|
Good job leaving a note on my talk page ( [1]). I see you did leave a proper signature ( Wikipedia:Signature), that's great. Also, good job adding yourself to your group ( [2]). Keep up the good job, and try making more edits on Wikipedia to get a feel for it! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Your citation here looks good! You may want to consider using cite templates in the future. Consider using this gadget (optional, but useful). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 03:45, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm. Why do you think this information needs to be shortened? While I am not saying that you are wrong, you may find that this could be controversial to some; people usually prefer to see content being added than removed. You may want to focus on adding content rather than removing it. See also: WP:SPOILER, WP:PLOT, Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(writing_about_fiction)#Plot_summaries (and check the two links there). You may want to wait with more rewritings/deletions till you've assimilated the information there (and if you want to continue that then, go ahead - one somebody challenges you, you'll now have some hard rules to fall back on :) ). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
You almost got it. I moved the cite book where it was supposed to be: [4]. Let me know if you have any questions (you created it fine, but you did not put it between the ref tags). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 05:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Good edits, also with the new articles. You may want to add more blue links ( WP:BTW); otherwise it looks quite professional. You may want to expanded them beyond stub for easier DYKs (see WP:DYK for all you could ever want to know about this part of Wikipedia). I'll post a comment on how close your article is to DYK on the talk page of the article in a few minutes, it seems a little short, but not by much (if you could get your teammates to chip in within <5 days, you should be able to do it). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 02:27, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Third-Party custody with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 03:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Compare, Karl: Bird's nest custody, Birds' nest custody... :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
1) WP:MOSBOLD (and see the section on "How not to apply emphasis"). Long story short: no bold beyond the lead. 2) Yes, I agree bundling is not necessary. 3) K. 4) I'll nominate it for you know, would hate for you t lose a DYK chance because of a few hour delay. Merger should not be of any importance. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 01:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Probably fine for DYK without too much global scope. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 06:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Posted my comments at its talk page. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to thank you for your help with the "family honor" article. -- Esery ( talk) 15:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
I recommend doing a citation bundle, rather than spacing throughout the sentence. Do that, or separate the content into multiple sentences and then give each the appropriate citation. This page will tell you how to do bundling. I can help if you need it. -- AstroCog ( talk) 13:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
On 20 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joint custody (United States), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in some joint custody arrangements, children reside in one house and the parents move in and out from separate residences? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Congratulations on getting your group article's to GA, and for your help to other students. In my book, this merits the "real" Wikipedia award - the original barnstar. Enjoy! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
This is not vandalism, so please learn what vandalism is. What he did was comply with WP:OVERLINK. PumpkinSky talk 01:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey Karl, time to come back and edit Wikipedia - we miss you :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
[8]. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Good job leaving a note on my talk page ( [1]). I see you did leave a proper signature ( Wikipedia:Signature), that's great. Also, good job adding yourself to your group ( [2]). Keep up the good job, and try making more edits on Wikipedia to get a feel for it! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Your citation here looks good! You may want to consider using cite templates in the future. Consider using this gadget (optional, but useful). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 03:45, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm. Why do you think this information needs to be shortened? While I am not saying that you are wrong, you may find that this could be controversial to some; people usually prefer to see content being added than removed. You may want to focus on adding content rather than removing it. See also: WP:SPOILER, WP:PLOT, Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(writing_about_fiction)#Plot_summaries (and check the two links there). You may want to wait with more rewritings/deletions till you've assimilated the information there (and if you want to continue that then, go ahead - one somebody challenges you, you'll now have some hard rules to fall back on :) ). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
You almost got it. I moved the cite book where it was supposed to be: [4]. Let me know if you have any questions (you created it fine, but you did not put it between the ref tags). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 05:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Good edits, also with the new articles. You may want to add more blue links ( WP:BTW); otherwise it looks quite professional. You may want to expanded them beyond stub for easier DYKs (see WP:DYK for all you could ever want to know about this part of Wikipedia). I'll post a comment on how close your article is to DYK on the talk page of the article in a few minutes, it seems a little short, but not by much (if you could get your teammates to chip in within <5 days, you should be able to do it). -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 02:27, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Third-Party custody with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin 03:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Compare, Karl: Bird's nest custody, Birds' nest custody... :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 04:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
1) WP:MOSBOLD (and see the section on "How not to apply emphasis"). Long story short: no bold beyond the lead. 2) Yes, I agree bundling is not necessary. 3) K. 4) I'll nominate it for you know, would hate for you t lose a DYK chance because of a few hour delay. Merger should not be of any importance. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 01:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Probably fine for DYK without too much global scope. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 06:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Posted my comments at its talk page. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to thank you for your help with the "family honor" article. -- Esery ( talk) 15:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
I recommend doing a citation bundle, rather than spacing throughout the sentence. Do that, or separate the content into multiple sentences and then give each the appropriate citation. This page will tell you how to do bundling. I can help if you need it. -- AstroCog ( talk) 13:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
On 20 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joint custody (United States), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in some joint custody arrangements, children reside in one house and the parents move in and out from separate residences? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Congratulations on getting your group article's to GA, and for your help to other students. In my book, this merits the "real" Wikipedia award - the original barnstar. Enjoy! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
This is not vandalism, so please learn what vandalism is. What he did was comply with WP:OVERLINK. PumpkinSky talk 01:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey Karl, time to come back and edit Wikipedia - we miss you :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
[8]. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)