This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Cool. Did you create the big "To Vandals:" sign on (or actually in) your page? Basketball 110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 22:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

No thanks. I don't have a vandal problem. Basketball 110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 23:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Nobody has actually vandalized and updated the counter. People have done this:

<!-- Muhahahaha... I vandalized it! -->.

Basketball 110 _{Go Longhorns!} 15:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

	The Hidden Barnstar
	This user has found Basketball110's secret hidden sub page! Can you find it?

Basketball 110 _{Go Longhorns!} 15:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I Don't agree with your comment Picasso was an artist, singers and other performers are artistes I Suggest you look in a dictionary. CanOfWorms ( talk) 01:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC) I would appreciate an apology for the unjustified reversion of my edit. Maybe you should put your RFA on hold until you beat the tendency to go off half-cocked CanOfWorms ( talk) 08:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I have been informed about your comment at WP:ANI [1] which has been moved to the top of Archive376. I have not been removing the acronyms. If you check my user contributions [2] I have been ensuring that the only contents of Category:Military acronyms are the acronyms themselves. For example "MASINT" is an acronym, and the redirect page at MASINT was categorized by me [3]. I then removed the target page from the category [4] because " Measurement and Signature Intelligence" is not an acronym, just the name from which the acronym is derived. Someone who goes to the category page and wants to know what the acronym means now has only one choice of page, but before there were five MASINT pages, so this way a user has less ambiguity.

I had previously done the same with the Category:Acronyms which Military acronyms is a subset of. It makes sense to me that a category called Acronyms should only contain acronyms. It is simple to do because redirects can also be categorised. It is a bit like removing The Lord of the Rings (the book) from the films category. Although films have been made from the book, the book itself should not be categorised as a film. Callmederek ( talk) 12:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

1. Yes, if they can be trusted with it.
2. I manually change it, so sometimes I forget to update it. I used to have it automatically update using StatusBot, but currently that isn't working.

  jj137 (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Can you create the wiki for me? GoPuma ( talk) 13:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Master of Puppets said the protection was removed, but when I try to create the wiki it says, "This page is currently semi-protected, and can be edited only by established registered users." What does that mean? GoPuma ( talk) 15:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Anyways, thanks for the help. I'll take your advice and ask an admin to create the article and un-protect it. GoPuma ( talk) 16:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Jj137's talk page is semi-protected. Do you know of any other active admins? GoPuma ( talk) 18:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/ _Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello, J.delanoy. You have new messages at Addshore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

·Add§hore· ^Talk/ _Cont 07:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I changed the speedy cat to simply "talk page of deleted article" so as not to give any more reaction to vandalism than is necessary. If they're going to vandalize, we should make it very boring and impersonal for them -- to the extent policy allows. -  CobaltBlueTony™  _talk 18:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

It needs {{ db-talk}} for pages like that. If no one had edited anything in bad faith on it, it would still get that tag. It's useful; Huggle whould look into this... -  CobaltBlueTony™  _talk 18:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I've just declined protection of your userpage, by the way, on the grounds that there is not enough activity at this time to justify protection. As the request was placed by another user, my response would be different if you were to request protection (as users are free to request protection of their userpages if they wish). _GB ^{T/ C} 20:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I reviewed the report of XuxiRawe22 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and saw no obvious vandalism. A third party also concurred. Can you check your report and remove or comment as appropriate? Thanks. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 21:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Per WP:AGF it always best to give benefit of the doubt - all wikipedia requires is that information is verifiable, not complete with citation - and there will always be another patroller around to check it out. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 12:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

For future use, just use the "edit this page" option - as you would any page - highlight the text and press delete. Just then leave a note in the summary. The report, and removal, remains in the page history but since the page is so active it gets quickly buried. You are not the first, and won't be the last, to file a report that needs removing. Cheers. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 17:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, cool. I asked you to remove it as politeness; just removing it might appear a bit abrupt - also you may have more knowledge about the vandal account and could point to previous "suspect" edits, or similar. I am aware that some vandals do "subtle" edits, wrong info that looks legit, so that is another reason to ask when I don't see it as obvious. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 17:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The original header for this section was "Why do the Las Vegas area casinos say they are in Paradise, Nevada?". I truncated it so that me TOC doesn't take up half of my page width. If that is the guideline then why don't the Orlando resorts state the specific city that they are in? 74.163.224.123 ( talk) 19:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for taking an interest in this article and cleaning it up. It seems to be the latest target for silly entries and vandalism in central NY. Stepp-Wulf ( talk) 01:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC).

Good humour? Would somebody check the envelope?! Man, thanks for the b'day gift... As fate would have it, J-status appears... I'm not usually a funnyman, but I gotta credit that comma-loving dude for my rv. Thanks for my making my day, and keep on clearing Wikipedia of vandalism! -- Jw 21/Penalty Killah ^BDAY! 18:48, 7 March 2008 (PST)

Why did you delete what I said from Farce-mistress's user talk page. She is a close personal friend of mine and I was talking straight to her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dyrthom ( talk • contribs) 00:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

that was not a personal attack. how is "see he got you too!" a personal attack? I had told her he would get her for unnecessary edits and i was right he did. That was in no way a personal attack.

Yes, go ahead.   jj137 (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment. And the cookies (it looked good). Unfortunately I think I'd better take the admins advice and change it. So like all other RC's (Republic Commando's), I shall adopt a nickname; Kimu. Let me know what you think. K im u 04:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Tis okay; what happened, though? Mouse is back 19:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah. Mouse is back 19:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Can you please stop adding user talk template messages when I've already reverted the main page? You've done this three times in a row. Mainly so that it's not confusing to those being warned, and even to myself when I keep getting the edit conflict page. Thanks, -- SyntaxError55 ^talk 19:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, okay. :D I've never used Huggle so I didn't know that happens. -- SyntaxError55 ^talk 19:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you mind describing the vandalism you are accusing me of? ThisMunkey ( talk) 20:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

So if I post a message to more than one person I am vandalising? Sorry, still cant see it. Would you mind describing -> the "vandalism"? ThisMunkey ( talk) 20:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I tried to make it sound as if he outright said his preference was for paedophilia. "If he said that he would rather look at paedophilia" you are now saying. "Well I know what that would make him whatever rights he has saying it and I have a right to point that out then". Final strike: "vandalism".? ThisMunkey ( talk) 21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I created the controversies section and I am trying to fix grammatical inconsistencies and give the section a finer tone. I am trying to stay within NPOV while making the article more aesthetically presentable. Please tell me how this is vandalism and please READ the article before you accuse me of such a thing! ~~Josh~~

By the time I got that message, it was already taken care of...  jj137 (talk) 23:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it is "pestering".   jj137 (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi J.delanoy,

I'm sure you are a good editor on Wikipedia, so don't take this personally please. I noticed on Talk:David A. Paterson, that you wrote the comment seen here. I could not after 1 minute of ponder see any conceivable good reason that this was a helpful or non-sarcastic argument (That may violate WP:AGF but seriously). Please refrain from doing things like that. I have no beef with you; just wanted to caution, since that kind of thing is against policy, and someone will most likely be extremely upset if you do that to them.
Take care ~ GoldenGoose100 ( talk) 04:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah ha! See I told you about that WP:AGF. lol. I hesitated there as you seemed to not be a vandal - just maybe it was one of those days. I didn't see that s/he wrote support in that previous edit. Maybe if you don't like removing things from talk pages, you can do that cross out feature? I don't even know how to do that, maybe you do. Sorry if I was too harsh in almost assuming that you were vandalizing.More careful review of that edit would have helped, my bad. And thanks for not taking offense to my comment; some people, namely TennisExpert, blow up at me with hotheads - what can you do. Long live wikipedia, and have a great day

~ GoldenGoose100 ( talk) 16:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

By the way, cool beans on your gabs/adds pun. It's funny. ~ GoldenGoose100 ( talk) 16:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Reverted lots of vandalism you have--deserve this you do! Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 18:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

As do you some of the time. Sometimes I'm like, "Whaaa? I wanted that revert!" Two One Six Five Five ^τ _ʃ 20:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work with the anti-vandalism work, I see your name around WP:AIV often. Keep it up! Tiptoety talk 22:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hm..not seeing the problem. Is it that he has made edits to pages other than Huggle related ones? Tiptoety ^talk 23:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please see Huggle's response on my talk page. Tiptoety ^talk 23:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This may answer your question. Tiptoety ^talk 23:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, how are you? Can we be friends? LANGOLASSI ( talk) 19:06 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it's just there's someone on 4chan who really hates me, they get a load of other forum members to come and attack me. They also vandalise articles I work on. I think it's in retaliation to me nominating a lot of D&D articles for deletion. J Milburn ( talk) 23:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I thought an editor was an acronym for someone who was new here. But I'll be doing things right from now on. :) -- Sumestest ( talk) 00:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, Peter Deer, hereby award this barnstar, to someone who has recieved this barnstar too many times already, for beating me to the punch on about a dozen vandal reverts in a morning. Damn, son!

It certainly seems to be! I shall have to go and get it. Cheers! Peter Deer ( talk) 15:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I thought I would ask first out of courtesy, but I assume (by your "userboxen") you would not mind me nominating you for adminship. I have been looking over your contributions, and in my humble opinion you seem to be sufficiently qualified. I shall await your response before proceeding. Peter Deer ( talk) 15:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough! I await your response. Good luck to you. Peter Deer ( talk) 16:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Responded on my talk page. Acalamari 17:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

As have I. dihydrogen monoxide ( H₂O) 10:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Regarding admin

I have responded on my talk page Wisdom89 _{( T / ^C)} 17:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA

I saw your comment at DHMO. I know you didn't ask for my opinion, but I'll give it anyway. Going for another RfA so soon would not be a good idea. Some people will oppose just for that. RfA voters want to see a solid gap of at least two months, and evidence that you've taken what was said under consideration. Enigma ^msg! 17:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Running again

Responded on my talk, echoing those above I'm afraid. Pedro :  Chat  18:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:RfA

You should probably wait. MFC (previously Ohmpandya) had a similar case here and here and, well, it didn't turn out so well.   jj137 (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Judgement Skills

This shows good judgement, the kind befitting of an admin. Well said and well thought out. Pedro :  Chat  10:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

It's a shame it seems to turn out that way. I wish the best of luck to you! Peter Deer ( talk) 04:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure - and thanks for the cookie! UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 17:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You more than deserve this! I can't believe I haven't given you one before! I'm pretty sure you make more reverts than me - and you beat me to the punch! Keep it up :) Tiddly- Tom 18:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar, it is much appreciated (and the revert - you beat me to the punch on that one!). Tiddly- Tom 18:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Erm, thanks for that... :D I don't get it...is it one of these American jokes about Canada? lol, sorry _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{tell me a joke...} 22:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

LOL! That one is so much better! _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{tell me a joke...} 19:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		A well-deserved barnstar - you truly are a vandal-terminator. AVand talk contribs 23:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I notice you've reported this user at AIV, but he only has 3 contribs and no warnings. I'm assuming your using some automated tool that's making these reports -- you may want to check that it's working correctly. I doubt I need to tell you this but users need to be warned before going to AIV. Equazcion •✗/ C • 23:37, 13 Mar 2008 (UTC)

Hey. Are you using 0.6.1 or 0.7.1? I'm having to use 0.6.1 due to problems in 0.7.1 - I would advice you to do the same if you are not already! Hopefully Gurch will fix it soon :) Tiddly- Tom 07:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I meant 0.6.3 - I'll check every report I make as well now :P Tiddly- Tom 17:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I have seen you have edited your userpage weirdly :P I see two problems; images can still be added by adding them to the first line, and your user page can still be blanked :P After my userpage was vandalizes repeatedly after getting huggle, and after I had not noticed it getting vandalised, I just got it protected and have not had any problems since :) You might like to think about it. Tiddly- Tom 18:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

This page (into which I put a lot of work) has been quite seriously vandalised, and I don't know how to get it back into shape. If you could look at it, I would be most appreciative! Regards, Macdonald-ross ( talk) 08:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing these out to me - I have started using them and will conintue to do so. Bob98133 ( talk) 15:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Can I ask for your help again? The article is already 84 kb long and the length warning appears. But there is a lot of information that needs adding. Some of the most important issues such as

• Churchill's involvement in the creation of Iraq (about which there is one new book published in 2007 and others in the last few years, there are 387000 google hits for Winston Churchill + Iraq)
• Churchill's role in the service cuts in the 1920s (a background to his campaign for rearmament -and why the service chiefs did not support it).

have not been dealt with at all and others such as his role in the General Strike and the rearmament need a lot of expansion Might it be better to cut the article in two so we have Winston Churchill in politics 1900-1922 and Winston Churchill in politics 1923-1939. This would be a good break in that the first covers his ascent, the war and the aftermath of the war, the second his return to the Conservatives, their distrust and his gradual separation from the main stream of politics. Your thoughts please Backnumber1662 ( talk) 20:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

