| The WORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - December 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Welcome, welcome, welcome JimKillock! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
CactiStaccingCrane ( talk)18:52, 1 February 2024 UTC [ refreshvia JWB and Geardona ( talk to me?)
Hello, JimKillock. Thank you for your work on Anglo-Jewish studies. Tacyarg, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Interesting article, thanks.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tacyarg}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Tacyarg ( talk) 17:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your help at WP:GOCE/REQ, but please don't accept a request unless you intend to finish it; your making several "first passes" doesn't reduce the backlog. All the best, Mini apolis 23:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @
Miniapolis, I don't feel confident enough at this point to copyedit without someone else taking a second look. Each copyedit has been a "full pass" edit, but I would prefer a second review. It should help speed up the work, therefore, as I should have removed the most obvious problems. But to me the alternative is that I don't edit at all.
Jim Killock
(talk) 08:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can't stop you from doing what you want, of course, but the GOCE has a number of useful links at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to. As far as your threat to quit editing unless you can do it your way ... well,
WP:HIGHMAINT.
Mini
apolis 13:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not meant as a threat! Just how I see it, so you can understand @
Miniapolis.
Jim Killock
(talk) 15:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. Since you're new to WP copyediting, though, you should understand that we have an established system for managing the large number of articles in need of work. Perhaps you should work on backlog articles until you have more confidence; they have less oversight, unlike an article requested by someone who hoping for its promotion to GA or similar. All the best, Mini apolis 15:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not meant as a threat! Just how I see it, so you can understand @
Miniapolis.
Jim Killock
(talk) 15:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can't stop you from doing what you want, of course, but the GOCE has a number of useful links at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to. As far as your threat to quit editing unless you can do it your way ... well,
WP:HIGHMAINT.
Mini
apolis 13:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Neo-Latin writers has been nominated for renaming
Category:Neo-Latin writers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw ( talk) 06:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
| The WORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - December 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Welcome, welcome, welcome JimKillock! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
CactiStaccingCrane ( talk)18:52, 1 February 2024 UTC [ refreshvia JWB and Geardona ( talk to me?)
Hello, JimKillock. Thank you for your work on Anglo-Jewish studies. Tacyarg, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Interesting article, thanks.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tacyarg}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Tacyarg ( talk) 17:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your help at WP:GOCE/REQ, but please don't accept a request unless you intend to finish it; your making several "first passes" doesn't reduce the backlog. All the best, Mini apolis 23:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @
Miniapolis, I don't feel confident enough at this point to copyedit without someone else taking a second look. Each copyedit has been a "full pass" edit, but I would prefer a second review. It should help speed up the work, therefore, as I should have removed the most obvious problems. But to me the alternative is that I don't edit at all.
Jim Killock
(talk) 08:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can't stop you from doing what you want, of course, but the GOCE has a number of useful links at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to. As far as your threat to quit editing unless you can do it your way ... well,
WP:HIGHMAINT.
Mini
apolis 13:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not meant as a threat! Just how I see it, so you can understand @
Miniapolis.
Jim Killock
(talk) 15:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. Since you're new to WP copyediting, though, you should understand that we have an established system for managing the large number of articles in need of work. Perhaps you should work on backlog articles until you have more confidence; they have less oversight, unlike an article requested by someone who hoping for its promotion to GA or similar. All the best, Mini apolis 15:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not meant as a threat! Just how I see it, so you can understand @
Miniapolis.
Jim Killock
(talk) 15:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can't stop you from doing what you want, of course, but the GOCE has a number of useful links at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to. As far as your threat to quit editing unless you can do it your way ... well,
WP:HIGHMAINT.
Mini
apolis 13:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Neo-Latin writers has been nominated for renaming
Category:Neo-Latin writers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw ( talk) 06:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)