Hi Alvinategyeka! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 10:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Davinia Esther Anyakun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin ( talk) 16:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Agnes Nandutu. Thanks! Nosebagbear ( talk) 19:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The Sqoop source isn't a very trusted source for systems

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agnes Nandutu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Agnes Nandutu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 ( talk) 09:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Agnes Nandutu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Agnes Nandutu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo ( talk) 12:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Rose Kirumira, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi - just a personal note to explain in a bit more detail why I moved this to draft. Your article was about a living person, but it didn't contain any sources at all - our verifiability require that information is referenced to reliable sources, and with biographies of living people it's particularly important. You can carry on working on the article as a draft until it's ready to publish, with reliable sourcing demonstrating that the subject is notable, and then move it back into article space when it's ready. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 14:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:Layout and WP:Tone altogether. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rose Kirumira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rose Kirumira, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( ^talk) 16:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rose Kirumira. Thanks! Sulfurboy ( talk) 16:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

I have made corrections on the article, please review again and advise accordingly. Thanks alot Alvinategyeka ( talk) 19:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Robina Hope Mukisa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 ( talk) 17:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Lydia Daphine Mirembe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 ( talk) 17:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Catherine Lamwaka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 ( talk) 17:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Lydia Daphine Mirembe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt ( talk) 07:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot, look forward to creating more Alvinategyeka ( talk) 10:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Catherine Lamwaka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 16:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot, this is encouraging, look forward to creating more articles. Thanks Alvinategyeka ( talk) 19:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply

A better place for a request like that is Wikipedia:Teahouse. Art LaPella ( talk) 17:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Oh thanks alot let me move it there Alvinategyeka ( talk) 20:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NARTIST for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rose Kirumira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rose Kirumira, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks let me work on the mistakes and resubmit. Thanks Alvinategyeka ( talk) 06:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I did some copyediting and clean-up, but it still needs work before being submitted again. David notMD ( talk) 11:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Robina Hope Mukisa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks looking forward to creating more. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I also cleaned up this article. Please take more care with capitalization. Also, punctuation marks are placed before the references, not after. David notMD ( talk) 11:51, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot Alvinategyeka ( talk) 12:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Agnes Kunihira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO    A& E⇑  10:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Jane Avur Pacuto, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren ( talk) 10:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot Alvinategyeka ( talk) 12:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Rosette Kajungu Mutambi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae ( talk) 13:45, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Agnes Kunihira, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 18:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the guidance Alvinategyeka ( talk) 18:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot Alvinategyeka ( talk) 18:49, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Rosette Kajungu Mutambi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PATH SLOPU 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot, looking forward to creating more Alvinategyeka ( talk) 08:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

wikipedia cannot source itself

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noeline Kisembo Basemera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noeline Kisembo Basemera, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy ( talk) 23:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Ok let me remove Wikipedia as a source and add more citations Alvinategyeka ( talk) 23:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Margaret Mbeiza Kisira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Margaret Mbeiza Kisira, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Some of the articles I submitted were rejected for lack of enough sources. The people I wrote about are members of parliament of uganda(some in their first term of office) and don't have enough coverage. Requesting for more advice, any additions and corrections to the rejected articles is highly appreciated. Thanks Alvinategyeka ( talk) 06:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Lowila CD Oketayot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 08:26, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot. I appreciate Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Noeline Kisembo Basemera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 09:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot, look forward to improving as I edit more articles. Thanks Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Margaret Mbeiza Kisira, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin ( talk) 13:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot. This is encouraging. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 16:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! You created a thread called Article about ROSE KIRUMIRA NAMUBIRU at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{ nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot ( talk) 19:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! You created a thread called Article ajilo elogu at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot ( talk) 19:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! You created a thread called Artles mbeiza kisira and kisembo basemera at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot ( talk) 19:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! You created a thread called Article Rose Kirumira Namubiru at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot ( talk) 19:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Pamela Nasiyo Kamugo instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Nasiyo Kamugo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pamela Nasiyo Kamugo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin ( talk) 13:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

