( 223.230.128.8 ( talk) 14:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC))
The article on Franken rightly has a substantial section on "Sexual misconduct allegations". The introduction to the article rightly says that "Franken resigned on January 2, 2018, after several allegations of sexual misconduct were made against him." To me, this seems enough. Perhaps to you it does not. If it doesn't, please argue for this in Talk:Al Franken. And when you do edit articles, be candid in your edit summaries about what you are doing. This was not a "Minor edit to clarify one sentence and add references to current status of subject". The meaning of "minor edit" is explained here. -- Hoary ( talk) 07:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC) Posted to User talk:Dale B. Phelps; pasted here by 8.46.95.20
Since you reverted my request for unprotection, that is removal of the move not the semi-protection, of The Rebel Media, which I'm not sure why, can you kindly un-move protect the page?
Thanks,
Doug Mehus
T·
C 13:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
I have nominated Sicilian Baroque for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Beland ( talk) 00:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, there have been two new accounts editing the page, again demonstrating the same levels of competence and making similar edits to the three blocked accounts. I gave the first one the benefit of the doubt even though they sneaked the degrees back into the infobox after fiddling with the parameters. The second one, I'm more sure (as I can be at this stage) that it is yet another incarnation. It has made similar edits to the others, including disruptive ones to Zuckerberg's page (again) and the two new accounts are also talking to each other. Should these newer accounts be reported to SPI (not something I have experience of)? Eagleash ( talk) 07:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you; Yes I was following the ANI (I've been 'involved' with the 'Shamsheer problem' since last May when the help desk was disrupted with persistent incompetent requests) and was disappointed but not surprised, when the thread got archived without any input. ANI does not seem to react to this kind of 'low-level' disruption no matter how long it has gone on for. Cheers. Eagleash ( talk) 08:38, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
There's an editor here who seems nothing but disruptive so far. Some of their efforts have been deleted, but they persist in creating article and article-type material mainly in user space. (including pasting their own name into the article about Virat Kohli and submitting it). In some of these they claim to be a 14-year-old boy from Bihar. Coincidence? Probably, but.. Cheers, Eagleash ( talk) 12:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Care to take a look:
This is a mayor issue now. Look for my User page to learn all this guys Sock puppets. And all his personal attacks and accustions. Mr.User200 ( talk) 13:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Hoary!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DGG (
talk ) 07:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello! Your submission of Teikō Shiotani at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
based on your question sir,
You suggest that you're working on a biography. At the top of your user talk page, you write "Working on creating a client biography". Do you mean that you're working, or that you're intending to work, on the biography of somebody who is a client of yours? -- Hoary (talk) 00:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Yes, it's a client biography — Preceding unsigned comment added by ViciousProxy ( talk • contribs) 06:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, the situation with this editor has been ongoing since 2015. Multiple editors have tried to assist and / or asked for an explanation. The editor has an account but more often edits whilst 'logged out' (multiple IPs). The account TP has multiple comments about their level of competence and there was an ANI which had no result. It has largely been felt, I believe, that the editor is a net positive and HD volunteers usually just fix the edits. Cheers. Eagleash ( talk) 04:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
On 7 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Teikō Shiotani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Teikō Shiotani photographed View with Weather Forecast (shown) from his upstairs window, exaggerating the curvature of the horizon by bending the photographic paper under the enlarger? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teikō Shiotani. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Teikō Shiotani), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
--valereee ( talk) 00:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the modification
I try to use the same pseudo in all the "wikipedia" portal (Otherwise I'm going crazy).
My complete profile is here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:SFCCF
I'm a fans of women soccer since 23 years but my job, is in the Geneva Airport :-) Sandy plays not in Servette FC but in Servette Fooball Club Chênois féminin https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servette_football_club_ch%C3%AAnois_f%C3%A9minin (page to be approuve this week ;-)) https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Joueuse_du_Servette_FC_Ch%C3%AAnois
It's possible to have the same login in all wikipedia ? I know, there is a lot of rules and not the same rules in all wikipedia but is the same aim, no ?
I'm not a bad guys, sure, i'm 47 years old and i have no time to be a bad guys :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SFCCF ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
In French there one expression "Too many rules kill the rules" "Trop de règles tuent les règles| Trop d'informations tuent les informations". Don't worry, "la patience est la mère des vertues / Patience is the mother of virtues"... not sure the translation is correct but I try:-( — Preceding unsigned comment added by SFCCF ( talk • contribs) 23:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank's a lot for the suggestion I begin with the third, because SFCCF his my own creation for the acronyme of Servette Football Club Chênois féminin ;-).
I am a volunteer who campaigned for the development of Women's Football in Geneva and this nickname corresponds to me. For that I would like to keep it as much as possible :-)
This guiy is me
https://www.proxifoot.ch/new/2017/02/salvatore-musso-les-recrues-vont-beaucoup-nous-apporter/
Salvatore
(talk to me) 11:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
do it: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_names
photography | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 2195 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for welcoming me. I want to ask if you can help me review a page that I created? I have posted about it on the help desk too. I want to bring my knowledge of banking, finance, politics, and human rights here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FZR2020 ( talk • contribs) 02:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Thankyou for understanding me. That were my past mistakes and childish behaviours. Even after creating first and second socks, I never intended to destructive editing and any promotions. I may be banned from Wikipedia anytime so I thought to thank you. — GargAvinash talk 15:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Here's an unusual one. I rejected this editor's sandbox draft (they keep meddling with my attempts to clean it up for them but that's a separate issue). Then I noticed that they copied all my userboxes and user infobox from my own userpage to theirs. They made some minor changes to dates and locations and the content is displayed at their userpage with user rights they don't have etc. (although not hard to spot for most people I expect). I was tempted to delete it but not certain of my ground as in userspace "Db-something" could apply I suppose? I have left a message at their TP but no response. Any advice? Cheers. Eagleash ( talk) 12:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary. I just happened upon your user page, after seeing your comments at the Help Desk in a section immediately above a question that I just posted there. I just wanted to say hi, and to tell you that I admire your edits, as well as your approach to the details posted at your user page. I really like the way that you have laid out your editing philosophy here, and I enjoyed seeing the numerous edits reflected by your barnstars. I appreciate all your apparent efforts here. I think you've given me some ideas that I may try out sometime, for my own user page sometime. thanks!! -- Sm8900 ( talk) 12:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Look at your response here. Yes, I'm way behind. It used to be the Teahouse where I was behind but they changed their archive structure.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary, in this message if I sond rude it is intentional. I am the person who keeps editing the wiked wikipedia page, I would like to say that Wicked is a common phrase in New England. Maybe before calling out someones edit you should do some reasarch, dum dum. I would like to say you are a shame to the whole wikipedia comunity. Please respond to my message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HairyLittleMan ( talk • contribs) 04:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Best regards, HairyLittleMan
You answered someone's question about Wikidata, and someone else asked a very complicated question about Wikidata that didn't get an answer. Could you go here and see if you can answer the question or find someone who can? Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reconfirming. But, I can't access the article's talk nor my watchlist responses. Which means what, exactly? And for what period of time? Thanks. Pasdecomplot ( talk) 16:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, can't seem to reply to you at oneplace. Tried. But, yes, still can't access talk. Can read watchlist list, but not access info in actual posts. (Apologies if lack of knowledge prevented reply at oneplace.) Pasdecomplot ( talk) 12:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply and advice. Domnica Lungu ( talk) 14:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Bishonen | tålk 20:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC).
Dear Hoary, I was looking back through the Help Desk archive, hopeless of finding an answer to my question. It made my day to see your answer and help. Thank you for your service to Wikipedia, keep up the good work. Mohammad 19:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC) |
Hoary, I want to thank you for helping me relocate the page Draft:Mark Gillespie from (music producer) to (music manager). The original draft was moved by an admin to (music producer). However, the draft contained no text or cited source suggesting the subject was about music production. The admin then denied the article, stating it did not meet the musical notability criteria needed for a music producer. After various Talks about how I deemed it an inaccurate move without basis, the admin explained that they did not see the difference between production of music and business of music. Although the differences were explained in detail, the admin yielded yet refused to move the article to its correct location. Whether this was because the admin forgot or refused under malice, I never thought the day would come where I would see the draft moved. Enter, user Hoary. Now, I finally feel confident in my resubmitting.
All of that being said, I thank you. 2020 Isn’t all bad. Bouncecouncil ( talk) 14:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Would you be so kind as to delete the redirect Forensic Oceanography, so as to make way for Draft:Forensic Oceanography please? Thank you. - Lopifalko ( talk) 14:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Recovery | ||
For your devoted recovery work on the Ariko Inaoka article. Netherzone ( talk) 21:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hoglin2020 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Hi, Thanks for your review of my submission for Steven Paul Carver. I see that you question the contents of the site "Invaluable.com". This is an independent site. I assume you clicked on the "more details" button to see the information about Mr. Carver. I agree that the content was probably written by him at some point, as most artists and authors are asked to write their own bios quite often.
The reason I included so many references was that I have been consistently asked to provide more references, so I carefully looked at each reference I had and included it next to as many facts as I could find in that reference. Should I use it less often if the fact is referenced somewhere else?
Thanks,
Joy
Gammajv ( talk) 15:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. thanks for your respond. How I declare that i am not getting paid for creating an article.... actually, this is going to be my first article, I am doing this for an artist that i know, it would be based on multiple articles and books about his career. I work in a totally different field. I am not a philologist or literature professional, I don't even like that, I don't read books, and I am not a writer... i just like challenges and if I can help somebody I would do my best to do it..... Now, should I add a link to the article probing that I am not getting paid for this...? Joannych Joannych ( talk) 00:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
I might need your help to stop someone obviously starting an edit war in this article, and precisely this paragraph. In spite of my arguments, and invitations to discuss facts on the talk page, in the dedicated section I created for him after already a few reverts from him ( Second section called "Do not start an edit war on wrong definitions"), he keeps reverting and bringing provocations without answers to the points If and when you have time, I will appreciate that you intervene. Thanks in advance, Rgds, -- Emigré55 ( talk) 13:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, you are right. From his 63 year long coaching career, we should just focus on those 2 years, that are r elated to BALCO. Sounds right. Radspeed ( talk) 09:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear "Hoary",
Thanks for your comments on my draft.
As a new contributor, I confused Wikipedia's specific uses of the terms "References" and "Sources". I am now confining myself to "References" (effectively footnotes) and "External Links" at the foot of the article. Having no previous experience of coding, I think that I have managed to use the referencing code more or less correctly although there are a couple of specialist queries that you may be able to help me with.(eg 2 editions of the same book. I am also unable to delete the references that I put in the wrong place. Thanks. Broadfields ( talk) 12:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Will take a look and try to iron out the remaining issues.
Would you be willing to review the submission again once I'm done? GregorB ( talk) 10:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks so much for your feedback on Draft: Charles Tracy (art historian). The piece was put together by a very new wikipedia editor, so this was all really good feedback for her! I and another person have helped to adjust the article, I hope in line with your suggestions. Thank you for all the tips! KerstingFan ( talk) 12:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your comment about the articles. I included so many because they were written for two serious academic journals in the field of art history, and help to show the depth and breadth of Dr Gordon's scholarship and art historical activities, alongside her many years of curatorial work for the National Gallery, and in addition to the books she has written and co-written. I hope this helps to clarify. I'm grateful for your input - thank you! CourtauldGill ( talk) 18:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary. Since you've reviewed Draft:Oswaldo Castro Intriago and seem to be trying to help sort it, I just though I'd let you know about User talk:Oscar Waldoosty#Conflict of interest editing for a little more background on the draft and it's creator; that might explain why the references seem overly primary or as "digressive notes" as you pointed out. Having a COI shouldn't be reason why this draft can't perhaps someday become an article, but it might explain all of the detail the draft contains as well as the sources being cited. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Is there any way that this block could be made an indefinite one given their disturbingly Karenesque behaviour? I don't think they're going to do anything but the exact same content removal and screed-posting once that 31h expires. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 12:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
I've wondered (for some time actually!) whether the difficulty here is a vision issue. Using some kind of software to read our posts to them and perhaps another type to edit or reply. I've noticed idiosyncratic misspellings over the years; E.g. recent writing of my username as 'Eglish' even though it was correctly rendered only 2 lines above. That's how it might sound if read 'phonetically' as it were (it's actually Eagle-ash, but that's not important right now!) And possibly David Biddulph as 'Birrulph' (amongst other versions). If they'd say what the issue is it would be better all round. Eagleash ( talk) 03:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I'll try to comment on the first three of AlanM1's points.
-- Hoary ( talk) 01:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary, I added Patrick MacDowell to page... He was great great grandfather and this information will be of great interest as his work is at Belfast City Hall, St Paul's Cath and Houses of Parliament.. Gives link between past and present.. Master Carver.. I have enormous experience and a Masters Degree Verdant333 ( talk) 22:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
That's an amazing reply! My gr gr grandaddy could be left out cus he only made 4 prime ministers in marble and JMW Turner looking silly.. I never met him.. 105 years deaded before I squeezed out of my mamma body. I'm trying to give people the gist of the life of a real artist whos made commissions in different places.... Did the most important work of Scottish modern art.. It made the old fella the Scots Makar when they saw my work..then he was writing the poem which opened a new parliament... He remembered the poor student who made his graven image😉 Verdant333 ( talk) 23:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Master is more so denoting a ' Woodcarver', an experienced guy in a workshop, or someone with a large body of work. Can you tell me what else needs to be amended in this article please. I'm just complimenting you on your replies! Verdant333 ( talk) 19:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Hoary, Drake got publicity after his death in Gloucester. He was a very well known elderly black chap. his funeral at Gloucester Cathedral was well attended. The article attempts to give him recognition. Innes worked for him as stipulated. Tell us what is acceptible? Do we delete Drake cus there is no reference. However there is one photo of Drake and Innes working at Glos cathedral together. Same with Isabella, Innes and her worked together before she became famous. Do we delete that.. People will remember Izzie and Inny together. Verdant333 ( talk) 11:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I have started from June 14 forward, looking for good info to add back into the article. I am not very WP-tech savvy, at retrieving from old versions, so there may be a number of things I neglect to properly correct. Thanks for your help with the Amazon problem, shoutyness and gushing! I should have recognized the gushiness myself, and edited that too, before re-adding. Thanks once again for working your Admin magic, and restoring to the earlier version. Best, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hoary, Excuse bias of R. D. Innes who is often scathing and calvinistic about the art works he produces. The Wood is maybe in time seen to be the most notable work of Scottish Modern Art. It made Morgan... A respected city poet somebody at the end of his life... A Glasgow Laureate and shortly after the Scots Makar.. In a short time who wrote the most important modern poem in Britain. A poem which opened a new Parliament!.. Brilliant idea and very Scottish. The Innes article gives people in Scotland key information and is highly notable. Verdant333 ( talk) 14:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Hoary, I have deleted downwards.. Tidied article. Detailed advice, please give to get it published. There are two newspaper articles and Morgan's book. Its on Wikita, not sure what relationship it has with Wikipedia. It wasn't me who put it on Wikita, I am pleased. Verdant333 ( talk) 22:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello thanks for your comments. Yes I run VIMS. And I know Chila, having introduced him to NPG staff. I don’t see that as a problem is it? Thanks for your comments. I'll do more work to add some summaries. And there's another source discussing his work that Ive not cited. Thanks again davidz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dz3 ( talk • contribs) 08:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ive done more work on the draft, added more refs and expanded. For now that's all I can do. I'd like to add another similar bio of the other photographer in the original show but wait to see what you make this. thanks again david — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dz3 ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Dear Hoary, many thanks for your comments. Much appreciated. On Chila there aren't really sources to warrant further expansion though there are things in the pipeline for next year. The main expansion I envisage will have to wait until I can see him so I can get releases for some sample images. And yes indeed we need to work out a process to deal with the Finlak draft. Dz3 ( talk) 07:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
As you have been instrumental at the beginning of this article on the
"Portrait of a Noble young Lady", I would like to ask your opinion on the applicable rule of Wikipedia,
WP:RS/SPS, regarding blogs by experts.
My arguments on its applicability have been totally ignored/disregarded by the other contributors, whereas
I detailed them in this thread. None of the contributors who denied and reverted this source in the article did even take the time to answer my detailed explanations, and evidences provided (i.e., that the disputed case abides by this rule).
Instead of properly answering my arguments in this very thread, they diverted and hence biased the discussion in trying to oppose a "consensus". "Consensus" which not only was not met in this article, but also is not cited by the said rule as a necessary condition for the eligibility/reliability of the source.
Note that this discussion was also brought by reasons which have nothing to do with the article,
as summarised in this thread by another contributor.
In my opinion, if the rule, as I recall it in my thread, does not mention "consensus" of the community on the blog or his author, it is enough to see it as a reliable source, if all criteria cited by the rule, and only them, are met.
What is your opinion?
Thank you in advance,--
Emigré55 (
talk) 10:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I strongly agree with your view that Issei Suda was an outstanding photographer. The problem with his article is that it doesn't (can't?) contain any of his works because none exist in Commons. I don't see how it will ever get beyond start class while the only image is to the spines of some of his photobooks. And Suda is dead, which makes matters easier in principle when writing good articles. Aside from the prima donna tendencies, Ed Gold is also an outstanding photographer (IMO, at least) AND we have available photos properly licensed under {{CC BY-SA 4.0}}. So let's try to move forward to improve the article, otherwise I just think we are all WP:NOTHERE. Mike Turnbull ( talk) 14:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hoary, I am preparing text for a Samuel Finlak entry similar to the Chila one. Any thoughts on how to address the CoI issues that I have? I'm happy to pass basic draft on to you as a third party to assess/ finish. Dz3 ( talk) 09:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
OK if that's allowed that will be fine. Just a few more things to check Dz3 ( talk) 16:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hoary,
the Samuel Finlak draft is now at a similar state to the Chila one. Ive put a photo of him in wikimedia commons too. Happy for you to look at it when you have a moment Many thanks dz ( Hoary, Dz3 ( talk) 09:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Its really one source for both - now inserted but not sure if in right place. Nor how to put in page ref correctly ( Hoary, Dz3 ( talk) 10:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
https://www.thoughtco.com/tiberius-roman-emperor-121262 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 06:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I want to know where in the article put the source 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
The problem is where to put the reference because I don't want to be reversed later 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiberius His period as a Roman emperor 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I asked 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
The way you spoke to me in the Teahouse is not acceptable. Please modify your netiquette. Cheers Hockeycatcat ( talk) 06:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Bound (1996 film) I am very annoyed by current ref #9. It is used a-v, Twenty-two citations... yet there is no way to truly confirm this source. Every portion wikilinks to a WP article, and not to an actual source. Even "DVD" wikilinks to the WP article on DVDs. These same 22 citations where present when the article was graded as a GA in 2009. So, WTF? failed verification for all citations??? (Not the way I really want to go...to be honest.) Who wrote the source material? Where did it come from? The source may have been the liner notes for the DVD, but surely, there is a better way to attribute. What would have been the proper way to cite? Rather annoyed, but perhaps I am wrong to be annoyed....Thanks for any possible help, and for allowing me to vent. Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
( 223.230.128.8 ( talk) 14:53, 5 January 2020 (UTC))
The article on Franken rightly has a substantial section on "Sexual misconduct allegations". The introduction to the article rightly says that "Franken resigned on January 2, 2018, after several allegations of sexual misconduct were made against him." To me, this seems enough. Perhaps to you it does not. If it doesn't, please argue for this in Talk:Al Franken. And when you do edit articles, be candid in your edit summaries about what you are doing. This was not a "Minor edit to clarify one sentence and add references to current status of subject". The meaning of "minor edit" is explained here. -- Hoary ( talk) 07:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC) Posted to User talk:Dale B. Phelps; pasted here by 8.46.95.20
Since you reverted my request for unprotection, that is removal of the move not the semi-protection, of The Rebel Media, which I'm not sure why, can you kindly un-move protect the page?
Thanks,
Doug Mehus
T·
C 13:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
I have nominated Sicilian Baroque for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Beland ( talk) 00:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, there have been two new accounts editing the page, again demonstrating the same levels of competence and making similar edits to the three blocked accounts. I gave the first one the benefit of the doubt even though they sneaked the degrees back into the infobox after fiddling with the parameters. The second one, I'm more sure (as I can be at this stage) that it is yet another incarnation. It has made similar edits to the others, including disruptive ones to Zuckerberg's page (again) and the two new accounts are also talking to each other. Should these newer accounts be reported to SPI (not something I have experience of)? Eagleash ( talk) 07:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you; Yes I was following the ANI (I've been 'involved' with the 'Shamsheer problem' since last May when the help desk was disrupted with persistent incompetent requests) and was disappointed but not surprised, when the thread got archived without any input. ANI does not seem to react to this kind of 'low-level' disruption no matter how long it has gone on for. Cheers. Eagleash ( talk) 08:38, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
There's an editor here who seems nothing but disruptive so far. Some of their efforts have been deleted, but they persist in creating article and article-type material mainly in user space. (including pasting their own name into the article about Virat Kohli and submitting it). In some of these they claim to be a 14-year-old boy from Bihar. Coincidence? Probably, but.. Cheers, Eagleash ( talk) 12:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Care to take a look:
This is a mayor issue now. Look for my User page to learn all this guys Sock puppets. And all his personal attacks and accustions. Mr.User200 ( talk) 13:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Hoary!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DGG (
talk ) 07:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello! Your submission of Teikō Shiotani at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
based on your question sir,
You suggest that you're working on a biography. At the top of your user talk page, you write "Working on creating a client biography". Do you mean that you're working, or that you're intending to work, on the biography of somebody who is a client of yours? -- Hoary (talk) 00:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Yes, it's a client biography — Preceding unsigned comment added by ViciousProxy ( talk • contribs) 06:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, the situation with this editor has been ongoing since 2015. Multiple editors have tried to assist and / or asked for an explanation. The editor has an account but more often edits whilst 'logged out' (multiple IPs). The account TP has multiple comments about their level of competence and there was an ANI which had no result. It has largely been felt, I believe, that the editor is a net positive and HD volunteers usually just fix the edits. Cheers. Eagleash ( talk) 04:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
On 7 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Teikō Shiotani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Teikō Shiotani photographed View with Weather Forecast (shown) from his upstairs window, exaggerating the curvature of the horizon by bending the photographic paper under the enlarger? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teikō Shiotani. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Teikō Shiotani), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
--valereee ( talk) 00:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the modification
I try to use the same pseudo in all the "wikipedia" portal (Otherwise I'm going crazy).
My complete profile is here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:SFCCF
I'm a fans of women soccer since 23 years but my job, is in the Geneva Airport :-) Sandy plays not in Servette FC but in Servette Fooball Club Chênois féminin https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servette_football_club_ch%C3%AAnois_f%C3%A9minin (page to be approuve this week ;-)) https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Joueuse_du_Servette_FC_Ch%C3%AAnois
It's possible to have the same login in all wikipedia ? I know, there is a lot of rules and not the same rules in all wikipedia but is the same aim, no ?
I'm not a bad guys, sure, i'm 47 years old and i have no time to be a bad guys :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SFCCF ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
In French there one expression "Too many rules kill the rules" "Trop de règles tuent les règles| Trop d'informations tuent les informations". Don't worry, "la patience est la mère des vertues / Patience is the mother of virtues"... not sure the translation is correct but I try:-( — Preceding unsigned comment added by SFCCF ( talk • contribs) 23:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank's a lot for the suggestion I begin with the third, because SFCCF his my own creation for the acronyme of Servette Football Club Chênois féminin ;-).
I am a volunteer who campaigned for the development of Women's Football in Geneva and this nickname corresponds to me. For that I would like to keep it as much as possible :-)
This guiy is me
https://www.proxifoot.ch/new/2017/02/salvatore-musso-les-recrues-vont-beaucoup-nous-apporter/
Salvatore
(talk to me) 11:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
do it: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_names
photography | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 2195 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for welcoming me. I want to ask if you can help me review a page that I created? I have posted about it on the help desk too. I want to bring my knowledge of banking, finance, politics, and human rights here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FZR2020 ( talk • contribs) 02:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Thankyou for understanding me. That were my past mistakes and childish behaviours. Even after creating first and second socks, I never intended to destructive editing and any promotions. I may be banned from Wikipedia anytime so I thought to thank you. — GargAvinash talk 15:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Here's an unusual one. I rejected this editor's sandbox draft (they keep meddling with my attempts to clean it up for them but that's a separate issue). Then I noticed that they copied all my userboxes and user infobox from my own userpage to theirs. They made some minor changes to dates and locations and the content is displayed at their userpage with user rights they don't have etc. (although not hard to spot for most people I expect). I was tempted to delete it but not certain of my ground as in userspace "Db-something" could apply I suppose? I have left a message at their TP but no response. Any advice? Cheers. Eagleash ( talk) 12:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary. I just happened upon your user page, after seeing your comments at the Help Desk in a section immediately above a question that I just posted there. I just wanted to say hi, and to tell you that I admire your edits, as well as your approach to the details posted at your user page. I really like the way that you have laid out your editing philosophy here, and I enjoyed seeing the numerous edits reflected by your barnstars. I appreciate all your apparent efforts here. I think you've given me some ideas that I may try out sometime, for my own user page sometime. thanks!! -- Sm8900 ( talk) 12:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Look at your response here. Yes, I'm way behind. It used to be the Teahouse where I was behind but they changed their archive structure.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary, in this message if I sond rude it is intentional. I am the person who keeps editing the wiked wikipedia page, I would like to say that Wicked is a common phrase in New England. Maybe before calling out someones edit you should do some reasarch, dum dum. I would like to say you are a shame to the whole wikipedia comunity. Please respond to my message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HairyLittleMan ( talk • contribs) 04:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Best regards, HairyLittleMan
You answered someone's question about Wikidata, and someone else asked a very complicated question about Wikidata that didn't get an answer. Could you go here and see if you can answer the question or find someone who can? Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reconfirming. But, I can't access the article's talk nor my watchlist responses. Which means what, exactly? And for what period of time? Thanks. Pasdecomplot ( talk) 16:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, can't seem to reply to you at oneplace. Tried. But, yes, still can't access talk. Can read watchlist list, but not access info in actual posts. (Apologies if lack of knowledge prevented reply at oneplace.) Pasdecomplot ( talk) 12:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply and advice. Domnica Lungu ( talk) 14:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Bishonen | tålk 20:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC).
Dear Hoary, I was looking back through the Help Desk archive, hopeless of finding an answer to my question. It made my day to see your answer and help. Thank you for your service to Wikipedia, keep up the good work. Mohammad 19:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC) |
Hoary, I want to thank you for helping me relocate the page Draft:Mark Gillespie from (music producer) to (music manager). The original draft was moved by an admin to (music producer). However, the draft contained no text or cited source suggesting the subject was about music production. The admin then denied the article, stating it did not meet the musical notability criteria needed for a music producer. After various Talks about how I deemed it an inaccurate move without basis, the admin explained that they did not see the difference between production of music and business of music. Although the differences were explained in detail, the admin yielded yet refused to move the article to its correct location. Whether this was because the admin forgot or refused under malice, I never thought the day would come where I would see the draft moved. Enter, user Hoary. Now, I finally feel confident in my resubmitting.
All of that being said, I thank you. 2020 Isn’t all bad. Bouncecouncil ( talk) 14:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Would you be so kind as to delete the redirect Forensic Oceanography, so as to make way for Draft:Forensic Oceanography please? Thank you. - Lopifalko ( talk) 14:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Recovery | ||
For your devoted recovery work on the Ariko Inaoka article. Netherzone ( talk) 21:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hoglin2020 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Hi, Thanks for your review of my submission for Steven Paul Carver. I see that you question the contents of the site "Invaluable.com". This is an independent site. I assume you clicked on the "more details" button to see the information about Mr. Carver. I agree that the content was probably written by him at some point, as most artists and authors are asked to write their own bios quite often.
The reason I included so many references was that I have been consistently asked to provide more references, so I carefully looked at each reference I had and included it next to as many facts as I could find in that reference. Should I use it less often if the fact is referenced somewhere else?
Thanks,
Joy
Gammajv ( talk) 15:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. thanks for your respond. How I declare that i am not getting paid for creating an article.... actually, this is going to be my first article, I am doing this for an artist that i know, it would be based on multiple articles and books about his career. I work in a totally different field. I am not a philologist or literature professional, I don't even like that, I don't read books, and I am not a writer... i just like challenges and if I can help somebody I would do my best to do it..... Now, should I add a link to the article probing that I am not getting paid for this...? Joannych Joannych ( talk) 00:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
I might need your help to stop someone obviously starting an edit war in this article, and precisely this paragraph. In spite of my arguments, and invitations to discuss facts on the talk page, in the dedicated section I created for him after already a few reverts from him ( Second section called "Do not start an edit war on wrong definitions"), he keeps reverting and bringing provocations without answers to the points If and when you have time, I will appreciate that you intervene. Thanks in advance, Rgds, -- Emigré55 ( talk) 13:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, you are right. From his 63 year long coaching career, we should just focus on those 2 years, that are r elated to BALCO. Sounds right. Radspeed ( talk) 09:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear "Hoary",
Thanks for your comments on my draft.
As a new contributor, I confused Wikipedia's specific uses of the terms "References" and "Sources". I am now confining myself to "References" (effectively footnotes) and "External Links" at the foot of the article. Having no previous experience of coding, I think that I have managed to use the referencing code more or less correctly although there are a couple of specialist queries that you may be able to help me with.(eg 2 editions of the same book. I am also unable to delete the references that I put in the wrong place. Thanks. Broadfields ( talk) 12:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Will take a look and try to iron out the remaining issues.
Would you be willing to review the submission again once I'm done? GregorB ( talk) 10:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks so much for your feedback on Draft: Charles Tracy (art historian). The piece was put together by a very new wikipedia editor, so this was all really good feedback for her! I and another person have helped to adjust the article, I hope in line with your suggestions. Thank you for all the tips! KerstingFan ( talk) 12:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your comment about the articles. I included so many because they were written for two serious academic journals in the field of art history, and help to show the depth and breadth of Dr Gordon's scholarship and art historical activities, alongside her many years of curatorial work for the National Gallery, and in addition to the books she has written and co-written. I hope this helps to clarify. I'm grateful for your input - thank you! CourtauldGill ( talk) 18:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary. Since you've reviewed Draft:Oswaldo Castro Intriago and seem to be trying to help sort it, I just though I'd let you know about User talk:Oscar Waldoosty#Conflict of interest editing for a little more background on the draft and it's creator; that might explain why the references seem overly primary or as "digressive notes" as you pointed out. Having a COI shouldn't be reason why this draft can't perhaps someday become an article, but it might explain all of the detail the draft contains as well as the sources being cited. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Is there any way that this block could be made an indefinite one given their disturbingly Karenesque behaviour? I don't think they're going to do anything but the exact same content removal and screed-posting once that 31h expires. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 12:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
I've wondered (for some time actually!) whether the difficulty here is a vision issue. Using some kind of software to read our posts to them and perhaps another type to edit or reply. I've noticed idiosyncratic misspellings over the years; E.g. recent writing of my username as 'Eglish' even though it was correctly rendered only 2 lines above. That's how it might sound if read 'phonetically' as it were (it's actually Eagle-ash, but that's not important right now!) And possibly David Biddulph as 'Birrulph' (amongst other versions). If they'd say what the issue is it would be better all round. Eagleash ( talk) 03:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I'll try to comment on the first three of AlanM1's points.
-- Hoary ( talk) 01:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hoary, I added Patrick MacDowell to page... He was great great grandfather and this information will be of great interest as his work is at Belfast City Hall, St Paul's Cath and Houses of Parliament.. Gives link between past and present.. Master Carver.. I have enormous experience and a Masters Degree Verdant333 ( talk) 22:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
That's an amazing reply! My gr gr grandaddy could be left out cus he only made 4 prime ministers in marble and JMW Turner looking silly.. I never met him.. 105 years deaded before I squeezed out of my mamma body. I'm trying to give people the gist of the life of a real artist whos made commissions in different places.... Did the most important work of Scottish modern art.. It made the old fella the Scots Makar when they saw my work..then he was writing the poem which opened a new parliament... He remembered the poor student who made his graven image😉 Verdant333 ( talk) 23:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Master is more so denoting a ' Woodcarver', an experienced guy in a workshop, or someone with a large body of work. Can you tell me what else needs to be amended in this article please. I'm just complimenting you on your replies! Verdant333 ( talk) 19:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Hoary, Drake got publicity after his death in Gloucester. He was a very well known elderly black chap. his funeral at Gloucester Cathedral was well attended. The article attempts to give him recognition. Innes worked for him as stipulated. Tell us what is acceptible? Do we delete Drake cus there is no reference. However there is one photo of Drake and Innes working at Glos cathedral together. Same with Isabella, Innes and her worked together before she became famous. Do we delete that.. People will remember Izzie and Inny together. Verdant333 ( talk) 11:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I have started from June 14 forward, looking for good info to add back into the article. I am not very WP-tech savvy, at retrieving from old versions, so there may be a number of things I neglect to properly correct. Thanks for your help with the Amazon problem, shoutyness and gushing! I should have recognized the gushiness myself, and edited that too, before re-adding. Thanks once again for working your Admin magic, and restoring to the earlier version. Best, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hoary, Excuse bias of R. D. Innes who is often scathing and calvinistic about the art works he produces. The Wood is maybe in time seen to be the most notable work of Scottish Modern Art. It made Morgan... A respected city poet somebody at the end of his life... A Glasgow Laureate and shortly after the Scots Makar.. In a short time who wrote the most important modern poem in Britain. A poem which opened a new Parliament!.. Brilliant idea and very Scottish. The Innes article gives people in Scotland key information and is highly notable. Verdant333 ( talk) 14:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Hoary, I have deleted downwards.. Tidied article. Detailed advice, please give to get it published. There are two newspaper articles and Morgan's book. Its on Wikita, not sure what relationship it has with Wikipedia. It wasn't me who put it on Wikita, I am pleased. Verdant333 ( talk) 22:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello thanks for your comments. Yes I run VIMS. And I know Chila, having introduced him to NPG staff. I don’t see that as a problem is it? Thanks for your comments. I'll do more work to add some summaries. And there's another source discussing his work that Ive not cited. Thanks again davidz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dz3 ( talk • contribs) 08:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ive done more work on the draft, added more refs and expanded. For now that's all I can do. I'd like to add another similar bio of the other photographer in the original show but wait to see what you make this. thanks again david — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dz3 ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Dear Hoary, many thanks for your comments. Much appreciated. On Chila there aren't really sources to warrant further expansion though there are things in the pipeline for next year. The main expansion I envisage will have to wait until I can see him so I can get releases for some sample images. And yes indeed we need to work out a process to deal with the Finlak draft. Dz3 ( talk) 07:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
As you have been instrumental at the beginning of this article on the
"Portrait of a Noble young Lady", I would like to ask your opinion on the applicable rule of Wikipedia,
WP:RS/SPS, regarding blogs by experts.
My arguments on its applicability have been totally ignored/disregarded by the other contributors, whereas
I detailed them in this thread. None of the contributors who denied and reverted this source in the article did even take the time to answer my detailed explanations, and evidences provided (i.e., that the disputed case abides by this rule).
Instead of properly answering my arguments in this very thread, they diverted and hence biased the discussion in trying to oppose a "consensus". "Consensus" which not only was not met in this article, but also is not cited by the said rule as a necessary condition for the eligibility/reliability of the source.
Note that this discussion was also brought by reasons which have nothing to do with the article,
as summarised in this thread by another contributor.
In my opinion, if the rule, as I recall it in my thread, does not mention "consensus" of the community on the blog or his author, it is enough to see it as a reliable source, if all criteria cited by the rule, and only them, are met.
What is your opinion?
Thank you in advance,--
Emigré55 (
talk) 10:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I strongly agree with your view that Issei Suda was an outstanding photographer. The problem with his article is that it doesn't (can't?) contain any of his works because none exist in Commons. I don't see how it will ever get beyond start class while the only image is to the spines of some of his photobooks. And Suda is dead, which makes matters easier in principle when writing good articles. Aside from the prima donna tendencies, Ed Gold is also an outstanding photographer (IMO, at least) AND we have available photos properly licensed under {{CC BY-SA 4.0}}. So let's try to move forward to improve the article, otherwise I just think we are all WP:NOTHERE. Mike Turnbull ( talk) 14:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hoary, I am preparing text for a Samuel Finlak entry similar to the Chila one. Any thoughts on how to address the CoI issues that I have? I'm happy to pass basic draft on to you as a third party to assess/ finish. Dz3 ( talk) 09:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
OK if that's allowed that will be fine. Just a few more things to check Dz3 ( talk) 16:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hoary,
the Samuel Finlak draft is now at a similar state to the Chila one. Ive put a photo of him in wikimedia commons too. Happy for you to look at it when you have a moment Many thanks dz ( Hoary, Dz3 ( talk) 09:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Its really one source for both - now inserted but not sure if in right place. Nor how to put in page ref correctly ( Hoary, Dz3 ( talk) 10:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
https://www.thoughtco.com/tiberius-roman-emperor-121262 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 06:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I want to know where in the article put the source 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
The problem is where to put the reference because I don't want to be reversed later 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiberius His period as a Roman emperor 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I asked 👀Gremista.32 ( talk) 08:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
The way you spoke to me in the Teahouse is not acceptable. Please modify your netiquette. Cheers Hockeycatcat ( talk) 06:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Bound (1996 film) I am very annoyed by current ref #9. It is used a-v, Twenty-two citations... yet there is no way to truly confirm this source. Every portion wikilinks to a WP article, and not to an actual source. Even "DVD" wikilinks to the WP article on DVDs. These same 22 citations where present when the article was graded as a GA in 2009. So, WTF? failed verification for all citations??? (Not the way I really want to go...to be honest.) Who wrote the source material? Where did it come from? The source may have been the liner notes for the DVD, but surely, there is a better way to attribute. What would have been the proper way to cite? Rather annoyed, but perhaps I am wrong to be annoyed....Thanks for any possible help, and for allowing me to vent. Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)