|
|||
Howdy. It looks like your tool labs tools are offline following the data center migration. I suspect all that's needed is for you to follow the instructions at wikitech:Tool_Labs/Migration_to_eqiad#Tools_webpage_shows:_No_webservice. Cheers. - TB ( talk) 13:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
A content dispute resolution process has been started at [1]. Please participate and contribute to a resolution. Wdford ( talk) 16:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Christ myth theory". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 05:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
On 13 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The American Religion, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the same year Bill Clinton was elected, Harold Bloom wrote in The American Religion that he feared there would never be another Democrat US President in his lifetime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The American Religion. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
slakr\ talk / 02:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).== Notification of automated file description generation ==
Your upload of
File:Cfflowtest3.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for the source help, I appreciate it! :bloodofox: ( talk) 02:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |
Thank you for taking the semantic issues there seriously. It's heartening but all too rare to come across editors who understand that words have meaning and that meaning matters. Regardless of how it comes out (I'm betting on "no consensus," as always), discussing it with you is the kind of experience that makes editing here worthwhile to me.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 01:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination). Thanks. MarkBernstein ( talk) 21:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
What gives? Seems like wikihow would be ok.
50.242.132.209 ( talk) 19:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thanks, take care [2] And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. [3] And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever. [4] But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
50.242.132.209 ( talk) 14:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Pseudoscientific astronomers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, along with two related categories. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Muhammad calligraphy.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Genesis 17:15 produces this URL:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/bibleversefinder/?book=Genesis&verse=17%3A15&src=
which resulted in:
No webservice
The URI you have requested, /bibleversefinder/?book=Genesis&verse=17%3A15&src=, is not currently serviced.
If you have reached this page from somewhere else...
This URI is part of the bibleversefinder tool, maintained by Atethnekos.
That tool might not have a web interface, or it may currently be disabled.
If you're pretty sure this shouldn't be an error, you may wish to notify the tool's maintainers (above) about the error and how you ended up here.
If you maintain this tool
You have not enabled a web service for your tool, or it has stopped working because of a fatal error. You may wish to check your logs or common causes for errors in the help documentation.
YOU MAY USE ALL THESE INFO THERE
| list5 =
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 21:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 05:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Of the total Muslim population, 11-12% are Shia Muslims and 87-88% are Sunni Muslims.
Five-Percent Nation, Mahdavia AND Ahmadiyya is not amongst them.... 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This is something like Bahá'í Faith and Bábism which is not Muslim belief. Ahmadiyya is a NEW RELIGION with its own prophet...similar to Bahá'í Faith and Bábism which have their own prophet. Otherwise Judaism and christianity are supposed to be the same religion.. 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 05:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite encyclopedia}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help) --
Atethnekos (
Discussion,
Contributions) 05:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)YOU CAN PUT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE with these Five-Percent Nation and Mahdavia..wherever they belong to!! otherwise YOU ARE CREATING new CATEGORIZATION??? 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
if you write ahmadiyya then YOU HAVE TO WRITE Alevi, Alawi, Druze, Nizari as well!!! 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
in your template:
BIGGER COMMUNITIES AND MADHHABS ARE NOT SHOWN.....
You are putting less important and small communities LIKE
as if they are MAJOR branches.... 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 09:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 09:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite encyclopedia}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help) That's a citation from a reliable source which says that Aḥmadiyya is a part of Islam. --
Atethnekos (
Discussion,
Contributions) 16:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)The following groups have larger populations...
HAVE more members than Ahmadiyya, BUT YOU NEVER MENTION ABOUT THEM IN THE TEMPLATE!!!