This is very unfair, I created my article yesterday and submitted it and someone made the same article after me, but since he used the main space, mine was not allowed but am the one who created the page first Alvinategyeka ( talk) 14:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Caroline Kamusiime, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin ( talk) 14:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot. I appreciate Alvinategyeka ( talk) 20:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

I see that you are creating many articles, and you continue to make the same errors in capitalization, spacing, etc. Names of schools and companies are capitalized

• Bishop Comboni College Kanungu (and if Kanungu is a place and not part of the name, then a comma before)
• Makerere University
• British American Tobacco, Uganda
• Caltex, Uganda
• "she won with a two(2) vote margin" need a space between two and (2)

You also persist in creating hyperlinks in the body of the article, for example:

• In the Uganda parliament, she serves on the legal and parliamentary affairs committee
• she later on joined merry land high school
• In parliament she serves on the committee on human rights

Once you start an article with a name (Pamela Nasiyo Kamugo) use only the surname for all subsequent mentions.

Please consider returning to your drafts and your articles to improve the copyediting errors. David notMD ( talk) 21:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much, I'll have to rectify the errors. Thanks for the advice Alvinategyeka ( talk) 21:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Another observation: you have a tendency toward long sentences, separating sections by commas, when short sentences would be better. See this especially in the Education sections, where you do all the schools as a run-on sentence. I cleaned up Lucy, but will not do the other. Gook luck with the applications. David notMD ( talk) 19:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks let me work on the other too. And I will make sure I use short sentences in my subsequent articles Alvinategyeka ( talk) 20:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Jane Nabulindo Kwoba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 22:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks, this is encouraging Alvinategyeka ( talk) 22:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Driwaru Zaitun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 23:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot. Appreciate Alvinategyeka ( talk) 23:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Egunyu Janepher Nantume, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 01:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks, much more encouraging Alvinategyeka ( talk) 06:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Achiro Lucy Otim instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There already is an article on Achiro Lucy Otim. Information that is in this draft that is not in the article can be added to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Achiro Lucy Otim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Achiro Lucy Otim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Alum Sandra Ogwang Santa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot Alvinategyeka ( talk) 08:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Articles for review., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot ( talk) 19:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More independent, reliable sources are needed to establish notability. Also, it would be unusual for research projects to be named as they are named in the article - are they papers or studies?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rose Kirumira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rose Kirumira, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman ( talk) 20:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Articles that dashboard may not have picked, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot ( talk) 19:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Disappointed over submitting articles for review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot ( talk) 19:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi I have just reviewed Margaret Mbeiza Kisira. Thank you for writing such a well sourced article. I hope you continue to enjoy editing. Mccapra ( talk) 19:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Thus is Amazing. Thanks Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot for the kind comments and observations. Looking forward to contributing more quality articles Alvinategyeka ( talk) 19:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Mungula refugee settlement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 ( talk) 14:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rose Kirumira. Thanks! ~ Kvng ( talk) 17:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Rose Kirumira, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain ( talk) 19:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pamela Nasiyo Kamugo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Gerald Kankya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on William Amanzuru, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My article Abaasa, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot ( talk) 19:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Abaasa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ScottishFinnishRadish were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are either not significant coverage, or interviews which do not contribute to notability and are primary sources. Biographical details are entirely unsourced. The sources for the Masters degree fail WP:V

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abaasa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abaasa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 12:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Fortunate Nantongo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin ( talk) 17:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot. This encourages me to create more Alvinategyeka ( talk) 22:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vinka. Thanks! Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Rapa Thomson Ricky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curbon7 ( talk) 06:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Linda Agnes Auma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman ( talk) 16:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot. This encourages me to create more in this wikigap campaign. Thanks.

