The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, not as a matter of principle, but there are only two articles in it, one for which anti-Zionism is a POV judgment and the other is anti-
Christian Zionism which is quite something different than Jewish Zionism. E.g. Christian Zionism asserts a parallel idea that the returnees ought to be encouraged to reject Judaism and adopt Christianity as a means of fulfilling biblical prophecies.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The reason for that is the existence of
Christian Zionism as a separate movement with quite a different agenda than
Zionism. They are not Zionists who happen to be Christians but rather adherents of Christian_Zionism.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 12:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 23:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Queen of ♡ |
speak 23:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anti-Zionist Christians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, the category contains people with widely diverging views, from antisemitism to advocy of Palestinian human rights, but generally it has very little to do with Christian theology. If applicable, articles are better off in
Category:American Zionists etc. than in a specific Christian category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 21:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The reason for that is the existence of
Christian Zionism as a separate movement with quite a different agenda than
Zionism. They are not Zionists who happen to be Christians but rather adherents of Christian_Zionism.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 12:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Queen of ♡ |
speak 23:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anti-mainlander sentiment in Hong Kong
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: "Anti-mainlander sentiment" is not a defining characteristic of the articles that have been placed in this category, which are about subjects that may be more accurately or commonly described as reflecting a "pro-democracy", "localist", or "anti-Chinese Communist Party" sentiment. The category name is also biased in favour of a narrative promoted by the Chinese government – the Hong Kong pro-democracy movement was portrayed as "anti-mainlander" to help cement Chinese public opinion against Hong Kong democracy activists. Citobun (
talk) 23:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Move the title to
Category:Anti-Chinese sentiment in Hong Kong. There is a difference between the pro-democracy movement and the anti-mainlander sentiment. Among the latter, some simply antagonize the CCP, but others antagonize the mainlander's people. However, many Hong Kongers see it as better to change the title than delete it, as they distinguish their identity from the [mainland] Chinese people.
ProKMT (
talk) 08:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I do not see how e.g.
Milk Tea Alliance can be understood as anti-mainlander or anti-Chinese sentiment.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete the category article itself is a completely different matter. I am well aware of the oppression of CCP in Hong Kong, but at the same time, I am also aware of discrimination against the mainlander 'people'. Even before I edited it, many articles related to Hong Kong topics included
Category:Anti-Chinese sentiment in Asia.
ProKMT (
talk) 07:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
None of the articles fits well with the category title. As said, they are much more about the Hong Kong democracy movements.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Otherwise rename to Anti-Chinese sentiment in Hong Kong per the Indonesian and the Japanese counterparts, or merge to both Hong Kong–China relations and Marcocapelle's proposed target.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or merge per Marco.
Mason (
talk) 13:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@Queen of Hearts: Where to merge to?
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 16:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Deaths due to hippopotamus attacks
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. This is a variation of a
WP:BARTENDER close: Rather than relist for further discussion on whether
Menes belongs in
Category:Deaths due to animal attacks or not, further discussion on this point can take place at
Talk:Menes. No prejudice against nominating the sibling categories for merging/deletion.
(non-admin closure)HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 02:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery Could you add rhinos and cougars to the nom if you agree?
NLeeuw (
talk) 21:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I think this discussion has been hijacked into something other than what I originally started it as, and hence those should be a different discussion. On the merge versus delete issue, do any of you really think the pharoh
Menes is defined by some legend about how he died? That's not how my understanding of defining characteristics works.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Seconding Pppery here. I don't see what about Menes's article would make his death defining. It's not even clear if it actually happened that way. I think it'd be worth removing
Accidental deaths in Egypt and
Hunting accident deaths from the article too.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions) 23:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
There is only one original source about him being killed by an animal, but one source is not uncommon in ancient history. It is a not a reason to not believe it per se.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Orange Twin albums
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Citizens of Indonesia through descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:History of Austria-Hungary by topic
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Meanwhile one of the subcategories has been nominated for deletion, probably leaving even only one subcategory here.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, strongly overlapping scope. (Of course if there is consensus about this, then all subcategories need to be nominated as well.)
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support. I think this is a really good idea. (However, if the decision ends with Keep, think we'd need to have a really really clear definition in the category description to support maintenance. )
Mason (
talk) 19:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
For what it's worth, I think this category should remain as is. :)
KīlaueaGlows (
talk) 06:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Ok, then for the top category it is too early to be merged. The subcategories by date and location are set categories, and items of infrastructure are always buildings or structures, so this objection does not apply to these subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose I've been looking at some categories about canals and they are appropriately categorized under "infrastructure" rather than "buildings and structures". I think with their addition and that of other similar categories. "structure" would become so broad (anything that is built?) as to become almost meaningless. There might be some overlap here but I think that the solution might be to change "buildings and structures" to just "buildings" and leave "infrastructure" be. LizRead!Talk! 22:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Looking at more categories, it looks like some "infrastructure" categories are placed under the parent categories of "buildings and structures" which I think is more appropriate than merging the two. LizRead!Talk! 22:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 19:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:16th-century Roman Catholic bishops in Portuguese Macau
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Hmmmm, I've been thinking of them like a country of work category, like that's where the bishop is serving, as opposed to the dioses. If we changed it to "of" Macau, would that mean that all the bishops would also have to be in the parent category? Category:XXXX-century Roman Catholic bishops in China (or Asia)? My goal is to make all the categories consistent, and possibly avoid having a perpetual edit war over the parent country category.
[1]Mason (
talk) 18:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
That would be fine with me. Although I think that the merge target should probably be China for the 20th and 21st centuries.
Mason (
talk) 22:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Just for twelve days in the 20th century? Domingos Lam served between 1988 and 2003 (i.e. across 1999) and the article already belongs to both the 20th- and 21st-century categories. His successor José Lai served between 2003 and 2016.
219.77.182.250 (
talk) 15:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
With all respect this isn't and shouldn't be an entirely mechanical process as you put it. You have to read and understand the subject as well.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Long story short, there were bishops appointed to dioceses elsewhere who served and were based in Macau (e.g. as administrators of the diocese, which covered an area large enough to be subdivided into hundreds of dioceses in the following centuries). These were bishops in Macau but not Bishops of Macau.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
That may be the case but that does not match with the content of this category tree. Bishops in these categories were bishops of Macao.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Reverse rename. That was the Portuguese period, and there was a time when it was a província ultramarina.
219.77.182.250 (
talk) 13:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
What does that even mean?
Mason (
talk) 00:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
It is obvious that it was Portuguese, that does not have to be added to the category name per se.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Then name the categories accordingly.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 09:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
No, I am just saying that it is not necessary.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Not necessary per se; but, as I read it, not something that cannot and shouldn't be done.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Rename the 17th to 20th-century categories accordingly and make them along with the 16th-century category under the tree of Category:Portuguese Macau.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
FYI, these are all the same IP and a well-known one at that
WP:LTA/HKGWMason (
talk) 13:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Could you at least make your attempt to sockpuppet less obvious?
Mason (
talk) 22:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 19:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of Indian civil awards and decorations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. The above awards aren't worth an exception from
WP:OCAWARD, they are not comparable to a Nobel prize.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. We're not starting this again, are we? Most of these are clearly notable and defining. They include the
Bharat Ratna, the highest civilian honour that can be awarded by India, and the
Kaisar-i-Hind Medal, an extremely prestigious award given in British India. If they're not defining, then what on earth is?
WP:OCAWARD certainly does not say that awards have to be comparable to a Nobel Prize; neither does it say that only international awards should be categorised, which is what such a suggestion implies. The deletion rationale is entirely spurious and ridiculously brief. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 09:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep I find it very hard to believe that a category based on India's highest civilian honour is not appropriate as defining. If that is the argument then the entire category tree at
Category:Order of the British Empire, which contains about a hundred subcategories and many thousands of articles should be added to this nomination. As should the substantial category tree at
Category:Recipients of United States civil awards and decorations. By singling out one country this nomination makes no sense.
AusLondonder (
talk) 15:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Temples (LDS Church) in Latin America
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Transport and the Mercosur
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jewish nobility
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:arbirtrary and irrelevant intersection by ethnicity. I found this category added to
Yehudi Menuhin on my watchlist and I'm about to revert it because, while it's true that he was Jewish and that he was a
Life peer, the intersection of these facts (especially the latter one) in a category seems more than a little bizarre and "non-defining", because he was by far best known as a violinist. There are probably many other examples just like this one.
Graham87 (
talk) 09:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose, this is a well-populated category.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 17:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 15:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Graham87 has a good point that lists allow for context that categories don't. But I am not in favour of listification either, as the net here has evidently been cast far too wide. E.g. someone like
James Goldsmith (picked at random) has nothing to do with "nobility".
NLeeuw (
talk) 15:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. It is another example of a non-useful, mostly meaningless category created by intersecting two unrelated traits. We don't have categories for Christian, Muslim, or Hindu nobility and we shouldn't have one for Jewish nobility either.
220.235.78.155 (
talk) 03:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and other users. It's a specific category that's already filled within the various subcategories for nobility per nationality. Furthermore, as mentioned above, there is no specific category for other major religions like Christians or Muslims.
Clear Looking Glass (
talk) 10:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Category created just to hold one list. This would be fine if there were multiple lists to file here, but is not necessary for just one -- but given that Northern Cyprus is a disputed territory which is diplomatically recognized only by Turkey, it's impossible to file multiple lists here. The list is already in
Category:Ambassadors of Turkey to Northern Cyprus, which is all that's needed in context -- but this category isn't necessary if it will only ever contain one list.
Bearcat (
talk) 13:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 15:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Public high schools in Chicago suburbs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename per nom, for consistency.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support renaming.
J 1982 (
talk) 10:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Neutral, as as I said with the songs about/against capitalism nomination, many of these songs have lyrics which are quite clearly critical of racism and/or xenophobia. With the songs about poverty or consumerism, those songs aren’t explicitly against the subject of said topics as much but are more about the topic itself and its effects.
Velociraptor888 (
talk) 23:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dos Santos family (Angolan business family)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining trait. This simply indicates that the game in question has it's web hostname in the
.io TLD. It is akin to having a category for ".com video games", ".org video games", etc. There is no connection between these games from a developer, publisher, or otherwise manner. --
ferret (
talk) 16:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete non-defining descriptor. -
Altenmann>talk 16:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Better write an article about it, with proper sourcing, as mentioned in the other discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, per my reasoning from the TFD that sources (
[2][3][4]) consider ".io games" a genre, but unlike my conclusion in the TFD, keep the category as genre is CATDEF. ~
A412talk! 16:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Lean delete. This doesn't seem defining.
Mason (
talk) 19:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - Valid game genre per above sources, plus
[5],
[6] --
Mika1h (
talk) 23:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I will note the TfD was closed as delete, FWIW. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 01:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of the Padma Shri in literature & education
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, not as a matter of principle, but there are only two articles in it, one for which anti-Zionism is a POV judgment and the other is anti-
Christian Zionism which is quite something different than Jewish Zionism. E.g. Christian Zionism asserts a parallel idea that the returnees ought to be encouraged to reject Judaism and adopt Christianity as a means of fulfilling biblical prophecies.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The reason for that is the existence of
Christian Zionism as a separate movement with quite a different agenda than
Zionism. They are not Zionists who happen to be Christians but rather adherents of Christian_Zionism.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 12:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 23:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Queen of ♡ |
speak 23:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anti-Zionist Christians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, the category contains people with widely diverging views, from antisemitism to advocy of Palestinian human rights, but generally it has very little to do with Christian theology. If applicable, articles are better off in
Category:American Zionists etc. than in a specific Christian category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 21:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The reason for that is the existence of
Christian Zionism as a separate movement with quite a different agenda than
Zionism. They are not Zionists who happen to be Christians but rather adherents of Christian_Zionism.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 12:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Queen of ♡ |
speak 23:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anti-mainlander sentiment in Hong Kong
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: "Anti-mainlander sentiment" is not a defining characteristic of the articles that have been placed in this category, which are about subjects that may be more accurately or commonly described as reflecting a "pro-democracy", "localist", or "anti-Chinese Communist Party" sentiment. The category name is also biased in favour of a narrative promoted by the Chinese government – the Hong Kong pro-democracy movement was portrayed as "anti-mainlander" to help cement Chinese public opinion against Hong Kong democracy activists. Citobun (
talk) 23:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Move the title to
Category:Anti-Chinese sentiment in Hong Kong. There is a difference between the pro-democracy movement and the anti-mainlander sentiment. Among the latter, some simply antagonize the CCP, but others antagonize the mainlander's people. However, many Hong Kongers see it as better to change the title than delete it, as they distinguish their identity from the [mainland] Chinese people.
ProKMT (
talk) 08:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I do not see how e.g.
Milk Tea Alliance can be understood as anti-mainlander or anti-Chinese sentiment.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete the category article itself is a completely different matter. I am well aware of the oppression of CCP in Hong Kong, but at the same time, I am also aware of discrimination against the mainlander 'people'. Even before I edited it, many articles related to Hong Kong topics included
Category:Anti-Chinese sentiment in Asia.
ProKMT (
talk) 07:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
None of the articles fits well with the category title. As said, they are much more about the Hong Kong democracy movements.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Otherwise rename to Anti-Chinese sentiment in Hong Kong per the Indonesian and the Japanese counterparts, or merge to both Hong Kong–China relations and Marcocapelle's proposed target.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or merge per Marco.
Mason (
talk) 13:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@Queen of Hearts: Where to merge to?
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 16:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Deaths due to hippopotamus attacks
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. This is a variation of a
WP:BARTENDER close: Rather than relist for further discussion on whether
Menes belongs in
Category:Deaths due to animal attacks or not, further discussion on this point can take place at
Talk:Menes. No prejudice against nominating the sibling categories for merging/deletion.
(non-admin closure)HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 02:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Pppery Could you add rhinos and cougars to the nom if you agree?
NLeeuw (
talk) 21:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
I think this discussion has been hijacked into something other than what I originally started it as, and hence those should be a different discussion. On the merge versus delete issue, do any of you really think the pharoh
Menes is defined by some legend about how he died? That's not how my understanding of defining characteristics works.
* Pppery *it has begun... 21:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Seconding Pppery here. I don't see what about Menes's article would make his death defining. It's not even clear if it actually happened that way. I think it'd be worth removing
Accidental deaths in Egypt and
Hunting accident deaths from the article too.
QuietHere (
talk |
contributions) 23:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
There is only one original source about him being killed by an animal, but one source is not uncommon in ancient history. It is a not a reason to not believe it per se.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Orange Twin albums
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Citizens of Indonesia through descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:History of Austria-Hungary by topic
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Meanwhile one of the subcategories has been nominated for deletion, probably leaving even only one subcategory here.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, strongly overlapping scope. (Of course if there is consensus about this, then all subcategories need to be nominated as well.)
Marcocapelle (
talk) 18:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support. I think this is a really good idea. (However, if the decision ends with Keep, think we'd need to have a really really clear definition in the category description to support maintenance. )
Mason (
talk) 19:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
For what it's worth, I think this category should remain as is. :)
KīlaueaGlows (
talk) 06:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Ok, then for the top category it is too early to be merged. The subcategories by date and location are set categories, and items of infrastructure are always buildings or structures, so this objection does not apply to these subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose I've been looking at some categories about canals and they are appropriately categorized under "infrastructure" rather than "buildings and structures". I think with their addition and that of other similar categories. "structure" would become so broad (anything that is built?) as to become almost meaningless. There might be some overlap here but I think that the solution might be to change "buildings and structures" to just "buildings" and leave "infrastructure" be. LizRead!Talk! 22:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Looking at more categories, it looks like some "infrastructure" categories are placed under the parent categories of "buildings and structures" which I think is more appropriate than merging the two. LizRead!Talk! 22:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 19:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:16th-century Roman Catholic bishops in Portuguese Macau
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Hmmmm, I've been thinking of them like a country of work category, like that's where the bishop is serving, as opposed to the dioses. If we changed it to "of" Macau, would that mean that all the bishops would also have to be in the parent category? Category:XXXX-century Roman Catholic bishops in China (or Asia)? My goal is to make all the categories consistent, and possibly avoid having a perpetual edit war over the parent country category.
[1]Mason (
talk) 18:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
That would be fine with me. Although I think that the merge target should probably be China for the 20th and 21st centuries.
Mason (
talk) 22:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Just for twelve days in the 20th century? Domingos Lam served between 1988 and 2003 (i.e. across 1999) and the article already belongs to both the 20th- and 21st-century categories. His successor José Lai served between 2003 and 2016.
219.77.182.250 (
talk) 15:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
With all respect this isn't and shouldn't be an entirely mechanical process as you put it. You have to read and understand the subject as well.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Long story short, there were bishops appointed to dioceses elsewhere who served and were based in Macau (e.g. as administrators of the diocese, which covered an area large enough to be subdivided into hundreds of dioceses in the following centuries). These were bishops in Macau but not Bishops of Macau.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
That may be the case but that does not match with the content of this category tree. Bishops in these categories were bishops of Macao.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Reverse rename. That was the Portuguese period, and there was a time when it was a província ultramarina.
219.77.182.250 (
talk) 13:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
What does that even mean?
Mason (
talk) 00:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
It is obvious that it was Portuguese, that does not have to be added to the category name per se.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Then name the categories accordingly.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 09:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
No, I am just saying that it is not necessary.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Not necessary per se; but, as I read it, not something that cannot and shouldn't be done.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Rename the 17th to 20th-century categories accordingly and make them along with the 16th-century category under the tree of Category:Portuguese Macau.
58.152.55.172 (
talk) 08:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
FYI, these are all the same IP and a well-known one at that
WP:LTA/HKGWMason (
talk) 13:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Could you at least make your attempt to sockpuppet less obvious?
Mason (
talk) 22:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 19:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of Indian civil awards and decorations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. The above awards aren't worth an exception from
WP:OCAWARD, they are not comparable to a Nobel prize.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. We're not starting this again, are we? Most of these are clearly notable and defining. They include the
Bharat Ratna, the highest civilian honour that can be awarded by India, and the
Kaisar-i-Hind Medal, an extremely prestigious award given in British India. If they're not defining, then what on earth is?
WP:OCAWARD certainly does not say that awards have to be comparable to a Nobel Prize; neither does it say that only international awards should be categorised, which is what such a suggestion implies. The deletion rationale is entirely spurious and ridiculously brief. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 09:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep I find it very hard to believe that a category based on India's highest civilian honour is not appropriate as defining. If that is the argument then the entire category tree at
Category:Order of the British Empire, which contains about a hundred subcategories and many thousands of articles should be added to this nomination. As should the substantial category tree at
Category:Recipients of United States civil awards and decorations. By singling out one country this nomination makes no sense.
AusLondonder (
talk) 15:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Temples (LDS Church) in Latin America
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Transport and the Mercosur
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jewish nobility
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:arbirtrary and irrelevant intersection by ethnicity. I found this category added to
Yehudi Menuhin on my watchlist and I'm about to revert it because, while it's true that he was Jewish and that he was a
Life peer, the intersection of these facts (especially the latter one) in a category seems more than a little bizarre and "non-defining", because he was by far best known as a violinist. There are probably many other examples just like this one.
Graham87 (
talk) 09:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose, this is a well-populated category.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 17:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 15:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Graham87 has a good point that lists allow for context that categories don't. But I am not in favour of listification either, as the net here has evidently been cast far too wide. E.g. someone like
James Goldsmith (picked at random) has nothing to do with "nobility".
NLeeuw (
talk) 15:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. It is another example of a non-useful, mostly meaningless category created by intersecting two unrelated traits. We don't have categories for Christian, Muslim, or Hindu nobility and we shouldn't have one for Jewish nobility either.
220.235.78.155 (
talk) 03:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and other users. It's a specific category that's already filled within the various subcategories for nobility per nationality. Furthermore, as mentioned above, there is no specific category for other major religions like Christians or Muslims.
Clear Looking Glass (
talk) 10:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Category created just to hold one list. This would be fine if there were multiple lists to file here, but is not necessary for just one -- but given that Northern Cyprus is a disputed territory which is diplomatically recognized only by Turkey, it's impossible to file multiple lists here. The list is already in
Category:Ambassadors of Turkey to Northern Cyprus, which is all that's needed in context -- but this category isn't necessary if it will only ever contain one list.
Bearcat (
talk) 13:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 15:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Public high schools in Chicago suburbs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename per nom, for consistency.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Support renaming.
J 1982 (
talk) 10:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Neutral, as as I said with the songs about/against capitalism nomination, many of these songs have lyrics which are quite clearly critical of racism and/or xenophobia. With the songs about poverty or consumerism, those songs aren’t explicitly against the subject of said topics as much but are more about the topic itself and its effects.
Velociraptor888 (
talk) 23:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dos Santos family (Angolan business family)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining trait. This simply indicates that the game in question has it's web hostname in the
.io TLD. It is akin to having a category for ".com video games", ".org video games", etc. There is no connection between these games from a developer, publisher, or otherwise manner. --
ferret (
talk) 16:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete non-defining descriptor. -
Altenmann>talk 16:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Better write an article about it, with proper sourcing, as mentioned in the other discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, per my reasoning from the TFD that sources (
[2][3][4]) consider ".io games" a genre, but unlike my conclusion in the TFD, keep the category as genre is CATDEF. ~
A412talk! 16:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Lean delete. This doesn't seem defining.
Mason (
talk) 19:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - Valid game genre per above sources, plus
[5],
[6] --
Mika1h (
talk) 23:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I will note the TfD was closed as delete, FWIW. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 01:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of the Padma Shri in literature & education