This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Bjelleklang - talk 10:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
What was your thought on these? I'm sitting on reception refs and I don't know if I should wait on putting them for the main article, if you were just going to create the episode articles. I'm fine with either. I have some other interview articles as well to sift through. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 20:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
On 11 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A.K.A. Jessica Jones, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Marvel's A.K.A. Jessica Jones's show runner, Melissa Rosenberg, reconfigured the series for Netflix from her original incarnation as an early 2010s ABC series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A.K.A. Jessica Jones. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
I undid your Undo - if you had checked you would have found that the movie had officially been nominated.
Yes sorry I had a think about it and was about to revert my revert to your revert. Thanks ( I suppose it's obvious that 'pending' implies that it's already been nominated, now I think about it....!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpalfour ( talk • contribs) 03:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I thought you may like to voice your opinon on a matter that is currently being debated over at the DC comic book character Katana's Talk page. It concerns Arrow. Thank you and cheers, LLArrow ( talk) 06:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Now is Not the End, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alias and Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thank you for helping with the GA review for Guardians of the Galaxy, and helping make the article a GA in the first place. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daredevil (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Leftovers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
If you are interested in following and/or commenting: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Requesting a block of a user. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello there. I'm sorry for getting in the way with my recent edits to the Aftershocks article. You've been working on MCU articles a lot longer than I have, so you have a better idea of what you're doing than I do. Anyway, I spent a few hours writing and then trimming a plot summary of the article, which I will share with you here. I'm not sure if you have a draft of the article started (you seem to be pretty fond of drafts), but if you don't, I hope you will find my plot summary useful, even though you'll probably trim it further. It's 710 words currently. Does the 400-700 word count from movie plot summaries apply to TV episode plots too, or are they supposed to be shorter?
Also, have you written a draft/are you planning to write a draft of the "Aftershocks" episode article anytime soon? If you are, I'll just wait for you to start it in the mainspace. If you haven't and aren't planning to in the next week or so, I may take a stab at writing it. I hope that if I follow the What They Become article as a template it will meet your standards, since you wrote most of that article. :) I don't want to start the article if you've already got a pretty good draft of it in your userspace. AmericanLemming ( talk) 11:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
In 1988, Skye’s mother helps a young Inhuman named Gordon come to grips with his newfound powers of teleportation; Gordon is revealed to be the eyeless man from the end of the last episode. In the present Skye is quarantined back at SHIELD headquarters because she was exposed to the terrigenesis mist. Everyone at SHIELD is grieving over Triplett, and Coulson wants to get revenge on HYDRA, whom he blames for his death. They mistakenly believe that the Obelisk caused the earthquake and are not aware of Skye’s new powers. Meanwhile, Simmons is in the alien city, documenting it and preparing to flood it. Raina ambushes and kills several SHIELD technicians; her body is now covered in thorns and she has claws on her hands. Simmons shoots her several times but is unable to prevent her from escaping. Coulson then orders Simmons to return to headquarters. A group of high-ranking Hydra officials meets to discuss filling Whitehall’s position. Coulson initiates a plan to strike back at Hydra by transferring Bakshi to General Talbot in exchange for additional assistance against the remaining Hydra operatives. While on their way to deliver Bakshi, Coulson and May are ambushed by SHIELD forces disguised as Hydra soldiers, allowing Bakshi to escape with Hunter, who is also pretending to work for Hydra. The elaborate ruse is intended to deceive Bakshi and have him lead Hunter to other Hydra leaders. Back at SHIELD’s headquarters, Skye and Simmons discuss Raina’s transformation. Skye is deeply disturbed by Simmons’ insistence that Raina is “infected” and that superpowers are inherently dangerous and harmful; Simmons blames herself for Triplett’s death and feels that her interest in superpowers is indirectly responsible. She plans to test Skye’s DNA “just to be safe”, which worries Skye. Dr. Hyde stows away aboard a cargo ship in San Juan where he is found by Raina. She is furious about her transformation and blames him for it. Dr. Hyde is delighted to hear that Skye has undergone terrigenesis, although he still wants revenge on Coulson for killing Whitehall and becoming a father figure to Skye. Raina asks for his help in undoing her transformation, but he tells her that she got what she wanted and that it cannot be reversed. When she says she cannot live as such a repulsive creature, Dr. Hyde coldly tells her to commit suicide. Hunter and Bakshi arrive at Mr. Bloom’s house. Bakshi goes inside and tells Hunter to wait in the car. Morse gets in the car right after Bakshi leaves. Hunter asks her about the secret she and Mac have been keeping. She tells him that they are both in a “support group.” Baskshi tells Bloom that the other leaders of Hydra are plotting to kill them based on false information from Hunter, and Bloom orders the other leaders to be killed. Raina stands at the edge of a busy street, preparing to kill herself by walking into traffic. Fitz tells Skye that she underwent a transformation similar to Raina’s, saying that the only way she could have survived the earthquake is if she had caused it. She becomes very upset and lose control of her powers, shattering a lamp. Skye tries to clean up the broken glass but cuts herself in the process. May comes by and asks if anything is wrong, having heard Skye’s scream. As she explains to Skye how Trip embodied the principles of SHIELD, Coulson arrives at Trip’s home to inform his mother of his death. A montage shows the assassination of several Hydra leaders. Hunter and Morse barge into Bloom’s house, killing him and recapturing Bakshi. May and Simmons see that Skye is bleeding and become suspicious, but Fitz arrives and gives a plausible explanation. He shows Simmons that the DNA tests came back “normal,” allowing Skye to leave quarantine. After May and Simmons leave he explains that he switched Skye’s old blood samples with the new ones and promises to keep her secret to protect her. Raina crosses the road and is almost captured by SHIELD soldiers but is rescued by Gordon, who teleports her to safety. A model car that Mac gave Coulson scans his office and finds Fury’s “toolbox.” Mac reports this to Morse, who says that she will “make contact soon.” |