Would kindly request you to look into more of the articles I created and advice on the way forward. Thanks Alvinategyeka ( talk) 23:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Prudence Ukkonika, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman ( talk) 16:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Phiona Nyamutooro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman ( talk) 06:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Charity Bainababo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman ( talk) 06:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shatsi Musherure Kutesa. Thanks! Greenman ( talk) 06:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Taban Sharifah Aate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman ( talk) 06:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Rose Emma Cherut, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot. This encourages me to edit more. I kindly request you to look into my other submitted articles. Thank you Alvinategyeka ( talk) 08:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Nancy Acora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 09:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks very much for reviewing the article. Looking forward to creating more. Would kindly request you to look into my other articles that I submitted and advise on the way forward. Thanks Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Aisa Black Agaba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 09:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot Alvinategyeka ( talk) 10:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Laura Kanushu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 10:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Busingye Peninah Kabingani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman ( talk) 07:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much. I appreciate. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 07:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Agnes Kirabo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing ( talk) 11:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Jennifer Alanyo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 11:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 11:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Nkonge Muwonge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarah Nkonge Muwonge, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong ( talk) 17:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Victor Nekesa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Robert Katende, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii ( talk) 19:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mako001 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abaasa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abaasa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 07:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. There is insufficient evidence that the subject meets the notability criteria on Wikipedia for a biography. Please ask at the Teahouse if you need help or advice on improving the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon Kiyimba Promise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sharon Kiyimba Promise, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary ( talk) 10:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement in establishing notability since the previous decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Nkonge Muwonge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarah Nkonge Muwonge, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman ( talk) 12:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka

Thank you for creating Tereza Mbire.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 ( talk) 16:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka

Thank you for creating Veronica Lugya (Vinka).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 ( talk) 13:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much for appreciating. This encourages me to write more wikipedia articles about subjects and people in Uganda. Thanks alot Alvinategyeka ( talk) 19:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka

Thank you for creating Irene Manjeri.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 ( talk) 11:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot. I appreciate Alvinategyeka ( talk) 16:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are interviews which are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. The Forbes article was written by a contributor rather than staff so is not a reliable source (see WP:FORBESCON) and 30-under-30 type lists do not convey notability anyway.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rapa Thomson Ricky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rapa Thomson Ricky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 ( talk) 15:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennifer Alanyo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Jennifer Alanyo, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Joram Muzira Job, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 23:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC) reply

You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS.

Hello Alvinategyeka,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{ stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is easy to do via the StubSorter tool, and is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks! MadameOctavian ( talk) 10:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot for the information Alvinategyeka ( talk) 13:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Joram Model Management, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 16:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC) reply

But sir whats wrong, you usually abuse my efforts. Why do u always move every article i write.

Why everything i write. You people abuse us and abuse our efforts only because youre foreign admins and what we write cant make sense for you. You should know that you people usually abuse our efforts while leaving the inadequate articles you write in your countries pass free.

For real tell me if its not malice, why would u always choose to do this everytime??

Okay be an example and show me an article you have ever written with origin in Africa, and i see all the sufficient refrences you cited.

My biggest problem with you is that you just come up, tag, delete or move an article without even putting sufficient time to read through or understand whats in them and if everything has been exhausted.

I know you'll brand me biased but i would like to also advise you that you should be polite in the way you handle our efforts.

You just dont trash everything someone writes. I have written arricles for 3 years in Uganda, so don't even start thinking of telling me ive not followed the rules.

You people are insuferable! You dont know what your trashing does to us.

I may not ever write articles again but revise your ways. If you wanted only artocles writen by you people, you shouldn't have introduced us to these Wikimedia competitions and encouraged us write articles. I just think you think we are soo dumb. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 16:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Td ^{she /her} 17:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template). reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources are truly independent coverage because they all quote the subject. Some of these sources look like churnalism; I doubt many of these are reliable sources but I don't know African media. None of the awards won are notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joram Model Management and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman ( talk) 00:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Alvinategyeka. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alvinategyeka. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alvinategyeka|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC) reply

This is the problem that we are always accused of. First of all, i don't have any financial benefits am getting from anyone to edit wikipedia!. No one pays me. You may intrest yourself in all the edits ive made for the last 3 years and tell me if there was money involved or its mpney that was the motivation. Please don't belittle me to that standard.

Fact is, i dont know whats wrong with wikipedia Admins, the threshold you use and double standards cant be understood.

I always write article about all topics in Uganda but you treat topics such as politics differently from other topics, forexample an MP or councilor i write about may have only 2 citations and is allowed, but when i write about a celebrity in our entertainment scene, you quickly label it biased! Why do you do this?

Tell us collectively that you dont consider our entertainment industry as a whole as people we shouldn't write about, otherwise when you tell me that am paid you make me not understand what you're meaning or what you want to achieve by this!!

Let me tell you, most of us Wikimedians in Wikimedia community user group Uganda have one goal, to make sure that brands or personalities we deem should be on a platform like wikipedia get that platform! In any case, do you think i have the time to look for people, demand money from them to write about them?? Thats ridiculous.

Please tell me other things, delete the article all together, or block me if you want but don't again take me cheap to that level!! Why would someone even pay fpr an article? How will they even know that someone writes articles on wikipedia? If thats the practice in your countries, this side its diferent, wikipedia isn't that popular!, we sacridice our time, to write about topics that interest us and we feel are worthy being on such a platform, nevertheless when writing, we are guided by articles about european or American personalities or brands which are not any different from the ones this side. Also, you should know that what we consider big websites here and we quote them, may not necessarily look big to you. Ive told you mind, if you feel you still don't get my point en you feel am paid, block me. Truthfully i wont get any regrets because, i usually write when i want to and i thought Wikipedia had interest for information from across the globe. The only problem i see is that you Admins from the other side don't get very well or appreciate the angle from where we write or create or our perspective or the African media. Going forward, you should increase the number of Wikimedia Admins from Africa, maybe they'll have appreciation for how things play out this side. Forexample why do we have American Admins who haven't edited wikipedia for even 2 years as Admins and Africa as a whole has a very small number of Admins? Me myself have edited for 3 years and have won a number of Wikimedia challenges like wikigap in my country and wikimedia commons challenges. You may interest yourself in checking all my contributions both on wikipedia and wiki commons. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abaasa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Xclusivzik ( talk) 05:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarah Nkonge Muwonge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 07:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Uganda Wildlife Conservation Education Centre (UWEC) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find sufficient sources to establish notability per WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Stop the excitement. Always look deep into an article before u take such actions. I know you're working hard to become an admin but that doesn't mean you should parade your excitement. As for the article, you're free to go ahead and delete it. I dont care, since u seem to be preoccupied by that. Wont add anything. I lose nothing when u delete it. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 05:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rapa Thomson Ricky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:02, 27 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rapa Thomson Ricky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitted without improvement and nothing suggests the subject can meet the notability guidelines. The sources are largely marketing/promotional fluff.

S0091 ( talk) 17:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Joram's passion for Fashion and modeling was sparked by his elder sister Druscilla Muzira who had won the Eastern region miss Uganda contest in 2002. Her win inspired him to pursue a career in Fashion and he would tag along with her whenever she was invited for modeling work does not sound like it meets WP:NPOV. This is one of many sentences which make it sound more like a personal website, or a CV written in the third person.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joram Muzira Job and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 19:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joram Muzira Job and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples ( talk) 08:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joram Model Management, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abaasa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Alvinategyeka! Your additions to Rebecca Margaret Nyegenye have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 16:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kitechura Central Forest reserve, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:31, 28 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rapa Thomson Ricky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joram Muzira Job, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvinategyeka! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Joshua_Sikhu_Okonya [1] that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 22:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Winnie Nwagi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The page Draft:Joram Muzira Job has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 9 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Alvinategyeka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Abaasa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Alvin, i'm insterested in creating a page for myself to showcase my achievements. Is this something i can do myself? -- Casafer1971 ( talk) 18:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC) reply

.Hello Casafer1971,

While it’s great that you’re interested in creating a Wikipedia page to showcase your achievements, it’s important to note that Wikipedia has specific rules and guidelines for creating pages.

Firstly, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and its primary purpose is to provide neutral, reliable, and verifiable information. It’s not intended to be a platform for self-promotion or personal advertising.

Secondly, Wikipedia has a notability guideline. This means that a topic must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. So, if you’re considering creating a page about yourself, you need to ensure that you meet these notability criteria.

Lastly, creating a Wikipedia page requires a good understanding of Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. You need to ensure that the content is neutral, verifiable, and does not contain original research.

If you’re new to Wikipedia, it might be helpful to start by contributing to existing articles before attempting to create a new page. This can help you understand the Wikipedia community’s expectations and standards.

I hope this information is helpful. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

Kind regards,

Alvin Alvinategyeka ( talk) 20:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Como me registro a desafío al desnudo -- Driver vega ( talk) 05:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Am very sorry, i don't understand the language you're Using. I can only be of help on Subjects conveyed in English. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:17, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply

how to mark reading progress -- Jarp1953 ( talk) 15:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Jarp1953

I would like to understand your Question more clearly on the type of progress that you are meaning. please reach out again and add more context to the question.

However if You meant your progress regarding contributions, you can always tap your profile icon on the top right side of of the page, scroll down and click on contributions. There you'll be able to check all the articles you have contributed to.

Kind Regards. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply

برای داده های اطلعاتی من در سرار جهان بیدار باشید .آمین -- AMIRMOHAMMAD01 ( talk) 22:28, 9 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello.

Unfortunately i can only answer questions in English Alvinategyeka ( talk) 07:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply

This info is obviously incorrect -- Mikey5869 ( talk) 16:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Mickey5869.

If the information on the article that you have highlighted here is incorrect, the best thing to do is to visit its talk page and suggest changes to it with the right information and cite the right sources for the right information. Kind Regards. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply

How can i add someone on wikipedia by search -- Armankhan0007 ( talk) 13:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, AemanKhan0007

I don't quite sufficiently understand your question, however, i will try to explain to you briefly how adding someone on Wikipedia can be done and how he/she can come up when you make a google search..

the first thing is to write an article about that person if he is notable and not already on Wikipedia, make sure the person passes the Notability test and you cite and reference the article sufficiently,.

when the article is reviewed by an Admin, it will automatically show up when you search it. there is no other magic to it. The Web crawler will pick it up automatically after it has been reviewed. However, even before review, a quick search directly on Wikipedia will bring up the article though a search on google wont bring it up if it has not been reviewed and automatically picked by the Web Crawler.

If you have a follow up question, feel free to add it here..

Kind Regards. Creto Pretty ( talk) 09:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

hi can you speak slovak -- Aurel knoth ( talk) 13:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

No unfortunately, I don't speak Slovak Alvinategyeka ( talk) 07:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello I want to edit Kai Havertz' wikipedia page because the information is incorrect -- Svetoslavfcb ( talk) 22:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Its Okay, you can go ahead and add the correct information. But make sure that You reference your edits with strong references/citations, otherwise, unreferenced work will be deleted. also make sure that you acquaint yourself with Wikipedia Editing rules if you're new to Wikipedia before you go ahead to edit the Kai Harvertz Wikipedia page. here is a link you can visit to Acquaint yourself wiki the simple editing rules; /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Ten_simple_rules_for_editing_Wikipedia Alvinategyeka ( talk) 09:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, As we are new to setting up our company Wiki page we were hoping to make sure we are all set up properly. Not sure how the mentorship works but we would be happy to learn any important tips to our edits. Thanks, Mark -- Audiophileusa ( talk) 00:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Mark,

I appreciate your enthusiasm in wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. It’s a great platform for sharing knowledge. However, it’s important to remember that Wikipedia is not a promotional tool and has strict guidelines against conflicts of interest.

As you’re affiliated with Audiophileusa, directly creating or editing a Wikipedia page about your company could be seen as a conflict of interest. But don’t worry, there are still ways you can contribute:

Propose Changes: If you believe that the article about your company needs to be updated or corrected, you can propose these changes on the article’s talk page.

Disclose Your Affiliation: Be transparent about your affiliation with Audiophileusa when proposing changes.

Contribute to Other Areas: There are millions of other articles on Wikipedia that could benefit from your expertise.

Contributing to these articles can help you understand Wikipedia’s guidelines and build your reputation within the community.

