This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Sorry, its been a long day, and i am not usually this absent minded when trying to create such simply pages. Thanks for the help. I'm going to stop tinkering with the archive pages (all of them) before I screw something else up. Thanks for your help. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Since you expressed interest: Pre-proposal for redlink-removing bot - Pseudomonas( talk) 13:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
OK its installed but nothings changed? Hmm. — Realist2 ( Who's Bad?) 14:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
i r in a cats u? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.203.139.170 ( talk) 16:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
There is no doubt that the speech is more sought after than the book ( http://stats.grok.se/en/200806/A_More_Perfect_Union_(Speech) vs http://stats.grok.se/en/200806/A More Perfect Union: Advancing New American Rights). The question is whether more people who enter that phrase are looking for the Preamble to the United States Constitution for which it is the stated first objective. I guess a move would be O.K., but is there a way to see the clickthroughs on the preamble link?-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my page.-- Greg D. Barnes ( talk) 01:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
May I request semi-protection please???!!!-- Greg D. Barnes ( talk) 02:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thx 4 the help with the table 76.215.109.166 ( talk) 03:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning Rollback, it certainly sounds useful. I'll definitely request it.
Thanks again, Fieldday-sunday ( talk) 13:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. :) In the turn-about is fair play category, I'd like to ask you if you'd mind looking at a copyright problem I'm having trouble investigating here. I've cleared out everything except St. Agnes Catholic High School, and I can't get the listed sources to load. I don't know if this is a problem on my end. I'm not sure what I'm going to do if you can't get them to load, either. I tried searching wayback with no luck. I know that you're not online atm, but this is not urgent. When you can. :D -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I remember you from before and you seem pretty knowledgeable, so I have a question. In the matter of professional reviews for music albums and posting the reviews on articles, does Wikipedia look for professionalism, or reviewer notability? If you know a link pointing in either direction, please provide, I can't find any. If not, just give me your opinion, please. dude527 ( talk) 21:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I have been editing on wikipedia for a good while and I was wondering how my edit was not helpful? Thank you. Ehccheehcche ( talk) 01:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm... no, you did the right thing. I was trying to revert that sentence but when I got to edit it, I couldn't find it... I think I made a mistake somehow. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ehccheehcche (
talk •
contribs) 01:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Your talk page is now move-protected. Keep up the good work. :-) Regards, Hús ö nd 02:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
...I couldn't agree more :) SWik78 ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Gah! Sorry. That was a big mistake! I'll be more careful in future. Sorry again! Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
? KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/68.79.123.131 Special:Contributions/68.79.91.174
I can give you more if you want. J.delanoy gabs adds 00:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
←Not my conversation, but you remove the report with a note of how you messed up in the edit summary. You report the actual vandal. You 'fess up to CBW and chuckle over it together. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Here is the review in question
Please help us reach a valid consensus on the Rolling Stone section of Indestructible's talk page. This user is, frankly, not willing to give this up, at all, the argument about whether the review by The Rolling Stone belongs in the article or not. The argument first started as me finding reasons for it to stay, but after you sent me a couple links, he is now trying to twist those a little, such as trying to make it seem as though reviews should be factual-based, and not opinion. I don't know, I think this review should stay here because it's listed in section of reliable reviews for Wikipedia, it meets the criteria for being a reliable source (although, it did get one fact wrong, but I already stated, reviews are supposed to be opinion), and it passes the album review section as well.
Now his argument is quite different. He says that, because the review is written unprofessionally (it takes a few personal cuts at the band), it should be taken down. He also says that one sentence from the reliable sources section insinuates this as well. Here is that sentence: "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy," and he says that the one fact that the review got wrong makes it fail those standards. He also states that, because of the way this sentence in the WP:Album is worded (Sentence is: "When choosing which reviews to include, consider the notability of the review source and keeping a neutral point of view."), it insinuates that notability is not important in choosing reviews, that it's simply another thing to consider, but not important.
I admit he forms a nice argument, but, surely, as this is reviewer is listed in the list of reliable reviewers, that should dispel the insinuations that it is unreliable.
I don't want you to run in and support me, off the bat. I want you to run in, read the comments previously made, and from those, form your own opinion, and then comment. Here's the page again. dude527 ( talk) 12:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 00:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
For this - it's been a busy week :-) Cheers! Frank | talk 01:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind comment:-) I didn't know you've noticed me, but I'm not shocked;-) I put lots of time into keeping wikipedia clean of vandalism, and I would be shocked if people didn't notice my work. How long have you been fighting vandalism on wikipedia?-- SJP Chat 21:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You caught the copyvio only seconds before me! :P Lol. Should I report the username to UAA? - Warthog Demon 02:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I'd give you another kindness barnstar for helping me with the template stuff, but I've already done that. :) Just wanted to let you know that I've just used your modified template, and I appreciate it. Also that I'm glad to have you around. Nice to have colleagues who can do stuff and who are friendly and willing to help! :D -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
for your welcome note. I'm a 'retired' contributor who now edits vandalism, anonymously. Cheers, 99.0.80.176 ( talk) 01:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
...same thing on many user talk pages. header shortened so that the TOC doesn't take up half the page.
