I prefer to keep discussions in one place. This means if you post on my talk page, I'll reply here, unless you specify otherwise. If I post on yours, please reply there. (But please leave me a talkback!)
I am highly forgetful. {{
reply}}, {{
reply}}, {{
reply}}. Please. Even when it's a discussion on a Template talk:, Wikipedia talk:, or Talk: page.
Please don't revert petty talkpage vandalism or personal attacks, unless it targets someone besides me, violates
WP:BLP and/or
outs me. I can handle nasty comments, and I'm really big on transparency/keeping all comments accessible. That said, I might collapse a section with particularly nasty comments, but I generally won't remove the comments. (I reserve the right to go back on this if it's something outrageously egregious.)
I'm (relatively) smart. That said, I sometimes often make stupid mistakes. Please assume good faith. If you believe I've made a mistake, let me know. Also, link to policy/guideline/essay pages so I can read up on where I went wrong. I'll set about fixing my mistake as soon as I can. I'm very nice and I don't bite. People who don't
assume good faith make me a bit angry, though.
You don't have to let me know about declined speedy nominations if it's not because I screwed up. I usually don't watchlist pages I've nommed for speedy deletion unless I think the page creator might remove the speedy tag. That said, I'm completely open to being contacted about why you declined my speedy, especially if it's because I made an error in judgement. I do that sometimes, and I'd like to do it less, so any comments about why my nomination wasn't valid. If, however, it's just a matter of me A7-ing an article which subsequently got improved, don't feel like you have to notify me.
Talking to me:
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then notify my talk page.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{
Talkback|Cymru.lass}} on your talkpage.
If I maintain the page as it was and re-draft it in an article space, can it be deleted again?
The draft of the page Goest Ryder still indicates the article is under review and can take upto 6 weeks for the review results. I do not understand this.
And is it possible to tag an administrator for article review, when it is being submitted for review. Thank again.
Goest Ryder (
talk) 21:44, 18 January 2019 (UTC)reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the page.
This is
Cymru.lass's
talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Cymru.lass.
I prefer to keep discussions in one place. This means if you post on my talk page, I'll reply here, unless you specify otherwise. If I post on yours, please reply there. (But please leave me a talkback!)
I am highly forgetful. {{
reply}}, {{
reply}}, {{
reply}}. Please. Even when it's a discussion on a Template talk:, Wikipedia talk:, or Talk: page.
Please don't revert petty talkpage vandalism or personal attacks, unless it targets someone besides me, violates
WP:BLP and/or
outs me. I can handle nasty comments, and I'm really big on transparency/keeping all comments accessible. That said, I might collapse a section with particularly nasty comments, but I generally won't remove the comments. (I reserve the right to go back on this if it's something outrageously egregious.)
I'm (relatively) smart. That said, I sometimes often make stupid mistakes. Please assume good faith. If you believe I've made a mistake, let me know. Also, link to policy/guideline/essay pages so I can read up on where I went wrong. I'll set about fixing my mistake as soon as I can. I'm very nice and I don't bite. People who don't
assume good faith make me a bit angry, though.
You don't have to let me know about declined speedy nominations if it's not because I screwed up. I usually don't watchlist pages I've nommed for speedy deletion unless I think the page creator might remove the speedy tag. That said, I'm completely open to being contacted about why you declined my speedy, especially if it's because I made an error in judgement. I do that sometimes, and I'd like to do it less, so any comments about why my nomination wasn't valid. If, however, it's just a matter of me A7-ing an article which subsequently got improved, don't feel like you have to notify me.
Talking to me:
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then notify my talk page.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{
Talkback|Cymru.lass}} on your talkpage.
If I maintain the page as it was and re-draft it in an article space, can it be deleted again?
The draft of the page Goest Ryder still indicates the article is under review and can take upto 6 weeks for the review results. I do not understand this.
And is it possible to tag an administrator for article review, when it is being submitted for review. Thank again.
Goest Ryder (
talk) 21:44, 18 January 2019 (UTC)reply
