![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Titodutta ( talk) 16:34, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Please change total state in india 28 and ut 9 after article 370 remove from India constitute 05-08-2019
States and union territories of India Ramdayalhb ( talk) 01:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Here are links supporting the changes i had made
3. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/nationald-herald-subramanian-swamy-rahul-sonia-gandhi-5569112/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntu129 ( talk • contribs) 07:40, 11 August 2019 (UTC) @ Ntu129:
I have added the citation now.
Ntu129 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added
08:32, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I found this https://www.nba.com/article/2019/08/10/report-michael-beasley-reaches-1-year-deal-detroit-pistons before I accepted, seems correct? I was just about to add it when you reverted. Govindaharihari ( talk) 12:13, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey I just edited the Jodhaa Akhbar page to include the two National Film Awards, how do I do the citations? Rocknrollprincess131 ( talk) 05:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pandua ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Please refer to the article on the talk page I created to see why I removed the "greatest threat" section
212.129.83.171 ( talk) 18:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Nice job on your most recent article. Keep contributing! Cheers. Lefcentreright ( talk) 15:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC) |
I definitely stated the reason for my edit. Perhaps you did not read it. I stated that Lal Kot is a different place. Lal Kot is not Red Fort. History of Lal Kot and other places in Mehrauli region of Delhi is not the history of Red Fort. Please read the Wikipedia article Mehrauli. - Ravindra Rao Rao Ravindra ( talk) 09:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
I could template you for adding poorly sourced content against policy but then, as you should know, templating regulars is frowned upon. So, I suggest you resist the temptation to do it yourself. DrKay ( talk) 09:27, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Kolkata shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay ( talk) 09:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I very strongly protest against your insinuation that I should have been trying to erase information about human rights abuses under false pretexts. I've been editing this wikipedia since 2005, so I am quite aware of the policies.
I was trying to use the "undo" function since some fool had removed the flag of a first order administrative division ( Jammu and Kashmir) falsely citing policy that flags of such entities were outlawed. Such flags are quite allowed, see e.g. the articles about US states, Baden-Wurttemberg or Northumberland. As you know, the undo function breaks when others make conflicting edits, so it was quite a sensible thing to do to do a revert to the last non-broken version, since making copy-paste edits is hell when dealing with infoboxes. Valentinian T / C 11:03, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Greetings, you may also discuss at Talk:Kolkata#Recent_edits_19_August_2019. Regards. -- Titodutta ( talk) 11:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I was off wiki for couple of days. I will read the thread and respond later sometime. I reiterate that I consider it a trivial dispute. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 08:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
On 31 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill introduced in 2019 by the Indian parliament has been met with protests and criticism by the queer community? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Titodutta ( talk) 11:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for all you do around here! S0091 ( talk) 20:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC) |
You are most welcome sir.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
11:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
the current section is inaccurate (bipolar is not mentioned) and unstructured. why did you revert the improvements? JCJC777 ( talk) 21:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I recently saw that you changed my edit on the no. of Tejas ordered by Indian Air Force. The update I made was accurate, why did you change it ?. Bikram Bagani ( talk) 03:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
— Newslinger talk 07:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I did check MOS:LEADBIO before adding the tag. Name of wife and surviving family members in the lead section can very well go into the "Personal life" section. This detail doesn't help to establish his notability. Have a great day. Csgir ( talk) 07:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Titodutta ( talk) 07:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Over the last few days, I have been checking your GA noms. Good work. Is there something where you need a hand. You asked help but I dont see how I can help there. regards. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 11:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
On 9 September 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ram Jethmalani, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 20:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey dude, I was just seeking for some knowledge or understandings of how to make sure that the references which are cited with any information is reliable or valid. Because in past few weeks, the information I've added with resources are being removed or reverted by few editors stating they are snippets from Google books or from Raj Era. But does that mean all the historical records of Raj Era are 100% false? Just needed your help regarding this. HinduKshatrana ( talk) 07:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Tamravidhir,
This was regarding my last edit on wikipage Balaji Telefilms where you undid the list of references added by me to the page. Could you please let me know the reason as to why the list of references were removed and how the sources were not reliable.
Thanks & Regards, User: Noormohammed satya Noormohammed satya ( talk) 08:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gateway of India you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk)
06:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
i am fixing references in my user space ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Do you mind explaining non-relevant sources and not-constructive edits that I made to the RAW article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.222.27.228 ( talk) 18:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:SORTKEY 97.85.251.254 ( talk) 03:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
You hastily removed my pending edit on No Country for Old Men in two hours. You are invited to join the talk section I created to discuss this removal. 73.159.229.5 ( talk) 07:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey. I haven't forgotten you at all. I became unexpectedly busy with other articles. I have you in mind though. I will get back to you... ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 04:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
( ←) I don't know. But there are many missing references on that article, and the reason they are missing is because someone moved text from other articles, such as Navaratri, and didn'talso move the corresponding references, such as Bradley 2012 (which I just now added, so you can see what I am talking about)... ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk)
Just for your concern, check this and this one too. I’ve added controversy section on Sadhvi Pragya and Nithyananda too. I add it when someone is in News.— Harshil want to talk? 09:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
You need better sources. Go to Google Scholar and carefully choose a few. Then request them at WP:RX. Don't request irrelevant ones.. these look good:
♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
The article
Gateway of India you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Gateway of India for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk)
20:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Namaste, Tamravidhir. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with Indian clothing customs. In the "Social disruption" section of Bengal famine of 1943 there is a photo that Fowler&fowler (who is on wikibreak, and I do not wish to disturb him) has labeled " Destitute mother and child Bengal famine 1943". Following this description, I made the alt text: "Alt text: Old photograph of a woman squatting and tiny, emaciated toddler standing on a sidewalk. The woman is shirtless but squatting to conceal her breasts. The toddler is wearing rags." But ... you know... those arms look kinda muscular, and so does the back.. the face is a bit unclear and a bit androgynous, so might be a young man, maybe late teens (?) .. do the bracelets definitely mark the wearer as female? ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 06:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
|
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Diwali!!! | |
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous
Diwali.
|
DBig Xrayᗙ 07:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
On 18 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gateway of India, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the last British troops left India in 1948, post independence, from the Gateway of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gateway of India. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Gateway of India), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Titodutta ( talk) 16:34, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Please change total state in india 28 and ut 9 after article 370 remove from India constitute 05-08-2019
States and union territories of India Ramdayalhb ( talk) 01:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Here are links supporting the changes i had made
3. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/nationald-herald-subramanian-swamy-rahul-sonia-gandhi-5569112/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntu129 ( talk • contribs) 07:40, 11 August 2019 (UTC) @ Ntu129:
I have added the citation now.
Ntu129 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added
08:32, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I found this https://www.nba.com/article/2019/08/10/report-michael-beasley-reaches-1-year-deal-detroit-pistons before I accepted, seems correct? I was just about to add it when you reverted. Govindaharihari ( talk) 12:13, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey I just edited the Jodhaa Akhbar page to include the two National Film Awards, how do I do the citations? Rocknrollprincess131 ( talk) 05:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pandua ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Please refer to the article on the talk page I created to see why I removed the "greatest threat" section
212.129.83.171 ( talk) 18:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Nice job on your most recent article. Keep contributing! Cheers. Lefcentreright ( talk) 15:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC) |
I definitely stated the reason for my edit. Perhaps you did not read it. I stated that Lal Kot is a different place. Lal Kot is not Red Fort. History of Lal Kot and other places in Mehrauli region of Delhi is not the history of Red Fort. Please read the Wikipedia article Mehrauli. - Ravindra Rao Rao Ravindra ( talk) 09:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
I could template you for adding poorly sourced content against policy but then, as you should know, templating regulars is frowned upon. So, I suggest you resist the temptation to do it yourself. DrKay ( talk) 09:27, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Kolkata shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay ( talk) 09:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I very strongly protest against your insinuation that I should have been trying to erase information about human rights abuses under false pretexts. I've been editing this wikipedia since 2005, so I am quite aware of the policies.
I was trying to use the "undo" function since some fool had removed the flag of a first order administrative division ( Jammu and Kashmir) falsely citing policy that flags of such entities were outlawed. Such flags are quite allowed, see e.g. the articles about US states, Baden-Wurttemberg or Northumberland. As you know, the undo function breaks when others make conflicting edits, so it was quite a sensible thing to do to do a revert to the last non-broken version, since making copy-paste edits is hell when dealing with infoboxes. Valentinian T / C 11:03, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Greetings, you may also discuss at Talk:Kolkata#Recent_edits_19_August_2019. Regards. -- Titodutta ( talk) 11:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I was off wiki for couple of days. I will read the thread and respond later sometime. I reiterate that I consider it a trivial dispute. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 08:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
On 31 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill introduced in 2019 by the Indian parliament has been met with protests and criticism by the queer community? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Titodutta ( talk) 11:56, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for all you do around here! S0091 ( talk) 20:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC) |
You are most welcome sir.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
11:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
the current section is inaccurate (bipolar is not mentioned) and unstructured. why did you revert the improvements? JCJC777 ( talk) 21:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I recently saw that you changed my edit on the no. of Tejas ordered by Indian Air Force. The update I made was accurate, why did you change it ?. Bikram Bagani ( talk) 03:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
— Newslinger talk 07:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I did check MOS:LEADBIO before adding the tag. Name of wife and surviving family members in the lead section can very well go into the "Personal life" section. This detail doesn't help to establish his notability. Have a great day. Csgir ( talk) 07:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Titodutta ( talk) 07:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Over the last few days, I have been checking your GA noms. Good work. Is there something where you need a hand. You asked help but I dont see how I can help there. regards. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 11:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
On 9 September 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ram Jethmalani, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 20:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey dude, I was just seeking for some knowledge or understandings of how to make sure that the references which are cited with any information is reliable or valid. Because in past few weeks, the information I've added with resources are being removed or reverted by few editors stating they are snippets from Google books or from Raj Era. But does that mean all the historical records of Raj Era are 100% false? Just needed your help regarding this. HinduKshatrana ( talk) 07:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Tamravidhir,
This was regarding my last edit on wikipage Balaji Telefilms where you undid the list of references added by me to the page. Could you please let me know the reason as to why the list of references were removed and how the sources were not reliable.
Thanks & Regards, User: Noormohammed satya Noormohammed satya ( talk) 08:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gateway of India you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk)
06:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
i am fixing references in my user space ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Do you mind explaining non-relevant sources and not-constructive edits that I made to the RAW article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.222.27.228 ( talk) 18:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:SORTKEY 97.85.251.254 ( talk) 03:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
You hastily removed my pending edit on No Country for Old Men in two hours. You are invited to join the talk section I created to discuss this removal. 73.159.229.5 ( talk) 07:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey. I haven't forgotten you at all. I became unexpectedly busy with other articles. I have you in mind though. I will get back to you... ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 04:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
( ←) I don't know. But there are many missing references on that article, and the reason they are missing is because someone moved text from other articles, such as Navaratri, and didn'talso move the corresponding references, such as Bradley 2012 (which I just now added, so you can see what I am talking about)... ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk)
Just for your concern, check this and this one too. I’ve added controversy section on Sadhvi Pragya and Nithyananda too. I add it when someone is in News.— Harshil want to talk? 09:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
You need better sources. Go to Google Scholar and carefully choose a few. Then request them at WP:RX. Don't request irrelevant ones.. these look good:
♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
The article
Gateway of India you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Gateway of India for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
KJP1 --
KJP1 (
talk)
20:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Namaste, Tamravidhir. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with Indian clothing customs. In the "Social disruption" section of Bengal famine of 1943 there is a photo that Fowler&fowler (who is on wikibreak, and I do not wish to disturb him) has labeled " Destitute mother and child Bengal famine 1943". Following this description, I made the alt text: "Alt text: Old photograph of a woman squatting and tiny, emaciated toddler standing on a sidewalk. The woman is shirtless but squatting to conceal her breasts. The toddler is wearing rags." But ... you know... those arms look kinda muscular, and so does the back.. the face is a bit unclear and a bit androgynous, so might be a young man, maybe late teens (?) .. do the bracelets definitely mark the wearer as female? ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 06:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
|
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Diwali!!! | |
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous
Diwali.
|
DBig Xrayᗙ 07:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
On 18 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gateway of India, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the last British troops left India in 1948, post independence, from the Gateway of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gateway of India. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Gateway of India), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)