|
|
Thanks for taking part in the Take Back the Night edit-a-thon! Your article looks great! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC) |
Hello Mooeena, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Allan G. Johnson has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 23:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Allan G. Johnson
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Allan G. Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Diannaa ( talk) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
The article The Gender Knot: Unraveling our Patriarchal Legacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non notable book by non notable author
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Diannaa (
talk) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- I took care of this - the book article is safe. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- I also saved Johnson's article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Haha thanks! Mooeena ( talk) 02:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:First Location of St. Johns Country Day School.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
I've just noticed you've signed up as a member of Women in Red. That's great as I see you have been creating articles along the lines we want. I've added your name to our mailing list to keep you informed of our activities. If even you run into any problems, just let me know.-- Ipigott ( talk) 19:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks! Mooeena ( talk) 20:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Mooeena! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 16:26, Friday, September 30, 2016 ( UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Thanks for creating Alanna (The Song of the Lioness), Mooeena!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Are you able to help add sources and show how the character meets WP:NOTABILITY for a stand-alone article? Thanks for your help.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 19:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk) 15:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jeanne Smith
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Jeanne Smith, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
Jeanne Smith, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 03:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeanne Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens
The article
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk) 21:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens
The article
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk) 09:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Congratulations! I was hoping I'd done this correctly and now you've got the notification. It's a very nice article on an interesting museum. Thanks for responding so fully and so promptly to the issues raised during the review. Best regards. KJP1 ( talk) 09:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 10:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk) 04:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Accidental revert on Hedgesville High School
You may get a notice that I reverted a recent edit you made to Hedgesville High School. I just wanted you to know that it was a mistake and I have restored your edit. My apologies.
-- KNHaw (talk) 23:51, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
By the way, for your recent edit on my edit of the plot of three film Dhuruvangal Pathinaaru, why do you think remaining text makes no sense? Have you even seen the film? I have. And I feel if nothing, then at least the beginning and ending lines should be removed for letting the viewer enjoy the film. Why be so mechanical? Wikipedia is not an epic to contain everything.
The film is a murder mystery, and has revealed every single thing about the film. Can't a synopsis be better? I strongly dislike this rule of Wikipedia to include and reveal everything about a film. Afterall, a film is meant to be seen and not be read. MyBleedingHeart ( talk) 04:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, @MyBleedingHeart, my reasoning for why your edited summary didn't make sense was that it cut out some of the motivations for the characters and why/how certain events happen. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a review website, so we have to include the entire plot. There are many examples of mysteries revealing the ending in their wiki plot summary. See The Sixth Sense for what I mean. On a website like IMBD which is intended to give a taste of a movie a synopsis may be appropriate, but that is not the kind of website that Wikipedia is. Do you get what I'm saying? I'd be happy to answer any other questions you may have, but it's not actually in my power to change the rules of Wikipedia. -- Mooeena ( talk) 14:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk) 19:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
On 11 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens was selected for the United States' National Register of Historic Places? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 04:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
women and garden museum
Thank you for quality articles such as Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens, for Women in Red, Stefanie Nauheimer, Anna Schofield and more, and more to come, - user doing science and still alive. you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1654 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The Wikimedia movement strategy core team and working groups have completed reviewing the more than 1800 thematic statements we received from the first discussion. They have identified 5 themes that were consistent across all the conversations - each with their own set of sub-themes. These are not the final themes, just an initial working draft of the core concepts.
You are invited to join the online and offline discussions taking place on these 5 themes. This round of discussions will take place between now and June 12th. You can discuss as many as you like; we ask you to participate in the ones that are most (or least) important to you.
Here are the five themes, each has a page on Meta-Wiki with more information about the theme and how to participate in that theme's discussion:
- Healthy, Inclusive Communities
- The Augmented Age
- A Truly Global Movement
- The Most Respected Source of Knowledge
- Engaging in the Knowledge Ecosystem
On the movement strategy portal on Meta-Wiki, you can find more information about each of these themes, their discussions, and how to participate.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation • Please help translate to other languages. • Get help19:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Yael Azoulay, Mooeena!
Wikipedia editor Xyzspaniel just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Add citatons where requested
To reply, leave a comment on Xyzspaniel's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
XyzSpaniel Talk Page 23:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you undoing the changes by the vandals so thanks very much for that. But I see you are manually undoing each changes, this can be slow and it's also possible to miss out some changes. You can try out Twinkle to revert last changes by the same user in a page faster. To enable it just go to your preferences and find the gadgets tab, find Twinkle and enable it. Good luck! -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 01:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Oh, neat! Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 01:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
That was made for fun and NOT for anyone to actually take seriously Msareeba ( talk) 13:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC) The thing is, wikipedia articles aren't the place for jokes, or nobody would be able to find any information through the vandalism. Try Facebook next time. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 17:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi ( talk) 20:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
A145GI15I95 (
talk) 01:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Detransition. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! MrClog ( talk) 11:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- I have decided to close it because the dispute is primarily about user conduct, not content. MrClog ( talk) 13:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
MrClog ( talk) 13:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has declined the request for arbitration " Transgender-related POV editing". You and the other parties are encouraged to pursue other dispute resolution methods as necessary. Bradv 🍁 04:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Detransition shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry for templating you, but this is how I assure that the warnings I leave on the user talk pages of all involved editors are both fair and worded exactly the same, so that I don't appear to be playing favorites or giving anyone an advantage over someone else. :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yep, no hard feelings. I don't intend to revert the page any further in the next 24 hours. (Which, just for my own reference, is 8:37 PM tomorrow.)
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 03:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Cool deal! And I wouldn't intend to revert the article any further at all until any discussions regarding the dispute (as well as the ANI) have come to a
consensus and close. You don't want to be "that user" who tries to make three reverts every 24 hours in order to stay just out of the
3RR threshold. You can still be blocked for edit warring; 3RR is just a bright-line rule that, if violated, will almost always be interpreted as edit warring and any blocks applied will be considered appropriate and justified. In a nutshell: Edit warring doesn't mean that you're violating 3RR; violating 3RR means that you're edit warring. ;-)
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 04:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to imply that I would be further edit warring after that time, I'm just very forgetful so I take notes. I'm going to bring the content dispute to
WP:3O to find a resolution.
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 04:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, okay - I understand what you mean now. No worries; I just wanted to give my recommendations so you stay outta trouble! ;-) Perfect; that's a great idea, and I hope that it helps bring the dispute to a peaceful close and that the right decision is made. :-) Good luck, and please don't hesitate to message me on my user talk page if you need my input or advice, and I'll be more than happy to help you. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to imply that I would be further edit warring after that time, I'm just very forgetful so I take notes. I'm going to bring the content dispute to
WP:3O to find a resolution.
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 04:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Cool deal! And I wouldn't intend to revert the article any further at all until any discussions regarding the dispute (as well as the ANI) have come to a
consensus and close. You don't want to be "that user" who tries to make three reverts every 24 hours in order to stay just out of the
3RR threshold. You can still be blocked for edit warring; 3RR is just a bright-line rule that, if violated, will almost always be interpreted as edit warring and any blocks applied will be considered appropriate and justified. In a nutshell: Edit warring doesn't mean that you're violating 3RR; violating 3RR means that you're edit warring. ;-)
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 04:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I have been working on an essay to address some of the problems editors have with citation, and I would be interested in any comments you might have. It can be perused here. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 23:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
there is no edit summary why material was being removed or replaced - it always helps JarrahTree 01:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
I've added a summary. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 02:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
ok - but... JarrahTree 02:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Hello, I do Wiki LGBT+ things here at UVA. Are you in Cville also?
Sorry, have we met? If not can we meet to talk wiki? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC) |
You recently removed a portion of content from List of LGBT-related slurs. The information was well-sourced, so it will remain. Thank you. 84percent ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=LGBT_slang&diff=892518895&oldid=892510608
The same content also exists in this article: /info/en/?search=LGBT_linguistics
A145GI15I95 ( talk) 02:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- User:A145GI15I95 An article on linguistics can go into much greater detail on why and how language is used than the lede of a list. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 03:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't go into much further detail there. I don't mind either way, but I thought it might interest you, since it seemed to interest you in the article I'd edited. A145GI15I95 ( talk) 03:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Since we first met six weeks ago, you've filed three cases on me. [1] [2] [3] First was denied as premature. Second resulted in a long, abandoned thread. Third (last week) locked a page, disrupting other editors. [4]
There, another editor supported the impression that you're hounding and unreasonably deleting content. Another described us as good editors who need to resolve a conflict. I requested advice and was told to seek mediation or file a dispute resolution request or administrators' noticeboard/incident on you. The docs of those options suggest user-talk communication first.
May I ask plainly: Are you searching or following me on or outside Wikipedia? Are you deleting content you perceive added or supported by me?
Examples last week:
- The deletion of content from me on a slang page, but not of the same content by another editor on another page [5]: Granted, similar articles are in your contributions. And I don't disagree with the deletion, but no change to the other page seemed odd. Did you follow me there? Did you delete the contribution because it appeared to come from me?
- The repeated deletion of content on a feminism page [6]: You'd previously not contributed to that page before last week. Your first edits were on a thread forked from my comment. Granted, similar articles are in your contributions, and I appreciate your later expression that you'd "jumped the gun". Still, did you follow me there? Did you delete the content because you saw it as favored by me?
- The claim of "close personal connection" to specific social networks on that same page [7]: Why name outside networks and claim association in logs? Are you searching or following me outside Wikipedia? Does your perception of me off-Wiki affect our work here?
- The log-less deletion of content on a Star Wars page [8]: You've no previous edits on Star Wars articles. How did you find yourself there? Why did you delete this? Why leave no log?
Can you see how this appears? Do you feel I've done so to you?
I don't wish to shame or irritate in this writing. Rather than report, I prefer personal resolution. We share an interest; we can expect to meet again. Let's clear past air and move forward. I've disagreed with other editors, and we've later approached new topics with fresh attitudes, even supported each other. I'd like that to be so with us. What would you like?
Thank you, A145GI15I95 ( talk) 17:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Many of those pages are on my watch page (I don't plan to address them point-by-point), but I will answer your larger question.
- I believe that many of the edits that you make on this wiki, especially regarding transgender or feminist topics, favor a specific trans-exclusionary point of view. I have both in article space and talk pages attempted to bring these topics to a respectful, encyclopedic standard. You will find that there are many perfectly good edits of yours that I haven't touched. For instance, you are excellent at copyediting articles.
- Last month, while I was searching for resources on detransition, I found posts by accounts with your then-current username on both Reddit and Urban Dictionary. Some of these posts had frankly offensive content which has certainly colored my impressions of your intentions here. However, you will note that I have linked to nor quoted neither out of respect for your feelings on internet security.
- While I certainly don't hold a vendetta against you personally, I believe that you will find, if your previous editing patterns continue, that we will continue to butt heads over content in the future. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 00:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- This is more than "butting heads". Apart from how I feel, it's affected other editors.
- The three pages noted above had no previous activity from you. The "Cultural Impact of SW" article is particularly niche. Why would these be on your watchlist but only show you active after my activity? Is the timing of coincidence?
- You began to name networks (named and not named in the dox) one day after the dox was posted to a page where you'd contributed. But you didn't search me? Is this timing also coincidence?
- I may find bias and offense in your views too. But we're peers here; I'd like to be sure we're being fair and honest with each other, please.
A145GI15I95 (
talk) 16:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- I will answer your question this once. I don't plan to repeat myself. I am not lying about finding your off-wiki activity from what you insist is a dox. This timing is a coincidence. Posts by your former username using terms and preferences that you repeat here are extremely prominent in the search results for "detrans." I don't expect you to admit any association with these avenues, but you and I both know that they are true. Please stop insinuating that there is some sort of conspiracy against you perpetrated by myself and others. I am tired of reiterating this to you.
- Again, if you continue your pattern of editing in the future, I will likely oppose you on the talk page. We have opposing views. That's how these things work.
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 02:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'd like to repeat that I'm not trying to irritate you, I'm trying to resolve the personal conflict that other editors and I have noted in multiple threads. I want to be sure I understand you, and I'm only seeeing partial answers. I hear you say you didn't search for me off-wiki—that the timing of your in-wiki claims to my off-wiki activity is coincidental to my admin-confirmed doxxing—and I appreciate you answering that. Are you also saying your entrances into in-wiki conversations and your deletions are coincidental to my in-wiki participation (the log-less Star Wars deletion being the most peculiar example), or did those examples have a different explanation? Thank you, A145 ( talk) 19:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mooeena! my next text for "radical feminism" I put in my sandbox, please have a look! I have a few questions, e.g. the headlines have a link to wikipedia articles - now they are bold and blue - shure this is somehow wrong... I hope you may explain how it has to be done? Lucida thanks!
Lucida 20:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Template:Alternate reality game page has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Alanna (The Song of the Lioness) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TTN (
talk) 20:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brown College at Monroe Hill
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Brown College at Monroe Hill you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kingsif --
Kingsif (
talk) 04:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brown College at Monroe Hill
The article
Brown College at Monroe Hill you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Brown College at Monroe Hill for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kingsif --
Kingsif (
talk) 05:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
|
Hello Mooeena, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Category:Members of The Archaeology Club has been nominated for deletion
Category:Members of The Archaeology Club has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
|
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Members of Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores has been nominated for deletion
Category:Members of Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Concern regarding Draft:Wings of Fire (novel series)
Hello, Mooeena. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Wings of Fire (novel series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Wings of Fire (novel series)
Hello, Mooeena. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Wings of Fire".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, this is Sean King. I recognize I engaged in an edit war five years ago on the Gab page. And I apologize.
Reflecting on it, I was wrong. Gab is an alt-right site and I believe it's time to admit Torba's not actually pro-freedom of speech.
Personal opinion aside, I hope to be a better contributor to the Wikipedia community going forward. I know you and others may not forgive me immediately. But I will do my best to have better conduct going forward. Happy editing! N0rjfofjifefeifjwef ( talk) 18:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
|
|
|
Thanks for taking part in the Take Back the Night edit-a-thon! Your article looks great! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC) |
Hello Mooeena, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Allan G. Johnson has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 23:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Allan G. Johnson
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Allan G. Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Diannaa ( talk) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
The article The Gender Knot: Unraveling our Patriarchal Legacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non notable book by non notable author
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Diannaa (
talk) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- I took care of this - the book article is safe. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- I also saved Johnson's article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Haha thanks! Mooeena ( talk) 02:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:First Location of St. Johns Country Day School.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
I've just noticed you've signed up as a member of Women in Red. That's great as I see you have been creating articles along the lines we want. I've added your name to our mailing list to keep you informed of our activities. If even you run into any problems, just let me know.-- Ipigott ( talk) 19:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks! Mooeena ( talk) 20:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Mooeena! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 16:26, Friday, September 30, 2016 ( UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Thanks for creating Alanna (The Song of the Lioness), Mooeena!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Are you able to help add sources and show how the character meets WP:NOTABILITY for a stand-alone article? Thanks for your help.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 19:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk) 15:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jeanne Smith
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Jeanne Smith, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a
speedy deletion tag from
Jeanne Smith, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 03:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeanne Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens
The article
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk) 21:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens
The article
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk) 09:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Congratulations! I was hoping I'd done this correctly and now you've got the notification. It's a very nice article on an interesting museum. Thanks for responding so fully and so promptly to the issues raised during the review. Best regards. KJP1 ( talk) 09:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 10:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk) 04:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Accidental revert on Hedgesville High School
You may get a notice that I reverted a recent edit you made to Hedgesville High School. I just wanted you to know that it was a mistake and I have restored your edit. My apologies.
-- KNHaw (talk) 23:51, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
By the way, for your recent edit on my edit of the plot of three film Dhuruvangal Pathinaaru, why do you think remaining text makes no sense? Have you even seen the film? I have. And I feel if nothing, then at least the beginning and ending lines should be removed for letting the viewer enjoy the film. Why be so mechanical? Wikipedia is not an epic to contain everything.
The film is a murder mystery, and has revealed every single thing about the film. Can't a synopsis be better? I strongly dislike this rule of Wikipedia to include and reveal everything about a film. Afterall, a film is meant to be seen and not be read. MyBleedingHeart ( talk) 04:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, @MyBleedingHeart, my reasoning for why your edited summary didn't make sense was that it cut out some of the motivations for the characters and why/how certain events happen. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a review website, so we have to include the entire plot. There are many examples of mysteries revealing the ending in their wiki plot summary. See The Sixth Sense for what I mean. On a website like IMBD which is intended to give a taste of a movie a synopsis may be appropriate, but that is not the kind of website that Wikipedia is. Do you get what I'm saying? I'd be happy to answer any other questions you may have, but it's not actually in my power to change the rules of Wikipedia. -- Mooeena ( talk) 14:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk) 19:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
On 11 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens was selected for the United States' National Register of Historic Places? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 04:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
women and garden museum
Thank you for quality articles such as Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens, for Women in Red, Stefanie Nauheimer, Anna Schofield and more, and more to come, - user doing science and still alive. you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1654 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The Wikimedia movement strategy core team and working groups have completed reviewing the more than 1800 thematic statements we received from the first discussion. They have identified 5 themes that were consistent across all the conversations - each with their own set of sub-themes. These are not the final themes, just an initial working draft of the core concepts.
You are invited to join the online and offline discussions taking place on these 5 themes. This round of discussions will take place between now and June 12th. You can discuss as many as you like; we ask you to participate in the ones that are most (or least) important to you.
Here are the five themes, each has a page on Meta-Wiki with more information about the theme and how to participate in that theme's discussion:
- Healthy, Inclusive Communities
- The Augmented Age
- A Truly Global Movement
- The Most Respected Source of Knowledge
- Engaging in the Knowledge Ecosystem
On the movement strategy portal on Meta-Wiki, you can find more information about each of these themes, their discussions, and how to participate.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation • Please help translate to other languages. • Get help19:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Yael Azoulay, Mooeena!
Wikipedia editor Xyzspaniel just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Add citatons where requested
To reply, leave a comment on Xyzspaniel's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
XyzSpaniel Talk Page 23:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you undoing the changes by the vandals so thanks very much for that. But I see you are manually undoing each changes, this can be slow and it's also possible to miss out some changes. You can try out Twinkle to revert last changes by the same user in a page faster. To enable it just go to your preferences and find the gadgets tab, find Twinkle and enable it. Good luck! -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 01:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Oh, neat! Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 01:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
That was made for fun and NOT for anyone to actually take seriously Msareeba ( talk) 13:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC) The thing is, wikipedia articles aren't the place for jokes, or nobody would be able to find any information through the vandalism. Try Facebook next time. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 17:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi ( talk) 20:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
A145GI15I95 (
talk) 01:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Detransition. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! MrClog ( talk) 11:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- I have decided to close it because the dispute is primarily about user conduct, not content. MrClog ( talk) 13:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
MrClog ( talk) 13:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has declined the request for arbitration " Transgender-related POV editing". You and the other parties are encouraged to pursue other dispute resolution methods as necessary. Bradv 🍁 04:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Detransition shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry for templating you, but this is how I assure that the warnings I leave on the user talk pages of all involved editors are both fair and worded exactly the same, so that I don't appear to be playing favorites or giving anyone an advantage over someone else. :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yep, no hard feelings. I don't intend to revert the page any further in the next 24 hours. (Which, just for my own reference, is 8:37 PM tomorrow.)
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 03:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Cool deal! And I wouldn't intend to revert the article any further at all until any discussions regarding the dispute (as well as the ANI) have come to a
consensus and close. You don't want to be "that user" who tries to make three reverts every 24 hours in order to stay just out of the
3RR threshold. You can still be blocked for edit warring; 3RR is just a bright-line rule that, if violated, will almost always be interpreted as edit warring and any blocks applied will be considered appropriate and justified. In a nutshell: Edit warring doesn't mean that you're violating 3RR; violating 3RR means that you're edit warring. ;-)
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 04:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to imply that I would be further edit warring after that time, I'm just very forgetful so I take notes. I'm going to bring the content dispute to
WP:3O to find a resolution.
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 04:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, okay - I understand what you mean now. No worries; I just wanted to give my recommendations so you stay outta trouble! ;-) Perfect; that's a great idea, and I hope that it helps bring the dispute to a peaceful close and that the right decision is made. :-) Good luck, and please don't hesitate to message me on my user talk page if you need my input or advice, and I'll be more than happy to help you. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to imply that I would be further edit warring after that time, I'm just very forgetful so I take notes. I'm going to bring the content dispute to
WP:3O to find a resolution.
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 04:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Cool deal! And I wouldn't intend to revert the article any further at all until any discussions regarding the dispute (as well as the ANI) have come to a
consensus and close. You don't want to be "that user" who tries to make three reverts every 24 hours in order to stay just out of the
3RR threshold. You can still be blocked for edit warring; 3RR is just a bright-line rule that, if violated, will almost always be interpreted as edit warring and any blocks applied will be considered appropriate and justified. In a nutshell: Edit warring doesn't mean that you're violating 3RR; violating 3RR means that you're edit warring. ;-)
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 04:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I have been working on an essay to address some of the problems editors have with citation, and I would be interested in any comments you might have. It can be perused here. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 23:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
there is no edit summary why material was being removed or replaced - it always helps JarrahTree 01:31, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
I've added a summary. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 02:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
ok - but... JarrahTree 02:23, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Hello, I do Wiki LGBT+ things here at UVA. Are you in Cville also?
Sorry, have we met? If not can we meet to talk wiki? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC) |
You recently removed a portion of content from List of LGBT-related slurs. The information was well-sourced, so it will remain. Thank you. 84percent ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:41, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=LGBT_slang&diff=892518895&oldid=892510608
The same content also exists in this article: /info/en/?search=LGBT_linguistics
A145GI15I95 ( talk) 02:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- User:A145GI15I95 An article on linguistics can go into much greater detail on why and how language is used than the lede of a list. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 03:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't go into much further detail there. I don't mind either way, but I thought it might interest you, since it seemed to interest you in the article I'd edited. A145GI15I95 ( talk) 03:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Since we first met six weeks ago, you've filed three cases on me. [1] [2] [3] First was denied as premature. Second resulted in a long, abandoned thread. Third (last week) locked a page, disrupting other editors. [4]
There, another editor supported the impression that you're hounding and unreasonably deleting content. Another described us as good editors who need to resolve a conflict. I requested advice and was told to seek mediation or file a dispute resolution request or administrators' noticeboard/incident on you. The docs of those options suggest user-talk communication first.
May I ask plainly: Are you searching or following me on or outside Wikipedia? Are you deleting content you perceive added or supported by me?
Examples last week:
- The deletion of content from me on a slang page, but not of the same content by another editor on another page [5]: Granted, similar articles are in your contributions. And I don't disagree with the deletion, but no change to the other page seemed odd. Did you follow me there? Did you delete the contribution because it appeared to come from me?
- The repeated deletion of content on a feminism page [6]: You'd previously not contributed to that page before last week. Your first edits were on a thread forked from my comment. Granted, similar articles are in your contributions, and I appreciate your later expression that you'd "jumped the gun". Still, did you follow me there? Did you delete the content because you saw it as favored by me?
- The claim of "close personal connection" to specific social networks on that same page [7]: Why name outside networks and claim association in logs? Are you searching or following me outside Wikipedia? Does your perception of me off-Wiki affect our work here?
- The log-less deletion of content on a Star Wars page [8]: You've no previous edits on Star Wars articles. How did you find yourself there? Why did you delete this? Why leave no log?
Can you see how this appears? Do you feel I've done so to you?
I don't wish to shame or irritate in this writing. Rather than report, I prefer personal resolution. We share an interest; we can expect to meet again. Let's clear past air and move forward. I've disagreed with other editors, and we've later approached new topics with fresh attitudes, even supported each other. I'd like that to be so with us. What would you like?
Thank you, A145GI15I95 ( talk) 17:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Many of those pages are on my watch page (I don't plan to address them point-by-point), but I will answer your larger question.
- I believe that many of the edits that you make on this wiki, especially regarding transgender or feminist topics, favor a specific trans-exclusionary point of view. I have both in article space and talk pages attempted to bring these topics to a respectful, encyclopedic standard. You will find that there are many perfectly good edits of yours that I haven't touched. For instance, you are excellent at copyediting articles.
- Last month, while I was searching for resources on detransition, I found posts by accounts with your then-current username on both Reddit and Urban Dictionary. Some of these posts had frankly offensive content which has certainly colored my impressions of your intentions here. However, you will note that I have linked to nor quoted neither out of respect for your feelings on internet security.
- While I certainly don't hold a vendetta against you personally, I believe that you will find, if your previous editing patterns continue, that we will continue to butt heads over content in the future. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 00:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- This is more than "butting heads". Apart from how I feel, it's affected other editors.
- The three pages noted above had no previous activity from you. The "Cultural Impact of SW" article is particularly niche. Why would these be on your watchlist but only show you active after my activity? Is the timing of coincidence?
- You began to name networks (named and not named in the dox) one day after the dox was posted to a page where you'd contributed. But you didn't search me? Is this timing also coincidence?
- I may find bias and offense in your views too. But we're peers here; I'd like to be sure we're being fair and honest with each other, please.
A145GI15I95 (
talk) 16:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- I will answer your question this once. I don't plan to repeat myself. I am not lying about finding your off-wiki activity from what you insist is a dox. This timing is a coincidence. Posts by your former username using terms and preferences that you repeat here are extremely prominent in the search results for "detrans." I don't expect you to admit any association with these avenues, but you and I both know that they are true. Please stop insinuating that there is some sort of conspiracy against you perpetrated by myself and others. I am tired of reiterating this to you.
- Again, if you continue your pattern of editing in the future, I will likely oppose you on the talk page. We have opposing views. That's how these things work.
Mooeena ●
💌 ●
✒️ ●
❓ 02:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'd like to repeat that I'm not trying to irritate you, I'm trying to resolve the personal conflict that other editors and I have noted in multiple threads. I want to be sure I understand you, and I'm only seeeing partial answers. I hear you say you didn't search for me off-wiki—that the timing of your in-wiki claims to my off-wiki activity is coincidental to my admin-confirmed doxxing—and I appreciate you answering that. Are you also saying your entrances into in-wiki conversations and your deletions are coincidental to my in-wiki participation (the log-less Star Wars deletion being the most peculiar example), or did those examples have a different explanation? Thank you, A145 ( talk) 19:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mooeena! my next text for "radical feminism" I put in my sandbox, please have a look! I have a few questions, e.g. the headlines have a link to wikipedia articles - now they are bold and blue - shure this is somehow wrong... I hope you may explain how it has to be done? Lucida thanks!
Lucida 20:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Template:Alternate reality game page has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Alanna (The Song of the Lioness) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TTN (
talk) 20:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brown College at Monroe Hill
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Brown College at Monroe Hill you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kingsif --
Kingsif (
talk) 04:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brown College at Monroe Hill
The article
Brown College at Monroe Hill you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Brown College at Monroe Hill for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Kingsif --
Kingsif (
talk) 05:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
|
Hello Mooeena, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Category:Members of The Archaeology Club has been nominated for deletion
Category:Members of The Archaeology Club has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
|
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Members of Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores has been nominated for deletion
Category:Members of Rei Cretariae Romanae Fautores has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Concern regarding Draft:Wings of Fire (novel series)
Hello, Mooeena. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Wings of Fire (novel series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Wings of Fire (novel series)
Hello, Mooeena. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Wings of Fire".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, this is Sean King. I recognize I engaged in an edit war five years ago on the Gab page. And I apologize.
Reflecting on it, I was wrong. Gab is an alt-right site and I believe it's time to admit Torba's not actually pro-freedom of speech.
Personal opinion aside, I hope to be a better contributor to the Wikipedia community going forward. I know you and others may not forgive me immediately. But I will do my best to have better conduct going forward. Happy editing! N0rjfofjifefeifjwef ( talk) 18:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)