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 19:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
YOU HAVE TO CLASSIFY ALL SECTS UNDER ONE OF THESE:
WHY DONT YOU MENTION ABOUT THE FOLLOWING:
AS YOU DID IN Ahmadiyya 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 22:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
WHICH ARE NOT IN THE TEMPLATE WHY DONT YOU PUT OR LIST THEM IF AHMEDISM IS ANOTHER SECT PUT IT SOMEWHERE BUT IT ISNT THE EQUIV OF sunni more than a billion nor equiv of shi'ite more than a 100 million
according to your logic?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 23:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Similarly you have a private template of Ahmadiyya as well. Therefore you cant put them there otherwise you have to put Druze & Nizari ++ Alevi & Alawi as well they are on Ismaili template O.K. Ahmadiyya is on Ahmadiyya template do you understand?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 23:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Islam (FRENCH) SO THAT you may perform the necessary corrections 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 01:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
if you claim that it can NOT be put under one of these titles, then it is a new religion, but not islam.
Alevi, Alawi, Druze, Nizari, Assasins, Gulen movement under one of these THREE main branches, namely Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij, in a similar way, you can classify Aḥmadī movement under one of them. If you claim that it is so special and cannot be classified under one of the 3 main branches of Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij; then the members of these groups, namely Alevi, Alawi, Druze, Nizari, Assasins, Gulen movement CAN CLAIM that they are very special as well. In that case, the names of Gulen movement, Alevi, Alawi, Druze, etc. SHOULD BE written besides the Aḥmadī movement, this is my opinion.
SEE: Template:Islam (in FRENCH) 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 05:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
yOUR Aḥmadī movement is just an equivalent of the following:
And you are just missing them..THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE, YOU HAVE TO LIST THEM AS WELL..AS THEY DID IN Template:Islam (in FRENCH) you are just incorrectly copying from other sourses 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
YES ISLAM IS A PART OF THESE THINGS:
BECAUSE YOUR TEMPLATE JUST GIVES THEIR NAMES AS ISLAM...THAT JUST SHOWS YOUR INADEQUACY IN THIS AREA, BECAUSE ONLY THESE
REPRESENT ISLAM GO AND READ A LITTLE BIT OF THIS Template:Islam (in FRENCH) 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC) YOU ARE ASKING ABSCURD QUESTIONS AND EVEN THIS SHOWS YOR INCOMPETANCY IN THE AREA IF YOU ARE GOINGTO PREPARE IT DO IT PROPERLY YOU ARE NOT THE ONE WHO WILL DECIDE ON THIS JUST LESS THAN 0,1% OCCUPIES YOUR TEMPLATE: THIS
CAN YOU TELL ME WHO ARE THESE GUYS AN WHY SHALL WE LEARN ABOUT THEM??? 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
we have a template for sunni as well you can delete it since totally abscurd! 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
The following groups have larger populations...
- Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij
- IF YOU CANT PUT UNDER THESE GROUPS
- THEN EITHER (1) IT'S NOT ISLAM
- OR (2) IS A NEWLY EMERGED TARIQA WHOSE PATH IS A SPECIAL WAY probably un divine one i.e. it's divinity is an open ended question..
- YOU HAVE TO THEN RE-GROUPS THESE SPECIAL so-called TARIQA
- what you have to do is to invent a new TITLE for these residual groups
- WHO CLAIM THEMSELVES AS A PART OF THE Dīn of Islam
- A PROPER TITLE MAY THE unclassified tariqah of islam
- QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE RESIDUAL GROUPS
- ANSWER: According to your template is the following ones
- Aḥmadī movement,
- Din-e Ilahi (add),
- Khojas (add),
- Nation of Islam,
- Five-Percent Nation,
- Malcolm X (add),
- Mahdavia
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 20:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij
- IF YOU CANT PUT UNDER THESE GROUPS
- THEN EITHER (1) IT'S NOT ISLAM
- OR (2) IS A NEWLY EMERGED TARIQA WHOSE PATH IS A SPECIAL WAY probably un divine one i.e. it's divinity is an open ended question..