Hi. I wrote to all the people who voted keep here: [1].-- 87.28.126.85 ( talk) 15:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Please see my userpage. Schfifty Three 19:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Help fix the shirts on Celtic FC ,I don't know how. 宁雨翔 ( talk) 22:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
do you NOT realize they look different,earlier in the afternoon ,the page was vandalised by rangers supporters,some of the mistakes have already been fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YXN ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
What's with your userpage. Licking chairs???? What happened?-- Anfish ( talk) 13:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh my goodness, I hate vandalism. Why do people even do it you know what I mean. It's pointless. Oh and sorry, I forgot to sign on my last comment.-- Anfish ( talk) 13:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I suggest getting your userpage semi-protected. I looked at your page history and it said that an IP was the one who messed it up. If you do that non users won't be able to edit your page. That should stop some of the vandalism. On the other hand, I think it's kind of stupid how that IP user calls himself Mr.Vandal. That's just idiotic. Don't you think. -- Anfish ( talk) 14:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
It's your choice. I'm just giving a suggestion. Do what you want I'm not holding you back. -- Anfish ( talk) 14:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
No, My fault I'm sorry. I didn't mean the above comment in a negative way I'm just telling you to go with the flow. Make your own choices you know. You didn't do anything wrong. I have a problem with wording things in the right way. Well really let's drop this subject and get back to contributing. This is a waste of time right now. If you reply to this i won't be replying back for a while. Meet you later. -- Anfish ( talk) 14:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I cannot believe that I, non-scripted, non autmoated, oldman Keeper, have beaten you, Huggler extraordinaire, in reverting your very own userpage. Absolutely made my day. Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 15:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Huggle is a great tool. However, when I edit a page to remove an advertisement, and in my edit summary I state "removed advert", that's EXACTLY what I was doing. Please do not revert like this again. BMW (drive) 16:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I cannot view the edits by new contributors, i.e. those who have opened account, while using huggle. I can only view the edits bu anonymous IPs. Do you know how to view the edits by contributors with usernames? Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Under other circumstances I would not have reverted/warned, but it was an active vandal. ... discospinster talk 03:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Tiptoety has granted me, Beam the power of Dictator of ULTIMATE Awesome. This is simply an announcement for now. More details on my powers to come later. Beam 03:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello J.delanoy. I'm a bit short on time recently and do not think I would be able to nominate you for adminship. However, if you wish to wait for me to be your nominator, I may become active again in September and October. Hope you are enjoying your summer! ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 16:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
And another task for you. I've begun really trawling your contrib history. It's clear that you're not really a content contributor, but more a vandal whacker. That's fine. The days when admins were required to have written an FA are long gone. However, I think it'd be good for you to be able to demonstrate that you understand what articles should be like in a positive manner, not just the negative (ie deletion process). A good way to do this is by chipping in at Peer Review. Have you spent much time at those pages? Have a look through some well developed reviews and let me know when you're ready for the next steps! -- Dweller ( talk) 12:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
OK, here's where I see it. I suggested doing some AfD and PR work, not to kid anyone that you're anything that you're not, but so people could be assured that you understand deletion process and (because you're not a content editor) encyclopedia work respectively. However, your response is admirable. If anything, I'm more convinced of your suitability for adminship for your reply. I think you'll probably incur some objections that you may not have done if you'd gone with my suggestion, but, goodness, I would hope that your splendid reply should earn you plenty of support. Not least for convincingly demonstrating that you're not "power-hungry"!
I've not really seen how your interactions with others are, as they're swamped with automated messages. If you've been level-headed, civil and communicative with others for at least the last good few months, I'm prepared to nominate you on Monday. -- Dweller ( talk) 15:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
You are very insensitive. If you think a terrorist should be called a militant your from a different planet. This man brutaly murdered a non-combatent family. What he did was a nazi act. Please consider at least calling him a terrorist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yisrael77 ( talk • contribs) 18:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
No worries. I thought about reverting it all and protecting the page myself, but I guess he has the right to argue the block, same as everyone else. Tan ǀ 39 18:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. I'm curious to know what you think the AfD in general, as there's been a lot of back-and-forth on both sides. It's been a little crazy, but I'm doing my best to keep a level head. Cheers! TN‑ X- Man 19:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi J. Delanoy, I felt the nagging compulsion to drop you a note after I read your comment at your RfA's talk page : ) I hope you understand the rationale behind my oppose, and that it is absolutely not a reflection of you as an editor. In fact, you're work is valued, and your anti-vandalism is tenacious and impressive. However, I just feel uncomfortable supporting give my criteria. Cheers mate. And good luck with the RfA. Wisdom89 ( T / C) 20:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 07:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I think it's going pretty well, which is as you deserve. Hope you're OK. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, just wondering if you could revert your waraning on my talk page that happened when we both reverted another article at the same time. I see you got your double revert there but it left the mistaken waraning on my talk page. Thanks. Ajh16 ( talk) 15:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar | ||
I was waiting for your RfA to turn up, because I have seen you around this encyclopedia all over the place, and you have done such a lot for this project. And we have a lot in common; when I was ran for RfA, I was primarily a vandal-fighter, and as for age, I wasn't then 18 either. In recognition of your fantastic work here, I feel you deserve this barnstar, as well as my support for your RfA. Very best wishes, Lra drama 11:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC) |
That was actually only one reason. I will change it for you, but it will still be an oppose (albeit a weak one). I do so hope you do not take this as an attack on you personally, it's just that I have an unwritten criteria. Asenine 23:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
FFor being faster than me at editing vandalism on my own userpage, I award you this Special Barnstar. Keep it up! NuclearWarfare ( talk) 00:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC) |
Hey J, the RfA is looking good! Your prod of this should have been a speedy tag. See the deletion log for why I went ahead and deleted it. You might want to amend the message left to the user who created it so that they do not become confused. Cheers. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Person Who Knows Stuff®. Do you by any chance know how to tell somebody who doesn't Know Stuff how to clear out all the automatic fill-in edit summaries and whatnot? I know this is on my local computer, but I don't know where to go to wipe it. I hate to lose my useful edit summaries, but it'll be worth it to lose the "one time use only" ones. If it matters, I use Mozilla. And if this falls into the category of Stuff You Don't Know®, please don't sweat it. I'm not asking you to research it for me. I just figured if you happened to know off the top of your head, you could save me some time. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for doing this. A shame our friend the creator didn't listen to the first request to change it 300 articles ago ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
SUper stuff. I'll give you a bell in the future if I need anything. The only thing I can think of offhand is that the articles in Category:British films need the {{CinemaoftheUK}} template adding to the foot of the page to connect the years in film and articles all together. It isn't urgent but it will need doing gradually. It could probably be done by AWB ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, it looks set fair, so I don't feel too guilty about sailing off into the sunset and leaving you to your fate. I look forward to shaking your en-broomed hand on my return. Well done. -- Dweller ( talk) 13:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, J.delanoy. I'm just here to wish you good luck on your RfA. I'm very positive that it will turn out successful. Anyways, good luck! Schfifty Three 22:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, block anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on articles for deletion for more than 5 days (provided there's a consensus), protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.
Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun! =Nichalp «Talk»==Nichalp «Talk»= 13:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats...here's your shirt! :-) Frank | talk 13:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats J.d Seraphim♥ Whipp 14:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! — Rlevse • Talk • 14:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! :-) — αἰτίας • discussion• 19:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RfA! Do everything you're supposed to and nothing you're not! Make sure to check out the new admin school. Good luck and feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Glass Cobra 19:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Many congratulations, utilise the mop well. :-) — Mizu onna sango15 Hello! 19:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Well done, I hope you don't get RSI sending thankyou messages, what with all those "support" (!)votes! - Toon 05 19:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! =) sephiroth bcr ( converse) 20:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! Try not to burn out though, okay? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 00:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Well done! keep up the good work!! :)
--
Badgernet
Talk 09:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! Use those tools carefully, though. Now that you're a sysop, you'll be able to block, delete, protect, and do other stuff. Good luck! Schfifty Three 14:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Yay...*huggles delanoy* Congratulations! Do your best with the mop!
IceUnshattered (
talk) 18:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi J.delanoy, congratulations on passing your request for adminship. :) I'm impressed with how well you did, nice one. The only thing I find disappointing is that you'll now stop going to me for help in deleting a page, protecting your talk, or blocking a vandal. :D Heh, heh, good luck with your new tools. You know where I am if you need help. Best wishes. Acalamari 16:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Ncmvocalist ( talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send kittens to others by adding {{ subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Twas very sweet of you to make the personalized messages like that - cheers. :) I'm sorry I didn't end up getting to ask those questions as I'd planned...I kinda forgot *turns bright red*... but if the supports are anything to go by, you should be fine ;) Best wishes, and congratulations! Ncmvocalist ( talk) 21:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
This gave me a bit of a chuckle when I saw it on my watchlist. :P Glass Cobra 03:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! I hope you will be successful as an admin. Regards, Masterpiece2000 ( talk) 08:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I am just wondering why my report of User:Rebafan11 on AIV has sat for some 6 hours, but other reports are being acted on much quicker. - NeutralHomer T: C 12:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I set miszabot to automatically archive Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. I used the instructions at User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo and kept the examples "250K" as max archive size. This seemed a bit big to me, as my archive is "100K", but archives aren't accessed that often anyway. We started at archive 25. This morning, we're up to 43. Miszabot put each thread in its own archive. I'm going to have to repair this manually, but I don't want it to keep happening. Can you help me figure out what's wrong? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
importScript(' User:Xenocidic/statusChanger2.js');
...if you like. I think it can even be customized if you don't need all four params. – xeno ( talk) 15:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
From your user page... "If you think I did something wrong, such as delete a page you did not think should be deleted or protect a page that should not have been protected, please tell me.". HAHAHAHHA. Trust me; no one needs this. If you delete it, they will come. Tan ǀ 39 15:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I knew a guy once that was sent to central Africa for his job. His name was Ulay (pronounced you-LAY). He was an exterminator by trade, and this particular country had a huge infestation of vermin, namely rats. Long story short, he was quite successfull of ridding the country of their problem, and was rewarded by the native men with much thanks and applause, and from that point forward, rewarded with quite a bit more work. He enjoyed the applause, and appreciated the thanking, but at the end of it, he was really just doing more work. :-) The moral of the story, and his new motto? Congo rats? Ulay shuns!. Enjoy the extra work :-) Keeper ǀ 76 18:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. I didn't know that there was a template used for deleting your own userpages. Thank you so much. I figure, why not delete the page if your no longer going to use it? Thanks and Happy Editing Tm93 TALK 19:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
re: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Interdisciplinarity_fields&action=edit&redlink=1 Don't forget http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Interdisciplinarity_field! Thanks // Fra nkB 20:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I looked. Your deletion seemed good to me! I noted the diff in my deletion summary. Happy admining :) Pedro : Chat 22:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your passed RFA. I'm sure you'll do well. And since you seem to like archived vandalism, here's a link to my (growing) collection of vandal mail [2]. Cheers and happy adminning (is that a word?) Channel ® 00:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |
If you could copy my deleted article about Mindshare to my user page I will update it and re-post it. Thanks for your help.
Jonnybee24
Thank you for your help in getting my account unblocked! tabor- drop me a line 19:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Could you confirm you requested the account "J.delanoy" on the account creation tool? Thanks, Prodego talk 19:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
For reverting my talk page. :) Caiaffa ( talk) 03:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop by and say congratulations on the good outcome of your RfA. Hopefully I can come to you when I need some help, lol. Take care. Happy editing! eric (mailbox) 03:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I am wondering whether this edit was an accident or an error with that Huggle thing or something? Thanks -- DerRichter ( talk) 06:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I think there may be a sock meat problem going on with this article and the related ones (Current Magazine), the various edits to places which Joe has appeared (ATWT, Hope and Faith, etc). I've been trying to WP:AGF for awhile but, am reaching the end of my tether so to speak. Would you mind having a look around and if you agree point me in the correct direction for how to procede. Thank you. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 16:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Finally. Now I don't have to keep blocking your aiv reports. :P Cheers =) -- slakr\ talk / 21:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you unblocked 203.162.3.166 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) because he was not previously warned about vandalizing my user page. Technically true, but his pattern of edits is exactly the same as Billthebob ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was recently banned for the same reason. I don't think this person deserves another warning. Oh, and I have gotten my user page semi-protected, so that's not a problem anymore, but now he's back vandalizing Jablonski-related articles (disambig is semi-protected, so he's adding his self-promo to the pages it links to), which is where this all began. Latest IP is User:119.70.40.101. Steve Carlson Talk 03:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hiya. Most of those are/were open proxies. If you run across more of the same, if you get a chance/feel like it, drop a note on WP:OP with their addresses. Cheers =) -- slakr\ talk / 03:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
No problemo and congrats. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 04:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your speedy reversion on my talk page. Useight ( talk) 04:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Your CHU usurp has been done. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could help out with the Joe Sernio page? We have been editing as we should and adding all ref. to the article but its been considered for deletion. How can we fix this issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.250.187.106 ( talk) 14:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Sorry, its been a long day, and i am not usually this absent minded when trying to create such simply pages. Thanks for the help. I'm going to stop tinkering with the archive pages (all of them) before I screw something else up. Thanks for your help. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Since you expressed interest: Pre-proposal for redlink-removing bot - Pseudomonas( talk) 13:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
OK its installed but nothings changed? Hmm. — Realist2 ( Who's Bad?) 14:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
i r in a cats u? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.203.139.170 ( talk) 16:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
There is no doubt that the speech is more sought after than the book ( http://stats.grok.se/en/200806/A_More_Perfect_Union_(Speech) vs http://stats.grok.se/en/200806/A More Perfect Union: Advancing New American Rights). The question is whether more people who enter that phrase are looking for the Preamble to the United States Constitution for which it is the stated first objective. I guess a move would be O.K., but is there a way to see the clickthroughs on the preamble link?-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my page.-- Greg D. Barnes ( talk) 01:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
May I request semi-protection please???!!!-- Greg D. Barnes ( talk) 02:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thx 4 the help with the table 76.215.109.166 ( talk) 03:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning Rollback, it certainly sounds useful. I'll definitely request it.
