File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg | Have an enjoyable New Year! | |
Hello Tim riley: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
New Year! Cheers,
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
00:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Ready for peer review? If you're happy, I'll nominate. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
A man after my own heart who indulged himself "...through the worlds of reading and of music hall and pantomime." Although certainly not in expert in this field (ouch!), I will endeavour to offer some comments in what promises to be a very interesting article. -- Cassianto Talk 22:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
— Cliftonian (talk) 04:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. Although I've lived in Yorkshire since 1970 the [Manchester] Guardian has been my constant companion for even longer (today's has just arrived from Whip-Ma-Whop-Ma-Gate) and I can dimly recall articles in it by Cardus which, I'm sorry to say, were rather disappointing and gave me the impression that he was in his dotage (ah, the arrogance of youth). Nevertheless, I'll give the article a good read and may indulge in picking a few nits here and there. Happy New Year! -- Guillaume Tell 10:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tim, just a quick note to let you know of the recent FAC of the character actor John Le Mesurier which I have co-nominated along with Schrodinger's cat is alive and Dr. Blofeld. Confident it meets all featured article criteria and should the subject matter interest you enough, we would welcome any comments or criticisms that you may have to offer. -- Cassianto Talk 21:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I started an article on the Portrait of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge and Category:Portraits of the British Royal Family, realizing our coverage of Royal portraits is extremely poor. I was wondering if you or Brian were knowledgeable or you know somebody knowledgeable who could create a list of missing notable royal portraits. I'm keen to improve coverage in this area.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
I've added a few penceworth to the comments. I can't see anything still outstanding, and I doubt there will be further comments. So what do you say to an FAC nomination on, say, Sunday? Incidentally, I note that an IP has added date format and BritEng templates. I'm not sure these are necessary; more templates can mean longer loading times, or so I am told. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Tim, I guess you're probably away now, but there are a couple of points in Gerda's list that I was hoping you would deal with:
If you are able to address these from your Cumbrian fastness, I'd be glad if you would do so. Otherwise, I'll deal with them myself along the above lines, but I'd really prefer to have your opinion first. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A. H. Fox Strangways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wellington College ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, you may already have been planning to review this but thought I'd ping you anyway (as I have Brian); in addition to overall comments, I'd value a spotcheck from you if you can manage it. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 23:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
On the subject of English National Opera, tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=en:English_National_Opera is reporting a lot of deadlinks, and I thought I'd try to fix them. Some might just be temporary problems (The Independent?) but the Gramophone ones seem to be dead permanently since they've switched to a new fee-based archive and retired their previous archive. A search for a few sample ones using the "Wayback Machine" brings no joy. Any thoughts? Bencherlite Talk 12:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Tim, you beat me to it. @#$%&[:)]. I wanted to do Nora Nicholson, at least start it anyway. I procrastinated way too long. My hats off to you and some of the others, who have contributed already, like SsSilvers, I recognize his name. She was a wonderful character actress, overdue for a wiki. I might have a citation or two the article can use. Once again great article, a job well done. All my best! Koplimek ( talk) 14:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know I checked that reference to the Hammerstein book and it is all correct.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 13:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of English National Opera know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on February 1, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 1, 2013. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegates Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:
English National Opera (ENO) is an opera company based in London, resident at the London Coliseum (pictured). Its productions are sung in English. The company's origins were in the late 19th century, when the philanthropist Emma Cons, later assisted by her niece Lilian Baylis, presented theatrical and operatic performances at the Old Vic in a rough area of London for the benefit of local people. Baylis acquired and rebuilt Sadler's Wells theatre in north London, which was better suited to opera than the Old Vic. The opera company grew there into a permanent ensemble in the 1930s and, after expansion required a move to the Coliseum in 1968, adopted its present name in 1974. Conductors associated with the company include Colin Davis, Reginald Goodall, Charles Mackerras, Mark Elder and Edward Gardner. ENO is known for its emphasis on the dramatic aspect of opera, with productions, sometimes controversial, by directors including David Pountney, Jonathan Miller, Nicholas Hytner, Phyllida Lloyd and Calixto Bieito. In addition to the core operatic repertoire, ENO has presented a wide range of works, from early operas by Monteverdi to new commissions, operetta and Broadway shows. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Great and inviting! - Do you know when The Flying Dutchman (opera) was first staged, in English that is? Perhaps also go over that article? I think to link "love" is overlinking, for example, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Best of luck with ENO above; my TFAs usually end in fights, often about infoboxes, but I'll look forward to seeing this one on the main page (I noted the mention of Claudio in the blurb). If in the cold wastes of the north you have a moment to spare, I'd be pleased if you would cast an eye over Mr Widmerpool. This has been months in the coming; I had to read all 12 of Powell's volumes (approx 3000 pages), but it was worth it (well, almost). Or you may wish to save comments for your return to civilisation; it will be at PR for a couple of weeks at least. What is your next project? Arguments over infoboxes have rather drained my enthusiasm for musical articles, so after I'm done with Ken I will probably start something completely different; George Lansbury has always been a hero of mine. But if you have a musical subject in mind. I'll always be prepared to help. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Widmerpool has engineered his way on to the FAC page and would be grateful for any attention you might give him.
On a more general issue, I have been avoiding music articles recently, and my current project George Lansbury is political, but thereafter I am considering a cautious return to the musical sphere. I enjoyed doing Warlock, and our joint effort on Delius. I've been looking at RVW and Holst; the former doesn't really grab me, but the latter might. The article is quite well developed, but needs a lot of polishing. Would you be at all interested, say about mid-March, in giving this a seeing-to? Brianboulton ( talk) 14:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas German Reed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilbert à Beckett ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I know you are incredibly busy on a number of things—all in subjects both worthy and worthwhile—but is there a chance you would have an opportunity to go down market and comment on the creator of an unspeakable public school bully with odious political views? Do not worry if you're overburdened with your other commitments or really can't stomach the subject—all entirely understandable. Many thanks! - SchroCat ( talk) 14:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I've had a bit of a play around in the unholy territory of the infobox and come up with the abomination that is this. To quote Spinoza: "what an utter pain in **** that is! Whoever designed it should be taken out and horse-whipped to Blackfriars and back again". There must be a better way of doing it than this, but I'm not sure what it is, I'm afraid. (By the way, I may be misktaken on the Spinoza attribution—I'm afraid I don't have the sources to hand). All the best - SchroCat ( talk) 15:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, can you give Mother India a read and give some feedback?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your time and thoughts on the McNeile peer review. The article has now progressed to FAC for consideration. Thanks again. — SchroCat ( talk) 03:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, some time ago, you mentioned the links to the Gramophone going dead. What do we do in such cases? I just noticed ( BWV 159) that arkivmusic, for example, changed their display of Gramophone articles to just the first lines, without the name of the author. So a link is still working, but not showing the essential information, which WAS THERE before. How to show? A comment in the cite template perhaps? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Most grateful, thankyou!! Well, I like old movies, and Mother India is considered one of the most important Indian films of all time. I created the lists of Indians films back in about 2007, I used to edit films almost entirely for a while back then.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Indians would think you were mad for considering Mother India to be obscure!! A lot of them revere it as a Holy Grail of Indian culture for what it stands for in the aftermath of Indian independence! I agree though that to us Brits old Asian movies, Indian or Indonesian or whatever appear as obscure topics to us, which is why its most impressive when they reach GA or FA quality!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Incidentally Kareena Kapoor which I have heavily contributed to is at FAC now. Any input at the FAC would be appreciated although I see Chopra has beaten you both to it and she's prettier than Kareena.... I think I'd like to see the numeric dates formatted properly, would you agree?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Royal opera
Thank you for the London opera, another great article with dedication to details about the people behind an institution, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
A year ago, you were the twentieth recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style. I miss the photographer, again, and put "Letting go of the past" on top of my talk, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Messiah: it's now nominated, - could you please fix the link to Gramophone, as in ENO? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello sir, we would like your suggestions on the fac. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Priyanka Chopra/archive1. Please , review it and represent your thoughts. Thank You. Prashant ✉ 18:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your recent comments atPR for The Flashman Papers. The article is now at FLC, should you wish to view or comment further. Thanks again. - SchroCat ( talk) 16:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I noticed at the Flashman PR that you have access to the TLS archive... One of my vaguer plans, that will probably never come to anything, is to do something with George Smiley or Le Carre's " Karla trilogy". I've got anything from the Times, Guardian, etc, but wondered if there was anything in the TLS? If you could have a check for me, I would be very grateful! Sarastro1 ( talk) 16:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Just to add (after my clumsy attempt to reply to yours about Walton) I'm delighted to see your addition to this article. All very best, Alfietucker ( talk) 16:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim. As you probably know, the article is the subject of a TFA request, here. Ref 137 is giving a dead link message (the page evidently no longer exists). Is there an alternative source, or should the text on Willcocks's recording simply be cut? I have dealt with the dead Gramophone links by adding {{ subscription}} indicators, not quite as you dealt with the problem at ENO, but this way makes it clear the archive still exists. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Awesome Farces Award |
I award you this "Awesome Farces" award in recognition of your serious achievements made, while drawing dirty looks from the librarians at the British Library, as you guffawed your way through the scripts of the Aldwych farces. This award also reflects your various other ongoing efforts to improve articles about the theatre in the English-speaking world, including plays, theatre companies, actors, producers, writers and critics. You are not merely a prolific contributor, but a skilled researcher and a stylish writer. Your contributions can only be described as "awesome", and that's no farce! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 10:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC) |
This is all very kind. I'll feel a bit more justified in nailing this colour to my mast once I have written articles on the last three of the Aldwych series and overhauled the Aldwych farce article in the light of my archival rummaging. I wish to deny emphatically that I guffawed in the reading room of the British Library; whether my unfortunate neighbours found my stifled splutters and strangulated snorts any better than guffaws is not for me to say. Tim riley ( talk) 14:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. Can you do me a favour and give this a read. I think it has FA potential. What do you think? Can you open a peer review on it?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 10:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
OK, no worries. thanks.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Is this info of any use or interest to you? It updates every time you press the "save" key. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Reminder re: now-defunct Gramophone website: "strip the dead URLs from Gramophone citations and leave the citations as they would have been if they had originally referred to the print edition, i.e. author, article title, month and year, and page number..." - Tim riley ( talk) 2:47 pm, 9 February 2013, Saturday (20 days ago) (UTC−5)
Thanks for participating in the PR ( Wikipedia:Peer review/Mother India/archive1). Mother India is now at FAC.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 08:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
On behalf of this humble Wikignome, you're welcome for the spelling edit. Thanks for creating the article in the first place and growing Wikipedia. ejly ( talk) 00:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I nominated Neville Cardus for TFA on 3 April, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
If you're in a good mood you might like to cast your reviewer's eye over the above, my first venture into the world of political biography. Perhaps the surname may tempt a few curious readers to find out what Angela's grandad did for a living. I can but hope. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I think it would be best to close it for now. I'm working on it but it will take a while. I'll renominate when I'm ready - thanks for your help. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your very constructive review of the Number 10 Downing Street article. For the last two days I have been editing it to address as best I can most of your comments and recommendations. I am making very good progress. I don't know the Wikipedia rules about reviews but hopefully you will be able to re-open the review soon. Sir Cloudesley Shovel II ( talk) 23:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Tim riley for your pointing out. Now I understand my fault. Yet, do you think at least two of them ( Isleworth and Napoleonic Wars) are helpful? If you agree with me, I would like to resume putting links which are really beneficial for readers. Thank you-- Ponruy ( talk) 16:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim riley! Thank you so much for your revising of Piano Concerto (Yashiro). Now it is greatly improved. I'm still working on Delius and have translated related articles such as Julius Buths and Hans Haym. Today, I uploaded Piano Concerto (Delius). When you have time, please pay a brief visit to that article. I hope you will enjoy it.-- Ponruy ( talk) 14:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
If you have a moment and care to put your 2p in, Flying Eagle cent is somewhat languishing at FAC. I think you'd prefer it to my other FAC :) Many thanks.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 22:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to
disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk)
11:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I have agreed to peer-review this article about a Norwegian composer. There's some stuff on my talkpage. I've never heard of her, and can find no mention in any of the English-language music reference books. Internet searches don't reveal much, either. Do you think there's anything in the BL that would throw any light? Maybe you'd be prepared to join in the review, if only to encourage another classical music editor ? Brianboulton ( talk)
I've archived the debate [1]. Nothing more productive was going to come, and the majority approved the motion that info boxes are not always necessary. Seems a good compromise. Giano 19:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorting through some images on Commons tonight I came across one of Noël Coward performing in Sri Lanka in 1944, and while adding it to the article discovered that we have an entry for his accompanist - Norman Hackforth. Unfortunately, the article turns out to be entirely a lift from his Independent obituary, and so I've had to hack it back to a couple of sentences.
I am guessing his post-war radio work (he was "the mystery voice" of Twenty Questions) makes him notable enough for an article, but I'm not sure how significant his work with Coward actually was - the obituary suggests he was influential, but until I added the photograph he wasn't mentioned at all in the main article!
As you wrote much of the Coward article, and you're more up on such things than I, could you have a quick glance at it? Many thanks, Andrew Gray ( talk) 22:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
In advance of next Saturday's TFA I've been looking at the Messiah article. I've fixed a few dead links, removed drive-by uncited text and made other minor changes; otherwise the article looks fit to go. One little problem I can't solve: it may be something to do with my own browser, and therefore not a problem to anyone else, but please take a look at the second item in the Sources section. My computer insists on representing the CD number as a phone number, complete with an icon and a hover message saying "Call this phone number in United Kingdom with Skype". Does this happen with yours? Brianboulton ( talk) 23:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
First, I've nominated Lansbury at FAC if you care to check it out. Second, some while back I indicated that my return to music article writing might be via Gustav Holst, and I suggested we could combine forces for this. Are you still up for that? I've done a bit of source researching (see here) and you may have some suggestions. Now that I have JSTOR access I am a little more independent than I used to be! Brianboulton ( talk) 23:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jeffrey-skitch-pinafore.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Stefan2 ( talk) 00:09, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim. Since you commented at the original FAC for George Harrison, I wonder if you wouldn't mind giving it a second look for the current FAC when you get a chance. As always, any input you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
You are completely correct--but my point was made because a "lyric" poem, here set to music, should still be referred to as a "lyric." Just a personal bias, perhaps, but a lyric is a lyric, whether musically used or not. Do as you will; I tilt at windmills regularly. Thanks for all your good work. 99.93.246.124 ( talk) 02:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Neville Cardus know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 2, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or one of his delegates ( Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 2, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Neville Cardus (1888–1975) was an English writer and critic. He became cricket correspondent of The Manchester Guardian in 1919, and its chief music critic in 1927, holding both posts until 1940. His contributions to these two distinct fields in the years before the Second World War established his reputation as one of the foremost critics of his generation. He considered music criticism as his principal vocation. Without any formal musical training, he was initially influenced by Samuel Langford and Ernest Newman, but developed his own individual style of criticism—subjective, romantic and personal, in contrast to the objective analysis practised by Newman. Cardus's opinions and judgments were often forthright and unsparing, which sometimes caused friction with leading performers. Nevertheless his personal charm and gregarious manner enabled him to form lasting friendships in the cricketing and musical worlds, with among others Newman, Thomas Beecham and Donald Bradman. Cardus spent the Second World War years in Australia, where he wrote for The Sydney Morning Herald and gave regular radio talks. In his last years he became an inspirational figure to aspiring young writers. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:01, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words. I have just a few more sources to incorporate into the article and then I will be attempting to promote to FA status. Please feel free to keep an eye on the article, if interested, and to provide feedback during the review. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Update, FYI: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Music for a Time of War/archive1. Feel free to add comments. Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Helloelloello! I was wondering if you could review this one. I feel it is adequate for a GA. It has been very well-researched. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 19:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Can you reserve the review for a later date then?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 09:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hehe, and who else is likely to be an expert on here in Fatimid architecture? ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Nearly 10 days...♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! Points should have been addressed by now! Only one needs addressing, can you sort out the dashes? ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 15:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Nice one. If nobody has claimed your article by Monday I'll claim it, promise. It's a tough job reviewing your articles for GA as I'll probably end up not being picky enough!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hope you're enjoying the long weekend! The sun even seems to have emerged for it, here in the wild fenlands. As promised, a first attempt at the Ashton event outline - thoughts? Andrew Gray ( talk) 22:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
A couple of things from your draft:
I've signed up - I'll be seeing Gloriana at the ROH on the 22nd, so I'll come down to London the previous evening (I don't fancy catching early morning trains). How exactly does the editathon work? (And by the way, Editathon redirects to Hackathon!) -- Guillaume Tell 11:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation, but I am rarely in London at weekends, alas, and even when I am, family commitments tend to make it difficult to get to such things. I hope it goes well. As for people who might be interested, I'm not sure who to suggest who wouldn't already be in your thoughts anyway. Yours, Bencherlite Talk 10:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, just a quick note to let you that I have listed Marie Lloyd at peer review with a GAC and FAC in mind. It's been three months of intense research, but I'm happy the article is now as complete as it ever could be. If you could spare the time, then It would be great to hear your thoughts. -- Cassianto Talk 16:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Would you be willing to participate in a second peer review to prep the Gospel of the Ebionites article for FAC? Your name was recommended to me by Ian Rose. Thanks. Ignocrates ( talk) 21:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
You probably recall Ezra Meeker, who utterly stole the show in one of my coin articles. I've done a bit of work on his article and taken it to peer review and I'd be grateful for your comments in due course. Hope all is well.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. You said some nice things about the article I started on Edward Clark (conductor), so I thought you might be interested to know what's happened since. I became aware during my research that his son Conrad Clark lives in Melbourne, so I bit the bullet and contacted him. I live close to 3 hours drive away, but I had reason to be down there and suggested we meet up. He was more than happy to do so; we had a most engrossing 3-hour lunch during which he filled in a number of gaps in my knowledge, told me a lot about his father and mother Elisabeth Lutyens, and mentioned a whole host of famous names he'd met through them.
One little anecdote of many: whenever Igor Stravinsky came to London, the first person he always asked after and wanted to see was Edward. Vere is Clark?, he would demand.
Conrad took me back to his flat, showed my some of his amazing sculptures, showed me the first decent photo I'd ever seen of his father, and let me have a complete printed catalogue of his mother's works. I had to shame-facedly admit to him that, in a lifetime of music listening, I had yet to hear a single note of her music. That's now being attended to.
Conrad has a website ( [2]) and a youtube video ( [3]) but is not connected to the internet at home (he accesses emails at the local library). I took with me a printed copy of my article to give him, and asked for feedback in due course. When he got back to me, he said there was one important omission. He claims Anton Webern dedicated his orchestration of the Ricarcare from Bach's The Musical Offering to Edward Clark. I've had a good look around google, but have failed to find any confirmation of this at all. Do you have access to any sources that might shed any light on this?
Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [Talk] 13:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
Without your highly valued insights and edits at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/George Harrison/archive2, the article would not be FA today! Thanks so much for all the encouragement! GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 20:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Tim -- Bencherlite is casting round for non-date-specific suggestions for Today's Featured Article, and I thought of Adrian Boult, which I don't believe has run yet. Would you mind if I were to nominate it (or would you like to nominate it yourself), or are you holding it for an anniversary or some other reason? Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 03:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
BBC Symphony Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Rudolf Schwarz (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk)
14:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to be bothering you again at the ancestral shack, but this lady has crept into FAC, if you have a moment to take a look. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 04:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Many thanks for the review. (Although I once visited the British Museum, I fear I missed your friend there; there's so much to see in the museum that I was a bit overwhelmed.) I have one small question in response to your comments. Once that's answered, I suppose I'll close the review and nominate at FAC. A. Parrot ( talk) 19:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
I have finished drafting the Music section. I am not particularly happy with it yet; at 3300 words I think it's too long. Among other problems the "style" subsection is especially weak, and the "Indian period" disproportionately detailed. I shall be looking to reduce the whole section by around 500 words, but I'm a bit exhausted with Holst and am taking a 24-hour break from him. Incidentally, the article is now over 9000 words, with more to be added; an expanded lead, replacement of the rubbishy Commemorations section with a more worthy assessment, etc. That seems a little bloated, and I think we should look for other opportunities - duplications of information, perhaps - to reduce the text. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Over to you, for consideration once you have had enough of a break from Holstiana. Tim riley ( talk) 12:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Landon Ronald, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Symphony No. 8 and Ben Davies ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. I've created this for better organization with my usual collaborators. Can you add what articles you wanted reviewed/peer reviewed/ FAC with input from me. I forgot what article it was you wanted GA reviewed! I'd be grateful if you could alert me of the projects you're working on so I can keep tabs on everything!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 16:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Adrian Boult know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 30, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or one of his delegates ( Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 30, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Adrian Boult (1889–1983) was an English conductor, known for championing British music. His first major post was conductor of the City of Birmingham Orchestra in 1924. Appointed director of music of the British Broadcasting Corporation in 1930, he established the BBC Symphony Orchestra, which was regarded as among the best in Britain under his chief conductorship. On retirement from the BBC in 1950, he took up the position of chief conductor of the London Philharmonic Orchestra and, in what was widely called his "Indian Summer", continued to conduct it until his retirement in 1978. He gave the first performance of his friend Gustav Holst's The Planets, and introduced new works by other British composers including Bliss, Britten, Delius, Tippett, Vaughan Williams and Walton, as well as foreign composers such as Bartók, Berg, Stravinsky, Schoenberg and Webern. A modest man who disliked the limelight, he felt as comfortable in the recording studio as on the concert platform and made recordings throughout his career, many of which have remained in the catalogue for three or four decades. Prominent conductors influenced by him include Colin Davis and Vernon Handley. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi! The article Tripura is currently in FAC. I have no idea whether you have any time or any interest in the topic at all. Since the FAC has not received significant reviews/comments, I was wondering if you would be kind enough to have a look at it. I understand you may be busy, so no rush. Sorry for such an abrupt request. Regards.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 05:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The link provided by ref 57 does not seem to provide helpful information. Is there a further procedure that needs to be followed, to verify the cited info? Brianboulton ( talk) 11:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
PS: Did you see that the Leningrad symphony is on the FAC page? (Daah, daah-di duh duh/daah, daah-di duh duh/daah, daah-di DUH DUH/Dee daah dee daah dee duh duh/Dee daah dee daah dee duh duh/dee daah, daah, di-duh duh/daah, daah-di dum dum dum dum/daah, daah, di-duh duh/dee duh duh/dee DUH DUH!) Brianboulton ( talk) 16:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I am very fond of the piece, having sung it on a Radio 3 broadcast of choral evensong from Westminster Abbey on an RSCM course when I was a lad. I long to sing it again (or perhaps play the organ part somewhere!) Bencherlite Talk 21:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm being a bit cheeky here, but you have commented on cricket issues here and there, and I wondered if you fancy taking a look at the article on Mr Hobbs at PR here? It needs non-cricket-obsessive eyes, and your advice and comments are always invaluable. If you have neither the time nor inclination, it's not a problem, and I should warn you that it is a very long article. Thanks. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, Thanks - yes that's great - as I said I started what I thought would be a single paragraph stub to link from another article I have written - but it got to the "early hours" and it was still growing! I know that it needed a full list of all the musical numbers and was going to order the score myself, but you seem already to have access ( I had not wanted to cut and paste from the MIDI website and prefer to go back always to good printed sources if I can). I see you have brought forward its opening date by a few days - the only thing here is that from what I could see, the opening night was continually put back due to what was running in the theatre previously - so we need to be a little careful here to find when it actually did start (as opposed to false starts announced in the press!). Could the William Hay in Act 2 be the "famous" one? I have not been able to prove whether this was one of his early roles. Finally - its really good to see you back - its been on my mind for much of the past year that I had said something! Very best wishes. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Review has begun..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay I did remember last night but didn't have time to do it. I've passed BBC Symphony Orchestra and uploaded some photos which I think look good and were much needed in replace of that silly empty infobox. I may be a few days in getting to the FA as I have some urgent Indian ones to attend to first which I'm already well behind on!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping the GAN open. I thought I wouldn't be able to do anything until next, week, but I did manage to focus down and do some work today. Would you take a look and let me know what else needs doing. SilkTork ✔Tea time 13:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
No PR comments since 29 April - maybe that's it (unless your doctor friend, above, wants to give it a go?). I intend to spend some time on a final readthrough and polish on Saturday; shall we wait until, say, Monday on the off-chance any further comments, and then send it on to FAC? Brianboulton ( talk) 18:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I'll look at Flanders (my father was particularly fond of Flanders and Swann). I'll leave any comments on the talk page. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I was looking back through and noticed that the Davis portrait bust reference disappeared some years ago after your major edit in 2010ish I think. I'd be interested to know what more you feel would be needed to contemplate replacing it, bearing in mind the reference for the archive of correspondence on the bust between artist and sitter is held in the national Henry Moore Institute archive? (Conversely, I don't think it is currently in a public collection.) kind regards Cazimir ( talk) 12:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Holst now nominated at FAC. We await the consequences. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Yvonne Printemps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Oscar Straus (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I have just completed an article on the singer Stanley Kirkby. I have put a considerable amount of work into this and would appreciate it if you have any comments (good or bad) to make. Kirkby's life appears to be been written only by what I would call "Internet rumour" in the past few years and I have tried to get back to decent sources to give hopefully a full and balanced account of his life and career and show that he was not just a "music hall" singer. Richard J Myers ( talk)
If you could put them on my talk page and I'll take it from there. I'm hoping not too much is required here. (cf. The Cherry Girl - which was just a quickie!). Kirkby "existed" in roughly the same world as Ernest Pike - you may remember that I started the article about him a couple of years ago. Neither was quite as well known as Peter Dawson, but all three were early recording artists from about 100 years ago. Not much has been written about Kirkby or Pike and so finding out about their lives has been quite an interesting challenge and I have certainly enjoyed it. Pike is now back on my agenda as there is further work to do there!
Please also read my comments on the Talk page. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi - thanks Tim. This is an excellent offer. I am a reader myself, but I live in Staffordshire and don't get down very often. Your suggestion leads me on to a key question about this and other similar articles I have written. I mention recordings, often ones from obscure and short-lived British record companies. Every one of these statements therefore presumably requires a "citation needed" (I have lots of these!) because I do not have some of the record catalogues to hand. What I need is access to these catalogues - e.g. Regal, Scala and Coliseum. However I wouldn't ask you to read through all of these (should they be available in the BL) as it would take a huge amount of time and be about as exciting as watching paint dry! If I can can think of anything else I will let you know during the course of this evening.
If record catalogues no longer exist or cannot be obtained, can the possession of an actual record or a photo of one be deemed as actual proof that the recording exists, so making it an "established fact" therefore obviating the need for a citation needed? Is there a Wikipedia construct that could be used instead of citation needed?
Otherwise thanks for your suggestions about improvements, most of which are fairly minor and I will fix these in the next couple of hours. With regard to G&S, I have stated that Kirkby only took part in earlier recordings. By the time D'Oyly-Carte was on the scene, kirkby was recording for Edison Bell and working with Hudson on his stage shows. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Tim, I believe I have fixed 99% of what you suggested. I still have further improvements of my own outstanding plus, of course looking up all the matrix numbers from my record collection; this will be better than the cns! I'm still pondering the oratorio issue for now. Can you find a citation from the BL for the fact that he was cousin of Louise Kirkby Lunn, or even was believed to be? - this would be very helpful. Thanks Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi Tim, Absolutely brilliant. I will add that to the article shortly. I must admit I did wonder why he didn't serve in the War, although it doesn't say I suppose it may have been felt that he was doing good work with some of the propaganda songs he sang. Thanks. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi Tim, As you can see the article has gone from a stub to a B-Class, the only significant change being the combining of both operatic and popular (mustn't use this word!) recordings. I seem to have lost the battle over oratorio, but not the war. A serious thanks for your help here. One thing I would like your opinion on is that in the second paragraph of the lead, "concert-party performances" has had the hyphen removed. I know that compound adjectives are always hyphenated, but that with nouns this is usually done to make the meaning clear, should it be unclear. Do you think the hyphen should be there in this case? Richard J Myers ( talk)
Tim, thanks for contributing to the Gospel of the Ebionites second peer review. So far, no one has stepped up to review the article in FAC. A passing comment was made about the reference format. However, it is the same format that is used on the George Harrison feature article; that is the article I relied on as a template to improve the references. Can you take a look at it? Thanks. Ignocrates ( talk) 19:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim. I would be happy to work with you on the Britten article. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 19:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I wondered if you could provide some input into the discussion at the bottom of the page involving a dispute over a fact in this FA article.
Hi Tim, One of the songs that Stanley Kirkby recorded was "The Galloping major". As I have the original sheet music for this, I have added an article about the song (I have done several other songs as well): The Galloping Major (song). Searching through a box of old Edison cylinders, I found an original recording of this song by Harry Graham (poet) which I believe must be quite rare! I see you have contributed to the Harry Graham article in the past, but no mention is made there or anywhere else on the Internet about Graham being a singer as well as a poet. But it must surely be the same guy, for one, I have found reference to another cylinder in America with an associated article which specifically mentions his dates and secondly, the subject matter of the song is military and he was in the Army? I have heard this song described as a childrens' song; the first verse and chorus maybe, but I think much of the rest (especially the encore verse which is not on any recording) was probably intended for the Officer's Mess! Have you any other proof that he made any recordings? - This is not an urgent request. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi Tim, Yes I suppose what's needed is a reference to add substance to a new section on his recordings. So perhaps you could have a search when you return from your trip to see if you can find anything. Enjoy the lakes. The link to the website with info on the other cylinder which has a similar number to the one now on the Galloping Major page is: Cylinder Link Richard J Myers ( talk)
Just to let you know that Mr Hobbs is now at FAC here. Sarastro1 ( talk) 19:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure where you are at the moment, but if you are still online from time to time, could you look at my Jane Joseph effort, at PR? A spin-off from Holst, I admit - but I've got to make the most of all that research and book-buying. Please comment if you can. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Morning Tim, Could I ask your advice on a peculiarly perplexing piece of punctuation? In involves the use of the comma in the following circumstances at the beginning of sentences: "In 2004, he rode a bike" as opposed to "In 2004 he rode a bike". There is no sub-clause involved, bust the straightforward use of the comma. I always understood that the comma in these circumstances was an American aberration, but I have recently had the following thread placed on my talk page, and my removal of such commas reverted. I note that neither of the two links provided on my thread actually deal with the date format, so I am not sure the posted has read this correctly. Is there anything you can provide by way of clarity for my poor brain?! Much obliged! - SchroCat ( talk) 09:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Would you have any objections to me closing the Savile Row review as not-listed so I can clear it from my watchlist? SilkTork ✔Tea time 13:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, How are you? I hope you are keeping well. I'm just dropping a short note about the Rudd Concession article I wrote, which has been at FAC for about a month now, and has won a couple supports but needs a few more pairs of eyes I think. It has always been a great pleasure of mine working together in the past, and I'd very much enjoy hearing your thoughts on it if you have the time. The review is here if you are interested. Thanks, and have a great week! — Cliftonian (talk) 11:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Please see my talk page for the conversation on commas. Inglok ( talk) 23:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Happy to see your construction site! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I've found a bit of a problem, though one that should be resolved fairly soon: this Mikado poster is from before 1923, but Britain doesn't have a fixed date, just life+70.
That last part doesn't matter here, but does matter on Commons. Now, you uploaded it here, which is fine, but there's some bots that go around tagging things to be transferred to Commons, and it got tagged, and someone didn't check, so it was moved over.
The easiest way to avoid this happening again is to use {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}}, which notes the image is in copyright in its home country. If you know the year it clears copyright in the home country (usually the year of death of the artist +71 years [Long story short: clearing copyright can only happen on a January 1st, so you have to up the year count one year higher than you'd think.]).
Alternatively, just shove a {{ notcommons}} on the image.
If you're ever in doubt, feel free to ask me on my talk page.
Honestly, the only reason this is important is that Commons is a little bad about moving things back here if they get mistakenly transferred. They'll often just delete them instead. Luckily, I caught this one. =) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 15:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks,
BracketBot (
talk)
18:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Now that the FAC page is a little clearer, I've nominated Jane. Please visit at your leisure. I note that you are getting visits from BracketBot, the little minx. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:07, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
It's very kind of you to have become involved and to have gone the extra mile in asking for admin review, and it looks a lot better that in independent editor has done it rather than me forcing the issue! Thanks again and all the best. - SchroCat ( talk) 04:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
GA Review on Hold.
Please see comments at Talk:Elizabeth David/GA1.
NOTE: Please respond, below the entire GA Review, and not interspersed in the GA Review comments themselves. Thank you!
— Cirt ( talk) 22:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the kind words! I've got a few projects on the way towards featured candidacy discussions, I suppose I'm a bit nervous, which is probably why I haven't just gone and nominated them yet, but any extra help would be appreciated! — Cirt ( talk) 17:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Any chance you could get access to this source? — Cirt ( talk) 18:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, as someone who has commented in the past on whether The Rite of Spring article should have an infobox or not, I wanted to let you know that the discussion has been reopened on the article's talk page. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Update: Now at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2, your input would be appreciated, — Cirt ( talk) 19:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim.
Now, about this: What about the C. B. Frys and the A. J. Ayers and the J. S. Bachs and the Winston S. Churchills of the world - et many al?
Would you be suggesting Coenraad V. Bos be moved to Coenraad V Bos rather than having to pipe him? -- Jack of Oz [Talk] 20:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
You may hear the sound of embarrassed shuffling of feet. They're mine: having gone in to try and sort out the footnote problems, I see that all the footnotes are already using the {{efn|}} template. I'll withdraw as gracefully as I can, keep the shreds of my dignity intact, and let you use the 'old school' tag:refs, which I don't know to use! All the best. - SchroCat ( talk) 20:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I've sent Isabeau to peer review in preparation for another run at FAC. Your input would be welcome if you have time to give it a look. Thanks. Victoria ( talk) 15:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Seeing your name pop up at Gubby Allen (which I warn you is a long, long way from being ready! And probably will not be for quite a while as I like to let articles "rest" when I'm heartily sick of them, which sums up my feelings for Gubby right now...) reminds me that I meant to ask you if his name pops up in any of your Douglas Home sources. I know that the pair were friends at school, but I was specifically thinking from MCC business in the 1960s, particularly the D'Oliviera affair. Thanks! Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Munch ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, you'll recall that you contributed to the FA review of History of Gibraltar few months ago. I've nominated it at TFAR for July 13, the tercentenary of Gibraltar becoming a British territory. If you have any thoughts on this you're very welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#July 13. Prioryman ( talk) 20:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks,
BracketBot (
talk)
11:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, in case there is any misunderstanding, I didn't mean you should stop writing! I was enjoying watching the article develop, it is of interest to me. I've left quibbles on the PR, more to follow. Best. Ceoil ( talk) 06:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.-- Dom497 ( talk) This message was sent out by -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 15:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
Dear Tim, I know you have tons on your plate, but I am writing to ask if you may be willing to take on the GA review for Charles-Valentin Alkan. It's been up for review for a few weeks, but no takers yet ..... or maybe you know of someone else who might take up the burden? I'm hoping to get it up to FA for CVA's birthday in November. Thanks anyway, and hoping this doesn't end up in the compost heap! Best, -- Smerus ( talk) 13:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Tim, could you briefly revisit the FAC review, above, and consider a point I've raised about the ordering of the prose? Many thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure how familiar you are with Archie MacLaren, but his inevitably long article is at PR here, and as ever your comments would be gratefully received if you have the time and inclination. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:PerGrunden.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
To mark the 110th anniversary of his birth, perhaps? Or have you another preference? Bencherlite Talk 15:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim! I wondered if you or Brian who I suspect are "baby boomers" might be interested in nurturing this. Aside from needing a majr copyedit it is a bit too pop culture-oriented, it needs more info on events and building changes. Can you look into it sometime? Perhaps you could borrow a book on the history of London like this to help improve it? It's a "Swinging" article which I'd hope would interest you!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 15:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Herbert James Rowse may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Frederick Ashton may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:16, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:07, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
I was happy to help.....!! Good luck with your summer project at ROH, and look forward to report on it. Shall be in London in early November for Les vêpres. Viva-Verdi ( talk) 23:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Do you happen to know if there are significant differences between the 2003 and 2013 editions of David Matthews's biography of BB? Or was the latter a centenary spin-off reprint? Brianboulton ( talk) 15:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Alec Douglas-Home know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 2, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or one of his delegates ( Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 2, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Alec Douglas-Home (1903–95) was a British Conservative politician who served as Prime Minister from October 1963 to October 1964. His reputation rests more on his two spells as the UK's foreign minister than on his brief, uneventful premiership. As parliamentary aide to Neville Chamberlain, he witnessed at first hand Chamberlain's efforts to preserve peace before the Second World War. In 1951 he inherited the earldom of Home and became a member of the House of Lords. Under Winston Churchill, Anthony Eden and Harold Macmillan he was appointed to posts including Leader of the House of Lords and Foreign Secretary. In October 1963 Macmillan resigned as Prime Minister. Home was controversially chosen to succeed him, renouncing his earldom and winning election to the House of Commons. He was criticised by the Labour Party as an out-of-touch aristocrat, and he came over stiffly in television interviews. After narrow defeat in the 1964 general election he resigned as party leader; he later served under Edward Heath as Secretary of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. After the defeat of the Heath government in 1974 he retired from front-line politics. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
You removed an edit I made to this page, calling it uncited trivia. And then the message I posted here to discuss it, you removed saying something about gibberish being moved to the compost heap. It isn't gibberish. The "uncited trivia" you referred to is taken from the wiki page that it linked to... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Day_in_the_Life — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.76.83 ( talk) 14:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
The Company of Heaven was started, I would like to add but don't have time right now, improvements welcome, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Harold Davidson is in the dock at peer review. Let justice be swift and impartial. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I will be glad to look at it but it will take me a few days. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Very nearly there, a few tweaks and it's good to go (and I'd suggest going on straight to a peer review, the next step for FA status, afterwards) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 10:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
When you are free from your Royal Ballet duties, would you mind pronouncing on a capitals issue that has arisen in the esteemed Wehwalt's comments on Wikipedia:Peer review/Harold Davidson/archive1? I am awarding you the casting vote. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
The GEbi article was promoted to FA today. Thank you for your helpful comments and support, both in peer review and FAC. Cheers! Ignocrates ( talk) 16:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Wonderful to meet you yesterday - quite hope you survived the post-Ballet revels. Gareth E Kegg ( talk) 17:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try to get it vigorously edited this week and overhaul the referencing. As you say the content is pretty good and with a bit of editing I think we could whip it into GA shape. I was going to ask if you were interested in reviewing Marrakesh for GA and I only saw this article in the queue then, but after seeing this I see you've already got a lot on your plate so no worries. I did though want a very good reviewer as I intend taking Marrakesh to FA at some point, it has been well enough researched.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Could I ask that you briefly revisit Wikipedia:Peer review/Harold Davidson/archive1, to comment on an issue I have raised concerning the use of this image. Many thanks Brianboulton ( talk) 10:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I am passionate about the cello and its repertoire. I have tried to add a paragraph to the Elgar Cello concerto page twice and, on both occasions, it was deleted. It was essential, unopinionated information about the 1985 Best Classical recording award given to the RPO recording of the Elgar cello concerto with Julian Lloyd Webber and Sir Yehudi Menuhin. Please can you let me know if my edit was in any way incorrect and how I can put the text back on the Wikipedia page? Many thanks and kind regards, Michela — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.55.29 ( talk) 20:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your super-fast reply! I would really appreciate it if you could restore the text, thank you! I am new to the Wikipedia editing community, I didn't know I had to register, I thought logging in as a user was sufficient.My Wikipedia user name is Cocolinmichela (my real name Michela Cocolin). I had text and video links removed from other pages (as well as the Elgar cello page) by another user in the past and would like to make sure I am not doing anything wrong, so that it doesn't happen again. Thanks again for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.55.29 ( talk) 20:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much! I shall try to find out more about editing on Wikipedia in the meantime. Best wishes, Michela — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.55.29 ( talk) 21:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Company of Heaven, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that The Company of Heaven, Benjamin Britten's 1937 composition for speakers, soloists, choir and orchestra, contains "metrical spoken (shouted) male chorus"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Company of Heaven. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (
nominate) 16:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
About two years ago I sent you a message complimenting you on your work on the page about Stephen Potter. Which I totally stand by, incidentally.
I've since acquired more of his books, including his Nonesuch edition of Coleridge, his early books A Muse In Chains and Coleridge and S.T.C. and his later corporate history of Heinz, The Magic Number. These have changed my picture of him as a writer a good deal, and I hope to get back to this article soon with some more detail. Just keeping you posted. Lexo ( talk) 23:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I hope all is well with you. I've been tinkering in user space from time to time with " Die Forelle", Schubert's rather pleasant lied. I've moved it all to the article space today, but I'm still not overly happy with it, partly because I'm such a duffer at the musical angle. Could you have a glance over it at some point and highlight a few major issues? Don't worry in the slightest if you're already tied up on other things - it's not important and with what I've done is probably only a GA at best, but I'd like to make it a good GA, if I can. Many thanks indeed for all your help! - SchroCat ( talk) 21:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
What's an article on Britten without a picture of Pears? Enjoy, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Now up for FA. Best, -- Smerus ( talk) 12:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Tim, profound thanks for your helpful comments during the peer review and for your warm support during this effort - which wasn't one of the easiest I've undertaken. Victoria ( talk) 00:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, Tim. I'll get in touch when we get closer to the time. Viva-Verdi ( talk) 14:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
I have nommed the errant rector. Let's see if he gets his just deserts. Can you give me a rough deadline for detailed work on the Britten music section, so that I can plan my next few weeks' activities? Brianboulton ( talk) 19:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you please explain this summary? [4] "reverting falsified quote to ipsissima verba"? What on earth did I do? That edit summary is extremely hostile! ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 15:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Good to see the Main page as a home for Home, - your reputation rests on articles like that (thanks for a new phrase!) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Ref 70 ("Matthews, p. 870") is clearly a typo. However, if the correct page ref is 87, there's a slight problem with my own Matthews refs (Nos 162, 164, 165, 169 and 170). As I think I mentioned earlier, I am using the 2003 edition of the Matthews book, in which the Britten-Menhuin visit to Belsen is on page 83, not 87. Would you mind checking out my Matthews refs in your 2013 edition? Brianboulton ( talk) 09:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately you've caught this at a moment when QatarLeague added a lot of bare url links for sources which now need to be formatted. I still need a few days on this, but you should see that considerable improvements have already been made.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, Cassianto and I are in the process of copy editing the article on Terry-Thomas, which should be going to PR in a few days. Before we get that far, could you let me know which possessive form we should be using: Terry-Thomas' or Terry-Thomas's? I've been happily using the first version, but now have doubts that this may be incorrect: could you shed a little light on my darkness? Many thanks, as always - SchroCat ( talk) 16:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
It's an absolute shower! The King of the Cads is at PR. If there is any chance you could pop your head round to have a look, Cassianto and I would be very much obliged. All the best – SchroCat ( talk) 23:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
This article gets better and better, largely due to your hard work. The stuff about Alice Hofmannsthal was particularly amusing, so have copied it over to her article. And I've started an article on another contemporary of Fred's, choreographer Andrée Howard. Edwardx ( talk) 12:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
I am looking for a book review of Christopher Matthew's Diary of a Somebody, published in 1980. This is the fictional diary of one Simon Crisp, a 1970s descendent of Pooter. Matthews wrote two other Crisp diaries, Loosely Engaged and The Crisp Report, published in 1980-81, and the three together were published as an omnibus in 1988. I am sure the books would have been reviewed in the Guardian, Observer, Telegraph etc, though I can find nothing online. Can you help? It's reviews of the first that I am particularly interested in. Much thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 20:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm only really interested in him as a racehorse owner, but I found this [8] which could be added as an example of his philanthropic activities. Tigerboy1966 13:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Tim. Unfortunately some German editor has made a complete hash of my editing which he dismisses as "lazy" and has restored the excessive demographic data (which few people really care for in the main article) and replaced my comprehensive district guide down to an unsourced crappy bulleted list again. I'm not tolerating that. I'll be reverted by him if I restore and an edit war will ensue. I'm not putting up with this. I strongly suggest his edits are undone and the article is restored.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking the time to review this article Tim, I much appreciate it.-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 18:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
An exasperating innovation suddenly polluting the edit screen is some ghastly code that changes all my English spellings into American, so that I have to go back and turn them all into English again. Does any kind visitor to this page know how to switch this loathsome device off? – Tim riley ( talk) 18:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I have just added a rather hefty chunk of prose to the music section, on the Canticles. I've probably overdone it in my enthusiasm, so don't hesitate to cut it down to whatever size you think appropriate. One thing you will have to do is check the additional Matthews refs. This time I have anticipated the latest edition by adding 4 to my edition's paging, but you had better check that this is right. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Just so. I've added a collapsed version at Les Illuminations (Britten). See what you think. Tim riley ( talk) 21:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
I just blundered onto your Britten PR page to leave some comments, and realised that I forgot to inform you that Archie is now at FAC here, and that any further comments are always welcome. Hoping that having him at FAC is not a bad omen for this week... Sarastro1 ( talk) 17:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, do you think this has FA potential? I think with the referencing converted to sfn and a slight restructuring it has potential. I'm considering readdressing it and placing for a peer review. It would be amazing to have an FA on Oceania. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 10:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
You are most welcome Master Timothy, I've been enjoying the sunshine so I did it earlier than later. Funnily enough there is a young editor on here from Mauritius or the Maldives I always get them mixed up, and rather than write about his exotic Indian Ocean country he produces featured articles on Beyonce albums and singles... Americanization huh... I wanna know about things like Mauritian canoes and dances!! 16:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, Tim, but you may have overlooked a request/suggestion that appears earlier on this talkpage, re Britten. At the moment, the first mention that he wrote incidental music for theatre/cinema is in the Music section, in a paragraph added by me. As he wrote rather a lot of this stuff in his earlyish career, I think there should be a something (the odd sentence, perhaps) about this in the biographical sections of the article, to provide a context for the reference in the Music section. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I have added "Legacy" to the Music section. A bit longer than I intended, will see if I can trim down (though I don't think that overall, the music section is overlong for such an important composer) Brianboulton ( talk) 16:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Tim, can you answer a point that's been raised on my talkpage about the Britten centenary. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I think I have done all I can do with the Music section. I have cut out a few bits where pieces were merely mentioned without any musical detail, and added a few other bits. I think it looks OK now, but time – and FAC – will tell. At the FAC I will restrict myself to dealing with comments on this section, except where I am needed to wade in on any general issues. The article looks generally in fine shape, and it should do well. Brianboulton ( talk) 07:43, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Just for the record, I hold you entirely responsible for today's frankly implausible events, on the basis of this edit. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I looked right at it and I still hit okay, gah! Thanks for catching it. I swear if this was the template format I'd not slip it up. I will ask Ohconfucius about this one so I don't keep screwing it up accidentally. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 20:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, Tim, from Santa Fe where we have a fabulous La donna del lago on stage this summer!
