This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
-- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 15:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Piotrus, I'm guessing you never saw the suggested alternate hook here. Can you comment on whether it's accurate and supported? (The nomination still hasn't been reviewed, which is true of ten of the nominations on that date.) Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 17:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, it's Viviane here! Thought I should send you a message so you can know my username ViSampaio ( talk) 01:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
There is a problem. I am kind of upset. I was working on Globalization of wine translating English to Korean for the wikipedia class. and I checked and tried to edit more next day and it has been deleted WITHOUT NOTICE. I left a message to the person who deleted it. I had referneces(two where it came from is wikipedia because I translated from there. how should I put the references if I got the information from English wikipedia?) hope you answer me back, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaHee Park ( talk • contribs) 08:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC) -- GaHee Park ( talk) 17:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/와인의_세계화
this is the final second assignment of Wikipedia class(Globalization of wine). I left a message again and I all translated of the English wikipedia to Korean. furthermore, the working on Hanok article editing grammatically missed has been edited ; ) When you confirm this talk page, could you please answer me back as soon as possible? yap, not only the wikipedia edits are important, but also the GRADES being 'UPGRADE'is VERY important to me because the last day of final editing grades are today Dec. 31 ;) thank you!!!!!!!!!!!! -- GaHee Park ( talk) 17:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
I am really sorry to bother you. Is wikipedia's final edit isn't enough to get more grade? Please, I hope.you answer soon thank you. Even though it is annoying please consider the condition that the final marking grade date it until today in Korean time it is 4:18pm now. Thank you-- GaHee Park ( talk) 07:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Krupnik (soup) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hieronymous Francken II may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this is in reply to your e-mail (which I'm replying to here because I prefer not to use e-mail for privacy reasons, see my user page).
I'm sorry to say that I've had very little experience with the process you mention, and I've also not been following the issues and editors you mention, except to the limited (and, luckily, ever-diminishing) extent they end up being discussed at WP:AE. Because of this, I do not think that I can give you useful advice in this matter. I would also prefer not to involve myself in the process, as this might compromise my ability to respond to future AE requests concerning this topic area.
Best regards and happy editing, Sandstein 19:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Since when did chairman of a University be considered to fail WP:Academic guidelines if it meets criteria #5?-- Mishae ( talk) 19:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Bringing an update about my progress on the past days: I have been making edits on diverse wikipedia articles about varying topics. Some of them were choose and others i have found as articles that needed more attention on the wikipedia. I have been trying to collaborate in different ways and have practiced different types of editions to get more familiar with them, such as: fixing references or reflists; uploading images for a article; expanding sections; working on infobox sections; removing biased text; making texts more concise; adding coordinates; translating some sections of pages from portuguese-english and the other way around; and others.
So far i have made 13 contributions on the English Wikipedia + 9 on the portuguese one (that you can check here https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribui%C3%A7%C3%B5es/Fredderico18). I Know that haven't finished the 40 edits as planned but will do so till this weekend. I plan on doing half of the edits on the english wikipedia and the other half on the portuguese one. Thanks! Fredderico18 ( talk) 17:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Until now, I have made 25 edits on English Wikipedia and 5 on Portuguese Wikipedia (it seems my contributions in portuguese don't appear in my english page, so here is the link for quick reference https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribui%C3%A7%C3%B5es/ViSampaio). I have mainly worked on articles of my interest doing minor edits, adding links, correcting typos and adding sources. ViSampaio ( talk) 07:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Tim Cumming here. The page was put up by one of my publishers, John Knight of Pitt St Poetry in Sydney, Australia. We have met once, at the launch reading of the book of mine he published, Etruscan Miniatures, so while he is my publisher, we have no personal connection at all. I have added some links to reviews and work online, covering the poetry, painting, and film work. Is this enough to stop the page being deleted? I hope so. 83.244.234.228 ( talk) 17:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Witaj! Zauważyłem, że masz na koncie wiele zgłoszeń artykułów do GA. Przypadkowo natknąłem się na dwa artykuły, które według mnie mogą być godne tytułu GA - Constance, Duchess of Wodzisław oraz Arthur Szyk. Czy możesz je ocenić i ewentualnie zgłosić do GA - osobiście na EnWiki, się tym nie znam. Pozdrawiam! Kobrabones ( talk) 22:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
I just found that on the link that you sent to me it already explain how to extract the coordinates on the way that i discovered. By the way, thank you for the snacks! Fredderico18 ( talk) 13:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition began on 1 January. There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn ( talk · contribs), The ed17 ( talk · contribs) and Miyagawa ( talk · contribs) 18:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Been busy with the holidays and cooling off after getting rather torqued. I'm not surprise at recent actions, I did ask the admin to include me on the ban since the recent comments were directed at me. Ajh1492 ( talk) 20:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, thanks for your DYK suggestion, I think I've created the Template but I'm not sure - would you mind looking at it?
/info/en/?search=Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_December_26 /info/en/?search=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Swedish_nuclear_weapons_program
Thanks DMattis ( talk) 03:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National symbols of Poland. Since you had some involvement with the National symbols of Poland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ( chat) 14:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for reviewing the DYK nomination for Inchdrewer Castle so promptly! I've now moved the draft of George Ogilvy, 3rd Lord Banff to main space. It's pretty short so if you get the chance would you consider also doing the necessary to review that as it's been added to the original nomination. I hope you don't think I'm being cheeky by asking? Kind regards. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
I've changed the hook for Prince of Wales F.C. The C of E God Save the Queen! ( talk) 13:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Sociology for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 02:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Omi Shrine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mind matrix 19:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I am the user working on the article about the above person and I have read your message. I still do not understand why the article has been marked for deletion since I translated it (partially) from the Spanish Wikipedia, the sources are official and independent (European Broadcasting Union, where this person works, and the contests he organizes) and this person has a relevant position. The format might be improved indeed but I am not a Wikipedia expert and I am still learning.
Even another user uploaded a picture of him to the website, which is the one I used: that gives an idea about the relevance of this person and his role.
There are few sources about this person since the projects he has lead are quite small and it is challenging to find more information from reliable websites (and in English).
I do not know if this is the right place to contact you, but I would like to check this out and make it approved.
Thank you. Lprincon ( talk) 23:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi again, sorry if my first message sounded a bit "strict" but I did not know how to address you and I was quite stressed with your message. I have added extra link from other independent sources and public broadcasters. I hope it helps. Thank you again. Lprincon ( talk) 23:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
By order of the
Military History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's
Peer,
Good Article,
A-Class and
Featured Article Candidate reviews for the period October–December 2013, I am delighted to award you this
Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. During this period you undertook three reviews. Without reviewers it would be very difficult for our writers to achieve their goals of creating high quality content, so your efforts are greatly appreciated.
AustralianRupert (
talk) 04:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Hello! Your submission of Kielce Bus Station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 19:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC) -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 19:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Katowice historic train station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pgallert ( talk) 14:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus, Kinldy help me to improve Wikipedia biography about Michał Safianik. I managed to add citations, and in my opinion I have done all necessary work to convince Wikipedia to not delete this article. Please let me know when and how finish this disscussion.
Thank you in advance! Ula Urs8721 ( talk)Urs8712 —Preceding undated comment added 17:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
On 12 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kielce Bus Station, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the UFO-like Kielce Bus Station (pictured) has been praised as "one of the most valuable" architectural designs of the last decades of the People's Republic of Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kielce Bus Station. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 17:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Here is a brief list of sources with their internet editions, who are presenting the book
Bulgarian national newspapers: 24 hours: http://www.24chasa.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=2670458 Monitor: http://www.monitor.bg/article?id=412292 Trud: http://www.trud.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=2670436 Duma: http://duma.bg/node/68951
TV Here is interview with the author of the book Ognian Georgiev at the morning show of Nova TV – one of the national TV stations in Bulgaria. Starting from 54 minute from 11 January http://play.novatv.bg/program/sbudise
Radio Here is interview with the author at the national “Darik” radio station with one of the most popular radio announcers Nikolay Kantchev. Here the author was asked if he plans to translate and to Publish the book in Portugal and he answered that probably first it will be published in Germany, because Boevski competed in a German club years ago. http://radio.dariknews.bg/?page=audio&id=231490
The book is published in Bulgaria just 20 days ago after the huge interest of the arrest and sentence of the Olympic champion Boevski 2 years ago, which was noticed by the news around the world from Europe to New Zealand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celibat ( talk • contribs) 19:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Józef Karol Konrad Chełmicki may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Piotrus, I am flattered by your comments about Letort. I usually add talk page templates but on that occasion I simply forgot. I used to forward articles to DYK, but almost 12 months ago I ran into two editors who seemed to pathetically enjoy wielding their little trace of power by withholding approval and demanding levels of referencing that are not commensurate with dead Frenchmen from 100 years ago. (I had exhaustively trawled through French newspapers accumulating snippets etc.) So yet another editor lost interest in Wiki due to the egos and hubris of a few, in my case for about 6 months. Although I have recently started creating good little articles again, (I only ever create good stuff :) ), I decided that I don't have the energy for DYK, I am not here to argue, I am only interested in wring good sentences, good subjects and good grammar. Thus Léon Letort, Émile-Louis Letord and René Couzinet remain hidden under a bushell. If you want to propose them I will be flattered, and may even become enthused about DYK. I know that Couzinet is not finished, but it's a good start about an interesting, forgotten man, exactly what Wiki was invented for. Many regards, If you think it is worth it I will get embroiled in submitting to DYK, I am getting more enthusiastic every word I write. Flattery - it's like a drug :) . Regards Chienlit ( talk) 16:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Noble families had nobility status in certain feudal entity which is different from modern day nationality. Therefore Noble families by nationality category does not make much sense. -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dariusz Jemielniak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stewards ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Anti-Katyń isn't about the Katyń denial. I'm sorry but I don't understand your postion. Maybe you mean the relativisation? Xx236 ( talk) 08:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, in response to your two technical opposes at the RFC at DYK, the QPQ check takes mere seconds to see how many credits a user has. Thanks, Mat ty. 007 17:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Piotrus! Hi! Hoping you are well. Kindly give me a favor by reviewing article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hafiz Muhammad Fazal Azim Taha. Here I am giving you the link /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Hafiz_Muhammad_Fazal_Azim_Taha. Kindly review this article and tell me how it can be published on Wikipedia? Cheers! Umar Taha ( talk) 16:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked mostly minor features and fixing bugs. A few significant bugs include working around a bug in CSSJanus that was wrongly flipping images used in some templates in right-to-left (RTL) environments ( bug 50910) a major bug that meant inserting any template or other transclusion failed ( bug 59002), a major but quickly resolved problem due to an unannounced change in MediaWiki core, which caused VisualEditor to crash on trying to save ( bug 59867). This last bugs did not appear on any Wikipedia. Additionally, significant work has been done in the background to make VisualEditor work as an independent editing system.
As of today, VisualEditor is now available as an opt-out feature to all users at 149 active Wikipedias.
__NOTOC__
and __FORCETOC__
as selection (forced on, forced off, or default setting; bugs
56866 and
56867) and __NOEDITSECTION__
as a checkbox (
bug 57166).Looking ahead: The character formatting menu on the toolbar will get a drop-down indicator next Thursday. The reference and media items will be the first two listed in the Insert menu. The help menu will get a page listing the keyboard shortcuts. Looking further out, image handling will be improved, including support for alignment (left, right, and center) and better control over image size (including default and upright sizes). The developers are also working on support for editing redirects and image galleries.