Thanks again, Fieldday-sunday ( talk) 13:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. :) In the turn-about is fair play category, I'd like to ask you if you'd mind looking at a copyright problem I'm having trouble investigating here. I've cleared out everything except St. Agnes Catholic High School, and I can't get the listed sources to load. I don't know if this is a problem on my end. I'm not sure what I'm going to do if you can't get them to load, either. I tried searching wayback with no luck. I know that you're not online atm, but this is not urgent. When you can. :D -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I remember you from before and you seem pretty knowledgeable, so I have a question. In the matter of professional reviews for music albums and posting the reviews on articles, does Wikipedia look for professionalism, or reviewer notability? If you know a link pointing in either direction, please provide, I can't find any. If not, just give me your opinion, please. dude527 ( talk) 21:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I have been editing on wikipedia for a good while and I was wondering how my edit was not helpful? Thank you. Ehccheehcche ( talk) 01:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm... no, you did the right thing. I was trying to revert that sentence but when I got to edit it, I couldn't find it... I think I made a mistake somehow. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ehccheehcche (
talk •
contribs) 01:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Your talk page is now move-protected. Keep up the good work. :-) Regards, Hús ö nd 02:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
...I couldn't agree more :) SWik78 ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Gah! Sorry. That was a big mistake! I'll be more careful in future. Sorry again! Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
? KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/68.79.123.131 Special:Contributions/68.79.91.174
I can give you more if you want. J.delanoy gabs adds 00:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
←Not my conversation, but you remove the report with a note of how you messed up in the edit summary. You report the actual vandal. You 'fess up to CBW and chuckle over it together. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Here is the review in question
Please help us reach a valid consensus on the Rolling Stone section of Indestructible's talk page. This user is, frankly, not willing to give this up, at all, the argument about whether the review by The Rolling Stone belongs in the article or not. The argument first started as me finding reasons for it to stay, but after you sent me a couple links, he is now trying to twist those a little, such as trying to make it seem as though reviews should be factual-based, and not opinion. I don't know, I think this review should stay here because it's listed in section of reliable reviews for Wikipedia, it meets the criteria for being a reliable source (although, it did get one fact wrong, but I already stated, reviews are supposed to be opinion), and it passes the album review section as well.
Now his argument is quite different. He says that, because the review is written unprofessionally (it takes a few personal cuts at the band), it should be taken down. He also says that one sentence from the reliable sources section insinuates this as well. Here is that sentence: "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy," and he says that the one fact that the review got wrong makes it fail those standards. He also states that, because of the way this sentence in the WP:Album is worded (Sentence is: "When choosing which reviews to include, consider the notability of the review source and keeping a neutral point of view."), it insinuates that notability is not important in choosing reviews, that it's simply another thing to consider, but not important.
I admit he forms a nice argument, but, surely, as this is reviewer is listed in the list of reliable reviewers, that should dispel the insinuations that it is unreliable.
I don't want you to run in and support me, off the bat. I want you to run in, read the comments previously made, and from those, form your own opinion, and then comment. Here's the page again. dude527 ( talk) 12:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 00:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
For this - it's been a busy week :-) Cheers! Frank | talk 01:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind comment:-) I didn't know you've noticed me, but I'm not shocked;-) I put lots of time into keeping wikipedia clean of vandalism, and I would be shocked if people didn't notice my work. How long have you been fighting vandalism on wikipedia?-- SJP Chat 21:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You caught the copyvio only seconds before me! :P Lol. Should I report the username to UAA? - Warthog Demon 02:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I'd give you another kindness barnstar for helping me with the template stuff, but I've already done that. :) Just wanted to let you know that I've just used your modified template, and I appreciate it. Also that I'm glad to have you around. Nice to have colleagues who can do stuff and who are friendly and willing to help! :D -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
for your welcome note. I'm a 'retired' contributor who now edits vandalism, anonymously. Cheers, 99.0.80.176 ( talk) 01:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
...same thing on many user talk pages. header shortened so that the TOC doesn't take up half the page.