Seek Help: If you’re unsure about anything, don’t hesitate to ask for help. The Wikipedia community is very supportive and there are always experienced editors willing to assist.

Remember, the goal of Wikipedia is to share neutral, verifiable information. Your understanding and respect for this goal is what makes Wikipedia a valuable resource for everyone. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 07:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

How do i create a valid artice name?. -- Smadur1997 ( talk) 21:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Smadur1997,

Creating a valid article name on Wikipedia is an important step in contributing to this vast knowledge base. Here are some guidelines to help you:

1. Concise and Clear: The article name should clearly and concisely communicate what a user may find in the article.
2. Avoid Descriptive Adjectives: Try to keep the article name short and avoid using descriptive adjectives.
3. Unique: Make sure the article name is unique. You can check this by searching for the name on Wikipedia before creating your article.
4. Follow Wikipedia’s Naming Conventions: Wikipedia has specific naming conventions that you should follow. You can find more information about this on the Wikipedia Naming Conventions page.

Remember, the goal is to make the article easily discoverable and understandable to readers. If you need further assistance, don’t hesitate to ask. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 07:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Alvin, I'm Cris, I'm enjoying learning how to edit on Wikipedia and use writing and editing skills. I'm a film critic from Australia. -- CriticallyCK ( talk) 21:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Cris,

It’s great to hear that you’re enjoying learning how to edit on Wikipedia. Your background as a film critic will certainly bring a unique perspective to the articles you contribute to. Here are a few tips that might help you:

1. Cite Your Sources: When adding information to an article, especially if it’s a statement of fact or a critical analysis, make sure to cite your sources.
2. Maintain a Neutral Point of View: As a critic, you have your own opinions, but remember that Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view.
3. Engage with the Community: Don’t hesitate to engage with other editors on the talk pages and be open to feedback.
4. Follow the Guidelines: Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia’s guidelines and best practices.

Remember, the Wikipedia community is here to support you. Don’t hesitate to ask for help if you need it. Happy editing! Alvinategyeka ( talk) 07:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I uploaded some text yesterday and do not know where it is today. -- Leeshiwei ( talk) 14:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Leeshiwei,

It’s possible that the text you uploaded was removed or modified by other Wikipedia editors. Wikipedia is a collaborative platform, and all edits are subject to review and revision by the community.

Here are a few steps you can take to find your contributions:

Check Your Contribution History: You can view all your edits in your contribution history. To access this, click on “Contributions” at the top right of any Wikipedia page when you’re logged in.

Check the Article’s History: If you know which article you edited, you can check the article’s revision history. This can be accessed by clicking on “View history” at the top of the article.

Check the Talk Page: Sometimes, if an edit is removed, the reason might be explained on the article’s talk page.

Remember, all contributions should adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. If you need further assistance, don’t hesitate to ask. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 07:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi! Hope you find yourself well. I have a quick question: I just made this article, and I was wondering if you could review it and help me know if there is something I need to improve. Overall, is it a good article? Thank you so much in advance. -- Twig.algo ( talk) 06:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Twig.algo,

I’m glad you’ve created a draft article on Fábio Nascimento. It’s a fascinating topic. However, before you submit it for review, I recommend you make some enhancements to make it more compatible with Wikipedia.

Here are some aspects that you should pay attention to:

• Sources: You need to add citations to trustworthy, independent sources that support your content. Sources are crucial for verifying the information and establishing the notability of the topic. You can use the Citation Tool for Google Books or the Citation Generator to help you create citations.
• Structure: You need to follow the standard structure of a Wikipedia article. It should start with an introduction that summarizes the topic and explains why it is notable, followed by sections that provide more details, and end with appendices such as references and related articles. You can use the Article Wizard or the Article Development Template to help you create a well-structured article.
• Style: You need to use formal and neutral language. Avoid using informal words and personal pronouns, such as “I”, “we”, or “you”. You can use the Manual of Style or the Cheatsheet to help you follow the style guidelines.
• Format: You need to use proper formatting for headings, links, lists, tables, and images. You can use the Visual Editor or the Editing Toolbar to help you format your article.

If you need more guidance, you can refer to the Your First Article page or the Content Policies and Guidelines page. You can also ask for help from other editors on the Teahouse or the [Help Desk].

Remember, the Wikipedia community is very supportive and there are always experienced editors willing to assist. Don’t be discouraged by the feedback, but use it as an opportunity to learn and improve. I hope you’ll continue to contribute to Wikipedia and share your knowledge with the world. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 11:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Alvin,

Could you please help me to set up my page for Wikipedia? -- John R Spender ( talk) 06:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello John,

Creating a Wikipedia page involves several steps. Here’s a simplified guide:

1. Create an account: You’ll need a Wikipedia account to create a new page. If you don’t have one, you can create it here .
2. Start small: Before creating your own page, it’s a good idea to make some edits to existing Wikipedia articles. This will help you understand how Wikipedia works and what kind of content is acceptable. You can start by editing a random article.
3. Check notability: Make sure the subject you want to write about meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. If the subject isn’t considered “notable”, or if it doesn’t have reliable third-party sources, it may not be suitable for a Wikipedia article. Read more about Notability here
4. Search for duplicates: Before you create a new page, make sure there isn’t already a page on the same topic. You can use the search bar at the top of Wikipedia to check.
5. Prepare your content: Write a draft of your article in your own user space or in a Word document. Make sure you’re not copying text from other sources and that you’re citing all your information. Here’s a guide on how to write your first article.
6. Create the page: Once your draft is ready, you can create a new page by typing the title of your new article into the search bar and clicking “Go”. If the page doesn’t exist, you’ll see an option to create it. Here is more on editing.
7. Submit for review: After you’ve created your page, it’s a good idea to submit it for review. Experienced Wikipedia editors will check your page and give you feedback. You can submit your article for review here.

Remember, creating a Wikipedia page is a responsibility. Make sure your information is accurate, unbiased, and cited properly. Good luck!

Kind Regards Alvinategyeka ( talk) 10:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hey, I was just wondering If I can make an article about myself and post it! 😊 -- Sandip46656 ( talk) 13:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

No. See Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. SlightlyToastedCheesecake ( talk) 15:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I've been trying to edit the following page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samara

All I've been trying to do is to add a citation where it says [citation needed] and yet the filter disallows my edit for not being constructive. What can I do? -- Sarah0216 ( talk) 21:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Sarah,

I’m sorry to hear that you’re having trouble editing the Wikipedia page. Here are a few suggestions that might help:

1. Ensure your citation is reliable: Wikipedia requires that all information is verifiable and comes from reliable sources. Make sure the source you’re citing is considered reliable according to Wikipedia’s reliability guidelines.
2. Format your citation correctly: It’s important to format your citation correctly using one of the accepted citation styles. You can find more information on how to do this in Wikipedia’s citation guide.
3. Be patient: If you’re a new editor, your edits may be subject to review by more experienced editors. This process can take some time, so don’t be discouraged if your edit isn’t immediately accepted.
4. Ask for help: If you’re still having trouble, consider asking for help on the article’s talk page or at the Teahouse, a friendly space where new editors can ask questions and get help from experienced Wikipedians.
5. Here are some links that can further guide you on the subject of citations;

·         /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Citing_sources

·         /info/en/?search=Help:Referencing_for_beginners

·        

Remember, the goal of Wikipedia is to build an encyclopedia, so all edits should be made with this goal in mind. Good luck!

Best, Alvin Alvinategyeka ( talk) 11:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello am Solomon from Rwanda i do want to become an editor and i want you teach me how -- Nshuti Salomon ( talk) 10:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Solomon, it’s great to hear that you’re interested in becoming a Wikipedia editor. Here are some steps to guide you:

1. Create a Wikipedia account: Only registered users can create new Wikipedia articles. Here is more on
2. Familiarize yourself with the policies: Read the five pillars of Wikipedia to know about Wikipedia’s main principles. You can also refer to Wikipedia’s purpose and the basics of contributing.
3. Read existing articles before making edits: This will help you learn the proper tone and formatting.
4. Start small: Make a few edits to existing pages first. It’s good to get some practice before jumping straight into creating a new article.
5. Ask for help: Don’t hesitate to ask for help. There are many ways to get help on Wikipedia, including the Tea house, Community portal, and the Help desk.
6. Take the Wikipedia Adventure: Learn the basics with an interactive game.
7. Follow Wikipedia’s best practices: Use edit summaries, avoid controversy and edit wars, engage in a collaborative and constructive manner.
8. Stay active: Keep contributing. As you continue to make valuable contributions, you will be recognized for your efforts.