That was fast! -- Elliskev 18:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent WP:AIV report of 64.33.161.12 ( talk · contribs) concerns me. The IP's last edit was at 14:22, with however you issued a level 2 warning at 14:53, level 3 at 14:54, level 4 at 14:54, then reported the IP to AIV at 14:54 ... all 32 minutes after the IP stopped editing. Escalating levels of warnings are supposed to be issued if an editor ignores the previous warning and persists in vandalism, rather than being slapped on all at once. Likewise AIV criteria #2 states that the vandal "must be active now," which was clearly not the case for this report. -- Kralizec! ( talk) 20:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Keep up the Good work in removing vandalism. Terra What do you want? 20:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that makes sense. I will delete if it is still there. - Colfer2 ( talk) 21:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Great, now look what has happened! http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:74.66.11.10&oldid=198280020 If you can help me with this I would appreciate it. - Colfer2 ( talk) 21:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The other page in question is User talk:199.3.218.137 but it seems fine now. - Colfer2 ( talk) 21:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I went ahead and fixed it: User talk:74.66.11.10 - Colfer2 ( talk) 00:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar! BTW, the userpage was by user:WBOSITG - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

A little secret: I use huggle too :)

Have you sent him an email about it?   jj137 (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

No need to thank me, Wikipedia looks like a war zone now and then and I was just going after a vandal. Thanks for the heads up on the rollback (and the “cookie”). After you told me I requested rollback rights and got it! – Zntrip 05:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I just reverted the edit done by Achilies who deleated important information. the result of the battle was that the Greek army was encircled the batle didn't end in stalemate. by the way why didn't you regard his edit to be inconstructive?-- Avidius ( talk) 19:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for staying on top of the blatantly unencyclopedic article, Dan Brace, but I wanted to point out to you that WP:CSD#G4 is specifically for articles that are recreations of deletion discussions, not for articles that have been speedily deleted. In many instances, of course, those are speediable for the same reasons they were speedied the first time. Just wanted to point this out, for future use. :) -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Yup, whichever you would have used before is the way to go. :) I deleted this one as a blatant hoax, given the creator's previous edits which identified the subject somewhat differently. -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I'm a little new to this! Thanks for the help :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy120 ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry! I was revert warring! I was going to take care of Malta but you did the job anyways! :) Thanks! -- Lolipod ( talk) 17:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

This wasn't a good revert. Even worse that you warned him about it. He was correcting a grammatical error. Justin ^(Gmail?) _(u) 18:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Right, got it. I was looking at United, not America. OK, good call. Probably not completely deserving of a level 4, though, but whatever. Justin ^(Gmail?) _(u) 19:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for tagging the user page 163.153.189.146. The district has reported that they have the students found and taken appropriate action have they. -- NERIC-Security ( talk) 18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, we try to log all of the annon edits that come from our Class B addresses, and there are some good faith edits too. But, much like newspapers, people going about their business tends not to draw attention. We do our best to encourage the GF edits, since kids usually have some passion that they do know all about, and can contribute to some articles. -- NERIC-Security ( talk) 18:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging the user page 163.153.132.2. The district has asked that I extend their apologies for the action of their students, and to let you know that they have identified those involved and are taking appropriate action. -- NERIC-Security ( talk) 12:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Wade Nichols was a gay adult film star, what the hell did I get a warning for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.135.93.190 ( talk) 19:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

		Thanks for the support
		Thanks for your support on my request for adminship, which passed 92/2/2. I'm honored that you haven't seen someone this qualified in a long time, so I hope to live up to all of the expectations. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Why did you put in that he was dead?I had just deleted that.Enda Kenny ISN'T DEAD.A FEW MINUTES LATER:Thank you and long live Enda Kenny and Bertie Ahern and Gerry Adams and Eamonn Gilmore and Jackie Healy Rae and all the rest of them!-- 86.45.130.207 ( talk) 15:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I apologize for the recent vandalism from the IP writing this message. This is an office computer, and someone was running an unauthorized program designed to vandalize random wikipedia pages. I will, if not done so already by the vigilant watchers of Wikipedia, personally go through the history and make sure that all vandalism from this computer is undone. Thank you very much!

RE: RE:

Yes, i saw that. However, i feel personally responsible for not keeping better watch over our computers.

You know that Soleil Moon Frye's child Jagger Joseph is a male, not a female. 124.13.117.99 ( talk) 15:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Read this: "Sinn eventually went gay for Val, who killed Sinn in order to gain control of the Deceptacles and the Annhilatrix.

Deceased."

My edit was productive for the following reasons: 1. Grammar. 2. "Went gay?" Are you kidding me? That's very encyclopedic. No, it is... really. 3. Spelling. "Annhilatrix?" Why don't we change the spelling of Sinn to Cinn, like Cinnamon, while we're at it. If you can't spell the names of main characters and plot driving devices, you don't have any business typing them in the first place. 4. Deceased doesn't follow the structure of the article. We haven't done that for other characters, and there's no reason to start now. Further, we just pointed out that Val kills Sinn. Redundant.

If I need to read the introduction to editing, you definitely need to read about cleanup and quality standards.

The discussion page can't handle a detailed explanation of every edit, and that is not the place for it. Minor changes (this was a very minor change) should not be mentioned. I will not cover every minor change in the talk page, nor am I obligated to.

How about you mind your own and let other people tweak and improve Wikipedia?

Schwin47 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

This reversion [5] was fine, but the edit summary is wrong (and not exactly complimentary to me!) - there were three edits, not two: one by the vandal, my revert thereof, and a second by the vandal. Can you recall which vandalism you were trying to revert? It looks as though you saw the same one I did, chose to revert, I beat you to it, your anti-vandal tool cooked up an edit summary, and then the vandal got a second one in before your revert took. Philip Trueman ( talk) 18:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm telling you this because I think you have a bug in your anti-vandal tool that should be addressed. Philip Trueman ( talk) 18:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello sorry about the attacks there only because you deleted mi page im new 2 wikipedia and your not helping me

Btw 2bh your realy not funny and can u please not get in my way again as i am young and new to this site —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenal-Samuel ( talk • contribs) 21:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello I need some help on this website i need you to help Reply please Ta —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenal-Samuel ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

is there any competions or anything you can do =] kl sfe {O{ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenal-Samuel ( talk • contribs) 22:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Pretty please, would you block this IP as you warned her on her talk page? Thanks :) -- W2bh ( talk) 02:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I hadn't realised that... Thank for the link! -- W2bh ( talk) 03:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

What about my edit was 'unconstructive'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ara6012 ( talk • contribs) 15:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The fire occurred during the middle ages.

FACT: The shroud was subjected to intense heat at low oxygen in 1532.

Dr. Dimitri Kouznetsov of the Sedov Biopolymer Research Laboratory in Moscow has conducted experiments on the accuracy of radiocarbon dating of samples previously exposed to intense heat. Dr. Kouznetsov acquired an ancient linen cloth with origin in Israel, radiocarbon dated to 200 CE. The cloth was exposed to intense heat in the presence of silver, after which it radiocarbon dated 1400 years later! Dr. Kouznetsov attributes this to biofractionalization and the chemical bonding, under heat, of extrinisic C14 to the linen. I will qualify that there are those who question Dr. Kouznetsov's scientific expertise and methodology.

http://www.historian.net/shroud.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ara6012 ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

http://www.skepticalspectacle.com/history11.htm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4210369.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ara6012 ( talk • contribs) 16:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

You may want to request that your user page is simi protected to stop people from vandalizing it you can refer to the simi protect page Here

Thanks Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 16:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Seconded. Your user/talkpage gets hit all the time. Enigma ^msg! 16:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Very good point i personally know html fairly well but i don't know wiki mark up i liked how you have your user page setup

Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 17:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Though I have no idea about the 'requesting account' thing you talked about, I have created a user account under the name Jdelanoy and will email you the password now. Please change the password once you get it, I don't want us to be accused of sharing an account or anything. J Milburn ( talk) 16:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

J Milburn (
talk) 16:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

J.delanoy
gabs
adds 17:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism here; however, I don't think the current level of vandal activity merits re-protection, but I do have the page watchlisted in case another bout develops. Cheers, Espresso Addict ( talk) 18:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Yarbitrage was most certainly not patent nonsense. It was an earnest, if not misguided, attempt. It's not a good idea to simply slap a speedy cat on something just to get rid of it. We need to be consistent so new users take us seriously. -  CobaltBlueTony™  _talk 15:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Rest well. Get some milk to go with this cookie. -  CobaltBlueTony™  _talk 16:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