Found two more: AV Club and Collider. Don't know if I'll be able to add them or not before you get on next. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Captain America Adventure Program from "Bridge and Tunnel".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you're well. I didn't remove them because I'm disputing that the film won the awards. The organisation which gives this award as well as the awards articles subordinate to it went to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix Film Critics Society where they were judged by the community to be non notable. These accolades lists are not a list of every award that a film has won as you can see if you compare this list to the one on IMDb just the notable ones. I hope you understand and won't revert me when I restore my edit. Cowlibob ( talk) 09:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm a fan of consistency myself, but it's important to keep in mind that there are practices—such as listing an internal link under the External links section—that are suboptimal and shouldn't be replicated for the sake of consistency. For example, we wouldn't want to add disambiguators to every US state article just because we do so for Georgia and Washington. The MOS says WP:SEEALSO is the place for portals. And I'm also unsure of the breadth of articles you want to use this non-standard practice on. Anything at all related to the MCU? Just articles on the films themselves? I'm not going to fight you on this, but I hope you'll reconsider. It's best to adhere to standards absent a compelling reason to deviate from them. -- BDD ( talk) 00:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've restored the brief Daredevil episode details for #8-#13. It looks like you removed those. If so, why? - AL
Thanks. I am new to Wikipedia editing. I can see using Netflix descriptions would have been admissable as short quotations if I'd bothered to put them in quotations, and cite the source of origin. -AL
I noticed your undoing of my addition to Talk:X-Men: Days of Future Past. This is perfectly OK; I did go a little too far in my discussion. However, WP:NOTFORUM does state that we "should resolve problems with articles on the relevant talk pages, but please do not take discussion into articles." In other words, NOTFORUM only applies to pages in article space (in my humble opinion), not talk pages. Also see "Off-topic posts" in WP:TALKO. Your thoughts? -- RoyGoldsmith ( talk) 21:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Here's the original diff: [1]
So, I go to add this and see that once again you revert me. Did you even read the whole thing? Doing something like that makes you look even worse than before. And I'm trying my best to be as civil as I can and not say how I really feel. -- Musdan77 ( talk) 01:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
On 20 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 1), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the final six episodes of the first season of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. were informed by the events in the film Captain America: The Winter Soldier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 1). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 20:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I see you have removed my ref addition by saying that it should be included in the lead. But if you check the article you should see that there are also refs in the lead. In general, you are right, it's better to cite the content rather than the lead. But as far as I know there is no guideline against it. And I'd appreciate it if you could do it yourself rather than removing the whole thing. Thank you! -- Chamith (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
It seems that there's some confusion as to whether the Tesseract is the Cosmic Cube and/or the Space Gem. It seems that though the tesseract shares some characteristics with the cosmic cube (which seem to be limited to the shape and involvement with the Red Skull), it's been confirmed to be the space gem both in and out of the films, so the primary information should reside there. I agree that a note about similarities to the cube should be mentioned in the film section of the cosmic cube page, but as there's been no mention of the phrase "cosmic cube" anywhere in the MCU, it shouldn't live there alone. Acbsmith ( talk) 15:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Adamstom.97. With all due respect, the movie never says Stark and Barton are "retiring" from the team. Please see Talk:Avengers: Age of Ultron. Neither that words nor the concept is ever mentioned. Also, we never see the Vision destroy Ultron. All we can state with plots is the concrete, manifest content of the movie. In this case, all we saw was a flash. You or I could each come up with three other possibilities of what that flash could be. Regardless, we can't say Ultron was destroyed. Again, please see the talk page. Thanks, -- Tenebrae ( talk) 19:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
This is a neutral notice of a discussion at Talk:Avengers: Age of Ultron#Subsection: RE: "visit" over using either the word "visit" or the phrase "go to" in a particular context. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 18:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to the Avengers: Age of Ultron article. I am puzzled by your reason—"that implies something different"—as all I did was change the spaced em dashes to unspaced em dashes, which are punctuationally exactly equivalent, but banned by the MoS.— DocWatson42 ( talk) 04:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello there. You recently reverted my edit to Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) where I changed all instances of "Campbell" to "Lincoln". Your reasoning was that "in this encyclopaedia we use formal language, including surnames when noting characters." As far as I can tell, that is found neither in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television, nor in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction, though if it's an unwritten rule (and it seems to be) then we should probably follow it for consistency in most cases.
And I would agree with your assertion that it's generally common practice on Wikipedia to refer to fictional characters by their last names, but in my opinion there are some cases in which doing so may be confusing to the reader. Take Lincoln, for example. I don't believe that he is ever referred to as "Campbell," and I don't even think he says it to Skye when he introduces himself to her in "Afterlife." Thus, his last name only appears in the production notes: Declassifying Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D: Afterlife. I would argue that in such a case our readers would be better served by referring to him as Lincoln.
Anyway, if we're going to always refer to characters by their last names simply because it's more formal, then why doesn't the article call Cal "Johnson" or "Zabo" and why doesn't it call Skye "Johnson"? The reason why it doesn't is because Cal is always called Cal, while Skye is always called Skye (except when Cal calls her Daisy), and it would be highly confusing to do otherwise. I would argue that the spirit of WP:COMMONNAME applies here, even though it's about article titles: "Wikipedia prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in reliable English-language sources) as such names will be the most recognizable and the most natural."
I'm not demanding that we call "Campbell" by his first name "Lincoln" simply because that's my personal preference, but rather because I don't see any policies that demand we refer to characters by their last names, nor do I think it makes sense in this case. If you could point me to a policy or guideline saying we should always use last names for fictional characters, or explain to me your line of thinking, I would be happy to reconsider my position. AmericanLemming ( talk) 17:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
As you can see, I started reworking them on the season articles. Does what I suggested make sense to you? It makes sense to me that the brief overview of the episode is right there in the first sentence, which we get now. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 23:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey! Hope you've been able to watch the series and enjoyed it. I still haven't had the time to start, which is killing me! But I hope to soon to come back and help on the article. I've been adding bits and pieces here and there if you see me popping in, but I haven't watch any of it yet. Also, since the article isn't on my watch, wanted to further explain my last edit on the page. I removed the "Broadcast" subheading because it doesn't really apply, since it, in theory, is an indefinite "release" until presumably Netflix shuts down, or decided to remove their original programming. Hope you agree with my thinking. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Adamstom.97:Since we were talking about this in my comment above, thought you'd like to see the answer to why the films release outside the US first. [2] - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
I split the two-hour season finale "S.O.S." into two parts. Please don't try to fuse them back together into one. Please talk about this on the "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2)" talk page. AdamDeanHall ( talk) 13:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
I sent a thanks for an edit because I'd misread something and it's late and I'm tired. I do apologize for any confusion. With regards, Tenebrae ( talk) 00:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have noticed that you have occasionally reverted some information revolving around some bios for the Agent Carter page. I have been working hard to get some information that was not included in their bios like Daniel Sousa using a type of crutch to help support his fake leg after the leg in question was amputated, how Johann Fenhoff was specially gagged and gained Arnim Zola as a cellmate, and expanding the bio of Miriam Fry (which also included how she had seen one of Harry Houdini's shows on The Griffith Hotel for Women). I know the bios aren't like the bios seen on the characters for Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., Game of Thrones, Gotham, and Once Upon a Time to name a few, but at least some of us are trying improve the bios of anyone on Agent Carter that was not in the comics even before the next season debuts. Did I leave anything out? -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 23:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Adam, there seems to be some confusion with the duplicate links. Here's the list of the links that were name as duplicates, and where they have been linked previously in the article:
Alex| The| Whovian 06:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Since we got two renewals (yay!) I'm thinking we can maybe split out AC stuff. Not really much for AoS s3 yet, and I've added the info in the necessary spots (main page, LoE in the lead, and s2 article in the lead). Thoughts? - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so I have split AC into a new main page and a season 1 page, and have whipped up a bit of a characters page as well. Thoughts? - adamstom97 ( talk) 08:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Fine with the design split - if it turns out to still be in the 1940s, we can just move some back. The lead is getting closer. Now I think it's a bit of a run on, and if you take out that middle stuff it reads as "The first season of the American television series Marvel's Agent Carter, or simply Agent Carter, is set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), sharing continuity with the films of the franchise." I don't feel like that's first sentence material, you know what I mean? The MCU stuff was good as second sentence stuff. I almost feel like the first sentence of the second paragraph has to come up higher, so it becomes something like this:
"The first season of the American television series Marvel's Agent Carter, or simply Agent Carter, which is inspired by the films Captain America: The First Avenger and Captain America: The Winter Soldier, and the Marvel One-Shot short film of the same name,[1] features the Marvel Comics character Peggy Carter as she must balance doing administrative work and going on secret missions for Howard Stark while trying to navigate life as a single woman in 1940s America. It is set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), sharing continuity with the films of the franchise. The season, which aired on ABC from January 6 to February 24, 2015, over 8 episodes, was produced by ABC Studios, Marvel Television, and F&B Fazekas & Butters, with Tara Butters, Michele Fazekas, and Chris Dingess serving as showrunners.
Hayley Atwell reprises her role from the film series and One-Shot as Peggy Carter, with James D'Arcy, Chad Michael Murray, Enver Gjokaj, and Shea Whigham starring as well. In May 2014, ABC bypassed a pilot, ordering a show based on the One-Shot straight to series for an eight episode season. Filming took place in Los Angeles from September 2014 to January 2015, and Industrial Light & Magic provided visual effects. The season introduces the origins of several characters and storylines from MCU films, while other characters from the films and Marvel One-Shots also appear."
And while it's not similar to AoS or Daredevil, I think this works better for this. And those could maybe even be tweaked to read like this now. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 03:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
So, I have made some changes to my AC, AoS, and DD list of character ideas, based on your feedback. AoS and DD are still a ways off, but I would be happy to move the AC list to the main space now unless you still aren't happy with the format. - adamstom97 ( talk) 04:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
@ Favre1fan93: I have done more work on my version of the AoS character page, and was wondering if, when you have the time, you can take a look at it and give me any feedback you may have on the content I have added. The styling is inline with the current AC character page, which hasn't gotten any comments as far as I know, so I was thinking of proposing it at the talk page before making any change in case users who haven't visited the AC character page may have thoughts on it, but I wanted to run it by you first. - adamstom97 ( talk) 08:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
I know its a take on Template:Episode list, but "Release date" also is also acceptable, and it works a lot better. Grapesoda22 ( talk) 03:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
How is it unnecessary? It provides new information and adds to the discussion affirming a 2015 release date after the Netflix COO casts doubt on a release date for this year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.205.95 ( talk) 03:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey, so I wanted to give you a heads up that I know I will not be online right when this Good Topic retention ends. I'll be on a wiki break, so I probably shouldn't be the one to nominate the article. I'll be on the break starting this week, but I'll try my best to help clean it up some for the nomination (the Box office info especially) before I get off. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnGormleyJG -- JohnGormleyJG ( talk) 14:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnGormleyJG -- JohnGormleyJG ( talk) 12:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Could you please explain your issues with how I had re-arranged the List of X-Men Films Cast Members? I did not alter the content of the page in any way, just the presentation, to something I thought was better.
My re-ordering was not random. Jean Grey, for instance, appears in more films than Storm (at least, as reflected by the list), so I moved Jean Grey above Storm, thinking that was better organization. Same with moving Beast above Colossus, and moving Psylocke up two spaces.
Have a nice day.
Garthe29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garthe29 ( talk • contribs) 03:25, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America 1000 16:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Agent Carter (season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa ( talk) 08:21, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering why you keep removing Elodie Yung as Elektra from the pages related to the Daredevil series, despite a reference? I mean no insult, I am just genuinely confused. Thank you! Brerose| Talk 12:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Agent Carter (TV series) and
The Flash (2014 TV series). Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
You two are out of control, regularly blowing up my watchlist with unneeded edit wars. Please, use the talk pages to discuss! --Logical Fuzz
TriiipleThreat (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:HH2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Favre1fan93 (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:HH2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The article Agent Carter (season 1) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Agent Carter (season 1) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa ( talk) 23:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Agent Carter (season 1) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Agent Carter (season 1) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa ( talk) 10:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
On 24 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the second season of the television series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. introduced the Inhumans race to the Marvel Cinematic Universe ahead of their own film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 13:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary here, please link me to this discussion. I'd like to read it. True CRaysball | #RaysUp 03:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:The Walking Dead video game episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MASEM ( t) 16:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Strongman2014 ( talk) 23:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC) I don't know how to source the actual film. Here it is at this link, can you do it? https://vimeo.com/45964463
FYI if you want to just watch it. I nominated it, and did the QPQ. Felt the hook was good, but might need your ideas if reviewers thinks otherwise. Feel free to add an ALT one if you want. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 22:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I was meaning to post to you that I thought since we had not heard anything about a release date, Marvel may announce it at NY Comic Con. But I'm guess I'm wrong. Hoping still that they may screen a episode or two there. I'm going so that'd be great. Also, I didn't know if you noticed in the announce video, around 0:34, they have a very similar image that Daredevil had, with Cox and his reflection and the Avengers Tower in the back. Hopefully they will release a better image of that, because that might be a good addition to the List of TV series page. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 22:50, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Panther (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
As I said, IT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED. It was discussed with the person who added it. Stop your edit warring. Links to draft articles are not allowed. I'm looking the other way if it is 6 months or less from filming. Having these notices for films scheduled 5 years out are not good.
Bgwhite (
talk) 07:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
What are you thoughts on nominating
Daredevil (season 1),
Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and
Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) for GA? -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 19:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agent Coulson confronts Mike Peterson, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. "Pilot".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Josh Milburn ( talk) 14:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
On 23 September 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agent Carter (season 2), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the second season of Agent Carter will film and be set in Los Angeles, in part because much of the city still looks like it did in the 1940s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agent Carter (season 2). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Yunshui 雲 水 14:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 04:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 7. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Great job getting the rest of the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. season 2 episode articles created. We said we wanted to have them created before season 3 started, and you were able to get it done! - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC) |
Kudos for finishing all the ep pages! I'm hoping to make my next project to go through each and expand reception and/or other areas. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Just because I know you are always on top of stuff, if you happened to come across this poster, even though it doesn't show it in the image, I just wanted you to know it is production concept art (similar to Quesada's Daredevil ones). On the poster for this that I picked up at NY Comic Con today, it is noted at the bottom of the poster (which is cut off in this image). - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
So the episode was really good. Super dark. Like Daredevil dark up another level, and psychological. Ritter was super sassy and Tennant was super creepy and it was awesome. Also wanted to mention to you and maybe bring in Triiiple to this conversation, that I have a bunch of photos I took during the panel. However, they are mostly of the big video boards and/or far away (and just from an iPhone). Didn't know though if we wanted to use any I choose, or wait and see if any Creative Commons show up on Flicker. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daredevil (season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 23:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
The article Daredevil (season 1) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daredevil (season 1) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 21:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 01:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The article Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 08:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Congrats on getting this passed. Sorry I didn't help more. Also, I guess moving forward, this is a good indication of some quote cut back we may need to do. While obviously this is just one reviewer and their perspective on the content, it wouldn't hurt. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
For taking the lead to get three MCU television articles to GA status, and your continued work and commitment to make the MCU articles GA-worthy (particularly the television ones) from the time they are announced, to their time of GA nomination and beyond. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phil Coulson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Writing on the Wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
The words I tried to add are as much as appropriate for wikipedia as all the other ones in that section. copypasta of text from an official source is actually more accurate than your own interpretation (I assume that's what you did when filling that section, since it differs from the source you've embedded). All I did was make the article more precise, in accordance with a legit source and without forgetting about the appropriate language. If you don't find the word "extraordinary" appropriate, then explain why. I'm trying to improve the article, and all you're doing is undoing my edits with no valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icelily638 ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Adamstom.97. Doctor Strange (film), an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 22:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC) |
/info/en/?search=Talk:Arrow_(TV_series)#New_subsection_for_Arrowverse Thought you might be interested in putting in your 2-cents worth, if not that's fine too. Thanks! LLArrow ( talk) 03:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I reverted you on that template because that is the name it goes by. If you check the other attractions on the template, they don't say "tours" instead of "star wars tours" or "weekends" instead of "star wars weekends". The same applies in the case of Star Wars: Where science meets imagination. Regards.-- Nadirali نادرالی ( talk) 22:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel Cinematic Universe tie-in comics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Mack and One-shot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Isn't the logical place to re-explain Hopes resentment with the reveal? Besides we already established that they are estranged in the first paragraph. Why force it with it with information that has nothing to do with it?-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 00:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
On 22 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doctor Strange (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that various incarnations of Doctor Strange, the upcoming 2016 Marvel Studios film, have been in development since 1986? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doctor Strange (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Exactly how are the cases not the same? Please provide a reason. I only reverted once and gave a sound reason but you're reverting constantly so it does not make sense to tell me to stop reverting. -- A talk/ contribs 01:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Many Heads, One Tale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhuman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maveth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhuman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016! | |
Hello Adamstom.97, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
I noticed you recently uploaded File:Agent Carter. logo.png as a public domain file. While basics fonts and shapes maybe considered public domain, the character design in the center of this logo is not. You want change the image's license, and re-size it before someone deletes it entirely. Thanks.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 14:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Favre1fan93 (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:HH2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I have noticed that you have reverted my additions to Jessica Jones and it's character page due to claims to poorly written parts. If you want to re-add the information your way, go right ahead. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 02:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Would you mind to elaborate on why we don't direct readers to the film version of a character when they're linked from the film's page? Argento Surfer ( talk) 21:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This is just a notice that an RfC has been created for the discussion regarding alternate titles with Star Wars: The Force Awakens in which you participated in. If you would like to participate in the RfC, you can find it here. Thank you. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 00:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Bjelleklang - talk 10:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
What was your thought on these? I'm sitting on reception refs and I don't know if I should wait on putting them for the main article, if you were just going to create the episode articles. I'm fine with either. I have some other interview articles as well to sift through. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 20:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
On 11 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A.K.A. Jessica Jones, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Marvel's A.K.A. Jessica Jones's show runner, Melissa Rosenberg, reconfigured the series for Netflix from her original incarnation as an early 2010s ABC series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A.K.A. Jessica Jones. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
I undid your Undo - if you had checked you would have found that the movie had officially been nominated.
Yes sorry I had a think about it and was about to revert my revert to your revert. Thanks ( I suppose it's obvious that 'pending' implies that it's already been nominated, now I think about it....!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpalfour ( talk • contribs) 03:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I thought you may like to voice your opinon on a matter that is currently being debated over at the DC comic book character Katana's Talk page. It concerns Arrow. Thank you and cheers, LLArrow ( talk) 06:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Now is Not the End, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alias and Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thank you for helping with the GA review for Guardians of the Galaxy, and helping make the article a GA in the first place. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daredevil (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Leftovers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
If you are interested in following and/or commenting: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Requesting a block of a user. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello there. I'm sorry for getting in the way with my recent edits to the Aftershocks article. You've been working on MCU articles a lot longer than I have, so you have a better idea of what you're doing than I do. Anyway, I spent a few hours writing and then trimming a plot summary of the article, which I will share with you here. I'm not sure if you have a draft of the article started (you seem to be pretty fond of drafts), but if you don't, I hope you will find my plot summary useful, even though you'll probably trim it further. It's 710 words currently. Does the 400-700 word count from movie plot summaries apply to TV episode plots too, or are they supposed to be shorter?
Also, have you written a draft/are you planning to write a draft of the "Aftershocks" episode article anytime soon? If you are, I'll just wait for you to start it in the mainspace. If you haven't and aren't planning to in the next week or so, I may take a stab at writing it. I hope that if I follow the What They Become article as a template it will meet your standards, since you wrote most of that article. :) I don't want to start the article if you've already got a pretty good draft of it in your userspace. AmericanLemming ( talk) 11:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
In 1988, Skye’s mother helps a young Inhuman named Gordon come to grips with his newfound powers of teleportation; Gordon is revealed to be the eyeless man from the end of the last episode. In the present Skye is quarantined back at SHIELD headquarters because she was exposed to the terrigenesis mist. Everyone at SHIELD is grieving over Triplett, and Coulson wants to get revenge on HYDRA, whom he blames for his death. They mistakenly believe that the Obelisk caused the earthquake and are not aware of Skye’s new powers. Meanwhile, Simmons is in the alien city, documenting it and preparing to flood it. Raina ambushes and kills several SHIELD technicians; her body is now covered in thorns and she has claws on her hands. Simmons shoots her several times but is unable to prevent her from escaping. Coulson then orders Simmons to return to headquarters. A group of high-ranking Hydra officials meets to discuss filling Whitehall’s position. Coulson initiates a plan to strike back at Hydra by transferring Bakshi to General Talbot in exchange for additional assistance against the remaining Hydra operatives. While on their way to deliver Bakshi, Coulson and May are ambushed by SHIELD forces disguised as Hydra soldiers, allowing Bakshi to escape with Hunter, who is also pretending to work for Hydra. The elaborate ruse is intended to deceive Bakshi and have him lead Hunter to other Hydra leaders. Back at SHIELD’s headquarters, Skye and Simmons discuss Raina’s transformation. Skye is deeply disturbed by Simmons’ insistence that Raina is “infected” and that superpowers are inherently dangerous and harmful; Simmons blames herself for Triplett’s death and feels that her interest in superpowers is indirectly responsible. She plans to test Skye’s DNA “just to be safe”, which worries Skye. Dr. Hyde stows away aboard a cargo ship in San Juan where he is found by Raina. She is furious about her transformation and blames him for it. Dr. Hyde is delighted to hear that Skye has undergone terrigenesis, although he still wants revenge on Coulson for killing Whitehall and becoming a father figure to Skye. Raina asks for his help in undoing her transformation, but he tells her that she got what she wanted and that it cannot be reversed. When she says she cannot live as such a repulsive creature, Dr. Hyde coldly tells her to commit suicide. Hunter and Bakshi arrive at Mr. Bloom’s house. Bakshi goes inside and tells Hunter to wait in the car. Morse gets in the car right after Bakshi leaves. Hunter asks her about the secret she and Mac have been keeping. She tells him that they are both in a “support group.” Baskshi tells Bloom that the other leaders of Hydra are plotting to kill them based on false information from Hunter, and Bloom orders the other leaders to be killed. Raina stands at the edge of a busy street, preparing to kill herself by walking into traffic. Fitz tells Skye that she underwent a transformation similar to Raina’s, saying that the only way she could have survived the earthquake is if she had caused it. She becomes very upset and lose control of her powers, shattering a lamp. Skye tries to clean up the broken glass but cuts herself in the process. May comes by and asks if anything is wrong, having heard Skye’s scream. As she explains to Skye how Trip embodied the principles of SHIELD, Coulson arrives at Trip’s home to inform his mother of his death. A montage shows the assassination of several Hydra leaders. Hunter and Morse barge into Bloom’s house, killing him and recapturing Bakshi. May and Simmons see that Skye is bleeding and become suspicious, but Fitz arrives and gives a plausible explanation. He shows Simmons that the DNA tests came back “normal,” allowing Skye to leave quarantine. After May and Simmons leave he explains that he switched Skye’s old blood samples with the new ones and promises to keep her secret to protect her. Raina crosses the road and is almost captured by SHIELD soldiers but is rescued by Gordon, who teleports her to safety. A model car that Mac gave Coulson scans his office and finds Fury’s “toolbox.” Mac reports this to Morse, who says that she will “make contact soon.” |
Found two more: AV Club and Collider. Don't know if I'll be able to add them or not before you get on next. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Captain America Adventure Program from "Bridge and Tunnel".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Hope you're well. I didn't remove them because I'm disputing that the film won the awards. The organisation which gives this award as well as the awards articles subordinate to it went to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix Film Critics Society where they were judged by the community to be non notable. These accolades lists are not a list of every award that a film has won as you can see if you compare this list to the one on IMDb just the notable ones. I hope you understand and won't revert me when I restore my edit. Cowlibob ( talk) 09:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm a fan of consistency myself, but it's important to keep in mind that there are practices—such as listing an internal link under the External links section—that are suboptimal and shouldn't be replicated for the sake of consistency. For example, we wouldn't want to add disambiguators to every US state article just because we do so for Georgia and Washington. The MOS says WP:SEEALSO is the place for portals. And I'm also unsure of the breadth of articles you want to use this non-standard practice on. Anything at all related to the MCU? Just articles on the films themselves? I'm not going to fight you on this, but I hope you'll reconsider. It's best to adhere to standards absent a compelling reason to deviate from them. -- BDD ( talk) 00:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've restored the brief Daredevil episode details for #8-#13. It looks like you removed those. If so, why? - AL
Thanks. I am new to Wikipedia editing. I can see using Netflix descriptions would have been admissable as short quotations if I'd bothered to put them in quotations, and cite the source of origin. -AL
I noticed your undoing of my addition to Talk:X-Men: Days of Future Past. This is perfectly OK; I did go a little too far in my discussion. However, WP:NOTFORUM does state that we "should resolve problems with articles on the relevant talk pages, but please do not take discussion into articles." In other words, NOTFORUM only applies to pages in article space (in my humble opinion), not talk pages. Also see "Off-topic posts" in WP:TALKO. Your thoughts? -- RoyGoldsmith ( talk) 21:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Here's the original diff: [1]
So, I go to add this and see that once again you revert me. Did you even read the whole thing? Doing something like that makes you look even worse than before. And I'm trying my best to be as civil as I can and not say how I really feel. -- Musdan77 ( talk) 01:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
On 20 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 1), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the final six episodes of the first season of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. were informed by the events in the film Captain America: The Winter Soldier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 1). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 20:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I see you have removed my ref addition by saying that it should be included in the lead. But if you check the article you should see that there are also refs in the lead. In general, you are right, it's better to cite the content rather than the lead. But as far as I know there is no guideline against it. And I'd appreciate it if you could do it yourself rather than removing the whole thing. Thank you! -- Chamith (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
It seems that there's some confusion as to whether the Tesseract is the Cosmic Cube and/or the Space Gem. It seems that though the tesseract shares some characteristics with the cosmic cube (which seem to be limited to the shape and involvement with the Red Skull), it's been confirmed to be the space gem both in and out of the films, so the primary information should reside there. I agree that a note about similarities to the cube should be mentioned in the film section of the cosmic cube page, but as there's been no mention of the phrase "cosmic cube" anywhere in the MCU, it shouldn't live there alone. Acbsmith ( talk) 15:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Adamstom.97. With all due respect, the movie never says Stark and Barton are "retiring" from the team. Please see Talk:Avengers: Age of Ultron. Neither that words nor the concept is ever mentioned. Also, we never see the Vision destroy Ultron. All we can state with plots is the concrete, manifest content of the movie. In this case, all we saw was a flash. You or I could each come up with three other possibilities of what that flash could be. Regardless, we can't say Ultron was destroyed. Again, please see the talk page. Thanks, -- Tenebrae ( talk) 19:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
This is a neutral notice of a discussion at Talk:Avengers: Age of Ultron#Subsection: RE: "visit" over using either the word "visit" or the phrase "go to" in a particular context. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 18:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to the Avengers: Age of Ultron article. I am puzzled by your reason—"that implies something different"—as all I did was change the spaced em dashes to unspaced em dashes, which are punctuationally exactly equivalent, but banned by the MoS.— DocWatson42 ( talk) 04:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello there. You recently reverted my edit to Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) where I changed all instances of "Campbell" to "Lincoln". Your reasoning was that "in this encyclopaedia we use formal language, including surnames when noting characters." As far as I can tell, that is found neither in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television, nor in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction, though if it's an unwritten rule (and it seems to be) then we should probably follow it for consistency in most cases.
And I would agree with your assertion that it's generally common practice on Wikipedia to refer to fictional characters by their last names, but in my opinion there are some cases in which doing so may be confusing to the reader. Take Lincoln, for example. I don't believe that he is ever referred to as "Campbell," and I don't even think he says it to Skye when he introduces himself to her in "Afterlife." Thus, his last name only appears in the production notes: Declassifying Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D: Afterlife. I would argue that in such a case our readers would be better served by referring to him as Lincoln.
Anyway, if we're going to always refer to characters by their last names simply because it's more formal, then why doesn't the article call Cal "Johnson" or "Zabo" and why doesn't it call Skye "Johnson"? The reason why it doesn't is because Cal is always called Cal, while Skye is always called Skye (except when Cal calls her Daisy), and it would be highly confusing to do otherwise. I would argue that the spirit of WP:COMMONNAME applies here, even though it's about article titles: "Wikipedia prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in reliable English-language sources) as such names will be the most recognizable and the most natural."
I'm not demanding that we call "Campbell" by his first name "Lincoln" simply because that's my personal preference, but rather because I don't see any policies that demand we refer to characters by their last names, nor do I think it makes sense in this case. If you could point me to a policy or guideline saying we should always use last names for fictional characters, or explain to me your line of thinking, I would be happy to reconsider my position. AmericanLemming ( talk) 17:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
As you can see, I started reworking them on the season articles. Does what I suggested make sense to you? It makes sense to me that the brief overview of the episode is right there in the first sentence, which we get now. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 23:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey! Hope you've been able to watch the series and enjoyed it. I still haven't had the time to start, which is killing me! But I hope to soon to come back and help on the article. I've been adding bits and pieces here and there if you see me popping in, but I haven't watch any of it yet. Also, since the article isn't on my watch, wanted to further explain my last edit on the page. I removed the "Broadcast" subheading because it doesn't really apply, since it, in theory, is an indefinite "release" until presumably Netflix shuts down, or decided to remove their original programming. Hope you agree with my thinking. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
@ Adamstom.97:Since we were talking about this in my comment above, thought you'd like to see the answer to why the films release outside the US first. [2] - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
I split the two-hour season finale "S.O.S." into two parts. Please don't try to fuse them back together into one. Please talk about this on the "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2)" talk page. AdamDeanHall ( talk) 13:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
I sent a thanks for an edit because I'd misread something and it's late and I'm tired. I do apologize for any confusion. With regards, Tenebrae ( talk) 00:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I have noticed that you have occasionally reverted some information revolving around some bios for the Agent Carter page. I have been working hard to get some information that was not included in their bios like Daniel Sousa using a type of crutch to help support his fake leg after the leg in question was amputated, how Johann Fenhoff was specially gagged and gained Arnim Zola as a cellmate, and expanding the bio of Miriam Fry (which also included how she had seen one of Harry Houdini's shows on The Griffith Hotel for Women). I know the bios aren't like the bios seen on the characters for Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., Game of Thrones, Gotham, and Once Upon a Time to name a few, but at least some of us are trying improve the bios of anyone on Agent Carter that was not in the comics even before the next season debuts. Did I leave anything out? -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 23:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Adam, there seems to be some confusion with the duplicate links. Here's the list of the links that were name as duplicates, and where they have been linked previously in the article:
Alex| The| Whovian 06:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Since we got two renewals (yay!) I'm thinking we can maybe split out AC stuff. Not really much for AoS s3 yet, and I've added the info in the necessary spots (main page, LoE in the lead, and s2 article in the lead). Thoughts? - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so I have split AC into a new main page and a season 1 page, and have whipped up a bit of a characters page as well. Thoughts? - adamstom97 ( talk) 08:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Fine with the design split - if it turns out to still be in the 1940s, we can just move some back. The lead is getting closer. Now I think it's a bit of a run on, and if you take out that middle stuff it reads as "The first season of the American television series Marvel's Agent Carter, or simply Agent Carter, is set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), sharing continuity with the films of the franchise." I don't feel like that's first sentence material, you know what I mean? The MCU stuff was good as second sentence stuff. I almost feel like the first sentence of the second paragraph has to come up higher, so it becomes something like this:
"The first season of the American television series Marvel's Agent Carter, or simply Agent Carter, which is inspired by the films Captain America: The First Avenger and Captain America: The Winter Soldier, and the Marvel One-Shot short film of the same name,[1] features the Marvel Comics character Peggy Carter as she must balance doing administrative work and going on secret missions for Howard Stark while trying to navigate life as a single woman in 1940s America. It is set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), sharing continuity with the films of the franchise. The season, which aired on ABC from January 6 to February 24, 2015, over 8 episodes, was produced by ABC Studios, Marvel Television, and F&B Fazekas & Butters, with Tara Butters, Michele Fazekas, and Chris Dingess serving as showrunners.
Hayley Atwell reprises her role from the film series and One-Shot as Peggy Carter, with James D'Arcy, Chad Michael Murray, Enver Gjokaj, and Shea Whigham starring as well. In May 2014, ABC bypassed a pilot, ordering a show based on the One-Shot straight to series for an eight episode season. Filming took place in Los Angeles from September 2014 to January 2015, and Industrial Light & Magic provided visual effects. The season introduces the origins of several characters and storylines from MCU films, while other characters from the films and Marvel One-Shots also appear."
And while it's not similar to AoS or Daredevil, I think this works better for this. And those could maybe even be tweaked to read like this now. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 03:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
So, I have made some changes to my AC, AoS, and DD list of character ideas, based on your feedback. AoS and DD are still a ways off, but I would be happy to move the AC list to the main space now unless you still aren't happy with the format. - adamstom97 ( talk) 04:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
@ Favre1fan93: I have done more work on my version of the AoS character page, and was wondering if, when you have the time, you can take a look at it and give me any feedback you may have on the content I have added. The styling is inline with the current AC character page, which hasn't gotten any comments as far as I know, so I was thinking of proposing it at the talk page before making any change in case users who haven't visited the AC character page may have thoughts on it, but I wanted to run it by you first. - adamstom97 ( talk) 08:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
I know its a take on Template:Episode list, but "Release date" also is also acceptable, and it works a lot better. Grapesoda22 ( talk) 03:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
How is it unnecessary? It provides new information and adds to the discussion affirming a 2015 release date after the Netflix COO casts doubt on a release date for this year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.205.95 ( talk) 03:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey, so I wanted to give you a heads up that I know I will not be online right when this Good Topic retention ends. I'll be on a wiki break, so I probably shouldn't be the one to nominate the article. I'll be on the break starting this week, but I'll try my best to help clean it up some for the nomination (the Box office info especially) before I get off. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnGormleyJG -- JohnGormleyJG ( talk) 14:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JohnGormleyJG -- JohnGormleyJG ( talk) 12:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Could you please explain your issues with how I had re-arranged the List of X-Men Films Cast Members? I did not alter the content of the page in any way, just the presentation, to something I thought was better.
My re-ordering was not random. Jean Grey, for instance, appears in more films than Storm (at least, as reflected by the list), so I moved Jean Grey above Storm, thinking that was better organization. Same with moving Beast above Colossus, and moving Psylocke up two spaces.
Have a nice day.
Garthe29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garthe29 ( talk • contribs) 03:25, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America 1000 16:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Agent Carter (season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa ( talk) 08:21, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering why you keep removing Elodie Yung as Elektra from the pages related to the Daredevil series, despite a reference? I mean no insult, I am just genuinely confused. Thank you! Brerose| Talk 12:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Agent Carter (TV series) and
The Flash (2014 TV series). Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
You two are out of control, regularly blowing up my watchlist with unneeded edit wars. Please, use the talk pages to discuss! --Logical Fuzz
TriiipleThreat (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:HH2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Favre1fan93 (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:HH2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The article Agent Carter (season 1) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Agent Carter (season 1) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa ( talk) 23:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Agent Carter (season 1) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Agent Carter (season 1) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa ( talk) 10:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
On 24 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the second season of the television series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. introduced the Inhumans race to the Marvel Cinematic Universe ahead of their own film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 13:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary here, please link me to this discussion. I'd like to read it. True CRaysball | #RaysUp 03:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:The Walking Dead video game episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MASEM ( t) 16:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Strongman2014 ( talk) 23:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC) I don't know how to source the actual film. Here it is at this link, can you do it? https://vimeo.com/45964463
FYI if you want to just watch it. I nominated it, and did the QPQ. Felt the hook was good, but might need your ideas if reviewers thinks otherwise. Feel free to add an ALT one if you want. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 22:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I was meaning to post to you that I thought since we had not heard anything about a release date, Marvel may announce it at NY Comic Con. But I'm guess I'm wrong. Hoping still that they may screen a episode or two there. I'm going so that'd be great. Also, I didn't know if you noticed in the announce video, around 0:34, they have a very similar image that Daredevil had, with Cox and his reflection and the Avengers Tower in the back. Hopefully they will release a better image of that, because that might be a good addition to the List of TV series page. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 22:50, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Panther (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
As I said, IT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED. It was discussed with the person who added it. Stop your edit warring. Links to draft articles are not allowed. I'm looking the other way if it is 6 months or less from filming. Having these notices for films scheduled 5 years out are not good.
Bgwhite (
talk) 07:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
What are you thoughts on nominating
Daredevil (season 1),
Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and
Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) for GA? -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 19:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agent Coulson confronts Mike Peterson, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. "Pilot".jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Josh Milburn ( talk) 14:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
On 23 September 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agent Carter (season 2), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the second season of Agent Carter will film and be set in Los Angeles, in part because much of the city still looks like it did in the 1940s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agent Carter (season 2). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Yunshui 雲 水 14:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 04:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 7. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Great job getting the rest of the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. season 2 episode articles created. We said we wanted to have them created before season 3 started, and you were able to get it done! - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC) |
Kudos for finishing all the ep pages! I'm hoping to make my next project to go through each and expand reception and/or other areas. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 18:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Just because I know you are always on top of stuff, if you happened to come across this poster, even though it doesn't show it in the image, I just wanted you to know it is production concept art (similar to Quesada's Daredevil ones). On the poster for this that I picked up at NY Comic Con today, it is noted at the bottom of the poster (which is cut off in this image). - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
So the episode was really good. Super dark. Like Daredevil dark up another level, and psychological. Ritter was super sassy and Tennant was super creepy and it was awesome. Also wanted to mention to you and maybe bring in Triiiple to this conversation, that I have a bunch of photos I took during the panel. However, they are mostly of the big video boards and/or far away (and just from an iPhone). Didn't know though if we wanted to use any I choose, or wait and see if any Creative Commons show up on Flicker. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 02:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daredevil (season 1) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 23:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
The article Daredevil (season 1) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daredevil (season 1) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 21:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 01:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The article Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pilot (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt ( talk) 08:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Congrats on getting this passed. Sorry I didn't help more. Also, I guess moving forward, this is a good indication of some quote cut back we may need to do. While obviously this is just one reviewer and their perspective on the content, it wouldn't hurt. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
For taking the lead to get three MCU television articles to GA status, and your continued work and commitment to make the MCU articles GA-worthy (particularly the television ones) from the time they are announced, to their time of GA nomination and beyond. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 04:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phil Coulson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Writing on the Wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
The words I tried to add are as much as appropriate for wikipedia as all the other ones in that section. copypasta of text from an official source is actually more accurate than your own interpretation (I assume that's what you did when filling that section, since it differs from the source you've embedded). All I did was make the article more precise, in accordance with a legit source and without forgetting about the appropriate language. If you don't find the word "extraordinary" appropriate, then explain why. I'm trying to improve the article, and all you're doing is undoing my edits with no valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icelily638 ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Adamstom.97. Doctor Strange (film), an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 22:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC) |
/info/en/?search=Talk:Arrow_(TV_series)#New_subsection_for_Arrowverse Thought you might be interested in putting in your 2-cents worth, if not that's fine too. Thanks! LLArrow ( talk) 03:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I reverted you on that template because that is the name it goes by. If you check the other attractions on the template, they don't say "tours" instead of "star wars tours" or "weekends" instead of "star wars weekends". The same applies in the case of Star Wars: Where science meets imagination. Regards.-- Nadirali نادرالی ( talk) 22:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel Cinematic Universe tie-in comics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Mack and One-shot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Isn't the logical place to re-explain Hopes resentment with the reveal? Besides we already established that they are estranged in the first paragraph. Why force it with it with information that has nothing to do with it?-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 00:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
On 22 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doctor Strange (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that various incarnations of Doctor Strange, the upcoming 2016 Marvel Studios film, have been in development since 1986? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Doctor Strange (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Exactly how are the cases not the same? Please provide a reason. I only reverted once and gave a sound reason but you're reverting constantly so it does not make sense to tell me to stop reverting. -- A talk/ contribs 01:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Many Heads, One Tale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhuman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maveth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhuman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016! | |
Hello Adamstom.97, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
I noticed you recently uploaded File:Agent Carter. logo.png as a public domain file. While basics fonts and shapes maybe considered public domain, the character design in the center of this logo is not. You want change the image's license, and re-size it before someone deletes it entirely. Thanks.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 14:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Favre1fan93 (
talk) is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:HH2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I have noticed that you have reverted my additions to Jessica Jones and it's character page due to claims to poorly written parts. If you want to re-add the information your way, go right ahead. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 02:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Would you mind to elaborate on why we don't direct readers to the film version of a character when they're linked from the film's page? Argento Surfer ( talk) 21:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This is just a notice that an RfC has been created for the discussion regarding alternate titles with Star Wars: The Force Awakens in which you participated in. If you would like to participate in the RfC, you can find it here. Thank you. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 00:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)