![]() | This is an
archive of past discussions for the period September 2021 to January 2022. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
Hi Sdqraz
You tagged a page, B A F Shaheen College Kurmitola for speedy deletion as criteria G4. But this article isn't substantially identical to the deleted version, and any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted. Because there are now 2 reliable sources. dhaka.gov.bd and baf.mil.bd is absolutely reliable source. Thanks. ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! 【Click to Discuss】 18:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
dhaka.gov.bd is the official website of Bangladesh's capital Dhaka and baf.mil.bd is the official website of Bangladesh Air Force. There are surely absolutely reliable source. I'm sure! Thanks ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! 【Click to Discuss】 18:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Sdrqaz for helping me in my talk page! ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! 【Click to Discuss】 13:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: Message was in response to this edit on Tajwar's talk page.
On 24 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shadow docket, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Trump won 28 times more shadow docket requests per year than Bush and Obama? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shadow docket. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Shadow docket), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Just to let you know I changed the short description back to "1920 film" as that format is the de facto standard for film article shortdescs. All the best. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this edit at The Kelly Gang.
uhh i dont understand how to find information with a page that just redirects to roger taylors page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queen fan who edited ogre battle article ( talk • contribs) 20:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the creation of this page.
I dont now how to add the fact that I am Sepehr Haddad of Shahin and Sepehr but am also an author which has written a book. I tried to make a separate page for myself only ( Sepehr Haddad) but it seemed I could not since I am part of Shahin and Sepehr because of my music. If you could be of assistance to show me how to do it as I am a public figure, I would appreciate it. Thank you for all your support and the time you take to make things right. Much appreciated Sepehr — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEPEHRHADDAD ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding these edits at Shahin & Sepehr. Part of the message was titled "Thank you kindly for your excellent explanation and so prompt response"; this heading was removed and merged into the previous message.
I am not sure how Ralph Pelleymounter page is a conflict of interest? I did approve a page about myself of which I hadn't realized I shouldn't and I apologize but I believe both have merit to be listed due to the public nature of both of our collective works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteroberth ( talk • contribs) 19:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
"both have merit to be listed", please submit the drafts for review by our reviewers instead of just reverting and moving it back into the mainspace. You can do so by adding
{{subst:submit}}
to them.
Sdrqaz (
talk)
22:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Note: Conversation was regarding the page move of Peter Oberth to Draft:Peter Oberth and page move of Ralph Pelleymounter (Singer) to Draft:Ralph Pelleymounter (Singer).
Hi Sdrqaz. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
patroller
with care. Yours,
Sdrqaz (
talk)
00:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for the hard work on ENwiki \(^_^\ ) ToffeeQueen ( talk) 02:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC) |
On 25 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Raed Ahmed, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olympic flagbearer Raed Ahmed defected after he saw Bill Clinton clapping? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Raed Ahmed. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Raed Ahmed), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello my name is BloxyColaSweet! I have been strolling on both user and talk page. They are interesting but they arent very notable! But they are notable for a deletion, regards. BloxyColaSweet ( talk) 10:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
"notable for a deletion"means. Sdrqaz ( talk) 12:54, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
"very notable for deletion"means (your subpage did not clear anything up). As an aside, your user page is highly misleading, as you do not have any of the four permissions you claim to have in your top-icons. Please remove them. Sdrqaz ( talk) 00:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
"repl[y] an answer of a excuse that both user page and talk page are 'Very Notable'". I advise you to focus on building an encyclopedia instead of making strange statements on policy, and perhaps (if applicable) contribute to another project in your first language because others are having difficulty communicating with you here. Sdrqaz ( talk) 09:58, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
On 4 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Man Who Died Twice (novel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a reviewer said that Richard Osman's The Man Who Died Twice has "more holes than a dodgy knitting pattern" but he "enjoyed every minute"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Man Who Died Twice (novel). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Man Who Died Twice (novel)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sdrqaz,
I noticed that the article that I created for Neal Ludevig was deleted, however I'm confused as to why. I understand it was deleted earlier, but its been substantial time since then and he's been in the press and public eye quite a bit since then.
In addition to the material that was relevant (him as a producer and curator, which was covered substantially), since the creation and deletion of the last article, he was in a number of other places. The main argument earlier seemed to be that him being a producer and curator of large events wasn't enough (despite their large coverage), but now it seems he's been interviewed all over the place - Nasdaq, numerous podcasts and news stations...doesn't this justify this article being reviewed again?
Let me know the process here to open this up. It definitely feels like it merits a review, especially considering this text seems pretty different from previous articles.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiztorybuph ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Neal Ludevig. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hiztorybuph ( talk) 23:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the G4 deletion of Neal Ludevig; the deletion review can be found at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 November 5 § Neal Ludevig.
On 6 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Niz-Chavez v. Garland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a U.S. Supreme Court case had "odd bedfellows"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Niz-Chavez v. Garland. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Niz-Chavez v. Garland), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
I have made some explanations regarding the page u tagged for deletion and I believe the page has met the criteria for notability. Uncle Bash007 ( talk) 23:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the G4 CSD nomination of FilmOne.
There is absolutely no reason to leave such an obvious case to an administrator. Unless you want users indefinitely blocked for copyvio to have advanced privileges? See here if you want precedent that administrator status is not required to decline an obvious case. Polyamorph ( talk) 10:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"users indefinitely blocked for copyvio to have advanced privileges". While Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, I would rather that it were administrators making decisions at the permissions noticeboard. Although we as non-administrators have the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, the right to warn, ultimately the decision on whether to grant a permission comes down to the reviewing administrator. DanCherek had already noted the partial block, and any administrator worth their salt would have looked at their block log before granting a permission. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"If you aren't in a position to grant the request you aren't in a position to decline it."You disagree, and that's fine. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this edit at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer, which caused this discussion – Special:Permalink/1055049971 § User:2006nishan178713.
Hello, is subvariety used to classify plants geographically like variety? if so or not, please show me a well-explained example! thank you!
BloxyColaSweet ( talk) 03:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Sdrqaz,
I saw your comment at پارسا_آملی's SPI case. CSD G5 is for block evasion and, for me and other administrators, we need to see that there is a real connection between an editor suspected of sockpuppetry and the sockmaster and that the alleged sockpuppet's account was created after the sockmaster was blocked. We have some editors who tag an editor's page creations as soon as they are reported at SPI and that is not acceptable. Suspicion is not confirmation. We also have some editors who tag any page that the alleged sockpuppet created, regardless of other editors' contributions to the article. There is a lot of misunderstanding about CSD G5 and some editors, to me, act with unusual eagerness to delete an alleged sockpuppet's page creations as soon as there are suspicions about them. You'll find long discussions about CSD G5 on my talk page as we try to sort out when it is appropriate and when it isn't (and discussion involved a checkuser).
I don't think there is a need to rush and pages should be evaluated to see if the tagging and deletion are appropriate. Page deletion is a serious act to take against an editor and I need to see proof that it is justified before deleting articles an editor created. We used to have admins who would just delete any page with a CSD tag on it without looking it over but they aren't admins any more and I think you'll find other admins who are just as cautious as I am.
But if you disagree with me, you're right, this issue might warrant a discussion at WP:CSD. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this edit at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی.
Hi there! There was a lot of information in your response to my submission for Mount Washington Valley SPIRIT, and I don't understand it all. I was hoping you could simplify everything for me.
I created the page as the team has been around for 13 years and has worked alongside the ghost hunters and ghost hunters international television shows. It has continually gained popularity over the years. We are research field leaders and share our experience and knowledge though our blog and podcast at no cost to anyone. We don't even have a patreon page.
The group has no finances and any expenses are covered by me out of pocket. I don't even accept donations. There isn't a financial conflict of interest involved.
There isn't anyone more qualified to write an article about the group than me.
I have several learning disabilities so going through a bunch of links for information isn't feasible for me so I was hoping that you could simplify things.
I spent a dozen hours putting together that article as my learning disabilities make it difficult for me to read.
Could you please simplify what i need to do to get it published. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EricExtreme47 ( talk • contribs) 00:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was in response to this message at EricExtreme47's talk page.
Submitted the draft for review. Thank You Lynne Thornton ( talk) 18:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was following the page move of Josef Yohannes to Draft:Josef Yohannes.
remove deletion tag please Deependra Singh (Actor) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorbrother ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
"sufficiently identical". You'll have to wait for an administrator to decide whether it's correct. If it is, talk to them on their talk page and if they don't want to restore it, you can ask for others to weigh in at deletion review. Sdrqaz ( talk) 18:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Deependra Singh (Actor) was deleted under G4 and Editorbrother subsequently blocked as a sockpuppet.
Hello, Sorry to disturb you. But i couldn't understand the reason for moving the page to the draft. Also i had a badge saying it needs notability. i couldn't understand about it. what should i do to show the notability. kindly guide me step by step pls.
RajendranMCV ( talk) 17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Relevant information can be found at Draft:MCV Network.
Hi Sdrqaz,
I really appreciate you reviewing my (very first new from scratch) Wikipedia page Draft:Tom_Neenan_(writer_/_performer) on 26 November!
I've now added more detail, made an effort to address your concerns (the need to cite independent, reliable sources, etc.), and submitted for review. Understand anyone could pick it up now, but letting you know in case you would like to review it for continuity.
Thanks again and best wishes,
David (Easleydp) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Easleydp (
talk •
contribs)
18:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was following the page move of Tom Neenan (writer / performer) to Draft:Tom Neenan (writer / performer).
Hi! ))
Олег Черкасский (
talk)
10:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ksenia Svarovski.
Hello Sdrqaz. I'd appreciate the opportunity to revise the content of Vestwell page with significantly pared down information as well as citing only third-party sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epcomms ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was following the page move of Vestwell to Draft:Vestwell, which was subsequently deleted and recreated.
![]() |
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia | |
For reviewing more than 500 articles during the backlog drive. |
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For re-reviewing at least 25 articles during the backlog drive. |
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 524 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. ( t · c) buidhe 12:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/November 2021.
Do you have an actual source that Shadi Skaf has made 3 international appearances? All of the sources in the article suggest he's made none, and if he hasn't actually made a full international appearance, he doesn't meet WP:NFOOTY. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadi Skaf and the prior page move to draftspace.
Hello Sdrqaz! Thank you for your comments on my research. I have moved my information to the page you linked and removed one of the sources I used in my original post since I found that it was very difficult to open. Let me know if you notice anything that needs revision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SammySamy ( talk • contribs) 19:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding my message at SammySamy's talk page.
Hi, I hope this message will find you in high spirits. Thanks for knowing me on my promotional editing on a page named Chaman, but most of that information was not promotional kindly restore that information and editing which you deleted with other promotional stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inamullahtopper ( talk • contribs) 01:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
"the peopled are left to deprive from hunger ... In spite of this in order to improve the living of the people, the government and FC officials grabbed the only source of income from the people by imposing sanctions on imports from Afghanistan.") If you can find reliable sources that support those statements, please add them back in. However, Wikipedia is not your personal website. Your "profile image" does not belong here. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding these edits at Chaman.
Hello Sdrqaz: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Just i yaya 23:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
I see you make good edits on Wikipedia. So I would like you to correct some problems in my article I made. Cause I want to know where I went wrong and improve on it. Tylerbrizyy ( talk) 22:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
"Getting verified on Spotify as an official artist"and
"passing over 85,000 total video views on Instagram"are simply not enough for Wikipedia, which needs its subjects to be notable – that means having multiple reliable, independent sources writing about them at good detail. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the A7 speedy deletion nomination of Tylerbrizyy, which was deleted as such.
Hello, Sdrqaz,
I think this deletion request might need more explanation as it has been sitting for more than 8 hours without an admin taking action. It's not clear how it is vandalism. You might consider nominating it at WP:RFD where you can provide an explanation on why this page should be deleted. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the G3 and R3 speedy deletion nominations of this page, which was deleted as such.
I apologise if my comment in the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#British politician sex offended you or you otherwise felt inappropriate. That was not my intention. Thryduulf ( talk) 23:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this message and its reply at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28 § British politician sex.
![]() |
You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already! |
Note: Part of the message was titled "There is a mop reserved in your name" and another part was titled "Review"; these headings were removed and merged into the previous message.
Thank you for removing that entry from the NPP TP, at the time of the entry, the idea was for more eyes looking at the AFD, in hindsight, I clearly see how that came off as something other than what was intended. I was going to remove the entry when I discovered you beat me to it. Thank you for that action. It is very much appreciated. Celestina007 ( talk) 23:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the removal of this message at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers. See this message at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquorose as well.
I do not see a reason for the request deletion for the Jack Murphy page I created. The content is sourced and the content is of better quality than many wikipedia pages currently up. Additionally, the content that the page is about is about a public figure that has received a lot of notoriety, and everything is sourced. I looked at the other page that has a request deletion for it as well, and I fail to see how the page I created is viewed in the same regard as that page. This is insulting. Valdemarpeterson ( talk) 23:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive340 § Requested BLPDELETE and the deletion request for Jack Murphy (author), which was deleted under A7.
Hi! I saw this comment of yours at WP:UAA. There was in fact an attempt to add a link as HelenDegenerate suggested. It was in the edit filter log: see this and this. I've blocked the account for this reason. I sometimes fail to think about the edit filter log too. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
"added link to a website with the same name"and thought it was an actual edit, not a filter log entry. I dove into their contributions and saw an edit adding a differently-named website, so assumed that a mistake had been made somewhere along the way – it turned out that the mistake had been made by me. Another reminder for me not to make assumptions. Sdrqaz ( talk) 04:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you pinged me at UAA about Olastech, a user I reported. To answer your question, the edit that I reported them for was one that only showed up in the filter log; it was flagged by filter 149 and didn't publish. Helen( 💬 📖) 22:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this question at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. Part of the message was titled "Re: UAA"; this heading was removed and merged into the previous conversation.
I left the talk page message on BBC Studio Productions, rather than make the changes myself, so the new editor could learn (since the problems weren't urgent). Thanks for fixing the apostrophe issue, I hope they see what was done so they'll know for next time. Schazjmd (talk) 01:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this message at Talk:BBC Studios Productions and this subsequent move and .
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Shadow docket you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Cerebellum --
Cerebellum (
talk)
17:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
Shadow docket you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Shadow docket for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Cerebellum --
Cerebellum (
talk)
19:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
Shadow docket you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Shadow docket for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Cerebellum --
Cerebellum (
talk)
16:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: See Talk:Shadow docket/GA1. Two parts of the message were both titled "Your GA nomination of Shadow docket"; these headings were removed and merged into the previous conversation.
Hi Sdrqaz. I am turning to you because you were helpful in the past with an edit request for Jonathan D. Gray. I would like to continue to improve the page, and I am asking if you can take a look at my most recent edit request here, and if you agree the requested edits improve the page, to please implement. Thanks so much. ThomasClements Blackstone ( talk) 20:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
On 21 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Magic minute, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the magic minute exposed a "secret" about baby carrots and criticized Jimmy Carter's sweaters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Magic minute. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Magic minute), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much, maybe I need more coffee
. I was quite surprised to see those pages come up on my watchlist and it still took a few minutes to realize why you moved them. Again, thank you! Cheers, -
FlightTime (
open channel)
01:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
tboverride
...
Sdrqaz (
talk)
16:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Note: Conversation was regarding this page move and this subsequent edit.
![]() | This is an
archive of past discussions for the period September 2021 to January 2022. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
![]() | This is an
archive of past discussions for the period September 2021 to January 2022. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
Hi Sdqraz
You tagged a page, B A F Shaheen College Kurmitola for speedy deletion as criteria G4. But this article isn't substantially identical to the deleted version, and any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted. Because there are now 2 reliable sources. dhaka.gov.bd and baf.mil.bd is absolutely reliable source. Thanks. ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! 【Click to Discuss】 18:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
dhaka.gov.bd is the official website of Bangladesh's capital Dhaka and baf.mil.bd is the official website of Bangladesh Air Force. There are surely absolutely reliable source. I'm sure! Thanks ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! 【Click to Discuss】 18:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Sdrqaz for helping me in my talk page! ➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN! 【Click to Discuss】 13:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: Message was in response to this edit on Tajwar's talk page.
On 24 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shadow docket, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Trump won 28 times more shadow docket requests per year than Bush and Obama? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shadow docket. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Shadow docket), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Just to let you know I changed the short description back to "1920 film" as that format is the de facto standard for film article shortdescs. All the best. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this edit at The Kelly Gang.
uhh i dont understand how to find information with a page that just redirects to roger taylors page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queen fan who edited ogre battle article ( talk • contribs) 20:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the creation of this page.
I dont now how to add the fact that I am Sepehr Haddad of Shahin and Sepehr but am also an author which has written a book. I tried to make a separate page for myself only ( Sepehr Haddad) but it seemed I could not since I am part of Shahin and Sepehr because of my music. If you could be of assistance to show me how to do it as I am a public figure, I would appreciate it. Thank you for all your support and the time you take to make things right. Much appreciated Sepehr — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEPEHRHADDAD ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding these edits at Shahin & Sepehr. Part of the message was titled "Thank you kindly for your excellent explanation and so prompt response"; this heading was removed and merged into the previous message.
I am not sure how Ralph Pelleymounter page is a conflict of interest? I did approve a page about myself of which I hadn't realized I shouldn't and I apologize but I believe both have merit to be listed due to the public nature of both of our collective works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteroberth ( talk • contribs) 19:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
"both have merit to be listed", please submit the drafts for review by our reviewers instead of just reverting and moving it back into the mainspace. You can do so by adding
{{subst:submit}}
to them.
Sdrqaz (
talk)
22:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Note: Conversation was regarding the page move of Peter Oberth to Draft:Peter Oberth and page move of Ralph Pelleymounter (Singer) to Draft:Ralph Pelleymounter (Singer).
Hi Sdrqaz. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
patroller
with care. Yours,
Sdrqaz (
talk)
00:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for the hard work on ENwiki \(^_^\ ) ToffeeQueen ( talk) 02:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC) |
On 25 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Raed Ahmed, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olympic flagbearer Raed Ahmed defected after he saw Bill Clinton clapping? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Raed Ahmed. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Raed Ahmed), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello my name is BloxyColaSweet! I have been strolling on both user and talk page. They are interesting but they arent very notable! But they are notable for a deletion, regards. BloxyColaSweet ( talk) 10:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
"notable for a deletion"means. Sdrqaz ( talk) 12:54, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
"very notable for deletion"means (your subpage did not clear anything up). As an aside, your user page is highly misleading, as you do not have any of the four permissions you claim to have in your top-icons. Please remove them. Sdrqaz ( talk) 00:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
"repl[y] an answer of a excuse that both user page and talk page are 'Very Notable'". I advise you to focus on building an encyclopedia instead of making strange statements on policy, and perhaps (if applicable) contribute to another project in your first language because others are having difficulty communicating with you here. Sdrqaz ( talk) 09:58, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
On 4 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Man Who Died Twice (novel), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a reviewer said that Richard Osman's The Man Who Died Twice has "more holes than a dodgy knitting pattern" but he "enjoyed every minute"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Man Who Died Twice (novel). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Man Who Died Twice (novel)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sdrqaz,
I noticed that the article that I created for Neal Ludevig was deleted, however I'm confused as to why. I understand it was deleted earlier, but its been substantial time since then and he's been in the press and public eye quite a bit since then.
In addition to the material that was relevant (him as a producer and curator, which was covered substantially), since the creation and deletion of the last article, he was in a number of other places. The main argument earlier seemed to be that him being a producer and curator of large events wasn't enough (despite their large coverage), but now it seems he's been interviewed all over the place - Nasdaq, numerous podcasts and news stations...doesn't this justify this article being reviewed again?
Let me know the process here to open this up. It definitely feels like it merits a review, especially considering this text seems pretty different from previous articles.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiztorybuph ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Neal Ludevig. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hiztorybuph ( talk) 23:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the G4 deletion of Neal Ludevig; the deletion review can be found at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 November 5 § Neal Ludevig.
On 6 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Niz-Chavez v. Garland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a U.S. Supreme Court case had "odd bedfellows"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Niz-Chavez v. Garland. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Niz-Chavez v. Garland), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
I have made some explanations regarding the page u tagged for deletion and I believe the page has met the criteria for notability. Uncle Bash007 ( talk) 23:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the G4 CSD nomination of FilmOne.
There is absolutely no reason to leave such an obvious case to an administrator. Unless you want users indefinitely blocked for copyvio to have advanced privileges? See here if you want precedent that administrator status is not required to decline an obvious case. Polyamorph ( talk) 10:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"users indefinitely blocked for copyvio to have advanced privileges". While Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, I would rather that it were administrators making decisions at the permissions noticeboard. Although we as non-administrators have the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, the right to warn, ultimately the decision on whether to grant a permission comes down to the reviewing administrator. DanCherek had already noted the partial block, and any administrator worth their salt would have looked at their block log before granting a permission. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
"If you aren't in a position to grant the request you aren't in a position to decline it."You disagree, and that's fine. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this edit at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer, which caused this discussion – Special:Permalink/1055049971 § User:2006nishan178713.
Hello, is subvariety used to classify plants geographically like variety? if so or not, please show me a well-explained example! thank you!
BloxyColaSweet ( talk) 03:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Sdrqaz,
I saw your comment at پارسا_آملی's SPI case. CSD G5 is for block evasion and, for me and other administrators, we need to see that there is a real connection between an editor suspected of sockpuppetry and the sockmaster and that the alleged sockpuppet's account was created after the sockmaster was blocked. We have some editors who tag an editor's page creations as soon as they are reported at SPI and that is not acceptable. Suspicion is not confirmation. We also have some editors who tag any page that the alleged sockpuppet created, regardless of other editors' contributions to the article. There is a lot of misunderstanding about CSD G5 and some editors, to me, act with unusual eagerness to delete an alleged sockpuppet's page creations as soon as there are suspicions about them. You'll find long discussions about CSD G5 on my talk page as we try to sort out when it is appropriate and when it isn't (and discussion involved a checkuser).
I don't think there is a need to rush and pages should be evaluated to see if the tagging and deletion are appropriate. Page deletion is a serious act to take against an editor and I need to see proof that it is justified before deleting articles an editor created. We used to have admins who would just delete any page with a CSD tag on it without looking it over but they aren't admins any more and I think you'll find other admins who are just as cautious as I am.
But if you disagree with me, you're right, this issue might warrant a discussion at WP:CSD. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this edit at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی.
Hi there! There was a lot of information in your response to my submission for Mount Washington Valley SPIRIT, and I don't understand it all. I was hoping you could simplify everything for me.
I created the page as the team has been around for 13 years and has worked alongside the ghost hunters and ghost hunters international television shows. It has continually gained popularity over the years. We are research field leaders and share our experience and knowledge though our blog and podcast at no cost to anyone. We don't even have a patreon page.
The group has no finances and any expenses are covered by me out of pocket. I don't even accept donations. There isn't a financial conflict of interest involved.
There isn't anyone more qualified to write an article about the group than me.
I have several learning disabilities so going through a bunch of links for information isn't feasible for me so I was hoping that you could simplify things.
I spent a dozen hours putting together that article as my learning disabilities make it difficult for me to read.
Could you please simplify what i need to do to get it published. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EricExtreme47 ( talk • contribs) 00:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was in response to this message at EricExtreme47's talk page.
Submitted the draft for review. Thank You Lynne Thornton ( talk) 18:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was following the page move of Josef Yohannes to Draft:Josef Yohannes.
remove deletion tag please Deependra Singh (Actor) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorbrother ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
"sufficiently identical". You'll have to wait for an administrator to decide whether it's correct. If it is, talk to them on their talk page and if they don't want to restore it, you can ask for others to weigh in at deletion review. Sdrqaz ( talk) 18:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Deependra Singh (Actor) was deleted under G4 and Editorbrother subsequently blocked as a sockpuppet.
Hello, Sorry to disturb you. But i couldn't understand the reason for moving the page to the draft. Also i had a badge saying it needs notability. i couldn't understand about it. what should i do to show the notability. kindly guide me step by step pls.
RajendranMCV ( talk) 17:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Relevant information can be found at Draft:MCV Network.
Hi Sdrqaz,
I really appreciate you reviewing my (very first new from scratch) Wikipedia page Draft:Tom_Neenan_(writer_/_performer) on 26 November!
I've now added more detail, made an effort to address your concerns (the need to cite independent, reliable sources, etc.), and submitted for review. Understand anyone could pick it up now, but letting you know in case you would like to review it for continuity.
Thanks again and best wishes,
David (Easleydp) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Easleydp (
talk •
contribs)
18:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was following the page move of Tom Neenan (writer / performer) to Draft:Tom Neenan (writer / performer).
Hi! ))
Олег Черкасский (
talk)
10:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ksenia Svarovski.
Hello Sdrqaz. I'd appreciate the opportunity to revise the content of Vestwell page with significantly pared down information as well as citing only third-party sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epcomms ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was following the page move of Vestwell to Draft:Vestwell, which was subsequently deleted and recreated.
![]() |
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia | |
For reviewing more than 500 articles during the backlog drive. |
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For re-reviewing at least 25 articles during the backlog drive. |
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 524 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. ( t · c) buidhe 12:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/November 2021.
Do you have an actual source that Shadi Skaf has made 3 international appearances? All of the sources in the article suggest he's made none, and if he hasn't actually made a full international appearance, he doesn't meet WP:NFOOTY. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadi Skaf and the prior page move to draftspace.
Hello Sdrqaz! Thank you for your comments on my research. I have moved my information to the page you linked and removed one of the sources I used in my original post since I found that it was very difficult to open. Let me know if you notice anything that needs revision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SammySamy ( talk • contribs) 19:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding my message at SammySamy's talk page.
Hi, I hope this message will find you in high spirits. Thanks for knowing me on my promotional editing on a page named Chaman, but most of that information was not promotional kindly restore that information and editing which you deleted with other promotional stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inamullahtopper ( talk • contribs) 01:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
"the peopled are left to deprive from hunger ... In spite of this in order to improve the living of the people, the government and FC officials grabbed the only source of income from the people by imposing sanctions on imports from Afghanistan.") If you can find reliable sources that support those statements, please add them back in. However, Wikipedia is not your personal website. Your "profile image" does not belong here. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding these edits at Chaman.
Hello Sdrqaz: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Just i yaya 23:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
I see you make good edits on Wikipedia. So I would like you to correct some problems in my article I made. Cause I want to know where I went wrong and improve on it. Tylerbrizyy ( talk) 22:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
"Getting verified on Spotify as an official artist"and
"passing over 85,000 total video views on Instagram"are simply not enough for Wikipedia, which needs its subjects to be notable – that means having multiple reliable, independent sources writing about them at good detail. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the A7 speedy deletion nomination of Tylerbrizyy, which was deleted as such.
Hello, Sdrqaz,
I think this deletion request might need more explanation as it has been sitting for more than 8 hours without an admin taking action. It's not clear how it is vandalism. You might consider nominating it at WP:RFD where you can provide an explanation on why this page should be deleted. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the G3 and R3 speedy deletion nominations of this page, which was deleted as such.
I apologise if my comment in the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#British politician sex offended you or you otherwise felt inappropriate. That was not my intention. Thryduulf ( talk) 23:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this message and its reply at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28 § British politician sex.
![]() |
You are a remarkable editor in many ways. You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an administrator without tools and have gained my support already! |
Note: Part of the message was titled "There is a mop reserved in your name" and another part was titled "Review"; these headings were removed and merged into the previous message.
Thank you for removing that entry from the NPP TP, at the time of the entry, the idea was for more eyes looking at the AFD, in hindsight, I clearly see how that came off as something other than what was intended. I was going to remove the entry when I discovered you beat me to it. Thank you for that action. It is very much appreciated. Celestina007 ( talk) 23:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding the removal of this message at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers. See this message at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquorose as well.
I do not see a reason for the request deletion for the Jack Murphy page I created. The content is sourced and the content is of better quality than many wikipedia pages currently up. Additionally, the content that the page is about is about a public figure that has received a lot of notoriety, and everything is sourced. I looked at the other page that has a request deletion for it as well, and I fail to see how the page I created is viewed in the same regard as that page. This is insulting. Valdemarpeterson ( talk) 23:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive340 § Requested BLPDELETE and the deletion request for Jack Murphy (author), which was deleted under A7.
Hi! I saw this comment of yours at WP:UAA. There was in fact an attempt to add a link as HelenDegenerate suggested. It was in the edit filter log: see this and this. I've blocked the account for this reason. I sometimes fail to think about the edit filter log too. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
"added link to a website with the same name"and thought it was an actual edit, not a filter log entry. I dove into their contributions and saw an edit adding a differently-named website, so assumed that a mistake had been made somewhere along the way – it turned out that the mistake had been made by me. Another reminder for me not to make assumptions. Sdrqaz ( talk) 04:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you pinged me at UAA about Olastech, a user I reported. To answer your question, the edit that I reported them for was one that only showed up in the filter log; it was flagged by filter 149 and didn't publish. Helen( 💬 📖) 22:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this question at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. Part of the message was titled "Re: UAA"; this heading was removed and merged into the previous conversation.
I left the talk page message on BBC Studio Productions, rather than make the changes myself, so the new editor could learn (since the problems weren't urgent). Thanks for fixing the apostrophe issue, I hope they see what was done so they'll know for next time. Schazjmd (talk) 01:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: Conversation was regarding this message at Talk:BBC Studios Productions and this subsequent move and .
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Shadow docket you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Cerebellum --
Cerebellum (
talk)
17:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
Shadow docket you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Shadow docket for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Cerebellum --
Cerebellum (
talk)
19:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The article
Shadow docket you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Shadow docket for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Cerebellum --
Cerebellum (
talk)
16:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: See Talk:Shadow docket/GA1. Two parts of the message were both titled "Your GA nomination of Shadow docket"; these headings were removed and merged into the previous conversation.
Hi Sdrqaz. I am turning to you because you were helpful in the past with an edit request for Jonathan D. Gray. I would like to continue to improve the page, and I am asking if you can take a look at my most recent edit request here, and if you agree the requested edits improve the page, to please implement. Thanks so much. ThomasClements Blackstone ( talk) 20:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
On 21 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Magic minute, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the magic minute exposed a "secret" about baby carrots and criticized Jimmy Carter's sweaters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Magic minute. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Magic minute), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much, maybe I need more coffee
. I was quite surprised to see those pages come up on my watchlist and it still took a few minutes to realize why you moved them. Again, thank you! Cheers, -
FlightTime (
open channel)
01:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
tboverride
...
Sdrqaz (
talk)
16:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Note: Conversation was regarding this page move and this subsequent edit.
![]() | This is an
archive of past discussions for the period September 2021 to January 2022. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |