoned village in Panama
) and one oddly ungrammatical one pulled from text in Infobox Settlement (Depopulated in Colón, Panama
). I'm guessing the second of these is actually drawn from Wikidata, to which the Infobox seems linked. If so and given your Wikidata knowledge, would you know a way of disabling this second short desc without having to delete the infobox itself? If not no problems as I'll keep asking around elsewhere. --
Euryalus (
talk)
04:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Automatically generated descriptions within templates should set the second parameter as noreplace so they do not override any short descriptions specifically added to the transcluding article.(which Module:Settlement short description is doing). So I dunno what's going on here, at a glance. Not sure if any of @ Galobtter and Trialpears have time to check on this? ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 14:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This article displays two short descsthat's only because you're using custom styles that expose additional shortdescs. The system only recognises one shortdesc per article, which in this case would have been "Abandoned ..." (though I haven't checked) per what PR says. If that's the case, there is no issue. – SD0001 ( talk) 07:58, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Fram,
I see you tagged this page for deletion but it seems like content that is also contained in Murder of Chen Shijun if you wanted to review this article, too. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Template:Year in country category/old has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Only 6 teams participated in that edition. I am going to add squad details of other 2 teams. User_talk:Silverdragon3002
A tag has been placed on Category:1590s establishments in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1596 in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1870 in Gaelic games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Coming from this, you did a good job by nabbing the article in time, in my honest opinion I do not believe the article to be a genuine one, I may be wrong but that is my honest opinion. Thanks once more Fram. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to do a lot more of this kind of cleanup (or if you want to join me in my private, futile rage against royaltycruft editors from 6+ years ago) just check out all my contribs with edit summaries like "rem forum, blog, and image refs" and you'll find a shitload of now-unsourced sections in nobility biographies that could be removed. My favorite thing in the world is going through the "Titles and Honors" of modern holders of defunct-for-150-years fourth-tier princeships, manually replacing with {{CN}} all the Alamy and Pinterest pictures of the subject allegedly wearing some incestuous order as identified by royalty forum members that Mimich cited in 2012, reaching the end of a subsection, and realizing there are now no sources and I could've just placed {{unreferenced section}} instead... JoelleJay ( talk) 18:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
On 4 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Grand Jojo, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 07:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Years of the 16th century in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1590s in Switzerland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Fram I just want to know why you are nominating my articles for deletion?? JJking56 ( talk) 12:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Can you help me on an issue I raised in ANI/SPI? Thanks. NewManila2000 ( talk) 14:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Cargo Connect should not be a redirect due to its relativity to the subject. The First Lego League Challenge page states hardly anything on the subject and should not be changed yearly due to the change of fll season. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MommaMia1231 ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Fram, I had some minor input into the Great Iran Flood and prematurely curated it through before you placed it in draft. In hindsight, I should have checked the mirrored source more carefully but the NY times ref had me sold. I had also done a quick google search before hitting review and had quite a few sources pop up. Anyway I've added a few additional sources in now and would like your opinion as to whether you think the article is ready for the mainspace now. Best Regards. Hughesdarren ( talk) 01:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Fram! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
19:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anouk Geurts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
StickyWicket ( talk) 11:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
I agree with you that there is information that should not have been on
Adan Santiago Goc-ong Igut and should not have been to the point that some of it required suppression. But
WP:G10 requires that it be [[entirely negative in tone and unsourced
and there clearly was information that was neutral and was sourced, if to imdb which is obviously not OK. But that doesn't, in my view, provide some G10 loophole for an entire page. I see
Liz has since deleted it as G4, which I'm going to presume was appropriate and why I commented that I hadn't considered any other CSD. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
17:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Alalch Emis ( talk) 20:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, you suggested some helpfull improvements to my articel, thanks for that. But there is no point in putting every articel written by me in to Draft-Space. The last articel Sajid Mir was so obvers relevant and meets all criteria of Wikipedia, that your attitude is very unproductiv. Please cool down. -- Outdoor-Bro ( talk) 12:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fram,
I am considering declining the... oops
I must admit that, knowingly at risk of WP:POINTY-ness, I was going to mention all the articles it could possibly be "what links here"-d to.
In its current shape, it's not ready for mainspace. Do think a better outcome all round would be WP:DRAFTIFY-ing?
What to you think? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Thankyou for nominating the article on Alice Walker (fencer) for deletion. The number of articles that we have on Olympians that do not meet our inclusion criteria that have existed since October 2021 is quite staggering. It also surprises me we have not seen more nominations on this matter, but it is probably best people double and triple check before moving forward. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
This page KANTO – National Agent Data was requested so I do not understand why you would immediately need to delete it. Deletion does not seem appropriate for the moment. This page is important giving additional background information to the Wikidata item KANTO (Q104089764) and the wikidata property KANTO ID (P8980) THere are links to pages providing addtional information which was not copied to Wikipedia. Saarik ( talk) 17:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
hi Fram, a kitten for the civility you (and others:)) showed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Walker (fencer).
Coolabahapple (
talk)
14:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello dear admin you asked speedy deletion for my first article. I Beg you to leave that and let me add what is allowed on wikipedia give me just one week please on knees Imcherokeedazz ( talk) 11:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello dear admin you asked speedy deletion for my first article. I Beg you to leave that and let me add what is allowed on wikipedia give me just one week please on knees Imcherokeedazz ( talk) 11:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram, how you doing? The article "List of abandoned properties in Hayden, Arizona" should not be in "Speedy Deletion" because the content in the Hayden, Arizona article was originally written by me. I have tried to include some of my images there, however a certain editor continued to remove them. That is why I wrote this article and used the information which I had created in the first place. Thank you and take care. Tony the Marine ( talk) 16:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
for catching my page in the wrong space. DGG ( talk ) 00:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Can you please justify your edit? Excellenc1 ( talk) 11:17, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Thankyou for your well thought out deletion nominations. Especially the one for Maxwell Burns. The fact that that article in particular ever existed shows me that Wikipedia has a real big problem with articles being created on people who were not even remotely close to being notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
I have to admit that I am downright shocked the extent to which some editors are willing to go to save an article on a child who died before that age of 5. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hii..Greetings!! Recently i have made changes in articles as per you suggested. Now it's very simple to read and have removed extra write- up as per your suggestion. Please have a look. Please publish I made so much efforts and research. It's about a classic Newspaper. Thank you so much 2409:4040:E0A:A9B9:7735:6B55:3DE3:A317 ( talk) 17:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
I added some data & refs in the Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd, now it is qualify the notablity. I want u to remove deletion template from thata article. Success think ( talk) 19:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
I would advise (although I know full well that you may decide against taking my advice) against making any further edits to this page. I have several times been on the receiving end of this editor's goalpost-moving bludgeoning (twice having been taken to AfD) and whatever I say has come nowhere near persuading him that his first knee-jerk opinion was wrong, however good and however numerous the sources that I find. I'm amazed that such an incompetent editor has been allowed to continue for years. I think it's that he's so incompetent that nobody can understand what he is saying, but instead of admitting that people are pretending that they do understand and thinking that there's more than randomness in it. Phil Bridger ( talk) 17:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram. On the AN discussion, I have changed my statement to remove the “official” part of the 3RR rule being broken. Would you be willing to change your reply, “If you want to accuse people of "officially" and "unofficially" (???) breaking 3RR, you better provide evidence or retract your claims. Incorrect accusations only reflect badly on the accuser” as the statement being referred to has been altered. Thank you and have a good day! Elijahandskip ( talk) 18:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Just a quick fyi that you've misgendered that candidate, I would have fixed it for you but I didn't want to look all pointy. :) valereee ( talk) 10:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Fram - I do not have a 'copy' of the article to access. How can you make one available so that I can alter and copy paste it on our Researching the Life and Times of Robert Burns Club (N0.2262) Facebook site? A lot of work went into writing it. Rosser Gruffydd 11:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't want to drag our conversation at that RfA further off topic, so I hope you don't mind if I continue here. I'm all for high standards of fact checking for Main Page content; a question is whether that needs to be balanced with the wishes for sufficient throughput that are connected to having a nice editing game that encourages editors. There's also the question how to have a collegial atmosphere where people treat each other with kindness while still not allowing nonsense on the Main Page. Hooks of the form "Did you know that X was the first Y to do Z" are notorious for being easy to verify with "reliable" sources while still failing to be true (as your aviator example; really, people should have stopped to think and check), so they require people paying attention to detail who actually try to fact check instead of just providing a tick. Still, my feeling is that DYK standards have been improving in practice, and it might be helpful (and possible) to formally ask for higher quality articles and higher quality reviews. But I'm usually too optimistic in such matters (and I have no hard data to back up my observations other than "far fewer DYK articles get deleted as copyvios than in 2006", which isn't exactly a high standard). Do you have a suggestion how to improve things? — Kusma ( talk) 12:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram, I'm the creator of the article of American actor Steve Clark (actor), I now that you placed a tag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because you noticed that the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate. Just for you to now that the actor has 319 credits on his career, also in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Clark (actor) John Pack Lambert ( talk) said that it shoud be deleted because it lacked of reliable sources providing signifant coverage with Find-a-grave and IMDb sources not been reliable, it should be noted that I put them only as temporary sources until I found more reliable, which I already did and I already replaced the Find-a-grave and IMDb sources with more reliable sources that proves a signifant coverage. It should also be noted that this article is still under construction and I'm also fixing some other minor problems. I already write my reasons and my proofs of why this article should not be deleted on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Clark (actor) to which you haven't closed yet, so would it be possible please that you to close the discussion and remove the Speedy deletion nomination tag from the article? Latyelcop ( talk) 10:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Please find a way to be more agreeable at XRV. Your ultra-hostile approach is doing a lot to kill that board (remember the last time you were there?). Seriously, I know this is something a lot of people have asked you before, and I'm going to ask you again. You are very good at spotting problems. Please find a way to raise problems without setting everything around you on fire. Take a class or read a book on communication or just ask someone you know and whose opinion you value for some advice. Because it really, really does harm when the temperature is always set to boil. Levivich 14:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello dear Fram,
I figured out that you moved the page (Dutch architects projects in Education category), so i have started to categorize the dutch architects according to their projects in Education design and i would like to submit this . i noticed that even i need to change the title name. may you please help me to improve the content ?how and what should i add or which title can be suitabe ?thank you in advnace.
Amir.mansour1370 ( talk) 12:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Medaillon and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Medaillon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. PoundTales ( talk) 14:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fram. Regarding this MfD, associated with [[ this AfD, I hope I was not too annoying and can be forgiven given that the right outcome was reached soon enough. As someone mentioned, there is a history of namespace page moves to allow a choice of XfD making trouble. I think it is important to keep certain processes, XfD and draftifications working right (“working right” is open for debate), and apologise if taking this line was a frustration. I wanted to note that I agree that BLPCRIME is important, and that had’ve your MfD nomination not been preceded by the namespace move, the rationale would have been good for me for deletion from draftspace. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 11:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Why should Timeline of Watertown, New York get deleted if Timeline of Briarcliff Manor is just fine despite being 4 times smaller? Lallint⟫⟫⟫ Talk 15:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Note that http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/yard/yf854.htm is a direct copy of the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships - - see also https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/danfs/l/littlehales-ii.html. Nigel Ish ( talk) 18:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Posting public domain text as if they are their own words is still a clear no-go of course. I see on their talk page quite a few earlier warnings both for copyvio and for copying without attribution... Fram ( talk) 18:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
It looks like there's a problem with copyvios.toolforge.org. For example, League of Free Youth currently gives me Violation Unlikely 0.0%. Assuming good faith that the tagging is correct, this implies the tool is broken. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:1957 establishments in Swaziland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Greetings Fram, issues have been raised regarding Church of Our Lady of Zvonik. I was informed recently that I needed to attributed to the section used from the larger article and embed it within the text so this was not willful noncompliance. I had just not got round to it being a full-time educator. I will add however that it is not bizarre that I used a section from Trpimir I of Croatia in the article as he authorised a charter, that documents his decision to build a church and the first Benedictine monastery in Rižinice, between the towns of Klis and Solin... Solin is near Split and the section was in reference to a bishop being appointed to oversee churches in Split, like St. Martins. Since then, I have expanded the section because right now editing Wikipedia is the most vital thing anyone can do (insert sarcasm). Therefore can you please reinstate the page? I never look for phrase or support on this platform (hell knows I never do) but having long term health issues it would be nice not to just be treated like moron or retard every time I make a mistake, if I did that in my professional capacity I would be sacked! and rightly so! I do think administrators and senior editors need to recognise that not everyone is familiar with every rule, bylaw and convention on this platform and a bit of understanding would not go amiss. Thank you. The Emperor of Byzantium ( talk) 12:09, 27 Feb 2022 (UTC)
I got your talk page message. I actually don't remember making that edit. As a matter of fact, I do not even remember visiting that page. I am very familiar with WP:DRAFTNOCAT, and I know for a fact that your edits were constructive. I must have misclicked something on Redwarn without realizing it. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 11:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Fram,
Do you remember this editor? Well, I just ran into a new account, TableSalt43. But they are not in any way similar, totally different editing interests. Do you think this was just an unfortunate username choice? Liz Read! Talk! 02:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
I declined the G12 on HMS Petunia (K79) (after trimming further the account of the ship's loss) as there is enough free-content left on the page after the copyvio stuff has been excised as to still be worth preserving - I have also left a note on the article talk page to attribute the stuff copied from Flower-class corvette. Whether it needs some revdel of the history is a different question. Of more concern are that this does not appear to be an isolated page - is this CCI territory? Nigel Ish ( talk) 16:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fram, you might wish to take a look at WP:ANI#Unprofessional behaviour.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
I was searching about some industrial projects in India in internet and later I got this. I found it very interesting and attractive so I though to make a page on it. But couldn't find more information I don't know that is this a real company or fraud company. Please tell now what to do. - Thank You User:BangsMetala — Preceding undated comment added 15:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Should Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case say "autopatrolled tight" instead of "Right"? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 02:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
that was awkward... Didn't even think to check the provenance of it. Early diffs of the other page might need RD1, but I can deal with that. Primefac ( talk) 09:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Have you considered writing an essay summing up the kinds of cleanup you find yourself doing around issues of Wikidata in (English) Wikipedia? I see that more than one section of this talk page has to do with that, and I think it could be helpful for editors who contribute to one or both projects. Arlo James Barnes 17:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Fram, I'm JosetheTenderEngine, creator of page 1959-60 Cornwall Combination , and because you put it to deletion, quickly deleting is not cool, since it's hard to find information about this tournament other than Cornwallcomboleague, just because the article is incomplete, tournaments as this only has this site I mentioned to find, I thought about putting an image, but as images of this tournament are hard to find, I won't put images, what I suffered to do because I did it 3 times in a row I couldn't.I've done other pages like 1939-40 Serie da Galicia and 2016-17 División de Honor, even though they're already complete. Jose the Tender Engine ( talk) 22:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm dropping by on behalf of Parsedan who left a concerned message on my talk page about a page he recently created ( Jeanne II d'Albret) being removed and redirected without any discussion or even alerting the author of the page. I don't claim to be an expert in notability guidelines, but I was concerned because the editor is clearly acting in good faith, has a solid track record, and is genuinely concerned about the correct way to voice his opinion without causing strife. Despite that, their article was removed without any consensus or even a heads-up, with the only explanation given for the removal being an edit summary. Anyways, I wanted to give you a heads up that I'm going to start a discussion at Arthur III, Duke of Brittany. Even if the article isn't notable, I feel like the author deserves an explanation as to why; even speedy deletion nominations give an alert to the editor and can be contested. Thanks, Fritzmann ( message me) 03:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{ ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
Happy template editing! Primefac ( talk) 10:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Although it is very odd, in the WP:WPNAMES space, it seems people rely on articles that in other spaces would not be considered WP:RS. I saw your edit at Charleston (name). I understand full well what RS is about. However, researching names seems to be a different science. Is it reasonable that in certain fields standards could be different.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
I request that you voluntarily and speedily withdraw Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States federal judges who died in active service. It is premised on a factual error, and one that is dispelled by a source in the article. If you will not withdraw the nomination, please withdraw the factually incorrect claim that this is a "fairly common occurrence", or provide a source supporting your claim, since it is currently counterfactual to a source that has now been provided. BD2412 T 08:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, im Jose the Engine(the old Jose the Tender Engine)i need to make more wrc rally articles, the Tour de Corse work,i need to focus on pages that will be relevant (I need to stop with regional championship articles because I realized it doesn't work) well, I have to stop with articles from regional division seasons, (I realized that deleting less relevant article makes sense) Jose the Engine ( talk) 22:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
I have noticed that you have removed {{ Charles}} when you remove references. I don't think this makes sense, but am open to your explanation.- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
This is not a contest towards the deletion, however I was wondering if my recent edits of adding the sources of le Parisien and le Monde would be sufficient to remove the deletion contest for Berceuses (radio station.
Thanks! Pohjamadesse1 ( talk) 11:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Museums disestablished in 1855 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Template:BLP unsourced has been nominated for merging with Template:Unreferenced. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 21:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Crooked Cop Air and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 5#Crooked Cop Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for bringing this article to articles for deletion. It led to improvements on the page that may not have happened otherwise. Vahvistus ( talk) 19:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for bringing this article to articles for deletion. It led to improvements on the page that may not have happened otherwise. Vahvistus ( talk) 19:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello you posted this into drafts and said something about the population being for the county. But I got the info from Census here [5]. It is the population for the area. What else needs to be done to bring this live? Turnoffthat ( talk) 09:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
I was going to add in more infomation about the flags because these lists needs a revamp. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 14:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)