-  CobaltBlueTony™  _talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[6], much appreciated. Tiptoety ^talk 16:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Resolved

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Women in the Victorian era: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  16:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

J.delanoy reported IP on WP:AIV. StaticGull  Talk  16:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I have truely and sincerely reformed. Thanks to your polite and personally worded encouragement I shall not vandalise Wikipedia again. 81.151.241.194 ( talk) 23:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

PS

I was lying :) 81.151.241.194 ( talk) 13:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

show me how to edit the rightway then I have infromation on thoese topics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.209.219 ( talk) 23:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

all that looks too complicated for me. And I am a Dr. I have information on those topics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.209.219 ( talk) 23:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I have noticed rollback....but am not sure exactly what it is...

I do have a question for you, is there something you can add into a template (like how you can add in what the article was with "|article" that indicates the specific edit? I've seen it been done a lot (and quickly too) but haven't found anything like that yet. Shinpah1 ( talk) 21:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

For example: User talk:96.237.8.51.....The warning here has a link to the specific edit that was made, where it says "recent edit". I'm trying to figure out if this is something that can be added into the template, or has to be manually typed in....(or if you're not using templates at all and are typing everything out...that would be intense). I also forget how to indent edits.... Shinpah1 ( talk) 21:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi I recently added a discussion to a user's page. I know it may have been inappropriate and immature, but the guy has been editing the St. Josephs High School (Saskatoon) and adding alot of rubbish. Everything about the school and zulu program is true but he feels the need to add alot of lies. I know what i did whas wrong but it was out of frustration.

I have now reported Sebastian93 for vandalism to Jeff Gordon and other NASCAR related articles.( Rhinostampede ( talk) 22:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC))

Hi! I am not trying to vandalize any pages. I blanked some pages redirects pertaining to the same person to facilitate a name change move. I reported a false positive to the bot also.

Please advise. Pluswhich ( talk) 00:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Is everything cool? Pluswhich ( talk) 00:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem - I appreciate your anti-vandalism efforts. Pluswhich ( talk) 00:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

As a frequent contributor (or vandal patroller) to the days of the year articles ( WP:DAYS), your comments on the current state of the proposed guideline for that project would be greatly appreciated. Discussion is taking place here. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 18:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Have your userpage/talkpage/subpages really been vandalized 112 times?

I was wondering is that md5 code that you have to protect the link to the real page?.I wanted to do the same but i cant figure out what encryption that you are using that is capable with html.

Thanks Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 13:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you i really appreciate it. Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 15:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Please note that rollback should only be used to revert clear and obvious vandalism. This revert was not clear and obvious vandalism, and should have been reverted the usual way, leaving an edit summary. Rolling an edit back is a way of saying "I think that edit was so worthless that it does not even justify a reason for reverting". Stifle ( talk) 13:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

You are absolutely correct. I have apologized on the talk page of the user in question and I removed the warning. As you may have guessed if you looked at my contribs, I am using an automated tool to revert vandalism. I am not trying to justify my error, I am simply saying that I see so much vandalism that sometimes I lose focus. I am working on finding a happy medium where I can revert vandalisms quickly and efficiently without making errors. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Regards, J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, I just read the thing about 3RR's that you linked to near the top of this page, and I have a question. Around the time that Kosovo declared independence, there was no set rule on Wikipedia about whether things were in Kosovo or Serbia. As a result, IPs (I assume from Serbia, never actually checked) kept changing articles that said "Country: Kosovo" to "Country: Serbia". Because the US recognized Kosovo as an independent country, and basically the entire western world, and all English speaking countries I knew of at least didn't say outright that they would not recognize Kosovo, I reverted people many, many times changing the articles back to "Country: Kosovo". Since then, I believe the ArbCom has issued an injunction to stop the edit wars. I was never called out for my reverts, nor was I mentioned in the ArbCom ruling. Indeed, I started a thread at the Village Pump to try to draw up a preliminary guideline. (I think that the ArbCom ruling was the end result of that discussion) What I am asking is, by continually reverting those articles in the absence of any consensus, do you think I was revert-warring? J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

See {{ uw-balkans}}. Stifle ( talk) 16:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Did i do it correctly? feel free to help out and make changes if you like.

Thanks Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 16:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

One last thing i am having difficulty setting up the status bot i was wondering if you can aid me in setting this up.