- YOU HAVE TO THEN RE-GROUPS THESE SPECIAL so-called TARIQA
- what you have to do is to invent a new TITLE for these residual groups
- WHO CLAIM THEMSELVES AS A PART OF THE Dīn of Islam
- A PROPER TITLE MAY THE unclassified tariqah of islam
- QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE RESIDUAL GROUPS
- ANSWER: According to your template is the following ones
- Aḥmadī movement,
- Din-e Ilahi (add),
- Khojas (add),
- Nation of Islam,
- Five-Percent Nation,
- Malcolm X (add),
- Mahdavia
you already failed!
- Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij
- IF YOU CANT PUT UNDER THESE GROUPS
- THEN EITHER (1) IT'S NOT ISLAM
- OR (2) IS A NEWLY EMERGED TARIQA WHOSE PATH IS A SPECIAL WAY probably un divine one i.e. it's divinity is an open ended question..
- YOU HAVE TO THEN RE-GROUPS THESE SPECIAL so-called TARIQA
- what you have to do is to invent a new TITLE for these residual groups
- WHO CLAIM THEMSELVES AS A PART OF THE Dīn of Islam
- A PROPER TITLE MAY THE unclassified tariqah of islam
- QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE RESIDUAL GROUPS
- ANSWER: According to your template is the following ones
- Aḥmadī movement,
- Din-e Ilahi (add),
- Khojas (add),
- Nation of Islam,
- Five-Percent Nation,
- Malcolm X (add),
- Mahdavia
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 22:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
in case of help dont hesitate to ask me but you should make the necessary corrections instead of getting angry
I mentioned you at ANI, in regards to the IP spamming on your and Dougweller's talk pages, as well as a template talk page and general... confusion on his part. Ian.thomson ( talk) 00:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
-- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 06:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Noticeboard#Userspace drafts. John Carter ( talk) 15:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Equating COI editing to driving while intoxicated and potentially killing people is entirely inappropriate. Please do not restore the image.--v/r - T P 03:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Please read up on WP:OUTCOMES before nominating articles for deletion. You may be able to yourself and other editors some work. Thanks. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The following message left on my talk page may be of interest to you too:
"This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Historicity of Jesus". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! MrScorch6200 ( talk | ctrb) 20:36, 3 August 2014 (UTC)"
Martijn Meijering ( talk) 00:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I saw on WP:SHARED that in 2012 you mentioned you have access to Springer Link. Is that still the case? If so, would you be able to provide me access to this article? I want to verify that all the information from Sexual dysfunction that's attributed the source is actually present in the article. A pdf would be ideal, but any kind of access would be wonderful. I do have email enabled, or you can reply here. Thank you! :) cymru.lass ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I assume you are maintaining Template:Bibleverse/Bibleversefinder. Please note that the NAB link is dead, but it can be found at Biblegateway and at [7]. Also the New Jerusalem Bible is missing but can be found at [8]. Thanks. trespassers william ( talk) 00:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
gift on ideas
Thank you for quality articles on philosphy and its people, such as
On Ideas and
On the Pathos of Truth, for fighting for verifiability and "Dialogue should be conducted with freedom, but decisions should be constrained by reason", for
adding a bird, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:33, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 642nd recipient of my Sky Prize, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Six years ago, you were recipient no. 642 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
http://tools.wmflabs.org/bibleversefinder
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.
We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.
If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.
Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)
You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.
First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.
Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.
Best regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Redwingedblackbird1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Template:Citeplaton has been nominated for merging with Template:Citeplato. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Template:Citebukhari has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:Upgradestiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 16:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation has invited the various Wikimedia communities, including the English Wikipedia, to participate in a consultation on improving communication methods within the Wikimedia projects. As such, a request for comment has been created at Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019. You are invited to express your views in the discussion. ~ Winged Blades Godric 05:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Seven years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Template:Citeplato has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dan from A.P. ( talk) 10:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Coi hatnote has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{ Nihiltres | talk | edits}} 16:59, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
|
|||
Howdy. It looks like your tool labs tools are offline following the data center migration. I suspect all that's needed is for you to follow the instructions at wikitech:Tool_Labs/Migration_to_eqiad#Tools_webpage_shows:_No_webservice. Cheers. - TB ( talk) 13:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
A content dispute resolution process has been started at [1]. Please participate and contribute to a resolution. Wdford ( talk) 16:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Christ myth theory". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 05:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
On 13 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The American Religion, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the same year Bill Clinton was elected, Harold Bloom wrote in The American Religion that he feared there would never be another Democrat US President in his lifetime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The American Religion. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
slakr\ talk / 02:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).== Notification of automated file description generation ==
Your upload of
File:Cfflowtest3.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for the source help, I appreciate it! :bloodofox: ( talk) 02:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |
Thank you for taking the semantic issues there seriously. It's heartening but all too rare to come across editors who understand that words have meaning and that meaning matters. Regardless of how it comes out (I'm betting on "no consensus," as always), discussing it with you is the kind of experience that makes editing here worthwhile to me.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 01:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination). Thanks. MarkBernstein ( talk) 21:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
What gives? Seems like wikihow would be ok.
50.242.132.209 ( talk) 19:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thanks, take care [2] And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. [3] And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever. [4] But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
50.242.132.209 ( talk) 14:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Pseudoscientific astronomers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, along with two related categories. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 22:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Muhammad calligraphy.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Genesis 17:15 produces this URL:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/bibleversefinder/?book=Genesis&verse=17%3A15&src=
which resulted in:
No webservice
The URI you have requested, /bibleversefinder/?book=Genesis&verse=17%3A15&src=, is not currently serviced.
If you have reached this page from somewhere else...
This URI is part of the bibleversefinder tool, maintained by Atethnekos.
That tool might not have a web interface, or it may currently be disabled.
If you're pretty sure this shouldn't be an error, you may wish to notify the tool's maintainers (above) about the error and how you ended up here.
If you maintain this tool
You have not enabled a web service for your tool, or it has stopped working because of a fatal error. You may wish to check your logs or common causes for errors in the help documentation.
YOU MAY USE ALL THESE INFO THERE
| list5 =
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 21:05, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 05:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Of the total Muslim population, 11-12% are Shia Muslims and 87-88% are Sunni Muslims.
Five-Percent Nation, Mahdavia AND Ahmadiyya is not amongst them.... 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
This is something like Bahá'í Faith and Bábism which is not Muslim belief. Ahmadiyya is a NEW RELIGION with its own prophet...similar to Bahá'í Faith and Bábism which have their own prophet. Otherwise Judaism and christianity are supposed to be the same religion.. 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 05:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite encyclopedia}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help) --
Atethnekos (
Discussion,
Contributions) 05:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)YOU CAN PUT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE with these Five-Percent Nation and Mahdavia..wherever they belong to!! otherwise YOU ARE CREATING new CATEGORIZATION??? 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
if you write ahmadiyya then YOU HAVE TO WRITE Alevi, Alawi, Druze, Nizari as well!!! 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
in your template:
BIGGER COMMUNITIES AND MADHHABS ARE NOT SHOWN.....
You are putting less important and small communities LIKE
as if they are MAJOR branches.... 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 09:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 09:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite encyclopedia}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help) That's a citation from a reliable source which says that Aḥmadiyya is a part of Islam. --
Atethnekos (
Discussion,
Contributions) 16:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)The following groups have larger populations...
HAVE more members than Ahmadiyya, BUT YOU NEVER MENTION ABOUT THEM IN THE TEMPLATE!!!
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 19:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
YOU HAVE TO CLASSIFY ALL SECTS UNDER ONE OF THESE:
WHY DONT YOU MENTION ABOUT THE FOLLOWING:
AS YOU DID IN Ahmadiyya 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 22:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
WHICH ARE NOT IN THE TEMPLATE WHY DONT YOU PUT OR LIST THEM IF AHMEDISM IS ANOTHER SECT PUT IT SOMEWHERE BUT IT ISNT THE EQUIV OF sunni more than a billion nor equiv of shi'ite more than a 100 million
according to your logic?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 23:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Similarly you have a private template of Ahmadiyya as well. Therefore you cant put them there otherwise you have to put Druze & Nizari ++ Alevi & Alawi as well they are on Ismaili template O.K. Ahmadiyya is on Ahmadiyya template do you understand?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 23:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Islam (FRENCH) SO THAT you may perform the necessary corrections 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 01:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
if you claim that it can NOT be put under one of these titles, then it is a new religion, but not islam.
Alevi, Alawi, Druze, Nizari, Assasins, Gulen movement under one of these THREE main branches, namely Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij, in a similar way, you can classify Aḥmadī movement under one of them. If you claim that it is so special and cannot be classified under one of the 3 main branches of Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij; then the members of these groups, namely Alevi, Alawi, Druze, Nizari, Assasins, Gulen movement CAN CLAIM that they are very special as well. In that case, the names of Gulen movement, Alevi, Alawi, Druze, etc. SHOULD BE written besides the Aḥmadī movement, this is my opinion.
SEE: Template:Islam (in FRENCH) 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 05:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
yOUR Aḥmadī movement is just an equivalent of the following:
And you are just missing them..THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE, YOU HAVE TO LIST THEM AS WELL..AS THEY DID IN Template:Islam (in FRENCH) you are just incorrectly copying from other sourses 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
YES ISLAM IS A PART OF THESE THINGS:
BECAUSE YOUR TEMPLATE JUST GIVES THEIR NAMES AS ISLAM...THAT JUST SHOWS YOUR INADEQUACY IN THIS AREA, BECAUSE ONLY THESE
REPRESENT ISLAM GO AND READ A LITTLE BIT OF THIS Template:Islam (in FRENCH) 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC) YOU ARE ASKING ABSCURD QUESTIONS AND EVEN THIS SHOWS YOR INCOMPETANCY IN THE AREA IF YOU ARE GOINGTO PREPARE IT DO IT PROPERLY YOU ARE NOT THE ONE WHO WILL DECIDE ON THIS JUST LESS THAN 0,1% OCCUPIES YOUR TEMPLATE: THIS
CAN YOU TELL ME WHO ARE THESE GUYS AN WHY SHALL WE LEARN ABOUT THEM??? 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
we have a template for sunni as well you can delete it since totally abscurd! 68.100.172.139 ( talk) 08:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
The following groups have larger populations...
- Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij
- IF YOU CANT PUT UNDER THESE GROUPS
- THEN EITHER (1) IT'S NOT ISLAM
- OR (2) IS A NEWLY EMERGED TARIQA WHOSE PATH IS A SPECIAL WAY probably un divine one i.e. it's divinity is an open ended question..
- YOU HAVE TO THEN RE-GROUPS THESE SPECIAL so-called TARIQA
- what you have to do is to invent a new TITLE for these residual groups
- WHO CLAIM THEMSELVES AS A PART OF THE Dīn of Islam
- A PROPER TITLE MAY THE unclassified tariqah of islam
- QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE RESIDUAL GROUPS
- ANSWER: According to your template is the following ones
- Aḥmadī movement,
- Din-e Ilahi (add),
- Khojas (add),
- Nation of Islam,
- Five-Percent Nation,
- Malcolm X (add),
- Mahdavia
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 20:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij
- IF YOU CANT PUT UNDER THESE GROUPS
- THEN EITHER (1) IT'S NOT ISLAM
- OR (2) IS A NEWLY EMERGED TARIQA WHOSE PATH IS A SPECIAL WAY probably un divine one i.e. it's divinity is an open ended question..
- YOU HAVE TO THEN RE-GROUPS THESE SPECIAL so-called TARIQA
- what you have to do is to invent a new TITLE for these residual groups
- WHO CLAIM THEMSELVES AS A PART OF THE Dīn of Islam
- A PROPER TITLE MAY THE unclassified tariqah of islam
- QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE RESIDUAL GROUPS
- ANSWER: According to your template is the following ones
- Aḥmadī movement,
- Din-e Ilahi (add),
- Khojas (add),
- Nation of Islam,
- Five-Percent Nation,
- Malcolm X (add),
- Mahdavia
you already failed!
- Sunni - Shi'ite - Khawarij
- IF YOU CANT PUT UNDER THESE GROUPS
- THEN EITHER (1) IT'S NOT ISLAM
- OR (2) IS A NEWLY EMERGED TARIQA WHOSE PATH IS A SPECIAL WAY probably un divine one i.e. it's divinity is an open ended question..
- YOU HAVE TO THEN RE-GROUPS THESE SPECIAL so-called TARIQA
- what you have to do is to invent a new TITLE for these residual groups
- WHO CLAIM THEMSELVES AS A PART OF THE Dīn of Islam
- A PROPER TITLE MAY THE unclassified tariqah of islam
- QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE RESIDUAL GROUPS
- ANSWER: According to your template is the following ones
- Aḥmadī movement,
- Din-e Ilahi (add),
- Khojas (add),
- Nation of Islam,
- Five-Percent Nation,
- Malcolm X (add),
- Mahdavia
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 22:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
in case of help dont hesitate to ask me but you should make the necessary corrections instead of getting angry
I mentioned you at ANI, in regards to the IP spamming on your and Dougweller's talk pages, as well as a template talk page and general... confusion on his part. Ian.thomson ( talk) 00:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
-- Iryna Harpy ( talk) 06:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Noticeboard#Userspace drafts. John Carter ( talk) 15:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Equating COI editing to driving while intoxicated and potentially killing people is entirely inappropriate. Please do not restore the image.--v/r - T P 03:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Please read up on WP:OUTCOMES before nominating articles for deletion. You may be able to yourself and other editors some work. Thanks. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The following message left on my talk page may be of interest to you too:
"This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Historicity of Jesus". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! MrScorch6200 ( talk | ctrb) 20:36, 3 August 2014 (UTC)"
Martijn Meijering ( talk) 00:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I saw on WP:SHARED that in 2012 you mentioned you have access to Springer Link. Is that still the case? If so, would you be able to provide me access to this article? I want to verify that all the information from Sexual dysfunction that's attributed the source is actually present in the article. A pdf would be ideal, but any kind of access would be wonderful. I do have email enabled, or you can reply here. Thank you! :) cymru.lass ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
I assume you are maintaining Template:Bibleverse/Bibleversefinder. Please note that the NAB link is dead, but it can be found at Biblegateway and at [7]. Also the New Jerusalem Bible is missing but can be found at [8]. Thanks. trespassers william ( talk) 00:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
gift on ideas
Thank you for quality articles on philosphy and its people, such as
On Ideas and
On the Pathos of Truth, for fighting for verifiability and "Dialogue should be conducted with freedom, but decisions should be constrained by reason", for
adding a bird, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:33, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 642nd recipient of my Sky Prize, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Six years ago, you were recipient no. 642 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
http://tools.wmflabs.org/bibleversefinder
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.
We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.
If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.
Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)
You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.
First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.
Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.
Best regards, TransporterMan ( talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Redwingedblackbird1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Template:Citeplaton has been nominated for merging with Template:Citeplato. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Template:Citebukhari has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:Upgradestiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 16:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation has invited the various Wikimedia communities, including the English Wikipedia, to participate in a consultation on improving communication methods within the Wikimedia projects. As such, a request for comment has been created at Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019. You are invited to express your views in the discussion. ~ Winged Blades Godric 05:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Seven years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Template:Citeplato has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dan from A.P. ( talk) 10:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Coi hatnote has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{ Nihiltres | talk | edits}} 16:59, 7 September 2022 (UTC)