An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Small coal. Since you had some involvement with the Small coal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 21:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, hope you're well - I was considering nominating Template:Roller Derby Association of Canada for deletion, and see you created it, so figured I would run it by you first. RDAC as an org is dormant/kaput - their website hasn't been updated since 2013/2014: [1] and RDAC never reached the same level of importance as say UKRDA, and never achieved its own wiki article. The template itself hasn't been updated since June 2013, and the vast majority of the leagues in the template are redlinked, so its usefulness is limited. So I'm thinking it may not be worth maintaining. Thoughts? Echoedmyron ( talk) 00:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Ten years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Roller Derby Association of Canada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Echoedmyron ( talk) 16:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Ugh, this [2] dropped today. Time to revamp WFTDA Apprentice Program I guess ... Echoedmyron ( talk) 19:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
You have good knowledge of and access to socialist/labour historical records. I am trying to ID an Edwardian postcard I have. It has the picture of a candidate above an over-print stamp 'Vote for Wheatley'. On the back in handwriting it says "with Penistone Sheffield collection". I can't match it to a parliamentary election, so assume it may be municipal. It is not a picture of the Scottish Labour MP. Please let me know if you can ID. Graemp ( talk) 14:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elinor Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elinor Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JAH2k ( talk) 14:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Fabian Society Executive Committee, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou ( talk) 16:13, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
I've opened a bureaucrat chat for a current RfA. Your input would be most appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RexxS/Bureaucrat chat. Best regards, Maxim(talk) 22:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Could you please take a look at the Ernie Tate article which you helped write? It's been nominated for deletion so any improvement of it would be appreciated. CosmosCagoul ( talk) 18:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-- Dolotta ( talk) 22:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Administrators
must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, just a quick note. School Board redirects to an article about an American phenomenon. The relevant links for school boards in Britain are School boards in Scotland (sadly lacking in information about the boards established under the Education (Scotland) Act 1872), and School boards in England and Wales. Good work by the way on the trades unionists. DuncanHill ( talk) 20:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
A long long time ago ....
Thanks for beginning Bookworm. From tiny larvae, little bookworms grow. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marxist–Leninist Party, USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marxist–Leninist Party, USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 21:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
I've opened a bureaucrat chat for a current RfA. Your input would be most appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Floquenbeam 2/Bureaucrat chat. Primefac ( talk) 19:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Irene Ward 1924.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 03:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article League of Revolutionaries for a New America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/League of Revolutionaries for a New America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 03:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 06:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)On 17 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1925 London County Council election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, following the 1925 London County Council election, the Labour Party became the official opposition for the first time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1925 London County Council election. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 1925 London County Council election), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi - I noticed you are one of the original members of the organized labour project who is still active (and actively editing labour-related issues). I'm contacting active original members as the project has fallen inactive of late and have a couple of thoughts of getting things moving again:
-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 11:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Enid Stacy (Q19325606). Since you had some involvement with the Enid Stacy (Q19325606) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk) 03:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sarah Dickenson (Q18576991). Since you had some involvement with the Sarah Dickenson (Q18576991) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk) 03:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Just discovering all the work you have done in bringing the international structures of the labour movement to Wikipedia. You deserve one of these. Goldsztajn ( talk) 10:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, do you have a citation for H. H. Asquith being President of the Scottish Liberal Federation please? See here and here. Thanks, DuncanHill ( talk) 11:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent articles, including Stefan Nędzyński, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't see that in the cats. I've already tagged that and several other articles with the rationale "Article needs to mention and verify that he was a Stormont senator as the categories say". ミラ P 01:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはWarofdreamsたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
03:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Small coal. Since you had some involvement with the Small coal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 21:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, hope you're well - I was considering nominating Template:Roller Derby Association of Canada for deletion, and see you created it, so figured I would run it by you first. RDAC as an org is dormant/kaput - their website hasn't been updated since 2013/2014: [1] and RDAC never reached the same level of importance as say UKRDA, and never achieved its own wiki article. The template itself hasn't been updated since June 2013, and the vast majority of the leagues in the template are redlinked, so its usefulness is limited. So I'm thinking it may not be worth maintaining. Thoughts? Echoedmyron ( talk) 00:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Ten years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Roller Derby Association of Canada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Echoedmyron ( talk) 16:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Ugh, this [2] dropped today. Time to revamp WFTDA Apprentice Program I guess ... Echoedmyron ( talk) 19:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
You have good knowledge of and access to socialist/labour historical records. I am trying to ID an Edwardian postcard I have. It has the picture of a candidate above an over-print stamp 'Vote for Wheatley'. On the back in handwriting it says "with Penistone Sheffield collection". I can't match it to a parliamentary election, so assume it may be municipal. It is not a picture of the Scottish Labour MP. Please let me know if you can ID. Graemp ( talk) 14:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elinor Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elinor Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JAH2k ( talk) 14:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Fabian Society Executive Committee, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou ( talk) 16:13, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
I've opened a bureaucrat chat for a current RfA. Your input would be most appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RexxS/Bureaucrat chat. Best regards, Maxim(talk) 22:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Could you please take a look at the Ernie Tate article which you helped write? It's been nominated for deletion so any improvement of it would be appreciated. CosmosCagoul ( talk) 18:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
-- Dolotta ( talk) 22:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Administrators
must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, just a quick note. School Board redirects to an article about an American phenomenon. The relevant links for school boards in Britain are School boards in Scotland (sadly lacking in information about the boards established under the Education (Scotland) Act 1872), and School boards in England and Wales. Good work by the way on the trades unionists. DuncanHill ( talk) 20:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
A long long time ago ....
Thanks for beginning Bookworm. From tiny larvae, little bookworms grow. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marxist–Leninist Party, USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marxist–Leninist Party, USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 21:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
I've opened a bureaucrat chat for a current RfA. Your input would be most appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Floquenbeam 2/Bureaucrat chat. Primefac ( talk) 19:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Irene Ward 1924.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 03:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article League of Revolutionaries for a New America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/League of Revolutionaries for a New America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 03:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 06:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)On 17 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1925 London County Council election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, following the 1925 London County Council election, the Labour Party became the official opposition for the first time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1925 London County Council election. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, 1925 London County Council election), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi - I noticed you are one of the original members of the organized labour project who is still active (and actively editing labour-related issues). I'm contacting active original members as the project has fallen inactive of late and have a couple of thoughts of getting things moving again:
-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 11:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Enid Stacy (Q19325606). Since you had some involvement with the Enid Stacy (Q19325606) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk) 03:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sarah Dickenson (Q18576991). Since you had some involvement with the Sarah Dickenson (Q18576991) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk) 03:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Just discovering all the work you have done in bringing the international structures of the labour movement to Wikipedia. You deserve one of these. Goldsztajn ( talk) 10:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, do you have a citation for H. H. Asquith being President of the Scottish Liberal Federation please? See here and here. Thanks, DuncanHill ( talk) 11:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent articles, including Stefan Nędzyński, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't see that in the cats. I've already tagged that and several other articles with the rationale "Article needs to mention and verify that he was a Stormont senator as the categories say". ミラ P 01:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはWarofdreamsたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
03:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)