Hi. I wrote to all the people who voted keep here: [1].-- 87.28.126.85 ( talk) 15:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Please see my userpage. Schfifty Three 19:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Help fix the shirts on Celtic FC ,I don't know how. 宁雨翔 ( talk) 22:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
do you NOT realize they look different,earlier in the afternoon ,the page was vandalised by rangers supporters,some of the mistakes have already been fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YXN ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
What's with your userpage. Licking chairs???? What happened?-- Anfish ( talk) 13:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh my goodness, I hate vandalism. Why do people even do it you know what I mean. It's pointless. Oh and sorry, I forgot to sign on my last comment.-- Anfish ( talk) 13:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I suggest getting your userpage semi-protected. I looked at your page history and it said that an IP was the one who messed it up. If you do that non users won't be able to edit your page. That should stop some of the vandalism. On the other hand, I think it's kind of stupid how that IP user calls himself Mr.Vandal. That's just idiotic. Don't you think. -- Anfish ( talk) 14:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
It's your choice. I'm just giving a suggestion. Do what you want I'm not holding you back. -- Anfish ( talk) 14:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
No, My fault I'm sorry. I didn't mean the above comment in a negative way I'm just telling you to go with the flow. Make your own choices you know. You didn't do anything wrong. I have a problem with wording things in the right way. Well really let's drop this subject and get back to contributing. This is a waste of time right now. If you reply to this i won't be replying back for a while. Meet you later. -- Anfish ( talk) 14:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I cannot believe that I, non-scripted, non autmoated, oldman Keeper, have beaten you, Huggler extraordinaire, in reverting your very own userpage. Absolutely made my day. Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 15:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Huggle is a great tool. However, when I edit a page to remove an advertisement, and in my edit summary I state "removed advert", that's EXACTLY what I was doing. Please do not revert like this again. BMW (drive) 16:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I cannot view the edits by new contributors, i.e. those who have opened account, while using huggle. I can only view the edits bu anonymous IPs. Do you know how to view the edits by contributors with usernames? Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Under other circumstances I would not have reverted/warned, but it was an active vandal. ... discospinster talk 03:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
User:Tiptoety has granted me, Beam the power of Dictator of ULTIMATE Awesome. This is simply an announcement for now. More details on my powers to come later. Beam 03:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello J.delanoy. I'm a bit short on time recently and do not think I would be able to nominate you for adminship. However, if you wish to wait for me to be your nominator, I may become active again in September and October. Hope you are enjoying your summer! ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 16:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
And another task for you. I've begun really trawling your contrib history. It's clear that you're not really a content contributor, but more a vandal whacker. That's fine. The days when admins were required to have written an FA are long gone. However, I think it'd be good for you to be able to demonstrate that you understand what articles should be like in a positive manner, not just the negative (ie deletion process). A good way to do this is by chipping in at Peer Review. Have you spent much time at those pages? Have a look through some well developed reviews and let me know when you're ready for the next steps! -- Dweller ( talk) 12:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
OK, here's where I see it. I suggested doing some AfD and PR work, not to kid anyone that you're anything that you're not, but so people could be assured that you understand deletion process and (because you're not a content editor) encyclopedia work respectively. However, your response is admirable. If anything, I'm more convinced of your suitability for adminship for your reply. I think you'll probably incur some objections that you may not have done if you'd gone with my suggestion, but, goodness, I would hope that your splendid reply should earn you plenty of support. Not least for convincingly demonstrating that you're not "power-hungry"!
I've not really seen how your interactions with others are, as they're swamped with automated messages. If you've been level-headed, civil and communicative with others for at least the last good few months, I'm prepared to nominate you on Monday. -- Dweller ( talk) 15:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
You are very insensitive. If you think a terrorist should be called a militant your from a different planet. This man brutaly murdered a non-combatent family. What he did was a nazi act. Please consider at least calling him a terrorist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yisrael77 ( talk • contribs) 18:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
No worries. I thought about reverting it all and protecting the page myself, but I guess he has the right to argue the block, same as everyone else. Tan ǀ 39 18:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. I'm curious to know what you think the AfD in general, as there's been a lot of back-and-forth on both sides. It's been a little crazy, but I'm doing my best to keep a level head. Cheers! TN‑ X- Man 19:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi J. Delanoy, I felt the nagging compulsion to drop you a note after I read your comment at your RfA's talk page : ) I hope you understand the rationale behind my oppose, and that it is absolutely not a reflection of you as an editor. In fact, you're work is valued, and your anti-vandalism is tenacious and impressive. However, I just feel uncomfortable supporting give my criteria. Cheers mate. And good luck with the RfA. Wisdom89 ( T / C) 20:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 07:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I think it's going pretty well, which is as you deserve. Hope you're OK. -- Dweller ( talk) 10:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey, just wondering if you could revert your waraning on my talk page that happened when we both reverted another article at the same time. I see you got your double revert there but it left the mistaken waraning on my talk page. Thanks. Ajh16 ( talk) 15:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar | ||
I was waiting for your RfA to turn up, because I have seen you around this encyclopedia all over the place, and you have done such a lot for this project. And we have a lot in common; when I was ran for RfA, I was primarily a vandal-fighter, and as for age, I wasn't then 18 either. In recognition of your fantastic work here, I feel you deserve this barnstar, as well as my support for your RfA. Very best wishes, Lra drama 11:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC) |
That was actually only one reason. I will change it for you, but it will still be an oppose (albeit a weak one). I do so hope you do not take this as an attack on you personally, it's just that I have an unwritten criteria. Asenine 23:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
FFor being faster than me at editing vandalism on my own userpage, I award you this Special Barnstar. Keep it up! NuclearWarfare ( talk) 00:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC) |
Hey J, the RfA is looking good! Your prod of this should have been a speedy tag. See the deletion log for why I went ahead and deleted it. You might want to amend the message left to the user who created it so that they do not become confused. Cheers. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Person Who Knows Stuff®. Do you by any chance know how to tell somebody who doesn't Know Stuff how to clear out all the automatic fill-in edit summaries and whatnot? I know this is on my local computer, but I don't know where to go to wipe it. I hate to lose my useful edit summaries, but it'll be worth it to lose the "one time use only" ones. If it matters, I use Mozilla. And if this falls into the category of Stuff You Don't Know®, please don't sweat it. I'm not asking you to research it for me. I just figured if you happened to know off the top of your head, you could save me some time. :) -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for doing this. A shame our friend the creator didn't listen to the first request to change it 300 articles ago ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
SUper stuff. I'll give you a bell in the future if I need anything. The only thing I can think of offhand is that the articles in Category:British films need the {{CinemaoftheUK}} template adding to the foot of the page to connect the years in film and articles all together. It isn't urgent but it will need doing gradually. It could probably be done by AWB ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, it looks set fair, so I don't feel too guilty about sailing off into the sunset and leaving you to your fate. I look forward to shaking your en-broomed hand on my return. Well done. -- Dweller ( talk) 13:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, J.delanoy. I'm just here to wish you good luck on your RfA. I'm very positive that it will turn out successful. Anyways, good luck! Schfifty Three 22:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, block anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on articles for deletion for more than 5 days (provided there's a consensus), protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.
Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun! =Nichalp «Talk»==Nichalp «Talk»= 13:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats...here's your shirt! :-) Frank | talk 13:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats J.d Seraphim♥ Whipp 14:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! — Rlevse • Talk • 14:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! :-) — αἰτίας • discussion• 19:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RfA! Do everything you're supposed to and nothing you're not! Make sure to check out the new admin school. Good luck and feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Glass Cobra 19:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Many congratulations, utilise the mop well. :-) — Mizu onna sango15 Hello! 19:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Well done, I hope you don't get RSI sending thankyou messages, what with all those "support" (!)votes! - Toon 05 19:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! =) sephiroth bcr ( converse) 20:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! Try not to burn out though, okay? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 00:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Well done! keep up the good work!! :)
--
Badgernet
Talk 09:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! Use those tools carefully, though. Now that you're a sysop, you'll be able to block, delete, protect, and do other stuff. Good luck! Schfifty Three 14:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Yay...*huggles delanoy* Congratulations! Do your best with the mop!
IceUnshattered (
talk) 18:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi J.delanoy, congratulations on passing your request for adminship. :) I'm impressed with how well you did, nice one. The only thing I find disappointing is that you'll now stop going to me for help in deleting a page, protecting your talk, or blocking a vandal. :D Heh, heh, good luck with your new tools. You know where I am if you need help. Best wishes. Acalamari 16:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Ncmvocalist ( talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send kittens to others by adding {{ subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Twas very sweet of you to make the personalized messages like that - cheers. :) I'm sorry I didn't end up getting to ask those questions as I'd planned...I kinda forgot *turns bright red*... but if the supports are anything to go by, you should be fine ;) Best wishes, and congratulations! Ncmvocalist ( talk) 21:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
This gave me a bit of a chuckle when I saw it on my watchlist. :P Glass Cobra 03:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations! I hope you will be successful as an admin. Regards, Masterpiece2000 ( talk) 08:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I am just wondering why my report of User:Rebafan11 on AIV has sat for some 6 hours, but other reports are being acted on much quicker. - NeutralHomer T: C 12:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I set miszabot to automatically archive Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. I used the instructions at User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo and kept the examples "250K" as max archive size. This seemed a bit big to me, as my archive is "100K", but archives aren't accessed that often anyway. We started at archive 25. This morning, we're up to 43. Miszabot put each thread in its own archive. I'm going to have to repair this manually, but I don't want it to keep happening. Can you help me figure out what's wrong? -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
importScript(' User:Xenocidic/statusChanger2.js');
...if you like. I think it can even be customized if you don't need all four params. – xeno ( talk) 15:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
From your user page... "If you think I did something wrong, such as delete a page you did not think should be deleted or protect a page that should not have been protected, please tell me.". HAHAHAHHA. Trust me; no one needs this. If you delete it, they will come. Tan ǀ 39 15:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I knew a guy once that was sent to central Africa for his job. His name was Ulay (pronounced you-LAY). He was an exterminator by trade, and this particular country had a huge infestation of vermin, namely rats. Long story short, he was quite successfull of ridding the country of their problem, and was rewarded by the native men with much thanks and applause, and from that point forward, rewarded with quite a bit more work. He enjoyed the applause, and appreciated the thanking, but at the end of it, he was really just doing more work. :-) The moral of the story, and his new motto? Congo rats? Ulay shuns!. Enjoy the extra work :-) Keeper ǀ 76 18:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. I didn't know that there was a template used for deleting your own userpages. Thank you so much. I figure, why not delete the page if your no longer going to use it? Thanks and Happy Editing Tm93 TALK 19:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
re: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Interdisciplinarity_fields&action=edit&redlink=1 Don't forget http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Interdisciplinarity_field! Thanks // Fra nkB 20:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I looked. Your deletion seemed good to me! I noted the diff in my deletion summary. Happy admining :) Pedro : Chat 22:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your passed RFA. I'm sure you'll do well. And since you seem to like archived vandalism, here's a link to my (growing) collection of vandal mail [2]. Cheers and happy adminning (is that a word?) Channel ® 00:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |
If you could copy my deleted article about Mindshare to my user page I will update it and re-post it. Thanks for your help.
Jonnybee24
Thank you for your help in getting my account unblocked! tabor- drop me a line 19:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Could you confirm you requested the account "J.delanoy" on the account creation tool? Thanks, Prodego talk 19:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
For reverting my talk page. :) Caiaffa ( talk) 03:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to drop by and say congratulations on the good outcome of your RfA. Hopefully I can come to you when I need some help, lol. Take care. Happy editing! eric (mailbox) 03:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I am wondering whether this edit was an accident or an error with that Huggle thing or something? Thanks -- DerRichter ( talk) 06:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I think there may be a sock meat problem going on with this article and the related ones (Current Magazine), the various edits to places which Joe has appeared (ATWT, Hope and Faith, etc). I've been trying to WP:AGF for awhile but, am reaching the end of my tether so to speak. Would you mind having a look around and if you agree point me in the correct direction for how to procede. Thank you. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 16:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Finally. Now I don't have to keep blocking your aiv reports. :P Cheers =) -- slakr\ talk / 21:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you unblocked 203.162.3.166 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) because he was not previously warned about vandalizing my user page. Technically true, but his pattern of edits is exactly the same as Billthebob ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was recently banned for the same reason. I don't think this person deserves another warning. Oh, and I have gotten my user page semi-protected, so that's not a problem anymore, but now he's back vandalizing Jablonski-related articles (disambig is semi-protected, so he's adding his self-promo to the pages it links to), which is where this all began. Latest IP is User:119.70.40.101. Steve Carlson Talk 03:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hiya. Most of those are/were open proxies. If you run across more of the same, if you get a chance/feel like it, drop a note on WP:OP with their addresses. Cheers =) -- slakr\ talk / 03:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
No problemo and congrats. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 04:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your speedy reversion on my talk page. Useight ( talk) 04:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Your CHU usurp has been done. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could help out with the Joe Sernio page? We have been editing as we should and adding all ref. to the article but its been considered for deletion. How can we fix this issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.250.187.106 ( talk) 14:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |