New to bots on Wikipedia? Read these primers!
Operator: Kanashimi ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 14:07, Sunday, December 3, 2023 ( UTC)
Function overview: Implement WP:PIQA + Merge {{ VA}} into {{ WPBS}}.
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): wikiapi on GitHub
Source code available: 20200122.update vital articles.js on GitHub
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles#Break 2, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 17#Template:Vital article
Edit period(s): weekly
Estimated number of pages affected: Talk pages including WikiProject templates. (['Category:WikiProject banners without quality assessment', 'Category:WikiProject banners with quality assessment', 'Category:Inactive WikiProject banners'] - ['Category:WikiProjects using a non-standard quality scale'])
Namespace(s): Talk
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details:
This task is basically
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 26 plus the transfer of the {{
Vital article}} and the handling of |activepol=
, |blpo=
, |listas=
in {{
WikiProject Biography}}. In the future it might be possible to discuss automatically removing |blp=
after a person has passed away.
There are some tests:
The goal of this task is to be the main operator for the additions described above, and to work with Qwerfjkl (bot) for the rest. Also, User:MSGJ, I'm a bit curious, since we've transferred all the important functionality of {{ WikiProject Biography}} to the {{ WikiProject banner shell}} template, can we just remove {{ WikiProject Biography}}, just like we do with {{ Vital article}}? -- Kanashimi ( talk) 14:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Just to note my support for this task, and confirm it fits within all recent discussions we have had on how to merge the {{ vital article}} template. My thanks to Kanashimi for taking this on. One small note on 3 above: there was a clash in ratings - would it be better for a human editor to review cases like this, rather than overwrite one of the ratings? You could transfer the rating from {vital article} and leave the rating on the other template. That will automatically place the page in Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings which is monitored. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 20:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Some issues with recent edits:
|vital=yes
. Also it did not transfer the |listas=
to the shell.|class=start
from other banners|class=B
from the banners which agree with the PIQA rating? (Keep the C-class for human review.)|vital=yes
, did not transfer the |listas=
value, did not remove class from conforming bannersAlso, I know you are an experienced bot operator, but I believe you are supposed to wait for BAG to approve a trial before doing the trial? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 12:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply
{{ bag assistance needed}} Please review and approve a trial, thanks — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Also I can do this: [13] -- Kanashimi ( talk) 05:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply
I will also clean Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates [14] -- Kanashimi ( talk) 03:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
|living=
or |blp=
parameter can now be migrated to the banner shell, or just removed if it is already there (
example) — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 19:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
Approved. Kanashimi, I would ask that you start slowly (maybe batches of <1000 per day) at the outset just to make sure any lingering issues that weren't seen in the trials can be dealt with. Primefac ( talk) 13:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC) reply
New to bots on Wikipedia? Read these primers!
Operator: Kanashimi ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 14:07, Sunday, December 3, 2023 ( UTC)
Function overview: Implement WP:PIQA + Merge {{ VA}} into {{ WPBS}}.
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): wikiapi on GitHub
Source code available: 20200122.update vital articles.js on GitHub
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles#Break 2, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 17#Template:Vital article
Edit period(s): weekly
Estimated number of pages affected: Talk pages including WikiProject templates. (['Category:WikiProject banners without quality assessment', 'Category:WikiProject banners with quality assessment', 'Category:Inactive WikiProject banners'] - ['Category:WikiProjects using a non-standard quality scale'])
Namespace(s): Talk
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details:
This task is basically
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 26 plus the transfer of the {{
Vital article}} and the handling of |activepol=
, |blpo=
, |listas=
in {{
WikiProject Biography}}. In the future it might be possible to discuss automatically removing |blp=
after a person has passed away.
There are some tests:
The goal of this task is to be the main operator for the additions described above, and to work with Qwerfjkl (bot) for the rest. Also, User:MSGJ, I'm a bit curious, since we've transferred all the important functionality of {{ WikiProject Biography}} to the {{ WikiProject banner shell}} template, can we just remove {{ WikiProject Biography}}, just like we do with {{ Vital article}}? -- Kanashimi ( talk) 14:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Just to note my support for this task, and confirm it fits within all recent discussions we have had on how to merge the {{ vital article}} template. My thanks to Kanashimi for taking this on. One small note on 3 above: there was a clash in ratings - would it be better for a human editor to review cases like this, rather than overwrite one of the ratings? You could transfer the rating from {vital article} and leave the rating on the other template. That will automatically place the page in Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings which is monitored. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 20:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Some issues with recent edits:
|vital=yes
. Also it did not transfer the |listas=
to the shell.|class=start
from other banners|class=B
from the banners which agree with the PIQA rating? (Keep the C-class for human review.)|vital=yes
, did not transfer the |listas=
value, did not remove class from conforming bannersAlso, I know you are an experienced bot operator, but I believe you are supposed to wait for BAG to approve a trial before doing the trial? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 12:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply
{{ bag assistance needed}} Please review and approve a trial, thanks — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Also I can do this: [13] -- Kanashimi ( talk) 05:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply
I will also clean Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates [14] -- Kanashimi ( talk) 03:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply
|living=
or |blp=
parameter can now be migrated to the banner shell, or just removed if it is already there (
example) — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 19:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
reply
Approved. Kanashimi, I would ask that you start slowly (maybe batches of <1000 per day) at the outset just to make sure any lingering issues that weren't seen in the trials can be dealt with. Primefac ( talk) 13:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC) reply