Thank You

Your Friend Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I was looking for something that is simple i wanted to fill up that corner and i wanted it to stop right were my user boxes start thats all and any style that will fit with the page lol.

Thanks Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 17:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the rollback suggestion - I hadn't heard of it, but I have now made the request. Cheers! Dawn bard ( talk) 19:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to stop vandal fighting for now; seems you're one step ahead of me on everything I find ;-) Tan | 39 16:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Saw your list of funny vandalism, thought I'd share my favorite. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I have two to share. One. Two. Enigma ^message 17:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if this is humorous or what. Still trying to figure it out. Enigma ^message 04:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

That user you warned is still vandalising the michael jackson article. Could you take a look. Realist2 ( talk) 18:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Cheers ive saved that page ill use them more often. Your help has been appreciated. Realist2 ( talk) 23:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I saw the screen shot that you sent me and i like it it looks very good thank you again for your help.

Thanks Staffwaterboy ^Talk♂ 00:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Dear Delanoy,

This user continues blunt vandalism here [7] and also removed vandalism warning from his talk page [8]. He also also investigated for sockpopetry [9]. He also vandalized my talk page [10]. We need your help, I warned him on his talk page but he keeps removing the warning tag. Thanks a lot. Iberieli ( talk) 13:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I was about to ask you, are you a sysop, but then I saw the big message at the top. My question is, why aren't you a sysop? Do you not wish to be a sysop? Steve Crossin (talk to me) 15:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Ahh, I see. Someone nommed me about a week ago, and I declined. I won't pass an RFA at the moment, I just dont have much article writing at the moment. But I'm going to write a few DYKs this week, and I'll continue to clerk at WP:AIV. :( You're beating me to the reverts. My internet is slow at the moment :( Steve Crossin (talk to me) 15:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey (Hello). I don't remember how your talk page got on my watchlist, but it did. Probably something to do with cleaning up vandalism. I'll continue to keep an eye out for your next nomination. I'll second it. I've reviewed your edit history, and I find it commendable. I think you'd make a very good admin. I don't hang out on WP:RFA too much, so please drop me a line when you decide to accept a nomination. I've got some pretty strong feelings about what qualities I like to see in an admin, and you pass my test. -- Elliskev 19:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for that. Cheers, Basketball 110 16:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

It seems that Ip- 24.32.0.71 belongs to Cebridge Connections. Should I tag it? am I authorized to? Thanks ~ Dark Zorro 16:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The use of excessive force in the tagging of 24.32.0.71 has been approved. ;-) Tan | 39 16:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok Dark Zorro 16:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The message is there to say that the internet is better in Firefox. Plus in Internet Explorer 7:

• The table of articles is broken (centred)
• The side of the second module on the right is gone
• The padding in the userbox module is broken

I could go on... so yes. IE < FF. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{I push my hand up to the sky} 17:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

lol, I'm surprised you took the time and bothered, you must have been really bored =P _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{I push my hand up to the sky} 18:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I was right! Did that seriously take only 5 minutes? _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{I push my hand up to the sky} 19:39, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

It's great to be recognized by a fellow vandal-basher. Cheers, Dawn bard ( talk) 20:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Would give you a barnstar, but already have recently. So I thought I would just let you know that your anti-vandalism work is greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work. Tiptoety ^talk 20:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

What program are you using for anti-vandalism? Reports like this don't deserve a block. Not yet, anyway. Steve Crossin (talk to me) 20:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I just want to let you know I'm not trying to impede you by checking reports. I hope you don't feel I am, but if you have a concern, you know where my talk page is ;) Steve Crossin (talk to me) 21:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm pleased to announce that the Awards Center will be getting its own newsletter shortly. If you want to receive the WP:AWC newsletter, put your name here. -- Shark face 217 20:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

A message from Warthog Demon.

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, was unsuccessful with 61 support, 25 oppose, and 4 neutral. I've been taking the advice of the Opposes into practice and hopefully I can improve myself. Once again, thank you. ^_^

Just a reminder that rollback should only be used to revert the most obvious vandalism. For everything else you should still do a manual revert with a proper edit summary. An edit summary would have been appropriate on this revert, for example. Thanks! Stifle ( talk) 11:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I have changed the license on the pic in ? to CC BY

Glad I could help and thanks for using my pic :)

Justin

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.