This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Extended content
|
---|
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all! Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk). |
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Thanks for uploading
File:Bit House Saloon logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
The Pacific Northwest College of Art (PNCA) is hosting a Wikipedia edit-a-thon in the Shipley Collins Mediatheque (511 NW Broadway) on Saturday, March 9 from 10am – 2:30pm. This is a free community event designed to teach people to add and edit information about cis and transgender women and nonbinary folks to Wikipedia. We'll have training sessions, artist talks, snacks, free childcare, and plenty of exciting energy and collaboration! You're welcome to drop in any time during the event. Participants are encouraged to bring their own laptops and charging cables, though if you are not able, computer stations will be available. Please visit this link for more information. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 21:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Sullivan's Gulch Bar & Grill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sullivan's Gulch Bar & Grill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 18:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
|
The Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education, in partnership with social practice artist Shoshana Gugenheim and as part of the Art+Feminism Project, will host the 2nd Annual International Women's Day Wikipedia Edit-a-thon to edit and/or create Wikipedia articles for Jewish women artists. The event will be held at the museum on Thursday, March 7 from 4 to 8 pm. Pre-registration is preferred but not required. Members of the public are invited to come to the museum to learn about the editing process, its history, its impact, and how to do it. We aim to collaboratively edit/enter 18 Jewish women artists into the canon. Support will be provided by an experienced local Wikipedian who will be on site to teach and guide the process. This edit-a-thon will serve as both a public art action and a public educational program. Participants will have an opportunity to select an artist/s ahead of time or on site.
Please visit this link and the meetup page for more information. Thanks! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I may have already brought this up with you, so if I have, I'm asking again: Why did you tell me at some point in the not-too-distant past that if I wanted to make a page for a topic you'd already made a redirect for, to just approach or ping you and ask for you to request speedy deletion for it yourself, but you don't actually approach any other editor to ask them to do so for theirs? I'm not asking this so you'll start doing it to me, but it seems like a double standard, as if this was some congenial thing you would afford other editors/you want them to let you know their intentions, but you don't seem to want to let them know you're intending to make pages for their redirects by informing them about it. Instead, you're still going the draft route (as you've done for the two Diplo EPs you just made articles for), as if you're unsure the topics you're making redirects for are even notable. You're not new, you're an editor who's been around for over a decade, like myself, and I would trust by this point you know what's notable and what's not, considering you're also including news sources and reviews on them, which are clear indications of notability. Please don't tell me the only reason is "I don't know how editors would react if asked, but I know I would if asked" because as I said, it just seemed like you want(ed) to be informed for some reason but don't actually do the same in practice. I'm not accusing you of acting in bad faith, I'm just baffled by the fact that you're still making these articles as drafts instead of in your userspace. I only recommend this to newer editors. This is exactly why I never did and still won't come to you to let you know; I'll just request it elsewhere, because your request made no sense if it's not a vice versa thing. I'll also be sure to make a little stub next time Diplo announces an EP, album or notable song, and it'd be great to see you work on that...Doubt it though. Ss 112 12:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu ( talk) 03:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Take a look at Theneondemon's edits. They go back far, and it's a pattern of them constantly changing the progress tables to fit their own view point. I'm not sure whether to take this to ANI yet, but it will help to have a few more eyes on it. Pinging Brocicle as well. Thanks. Nihlus 04:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Lines of Color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mjs1991 ( talk) 05:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 17:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
About This Month in GLAM ·
Subscribe/Unsubscribe ·
Global message delivery ·
Romaine 07:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
About This Month in GLAM ·
Subscribe/Unsubscribe ·
Global message delivery ·
Romaine 20:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
About This Month in GLAM ·
Subscribe/Unsubscribe ·
Global message delivery ·
Romaine 06:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Rock Candy Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Candy Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford ( talk) 17:35, 8 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:08, 10 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on White Owl Social Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Graywalls ( talk) 13:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Graywalls: I don't feel inclined to reply here. These discussions are becoming circular. Happy editing, ---
Another Believer (
Talk) 14:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
You wrote "Can you please restore this page? The entry should not have been deleted." Maybe you could tell me why you think it shouldn't have been deleted. Deb ( talk) 14:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
|
And sympathy. As someone who has been hit before with a rapid-fire series of AfDs (sometimes by sometimes by sockpuppets, other times by POV editors,) I know ow overwhelming this can feel. I have learned a lot about mistakes I was making from deletion discussions, and am a more careful editor now. Don't take it too much to heart. A few deleted articles are not that big a deal. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, and I hope all is well. With some of your newest templates of West Coast artists, there seems to be an unwritten template rule (maybe it should be written) that a template should have at least five entries. Templates like {{ Buster Simpson}} are coming in under that. There are quite a few major artists who have under five possible-use entries, and they are untemplated (my favorites among the 'untemplated' include John Peter Russell and many European painters). But I am a template snob, so there's that. Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:02, 13 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I noticed that you have updated the importance scale of several WikiProjects. Out of curiosity, can anyone update this? What is the criteria that is used? For example, the importance scale for Pure Heroine is low even though I think it should be raised a bit higher given how many publications have cited the album as influential or a record that aided in pop music's transition to slower tempo songs and deeper lyrical content. What do you think? De88 ( talk) 23:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, Another Believer, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Plastique Tiara should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara . You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Onel5969 TT me 13:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Plastique Tiara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 05:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
During the situation with Tony85poon, I wondered why you're not an admin. I found User_talk:Another_Believer/Archive_24#No_mop? and I can say I was once like you, deflecting suggestions that I run for adminship, and those two points were two of my reasons for saying no. But, to those points, (a) I thought the admin nomination process would be a pain too, but it wasn't. There are a few challenging questions to answer, but they can help you reflect on your editing and what kind of admin you'd be. And (b) Mr Guye showed you that list of tools. It can get complex, but you can keep it simple too. If there's a vandal working fast and furious, you can block them. Protecting pages from vandalism, removing serious BLP violations from the edit histories, that's mostly what I use it for. If there's an admin task you don't want to involve yourself in, you don't have to! You could be the admin who blocks a stray vandal once or twice but otherwise focuses on the content. I'm still creating content about the same rate I was before. I was hesitant to take the plunge too, but I don't regret it. I doubt you would either. And we could use you as an admin around here. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi! It's been a week or two. What are your thoughts? – Muboshgu ( talk) 15:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Just want to ask your opinion on something I'd like to do in the Honey Davenport article. There's a section about the Monster Bar controversy, which was sparked by this flyer. That image itself is not licensed for reuse, but do you think it would be appropriate to add a low-resolution version of it to the article under WP:NFCCP? Armadillopteryx talk 22:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Argo Design". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 22:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Thanks for creating Yuhua Hamasaki. I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 13:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Yuhua Hamasaki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuhua Hamasaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Soju (drag queen) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soju (drag queen) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
|
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Electric Paradise (song). Since you had some involvement with the Electric Paradise (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 15:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Electric Paradise (David Guetta song). Since you had some involvement with the Electric Paradise (David Guetta song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 15:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yosemite (Lana Del Rey song). Since you had some involvement with the Yosemite (Lana Del Rey song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 23:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect When the World Was at War We Just Kept Dancing. Since you had some involvement with the When the World Was at War We Just Kept Dancing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 23:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Hi. Are you interested in working on No Gay No Way please? It looks notable to me. Not sure if this is the first campaign of its kind... Zigzig20s ( talk) 22:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
Hi, this all looks off topic to the subject of Dante's nightclub. It might be relevant to an article about that building, but the article is about the club itself. If you disagree that this is off topic, please be bold and add material to the article or alterantively since the article talk page is for by-god discussion of article improvements, please start a by-god substantive discussion about this material. Per WP:TPG and WP:BRD. Thanks. Note than almost three weeks have gone by since you wrote the material was parked for "future reference" but no one, including you, seems to have done anything in that time. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 17:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC) Moving this content over from the article for future reference:
|
There is no mention of this title at Interpol (band) or Interpol discography. Can you please add it, as you created the redirects? The WP:BURDEN is therefore on you. Not being mentioned at the target is a common reason for deletion at WP:RFD, and several of yours have been deleted for this reason as well. Ss 112 22:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Libby Werbel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libby Werbel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Biwom ( talk) 01:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Thanks for uploading
File:Prism Health logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC) |
I have made this article a GA nominee and am currently awaiting a review from BeatlesLedTV. I'm not asking you to review it in his current absence (probably asleep) but could you look at it and tell me if there's any issues? Kyle Peake ( talk) 15:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I am currently creating the project and have various sections, Goals for example. Should I post content in these sections myself or wait until there's more members? -- Kyle Peake ( talk) 16:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
An article you created or have contributed to has been nominated for deletion
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Anarchyte ( talk | work) 11:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Just wondering if you could swing by Providence Park and grab some photos of the new construction there before it's too late. Would be helpful for when the article is eventually expanded. Sounder Bruce 22:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Thanks for alerting me to that discussion. I reply here (rather than there) because it is a serious but complex set of issues that you touch on, and I am not sure I will usefully progress the thing if I jump into the soup on the basis of instant reactions. My general impression is that you have triggered lots of interesting thoughts and ideas, but the more strands you get into the discussion the harder it becomes to get to something that will cohere into a doable project. Herding cats comes to mind. And speaking (writing) for myself, I fear I am instinctively more likely to identify with the cats than with the shepherds and their dogs, however much I admire and / or respect the motives of the dogs and their partners. My (relatively) considered thoughts on the translation project are summarised here. It was set up - or at least relaunched - by a wiki-user with huge focus, energy and sheer intellectual horsepower steaming out of his ears. "Dr Blofeld" has done more that is good for wikipedia than most of us are ever likely to manage ("IMHO..."). And he himself has contributed large amounts of good content over the years which gives him authority in terms of leading - trying to lead - others of us. But nevertheless, the translation project was an example of Person A enthusiastically telling Persons B, C and D and and what to do. And, which is more striking, how to do it. I went along with it because it ties in, more or less, with what I already did. I still do partly out of habit, partly because the structure of the thing helps me structure my wiki activity and partly because simply having it still there draws peoples' attention to the potential goldmine of wiki-viable information in wikipedia versions which are not in the English language. And although none of the other people who jumped in and joined the relaunched project back in 2015 still uses it to structure their work, many of them are still producing excellent translations for en-wiki. Mostly quietly unless (1) you know where to look or (2) you just happen to alight on an example. I have received various invitations to participate in marathons over the years, but I tend to ignore them (if they're standardised) or at least politely decline (if they're personal). Time spent mastering the marathon-rules (or worse still, trying to influence them) is time I would rather spend contributing "content". But this is a personal thing to me. The team sports gene has rather passed me by. That makes me a bit of a curmudgeon. Guilty as charged; but there are self-evidently an awful lot of curmudgens doing their number constructively (in many cases) on wikipedia. Marathons can be fun once in a while, but I think - however much I shared the underlying goals - I think I would be unlikely to come on board and if I did I'd be unlikely to stay. But that's just me. I do wish you every success. Wikipedia always needs new ideas, and with the average age of productive contributors still getting higher I suspect that these days it needs them ever more. And you have already triggered plenty of other thoughts each one of which may go to a good place on a large scale or a lesser scale. That's all helpful. Thank you much. Success Charles01 ( talk) 07:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
|
I added both SPI and that image you'd mentioned to the LGBT culture in Portland, Oregon article... good snag! AHampton ( talk) 00:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I've added coords. The map "Portland downtown" seems to cover it, though I'll do another if you don't like it. I leave you to add the map to the infobox - that's your skill not mine. You've probably seen a ping to a talk page thread to someone who seems to have deleted lots of the modules that drive Oregn maps - User talk:Plastikspork#Deletions. That's a bit annoying. -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 10:38, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Tagishsimon and Jonesey95: Thank you, both! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nostrana (restaurant) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Valereee -- Valereee ( talk) 13:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Nostrana (restaurant) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nostrana (restaurant) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Valereee -- Valereee ( talk) 19:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Weed the People you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 04:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Weed the People you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Weed the People for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 23:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Weed the People you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Weed the People for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 03:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 21:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article " Why Did You Do That?" has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I think it should now pass GA criteria for prose.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. I'm here just to ask if this [1] can be added to the Our Planet page. If so, where should I put it at? Opening a new section about the impacts of the documentary? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tray Framework ( talk • contribs) 09:11, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tray Framework ( talk • contribs) 16:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC) It's done. Please take a look and let me know your thoughts about it, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tray Framework ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
I am bothered by your comments along the line of "removing similar low quality image", reverting with comment such as "it was better" as projects an assertion of inferiority against others and superiority of yourself. Most recently, in this . I am not the only who voiced concerns of your apparent superiority attitude as seen here. When editing on articles in which you worked on or created, the interaction makes me feel as if you are exhibiting a sense of ownership on those articles. In my actual opinion, I believe the composition of the main photo in the article in question is quite poor, but that is my opinion and it would be uncivil for me to remove it with a remark like yours. Graywalls ( talk) 14:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Jason,
Thank you for your recent work on Notre Dame fire. You have greatly helped the article and for this I reward you with a barnstar!
The Minor Barnstar | ||
For excellent contributions to the Notre-Dame Fire page (current event). Muffington ( talk) 19:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks, Muffington ( talk) 19:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Article Rescue Squadron. We have shared concerns. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:50, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I know tweets aren't ideal sources, and we should try to find media coverage that repeats the statement instead of citing the tweet itself, but Ru has actually personally tweeted that fictional characters aren't permissible due to copyright. Bearcat ( talk) 21:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Another Believer. I've noticed that you have worked on Portland-related articles in the past, and was hoping that you could offer some help with this article. I scheduled it for a future TFL appearance, but just noticed that one of the entries in the table has a failed verification tag. It appears that at least one of the sources lists a different height than we do, which may be why the tag was placed there. Would you mind taking a minute to look at this and see if we need to fix the entry in question? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Giants2008 ( Talk) 00:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Just wondering if it would be better to redirect Sullivan's Crossing and Flanders Crossing into I-84 and I-405, respectively, until they're actually built. It's fairly rare for a "normal" freeway bridge to have its own standalone article, and I've only seen Gibbs Street Pedestrian Bridge as an exception to this. Sounder Bruce 02:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Christopher Paul Hasson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Paul Hasson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 10:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |
Portal:Rufus Wainwright, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Rufus Wainwright and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Rufus Wainwright during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac ( talk) 17:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Hey, you have a big interest in art. Would you be able to help out with ME!? It's a mural in The Gulch, Nashville, Tennessee, that at least three local news outlets are reporting is connected to Taylor Swift's April 26 announcement. If it turns out to be nothing, I'm willing to have it deleted/moved to my userspace. Anything you can do/add would be cool. Ss 112 15:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey! Sent you an email on this, but I'll also say here: Taylor said she commissioned the artwork. However, it being a song title is still unconfirmed. If it does end up being a song title, would you help transform it into an article about that? Ss 112
|
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "Me Too" (Meghan Trainor song) has been completed and in my opinion now meets GA standards.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 15:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Snatch Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- wooden superman 14:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:
Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, Ceranthor, Lee Vilenski, and Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and MPJ-DK with a seven item GT. So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Vivacious (drag queen) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivacious (drag queen) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- wooden superman 12:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Nina West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina West until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- wooden superman 12:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Miz Cracker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miz Cracker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- wooden superman 12:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Pete Remembers Woody is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Remembers Woody until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 14:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
I'm thinking of putting the above album, which you created over a decade ago, up for deletion – I can't see how it passes GNG in any way, it didn't even appear to make the top 100 of the UK Compilations chart. Would you have any objections? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Thanks for uploading File:Acoustic 07 album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
That's what happens when you have a single section open for way too long while editing. Thanks! (Might have to actually find and upload the photo I snapped at Hands Across Hawthorne of the former mayor of Portland - botched my sub, ha! AHampton ( talk) 20:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
The phrase was Latin and no misspelling. I did not know how to mark it so I left the language template [undefined] Error: {{Lang}}: no text ( help) for another editor. I cannot fix it even after I read about the language template. sorry. Eschoryii ( talk) 21:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Another Believer! I got a messaged that you mentioned me here two days ago, but for the life of me I can't seem to find it. Probably not enough coffee yet. Did you want me for something? -- valereee ( talk) 12:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Maybe It's Time has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 12:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Hey, would you mind weighing in with your thoughts here Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 15? In ictu oculi nominated a redirect I made to The Space Between the Shadows, Face of the Sun, for deletion. Just thought you might want to know since you made the album article. Thanks! Ss 112 12:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article No Vacancy Lounge has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I did not make the change, but you might want to consider putting Swanburg's second quote in the Reception Section in a blockquote format, it's long enough, although visually it might look odd with no text after it.
Best of luck moving the article forward.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi there User:Another Believer. You may recall I asked whether you would review a draft of an article about a female journalist, Sarah Jones. I think you agreed (!). Anyway, here it is. Would love any feedback, particularly whether you believe she meets the notability standard for individuals.
Extended content
|
---|
Sarah Jones is an American-born broadcast and print journalist, author, and founder of the Remembering Fallen Journalists movement, which honors journalists who have died while on assignment. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Jones grew up outside Cleveland, Ohio. Her father, Albert Beckford Jones, a business executive, served as of 2019 as special advisor for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Research Competitiveness Program (RCP). Her mother, Layla, is a retired 19th century English literature professor. When Sarah Jones was 13, she wrote a cancer awareness publication, Cancer Awareness Magazine (CAM for Kids) focused on Leukemia, that was later published as a book by the American Cancer Society. The publication received approval by the American Cancer Society, Cleveland Clinic, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Mayo Clinic and Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York. These groups distributed it to leukemia patients and their families. [7] [8] Jones earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in communications from Lake Forest College, Illinois, and a M.A. with Merit, in 2009, from the City, University of London, England graduate school of journalism. [6]
In 2018, she was hired as a television journalist by KWQC, a television station serving the Quad Cities metropolitan area in Iowa. Various media companies have employed her as a journalist, among them TRT World, Reuters Trust; VICE; Al Jazeera America; CNN; ITN’s Channel 4 News; Gulf News; BBC World Service; affiliates of NBC News and ABC News [6] [9]Jones is recipient of the Best Journalist in Social Media at the Sixth Annual Shorty Awards in New York City, Times Center, in 2014. [6]Jones received an International Women’s Media Foundation fellow in 2018 and is a two time International Reporting Project Fellow (IRP.) [9] She has been a featured speaker at international conferences, including the International Women and Justice Summit in 2016. [10] References
|
Thanks in advance for any guidance. DanDavidCook ( talk) 21:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Re: [1] Ah, my mistake... late night edit! 😉 Thanks for your efforts.👍 → 72.234.220.38 ( talk) 00:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
To not take up so much space in the main discussion, I will provide an overview here to attempt to understand your expectations using albums by The 1975 as an example. The 1975 have four albums and four EPs within Category:The 1975 albums.
Let's ignore the new album and the EPs for now. Based on the sourced genres of their 3 albums, I've categorized each album article in the respective categories (or the "by nationality" sub-category). Based only on those 3, what do you see as permittable within Category:The 1975 albums? Each of the three has rock or a subgenre of rock, each has pop or a subgenre of pop, each has a subgenre of R&B and each has a subgenre of electronic music, so can its parents be: Category:Rock albums by English artists, Category:Pop albums by English artists, Category:Rhythm and blues albums by English artists, and Category:Electronic albums by English artists? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 01:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC) |
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
You redirected this album article back to the artist Amon Tobin back in February – I agree it was the right thing to do at the time, given that the album's release was still more than two months away and there was no information about it at that moment. However, we now have at least five reviews from reliable sources [2] and an article, albeit a primary source interview in Clash magazine [3]. Do you think we could restore the article now? Richard3120 ( talk) 15:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a
discussion taking place as to whether
Portal:Adele should be
deleted at
MfD.
You are being notified because you were a participant in the
previous nomination discussion.
Thank you, –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 21:03, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, the list ends at 4500. I'm not sure who should be notify. Need to start a new list 4501-5000. Thanks, SWP13 ( talk) 22:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
>>Thanks for starting a new list. BTW, there was a numbering problem in all of the archived list. I fixed all the lists. Trial and error, and dumb luck. :) SWP13 ( talk) 22:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
>>I saw numbers from 1-9, and 0, repeated before. After my update, the numbers displayed correctly. Maybe there is an alternative fix. SWP13 ( talk) 00:44, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Unless I'm mistaken, the Model T Driving School is part of Western Antique Aeroplane & Automobile Museum in Bend. Not sure a separate stub is viable? ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Extended content
|
---|
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all! Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk). |
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
The Pacific Northwest College of Art (PNCA) is hosting a Wikipedia edit-a-thon in the Shipley Collins Mediatheque (511 NW Broadway) on Saturday, March 9 from 10am – 2:30pm. This is a free community event designed to teach people to add and edit information about cis and transgender women and nonbinary folks to Wikipedia. We'll have training sessions, artist talks, snacks, free childcare, and plenty of exciting energy and collaboration! You're welcome to drop in any time during the event. Participants are encouraged to bring their own laptops and charging cables, though if you are not able, computer stations will be available. Please visit this link for more information. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 21:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Sullivan's Gulch Bar & Grill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sullivan's Gulch Bar & Grill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 18:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
|
The Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education, in partnership with social practice artist Shoshana Gugenheim and as part of the Art+Feminism Project, will host the 2nd Annual International Women's Day Wikipedia Edit-a-thon to edit and/or create Wikipedia articles for Jewish women artists. The event will be held at the museum on Thursday, March 7 from 4 to 8 pm. Pre-registration is preferred but not required. Members of the public are invited to come to the museum to learn about the editing process, its history, its impact, and how to do it. We aim to collaboratively edit/enter 18 Jewish women artists into the canon. Support will be provided by an experienced local Wikipedian who will be on site to teach and guide the process. This edit-a-thon will serve as both a public art action and a public educational program. Participants will have an opportunity to select an artist/s ahead of time or on site.
Please visit this link and the meetup page for more information. Thanks! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I may have already brought this up with you, so if I have, I'm asking again: Why did you tell me at some point in the not-too-distant past that if I wanted to make a page for a topic you'd already made a redirect for, to just approach or ping you and ask for you to request speedy deletion for it yourself, but you don't actually approach any other editor to ask them to do so for theirs? I'm not asking this so you'll start doing it to me, but it seems like a double standard, as if this was some congenial thing you would afford other editors/you want them to let you know their intentions, but you don't seem to want to let them know you're intending to make pages for their redirects by informing them about it. Instead, you're still going the draft route (as you've done for the two Diplo EPs you just made articles for), as if you're unsure the topics you're making redirects for are even notable. You're not new, you're an editor who's been around for over a decade, like myself, and I would trust by this point you know what's notable and what's not, considering you're also including news sources and reviews on them, which are clear indications of notability. Please don't tell me the only reason is "I don't know how editors would react if asked, but I know I would if asked" because as I said, it just seemed like you want(ed) to be informed for some reason but don't actually do the same in practice. I'm not accusing you of acting in bad faith, I'm just baffled by the fact that you're still making these articles as drafts instead of in your userspace. I only recommend this to newer editors. This is exactly why I never did and still won't come to you to let you know; I'll just request it elsewhere, because your request made no sense if it's not a vice versa thing. I'll also be sure to make a little stub next time Diplo announces an EP, album or notable song, and it'd be great to see you work on that...Doubt it though. Ss 112 12:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu ( talk) 03:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Take a look at Theneondemon's edits. They go back far, and it's a pattern of them constantly changing the progress tables to fit their own view point. I'm not sure whether to take this to ANI yet, but it will help to have a few more eyes on it. Pinging Brocicle as well. Thanks. Nihlus 04:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Lines of Color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mjs1991 ( talk) 05:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
About This Month in GLAM ·
Subscribe/Unsubscribe ·
Global message delivery ·
Romaine 07:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
About This Month in GLAM ·
Subscribe/Unsubscribe ·
Global message delivery ·
Romaine 20:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
About This Month in GLAM ·
Subscribe/Unsubscribe ·
Global message delivery ·
Romaine 06:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Rock Candy Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Candy Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford ( talk) 17:35, 8 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on White Owl Social Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Graywalls ( talk) 13:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Graywalls: I don't feel inclined to reply here. These discussions are becoming circular. Happy editing, ---
Another Believer (
Talk) 14:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
You wrote "Can you please restore this page? The entry should not have been deleted." Maybe you could tell me why you think it shouldn't have been deleted. Deb ( talk) 14:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
|
And sympathy. As someone who has been hit before with a rapid-fire series of AfDs (sometimes by sometimes by sockpuppets, other times by POV editors,) I know ow overwhelming this can feel. I have learned a lot about mistakes I was making from deletion discussions, and am a more careful editor now. Don't take it too much to heart. A few deleted articles are not that big a deal. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 18:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, and I hope all is well. With some of your newest templates of West Coast artists, there seems to be an unwritten template rule (maybe it should be written) that a template should have at least five entries. Templates like {{ Buster Simpson}} are coming in under that. There are quite a few major artists who have under five possible-use entries, and they are untemplated (my favorites among the 'untemplated' include John Peter Russell and many European painters). But I am a template snob, so there's that. Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
Hello, I noticed that you have updated the importance scale of several WikiProjects. Out of curiosity, can anyone update this? What is the criteria that is used? For example, the importance scale for Pure Heroine is low even though I think it should be raised a bit higher given how many publications have cited the album as influential or a record that aided in pop music's transition to slower tempo songs and deeper lyrical content. What do you think? De88 ( talk) 23:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, Another Believer, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Plastique Tiara should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara . You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Onel5969 TT me 13:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Plastique Tiara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 05:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
During the situation with Tony85poon, I wondered why you're not an admin. I found User_talk:Another_Believer/Archive_24#No_mop? and I can say I was once like you, deflecting suggestions that I run for adminship, and those two points were two of my reasons for saying no. But, to those points, (a) I thought the admin nomination process would be a pain too, but it wasn't. There are a few challenging questions to answer, but they can help you reflect on your editing and what kind of admin you'd be. And (b) Mr Guye showed you that list of tools. It can get complex, but you can keep it simple too. If there's a vandal working fast and furious, you can block them. Protecting pages from vandalism, removing serious BLP violations from the edit histories, that's mostly what I use it for. If there's an admin task you don't want to involve yourself in, you don't have to! You could be the admin who blocks a stray vandal once or twice but otherwise focuses on the content. I'm still creating content about the same rate I was before. I was hesitant to take the plunge too, but I don't regret it. I doubt you would either. And we could use you as an admin around here. – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi! It's been a week or two. What are your thoughts? – Muboshgu ( talk) 15:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Just want to ask your opinion on something I'd like to do in the Honey Davenport article. There's a section about the Monster Bar controversy, which was sparked by this flyer. That image itself is not licensed for reuse, but do you think it would be appropriate to add a low-resolution version of it to the article under WP:NFCCP? Armadillopteryx talk 22:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Argo Design". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 22:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Thanks for creating Yuhua Hamasaki. I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 13:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Yuhua Hamasaki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuhua Hamasaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Soju (drag queen) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soju (drag queen) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
|
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Electric Paradise (song). Since you had some involvement with the Electric Paradise (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 15:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Electric Paradise (David Guetta song). Since you had some involvement with the Electric Paradise (David Guetta song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 15:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yosemite (Lana Del Rey song). Since you had some involvement with the Yosemite (Lana Del Rey song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 23:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect When the World Was at War We Just Kept Dancing. Since you had some involvement with the When the World Was at War We Just Kept Dancing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho ( talk) 23:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Hi. Are you interested in working on No Gay No Way please? It looks notable to me. Not sure if this is the first campaign of its kind... Zigzig20s ( talk) 22:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
Hi, this all looks off topic to the subject of Dante's nightclub. It might be relevant to an article about that building, but the article is about the club itself. If you disagree that this is off topic, please be bold and add material to the article or alterantively since the article talk page is for by-god discussion of article improvements, please start a by-god substantive discussion about this material. Per WP:TPG and WP:BRD. Thanks. Note than almost three weeks have gone by since you wrote the material was parked for "future reference" but no one, including you, seems to have done anything in that time. NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 17:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC) Moving this content over from the article for future reference:
|
There is no mention of this title at Interpol (band) or Interpol discography. Can you please add it, as you created the redirects? The WP:BURDEN is therefore on you. Not being mentioned at the target is a common reason for deletion at WP:RFD, and several of yours have been deleted for this reason as well. Ss 112 22:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Libby Werbel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libby Werbel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Biwom ( talk) 01:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC) |
I have made this article a GA nominee and am currently awaiting a review from BeatlesLedTV. I'm not asking you to review it in his current absence (probably asleep) but could you look at it and tell me if there's any issues? Kyle Peake ( talk) 15:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I am currently creating the project and have various sections, Goals for example. Should I post content in these sections myself or wait until there's more members? -- Kyle Peake ( talk) 16:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
|
|
Hello, Another Believer. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Anarchyte ( talk | work) 11:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Just wondering if you could swing by Providence Park and grab some photos of the new construction there before it's too late. Would be helpful for when the article is eventually expanded. Sounder Bruce 22:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Thanks for alerting me to that discussion. I reply here (rather than there) because it is a serious but complex set of issues that you touch on, and I am not sure I will usefully progress the thing if I jump into the soup on the basis of instant reactions. My general impression is that you have triggered lots of interesting thoughts and ideas, but the more strands you get into the discussion the harder it becomes to get to something that will cohere into a doable project. Herding cats comes to mind. And speaking (writing) for myself, I fear I am instinctively more likely to identify with the cats than with the shepherds and their dogs, however much I admire and / or respect the motives of the dogs and their partners. My (relatively) considered thoughts on the translation project are summarised here. It was set up - or at least relaunched - by a wiki-user with huge focus, energy and sheer intellectual horsepower steaming out of his ears. "Dr Blofeld" has done more that is good for wikipedia than most of us are ever likely to manage ("IMHO..."). And he himself has contributed large amounts of good content over the years which gives him authority in terms of leading - trying to lead - others of us. But nevertheless, the translation project was an example of Person A enthusiastically telling Persons B, C and D and and what to do. And, which is more striking, how to do it. I went along with it because it ties in, more or less, with what I already did. I still do partly out of habit, partly because the structure of the thing helps me structure my wiki activity and partly because simply having it still there draws peoples' attention to the potential goldmine of wiki-viable information in wikipedia versions which are not in the English language. And although none of the other people who jumped in and joined the relaunched project back in 2015 still uses it to structure their work, many of them are still producing excellent translations for en-wiki. Mostly quietly unless (1) you know where to look or (2) you just happen to alight on an example. I have received various invitations to participate in marathons over the years, but I tend to ignore them (if they're standardised) or at least politely decline (if they're personal). Time spent mastering the marathon-rules (or worse still, trying to influence them) is time I would rather spend contributing "content". But this is a personal thing to me. The team sports gene has rather passed me by. That makes me a bit of a curmudgeon. Guilty as charged; but there are self-evidently an awful lot of curmudgens doing their number constructively (in many cases) on wikipedia. Marathons can be fun once in a while, but I think - however much I shared the underlying goals - I think I would be unlikely to come on board and if I did I'd be unlikely to stay. But that's just me. I do wish you every success. Wikipedia always needs new ideas, and with the average age of productive contributors still getting higher I suspect that these days it needs them ever more. And you have already triggered plenty of other thoughts each one of which may go to a good place on a large scale or a lesser scale. That's all helpful. Thank you much. Success Charles01 ( talk) 07:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
|
I added both SPI and that image you'd mentioned to the LGBT culture in Portland, Oregon article... good snag! AHampton ( talk) 00:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I've added coords. The map "Portland downtown" seems to cover it, though I'll do another if you don't like it. I leave you to add the map to the infobox - that's your skill not mine. You've probably seen a ping to a talk page thread to someone who seems to have deleted lots of the modules that drive Oregn maps - User talk:Plastikspork#Deletions. That's a bit annoying. -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 10:38, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
@ Tagishsimon and Jonesey95: Thank you, both! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nostrana (restaurant) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Valereee -- Valereee ( talk) 13:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Nostrana (restaurant) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nostrana (restaurant) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Valereee -- Valereee ( talk) 19:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Weed the People you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 04:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Weed the People you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Weed the People for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 23:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Weed the People you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Weed the People for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS ( talk) 03:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 21:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article " Why Did You Do That?" has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I think it should now pass GA criteria for prose.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. I'm here just to ask if this [1] can be added to the Our Planet page. If so, where should I put it at? Opening a new section about the impacts of the documentary? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tray Framework ( talk • contribs) 09:11, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tray Framework ( talk • contribs) 16:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC) It's done. Please take a look and let me know your thoughts about it, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tray Framework ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
I am bothered by your comments along the line of "removing similar low quality image", reverting with comment such as "it was better" as projects an assertion of inferiority against others and superiority of yourself. Most recently, in this . I am not the only who voiced concerns of your apparent superiority attitude as seen here. When editing on articles in which you worked on or created, the interaction makes me feel as if you are exhibiting a sense of ownership on those articles. In my actual opinion, I believe the composition of the main photo in the article in question is quite poor, but that is my opinion and it would be uncivil for me to remove it with a remark like yours. Graywalls ( talk) 14:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Jason,
Thank you for your recent work on Notre Dame fire. You have greatly helped the article and for this I reward you with a barnstar!
The Minor Barnstar | ||
For excellent contributions to the Notre-Dame Fire page (current event). Muffington ( talk) 19:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks, Muffington ( talk) 19:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Article Rescue Squadron. We have shared concerns. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:50, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I know tweets aren't ideal sources, and we should try to find media coverage that repeats the statement instead of citing the tweet itself, but Ru has actually personally tweeted that fictional characters aren't permissible due to copyright. Bearcat ( talk) 21:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Another Believer. I've noticed that you have worked on Portland-related articles in the past, and was hoping that you could offer some help with this article. I scheduled it for a future TFL appearance, but just noticed that one of the entries in the table has a failed verification tag. It appears that at least one of the sources lists a different height than we do, which may be why the tag was placed there. Would you mind taking a minute to look at this and see if we need to fix the entry in question? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. Giants2008 ( Talk) 00:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Just wondering if it would be better to redirect Sullivan's Crossing and Flanders Crossing into I-84 and I-405, respectively, until they're actually built. It's fairly rare for a "normal" freeway bridge to have its own standalone article, and I've only seen Gibbs Street Pedestrian Bridge as an exception to this. Sounder Bruce 02:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Christopher Paul Hasson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Paul Hasson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 10:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |
Portal:Rufus Wainwright, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Rufus Wainwright and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Rufus Wainwright during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac ( talk) 17:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Hey, you have a big interest in art. Would you be able to help out with ME!? It's a mural in The Gulch, Nashville, Tennessee, that at least three local news outlets are reporting is connected to Taylor Swift's April 26 announcement. If it turns out to be nothing, I'm willing to have it deleted/moved to my userspace. Anything you can do/add would be cool. Ss 112 15:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey! Sent you an email on this, but I'll also say here: Taylor said she commissioned the artwork. However, it being a song title is still unconfirmed. If it does end up being a song title, would you help transform it into an article about that? Ss 112
|
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "Me Too" (Meghan Trainor song) has been completed and in my opinion now meets GA standards.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 15:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Snatch Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- wooden superman 14:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:
Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, Ceranthor, Lee Vilenski, and Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and MPJ-DK with a seven item GT. So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 ( talk), Sturmvogel 66 ( talk), Vanamonde ( talk) and Cwmhiraeth ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Vivacious (drag queen) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivacious (drag queen) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- wooden superman 12:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Nina West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina West until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- wooden superman 12:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Miz Cracker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miz Cracker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- wooden superman 12:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Pete Remembers Woody is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Remembers Woody until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs) 14:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
I'm thinking of putting the above album, which you created over a decade ago, up for deletion – I can't see how it passes GNG in any way, it didn't even appear to make the top 100 of the UK Compilations chart. Would you have any objections? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Thanks for uploading File:Acoustic 07 album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
That's what happens when you have a single section open for way too long while editing. Thanks! (Might have to actually find and upload the photo I snapped at Hands Across Hawthorne of the former mayor of Portland - botched my sub, ha! AHampton ( talk) 20:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
The phrase was Latin and no misspelling. I did not know how to mark it so I left the language template [undefined] Error: {{Lang}}: no text ( help) for another editor. I cannot fix it even after I read about the language template. sorry. Eschoryii ( talk) 21:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey, Another Believer! I got a messaged that you mentioned me here two days ago, but for the life of me I can't seem to find it. Probably not enough coffee yet. Did you want me for something? -- valereee ( talk) 12:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Maybe It's Time has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 12:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Hey, would you mind weighing in with your thoughts here Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 15? In ictu oculi nominated a redirect I made to The Space Between the Shadows, Face of the Sun, for deletion. Just thought you might want to know since you made the album article. Thanks! Ss 112 12:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article No Vacancy Lounge has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I did not make the change, but you might want to consider putting Swanburg's second quote in the Reception Section in a blockquote format, it's long enough, although visually it might look odd with no text after it.
Best of luck moving the article forward.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi there User:Another Believer. You may recall I asked whether you would review a draft of an article about a female journalist, Sarah Jones. I think you agreed (!). Anyway, here it is. Would love any feedback, particularly whether you believe she meets the notability standard for individuals.
Extended content
|
---|
Sarah Jones is an American-born broadcast and print journalist, author, and founder of the Remembering Fallen Journalists movement, which honors journalists who have died while on assignment. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Jones grew up outside Cleveland, Ohio. Her father, Albert Beckford Jones, a business executive, served as of 2019 as special advisor for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Research Competitiveness Program (RCP). Her mother, Layla, is a retired 19th century English literature professor. When Sarah Jones was 13, she wrote a cancer awareness publication, Cancer Awareness Magazine (CAM for Kids) focused on Leukemia, that was later published as a book by the American Cancer Society. The publication received approval by the American Cancer Society, Cleveland Clinic, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Mayo Clinic and Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York. These groups distributed it to leukemia patients and their families. [7] [8] Jones earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in communications from Lake Forest College, Illinois, and a M.A. with Merit, in 2009, from the City, University of London, England graduate school of journalism. [6]
In 2018, she was hired as a television journalist by KWQC, a television station serving the Quad Cities metropolitan area in Iowa. Various media companies have employed her as a journalist, among them TRT World, Reuters Trust; VICE; Al Jazeera America; CNN; ITN’s Channel 4 News; Gulf News; BBC World Service; affiliates of NBC News and ABC News [6] [9]Jones is recipient of the Best Journalist in Social Media at the Sixth Annual Shorty Awards in New York City, Times Center, in 2014. [6]Jones received an International Women’s Media Foundation fellow in 2018 and is a two time International Reporting Project Fellow (IRP.) [9] She has been a featured speaker at international conferences, including the International Women and Justice Summit in 2016. [10] References
|
Thanks in advance for any guidance. DanDavidCook ( talk) 21:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Re: [1] Ah, my mistake... late night edit! 😉 Thanks for your efforts.👍 → 72.234.220.38 ( talk) 00:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
To not take up so much space in the main discussion, I will provide an overview here to attempt to understand your expectations using albums by The 1975 as an example. The 1975 have four albums and four EPs within Category:The 1975 albums.
Let's ignore the new album and the EPs for now. Based on the sourced genres of their 3 albums, I've categorized each album article in the respective categories (or the "by nationality" sub-category). Based only on those 3, what do you see as permittable within Category:The 1975 albums? Each of the three has rock or a subgenre of rock, each has pop or a subgenre of pop, each has a subgenre of R&B and each has a subgenre of electronic music, so can its parents be: Category:Rock albums by English artists, Category:Pop albums by English artists, Category:Rhythm and blues albums by English artists, and Category:Electronic albums by English artists? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 01:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC) |
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
You redirected this album article back to the artist Amon Tobin back in February – I agree it was the right thing to do at the time, given that the album's release was still more than two months away and there was no information about it at that moment. However, we now have at least five reviews from reliable sources [2] and an article, albeit a primary source interview in Clash magazine [3]. Do you think we could restore the article now? Richard3120 ( talk) 15:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a
discussion taking place as to whether
Portal:Adele should be
deleted at
MfD.
You are being notified because you were a participant in the
previous nomination discussion.
Thank you, –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 21:03, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, the list ends at 4500. I'm not sure who should be notify. Need to start a new list 4501-5000. Thanks, SWP13 ( talk) 22:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
>>Thanks for starting a new list. BTW, there was a numbering problem in all of the archived list. I fixed all the lists. Trial and error, and dumb luck. :) SWP13 ( talk) 22:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
>>I saw numbers from 1-9, and 0, repeated before. After my update, the numbers displayed correctly. Maybe there is an alternative fix. SWP13 ( talk) 00:44, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
| |
---|---|
|
Unless I'm mistaken, the Model T Driving School is part of Western Antique Aeroplane & Automobile Museum in Bend. Not sure a separate stub is viable? ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:57, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |