Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | Backlog drives | Mentorship | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
The July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive is a one-month-long effort to reduce the backlog of Good Article nominations. Please ensure that you familiarise yourself with the Good Article review process before starting to review an article, and that you are familiar with the GA criteria and the Manual of Style. Also, it is recommended that you read the essays What the Good article criteria are not and Reviewing good articles. The co-ordinators for this drive are Buidhe, Usernameunique, and Lee Vilenski. If you have any questions, leave a message on this drive's talk page. The drive began on 1 July 2021 at 00:00:00 (UTC) and ended on 31 July 2021 at 23:59:59 (UTC).
The ultimate goal of this backlog elimination drive is to cut the number of outstanding GANs and in particular those which have been in the queue 90 days or more. Awards will be given out to those individuals who do the most work in helping reduce the size of the backlog and reach milestones related to the number, age, and size, of articles reviewed. The drive is intended to promote a faster rate of decreasing backlog whilst maintaining quality reviews.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Date | Outstanding nominations |
Unreviewed nominations |
Change since previous day [N 1] |
Change since beginning [N 1] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 July 2021 | 540 | 464 | — | — |
2 July 2021 | 531 | 371 | 93 (20%) | 93 (20%) |
3 July 2021 | 516 | 354 | 17 (4.6%) | 110 (23.7%) |
4 July 2021 | 511 | 339 | 15 (4.2%) | 125 (26.9%) |
5 July 2021 | 506 | 331 | 8 (2.4%) | 133 (28.7%) |
6 July 2021 | 490 | 314 | 17 (5.1%) | 150 (32.3%) |
7 July 2021 | 477 | 307 | 7 (2.2%) | 157 (33.8%) |
8 July 2021 | 468 | 295 | 12 (3.9%) | 169 (36.4%) |
9 July 2021 | 451 | 291 | 4 (1.4%) | 173 (37.3%) |
10 July 2021 | 437 | 281 | 10 (3.4%) | 183 (39.4%) |
11 July 2021 | 423 | 266 | 15 (5.3%) | 198 (42.7%) |
12 July 2021 | 423 | 269 | 3 (1.1%) | 195 (42%) |
13 July 2021 | 415 | 263 | 6 (2.2%) | 201 (43.3%) |
14 July 2021 | 406 | 265 | 2 (0.8%) | 199 (42.9%) |
15 July 2021 | 396 | 262 | 3 (1.1%) | 202 (43.5%) |
16 July 2021 | 403 | 275 | 13 (5%) | 189 (40.7%) |
17 July 2021 | 390 | 257 | 18 (6.5%) | 207 (44.6%) |
18 July 2021 | 379 | 242 | 15 (5.8%) | 222 (47.8%) |
19 July 2021 | 361 | 235 | 7 (2.9%) | 229 (49.4%) |
20 July 2021 | 358 | 230 | 5 (2.1%) | 234 (50.4%) |
21 July 2021 | 356 | 235 | 5 (2.2%) | 229 (49.4%) |
22 July 2021 | 361 | 243 | 8 (3.4%) | 221 (47.6%) |
23 July 2021 | 351 | 230 | 13 (5.3%) | 234 (50.4%) |
24 July 2021 | 354 | 233 | 3 (1.3%) | 231 (49.8%) |
25 July 2021 | 360 | 243 | 10 (4.3%) | 221 (47.6%) |
26 July 2021 | 371 | 251 | 8 (3.3%) | 213 (45.9%) |
27 July 2021 | 364 | 249 | 2 (0.8%) | 215 (46.3%) |
28 July 2021 | 359 | 243 | 6 (2.4%) | 221 (47.6%) |
29 July 2021 | 364 | 245 | 2 (0.8%) | 219 (47.2%) |
30 July 2021 | 357 | 249 | 4 (1.6%) | 215 (46.3%) |
31 July 2021 | 350 | 249 | 0 (0%) | 215 (46.3%) |
1 August 2021 | 350 | 245 | 4 (1.6%) | 219 (47.2%) |
To receive an award, please include your name and the number of reviews you have completed as part of this drive. Awards will be given by the co-ordinator(s) after this drive ends.
This is the scheme for the awards:
At least 3 points: The Invisible Barnstar
At least 7 points: The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
At least 15 points: The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
At least 20 points: The Reviewer Barnstar
At least 30 points: The Multiple Good Article Reviewer Barnstar
At least 40 points: The WikiProject Good Articles Medal of Merit
At least 60 points: The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
In addition, the person who accumulates the most points during the backlog elimination drive will receive the Content Review Medal of Merit |
In addition:
Quick-fails are eligible for only up to one point; the word counts from quick-failed articles are not credited towards extra points.
The following list contains all nominations that are currently 90+ days old. A review of these articles is thus worth an extra half point.
Article | Nomination | Notes |
---|---|---|
Arab Christians | 26 March 2021 | 7,000+ words |
Steinitz's theorem | 21 April 2021 | 2,800+ words |
Affine symmetric group | 21 April 2021 | 6,000+ words |
The below articles have had their nominations abandoned, or need a second opinion.
Keep a running total of your reviewing in the Participants section below by creating your own list. Only passes and fails will be recognised as completing a review. If necessary, you can put the article on hold if the article needs to be edited further to be passed. Each of your reviews should be included in your list. Article reviews started before 31 July but completed after 31 July can be included in the running total – however should be completed as quickly as possible to avoid being too late. Reviews started before 1 July do not count. Please state if the article is a pass, fail, or on hold. Make sure you follow up on reviews that you have started or placed on hold.
A sample review section is below; all sections start with a fourth-level header containing the editor's username and the {{ Div col}} and {{ Div col end}} templates. Between those templates, each article reviewed is given its own line. Use the "GA" icon line for an article that passes, the "FGAN" icon line for an article that fails, the "GAH" icon line for an article where the initial review is complete and has been placed on hold, and the "GAN" icon line for an article where the review has started but has not yet been placed on hold. (Change "GAN" and "GAH" to "GA" or "FGAN" when the article passes or fails.) After the article name is a parenthetical for the number of words in the article. If the nomination is 90 or more days old when you begin your review, add "(old)" after the number of words. Following the {{ Div col end}} template are three lines to tabulate each participant's total number of articles reviewed, total number of old nominations reviewed, and total words reviewed.
====[[User:Username|Username]]==== {{Div col}} #{{icon|GA}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) (old) #{{icon|FGAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) #{{icon|GAH}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) (old) #{{icon|GAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) {{Div col end}} '''Articles reviewed:''' <br>'''Old nominations reviewed:''' <br>'''Total words reviewed:'''
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 6407
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 6
Old nominations reviewed: 5
Total words reviewed: 12,217 words
Points: 11.5
Articles reviewed: 16
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 28,130
Points: 24
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,999
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 12
Old nominations reviewed: 5
Total words reviewed: 30,408
Points: 21.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 9,062
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 8,246
Points: 7.5
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 16,877
Points: 11.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 818
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,824
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 8
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Total words reviewed: 18,986
Points: 13.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 6,900
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 1,758
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 6
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 22,270
Points: 10.5
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 2,798
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Total words reviewed: 22,621
Points: 12
Articles reviewed: 11
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 38,010
Points: 21
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 2168
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 10,964 words
Points: 6.5
Articles reviewed: 18
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 45,514
Points: 30
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,910
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 13
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 31,635
Points: 21
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 5,335
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 4,387
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 1 (The Dream of Ossian review started 30 June)
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,751
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 1,253
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 11
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 31,499
Points: 18.5
Articles reviewed: 8
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 16,311
Points: 12
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 8,257
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 10
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 18,791 words
Points: 14
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 3,544
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,102
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,234
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 9,091
Points: 3.5
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 12,179
Points: 7.5
Articles reviewed: 28
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 33,732
Points: 36
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 6,082
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,500
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 5,614
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 12,721
Points: 8
Articles reviewed: 1 (2021 EFL League One play-off Final review started 21 June)
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 3,339
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: N/A (quick-fail)
Points: 1
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 18,656
Points: 7.5
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 5,007
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 17
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 54,778
Points: 31
Articles reviewed: 150
Old nominations reviewed: 17
Total words reviewed: 414,631
Points: 261.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 8,797
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 7,543
Points: 6.5
Articles reviewed: 30
Old nominations reviewed: 9
Total words reviewed: 110,611
Points: 61.5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,186
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 13,916
Points: 7
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 6,620
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 4,418
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 9
Old nominations reviewed: 8
Total words reviewed: 29,859
Points:
Articles reviewed: 12
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 24,815
Points: 19
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,415
Points: 1
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 4,638
Points: 7
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 11,294
Points: 6.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,570
Points: 2.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 4,639
Points: 3.5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 5
Total words reviewed: 14,803
Points: 10.5
Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | Backlog drives | Mentorship | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
The July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive is a one-month-long effort to reduce the backlog of Good Article nominations. Please ensure that you familiarise yourself with the Good Article review process before starting to review an article, and that you are familiar with the GA criteria and the Manual of Style. Also, it is recommended that you read the essays What the Good article criteria are not and Reviewing good articles. The co-ordinators for this drive are Buidhe, Usernameunique, and Lee Vilenski. If you have any questions, leave a message on this drive's talk page. The drive began on 1 July 2021 at 00:00:00 (UTC) and ended on 31 July 2021 at 23:59:59 (UTC).