The Britten article is coming along and now looks amazing!! (And it reads very well too! Which makes trying to get the Verdi article to look anything as good rather problematical with the tons of work involved.)
One suggestion: keep the References as the single main heading word, which is "standard" elsewhere with opera articles, but also keep "Notes" (maybe then make then A,B,C?? rather than 1,2,3??). Then label the linked-in "Notes" from the text as "Footnotes" to distinguish them?? It would keep the "look" as established in the the major WP:Opera guidelines but also use dual versions of the word "notes". Viva-Verdi ( talk) 01:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Following an inquiry I'd made, I gathered the scanned image of Maggie Teyte as Cherubino could be in Wikimedia Commons under {{PD-art-two|PD-old|PD-1923}}
This illustration by George Cecil Wilmshurst appears here and here as well. Wilmshurst was born in 1873, according to English Wikipedia, or in 1874 according to London 1901 census. He was active between 1897-1917, according to his viaf page. He died in 1930.
I would be much grateful if you do so, for I could use your excellent scan on other Wikis.
Regards, ש. יונתן ( talk) 04:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC).
Dear Tame McOrally
I like where you've been going with Britten. Koussevitzky must have been crazy, or ill-advised, to prefer the z. I'm sure he has multiple redirects. It's a minor matter of minuscule moment.
Did you see my personal contribution to the Britten centenary - Mont Juic (suite)? Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasant conversation] 20:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Morning Mr R, Just looking over Britten at FAC and I see there's quite a bit of overlinking in the Influences section. Is this deliberate, or are you happy for me to de-link the offending terms? Pip pip - SchroCat ( talk) 07:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Well deserved promotion. I have this crazy dream of Falstaff for Verdi's birthday ... - let's start improving, even if we don't get that fa[r]! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:25, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks again for your previous help at PR for the T-T article. The old chap is in the spotlight of FAC, although the stage is a rather crowded one at the moment. I hope you'll have the time to pop along to see him once again. Many thanks - SchroCat ( talk) 11:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim! Thanks so much for the review of the Knights of Columbus article. I do appreciate it, and you had some excellent suggestions. I tried to address all of them, and plan on putting it up for Featured Article status again. If there is anything else you can suggest beforehand, I would very much appreciate it. Thanks again! -- Briancua ( talk) 19:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, just so you, Brian and anybody else watching this page knows, I, the artist formerly known as Dr. Blofeld is resuming as User:Tibetan Prayer now, marking an end of DYK contributing and a new era of focusing more on GA and FA and editing outside of DYK. Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 08:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Tim, some of your reversions appear to be a bit sweeping. I couldn't figure out exactly which deleted material you restored today at 09:26, but part of your edit undid Ian Rose's correct insertion of a comma betweeen the honours and his moving the WL for pacifism to the first occurrence. Your revert of the semicolons also undid removal of a redundant word ("most particularly" is pompous). After the somewhat WP:OWNy reversion of the semicolons (by "semicolons preferred" you declare your preference to overrule someone else's) I won't be continuing to help there, but you might want at least to restore Ian Rose's corrections. -- Stfg ( talk) 10:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I advised the author of this not to bunch and replicate books in the notes section and put them underneath. I began converting them to sfn notes and thought he'd be happy to continue but he seems rather upset with beginning to overhaul the references. Sfn isn't compulsory but isn't it ill-advised not to replicate books in the notes and also underneath? Care to comment? Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 19:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I have a question at the bottom of my input to date at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Charles-Valentin Alkan/archive1 on the use of "amongst" and "whilst". I don't know whether you'd consider amongst in the same way as whilst, but I remember you picked up on it in my articles and I wondered if you could give your opinion on the matter. Off to enjoy some sunshine now, thanks! Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 13:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
How are you with 1900s popular songs? Could you find if Charles Ridgewell and Will Godwin's "If Those Lips Could Only Speak" was adapted from a French tune? (Related to Boenga Roos dari Tjikembang, unsurprisingly another Indonesia article) — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your spotcheck. Is the review done. I don't see a cross out at the FA:Talk. LittleJerry ( talk) 23:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Mr Pooter awaits your kind attention. Brianboulton ( talk) 14:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. Ssilvers told me to send you a message. I need an item from the BL, but they are currently undergoing some sort of electronic ... well, I don't know WHAT it's called, but I will be unable to order a copy from their website because of their system changing. But if someone could retrieve it for me, the problem would be eliminated. I wonder if you might do it for me? Shouldn't be too difficult or costly. Write me please? Slfarrell ( talk) 20:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, this is just a quick note to let you know that the Rhodesian UDI article is now at FAC. I would be delighted to know your opinion if you are interested. The link is here if you want to take a look. Thanks again and I hope you are well. — Cliftonian (talk) 07:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
In my first draft of the synopsis I mentioned the bath incident. However, that version was far too long, so I cut a lot of incidents out. I have just added back a couple of lines on the bath, though I'm not yet convinced this is the right thing to do. It opens up the possibility that others will graft on their own favourite incidents, and in no time the synopsis will be bloated and unbalanced again. Perhaps you'd let me know your thoughts? Brianboulton ( talk) 21:48, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
One by one: Mont Juic (suite) DYK? (not by me) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm still getting people attacking me and saying things like "the earlier version was better". Seems the more work you put into something the more people complain and the less grateful they are! Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 10:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Falstaff (Elgar) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you removed a section about his church music that I added to the Walton article recently, saying that it needed citations, but the claim in what was then the next paragraph that "One of the best-known and most frequently performed of Walton's works is the cantata Belshazzar's Feast" isn't cited either. Not every fact has a citation to support it. I'm not about to go and do a survey of cathedral music lists and concert hall programmes to establish my claim, but it seems an eminently reasonable claim to make. Even if you disagreed with it, couldn't the paragraph just have been edited slightly to allow his church music to be at least mentioned in the article? Belshazzar's Feast, although famous, surely gets nothing like the number of performances of his small sacred works, which are sung week in week out in the cathedrals, churches, and college chapels of this country. DTOx ( talk) 09:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 15:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Hello,
I'm one of the 'steward' editors of the Paris article, and am just getting up to date on the many changes made there over the past month. For a bit of background: I was one of a few contributors working to improve the article from 2007~2010, and once my work done, I've only been checking up on the article once or twice a month. When I checked in around a week ago, I discovered that the article had been entirely rewritten over a two-week period, and not in a good way - it reads like a tourist guide article today, and it is organised around administrative districts that have nothing to do with the city's distinct 'quarters' that in some cases span several districts. In short, although well intentioned, the 'lone rewriter' is lacking in his knowledge of this city, thus doesn't provide the proper context for article content - this is wrong.
I realise that you have worked together to bring the article to GA status, and would like to preserve that status and even bring it up to FA status if possible. Could you give us a brief outline of the technical 'GA good' points about the article, perhaps on the Paris talk page?
Thanks so much for your help, THEPROMENADER 08:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
The Importance of Being Earnest may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Old Church of St Nidan, Llanidan/archive1. Hope you're enjoying the summer. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 14:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, remembering your architectural interest in Burges and others, I was wondering if you'd be able to review this important Jacobean house for GA. If not, no worries, but it could use somebody with sharp eyes such as yourself to review it!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I've been delaying the diary's FAC nomination because of the current overcrowding there, but it doesn't look like easing off, so I've gone ahead and nommed it: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Diary of a Nobody/archive1. I'd be grateful for any comments, if you're around (and if the Doctor feels like taking a punt, so much the better). Brianboulton ( talk) 19:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Wow another one! Sure, I'll add it to the other two I'll try to look at tomorrow.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
There is a nice video clip of Britten rehearsing a combined choir and orchestra at Aldeburgh in 1967 on the BBC here which I thought you and any talk page stalkers might enjoy. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. This passed this morning, in no small part thanks to your input. I wanted to say thanks for giving us so much help and encouragment. I found your review to be very rewarding; I'm much more pleased with how the page turned out since. Ceoil ( talk) 16:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Mr Riley,
Thanks for all your recent hard work on the The Importance of Being Earnest article. I've noticed you add a great number of works to the "Sources" list though few of them appear to be cited in the article. Would they not fit better in a " Further Reading" section.. Best wishes, -- Ktlynch ( talk) 13:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
I know you are a busy man, but if you can find the time I would greatly appreciate a few edits/comments at Ringo Starr, currently at FAC. Cheers! GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 21:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You're invited to participate in a peer review for the Mughal-e-Azam article at Wikipedia:Peer review/Mughal-e-Azam/archive1. I hope that constructive input from several people can better prepare it for FAC. It probably needs several pairs of eyes who don't know much about Indian film to comment on as much as it needs experts to comment..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, Have I seen you doing spot checks at FAC before? If you have, would you be able to venture into the modern and profane world of popular Eurodance music at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S&M (song)/archive10? If the very thought of going through it leaves you cold, or if you're just too busy on other bits, do you know of anyone who is particularly good at spot-checking? It's the final hurdle for this article at its tenth (yes, tenth) appearance at FAC. Many thanks - SchroCat ( talk) 15:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Tim, would you be willing to do the GA review on this opera? I want a tough, but fair, review. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 19:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Curious. Any chance you could get a scan of Satan's Harvest Home at the British Library? Or a photograph? Assuming, of course, it's on display and they allow photography or would be willing to work with us.
BTW, I found myself doing my first stage play GA just last week (no opera, but the Indonesians didn't really have operas): Allah jang Palsoe. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 07:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
As you've probably realised, I have a weakness for lost, destroyed or non-existent works of art. I've been in London this past week, away from my Tippett library, so I've been amusing myself researching Sibelius's lost eighth. I have now sent the results of my labours for peer review; any comment you care to make would be most welcome. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the peer review a few weeks ago. I'm back and I've nominated the article at FAC here. Edgepedia ( talk) 05:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madame Sans-Gêne (play), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Verneuil and Knickerbocker Theatre ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
I know we've never interacted on Wikipedia before, but I was wondering if you would consider reviewing my current FAC for the Kellie Loder article. I noticed that you reviewed the Ringo Starr FAC and thought you might be interested in this FAC as well. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide at the corresponding discussion would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix ( talk) 21:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Despite a recent difference of opinion, I am going to assume good faith, and would like to pass on a link that may be of use to you.
You recently uploaded some scans of Illustrated London News drawings,
I Found this on a very quick search, http://www.artbiogs.co.uk/2/organizations/illustrated-london-news which is a set of biographies for various British artists, It might help provide additional clues as to possible artists for ILN drawings. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, Not my best response. I've taken your concern on-board. Are there any specfic images you'd like me to review a third time? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Pray observe that Symphony No. 8 (Sibelius) has been nominated at FAC and awaits its fate there. (Someone needs to wipe that grin off Sibelius's face). Brianboulton ( talk) 21:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I hope you are well. This is just a note to let you know that the Southern Rhodesian involvement in World War I article is now at FAC. The FAC is here. If you're interested and find yourself at a loose end, your thoughts would as always be very welcome. — Cliftonian (talk) 03:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Having recovered sufficiently from the Edinburgh Festival, I've done the first analysis. Conclusion was, unfortunately, that it wasn't quite there, but it's not that far off. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 15:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Tim. I had to take it rather craftily as they don't like cameras in there, as you know! Jack1956 ( talk) 20:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. As I can't see anything in the guidelines about it but am pretty sure the norm on here is to not add a full stop after every book citation do you have any idea if it is advised to not include them? Just I notice that most articles, including yours, Brian's (and mine), avoid using full stops after every book note. I brought it up at Talk:This Guitar (Can't Keep from Crying)/GA1 and while it's probably not something which should prevent an article passing GA I'd appreciate it if you could offer an insight into this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Good to hear from you and thanks for the heads-up on Ein Heldeleben, about which I gave my two cents on the talk page. I've started work on an article on the Michael Tippett piano concerto as an adjunct to Brian's revamp on the main article on the composer. Should you have any suggestions on sources or anything else, please feel free. The article itself is still just a stub currently but plan to plunge in depth once my sources are in better order. Thanks. Jonyungk ( talk) 17:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
This might amuse you. While toiling away on the Tippett article, I was reminded that a few years ago I was idly listening to Radio 3 when a performance of The Heart's Assurance, Tippett's song cycle for tenor and piano was announced. The announcer gave a short introduction to the work which, she said, was first performed at the Wigmore Hall in 1953 by Britten and Pears. What I heard, however, was that it was first performed at the Wigmore Hall in 1953 by "Britney Spears". Now, were one a time traveller, wouldn't that be a premiere worth going to! Brianboulton ( talk) 20:25, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
My point during that review was if we're actually using summary style and all the facts are clear there is no need for any notes, and a FA article doesn't require notes to be promoted. Notes seem to come up for a few reasons. A fact in the article is challenged and to clarify during in the review process you add a note to explain to get support. You might be writing and realize that 3 sources say X but 1 says Y and 1 says 'X and Y are wrong, Z' and you decide to add a note in advance of being challenged after choosing to put X in the article. There's also the 'not central to the narrative' type of notes you mentioned. #1 is usually ok. #2 is sometimes ok, although no one reads notes and historians who can't agree about basic facts isn't really that interesting to read most of the time....see WP:SS. The 'not central' type notes I think are not good practice since if we're observing summary style its either in the article or in another article, or omitted. Also, #1 tend to be short sentences or even just a couple of words. #2 can get kind of long, #3 seem to be a whole paragraph with multiple citations and I always wonder with the interesting asides why this isn't in the article! If you have an article you want me to review let me know I'd be happy to help. Kirk ( talk) 22:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tim, just to say thank you for your timely intervention. I was just writing a reasoned reply to Ssilvers (a) many people refer by default to Lady Jane's "double bass", as Google confirms, so I think some clarification at least seems justified; b) it's all in a footnote, after all!), but I guess, since the addition stands and you've intervened, keeping my own counsel is a more gracious option. Anyway thank you matron, you made me smile! Alfietucker ( talk) 17:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Sure, I'll look at it tomorrow, Tuesday at latest. You might be interested in reviewing Amir Hamzah, if you can't do it at the moment you could review at a later date and reserve the review. It needs a good reviewer as in my opinion it has FA potential.. If not, no worries..♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
I am waking this sleeper up. As an experiment I have (temporarily) added one of the Opera project's optional boxes to the article (I was not hassled about this in any way, it's my own idea). I should be very glad to have your plain opinion as to whether this (a)improves the article, (b) makes it worse or (c) makes no difference. Together with any other wise words you may wish to impart. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Amir Hamzah duly reviewed. And promoted in short order. A top-notch article. Tim riley ( talk) 15:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes that's my feeling on it that neither Aymatth or myself are experts and we both know that articles can appear to be very good and of FA quality but when looked at by an expert on the subject can seem grossly deficient. All I know is that it was written based on what we consider to be reliable sources so should generally be OK, just as you say, there is always that doubt that it's substantial enough without an expert on Middle eastern architecture providing some feedback. It might be worth a shot anyway. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll keep it in mind. Sorry for the delay on the Disraeli front Tim, really not been feeling much like wiki of late. I'll definitely resume tomorrow!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
OK. Well it would only be nitpicking anyway, it's a superb article and am sure will pass FA with little trouble. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, not sure if you saw my comment at the review but as the nominator is new to FAC I'd like to see a spotcheck of sources and since most are apparently in book form, I thought of you... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 14:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I offered a brief second opinion on general policy vis-à-vis citation/criteria 2 compliance, I'll take a closer look later on specifics and to see if there are other things needing remedy. I do agree, prima facie, with your assessment and interpretation. Please keep me updated. -- ColonelHenry ( talk) 15:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tim, hope your well. Just a quick note to let you know of the listing of Little Tich at peer review. I would love for you to take part if you're able to. Many thanks! -- Cassianto Talk 08:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
You may like to visit this page, where I am nominating Ben as a "vital" composer (probably in place of Satie). Brianboulton ( talk) 16:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
To present this award to others, simply type {{subst:User:JackofOz/PENISS}} on their talk page.
Jack of Oz
[pleasantries]
20:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:David-mediterranean.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Elizabeth-david-frenc-country-cooking-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Elizabeth David Is There a Nutmeg in the House PB Oct 2001 014029290X.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Italian-Food E-David.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:French prov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Omelette and GW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically
Elizabeth David bibliography, may fail our
non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our
Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page.
Werieth (
talk)
10:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Tim Riley, I sent an email with the content below to Martinevans asking for advice. The same material is also on my talk page. Martin suggested that you are the one of the major contributors to the Benjamin Britten article and should be contacted. He also explained how to contact you other than send an email. I will appreciate your advice. (arno, aka Glencliffe) -- Glencliffe ( talk) 18:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Note to Tim riley, Martinevans and Ruhrfisch:
I will greatly appreciate your advice about what I have gathered below - whether I am on the correct track and whether it is useful. Regarding the existing Wikipedia information about the "School" - there is no article about the school but many references in various articles as well as the redirect page.
(Wikipedia article title) (Benjamin Britten) No mention of the school in the Benjamin Britten article. Britten died shortly after hearing the first master classes that were the beginnings of the school. (Peter Pears) - no mention in Wikipedia article. (Aldeburgh Festival): "In addition to the annual Festival, Aldeburgh Music also runs the Britten-Pears Young Artist Programme (formerly the Britten-Pears School for Advanced Musical Studies)". (Nancy Evans): "Evans taught singing at the Britten-Pears School in Snape Maltings". (Britten-Pears Orchestra): "Since the very first course in 1972, over 10,000 young artists have attended what started as the Britten–Pears School for Advanced Musical Studies, and is now called the Britten–Pears Young Artist Programme. The programme aims to bridge the gap between conservatoires and professional life, offering unique development and performance opportunities to young musicians. Many have gone on to become leading musicians in their own right."
I think that, rather than an article about the school, some information could be added to the Britten article (at least a reference and link) and more comments could be added to the Pears article. My contribution might be the comments below and the picture of Eric Crozier with his wife Nancy Evans and my wife [she needs to be edited out] as there is no picture of him and a very early picture of Nancy Evans in the Wikipedia article. My picture is probably the last picture taken of Crozier, only a few weeks before his death ( http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=eric%20crozier). I will gladly make this photo available, but would need someone skilled to edit out my wife. I don't know where or how to add to the Britten or Pears articles. I also suggest that the recent publication listed below (Making Musicians, by Moira Bennett), be included in the Britten and/or Pears bibliography. A personal note - my wife taught at the school from 1990 to 2005, during which time I spent a good deal of time in the Britten-Pears library (adjacent to the Red House) as well as time in Aldeburgh and with the students and teachers at the school. The Bennett book is a history about the school from its earliest beginnings to approximately 2011 with numerous (b&w) photographs.
"'One day in 1953 he [Britten] said: 'What you and Peter and I have got to remember is that we're going to have a music school here one day.' The 'school' came to birth in 1973 with a Snape Maltings weekend for singers directed by Peter Pears, and it has gone on growing ever since." (1) Quotation from Chapter 2, Imogen Holst, p. 50.
"Britten was speaking only five years after the establishment of the Aldeburgh Festival." (2) Bennett, p. 21.
The Britten-Pears School for Advanced Musical Studies ( http://www.brittenpears.org/page.php?pageid=625) was opened by Queen Elizabeth on 28 April 1979 (2)Bennett, p.83. It is now the Britten-Pears Young Artist Programme ( http://www.aldeburgh.co.uk/bpp).
The School was important to Britten, and also to Peter Pears, who gave the first masterclasses in 1972. [Imogen Holst incorrectly gives the year of the first master classes as 1973] (3)
After the school building was opened…"Pears was in charge of the singers' master classes, held at various times during the year with Nancy Evans as his co-director of singing studies, and many other instrumentalists and singers - among them, Galina Vishnevskaya - who had worked with Britten came to teach." (4) p. 588-589.
Sources for above information: (1) The Britten Companion, edited by Christopher Palmer. Faber & Faber. London, U.K. © (1984). ISBN 0-571-13168-9 Pbk
( 2, 3) Making Musicians A Personal History of the Britten-Pears School. Moira Bennett. The Bittern Press, Woodbridge, Suffolk �© (2012). ISBN: 978-0-9571672-0-9.
(4) Benjamin Britten A Biography. Humphrey Carpenter. Faber & Faber Limited, London, U.K., © (1992). ISBN: 0-571-14324-5.
Existing Wikipedia articles: (Benjamin Britten) /info/en/?search=Benjamin_Britten (Peter Pears) /info/en/?search=Peter_Pears (Aldeburgh Festival) /info/en/?search=Aldeburgh_Festival
Relevant websites (About Aldeburgh Music) http://www.aldeburgh.co.uk/about_us (Britten-Pears Foundation) http://www.brittenpears.org/index.php
--Glencliffe (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)-- Glencliffe ( talk) 18:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, Tim Riley. I would be much obliged if you could take the time to return to Amir Hamzah for the peer review here. The article has been expanded a bit since your last visit, but not dramatically so. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 03:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your kind words and also your checks at the British Library (which I had the pleasure of visiting last week). The process was less daunting than I expected so I may try putting a few other articles I've been the main contributor to up for candidature. It took Aunva6 to take it in hand and do much of the required review improvements and I am grateful to him. Thanks again. -- Bill Reid | ( talk) 08:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For an excellent article on Disraeli – one of a large number you should have received a barnstar for. Thanks for the very enjoyable read. – SchroCat ( talk) 09:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |
How very kind! It's been a good morning, what with this pleasing addition and Dizzy's promotion to FA. Tim riley ( talk) 11:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Congrats, no sooner had the peer review finished and it is promoted to FA!! Sorry I didn't have time to cast my support!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
For better, for worse, I've nominated it at FAC. Obviously I hope for the better. Brianboulton ( talk) 20:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Thankyou for your work on the article, notably the supplying of refs on April 14, 2009. Would you object to having the url "Obituary of Graham Payn" in the reference, as within the remit of WP:CITEVAR? I thought being able to read the ref was useful, especially as there is more there than is used in the wikipedia article, that may assist future editors. Also, do you object to having "Retrieved 26 September 2013", which could help in the event of the link dying? (unlikely in the case of The Daily Telegraph)-- DadaNeem ( talk) 23:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
The Kellie Loder FAC was successful! Thank you for participating in that conversation. I have nominated the article to go up on the main page here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix ( talk) 17:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hullo Tim, hope you're well. I have a somewhat-left-field spotcheck request for you this time, namely a Military History Project A-Class Review. I know I generally ask you for these things at FAC but that's the stated destination for this article and I think it'd be great to get a spotcheck out of the way beforehand. I'm keen on that especially because I've copyedited and reviewed the article in my capacity as a MilHist member, and found it generally very good, but not being an expert on Nasser or modern Egyptian history I'd feel more comfortable about fully endorsing if someone like yourself could give it a more thorough spotcheck than mine (which did in fact reveal a couple of things needing attention). Now I know you're probably not a MilHist member but I'm sure no-one there would have an issue with you joining in, particularly given your experience with political biography. Anyway, no pressure, just if you're interested and have time...! Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 14:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, you might be able to think of a way to steer the Ark between Scylla and Charybdis (to mix my myths) at Talk:Noye's Fludde#Performance history, although there is absolutely no rush and you may not have anything of use in your books (even when you're reunited with them). Best wishes, Bencherlite Talk 15:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your note about the opera, and appreciate your thoughts abut how we might somehow combine the best elements. I worked on it extensively for a class I was giving to an adult ed. group in town which, towards the end, focused on Verdi's relationship with Boito. (Additionally, I did work on Otello and Simon Boccanegra (plus almost every other Verdi article for that matter since the Spring!!)
Anyway, at a quick glance, you appear to have more on the comparison with the plays, which is good. I found some good stuff in Phillips-Matz as well as Frank Walker on the working relationship (since my class also focused on Verdi's relationships with his key librettists, Cammarano and then Piave).
Here's the situation: I leave tomorrow for Italy for the whole of October, and arrive in London on 30th, staying there till 14th. I was going to drop you a line anyway after your suggestion to meet up at Covent Garden for a beer some time ago now, and I don't expect to be able to do very much before month's end. But let me know if you have some merge ideas, and I'll check them at various points. I'll be in Busseto on 10 October, of course!! All the best, Viva-Verdi ( talk) 18:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Just would like a little more detail on why my entry to the page was trivia (or is it trivial). I'm treading carefully since I've only edited a few pages. It seems to me to be no more a piece of trivia (or trivial) than the television references, especially since it is associated with an historically significant recording. Since you are my senior in these matters I am willing defer to your judgment, but it would be helpful to know the criteria you used so I do not repeat the error. RMoribayashi ( talk) 05:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Tim, on my talkpage is a very nice note from Andrew Lowe Watson, the original author of the Tippett article which I am in the process of mangling. He has kind words to say about the Britten article, too. I thought you should read what he says. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Afternoon, and I hope all is well in the lakes. If you're looking around for diversions while you are away from the metropolis, I've given " Die Forelle" a workover and put it up for GAN. I'm not entirely sure about the various foibles of GA's relating to classical songs and leids, so it's more than the nomination is more in hope than expectation. Could I ask for a visit to have a look over it? (Feel free to quick fail it if you think its a deserved fate)! Many thanks if you're able to spare the time – and no problems if you're not able to. All the best – SchroCat ( talk) 14:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't know if this is totally eccentric, but for some reason today it occurs to me that this article, which both you and I have done quite a bit of work on in the past, might be suitable for GA nomination. I confess I'm a total novice about this process, but thought it might a) be worthy; b) incidentally good preparation for me to see from the "other side" how such a process works before I get involved with helping with the Tippett FAC. So do you think SW is a realistic prospect for GA nomination? Alfietucker ( talk) 16:51, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Tim riley, how have you been? I'm a Japanese Wikipedian who created Piano Concerto (Delius) before, with your great cooperation. Today I found that the article Symphony No. 3 (Raff) is composed of complete copy-paste from an external web site. This obviously violates copyright and needs to be deleted from Wikipedia right now. However, deletion procedure here seems different from Japanese one and it will take long time for me to fully understand the guideline and submit the deletion request. Would you kindly submit deletion request instead of me? You are the only English speaking Wikipedian who I had contact before and are currently active. Best regards, -- Ponruy ( talk) 11:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your rapid response and action. Your instruction on Talk page of the Symphony is also great education for me. I will learn more to deal with this kind of problems.-- Ponruy ( talk) 14:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Tim - In traditional Wikipedia style, please accept this gift of a triple (or quadruple?) whammy from across Italy [9]. By all means feel free to adjust the ingredients to suit the refinements of your impeccable taste (though take care with the sciusceddu...). Buon appetito! 86.162.136.32 ( talk) 10:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Friday Afternoons is a red link in BB's list of works, but mentioned in his lede. Is it more important than A Ceremony of Carols or others? Will there be an article? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
I have dragged myself over the finishing line with Michael Tippett, and it is ready for review, though I'm still sorting out some of the references. God, I need a holiday! I hope you can find time to cast an eye over it – and Christe receive thy saule. On another matter, I shall be going later this week to the Stamford G&S Society's current production of The Mikado. They generally do these things quite well, though like most such companies these days, the singers tend to be on the elderly side. The Three Little Maids don't have quite the right allure when their combined age exceeds 150. And Nanki-poo should definitely not be portly. I suppose the thing to do is to close the eyes from time to time. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:42, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Quarter Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Benjamin Disraeli (estimated annual readership: 299,665) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! |
The Million Award is an initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:
![]() | This editor won the Quarter Million Award for bringing Benjamin Disraeli to Featured Article status. |
If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers and all best, – Quadell ( talk) 14:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
You recently participated in the FAC review of L'Arianna which resulted in the article's promotion. Could you spare a minute to look at, and possibly make a comment on, a discussion on the article's talkpage, here, about a proposed change to the article's lead image. Many thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:48, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
After Tippett I am taking a couple of months' rest from music-related articles. I'm going to work on a couple of last century's women writers: Stella Gibbons and Nancy Mitford (oh! what fun!). Gibbons first. There isn't much internet material on her; could you possibly search your newspaper source and see if you can spot a decent obituary, and any critical reviews of one of her novels – preferably not Cold Comfort Farm, on which I've lots of stuff. No hurry, as I shall be away after tomorrow, until 24th or 25th, but I would be very grateful if you'd take a look. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Excellent work, of course. I looked for the Punch joke first, I must admit... (I'm sure you know it, but this link for those who don't). I also note that the dates on the picture of the gravestone don't comply with MOS and insist that you re-chisel it to say "1910–86", using a proper-length horizontal line of course... Bencherlite Talk 12:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
I hope you are home from your trip and that you left all well behind you. If you have a spare moment, I have offered History of Chincoteague, Virginia to the gods of peer review. It is a bit of a different tack for me; it is my favorite shore resort. An interesting history, you may find.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 02:20, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm just back from hot places. Thanks for the emailed Gibbons stuff which I've not had a chance to read yet. Anything I can do for you in your (apparent) exile? Brianboulton ( talk) 08:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Did you know this? How do I know what is in the collection. I found it on BWV 5. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
It's been a while with one thing and another, but if you have the time, energy and inclination, I've another cricket PR going here. Your comments are always welcome, and please let me know if I can return any of your kind favours. Sarastro1 ( talk) 22:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know, wherever you may be, that I have nominated Tippett at FAC, here. Any comments of course will be welcome. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I must say I'm confused. If this is wrong, then what is the correct link? Best, Toccata quarta ( talk) 06:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
Thank you again for reviewing the Kellie Loder article for its FAC. I now have another article up for featured status: Nefarious: Merchant of Souls. If you have time to contribute to its FAC here, I would appreciate any constructive comments you are willing to provide.
Neelix ( talk) 20:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. If you're not too busy would you care to review to Buah Rindu? Not been snapped up in a while.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Benjamin Britten know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 22, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite ( talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 22, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Benjamin Britten (1913–76) was an English composer, conductor and pianist, and a central figure in 20th-century British classical music. His wide compositional range includes opera, orchestral, choral, solo vocal, chamber, instrumental and film music. He showed talent from an early age, and first came to public attention with the choral work A Boy Was Born in 1934. His best-known works include the operas Peter Grimes (1945) and Billy Budd (1951), the War Requiem (1962) and the orchestral showpiece The Young Person's Guide to the Orchestra (1945). Recurring themes in his operas are the struggle of an outsider against a hostile society, and the corruption of innocence. He wrote copiously for children and amateur performers, including the opera Noye's Fludde, a Missa Brevis, and the song collection Friday Afternoons. Britten often composed with particular performers in mind, most importantly his personal and professional partner, the tenor Peter Pears, with whom he co-founded the annual Aldeburgh Festival in 1948; the pair were responsible for the creation of its Snape Maltings concert hall in 1967. In 1976 Britten became the first composer to be awarded a life peerage. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
At the peer review were kind enough to suggest that I contact you when Monro's Description moved on to the next stage. After the review I got rather distracted as I was away for longer than I expected and a now indef-blocked user took an interest in the topic, but it's now at FLC - see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Description of the Western Isles of Scotland/archive1. Ben Mac Dui 20:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim
Thanks for getting in touch, and apologies for not responding more promptly.
It's great to see a page on Wilfred.
Yes, please go ahead and dive in with your changes to the Dilly Knox page. If happens to be any tidying up needed, either I'll pick it up unless someone else jumps in first.
RobertBurrellDonkin ( talk) 14:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. Did you see my reply to you on my talk page? I wonder what you think of events since then? Having thought about it for a couple of days, I think what Hucbald says may be the best way to go, painful as it is, because he makes clear that he's somewhat at odds with the Wikipedian way in any case. All the same, I don't want to make difficulties. If you think it's worth trying to get things moving again, please do whatever you think fit, and you can be sure I won't disrupt it. Best, Simon -- Stfg ( talk) 12:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I understand and agree with your concerns regarding her edits, but I wonder if maybe your most recent message to her was a bit harsh? After all, she hasn't edited at all since my message, and she is still a newbie. Nikkimaria ( talk) 16:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid that while I tried to be concise, my notes about Fauré's Pavane are a bit lengthy. I just didn't want to leave anything pertinent out. As it was I removed some material about what happened to the manuscript. Anyway, see what you think. Orfeocookie ( talk) 04:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for all the time and effort you put into Wikipedia:Peer review/Wells Cathedral/archive1 which has definitely helped to improve the article. I've dealt with some of the issues, but had to ask for help with some of the architecture & grammar questions. One of the most comprehensive and helpful reviews I've seen.— Rod talk 10:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Here's a little birthday gift for the master. I found the Catalogue (detailed info, even days of composition) by chance, are you using it? - Feel free to add, I am looking at the next, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:23, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
André Navarra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Rudolf Schwarz (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk)
09:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Harry Houdini mentions Robert Browning and the fraud of Home in the newspaper the London Times, see here [10]
Also according to The Times article in the introduction it says there was an alternative spelling for the paper in other countries outside Britain "In these countries and others, the newspaper is often referred to as The London Times." Houdini was American... so it makes sense. I'm not too bothered either way... So it should be left as The Times? Fodor Fan ( talk) 21:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
I have taken the good lady to peer review, and will glad if you are able to comment. It's not a long article, and it's been a peach to do after the trials of Tippett. Many thanks in advance. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
You previously mentioned that you would be on the lookout for another GAN of Kinky Boots (musical). It is now renominated.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Judging by your comment on my talk page here, you may be interested in this conversation: Talk:Wells Cathedral#Restrictive which.
How wonderful Ben looks on the front page! Congratulations for all your hard work. Gareth E Kegg ( talk) 08:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Nice work on the article about Benjamin Britten, Tim, though I was the one who helped started it. I just got back from my two month semi retirement back in October. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 09:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
I wanted to give you this barnstar for your contributions to Benjamin Britten which is now today's featured article. Having such articles on such important figures in the arts is a great credit to this encyclopedia. For each person that listens to the Courtly Dances from Gloriana because of reading that article, you'll have helped light a fire in a heart! Atethnekos ( Discussion, Contributions) 11:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you so much, Atethnekos. I am much touched and very grateful, and shall proudly add the star to my user page. – Tim riley ( talk) 11:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
As you were one of the peer reviewers, I thought you might like to know the article is at FAC. Many thanks for your suggestions for improvement of the article.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 19:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
The first is straightforward: later today Stella Gibbons will be at FAC, if you would care to renew your acquaintance there.
The second is a bit more complex. About 18 months ago you kindly created a simplified family tree for the Tichbornes, which I used in the Tichborne case article. I wonder if I can presume to ask for something similar for use in the Nancy Mitford article, which is now in my sights. The Mitfords were related to just about everybody, and a full family diagram would be impossible. What I have in mind is something which will highlight one or two of the more interesting connections. Here is the basic information:
If this is too much of a task, please say so; otherwise, when you're ready just dump it in my talk. There is of course considerable doubt about some of the above assumed parentages, and even the great WSC is not exempt from rumour. How much of the scandal will find its way into the NM article is a matter for juicy anticipation. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Dear Tim, Have just been re-reading your GA review and laughed so loud I spat out my sauvignon when I came across your description of him as a "Victorian menace". I'm conscious I haven't repaid my very considerable debt by taking up any of your invitations re. other, excellent, articles. I fear that, in Wikipedia, I'm a bit of a one-trick pony, and thus a disappointment to the good Doctor. But if he does make TFA on Monday it will owe more to you, and the Doctor, than to me. And for that, my sincere thanks. KJP1 ( talk) 22:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, sorry I don't understand the difference on Noel Coward between ref 123 and the 2 refs I just added? Can you explain on article Talk page please. Thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
The chart looks excellent! Many thanks for this. A few changes are required:
Other interesting surmises, e.g. that Algernon the 1st Baron was Clemmie's true father, and the WSC himself was Esmond Romilly's real dad, will have to be covered in the text; there are no categories of dotted line that can deal with this in the chart. The things that went on in those respectable Victorian country houses! I am toying with the possibility of highlighting in the chart those who are directly members of or ancestors of the Mitford family; thus the boxes for the 10th earl, Algernon, the second earl, the Mitford siblings and E. Romilly could be shaded differently from the others. Does that sound possible? Once again my warmest thanks for the time and trouble taken in helping with this. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
On reflection:
Can either of these amendments be done, and if so at what cost? Brianboulton ( talk) 16:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to William Burges, an example of spirited collaboration, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
I created the nomination for you. You can add alternative hooks if original hook is not the only interesting fact. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
The Owen image is seemingly free on Commons, which may be incorrect. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I hope all is well with you. Cassianto and I come with begging bowls in hand asking for a favour. We've got the very lovely Hattie Jacques at PR, and would appreciate any comments, thoughts and suggestions you may have. As always there is no rush, and if you are too busy, then there is no problem at all. All the best - SchroCat( talk) 07:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks once again for your hugely useful efforts on Hattie. The dear lady is now at FAC, in no small part because of your assistance. Thanks again. - SchroCat ( talk) 21:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
I've just created an article on the delightful Hyde House in Bucks, where Disraeli claimed he wroteVivian Grey. Did you ever see this wot I wrote? I do so wish we could get a picture for each one. Gareth E Kegg ( talk) 01:24, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
[[ Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]] | On 12 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bessie Jones (Welsh singer), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Welsh singer Bessie Jones was the first to record Noël Coward's earliest stage lyric, "Peter Pan", from the revue Tails Up!? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bessie Jones (Welsh singer). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 17:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I've been giving this more thought. First, I have considerably trimmed the prose in the "family background" section so that, in my view, in either the horizontal or vertical forms the chart, if readable, is too large and overpowering for the section. I have decided to put it into a separate section at the end of the article, where space won't be a problem, where we can present it in a readable size.
I've also given more thought to format. Looking at either of the present versions, the immediate visual impression is that it is the Earl of Airlie's rather than the Mitfords' family tree. So I am proposing some revisions which, without the benefit of any graphic tools, I have somewhat laboriously assembled in a sandbox, here. I'm not able to draw the horizontal lines, but it will be pretty clear to you from the original where these need to go. The objective is to highlight the Mitford line, which I think it will do in this form. For this reason I think that it will have to be in the original, traditional family tree format, which on balance I'm inclined to prefer.
Note that I have shortened the contents of some boxes, as well as eliminating the intermediate Airlies. Can I ask you to ponder, tinker, and let me know how you think it looks in revised polished form. Many thanks, Brianboulton ( talk) 19:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I like what I see. Just one micro-addition requested: in the Esmond Romilly box, add "m. Jessica Mitford". And, as that brings him into the Mitford family, perhaps his box should be Oxford rather than Cambridge? Brianboulton ( talk) 21:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Tim, I agree that we don't want a laundry list, but how high do we wish to set the rib? In 2013 Nina Stemme was i.a. selected as the world's leading female opera singer by the International Opera Award (Jonas Kaufmann was the male counterpart). It is a fairly common opinion that Nina Stemme is the foremost dramatic soprano since the retirement of Birgit Nilsson, and quite a few critics claim that she surpasses Kirsten Flagstad. For the sake of consistency, can it honestly be claimed that Hans Hotter who is also on the list holds a similar distinction as the leading Wagnerian tenor of his time? Not likely, you will most certainly be told that he was far surpassed by singers such as Ben Heppner, Siegfried Jerusalem, Lauritz Melchior, Wolfgang Windgassen and several others.
Perhaps it would be better to stop futile discussions about the relative merits of different singers once and for all by simply stating that "The majority of the leading opera singers in the past century have performed at the Royal Opera House" which would be pretty close to the truth?! Andersneld ( talk) 17:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, this is just a quick note to let you know that I've just nominated Air Rhodesia Flight 825 for FA. This was one of the uglier incidents of the Bush War of the 1970s; guerrillas shot a civilian airliner down and executed most of the survivors amid the wreckage (some of the passengers survived by hiding before the attackers reached the crash site). Rhodesia obliterated guerrilla bases in Zambia and Mozambique in response. If you have the time and are interested, I'd very much appreciate any thoughts you might have on this. The review is here. Thanks, and I hope you are well. — Cliftonian (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Can you tell me what EGO stands for in the listing of the Britten-Pears Foundation saying "boys' voices of the EOG". Imogen Holst conducted the first performance of the revised version, did you know? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't understand why you're objecting to my revisions - there are no such nationalities as English, Welsh or Scottish any more as these nations ceased to exist when the union between England, Wales and Scotland took place - I'm changing all references to English, Welsh and Scottish nationalities to British for the sake of correctness. Marosc9 ( talk) 21:16, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I have had a further thought, namely a dotted line extending rightwards from the Stanley box to a new box containing: "Katharine Stanley, m. John Russell, Viscount Amberley", from which drops a solid line to a box containing "Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell, 1872–1970". All new boxes in the Stanley grey colour. Don't you think that would round the box off nicely, and provide even more talking points, e.g. who the hell wasn't related in some way to these pesky girls? Let me know what you think. Incidentally, when the chart is finally complete we will need to add sources to the image page. I have these aplenty. Brianboulton ( talk) 14:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() | |
Thanks for all the help with the Early Netherlandish painting PR, and hope you have a good christmas. Ceoil ( talk) 15:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
My wife has been known to send thank you cards to people who have sent her a thank you card. I don't approve though I dare say is helps economic growth. So, despite myself, thank you for your thanks notification, and, more to the point, it arose from a little discussion at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#Rothschild. Thincat ( talk) 22:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
|
Christmas greetings for 2013 and best wishes for 2014. Peace on earth and goodwill to all May you take pleasure in all you do and find success and happiness |
Brianboulton ( talk) 21:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Victuallers
talkback is wishing Tim Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote
WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. -
Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same |
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Merry Christmas and best wishes for a happy, healthy and productive 2014! |
Ruhrfisch ><>°° 23:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC) |
Martinevans123
Santas Grotto wishes you and yours
"Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda"
May the true spirit of Christmas bless you with warmth and peace ....
Following your PR of Wells Cathedral (and input from lots of others) we have finally bitten the bullet and nominated it at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wells Cathedral/archive1 - you asked me to let you know when the nomination went in. Thanks for all help so far.— Rod talk 14:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jeffrey-skitch-pinafore.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree filesbecause its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy holidays. | |
Best wishes for joy and happiness. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 02:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC) |
I have repositioned your chart in the Nancy article, to bring it close to the relevant text – it stood in some danger of being overlooked, stuck on the end. What do you think? I have also sized it to upright= 3.5 and restored the thumb. I think myself it looks fabulous, but others may demur. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
PS it may be appropriate to remove your "work in progress" note from the image page. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg | Have an enjoyable New Year! | |
Hello Tim riley: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
New Year! Cheers,
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
00:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Ready for peer review? If you're happy, I'll nominate. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
A man after my own heart who indulged himself "...through the worlds of reading and of music hall and pantomime." Although certainly not in expert in this field (ouch!), I will endeavour to offer some comments in what promises to be a very interesting article. -- Cassianto Talk 22:58, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
— Cliftonian (talk) 04:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. Although I've lived in Yorkshire since 1970 the [Manchester] Guardian has been my constant companion for even longer (today's has just arrived from Whip-Ma-Whop-Ma-Gate) and I can dimly recall articles in it by Cardus which, I'm sorry to say, were rather disappointing and gave me the impression that he was in his dotage (ah, the arrogance of youth). Nevertheless, I'll give the article a good read and may indulge in picking a few nits here and there. Happy New Year! -- Guillaume Tell 10:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tim, just a quick note to let you know of the recent FAC of the character actor John Le Mesurier which I have co-nominated along with Schrodinger's cat is alive and Dr. Blofeld. Confident it meets all featured article criteria and should the subject matter interest you enough, we would welcome any comments or criticisms that you may have to offer. -- Cassianto Talk 21:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I started an article on the Portrait of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge and Category:Portraits of the British Royal Family, realizing our coverage of Royal portraits is extremely poor. I was wondering if you or Brian were knowledgeable or you know somebody knowledgeable who could create a list of missing notable royal portraits. I'm keen to improve coverage in this area.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
I've added a few penceworth to the comments. I can't see anything still outstanding, and I doubt there will be further comments. So what do you say to an FAC nomination on, say, Sunday? Incidentally, I note that an IP has added date format and BritEng templates. I'm not sure these are necessary; more templates can mean longer loading times, or so I am told. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Tim, I guess you're probably away now, but there are a couple of points in Gerda's list that I was hoping you would deal with:
If you are able to address these from your Cumbrian fastness, I'd be glad if you would do so. Otherwise, I'll deal with them myself along the above lines, but I'd really prefer to have your opinion first. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A. H. Fox Strangways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wellington College ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, you may already have been planning to review this but thought I'd ping you anyway (as I have Brian); in addition to overall comments, I'd value a spotcheck from you if you can manage it. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 23:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
On the subject of English National Opera, tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=en:English_National_Opera is reporting a lot of deadlinks, and I thought I'd try to fix them. Some might just be temporary problems (The Independent?) but the Gramophone ones seem to be dead permanently since they've switched to a new fee-based archive and retired their previous archive. A search for a few sample ones using the "Wayback Machine" brings no joy. Any thoughts? Bencherlite Talk 12:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Tim, you beat me to it. @#$%&[:)]. I wanted to do Nora Nicholson, at least start it anyway. I procrastinated way too long. My hats off to you and some of the others, who have contributed already, like SsSilvers, I recognize his name. She was a wonderful character actress, overdue for a wiki. I might have a citation or two the article can use. Once again great article, a job well done. All my best! Koplimek ( talk) 14:48, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know I checked that reference to the Hammerstein book and it is all correct.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 13:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of English National Opera know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on February 1, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 1, 2013. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegates Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:
English National Opera (ENO) is an opera company based in London, resident at the London Coliseum (pictured). Its productions are sung in English. The company's origins were in the late 19th century, when the philanthropist Emma Cons, later assisted by her niece Lilian Baylis, presented theatrical and operatic performances at the Old Vic in a rough area of London for the benefit of local people. Baylis acquired and rebuilt Sadler's Wells theatre in north London, which was better suited to opera than the Old Vic. The opera company grew there into a permanent ensemble in the 1930s and, after expansion required a move to the Coliseum in 1968, adopted its present name in 1974. Conductors associated with the company include Colin Davis, Reginald Goodall, Charles Mackerras, Mark Elder and Edward Gardner. ENO is known for its emphasis on the dramatic aspect of opera, with productions, sometimes controversial, by directors including David Pountney, Jonathan Miller, Nicholas Hytner, Phyllida Lloyd and Calixto Bieito. In addition to the core operatic repertoire, ENO has presented a wide range of works, from early operas by Monteverdi to new commissions, operetta and Broadway shows. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Great and inviting! - Do you know when The Flying Dutchman (opera) was first staged, in English that is? Perhaps also go over that article? I think to link "love" is overlinking, for example, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:50, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Best of luck with ENO above; my TFAs usually end in fights, often about infoboxes, but I'll look forward to seeing this one on the main page (I noted the mention of Claudio in the blurb). If in the cold wastes of the north you have a moment to spare, I'd be pleased if you would cast an eye over Mr Widmerpool. This has been months in the coming; I had to read all 12 of Powell's volumes (approx 3000 pages), but it was worth it (well, almost). Or you may wish to save comments for your return to civilisation; it will be at PR for a couple of weeks at least. What is your next project? Arguments over infoboxes have rather drained my enthusiasm for musical articles, so after I'm done with Ken I will probably start something completely different; George Lansbury has always been a hero of mine. But if you have a musical subject in mind. I'll always be prepared to help. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Widmerpool has engineered his way on to the FAC page and would be grateful for any attention you might give him.
On a more general issue, I have been avoiding music articles recently, and my current project George Lansbury is political, but thereafter I am considering a cautious return to the musical sphere. I enjoyed doing Warlock, and our joint effort on Delius. I've been looking at RVW and Holst; the former doesn't really grab me, but the latter might. The article is quite well developed, but needs a lot of polishing. Would you be at all interested, say about mid-March, in giving this a seeing-to? Brianboulton ( talk) 14:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas German Reed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilbert à Beckett ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I know you are incredibly busy on a number of things—all in subjects both worthy and worthwhile—but is there a chance you would have an opportunity to go down market and comment on the creator of an unspeakable public school bully with odious political views? Do not worry if you're overburdened with your other commitments or really can't stomach the subject—all entirely understandable. Many thanks! - SchroCat ( talk) 14:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I've had a bit of a play around in the unholy territory of the infobox and come up with the abomination that is this. To quote Spinoza: "what an utter pain in **** that is! Whoever designed it should be taken out and horse-whipped to Blackfriars and back again". There must be a better way of doing it than this, but I'm not sure what it is, I'm afraid. (By the way, I may be misktaken on the Spinoza attribution—I'm afraid I don't have the sources to hand). All the best - SchroCat ( talk) 15:43, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, can you give Mother India a read and give some feedback?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your time and thoughts on the McNeile peer review. The article has now progressed to FAC for consideration. Thanks again. — SchroCat ( talk) 03:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, some time ago, you mentioned the links to the Gramophone going dead. What do we do in such cases? I just noticed ( BWV 159) that arkivmusic, for example, changed their display of Gramophone articles to just the first lines, without the name of the author. So a link is still working, but not showing the essential information, which WAS THERE before. How to show? A comment in the cite template perhaps? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Most grateful, thankyou!! Well, I like old movies, and Mother India is considered one of the most important Indian films of all time. I created the lists of Indians films back in about 2007, I used to edit films almost entirely for a while back then.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Indians would think you were mad for considering Mother India to be obscure!! A lot of them revere it as a Holy Grail of Indian culture for what it stands for in the aftermath of Indian independence! I agree though that to us Brits old Asian movies, Indian or Indonesian or whatever appear as obscure topics to us, which is why its most impressive when they reach GA or FA quality!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Incidentally Kareena Kapoor which I have heavily contributed to is at FAC now. Any input at the FAC would be appreciated although I see Chopra has beaten you both to it and she's prettier than Kareena.... I think I'd like to see the numeric dates formatted properly, would you agree?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Royal opera
Thank you for the London opera, another great article with dedication to details about the people behind an institution, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
A year ago, you were the twentieth recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style. I miss the photographer, again, and put "Letting go of the past" on top of my talk, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Messiah: it's now nominated, - could you please fix the link to Gramophone, as in ENO? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello sir, we would like your suggestions on the fac. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Priyanka Chopra/archive1. Please , review it and represent your thoughts. Thank You. Prashant ✉ 18:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your recent comments atPR for The Flashman Papers. The article is now at FLC, should you wish to view or comment further. Thanks again. - SchroCat ( talk) 16:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I noticed at the Flashman PR that you have access to the TLS archive... One of my vaguer plans, that will probably never come to anything, is to do something with George Smiley or Le Carre's " Karla trilogy". I've got anything from the Times, Guardian, etc, but wondered if there was anything in the TLS? If you could have a check for me, I would be very grateful! Sarastro1 ( talk) 16:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Just to add (after my clumsy attempt to reply to yours about Walton) I'm delighted to see your addition to this article. All very best, Alfietucker ( talk) 16:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim. As you probably know, the article is the subject of a TFA request, here. Ref 137 is giving a dead link message (the page evidently no longer exists). Is there an alternative source, or should the text on Willcocks's recording simply be cut? I have dealt with the dead Gramophone links by adding {{ subscription}} indicators, not quite as you dealt with the problem at ENO, but this way makes it clear the archive still exists. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Awesome Farces Award |
I award you this "Awesome Farces" award in recognition of your serious achievements made, while drawing dirty looks from the librarians at the British Library, as you guffawed your way through the scripts of the Aldwych farces. This award also reflects your various other ongoing efforts to improve articles about the theatre in the English-speaking world, including plays, theatre companies, actors, producers, writers and critics. You are not merely a prolific contributor, but a skilled researcher and a stylish writer. Your contributions can only be described as "awesome", and that's no farce! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 10:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC) |
This is all very kind. I'll feel a bit more justified in nailing this colour to my mast once I have written articles on the last three of the Aldwych series and overhauled the Aldwych farce article in the light of my archival rummaging. I wish to deny emphatically that I guffawed in the reading room of the British Library; whether my unfortunate neighbours found my stifled splutters and strangulated snorts any better than guffaws is not for me to say. Tim riley ( talk) 14:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. Can you do me a favour and give this a read. I think it has FA potential. What do you think? Can you open a peer review on it?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 10:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
OK, no worries. thanks.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Is this info of any use or interest to you? It updates every time you press the "save" key. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Reminder re: now-defunct Gramophone website: "strip the dead URLs from Gramophone citations and leave the citations as they would have been if they had originally referred to the print edition, i.e. author, article title, month and year, and page number..." - Tim riley ( talk) 2:47 pm, 9 February 2013, Saturday (20 days ago) (UTC−5)
Thanks for participating in the PR ( Wikipedia:Peer review/Mother India/archive1). Mother India is now at FAC.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 08:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
On behalf of this humble Wikignome, you're welcome for the spelling edit. Thanks for creating the article in the first place and growing Wikipedia. ejly ( talk) 00:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I nominated Neville Cardus for TFA on 3 April, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
If you're in a good mood you might like to cast your reviewer's eye over the above, my first venture into the world of political biography. Perhaps the surname may tempt a few curious readers to find out what Angela's grandad did for a living. I can but hope. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I think it would be best to close it for now. I'm working on it but it will take a while. I'll renominate when I'm ready - thanks for your help. Cloudbound ( talk) 20:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your very constructive review of the Number 10 Downing Street article. For the last two days I have been editing it to address as best I can most of your comments and recommendations. I am making very good progress. I don't know the Wikipedia rules about reviews but hopefully you will be able to re-open the review soon. Sir Cloudesley Shovel II ( talk) 23:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Tim riley for your pointing out. Now I understand my fault. Yet, do you think at least two of them ( Isleworth and Napoleonic Wars) are helpful? If you agree with me, I would like to resume putting links which are really beneficial for readers. Thank you-- Ponruy ( talk) 16:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim riley! Thank you so much for your revising of Piano Concerto (Yashiro). Now it is greatly improved. I'm still working on Delius and have translated related articles such as Julius Buths and Hans Haym. Today, I uploaded Piano Concerto (Delius). When you have time, please pay a brief visit to that article. I hope you will enjoy it.-- Ponruy ( talk) 14:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
If you have a moment and care to put your 2p in, Flying Eagle cent is somewhat languishing at FAC. I think you'd prefer it to my other FAC :) Many thanks.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 22:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to
disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk)
11:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
I have agreed to peer-review this article about a Norwegian composer. There's some stuff on my talkpage. I've never heard of her, and can find no mention in any of the English-language music reference books. Internet searches don't reveal much, either. Do you think there's anything in the BL that would throw any light? Maybe you'd be prepared to join in the review, if only to encourage another classical music editor ? Brianboulton ( talk)
I've archived the debate [1]. Nothing more productive was going to come, and the majority approved the motion that info boxes are not always necessary. Seems a good compromise. Giano 19:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorting through some images on Commons tonight I came across one of Noël Coward performing in Sri Lanka in 1944, and while adding it to the article discovered that we have an entry for his accompanist - Norman Hackforth. Unfortunately, the article turns out to be entirely a lift from his Independent obituary, and so I've had to hack it back to a couple of sentences.
I am guessing his post-war radio work (he was "the mystery voice" of Twenty Questions) makes him notable enough for an article, but I'm not sure how significant his work with Coward actually was - the obituary suggests he was influential, but until I added the photograph he wasn't mentioned at all in the main article!
As you wrote much of the Coward article, and you're more up on such things than I, could you have a quick glance at it? Many thanks, Andrew Gray ( talk) 22:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
In advance of next Saturday's TFA I've been looking at the Messiah article. I've fixed a few dead links, removed drive-by uncited text and made other minor changes; otherwise the article looks fit to go. One little problem I can't solve: it may be something to do with my own browser, and therefore not a problem to anyone else, but please take a look at the second item in the Sources section. My computer insists on representing the CD number as a phone number, complete with an icon and a hover message saying "Call this phone number in United Kingdom with Skype". Does this happen with yours? Brianboulton ( talk) 23:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
First, I've nominated Lansbury at FAC if you care to check it out. Second, some while back I indicated that my return to music article writing might be via Gustav Holst, and I suggested we could combine forces for this. Are you still up for that? I've done a bit of source researching (see here) and you may have some suggestions. Now that I have JSTOR access I am a little more independent than I used to be! Brianboulton ( talk) 23:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jeffrey-skitch-pinafore.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Stefan2 ( talk) 00:09, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim. Since you commented at the original FAC for George Harrison, I wonder if you wouldn't mind giving it a second look for the current FAC when you get a chance. As always, any input you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
You are completely correct--but my point was made because a "lyric" poem, here set to music, should still be referred to as a "lyric." Just a personal bias, perhaps, but a lyric is a lyric, whether musically used or not. Do as you will; I tilt at windmills regularly. Thanks for all your good work. 99.93.246.124 ( talk) 02:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Neville Cardus know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 2, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or one of his delegates ( Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 2, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Neville Cardus (1888–1975) was an English writer and critic. He became cricket correspondent of The Manchester Guardian in 1919, and its chief music critic in 1927, holding both posts until 1940. His contributions to these two distinct fields in the years before the Second World War established his reputation as one of the foremost critics of his generation. He considered music criticism as his principal vocation. Without any formal musical training, he was initially influenced by Samuel Langford and Ernest Newman, but developed his own individual style of criticism—subjective, romantic and personal, in contrast to the objective analysis practised by Newman. Cardus's opinions and judgments were often forthright and unsparing, which sometimes caused friction with leading performers. Nevertheless his personal charm and gregarious manner enabled him to form lasting friendships in the cricketing and musical worlds, with among others Newman, Thomas Beecham and Donald Bradman. Cardus spent the Second World War years in Australia, where he wrote for The Sydney Morning Herald and gave regular radio talks. In his last years he became an inspirational figure to aspiring young writers. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:01, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words. I have just a few more sources to incorporate into the article and then I will be attempting to promote to FA status. Please feel free to keep an eye on the article, if interested, and to provide feedback during the review. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Update, FYI: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Music for a Time of War/archive1. Feel free to add comments. Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Helloelloello! I was wondering if you could review this one. I feel it is adequate for a GA. It has been very well-researched. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 19:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Can you reserve the review for a later date then?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 09:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hehe, and who else is likely to be an expert on here in Fatimid architecture? ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Nearly 10 days...♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! Points should have been addressed by now! Only one needs addressing, can you sort out the dashes? ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 15:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Nice one. If nobody has claimed your article by Monday I'll claim it, promise. It's a tough job reviewing your articles for GA as I'll probably end up not being picky enough!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hope you're enjoying the long weekend! The sun even seems to have emerged for it, here in the wild fenlands. As promised, a first attempt at the Ashton event outline - thoughts? Andrew Gray ( talk) 22:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
A couple of things from your draft:
I've signed up - I'll be seeing Gloriana at the ROH on the 22nd, so I'll come down to London the previous evening (I don't fancy catching early morning trains). How exactly does the editathon work? (And by the way, Editathon redirects to Hackathon!) -- Guillaume Tell 11:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation, but I am rarely in London at weekends, alas, and even when I am, family commitments tend to make it difficult to get to such things. I hope it goes well. As for people who might be interested, I'm not sure who to suggest who wouldn't already be in your thoughts anyway. Yours, Bencherlite Talk 10:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, just a quick note to let you that I have listed Marie Lloyd at peer review with a GAC and FAC in mind. It's been three months of intense research, but I'm happy the article is now as complete as it ever could be. If you could spare the time, then It would be great to hear your thoughts. -- Cassianto Talk 16:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Would you be willing to participate in a second peer review to prep the Gospel of the Ebionites article for FAC? Your name was recommended to me by Ian Rose. Thanks. Ignocrates ( talk) 21:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
You probably recall Ezra Meeker, who utterly stole the show in one of my coin articles. I've done a bit of work on his article and taken it to peer review and I'd be grateful for your comments in due course. Hope all is well.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. You said some nice things about the article I started on Edward Clark (conductor), so I thought you might be interested to know what's happened since. I became aware during my research that his son Conrad Clark lives in Melbourne, so I bit the bullet and contacted him. I live close to 3 hours drive away, but I had reason to be down there and suggested we meet up. He was more than happy to do so; we had a most engrossing 3-hour lunch during which he filled in a number of gaps in my knowledge, told me a lot about his father and mother Elisabeth Lutyens, and mentioned a whole host of famous names he'd met through them.
One little anecdote of many: whenever Igor Stravinsky came to London, the first person he always asked after and wanted to see was Edward. Vere is Clark?, he would demand.
Conrad took me back to his flat, showed my some of his amazing sculptures, showed me the first decent photo I'd ever seen of his father, and let me have a complete printed catalogue of his mother's works. I had to shame-facedly admit to him that, in a lifetime of music listening, I had yet to hear a single note of her music. That's now being attended to.
Conrad has a website ( [2]) and a youtube video ( [3]) but is not connected to the internet at home (he accesses emails at the local library). I took with me a printed copy of my article to give him, and asked for feedback in due course. When he got back to me, he said there was one important omission. He claims Anton Webern dedicated his orchestration of the Ricarcare from Bach's The Musical Offering to Edward Clark. I've had a good look around google, but have failed to find any confirmation of this at all. Do you have access to any sources that might shed any light on this?
Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [Talk] 13:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
Without your highly valued insights and edits at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/George Harrison/archive2, the article would not be FA today! Thanks so much for all the encouragement! GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 20:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Tim -- Bencherlite is casting round for non-date-specific suggestions for Today's Featured Article, and I thought of Adrian Boult, which I don't believe has run yet. Would you mind if I were to nominate it (or would you like to nominate it yourself), or are you holding it for an anniversary or some other reason? Regards, Espresso Addict ( talk) 03:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
BBC Symphony Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Rudolf Schwarz (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk)
14:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to be bothering you again at the ancestral shack, but this lady has crept into FAC, if you have a moment to take a look. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 04:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Many thanks for the review. (Although I once visited the British Museum, I fear I missed your friend there; there's so much to see in the museum that I was a bit overwhelmed.) I have one small question in response to your comments. Once that's answered, I suppose I'll close the review and nominate at FAC. A. Parrot ( talk) 19:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
I have finished drafting the Music section. I am not particularly happy with it yet; at 3300 words I think it's too long. Among other problems the "style" subsection is especially weak, and the "Indian period" disproportionately detailed. I shall be looking to reduce the whole section by around 500 words, but I'm a bit exhausted with Holst and am taking a 24-hour break from him. Incidentally, the article is now over 9000 words, with more to be added; an expanded lead, replacement of the rubbishy Commemorations section with a more worthy assessment, etc. That seems a little bloated, and I think we should look for other opportunities - duplications of information, perhaps - to reduce the text. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Over to you, for consideration once you have had enough of a break from Holstiana. Tim riley ( talk) 12:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Landon Ronald, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Symphony No. 8 and Ben Davies ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. I've created this for better organization with my usual collaborators. Can you add what articles you wanted reviewed/peer reviewed/ FAC with input from me. I forgot what article it was you wanted GA reviewed! I'd be grateful if you could alert me of the projects you're working on so I can keep tabs on everything!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 16:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Adrian Boult know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 30, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or one of his delegates ( Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 30, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Adrian Boult (1889–1983) was an English conductor, known for championing British music. His first major post was conductor of the City of Birmingham Orchestra in 1924. Appointed director of music of the British Broadcasting Corporation in 1930, he established the BBC Symphony Orchestra, which was regarded as among the best in Britain under his chief conductorship. On retirement from the BBC in 1950, he took up the position of chief conductor of the London Philharmonic Orchestra and, in what was widely called his "Indian Summer", continued to conduct it until his retirement in 1978. He gave the first performance of his friend Gustav Holst's The Planets, and introduced new works by other British composers including Bliss, Britten, Delius, Tippett, Vaughan Williams and Walton, as well as foreign composers such as Bartók, Berg, Stravinsky, Schoenberg and Webern. A modest man who disliked the limelight, he felt as comfortable in the recording studio as on the concert platform and made recordings throughout his career, many of which have remained in the catalogue for three or four decades. Prominent conductors influenced by him include Colin Davis and Vernon Handley. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi! The article Tripura is currently in FAC. I have no idea whether you have any time or any interest in the topic at all. Since the FAC has not received significant reviews/comments, I was wondering if you would be kind enough to have a look at it. I understand you may be busy, so no rush. Sorry for such an abrupt request. Regards.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 05:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The link provided by ref 57 does not seem to provide helpful information. Is there a further procedure that needs to be followed, to verify the cited info? Brianboulton ( talk) 11:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
PS: Did you see that the Leningrad symphony is on the FAC page? (Daah, daah-di duh duh/daah, daah-di duh duh/daah, daah-di DUH DUH/Dee daah dee daah dee duh duh/Dee daah dee daah dee duh duh/dee daah, daah, di-duh duh/daah, daah-di dum dum dum dum/daah, daah, di-duh duh/dee duh duh/dee DUH DUH!) Brianboulton ( talk) 16:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I am very fond of the piece, having sung it on a Radio 3 broadcast of choral evensong from Westminster Abbey on an RSCM course when I was a lad. I long to sing it again (or perhaps play the organ part somewhere!) Bencherlite Talk 21:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm being a bit cheeky here, but you have commented on cricket issues here and there, and I wondered if you fancy taking a look at the article on Mr Hobbs at PR here? It needs non-cricket-obsessive eyes, and your advice and comments are always invaluable. If you have neither the time nor inclination, it's not a problem, and I should warn you that it is a very long article. Thanks. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, Thanks - yes that's great - as I said I started what I thought would be a single paragraph stub to link from another article I have written - but it got to the "early hours" and it was still growing! I know that it needed a full list of all the musical numbers and was going to order the score myself, but you seem already to have access ( I had not wanted to cut and paste from the MIDI website and prefer to go back always to good printed sources if I can). I see you have brought forward its opening date by a few days - the only thing here is that from what I could see, the opening night was continually put back due to what was running in the theatre previously - so we need to be a little careful here to find when it actually did start (as opposed to false starts announced in the press!). Could the William Hay in Act 2 be the "famous" one? I have not been able to prove whether this was one of his early roles. Finally - its really good to see you back - its been on my mind for much of the past year that I had said something! Very best wishes. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Review has begun..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay I did remember last night but didn't have time to do it. I've passed BBC Symphony Orchestra and uploaded some photos which I think look good and were much needed in replace of that silly empty infobox. I may be a few days in getting to the FA as I have some urgent Indian ones to attend to first which I'm already well behind on!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 13:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping the GAN open. I thought I wouldn't be able to do anything until next, week, but I did manage to focus down and do some work today. Would you take a look and let me know what else needs doing. SilkTork ✔Tea time 13:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
No PR comments since 29 April - maybe that's it (unless your doctor friend, above, wants to give it a go?). I intend to spend some time on a final readthrough and polish on Saturday; shall we wait until, say, Monday on the off-chance any further comments, and then send it on to FAC? Brianboulton ( talk) 18:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I'll look at Flanders (my father was particularly fond of Flanders and Swann). I'll leave any comments on the talk page. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I was looking back through and noticed that the Davis portrait bust reference disappeared some years ago after your major edit in 2010ish I think. I'd be interested to know what more you feel would be needed to contemplate replacing it, bearing in mind the reference for the archive of correspondence on the bust between artist and sitter is held in the national Henry Moore Institute archive? (Conversely, I don't think it is currently in a public collection.) kind regards Cazimir ( talk) 12:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Holst now nominated at FAC. We await the consequences. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Yvonne Printemps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Oscar Straus (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I have just completed an article on the singer Stanley Kirkby. I have put a considerable amount of work into this and would appreciate it if you have any comments (good or bad) to make. Kirkby's life appears to be been written only by what I would call "Internet rumour" in the past few years and I have tried to get back to decent sources to give hopefully a full and balanced account of his life and career and show that he was not just a "music hall" singer. Richard J Myers ( talk)
If you could put them on my talk page and I'll take it from there. I'm hoping not too much is required here. (cf. The Cherry Girl - which was just a quickie!). Kirkby "existed" in roughly the same world as Ernest Pike - you may remember that I started the article about him a couple of years ago. Neither was quite as well known as Peter Dawson, but all three were early recording artists from about 100 years ago. Not much has been written about Kirkby or Pike and so finding out about their lives has been quite an interesting challenge and I have certainly enjoyed it. Pike is now back on my agenda as there is further work to do there!
Please also read my comments on the Talk page. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi - thanks Tim. This is an excellent offer. I am a reader myself, but I live in Staffordshire and don't get down very often. Your suggestion leads me on to a key question about this and other similar articles I have written. I mention recordings, often ones from obscure and short-lived British record companies. Every one of these statements therefore presumably requires a "citation needed" (I have lots of these!) because I do not have some of the record catalogues to hand. What I need is access to these catalogues - e.g. Regal, Scala and Coliseum. However I wouldn't ask you to read through all of these (should they be available in the BL) as it would take a huge amount of time and be about as exciting as watching paint dry! If I can can think of anything else I will let you know during the course of this evening.
If record catalogues no longer exist or cannot be obtained, can the possession of an actual record or a photo of one be deemed as actual proof that the recording exists, so making it an "established fact" therefore obviating the need for a citation needed? Is there a Wikipedia construct that could be used instead of citation needed?
Otherwise thanks for your suggestions about improvements, most of which are fairly minor and I will fix these in the next couple of hours. With regard to G&S, I have stated that Kirkby only took part in earlier recordings. By the time D'Oyly-Carte was on the scene, kirkby was recording for Edison Bell and working with Hudson on his stage shows. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Tim, I believe I have fixed 99% of what you suggested. I still have further improvements of my own outstanding plus, of course looking up all the matrix numbers from my record collection; this will be better than the cns! I'm still pondering the oratorio issue for now. Can you find a citation from the BL for the fact that he was cousin of Louise Kirkby Lunn, or even was believed to be? - this would be very helpful. Thanks Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi Tim, Absolutely brilliant. I will add that to the article shortly. I must admit I did wonder why he didn't serve in the War, although it doesn't say I suppose it may have been felt that he was doing good work with some of the propaganda songs he sang. Thanks. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi Tim, As you can see the article has gone from a stub to a B-Class, the only significant change being the combining of both operatic and popular (mustn't use this word!) recordings. I seem to have lost the battle over oratorio, but not the war. A serious thanks for your help here. One thing I would like your opinion on is that in the second paragraph of the lead, "concert-party performances" has had the hyphen removed. I know that compound adjectives are always hyphenated, but that with nouns this is usually done to make the meaning clear, should it be unclear. Do you think the hyphen should be there in this case? Richard J Myers ( talk)
Tim, thanks for contributing to the Gospel of the Ebionites second peer review. So far, no one has stepped up to review the article in FAC. A passing comment was made about the reference format. However, it is the same format that is used on the George Harrison feature article; that is the article I relied on as a template to improve the references. Can you take a look at it? Thanks. Ignocrates ( talk) 19:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim. I would be happy to work with you on the Britten article. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 19:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I wondered if you could provide some input into the discussion at the bottom of the page involving a dispute over a fact in this FA article.
Hi Tim, One of the songs that Stanley Kirkby recorded was "The Galloping major". As I have the original sheet music for this, I have added an article about the song (I have done several other songs as well): The Galloping Major (song). Searching through a box of old Edison cylinders, I found an original recording of this song by Harry Graham (poet) which I believe must be quite rare! I see you have contributed to the Harry Graham article in the past, but no mention is made there or anywhere else on the Internet about Graham being a singer as well as a poet. But it must surely be the same guy, for one, I have found reference to another cylinder in America with an associated article which specifically mentions his dates and secondly, the subject matter of the song is military and he was in the Army? I have heard this song described as a childrens' song; the first verse and chorus maybe, but I think much of the rest (especially the encore verse which is not on any recording) was probably intended for the Officer's Mess! Have you any other proof that he made any recordings? - This is not an urgent request. Richard J Myers ( talk)
Hi Tim, Yes I suppose what's needed is a reference to add substance to a new section on his recordings. So perhaps you could have a search when you return from your trip to see if you can find anything. Enjoy the lakes. The link to the website with info on the other cylinder which has a similar number to the one now on the Galloping Major page is: Cylinder Link Richard J Myers ( talk)
Just to let you know that Mr Hobbs is now at FAC here. Sarastro1 ( talk) 19:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure where you are at the moment, but if you are still online from time to time, could you look at my Jane Joseph effort, at PR? A spin-off from Holst, I admit - but I've got to make the most of all that research and book-buying. Please comment if you can. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Morning Tim, Could I ask your advice on a peculiarly perplexing piece of punctuation? In involves the use of the comma in the following circumstances at the beginning of sentences: "In 2004, he rode a bike" as opposed to "In 2004 he rode a bike". There is no sub-clause involved, bust the straightforward use of the comma. I always understood that the comma in these circumstances was an American aberration, but I have recently had the following thread placed on my talk page, and my removal of such commas reverted. I note that neither of the two links provided on my thread actually deal with the date format, so I am not sure the posted has read this correctly. Is there anything you can provide by way of clarity for my poor brain?! Much obliged! - SchroCat ( talk) 09:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Would you have any objections to me closing the Savile Row review as not-listed so I can clear it from my watchlist? SilkTork ✔Tea time 13:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, How are you? I hope you are keeping well. I'm just dropping a short note about the Rudd Concession article I wrote, which has been at FAC for about a month now, and has won a couple supports but needs a few more pairs of eyes I think. It has always been a great pleasure of mine working together in the past, and I'd very much enjoy hearing your thoughts on it if you have the time. The review is here if you are interested. Thanks, and have a great week! — Cliftonian (talk) 11:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Please see my talk page for the conversation on commas. Inglok ( talk) 23:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Happy to see your construction site! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I've found a bit of a problem, though one that should be resolved fairly soon: this Mikado poster is from before 1923, but Britain doesn't have a fixed date, just life+70.
That last part doesn't matter here, but does matter on Commons. Now, you uploaded it here, which is fine, but there's some bots that go around tagging things to be transferred to Commons, and it got tagged, and someone didn't check, so it was moved over.
The easiest way to avoid this happening again is to use {{ PD-US-1923-abroad}}, which notes the image is in copyright in its home country. If you know the year it clears copyright in the home country (usually the year of death of the artist +71 years [Long story short: clearing copyright can only happen on a January 1st, so you have to up the year count one year higher than you'd think.]).
Alternatively, just shove a {{ notcommons}} on the image.
If you're ever in doubt, feel free to ask me on my talk page.
Honestly, the only reason this is important is that Commons is a little bad about moving things back here if they get mistakenly transferred. They'll often just delete them instead. Luckily, I caught this one. =) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 15:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks,
BracketBot (
talk)
18:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Now that the FAC page is a little clearer, I've nominated Jane. Please visit at your leisure. I note that you are getting visits from BracketBot, the little minx. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:07, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
It's very kind of you to have become involved and to have gone the extra mile in asking for admin review, and it looks a lot better that in independent editor has done it rather than me forcing the issue! Thanks again and all the best. - SchroCat ( talk) 04:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
GA Review on Hold.
Please see comments at Talk:Elizabeth David/GA1.
NOTE: Please respond, below the entire GA Review, and not interspersed in the GA Review comments themselves. Thank you!
— Cirt ( talk) 22:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the kind words! I've got a few projects on the way towards featured candidacy discussions, I suppose I'm a bit nervous, which is probably why I haven't just gone and nominated them yet, but any extra help would be appreciated! — Cirt ( talk) 17:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Any chance you could get access to this source? — Cirt ( talk) 18:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, as someone who has commented in the past on whether The Rite of Spring article should have an infobox or not, I wanted to let you know that the discussion has been reopened on the article's talk page. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Update: Now at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2, your input would be appreciated, — Cirt ( talk) 19:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim.
Now, about this: What about the C. B. Frys and the A. J. Ayers and the J. S. Bachs and the Winston S. Churchills of the world - et many al?
Would you be suggesting Coenraad V. Bos be moved to Coenraad V Bos rather than having to pipe him? -- Jack of Oz [Talk] 20:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
You may hear the sound of embarrassed shuffling of feet. They're mine: having gone in to try and sort out the footnote problems, I see that all the footnotes are already using the {{efn|}} template. I'll withdraw as gracefully as I can, keep the shreds of my dignity intact, and let you use the 'old school' tag:refs, which I don't know to use! All the best. - SchroCat ( talk) 20:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I've sent Isabeau to peer review in preparation for another run at FAC. Your input would be welcome if you have time to give it a look. Thanks. Victoria ( talk) 15:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Seeing your name pop up at Gubby Allen (which I warn you is a long, long way from being ready! And probably will not be for quite a while as I like to let articles "rest" when I'm heartily sick of them, which sums up my feelings for Gubby right now...) reminds me that I meant to ask you if his name pops up in any of your Douglas Home sources. I know that the pair were friends at school, but I was specifically thinking from MCC business in the 1960s, particularly the D'Oliviera affair. Thanks! Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Munch ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, you'll recall that you contributed to the FA review of History of Gibraltar few months ago. I've nominated it at TFAR for July 13, the tercentenary of Gibraltar becoming a British territory. If you have any thoughts on this you're very welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#July 13. Prioryman ( talk) 20:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks,
BracketBot (
talk)
11:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, in case there is any misunderstanding, I didn't mean you should stop writing! I was enjoying watching the article develop, it is of interest to me. I've left quibbles on the PR, more to follow. Best. Ceoil ( talk) 06:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.-- Dom497 ( talk) This message was sent out by -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 15:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
Dear Tim, I know you have tons on your plate, but I am writing to ask if you may be willing to take on the GA review for Charles-Valentin Alkan. It's been up for review for a few weeks, but no takers yet ..... or maybe you know of someone else who might take up the burden? I'm hoping to get it up to FA for CVA's birthday in November. Thanks anyway, and hoping this doesn't end up in the compost heap! Best, -- Smerus ( talk) 13:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Tim, could you briefly revisit the FAC review, above, and consider a point I've raised about the ordering of the prose? Many thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure how familiar you are with Archie MacLaren, but his inevitably long article is at PR here, and as ever your comments would be gratefully received if you have the time and inclination. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:PerGrunden.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
To mark the 110th anniversary of his birth, perhaps? Or have you another preference? Bencherlite Talk 15:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim! I wondered if you or Brian who I suspect are "baby boomers" might be interested in nurturing this. Aside from needing a majr copyedit it is a bit too pop culture-oriented, it needs more info on events and building changes. Can you look into it sometime? Perhaps you could borrow a book on the history of London like this to help improve it? It's a "Swinging" article which I'd hope would interest you!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 15:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Herbert James Rowse may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Frederick Ashton may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:16, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:07, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Benjamin Britten may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
I was happy to help.....!! Good luck with your summer project at ROH, and look forward to report on it. Shall be in London in early November for Les vêpres. Viva-Verdi ( talk) 23:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Do you happen to know if there are significant differences between the 2003 and 2013 editions of David Matthews's biography of BB? Or was the latter a centenary spin-off reprint? Brianboulton ( talk) 15:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Alec Douglas-Home know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 2, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or one of his delegates ( Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), Gimmetoo ( talk · contribs), and Bencherlite ( talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 2, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Alec Douglas-Home (1903–95) was a British Conservative politician who served as Prime Minister from October 1963 to October 1964. His reputation rests more on his two spells as the UK's foreign minister than on his brief, uneventful premiership. As parliamentary aide to Neville Chamberlain, he witnessed at first hand Chamberlain's efforts to preserve peace before the Second World War. In 1951 he inherited the earldom of Home and became a member of the House of Lords. Under Winston Churchill, Anthony Eden and Harold Macmillan he was appointed to posts including Leader of the House of Lords and Foreign Secretary. In October 1963 Macmillan resigned as Prime Minister. Home was controversially chosen to succeed him, renouncing his earldom and winning election to the House of Commons. He was criticised by the Labour Party as an out-of-touch aristocrat, and he came over stiffly in television interviews. After narrow defeat in the 1964 general election he resigned as party leader; he later served under Edward Heath as Secretary of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. After the defeat of the Heath government in 1974 he retired from front-line politics. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
You removed an edit I made to this page, calling it uncited trivia. And then the message I posted here to discuss it, you removed saying something about gibberish being moved to the compost heap. It isn't gibberish. The "uncited trivia" you referred to is taken from the wiki page that it linked to... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Day_in_the_Life — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.76.83 ( talk) 14:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
The Company of Heaven was started, I would like to add but don't have time right now, improvements welcome, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Harold Davidson is in the dock at peer review. Let justice be swift and impartial. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I will be glad to look at it but it will take me a few days. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Very nearly there, a few tweaks and it's good to go (and I'd suggest going on straight to a peer review, the next step for FA status, afterwards) Adam Cuerden ( talk) 10:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
When you are free from your Royal Ballet duties, would you mind pronouncing on a capitals issue that has arisen in the esteemed Wehwalt's comments on Wikipedia:Peer review/Harold Davidson/archive1? I am awarding you the casting vote. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
The GEbi article was promoted to FA today. Thank you for your helpful comments and support, both in peer review and FAC. Cheers! Ignocrates ( talk) 16:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Wonderful to meet you yesterday - quite hope you survived the post-Ballet revels. Gareth E Kegg ( talk) 17:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try to get it vigorously edited this week and overhaul the referencing. As you say the content is pretty good and with a bit of editing I think we could whip it into GA shape. I was going to ask if you were interested in reviewing Marrakesh for GA and I only saw this article in the queue then, but after seeing this I see you've already got a lot on your plate so no worries. I did though want a very good reviewer as I intend taking Marrakesh to FA at some point, it has been well enough researched.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 18:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Could I ask that you briefly revisit Wikipedia:Peer review/Harold Davidson/archive1, to comment on an issue I have raised concerning the use of this image. Many thanks Brianboulton ( talk) 10:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I am passionate about the cello and its repertoire. I have tried to add a paragraph to the Elgar Cello concerto page twice and, on both occasions, it was deleted. It was essential, unopinionated information about the 1985 Best Classical recording award given to the RPO recording of the Elgar cello concerto with Julian Lloyd Webber and Sir Yehudi Menuhin. Please can you let me know if my edit was in any way incorrect and how I can put the text back on the Wikipedia page? Many thanks and kind regards, Michela — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.55.29 ( talk) 20:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your super-fast reply! I would really appreciate it if you could restore the text, thank you! I am new to the Wikipedia editing community, I didn't know I had to register, I thought logging in as a user was sufficient.My Wikipedia user name is Cocolinmichela (my real name Michela Cocolin). I had text and video links removed from other pages (as well as the Elgar cello page) by another user in the past and would like to make sure I am not doing anything wrong, so that it doesn't happen again. Thanks again for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.55.29 ( talk) 20:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much! I shall try to find out more about editing on Wikipedia in the meantime. Best wishes, Michela — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.55.29 ( talk) 21:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Company of Heaven, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that The Company of Heaven, Benjamin Britten's 1937 composition for speakers, soloists, choir and orchestra, contains "metrical spoken (shouted) male chorus"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Company of Heaven. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (
nominate) 16:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
About two years ago I sent you a message complimenting you on your work on the page about Stephen Potter. Which I totally stand by, incidentally.
I've since acquired more of his books, including his Nonesuch edition of Coleridge, his early books A Muse In Chains and Coleridge and S.T.C. and his later corporate history of Heinz, The Magic Number. These have changed my picture of him as a writer a good deal, and I hope to get back to this article soon with some more detail. Just keeping you posted. Lexo ( talk) 23:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I hope all is well with you. I've been tinkering in user space from time to time with " Die Forelle", Schubert's rather pleasant lied. I've moved it all to the article space today, but I'm still not overly happy with it, partly because I'm such a duffer at the musical angle. Could you have a glance over it at some point and highlight a few major issues? Don't worry in the slightest if you're already tied up on other things - it's not important and with what I've done is probably only a GA at best, but I'd like to make it a good GA, if I can. Many thanks indeed for all your help! - SchroCat ( talk) 21:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
What's an article on Britten without a picture of Pears? Enjoy, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Now up for FA. Best, -- Smerus ( talk) 12:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Tim, profound thanks for your helpful comments during the peer review and for your warm support during this effort - which wasn't one of the easiest I've undertaken. Victoria ( talk) 00:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, Tim. I'll get in touch when we get closer to the time. Viva-Verdi ( talk) 14:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
I have nommed the errant rector. Let's see if he gets his just deserts. Can you give me a rough deadline for detailed work on the Britten music section, so that I can plan my next few weeks' activities? Brianboulton ( talk) 19:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you please explain this summary? [4] "reverting falsified quote to ipsissima verba"? What on earth did I do? That edit summary is extremely hostile! ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 15:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Good to see the Main page as a home for Home, - your reputation rests on articles like that (thanks for a new phrase!) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Ref 70 ("Matthews, p. 870") is clearly a typo. However, if the correct page ref is 87, there's a slight problem with my own Matthews refs (Nos 162, 164, 165, 169 and 170). As I think I mentioned earlier, I am using the 2003 edition of the Matthews book, in which the Britten-Menhuin visit to Belsen is on page 83, not 87. Would you mind checking out my Matthews refs in your 2013 edition? Brianboulton ( talk) 09:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately you've caught this at a moment when QatarLeague added a lot of bare url links for sources which now need to be formatted. I still need a few days on this, but you should see that considerable improvements have already been made.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, Cassianto and I are in the process of copy editing the article on Terry-Thomas, which should be going to PR in a few days. Before we get that far, could you let me know which possessive form we should be using: Terry-Thomas' or Terry-Thomas's? I've been happily using the first version, but now have doubts that this may be incorrect: could you shed a little light on my darkness? Many thanks, as always - SchroCat ( talk) 16:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
It's an absolute shower! The King of the Cads is at PR. If there is any chance you could pop your head round to have a look, Cassianto and I would be very much obliged. All the best – SchroCat ( talk) 23:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
This article gets better and better, largely due to your hard work. The stuff about Alice Hofmannsthal was particularly amusing, so have copied it over to her article. And I've started an article on another contemporary of Fred's, choreographer Andrée Howard. Edwardx ( talk) 12:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
I am looking for a book review of Christopher Matthew's Diary of a Somebody, published in 1980. This is the fictional diary of one Simon Crisp, a 1970s descendent of Pooter. Matthews wrote two other Crisp diaries, Loosely Engaged and The Crisp Report, published in 1980-81, and the three together were published as an omnibus in 1988. I am sure the books would have been reviewed in the Guardian, Observer, Telegraph etc, though I can find nothing online. Can you help? It's reviews of the first that I am particularly interested in. Much thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 20:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm only really interested in him as a racehorse owner, but I found this [8] which could be added as an example of his philanthropic activities. Tigerboy1966 13:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Tim. Unfortunately some German editor has made a complete hash of my editing which he dismisses as "lazy" and has restored the excessive demographic data (which few people really care for in the main article) and replaced my comprehensive district guide down to an unsourced crappy bulleted list again. I'm not tolerating that. I'll be reverted by him if I restore and an edit war will ensue. I'm not putting up with this. I strongly suggest his edits are undone and the article is restored.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 20:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking the time to review this article Tim, I much appreciate it.-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 18:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
An exasperating innovation suddenly polluting the edit screen is some ghastly code that changes all my English spellings into American, so that I have to go back and turn them all into English again. Does any kind visitor to this page know how to switch this loathsome device off? – Tim riley ( talk) 18:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I have just added a rather hefty chunk of prose to the music section, on the Canticles. I've probably overdone it in my enthusiasm, so don't hesitate to cut it down to whatever size you think appropriate. One thing you will have to do is check the additional Matthews refs. This time I have anticipated the latest edition by adding 4 to my edition's paging, but you had better check that this is right. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Just so. I've added a collapsed version at Les Illuminations (Britten). See what you think. Tim riley ( talk) 21:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
I just blundered onto your Britten PR page to leave some comments, and realised that I forgot to inform you that Archie is now at FAC here, and that any further comments are always welcome. Hoping that having him at FAC is not a bad omen for this week... Sarastro1 ( talk) 17:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, do you think this has FA potential? I think with the referencing converted to sfn and a slight restructuring it has potential. I'm considering readdressing it and placing for a peer review. It would be amazing to have an FA on Oceania. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 10:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
You are most welcome Master Timothy, I've been enjoying the sunshine so I did it earlier than later. Funnily enough there is a young editor on here from Mauritius or the Maldives I always get them mixed up, and rather than write about his exotic Indian Ocean country he produces featured articles on Beyonce albums and singles... Americanization huh... I wanna know about things like Mauritian canoes and dances!! 16:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, Tim, but you may have overlooked a request/suggestion that appears earlier on this talkpage, re Britten. At the moment, the first mention that he wrote incidental music for theatre/cinema is in the Music section, in a paragraph added by me. As he wrote rather a lot of this stuff in his earlyish career, I think there should be a something (the odd sentence, perhaps) about this in the biographical sections of the article, to provide a context for the reference in the Music section. Brianboulton ( talk) 10:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I have added "Legacy" to the Music section. A bit longer than I intended, will see if I can trim down (though I don't think that overall, the music section is overlong for such an important composer) Brianboulton ( talk) 16:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Tim, can you answer a point that's been raised on my talkpage about the Britten centenary. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I think I have done all I can do with the Music section. I have cut out a few bits where pieces were merely mentioned without any musical detail, and added a few other bits. I think it looks OK now, but time – and FAC – will tell. At the FAC I will restrict myself to dealing with comments on this section, except where I am needed to wade in on any general issues. The article looks generally in fine shape, and it should do well. Brianboulton ( talk) 07:43, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Just for the record, I hold you entirely responsible for today's frankly implausible events, on the basis of this edit. Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I looked right at it and I still hit okay, gah! Thanks for catching it. I swear if this was the template format I'd not slip it up. I will ask Ohconfucius about this one so I don't keep screwing it up accidentally. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 20:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, Tim, from Santa Fe where we have a fabulous La donna del lago on stage this summer!
The Britten article is coming along and now looks amazing!! (And it reads very well too! Which makes trying to get the Verdi article to look anything as good rather problematical with the tons of work involved.)
One suggestion: keep the References as the single main heading word, which is "standard" elsewhere with opera articles, but also keep "Notes" (maybe then make then A,B,C?? rather than 1,2,3??). Then label the linked-in "Notes" from the text as "Footnotes" to distinguish them?? It would keep the "look" as established in the the major WP:Opera guidelines but also use dual versions of the word "notes". Viva-Verdi ( talk) 01:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Following an inquiry I'd made, I gathered the scanned image of Maggie Teyte as Cherubino could be in Wikimedia Commons under {{PD-art-two|PD-old|PD-1923}}
This illustration by George Cecil Wilmshurst appears here and here as well. Wilmshurst was born in 1873, according to English Wikipedia, or in 1874 according to London 1901 census. He was active between 1897-1917, according to his viaf page. He died in 1930.
I would be much grateful if you do so, for I could use your excellent scan on other Wikis.
Regards, ש. יונתן ( talk) 04:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC).
Dear Tame McOrally
I like where you've been going with Britten. Koussevitzky must have been crazy, or ill-advised, to prefer the z. I'm sure he has multiple redirects. It's a minor matter of minuscule moment.
Did you see my personal contribution to the Britten centenary - Mont Juic (suite)? Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasant conversation] 20:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Morning Mr R, Just looking over Britten at FAC and I see there's quite a bit of overlinking in the Influences section. Is this deliberate, or are you happy for me to de-link the offending terms? Pip pip - SchroCat ( talk) 07:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Well deserved promotion. I have this crazy dream of Falstaff for Verdi's birthday ... - let's start improving, even if we don't get that fa[r]! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:25, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks again for your previous help at PR for the T-T article. The old chap is in the spotlight of FAC, although the stage is a rather crowded one at the moment. I hope you'll have the time to pop along to see him once again. Many thanks - SchroCat ( talk) 11:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Tim! Thanks so much for the review of the Knights of Columbus article. I do appreciate it, and you had some excellent suggestions. I tried to address all of them, and plan on putting it up for Featured Article status again. If there is anything else you can suggest beforehand, I would very much appreciate it. Thanks again! -- Briancua ( talk) 19:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, just so you, Brian and anybody else watching this page knows, I, the artist formerly known as Dr. Blofeld is resuming as User:Tibetan Prayer now, marking an end of DYK contributing and a new era of focusing more on GA and FA and editing outside of DYK. Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 08:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Tim, some of your reversions appear to be a bit sweeping. I couldn't figure out exactly which deleted material you restored today at 09:26, but part of your edit undid Ian Rose's correct insertion of a comma betweeen the honours and his moving the WL for pacifism to the first occurrence. Your revert of the semicolons also undid removal of a redundant word ("most particularly" is pompous). After the somewhat WP:OWNy reversion of the semicolons (by "semicolons preferred" you declare your preference to overrule someone else's) I won't be continuing to help there, but you might want at least to restore Ian Rose's corrections. -- Stfg ( talk) 10:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I advised the author of this not to bunch and replicate books in the notes section and put them underneath. I began converting them to sfn notes and thought he'd be happy to continue but he seems rather upset with beginning to overhaul the references. Sfn isn't compulsory but isn't it ill-advised not to replicate books in the notes and also underneath? Care to comment? Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 19:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I have a question at the bottom of my input to date at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Charles-Valentin Alkan/archive1 on the use of "amongst" and "whilst". I don't know whether you'd consider amongst in the same way as whilst, but I remember you picked up on it in my articles and I wondered if you could give your opinion on the matter. Off to enjoy some sunshine now, thanks! Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 13:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
How are you with 1900s popular songs? Could you find if Charles Ridgewell and Will Godwin's "If Those Lips Could Only Speak" was adapted from a French tune? (Related to Boenga Roos dari Tjikembang, unsurprisingly another Indonesia article) — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your spotcheck. Is the review done. I don't see a cross out at the FA:Talk. LittleJerry ( talk) 23:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Mr Pooter awaits your kind attention. Brianboulton ( talk) 14:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. Ssilvers told me to send you a message. I need an item from the BL, but they are currently undergoing some sort of electronic ... well, I don't know WHAT it's called, but I will be unable to order a copy from their website because of their system changing. But if someone could retrieve it for me, the problem would be eliminated. I wonder if you might do it for me? Shouldn't be too difficult or costly. Write me please? Slfarrell ( talk) 20:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, this is just a quick note to let you know that the Rhodesian UDI article is now at FAC. I would be delighted to know your opinion if you are interested. The link is here if you want to take a look. Thanks again and I hope you are well. — Cliftonian (talk) 07:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
In my first draft of the synopsis I mentioned the bath incident. However, that version was far too long, so I cut a lot of incidents out. I have just added back a couple of lines on the bath, though I'm not yet convinced this is the right thing to do. It opens up the possibility that others will graft on their own favourite incidents, and in no time the synopsis will be bloated and unbalanced again. Perhaps you'd let me know your thoughts? Brianboulton ( talk) 21:48, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
One by one: Mont Juic (suite) DYK? (not by me) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm still getting people attacking me and saying things like "the earlier version was better". Seems the more work you put into something the more people complain and the less grateful they are! Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 10:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Falstaff (Elgar) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you removed a section about his church music that I added to the Walton article recently, saying that it needed citations, but the claim in what was then the next paragraph that "One of the best-known and most frequently performed of Walton's works is the cantata Belshazzar's Feast" isn't cited either. Not every fact has a citation to support it. I'm not about to go and do a survey of cathedral music lists and concert hall programmes to establish my claim, but it seems an eminently reasonable claim to make. Even if you disagreed with it, couldn't the paragraph just have been edited slightly to allow his church music to be at least mentioned in the article? Belshazzar's Feast, although famous, surely gets nothing like the number of performances of his small sacred works, which are sung week in week out in the cathedrals, churches, and college chapels of this country. DTOx ( talk) 09:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 15:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Hello,
I'm one of the 'steward' editors of the Paris article, and am just getting up to date on the many changes made there over the past month. For a bit of background: I was one of a few contributors working to improve the article from 2007~2010, and once my work done, I've only been checking up on the article once or twice a month. When I checked in around a week ago, I discovered that the article had been entirely rewritten over a two-week period, and not in a good way - it reads like a tourist guide article today, and it is organised around administrative districts that have nothing to do with the city's distinct 'quarters' that in some cases span several districts. In short, although well intentioned, the 'lone rewriter' is lacking in his knowledge of this city, thus doesn't provide the proper context for article content - this is wrong.
I realise that you have worked together to bring the article to GA status, and would like to preserve that status and even bring it up to FA status if possible. Could you give us a brief outline of the technical 'GA good' points about the article, perhaps on the Paris talk page?
Thanks so much for your help, THEPROMENADER 08:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
The Importance of Being Earnest may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Old Church of St Nidan, Llanidan/archive1. Hope you're enjoying the summer. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 14:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, remembering your architectural interest in Burges and others, I was wondering if you'd be able to review this important Jacobean house for GA. If not, no worries, but it could use somebody with sharp eyes such as yourself to review it!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I've been delaying the diary's FAC nomination because of the current overcrowding there, but it doesn't look like easing off, so I've gone ahead and nommed it: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Diary of a Nobody/archive1. I'd be grateful for any comments, if you're around (and if the Doctor feels like taking a punt, so much the better). Brianboulton ( talk) 19:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Wow another one! Sure, I'll add it to the other two I'll try to look at tomorrow.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
There is a nice video clip of Britten rehearsing a combined choir and orchestra at Aldeburgh in 1967 on the BBC here which I thought you and any talk page stalkers might enjoy. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. This passed this morning, in no small part thanks to your input. I wanted to say thanks for giving us so much help and encouragment. I found your review to be very rewarding; I'm much more pleased with how the page turned out since. Ceoil ( talk) 16:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Mr Riley,
Thanks for all your recent hard work on the The Importance of Being Earnest article. I've noticed you add a great number of works to the "Sources" list though few of them appear to be cited in the article. Would they not fit better in a " Further Reading" section.. Best wishes, -- Ktlynch ( talk) 13:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
I know you are a busy man, but if you can find the time I would greatly appreciate a few edits/comments at Ringo Starr, currently at FAC. Cheers! GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 21:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You're invited to participate in a peer review for the Mughal-e-Azam article at Wikipedia:Peer review/Mughal-e-Azam/archive1. I hope that constructive input from several people can better prepare it for FAC. It probably needs several pairs of eyes who don't know much about Indian film to comment on as much as it needs experts to comment..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, Have I seen you doing spot checks at FAC before? If you have, would you be able to venture into the modern and profane world of popular Eurodance music at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S&M (song)/archive10? If the very thought of going through it leaves you cold, or if you're just too busy on other bits, do you know of anyone who is particularly good at spot-checking? It's the final hurdle for this article at its tenth (yes, tenth) appearance at FAC. Many thanks - SchroCat ( talk) 15:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Tim, would you be willing to do the GA review on this opera? I want a tough, but fair, review. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 19:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Curious. Any chance you could get a scan of Satan's Harvest Home at the British Library? Or a photograph? Assuming, of course, it's on display and they allow photography or would be willing to work with us.
BTW, I found myself doing my first stage play GA just last week (no opera, but the Indonesians didn't really have operas): Allah jang Palsoe. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 07:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
As you've probably realised, I have a weakness for lost, destroyed or non-existent works of art. I've been in London this past week, away from my Tippett library, so I've been amusing myself researching Sibelius's lost eighth. I have now sent the results of my labours for peer review; any comment you care to make would be most welcome. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the peer review a few weeks ago. I'm back and I've nominated the article at FAC here. Edgepedia ( talk) 05:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madame Sans-Gêne (play), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Verneuil and Knickerbocker Theatre ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
I know we've never interacted on Wikipedia before, but I was wondering if you would consider reviewing my current FAC for the Kellie Loder article. I noticed that you reviewed the Ringo Starr FAC and thought you might be interested in this FAC as well. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide at the corresponding discussion would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix ( talk) 21:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Despite a recent difference of opinion, I am going to assume good faith, and would like to pass on a link that may be of use to you.
You recently uploaded some scans of Illustrated London News drawings,
I Found this on a very quick search, http://www.artbiogs.co.uk/2/organizations/illustrated-london-news which is a set of biographies for various British artists, It might help provide additional clues as to possible artists for ILN drawings. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, Not my best response. I've taken your concern on-board. Are there any specfic images you'd like me to review a third time? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Pray observe that Symphony No. 8 (Sibelius) has been nominated at FAC and awaits its fate there. (Someone needs to wipe that grin off Sibelius's face). Brianboulton ( talk) 21:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I hope you are well. This is just a note to let you know that the Southern Rhodesian involvement in World War I article is now at FAC. The FAC is here. If you're interested and find yourself at a loose end, your thoughts would as always be very welcome. — Cliftonian (talk) 03:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Having recovered sufficiently from the Edinburgh Festival, I've done the first analysis. Conclusion was, unfortunately, that it wasn't quite there, but it's not that far off. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 15:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Tim. I had to take it rather craftily as they don't like cameras in there, as you know! Jack1956 ( talk) 20:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. As I can't see anything in the guidelines about it but am pretty sure the norm on here is to not add a full stop after every book citation do you have any idea if it is advised to not include them? Just I notice that most articles, including yours, Brian's (and mine), avoid using full stops after every book note. I brought it up at Talk:This Guitar (Can't Keep from Crying)/GA1 and while it's probably not something which should prevent an article passing GA I'd appreciate it if you could offer an insight into this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Good to hear from you and thanks for the heads-up on Ein Heldeleben, about which I gave my two cents on the talk page. I've started work on an article on the Michael Tippett piano concerto as an adjunct to Brian's revamp on the main article on the composer. Should you have any suggestions on sources or anything else, please feel free. The article itself is still just a stub currently but plan to plunge in depth once my sources are in better order. Thanks. Jonyungk ( talk) 17:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
This might amuse you. While toiling away on the Tippett article, I was reminded that a few years ago I was idly listening to Radio 3 when a performance of The Heart's Assurance, Tippett's song cycle for tenor and piano was announced. The announcer gave a short introduction to the work which, she said, was first performed at the Wigmore Hall in 1953 by Britten and Pears. What I heard, however, was that it was first performed at the Wigmore Hall in 1953 by "Britney Spears". Now, were one a time traveller, wouldn't that be a premiere worth going to! Brianboulton ( talk) 20:25, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
My point during that review was if we're actually using summary style and all the facts are clear there is no need for any notes, and a FA article doesn't require notes to be promoted. Notes seem to come up for a few reasons. A fact in the article is challenged and to clarify during in the review process you add a note to explain to get support. You might be writing and realize that 3 sources say X but 1 says Y and 1 says 'X and Y are wrong, Z' and you decide to add a note in advance of being challenged after choosing to put X in the article. There's also the 'not central to the narrative' type of notes you mentioned. #1 is usually ok. #2 is sometimes ok, although no one reads notes and historians who can't agree about basic facts isn't really that interesting to read most of the time....see WP:SS. The 'not central' type notes I think are not good practice since if we're observing summary style its either in the article or in another article, or omitted. Also, #1 tend to be short sentences or even just a couple of words. #2 can get kind of long, #3 seem to be a whole paragraph with multiple citations and I always wonder with the interesting asides why this isn't in the article! If you have an article you want me to review let me know I'd be happy to help. Kirk ( talk) 22:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tim, just to say thank you for your timely intervention. I was just writing a reasoned reply to Ssilvers (a) many people refer by default to Lady Jane's "double bass", as Google confirms, so I think some clarification at least seems justified; b) it's all in a footnote, after all!), but I guess, since the addition stands and you've intervened, keeping my own counsel is a more gracious option. Anyway thank you matron, you made me smile! Alfietucker ( talk) 17:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Sure, I'll look at it tomorrow, Tuesday at latest. You might be interested in reviewing Amir Hamzah, if you can't do it at the moment you could review at a later date and reserve the review. It needs a good reviewer as in my opinion it has FA potential.. If not, no worries..♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
I am waking this sleeper up. As an experiment I have (temporarily) added one of the Opera project's optional boxes to the article (I was not hassled about this in any way, it's my own idea). I should be very glad to have your plain opinion as to whether this (a)improves the article, (b) makes it worse or (c) makes no difference. Together with any other wise words you may wish to impart. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Amir Hamzah duly reviewed. And promoted in short order. A top-notch article. Tim riley ( talk) 15:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes that's my feeling on it that neither Aymatth or myself are experts and we both know that articles can appear to be very good and of FA quality but when looked at by an expert on the subject can seem grossly deficient. All I know is that it was written based on what we consider to be reliable sources so should generally be OK, just as you say, there is always that doubt that it's substantial enough without an expert on Middle eastern architecture providing some feedback. It might be worth a shot anyway. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll keep it in mind. Sorry for the delay on the Disraeli front Tim, really not been feeling much like wiki of late. I'll definitely resume tomorrow!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
OK. Well it would only be nitpicking anyway, it's a superb article and am sure will pass FA with little trouble. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, not sure if you saw my comment at the review but as the nominator is new to FAC I'd like to see a spotcheck of sources and since most are apparently in book form, I thought of you... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 14:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I offered a brief second opinion on general policy vis-à-vis citation/criteria 2 compliance, I'll take a closer look later on specifics and to see if there are other things needing remedy. I do agree, prima facie, with your assessment and interpretation. Please keep me updated. -- ColonelHenry ( talk) 15:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tim, hope your well. Just a quick note to let you know of the listing of Little Tich at peer review. I would love for you to take part if you're able to. Many thanks! -- Cassianto Talk 08:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
You may like to visit this page, where I am nominating Ben as a "vital" composer (probably in place of Satie). Brianboulton ( talk) 16:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
To present this award to others, simply type {{subst:User:JackofOz/PENISS}} on their talk page.
Jack of Oz
[pleasantries]
20:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:David-mediterranean.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Elizabeth-david-frenc-country-cooking-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Elizabeth David Is There a Nutmeg in the House PB Oct 2001 014029290X.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Italian-Food E-David.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:French prov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Omelette and GW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically
Elizabeth David bibliography, may fail our
non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our
Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page.
Werieth (
talk)
10:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Tim Riley, I sent an email with the content below to Martinevans asking for advice. The same material is also on my talk page. Martin suggested that you are the one of the major contributors to the Benjamin Britten article and should be contacted. He also explained how to contact you other than send an email. I will appreciate your advice. (arno, aka Glencliffe) -- Glencliffe ( talk) 18:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Note to Tim riley, Martinevans and Ruhrfisch:
I will greatly appreciate your advice about what I have gathered below - whether I am on the correct track and whether it is useful. Regarding the existing Wikipedia information about the "School" - there is no article about the school but many references in various articles as well as the redirect page.
(Wikipedia article title) (Benjamin Britten) No mention of the school in the Benjamin Britten article. Britten died shortly after hearing the first master classes that were the beginnings of the school. (Peter Pears) - no mention in Wikipedia article. (Aldeburgh Festival): "In addition to the annual Festival, Aldeburgh Music also runs the Britten-Pears Young Artist Programme (formerly the Britten-Pears School for Advanced Musical Studies)". (Nancy Evans): "Evans taught singing at the Britten-Pears School in Snape Maltings". (Britten-Pears Orchestra): "Since the very first course in 1972, over 10,000 young artists have attended what started as the Britten–Pears School for Advanced Musical Studies, and is now called the Britten–Pears Young Artist Programme. The programme aims to bridge the gap between conservatoires and professional life, offering unique development and performance opportunities to young musicians. Many have gone on to become leading musicians in their own right."
I think that, rather than an article about the school, some information could be added to the Britten article (at least a reference and link) and more comments could be added to the Pears article. My contribution might be the comments below and the picture of Eric Crozier with his wife Nancy Evans and my wife [she needs to be edited out] as there is no picture of him and a very early picture of Nancy Evans in the Wikipedia article. My picture is probably the last picture taken of Crozier, only a few weeks before his death ( http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=eric%20crozier). I will gladly make this photo available, but would need someone skilled to edit out my wife. I don't know where or how to add to the Britten or Pears articles. I also suggest that the recent publication listed below (Making Musicians, by Moira Bennett), be included in the Britten and/or Pears bibliography. A personal note - my wife taught at the school from 1990 to 2005, during which time I spent a good deal of time in the Britten-Pears library (adjacent to the Red House) as well as time in Aldeburgh and with the students and teachers at the school. The Bennett book is a history about the school from its earliest beginnings to approximately 2011 with numerous (b&w) photographs.
"'One day in 1953 he [Britten] said: 'What you and Peter and I have got to remember is that we're going to have a music school here one day.' The 'school' came to birth in 1973 with a Snape Maltings weekend for singers directed by Peter Pears, and it has gone on growing ever since." (1) Quotation from Chapter 2, Imogen Holst, p. 50.
"Britten was speaking only five years after the establishment of the Aldeburgh Festival." (2) Bennett, p. 21.
The Britten-Pears School for Advanced Musical Studies ( http://www.brittenpears.org/page.php?pageid=625) was opened by Queen Elizabeth on 28 April 1979 (2)Bennett, p.83. It is now the Britten-Pears Young Artist Programme ( http://www.aldeburgh.co.uk/bpp).
The School was important to Britten, and also to Peter Pears, who gave the first masterclasses in 1972. [Imogen Holst incorrectly gives the year of the first master classes as 1973] (3)
After the school building was opened…"Pears was in charge of the singers' master classes, held at various times during the year with Nancy Evans as his co-director of singing studies, and many other instrumentalists and singers - among them, Galina Vishnevskaya - who had worked with Britten came to teach." (4) p. 588-589.
Sources for above information: (1) The Britten Companion, edited by Christopher Palmer. Faber & Faber. London, U.K. © (1984). ISBN 0-571-13168-9 Pbk
( 2, 3) Making Musicians A Personal History of the Britten-Pears School. Moira Bennett. The Bittern Press, Woodbridge, Suffolk �© (2012). ISBN: 978-0-9571672-0-9.
(4) Benjamin Britten A Biography. Humphrey Carpenter. Faber & Faber Limited, London, U.K., © (1992). ISBN: 0-571-14324-5.
Existing Wikipedia articles: (Benjamin Britten) /info/en/?search=Benjamin_Britten (Peter Pears) /info/en/?search=Peter_Pears (Aldeburgh Festival) /info/en/?search=Aldeburgh_Festival
Relevant websites (About Aldeburgh Music) http://www.aldeburgh.co.uk/about_us (Britten-Pears Foundation) http://www.brittenpears.org/index.php
--Glencliffe (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)-- Glencliffe ( talk) 18:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, Tim Riley. I would be much obliged if you could take the time to return to Amir Hamzah for the peer review here. The article has been expanded a bit since your last visit, but not dramatically so. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 03:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your kind words and also your checks at the British Library (which I had the pleasure of visiting last week). The process was less daunting than I expected so I may try putting a few other articles I've been the main contributor to up for candidature. It took Aunva6 to take it in hand and do much of the required review improvements and I am grateful to him. Thanks again. -- Bill Reid | ( talk) 08:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For an excellent article on Disraeli – one of a large number you should have received a barnstar for. Thanks for the very enjoyable read. – SchroCat ( talk) 09:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |
How very kind! It's been a good morning, what with this pleasing addition and Dizzy's promotion to FA. Tim riley ( talk) 11:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Congrats, no sooner had the peer review finished and it is promoted to FA!! Sorry I didn't have time to cast my support!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
For better, for worse, I've nominated it at FAC. Obviously I hope for the better. Brianboulton ( talk) 20:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Thankyou for your work on the article, notably the supplying of refs on April 14, 2009. Would you object to having the url "Obituary of Graham Payn" in the reference, as within the remit of WP:CITEVAR? I thought being able to read the ref was useful, especially as there is more there than is used in the wikipedia article, that may assist future editors. Also, do you object to having "Retrieved 26 September 2013", which could help in the event of the link dying? (unlikely in the case of The Daily Telegraph)-- DadaNeem ( talk) 23:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
The Kellie Loder FAC was successful! Thank you for participating in that conversation. I have nominated the article to go up on the main page here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix ( talk) 17:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hullo Tim, hope you're well. I have a somewhat-left-field spotcheck request for you this time, namely a Military History Project A-Class Review. I know I generally ask you for these things at FAC but that's the stated destination for this article and I think it'd be great to get a spotcheck out of the way beforehand. I'm keen on that especially because I've copyedited and reviewed the article in my capacity as a MilHist member, and found it generally very good, but not being an expert on Nasser or modern Egyptian history I'd feel more comfortable about fully endorsing if someone like yourself could give it a more thorough spotcheck than mine (which did in fact reveal a couple of things needing attention). Now I know you're probably not a MilHist member but I'm sure no-one there would have an issue with you joining in, particularly given your experience with political biography. Anyway, no pressure, just if you're interested and have time...! Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 14:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, you might be able to think of a way to steer the Ark between Scylla and Charybdis (to mix my myths) at Talk:Noye's Fludde#Performance history, although there is absolutely no rush and you may not have anything of use in your books (even when you're reunited with them). Best wishes, Bencherlite Talk 15:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Many thanks for your note about the opera, and appreciate your thoughts abut how we might somehow combine the best elements. I worked on it extensively for a class I was giving to an adult ed. group in town which, towards the end, focused on Verdi's relationship with Boito. (Additionally, I did work on Otello and Simon Boccanegra (plus almost every other Verdi article for that matter since the Spring!!)
Anyway, at a quick glance, you appear to have more on the comparison with the plays, which is good. I found some good stuff in Phillips-Matz as well as Frank Walker on the working relationship (since my class also focused on Verdi's relationships with his key librettists, Cammarano and then Piave).
Here's the situation: I leave tomorrow for Italy for the whole of October, and arrive in London on 30th, staying there till 14th. I was going to drop you a line anyway after your suggestion to meet up at Covent Garden for a beer some time ago now, and I don't expect to be able to do very much before month's end. But let me know if you have some merge ideas, and I'll check them at various points. I'll be in Busseto on 10 October, of course!! All the best, Viva-Verdi ( talk) 18:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Just would like a little more detail on why my entry to the page was trivia (or is it trivial). I'm treading carefully since I've only edited a few pages. It seems to me to be no more a piece of trivia (or trivial) than the television references, especially since it is associated with an historically significant recording. Since you are my senior in these matters I am willing defer to your judgment, but it would be helpful to know the criteria you used so I do not repeat the error. RMoribayashi ( talk) 05:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Tim, on my talkpage is a very nice note from Andrew Lowe Watson, the original author of the Tippett article which I am in the process of mangling. He has kind words to say about the Britten article, too. I thought you should read what he says. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Afternoon, and I hope all is well in the lakes. If you're looking around for diversions while you are away from the metropolis, I've given " Die Forelle" a workover and put it up for GAN. I'm not entirely sure about the various foibles of GA's relating to classical songs and leids, so it's more than the nomination is more in hope than expectation. Could I ask for a visit to have a look over it? (Feel free to quick fail it if you think its a deserved fate)! Many thanks if you're able to spare the time – and no problems if you're not able to. All the best – SchroCat ( talk) 14:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't know if this is totally eccentric, but for some reason today it occurs to me that this article, which both you and I have done quite a bit of work on in the past, might be suitable for GA nomination. I confess I'm a total novice about this process, but thought it might a) be worthy; b) incidentally good preparation for me to see from the "other side" how such a process works before I get involved with helping with the Tippett FAC. So do you think SW is a realistic prospect for GA nomination? Alfietucker ( talk) 16:51, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Tim riley, how have you been? I'm a Japanese Wikipedian who created Piano Concerto (Delius) before, with your great cooperation. Today I found that the article Symphony No. 3 (Raff) is composed of complete copy-paste from an external web site. This obviously violates copyright and needs to be deleted from Wikipedia right now. However, deletion procedure here seems different from Japanese one and it will take long time for me to fully understand the guideline and submit the deletion request. Would you kindly submit deletion request instead of me? You are the only English speaking Wikipedian who I had contact before and are currently active. Best regards, -- Ponruy ( talk) 11:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your rapid response and action. Your instruction on Talk page of the Symphony is also great education for me. I will learn more to deal with this kind of problems.-- Ponruy ( talk) 14:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Tim - In traditional Wikipedia style, please accept this gift of a triple (or quadruple?) whammy from across Italy [9]. By all means feel free to adjust the ingredients to suit the refinements of your impeccable taste (though take care with the sciusceddu...). Buon appetito! 86.162.136.32 ( talk) 10:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Friday Afternoons is a red link in BB's list of works, but mentioned in his lede. Is it more important than A Ceremony of Carols or others? Will there be an article? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
I have dragged myself over the finishing line with Michael Tippett, and it is ready for review, though I'm still sorting out some of the references. God, I need a holiday! I hope you can find time to cast an eye over it – and Christe receive thy saule. On another matter, I shall be going later this week to the Stamford G&S Society's current production of The Mikado. They generally do these things quite well, though like most such companies these days, the singers tend to be on the elderly side. The Three Little Maids don't have quite the right allure when their combined age exceeds 150. And Nanki-poo should definitely not be portly. I suppose the thing to do is to close the eyes from time to time. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:42, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Quarter Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Benjamin Disraeli (estimated annual readership: 299,665) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! |
The Million Award is an initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:
![]() | This editor won the Quarter Million Award for bringing Benjamin Disraeli to Featured Article status. |
If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers and all best, – Quadell ( talk) 14:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
You recently participated in the FAC review of L'Arianna which resulted in the article's promotion. Could you spare a minute to look at, and possibly make a comment on, a discussion on the article's talkpage, here, about a proposed change to the article's lead image. Many thanks. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:48, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
After Tippett I am taking a couple of months' rest from music-related articles. I'm going to work on a couple of last century's women writers: Stella Gibbons and Nancy Mitford (oh! what fun!). Gibbons first. There isn't much internet material on her; could you possibly search your newspaper source and see if you can spot a decent obituary, and any critical reviews of one of her novels – preferably not Cold Comfort Farm, on which I've lots of stuff. No hurry, as I shall be away after tomorrow, until 24th or 25th, but I would be very grateful if you'd take a look. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Excellent work, of course. I looked for the Punch joke first, I must admit... (I'm sure you know it, but this link for those who don't). I also note that the dates on the picture of the gravestone don't comply with MOS and insist that you re-chisel it to say "1910–86", using a proper-length horizontal line of course... Bencherlite Talk 12:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
I hope you are home from your trip and that you left all well behind you. If you have a spare moment, I have offered History of Chincoteague, Virginia to the gods of peer review. It is a bit of a different tack for me; it is my favorite shore resort. An interesting history, you may find.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 02:20, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm just back from hot places. Thanks for the emailed Gibbons stuff which I've not had a chance to read yet. Anything I can do for you in your (apparent) exile? Brianboulton ( talk) 08:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Did you know this? How do I know what is in the collection. I found it on BWV 5. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
It's been a while with one thing and another, but if you have the time, energy and inclination, I've another cricket PR going here. Your comments are always welcome, and please let me know if I can return any of your kind favours. Sarastro1 ( talk) 22:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know, wherever you may be, that I have nominated Tippett at FAC, here. Any comments of course will be welcome. Brianboulton ( talk) 19:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I must say I'm confused. If this is wrong, then what is the correct link? Best, Toccata quarta ( talk) 06:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim,
Thank you again for reviewing the Kellie Loder article for its FAC. I now have another article up for featured status: Nefarious: Merchant of Souls. If you have time to contribute to its FAC here, I would appreciate any constructive comments you are willing to provide.
Neelix ( talk) 20:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. If you're not too busy would you care to review to Buah Rindu? Not been snapped up in a while.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Benjamin Britten know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 22, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite ( talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 22, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Benjamin Britten (1913–76) was an English composer, conductor and pianist, and a central figure in 20th-century British classical music. His wide compositional range includes opera, orchestral, choral, solo vocal, chamber, instrumental and film music. He showed talent from an early age, and first came to public attention with the choral work A Boy Was Born in 1934. His best-known works include the operas Peter Grimes (1945) and Billy Budd (1951), the War Requiem (1962) and the orchestral showpiece The Young Person's Guide to the Orchestra (1945). Recurring themes in his operas are the struggle of an outsider against a hostile society, and the corruption of innocence. He wrote copiously for children and amateur performers, including the opera Noye's Fludde, a Missa Brevis, and the song collection Friday Afternoons. Britten often composed with particular performers in mind, most importantly his personal and professional partner, the tenor Peter Pears, with whom he co-founded the annual Aldeburgh Festival in 1948; the pair were responsible for the creation of its Snape Maltings concert hall in 1967. In 1976 Britten became the first composer to be awarded a life peerage. ( Full article...)
UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
At the peer review were kind enough to suggest that I contact you when Monro's Description moved on to the next stage. After the review I got rather distracted as I was away for longer than I expected and a now indef-blocked user took an interest in the topic, but it's now at FLC - see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Description of the Western Isles of Scotland/archive1. Ben Mac Dui 20:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim
Thanks for getting in touch, and apologies for not responding more promptly.
It's great to see a page on Wilfred.
Yes, please go ahead and dive in with your changes to the Dilly Knox page. If happens to be any tidying up needed, either I'll pick it up unless someone else jumps in first.
RobertBurrellDonkin ( talk) 14:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim. Did you see my reply to you on my talk page? I wonder what you think of events since then? Having thought about it for a couple of days, I think what Hucbald says may be the best way to go, painful as it is, because he makes clear that he's somewhat at odds with the Wikipedian way in any case. All the same, I don't want to make difficulties. If you think it's worth trying to get things moving again, please do whatever you think fit, and you can be sure I won't disrupt it. Best, Simon -- Stfg ( talk) 12:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I understand and agree with your concerns regarding her edits, but I wonder if maybe your most recent message to her was a bit harsh? After all, she hasn't edited at all since my message, and she is still a newbie. Nikkimaria ( talk) 16:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid that while I tried to be concise, my notes about Fauré's Pavane are a bit lengthy. I just didn't want to leave anything pertinent out. As it was I removed some material about what happened to the manuscript. Anyway, see what you think. Orfeocookie ( talk) 04:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for all the time and effort you put into Wikipedia:Peer review/Wells Cathedral/archive1 which has definitely helped to improve the article. I've dealt with some of the issues, but had to ask for help with some of the architecture & grammar questions. One of the most comprehensive and helpful reviews I've seen.— Rod talk 10:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Here's a little birthday gift for the master. I found the Catalogue (detailed info, even days of composition) by chance, are you using it? - Feel free to add, I am looking at the next, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:23, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
André Navarra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Rudolf Schwarz (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk)
09:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Harry Houdini mentions Robert Browning and the fraud of Home in the newspaper the London Times, see here [10]
Also according to The Times article in the introduction it says there was an alternative spelling for the paper in other countries outside Britain "In these countries and others, the newspaper is often referred to as The London Times." Houdini was American... so it makes sense. I'm not too bothered either way... So it should be left as The Times? Fodor Fan ( talk) 21:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
I have taken the good lady to peer review, and will glad if you are able to comment. It's not a long article, and it's been a peach to do after the trials of Tippett. Many thanks in advance. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
You previously mentioned that you would be on the lookout for another GAN of Kinky Boots (musical). It is now renominated.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Judging by your comment on my talk page here, you may be interested in this conversation: Talk:Wells Cathedral#Restrictive which.
How wonderful Ben looks on the front page! Congratulations for all your hard work. Gareth E Kegg ( talk) 08:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Nice work on the article about Benjamin Britten, Tim, though I was the one who helped started it. I just got back from my two month semi retirement back in October. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 09:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
I wanted to give you this barnstar for your contributions to Benjamin Britten which is now today's featured article. Having such articles on such important figures in the arts is a great credit to this encyclopedia. For each person that listens to the Courtly Dances from Gloriana because of reading that article, you'll have helped light a fire in a heart! Atethnekos ( Discussion, Contributions) 11:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you so much, Atethnekos. I am much touched and very grateful, and shall proudly add the star to my user page. – Tim riley ( talk) 11:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
As you were one of the peer reviewers, I thought you might like to know the article is at FAC. Many thanks for your suggestions for improvement of the article.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 19:31, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
The first is straightforward: later today Stella Gibbons will be at FAC, if you would care to renew your acquaintance there.
The second is a bit more complex. About 18 months ago you kindly created a simplified family tree for the Tichbornes, which I used in the Tichborne case article. I wonder if I can presume to ask for something similar for use in the Nancy Mitford article, which is now in my sights. The Mitfords were related to just about everybody, and a full family diagram would be impossible. What I have in mind is something which will highlight one or two of the more interesting connections. Here is the basic information:
If this is too much of a task, please say so; otherwise, when you're ready just dump it in my talk. There is of course considerable doubt about some of the above assumed parentages, and even the great WSC is not exempt from rumour. How much of the scandal will find its way into the NM article is a matter for juicy anticipation. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Dear Tim, Have just been re-reading your GA review and laughed so loud I spat out my sauvignon when I came across your description of him as a "Victorian menace". I'm conscious I haven't repaid my very considerable debt by taking up any of your invitations re. other, excellent, articles. I fear that, in Wikipedia, I'm a bit of a one-trick pony, and thus a disappointment to the good Doctor. But if he does make TFA on Monday it will owe more to you, and the Doctor, than to me. And for that, my sincere thanks. KJP1 ( talk) 22:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, sorry I don't understand the difference on Noel Coward between ref 123 and the 2 refs I just added? Can you explain on article Talk page please. Thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
The chart looks excellent! Many thanks for this. A few changes are required:
Other interesting surmises, e.g. that Algernon the 1st Baron was Clemmie's true father, and the WSC himself was Esmond Romilly's real dad, will have to be covered in the text; there are no categories of dotted line that can deal with this in the chart. The things that went on in those respectable Victorian country houses! I am toying with the possibility of highlighting in the chart those who are directly members of or ancestors of the Mitford family; thus the boxes for the 10th earl, Algernon, the second earl, the Mitford siblings and E. Romilly could be shaded differently from the others. Does that sound possible? Once again my warmest thanks for the time and trouble taken in helping with this. Brianboulton ( talk) 13:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
On reflection:
Can either of these amendments be done, and if so at what cost? Brianboulton ( talk) 16:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to William Burges, an example of spirited collaboration, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
I created the nomination for you. You can add alternative hooks if original hook is not the only interesting fact. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
The Owen image is seemingly free on Commons, which may be incorrect. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I hope all is well with you. Cassianto and I come with begging bowls in hand asking for a favour. We've got the very lovely Hattie Jacques at PR, and would appreciate any comments, thoughts and suggestions you may have. As always there is no rush, and if you are too busy, then there is no problem at all. All the best - SchroCat( talk) 07:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks once again for your hugely useful efforts on Hattie. The dear lady is now at FAC, in no small part because of your assistance. Thanks again. - SchroCat ( talk) 21:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
I've just created an article on the delightful Hyde House in Bucks, where Disraeli claimed he wroteVivian Grey. Did you ever see this wot I wrote? I do so wish we could get a picture for each one. Gareth E Kegg ( talk) 01:24, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
[[ Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]] | On 12 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bessie Jones (Welsh singer), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Welsh singer Bessie Jones was the first to record Noël Coward's earliest stage lyric, "Peter Pan", from the revue Tails Up!? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bessie Jones (Welsh singer). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 17:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I've been giving this more thought. First, I have considerably trimmed the prose in the "family background" section so that, in my view, in either the horizontal or vertical forms the chart, if readable, is too large and overpowering for the section. I have decided to put it into a separate section at the end of the article, where space won't be a problem, where we can present it in a readable size.
I've also given more thought to format. Looking at either of the present versions, the immediate visual impression is that it is the Earl of Airlie's rather than the Mitfords' family tree. So I am proposing some revisions which, without the benefit of any graphic tools, I have somewhat laboriously assembled in a sandbox, here. I'm not able to draw the horizontal lines, but it will be pretty clear to you from the original where these need to go. The objective is to highlight the Mitford line, which I think it will do in this form. For this reason I think that it will have to be in the original, traditional family tree format, which on balance I'm inclined to prefer.
Note that I have shortened the contents of some boxes, as well as eliminating the intermediate Airlies. Can I ask you to ponder, tinker, and let me know how you think it looks in revised polished form. Many thanks, Brianboulton ( talk) 19:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I like what I see. Just one micro-addition requested: in the Esmond Romilly box, add "m. Jessica Mitford". And, as that brings him into the Mitford family, perhaps his box should be Oxford rather than Cambridge? Brianboulton ( talk) 21:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Tim, I agree that we don't want a laundry list, but how high do we wish to set the rib? In 2013 Nina Stemme was i.a. selected as the world's leading female opera singer by the International Opera Award (Jonas Kaufmann was the male counterpart). It is a fairly common opinion that Nina Stemme is the foremost dramatic soprano since the retirement of Birgit Nilsson, and quite a few critics claim that she surpasses Kirsten Flagstad. For the sake of consistency, can it honestly be claimed that Hans Hotter who is also on the list holds a similar distinction as the leading Wagnerian tenor of his time? Not likely, you will most certainly be told that he was far surpassed by singers such as Ben Heppner, Siegfried Jerusalem, Lauritz Melchior, Wolfgang Windgassen and several others.
Perhaps it would be better to stop futile discussions about the relative merits of different singers once and for all by simply stating that "The majority of the leading opera singers in the past century have performed at the Royal Opera House" which would be pretty close to the truth?! Andersneld ( talk) 17:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Tim, this is just a quick note to let you know that I've just nominated Air Rhodesia Flight 825 for FA. This was one of the uglier incidents of the Bush War of the 1970s; guerrillas shot a civilian airliner down and executed most of the survivors amid the wreckage (some of the passengers survived by hiding before the attackers reached the crash site). Rhodesia obliterated guerrilla bases in Zambia and Mozambique in response. If you have the time and are interested, I'd very much appreciate any thoughts you might have on this. The review is here. Thanks, and I hope you are well. — Cliftonian (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Can you tell me what EGO stands for in the listing of the Britten-Pears Foundation saying "boys' voices of the EOG". Imogen Holst conducted the first performance of the revised version, did you know? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't understand why you're objecting to my revisions - there are no such nationalities as English, Welsh or Scottish any more as these nations ceased to exist when the union between England, Wales and Scotland took place - I'm changing all references to English, Welsh and Scottish nationalities to British for the sake of correctness. Marosc9 ( talk) 21:16, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I have had a further thought, namely a dotted line extending rightwards from the Stanley box to a new box containing: "Katharine Stanley, m. John Russell, Viscount Amberley", from which drops a solid line to a box containing "Bertrand Russell, 3rd Earl Russell, 1872–1970". All new boxes in the Stanley grey colour. Don't you think that would round the box off nicely, and provide even more talking points, e.g. who the hell wasn't related in some way to these pesky girls? Let me know what you think. Incidentally, when the chart is finally complete we will need to add sources to the image page. I have these aplenty. Brianboulton ( talk) 14:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() | |
Thanks for all the help with the Early Netherlandish painting PR, and hope you have a good christmas. Ceoil ( talk) 15:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC) |
My wife has been known to send thank you cards to people who have sent her a thank you card. I don't approve though I dare say is helps economic growth. So, despite myself, thank you for your thanks notification, and, more to the point, it arose from a little discussion at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#Rothschild. Thincat ( talk) 22:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
|
Christmas greetings for 2013 and best wishes for 2014. Peace on earth and goodwill to all May you take pleasure in all you do and find success and happiness |
Brianboulton ( talk) 21:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Victuallers
talkback is wishing Tim Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote
WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. -
Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same |
![]() |
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Merry Christmas and best wishes for a happy, healthy and productive 2014! |
Ruhrfisch ><>°° 23:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC) |
Martinevans123
Santas Grotto wishes you and yours
"Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda"
May the true spirit of Christmas bless you with warmth and peace ....
Following your PR of Wells Cathedral (and input from lots of others) we have finally bitten the bullet and nominated it at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wells Cathedral/archive1 - you asked me to let you know when the nomination went in. Thanks for all help so far.— Rod talk 14:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jeffrey-skitch-pinafore.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree filesbecause its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy holidays. | |
Best wishes for joy and happiness. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 02:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC) |
I have repositioned your chart in the Nancy article, to bring it close to the relevant text – it stood in some danger of being overlooked, stuck on the end. What do you think? I have also sized it to upright= 3.5 and restored the thumb. I think myself it looks fabulous, but others may demur. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
PS it may be appropriate to remove your "work in progress" note from the image page. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)