Subscriptions to this newsletter are managed at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Newsletter. Please add or remove your name to change your subscription settings. If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 20:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
On 18 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Omi Shrine, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Japanese Shinto shrine Omi Jingu (pictured), dedicated to Emperor Tenji, holds karuta and water clock festivals and has been recently popularized by the manga Chihayafuru? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Omi Shrine. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 00:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
ƬheStrike Σagle sorties 03:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, I'm trying to make the List of notable people under Five Eyes surveillance a featured list before Feb 11 so that we can include it for our project ( Wikipedia:Surveillance awareness day). As time is running short, could you help me do a peer review? That would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
- A1candidate ( talk) 22:58, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I have added/copy-pasted citations to the family tree. Although I'd argue that citations are unnecessary for the same reason they are unnecessary in the lead (the section being a summary rather than new information), I think you are right in thinking that some editors might complain about it, so it is better to play safe. Cheers, Surtsicna ( talk) 17:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
On 20 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Irena Jurgielewiczowa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Polish writer Irena Jurgielewiczowa was also an underground teacher and a resistance fighter in WWII? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Irena Jurgielewiczowa. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Katowice historic train station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 16:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irena Jurgielewiczowa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memoires ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
First I, later user JorisvS, later I again, reduced the size of the graphic by Sobiepan. "Editing comments" is one but Sobiepan have no right to destroy the layout of page, too large graphics and separating lines are unacceptable. Size of Sobiepan's graphics have been reduced (graphics are not removed), separating lines can not exist because it is written posts directly to that text. We both (I and JorisvS) thoroughly explained what was going on. Sobiepan can not be subordinate, makes it difficult to discuss. Sobiepan did it, mass introduces templates POV to articles Lechitic languages, Slavic languages, West Slavic languages, Silesian language... We with him can not cooperate, his behavior more and more like trolling, making confusion. I can not cope. I want to constructively discuss, Sobiepan just bothers and exacerbate the matter. Franek K. ( talk) 12:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
... and again, again again [1]. Franek K. ( talk) 12:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you know much more about sociology than I do, so perhaps you can have a look at Academic imperialism and see whether it is more than an expression just used in a single article? Thanks. -- Randykitty ( talk) 17:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I see that you are an experienced user and former administrator. However You partly supported (as a comment) no neutral option - dialect. I would like to show you one thing. Between linguists, sociolinguists, linguistic organizations, people who use the language, politicians there is no consensus for status language or dialect. We all agree with the fact that the case of Silesian is complicated. This is fact. Accordance with the core content policies of Wikipedia: Neutral point of view, Wikipedia must to be neutral and can not show only one side. Change the name of the article on "dialect" violates the fundamental principle of Wikipedia and can not be changed. But, user JorisvS presented an interesting option - Upper Silesian". This option is full neutral, this is ideal compromise, the name does not refer to a dialect or language and should not offend anyone, both supporters - dialect and language. You support this compromise? Franek K. ( talk) 22:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Your project sounds interesting, please let me know how I can help. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 13:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I've changed my e-mail setting, you can now e-mail me via WIkipedia. Boleyn ( talk) 15:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
On 24 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kazania sejmowe, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although Piotr Skarga's Sejm Sermons political treatise was ignored during his lifetime, he was labeled a "patriotic seer" centuries after his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kazania sejmowe. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Caponer ( talk) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
Piotrus, I wanted to give you this whisky as an apology for not including the year in the alternative DYK hook for Kazania sejmowe! By the time I saw your response, the alternative hook had already been published on the Front Page! Thank you for your many interesting and comprehensive articles on Poland, and its culture and people! -- Caponer ( talk) 01:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{ WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Message received at 01:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Piotruś rozumiem Twoje zdenerwowanie i doskonale zdaję sobie sprawę z tego, że artykuły obecnie przeze mnie pisane pozostawiają wiele do życzenia. Problem w tym, że od dłuższego czasu piszę je na kolanie, na komputerze pozbawionym polskich znaków i w wielkim pośpiechu. Nie mam tyle czasu co dawniej i te artykuły siłą rzeczy są niedopieszczone. Bardzo przepraszam, staram się jak mogę, ale naprawdę to cud że jeszcze coś piszę. Pozdrawiam i nie denerwuj się. Nie robię tego na złość. Tymek ( talk) 06:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 01:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotruś. Thank you for your input in my article. I'm doing it first time in my life and it seems to be not simple but I'm learning. Can you give me, please, some advices how I can improve it without deletion of the article? Will it be sufficient to change the article for just BLP instead of Accademics? Regards, Joanna
I would. The only limitation is that I don't use communication channels other than wiki pages - I hope that's fine with you. GregorB ( talk) 11:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, to which I have responded on the talk-page. Best, -- Smerus ( talk) 14:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I would be delighted to take part in your survey. Best wishes. Dormskirk ( talk) 13:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus - I went ahead and replied to you on Meta. Also, heh, the essay your meta userpage links regarding Poles reminds me a lot of some of my experiences in recent naming discussions... Best, Kevin Gorman ( talk) 00:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey Piotrus-- I know you from your work at the Intelligence task force of Military history. I and a few others have been trying to start up Wikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillance. We're trying to gear up for an editing drive.
I've never run a wikiproject before-- we could use the advice of an expert. Would love to have you on the team. -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 10:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotr.
I received an e-mail containing a survey from the account Piotrusbot. Two questions:
Relatedly, I believe the full text of this e-mail should be posted on-wiki for scrutiny and transparency. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 05:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I have answedered you here - Sietecolores ( talk) 14:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from TASIM, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! De728631 ( talk) 15:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Piotruś, I will be very greatfull for your help. I was creating my article watching this one: /info/en/?search=Douglas_P._Fry I had a few more "chapters" but someone changed it because it was to detailed. Maybe you can give me some advices how to improve the article - can be in polish maybe then it will be more understandable for me. And yes I have completed Wikipedia:Tutorial but maybe I should do this again. Joanna Rogowska ( talk) 16:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
On 29 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Academic imperialism, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that imperialism also happens within academia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Academic imperialism. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
On 29 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Academic imperialism, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that imperialism also happens within academia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Academic imperialism. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll see what I can do.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, the article Generation War has had about 10 edits in the last day which are ALL VANDALISM (VERY OBVIOUSLY) by someone who identifies himself as JosefShevchenko. These edits have been reverted one-by-one, but this continuous vandalism is absurd. As an ADMINISTRATOR, do you know of a procedure for Wikipedia to block this vandallism? Prospero10 ( talk) 16:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your encouragement. Will keep your suggestions in mind for future contributions. Doewiets ( talk) 17:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotus. Thanks for offering help for the Jozef Pilsudski Institute of America. We are looking for Pl speakers to help out remote and local. Do you have people located in New York at all? We are looking for some local volunteers to help adding their archival materials to WP. OR drohowa ( talk) 17:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC) you can also email me at dhoward@metro.org
Hi Piotrus. I haven't received any mail from you since January 14. Please resend. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
On 30 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Bytom and Będzin, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Treaty of Bytom and Będzin ended the fourteen-month long imprisonment of Maximilian III, Archduke of Austria, in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Treaty of Bytom and Będzin. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 16:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
There is a chance to end the conflict: Talk:Silesian_language#If the name with the words of dialect, language, Polish are POV, what the name of the target. Please vote, which option is better according to You. Regards, Franek K. ( talk) 19:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Piotrus, I have put my article do the sandbox and I will try to improve it slowly. Also the idea with starting with polish wikipedia is interesting. Thank you for your help. Joanna Rogowska ( talk) 20:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate your including me in your survey, but I'd rather not, frankly. I might feel differently if it was anonymized, but then again, I might not. Thanks for your kind words.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 22:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
If I remember correctly, photos from the prezydent's website, like these [2] are free to use on Wikipedia, right? Volunteer Marek ( talk) 08:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
On 1 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Upper Silesian Railway, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Upper Silesian Railway was part of the first rail network connecting Berlin, Vienna, Kraków and Warsaw by the late 1840s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Upper Silesian Railway. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks to you for your contribution Victuallers ( talk) 00:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Just a courtesy note as requested to say that I've de-prodded Back to the Klondike. Optimist on the run ( talk) 16:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Godot13 ( submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.
Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email), The ed17 ( talk • email) and Miyagawa ( talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
See here: Talk:Midrasz#Notability.3F. // Halibu tt 22:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
What do you think of Template:Chopin/-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey Piotr! Thanks for the reminder! Now i did it. I don't find to remember somethings related about how i entered the bug, but did as best as i could and hope that it helps improving the tutorial, because it's pretty good already! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredderico18 ( talk • contribs) 05:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
C/e done. Soham 15:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Matejko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamienica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, it looks that in June 2013 you searched for help with this and now I have the same problem. May I ask if you have found any solution? The responses at various message boards aren't very helpful. Thanks for any advice. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 07:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for your comments. I deleted the Category Proposed for Deletion after a major edit of the page with numerous additions that should substantiate the notability of the person. Please also note that because the artist is active (exhibitions, events, reviews, secondary literature) is a lot of non-English countries, the material is sometimes difficult to track and to reference. thanks! ˜˜˜˜Globaleditor˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Globalarteditor ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
I changed the date (hidden category) for notability on Przemysław Frasunek, not because I think he's notable, but because it appears in the backlog, which makes more work for sysops. Please don't revert it, please. For teh kitteh!
Bearian (
talk) 18:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
On 6 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Żywoty świętych, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Polish Jesuit Piotr Skarga's Lives of the Saints (1579) contained graphic and detailed description of tortures and suffering? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Żywoty świętych. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Mentoz ( talk) 11:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daedongyeojido may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Martin Franzkowiak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
On 8 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Devotional articles, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that devotional articles have been produced and sold as far back as the times of ancient Egypt and ancient Mesopotamia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Devotional articles. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 12:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
On 9 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Katowice historic train station, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that delay of the planned restoration of the ruined Katowice historic train station, which attained monument status in 1975, has led to public protests? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Katowice historic train station. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 13:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roman Dmowski you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 ( talk) 22:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
see talk page on Durkheim 128.214.173.46 ( talk) 10:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the help there, Piotrus! It certainly does have "insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject", and I'm certainly one of them. Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
FYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 14:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! Yoninah ( talk) 18:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Jeśli możesz rozwinąć, to będzie świetnie. Ja z tego co mam w ręce więcej "nie wyduszę" :( - o handlowych mam tylko Piwowońskiego Byłoby w sumie mieć polski statek w tutejszym czywieszu :)-- Felis domestica ( talk) 19:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The numbers can be found by hitting the "reader comments" link at the top of the WWII page. /info/en/?search=Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/World_War_II?ref=article&filter=featured Most of the user complaints were similar to what I also considered as problems with the WWII article. The text is ver dry; just chronologically listing the order of military campaigns, and shying away from presenting the true brutality of the conflict. In fact, as an example; the WWI article does a very good job of showing all aspects of the war; from military engagements, to the civilian casualties.
When I started to edit the WWII page a few days ago. There was not single picture of Stalin, Roosvelt, Concentration Camps, and still no image of a Swastica (that got removed). The article just lists facts without any consideration of scope. The section War breaks out in Europe (1939–40) started out by saying: "On 1 September 1939, Germany and Slovakia invaded Poland". Really, that just might be a deliberate blurring of event details. Yes, the Slovaks did invite, but when stated in such a way, a reader who is unfamiliar with the events of WWII might think that both countries were equal belligerents; and this is the problem with this article, no context is given. no clear separation between aggressors and victims, and the most difficult subject matter explained in a encyclopedic language with out any context. -- Factor01 ( talk) 21:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
On 10 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Floriańska Street, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 13th-century Floriańska Street in Kraków is one of the most prestigious streets in Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Floriańska Street. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 22:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Would you leave a comment at the entry page. Thanks, Billy Hathorn ( talk) 23:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Lonnie_Stabler
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daedongyeojido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering how I could be eligible to become an admin. I do realize I have a long way to go but I have goals. Please reply!
PS I have been an admin/moderator on forums before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CatcherStorm ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Sure! Me and Vivi keep working on it! On the exactly moment that we finish the first complete version of it we'll send you a message for the assessment. Thank you once more for all the help and support on this project! We really appreciate everything. Best regards, -- Fredderico18 ( talk) 16:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship.2FPiotrus_3.E2.80.8E_edit_warring. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 18:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Can you clarify, is this your withdrawl or do you plan to post another? I'm standing by to courtesy blank the talk page and RFA whenever it closes.--v/r - T P 19:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 00:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
A cup of Mitha Dahi for you | ||
Here is a cup of
Mitha Dahi for you. Mitha Dahi is a fermented sweet
dahi or sweet
yogurt and mainly poplar in Bengal. Hope you'll like it. For those who visit calcutta or a part of it. Thank you.
Soham 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
It was delicious. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 18:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the message, and for the balaclava. I am sincerely sorry that the RfA did not work - yes, I know you withdrew, but it was clearly and unfortunately going to fail. It is sad that some editors appear unable to forgive and forget even after five years. You might think about trying again in 6 - 12 months? -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 20:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
A cookie for a baklava... Epicgenius ( talk) 02:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I reviewed one of your recent DYK nominations ( nom:Daedongyeojido), but had a small concern. Perhaps you can check it out and we'll resolve it? Cheers, Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Piotrus, sorry the RfA didn't go as it should. I think you would make a fine admin. I supported you last time, and your behavior in this RfA directly addressed the concern I expressed the last go-round. I was just waiting for a long-enough passage of time so I could fully express this. Then the whole "kitten-kanvass kerfuffle" came up, and I felt that my vote would only generate more unhelpful controversy. You know this already, but all RfAs generate an unreasonable amount of scrutiny, and because you've been so highly active for so long and don't shy away from heated topics (although why some of them are so contentious baffles me), your RfAs are exponentially worse than average, so perhaps the only safe thing to do on Wikipedia during your next RfA is to answer the questions and forget the rest of the project. Anyway, thanks for what you do here, and please accept my moral support. Regarding the kitten itself: thanks! I love kittens. AfC is far and away the most difficult and unrewarding thing I do around here, and even though those recent actions were just to pick some low-hanging fruit, I appreciate the encouragement. Take care, 78.26 ( I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK is on the agenda. I've got all the stuff to expand. Created the article in response to on-going review of Rainbow trout at FAC. Thanks. -- Mike Cline ( talk) 13:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
I was impressed with the mature decorum you displayed during the Rfa you subjected yourself to...withdrawing as things started to get silly elevated you above the nonsense. Good show! MONGO 04:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi there,
Just to let you know that I've removed the GAR points for Talk:Normative social influence/GA1 in the Wikicup as although you were quite right to quickfail it for the reasons you gave, the scoring system says for the cup that "Only reviews of a sufficient length will be counted; quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points." Sorry! Miyagawa ( talk) 11:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
On 15 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stanisław Salmonowicz, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Polish historian Stanisław Salmonowicz, once repressed by the Polish communist authorities, has published over 1,000 works? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stanisław Salmonowicz. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from the DYK project and me Victuallers ( talk) 15:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Did You Know that Peter Kiolbassa, the first Polish American to serve as Chicago's Treasurer, was nicknamed "Honest Pete" for refusing to collect interest on financial decisions made in office?-- Pola.mola ( talk) 01:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
On 16 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daedongyeojido, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that South Korea's proposed highest-denomination 100,000- won banknote was cancelled in 2008, since the 19th-century map Daedongyeojido depicted on the note did not portray the Liancourt Rocks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daedongyeojido. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the pie :)-- Cattus talk 19:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I occasionally do some minor edits to Wikipedia articles if I look something up and see mistakes, but if I ever find the time to spend more time on the site I'll be back for some advice.... :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivanevian ( talk • contribs) 22:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey Piotrus sorry about the recent RFA. Try not to take it personally, pretty much everyone knows the RFA process is broken. I noticed most of the Opposes were because of giving out WikiKittens (viewed as canvassing) which I think is pretty much the dumbest thing Ive heard there in a while and because of the desysopping back in 09, which is so old, it doesn't even show up in the User rights history. So IMO both arguments are essentially meaningless opposes. Better luck next time. 108.45.104.158 ( talk) 22:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotrus,
A user called Maxim Musson, whom you have greeted to Wikipedia, has made seven (7) edits to the article Generation War to insert his own review into the body of the article.
Maxim Musson's review ia taken from a website called 'Western Spring,' which is an anti-immigrant and neo-Nazi website, to which Musson has made extensive contributions. The review is obviously designed to advertise the website.
To see what 'Western Spring' promotes, the article 'Repatriation,' at [ [3]] advocates the 'compulsory repatriation of non-White immigrants' to the UK. 'Das Buch' at [ [4]] about Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' says that Hitler 'sets out beliefs and tells his story in a readily appreciable manner.'
Musson is entitled to his views. But I believe a Wikipedia page with about 1000 to 4,700 daily readers should not be used to provide publicity for a small, insignificant, neo-Nazi political group.
Maxim Musson has made repeated Edits to put his 'review' back into Generation War
In my opinion, Maxim Musson should be blocked. Prospero10 ( talk) 19:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello again, Piotrus. (I realize that in greeting Maxim Musson you were not endorsing his contributions)
Thanks for your message, and the reference to Wikipedia:RS. Actually, I think the relevant section is WP:SRS
The repeated edits by Maxim Musson, where he has repeatedly inserted a review WRITTEN BY HIMSELF for his neo-Nazi website into the text of the Wikipedia page Generation War, violate the most basic Wikipedia policy. These reviews express HIS PERSONAL OPINION.
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BULLETIN BOARD FOR POSTING PERSONAL OPINIONS.
The issue is not that he is expressing a neo-Nazi viewpoint, which is what his 'Western Spring' website represents. The issue is that Wikipedia pages ARE NOT A PLACE FOR POSTING PERSONAL OPINIONS.
I believe that Maxim Musson needs to be blocked. Prospero10 ( talk) 14:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
CORRECTION: I meant to say above that Musson violates Wikipedia:SPS Prospero10 ( talk) 15:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, I am rather disconcerted by the rudeness that I have been shown by Prospero10 who edited out material that I had inserted into the Generation War article without any reference to me. I would have thought it polite, if he has an issue with the material inserted, for him to have at least discussed his concerns with me first. Had he done so, I would have realized what was happening and would not have attempted to reinsert the material which to me seemed to disappear without explanation. I thought I had simply made a mistake in the way I had made the edit which meant that the material inserted was not retained.
I have attempted to make just two insertions into the article, without removing or deleting anything anyone else has written. You see, I am a very democratically minded person and I am not concerned that others may express views that differ from mine, unlike Prospero10 it would seem. I am comfortable with a plurality of views - diversity is a strength, don't forget!
The first insertion I attempted to make consisted of the following:
"In a Western Spring review Max Musson stated: "Where ’Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter’ breaks new ground, is that it is a major German TV series, broadcast internationally to widespread acclaim, which depicts the plight of the German people sympathetically, not attempting to ‘whitewash’ the German war record, but merely presenting a balanced and objective view in which the German people are not unfairly demonised. The fact is that the conduct of modern warfare, in which entire nations are mobilised in support of the war effort, almost always entails the commission of atrocities by both sides, both against enemy combatants and enemy civilians. War is after all a ghastly process in which two protagonist groups commit atrocious acts of violence against each other with the intention of terrorising their opponents into submission. How could anyone expect this to be waged in an entirely civilised manner and in accordance with peacetime standards of conduct?
"It is now time for the reputation gained by the German people during WW2 to be rehabilitated and ’Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter’ represents a welcome step along that road."
This insertion is not qualitatively different to the pre-existing reviewer's opinions expressed. Furthermore, it is a very balanced and conciliatory opinion, which I don't think any objective person could take offense at. Why is my opinion as a reviewer less valid than the opinions expressed by the other reviewers featured in that article?
The second insertion that I made was of an external link to the review that I have written of the Generation War series. It was inserted among a number of other external links to reviews written by other people. Why is an external link to my review objectionable, whereas the external links to other reviews are not?
Prospero10 seems to be motivated by a desire to censor the content of that article in order to exclude viewpoints expressed by people he chooses to denigrate as 'neo-Nazi'.
Prospero10 cites other articles on the Western Spring website in order to support his intolerance. He cites an article entitled 'Repatriation' in which I merely describe the successful immigrant repatriation policies employed by the Israeli and Saudi Arabian governments and conclude that the employment of similar policies here in the UK would therefore not necessarily result in international opprobrium. Does Prospero10 believe that Israel and Saudi Arabia are neo-Nazi states?
Prospero10 also cites an article that I wrote commenting on the recent surge in the online sales of Mein Kampf. Similar article featured on the Daily Telegraph website, and on the Guardian website, does Prospero10 believe these too are neo-Nazi websites?
Mein Kampf is often characterized by other reviewers as 'unreadably turgid' or 'crazed rantings', I merely pointed out that on the contrary, the book 'sets out [Hitler's] beliefs and tells his story in a readily appreciable manner', which is true. I don't state that Hitler's viewpoint is valid, simply that it is clearly expressed.
Prospero10 states, "Musson is entitled to his views", but clearly he does not think this, because in the very next paragraph he states, "I believe that Maxim Musson needs to be blocked". It appears that Prospero10 does not believe in a plurality of opinions and does not realize that diversity is a strength.
He goes on, "But I believe a Wikipedia page with about 1000 to 4,700 daily readers should not be used to provide publicity for a small, insignificant, neo-Nazi political group". Would his opinion differ if Western Spring represented a large significant 'neo-Nazi' political group? I don't think so, and therefore the size and significance of Western Spring is immaterial to this discussion. The nub of this issue is simply that I have expressed views that Prospero10 wishes to suppress and censor and you might like to consider whether it is appropriate for Wikipedia to have as a moderator someone who is apparently so undemocratic and intolerant and so ready to condemn and block without any prior discussion.
I would appreciate it if someone would discuss these issues with me instead of simply berating me in a prejudiced and condemnatory manner. Maxim Musson ( talk) 17:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Why not?
Who posted all of the other quotations and external links? ... could it possibly be the authors of the sources cited?
Should I find a third party to add the material that I have attempted to insert? ... would that make it acceptable?
NB. You are still not explaining yourself properly, you are just firing statements at me. What's the matter, don't you people do communication in a civil manner?
If you stopped being so adversarial and started to hold a conversation, we might get somewhere. Maxim Musson ( talk) 20:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
With all due respect Piotrus, three individuals have ganged up in order to censor without consultation, two small insertions that I have made, which contain no inaccurate, insulting, inflamatory, or libelous material, but material which is not qualitatively different from that already there, except that it adds another viewpoint to the range of viewpoints already expressed. I don't believe there is need of a lengthy mediation process here (although I will resort to it if need be) as Alex Bakharev, Seaphoto and Prospero10 have made no attempt to substantiate their claims. Whenever I have asked them to explain they have declined to do so and simply fired another unsubstantiated accusation at me.
The article on Generation War consists of a review of the series 'Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter' (UMUV), with a variety of views expressed, the views of third parties who have themselves written reviews for various publications and websites. These views as I say are qualitatively no different from the one that I expressed. Furthermore, the review that I wrote of UMUV, a link to which I inserted in the external links section, is expressed in moderate terms, that is qualitatively no different to the other reviews linked to, except that it provides as I have stated, a further viewpoint.
Unless my three detractors above can show that the insertions I have made are qualitatively different from the material already there, I believe you should rule that their behavior is unreasonable and that my insertions are admissible. As for Prospero10's earlier attempts to belittle the Western Spring website, I would point out that it holds an Alexa ranking that is at least comparable to any of the mainstream UK political party websites and gets between 900 and 2400 views each day. Furthermore, I wonder whether any of the three detractors have themselves viewed UMUV and if not, in what way are they fit to criticise my review?
We can end this matter quickly and simply now, or we can engage in time consuming mediation, which I will win because I am obviously right in all of the assertions I have made. Maxim Musson ( talk) 07:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in our user study. Please email me at credivisstudy@gmail.com. Wkmaster ( talk) 14:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
On 17 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zbigniew Bródka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Zbigniew Bródka (pictured), the first Pole to win an Olympic gold medal in men's 1500 metres speed skating, is a professional firefighter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zbigniew Bródka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Piotrus, I spotted that message, left by you, on the talk page of a fairly inexperienced editor. I've never seen this kind of a message before, and I think it's a bit heavy for such an editor - especially as it makes no attempt to point them at any list of possible Wikiprojects. I've never heard it suggested before that an editor creating a page has any sort of responsibility to add talk page banners to notify appropriate Wikiprojects. Wikiprojects are probably a bit of a mystery to many new users, and I think I'd have found that message very confusing if I'd received it myself in earlier days. Pam D 16:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotrus. I created a draft for my first article about Southern Sociological Society. Would you mind having a look? You can find it here. Thanks for the help! Sladelellock ( talk) 17:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Ok, Piotrus. I took your suggestions into consideration and submitted my article for review. Thanks again. Sladelellock ( talk) 17:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked on some small changes to the user interface, such as moving the reference item to the top of the Insert menu, as well as some minor features and fixing bugs, especially for rich copying and pasting of references.
The biggest change was the addition of more features to the image dialog, including the ability to set alignment (left, right, center), framing options (thumbnail, frame, frameless, and none), adding alt text, and defining the size manually. There is still some work to be done here, including a quick way to set the default size.
==section headings==
in references), it now strips out the inappropriate HTML.Looking ahead: The link tool will tell you when you're linking to a disambiguation or redirect page. The warning about wikitext will hide itself after you remove the wikitext markup in that paragraph. Support for creating and editing redirects is in the pipeline. Looking further out, image handling will be improved, including default and upright sizes. The developers are also working on support for viewing and editing hidden HTML comments, some behavioral magic words like DISPLAYTITLE, and in-line language setting (dir="rtl"
).
If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 04:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genocide definitions, Definitions of pogrom and Definitions of fascism are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genocide definitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oncenawhile ( talk) 09:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Since I am a newby to the wikipedia community and not so familiar with the complete set of guidelines I might be wrong. However for the offshore industry the methodology described is very simple but advanced and I believe it should find its place in the encyclopedia. So, if the references are not sufficient for keeping the article alive I have to find more/ other references.
Now I need your advice. What type of references are required to keep the subject in the encyclopedia. Janfromholland ( talk) 16:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Writing Wikipedia Articles course (#WIKISOO)! We look forward to meeting you in the first class on 25 February (Americas)/26 Feb (Asia/Australia). By now you should have received an introductory email with some details about the course. If you can't find it, there's an archived copy of the email at this link.
To attend the live session, please check our course home page for instructions and the link. We recommend logging into Blackboard Collaborate (the live class software we use) before the day of class, to be sure it's working. (More tips on the home page.)
If taking the course in self-paced mode, please come say hello on the course talk page so we know who you are! Thanks for signing up, and we'll see you Tuesday! - Pete ( talk) 06:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
— ReviDiscussion 12:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jan Zamoyski you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 00:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar | |
In recognition of your years of high quality and enjoyable contributions to wikipedia as a whole and the Pittsburgh project specifically. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 22:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi there,
Thanks for your thanks on my edits. I've got a major interest in Poland - I've married into it and I'm curious about my new location.
I'll keep an eye on the Wikiproject Poland. I don't claim to be the world's best sub-editor (I've worked with those - I'm only using what I know of my native language) but I'll try to work my way through pages needing some work. I just learn as I go along - and I like that the Polish space on (English) Wikipedia isn't too ruthless (I like how there's pages for little things - so there's always the potential they might grow if people know more).
I'm also not an expert at Wikipedia itself - I just learn as I go along. I'm notoriously bad at sources (given that my main source here is a Google Translation of Polish Wikipedia) and I"m ever thankful of the Wikipedia Reference Generator for making my life easier.
Like I said, I'll try to work my way through your list of pages needing cleanups and see what I can add. Hopefully it makes a small difference!
Scott
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Escottf ( talk • contribs) 16:03, February 14, 2014
---Thanks again, I'll pop into the Warsaw Wikipedians eventually - often in Warsaw during the week but fighting inertia to get there in the weekends ;) Escottf ( talk) 13:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
And thanks for the medal! Escottf ( talk) 14:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your message Piotrus! I'm afraid I can't take credit for the category, though. It was originally made by User:Sobiepan, but I moved it from "Social class in the Poland". I'm not very knowledgeable in the subject, but I'll definitely be keeping an eye on it, as I found the articles listed there pretty interesting! Thanks -- Kateshortforbob talk 16:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Jan Zamoyski you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jan Zamoyski for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 22:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
OK, restored and AfDed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you asked me if we should add a "former power plants" section to the List of power stations in Poland...maybe it would be helpful if we considered power station lists more generally. I have been thinking about guidelines or thresholds for inclusion. To help me with my thinking I started adding some hydro and gas turbine plants. As it stands with what we have (and I know that's not the complete list) we have a total capacity of 38 GW and a maximum facility size of 5 GW. Applying two (very arbitrary) criteria of 0.05% of the total, or 5% of the largest facility, leaves us with a threshold of around 200 MW. I am sorry but I just can't see myself getting interested in a power station of 200 MW when you have 38,000 MW across the nation, and something two hours down the road is nearly 30 times the size! If you do want to include these older plants, I would prefer the term "Decommissioned"...but don't write your friendly local Halemba off just yet. I see from Google Maps that there is still coal on the stockpile. -- Graham Proud ( talk) 14:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Roman Dmowski you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roman Dmowski for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 ( talk) 22:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:
Other competitors of note include:
After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email), The ed17 ( talk • email) and Miyagawa ( talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus; I'm afraid the article isn't really eligible, both because it was nominated last year and because the changes you've made this year are on the smaller side. A quick look through suggests that it's a great article, but I don't think it's really eligible for WikiCup points. Thanks, J Milburn ( talk) 10:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Different from email above. — Revicomplaint? 17:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to ask for third party assistance on several issues regarding the Blue Army article. In particular the greatly over-expanded Controversies section, which was significantly enlarged to include big chunks of text dedicated to subject matter not directly associated with the Blue Army. Also, I would like to point out that most Wiki article admins control the size of content as not to have one user come-in and dump larger amounts of text in one section, and in the process completely shift the balance of the article, by creating un-due weight issues by simply over expanding one section.
Redundant statements re-emphasize similar points: (the two phrases are only one sentence apart).
Overstating wrongful claims; as those made by historian William W. Hagen. If his claims were soundly disproven, why include them? More importantly why does the paragraph go into such detail about the events of the pogrom when the Blue Army was not even there in the first place? Also, as noted by historian Edward Goldstein, the Blue Army was accuse of several pogroms; that they had nothing to do with, so Hagen's wrongful accusation is nothing unusual. Finally, other editors proposed to remove the text in the past.
The Blue Army was wrongly accused of committing the Lviv Pogrom of 1918. Historian William W. Hagen claimed that after helping to capture Lviv, some army units together with Polish civilians, engaged in three days of violence against the Jewish and Ukrainian inhabitants of the city, resulting in hundreds of civilian deaths.[29] But the army's participation in the pogrom is highly disputed, and according to the Cambridge History of Poland, when the Lviv Pogrom actually took place the Blue Army was still in France fighting on the Western Front. Also, it has been documented that the first units did not reach Poland until the spring of 1919, nearly five months after the actual pogrom had happened.[30] The Kronika Polski lists 14 April 1919 as the start of the first transports form France to Poland,[31] and historian Kay Lundgreen-Nielsen stated that the first units of the army did not leave France until 15 April 1919; its departure having been delayed by opposition from Britain and the United States.[32] Thus, requiring a special protocol before the Blue Army was allowed to return home to Poland.[33]
Over emphasizing individuals not directly linked to the Blue Army. The entire paragraph about Hugh S. Gibson, and his opinions about the Jews are completely irrelevant to our topic. Also, the American envoy did not come to Poland to look after Haller's troops. Finally, his reporting on the "food riots" is also not directly related to this article, as the events primarily occurred during civilian unrest, and not done by the army.
The United States sent an envoy to Poland, Hugh S. Gibson, a man who stood out for his antisemitism.[25] Hugh Gibson along with Dr. Boris Bogen, who was the general director of European relief operations of the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC), were tasked by the United States Government to investigate the situation.[26] Throughout their stay in Poland, Gibson and his colleagues ridiculed Jewish traits, customs, and appearance.[25] The official report sent back to Washington stated that many of the newspaper reports in the American press had been inflated, and Gibson himself wrote in his correspondence that he was concerned about separating fact from rumor. In his investigation, Hugh S. Gibson also addressed the issue of "food riots", and after investigating the circumstances reported that an even larger number of Christian shops had also been ransacked, thus disputing the claim that all the violence was strictly a product of anti-Jewish sentiment. Gibson also claimed that Zionists were conspiring with Berlin; according to historian Carole Fink, Gibson emphasized Jews' "social, economic, and ideological transgressions" and described the victims of the pogroms as "exploiters." [27] Gibson also expressed the opinion that Jews in Poland ought to "reform themselves" and assimilate into general Polish society.[28]
Since, we have had problems like this in the past regarding the Blue Army page; I ask that we all come together to finally create a fair and balanced article. Again, your input on this issue would be greatly appreciated. -- COD T 3 ( talk) 02:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! Just a quick reminder that the second WIKISOO class starts in about 3 hours. Even if you missed Week 1, please join us at this link for the live webinar - ideally about 15 minutes early to test your mic/speakers. If you haven’t finished up your Week 1 homework, there’s still time; post any questions on the class talk page! You can also watch a video of last week’s class on YouTube (earlier audio problems have been corrected). Feel free to contact me on my talk page with questions anytime! - WIKISOO co-instructor Sara FB ( talk) 22:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy ( talk) 09:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC) -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 01:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Greetings and felicitations. Given the elaborateness of your user page, I don't think your a spammer, but spam is the partial effect of one of your edits to the combined oral contraceptive pill article. -_-;;; I reverted the portion of that edit that added to the article's "External links" section, but thought you'd like to know.— DocWatson42 ( talk) 08:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Notifying you, as you participated in the peer review for the article:
I've nominated Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for Featured Article candidacy.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 05:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Szombierki Heat Power Station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Iselilja ( talk) 12:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of national independence days may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, we look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. We look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. Here's the link to our Week 3 class page and to the live webinar.
PLEASE NOTE: If you're not in the USA, please double-check the class time. We have gone on Daylight Savings Time (also known as Summer Time) in the USA, so for some of you the class time will be an hour earlier. (If your country goes on Summer Time in the coming weeks, you will want to check again!)
This week we are going to start off with some basic review of all we've covered. So if you've been feeling behind or confused by all the details, we'll make sure we've got your questions answered before forging ahead! See you soon, - Pete ( talk) 16:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, you have any idea who these poets are, please:
Thanks Krenakarore TK 15:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Can you explain exactly what you want in this edit? The check in note doesn't say. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 17:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
-- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 15:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Piotrus, I'm guessing you never saw the suggested alternate hook here. Can you comment on whether it's accurate and supported? (The nomination still hasn't been reviewed, which is true of ten of the nominations on that date.) Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 17:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, it's Viviane here! Thought I should send you a message so you can know my username ViSampaio ( talk) 01:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
There is a problem. I am kind of upset. I was working on Globalization of wine translating English to Korean for the wikipedia class. and I checked and tried to edit more next day and it has been deleted WITHOUT NOTICE. I left a message to the person who deleted it. I had referneces(two where it came from is wikipedia because I translated from there. how should I put the references if I got the information from English wikipedia?) hope you answer me back, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaHee Park ( talk • contribs) 08:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC) -- GaHee Park ( talk) 17:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/와인의_세계화
this is the final second assignment of Wikipedia class(Globalization of wine). I left a message again and I all translated of the English wikipedia to Korean. furthermore, the working on Hanok article editing grammatically missed has been edited ; ) When you confirm this talk page, could you please answer me back as soon as possible? yap, not only the wikipedia edits are important, but also the GRADES being 'UPGRADE'is VERY important to me because the last day of final editing grades are today Dec. 31 ;) thank you!!!!!!!!!!!! -- GaHee Park ( talk) 17:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
I am really sorry to bother you. Is wikipedia's final edit isn't enough to get more grade? Please, I hope.you answer soon thank you. Even though it is annoying please consider the condition that the final marking grade date it until today in Korean time it is 4:18pm now. Thank you-- GaHee Park ( talk) 07:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Krupnik (soup) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hieronymous Francken II may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this is in reply to your e-mail (which I'm replying to here because I prefer not to use e-mail for privacy reasons, see my user page).
I'm sorry to say that I've had very little experience with the process you mention, and I've also not been following the issues and editors you mention, except to the limited (and, luckily, ever-diminishing) extent they end up being discussed at WP:AE. Because of this, I do not think that I can give you useful advice in this matter. I would also prefer not to involve myself in the process, as this might compromise my ability to respond to future AE requests concerning this topic area.
Best regards and happy editing, Sandstein 19:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Since when did chairman of a University be considered to fail WP:Academic guidelines if it meets criteria #5?-- Mishae ( talk) 19:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Bringing an update about my progress on the past days: I have been making edits on diverse wikipedia articles about varying topics. Some of them were choose and others i have found as articles that needed more attention on the wikipedia. I have been trying to collaborate in different ways and have practiced different types of editions to get more familiar with them, such as: fixing references or reflists; uploading images for a article; expanding sections; working on infobox sections; removing biased text; making texts more concise; adding coordinates; translating some sections of pages from portuguese-english and the other way around; and others.
So far i have made 13 contributions on the English Wikipedia + 9 on the portuguese one (that you can check here https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribui%C3%A7%C3%B5es/Fredderico18). I Know that haven't finished the 40 edits as planned but will do so till this weekend. I plan on doing half of the edits on the english wikipedia and the other half on the portuguese one. Thanks! Fredderico18 ( talk) 17:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Until now, I have made 25 edits on English Wikipedia and 5 on Portuguese Wikipedia (it seems my contributions in portuguese don't appear in my english page, so here is the link for quick reference https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribui%C3%A7%C3%B5es/ViSampaio). I have mainly worked on articles of my interest doing minor edits, adding links, correcting typos and adding sources. ViSampaio ( talk) 07:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Tim Cumming here. The page was put up by one of my publishers, John Knight of Pitt St Poetry in Sydney, Australia. We have met once, at the launch reading of the book of mine he published, Etruscan Miniatures, so while he is my publisher, we have no personal connection at all. I have added some links to reviews and work online, covering the poetry, painting, and film work. Is this enough to stop the page being deleted? I hope so. 83.244.234.228 ( talk) 17:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Witaj! Zauważyłem, że masz na koncie wiele zgłoszeń artykułów do GA. Przypadkowo natknąłem się na dwa artykuły, które według mnie mogą być godne tytułu GA - Constance, Duchess of Wodzisław oraz Arthur Szyk. Czy możesz je ocenić i ewentualnie zgłosić do GA - osobiście na EnWiki, się tym nie znam. Pozdrawiam! Kobrabones ( talk) 22:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
I just found that on the link that you sent to me it already explain how to extract the coordinates on the way that i discovered. By the way, thank you for the snacks! Fredderico18 ( talk) 13:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition began on 1 January. There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn ( talk · contribs), The ed17 ( talk · contribs) and Miyagawa ( talk · contribs) 18:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Been busy with the holidays and cooling off after getting rather torqued. I'm not surprise at recent actions, I did ask the admin to include me on the ban since the recent comments were directed at me. Ajh1492 ( talk) 20:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, thanks for your DYK suggestion, I think I've created the Template but I'm not sure - would you mind looking at it?
/info/en/?search=Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_December_26 /info/en/?search=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Swedish_nuclear_weapons_program
Thanks DMattis ( talk) 03:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National symbols of Poland. Since you had some involvement with the National symbols of Poland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ( chat) 14:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for reviewing the DYK nomination for Inchdrewer Castle so promptly! I've now moved the draft of George Ogilvy, 3rd Lord Banff to main space. It's pretty short so if you get the chance would you consider also doing the necessary to review that as it's been added to the original nomination. I hope you don't think I'm being cheeky by asking? Kind regards. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
I've changed the hook for Prince of Wales F.C. The C of E God Save the Queen! ( talk) 13:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Sociology for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 02:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Omi Shrine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mind matrix 19:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I am the user working on the article about the above person and I have read your message. I still do not understand why the article has been marked for deletion since I translated it (partially) from the Spanish Wikipedia, the sources are official and independent (European Broadcasting Union, where this person works, and the contests he organizes) and this person has a relevant position. The format might be improved indeed but I am not a Wikipedia expert and I am still learning.
Even another user uploaded a picture of him to the website, which is the one I used: that gives an idea about the relevance of this person and his role.
There are few sources about this person since the projects he has lead are quite small and it is challenging to find more information from reliable websites (and in English).
I do not know if this is the right place to contact you, but I would like to check this out and make it approved.
Thank you. Lprincon ( talk) 23:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi again, sorry if my first message sounded a bit "strict" but I did not know how to address you and I was quite stressed with your message. I have added extra link from other independent sources and public broadcasters. I hope it helps. Thank you again. Lprincon ( talk) 23:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
By order of the
Military History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's
Peer,
Good Article,
A-Class and
Featured Article Candidate reviews for the period October–December 2013, I am delighted to award you this
Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. During this period you undertook three reviews. Without reviewers it would be very difficult for our writers to achieve their goals of creating high quality content, so your efforts are greatly appreciated.
AustralianRupert (
talk) 04:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Hello! Your submission of Kielce Bus Station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 19:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC) -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 19:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Katowice historic train station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pgallert ( talk) 14:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus, Kinldy help me to improve Wikipedia biography about Michał Safianik. I managed to add citations, and in my opinion I have done all necessary work to convince Wikipedia to not delete this article. Please let me know when and how finish this disscussion.
Thank you in advance! Ula Urs8721 ( talk)Urs8712 —Preceding undated comment added 17:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
On 12 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kielce Bus Station, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the UFO-like Kielce Bus Station (pictured) has been praised as "one of the most valuable" architectural designs of the last decades of the People's Republic of Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kielce Bus Station. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 17:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Here is a brief list of sources with their internet editions, who are presenting the book
Bulgarian national newspapers: 24 hours: http://www.24chasa.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=2670458 Monitor: http://www.monitor.bg/article?id=412292 Trud: http://www.trud.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=2670436 Duma: http://duma.bg/node/68951
TV Here is interview with the author of the book Ognian Georgiev at the morning show of Nova TV – one of the national TV stations in Bulgaria. Starting from 54 minute from 11 January http://play.novatv.bg/program/sbudise
Radio Here is interview with the author at the national “Darik” radio station with one of the most popular radio announcers Nikolay Kantchev. Here the author was asked if he plans to translate and to Publish the book in Portugal and he answered that probably first it will be published in Germany, because Boevski competed in a German club years ago. http://radio.dariknews.bg/?page=audio&id=231490
The book is published in Bulgaria just 20 days ago after the huge interest of the arrest and sentence of the Olympic champion Boevski 2 years ago, which was noticed by the news around the world from Europe to New Zealand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celibat ( talk • contribs) 19:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Józef Karol Konrad Chełmicki may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Piotrus, I am flattered by your comments about Letort. I usually add talk page templates but on that occasion I simply forgot. I used to forward articles to DYK, but almost 12 months ago I ran into two editors who seemed to pathetically enjoy wielding their little trace of power by withholding approval and demanding levels of referencing that are not commensurate with dead Frenchmen from 100 years ago. (I had exhaustively trawled through French newspapers accumulating snippets etc.) So yet another editor lost interest in Wiki due to the egos and hubris of a few, in my case for about 6 months. Although I have recently started creating good little articles again, (I only ever create good stuff :) ), I decided that I don't have the energy for DYK, I am not here to argue, I am only interested in wring good sentences, good subjects and good grammar. Thus Léon Letort, Émile-Louis Letord and René Couzinet remain hidden under a bushell. If you want to propose them I will be flattered, and may even become enthused about DYK. I know that Couzinet is not finished, but it's a good start about an interesting, forgotten man, exactly what Wiki was invented for. Many regards, If you think it is worth it I will get embroiled in submitting to DYK, I am getting more enthusiastic every word I write. Flattery - it's like a drug :) . Regards Chienlit ( talk) 16:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Noble families had nobility status in certain feudal entity which is different from modern day nationality. Therefore Noble families by nationality category does not make much sense. -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dariusz Jemielniak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stewards ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Anti-Katyń isn't about the Katyń denial. I'm sorry but I don't understand your postion. Maybe you mean the relativisation? Xx236 ( talk) 08:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, in response to your two technical opposes at the RFC at DYK, the QPQ check takes mere seconds to see how many credits a user has. Thanks, Mat ty. 007 17:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Piotrus! Hi! Hoping you are well. Kindly give me a favor by reviewing article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hafiz Muhammad Fazal Azim Taha. Here I am giving you the link /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Hafiz_Muhammad_Fazal_Azim_Taha. Kindly review this article and tell me how it can be published on Wikipedia? Cheers! Umar Taha ( talk) 16:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked mostly minor features and fixing bugs. A few significant bugs include working around a bug in CSSJanus that was wrongly flipping images used in some templates in right-to-left (RTL) environments ( bug 50910) a major bug that meant inserting any template or other transclusion failed ( bug 59002), a major but quickly resolved problem due to an unannounced change in MediaWiki core, which caused VisualEditor to crash on trying to save ( bug 59867). This last bugs did not appear on any Wikipedia. Additionally, significant work has been done in the background to make VisualEditor work as an independent editing system.
As of today, VisualEditor is now available as an opt-out feature to all users at 149 active Wikipedias.
__NOTOC__
and __FORCETOC__
as selection (forced on, forced off, or default setting; bugs
56866 and
56867) and __NOEDITSECTION__
as a checkbox (
bug 57166).Looking ahead: The character formatting menu on the toolbar will get a drop-down indicator next Thursday. The reference and media items will be the first two listed in the Insert menu. The help menu will get a page listing the keyboard shortcuts. Looking further out, image handling will be improved, including support for alignment (left, right, and center) and better control over image size (including default and upright sizes). The developers are also working on support for editing redirects and image galleries.
