The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move. Fixing error in page creation. (non-admin closure) Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 23:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• 'Court of attachment → Royal forest#Courts  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Random apostrophe at the start suggests WP:G6 but, since Court of attachment does not exist, I wanted to be sure. Nickps ( talk) 23:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete It's literally just a random apostrophe that makes this redirect practically useless Okmrman ( talk) 03:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Move: to Court of attachment to redirect to Royal forest#Courts as its creator clearly attended. Then delete the apostrophe version. Jim Killock (talk) 08:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Just FYI, page movers can move pages without leaving redirects. So, your proposal can be executed easier that way. Nickps ( talk) 15:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete for excess apostrophe. Create new redirect as required, Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply
• Move without redirect per Jim. The creator had the right intention but an apostrophe came in the way. Jay 💬 06:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• 'Appy 'Ampstead' → Albert Ketèlbey  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Appears to be a mistake. The target mentions " 'Appy 'Ampstead", notice the lack of a single quote at the end indicating that the first single quote was intended to be an apostrophe (like the second). Nickps ( talk) 23:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Typical WP:COSTLY#Some unneeded redirects. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Restore Unopposed, and as usual with RfD restores the new article will be in the new pages feed so New Page Patrol can decide what to do with it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Anastasia Horne → Undressed  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Actressed featured in several other shows, including a Buffy episode, Kids Incorporated and The Bachelor (1999 film). Does not seem to have enough sources for an independent article. PAge has been edit-warred back and forth from a near-sourcless article to a redirect. Rusalkii ( talk) 21:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Restore without prejudice to AfD. Thryduulf ( talk) 02:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Blatta Guziki → Blatta  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Contested WP:PROD candidate. Still an invalid name ( WP:SPECIES), no point on a redirect to parent genus. If the species gets accepted, I'm happy for restoration. Until then the redirect, nor article, serves no purpose. NotAGenious ( talk) 18:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Restore and send to AfD as a contested PROD and contested BLAR. Thryduulf ( talk) 19:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  That's a good idea. Can it be boldly done, or do we need this discussion to conclude? NotAGenious ( talk) 20:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete without redirect. It doesn't exist. It's not a scientific name, it's not even a misspelling of a scientific name (see here. As far as I can see, it's nothing, except possibly someone's "in-joke" pretending there's a cockroach named after one of his friends/enemies. It smells entirely like a practical joke, and doesn't need to be here. Dyanega ( talk) 00:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete the redirect if Blatta is not a valid species. No need to restore, just delete the page. Gjs238 ( talk) 14:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Battle Searcher → Gameplay of Pokémon#Items  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete. According to Bulbapedia, this is the directly-translated Japanese name of the Vs. Seeker, a Key Item from the 3rd Gen Kanto and 4th Gen Sinnoh games. We don't need info on this-- We're not Bulbapedia. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 01:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Thryduulf ( talk) 19:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Muhammad Murtadlo Dimyathi → Muhammad Murtadho Dimyathi  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

A typo by an editor. Quickly moved. Викидим ( talk) 17:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Mecha Break → The Game Awards 2023  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Non-notable game announced at the show and just mentioned as an item of the list in the target page. If it becomes notable, WP:RFD#DELETE #10 would still apply. Викидим ( talk) 17:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete WP:REDLINK discourages this practice of making totally useless redirects that will make articles seem like they exist. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 07:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Silphscope → Gameplay of Pokémon#Items  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Silph Scope is also a redirect with the same target which should be added to the nomination. There seems to be some history here, it looks like at some point stubs for the subject existed at Silphscope, Silph Scope and Silph scope, even simultaneously. Nickps ( talk) 00:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  On a related note, since there is no item list at the target anymore, List of Pokémon items and List of Pokemon items should also be nominated, probably at a separate RfD. Nickps ( talk) 00:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. It is a key plot item in the games but is otherwise non-notable outside of the verse. -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 02:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• The First Berserker: Khazan → The Game Awards 2023  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Non-notable game announced at the show and just mentioned as an item of the list in the target page. If it becomes notable, WP:RFD#DELETE #10 would still apply. Викидим ( talk) 17:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete WP:REDLINK discourages this practice of making totally useless redirects that will make articles seem like they exist. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 07:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• 7.9 → 8  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Delete Seems useless and potentially misleading. From the history it appears that someone made an article under the title about a music album's review score in some magazine, it was nominated for speedy, and someone else rounded the number off and redirected it. Trovatore ( talk) 16:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete, 7.9 is not 8. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 17:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete: Misleading StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Not the same thing. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 11:48, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: per WP:NFRINGE 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 ( talk・ edits) 21:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  I'm not sure how that's relevant to the redirect? Thryduulf ( talk) 22:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  The '7.9 = 8' theory touted by this redirect is some very fringe pseudomathematics 🙏‍ 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 ( talk・ edits) 23:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  Ohhhh, okay. Fair enough! 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 23:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  I uh, think HotMess is saying that this isn't notable? ...Not sure why zhe'd use WP:NFRINGE over WP:GNG or other notability tests. The conclusion is correct, though, 7.9 isn't a notable number. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 23:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPath ^talk 14:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Joe Biden family → Family of Joe Biden  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

redirect term is not found in article nor is it likely to be a common search term TarnishedPath ^talk 14:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep This seems like a very plausible search term to me. Dozens of hits on Google for this phrase. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 14:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Very plausible search term. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Referring to "Family of (blank)" as the "(blank) family" is rather common in English, especially for famous/important figures. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 15:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Metaltron → Dalek  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No mention of this name or term in Wikipedia. No incoming links. The target is quite an exhaustive article and there are multiple articles dealing with Daleks, but none have mention of what a Metaltron is. External searches link the name to Dalek in fansites, but having this redirect doesn't inform a reader on Wikipedia any further. Suggest to Delete. Jay 💬 08:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Weak Delete. As a note, if this should point anywhere, it should point to Dalek (Doctor Who episode), where one of the characters refers to a Dalek by this moniker. However, the article does not currently mention this in its current state. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 09:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Kodak Harrow. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Eastman Village → Harrow, London  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Eastman Village is not mentioned at the target article. The only mention of "Eastman" is in a link to the Kodak article. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 01:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• It seems to be a new housing estate on the site of a Kodak [1]. Maybe it should me covered in the target. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 18:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• The article has "a large industrial premises was built in 1890 by the American Eastman Kodak company in Wealdstone, and by 1965 there were over 100 buildings on a 55-acre site at Kodak Harrow, employing 5,500 people", which I believe is now Eastman Village. I would want a better source than what I have to actually add this to the article, though. Rusalkii ( talk) 20:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No mention has yet been added to the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• The Kodak Harrow article already contains a mention of this. Peter James ( talk) 13:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Kodak Harrow per Peter. Jay 💬 05:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Kaomoji. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Kao maaku → Emoticon  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Neither "Kao maaku" nor "maaku" are mentioned at the target page. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 04:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Weak delete. Potentially meant to refer to Kaomoji? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 04:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  Retarget to Kaomoji. It took some digging, but Kao maaku is (was?) definitely used as a synonym for kaomoji. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 13:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 08:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Bharat Rupee → Indian rupee  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No search result on Google except a joke comment on Reddit. Northern Moonlight 07:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep. Bhārat is an alternate name for India as per Names_for_India#Bhārata, and searching "Bhārat Rupee" (or indeed, Bharat Rupee) on Google immediately pulls up information (including Google's exchange rate calculator) for the Indian Rupee. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 09:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep per Lunamann. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Lunamann. English Wikipedia is used by millions of people in India, who may very well search for "Bharat Rupee". Also, I see several hundred Google results including Twitter posts, blogs, etc. Kk.urban ( talk) 18:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Return of Ultraman characters#Aliens. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Alien Baltan → Ultraman  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Alien not mentioned at the target page. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 16:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep: Not mentioned there, but is included in a lot of other related pages, to the point where I don't think there's another valid target but that it should go somewhere relevant. Tag with Template:R to article without mention and Template:R from fictional character, and maybe another editor will come along and add it later. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 08:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to List of Return of Ultraman characters#Aliens * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to List of Return of Ultraman characters#Aliens where mentioned. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Vận động viên trung lập cá nhân tại Thế vận hội mùa hè 2024 → Individual Neutral Athletes at the 2024 Summer Olympics  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Vietnamese translation of title, clear WP:RLANG fail (the neutral athletes are Russian and Belurusian). Rusalkii ( talk) 04:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 11:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Speedy delete per nom. Okmrman ( talk) 04:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

ok yeah it's strong delete not speedy delete Okmrman ( talk) 04:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per WP:RLANG. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 10:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• LGBT rights in Mzansi → LGBT rights in South Africa  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Does not specifically discuss the city of Mzansi in any way. Rusalkii ( talk) 04:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete: per nom. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 19:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• History of the socialism in Finland → Socialism in Finland  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Accidental creation at this title; was immediately moved. Unlikely mistake when searching. Rusalkii ( talk) 04:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Malformed RfD. I would consider fixing the nomination, properly tagging relevant pages, and relisting, but decided against it due to both the number of pages involved, and the fact that the one editor responding to the proposal itself opposed it. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

There was a large collection of redirects recently added such that listing them all here would be difficult. So using the template to suggest that seems impossible without a ton of busy work of adding every single one here. They were added as part of this AFC here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects_and_categories/2023-12#Redirect_request:_SpaceX_Transporter_/_SpaceX_Falcon_9_Transporter_/_Falcon_9_Transporter_/_Transporter_(SpaceX)_/_Transporter_(Falcon_9)_/_Transporter_(SpaceX_Falcon_9)_//_SpaceX_Transporter_mission_/_SpaceX_Falcon_9_Transporter_mission_/_Falcon_9_Transporter_mission_//_SpaceX_Transporter_missions_/_SpaceX_Falcon_9_Transporter_missions_/_Falcon_9_Transporter_missions_//_SpaceX_Transporters_/_SpaceX_Falcon_9_Transporters_/_Falcon_9_Transporters. I've currently marked them for speedy deletion but the creator who fulfilled the AFC disagrees so I'm bringing the discussion here. Here's my reasoning: Firstly several of the pages have "Transporters" in the title. None of the missions have ever been called this and they are unlikely to be called this because the sense of them is wrong. No teleportation is going on. Secondly, many of the page titles imply that Falcon 9 is being transported or that SpaceX is being transported, a mistake very unlikely to be made. Thirdly, the ip address who requested the pages be created has no recent edit history on Falcon-related pages. They were likely requested as a troll of some sort. Fourthly, the missions are always referred to by number in the form "Transporter-1", "Transporter-2", etc. I request that these pages be deleted. Ergzay ( talk) 02:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I'll note that I unmarked SpaceX Transporter missions as I feel like that is probably the only legitimate redirect out of that set. Ergzay ( talk) 02:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep they are missions called Transporter X, so pluralize that would be Transporters. They are launched on Falcon 9s from SpaceX, thus they make logical sense. I don't see where the implications the nominator is suggesting comes from. From the way that disambiguation works on Wikipedia, something called Transporter associated with SpaceX and Falcon 9 is being indicated, and not some sentence structure. So SpaceX Transporters would be a plural form redirect of the Transporter mission set from SpaceX, and not some science fiction device. That would be the grammatical meaning. Where do you get teleportation from any of this? It doesn't say teleporter. SpaceX is operating a transport mission on a Falcon 9, called "Transporter #", so there is transportation occuring, on a Falcon 9 rocket operated by SpaceX. -- 65.92.247.66 ( talk) 07:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  They would not pluralize to Transporters. The missions are properly called "Transporter-1 mission" so would pluralize to Transporter missions. You cannot call them "Transporters". For example see: https://www.spacex.com/launches/transporter-5/ "Transporters" is a common name that teleportation is given in science-fiction. Ergzay ( talk) 17:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• Comment every nominated redirect must be tagged and listed here. If there are too many to do easily, ask an AWB user for help. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).