The ultimate goal of this backlog elimination drive is to cut the number of outstanding GANs and in particular those which have been in the queue 90 days or more. Awards will be given out to those individuals who do the most work in helping reduce the size of the backlog and reach milestones related to the number, age, and size, of articles reviewed. The drive is intended to promote a faster rate of decreasing backlog whilst maintaining quality reviews.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Date | Outstanding nominations |
Unreviewed nominations |
Change since previous day [N 1] |
Change since beginning [N 1] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 July 2021 | 540 | 464 | — | — |
2 July 2021 | 531 | 371 | 93 (20%) | 93 (20%) |
3 July 2021 | 516 | 354 | 17 (4.6%) | 110 (23.7%) |
4 July 2021 | 511 | 339 | 15 (4.2%) | 125 (26.9%) |
5 July 2021 | 506 | 331 | 8 (2.4%) | 133 (28.7%) |
6 July 2021 | 490 | 314 | 17 (5.1%) | 150 (32.3%) |
7 July 2021 | 477 | 307 | 7 (2.2%) | 157 (33.8%) |
8 July 2021 | 468 | 295 | 12 (3.9%) | 169 (36.4%) |
9 July 2021 | 451 | 291 | 4 (1.4%) | 173 (37.3%) |
10 July 2021 | 437 | 281 | 10 (3.4%) | 183 (39.4%) |
11 July 2021 | 423 | 266 | 15 (5.3%) | 198 (42.7%) |
12 July 2021 | 423 | 269 | 3 (1.1%) | 195 (42%) |
13 July 2021 | 415 | 263 | 6 (2.2%) | 201 (43.3%) |
14 July 2021 | 406 | 265 | 2 (0.8%) | 199 (42.9%) |
15 July 2021 | 396 | 262 | 3 (1.1%) | 202 (43.5%) |
16 July 2021 | 403 | 275 | 13 (5%) | 189 (40.7%) |
17 July 2021 | 390 | 257 | 18 (6.5%) | 207 (44.6%) |
18 July 2021 | 379 | 242 | 15 (5.8%) | 222 (47.8%) |
19 July 2021 | 361 | 235 | 7 (2.9%) | 229 (49.4%) |
20 July 2021 | 358 | 230 | 5 (2.1%) | 234 (50.4%) |
21 July 2021 | 356 | 235 | 5 (2.2%) | 229 (49.4%) |
22 July 2021 | 361 | 243 | 8 (3.4%) | 221 (47.6%) |
23 July 2021 | 351 | 230 | 13 (5.3%) | 234 (50.4%) |
24 July 2021 | 354 | 233 | 3 (1.3%) | 231 (49.8%) |
25 July 2021 | 360 | 243 | 10 (4.3%) | 221 (47.6%) |
26 July 2021 | 371 | 251 | 8 (3.3%) | 213 (45.9%) |
27 July 2021 | 364 | 249 | 2 (0.8%) | 215 (46.3%) |
28 July 2021 | 359 | 243 | 6 (2.4%) | 221 (47.6%) |
29 July 2021 | 364 | 245 | 2 (0.8%) | 219 (47.2%) |
30 July 2021 | 357 | 249 | 4 (1.6%) | 215 (46.3%) |
31 July 2021 | 350 | 249 | 0 (0%) | 215 (46.3%) |
1 August 2021 | 350 | 245 | 4 (1.6%) | 219 (47.2%) |
To receive an award, please include your name and the number of reviews you have completed as part of this drive. Awards will be given by the co-ordinator(s) after this drive ends.
This is the scheme for the awards:
At least 3 points: The Invisible Barnstar
At least 7 points: The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
At least 15 points: The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
At least 20 points: The Reviewer Barnstar
At least 30 points: The Multiple Good Article Reviewer Barnstar
At least 40 points: The WikiProject Good Articles Medal of Merit
At least 60 points: The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
In addition, the person who accumulates the most points during the backlog elimination drive will receive the Content Review Medal of Merit |
In addition:
Quick-fails are eligible for only up to one point; the word counts from quick-failed articles are not credited towards extra points.
The following list contains all nominations that are currently 90+ days old. A review of these articles is thus worth an extra half point.
Article | Nomination | Notes |
---|---|---|
Arab Christians | 26 March 2021 | 7,000+ words |
Steinitz's theorem | 21 April 2021 | 2,800+ words |
Affine symmetric group | 21 April 2021 | 6,000+ words |
The below articles have had their nominations abandoned, or need a second opinion.
Keep a running total of your reviewing in the Participants section below by creating your own list. Only passes and fails will be recognised as completing a review. If necessary, you can put the article on hold if the article needs to be edited further to be passed. Each of your reviews should be included in your list. Article reviews started before 31 July but completed after 31 July can be included in the running total – however should be completed as quickly as possible to avoid being too late. Reviews started before 1 July do not count. Please state if the article is a pass, fail, or on hold. Make sure you follow up on reviews that you have started or placed on hold.
A sample review section is below; all sections start with a fourth-level header containing the editor's username and the {{ Div col}} and {{ Div col end}} templates. Between those templates, each article reviewed is given its own line. Use the "GA" icon line for an article that passes, the "FGAN" icon line for an article that fails, the "GAH" icon line for an article where the initial review is complete and has been placed on hold, and the "GAN" icon line for an article where the review has started but has not yet been placed on hold. (Change "GAN" and "GAH" to "GA" or "FGAN" when the article passes or fails.) After the article name is a parenthetical for the number of words in the article. If the nomination is 90 or more days old when you begin your review, add "(old)" after the number of words. Following the {{ Div col end}} template are three lines to tabulate each participant's total number of articles reviewed, total number of old nominations reviewed, and total words reviewed.
====[[User:Username|Username]]==== {{Div col}} #{{icon|GA}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) (old) #{{icon|FGAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) #{{icon|GAH}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) (old) #{{icon|GAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (# words) {{Div col end}} '''Articles reviewed:''' <br>'''Old nominations reviewed:''' <br>'''Total words reviewed:'''
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 6407
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 6
Old nominations reviewed: 5
Total words reviewed: 12,217 words
Points: 11.5
Articles reviewed: 16
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 28,130
Points: 24
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,999
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 12
Old nominations reviewed: 5
Total words reviewed: 30,408
Points: 21.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 9,062
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 8,246
Points: 7.5
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 16,877
Points: 11.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 818
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,824
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 8
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Total words reviewed: 18,986
Points: 13.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 6,900
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 1,758
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 6
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 22,270
Points: 10.5
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 2,798
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Total words reviewed: 22,621
Points: 12
Articles reviewed: 11
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 38,010
Points: 21
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 2168
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 10,964 words
Points: 6.5
Articles reviewed: 18
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 45,514
Points: 30
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,910
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 13
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 31,635
Points: 21
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 5,335
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 4,387
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 1 (The Dream of Ossian review started 30 June)
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,751
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 1,253
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 11
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 31,499
Points: 18.5
Articles reviewed: 8
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 16,311
Points: 12
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 8,257
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 10
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 18,791 words
Points: 14
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 3,544
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,102
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,234
Points: 3
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 9,091
Points: 3.5
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 12,179
Points: 7.5
Articles reviewed: 28
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 33,732
Points: 36
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 6,082
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,500
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 5,614
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 12,721
Points: 8
Articles reviewed: 1 (2021 EFL League One play-off Final review started 21 June)
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 3,339
Points: 1
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: N/A (quick-fail)
Points: 1
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 18,656
Points: 7.5
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 5,007
Points: 5
Articles reviewed: 17
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 54,778
Points: 31
Articles reviewed: 150
Old nominations reviewed: 17
Total words reviewed: 414,631
Points: 261.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 8,797
Points: 4.5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 7,543
Points: 6.5
Articles reviewed: 30
Old nominations reviewed: 9
Total words reviewed: 110,611
Points: 61.5
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,186
Points: 1.5
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Total words reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 13,916
Points: 7
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 6,620
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 4,418
Points: 4
Articles reviewed: 9
Old nominations reviewed: 8
Total words reviewed: 29,859
Points:
Articles reviewed: 12
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Total words reviewed: 24,815
Points: 19
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Total words reviewed: 1,415
Points: 1
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 4,638
Points: 7
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 11,294
Points: 6.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 2,570
Points: 2.5
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Total words reviewed: 4,639
Points: 3.5
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 5
Total words reviewed: 14,803
Points: 10.5