Here is some Useful link to help on how to get started;

·         /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia

Remember, Wikipedia not only allows you to create, revise, and edit articles, but it wants you to do so. You just need to remember that you can’t break Wikipedia and although there are many protocols, perfection is not required, as Wikipedia is a work in progress. Good luck on your journey to becoming a Wikipedia editor Alvinategyeka ( talk) 11:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello I am new to editing My ip address got blocked I was making an edit i made a simple spelling mistake -- Onemarsyboi ( talk) 09:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Onemarsyboi, I’m sorry to hear that you’re having trouble with your IP address being blocked on Wikipedia. Blocks are a measure used to protect Wikipedia from possible improper activity in breach of editorial policies. Here are some steps you can take:

1. Understand the reason for the block: The reason for your block may be found in your block log. It could be due to a problem with your editing or Wikipedia behavior, unintended triggering of anti-vandalism systems, or use of a VPN or other anonymizing proxy service.
2. Appeal the block: If you believe the block is a mistake, you can appeal it by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} to your talk page.
3. Create an account: If you have never edited Wikipedia before and/or do not have an account, you may need to create one. This will normally allow you to edit despite the block on your IP address. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, consider requesting one at Wikipedia:Request an account.
4. Check your internet settings: If you’re using a VPN or another service that uses proxies, these can be blocked to protect site security. Please disconnect from the service before trying to edit Wikipedia again.

Remember, Wikipedia is a collaborative platform and it’s important to respect its rules and guidelines. If you continue to face issues, don’t hesitate to ask for help from the Wikipedia community. Alvinategyeka ( talk) 11:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

how to edit introductory page -- UBWT ( talk) 12:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello UBWT, editing a Wikipedia page, including the introductory page, is quite straightforward. Here are the steps:

1. Find the page: Navigate to the page you want to edit.
2. Click “Edit”: If the page is unprotected, you can click the “Edit” button at the top of the page or next to the section you want to edit. If the page is protected, you’ll see a “View source” button instead of “Edit”. In this case, you can submit an edit request.
3. Make your changes: Correct any errors, add new information, or improve the existing content. Be sure to maintain a neutral point of view and cite your sources.
4. Preview your changes: Click “Show preview” to see how your changes will look before you save them.
5. Save your changes: If you’re happy with your edits, click “Publish changes”. It’s good practice to write a brief summary of your changes in the “Edit summary” box.

Remember, Wikipedia is a collaborative platform, and your changes can be revised by others. Always aim to improve the encyclopedia and respect others’ contributions. Happy editing Alvinategyeka ( talk) 11:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

What's your thought on the Arab republic of egypt -- MahmoodBola ( talk) 06:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. I really just want help with how I can improve one of the drafts I'm making. It's about the voice actor, Aleks Le. Someone who checked my submission said that the sources were unreliable, when other accepted wikipedia pages about voice actors include that same source. I also just want someone to specifically describe how to improve the draft because I don't want to make a bad article full of mistakes. So if you can, could you help me in making the article better specifically please? The draft is called "Draft: Aleks Le". -- Stupei acedefective ( talk) 10:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete this account of mine!!!!!!! It's all nonsense!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- Shiiiiiiittttttt ( talk) 04:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply

One of my recent drafts got deleted because it wasn't notable enough. It was about a voice actor who recently gained popularity after a major role. Since he is fairly new to the limelight, do you think I should wait until he gets more reliable sources or never make an article about him again? -- Stupei acedefective ( talk) 08:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello -- Obi G Moses buotique ( talk) 07:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello ,teach me how to edit -- Ntsali Monamoli ( talk) 14:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC) reply