![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... I'm trying to edit Harwich Mayflower Project to display the title as Harwich Mayflower Project (the Mayflower in the title is a ship). My edit here didn't work with a red error message so I undid it. The article has a template Infobox ship begin, but another edit here to attempt to add a parameter didn't work either. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-barrelroll.dev ( talk) 03:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Chesebrough, Shhhnotsoloud!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this disambiguation page!
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Elliot321 ( talk) 12:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor barnstar |
For fastidiously following process and AfD'ing a clearly extra Deep One (disambiguation) even though the previous AfD had been 11 years ago. Jclemens ( talk) 16:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi, I've noticed you have prodded a lot of pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title on the grounds that they only disambiguate two articles. These articles qualify for speedy deletion under WP:G6, as uncontroversial maintenance, since most if not all of the articles you have nominated have a clear primary topic and the dab page only lists one article in addition to the primary topic. I tagged a bunch of your prods the other day and found quite a few more again today. Hope this helps. — KuyaBriBri Talk 00:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Kuyabribri and Shhh, Shhh is right that a WP:2DABS situation doesn't meet the criteria at Template:db-disambig and so should be prodded. Some of these I've speedied (like Dujiangyan (disambiguation)) because they contained a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and a partial match. That one was removed because although it looked like a partial match, the creator asserted that it is commonly known by the shortened version. Boleyn ( talk) 10:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello Shhhnotsoloud. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Uhuru (wholefoods shop), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previous version of article contains a book source, so significance might exist. Use WP:AFD instead. Thank you. So Why 07:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
I would like to inform you that your technical move request is Done. -- Kostas20142 ( talk) 10:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Hero-class patrol vessel, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Ship classes are not italicized if they are not named after a ship
Llammakey (
talk)
15:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar | |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. For managing to find, and then appropriately deal with, a huge number of wrongly-created disambiguation pages. Boleyn ( talk) 09:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- There'sNoTime ( to explain) 10:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Well done, I'm glad you got the rights. Don't thank me though, the articles were too good to need reviewing. Boleyn ( talk) 18:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Good evening Shhhnotsoloud. I declined your CSD of Noctorum (band) because there's a credible claim of significance as one of the band's members has an article. If you still want to try deletion, I suggest you take it to AFD, though there's always the possibility of redirecting it to Marty_Willson-Piper#Solo_career_and_Noctorum. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello Shhhnotsoloud. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tihama (company), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previously decllined in 2006, thus not eligible for speedy deletion. Thank you. So Why 15:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello there:
Thanks for
your note about this; I have replied at
the AfD. Regards,
Swanny18 (
talk)
21:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
PS: Just to let you know, I've deleted the notability tag on this page, for the reason given. Also, (without wishing to be stalkerish in any way) I've edited The Representative (disambiguation) and Újpest (disambiguation) (which you had also prodded), and I've left a note at Talk:Rebus (TV series), if you wish to comment. I thought I should let you know. Regards, Swanny18 ( talk) 00:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Warren Church. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a
bot about
this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
15:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sweatman (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Sweatman (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Peter James ( talk) 12:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
This is a marginal case, but I have heard locals and blogs talk about "TCR" and mean Tottenham Court Road for years. You won't find it very much in respected sources, but it does crop up enough to be a cursory mention. Still, I'm not going to re-revert if you disagree and revert back. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for closing the old merge proposal on Flag of Nigeria (1914–1960). Just wanted to ask a favour, would you be able to close the merge proposal on Triangular corner flags in English football please as the consensus on the merge proposal is against merging? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The C of E ( talk • contribs) 16:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pennie Lane Trumbull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
91.252.115.143 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
filter log ·
WHOIS ·
RDNS ·
RBLs ·
http ·
block user ·
block log) Should have warnings before being reported. I templated 91.252.115.143 with {{
uw-selfrevert}}
Not sure if more can be done. I don't think the AIV report will be acted on. Cheers
Jim1138 (
talk)
09:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Isa Mine Early Infrastructure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uskside ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I was hasty in my revert there - should have assumed you were working on the disambiguation page and given you a while to finish. Girth Summit 16:41, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ford (crossing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford River ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey there. A question about why you deleted the mention to DC Comic's character in Red Lion. I don't really know why the character should be mentioned in the wiki pages i referred to. It is already known that Deathstroke's page has to be updated to include Rebirth and the character of Red Lion appeared in Rebirth. Honestly I think that updating what's missing rather that removing honest contributions (it's not even vandalism) would be way more interesting for Wikipedia. -- EyedMoon ( talk) 14:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry if my edit summaries were a bit curt - but most people editing this one have been vandals. Noticed after a couple of reverts that this is most definitely not the case here, in fact "disambigging" is your speciality, so I've had a "second look", at the MOS in particular, but I and really can't see that the "original text" contravenes anything important. Not all DAB pages will necessarily follow exactly the same format. Anyway, I do wish you could have a good look at the layout here and see why we chose to bring "logically related" lines together. If you strongly disagree - it might bean idea to more this to the talk page for the article and thrash it out there. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 12:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to change a redirect, please do it correctly and move the page to the new target. The way you did broke a few things. -- Gonnym ( talk) 19:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
| 94.21.204.175 ( talk) 16:33, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Is your username a reference to the classic dry martini joke? My fave! -- В²C ☎ 01:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
It occured to me that you or someone else who cares could go through List of ELCA synods and rename each synod to have ELCA in front of the synod. Except for the Slovak Zion Synod, none of them used to be separate denominations, and to the best of my knowledge none of them have had a rocky relationship with the main denomination. Maybe Slovak Zion Synod should be left alone. In other words, the ELCA synods they are more clearly middle judicatories than the LCMS districts.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 20:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bassem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basim ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying me. Wikipedia is a collective work and any contributions including yours are always welcome. I like the fact you always explain your moves with references to approved Wikipedia policies. At the end, nothing is set in stone. I created new pages and improve on existing pages by contributing my share... and you do yours. werldwayd ( talk) 20:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Shhhnotsoloud! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Latifa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latifa Al Maktoum ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi,
you closed the RFC at Cossack Hetmanate as no consensus, though if we summarize the votes the support for merge surpass the opposers..as far as I know, in case one side have majority, it means it is accepted, or? Thank You( KIENGIR ( talk) 14:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC))
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi - you gently reverted [ [1]] my removal of a red-linked item from a DAB page. I was unaware of the MOS:DABRL guideline and had never done the "what links here" to check for the presence of a red-link in an article for this particular scenario, so thanks for pointing it out. I posted a question on the DABRL talk page before I saw from your user banner that you are a DAB expert, so you are probably right, but I'm wondering whether a list qualifies as an article. It seems that a non-notable entry could spam a dab page and list by simply adding itself to two pages. Whatever the consensus, this at least is an opportunity to tighten the guidelines and remove any inherent vagueness. Cheers. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 21:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, @ Shhhnotsoloud:
I've seen you reverse my edition on the disambiguation page Delegation (disambiguation). I want to explain the reason for my edition. If you carefully review the page, you will see a link to the set index article (SIA) Delegation (computing). This article contains multiple links to related concepts that have the same name in the field of computer science. As you can see, I think it's best to leave only one link to Delegation (computing), as it contains a link to the article I removed— Delegation (object-oriented programming)—from the disambiguation page. Respectfully, -- Entalpia2 ( talk) 09:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peritoneum, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Perineal and Peroneal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
You have twice deleted the link I added to the Taiga (disambiguation). You did this even though there was a link to the source of information I've added. You explained your actions in this way - "Reverted to revision 906854376 by Shhhnotsoloud: My changes were not vandalism. An entry on a disambiguation page requires a valid article. References are not appropriate". I've looked through the English Wikipedia rules and did not find among them the statement that "adding a link to non-existent page to disambiguation page of English Wikipedia is completelly, 100% prohibited!" (or anything like that). If I am wrong, please give me link to exact rule or decision because I want to read it by myself. If you will make new edits without answer to my question I will think that you decided to deliberately ignore my question. If you need extra time to answer this question, please write how much time you need and when should I wait for your answer. Shadowcaster ( talk) 12:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
FYI: [2] Staszek Lem ( talk) 19:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
[3] I resisted this RfD one more time to see if consensus arises, you said if the result wasn't disambiguate, to speedy delete another thing per WP:G14. What about if it ends as no consensus? James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 13:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Just curious why you reverted my revision 919040357 on Manta. The device is codenamed manta, and the disambiguation page does not exclusively refer to mantarays, so your edit message doesn't make much sense. Thanks! JaredTamana ( talk) 16:52, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you removed several entries from the dab page Tamar.
Please re-read MOS:DABNAME, and I think you will then agree that the ones that were previously listed under {{ solename}} should be reinstated. – Fayenatic London 20:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, do you have time for a beginner's question? I wanted to take a baby step by adding Silicon Valley to the SV disambiguation page. I was motivated to do it while reading an article that referred to SV as if everyone knows it -- but it took me a while to figure out they were talking about Silicon Valley. So, I thought it would be helpful to others. Is the reason you reverted it that I should have pasted in a URL for the article I was reading, that used SV in that way? Would I have done that in the talk section? Anything you can tell me would be much appreciated. Siredwardcoke ( talk) 19:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind reverting your move of Jatt, please? I don't think there's a primary topic here, given how common this is a spelling for the ethnic group. – Uanfala (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはShhhnotsoloudたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
04:05, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi - your userpage just popped on my watchlist, and I was reminded how much I like your username - it has a kind of library/ Radio 3-ish, feeling to it that I always appreciate when I come across it. So, yeah - nothing to say, other than to congratulate you on a stylish handle, and wish you a happy new year. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 20:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
– 2020 is a
leap year –
news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (
#0F4C81), Pantone's
2020 Color of the year
– Utopes ( talk) 09:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Why this edition : https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Shower_(disambiguation)&oldid=prev&diff=933843377 on the Shower (disambiguation) article. All those are link to article related.
Pierre cb ( talk) 15:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Small penis—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doug Mehus T· C 19:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
You did not get a response to this question. I know I wouldn't be able to help. Maybe ask again? I'm not sure where to send you.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamilton (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russ Hamilton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at
Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_16, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- Soumyabrata ( talk • subpages) 05:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Why did you remove my edit? You stated reasoning for removing CN tags, but not for my edit. XenIsNotVerySmart ( talk) 19:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
You reverted anti-sex to its previous state (i.e. now it redirects to antisexism and profeminism). Is there a way that Anti-sex in English can mean one of those things? -- Yoramus ( talk) 18:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
The lack of a reference in another article is hardly a good reason to remove a red link. I have no experience in creating articles, but the presence of a red link may inspire another contributor to write one. It can be found on Landranger sheet 202, grid reference SX6150, and in the Plymouth A-Z atlas on page 33, believe it or not. Donnanz ( talk) 09:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I must have been creating those dab redirections by the hundreds and didn't notice that it wasn't redirected to a dab page. -- ExperiencedArticleFixer ( talk) 14:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ROK/US Combined Forces Command ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi - I'm interested to understand your reasons for removal of the hatnotes I placed on the two Class 422 train articles. What made you determine the New South Wales Class 422 as the primary topic between the two? I did consider the issue of primary topic, but between the two, weighing all the issues (links, age, sources, numbers built), they seemed remarkably even on the scale. Regards,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 20:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
{{
see also}}
hatnote is not suitable to be used at the top of an article: it's designed for Sections (see
Wikipedia:Hatnote#Hatnote templates). However, your query caused me to look a little deeper, and I found that
FS Class 422 redirects to
Prussian G 8, so I've amended the hatnote further. Regards,
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
07:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barnabas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barrabas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
No worries. It's an investigation/study book, so basically Saviano recounts in first person what he had found and researched on the international traffic of cocaine. I believe a novel has way more narrative fiction in it and most of the fiction of the series, including the characters, have been invented by the creators, despite fitting in the world of Saviano's book.-- TheVampire ( talk) 07:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
You are using italics on spacecraft class on Demo 1. However, it is going against the consensus formed at Talk:SpaceX_Starship/Archive_1#Starship_in_italics?. -- Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
I have resolved the confusion by moving London Underground C Stock and London Underground D Stock to London Underground C Stock (District Railway) and London Underground D Stock (District Railway) respectively, to avoid confusion with their more modern counterparts. Because both me and Thryduulf suggested keeping both redirects in the discussion, I shall shortly be closing the discussion as KEEP and removing the RfD notices on both pages. Thanks, C2A06 ( About • Talk • Edits) 10:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Not going to fight on this, but MOS:DABPIPING says "may", not "shall", so it's certainly no stronger than the guidance to keep links as close to the start as possible. — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 13:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Have I edited on Germany? I checked the history to find the edit you mentioned but I found nothing. Or you messed it with other article as I also don't remember to do edits on German-related articles. The only thing I remember was the German disambiguation page that I changed the section headline. Sorry for acting as a vandal. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 16:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I nominated Pakistan Zindabad (song) to be deleted because this redirect is confusing. I moved the anthem page from this title because there are many Pakistan Zindabad songs while this one was an anthem to a former wing of the country. I want you to reconsider your vote of keep since this redirect still is confusing because there are various Pakistan Zindabad songs made in recent years so someone searching for those songs will be redirected to anthem page. USaamo ( t@lk) 19:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Crotalus concolor. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — BarrelProof ( talk) 21:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I discussed Queen's College with you last year. I have now created my first disambiguation page Stamford College and was wondering if you would be willing to have a look at it. Stamford College, Malaysia does not currently have an article so perhaps I should create a redirect pointing to Stamford International College, which mentions it. Then I could disambiguate the four remaining non talk links to Stamford College to Stamford College, Malaysia. TSventon ( talk) 10:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you've nominated Tropical cyclones in 2006 (disambiguation) for deletion. This appears to be a standard redirect to dab, which is useful and doesn't qualify for deletion. Is this a first step to converting Tropical cyclones in 2006 to an article, which would be a welcome change? Certes ( talk) 16:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
that you asked me about back in... er... March (film clip of calendar pages blowing away) was taken care of by WT79 in June. It's a good thing, too, as their code looks much better than mine would have done. I thought I'd mention it in case you hadn't seen the new version. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 12:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Shhhnotsoloud I want to make a redirect to a page and I don't know if it is allowed. The redirect is Military of Ancient Greece. If you want to keep it redirected to Ancient Greek warfare, just tell me why. You use the links, I create it. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 19:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
I think that Military of Ancient Greece could be a page or at least a subpage. I don't want to change it, I want to create it. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 14:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't know if this could help. How can it help? You are a member of a group of Wikipedians that edit redirects. Is it allowed? I checked your link, and didn't find anything helpful. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 15:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
The page Military of Ancient Greece is redirected to Ancient Greek warfare. I want it as a non-redirect page to be organized and edited as an article. Shortly, Military of Ancient Greece to be an article, not a redirect. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 15:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Shhhnotsoloud. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lydia Pinkham (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Redirects only qualify for G14 if the redirect's target is not a disambiguation page or a page that performs a disambiguation-like function. Thank you. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 16:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I do see your point that it doesn't make sense to have this redirect, but my opinion is that it would have to go through WP:RFD rather than being eligible for CSD. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 16:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi! For future reference, if you are not proposing deletion, a PROD is inappropriate. I went ahead and redirected the articles you used PROD on, but going forward in the situation where a redirection is likely to be uncontroversial, you can be bold and redirect it yourself. Cheers, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
You left a note on this article, I just edited it, can you see if my work helps remove this note? Thank you for your time. CRS-20 ( talk) 08:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Deprivation. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 4#Deprivation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
AnonQuixote (
talk)
05:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Am I missing something?
You added the CSD tag to the target: Severin_Eskeland
Not to the dab page-- S Philbrick (Talk) 18:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, I just received your ping [7], on the talk page of I Can't Stop Me. Apologies for overwriting the dab page and for not putting the hat note. Thank you very much for taking care of it. -- Ashley yoursmile! 09:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, God created time so that everything wouldn't happen at once. Could you at least have given me a couple of days before reverting me? Acad Ronin ( talk) 14:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
You are right - this got mixed in with hundreds of other dab links to Middelburg. Thanks— Rod talk 19:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive330#New_editor_at_Ludwig_Wittgenstein. Pam D 09:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud,
You are an experienced editor so I just wanted to remind you that anytime you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, or AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator. I see that you used Twinkle to tag Education in China (disambiguation) but you need to set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator" and then Twinkle will do this automatically for you. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot FIFA website "the home of football".png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 13:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. I reversed your edit on this article because this is a very unusual case of two Red Army rifle divisions sharing the same number for about 18 months. I think it's important for users to immediately understand if they are accessing info on the one or the other. As you mention in your edit, this is hatnote-like text, but I would argue that it's quite different from standard hatnote text in its formatting and appearance so that it will not mislead any users that it is, in fact, a hatnote. I would be happy to discuss reformatting to address any further issues, but IMO including this important note as regular text in the intro is the equivalent of the reporter's bad practice of "burying the lede". Wreck Smurfy ( talk) 01:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi! There's generally a very strong expectation that if an editor proposes an article for deletion, they notify the creator and substantial contributors: WP:PRODNOM. – Uanfala (talk) 12:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't why you moved
Harnoncourt, a stable redirect to the Primary topic
Nikolaus Harnoncourt since 2006?? Please revert that. Would you move
Beethoven? --
Gerda Arendt (
talk)
13:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
EpicPupper ( talk) 18:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Your removal of the hatnotes completely removed all the navigation from the page. Is there any way you could add a navigation in the style of "previous ... next" instead? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
08:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
The article Jesse Murphy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non-notable musician
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ==
MurielMary ( talk) 10:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud,
Just a reminder that every time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator (see the message directly above this one for an example). If you use Twinkle to tag pages for deletion and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator", the program will post these notifications for you which makes thing easy. Please do this in the future if you tag any more pages for deletion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
You'll be interested in my comments at Talk:Baten Kaitos, I think. Skyerise ( talk) 01:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters named Taylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Mariah Carey is dubbed “Songbird Supreme” not “The Voice”. There are not one great source says that she is the Voice but Songbird! Phạm Huy Thông ( talk) 18:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
If you look at the two articles, I think you will see which one is primary. One is a short notational article, the other shows that it was extensively covered. -- Bejnar ( talk) 15:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Just wondering why you made this edit. I know that what I did was non-standard; but I think it looks better that way – more compact. DesertPipeline ( talk) 21:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
See Philadelphia Athletics. Your change of a year ago has been undone. Please take it to RFD or if you accept it, the hatnote at the old target needs to be fixed. MB 04:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Solar power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
You might want to {{ db-author}} Robin Hood (opera)(disambiguation) - the missing space means that User:DPL bot flagged the link to it as as error. NB the correctly-formatted Robin Hood (opera) (disambiguation) exists (and is now in use, see List of historical opera characters). Narky Blert ( talk) 10:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
I and other users have been debating whether to turn Valencian (see talk page) into a disambiguation page or not. Most of us have agreed with it and we're waiting to see if there are other thoughts to proceed to create the disambiguation page. I created the article Valencian (disambiguation) to link it to Valencian in order to display it at Valencian language and Valencians (i.e. Valencian people) in the same way as Spanish, Galician, etc. so I would like to leave it without been deleted if that's OK with you. – Nuvolet ( talk)
Hello, I'm
Evaline Nakano. An edit that you recently made to
CyanogenMod seemed to be a test and has been
reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Regarding Columbus Police and Lincoln County Sheriff's Office, it's unusual for a disambiguation page to consist almost entirely of red links with only one or two blue links. MOS:DABRED recommends against including redlinks to pages that probably aren't notable. Maybe I didn't take the correct action, but I'd rather not leave these seas of red lying around: what do you propose instead? - Apocheir ( talk) 22:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Shhh (if I may so address you), I saw your formatting at Ring of Silvianus which is definitely for the better. Could you take a look at the layout of the inscriptions at Nodens, which to my eye are really acutely unreadable at the moment? I think we should hide those incomprehensible technical attributions and format the Latin and English much as you did at Ring. Perhaps. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 15:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
=
.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
15:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't understand why you moved this page to an ambiguous title. All articles about Roman praenomina have a consistent titling format, and have since they were created—or at least they did until today. The target title is ambiguous for several reasons; Livy and other Roman writers frequently used "Appius" to refer to members of the Claudian gens who bore this name, from the earliest years of the Roman Republic down to the time of Appius Claudius Caecus, instead of referring to them as "Claudius" or by a surname. Several of them are equally probable targets for a search. Additionally, "Appius" is also a gentile name, and normally the bare nomen would redirect to the article about the gens, except that in this instance it is more likely to refer to one of the individuals mentioned by Roman writers—with no clear primary topic among them. Consistent titling among Roman onomastic articles has also prevented—in most instances—articles being moved to unpredictable titles by biologists who've used random names from Classical dictionaries for various genera of beetles, butterflies, spiders, or fish, something that frequently affects redirects to Roman topics. But while we wait for that to occur, "Appius" should be either a disambiguation page or a redirect to one of the appropriate articles—most likely "Claudia gens", rather than one of its prominent members, or the relatively obscure "Appia gens". This article should go back to its former title, which, by being consistent with all other articles about Roman praenomina, is more readily findable. P Aculeius ( talk) 13:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Before removing from a dab page an entry for a language (or, probably, for any other type of entity), it's usually a really good idea to first check if that entity is referred to by the dab term. For languages, the easiest way is to go to the linked article, click on the Glottolog entry in the infobox, and then check if that name is found either in the list of dialects (in the tree on the left), or is given as a synonym (click on "Alternative names" under the map on the right). Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 14:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Black Country (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required. Black Country has a hatnote.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Please dont remove important info from the article. Please use article talk page is you have objections. Loew Galitz ( talk) 17:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Your recent page-moving activity at "Dark Red" was not done with the competence I expect from editors with page-mover rights.
1. Dark Red is not a redirect to a disambiguation page.
2. Talk:Dark Red is a circular redirect.
You should not rely entirely on the swap tool to do all the necessary edits to implement the establishment of a new primary topic. Please check the work of this tool and clean up after it by doing the things it didn't do. Thanks, wbm1058 ( talk) 03:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
you have proposed a deletion on this page because there is already a hatnote on both of the page. This is a good reason to delete the page.
But at the same time, you wrote a comment which makes me doubt : "assuming they're different people!". The 2 people are differents. One is born in 1600, the other one was governor of Permanbucano in 1596.
Maybe we should improve the disammbiguation page, so if someone think this is the same person, they won't be mistaken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roniee ( talk • contribs) 16:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Muhir223: You emailed me:
/info/en/?search=Racism You mentioned Serbs and Armenians as martyrs of... racism? Are you serious man? The same CAUCASIAN Serbs who killed 8.000+ Bosniaks in a span of 24 hours in Srebrenica, how about mentioning human zoos, colonisation and genocide of Bosniaks instead of these biased bullshit.
I have no idea what you are talking about: perhaps you confused me with someone else. Please don't email me but discuss here. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 20:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | |||
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, ( t · c) buidhe 00:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC) |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... I'm trying to edit Harwich Mayflower Project to display the title as Harwich Mayflower Project (the Mayflower in the title is a ship). My edit here didn't work with a red error message so I undid it. The article has a template Infobox ship begin, but another edit here to attempt to add a parameter didn't work either. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
-barrelroll.dev ( talk) 03:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Chesebrough, Shhhnotsoloud!
Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for creating this disambiguation page!
To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Elliot321 ( talk) 12:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor barnstar |
For fastidiously following process and AfD'ing a clearly extra Deep One (disambiguation) even though the previous AfD had been 11 years ago. Jclemens ( talk) 16:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi, I've noticed you have prodded a lot of pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title on the grounds that they only disambiguate two articles. These articles qualify for speedy deletion under WP:G6, as uncontroversial maintenance, since most if not all of the articles you have nominated have a clear primary topic and the dab page only lists one article in addition to the primary topic. I tagged a bunch of your prods the other day and found quite a few more again today. Hope this helps. — KuyaBriBri Talk 00:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Kuyabribri and Shhh, Shhh is right that a WP:2DABS situation doesn't meet the criteria at Template:db-disambig and so should be prodded. Some of these I've speedied (like Dujiangyan (disambiguation)) because they contained a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and a partial match. That one was removed because although it looked like a partial match, the creator asserted that it is commonly known by the shortened version. Boleyn ( talk) 10:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello Shhhnotsoloud. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Uhuru (wholefoods shop), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previous version of article contains a book source, so significance might exist. Use WP:AFD instead. Thank you. So Why 07:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
I would like to inform you that your technical move request is Done. -- Kostas20142 ( talk) 10:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Hero-class patrol vessel, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Ship classes are not italicized if they are not named after a ship
Llammakey (
talk)
15:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar | |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. For managing to find, and then appropriately deal with, a huge number of wrongly-created disambiguation pages. Boleyn ( talk) 09:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- There'sNoTime ( to explain) 10:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Well done, I'm glad you got the rights. Don't thank me though, the articles were too good to need reviewing. Boleyn ( talk) 18:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Good evening Shhhnotsoloud. I declined your CSD of Noctorum (band) because there's a credible claim of significance as one of the band's members has an article. If you still want to try deletion, I suggest you take it to AFD, though there's always the possibility of redirecting it to Marty_Willson-Piper#Solo_career_and_Noctorum. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 10:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello Shhhnotsoloud. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tihama (company), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previously decllined in 2006, thus not eligible for speedy deletion. Thank you. So Why 15:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello there:
Thanks for
your note about this; I have replied at
the AfD. Regards,
Swanny18 (
talk)
21:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
PS: Just to let you know, I've deleted the notability tag on this page, for the reason given. Also, (without wishing to be stalkerish in any way) I've edited The Representative (disambiguation) and Újpest (disambiguation) (which you had also prodded), and I've left a note at Talk:Rebus (TV series), if you wish to comment. I thought I should let you know. Regards, Swanny18 ( talk) 00:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Warren Church. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a
bot about
this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot I
Talk to my owner:Online
15:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sweatman (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Sweatman (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Peter James ( talk) 12:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
This is a marginal case, but I have heard locals and blogs talk about "TCR" and mean Tottenham Court Road for years. You won't find it very much in respected sources, but it does crop up enough to be a cursory mention. Still, I'm not going to re-revert if you disagree and revert back. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for closing the old merge proposal on Flag of Nigeria (1914–1960). Just wanted to ask a favour, would you be able to close the merge proposal on Triangular corner flags in English football please as the consensus on the merge proposal is against merging? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The C of E ( talk • contribs) 16:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pennie Lane Trumbull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
91.252.115.143 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
filter log ·
WHOIS ·
RDNS ·
RBLs ·
http ·
block user ·
block log) Should have warnings before being reported. I templated 91.252.115.143 with {{
uw-selfrevert}}
Not sure if more can be done. I don't think the AIV report will be acted on. Cheers
Jim1138 (
talk)
09:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Isa Mine Early Infrastructure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uskside ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I was hasty in my revert there - should have assumed you were working on the disambiguation page and given you a while to finish. Girth Summit 16:41, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ford (crossing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford River ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey there. A question about why you deleted the mention to DC Comic's character in Red Lion. I don't really know why the character should be mentioned in the wiki pages i referred to. It is already known that Deathstroke's page has to be updated to include Rebirth and the character of Red Lion appeared in Rebirth. Honestly I think that updating what's missing rather that removing honest contributions (it's not even vandalism) would be way more interesting for Wikipedia. -- EyedMoon ( talk) 14:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry if my edit summaries were a bit curt - but most people editing this one have been vandals. Noticed after a couple of reverts that this is most definitely not the case here, in fact "disambigging" is your speciality, so I've had a "second look", at the MOS in particular, but I and really can't see that the "original text" contravenes anything important. Not all DAB pages will necessarily follow exactly the same format. Anyway, I do wish you could have a good look at the layout here and see why we chose to bring "logically related" lines together. If you strongly disagree - it might bean idea to more this to the talk page for the article and thrash it out there. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 12:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to change a redirect, please do it correctly and move the page to the new target. The way you did broke a few things. -- Gonnym ( talk) 19:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
| 94.21.204.175 ( talk) 16:33, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Is your username a reference to the classic dry martini joke? My fave! -- В²C ☎ 01:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
It occured to me that you or someone else who cares could go through List of ELCA synods and rename each synod to have ELCA in front of the synod. Except for the Slovak Zion Synod, none of them used to be separate denominations, and to the best of my knowledge none of them have had a rocky relationship with the main denomination. Maybe Slovak Zion Synod should be left alone. In other words, the ELCA synods they are more clearly middle judicatories than the LCMS districts.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 20:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bassem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basim ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying me. Wikipedia is a collective work and any contributions including yours are always welcome. I like the fact you always explain your moves with references to approved Wikipedia policies. At the end, nothing is set in stone. I created new pages and improve on existing pages by contributing my share... and you do yours. werldwayd ( talk) 20:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Shhhnotsoloud! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Latifa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latifa Al Maktoum ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi,
you closed the RFC at Cossack Hetmanate as no consensus, though if we summarize the votes the support for merge surpass the opposers..as far as I know, in case one side have majority, it means it is accepted, or? Thank You( KIENGIR ( talk) 14:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC))
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi - you gently reverted [ [1]] my removal of a red-linked item from a DAB page. I was unaware of the MOS:DABRL guideline and had never done the "what links here" to check for the presence of a red-link in an article for this particular scenario, so thanks for pointing it out. I posted a question on the DABRL talk page before I saw from your user banner that you are a DAB expert, so you are probably right, but I'm wondering whether a list qualifies as an article. It seems that a non-notable entry could spam a dab page and list by simply adding itself to two pages. Whatever the consensus, this at least is an opportunity to tighten the guidelines and remove any inherent vagueness. Cheers. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 21:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, @ Shhhnotsoloud:
I've seen you reverse my edition on the disambiguation page Delegation (disambiguation). I want to explain the reason for my edition. If you carefully review the page, you will see a link to the set index article (SIA) Delegation (computing). This article contains multiple links to related concepts that have the same name in the field of computer science. As you can see, I think it's best to leave only one link to Delegation (computing), as it contains a link to the article I removed— Delegation (object-oriented programming)—from the disambiguation page. Respectfully, -- Entalpia2 ( talk) 09:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peritoneum, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Perineal and Peroneal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
You have twice deleted the link I added to the Taiga (disambiguation). You did this even though there was a link to the source of information I've added. You explained your actions in this way - "Reverted to revision 906854376 by Shhhnotsoloud: My changes were not vandalism. An entry on a disambiguation page requires a valid article. References are not appropriate". I've looked through the English Wikipedia rules and did not find among them the statement that "adding a link to non-existent page to disambiguation page of English Wikipedia is completelly, 100% prohibited!" (or anything like that). If I am wrong, please give me link to exact rule or decision because I want to read it by myself. If you will make new edits without answer to my question I will think that you decided to deliberately ignore my question. If you need extra time to answer this question, please write how much time you need and when should I wait for your answer. Shadowcaster ( talk) 12:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
FYI: [2] Staszek Lem ( talk) 19:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
[3] I resisted this RfD one more time to see if consensus arises, you said if the result wasn't disambiguate, to speedy delete another thing per WP:G14. What about if it ends as no consensus? James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 13:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Just curious why you reverted my revision 919040357 on Manta. The device is codenamed manta, and the disambiguation page does not exclusively refer to mantarays, so your edit message doesn't make much sense. Thanks! JaredTamana ( talk) 16:52, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you removed several entries from the dab page Tamar.
Please re-read MOS:DABNAME, and I think you will then agree that the ones that were previously listed under {{ solename}} should be reinstated. – Fayenatic London 20:38, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, do you have time for a beginner's question? I wanted to take a baby step by adding Silicon Valley to the SV disambiguation page. I was motivated to do it while reading an article that referred to SV as if everyone knows it -- but it took me a while to figure out they were talking about Silicon Valley. So, I thought it would be helpful to others. Is the reason you reverted it that I should have pasted in a URL for the article I was reading, that used SV in that way? Would I have done that in the talk section? Anything you can tell me would be much appreciated. Siredwardcoke ( talk) 19:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind reverting your move of Jatt, please? I don't think there's a primary topic here, given how common this is a spelling for the ethnic group. – Uanfala (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:07, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはShhhnotsoloudたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P
04:05, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi - your userpage just popped on my watchlist, and I was reminded how much I like your username - it has a kind of library/ Radio 3-ish, feeling to it that I always appreciate when I come across it. So, yeah - nothing to say, other than to congratulate you on a stylish handle, and wish you a happy new year. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 20:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
– 2020 is a
leap year –
news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (
#0F4C81), Pantone's
2020 Color of the year
– Utopes ( talk) 09:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Why this edition : https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Shower_(disambiguation)&oldid=prev&diff=933843377 on the Shower (disambiguation) article. All those are link to article related.
Pierre cb ( talk) 15:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Small penis—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doug Mehus T· C 19:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
You did not get a response to this question. I know I wouldn't be able to help. Maybe ask again? I'm not sure where to send you.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamilton (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russ Hamilton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at
Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_16, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- Soumyabrata ( talk • subpages) 05:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Why did you remove my edit? You stated reasoning for removing CN tags, but not for my edit. XenIsNotVerySmart ( talk) 19:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
You reverted anti-sex to its previous state (i.e. now it redirects to antisexism and profeminism). Is there a way that Anti-sex in English can mean one of those things? -- Yoramus ( talk) 18:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
The lack of a reference in another article is hardly a good reason to remove a red link. I have no experience in creating articles, but the presence of a red link may inspire another contributor to write one. It can be found on Landranger sheet 202, grid reference SX6150, and in the Plymouth A-Z atlas on page 33, believe it or not. Donnanz ( talk) 09:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I must have been creating those dab redirections by the hundreds and didn't notice that it wasn't redirected to a dab page. -- ExperiencedArticleFixer ( talk) 14:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ROK/US Combined Forces Command ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi - I'm interested to understand your reasons for removal of the hatnotes I placed on the two Class 422 train articles. What made you determine the New South Wales Class 422 as the primary topic between the two? I did consider the issue of primary topic, but between the two, weighing all the issues (links, age, sources, numbers built), they seemed remarkably even on the scale. Regards,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 20:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
{{
see also}}
hatnote is not suitable to be used at the top of an article: it's designed for Sections (see
Wikipedia:Hatnote#Hatnote templates). However, your query caused me to look a little deeper, and I found that
FS Class 422 redirects to
Prussian G 8, so I've amended the hatnote further. Regards,
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
07:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barnabas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barrabas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
No worries. It's an investigation/study book, so basically Saviano recounts in first person what he had found and researched on the international traffic of cocaine. I believe a novel has way more narrative fiction in it and most of the fiction of the series, including the characters, have been invented by the creators, despite fitting in the world of Saviano's book.-- TheVampire ( talk) 07:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
You are using italics on spacecraft class on Demo 1. However, it is going against the consensus formed at Talk:SpaceX_Starship/Archive_1#Starship_in_italics?. -- Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
I have resolved the confusion by moving London Underground C Stock and London Underground D Stock to London Underground C Stock (District Railway) and London Underground D Stock (District Railway) respectively, to avoid confusion with their more modern counterparts. Because both me and Thryduulf suggested keeping both redirects in the discussion, I shall shortly be closing the discussion as KEEP and removing the RfD notices on both pages. Thanks, C2A06 ( About • Talk • Edits) 10:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Not going to fight on this, but MOS:DABPIPING says "may", not "shall", so it's certainly no stronger than the guidance to keep links as close to the start as possible. — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 13:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Have I edited on Germany? I checked the history to find the edit you mentioned but I found nothing. Or you messed it with other article as I also don't remember to do edits on German-related articles. The only thing I remember was the German disambiguation page that I changed the section headline. Sorry for acting as a vandal. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 16:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I nominated Pakistan Zindabad (song) to be deleted because this redirect is confusing. I moved the anthem page from this title because there are many Pakistan Zindabad songs while this one was an anthem to a former wing of the country. I want you to reconsider your vote of keep since this redirect still is confusing because there are various Pakistan Zindabad songs made in recent years so someone searching for those songs will be redirected to anthem page. USaamo ( t@lk) 19:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Crotalus concolor. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — BarrelProof ( talk) 21:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I discussed Queen's College with you last year. I have now created my first disambiguation page Stamford College and was wondering if you would be willing to have a look at it. Stamford College, Malaysia does not currently have an article so perhaps I should create a redirect pointing to Stamford International College, which mentions it. Then I could disambiguate the four remaining non talk links to Stamford College to Stamford College, Malaysia. TSventon ( talk) 10:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you've nominated Tropical cyclones in 2006 (disambiguation) for deletion. This appears to be a standard redirect to dab, which is useful and doesn't qualify for deletion. Is this a first step to converting Tropical cyclones in 2006 to an article, which would be a welcome change? Certes ( talk) 16:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
that you asked me about back in... er... March (film clip of calendar pages blowing away) was taken care of by WT79 in June. It's a good thing, too, as their code looks much better than mine would have done. I thought I'd mention it in case you hadn't seen the new version. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea ( talk) 12:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Shhhnotsoloud I want to make a redirect to a page and I don't know if it is allowed. The redirect is Military of Ancient Greece. If you want to keep it redirected to Ancient Greek warfare, just tell me why. You use the links, I create it. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 19:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
I think that Military of Ancient Greece could be a page or at least a subpage. I don't want to change it, I want to create it. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 14:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't know if this could help. How can it help? You are a member of a group of Wikipedians that edit redirects. Is it allowed? I checked your link, and didn't find anything helpful. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 15:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
The page Military of Ancient Greece is redirected to Ancient Greek warfare. I want it as a non-redirect page to be organized and edited as an article. Shortly, Military of Ancient Greece to be an article, not a redirect. -- ANONYMOUS USER2003 ( talk) 15:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Shhhnotsoloud. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lydia Pinkham (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Redirects only qualify for G14 if the redirect's target is not a disambiguation page or a page that performs a disambiguation-like function. Thank you. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 16:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I do see your point that it doesn't make sense to have this redirect, but my opinion is that it would have to go through WP:RFD rather than being eligible for CSD. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 16:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi! For future reference, if you are not proposing deletion, a PROD is inappropriate. I went ahead and redirected the articles you used PROD on, but going forward in the situation where a redirection is likely to be uncontroversial, you can be bold and redirect it yourself. Cheers, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
You left a note on this article, I just edited it, can you see if my work helps remove this note? Thank you for your time. CRS-20 ( talk) 08:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Deprivation. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 4#Deprivation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
AnonQuixote (
talk)
05:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Am I missing something?
You added the CSD tag to the target: Severin_Eskeland
Not to the dab page-- S Philbrick (Talk) 18:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, I just received your ping [7], on the talk page of I Can't Stop Me. Apologies for overwriting the dab page and for not putting the hat note. Thank you very much for taking care of it. -- Ashley yoursmile! 09:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, God created time so that everything wouldn't happen at once. Could you at least have given me a couple of days before reverting me? Acad Ronin ( talk) 14:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
You are right - this got mixed in with hundreds of other dab links to Middelburg. Thanks— Rod talk 19:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive330#New_editor_at_Ludwig_Wittgenstein. Pam D 09:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud,
You are an experienced editor so I just wanted to remind you that anytime you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, or AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator. I see that you used Twinkle to tag Education in China (disambiguation) but you need to set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator" and then Twinkle will do this automatically for you. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot FIFA website "the home of football".png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq ( talk) 13:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud. I reversed your edit on this article because this is a very unusual case of two Red Army rifle divisions sharing the same number for about 18 months. I think it's important for users to immediately understand if they are accessing info on the one or the other. As you mention in your edit, this is hatnote-like text, but I would argue that it's quite different from standard hatnote text in its formatting and appearance so that it will not mislead any users that it is, in fact, a hatnote. I would be happy to discuss reformatting to address any further issues, but IMO including this important note as regular text in the intro is the equivalent of the reporter's bad practice of "burying the lede". Wreck Smurfy ( talk) 01:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi! There's generally a very strong expectation that if an editor proposes an article for deletion, they notify the creator and substantial contributors: WP:PRODNOM. – Uanfala (talk) 12:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't why you moved
Harnoncourt, a stable redirect to the Primary topic
Nikolaus Harnoncourt since 2006?? Please revert that. Would you move
Beethoven? --
Gerda Arendt (
talk)
13:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
EpicPupper ( talk) 18:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Your removal of the hatnotes completely removed all the navigation from the page. Is there any way you could add a navigation in the style of "previous ... next" instead? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
08:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
The article Jesse Murphy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non-notable musician
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ==
MurielMary ( talk) 10:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Shhhnotsoloud,
Just a reminder that every time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator (see the message directly above this one for an example). If you use Twinkle to tag pages for deletion and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator", the program will post these notifications for you which makes thing easy. Please do this in the future if you tag any more pages for deletion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
You'll be interested in my comments at Talk:Baten Kaitos, I think. Skyerise ( talk) 01:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters named Taylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Mariah Carey is dubbed “Songbird Supreme” not “The Voice”. There are not one great source says that she is the Voice but Songbird! Phạm Huy Thông ( talk) 18:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
If you look at the two articles, I think you will see which one is primary. One is a short notational article, the other shows that it was extensively covered. -- Bejnar ( talk) 15:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Just wondering why you made this edit. I know that what I did was non-standard; but I think it looks better that way – more compact. DesertPipeline ( talk) 21:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
See Philadelphia Athletics. Your change of a year ago has been undone. Please take it to RFD or if you accept it, the hatnote at the old target needs to be fixed. MB 04:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Solar power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
You might want to {{ db-author}} Robin Hood (opera)(disambiguation) - the missing space means that User:DPL bot flagged the link to it as as error. NB the correctly-formatted Robin Hood (opera) (disambiguation) exists (and is now in use, see List of historical opera characters). Narky Blert ( talk) 10:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
I and other users have been debating whether to turn Valencian (see talk page) into a disambiguation page or not. Most of us have agreed with it and we're waiting to see if there are other thoughts to proceed to create the disambiguation page. I created the article Valencian (disambiguation) to link it to Valencian in order to display it at Valencian language and Valencians (i.e. Valencian people) in the same way as Spanish, Galician, etc. so I would like to leave it without been deleted if that's OK with you. – Nuvolet ( talk)
Hello, I'm
Evaline Nakano. An edit that you recently made to
CyanogenMod seemed to be a test and has been
reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Regarding Columbus Police and Lincoln County Sheriff's Office, it's unusual for a disambiguation page to consist almost entirely of red links with only one or two blue links. MOS:DABRED recommends against including redlinks to pages that probably aren't notable. Maybe I didn't take the correct action, but I'd rather not leave these seas of red lying around: what do you propose instead? - Apocheir ( talk) 22:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Shhh (if I may so address you), I saw your formatting at Ring of Silvianus which is definitely for the better. Could you take a look at the layout of the inscriptions at Nodens, which to my eye are really acutely unreadable at the moment? I think we should hide those incomprehensible technical attributions and format the Latin and English much as you did at Ring. Perhaps. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 15:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
=
.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
15:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't understand why you moved this page to an ambiguous title. All articles about Roman praenomina have a consistent titling format, and have since they were created—or at least they did until today. The target title is ambiguous for several reasons; Livy and other Roman writers frequently used "Appius" to refer to members of the Claudian gens who bore this name, from the earliest years of the Roman Republic down to the time of Appius Claudius Caecus, instead of referring to them as "Claudius" or by a surname. Several of them are equally probable targets for a search. Additionally, "Appius" is also a gentile name, and normally the bare nomen would redirect to the article about the gens, except that in this instance it is more likely to refer to one of the individuals mentioned by Roman writers—with no clear primary topic among them. Consistent titling among Roman onomastic articles has also prevented—in most instances—articles being moved to unpredictable titles by biologists who've used random names from Classical dictionaries for various genera of beetles, butterflies, spiders, or fish, something that frequently affects redirects to Roman topics. But while we wait for that to occur, "Appius" should be either a disambiguation page or a redirect to one of the appropriate articles—most likely "Claudia gens", rather than one of its prominent members, or the relatively obscure "Appia gens". This article should go back to its former title, which, by being consistent with all other articles about Roman praenomina, is more readily findable. P Aculeius ( talk) 13:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Before removing from a dab page an entry for a language (or, probably, for any other type of entity), it's usually a really good idea to first check if that entity is referred to by the dab term. For languages, the easiest way is to go to the linked article, click on the Glottolog entry in the infobox, and then check if that name is found either in the list of dialects (in the tree on the left), or is given as a synonym (click on "Alternative names" under the map on the right). Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 14:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Black Country (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required. Black Country has a hatnote.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Please dont remove important info from the article. Please use article talk page is you have objections. Loew Galitz ( talk) 17:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Your recent page-moving activity at "Dark Red" was not done with the competence I expect from editors with page-mover rights.
1. Dark Red is not a redirect to a disambiguation page.
2. Talk:Dark Red is a circular redirect.
You should not rely entirely on the swap tool to do all the necessary edits to implement the establishment of a new primary topic. Please check the work of this tool and clean up after it by doing the things it didn't do. Thanks, wbm1058 ( talk) 03:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
you have proposed a deletion on this page because there is already a hatnote on both of the page. This is a good reason to delete the page.
But at the same time, you wrote a comment which makes me doubt : "assuming they're different people!". The 2 people are differents. One is born in 1600, the other one was governor of Permanbucano in 1596.
Maybe we should improve the disammbiguation page, so if someone think this is the same person, they won't be mistaken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roniee ( talk • contribs) 16:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
@ Muhir223: You emailed me:
/info/en/?search=Racism You mentioned Serbs and Armenians as martyrs of... racism? Are you serious man? The same CAUCASIAN Serbs who killed 8.000+ Bosniaks in a span of 24 hours in Srebrenica, how about mentioning human zoos, colonisation and genocide of Bosniaks instead of these biased bullshit.
I have no idea what you are talking about: perhaps you confused me with someone else. Please don't email me but discuss here. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 20:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | |||
Hi Shhhnotsoloud, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, ( t · c) buidhe 00:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC) |