This is DesertPipeline's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
Archives: Index | |
I saw you making a couple of these substitutions on my watchlist. For future reference, per MOS:SEASONS, it is desirable to avoid referring to seasons instead preferring "late 1944", etc. ( t · c) buidhe 19:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing up SOLRAD 3! Is spaceflight of particular interest to you? I'm always happy to have fellow Spacepedians. :)
Neopeius (
talk) 00:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear DesertPipeline
Thanks for encouraging words! I was acitve in Wikipedia in the past when German site was below 1 Mio entries. The German article de:PlanetarySystemStacker was gratefully accepted. I was not aware about the restrictions on new articles in EN Wikipedia. Otherwise I would have added more references as I did now. Is it save to store the draft article under *User:Tubas*, see heading? It is an article about a scientific software which produces excellent results. But it will never be in the mainstream for mobile phone users. Perhaps some day someone will remember about this article and move it to the main pages. Tubas ( talk) 12:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Key excerpts, as you requested:
As you can see, the professional editors advocating for lowercase internet are not ignorant about the technical history of the distinction, they just know it's going the way of the dodo. Popcornfud ( talk) 21:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
I am sure SMc is already aware of their sources, and they have made their opinion on this clear - SMc just thinks they’re wrong. Popcornfud ( talk) 09:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Was that you? Good one. But you should sign your work, though as you can see, bees actually don't have hooves. E Eng 05:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
[[File:foo.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Blah blah blah {{right|-~~~}}]]
Note three ~ instead of four to omit timestamp, which is too cluttering.
E
Eng 06:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm curious about
[1]. Do you manually copy each heading into /* heading */
in the edit summary or do you have a tool helping make the edit summary?
Help:Edit summary#Section editing mentions the manual method but I don't recall ever seeing it used before. By the way,
MOS:BOLD includes: "This is also done at the first occurrence of a term (commonly a synonym in the lead) that
redirects to the article".
copyright trap redirects.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 13:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello friend. Please take a look at WP:COMMONNAME when you get a chance. It concerns me that you moved two articles from common names to uncommon names. For example, Video game piracy has 101,000 hits in Google, and Unauthorized distribution of video games only has 8. I am also concerned by your change of the word "free" to "gratis" (this is less clear/less succinct). I am also concerned by all your edits in general, as you seem to have a pro-piracy POV. (I also like piracy, but I do not let it show in my editing.) I would encourage you to dial back the boldness of your edits a bit and get consensus for big changes. Thanks for listening. Happy editing. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 14:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello DesertPipeline,
I've seen you do this in a few articles, but for what it's worth, double spaces are explicitly allowed on Wikipedia. There's absolutely no difference in how they display to the user, so it's a matter of editor preference. If you prefer to use single spaces in your own substantive edits, that's great, but don't do "drive-by" edits that do nothing but change the spacing style of an article; double spacing is not a problem to be "fixed", unlike say spelling errors. SnowFire ( talk) 15:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
The thing you have to learn, in having a goal, is not to set an impossible goal, something too high you can never reach. You gotta have a series of smaller goals, that you can accomplish, and slowly work your way up. And this is what I have done. That's why I'm so happy. My goal: right now, I want to be the all-being master of time, space and dimension.
Hi again. Listen, I need to talk with you again about your approach to stylistic choices in articles. I see two things you've been doing lately:
The bottom line is that you have somewhat rigid ideas about writing style and formatting which are not shared by the community as a whole, and more and more you're annoying other editors with them. First it was your ideas about neutral language; then it was the double spacing; after that colloquialisms. Your arbitrary conversion of articles to British English is especially serious; you are walking into a minefield and you will get blocked if you keep that up.
Please, please stop "cleaning up" stuff according to your personal ideas; editors who do wide-ranging cleanup work successfully are those who have paid their dues first by writing content themselves (not just "fixing" other people's content). I urge you to find a topic area you find sufficiently interesting to allow you to do that, and stop it with all this tinkering. E Eng 18:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't have the capacity to write my own material on Wikipedia; not to any significant extent anyway. It also requires me to cite sources, which is something I cannot do due to personal reasonsbecause it sounds ... well, sad. I can't imagine what your circumstances could be, but it must feel bad to want to contribute and yet have so much trouble finding a way to do it. Look, if you find yourself making the same kind of edit over and over, why don't you give me a ping and I'll take a look and tell you what I think? That way we can head off trouble. OK? E Eng 04:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see you've created Template:Quote punctuation. But do you really think a violation of MOS:LQ is something that deserves a banner at the top of an article? Compliance with MOS:LQ is inside baseball among editors that affects virtually nothing in terms of readers' understanding of topics or ease of reading. A much more effective way of asking for a verification of compliance in an article is to notify a forum like WT:GOCE. I thought of filing it for TfD but I figured I'd ask you first. Nardog ( talk) 02:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
So I've filed it for TfD: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#Template:Quote punctuation. Nardog ( talk) 01:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
You might contemplate that it is more noble to correct easily remediable problems rather than just identifying them. ;)
An editor thinks that word "blur" is used inappropriately in the Wikipedia article Raft. They can't be bothered to fix the problem, but are satisfied that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. |
Smallchief ( talk) 11:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Loaded words and terms on Wikipedia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Loaded words and terms on Wikipedia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Loaded words and terms on Wikipedia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 17:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Hi, Requesting you to please restore this page.. I'm updating the content and I'll remove or modify the sources cited. Again please restore this page.. ill make the appropriate changes as per the guideline.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SAMCO_Securities_(2nd_nomination) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nilesh M Sharma ( talk • contribs) 19:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
Following on from
your edit here, how did you add the section headings (-→ Rotating tunnels, → Framework, etc) to your edit summary? I'm curious...
Moonraker12 (
talk) 09:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
/*(Text here)*/
– You can put any text in between; only text which matches a section heading's name will result in a working link though, where it takes you to the section with that name when clicked on :)
DesertPipeline (
talk) 09:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if I'm supposed to answer on my page or yours, so sorry if I've got this wrong. It's Android I'm running it on, with Chrome. Like you say, I'd've thought they'd have this sorted by now. I did wonder after I'd written it off mp4 was under patent. Anyhow, at least I know now. Ta for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SquidSix ( talk • contribs) 11:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
); also, when replying, you should
indent your comments. The indenting and comment placement rules can be a little confusing at first, but it just takes some getting used to. I hope that helps. Regards,
DesertPipeline (
talk) 09:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Have you not noticed the effect on the References section of the articles? Multiref2 inserts enormous amounts of verticle whitespace that is quite disruptive. Constant314 ( talk) 16:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
deletion is not the only way to resolve the issue - very specifically the stations were created for the event. JarrahTree 12:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The 1987 event was of quite mixed blessings to some, - the railway stations are perhaps a set of the shortest duration railway stopping places in western australian railway history (literally only a few years operating) apart from Koongamia, Western Australia (less than 10 years and not even identified at this stage in the article) JarrahTree 12:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Moorgate tube crash shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are already at 4RR - please don't make it worse. I am happy to discuss this on the talk page, but you have to stop the reversions. - 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:1D4C:5458:CBD8:E267 ( talk) 10:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Please take a look at Template:Multiref2, where I fixed self-closed tag lint errors, but may not have done it exactly right. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 16:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
P.S. I suspect it's not right, because this markup
{{Multiref2|<ref name="Hayt_5"/>{{rp|360}} |<ref name="Balanis_AEE_2">{{Citation |last=Balanis |first= Constantine A. |year= 2012 |title= Engineering Electromagnetics |edition= 2nd |publisher= Wiley |isbn= 978-0-470-58948-9 |author-link=Constantine A. Balanis}}</ref>{{rp|142}}| <ref name="Harrington_THEF">{{Citation |last=Harrington |first= Roger F. |year= 1961 |title= Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields |publisher= McGraw-Hill |isbn= 0-07-026745-6 |author-link= Roger F. Harrington}}</ref>{{rp|50–52}} }}
from
User:Constant314/sandbox has a missing end tag for <p>
. I don't see the problem, because the first <p>
and the last </p>
seem to be properly nested outside all sets of {{...}}
. If you have not already done so, it would be helpful to read
WP:Linter and install lintHint, which is described there. —
Anomalocaris (
talk) 02:42, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
<p>
Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam.
<p>
Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo.
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</p>
<p>Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam.</p>
<p>Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo.</p>
<p>
becomes </p><p>
automatically) to keep the DOM sane. --
FeRDNYC (
talk) 08:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Hey! I noticed you messed around with this template a while back attempting to remove some whitespace. I had the same trouble with the same template on
Grey's Anatomy (season 17) with this reference:
[1]. It doesn't appear that you actually got around to publishing anything, possibly because the whitespace was still showing? In the sandbox I messed around with your edited version, which used a switch statement, and added what appeared to be a missing pipe (swapping {{{text}}}
for {{{text|}}}
) and it appears to have potentially fixed the issue. Here's an example using the sandbox with the added pipe:
[2]. I quickly glanced over the testcases and didn't notice that anything was broken but considering that I don't mess with templates often I wanted to check with you and see if there were any other underlying issues that may have caused you not to publish previously?
References
Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
Multiref2/sandbox}}
that fix the paragraph issue and the check for an empty first parameter. They also remove the requirement that a second parameter be supplied, because why not? There's no harm in supporting {{
Multiref2|(single citation)}}
as a derivative form, it shouldn't cause an error. (Perhaps the user wants to come back and add an additional citation later.) --
FeRDNYC (
talk) 09:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)<ref>{{
Multiref2|{{
cite web|cite1}}
|{{
cite web|cite2}}
|...}}
</ref>
<ref>{{
cite web|cite1}}
<p>{{
cite web|cite2}}
</p>...</ref>
<ol><li>{{
cite web|cite1}}
<p>{{
cite web|cite2}}
</p>...</li></ol>
<ol><li><ul><li>{{
cite web|cite1}}
</li><li>{{
cite web|cite2}}
</li><li>...</li></ul></li></ol>
{{
Multiref}}
gets around that by having the caller supply some introductory text which gets placed on the first line (the line with the ordered list number), before the unbulleted list. That text (even if it's empty) is a requirement of how HTML processes nested lists, so if any kind of list is used it can't be avoided. --
FeRDNYC (
talk) 10:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Help copy edit for the article. Thank you. Omomp ( talk) 02:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
copy edit|date=October 2021}}
to get further assistance. Regards,
DesertPipeline (
talk) 02:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Hi. A few months ago you've started a discussion about bolding of names in lists. I just want to let you know it's progressed somewhat. fgnievinski ( talk) 04:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Template:Packed gallery border has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Professional sound production/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 10:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Multiref/sandbox2, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rjjiii ( talk) 03:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
This is DesertPipeline's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
Archives: Index | |
I saw you making a couple of these substitutions on my watchlist. For future reference, per MOS:SEASONS, it is desirable to avoid referring to seasons instead preferring "late 1944", etc. ( t · c) buidhe 19:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing up SOLRAD 3! Is spaceflight of particular interest to you? I'm always happy to have fellow Spacepedians. :)
Neopeius (
talk) 00:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Dear DesertPipeline
Thanks for encouraging words! I was acitve in Wikipedia in the past when German site was below 1 Mio entries. The German article de:PlanetarySystemStacker was gratefully accepted. I was not aware about the restrictions on new articles in EN Wikipedia. Otherwise I would have added more references as I did now. Is it save to store the draft article under *User:Tubas*, see heading? It is an article about a scientific software which produces excellent results. But it will never be in the mainstream for mobile phone users. Perhaps some day someone will remember about this article and move it to the main pages. Tubas ( talk) 12:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Key excerpts, as you requested:
As you can see, the professional editors advocating for lowercase internet are not ignorant about the technical history of the distinction, they just know it's going the way of the dodo. Popcornfud ( talk) 21:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
I am sure SMc is already aware of their sources, and they have made their opinion on this clear - SMc just thinks they’re wrong. Popcornfud ( talk) 09:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Was that you? Good one. But you should sign your work, though as you can see, bees actually don't have hooves. E Eng 05:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
[[File:foo.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Blah blah blah {{right|-~~~}}]]
Note three ~ instead of four to omit timestamp, which is too cluttering.
E
Eng 06:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm curious about
[1]. Do you manually copy each heading into /* heading */
in the edit summary or do you have a tool helping make the edit summary?
Help:Edit summary#Section editing mentions the manual method but I don't recall ever seeing it used before. By the way,
MOS:BOLD includes: "This is also done at the first occurrence of a term (commonly a synonym in the lead) that
redirects to the article".
copyright trap redirects.
PrimeHunter (
talk) 13:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello friend. Please take a look at WP:COMMONNAME when you get a chance. It concerns me that you moved two articles from common names to uncommon names. For example, Video game piracy has 101,000 hits in Google, and Unauthorized distribution of video games only has 8. I am also concerned by your change of the word "free" to "gratis" (this is less clear/less succinct). I am also concerned by all your edits in general, as you seem to have a pro-piracy POV. (I also like piracy, but I do not let it show in my editing.) I would encourage you to dial back the boldness of your edits a bit and get consensus for big changes. Thanks for listening. Happy editing. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 14:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello DesertPipeline,
I've seen you do this in a few articles, but for what it's worth, double spaces are explicitly allowed on Wikipedia. There's absolutely no difference in how they display to the user, so it's a matter of editor preference. If you prefer to use single spaces in your own substantive edits, that's great, but don't do "drive-by" edits that do nothing but change the spacing style of an article; double spacing is not a problem to be "fixed", unlike say spelling errors. SnowFire ( talk) 15:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
The thing you have to learn, in having a goal, is not to set an impossible goal, something too high you can never reach. You gotta have a series of smaller goals, that you can accomplish, and slowly work your way up. And this is what I have done. That's why I'm so happy. My goal: right now, I want to be the all-being master of time, space and dimension.
Hi again. Listen, I need to talk with you again about your approach to stylistic choices in articles. I see two things you've been doing lately:
The bottom line is that you have somewhat rigid ideas about writing style and formatting which are not shared by the community as a whole, and more and more you're annoying other editors with them. First it was your ideas about neutral language; then it was the double spacing; after that colloquialisms. Your arbitrary conversion of articles to British English is especially serious; you are walking into a minefield and you will get blocked if you keep that up.
Please, please stop "cleaning up" stuff according to your personal ideas; editors who do wide-ranging cleanup work successfully are those who have paid their dues first by writing content themselves (not just "fixing" other people's content). I urge you to find a topic area you find sufficiently interesting to allow you to do that, and stop it with all this tinkering. E Eng 18:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't have the capacity to write my own material on Wikipedia; not to any significant extent anyway. It also requires me to cite sources, which is something I cannot do due to personal reasonsbecause it sounds ... well, sad. I can't imagine what your circumstances could be, but it must feel bad to want to contribute and yet have so much trouble finding a way to do it. Look, if you find yourself making the same kind of edit over and over, why don't you give me a ping and I'll take a look and tell you what I think? That way we can head off trouble. OK? E Eng 04:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I see you've created Template:Quote punctuation. But do you really think a violation of MOS:LQ is something that deserves a banner at the top of an article? Compliance with MOS:LQ is inside baseball among editors that affects virtually nothing in terms of readers' understanding of topics or ease of reading. A much more effective way of asking for a verification of compliance in an article is to notify a forum like WT:GOCE. I thought of filing it for TfD but I figured I'd ask you first. Nardog ( talk) 02:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
So I've filed it for TfD: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#Template:Quote punctuation. Nardog ( talk) 01:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
You might contemplate that it is more noble to correct easily remediable problems rather than just identifying them. ;)
An editor thinks that word "blur" is used inappropriately in the Wikipedia article Raft. They can't be bothered to fix the problem, but are satisfied that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. |
Smallchief ( talk) 11:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Loaded words and terms on Wikipedia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Loaded words and terms on Wikipedia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Loaded words and terms on Wikipedia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 17:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Hi, Requesting you to please restore this page.. I'm updating the content and I'll remove or modify the sources cited. Again please restore this page.. ill make the appropriate changes as per the guideline.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SAMCO_Securities_(2nd_nomination) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nilesh M Sharma ( talk • contribs) 19:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
Following on from
your edit here, how did you add the section headings (-→ Rotating tunnels, → Framework, etc) to your edit summary? I'm curious...
Moonraker12 (
talk) 09:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
/*(Text here)*/
– You can put any text in between; only text which matches a section heading's name will result in a working link though, where it takes you to the section with that name when clicked on :)
DesertPipeline (
talk) 09:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if I'm supposed to answer on my page or yours, so sorry if I've got this wrong. It's Android I'm running it on, with Chrome. Like you say, I'd've thought they'd have this sorted by now. I did wonder after I'd written it off mp4 was under patent. Anyhow, at least I know now. Ta for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SquidSix ( talk • contribs) 11:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
); also, when replying, you should
indent your comments. The indenting and comment placement rules can be a little confusing at first, but it just takes some getting used to. I hope that helps. Regards,
DesertPipeline (
talk) 09:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Have you not noticed the effect on the References section of the articles? Multiref2 inserts enormous amounts of verticle whitespace that is quite disruptive. Constant314 ( talk) 16:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
deletion is not the only way to resolve the issue - very specifically the stations were created for the event. JarrahTree 12:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The 1987 event was of quite mixed blessings to some, - the railway stations are perhaps a set of the shortest duration railway stopping places in western australian railway history (literally only a few years operating) apart from Koongamia, Western Australia (less than 10 years and not even identified at this stage in the article) JarrahTree 12:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Moorgate tube crash shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are already at 4RR - please don't make it worse. I am happy to discuss this on the talk page, but you have to stop the reversions. - 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:1D4C:5458:CBD8:E267 ( talk) 10:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Please take a look at Template:Multiref2, where I fixed self-closed tag lint errors, but may not have done it exactly right. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 16:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
P.S. I suspect it's not right, because this markup
{{Multiref2|<ref name="Hayt_5"/>{{rp|360}} |<ref name="Balanis_AEE_2">{{Citation |last=Balanis |first= Constantine A. |year= 2012 |title= Engineering Electromagnetics |edition= 2nd |publisher= Wiley |isbn= 978-0-470-58948-9 |author-link=Constantine A. Balanis}}</ref>{{rp|142}}| <ref name="Harrington_THEF">{{Citation |last=Harrington |first= Roger F. |year= 1961 |title= Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields |publisher= McGraw-Hill |isbn= 0-07-026745-6 |author-link= Roger F. Harrington}}</ref>{{rp|50–52}} }}
from
User:Constant314/sandbox has a missing end tag for <p>
. I don't see the problem, because the first <p>
and the last </p>
seem to be properly nested outside all sets of {{...}}
. If you have not already done so, it would be helpful to read
WP:Linter and install lintHint, which is described there. —
Anomalocaris (
talk) 02:42, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
<p>
Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam.
<p>
Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo.
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</p>
<p>Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam.</p>
<p>Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo.</p>
<p>
becomes </p><p>
automatically) to keep the DOM sane. --
FeRDNYC (
talk) 08:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Hey! I noticed you messed around with this template a while back attempting to remove some whitespace. I had the same trouble with the same template on
Grey's Anatomy (season 17) with this reference:
[1]. It doesn't appear that you actually got around to publishing anything, possibly because the whitespace was still showing? In the sandbox I messed around with your edited version, which used a switch statement, and added what appeared to be a missing pipe (swapping {{{text}}}
for {{{text|}}}
) and it appears to have potentially fixed the issue. Here's an example using the sandbox with the added pipe:
[2]. I quickly glanced over the testcases and didn't notice that anything was broken but considering that I don't mess with templates often I wanted to check with you and see if there were any other underlying issues that may have caused you not to publish previously?
References
Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
Multiref2/sandbox}}
that fix the paragraph issue and the check for an empty first parameter. They also remove the requirement that a second parameter be supplied, because why not? There's no harm in supporting {{
Multiref2|(single citation)}}
as a derivative form, it shouldn't cause an error. (Perhaps the user wants to come back and add an additional citation later.) --
FeRDNYC (
talk) 09:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)<ref>{{
Multiref2|{{
cite web|cite1}}
|{{
cite web|cite2}}
|...}}
</ref>
<ref>{{
cite web|cite1}}
<p>{{
cite web|cite2}}
</p>...</ref>
<ol><li>{{
cite web|cite1}}
<p>{{
cite web|cite2}}
</p>...</li></ol>
<ol><li><ul><li>{{
cite web|cite1}}
</li><li>{{
cite web|cite2}}
</li><li>...</li></ul></li></ol>
{{
Multiref}}
gets around that by having the caller supply some introductory text which gets placed on the first line (the line with the ordered list number), before the unbulleted list. That text (even if it's empty) is a requirement of how HTML processes nested lists, so if any kind of list is used it can't be avoided. --
FeRDNYC (
talk) 10:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Help copy edit for the article. Thank you. Omomp ( talk) 02:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
copy edit|date=October 2021}}
to get further assistance. Regards,
DesertPipeline (
talk) 02:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Hi. A few months ago you've started a discussion about bolding of names in lists. I just want to let you know it's progressed somewhat. fgnievinski ( talk) 04:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Template:Packed gallery border has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 23:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Professional sound production/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 10:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Multiref/sandbox2, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rjjiii ( talk) 03:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)