This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 9 |
Blablubbs,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Moneytrees🏝️
Talk🌴
Help out at CCI! 01:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Good morning Blablubbs, and Happy New Year! I am the Spanish-into-English translator who asked you for help the other day, and I followed your very useful advice – I found an article on the Spanish language Wikipedia, created a subpage in my user space where I pasted it, and noted its provenance in the edit summary. I now have additional questions, and when you have a moment, I will appreciate any additional guidance which you can give me.
1) The article I found already exists in the English language Wikipedia, which has a note saying that it could be expanded with additional material from the Spanish version, which is more extensive. I assume that I should just edit the English version rather than try to replace it with a translation of the entire Spanish article, yes? If so, then my next question is this: much of the content in the English version is different (not necessarily inaccurate, just different) from the content in the corresponding sections of the Spanish version - should I replace the English content with a translation of the Spanish, or edit it with additional material from the corresponding Spanish, or should I just leave it alone?
2) If I am just editing the existing English article, I would want to add new sections (translated sections from sections in the Spanish article) to it – can you tell me how to do that? Or point me in the direction of someone who could?
3) You were quite right, the articles (in both languages) which I pasted into my subpage look nothing like the actual articles – no images, none of the links work, none of the graphics (like boxes which contain text in addition to images) are present, the basic formatting is messed up. I assume that I need to fix all of that - yes? If that is the case, I would need help (from you or from some other source) to learn how to do that; if you were available to help me with that process when I begin it, or could point in the direction of some other source of help, I would appreciate that.
Thank you for your time and assistance. Shazertom ( talk) 15:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs, thank you for your quick reply. With your most recent advice I will get to work on translating the additional sections from the source article; I imagine I will have some more questions after a few days, and I will visit your talk page again when I do. I appreciate your willingness to help. Shazertom ( talk) 17:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
When should something be draftified? 4thfile4thrank ( talk) 17:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
I know you're just trying to clean up vandalism, but I think it's best to just leave the "NinjaRobotPirate is corrupt" stuff alone. It's just some aggrieved sock, and giving them this kind of attention guarantees that they're going to do it even more often (see WP:DENY). Also, tagging every page that they've ever edited for speedy deletion makes more work for admins. In the end, it's best to just ignore it, I think. I did revoke talk page access for the IP range, though. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
I am having problems with Moonythedwarf on the Falling-sand_game page. They are removing content leaving the page as a stub even though the page has twice been nominated for removal and been declined. Each time I put back the page they remove everything. Granted they are correct and the page is a WIP and needs rewriting, but how is deleting all the sections helpful? what do I do?
Look at history of the page, I keep trying to improve it, and then they come along and remove whole sections without raising it in the talk page.
Help! ~ Smellymoo 12:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I think I got a message from you saying I havea COI with the page I was trying to edit? Thi is my first time editing so I apologize if I'm going about this all wrong (I have no idea what I'm doing). I'm an admin in the same department as Hamid Ghandehari so I guess that would be a COI. We jsut wanted to update his page with more recent info (he had a title hcange, new website, etc). How can I make this happen?
Thanks! Halliemccarthy ( talk) 16:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
{{ Request Edit}}
Hamid Ghandehari Hamidreza (Hamid) Ghandehari is a pharmaceutical scientist whose lab has made contributions to the understanding of the transepithelial transport of polymeric carriers for oral drug delivery, design and development of polymer-drug conjugates for solid tumor therapy, design of recombinant polymers for localized gene delivery and as liquid embolics, and the understanding of the influence of physicochemical properties of inorganic nanoparticles on their toxicity. Hamid was born and raised in Tehran, Iran. He immigrated to the United States and received both his BS and PhD degrees from The University of Utah College of Pharmacy. He is currently professor and chair of the Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and Professor of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Utah. He Founded and Directs The Utah Center for Nanomedicine and serves as Editor in Chief of Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. In his free time he enjoys hiking and skiing in the Wasatch Mountains, traveling and spending time with family. External links: HAMIDREZA GHANDEHARI Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=TseikdAAAAAJ&hl=en HAMIDREZA GHANDEHARI Pubmed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=hamidreza+ghandehari&sort=date Ghandehari Lab https://pharmacy.utah.edu/ghandehari-lab/ Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry https://pharmacy.utah.edu/pharmaceutics/ Department of Biomedical Engineering https://www.bme.utah.edu/ Utah Center for Nanomedicine https://pharmacy.utah.edu/nanomedicine/ University of Utah Utah.edu Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews https://www.journals.elsevier.com/advanced-drug-delivery-reviews
Condensing old info into a simpler format and updating some CV info Halliemccarthy ( talk) 19:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
References
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! stwalkerster ( talk) 13:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your work on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VentureKit: thanks! Huldra ( talk) 23:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
Further info: I met
User:Quorum816 over at
Yousef Al Otaiba (see talk): there was some info there they really, really wanted out. It went twice to the BLP-boards etc. (Heh: how to made sure that that info is permanently in the article ...)
Cheers, and thanks again, Huldra ( talk) 23:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, You got my page deleted under the premises that I work for the company I made the page for. I do not understand this but I will remake the page and let you you that there are no transactions being made. Please let me know if I do it incorrectly. Cheers Installations2020 ( talk) 18:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)installations2020
Hi! This one. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/85.186.200.81
And he also holds at least one user now. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Skandura
Keeps vandalising FCSB page. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=FCSB&action=history
I bet most of the users on that page are his. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F09:3A17:BD00:CDB7:7E42:C947:340E ( talk) 14:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, Just wanted to answer your concerns about me adding ZenHub page. No, I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for editing Draft:ZenHub page. Geenue ( talk) 18:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
😃
Tatupiplu'
talk 18:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Regarding Israel Canada I want to know what specific changes are needed in order to approve this article. After all, this is a major Israeli investment firm, worth billions of dollars, and one of major 125 companies of the Tel Aviv Stock exchange. Maorkap3 ( talk) 11:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, Thanks for looking at the page I just translated from the french wikipedia : Gagan Gupta . I am new on the english wikipedia. I saw your speedy deletion request. Could you please help me to improve the page and to neutralize it, or give me some piece of advice? I added as much sources as i could in english from google news articles. Thanks! Rastapeuplulos ( talk) 20:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Blablubbs. I thought it was simpler and neater to remove the 3RR section — hope you agree. Just put it back if you like, or I will, if you prefer. Regards, Bishonen | tålk 22:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Hello Blablubbs. Thank you for your guidelines. I have included Template Paid on my user page. Hope it is acceptable. Please advise. Kind regards! RinaLina ( talk) 16:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! I have proposed changes on the article's talk page (Addiko Bank) and I got the answer to wait as I am the 163rd in line. Is there anything else I can do? Thank you again. RinaLina ( talk) 13:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
On 17 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Styles Hutchins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that attorney Styles Hutchins was the first African American to argue a case in a court in Georgia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Styles Hutchins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Styles Hutchins), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for all the hard work you do here-- Nice work on Styles Hutchins! Eddie891 Talk Work 00:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC) |
got a message from you regarding citation and COI concerns! i'm following this anarcha monument development and editing pages/authors/artists/persons related to it. i have gone through and cited all of the previously uncited sentences on the page. sometimes the information is already cited, but in a different section or paragraph, so i wasn't sure that i had to cite every sentence... i think/hope it's good now. i will submit for review and see if it's appropriate now. still kind of learning wiki stuff. thanks again. Endlessnapalm ( talk) 17:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
a social enterprise aimed at bridging the racial divide by providing educational tours to students and tourists in Montgomery, Alabama) and to ensure that the references you provideclearly show that she meets WP:NBIO. The latter means that you show that she as an individual has received in-depth (no passing mentions, listicles or similar) coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources that have some significance of their own (e.g. major national newspapers). Happy editing, feel free to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. Best wishes, Blablubbs| talk 17:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs... I'm curious to know why you refuse to take Theroadislong to task for accusing me of sock puppetry, when this investigation is still occurring? For the record, I have NOT engaged in this. I am unequivocal as per this! Also, why haven't you admonished Berchanhimez for cursing while conversing with me (on AfD page in question)? These incidents are plainly there for everyone to see, but you've said/done nothing, yet you continually admonish me. I'm simply looking for a modicum of consistency and fairness. Thanks! Ryan ( Ryancoke2020 ( talk) 23:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC))
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Possibly ( talk) 20:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to say your username is so cool and unique! Thanks for reading this -- Ilikememes128 ( talk) 21:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Why are you mass reverting edits to Röhm Gesellschaft and deleting the talkpage comments of others from Talk:Forgotten Weapons? Please don't do that again, especially without an edit summary. OrgoneBox ( talk) 17:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
YOUR MESSAGE There's a source in the footnotes. "Suicides in 2008." The article doesn't mention suicide though, I corrected it. Google it if you want further sources, the guy shot himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.96.139.8 ( talk) 22:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC) And the trouble with you people is, you never do any f--king work. Either you give orders or you hit the revert button. The worst thing about amending Wikipedia is having to deal with the snooty stuck-up lazy a--eholes who monitor it. I will NEVER amend Wikipedia again and that's final. You all go ---- yourselves now.
Hi. I had a conflict of interest message left on my talk page. Thank you for your time. I just wanted to declare that I have no conflict of interest in the subject of the article (or my edits), merely personal knowledge of the industry (I am retired though) and was contributing accordingly but I appreciate that perhaps the language could be more neutral or perhaps maybe some of the commercial elements left out so it reads less like a resume. What’s the best way to declare no conflict? Thank you in advance The Cleaning Laddy ( talk) 09:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@ Blablubbs, Anyway apart from this presumed guilty til proven innocent line of questioning, what do you suggest I can do to make my articles and edits more credible? I believe I’m compliant to guidelines but you imply that I’m not?
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello I notice my Wikipedia entry was deleted: Ebs Akintade. There weren’t links to the work I’ve done but I can add them as necessary. What can I do to re-establish the page or at least request for it to be I deleted? Ebuaki ( talk) 07:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
I'd like to get to the bottom of the ip editing of IHA but struggle to do that on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SkepticAnonymous. replylink doesn't work on that page and i get nothing but edit conflicts. Can we have a brief chat here where you point me to direct evidence that the IPs that we know for a fact were used by IHA (2601:2C0:C300:B7::/64, anything else?) before they created that account were used to edit anything related to Williamson? Vexations ( talk) 21:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
where is the connection to another sockpuppet: There is no single piece of smoking gun evidence here, but there are lots of behavioural links; many of them are unconvincing on their own, but strongly suggest a connection when combined. Many of them were pointed out in the SPI, including in GeneralNotability's closing statement. Not all socks have strong overlap – many of them can only be connected to each other by showing a preponderance of similarities that makes the likelihood of two distinct individuals being at work rather small. Combined with the technical evidence involved here, that probability strikes me as rather small in IHAs case. Blablubbs| talk 16:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Huge thanks to you, Blablubbs! Your clear instructions were easy to follow. Let me know how my requested edit looks (I put it on the talk page following directions from several resources you pointed me to) & if you think I could make any improvements. Sincere regards, Snyderlab| talk McGuire at Stanford Snyderlab ( talk) 06:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
) to sign your posts. To ping someone, type {{u|Username goes here}}
and sign your message in the same edit. I hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions. Best,
Blablubbs|
talk 11:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)McGuire at Stanford Snyderlab ( talk) 12:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
FYI: Draft:Michael P. Snyder draftified because it had no references. McGuire given some guidance at Teahouse about how to proceed. Briefly, the entire article needs a major revision to be about Snyder (with references) rather than lengthy descriptions of his research. David notMD ( talk) 13:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see you got added to the trainee list. Welcome aboard, glad to have more hands around to help! -- RoySmith (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Collapsing Sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
user:Blablubbs Can you help me with reviewing a blocked account. It is of my friend who has been blocked due to some misunderstanding that he is a paid editor. Please feel free to read his explanation. 06August01 ( talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Also, this reference is also to be added in CK Birla as he is the lead trustee there. So should I do that? 06August01 ( talk) 17:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Blablubbs. All I did was move the sentence from another part of the article. It wasnt sourced in the upper part of the article. Her having kids fits better in the personal section than the early life section. Please compare the last 2 version. Thank You. 2600:1003:B00E:2E3B:F424:5A93:F733:6CE7 ( talk) 00:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thanks for helping with the SPI! Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 00:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC) |
I just wanted to thank you for your work on Tim Palen. I knew it still had problems when I last edited it, even after all my work, but I also knew I needed to take a break from it and return with fresh eyes if I had any chance of doing it well myself, and yes, I hoped, in the meantime, that maybe other editors would step in, as at least two other editors had shown interest in improving the article last year. Needless to say, I was impressed and relieved when I finally had a chance to see your expert revision. This is why I love wikipedia, so again, my deepest thanks. Malcom Gregory Scott ( talk) 00:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
It’s a maze of twisty passages all around here. Sometimes, it’s hard to feel appreciated, and you deserve some love! This Heart-shaped Labyrinth is to say Thank YOU for all your hard work. I appreciate you being here - I really do - and so do these peeps! | |
You can also share some wikiKind wikiLove by adding {{ subst:Heart Labyrinth}} to any talk page with your own message. |
With love always, DrMel ( talk) 01:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm SoyokoAnis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jess Harnell, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SoyokoAnis 01:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Lol. SoyokoAnis 16:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello ; hope you are doing good , i saw you posted a speedy deletion on my recent article Javid Parsa as this person is notable and meet all the criteria's of notability as per wiki page requirements ; i might have made some mistakes while creating this article, please i request you remove the deletion tag and make some changes in the article as per rules thank you; help me to save my contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prakrutiprajapanti ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, remember me? Can we have a nice conversation together someday? Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 10:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I see that you have added Undisclosed paid tag on this page McKesson Corporation on 02:27, 7 December 2020. Just wondering what made you to add this? Did you reach out to the suspected user? What are the course of action to get this corrected? Serijarla ( talk) 17:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi BlaBlubbs,
Thank you for making us aware of this issue as I noticed that you placed a tag(Undisclosed paid|date=February 2021) on the Accenture article page on February 14th).
I am a novice on Wikipedia and am hoping you can help me identify what we need to do to remove this warning. Please note I work at Accenture and have identified as such on my user page. I am open to any suggestions/updates to follow relevant guidelines, as we are equally concerned with ensuring that the Accenture entry is objective and fair. Any advice is really appreciated.
Thanks in advance, Bohdithedog ( talk) 17:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC) BodhiTheDog
Hi Blablubbs, the original author has circumvented the draft review process at Tulsi Bhagat by copying the draft content to mainspace. I have fixed the revision history of the article, but you may like to nominate the article for deletion if your concerns have not been addressed. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Thanks for letting me know about the copy-and-paste manouver thingee. EGL 1234 06:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |
M1 does meet the criteria for musicians and ensembles for notability: 1)Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart. 2)Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. 3) Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
~~~~
. Or, you can use the
[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.)Hi Blablubbs
Thanks for looking at the review of the Finastra page so quickly. I actually work for Finastra, I'll update my user profile to say so. Apologies, this is only my second attempt to update Wiki and I'm not sure of the protocol.
I wanted to make sure that the Finastra page was up to date (adding the leadership team, updating the services etc - for example we have never actively sold 'legacy technology' so I changed it to banking software / banking technology) and complied to the guidelines so that we can get rid of the two warnings at the top.
I moved sections around (I actually looked at a few of our competitors' pages to ensure I was using the same layout) and added a couple of new citations/sources. And tried to remain neutral and factual.
I won't make any more edits until I hear back, and if I've got anything wrong, I'll check out all the guidelines more thoroughly.
Cheers Karen KLQ7 ( talk) 18:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for those cookies and for creating my account! I had a brownie laying around so here you go. Green Burger ( talk) 12:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC) |
I think you removed a reliable news source with content. I understand those were good-faith edits as you've mentioned "Someone released has no encyclopedic relevance" but you've removed two sources with that. If you agree I'll add them back in suitable place. Owlf 23:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
content from Prakash Neupane without adequately explaining why; she left a rather thorough explanation on the article's talk page. Editorial disagreements should be handled by discussion, not by templating the regulars when they are clearly aware of policy. Best, Blablubbs| talk 23:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Than how someone can remove editorial article of Nagarik Daily , Nepal Daily and OS Nepal ? Even he's not Nepali wikipedian. Owlf 00:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Blablubbs;
Hi Blablubbs. I found the page "Yang Yang (scientist)" is tagged "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. (January 2021)". I want to edit this page now but I wonder if this tag can be removed. If it cannot be removed. Could you help delete the page so I could creat a new one since now the information on the page is few and poorly organized.
Best
Tt23323 ( talk) 02:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. Thank you for your reply and questions. Actually I am Prof. Yang Yang's student. I have taken his class and be familiar with his experrience and background. I noticed his page lack many information so I want to edit it. I do not plan to promote him. He did not let me do so either. I just want to make my contributions to his page as I know some information about him. As for those accounts, I did not know them. But from the editing history, I can see they violated the rules of wiki badly. It is not good and I totally respect the administration and concept of wikepedia.
Best;
Tt23323 ( talk) 22:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. No, I want to edit the page only by my own will. I am not on behalf of anyone else. I will obey the policies of wiki.
Best
Tt23323 ( talk) 19:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs,
You asked whether I am being directly or indirectly compensated for Wikipedia edits: I am not.
Thanks,
Nvasony ( talk) 15:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs, We used to work together 21 years ago.
Nvasony ( talk) 05:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs,
You asked whether I am being directly or indirectly compensated for Wikipedia edits: I am, and was unaware of the disclosure requirements. I will provide the required disclosure.
Thanks, KellyLK2021 — Preceding undated comment added 15:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs! Are you still interested to help with Maximus Inc? If so, I have a request on the Talk page about some small edits for the article's introduction. If you're not available, is there anywhere else you'd recommend I reach out to? Again, for transparency, I work for Maximus and have a conflict of interest, which is why I've not made the changes myself. Thank you in advance. HSMaximus ( talk) 16:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs, an email was sent to permissions-en about the logo image. Hopefully it will be sufficient. -- Beeloser ( talk) 12:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Ah ok, I can understand what I did wrong. Will try to do better in the future. Apologies. -- Beeloser ( talk) 13:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello! A bit late, but here's the proxy checker script I promised. It's designed to run on toolforge, but you can comment out the 'is blocked' function if you want to run it elsewhere. I'm planning to convert this to a webservice for others to use, but you might find this useful in the meantime. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I've posted a request to assistance addressing the UDP tag on the Accenture article here. The page asks users to notify those who are mentioned in the discussion, and while my post is not about you or your actions, I want to be sure to let you know about the discussion just in case.
Thank you! Inkian Jason ( talk) 15:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs,
First, thanks for helping to arrange the cleanup; I wouldn't have known how to begin. Second, I see that you're marking things as spam or not-spam; is this important to you? I was just marking them as checked (including: spam I removed, spam someone else removed, good edits, bad but non-spam edits I removed, ...), but I could make a finer classification if you cared (though it would slow me down). -- JBL ( talk) 22:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
I was not expecting that barnstar. Thank you so much for the kind words. If you really think I am making that big of a difference, it is an honor. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 02:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
On 16 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Das Begräbnis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the first public reading of Wolfdietrich Schnurre's short story Das Begräbnis, part of the audience left the room in protest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Das Begräbnis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Das Begräbnis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for literature with a meaning! - It's also featured on Portal:Germany.
translate Begräbnis
Thank you for quality articles, several translated from German with narrative language skill, such as Das Begräbnis, Dachau camp trial and Hannibal (network), for fighting vandalism with a sense of humour, for welcoming users and articles, for "I do things here." - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2557 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
It's not a big deal, but I usually wait to see how a case resolves before moving it. Sometimes it turns out that the oldest account is found to be unrelated, and then you'll end up moving the case again. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the warm welcome. I'm very new to the whole wiki-editing process, so I imagine it'll take some time to figure out. Thanks for the help and advice! Ayvind-Bjarnason ( talk) 23:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
please do not delete or move my article, I need to complete my course assignment, I will modify it after getting feedback and grading from the teacher, if you move my article repeatedly, I will not get the score. Thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyu Han ( talk • contribs) 07:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello @Blablubbs, I have received a bot-delivered message saying that the draft page I have submitted will expire soon. Could you please help me or advise me on how to proceed to have the webpage I have submitted accepted ? Many thanks. Cheers.
Saxsxen (
talk) 07:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Saxsxen
Saxsxen ( talk) 07:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Source analysis
|
---|
|
significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and I have to tell you that I don't think those sources currently contribute towards showing that it meets that standard. I would suggest that you review the notability guideline and consider if there is enough sourcing to justify spending more time and effort on the draft. I'm not saying this to discourage you from contributing, I'm saying it because I don't want you to invest time and effort into an article that won't be published no matter how good it is, simply because it doesn't meet the guideline at this time – sometimes, it's just too soon to have an article about a subject.
Your DYK hook about Das Begräbnis drew 6,030 page views (502 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics#March 2021. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 ( talk) 19:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Blablubbs,
Yesterday you reverted some disruptive edits by this and this IP with the message "sock on proxy". The person behind these edits has been systematically targeting edits by me (see their first 7 edits here), has been reverted by multiple editors, and has refused to engage in talk page discussion (e.g., here), so warning this person was surely called for. However, they are only a suspected sock, not a confirmed one (see here). Some more eyes on the evidence (the bullet points, perhaps better to ignore the rest) would certainly be welcome. Apaugasma ( talk| contribs) 14:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I let myself get goaded into another colloquy with VeritasVox, before I realized that we were doing exactly what you told us not to do. In an attempt to undo the damage, I've hatted the discussion. My apologies. I don;t plan to post there again. In fact, despite the fact that I filed the SPI, I'm going to remove it from my watchlist. Beyond My Ken ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, I saw you use spihelper for managing SPI cases. I made this userbox for editors such as yourself who use spihelper. Jerm ( talk) 00:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikitext | userbox | where used | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{
User wikipedia/spihelper}}
|
|
linked pages |
Sorry to keep adding additional socks after you've already marked this as closed... it seems as soon as their creations are deleted, a new sock appears a few hours later and recreates them. I've asked again for the pages to be salted. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 05:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Now that you're doing more SPI clerking, it seems like it would be convenient if you had your own mop so you could do your own blocking. Would you mind if I nominated you for adminship? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello Blablubbs, Violating Wikipedia's rules is against the wiki community, I know this. I have joined this community after learning everything.Yes, I want to make Emiway Bantai, because I am a fan of them. Is it wrong to be a fan or not, and you can't even write and do this come under the purview of doubt? And I want to make Arishfa Khan and not Arshifa Khan - sandbox. You checked my sandbox but are still blaming me.I am not what you are thinking, and soon you will find out. Thank you 𝐃𝐚𝐝𝐚 𝐑𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐧🇮🇳 15:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello, please have a look at this? I am suspected as a Sockpuppet. Hope you can verify whether I'm a sock. Kindly please do it fast if you can. The false allegation disappoints! Sharath Abhivadyah Talk Page 01:16, 3 April 2021 (UTC) |
Should I add a report for Special:Contributions/Turgut Alp 500000; or should we just go straight to DENY and get blocks on sight without further bureaucracy? RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 16:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
You may be interested in this. Krepson ( talk) 00:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Blablubbs. Thank you for your note and for bringing these issues to my attention. I am a consultant with JustAnswer, and I am working on a project to refresh public-facing content about JustAnswer’s business. In the case of JustAnswer’s Wikipedia page, my primary intent was to correct content that is no longer accurate due to JustAnswer changing its business model a few years ago.
I sincerely apologize for not adhering to the policies you referenced in your message. I am new to Wikipedia, and I was unaware of these specific requirements. Besides reviewing the policies and terms you provided, can you please advise me on the appropriate next steps?
Thank you for your assistance. Respectfully, Juspub ( talk) 03:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Juspub
is an online question and answer site that connects customers with experts across 700 categories including tech support, legal, mechanic, home improvement, veterinary, medical and more, 24 hours a dayis not encyclopaedic content. Most of the content on the page appears to be aimed at making JustAnswer look good to potential customers – and that's not really what we're for. The entire lead (which is too long – content should be split into sections and the lead should be a short summary of those) is essentially "this is what the company has to say about its own product", even if secondary sources are used. The article will need a thorough rewrite, I'm afraid. Best, Blablubbs| talk 23:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again! In case you have notifications disabled, I wanted to let you know I've replied here and updated the draft based on your feedback. Do you have a moment to take another look? Thanks again! Inkian Jason ( talk) 15:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, Blablubbs. I am still hoping you might be able to revisit this discussion. If you are not interested, I will try to seek assistance elsewhere. Thanks! Inkian Jason ( talk) 17:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs! Thank you again for replying to my introduction request. I am not sure if you saw, I have also left a reply to the discussion you started about " Due weight" in the article. Both you and Z1720 raised some very interesting points. I think that a draft that I have prepared might help with addressing some of the key issues. Were you able to take a look at that yet? Also, I have a query about the Maximus logo. I left a message on the logo file talk page but have not received any response, do you happen to know anything about logo file licensing? Thank you in advance. HSMaximus ( talk) 17:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
I think you may not realize the possibility of outing in what you have been discussing at the VP. . Please take further concerns to a suitable forum, such as arbcom. DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
okay to participate in discussions internal to the project with two undisclosed accounts as long as there's no overlap?, which is implied by your action and does not relate to any specific individual. My understanding of policy was that undisclosed alternative accounts were not to be used in discussions internal to the project in general – I'm not bothered if that isn't the case, but it would be relevant to my work as an SPI clerk if I am misinterpreting policy there. Best, Blablubbs| talk 23:57, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
It looks like you have tagged the above user as blocked indefinitely, but they were only blocked for 31 hours. You may want to fix that. ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 05:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I edited the sweepstake wikipedia page. Forgive me, I'm new to this, but it looks like you just deleted all my work? Why? Of course, I'm happy to discuss and explain (and defend if necessary) my work. Thank you...
Thejokethief ( talk) 18:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Ah. OK, apologies, I did not consider that and obviously did not review those policies before making my edits. Of course, I will not do this again. Still, we think the business model we are bringing to market is worth Wikipedia's notice. And some of our competitors in this space are linked to from Wikipedia. What if any process might you recommend for us to work with Wikipedia? Thank you.
Thejokethief ( talk) 15:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. I found your name on the list of sockpuppet investigations clerks. I am convinced that the editor Igorikrasti is a sockpuppet of the recently blocked editor Deltagammaz, as the editing patterns of the two accounts seem similar to me, and specifically, both accounts have made numerous edits to Chamath Palihapitiya, mostly content that reflects negatively on the subject. But because I work for Chamath's company Social Capital (as I've disclosed), I'm not sure it's appropriate for me to file a sockpuppet investigation in this case. Do you think you could take a quick look at the situation? Thank you, CarmenCatSC ( talk) 19:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I'd been following Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SpareSeiko and it finally came to resolution and wanted to thank for your time and effort rooting them out. Extortion could threaten the entire project left unchecked. -- Green C 02:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs, I have replied to your query at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dipsikharay25. Thank you. Run n Fly ( talk) 11:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey buddy thank you so much for creating my account. May I get some assist? Aladdin.digi ( talk) 20:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
Not only for disentangling a complex SPI, but for being willing to clerk SPIs at all, and for taking this one on while under the scrutiny of training Fiddle Faddle 18:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
Fiddle Faddle 18:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
I really appreciate it that you closed the SPI on me, because I love editing TV related stuff. LooneyTraceYT No Pets allowed • contribs 15:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for getting an account set up for me. I know it seems silly, but there was a small tidbit of information I found tremendously helpful and I wanted to include it in the article about a certain fish. Normally, I would let it go as it wasn't a very pressing issue, but the thought occurred to me that I may wish to edit something in the future. I would have to go through the process then, so I may as well bite the bullet and take care of it now. Account created. Article edited. User happy. Thank you. NicevilleJenn ( talk) 15:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Good day Blablubbs! I dropped by to ask something from you. Well, the block placed on me was recently lifted as I have proven that Ajhenson21 and Gardo Versace 16 are not associated with my accounts. That being said, can I ask you to remove all tags from these accounts stating that they are suspected sockpuppets of mine or are my sockpuppets since it has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt that they are not related to me.
I would likewise want to bring to your attention Albe23413 and his long list of sockpuppets as I suspect the sockpuppets that were suspected to have been connected to me is actually his sockpuppets. All the hallmarks of his editing behavior are present in the accounts that were linked to me.
Warmest regards Gardo Versace ( talk) 16:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey, given the recent trolling, would you like me to semi-protect your user page for a few days? signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
There is an user @ Ndusskjraidmsjai: editing on Iraqi related articles. See other users @ Hpskawyocbauddkmajakriao: and @ Awawpshdmxn:. Beshogur ( talk) 20:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
That was a bit of fun while I was away. Thank you very much for caring about the integrity of these articles! -- 10mmsocket ( talk) 12:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs! How are you doing on this fine day? I'm still reverting vandalism, and I'm enjoying myself very much! How's the weather in your part of the world? Here in Queensland, Australia, it has been pouring with rain for two days straight! Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your page on German sources. It was quite helpful. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 20:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC) |
I used the tool on the main WP:SPI page, and I can see what went wrong: I didn't type the name with a capital M. This might be something that needs to get fixed, as I can't imagine I'm the first (or last) person to do this. I'm going to dig into the tool, see what I can do.
In the meantime: thanks for fixing that for me. I had no idea I'd even done it. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
My reason for unblock request was accepted by a reviewer. They were convicing .You just stressed on the similarity of our ideas, while Mz7 focused on the writing style of me and Ghazaalch. I really appriciate him for his carful investigation. I wonder if you update the SPI and explaine that I and Ghazaalch are not same users. Saff V. ( talk) 13:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, wanted to ask what happened to the case, is it closed now? I didn't quite understand your comment, could you please explain what's going to happen with the case? For the record, I didn't say Creffel=Curious, I think it's just proxy account or Creffel lending him the account. Regards, ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 10:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned or blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying)'unless they are able to show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits [...] New accounts which engage in the same behavior as a banned editor or blocked account in the same context, and who appear to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, are subject to the remedies applied to the editor whose behavior they are imitating.(emphasis mine).Creffel is not a new account, it probably can be argued that the changes are productive (I genuinely don't know and this is a highly contentious area) and the raid thing is at least a credible assertion of an independent motivation; this essentially means that I can only evaluate the meatpuppetry suspicion if I engage in two things that SPI is not suited for: a) Making a call about whether those changes were "good" and b) whether there was off-wiki coordination between Golden and Creffel, which inherently means that we're going to be debating evidence that is covered by WP:OUTING. Hence my deferral to the Checkuser queue; I would suggest waiting for a reply from them and handling the remaining sockpuppetry concerns via that route. Best, Blablubbs| talk 12:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs. Apologies if this is a little unexpected and forward, but I was just genuinely curious as to why you believe I know Golden personally? Of course, I am not fully expecting you to be open about this, but in case you are maybe you could share? I mean sure I think me and Golden have certain POV similarities. It's just I genuinely don't know the guy, but I find it interesting why it seems like I know him. - Creffel ( talk) 11:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 9 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 9 |
Blablubbs,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Moneytrees🏝️
Talk🌴
Help out at CCI! 01:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Good morning Blablubbs, and Happy New Year! I am the Spanish-into-English translator who asked you for help the other day, and I followed your very useful advice – I found an article on the Spanish language Wikipedia, created a subpage in my user space where I pasted it, and noted its provenance in the edit summary. I now have additional questions, and when you have a moment, I will appreciate any additional guidance which you can give me.
1) The article I found already exists in the English language Wikipedia, which has a note saying that it could be expanded with additional material from the Spanish version, which is more extensive. I assume that I should just edit the English version rather than try to replace it with a translation of the entire Spanish article, yes? If so, then my next question is this: much of the content in the English version is different (not necessarily inaccurate, just different) from the content in the corresponding sections of the Spanish version - should I replace the English content with a translation of the Spanish, or edit it with additional material from the corresponding Spanish, or should I just leave it alone?
2) If I am just editing the existing English article, I would want to add new sections (translated sections from sections in the Spanish article) to it – can you tell me how to do that? Or point me in the direction of someone who could?
3) You were quite right, the articles (in both languages) which I pasted into my subpage look nothing like the actual articles – no images, none of the links work, none of the graphics (like boxes which contain text in addition to images) are present, the basic formatting is messed up. I assume that I need to fix all of that - yes? If that is the case, I would need help (from you or from some other source) to learn how to do that; if you were available to help me with that process when I begin it, or could point in the direction of some other source of help, I would appreciate that.
Thank you for your time and assistance. Shazertom ( talk) 15:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs, thank you for your quick reply. With your most recent advice I will get to work on translating the additional sections from the source article; I imagine I will have some more questions after a few days, and I will visit your talk page again when I do. I appreciate your willingness to help. Shazertom ( talk) 17:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
When should something be draftified? 4thfile4thrank ( talk) 17:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
I know you're just trying to clean up vandalism, but I think it's best to just leave the "NinjaRobotPirate is corrupt" stuff alone. It's just some aggrieved sock, and giving them this kind of attention guarantees that they're going to do it even more often (see WP:DENY). Also, tagging every page that they've ever edited for speedy deletion makes more work for admins. In the end, it's best to just ignore it, I think. I did revoke talk page access for the IP range, though. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
I am having problems with Moonythedwarf on the Falling-sand_game page. They are removing content leaving the page as a stub even though the page has twice been nominated for removal and been declined. Each time I put back the page they remove everything. Granted they are correct and the page is a WIP and needs rewriting, but how is deleting all the sections helpful? what do I do?
Look at history of the page, I keep trying to improve it, and then they come along and remove whole sections without raising it in the talk page.
Help! ~ Smellymoo 12:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I think I got a message from you saying I havea COI with the page I was trying to edit? Thi is my first time editing so I apologize if I'm going about this all wrong (I have no idea what I'm doing). I'm an admin in the same department as Hamid Ghandehari so I guess that would be a COI. We jsut wanted to update his page with more recent info (he had a title hcange, new website, etc). How can I make this happen?
Thanks! Halliemccarthy ( talk) 16:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
{{ Request Edit}}
Hamid Ghandehari Hamidreza (Hamid) Ghandehari is a pharmaceutical scientist whose lab has made contributions to the understanding of the transepithelial transport of polymeric carriers for oral drug delivery, design and development of polymer-drug conjugates for solid tumor therapy, design of recombinant polymers for localized gene delivery and as liquid embolics, and the understanding of the influence of physicochemical properties of inorganic nanoparticles on their toxicity. Hamid was born and raised in Tehran, Iran. He immigrated to the United States and received both his BS and PhD degrees from The University of Utah College of Pharmacy. He is currently professor and chair of the Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and Professor of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Utah. He Founded and Directs The Utah Center for Nanomedicine and serves as Editor in Chief of Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. In his free time he enjoys hiking and skiing in the Wasatch Mountains, traveling and spending time with family. External links: HAMIDREZA GHANDEHARI Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=TseikdAAAAAJ&hl=en HAMIDREZA GHANDEHARI Pubmed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=hamidreza+ghandehari&sort=date Ghandehari Lab https://pharmacy.utah.edu/ghandehari-lab/ Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry https://pharmacy.utah.edu/pharmaceutics/ Department of Biomedical Engineering https://www.bme.utah.edu/ Utah Center for Nanomedicine https://pharmacy.utah.edu/nanomedicine/ University of Utah Utah.edu Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews https://www.journals.elsevier.com/advanced-drug-delivery-reviews
Condensing old info into a simpler format and updating some CV info Halliemccarthy ( talk) 19:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
References
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! stwalkerster ( talk) 13:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your work on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VentureKit: thanks! Huldra ( talk) 23:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
Further info: I met
User:Quorum816 over at
Yousef Al Otaiba (see talk): there was some info there they really, really wanted out. It went twice to the BLP-boards etc. (Heh: how to made sure that that info is permanently in the article ...)
Cheers, and thanks again, Huldra ( talk) 23:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, You got my page deleted under the premises that I work for the company I made the page for. I do not understand this but I will remake the page and let you you that there are no transactions being made. Please let me know if I do it incorrectly. Cheers Installations2020 ( talk) 18:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)installations2020
Hi! This one. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/85.186.200.81
And he also holds at least one user now. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Skandura
Keeps vandalising FCSB page. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=FCSB&action=history
I bet most of the users on that page are his. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F09:3A17:BD00:CDB7:7E42:C947:340E ( talk) 14:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, Just wanted to answer your concerns about me adding ZenHub page. No, I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for editing Draft:ZenHub page. Geenue ( talk) 18:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
😃
Tatupiplu'
talk 18:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Regarding Israel Canada I want to know what specific changes are needed in order to approve this article. After all, this is a major Israeli investment firm, worth billions of dollars, and one of major 125 companies of the Tel Aviv Stock exchange. Maorkap3 ( talk) 11:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, Thanks for looking at the page I just translated from the french wikipedia : Gagan Gupta . I am new on the english wikipedia. I saw your speedy deletion request. Could you please help me to improve the page and to neutralize it, or give me some piece of advice? I added as much sources as i could in english from google news articles. Thanks! Rastapeuplulos ( talk) 20:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Blablubbs. I thought it was simpler and neater to remove the 3RR section — hope you agree. Just put it back if you like, or I will, if you prefer. Regards, Bishonen | tålk 22:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC).
Hello Blablubbs. Thank you for your guidelines. I have included Template Paid on my user page. Hope it is acceptable. Please advise. Kind regards! RinaLina ( talk) 16:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! I have proposed changes on the article's talk page (Addiko Bank) and I got the answer to wait as I am the 163rd in line. Is there anything else I can do? Thank you again. RinaLina ( talk) 13:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
On 17 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Styles Hutchins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that attorney Styles Hutchins was the first African American to argue a case in a court in Georgia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Styles Hutchins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Styles Hutchins), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for all the hard work you do here-- Nice work on Styles Hutchins! Eddie891 Talk Work 00:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC) |
got a message from you regarding citation and COI concerns! i'm following this anarcha monument development and editing pages/authors/artists/persons related to it. i have gone through and cited all of the previously uncited sentences on the page. sometimes the information is already cited, but in a different section or paragraph, so i wasn't sure that i had to cite every sentence... i think/hope it's good now. i will submit for review and see if it's appropriate now. still kind of learning wiki stuff. thanks again. Endlessnapalm ( talk) 17:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
a social enterprise aimed at bridging the racial divide by providing educational tours to students and tourists in Montgomery, Alabama) and to ensure that the references you provideclearly show that she meets WP:NBIO. The latter means that you show that she as an individual has received in-depth (no passing mentions, listicles or similar) coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources that have some significance of their own (e.g. major national newspapers). Happy editing, feel free to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. Best wishes, Blablubbs| talk 17:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs... I'm curious to know why you refuse to take Theroadislong to task for accusing me of sock puppetry, when this investigation is still occurring? For the record, I have NOT engaged in this. I am unequivocal as per this! Also, why haven't you admonished Berchanhimez for cursing while conversing with me (on AfD page in question)? These incidents are plainly there for everyone to see, but you've said/done nothing, yet you continually admonish me. I'm simply looking for a modicum of consistency and fairness. Thanks! Ryan ( Ryancoke2020 ( talk) 23:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC))
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Possibly ( talk) 20:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to say your username is so cool and unique! Thanks for reading this -- Ilikememes128 ( talk) 21:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Why are you mass reverting edits to Röhm Gesellschaft and deleting the talkpage comments of others from Talk:Forgotten Weapons? Please don't do that again, especially without an edit summary. OrgoneBox ( talk) 17:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
YOUR MESSAGE There's a source in the footnotes. "Suicides in 2008." The article doesn't mention suicide though, I corrected it. Google it if you want further sources, the guy shot himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.96.139.8 ( talk) 22:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC) And the trouble with you people is, you never do any f--king work. Either you give orders or you hit the revert button. The worst thing about amending Wikipedia is having to deal with the snooty stuck-up lazy a--eholes who monitor it. I will NEVER amend Wikipedia again and that's final. You all go ---- yourselves now.
Hi. I had a conflict of interest message left on my talk page. Thank you for your time. I just wanted to declare that I have no conflict of interest in the subject of the article (or my edits), merely personal knowledge of the industry (I am retired though) and was contributing accordingly but I appreciate that perhaps the language could be more neutral or perhaps maybe some of the commercial elements left out so it reads less like a resume. What’s the best way to declare no conflict? Thank you in advance The Cleaning Laddy ( talk) 09:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@ Blablubbs, Anyway apart from this presumed guilty til proven innocent line of questioning, what do you suggest I can do to make my articles and edits more credible? I believe I’m compliant to guidelines but you imply that I’m not?
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello I notice my Wikipedia entry was deleted: Ebs Akintade. There weren’t links to the work I’ve done but I can add them as necessary. What can I do to re-establish the page or at least request for it to be I deleted? Ebuaki ( talk) 07:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
I'd like to get to the bottom of the ip editing of IHA but struggle to do that on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SkepticAnonymous. replylink doesn't work on that page and i get nothing but edit conflicts. Can we have a brief chat here where you point me to direct evidence that the IPs that we know for a fact were used by IHA (2601:2C0:C300:B7::/64, anything else?) before they created that account were used to edit anything related to Williamson? Vexations ( talk) 21:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
where is the connection to another sockpuppet: There is no single piece of smoking gun evidence here, but there are lots of behavioural links; many of them are unconvincing on their own, but strongly suggest a connection when combined. Many of them were pointed out in the SPI, including in GeneralNotability's closing statement. Not all socks have strong overlap – many of them can only be connected to each other by showing a preponderance of similarities that makes the likelihood of two distinct individuals being at work rather small. Combined with the technical evidence involved here, that probability strikes me as rather small in IHAs case. Blablubbs| talk 16:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Huge thanks to you, Blablubbs! Your clear instructions were easy to follow. Let me know how my requested edit looks (I put it on the talk page following directions from several resources you pointed me to) & if you think I could make any improvements. Sincere regards, Snyderlab| talk McGuire at Stanford Snyderlab ( talk) 06:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
) to sign your posts. To ping someone, type {{u|Username goes here}}
and sign your message in the same edit. I hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions. Best,
Blablubbs|
talk 11:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)McGuire at Stanford Snyderlab ( talk) 12:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
FYI: Draft:Michael P. Snyder draftified because it had no references. McGuire given some guidance at Teahouse about how to proceed. Briefly, the entire article needs a major revision to be about Snyder (with references) rather than lengthy descriptions of his research. David notMD ( talk) 13:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see you got added to the trainee list. Welcome aboard, glad to have more hands around to help! -- RoySmith (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Collapsing Sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
user:Blablubbs Can you help me with reviewing a blocked account. It is of my friend who has been blocked due to some misunderstanding that he is a paid editor. Please feel free to read his explanation. 06August01 ( talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Also, this reference is also to be added in CK Birla as he is the lead trustee there. So should I do that? 06August01 ( talk) 17:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Blablubbs. All I did was move the sentence from another part of the article. It wasnt sourced in the upper part of the article. Her having kids fits better in the personal section than the early life section. Please compare the last 2 version. Thank You. 2600:1003:B00E:2E3B:F424:5A93:F733:6CE7 ( talk) 00:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thanks for helping with the SPI! Shadowrvn728 ❯❯❯ Talk 00:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC) |
I just wanted to thank you for your work on Tim Palen. I knew it still had problems when I last edited it, even after all my work, but I also knew I needed to take a break from it and return with fresh eyes if I had any chance of doing it well myself, and yes, I hoped, in the meantime, that maybe other editors would step in, as at least two other editors had shown interest in improving the article last year. Needless to say, I was impressed and relieved when I finally had a chance to see your expert revision. This is why I love wikipedia, so again, my deepest thanks. Malcom Gregory Scott ( talk) 00:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
It’s a maze of twisty passages all around here. Sometimes, it’s hard to feel appreciated, and you deserve some love! This Heart-shaped Labyrinth is to say Thank YOU for all your hard work. I appreciate you being here - I really do - and so do these peeps! | |
You can also share some wikiKind wikiLove by adding {{ subst:Heart Labyrinth}} to any talk page with your own message. |
With love always, DrMel ( talk) 01:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm SoyokoAnis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jess Harnell, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SoyokoAnis 01:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Lol. SoyokoAnis 16:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello ; hope you are doing good , i saw you posted a speedy deletion on my recent article Javid Parsa as this person is notable and meet all the criteria's of notability as per wiki page requirements ; i might have made some mistakes while creating this article, please i request you remove the deletion tag and make some changes in the article as per rules thank you; help me to save my contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prakrutiprajapanti ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, remember me? Can we have a nice conversation together someday? Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 10:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I see that you have added Undisclosed paid tag on this page McKesson Corporation on 02:27, 7 December 2020. Just wondering what made you to add this? Did you reach out to the suspected user? What are the course of action to get this corrected? Serijarla ( talk) 17:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi BlaBlubbs,
Thank you for making us aware of this issue as I noticed that you placed a tag(Undisclosed paid|date=February 2021) on the Accenture article page on February 14th).
I am a novice on Wikipedia and am hoping you can help me identify what we need to do to remove this warning. Please note I work at Accenture and have identified as such on my user page. I am open to any suggestions/updates to follow relevant guidelines, as we are equally concerned with ensuring that the Accenture entry is objective and fair. Any advice is really appreciated.
Thanks in advance, Bohdithedog ( talk) 17:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC) BodhiTheDog
Hi Blablubbs, the original author has circumvented the draft review process at Tulsi Bhagat by copying the draft content to mainspace. I have fixed the revision history of the article, but you may like to nominate the article for deletion if your concerns have not been addressed. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Thanks for letting me know about the copy-and-paste manouver thingee. EGL 1234 06:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |
M1 does meet the criteria for musicians and ensembles for notability: 1)Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart. 2)Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. 3) Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
~~~~
. Or, you can use the
[ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.)Hi Blablubbs
Thanks for looking at the review of the Finastra page so quickly. I actually work for Finastra, I'll update my user profile to say so. Apologies, this is only my second attempt to update Wiki and I'm not sure of the protocol.
I wanted to make sure that the Finastra page was up to date (adding the leadership team, updating the services etc - for example we have never actively sold 'legacy technology' so I changed it to banking software / banking technology) and complied to the guidelines so that we can get rid of the two warnings at the top.
I moved sections around (I actually looked at a few of our competitors' pages to ensure I was using the same layout) and added a couple of new citations/sources. And tried to remain neutral and factual.
I won't make any more edits until I hear back, and if I've got anything wrong, I'll check out all the guidelines more thoroughly.
Cheers Karen KLQ7 ( talk) 18:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for those cookies and for creating my account! I had a brownie laying around so here you go. Green Burger ( talk) 12:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC) |
I think you removed a reliable news source with content. I understand those were good-faith edits as you've mentioned "Someone released has no encyclopedic relevance" but you've removed two sources with that. If you agree I'll add them back in suitable place. Owlf 23:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
content from Prakash Neupane without adequately explaining why; she left a rather thorough explanation on the article's talk page. Editorial disagreements should be handled by discussion, not by templating the regulars when they are clearly aware of policy. Best, Blablubbs| talk 23:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Than how someone can remove editorial article of Nagarik Daily , Nepal Daily and OS Nepal ? Even he's not Nepali wikipedian. Owlf 00:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Blablubbs;
Hi Blablubbs. I found the page "Yang Yang (scientist)" is tagged "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. (January 2021)". I want to edit this page now but I wonder if this tag can be removed. If it cannot be removed. Could you help delete the page so I could creat a new one since now the information on the page is few and poorly organized.
Best
Tt23323 ( talk) 02:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. Thank you for your reply and questions. Actually I am Prof. Yang Yang's student. I have taken his class and be familiar with his experrience and background. I noticed his page lack many information so I want to edit it. I do not plan to promote him. He did not let me do so either. I just want to make my contributions to his page as I know some information about him. As for those accounts, I did not know them. But from the editing history, I can see they violated the rules of wiki badly. It is not good and I totally respect the administration and concept of wikepedia.
Best;
Tt23323 ( talk) 22:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. No, I want to edit the page only by my own will. I am not on behalf of anyone else. I will obey the policies of wiki.
Best
Tt23323 ( talk) 19:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs,
You asked whether I am being directly or indirectly compensated for Wikipedia edits: I am not.
Thanks,
Nvasony ( talk) 15:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs, We used to work together 21 years ago.
Nvasony ( talk) 05:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs,
You asked whether I am being directly or indirectly compensated for Wikipedia edits: I am, and was unaware of the disclosure requirements. I will provide the required disclosure.
Thanks, KellyLK2021 — Preceding undated comment added 15:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs! Are you still interested to help with Maximus Inc? If so, I have a request on the Talk page about some small edits for the article's introduction. If you're not available, is there anywhere else you'd recommend I reach out to? Again, for transparency, I work for Maximus and have a conflict of interest, which is why I've not made the changes myself. Thank you in advance. HSMaximus ( talk) 16:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs, an email was sent to permissions-en about the logo image. Hopefully it will be sufficient. -- Beeloser ( talk) 12:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Ah ok, I can understand what I did wrong. Will try to do better in the future. Apologies. -- Beeloser ( talk) 13:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello! A bit late, but here's the proxy checker script I promised. It's designed to run on toolforge, but you can comment out the 'is blocked' function if you want to run it elsewhere. I'm planning to convert this to a webservice for others to use, but you might find this useful in the meantime. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I've posted a request to assistance addressing the UDP tag on the Accenture article here. The page asks users to notify those who are mentioned in the discussion, and while my post is not about you or your actions, I want to be sure to let you know about the discussion just in case.
Thank you! Inkian Jason ( talk) 15:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs,
First, thanks for helping to arrange the cleanup; I wouldn't have known how to begin. Second, I see that you're marking things as spam or not-spam; is this important to you? I was just marking them as checked (including: spam I removed, spam someone else removed, good edits, bad but non-spam edits I removed, ...), but I could make a finer classification if you cared (though it would slow me down). -- JBL ( talk) 22:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
I was not expecting that barnstar. Thank you so much for the kind words. If you really think I am making that big of a difference, it is an honor. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 02:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
On 16 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Das Begräbnis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the first public reading of Wolfdietrich Schnurre's short story Das Begräbnis, part of the audience left the room in protest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Das Begräbnis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Das Begräbnis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for literature with a meaning! - It's also featured on Portal:Germany.
translate Begräbnis
Thank you for quality articles, several translated from German with narrative language skill, such as Das Begräbnis, Dachau camp trial and Hannibal (network), for fighting vandalism with a sense of humour, for welcoming users and articles, for "I do things here." - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2557 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
It's not a big deal, but I usually wait to see how a case resolves before moving it. Sometimes it turns out that the oldest account is found to be unrelated, and then you'll end up moving the case again. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the warm welcome. I'm very new to the whole wiki-editing process, so I imagine it'll take some time to figure out. Thanks for the help and advice! Ayvind-Bjarnason ( talk) 23:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
please do not delete or move my article, I need to complete my course assignment, I will modify it after getting feedback and grading from the teacher, if you move my article repeatedly, I will not get the score. Thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyu Han ( talk • contribs) 07:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello @Blablubbs, I have received a bot-delivered message saying that the draft page I have submitted will expire soon. Could you please help me or advise me on how to proceed to have the webpage I have submitted accepted ? Many thanks. Cheers.
Saxsxen (
talk) 07:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Saxsxen
Saxsxen ( talk) 07:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Source analysis
|
---|
|
significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and I have to tell you that I don't think those sources currently contribute towards showing that it meets that standard. I would suggest that you review the notability guideline and consider if there is enough sourcing to justify spending more time and effort on the draft. I'm not saying this to discourage you from contributing, I'm saying it because I don't want you to invest time and effort into an article that won't be published no matter how good it is, simply because it doesn't meet the guideline at this time – sometimes, it's just too soon to have an article about a subject.
Your DYK hook about Das Begräbnis drew 6,030 page views (502 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics#March 2021. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 ( talk) 19:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear Blablubbs,
Yesterday you reverted some disruptive edits by this and this IP with the message "sock on proxy". The person behind these edits has been systematically targeting edits by me (see their first 7 edits here), has been reverted by multiple editors, and has refused to engage in talk page discussion (e.g., here), so warning this person was surely called for. However, they are only a suspected sock, not a confirmed one (see here). Some more eyes on the evidence (the bullet points, perhaps better to ignore the rest) would certainly be welcome. Apaugasma ( talk| contribs) 14:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I let myself get goaded into another colloquy with VeritasVox, before I realized that we were doing exactly what you told us not to do. In an attempt to undo the damage, I've hatted the discussion. My apologies. I don;t plan to post there again. In fact, despite the fact that I filed the SPI, I'm going to remove it from my watchlist. Beyond My Ken ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, I saw you use spihelper for managing SPI cases. I made this userbox for editors such as yourself who use spihelper. Jerm ( talk) 00:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikitext | userbox | where used | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{
User wikipedia/spihelper}}
|
|
linked pages |
Sorry to keep adding additional socks after you've already marked this as closed... it seems as soon as their creations are deleted, a new sock appears a few hours later and recreates them. I've asked again for the pages to be salted. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 05:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Now that you're doing more SPI clerking, it seems like it would be convenient if you had your own mop so you could do your own blocking. Would you mind if I nominated you for adminship? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello Blablubbs, Violating Wikipedia's rules is against the wiki community, I know this. I have joined this community after learning everything.Yes, I want to make Emiway Bantai, because I am a fan of them. Is it wrong to be a fan or not, and you can't even write and do this come under the purview of doubt? And I want to make Arishfa Khan and not Arshifa Khan - sandbox. You checked my sandbox but are still blaming me.I am not what you are thinking, and soon you will find out. Thank you 𝐃𝐚𝐝𝐚 𝐑𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐧🇮🇳 15:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC) |
sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello, please have a look at this? I am suspected as a Sockpuppet. Hope you can verify whether I'm a sock. Kindly please do it fast if you can. The false allegation disappoints! Sharath Abhivadyah Talk Page 01:16, 3 April 2021 (UTC) |
Should I add a report for Special:Contributions/Turgut Alp 500000; or should we just go straight to DENY and get blocks on sight without further bureaucracy? RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 16:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
sock |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
You may be interested in this. Krepson ( talk) 00:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Blablubbs. Thank you for your note and for bringing these issues to my attention. I am a consultant with JustAnswer, and I am working on a project to refresh public-facing content about JustAnswer’s business. In the case of JustAnswer’s Wikipedia page, my primary intent was to correct content that is no longer accurate due to JustAnswer changing its business model a few years ago.
I sincerely apologize for not adhering to the policies you referenced in your message. I am new to Wikipedia, and I was unaware of these specific requirements. Besides reviewing the policies and terms you provided, can you please advise me on the appropriate next steps?
Thank you for your assistance. Respectfully, Juspub ( talk) 03:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Juspub
is an online question and answer site that connects customers with experts across 700 categories including tech support, legal, mechanic, home improvement, veterinary, medical and more, 24 hours a dayis not encyclopaedic content. Most of the content on the page appears to be aimed at making JustAnswer look good to potential customers – and that's not really what we're for. The entire lead (which is too long – content should be split into sections and the lead should be a short summary of those) is essentially "this is what the company has to say about its own product", even if secondary sources are used. The article will need a thorough rewrite, I'm afraid. Best, Blablubbs| talk 23:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again! In case you have notifications disabled, I wanted to let you know I've replied here and updated the draft based on your feedback. Do you have a moment to take another look? Thanks again! Inkian Jason ( talk) 15:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, Blablubbs. I am still hoping you might be able to revisit this discussion. If you are not interested, I will try to seek assistance elsewhere. Thanks! Inkian Jason ( talk) 17:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs! Thank you again for replying to my introduction request. I am not sure if you saw, I have also left a reply to the discussion you started about " Due weight" in the article. Both you and Z1720 raised some very interesting points. I think that a draft that I have prepared might help with addressing some of the key issues. Were you able to take a look at that yet? Also, I have a query about the Maximus logo. I left a message on the logo file talk page but have not received any response, do you happen to know anything about logo file licensing? Thank you in advance. HSMaximus ( talk) 17:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
I think you may not realize the possibility of outing in what you have been discussing at the VP. . Please take further concerns to a suitable forum, such as arbcom. DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
okay to participate in discussions internal to the project with two undisclosed accounts as long as there's no overlap?, which is implied by your action and does not relate to any specific individual. My understanding of policy was that undisclosed alternative accounts were not to be used in discussions internal to the project in general – I'm not bothered if that isn't the case, but it would be relevant to my work as an SPI clerk if I am misinterpreting policy there. Best, Blablubbs| talk 23:57, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
It looks like you have tagged the above user as blocked indefinitely, but they were only blocked for 31 hours. You may want to fix that. ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 05:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I edited the sweepstake wikipedia page. Forgive me, I'm new to this, but it looks like you just deleted all my work? Why? Of course, I'm happy to discuss and explain (and defend if necessary) my work. Thank you...
Thejokethief ( talk) 18:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Ah. OK, apologies, I did not consider that and obviously did not review those policies before making my edits. Of course, I will not do this again. Still, we think the business model we are bringing to market is worth Wikipedia's notice. And some of our competitors in this space are linked to from Wikipedia. What if any process might you recommend for us to work with Wikipedia? Thank you.
Thejokethief ( talk) 15:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs. I found your name on the list of sockpuppet investigations clerks. I am convinced that the editor Igorikrasti is a sockpuppet of the recently blocked editor Deltagammaz, as the editing patterns of the two accounts seem similar to me, and specifically, both accounts have made numerous edits to Chamath Palihapitiya, mostly content that reflects negatively on the subject. But because I work for Chamath's company Social Capital (as I've disclosed), I'm not sure it's appropriate for me to file a sockpuppet investigation in this case. Do you think you could take a quick look at the situation? Thank you, CarmenCatSC ( talk) 19:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I'd been following Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SpareSeiko and it finally came to resolution and wanted to thank for your time and effort rooting them out. Extortion could threaten the entire project left unchecked. -- Green C 02:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs, I have replied to your query at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dipsikharay25. Thank you. Run n Fly ( talk) 11:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey buddy thank you so much for creating my account. May I get some assist? Aladdin.digi ( talk) 20:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
Not only for disentangling a complex SPI, but for being willing to clerk SPIs at all, and for taking this one on while under the scrutiny of training Fiddle Faddle 18:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
Fiddle Faddle 18:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
I really appreciate it that you closed the SPI on me, because I love editing TV related stuff. LooneyTraceYT No Pets allowed • contribs 15:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for getting an account set up for me. I know it seems silly, but there was a small tidbit of information I found tremendously helpful and I wanted to include it in the article about a certain fish. Normally, I would let it go as it wasn't a very pressing issue, but the thought occurred to me that I may wish to edit something in the future. I would have to go through the process then, so I may as well bite the bullet and take care of it now. Account created. Article edited. User happy. Thank you. NicevilleJenn ( talk) 15:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Good day Blablubbs! I dropped by to ask something from you. Well, the block placed on me was recently lifted as I have proven that Ajhenson21 and Gardo Versace 16 are not associated with my accounts. That being said, can I ask you to remove all tags from these accounts stating that they are suspected sockpuppets of mine or are my sockpuppets since it has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt that they are not related to me.
I would likewise want to bring to your attention Albe23413 and his long list of sockpuppets as I suspect the sockpuppets that were suspected to have been connected to me is actually his sockpuppets. All the hallmarks of his editing behavior are present in the accounts that were linked to me.
Warmest regards Gardo Versace ( talk) 16:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey, given the recent trolling, would you like me to semi-protect your user page for a few days? signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
There is an user @ Ndusskjraidmsjai: editing on Iraqi related articles. See other users @ Hpskawyocbauddkmajakriao: and @ Awawpshdmxn:. Beshogur ( talk) 20:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
That was a bit of fun while I was away. Thank you very much for caring about the integrity of these articles! -- 10mmsocket ( talk) 12:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Blablubbs! How are you doing on this fine day? I'm still reverting vandalism, and I'm enjoying myself very much! How's the weather in your part of the world? Here in Queensland, Australia, it has been pouring with rain for two days straight! Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 09:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your page on German sources. It was quite helpful. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 20:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC) |
I used the tool on the main WP:SPI page, and I can see what went wrong: I didn't type the name with a capital M. This might be something that needs to get fixed, as I can't imagine I'm the first (or last) person to do this. I'm going to dig into the tool, see what I can do.
In the meantime: thanks for fixing that for me. I had no idea I'd even done it. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
My reason for unblock request was accepted by a reviewer. They were convicing .You just stressed on the similarity of our ideas, while Mz7 focused on the writing style of me and Ghazaalch. I really appriciate him for his carful investigation. I wonder if you update the SPI and explaine that I and Ghazaalch are not same users. Saff V. ( talk) 13:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs, wanted to ask what happened to the case, is it closed now? I didn't quite understand your comment, could you please explain what's going to happen with the case? For the record, I didn't say Creffel=Curious, I think it's just proxy account or Creffel lending him the account. Regards, ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 10:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned or blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying)'unless they are able to show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits [...] New accounts which engage in the same behavior as a banned editor or blocked account in the same context, and who appear to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, are subject to the remedies applied to the editor whose behavior they are imitating.(emphasis mine).Creffel is not a new account, it probably can be argued that the changes are productive (I genuinely don't know and this is a highly contentious area) and the raid thing is at least a credible assertion of an independent motivation; this essentially means that I can only evaluate the meatpuppetry suspicion if I engage in two things that SPI is not suited for: a) Making a call about whether those changes were "good" and b) whether there was off-wiki coordination between Golden and Creffel, which inherently means that we're going to be debating evidence that is covered by WP:OUTING. Hence my deferral to the Checkuser queue; I would suggest waiting for a reply from them and handling the remaining sockpuppetry concerns via that route. Best, Blablubbs| talk 12:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello Blablubbs. Apologies if this is a little unexpected and forward, but I was just genuinely curious as to why you believe I know Golden personally? Of course, I am not fully expecting you to be open about this, but in case you are maybe you could share? I mean sure I think me and Golden have certain POV similarities. It's just I genuinely don't know the guy, but I find it interesting why it seems like I know him. - Creffel ( talk) 11:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 9 |