Operator: Qwerfjkl ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 20:04, Wednesday, October 4, 2023 ( UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Pywikibot
Function overview: Resolve conflicting class values where it is an article/non-article conflict
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Template talk:WikiProject banner shell#Moving ahead with project-independent quality ratings
Edit period(s): one time run, with more if necessary
Estimated number of pages affected: <1000
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: For the purposes of this, an article is anything in mainspace that's not a redirect or dab page. The bot will run on Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings. If the page is not an article page, the bot will remove any classes with values 'fa', 'a', 'ga', 'b', 'c', 'start', 'stub', 'fl', 'list' If the page is an article it will remove any classes with values 'file', 'image', 'img', 'draft', 'category', 'cat', 'categ', 'disambig', 'diamb', 'disambiguation', 'dab', 'redirect', 'redir', 'red', 'template', 'temp', 'templ', 'tpl', 'project'
Here's what the edits would look like: Special:Diff/1178602607, Special:Diff/1178602456.
@
Qwerfjkl: first diff is not working — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 20:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
reply
Just to confirm this task will be useful, and is very similar to the already approved Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 21 — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 20:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply
run those? — Qwerfjkl talk 16:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply
class
parameter value wasn't redirect
. —
Qwerfjkl
talk 17:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
reply
Just to note, the bot did not remove the start-class in this edit — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply
Just to note that this has taken a long time to get approved and probably is not needed anymore. We have changed the logic so it is impossible to rate a non-article with an article quality rating. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply
Operator: Qwerfjkl ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 20:04, Wednesday, October 4, 2023 ( UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Pywikibot
Function overview: Resolve conflicting class values where it is an article/non-article conflict
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Template talk:WikiProject banner shell#Moving ahead with project-independent quality ratings
Edit period(s): one time run, with more if necessary
Estimated number of pages affected: <1000
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: For the purposes of this, an article is anything in mainspace that's not a redirect or dab page. The bot will run on Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings. If the page is not an article page, the bot will remove any classes with values 'fa', 'a', 'ga', 'b', 'c', 'start', 'stub', 'fl', 'list' If the page is an article it will remove any classes with values 'file', 'image', 'img', 'draft', 'category', 'cat', 'categ', 'disambig', 'diamb', 'disambiguation', 'dab', 'redirect', 'redir', 'red', 'template', 'temp', 'templ', 'tpl', 'project'
Here's what the edits would look like: Special:Diff/1178602607, Special:Diff/1178602456.
@
Qwerfjkl: first diff is not working — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 20:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
reply
Just to confirm this task will be useful, and is very similar to the already approved Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 21 — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 20:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC) reply
run those? — Qwerfjkl talk 16:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC) reply
class
parameter value wasn't redirect
. —
Qwerfjkl
talk 17:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
reply
Just to note, the bot did not remove the start-class in this edit — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply
Just to note that this has taken a long time to get approved and probably is not needed anymore. We have changed the logic so it is impossible to rate a non-article with an article quality rating. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply