This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Thanks for the award. I appreciate it. -- Nvvchar. 05:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I have just finished edited articles and I have a question about userbox. Actually I didn't understand how to use userbox last class. Would you leave the tutorial link about userbox here? One more question!. I am a little bit confused about next assignment ' Informal Reviews ' Do you mean that we have to look at articles ,individual creations made by other students, not creations made by group and review them on that article's talk page, right? I am not sure i can get it perfectly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tksgk262 ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
We write 'to do list' at Talk:Ansan street arts festival Please check it:D Thank you-- Bohyunlee ( talk) 13:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
On 18 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ivan Petrizhitsky-Kulaga, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Cossack hetman Ivan Petrizhitsky-Kulaga was executed by other Cossacks after he lost a power struggle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivan Petrizhitsky-Kulaga. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
I reviewed some articles, Fashion in Korea and Modern Korean festivals. I think the more we review articles and give some advice, the more better articles are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tksgk262 ( talk • contribs) 11:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Started review, thanks!.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:35, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Mr.Piotrus. Editing Wikis, I have one question. When I click to 'edit' button of the top menu, It says 'You are using an alpha version of the VisualEditor. It may be slow and make erroneous changes - please check each edit that you make'. What is the problem? Please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JinsuRyu ( talk • contribs) 03:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Intro expanded; thanks. I've never been good at writing intros, so I tend not to realise when something really belongs in one. Nyttend ( talk) 15:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
This article has now been passed. I made a series of changes myself to complete the checklist. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 22:44, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Aye Piotrus, thanks for the Barnstar! Much appreciated. On your mention, I checked up on the Casimir Pulaski page and did some image size adjusting and caption work. Hope it meets with your approval. Btw, the image of the Pulaski stamp is from a photo I took of a stamp in my stamp album. (Yes, I am the proud owner.) When I first started editing/contributing on WP a few years ago I uploaded 100's of stamp images, most from my stamp collection. Cheers! -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 05:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Our team7 Beautiful Store's page was deleted again. A person name 'Deb'? deleted it because it is thought as an advertisement. That was what the warning?? sign said.... how should we do ?? help ~~ SOS please~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaHee Park ( talk • contribs) 10:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I needed that! :-) Your talk page is getting a bit long - it freezes my browser. Maybe time for another archive? Deb ( talk) 13:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello professor, I`m HaeYoon, Sung. Frist of all I finished my assignment which editing 7 articles and I write the suggesting review article for other groups. Also our group editing our 'To do list'. But I have a question. actually I make the infobox about beautiful store at User:GaHee Park/sandbox. But, Some information is not appear at infobox. For example, At editing page, I editing infobox about motto and vision of Beautiful store. But it is not appear to infobox at User:GaHee Park/sandbox. Why this things are happen? Could you help us? HaeYoon ( talk) 14:33, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. Noticing your threads on AN and DRV today, I've spun out a discussion asking participants at the Education Noticeboard to brainstorm about what level of involvement in student articles we expect/want from professors. I mentioned your activities there, by way of introduction of the topic. Please feel free to add any thoughts you might have to the discussion. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 15:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Professor! I finished my assignment. But I have questions. You write on Stages and deadlines that "Before Monday, April 23, each of your members should look at an article being developed by another group". April 23 is Tuesday. There was an error with the sentence. I am confused. Please check my assignment! Thank you :D Hyegyeong Yun ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm little late.I finished assignments. I comment other writing in blogger and I write editing at talk page in other group's article. Also, I edit 7 articles. Yet, I am poor at commenting and editing but I really try to strive. In this week, because of no class, I do extra Wiki assignments. Please let me know what I have deficiencies in my assignments. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bohyunlee ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
On 22 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kraków Uprising, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one of the leaders of the Kraków Uprising in 1846 was killed while leading a religious procession? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kraków Uprising. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
On 22 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sweetened beverage, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that consumption of sweetened beverages has been linked to obesity and related health problems? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sweetened beverage. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kazimierz Chodziński, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humboldt Park ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kindness and all support!!! We all thank you!! I hope this project goes well hopefully. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaHee Park ( talk • contribs) 13:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Professor, Group 6 finished updating our article, Ansan street arts festival. We updated images, added references and modified some contexts. Check it plz:) And, Thanks for teaching me how to add images. I appreciate it.-- Bohyunlee ( talk) 15:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus. The article is still almost completely rubbish. Just sayin' is all. Pete aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 12:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
On 24 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kazimierz Chodziński, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the statue of General Casimir Pulaski in Washington was sculpted by Kazimierz Chodziński? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kazimierz Chodziński. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello again, Piotr. Though I have a lot of respect for your contributions I was a little concerned that you might be involved in some sort of content dispute in the future. Other than that, I have no doubts that you will become a good administrator and I admit that I have made a mistake in my vote, so I changed my vote to neutral as a result. Other than that, I would be happy to have others help out on the Chopin article, namely Brianboulton. Also, I will help out on the Pulaski article whenever I can. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 04:00, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. Thank you for the Society Barnstar. It's awesome and I really appreciate it. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 04:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Professor, I did this week assignments, W9 writing and 7 edits, yesterday. This week, I learn many thing through my mistake. I'm really poor at English..... This mistake will not be repeated in the future. And it is thanks to your help:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bohyunlee ( talk • contribs) 13:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh, difficult one! I genuinely had not noticed that you were up for consideration. If I had, I would not have voted for you, but I would probably not have opposed you actively either. I have not had much contact with you in the past, and in your favour is the fact that you sought to make up the dispute with me and not to turn it into any kind of ongoing confrontation. However, I did think that your initial approach to me was rather aggressive and that your attempt to get the article restored on technical grounds was a poor use of everyone’s time and showed a lack of judgement. Although I appreciate what you are trying to do with the Korean students, it would have been more profitable if you had just helped them to lick the article into shape rather than making a major issue out of it – in my opinion, this was setting them a bad example, making them think that Wikipedia is here purely to help them practise their English. I would not hold the fact that you have previously been blocked against you in the long term – this has happened to many people who have later become valued contributors. However, I think there may be a communication issue and this may be partly cultural in your case. But don’t misunderstand me, I am not opposed to people becoming administrators just because English isn’t their first language. In short, I see no reason not to trust you but I would not feel able to vote for you at this stage. Deb ( talk) 14:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
On 25 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Added sugar, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the most common sources of added sugar consumption are sweetened beverages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Added sugar. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
A most enlightening talk page; are we now running university courses from Wikipedia? We'll have to think up a degree name. Anyhow, that's not why I'm here, I'd just like to know if you have abandoned this ill-conceived plan Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Piotrus 2? It's tiring having to research your Wikipedia history (a degree subject in itself - a fascinating romp across the plains and steppes of Easter Europe) and I hate wasting my time. Giano 10:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Passed, well done! I have a painting at GA too, can you review Portrait of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge for me?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
You're brave! I thought you were already an admin. You're probably too much of a superior editor to be an admin like myself and Malleus! Care to review this for me?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 09:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to come to your talk page to suggest that challenging (what seems like) every single editor who registers a negative or neutral opinion on your RfA candidacy feels like badgering, but when I got into your talk page I got presented with an assault on the eyes. Would you consider simplfying (and removing the floating along divs on) your talk page to make it more approachable? Thanks Hasteur ( talk) 15:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Well, I remove two out of three floaters yesterday, and the third one will go away in few days, so... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello professor, I'm sehyun Oh of group 3. I saw your comment in our article's talk page. So we rewrote some points that you advised. Please check our article again :) Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhtpgus90 ( talk • contribs) 09:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
On 30 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Safety-valve institution, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the function of safety-valve institutions such as gambling or pornography is to reduce the tensions in the society? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Safety-valve institution. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
No idea, really. I never seen the term used in any context other than a brief mention that the people who were trying to reach France after 1939 were sometimes jokingly called that. I'm not sure it's a good title for an article, I'm not even sure they deserve their own article rather than a section in some other article ( Polish Armed Forces in the West?). Sorry mate. // Halibu tt 01:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, this article is looking like it is almost ready to be passed. You may have missed my comment on it but the only issue left is the cite required tag in the last paragraph of the "Southern front" section. It looks it came about as the section was broken down into smaller paragraphs so I imagine it will straightforward to fix. Zawed ( talk) 08:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I had to edit 7 articles, but I was late. I'm sorry. So I finished it now. And I will do another 7 edits for this week assignments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choi Hyun Hee ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I am unable to vote in your RfA; I can only edit via Kindle Fire right now, and I am unable to navigate to the bottom of the Support section. However, I just want to let you know I would support you if I were able.
Love, Keepscases ( talk) 00:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
No Drmies. You said that Piotrus should be engaged in ultra civil behaviour as the expectation for people running RFA is to "kiss babies and hand out puppies". That is expecting ass licking behaviour from candidates which I think is unreasonable. There is a big difference between a civil, unheated response and ass licking. I'm more suspicious of editors who "hand out puppies" than make a sarcastic retort as I think it often comes across as false and shows a desperation to please everybody just to grab some tools. I think it's time the RFA process was given a complete overhaul. It is just an example of the general extreme approach to wikipedia and the worst case scenario outlook which is prevalent here. Candidates are treated as likely to become the worst case scenario in the same way things like images are treated as "there is a 0.01% chance of being sued, we must not use it" kind of approach. At RFA, every imperfection of a candidate is turned into the primary reason to oppose somebody, even if they are over 90% perfect as an editor, rather than giving them the benefit of the doubt and at least a chance to prove their worth. The wikipedia community generally has the tendency to grossly overreact and look at worst case scenario as a probability, and in my opinion this rigid outlook is slowing down progress and change for the better on here. Just how many positive proposals for reforms (like DYK etc) have been proposed and rejected as no consensus because of hyper response from many? ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be easier and faster to have it done using WP:AWB? - Darwinek ( talk) 05:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Replying to your message on my talk page:
I'm amazed that an admin candidate wouldn't know about the first two points; the notion that "business tourism" could be stretched to include war seems to indicate a poor knowledge of the English language. Anyway, as youself say here above, "live and learn." Kraxler ( talk) 15:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
On 1 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Famines in Austrian Galicia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that late 19th century poverty in Austrian Galicia, punctuated by numerous famines, resulted in millions of migrants and even became proverbial? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
On 1 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Poverty in Austrian Galicia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that late 19th century poverty in Austrian Galicia, punctuated by numerous famines, resulted in millions of migrants and even became proverbial? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poverty in Austrian Galicia. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
On 1 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sikorski's tourists, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the soldiers who enlisted in the Polish Armed Forces in the West during WWII were known as " Sikorski's tourists"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sikorski's tourists. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
The Rosetta Barnstar | ||
For your great efforts at editing, translating and interpreting sources on the
Tadeusz Kościuszko and
Casimir Pulaski pages. Gwillhickers ( talk) 17:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of Business tourism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Redtigerxyz Talk 17:09, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Yongsan Dreamhub at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER (ЯʘCK) 13:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
As a former resident, you may be interested in the current CFD for Category:Cuisine of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Nyttend ( talk) 17:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Both versions of the articles - and the 1st AfD - deal with the same topic i.e. Polish cabbage. Therefore the PROD tag should never have been added, and a new AfD is needed. Regards, Giant Snowman 11:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus...sorry your Rfa didn't succeed...one thing, while not admin related, that won't hurt is to take 2-3 of your former featured articles and bring them back to that level. I've been working off and on with my oldest FA to get it updated before it winds up at FAR. Just a suggestion that won't hurt and you can show it as a net positive on your next Rfa.-- MONGO 15:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry your RfA wasn't as successful as we both had hoped, but thank you for the pierogi. Mmm. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 20:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, now that you finally agree there is the need for two separate articles, how about removing the "Merge proposal" templates from both articles? Khnassmacher ( talk) 06:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry to inform you that I have closed your recent RfA as unsuccessful. Whilst you will not doubt be disappointed with the result, I hope you will continue to contribute to Wikipedia and will given due consideration to the comments of those supporting and opposing. Best, WJBscribe (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
As I said in my neutral comment, I hope you re-apply again in the future and look forward to following your work. Cheers, Mkdw talk 00:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I've been a member of and contributing to Wikipedia for years. -- Rpm2004 ( talk) 08:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the need for page refs. I have hard copies of all the sources I used in article and will do a cleanup. Also should the need arise I can send PDF copies by E-mail of these sources. I am busy today and tomorrow working on the presentation for Chinese class tomorrow evening. I hope to get to cleanup on Wed. Regards-- Woogie10w ( talk) 15:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
On 7 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yongsan Dreamhub, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yongsan Dreamhub. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Allen3 talk 00:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Sven Manguard ( submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Cwmhiraeth ( submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place Casliber ( submissions) and second place Sturmvogel_66 ( submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.
The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.
A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email) and The ed17 ( talk • email) 16:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
On 8 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Casimir Pulaski Monument in Savannah, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Casimir Pulaski Monument in Savannah, the first American monument to Pulaski, was built over 70 years after a US Congress resolution calling for it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Casimir Pulaski Monument in Savannah. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Have proposed alternative now. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { T/ C} 08:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi I'm sehyun oh from your class :) I saw a notification on our article page so I tried to do that said. So I added see also on the manner of alcohol with adult section. could you check again that I did right thing? Here is our article. Thanks. Dhtpgus90 ( talk) 13:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank for your help to professor, Now our group do keep editing article. Thank you again HaeYoon ( talk) 15:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
You have MAIL. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 18:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
We seem to have an editor ( Kpalion) who seems to be very opinionated about having flags used in the info boxes in the Tadeusz Kościuszko and Casimir Pulaski articles. He removed flags in both articles without discussion. I have restored them. See discussion-- Gwillhickers ( talk) 07:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
No problem, I think its a beautiful concept. Iztwoz ( talk) 07:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I replied to your objection. Thank you for your interest. -- Niwi3 ( talk) 14:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Piotrus, I just received
a email message regarding a neutrality dispute on the
Blue Army (Poland) page asking me to look into it. I thought perhaps you might be more familiar with the topic than I and that you might look into it also. There is a discussion currently taking place on the
talk page. --
Gwillhickers (
talk) 22:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus! This may interest you. [3] -- Tobby72 ( talk) 08:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Could you please address a single referencing issue at the Talk:Emilia Plater/GA1, so that I could proceed to the prose review. Cheers.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 10:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, my mistake. Thank you for calling my attention to this. Kmicic ( talk) 11:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
On 11 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nature reserves in Poland, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nature reserves in Poland. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Allen3 talk 17:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henryk Sienkiewicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamienica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
what uncivil comment? -- IIIraute ( talk) 06:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
For a quick snapshot of the primary source's account of the events, please see the Wikipedia page of the United States envoy to Poland Hugh S. Gibson, and if you would like to reference his official report on the issue you may do so at the US State Department archive. I am not sure how much more bias the 'Controversies' page can get, and what kind of individuals are pushing a special agenda, but if you honestly looked what the US envoy wrote, you would not think that Faustians' contributions are legitimate.
Note how Faustian uses Weasel word to create an overall exaggerated impression of the events in question, and others are used to cast doubt on anything reported by the Polish side as being legitimate... you don't think that this is bias? Everything the Polish side said -- 68.191.79.36 ( talk) 12:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)is just a "claim".
Also, note how Faustian conveniently referenced a book that had the shooter of the Blue Army soldier in Czestochowa listed as "unknown" I referenced a book link, and it states that the suspected assailant was a local jewish man. And I bet that if I do more research I can find more information that he was indeed a supporter of the Bolshevik cause.
Also, the US envoy stated that may of the newspaper articles reported were false or exaggerated, and actually planted by German and Soviet government sources. Now, these "historians" conducted their research based on those very same false reports, so you can "source" Faustians' version all you want it is still inaccurate. How else could someone like William W. Hagen say that based on his research the Blue Army took part in the Lwow Pogrom when French, British, Polish and American government records had the Blue Army on the Western Front when the Pogrom happened?
Finally, You mean to tell me that secondary source accounts of the events made by the so called "historians" who did their research out of their office, override the primary source accounts made by a United States envoy (no less) who was on the ground at the time of the events?
At the every least the 'Neutrality Tag' should be re-added until the accuracy of the sources can be reviewed, and the language used in the article reviewed by someone else than just You and Faustian. -- 68.191.79.36 ( talk) 12:27, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello!
I noticed that You wrote that You are having Your Korean EFL students work on Wikipedia. I am doing the same. A number of years ago, I did it on an individual basis with a few students. Now I am doing it as a part of a formal course. I have asked my students to use the names kyu-cics1, kyu-cics2 etc. They are free to choose what articles they edit and even in what language. I have suggested that they look at what Your students are doing. My students edits are due to be done on the 28th. Kim Dammers, Konyang University, Nonsan. Kdammers ( talk) 13:54, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Heya - I guess you didn't notice, but I responded to your proposed change at the DYK for Prince of Poets. Please re-review. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't expect to be in Seoul before mid-June (I avoid the metropolis as much as possible), but I will be at KOTESOL the last week-end in May. We are doing Wikipedia as a one-off as part of a course on SNS. I can send a copy of my proposed lesson plan if You wish. Kdammers ( talk) 02:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
On 14 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Trylogia Księżycowa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jerzy Żuławski's Lunar Trilogy published in the 1900s was a major milestone in the history of science fiction and fantasy in Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trylogia Księżycowa. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing this article. I've fixed the citation issue you suggest, so if it now meets the criteria for B-class and you're able to upgrade it, it'd be much appreciated. Jonathan Deamer ( talk) 13:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Thank you for reviewing the assessment request I submitted to WikiProject Biography for the Matthew G. Olsen article. I came across the article while doing a research project and noticed its lack of assessment, but was unsure whether to assess the article as Start-class or C-class and would like a second opinion. On a related note, thank you for resolving the dispute I had with with User:Osplace regarding the WikiProject Biography assessment of the Yadira Silva article. When reviewing User:Osplace's original assessment request, I was not entirely sure if the article met the B-class criteria and assessed it as C-class, an action which he subsequently disputed in comments on my UserTalk page which is why I re-submitted it for assessment by a neutral third party. -- TommyBoy ( talk) 03:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
On 16 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maria Konopnicka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Maria Konopnicka's poem Rota became so popular it was seen as unofficial anthem of Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Konopnicka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 07:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobile infantry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile infantry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Intothat darkness 21:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
On 18 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yoon Chang-jung, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sexual harassment allegations surrounding Korean official Yoon Chang-jung overshadowed Korean president Park Geun-hye's first visit to the USA? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yoon Chang-jung. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind greeting. I don't mean to be complaining within hours of beginning editing on this website, but aren't most of the people on this site total [insert expletive here]? I have watched some of the disciplinary procedures go on, and it is total high school elections all over again, with cliques all supporting each other and few or little oversight. I wonder how basically decent people like you even survive this nonsense. - Samsara9 ( talk) 08:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henryk Sienkiewicz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Epic, Royalty and Polish Legion ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for Barnstar! I've just realized that you gave it to me. Kmicic ( talk) 12:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I think we've hopefully addressed your issues, if you could kindly revisit when you have a chance? Ealdgyth - Talk 15:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria Konopnicka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wawel Dragon (statue) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 03:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Nice page! Sulfurboy ( talk) 09:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of Gender inequality in the United States at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Piotrus! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
Sorry to rain on your parade but I reckon business tourism needs radical work. Please see your nomination's entry for more details. Warden ( talk) 08:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
On 26 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wawel Dragon (statue), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Wawel Dragon statue (pictured) in Kraków, Poland, breathes fire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wawel Dragon (statue). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Ping! --- I have started a discussion here. -- Pgallert ( talk) 08:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
The article was published in "Вопросы истории, № 5, Май 2011, C. 22-35. " Xx236 ( talk) 10:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Education Amendments of 1972, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial aid ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
You've been around long enough to know how things work here. Please don't edit or touch the 2013 Woolwich attack article because it's pretty clear that you are grinding some sort of axe, [6] though I have no idea what it is. Plenty of eyes are on the article and will do whatever is needed. As a further note, it is definitely not civil to insult somebody's country by declaring a major incident to be trivial. Jehochman Talk 12:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Cindy( talk) 20:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm not sure whether you've watchlisted the William Post nomination. If not, could you please have a look? Schwede 66 10:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I'm afraid can't remember what sources I used exactly when creating the article 9 years ago. However, if you look at the Polish interwiki you will see there are secondary sources there. (I also don't speak Polish so I can't speak as to their triviality or non-triviality.) Thanks, Morwen ( Talk) 10:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tadeusz Kościuszko may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Erving Goffman may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Polish migration to the United Kingdom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Ping! -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 22:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I have pdf of English version of this book and can send you it by email, if you need to. It is enough to send me your letter with your email address to my Wikipedia e-mail-- Psychiatrick ( talk) 06:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC).
On 30 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tygodnik Ilustrowany, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Tygodnik Ilustrowany was a major Polish magazine published from 1859 until World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tygodnik Ilustrowany. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
I have just nominated for DYK an article I just created, the USS Ferret (1822), located at Template:Did you know nominations/USS Ferret (1822) and noticed you are more or less active in such reviews there. Most issues have been dealt with on the Ferret page but a reviewer has an issue with the bibliography formatting. I pointed out that the Tadeusz Kościuszko article employs such formatting in its bibliography and was granted GA status. The reviewer hasn't responded yet (at this time). If we can avoid stripping away all the formatting there that would be nice IMO, lest the sources listed in the bibliography would be all run together. Would appreciate your review also, for better or worse. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 21:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
I responded to your comments on my Julia Sand DYK? nomination (located here: Template:Did you know nominations/Julia Sand). Please respond to me whenever you'll have some time. Thank you very much. Futurist110 ( talk) 08:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Thought you might want to know about this upcoming workshop! Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager ( talk) 11:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
-- Bejnar ( talk) 16:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
On 3 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Janko Muzykant, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the story Janko Muzykant was one of Henryk Sienkiewicz's works mentioned in a speech during his 1905 Nobel Prize in Literature ceremony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Janko Muzykant. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicolaus Copernicus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adam Mickiewicz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Regarding to your previous comment, I have posted a portrait picture for this article. Update is still needed. Thanks for your compliments. Osplace 02:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for reviewing the article for DYK. I think I have fixed the bit that was causing problems and made it more clear that the police can act without a court order. Thanks very much! ツ Stacey ( talk) 08:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
On 7 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Face-to-face interaction, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that face-to-face interaction has been steadily supplemented by mediated interaction since the invention of the printing press in 15th century Europe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Face-to-face interaction. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
On 7 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mediated communication, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that face-to-face interaction has been steadily supplemented by mediated interaction since the invention of the printing press in 15th century Europe? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
The article Tim Jordan (sociologist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tassedethe ( talk) 01:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. It's a while since I have been in contact. I trust you are well. I have a couple of questions/issues:-
1) The page (about the song) "Rose of No Man's Land" should (I believe) be called: "The Rose of No Man's Land". I'm not sure what the procedure is to rename this?
2) How do I apply for an article to be a "good article"?
Thanks in advance and best wishes Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi - thanks - yes your answer was fine - it gives me enough to go on for now. Best wishes - Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hello. You have a new message at ColonelHenry's talk page.
Hi, A couple of days ago I was creating and editing 3 related pages about world war 1 songs with links between each. Right in the middle of my (complicated) edits another editor "jumped in" and thought he knew what I was trying to do and started to rename pages that I was still working on (he didn't understand that there were three similar songs and not two!). Oh dear! Confusion. He has created an erroneous redirect page: " Your King and Country Need You (Pelham)" to link to Your King and Country Need You. Can I ask you to delete this so that I can move the relevant page to this title with the actual content that it should have - in other words this redirect is not required. If you can let me know when you have done this - please let's not have any more complication over this one. I just want to finish properly the work that I started. This has already wasted 2 hours of time. I left a note about editor etiquette on his talk page - he never replied - looks like I'm not the first he has caused problems for. Thanks in advance. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Thanks for your reply. I have now fixed it myself as best I can by moving the re-direct page to a temporary name, then renaming "Your King and Country Need You" to Your King and Country Need You (pelham). I cannot use uppercase "p" as the old redirect page is still somewhere in the system. So we now have:-
I hope this all makes sense. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi, Thanks for your help. I requested deletes of the redirect pages using: "db-g6|". A Bot had created more extra ones trying to fix this! But they have all gone now and the songs have (what I think are) the correct titles to avoid confusion. The confusion between these titles seems to be everywhere on the Internet and also elsewhere in Wikipedia - I have already fixed some of these. The links above have been adjusted to the current titles. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hello! Your submission of Tygodnik Ilustrowany at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Dear Sir, I thank you for appreciating my work, especially about Stanislaw Kubista and other Polish martyrs in World War 2. I would sure like to see my work in the did you know corner, the option that you had presented to me and I agree. I hope you can place it in did you know corner, since I don't know how to place it there in the first place..hehe.. It would be of gratitude for me to share my works to others by helping me place it in the did you know corner. Yours truly... AdmiralProudmore ( talk)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Thanks for the award. I appreciate it. -- Nvvchar. 05:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I have just finished edited articles and I have a question about userbox. Actually I didn't understand how to use userbox last class. Would you leave the tutorial link about userbox here? One more question!. I am a little bit confused about next assignment ' Informal Reviews ' Do you mean that we have to look at articles ,individual creations made by other students, not creations made by group and review them on that article's talk page, right? I am not sure i can get it perfectly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tksgk262 ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
We write 'to do list' at Talk:Ansan street arts festival Please check it:D Thank you-- Bohyunlee ( talk) 13:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
On 18 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ivan Petrizhitsky-Kulaga, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Cossack hetman Ivan Petrizhitsky-Kulaga was executed by other Cossacks after he lost a power struggle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivan Petrizhitsky-Kulaga. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Panyd The muffin is not subtle 16:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
I reviewed some articles, Fashion in Korea and Modern Korean festivals. I think the more we review articles and give some advice, the more better articles are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tksgk262 ( talk • contribs) 11:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Started review, thanks!.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:35, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Mr.Piotrus. Editing Wikis, I have one question. When I click to 'edit' button of the top menu, It says 'You are using an alpha version of the VisualEditor. It may be slow and make erroneous changes - please check each edit that you make'. What is the problem? Please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JinsuRyu ( talk • contribs) 03:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Intro expanded; thanks. I've never been good at writing intros, so I tend not to realise when something really belongs in one. Nyttend ( talk) 15:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
This article has now been passed. I made a series of changes myself to complete the checklist. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 22:44, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Aye Piotrus, thanks for the Barnstar! Much appreciated. On your mention, I checked up on the Casimir Pulaski page and did some image size adjusting and caption work. Hope it meets with your approval. Btw, the image of the Pulaski stamp is from a photo I took of a stamp in my stamp album. (Yes, I am the proud owner.) When I first started editing/contributing on WP a few years ago I uploaded 100's of stamp images, most from my stamp collection. Cheers! -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 05:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Our team7 Beautiful Store's page was deleted again. A person name 'Deb'? deleted it because it is thought as an advertisement. That was what the warning?? sign said.... how should we do ?? help ~~ SOS please~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaHee Park ( talk • contribs) 10:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I needed that! :-) Your talk page is getting a bit long - it freezes my browser. Maybe time for another archive? Deb ( talk) 13:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello professor, I`m HaeYoon, Sung. Frist of all I finished my assignment which editing 7 articles and I write the suggesting review article for other groups. Also our group editing our 'To do list'. But I have a question. actually I make the infobox about beautiful store at User:GaHee Park/sandbox. But, Some information is not appear at infobox. For example, At editing page, I editing infobox about motto and vision of Beautiful store. But it is not appear to infobox at User:GaHee Park/sandbox. Why this things are happen? Could you help us? HaeYoon ( talk) 14:33, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. Noticing your threads on AN and DRV today, I've spun out a discussion asking participants at the Education Noticeboard to brainstorm about what level of involvement in student articles we expect/want from professors. I mentioned your activities there, by way of introduction of the topic. Please feel free to add any thoughts you might have to the discussion. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 15:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Professor! I finished my assignment. But I have questions. You write on Stages and deadlines that "Before Monday, April 23, each of your members should look at an article being developed by another group". April 23 is Tuesday. There was an error with the sentence. I am confused. Please check my assignment! Thank you :D Hyegyeong Yun ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm little late.I finished assignments. I comment other writing in blogger and I write editing at talk page in other group's article. Also, I edit 7 articles. Yet, I am poor at commenting and editing but I really try to strive. In this week, because of no class, I do extra Wiki assignments. Please let me know what I have deficiencies in my assignments. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bohyunlee ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
On 22 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kraków Uprising, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one of the leaders of the Kraków Uprising in 1846 was killed while leading a religious procession? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kraków Uprising. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
On 22 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sweetened beverage, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that consumption of sweetened beverages has been linked to obesity and related health problems? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sweetened beverage. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kazimierz Chodziński, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humboldt Park ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kindness and all support!!! We all thank you!! I hope this project goes well hopefully. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaHee Park ( talk • contribs) 13:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Professor, Group 6 finished updating our article, Ansan street arts festival. We updated images, added references and modified some contexts. Check it plz:) And, Thanks for teaching me how to add images. I appreciate it.-- Bohyunlee ( talk) 15:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus. The article is still almost completely rubbish. Just sayin' is all. Pete aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 12:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
On 24 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kazimierz Chodziński, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the statue of General Casimir Pulaski in Washington was sculpted by Kazimierz Chodziński? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kazimierz Chodziński. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello again, Piotr. Though I have a lot of respect for your contributions I was a little concerned that you might be involved in some sort of content dispute in the future. Other than that, I have no doubts that you will become a good administrator and I admit that I have made a mistake in my vote, so I changed my vote to neutral as a result. Other than that, I would be happy to have others help out on the Chopin article, namely Brianboulton. Also, I will help out on the Pulaski article whenever I can. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 04:00, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. Thank you for the Society Barnstar. It's awesome and I really appreciate it. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 04:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Professor, I did this week assignments, W9 writing and 7 edits, yesterday. This week, I learn many thing through my mistake. I'm really poor at English..... This mistake will not be repeated in the future. And it is thanks to your help:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bohyunlee ( talk • contribs) 13:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh, difficult one! I genuinely had not noticed that you were up for consideration. If I had, I would not have voted for you, but I would probably not have opposed you actively either. I have not had much contact with you in the past, and in your favour is the fact that you sought to make up the dispute with me and not to turn it into any kind of ongoing confrontation. However, I did think that your initial approach to me was rather aggressive and that your attempt to get the article restored on technical grounds was a poor use of everyone’s time and showed a lack of judgement. Although I appreciate what you are trying to do with the Korean students, it would have been more profitable if you had just helped them to lick the article into shape rather than making a major issue out of it – in my opinion, this was setting them a bad example, making them think that Wikipedia is here purely to help them practise their English. I would not hold the fact that you have previously been blocked against you in the long term – this has happened to many people who have later become valued contributors. However, I think there may be a communication issue and this may be partly cultural in your case. But don’t misunderstand me, I am not opposed to people becoming administrators just because English isn’t their first language. In short, I see no reason not to trust you but I would not feel able to vote for you at this stage. Deb ( talk) 14:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
On 25 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Added sugar, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the most common sources of added sugar consumption are sweetened beverages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Added sugar. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
A most enlightening talk page; are we now running university courses from Wikipedia? We'll have to think up a degree name. Anyhow, that's not why I'm here, I'd just like to know if you have abandoned this ill-conceived plan Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Piotrus 2? It's tiring having to research your Wikipedia history (a degree subject in itself - a fascinating romp across the plains and steppes of Easter Europe) and I hate wasting my time. Giano 10:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Passed, well done! I have a painting at GA too, can you review Portrait of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge for me?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
You're brave! I thought you were already an admin. You're probably too much of a superior editor to be an admin like myself and Malleus! Care to review this for me?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 09:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to come to your talk page to suggest that challenging (what seems like) every single editor who registers a negative or neutral opinion on your RfA candidacy feels like badgering, but when I got into your talk page I got presented with an assault on the eyes. Would you consider simplfying (and removing the floating along divs on) your talk page to make it more approachable? Thanks Hasteur ( talk) 15:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Well, I remove two out of three floaters yesterday, and the third one will go away in few days, so... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello professor, I'm sehyun Oh of group 3. I saw your comment in our article's talk page. So we rewrote some points that you advised. Please check our article again :) Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhtpgus90 ( talk • contribs) 09:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
On 30 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Safety-valve institution, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the function of safety-valve institutions such as gambling or pornography is to reduce the tensions in the society? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Safety-valve institution. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
No idea, really. I never seen the term used in any context other than a brief mention that the people who were trying to reach France after 1939 were sometimes jokingly called that. I'm not sure it's a good title for an article, I'm not even sure they deserve their own article rather than a section in some other article ( Polish Armed Forces in the West?). Sorry mate. // Halibu tt 01:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, this article is looking like it is almost ready to be passed. You may have missed my comment on it but the only issue left is the cite required tag in the last paragraph of the "Southern front" section. It looks it came about as the section was broken down into smaller paragraphs so I imagine it will straightforward to fix. Zawed ( talk) 08:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I had to edit 7 articles, but I was late. I'm sorry. So I finished it now. And I will do another 7 edits for this week assignments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choi Hyun Hee ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I am unable to vote in your RfA; I can only edit via Kindle Fire right now, and I am unable to navigate to the bottom of the Support section. However, I just want to let you know I would support you if I were able.
Love, Keepscases ( talk) 00:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
No Drmies. You said that Piotrus should be engaged in ultra civil behaviour as the expectation for people running RFA is to "kiss babies and hand out puppies". That is expecting ass licking behaviour from candidates which I think is unreasonable. There is a big difference between a civil, unheated response and ass licking. I'm more suspicious of editors who "hand out puppies" than make a sarcastic retort as I think it often comes across as false and shows a desperation to please everybody just to grab some tools. I think it's time the RFA process was given a complete overhaul. It is just an example of the general extreme approach to wikipedia and the worst case scenario outlook which is prevalent here. Candidates are treated as likely to become the worst case scenario in the same way things like images are treated as "there is a 0.01% chance of being sued, we must not use it" kind of approach. At RFA, every imperfection of a candidate is turned into the primary reason to oppose somebody, even if they are over 90% perfect as an editor, rather than giving them the benefit of the doubt and at least a chance to prove their worth. The wikipedia community generally has the tendency to grossly overreact and look at worst case scenario as a probability, and in my opinion this rigid outlook is slowing down progress and change for the better on here. Just how many positive proposals for reforms (like DYK etc) have been proposed and rejected as no consensus because of hyper response from many? ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be easier and faster to have it done using WP:AWB? - Darwinek ( talk) 05:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Replying to your message on my talk page:
I'm amazed that an admin candidate wouldn't know about the first two points; the notion that "business tourism" could be stretched to include war seems to indicate a poor knowledge of the English language. Anyway, as youself say here above, "live and learn." Kraxler ( talk) 15:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
On 1 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Famines in Austrian Galicia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that late 19th century poverty in Austrian Galicia, punctuated by numerous famines, resulted in millions of migrants and even became proverbial? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
On 1 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Poverty in Austrian Galicia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that late 19th century poverty in Austrian Galicia, punctuated by numerous famines, resulted in millions of migrants and even became proverbial? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poverty in Austrian Galicia. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
On 1 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sikorski's tourists, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the soldiers who enlisted in the Polish Armed Forces in the West during WWII were known as " Sikorski's tourists"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sikorski's tourists. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
The Rosetta Barnstar | ||
For your great efforts at editing, translating and interpreting sources on the
Tadeusz Kościuszko and
Casimir Pulaski pages. Gwillhickers ( talk) 17:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of Business tourism at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Redtigerxyz Talk 17:09, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Yongsan Dreamhub at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER (ЯʘCK) 13:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
As a former resident, you may be interested in the current CFD for Category:Cuisine of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Nyttend ( talk) 17:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Both versions of the articles - and the 1st AfD - deal with the same topic i.e. Polish cabbage. Therefore the PROD tag should never have been added, and a new AfD is needed. Regards, Giant Snowman 11:53, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus...sorry your Rfa didn't succeed...one thing, while not admin related, that won't hurt is to take 2-3 of your former featured articles and bring them back to that level. I've been working off and on with my oldest FA to get it updated before it winds up at FAR. Just a suggestion that won't hurt and you can show it as a net positive on your next Rfa.-- MONGO 15:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry your RfA wasn't as successful as we both had hoped, but thank you for the pierogi. Mmm. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 20:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, now that you finally agree there is the need for two separate articles, how about removing the "Merge proposal" templates from both articles? Khnassmacher ( talk) 06:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I am sorry to inform you that I have closed your recent RfA as unsuccessful. Whilst you will not doubt be disappointed with the result, I hope you will continue to contribute to Wikipedia and will given due consideration to the comments of those supporting and opposing. Best, WJBscribe (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
As I said in my neutral comment, I hope you re-apply again in the future and look forward to following your work. Cheers, Mkdw talk 00:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I've been a member of and contributing to Wikipedia for years. -- Rpm2004 ( talk) 08:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the need for page refs. I have hard copies of all the sources I used in article and will do a cleanup. Also should the need arise I can send PDF copies by E-mail of these sources. I am busy today and tomorrow working on the presentation for Chinese class tomorrow evening. I hope to get to cleanup on Wed. Regards-- Woogie10w ( talk) 15:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
On 7 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yongsan Dreamhub, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yongsan Dreamhub. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Allen3 talk 00:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Sven Manguard ( submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Cwmhiraeth ( submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place Casliber ( submissions) and second place Sturmvogel_66 ( submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.
The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.
A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email) and The ed17 ( talk • email) 16:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
On 8 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Casimir Pulaski Monument in Savannah, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Casimir Pulaski Monument in Savannah, the first American monument to Pulaski, was built over 70 years after a US Congress resolution calling for it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Casimir Pulaski Monument in Savannah. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Have proposed alternative now. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { T/ C} 08:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi I'm sehyun oh from your class :) I saw a notification on our article page so I tried to do that said. So I added see also on the manner of alcohol with adult section. could you check again that I did right thing? Here is our article. Thanks. Dhtpgus90 ( talk) 13:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank for your help to professor, Now our group do keep editing article. Thank you again HaeYoon ( talk) 15:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
You have MAIL. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 18:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
We seem to have an editor ( Kpalion) who seems to be very opinionated about having flags used in the info boxes in the Tadeusz Kościuszko and Casimir Pulaski articles. He removed flags in both articles without discussion. I have restored them. See discussion-- Gwillhickers ( talk) 07:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
No problem, I think its a beautiful concept. Iztwoz ( talk) 07:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I replied to your objection. Thank you for your interest. -- Niwi3 ( talk) 14:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Piotrus, I just received
a email message regarding a neutrality dispute on the
Blue Army (Poland) page asking me to look into it. I thought perhaps you might be more familiar with the topic than I and that you might look into it also. There is a discussion currently taking place on the
talk page. --
Gwillhickers (
talk) 22:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus! This may interest you. [3] -- Tobby72 ( talk) 08:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Could you please address a single referencing issue at the Talk:Emilia Plater/GA1, so that I could proceed to the prose review. Cheers.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 10:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, my mistake. Thank you for calling my attention to this. Kmicic ( talk) 11:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
On 11 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nature reserves in Poland, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nature reserves in Poland. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Allen3 talk 17:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henryk Sienkiewicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamienica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
what uncivil comment? -- IIIraute ( talk) 06:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
For a quick snapshot of the primary source's account of the events, please see the Wikipedia page of the United States envoy to Poland Hugh S. Gibson, and if you would like to reference his official report on the issue you may do so at the US State Department archive. I am not sure how much more bias the 'Controversies' page can get, and what kind of individuals are pushing a special agenda, but if you honestly looked what the US envoy wrote, you would not think that Faustians' contributions are legitimate.
Note how Faustian uses Weasel word to create an overall exaggerated impression of the events in question, and others are used to cast doubt on anything reported by the Polish side as being legitimate... you don't think that this is bias? Everything the Polish side said -- 68.191.79.36 ( talk) 12:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)is just a "claim".
Also, note how Faustian conveniently referenced a book that had the shooter of the Blue Army soldier in Czestochowa listed as "unknown" I referenced a book link, and it states that the suspected assailant was a local jewish man. And I bet that if I do more research I can find more information that he was indeed a supporter of the Bolshevik cause.
Also, the US envoy stated that may of the newspaper articles reported were false or exaggerated, and actually planted by German and Soviet government sources. Now, these "historians" conducted their research based on those very same false reports, so you can "source" Faustians' version all you want it is still inaccurate. How else could someone like William W. Hagen say that based on his research the Blue Army took part in the Lwow Pogrom when French, British, Polish and American government records had the Blue Army on the Western Front when the Pogrom happened?
Finally, You mean to tell me that secondary source accounts of the events made by the so called "historians" who did their research out of their office, override the primary source accounts made by a United States envoy (no less) who was on the ground at the time of the events?
At the every least the 'Neutrality Tag' should be re-added until the accuracy of the sources can be reviewed, and the language used in the article reviewed by someone else than just You and Faustian. -- 68.191.79.36 ( talk) 12:27, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello!
I noticed that You wrote that You are having Your Korean EFL students work on Wikipedia. I am doing the same. A number of years ago, I did it on an individual basis with a few students. Now I am doing it as a part of a formal course. I have asked my students to use the names kyu-cics1, kyu-cics2 etc. They are free to choose what articles they edit and even in what language. I have suggested that they look at what Your students are doing. My students edits are due to be done on the 28th. Kim Dammers, Konyang University, Nonsan. Kdammers ( talk) 13:54, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Heya - I guess you didn't notice, but I responded to your proposed change at the DYK for Prince of Poets. Please re-review. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I don't expect to be in Seoul before mid-June (I avoid the metropolis as much as possible), but I will be at KOTESOL the last week-end in May. We are doing Wikipedia as a one-off as part of a course on SNS. I can send a copy of my proposed lesson plan if You wish. Kdammers ( talk) 02:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
On 14 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Trylogia Księżycowa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jerzy Żuławski's Lunar Trilogy published in the 1900s was a major milestone in the history of science fiction and fantasy in Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trylogia Księżycowa. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 13:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing this article. I've fixed the citation issue you suggest, so if it now meets the criteria for B-class and you're able to upgrade it, it'd be much appreciated. Jonathan Deamer ( talk) 13:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Thank you for reviewing the assessment request I submitted to WikiProject Biography for the Matthew G. Olsen article. I came across the article while doing a research project and noticed its lack of assessment, but was unsure whether to assess the article as Start-class or C-class and would like a second opinion. On a related note, thank you for resolving the dispute I had with with User:Osplace regarding the WikiProject Biography assessment of the Yadira Silva article. When reviewing User:Osplace's original assessment request, I was not entirely sure if the article met the B-class criteria and assessed it as C-class, an action which he subsequently disputed in comments on my UserTalk page which is why I re-submitted it for assessment by a neutral third party. -- TommyBoy ( talk) 03:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
On 16 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maria Konopnicka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Maria Konopnicka's poem Rota became so popular it was seen as unofficial anthem of Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Konopnicka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 07:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobile infantry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile infantry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Intothat darkness 21:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
On 18 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yoon Chang-jung, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sexual harassment allegations surrounding Korean official Yoon Chang-jung overshadowed Korean president Park Geun-hye's first visit to the USA? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yoon Chang-jung. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind greeting. I don't mean to be complaining within hours of beginning editing on this website, but aren't most of the people on this site total [insert expletive here]? I have watched some of the disciplinary procedures go on, and it is total high school elections all over again, with cliques all supporting each other and few or little oversight. I wonder how basically decent people like you even survive this nonsense. - Samsara9 ( talk) 08:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henryk Sienkiewicz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Epic, Royalty and Polish Legion ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for Barnstar! I've just realized that you gave it to me. Kmicic ( talk) 12:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I think we've hopefully addressed your issues, if you could kindly revisit when you have a chance? Ealdgyth - Talk 15:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria Konopnicka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wawel Dragon (statue) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 03:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Nice page! Sulfurboy ( talk) 09:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of Gender inequality in the United States at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Piotrus! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
Sorry to rain on your parade but I reckon business tourism needs radical work. Please see your nomination's entry for more details. Warden ( talk) 08:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
On 26 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wawel Dragon (statue), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Wawel Dragon statue (pictured) in Kraków, Poland, breathes fire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wawel Dragon (statue). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Ping! --- I have started a discussion here. -- Pgallert ( talk) 08:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
The article was published in "Вопросы истории, № 5, Май 2011, C. 22-35. " Xx236 ( talk) 10:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Education Amendments of 1972, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial aid ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
You've been around long enough to know how things work here. Please don't edit or touch the 2013 Woolwich attack article because it's pretty clear that you are grinding some sort of axe, [6] though I have no idea what it is. Plenty of eyes are on the article and will do whatever is needed. As a further note, it is definitely not civil to insult somebody's country by declaring a major incident to be trivial. Jehochman Talk 12:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Cindy( talk) 20:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm not sure whether you've watchlisted the William Post nomination. If not, could you please have a look? Schwede 66 10:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I'm afraid can't remember what sources I used exactly when creating the article 9 years ago. However, if you look at the Polish interwiki you will see there are secondary sources there. (I also don't speak Polish so I can't speak as to their triviality or non-triviality.) Thanks, Morwen ( Talk) 10:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tadeusz Kościuszko may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Erving Goffman may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Polish migration to the United Kingdom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Ping! -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 22:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I have pdf of English version of this book and can send you it by email, if you need to. It is enough to send me your letter with your email address to my Wikipedia e-mail-- Psychiatrick ( talk) 06:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC).
On 30 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tygodnik Ilustrowany, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Tygodnik Ilustrowany was a major Polish magazine published from 1859 until World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tygodnik Ilustrowany. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
I have just nominated for DYK an article I just created, the USS Ferret (1822), located at Template:Did you know nominations/USS Ferret (1822) and noticed you are more or less active in such reviews there. Most issues have been dealt with on the Ferret page but a reviewer has an issue with the bibliography formatting. I pointed out that the Tadeusz Kościuszko article employs such formatting in its bibliography and was granted GA status. The reviewer hasn't responded yet (at this time). If we can avoid stripping away all the formatting there that would be nice IMO, lest the sources listed in the bibliography would be all run together. Would appreciate your review also, for better or worse. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 21:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
I responded to your comments on my Julia Sand DYK? nomination (located here: Template:Did you know nominations/Julia Sand). Please respond to me whenever you'll have some time. Thank you very much. Futurist110 ( talk) 08:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Thought you might want to know about this upcoming workshop! Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager ( talk) 11:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
-- Bejnar ( talk) 16:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
On 3 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Janko Muzykant, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the story Janko Muzykant was one of Henryk Sienkiewicz's works mentioned in a speech during his 1905 Nobel Prize in Literature ceremony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Janko Muzykant. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicolaus Copernicus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adam Mickiewicz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Regarding to your previous comment, I have posted a portrait picture for this article. Update is still needed. Thanks for your compliments. Osplace 02:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for reviewing the article for DYK. I think I have fixed the bit that was causing problems and made it more clear that the police can act without a court order. Thanks very much! ツ Stacey ( talk) 08:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
On 7 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Face-to-face interaction, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that face-to-face interaction has been steadily supplemented by mediated interaction since the invention of the printing press in 15th century Europe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Face-to-face interaction. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
On 7 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mediated communication, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that face-to-face interaction has been steadily supplemented by mediated interaction since the invention of the printing press in 15th century Europe? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
The article Tim Jordan (sociologist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tassedethe ( talk) 01:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. It's a while since I have been in contact. I trust you are well. I have a couple of questions/issues:-
1) The page (about the song) "Rose of No Man's Land" should (I believe) be called: "The Rose of No Man's Land". I'm not sure what the procedure is to rename this?
2) How do I apply for an article to be a "good article"?
Thanks in advance and best wishes Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi - thanks - yes your answer was fine - it gives me enough to go on for now. Best wishes - Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hello. You have a new message at ColonelHenry's talk page.
Hi, A couple of days ago I was creating and editing 3 related pages about world war 1 songs with links between each. Right in the middle of my (complicated) edits another editor "jumped in" and thought he knew what I was trying to do and started to rename pages that I was still working on (he didn't understand that there were three similar songs and not two!). Oh dear! Confusion. He has created an erroneous redirect page: " Your King and Country Need You (Pelham)" to link to Your King and Country Need You. Can I ask you to delete this so that I can move the relevant page to this title with the actual content that it should have - in other words this redirect is not required. If you can let me know when you have done this - please let's not have any more complication over this one. I just want to finish properly the work that I started. This has already wasted 2 hours of time. I left a note about editor etiquette on his talk page - he never replied - looks like I'm not the first he has caused problems for. Thanks in advance. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Thanks for your reply. I have now fixed it myself as best I can by moving the re-direct page to a temporary name, then renaming "Your King and Country Need You" to Your King and Country Need You (pelham). I cannot use uppercase "p" as the old redirect page is still somewhere in the system. So we now have:-
I hope this all makes sense. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi, Thanks for your help. I requested deletes of the redirect pages using: "db-g6|". A Bot had created more extra ones trying to fix this! But they have all gone now and the songs have (what I think are) the correct titles to avoid confusion. The confusion between these titles seems to be everywhere on the Internet and also elsewhere in Wikipedia - I have already fixed some of these. The links above have been adjusted to the current titles. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hello! Your submission of Tygodnik Ilustrowany at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Dear Sir, I thank you for appreciating my work, especially about Stanislaw Kubista and other Polish martyrs in World War 2. I would sure like to see my work in the did you know corner, the option that you had presented to me and I agree. I hope you can place it in did you know corner, since I don't know how to place it there in the first place..hehe.. It would be of gratitude for me to share my works to others by helping me place it in the did you know corner. Yours truly... AdmiralProudmore ( talk)