Subscriptions to this newsletter are managed at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Newsletter. Please add or remove your name to change your subscription settings. If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 20:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
On 18 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Omi Shrine, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Japanese Shinto shrine Omi Jingu (pictured), dedicated to Emperor Tenji, holds karuta and water clock festivals and has been recently popularized by the manga Chihayafuru? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Omi Shrine. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 00:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
ƬheStrike Σagle sorties 03:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, I'm trying to make the List of notable people under Five Eyes surveillance a featured list before Feb 11 so that we can include it for our project ( Wikipedia:Surveillance awareness day). As time is running short, could you help me do a peer review? That would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
- A1candidate ( talk) 22:58, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I have added/copy-pasted citations to the family tree. Although I'd argue that citations are unnecessary for the same reason they are unnecessary in the lead (the section being a summary rather than new information), I think you are right in thinking that some editors might complain about it, so it is better to play safe. Cheers, Surtsicna ( talk) 17:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
On 20 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Irena Jurgielewiczowa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Polish writer Irena Jurgielewiczowa was also an underground teacher and a resistance fighter in WWII? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Irena Jurgielewiczowa. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Katowice historic train station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset ( talk) 16:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irena Jurgielewiczowa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memoires ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
First I, later user JorisvS, later I again, reduced the size of the graphic by Sobiepan. "Editing comments" is one but Sobiepan have no right to destroy the layout of page, too large graphics and separating lines are unacceptable. Size of Sobiepan's graphics have been reduced (graphics are not removed), separating lines can not exist because it is written posts directly to that text. We both (I and JorisvS) thoroughly explained what was going on. Sobiepan can not be subordinate, makes it difficult to discuss. Sobiepan did it, mass introduces templates POV to articles Lechitic languages, Slavic languages, West Slavic languages, Silesian language... We with him can not cooperate, his behavior more and more like trolling, making confusion. I can not cope. I want to constructively discuss, Sobiepan just bothers and exacerbate the matter. Franek K. ( talk) 12:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
... and again, again again [1]. Franek K. ( talk) 12:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you know much more about sociology than I do, so perhaps you can have a look at Academic imperialism and see whether it is more than an expression just used in a single article? Thanks. -- Randykitty ( talk) 17:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I see that you are an experienced user and former administrator. However You partly supported (as a comment) no neutral option - dialect. I would like to show you one thing. Between linguists, sociolinguists, linguistic organizations, people who use the language, politicians there is no consensus for status language or dialect. We all agree with the fact that the case of Silesian is complicated. This is fact. Accordance with the core content policies of Wikipedia: Neutral point of view, Wikipedia must to be neutral and can not show only one side. Change the name of the article on "dialect" violates the fundamental principle of Wikipedia and can not be changed. But, user JorisvS presented an interesting option - Upper Silesian". This option is full neutral, this is ideal compromise, the name does not refer to a dialect or language and should not offend anyone, both supporters - dialect and language. You support this compromise? Franek K. ( talk) 22:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Your project sounds interesting, please let me know how I can help. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 13:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I've changed my e-mail setting, you can now e-mail me via WIkipedia. Boleyn ( talk) 15:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
On 24 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kazania sejmowe, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although Piotr Skarga's Sejm Sermons political treatise was ignored during his lifetime, he was labeled a "patriotic seer" centuries after his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kazania sejmowe. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Caponer ( talk) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
Piotrus, I wanted to give you this whisky as an apology for not including the year in the alternative DYK hook for Kazania sejmowe! By the time I saw your response, the alternative hook had already been published on the Front Page! Thank you for your many interesting and comprehensive articles on Poland, and its culture and people! -- Caponer ( talk) 01:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{ WikiScotch}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Message received at 01:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Piotruś rozumiem Twoje zdenerwowanie i doskonale zdaję sobie sprawę z tego, że artykuły obecnie przeze mnie pisane pozostawiają wiele do życzenia. Problem w tym, że od dłuższego czasu piszę je na kolanie, na komputerze pozbawionym polskich znaków i w wielkim pośpiechu. Nie mam tyle czasu co dawniej i te artykuły siłą rzeczy są niedopieszczone. Bardzo przepraszam, staram się jak mogę, ale naprawdę to cud że jeszcze coś piszę. Pozdrawiam i nie denerwuj się. Nie robię tego na złość. Tymek ( talk) 06:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 01:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotruś. Thank you for your input in my article. I'm doing it first time in my life and it seems to be not simple but I'm learning. Can you give me, please, some advices how I can improve it without deletion of the article? Will it be sufficient to change the article for just BLP instead of Accademics? Regards, Joanna
I would. The only limitation is that I don't use communication channels other than wiki pages - I hope that's fine with you. GregorB ( talk) 11:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, to which I have responded on the talk-page. Best, -- Smerus ( talk) 14:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I would be delighted to take part in your survey. Best wishes. Dormskirk ( talk) 13:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus - I went ahead and replied to you on Meta. Also, heh, the essay your meta userpage links regarding Poles reminds me a lot of some of my experiences in recent naming discussions... Best, Kevin Gorman ( talk) 00:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hey Piotrus-- I know you from your work at the Intelligence task force of Military history. I and a few others have been trying to start up Wikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillance. We're trying to gear up for an editing drive.
I've never run a wikiproject before-- we could use the advice of an expert. Would love to have you on the team. -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 10:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotr.
I received an e-mail containing a survey from the account Piotrusbot. Two questions:
Relatedly, I believe the full text of this e-mail should be posted on-wiki for scrutiny and transparency. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 05:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I have answedered you here - Sietecolores ( talk) 14:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from TASIM, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! De728631 ( talk) 15:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Piotruś, I will be very greatfull for your help. I was creating my article watching this one: /info/en/?search=Douglas_P._Fry I had a few more "chapters" but someone changed it because it was to detailed. Maybe you can give me some advices how to improve the article - can be in polish maybe then it will be more understandable for me. And yes I have completed Wikipedia:Tutorial but maybe I should do this again. Joanna Rogowska ( talk) 16:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
On 29 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Academic imperialism, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that imperialism also happens within academia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Academic imperialism. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
On 29 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Academic imperialism, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that imperialism also happens within academia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Academic imperialism. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll see what I can do.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:36, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, the article Generation War has had about 10 edits in the last day which are ALL VANDALISM (VERY OBVIOUSLY) by someone who identifies himself as JosefShevchenko. These edits have been reverted one-by-one, but this continuous vandalism is absurd. As an ADMINISTRATOR, do you know of a procedure for Wikipedia to block this vandallism? Prospero10 ( talk) 16:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your encouragement. Will keep your suggestions in mind for future contributions. Doewiets ( talk) 17:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotus. Thanks for offering help for the Jozef Pilsudski Institute of America. We are looking for Pl speakers to help out remote and local. Do you have people located in New York at all? We are looking for some local volunteers to help adding their archival materials to WP. OR drohowa ( talk) 17:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC) you can also email me at dhoward@metro.org
Hi Piotrus. I haven't received any mail from you since January 14. Please resend. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
On 30 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Bytom and Będzin, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Treaty of Bytom and Będzin ended the fourteen-month long imprisonment of Maximilian III, Archduke of Austria, in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Treaty of Bytom and Będzin. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 16:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
There is a chance to end the conflict: Talk:Silesian_language#If the name with the words of dialect, language, Polish are POV, what the name of the target. Please vote, which option is better according to You. Regards, Franek K. ( talk) 19:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Piotrus, I have put my article do the sandbox and I will try to improve it slowly. Also the idea with starting with polish wikipedia is interesting. Thank you for your help. Joanna Rogowska ( talk) 20:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate your including me in your survey, but I'd rather not, frankly. I might feel differently if it was anonymized, but then again, I might not. Thanks for your kind words.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 22:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
If I remember correctly, photos from the prezydent's website, like these [2] are free to use on Wikipedia, right? Volunteer Marek ( talk) 08:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
On 1 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Upper Silesian Railway, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Upper Silesian Railway was part of the first rail network connecting Berlin, Vienna, Kraków and Warsaw by the late 1840s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Upper Silesian Railway. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks to you for your contribution Victuallers ( talk) 00:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Just a courtesy note as requested to say that I've de-prodded Back to the Klondike. Optimist on the run ( talk) 16:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Godot13 ( submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.
Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email), The ed17 ( talk • email) and Miyagawa ( talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
See here: Talk:Midrasz#Notability.3F. // Halibu tt 22:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
What do you think of Template:Chopin/-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey Piotr! Thanks for the reminder! Now i did it. I don't find to remember somethings related about how i entered the bug, but did as best as i could and hope that it helps improving the tutorial, because it's pretty good already! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredderico18 ( talk • contribs) 05:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
C/e done. Soham 15:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Matejko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamienica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, it looks that in June 2013 you searched for help with this and now I have the same problem. May I ask if you have found any solution? The responses at various message boards aren't very helpful. Thanks for any advice. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 07:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for your comments. I deleted the Category Proposed for Deletion after a major edit of the page with numerous additions that should substantiate the notability of the person. Please also note that because the artist is active (exhibitions, events, reviews, secondary literature) is a lot of non-English countries, the material is sometimes difficult to track and to reference. thanks! ˜˜˜˜Globaleditor˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Globalarteditor ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
I changed the date (hidden category) for notability on Przemysław Frasunek, not because I think he's notable, but because it appears in the backlog, which makes more work for sysops. Please don't revert it, please. For teh kitteh!
Bearian (
talk) 18:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
On 6 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Żywoty świętych, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Polish Jesuit Piotr Skarga's Lives of the Saints (1579) contained graphic and detailed description of tortures and suffering? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Żywoty świętych. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Mentoz ( talk) 11:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daedongyeojido may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Martin Franzkowiak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
On 8 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Devotional articles, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that devotional articles have been produced and sold as far back as the times of ancient Egypt and ancient Mesopotamia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Devotional articles. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 12:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
On 9 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Katowice historic train station, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that delay of the planned restoration of the ruined Katowice historic train station, which attained monument status in 1975, has led to public protests? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Katowice historic train station. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 13:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roman Dmowski you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 ( talk) 22:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
see talk page on Durkheim 128.214.173.46 ( talk) 10:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the help there, Piotrus! It certainly does have "insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject", and I'm certainly one of them. Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
FYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 14:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! Yoninah ( talk) 18:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Jeśli możesz rozwinąć, to będzie świetnie. Ja z tego co mam w ręce więcej "nie wyduszę" :( - o handlowych mam tylko Piwowońskiego Byłoby w sumie mieć polski statek w tutejszym czywieszu :)-- Felis domestica ( talk) 19:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The numbers can be found by hitting the "reader comments" link at the top of the WWII page. /info/en/?search=Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/World_War_II?ref=article&filter=featured Most of the user complaints were similar to what I also considered as problems with the WWII article. The text is ver dry; just chronologically listing the order of military campaigns, and shying away from presenting the true brutality of the conflict. In fact, as an example; the WWI article does a very good job of showing all aspects of the war; from military engagements, to the civilian casualties.
When I started to edit the WWII page a few days ago. There was not single picture of Stalin, Roosvelt, Concentration Camps, and still no image of a Swastica (that got removed). The article just lists facts without any consideration of scope. The section War breaks out in Europe (1939–40) started out by saying: "On 1 September 1939, Germany and Slovakia invaded Poland". Really, that just might be a deliberate blurring of event details. Yes, the Slovaks did invite, but when stated in such a way, a reader who is unfamiliar with the events of WWII might think that both countries were equal belligerents; and this is the problem with this article, no context is given. no clear separation between aggressors and victims, and the most difficult subject matter explained in a encyclopedic language with out any context. -- Factor01 ( talk) 21:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
On 10 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Floriańska Street, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 13th-century Floriańska Street in Kraków is one of the most prestigious streets in Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Floriańska Street. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 22:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Would you leave a comment at the entry page. Thanks, Billy Hathorn ( talk) 23:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Lonnie_Stabler
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daedongyeojido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linden ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering how I could be eligible to become an admin. I do realize I have a long way to go but I have goals. Please reply!
PS I have been an admin/moderator on forums before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CatcherStorm ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Sure! Me and Vivi keep working on it! On the exactly moment that we finish the first complete version of it we'll send you a message for the assessment. Thank you once more for all the help and support on this project! We really appreciate everything. Best regards, -- Fredderico18 ( talk) 16:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship.2FPiotrus_3.E2.80.8E_edit_warring. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 18:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Can you clarify, is this your withdrawl or do you plan to post another? I'm standing by to courtesy blank the talk page and RFA whenever it closes.--v/r - T P 19:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 00:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
A cup of Mitha Dahi for you | ||
Here is a cup of
Mitha Dahi for you. Mitha Dahi is a fermented sweet
dahi or sweet
yogurt and mainly poplar in Bengal. Hope you'll like it. For those who visit calcutta or a part of it. Thank you.
Soham 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
It was delicious. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 18:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the message, and for the balaclava. I am sincerely sorry that the RfA did not work - yes, I know you withdrew, but it was clearly and unfortunately going to fail. It is sad that some editors appear unable to forgive and forget even after five years. You might think about trying again in 6 - 12 months? -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 20:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
A cookie for a baklava... Epicgenius ( talk) 02:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I reviewed one of your recent DYK nominations ( nom:Daedongyeojido), but had a small concern. Perhaps you can check it out and we'll resolve it? Cheers, Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Piotrus, sorry the RfA didn't go as it should. I think you would make a fine admin. I supported you last time, and your behavior in this RfA directly addressed the concern I expressed the last go-round. I was just waiting for a long-enough passage of time so I could fully express this. Then the whole "kitten-kanvass kerfuffle" came up, and I felt that my vote would only generate more unhelpful controversy. You know this already, but all RfAs generate an unreasonable amount of scrutiny, and because you've been so highly active for so long and don't shy away from heated topics (although why some of them are so contentious baffles me), your RfAs are exponentially worse than average, so perhaps the only safe thing to do on Wikipedia during your next RfA is to answer the questions and forget the rest of the project. Anyway, thanks for what you do here, and please accept my moral support. Regarding the kitten itself: thanks! I love kittens. AfC is far and away the most difficult and unrewarding thing I do around here, and even though those recent actions were just to pick some low-hanging fruit, I appreciate the encouragement. Take care, 78.26 ( I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK is on the agenda. I've got all the stuff to expand. Created the article in response to on-going review of Rainbow trout at FAC. Thanks. -- Mike Cline ( talk) 13:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
I was impressed with the mature decorum you displayed during the Rfa you subjected yourself to...withdrawing as things started to get silly elevated you above the nonsense. Good show! MONGO 04:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi there,
Just to let you know that I've removed the GAR points for Talk:Normative social influence/GA1 in the Wikicup as although you were quite right to quickfail it for the reasons you gave, the scoring system says for the cup that "Only reviews of a sufficient length will be counted; quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points." Sorry! Miyagawa ( talk) 11:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
On 15 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stanisław Salmonowicz, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Polish historian Stanisław Salmonowicz, once repressed by the Polish communist authorities, has published over 1,000 works? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stanisław Salmonowicz. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from the DYK project and me Victuallers ( talk) 15:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Did You Know that Peter Kiolbassa, the first Polish American to serve as Chicago's Treasurer, was nicknamed "Honest Pete" for refusing to collect interest on financial decisions made in office?-- Pola.mola ( talk) 01:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
On 16 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daedongyeojido, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that South Korea's proposed highest-denomination 100,000- won banknote was cancelled in 2008, since the 19th-century map Daedongyeojido depicted on the note did not portray the Liancourt Rocks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daedongyeojido. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the pie :)-- Cattus talk 19:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
I occasionally do some minor edits to Wikipedia articles if I look something up and see mistakes, but if I ever find the time to spend more time on the site I'll be back for some advice.... :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivanevian ( talk • contribs) 22:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey Piotrus sorry about the recent RFA. Try not to take it personally, pretty much everyone knows the RFA process is broken. I noticed most of the Opposes were because of giving out WikiKittens (viewed as canvassing) which I think is pretty much the dumbest thing Ive heard there in a while and because of the desysopping back in 09, which is so old, it doesn't even show up in the User rights history. So IMO both arguments are essentially meaningless opposes. Better luck next time. 108.45.104.158 ( talk) 22:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotrus,
A user called Maxim Musson, whom you have greeted to Wikipedia, has made seven (7) edits to the article Generation War to insert his own review into the body of the article.
Maxim Musson's review ia taken from a website called 'Western Spring,' which is an anti-immigrant and neo-Nazi website, to which Musson has made extensive contributions. The review is obviously designed to advertise the website.
To see what 'Western Spring' promotes, the article 'Repatriation,' at [ [3]] advocates the 'compulsory repatriation of non-White immigrants' to the UK. 'Das Buch' at [ [4]] about Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' says that Hitler 'sets out beliefs and tells his story in a readily appreciable manner.'
Musson is entitled to his views. But I believe a Wikipedia page with about 1000 to 4,700 daily readers should not be used to provide publicity for a small, insignificant, neo-Nazi political group.
Maxim Musson has made repeated Edits to put his 'review' back into Generation War
In my opinion, Maxim Musson should be blocked. Prospero10 ( talk) 19:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello again, Piotrus. (I realize that in greeting Maxim Musson you were not endorsing his contributions)
Thanks for your message, and the reference to Wikipedia:RS. Actually, I think the relevant section is WP:SRS
The repeated edits by Maxim Musson, where he has repeatedly inserted a review WRITTEN BY HIMSELF for his neo-Nazi website into the text of the Wikipedia page Generation War, violate the most basic Wikipedia policy. These reviews express HIS PERSONAL OPINION.
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BULLETIN BOARD FOR POSTING PERSONAL OPINIONS.
The issue is not that he is expressing a neo-Nazi viewpoint, which is what his 'Western Spring' website represents. The issue is that Wikipedia pages ARE NOT A PLACE FOR POSTING PERSONAL OPINIONS.
I believe that Maxim Musson needs to be blocked. Prospero10 ( talk) 14:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
CORRECTION: I meant to say above that Musson violates Wikipedia:SPS Prospero10 ( talk) 15:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, I am rather disconcerted by the rudeness that I have been shown by Prospero10 who edited out material that I had inserted into the Generation War article without any reference to me. I would have thought it polite, if he has an issue with the material inserted, for him to have at least discussed his concerns with me first. Had he done so, I would have realized what was happening and would not have attempted to reinsert the material which to me seemed to disappear without explanation. I thought I had simply made a mistake in the way I had made the edit which meant that the material inserted was not retained.
I have attempted to make just two insertions into the article, without removing or deleting anything anyone else has written. You see, I am a very democratically minded person and I am not concerned that others may express views that differ from mine, unlike Prospero10 it would seem. I am comfortable with a plurality of views - diversity is a strength, don't forget!
The first insertion I attempted to make consisted of the following:
"In a Western Spring review Max Musson stated: "Where ’Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter’ breaks new ground, is that it is a major German TV series, broadcast internationally to widespread acclaim, which depicts the plight of the German people sympathetically, not attempting to ‘whitewash’ the German war record, but merely presenting a balanced and objective view in which the German people are not unfairly demonised. The fact is that the conduct of modern warfare, in which entire nations are mobilised in support of the war effort, almost always entails the commission of atrocities by both sides, both against enemy combatants and enemy civilians. War is after all a ghastly process in which two protagonist groups commit atrocious acts of violence against each other with the intention of terrorising their opponents into submission. How could anyone expect this to be waged in an entirely civilised manner and in accordance with peacetime standards of conduct?
"It is now time for the reputation gained by the German people during WW2 to be rehabilitated and ’Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter’ represents a welcome step along that road."
This insertion is not qualitatively different to the pre-existing reviewer's opinions expressed. Furthermore, it is a very balanced and conciliatory opinion, which I don't think any objective person could take offense at. Why is my opinion as a reviewer less valid than the opinions expressed by the other reviewers featured in that article?
The second insertion that I made was of an external link to the review that I have written of the Generation War series. It was inserted among a number of other external links to reviews written by other people. Why is an external link to my review objectionable, whereas the external links to other reviews are not?
Prospero10 seems to be motivated by a desire to censor the content of that article in order to exclude viewpoints expressed by people he chooses to denigrate as 'neo-Nazi'.
Prospero10 cites other articles on the Western Spring website in order to support his intolerance. He cites an article entitled 'Repatriation' in which I merely describe the successful immigrant repatriation policies employed by the Israeli and Saudi Arabian governments and conclude that the employment of similar policies here in the UK would therefore not necessarily result in international opprobrium. Does Prospero10 believe that Israel and Saudi Arabia are neo-Nazi states?
Prospero10 also cites an article that I wrote commenting on the recent surge in the online sales of Mein Kampf. Similar article featured on the Daily Telegraph website, and on the Guardian website, does Prospero10 believe these too are neo-Nazi websites?
Mein Kampf is often characterized by other reviewers as 'unreadably turgid' or 'crazed rantings', I merely pointed out that on the contrary, the book 'sets out [Hitler's] beliefs and tells his story in a readily appreciable manner', which is true. I don't state that Hitler's viewpoint is valid, simply that it is clearly expressed.
Prospero10 states, "Musson is entitled to his views", but clearly he does not think this, because in the very next paragraph he states, "I believe that Maxim Musson needs to be blocked". It appears that Prospero10 does not believe in a plurality of opinions and does not realize that diversity is a strength.
He goes on, "But I believe a Wikipedia page with about 1000 to 4,700 daily readers should not be used to provide publicity for a small, insignificant, neo-Nazi political group". Would his opinion differ if Western Spring represented a large significant 'neo-Nazi' political group? I don't think so, and therefore the size and significance of Western Spring is immaterial to this discussion. The nub of this issue is simply that I have expressed views that Prospero10 wishes to suppress and censor and you might like to consider whether it is appropriate for Wikipedia to have as a moderator someone who is apparently so undemocratic and intolerant and so ready to condemn and block without any prior discussion.
I would appreciate it if someone would discuss these issues with me instead of simply berating me in a prejudiced and condemnatory manner. Maxim Musson ( talk) 17:40, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Why not?
Who posted all of the other quotations and external links? ... could it possibly be the authors of the sources cited?
Should I find a third party to add the material that I have attempted to insert? ... would that make it acceptable?
NB. You are still not explaining yourself properly, you are just firing statements at me. What's the matter, don't you people do communication in a civil manner?
If you stopped being so adversarial and started to hold a conversation, we might get somewhere. Maxim Musson ( talk) 20:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
With all due respect Piotrus, three individuals have ganged up in order to censor without consultation, two small insertions that I have made, which contain no inaccurate, insulting, inflamatory, or libelous material, but material which is not qualitatively different from that already there, except that it adds another viewpoint to the range of viewpoints already expressed. I don't believe there is need of a lengthy mediation process here (although I will resort to it if need be) as Alex Bakharev, Seaphoto and Prospero10 have made no attempt to substantiate their claims. Whenever I have asked them to explain they have declined to do so and simply fired another unsubstantiated accusation at me.
The article on Generation War consists of a review of the series 'Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter' (UMUV), with a variety of views expressed, the views of third parties who have themselves written reviews for various publications and websites. These views as I say are qualitatively no different from the one that I expressed. Furthermore, the review that I wrote of UMUV, a link to which I inserted in the external links section, is expressed in moderate terms, that is qualitatively no different to the other reviews linked to, except that it provides as I have stated, a further viewpoint.
Unless my three detractors above can show that the insertions I have made are qualitatively different from the material already there, I believe you should rule that their behavior is unreasonable and that my insertions are admissible. As for Prospero10's earlier attempts to belittle the Western Spring website, I would point out that it holds an Alexa ranking that is at least comparable to any of the mainstream UK political party websites and gets between 900 and 2400 views each day. Furthermore, I wonder whether any of the three detractors have themselves viewed UMUV and if not, in what way are they fit to criticise my review?
We can end this matter quickly and simply now, or we can engage in time consuming mediation, which I will win because I am obviously right in all of the assertions I have made. Maxim Musson ( talk) 07:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in our user study. Please email me at credivisstudy@gmail.com. Wkmaster ( talk) 14:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
On 17 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zbigniew Bródka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Zbigniew Bródka (pictured), the first Pole to win an Olympic gold medal in men's 1500 metres speed skating, is a professional firefighter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zbigniew Bródka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Piotrus, I spotted that message, left by you, on the talk page of a fairly inexperienced editor. I've never seen this kind of a message before, and I think it's a bit heavy for such an editor - especially as it makes no attempt to point them at any list of possible Wikiprojects. I've never heard it suggested before that an editor creating a page has any sort of responsibility to add talk page banners to notify appropriate Wikiprojects. Wikiprojects are probably a bit of a mystery to many new users, and I think I'd have found that message very confusing if I'd received it myself in earlier days. Pam D 16:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Piotrus. I created a draft for my first article about Southern Sociological Society. Would you mind having a look? You can find it here. Thanks for the help! Sladelellock ( talk) 17:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Ok, Piotrus. I took your suggestions into consideration and submitted my article for review. Thanks again. Sladelellock ( talk) 17:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked on some small changes to the user interface, such as moving the reference item to the top of the Insert menu, as well as some minor features and fixing bugs, especially for rich copying and pasting of references.
The biggest change was the addition of more features to the image dialog, including the ability to set alignment (left, right, center), framing options (thumbnail, frame, frameless, and none), adding alt text, and defining the size manually. There is still some work to be done here, including a quick way to set the default size.
==section headings==
in references), it now strips out the inappropriate HTML.Looking ahead: The link tool will tell you when you're linking to a disambiguation or redirect page. The warning about wikitext will hide itself after you remove the wikitext markup in that paragraph. Support for creating and editing redirects is in the pipeline. Looking further out, image handling will be improved, including default and upright sizes. The developers are also working on support for viewing and editing hidden HTML comments, some behavioral magic words like DISPLAYTITLE, and in-line language setting (dir="rtl"
).
If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 04:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genocide definitions, Definitions of pogrom and Definitions of fascism are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genocide definitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oncenawhile ( talk) 09:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Since I am a newby to the wikipedia community and not so familiar with the complete set of guidelines I might be wrong. However for the offshore industry the methodology described is very simple but advanced and I believe it should find its place in the encyclopedia. So, if the references are not sufficient for keeping the article alive I have to find more/ other references.
Now I need your advice. What type of references are required to keep the subject in the encyclopedia. Janfromholland ( talk) 16:32, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Writing Wikipedia Articles course (#WIKISOO)! We look forward to meeting you in the first class on 25 February (Americas)/26 Feb (Asia/Australia). By now you should have received an introductory email with some details about the course. If you can't find it, there's an archived copy of the email at this link.
To attend the live session, please check our course home page for instructions and the link. We recommend logging into Blackboard Collaborate (the live class software we use) before the day of class, to be sure it's working. (More tips on the home page.)
If taking the course in self-paced mode, please come say hello on the course talk page so we know who you are! Thanks for signing up, and we'll see you Tuesday! - Pete ( talk) 06:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
— ReviDiscussion 12:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jan Zamoyski you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 00:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar | |
In recognition of your years of high quality and enjoyable contributions to wikipedia as a whole and the Pittsburgh project specifically. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 22:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi there,
Thanks for your thanks on my edits. I've got a major interest in Poland - I've married into it and I'm curious about my new location.
I'll keep an eye on the Wikiproject Poland. I don't claim to be the world's best sub-editor (I've worked with those - I'm only using what I know of my native language) but I'll try to work my way through pages needing some work. I just learn as I go along - and I like that the Polish space on (English) Wikipedia isn't too ruthless (I like how there's pages for little things - so there's always the potential they might grow if people know more).
I'm also not an expert at Wikipedia itself - I just learn as I go along. I'm notoriously bad at sources (given that my main source here is a Google Translation of Polish Wikipedia) and I"m ever thankful of the Wikipedia Reference Generator for making my life easier.
Like I said, I'll try to work my way through your list of pages needing cleanups and see what I can add. Hopefully it makes a small difference!
Scott
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Escottf ( talk • contribs) 16:03, February 14, 2014
---Thanks again, I'll pop into the Warsaw Wikipedians eventually - often in Warsaw during the week but fighting inertia to get there in the weekends ;) Escottf ( talk) 13:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
And thanks for the medal! Escottf ( talk) 14:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your message Piotrus! I'm afraid I can't take credit for the category, though. It was originally made by User:Sobiepan, but I moved it from "Social class in the Poland". I'm not very knowledgeable in the subject, but I'll definitely be keeping an eye on it, as I found the articles listed there pretty interesting! Thanks -- Kateshortforbob talk 16:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Jan Zamoyski you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jan Zamoyski for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 22:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
OK, restored and AfDed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you asked me if we should add a "former power plants" section to the List of power stations in Poland...maybe it would be helpful if we considered power station lists more generally. I have been thinking about guidelines or thresholds for inclusion. To help me with my thinking I started adding some hydro and gas turbine plants. As it stands with what we have (and I know that's not the complete list) we have a total capacity of 38 GW and a maximum facility size of 5 GW. Applying two (very arbitrary) criteria of 0.05% of the total, or 5% of the largest facility, leaves us with a threshold of around 200 MW. I am sorry but I just can't see myself getting interested in a power station of 200 MW when you have 38,000 MW across the nation, and something two hours down the road is nearly 30 times the size! If you do want to include these older plants, I would prefer the term "Decommissioned"...but don't write your friendly local Halemba off just yet. I see from Google Maps that there is still coal on the stockpile. -- Graham Proud ( talk) 14:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Roman Dmowski you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roman Dmowski for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 ( talk) 22:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:
Other competitors of note include:
After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email), The ed17 ( talk • email) and Miyagawa ( talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus; I'm afraid the article isn't really eligible, both because it was nominated last year and because the changes you've made this year are on the smaller side. A quick look through suggests that it's a great article, but I don't think it's really eligible for WikiCup points. Thanks, J Milburn ( talk) 10:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Different from email above. — Revicomplaint? 17:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to ask for third party assistance on several issues regarding the Blue Army article. In particular the greatly over-expanded Controversies section, which was significantly enlarged to include big chunks of text dedicated to subject matter not directly associated with the Blue Army. Also, I would like to point out that most Wiki article admins control the size of content as not to have one user come-in and dump larger amounts of text in one section, and in the process completely shift the balance of the article, by creating un-due weight issues by simply over expanding one section.
Redundant statements re-emphasize similar points: (the two phrases are only one sentence apart).
Overstating wrongful claims; as those made by historian William W. Hagen. If his claims were soundly disproven, why include them? More importantly why does the paragraph go into such detail about the events of the pogrom when the Blue Army was not even there in the first place? Also, as noted by historian Edward Goldstein, the Blue Army was accuse of several pogroms; that they had nothing to do with, so Hagen's wrongful accusation is nothing unusual. Finally, other editors proposed to remove the text in the past.
The Blue Army was wrongly accused of committing the Lviv Pogrom of 1918. Historian William W. Hagen claimed that after helping to capture Lviv, some army units together with Polish civilians, engaged in three days of violence against the Jewish and Ukrainian inhabitants of the city, resulting in hundreds of civilian deaths.[29] But the army's participation in the pogrom is highly disputed, and according to the Cambridge History of Poland, when the Lviv Pogrom actually took place the Blue Army was still in France fighting on the Western Front. Also, it has been documented that the first units did not reach Poland until the spring of 1919, nearly five months after the actual pogrom had happened.[30] The Kronika Polski lists 14 April 1919 as the start of the first transports form France to Poland,[31] and historian Kay Lundgreen-Nielsen stated that the first units of the army did not leave France until 15 April 1919; its departure having been delayed by opposition from Britain and the United States.[32] Thus, requiring a special protocol before the Blue Army was allowed to return home to Poland.[33]
Over emphasizing individuals not directly linked to the Blue Army. The entire paragraph about Hugh S. Gibson, and his opinions about the Jews are completely irrelevant to our topic. Also, the American envoy did not come to Poland to look after Haller's troops. Finally, his reporting on the "food riots" is also not directly related to this article, as the events primarily occurred during civilian unrest, and not done by the army.
The United States sent an envoy to Poland, Hugh S. Gibson, a man who stood out for his antisemitism.[25] Hugh Gibson along with Dr. Boris Bogen, who was the general director of European relief operations of the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC), were tasked by the United States Government to investigate the situation.[26] Throughout their stay in Poland, Gibson and his colleagues ridiculed Jewish traits, customs, and appearance.[25] The official report sent back to Washington stated that many of the newspaper reports in the American press had been inflated, and Gibson himself wrote in his correspondence that he was concerned about separating fact from rumor. In his investigation, Hugh S. Gibson also addressed the issue of "food riots", and after investigating the circumstances reported that an even larger number of Christian shops had also been ransacked, thus disputing the claim that all the violence was strictly a product of anti-Jewish sentiment. Gibson also claimed that Zionists were conspiring with Berlin; according to historian Carole Fink, Gibson emphasized Jews' "social, economic, and ideological transgressions" and described the victims of the pogroms as "exploiters." [27] Gibson also expressed the opinion that Jews in Poland ought to "reform themselves" and assimilate into general Polish society.[28]
Since, we have had problems like this in the past regarding the Blue Army page; I ask that we all come together to finally create a fair and balanced article. Again, your input on this issue would be greatly appreciated. -- COD T 3 ( talk) 02:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! Just a quick reminder that the second WIKISOO class starts in about 3 hours. Even if you missed Week 1, please join us at this link for the live webinar - ideally about 15 minutes early to test your mic/speakers. If you haven’t finished up your Week 1 homework, there’s still time; post any questions on the class talk page! You can also watch a video of last week’s class on YouTube (earlier audio problems have been corrected). Feel free to contact me on my talk page with questions anytime! - WIKISOO co-instructor Sara FB ( talk) 22:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy ( talk) 09:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC) -- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 01:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Greetings and felicitations. Given the elaborateness of your user page, I don't think your a spammer, but spam is the partial effect of one of your edits to the combined oral contraceptive pill article. -_-;;; I reverted the portion of that edit that added to the article's "External links" section, but thought you'd like to know.— DocWatson42 ( talk) 08:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Notifying you, as you participated in the peer review for the article:
I've nominated Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for Featured Article candidacy.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 05:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Szombierki Heat Power Station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Iselilja ( talk) 12:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of national independence days may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, we look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. We look forward to seeing you in class in a few hours. Here's the link to our Week 3 class page and to the live webinar.
PLEASE NOTE: If you're not in the USA, please double-check the class time. We have gone on Daylight Savings Time (also known as Summer Time) in the USA, so for some of you the class time will be an hour earlier. (If your country goes on Summer Time in the coming weeks, you will want to check again!)
This week we are going to start off with some basic review of all we've covered. So if you've been feeling behind or confused by all the details, we'll make sure we've got your questions answered before forging ahead! See you soon, - Pete ( talk) 16:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, you have any idea who these poets are, please:
Thanks Krenakarore TK 15:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Can you explain exactly what you want in this edit? The check in note doesn't say. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 17:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)