This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello Sadko,
Please visit talk page at article " Serbs", so we can discuss about the images, please don't revert my edit because of stability of the article and edit war. We can sort this out ther. ;)
Regards, -- Wusten fuchs 14:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko!
Yes, it would be great to expand the article. Currently, I'm not very active on wikipedia (both sr and en), but I'll ask people there about the translation. Pozdrav Vladimir ( talk) 17:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Zdravo! :) I saw your activity on List of Serbs article, and therefor, i would ask you for some help. As this list is absolutely awful, full of non serbs, povs, and bad style, i started new one that will replace this. My crasy wish is to nominate this new list for FL, so your help is needed. By Art section, you will get the idea how list should look like. So, any comment is good, and any help will be awarded with barn! All best! -- WhiteWriter speaks 17:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Please see this. Thanks. Fainites barley scribs 16:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I left you a message at my talk page. I´m not sure if I can help you the way you would like. Best regards! FkpCascais ( talk) 19:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
I have responded to you on "Serbs" talk page, under the "2 pictures" section. And i have provided you with some more candidates for new pictures and some other recommendations. Please check it out, im sure you will like most of it! Greetings! ( Правичност ( talk) 04:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC))
Cool. Oh just one more thing; i remembered about adding Ivo Andrić, i think that would be a great idea, because he was a great writer, since "Croats" article claim him, "Serbs" article should claim him too ... as he declared as a croat only in younger years, after that he declared as a serb and as a serban writer all the way till his death. Thank you, greetings! ( Правичност ( talk) 01:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC))
Ok i will support it. ( Правичност ( talk) 22:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
Sadko, we have a slight problem.... somebody replaced ivo andrić with marina abramović pic in your mosaic and also replaced miloš Obrenović with some other person i cant recognize... and idk why ... abramović is already on the serbian american article, i dont think she needs to be on serbs too, atleast not of such importance like nikola tesla or some others by my opinion. I think Ivo Andrić and Miloš obrenović are of greater importance and should be returned back on the picture mosaic. ( Правичност ( talk) 14:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC))
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marina Abramović may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Zdravo druže, možeš li mi molim te kazati ko je osoba između Jovana Dučića i Ive Andrića na tvojim novim slikama ?- osoba izgleda mlada a i ima brkove. veoma mi poznat ali nikako da se setim imena :D ( Правичност ( talk) 14:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC))
aaa Mlutineeee jao, znači kad je bio mlad, ah kako nisam ukapirao :). Hvala :) I pogledaj na novo , stavio sam novu tvoju sliku gore i uredio imena dole.. pogledaj ako ti se svidi ( Правичност ( talk) 21:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC))
Pozdrav druže. Pokušao sam da prenesem jednu od dveh slika sa srpske vikipedije p. jurišića šturma na englesku vikipediju za infobox... ali ne ide nešto... da li bi ti znao nekom metodom preneti sliku s asrpske na englesku vikipediju? ili ako ne... d aje nekako skineš... mislim da je potrebna lepša slika na engleskoj vikipediji za šturma zaista. dve su slike koje bi mogle bit u infoboxu od šturma naći ćeš ih tu: http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5_%D0%88%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%9B_%D0%A8%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BC ( Правичност ( talk) 01:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC))
For Serbian Vojvodas and Generals i write down form this and this book and for King Alexander I form this page. I will add for King Peter I in future when i get this book. All of those pictures can be moved to commons since are 70 years + old. Snake bgd 20:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Pomaže Bog! ... I was thinking if you could replace Nadežda`s photo on "Serbs" article infobox picture mosaic with rather this photo (it is more original) .. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/Nadezda_Petrovic.jpg ... Could you do this? Pozdrav! ( Правичност ( talk) 03:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC))
Pozdrav majstore. Gledajući u collage slika poznatih Srba u infoboxu, može se reći da jedva postoji koji bosanski Srbin među drugima, sa obzirom da bosanski Srbi odnosno Srbi poreklom iz BiH broje skoro 1/3 svih Srba u svetu mogli bi dodati još koju osobu. Evo recimo ja predlažem i upravo sam samo na njega i mislio- Branka Čopića... Jovan Dučić svakako jeste poštovanja vredan i omenuća, no mislim da je Branko Čopić ipak nekako dalje posegnuo sa svojim delima i dostignućima i poznatije ime. To je moj predlog samo, a ti reci svoje mišljenje. Pozdrav veliki! ( Правичност ( talk) 03:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC))
WikiProject Republika Srpska | ||
---|---|---|
Hi, Sadko, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the
WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a
WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to
Republika Srpska and the
Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up.
WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia. | ||
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! |
--
Anulmanul (
talk)
21:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karl Nesselrode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dan arndt ( talk) 08:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)An article you recently created, [[Draft:Presidents of Serbian Academy of Sciences and arts|Presidents of Serbian Academy of Sciences and arts]. Pls clean up the template. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
09:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I saw you made contribution on talk page of International recognition of Kosovo in Grenada section. Appropriate amount of time has passed and no counter arguments were given against claim that Grenada revoked its recognition of Kosovo. Therefore I believe Grenada should be moved to the list of countries that have revoked recognition of Kosovo. Could you please move Grenada on that list? 37.1.207.70 ( talk) 21:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I see you reverted yourself. All I did in my edit was to remove the notes section because somebody removed the Kosovo template from the article, which then created a cite error in the notes section. I see this a lot where Kosovo is mentioned in an article. The note that you added, said do not remove, and I didn't. However, as you can see, the template that you added, does nothing but produce the letter - a - with no information provided. I have no idea what that is supposed to mean, but I left it because you said not to remove it. If you want to add the Kosovo note back, there was a special template created just for that note, which can be seen here - Template:Kosovo-note - just follow the instructions, or ping me and I will add it back if you want it in the article, I don't care one way or the other. That note is apparently controversial to certain editors, because I see disputes over it all the time, people will remove that template, but then they don't remove the notes section, which then creates that cite error. If you wanted to create a note about something else, then use the Template:Efn and follow the instructions there, or ping me, and I can help you with that as well. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 03:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 06:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Brate, video sam sta se desilo. Moram da ti kazem da se nece nista tamo desiti na ANI. Nije ni priblizno nista uradio da bi ga kaznili. Vec sam video slucaje gde cak i psuju pa nista ne bude. On jeste cesto grub, crnogorski je nacionalista, razumem te, ali mislim da si se zaleteo. A druga stvar, nije ti edit dovoljan. Ne znaci da to sto mu je knjiga stampana kod nas da je on srbin. Moras naci izvor gde direktno kaze da je on srbin. Ovim sto imas mozes uvrh glave da kazes da doprinosi srpskoj knjizevnosti. FkpCascais ( talk) 01:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Da bi uspeo da ga tuzis, moras da skupis sve kad te je uvredio i stavis linkove. Inace ovako se nece nista desiti. FkpCascais ( talk) 01:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
When content is disputed and consensus discussion is ongoing, restoring the disputed state (as you did) is disruptive. BLDM ( talk) 02:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am planning to open a mediation for the Skanderbeg case, because seems obvious those editors opposing my edits are going to do the best to keep that info out of the article. If we gather sources, we have tons of them, and it needs a mediation to inforce the edit and prevent them to erase perfectly valid sourced information just becausee they don´t like it. Do you think is a good idea or you may suggest something else? Who could also be invited to participate? PS: About Tesla, I apologise, but it had to be that way, I will explain it to you one they when dust settles. FkpCascais ( talk) 09:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
The next step would be to follow the conclusions of the consensus reached at the talkpage of that article. I am very busy in real life lately so I am not able to do it myself.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 19:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you, please, make some explanation on names for me?
As a non-native speaker I have some difficulty with the difference between English words for Serbians and Serbs – I would think Serbian denotes citizenship (or generally place of living or place of birth) while Serb is a nationality or ethinicity (inherited from parents and more generally from family, but not defined by a place).
However, the redirect List of Serbs → List of people from Serbia seems to translate 'Serbs' to 'people from Serbia', which is opposite to my intuition. Which one is correct? -- CiaPan ( talk) 15:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
It is a tricky one when translated in English.
Serbian (in our language Srbijanac) denotes a person from Serbia, mostly Serbs from Serbia but other nation as well (some 16% of Serbian population comes from minority groups). Not all Serbs are Serbians. Serbs from other countries (1.1 million of them in Bosnia and Herzegovina for example) are simply - Serbs.
For example Laslo Đere is a Serbian with Hungarian roots, while Jelena Dokic, Australian citizen, is a Serb.
That redirect is making all the trouble.
This means that we have 2 articles on the same topic, that is List of Serbians and List of people from Serbia, which is not good, if you would agree.
Sadko ( talk) 17:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
List of Serbs. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
21:09, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
You're at WP:3RR. You've been around long enough to know what this warning means. I would discuss with you if I had the time but the issues with what you're doing have already been raised by others it appears. You are inserting your own viewpoint (that such Serbianization is only WP:ALLEGED) in spite of what the cited sources say. You raise your concerns, calmly, on the talk page, and if possible bring forward RS and proposals, rather than condemning the other side. Cheers.-- Calthinus ( talk) 21:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
This is not WP:VANDAL. I see the issue as "Croatian" identity was not sourced, however, it is also problematic to consider him as Serbian instead of Montenegrin as well. The article is not written very well, it lacks citations, reference style, while other Wikipedian articles are not reliable sources for citation/adaptation especially if are from Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias which do not follow basic editing principles and are extremely biased. It does not matter if there is "no doubt" on his identity according to some RS, we follow NPOV, WEIGHT and BALANCE. Very reliable sources, like Croatian encyclopedia ( [1]), Hrvatska revija ( [2]) among others consider him as a Croatian and as such this information should be included in the article, stating something like he is considered as a Croat in Croatia or Croatian historiography or something. I will rewrite the article.-- Miki Filigranski ( talk) 11:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 ( talk) 08:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Good work on Milutin Garašanin! Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please see ANI - Vandalism on Ivan Gundulić by Sadko — Maile ( talk) 13:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. I noticed that you recently used celebstrendnow.com as a source for biographical information in List of Serbs of Croatia. I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that celebstrendnow.com meets reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.-- Ronz ( talk) 21:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey man, thanks for the star. PajaBG ( talk) 11:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
The Serbia Barnstar of National Merit | ||
I have noticed your edits in Serbia related articles and appreciated them greatly. Keep up the good work. Antidiskriminator ( talk) 20:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, thank you for pointing to the lack of sufficient references in those articles. I will try to find time and add some additional scholarly sources. Sorabino ( talk) 20:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Zaustavi ove što sprečavaju da se Čola nazove srpskim pjevačem. Nakon što sam pristao na kompromis da u uvodu stoji kako sad stoji (bez jugoslovenski je ali nema veze, u budućnosti će biti Bosnian-born Yugoslav-Serbian po smrti pjevača jer tada će obje odrednice i jug. i srp. biti jednako bitne), neki opet uklanjaju unapređenja članka odnosno napomene i brišu ćiriličko ime te stavljaju da je bosanski a nije više jer odabrao je da živi u Srbiji (a uz to je i etnički Srbin iz Sarajeva). Hvala. -- 5.43.77.235 ( talk) 19:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, i was just scrolling around on English wikipedia and was reading articles about WW2 and NDH ("Independent state of Croatia"). I have noticed that a lot of these pages have ultra-right and fascist things written in them like lowering the numbers of people killed (lowering the number of people killed in the NDH and in concentration camps), claiming that some people were of different ethnicity even if those same people identified as a specific ethnicity (for example claiming that Serbs in a specific area are not Serbs but Vlachs or Croats instead). I edited a few sentences on this specific page /info/en/?search=Serbs_of_Croatia but there are too many articles and too many things which are incorrect and i alone can not edit them all. So i would like to ask you to help and maybe even outright block access of editing to everyone except administrators since these articles on wikipedia are being used as a propaganda tool to misslead and change opinions of everyone but specifically the young people (since they are the ones who use wikipedia the most). I also notices that a large amount of these edits were being done by the same people over a lengthy period of time which just shows that they have an agenda.
Thanks in advance. -A user from the Balkans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.223.214.240 ( talk) 00:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 22:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 23:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 23:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 23:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Well, it's not like I didn't react at all. [3] It's just that having 1/3 of the intro say "A number of his views are considered to be chauvinistic, racist and anti-semitic and remain controversial" - when in fact this carries more like 1/30 of the actual importance for his bio - is not balanced at all. I really dislike whitewashing, but driving a not-so-subtle point home is a flip side of the same coin. GregorB ( talk) 21:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your continous fighting against POV-pushing and blatant vandalism, you deserve this award since long time now, congratulations! FkpCascais ( talk) 02:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC) |
Find it interesting how MOS doesn't matter when it comes to your articles. Could it possibly be that you are POV pushing? Hmmmmmmmmmm SerVasi ( talk) 03:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko
Thank you for creating Momir Korunović.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice article. I removed some of the styling from the gallery, though the works in the gallery are very nice! We just usually don't have styling like that on articles (although users commonly use stuff like that on user pages)
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here)( click me!) 21:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vladimir Nikolić, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep Talk 17:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Old Serbia at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:26, 02:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Sadko, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko. After reading one of your posts at the Admin's incident board I wanted to give you some info that might help you in the future. You stated " it is just that admins are sometimes rather busy and have too much on their plate and so they just count reverts (going by the book) and do not have the time to look at the content and the nature of reverts more deeply". In most instances it's not the job of administrators to judge who is right in an edit war. Of course, all editors engaged in edit warring believe they are doing the right thing. Editorial differences are to be discussed on the article's talk page and the article content is to be determined by consensus. Full stop. Any other course of action is edit warring. You must keep in mind that one can edit war without violating the three revert rule. There are exceptions detailed at WP:Edit warring but they are very few and extremely specific. I'm not commenting on the current discussion at AN/I or any of your past editing. I'm just attempting to make sure you don't run into future problems due to what might be a misunderstanding. Thanks for your time Tide rolls 15:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Laza Kostić at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 07:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Đura Jakšić at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koča Popović, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Order of the Republic and Order of Freedom ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Something tells me the IPs that have suddenly appeared at Smiljan are connected to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikola22. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 23:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko. I reverted your addition of additional sources at Josip Runjanin because it simply isn't needed. First, some of the sources (such as the self-published Vuckevich and a 1992 wartime propaganda book) aren't WP:RS. Moreover, there are sufficient references backing up the statement as it is. Regardless of how many sources you throw at something, Mikola22 and his various sockpuppets won't care either way because they are chauvinist trolls, so there's no point. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 15:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Think you can revert this chauvinist vandalism here? Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 17:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Recently you removed some stuff from your talk page. Though that's your right, it may sometimes be better to archive it. If admins are later trying to follow up on someone who isn't discussing properly, talk page evidence may be helpful. Things may be different if you are getting rid of something defamatory or full of expletives, but that wasn't the case here. Also, if somebody warns you for a silly reason, that reflects badly on them rather than you. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 18:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Jovan Jovanović Zmaj at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 06:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC) |
I'm editing from a tablet. Someone removed my last comment on this TP which I cannot reverse. Could you please do me favor by putting back the removed comment? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.243.245 ( talk) 19:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Poštovani Sadko,
Možete li pomoći da se ispravi slovna greška u članku o Ratku Janevu.
Potkrala se u biografiji slovna greška u reči "Radko", umesto Ratko (u članku o Ratko Janev-u), pa bi slovo "d" , trebalo zameniti slovom "t" u imenu Ratko.
Unapred zahvalan, 79.101.148.233 ( talk) 13:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Migrations of the Serbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Crossing the Delaware ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Could you please revert the article like in it"s original version, there were changes made by user sheldonium without a consensus
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Hi. You removed Marina Abramović's nationality from the lede, citing Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. But Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography says (emphasis added):
MoS guidelines for opening paragraphs should generally be followed, and the opening paragraph of a biographical article should establish notability, neutrally describe the person, and provide context. The opening paragraph should usually state:
- Name(s) and title(s), if any (see also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)). Handling of the subject's name is covered below in § First mention.
- Dates of birth and death, if found in secondary sources (do not use primary sources for birth dates of living persons or other private details about them).
- Context (location or nationality);
- The noteworthy position(s) the person held, activities they took part in, or roles they played; Why the person is notable.
And I almost always include nationality in articles. It makes sense; it's important. It points to the cultural context in which the person operates. It's as key as the time frame in which they lived (vital dates) which goes right up front.
On the other hand, arguing about the nationality of Balkan people is tedious, time consuming, and often unfruitful. Balkan people especially; I've run into this before. So I wonder if that's really why you deleted the nationality altogether, and I'm not sure that that's not best... but it does degrade the article a bit. Herostratus ( talk) 07:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you use reFill. This is a useful tool but sometimes introduces errors, most frequently inserting the unsupported parameter "|deadurl=y" instead of "|url-status=dead", such as here. I would ask you to preview your edits and resolve any issues before submitting. Thanks. -- John B123 ( talk) 20:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Nightenbelle ( talk) 22:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
I see you concern about generalizations. You might use "nationalist" instead of using "some" or "many" Serbian historians as you did in some of your reverted edits. An example [5]. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 00:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Nightenbelle ( talk) 22:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Regarding your posting at
WP:DRN, it will not be considered at all unless and until you give Sideshow Bob a proper notification: Ensure that you deliver a notice to each person you add to the case filing by leaving a notice on their user talk page. ... Giving notice on the article talk page in dispute or relying on linking their names here will not suffice.
Regards, --
T*U (
talk)
14:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
I see you edited this page recently. Should ethnicity not be mentioned in the intro as per Wiki rules? OyMosby ( talk) 03:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you just undid my revert of an edit in Pljeskavica. The edit was made by an obvious sock of a long-term-abusive user Shingling334, who is prohibited from editing Wikipedia, even if the edits are good. Furthermore, the edit was unsourced, and not supported by the existing source, see WP:HIJACK. I have again reverted it. I have also reverted another recent edit by another user per WP:HIJACK. If you'd like to make further contributions to the article, could I ask you to do so in your own words and properly cited? Thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 14:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Zdravo Sadko, vidim da si mi poslao mejl, ali nažalost, neću moći da ga otvorim dok sam na odmoru (zaboravljena lozinka). Ukoliko želiš, možeš da mi pišeš na perisic.m@yahoo.com. - BoleynSRB ( talk) 01:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. I noticed that for a number of Ragusan notable figure pages you removed the ethnicity of the individuals, which is correct as per Wikipedia guidelines and rules. But should the ethnicity be moved to a later sentence in the intro so long as not the first sentence or the body instead of pure removal? Thanks. OyMosby ( talk) 22:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buša cattle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gračanica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko. Re: this . Is there any reason you can't leave them on my talk page? Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 17:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sadko, thank you for reverting my work. I am not doing random edits but I am readings a lot of books and maps. I want to make pages even better and not direcred in one side of history. That map was publicated on british news website and was a translation from Serbian/Croatian language. I couldn't find the author so I wrote it as Unknown. If you look at Kosovo's history pages, they are all manipulated and if someone edits it then an administrator will revert it. I am 32 years old and I am really fear and aware of what I am editing. If it continues like this I will write an official letter to Wikipedia asking them to put Kosovo's history under control of people that know have real and clear knowledge of history.
Thank you, best greetings from Germany. Kreshnik Prizreni ( talk) 07:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Cheers. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yugoslavia_ethnic_map.jpg
Kreshnik Prizreni ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum ( talk) 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Note, you've been on Wikipedia longer than four days, and made more than 10 edits, so you don't need to use the Articles for creation process anymore, to create articles. You may, but I suspect you would rather not, given the experience you've had so far. -- Zanimum ( talk) 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Tuvixer ( talk) 23:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Srđan Dragojević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nebesa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Sadko, when you perform archiving (like you did here, here and on many other pages), you should always put a link to the archives on the talk page. You can use the {{ archivebox}} template, or the {{ talkheader}} template which automatically creates links to the archives. Can you, please, go back to all those pages and create links to the archives? Vanjagenije (talk) 23:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Are recent edits seen on Croats of Serbia per WP:BLP? I think not? What to do when someone gives diff stating "known information" and - it's not? ty, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Why, on Earth, did you delete it? PajaBG ( talk) 20:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kingdom of Serbia, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.balcanica.rs/balcanica/uploaded/balcanica/balcanica%2048/07%20Batakovic.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Kingdom of Serbia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! CC-by-NC-ND is not a compatible license. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sadko,
Travunija, Neretljanska kneževina and Zahumlje are also hold by Croats nobilties and Kingdom. This reverts means delete part of Croatian history. Thank you for understanding.
Best regards. — Uspjeh je ključ života ( talk) 22:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't know whether you think I was being "unconstructive" (in which case it's unacceptable as you doubt me without seeing my edits properly) or whatever, but you should not revert without telling a reason. I've explained clearly in my edit summaries the reason for all my changes: to fot exactly into what the source says. That is an absolutely right thing to do so an article doesn't stray from its original meaning.
I informed about my changes to the user who had added the claim that majority of Bosnian Serbs think the wedding started the shoot or Croats think killing of a Croat civilian started the shooting. Because that's not what the source Deustche Welle he used, said. It said that was what was taught in history books of Serbs or Croats. But wide agreement is that it started with recognition of Bosnian independence (it doesn't say Bosnian Muslims thinking so anywhere).
If you've got an issue, try raising it on the talk page. In case you actually had one. Don't do such unexplained reverts again. If you believe someone's unconstructive don't do it without a good prina facie reason. I will revert it and lodge a complain in future. 117.199.89.113 ( talk) 01:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
You left a post on my page accusing me of “vandalism” when firstly I was reverted by another users hours before, which they deemed a “good faith edit”. My edit brought multiple sources backing up my edit as well. I suggest you double check the criteria for what vandalism is. Unless you think it is vandalism to use the “ The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos” as a source. Simply not liking my edit doesn’t mean you should smear it. I hope this was simply a misunderstanding. OyMosby ( talk) 11:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
You think you are very constructive when you delete Croatian names or change notions into Serbian ones. I don't think so. -- [[User:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:purple; padding:2px 3px 2px 5px;">Silve</b>]][[User talk:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:blue; padding:2px 3px 2px 3px;">rije</b>]] ( talk) 21:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
I notice you have jumped into conflict again after previously insulting me. You have claimed my edits are not constructive. Can you please explain how they aren't. I clearly explained I added sources and what sources said about April 6 1992 being considered start of Bosnian War. If you don't have any reason then revert yourself, if you do mention it clearly on the talk page. 117.199.83.116 ( talk) 03:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not make blanket accusations like this one on my talk page where you are claiming that I am doing disruptive editing. It is not acting in good faith, especially since I was the one who originally added the climate table in the first place and have checked this page regularly given that various IP users repeated vandalise the climate table figures and change it to fictitious values. The reason I reverted that IPs edits on Leskovac is because this IP changed the values in the climate table that do not match the values provided by RHMS. For example, the one you reverted my edits introduced factual errors. First of all, the data claims to be from 1987-2017 but the RHMS source only says from 1981-2010. Also, the temperatures and sunshine data did not match the source values. For example, the Jul high on that version was 32.2 but the RHMS source says 29.1 and so on. Secondly, this has nothing to do with a content dispute or disruptive editing, this is simply a matter of vandalism because the various IPS have vandalized the climate table by deliberately introducing factual errors. Ssbbplayer ( talk) 01:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Sadko, almost forgot to respond to our previous discussion. Firstly, I came here in response to a Vandalism post you made on my page. You came to me initially 5 hours after another editor reverted my edit. However you cleared up you meant to post “unconstructive edits”. I was not “getting back to you” over anything as I made edits on an article you were not even editing at the time. I’m sorry if you got that impression from me or if it looked that way. Not my intention. I used the fascist organization of Ustashe as an example for consistency as it formed in the Yugoslavian territory as well. So seemed like the best example I could use. As for where Zbor operated, it was in historically named area of “Occupied Serbia” during the Holocaust in Serbia. The name of the organization doesn’t negate what it is or can be described as. For example NDH wasn’t independent (it was an illusion of independence) but a German Italian puppet state. I did not coin the phrase “Serbian fascist movement” I cited multiple RS that literaly describe it as such. Otherwise I wouldn’t make the edit. Seems constructive. I think you should kinda think this over (As apposed me doing so) before coming to me or in response. As again you misunderstood me. If the goal is to build better encyclopedia together. Anyway, we should stick to the subject article and discuss on the Yugoslav National Movement Talk page. We have worked well together before so I know we can have a productive discussion their and talk about the sources and if we agree they are valid enough or strong enough to make my suggested change. I will list the sources there if you wish to look them over. I won’t bother you talk page further with this. Cheers. OyMosby ( talk) 04:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. It is important that for two weeks no one changed a comma. We are not talking about some forgotten article that no one pays attention to, it is heavily watched and editors react right away. It doesn’t mean the text is brilliant, but is obviously not problematic. Information is true, well referenced and I said I will condense it. Sorry, but I do have an impression that you have problem with this specific issue. We do stuff and people form impressions on it. Impressions can be wrong, but that’s how people function, no WPs can change that. After all, your overreaction – deleting it and objecting to have it either here or as a separate article - is just the result of your impressions on style or that some WPs, which are arbitrary and non-measurable, are broken. There is no need for rigid enforcement – that way you won’t cause problems and wear out other editors when there is no reason to, especially as Wikipedia itself says that WPs are not laws and may be ignored completely in order to provide information. This is just Wikipedia, relax.
Based on the interraction through articles so far I absolutely have no impression that you support Progressive party so I don’t know why you added that to the mix - another overraction which enhances the impression. Marinika Tepic is vice president of the political party, parliamentary deputy and she gave her theory. That’s enough by itself, but If you take into the account how much effort the regime spends on smearing her on regular basis and even organize their extreme wings to threaten her publicly, the most important people in country obviously think she is not average or nothing special. Cheers. PajaBG ( talk) 23:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Please stop undermine the Independence of Kosovo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.100.251.67 ( talk) 12:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Would you mind stop wiki-hounding me around, and removing my edits, all the time, allover the placee?-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 11:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Can you show me any source that includes Serb victory? Crazydude1912 ( talk) 11:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Greetings , can you please tell me how long is that Rfc suppose to last since it is getting sour, I've noticed that people are getting pinged and attacked
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Leopold_Ružička.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Nightenbelle ( talk) 15:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
I have removed a comment of yours from the arbitration enforcement noticeboard as it was placed in another editor's section. Threaded discussion is not permitted at AE. If you would like to make a statement or reply, please feel free to make a section of your own and place your comments within it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
I can help, but i can't promise i will have will to translate all. -- Bojan Talk 20:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Sadko, thinking it over, I’d like to apologize if I misinterpreted your stance on the RfC. It wasn’t meant to be an attack or offend but rather how things appeared to me at the time. Seeing how you were deeply hurt by it, I am sorry. It was just that the two different stances on the article titles seemed contradictory so I assumed the more negative intentions. I trust that you were simply doing what you thought was for the best of Wikipedia. Take care. OyMosby ( talk) 21:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Please Sadko, don't push me into a corner, where I will have to seek protection from this badgering. Simple tools can show "hounding" without much need for explanations.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 19:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The consensus among a quorum of uninvolved admins at AE was that you should be warned for weaponizing AE to eliminate opponents of content disputes. Mikola22 is also warned for failing to be more concise and for bludgeoning discussions.The warning has been logged at WP:AEL. Thanks and good luck. El_C 17:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sadko. This is just a reminder that the article is covered by discretionary sanctions, under WP:ARBEE. You were previously alerted to the sanctions. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 15:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
dont delete my comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.118.30 ( talk) 14:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
don't delete my comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.6.99 ( talk) 12:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
It is not the first time you make in the same time removal of sourced content and OR modifications. It has become a common thing. Unless you reflect on my concern, I will file a report at AE. Best. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 13:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
The Translation Barnstar | ||
Thank you. Antidiskriminator ( talk) 10:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
1292simon ( talk) 01:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Hi Sadko, I just ran into an edit where you added screwed-up citations to an article ( [7]), in particular this one:
The citation has publisher ( Deutsche Welle) and date info in the title, mixes up publisher and author, screws up last and first, omits to mention the actual author (Nikolija Bjelica), etc. Can you please explain how this happened? This is about how it should have looked like:
If you use tools to auto-fill citation templates, please check that the values are correct before saving. If you need help in regard to the purpose of the various template parameters, please have a look here: Help:Citation Style 1. And to discuss more difficult cases, please consult the template's talk page. BTW, this related discussion might be insightful as well: Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Weird garbage in authors/titles... Hope it helps & greetings, -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 20:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
If you wish, your defence of fringe nationalist theories can be discussed with admins. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 17:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
How am I launching “personal attacks” in a diff when in that diff I am telling the person to not make personal jabs and misrepresent my edit? Not to mention I have already come to an agreement with them on their talk page. There is no need to add gas to embers. OyMosby ( talk) 20:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordan Mihić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kontakt.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
What are you talking about? About revisionism? Look up his devsirme papers, they're easily found online. Ethnic identity wasn't a thing back in the 16th century, let alone being a "Serb" from Bosnia. Classes were based on religion, wealth, feudal position and nobility. Nothing to do with ethnicity. What we do know and what is certain is the fact that he contributed mostly to Bosnia (NOT Serbia, which also had a lot of Muslims, in case you didn't know), and the fact that his devsirme papers stated that he was A BOSNAK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.116.124.18 ( talk) 08:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Can you explain how your use of the wp:Rollback function ( here, here and here) is compliant with our WP:ROLLBACKUSE guideline? It seams to me that you are using the function contrary to the guideline. Can you explain it? Vanjagenije (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
I fail to grasp that the reasoning to deliberately revert an revert that reverts DELETING of content is in any good faith if I stated in the comment to not edit war and instead continue the discussion to the article's talk page. The material seems to already be in the fitting section as it reflects the current political information and the section seems biased without this particular material in my humble opinion, and in respect to you, an another editor, even while having that opinion in mind I decided to not undo your edit to stop the edit warring. Do you think that the entire section should be moved to contemporary history, or did you reconsider? All the best, LukaAndjelkovic ( talk) 01:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Can you please talk with User:Vanjagenije who is now reverting Serbian to Yugoslav part in the sentence without knowing that he is supporting Notrium reverts without reached consensus. I tried to revert it to its original 2 times and I am now risking a Block but I dont see any reached consesus on talk page where it is agreed that it should be changed that MM was a Yugoslav scientist instead of Serbian as it is written in original. I think there is confusion in question — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.9.202.230 ( talk) 08:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
You are wasting your time. The whole biography is usurped and vandalised by a bunch of American idiots. The "Yugoslavian" is not the only idiocy here. Todorcevic is not notable for "specialising" rather for leading and being a world leader in pure mathematics (see https://web.archive.org/web/20161203170449/https://rsc-src.ca/sites/default/files/candidates/TODORCEVIC%2C%20Stevo.pdf), [1] is not a reference, and he did not attend Kurepa's lectures rather advanced lectures.
In addition this sentence "Todorčević's work involves mathematical logic, set theory, and their applications to pure mathematics. " is pure idiocy - math logic and set theory are the pure mathematics - "their applications to pure mathematics" only demonstrates ignorance of these two you pinged!
The next idiocy, in the current text (the Research section), reads, "In Todorčević's 1978 master’s thesis, he constructed a model of MA + ¬wKH in a way to allow him to make the continuum any regular cardinal, and so derived a variety of topological consequences.". Topological consequences of what? In order to understand what exactly J. Larson wrote, here is the full citation of the relevant statement: In his 1978 Master’s Thesis, Stevo Todorcevic used techniques of [Mitchell, 1972] and [Devlin, 1978] to construct a model of MA+¬wKH and did so in a way that allowed him to make the continuum any regular cardinal (see [Todorcevic, 1981c]). Todorcevic went on to derive a variety of topological consequences of MA+¬wKH. This is a sound proof that @ David Eppstein: did not understand the quoted J. Larson's text! The next sentence in Research is incomplete interpretation of the J Larson's statement about Todorcevic's and Abraham's work at the Settop summer school, Toronto Jul-August 1980.
When writing about the books Todorcevic authored, we need the book reviews, not the basic bibliographical data we can see at the MatSciNet. So we need reviews coming from I. Farah (Topics in topology), J. Larson, J. Moore (Walks on ordinals and their characteristics), etc.
Then, how to justify removal of the Todorcevic's list of PhD students from The Mathematical Genealogy Project, his research positions at IAS and Berkeley, his family status (married, one child)? Or removal of the section describing his advisory work?
For more details, see the whole discussion on this talk page and the history of the biography changes.
... i ne treba da ignorisemo to i prepustimo im je kao "hrvatsko pismo" nikako. Jedan od dokaza, vidi moje zadnje izmene. FkpCascais ( talk) 00:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sadko, I'm not an experienced Vikipedist but I think I can spot a POV when I see it. Unfortunately I do not know how to deal with it here... Could you please help me calm down the deleting fervor of Mikola22 at the Vasojevici page? I understand that all info should be sourced but: quite a lot off his deletes (e.g. Slobodan Milosevic being Vasojevic) is sourced well enough and not being disputed at all. Apart from that, isn't Wikipedia providing some less drastic measures for poor sourcing then outright deletion of the whole section that has been put together during so many years? I don't know, like puting a tag about lack of sources or smth... Thank you in advance! Drmiko ( talk) 08:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Hahahaha, I just realised that he deleted the whole section listing all the Vasojevici brotherhoods, claiming R-J. V. Vesović, 1935, "Pljeme Vasojevići", Državna Štampa u Sarajevu, Sarajevo - because "this source and informations from it are outdated":))))) Outdated how? Meaning that families that were Vasojevici 100 years ago are not Vasojevici any more? Drmiko ( talk) 08:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey Sadko, recently, I have been adding screenshots of creative commons Youtube videos to WikiCommons and properly licensing it so I could add them to the infoboxes. However, the mods are asking for more permissions even though it's creative commons. Can you help me on that one? Pozdrav! -- Elserbio00 ( talk) 19:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC).
Hey it appears that you and @ WEBDuB: have been attacked on personal level by unsigned IP : 93.142.66.189 on Drazen Petrovic revision history page and on Novak Djokovic talk page. Also there are few broken WP:rules. Thank you. - Theonewithreason ( talk) 11:46, 07 August 2020 (UTC)
The Literary Barnstar | ||
Thank you for the exceptional work and contribution to the articles on Serbian literature! WEBDuB ( talk) 11:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. You asked me a while ago about adding sources to some articles, including Stefan Konstantin. I got interested into this so I finally did something about it and, since I have found some new sources and included those from Serbian Wikipedia, I also prepared an expansion. However, since I don't know whether you had some plans for this article or just wanted more sources, check it first [8]. If it doesn't mess with any of your plans for the article, I will publish it. PajaBG ( talk) 12:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Check this out. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 18:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Take a look at these unsourced additions. [9] [10] Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 12:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my edit at Saint Sava's page on the ground that it was wp:primary... OK, I'll back it up with another citation by Noel Malcolm. Do you have any objections on the matter? Edion Petriti ( talk) 12:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not change the embassies with the letter A in the diplomatic missions in Macedonia please do not do it, you can do it in the diplomatic missions in Croatia, Slovenia or other countries where Kosovo has an embassy. If you do it again I will restore my version again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shkupi Kumanova 1234 ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Please do not delete the former embassies, the liaison office to open the reality must be accepted. If you do it again I will report to you and block you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shkupi Kumanova 1234 ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
I start discussion at WP:DRN so it would be nice for you to join us to resolve this in good faith, thank you. Mikola22 ( talk) 17:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
The article cites "Buchenau 2005" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata (
talk)
01:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:78.1.164.190, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot ( talk) 09:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
On the first article you reverted me and wrote: "Why are you removing the picture of children refugees, man?". I have removed the picture you coincidently added when we were discussing them on the Kosovo article, since that article has already a picture of Kosovo there. I sure hope you aren't using the fact that the image included children to advocate for your own POV.
On Kosovo you wrote "numbers are irrelevant", I think some explications are necessary here?? Ahmet Q. ( talk) 23:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Check this out. [14] Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 19:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
I didn’t delete the Greek genocide section. It was another user. And I disagree with its removal as well. But I would violate 3RR and blocked for edit warring. All genocides big or small should be represented given they carry cited sources. It is not Synth as each cited sources specifics genocide. Cheers OyMosby ( talk) 20:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Done. Milo Lompar, Elserbio00 ( talk) 13:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
If you (and native Croat GregorB), continue to delete from the LEDE (GJ is actor, director, convicted sex offender) the fact that Jevtić is a convicted sex offender just like Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, i will demand arbitration from native English speaking editors since you are from the former Yugoslavia just like Croat contributor "GregorB. Moelscene ( talk) 06:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi sadko, I would never put your immaculate knowledge of the subject in question, but during my recent lollygagging on the wiki i stumbled upon a page that you seem to edit quite frequently. Im open to alot of oddities but i found it surprising that there were 2 writers named Petar II. Petrović Njegoš and 2 writers named milica Stojadinović srpkinja (born and died in the same year) so i promptly removed one of each. I was wrong according to your judgement so can you please educate me on the subject. Cheers friend SerVasi ( talk) 19:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
To Mr. Sadko. Keep being cool and thank you for your support Theonewithreason ( talk) 22:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
Hey @ Sadko: I saw your revert today on Pastrovici article and I supported it. After reading materials about them I also could not find any of conformation that they are "Albanian" tribe, not just that I found that lots of members came from old Serbia but we are probably going to have another possible unnecessary edit war. There is this source that describes history of the tribe [ [15]] I dont know how much is considered reliable by Wikipedia standards but it does summarise all the info about them. I would also like to read opinions from @ Amanuensis Balkanicus: and @ Sorabino: about the topic and the source since I consider you 3 the biggest experts about medieval and Serbian history. Thank you. User:Theonewithreason ( talk) 06. December 2020 (UTC)
I have explained why using obscure doodles is wrong. Wikipedia should not promote the use of images that academic sources upon which it relies would never consider using in their works. You might be interested in this discussion on the topic. Surtsicna ( talk) 22:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Was your revert on the HRT page a mistake? I removed what is the same info repeated twice in the same paragraph.... OyMosby ( talk) 23:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I have created a map of serbian tourist attractions ( SerbiaOwnMapEN.jpg on wikimedia ). It is something that I missed when planning my holiday in Serbia last year. I thought about linking it to tourism sections of Wikipedia for Serbia, but I have no permissions to edit. Please take it under consideration - I think Serbia has a lot to offer, but is so much unrecognized. Pborys ( talk) 09:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 15:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Keep up with the good work both in terms of quality and quantity! Alexikoua ( talk) 23:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC) |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello Sadko,
Please visit talk page at article " Serbs", so we can discuss about the images, please don't revert my edit because of stability of the article and edit war. We can sort this out ther. ;)
Regards, -- Wusten fuchs 14:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko!
Yes, it would be great to expand the article. Currently, I'm not very active on wikipedia (both sr and en), but I'll ask people there about the translation. Pozdrav Vladimir ( talk) 17:06, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Zdravo! :) I saw your activity on List of Serbs article, and therefor, i would ask you for some help. As this list is absolutely awful, full of non serbs, povs, and bad style, i started new one that will replace this. My crasy wish is to nominate this new list for FL, so your help is needed. By Art section, you will get the idea how list should look like. So, any comment is good, and any help will be awarded with barn! All best! -- WhiteWriter speaks 17:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Please see this. Thanks. Fainites barley scribs 16:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I left you a message at my talk page. I´m not sure if I can help you the way you would like. Best regards! FkpCascais ( talk) 19:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
I have responded to you on "Serbs" talk page, under the "2 pictures" section. And i have provided you with some more candidates for new pictures and some other recommendations. Please check it out, im sure you will like most of it! Greetings! ( Правичност ( talk) 04:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC))
Cool. Oh just one more thing; i remembered about adding Ivo Andrić, i think that would be a great idea, because he was a great writer, since "Croats" article claim him, "Serbs" article should claim him too ... as he declared as a croat only in younger years, after that he declared as a serb and as a serban writer all the way till his death. Thank you, greetings! ( Правичност ( talk) 01:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC))
Ok i will support it. ( Правичност ( talk) 22:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC))
Sadko, we have a slight problem.... somebody replaced ivo andrić with marina abramović pic in your mosaic and also replaced miloš Obrenović with some other person i cant recognize... and idk why ... abramović is already on the serbian american article, i dont think she needs to be on serbs too, atleast not of such importance like nikola tesla or some others by my opinion. I think Ivo Andrić and Miloš obrenović are of greater importance and should be returned back on the picture mosaic. ( Правичност ( talk) 14:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC))
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marina Abramović may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Zdravo druže, možeš li mi molim te kazati ko je osoba između Jovana Dučića i Ive Andrića na tvojim novim slikama ?- osoba izgleda mlada a i ima brkove. veoma mi poznat ali nikako da se setim imena :D ( Правичност ( talk) 14:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC))
aaa Mlutineeee jao, znači kad je bio mlad, ah kako nisam ukapirao :). Hvala :) I pogledaj na novo , stavio sam novu tvoju sliku gore i uredio imena dole.. pogledaj ako ti se svidi ( Правичност ( talk) 21:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC))
Pozdrav druže. Pokušao sam da prenesem jednu od dveh slika sa srpske vikipedije p. jurišića šturma na englesku vikipediju za infobox... ali ne ide nešto... da li bi ti znao nekom metodom preneti sliku s asrpske na englesku vikipediju? ili ako ne... d aje nekako skineš... mislim da je potrebna lepša slika na engleskoj vikipediji za šturma zaista. dve su slike koje bi mogle bit u infoboxu od šturma naći ćeš ih tu: http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5_%D0%88%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%9B_%D0%A8%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BC ( Правичност ( talk) 01:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC))
For Serbian Vojvodas and Generals i write down form this and this book and for King Alexander I form this page. I will add for King Peter I in future when i get this book. All of those pictures can be moved to commons since are 70 years + old. Snake bgd 20:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Pomaže Bog! ... I was thinking if you could replace Nadežda`s photo on "Serbs" article infobox picture mosaic with rather this photo (it is more original) .. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/Nadezda_Petrovic.jpg ... Could you do this? Pozdrav! ( Правичност ( talk) 03:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC))
Pozdrav majstore. Gledajući u collage slika poznatih Srba u infoboxu, može se reći da jedva postoji koji bosanski Srbin među drugima, sa obzirom da bosanski Srbi odnosno Srbi poreklom iz BiH broje skoro 1/3 svih Srba u svetu mogli bi dodati još koju osobu. Evo recimo ja predlažem i upravo sam samo na njega i mislio- Branka Čopića... Jovan Dučić svakako jeste poštovanja vredan i omenuća, no mislim da je Branko Čopić ipak nekako dalje posegnuo sa svojim delima i dostignućima i poznatije ime. To je moj predlog samo, a ti reci svoje mišljenje. Pozdrav veliki! ( Правичност ( talk) 03:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC))
WikiProject Republika Srpska | ||
---|---|---|
Hi, Sadko, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the
WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a
WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to
Republika Srpska and the
Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up.
WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia. | ||
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! |
--
Anulmanul (
talk)
21:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karl Nesselrode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dan arndt ( talk) 08:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)An article you recently created, [[Draft:Presidents of Serbian Academy of Sciences and arts|Presidents of Serbian Academy of Sciences and arts]. Pls clean up the template. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
09:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I saw you made contribution on talk page of International recognition of Kosovo in Grenada section. Appropriate amount of time has passed and no counter arguments were given against claim that Grenada revoked its recognition of Kosovo. Therefore I believe Grenada should be moved to the list of countries that have revoked recognition of Kosovo. Could you please move Grenada on that list? 37.1.207.70 ( talk) 21:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I see you reverted yourself. All I did in my edit was to remove the notes section because somebody removed the Kosovo template from the article, which then created a cite error in the notes section. I see this a lot where Kosovo is mentioned in an article. The note that you added, said do not remove, and I didn't. However, as you can see, the template that you added, does nothing but produce the letter - a - with no information provided. I have no idea what that is supposed to mean, but I left it because you said not to remove it. If you want to add the Kosovo note back, there was a special template created just for that note, which can be seen here - Template:Kosovo-note - just follow the instructions, or ping me and I will add it back if you want it in the article, I don't care one way or the other. That note is apparently controversial to certain editors, because I see disputes over it all the time, people will remove that template, but then they don't remove the notes section, which then creates that cite error. If you wanted to create a note about something else, then use the Template:Efn and follow the instructions there, or ping me, and I can help you with that as well. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 03:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Regards, SshibumXZ ( talk · contribs). 06:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Brate, video sam sta se desilo. Moram da ti kazem da se nece nista tamo desiti na ANI. Nije ni priblizno nista uradio da bi ga kaznili. Vec sam video slucaje gde cak i psuju pa nista ne bude. On jeste cesto grub, crnogorski je nacionalista, razumem te, ali mislim da si se zaleteo. A druga stvar, nije ti edit dovoljan. Ne znaci da to sto mu je knjiga stampana kod nas da je on srbin. Moras naci izvor gde direktno kaze da je on srbin. Ovim sto imas mozes uvrh glave da kazes da doprinosi srpskoj knjizevnosti. FkpCascais ( talk) 01:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Da bi uspeo da ga tuzis, moras da skupis sve kad te je uvredio i stavis linkove. Inace ovako se nece nista desiti. FkpCascais ( talk) 01:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
When content is disputed and consensus discussion is ongoing, restoring the disputed state (as you did) is disruptive. BLDM ( talk) 02:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I am planning to open a mediation for the Skanderbeg case, because seems obvious those editors opposing my edits are going to do the best to keep that info out of the article. If we gather sources, we have tons of them, and it needs a mediation to inforce the edit and prevent them to erase perfectly valid sourced information just becausee they don´t like it. Do you think is a good idea or you may suggest something else? Who could also be invited to participate? PS: About Tesla, I apologise, but it had to be that way, I will explain it to you one they when dust settles. FkpCascais ( talk) 09:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
The next step would be to follow the conclusions of the consensus reached at the talkpage of that article. I am very busy in real life lately so I am not able to do it myself.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 19:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you, please, make some explanation on names for me?
As a non-native speaker I have some difficulty with the difference between English words for Serbians and Serbs – I would think Serbian denotes citizenship (or generally place of living or place of birth) while Serb is a nationality or ethinicity (inherited from parents and more generally from family, but not defined by a place).
However, the redirect List of Serbs → List of people from Serbia seems to translate 'Serbs' to 'people from Serbia', which is opposite to my intuition. Which one is correct? -- CiaPan ( talk) 15:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
It is a tricky one when translated in English.
Serbian (in our language Srbijanac) denotes a person from Serbia, mostly Serbs from Serbia but other nation as well (some 16% of Serbian population comes from minority groups). Not all Serbs are Serbians. Serbs from other countries (1.1 million of them in Bosnia and Herzegovina for example) are simply - Serbs.
For example Laslo Đere is a Serbian with Hungarian roots, while Jelena Dokic, Australian citizen, is a Serb.
That redirect is making all the trouble.
This means that we have 2 articles on the same topic, that is List of Serbians and List of people from Serbia, which is not good, if you would agree.
Sadko ( talk) 17:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
List of Serbs. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
21:09, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
You're at WP:3RR. You've been around long enough to know what this warning means. I would discuss with you if I had the time but the issues with what you're doing have already been raised by others it appears. You are inserting your own viewpoint (that such Serbianization is only WP:ALLEGED) in spite of what the cited sources say. You raise your concerns, calmly, on the talk page, and if possible bring forward RS and proposals, rather than condemning the other side. Cheers.-- Calthinus ( talk) 21:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
This is not WP:VANDAL. I see the issue as "Croatian" identity was not sourced, however, it is also problematic to consider him as Serbian instead of Montenegrin as well. The article is not written very well, it lacks citations, reference style, while other Wikipedian articles are not reliable sources for citation/adaptation especially if are from Serbo-Croatian Wikipedias which do not follow basic editing principles and are extremely biased. It does not matter if there is "no doubt" on his identity according to some RS, we follow NPOV, WEIGHT and BALANCE. Very reliable sources, like Croatian encyclopedia ( [1]), Hrvatska revija ( [2]) among others consider him as a Croatian and as such this information should be included in the article, stating something like he is considered as a Croat in Croatia or Croatian historiography or something. I will rewrite the article.-- Miki Filigranski ( talk) 11:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 ( talk) 08:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Good work on Milutin Garašanin! Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please see ANI - Vandalism on Ivan Gundulić by Sadko — Maile ( talk) 13:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. I noticed that you recently used celebstrendnow.com as a source for biographical information in List of Serbs of Croatia. I am unable to find any evidence or discussion indicating that celebstrendnow.com meets reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.-- Ronz ( talk) 21:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey man, thanks for the star. PajaBG ( talk) 11:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
The Serbia Barnstar of National Merit | ||
I have noticed your edits in Serbia related articles and appreciated them greatly. Keep up the good work. Antidiskriminator ( talk) 20:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, thank you for pointing to the lack of sufficient references in those articles. I will try to find time and add some additional scholarly sources. Sorabino ( talk) 20:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Zaustavi ove što sprečavaju da se Čola nazove srpskim pjevačem. Nakon što sam pristao na kompromis da u uvodu stoji kako sad stoji (bez jugoslovenski je ali nema veze, u budućnosti će biti Bosnian-born Yugoslav-Serbian po smrti pjevača jer tada će obje odrednice i jug. i srp. biti jednako bitne), neki opet uklanjaju unapređenja članka odnosno napomene i brišu ćiriličko ime te stavljaju da je bosanski a nije više jer odabrao je da živi u Srbiji (a uz to je i etnički Srbin iz Sarajeva). Hvala. -- 5.43.77.235 ( talk) 19:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, i was just scrolling around on English wikipedia and was reading articles about WW2 and NDH ("Independent state of Croatia"). I have noticed that a lot of these pages have ultra-right and fascist things written in them like lowering the numbers of people killed (lowering the number of people killed in the NDH and in concentration camps), claiming that some people were of different ethnicity even if those same people identified as a specific ethnicity (for example claiming that Serbs in a specific area are not Serbs but Vlachs or Croats instead). I edited a few sentences on this specific page /info/en/?search=Serbs_of_Croatia but there are too many articles and too many things which are incorrect and i alone can not edit them all. So i would like to ask you to help and maybe even outright block access of editing to everyone except administrators since these articles on wikipedia are being used as a propaganda tool to misslead and change opinions of everyone but specifically the young people (since they are the ones who use wikipedia the most). I also notices that a large amount of these edits were being done by the same people over a lengthy period of time which just shows that they have an agenda.
Thanks in advance. -A user from the Balkans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.223.214.240 ( talk) 00:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 22:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 23:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 23:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain ( talk) 23:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Well, it's not like I didn't react at all. [3] It's just that having 1/3 of the intro say "A number of his views are considered to be chauvinistic, racist and anti-semitic and remain controversial" - when in fact this carries more like 1/30 of the actual importance for his bio - is not balanced at all. I really dislike whitewashing, but driving a not-so-subtle point home is a flip side of the same coin. GregorB ( talk) 21:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your continous fighting against POV-pushing and blatant vandalism, you deserve this award since long time now, congratulations! FkpCascais ( talk) 02:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC) |
Find it interesting how MOS doesn't matter when it comes to your articles. Could it possibly be that you are POV pushing? Hmmmmmmmmmm SerVasi ( talk) 03:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko
Thank you for creating Momir Korunović.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice article. I removed some of the styling from the gallery, though the works in the gallery are very nice! We just usually don't have styling like that on articles (although users commonly use stuff like that on user pages)
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here)( click me!) 21:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vladimir Nikolić, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep Talk 17:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Old Serbia at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:26, 02:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Sadko, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko. After reading one of your posts at the Admin's incident board I wanted to give you some info that might help you in the future. You stated " it is just that admins are sometimes rather busy and have too much on their plate and so they just count reverts (going by the book) and do not have the time to look at the content and the nature of reverts more deeply". In most instances it's not the job of administrators to judge who is right in an edit war. Of course, all editors engaged in edit warring believe they are doing the right thing. Editorial differences are to be discussed on the article's talk page and the article content is to be determined by consensus. Full stop. Any other course of action is edit warring. You must keep in mind that one can edit war without violating the three revert rule. There are exceptions detailed at WP:Edit warring but they are very few and extremely specific. I'm not commenting on the current discussion at AN/I or any of your past editing. I'm just attempting to make sure you don't run into future problems due to what might be a misunderstanding. Thanks for your time Tide rolls 15:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Laza Kostić at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 07:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Đura Jakšić at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koča Popović, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Order of the Republic and Order of Freedom ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Something tells me the IPs that have suddenly appeared at Smiljan are connected to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikola22. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 23:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko. I reverted your addition of additional sources at Josip Runjanin because it simply isn't needed. First, some of the sources (such as the self-published Vuckevich and a 1992 wartime propaganda book) aren't WP:RS. Moreover, there are sufficient references backing up the statement as it is. Regardless of how many sources you throw at something, Mikola22 and his various sockpuppets won't care either way because they are chauvinist trolls, so there's no point. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 15:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Think you can revert this chauvinist vandalism here? Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 17:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Recently you removed some stuff from your talk page. Though that's your right, it may sometimes be better to archive it. If admins are later trying to follow up on someone who isn't discussing properly, talk page evidence may be helpful. Things may be different if you are getting rid of something defamatory or full of expletives, but that wasn't the case here. Also, if somebody warns you for a silly reason, that reflects badly on them rather than you. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 18:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Jovan Jovanović Zmaj at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 06:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC) |
I'm editing from a tablet. Someone removed my last comment on this TP which I cannot reverse. Could you please do me favor by putting back the removed comment? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.243.245 ( talk) 19:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Poštovani Sadko,
Možete li pomoći da se ispravi slovna greška u članku o Ratku Janevu.
Potkrala se u biografiji slovna greška u reči "Radko", umesto Ratko (u članku o Ratko Janev-u), pa bi slovo "d" , trebalo zameniti slovom "t" u imenu Ratko.
Unapred zahvalan, 79.101.148.233 ( talk) 13:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Migrations of the Serbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Crossing the Delaware ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Could you please revert the article like in it"s original version, there were changes made by user sheldonium without a consensus
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Hi. You removed Marina Abramović's nationality from the lede, citing Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. But Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography says (emphasis added):
MoS guidelines for opening paragraphs should generally be followed, and the opening paragraph of a biographical article should establish notability, neutrally describe the person, and provide context. The opening paragraph should usually state:
- Name(s) and title(s), if any (see also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)). Handling of the subject's name is covered below in § First mention.
- Dates of birth and death, if found in secondary sources (do not use primary sources for birth dates of living persons or other private details about them).
- Context (location or nationality);
- The noteworthy position(s) the person held, activities they took part in, or roles they played; Why the person is notable.
And I almost always include nationality in articles. It makes sense; it's important. It points to the cultural context in which the person operates. It's as key as the time frame in which they lived (vital dates) which goes right up front.
On the other hand, arguing about the nationality of Balkan people is tedious, time consuming, and often unfruitful. Balkan people especially; I've run into this before. So I wonder if that's really why you deleted the nationality altogether, and I'm not sure that that's not best... but it does degrade the article a bit. Herostratus ( talk) 07:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you use reFill. This is a useful tool but sometimes introduces errors, most frequently inserting the unsupported parameter "|deadurl=y" instead of "|url-status=dead", such as here. I would ask you to preview your edits and resolve any issues before submitting. Thanks. -- John B123 ( talk) 20:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Nightenbelle ( talk) 22:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
I see you concern about generalizations. You might use "nationalist" instead of using "some" or "many" Serbian historians as you did in some of your reverted edits. An example [5]. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 00:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Nightenbelle ( talk) 22:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Regarding your posting at
WP:DRN, it will not be considered at all unless and until you give Sideshow Bob a proper notification: Ensure that you deliver a notice to each person you add to the case filing by leaving a notice on their user talk page. ... Giving notice on the article talk page in dispute or relying on linking their names here will not suffice.
Regards, --
T*U (
talk)
14:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
I see you edited this page recently. Should ethnicity not be mentioned in the intro as per Wiki rules? OyMosby ( talk) 03:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you just undid my revert of an edit in Pljeskavica. The edit was made by an obvious sock of a long-term-abusive user Shingling334, who is prohibited from editing Wikipedia, even if the edits are good. Furthermore, the edit was unsourced, and not supported by the existing source, see WP:HIJACK. I have again reverted it. I have also reverted another recent edit by another user per WP:HIJACK. If you'd like to make further contributions to the article, could I ask you to do so in your own words and properly cited? Thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 14:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Zdravo Sadko, vidim da si mi poslao mejl, ali nažalost, neću moći da ga otvorim dok sam na odmoru (zaboravljena lozinka). Ukoliko želiš, možeš da mi pišeš na perisic.m@yahoo.com. - BoleynSRB ( talk) 01:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. I noticed that for a number of Ragusan notable figure pages you removed the ethnicity of the individuals, which is correct as per Wikipedia guidelines and rules. But should the ethnicity be moved to a later sentence in the intro so long as not the first sentence or the body instead of pure removal? Thanks. OyMosby ( talk) 22:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buša cattle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gračanica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Sadko. Re: this . Is there any reason you can't leave them on my talk page? Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 17:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sadko, thank you for reverting my work. I am not doing random edits but I am readings a lot of books and maps. I want to make pages even better and not direcred in one side of history. That map was publicated on british news website and was a translation from Serbian/Croatian language. I couldn't find the author so I wrote it as Unknown. If you look at Kosovo's history pages, they are all manipulated and if someone edits it then an administrator will revert it. I am 32 years old and I am really fear and aware of what I am editing. If it continues like this I will write an official letter to Wikipedia asking them to put Kosovo's history under control of people that know have real and clear knowledge of history.
Thank you, best greetings from Germany. Kreshnik Prizreni ( talk) 07:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Cheers. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yugoslavia_ethnic_map.jpg
Kreshnik Prizreni ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum ( talk) 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Note, you've been on Wikipedia longer than four days, and made more than 10 edits, so you don't need to use the Articles for creation process anymore, to create articles. You may, but I suspect you would rather not, given the experience you've had so far. -- Zanimum ( talk) 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Tuvixer ( talk) 23:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Srđan Dragojević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nebesa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Sadko, when you perform archiving (like you did here, here and on many other pages), you should always put a link to the archives on the talk page. You can use the {{ archivebox}} template, or the {{ talkheader}} template which automatically creates links to the archives. Can you, please, go back to all those pages and create links to the archives? Vanjagenije (talk) 23:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Are recent edits seen on Croats of Serbia per WP:BLP? I think not? What to do when someone gives diff stating "known information" and - it's not? ty, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Why, on Earth, did you delete it? PajaBG ( talk) 20:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kingdom of Serbia, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.balcanica.rs/balcanica/uploaded/balcanica/balcanica%2048/07%20Batakovic.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Kingdom of Serbia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! CC-by-NC-ND is not a compatible license. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sadko,
Travunija, Neretljanska kneževina and Zahumlje are also hold by Croats nobilties and Kingdom. This reverts means delete part of Croatian history. Thank you for understanding.
Best regards. — Uspjeh je ključ života ( talk) 22:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't know whether you think I was being "unconstructive" (in which case it's unacceptable as you doubt me without seeing my edits properly) or whatever, but you should not revert without telling a reason. I've explained clearly in my edit summaries the reason for all my changes: to fot exactly into what the source says. That is an absolutely right thing to do so an article doesn't stray from its original meaning.
I informed about my changes to the user who had added the claim that majority of Bosnian Serbs think the wedding started the shoot or Croats think killing of a Croat civilian started the shooting. Because that's not what the source Deustche Welle he used, said. It said that was what was taught in history books of Serbs or Croats. But wide agreement is that it started with recognition of Bosnian independence (it doesn't say Bosnian Muslims thinking so anywhere).
If you've got an issue, try raising it on the talk page. In case you actually had one. Don't do such unexplained reverts again. If you believe someone's unconstructive don't do it without a good prina facie reason. I will revert it and lodge a complain in future. 117.199.89.113 ( talk) 01:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
You left a post on my page accusing me of “vandalism” when firstly I was reverted by another users hours before, which they deemed a “good faith edit”. My edit brought multiple sources backing up my edit as well. I suggest you double check the criteria for what vandalism is. Unless you think it is vandalism to use the “ The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos” as a source. Simply not liking my edit doesn’t mean you should smear it. I hope this was simply a misunderstanding. OyMosby ( talk) 11:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
You think you are very constructive when you delete Croatian names or change notions into Serbian ones. I don't think so. -- [[User:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:purple; padding:2px 3px 2px 5px;">Silve</b>]][[User talk:Silverije|<b style="display:inline; color:orange; background:blue; padding:2px 3px 2px 3px;">rije</b>]] ( talk) 21:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
I notice you have jumped into conflict again after previously insulting me. You have claimed my edits are not constructive. Can you please explain how they aren't. I clearly explained I added sources and what sources said about April 6 1992 being considered start of Bosnian War. If you don't have any reason then revert yourself, if you do mention it clearly on the talk page. 117.199.83.116 ( talk) 03:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not make blanket accusations like this one on my talk page where you are claiming that I am doing disruptive editing. It is not acting in good faith, especially since I was the one who originally added the climate table in the first place and have checked this page regularly given that various IP users repeated vandalise the climate table figures and change it to fictitious values. The reason I reverted that IPs edits on Leskovac is because this IP changed the values in the climate table that do not match the values provided by RHMS. For example, the one you reverted my edits introduced factual errors. First of all, the data claims to be from 1987-2017 but the RHMS source only says from 1981-2010. Also, the temperatures and sunshine data did not match the source values. For example, the Jul high on that version was 32.2 but the RHMS source says 29.1 and so on. Secondly, this has nothing to do with a content dispute or disruptive editing, this is simply a matter of vandalism because the various IPS have vandalized the climate table by deliberately introducing factual errors. Ssbbplayer ( talk) 01:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Sadko, almost forgot to respond to our previous discussion. Firstly, I came here in response to a Vandalism post you made on my page. You came to me initially 5 hours after another editor reverted my edit. However you cleared up you meant to post “unconstructive edits”. I was not “getting back to you” over anything as I made edits on an article you were not even editing at the time. I’m sorry if you got that impression from me or if it looked that way. Not my intention. I used the fascist organization of Ustashe as an example for consistency as it formed in the Yugoslavian territory as well. So seemed like the best example I could use. As for where Zbor operated, it was in historically named area of “Occupied Serbia” during the Holocaust in Serbia. The name of the organization doesn’t negate what it is or can be described as. For example NDH wasn’t independent (it was an illusion of independence) but a German Italian puppet state. I did not coin the phrase “Serbian fascist movement” I cited multiple RS that literaly describe it as such. Otherwise I wouldn’t make the edit. Seems constructive. I think you should kinda think this over (As apposed me doing so) before coming to me or in response. As again you misunderstood me. If the goal is to build better encyclopedia together. Anyway, we should stick to the subject article and discuss on the Yugoslav National Movement Talk page. We have worked well together before so I know we can have a productive discussion their and talk about the sources and if we agree they are valid enough or strong enough to make my suggested change. I will list the sources there if you wish to look them over. I won’t bother you talk page further with this. Cheers. OyMosby ( talk) 04:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. It is important that for two weeks no one changed a comma. We are not talking about some forgotten article that no one pays attention to, it is heavily watched and editors react right away. It doesn’t mean the text is brilliant, but is obviously not problematic. Information is true, well referenced and I said I will condense it. Sorry, but I do have an impression that you have problem with this specific issue. We do stuff and people form impressions on it. Impressions can be wrong, but that’s how people function, no WPs can change that. After all, your overreaction – deleting it and objecting to have it either here or as a separate article - is just the result of your impressions on style or that some WPs, which are arbitrary and non-measurable, are broken. There is no need for rigid enforcement – that way you won’t cause problems and wear out other editors when there is no reason to, especially as Wikipedia itself says that WPs are not laws and may be ignored completely in order to provide information. This is just Wikipedia, relax.
Based on the interraction through articles so far I absolutely have no impression that you support Progressive party so I don’t know why you added that to the mix - another overraction which enhances the impression. Marinika Tepic is vice president of the political party, parliamentary deputy and she gave her theory. That’s enough by itself, but If you take into the account how much effort the regime spends on smearing her on regular basis and even organize their extreme wings to threaten her publicly, the most important people in country obviously think she is not average or nothing special. Cheers. PajaBG ( talk) 23:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Please stop undermine the Independence of Kosovo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.100.251.67 ( talk) 12:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Would you mind stop wiki-hounding me around, and removing my edits, all the time, allover the placee?-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 11:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Can you show me any source that includes Serb victory? Crazydude1912 ( talk) 11:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Greetings , can you please tell me how long is that Rfc suppose to last since it is getting sour, I've noticed that people are getting pinged and attacked
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Leopold_Ružička.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Nightenbelle ( talk) 15:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
I have removed a comment of yours from the arbitration enforcement noticeboard as it was placed in another editor's section. Threaded discussion is not permitted at AE. If you would like to make a statement or reply, please feel free to make a section of your own and place your comments within it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
I can help, but i can't promise i will have will to translate all. -- Bojan Talk 20:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Sadko, thinking it over, I’d like to apologize if I misinterpreted your stance on the RfC. It wasn’t meant to be an attack or offend but rather how things appeared to me at the time. Seeing how you were deeply hurt by it, I am sorry. It was just that the two different stances on the article titles seemed contradictory so I assumed the more negative intentions. I trust that you were simply doing what you thought was for the best of Wikipedia. Take care. OyMosby ( talk) 21:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Please Sadko, don't push me into a corner, where I will have to seek protection from this badgering. Simple tools can show "hounding" without much need for explanations.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 19:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The consensus among a quorum of uninvolved admins at AE was that you should be warned for weaponizing AE to eliminate opponents of content disputes. Mikola22 is also warned for failing to be more concise and for bludgeoning discussions.The warning has been logged at WP:AEL. Thanks and good luck. El_C 17:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sadko. This is just a reminder that the article is covered by discretionary sanctions, under WP:ARBEE. You were previously alerted to the sanctions. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 15:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
dont delete my comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.118.30 ( talk) 14:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
don't delete my comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.6.99 ( talk) 12:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
It is not the first time you make in the same time removal of sourced content and OR modifications. It has become a common thing. Unless you reflect on my concern, I will file a report at AE. Best. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 13:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
The Translation Barnstar | ||
Thank you. Antidiskriminator ( talk) 10:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
1292simon ( talk) 01:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Hi Sadko, I just ran into an edit where you added screwed-up citations to an article ( [7]), in particular this one:
The citation has publisher ( Deutsche Welle) and date info in the title, mixes up publisher and author, screws up last and first, omits to mention the actual author (Nikolija Bjelica), etc. Can you please explain how this happened? This is about how it should have looked like:
If you use tools to auto-fill citation templates, please check that the values are correct before saving. If you need help in regard to the purpose of the various template parameters, please have a look here: Help:Citation Style 1. And to discuss more difficult cases, please consult the template's talk page. BTW, this related discussion might be insightful as well: Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Weird garbage in authors/titles... Hope it helps & greetings, -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 20:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
If you wish, your defence of fringe nationalist theories can be discussed with admins. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 17:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
How am I launching “personal attacks” in a diff when in that diff I am telling the person to not make personal jabs and misrepresent my edit? Not to mention I have already come to an agreement with them on their talk page. There is no need to add gas to embers. OyMosby ( talk) 20:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordan Mihić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kontakt.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
What are you talking about? About revisionism? Look up his devsirme papers, they're easily found online. Ethnic identity wasn't a thing back in the 16th century, let alone being a "Serb" from Bosnia. Classes were based on religion, wealth, feudal position and nobility. Nothing to do with ethnicity. What we do know and what is certain is the fact that he contributed mostly to Bosnia (NOT Serbia, which also had a lot of Muslims, in case you didn't know), and the fact that his devsirme papers stated that he was A BOSNAK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.116.124.18 ( talk) 08:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Can you explain how your use of the wp:Rollback function ( here, here and here) is compliant with our WP:ROLLBACKUSE guideline? It seams to me that you are using the function contrary to the guideline. Can you explain it? Vanjagenije (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
I fail to grasp that the reasoning to deliberately revert an revert that reverts DELETING of content is in any good faith if I stated in the comment to not edit war and instead continue the discussion to the article's talk page. The material seems to already be in the fitting section as it reflects the current political information and the section seems biased without this particular material in my humble opinion, and in respect to you, an another editor, even while having that opinion in mind I decided to not undo your edit to stop the edit warring. Do you think that the entire section should be moved to contemporary history, or did you reconsider? All the best, LukaAndjelkovic ( talk) 01:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Can you please talk with User:Vanjagenije who is now reverting Serbian to Yugoslav part in the sentence without knowing that he is supporting Notrium reverts without reached consensus. I tried to revert it to its original 2 times and I am now risking a Block but I dont see any reached consesus on talk page where it is agreed that it should be changed that MM was a Yugoslav scientist instead of Serbian as it is written in original. I think there is confusion in question — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.9.202.230 ( talk) 08:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
You are wasting your time. The whole biography is usurped and vandalised by a bunch of American idiots. The "Yugoslavian" is not the only idiocy here. Todorcevic is not notable for "specialising" rather for leading and being a world leader in pure mathematics (see https://web.archive.org/web/20161203170449/https://rsc-src.ca/sites/default/files/candidates/TODORCEVIC%2C%20Stevo.pdf), [1] is not a reference, and he did not attend Kurepa's lectures rather advanced lectures.
In addition this sentence "Todorčević's work involves mathematical logic, set theory, and their applications to pure mathematics. " is pure idiocy - math logic and set theory are the pure mathematics - "their applications to pure mathematics" only demonstrates ignorance of these two you pinged!
The next idiocy, in the current text (the Research section), reads, "In Todorčević's 1978 master’s thesis, he constructed a model of MA + ¬wKH in a way to allow him to make the continuum any regular cardinal, and so derived a variety of topological consequences.". Topological consequences of what? In order to understand what exactly J. Larson wrote, here is the full citation of the relevant statement: In his 1978 Master’s Thesis, Stevo Todorcevic used techniques of [Mitchell, 1972] and [Devlin, 1978] to construct a model of MA+¬wKH and did so in a way that allowed him to make the continuum any regular cardinal (see [Todorcevic, 1981c]). Todorcevic went on to derive a variety of topological consequences of MA+¬wKH. This is a sound proof that @ David Eppstein: did not understand the quoted J. Larson's text! The next sentence in Research is incomplete interpretation of the J Larson's statement about Todorcevic's and Abraham's work at the Settop summer school, Toronto Jul-August 1980.
When writing about the books Todorcevic authored, we need the book reviews, not the basic bibliographical data we can see at the MatSciNet. So we need reviews coming from I. Farah (Topics in topology), J. Larson, J. Moore (Walks on ordinals and their characteristics), etc.
Then, how to justify removal of the Todorcevic's list of PhD students from The Mathematical Genealogy Project, his research positions at IAS and Berkeley, his family status (married, one child)? Or removal of the section describing his advisory work?
For more details, see the whole discussion on this talk page and the history of the biography changes.
... i ne treba da ignorisemo to i prepustimo im je kao "hrvatsko pismo" nikako. Jedan od dokaza, vidi moje zadnje izmene. FkpCascais ( talk) 00:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sadko, I'm not an experienced Vikipedist but I think I can spot a POV when I see it. Unfortunately I do not know how to deal with it here... Could you please help me calm down the deleting fervor of Mikola22 at the Vasojevici page? I understand that all info should be sourced but: quite a lot off his deletes (e.g. Slobodan Milosevic being Vasojevic) is sourced well enough and not being disputed at all. Apart from that, isn't Wikipedia providing some less drastic measures for poor sourcing then outright deletion of the whole section that has been put together during so many years? I don't know, like puting a tag about lack of sources or smth... Thank you in advance! Drmiko ( talk) 08:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Hahahaha, I just realised that he deleted the whole section listing all the Vasojevici brotherhoods, claiming R-J. V. Vesović, 1935, "Pljeme Vasojevići", Državna Štampa u Sarajevu, Sarajevo - because "this source and informations from it are outdated":))))) Outdated how? Meaning that families that were Vasojevici 100 years ago are not Vasojevici any more? Drmiko ( talk) 08:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey Sadko, recently, I have been adding screenshots of creative commons Youtube videos to WikiCommons and properly licensing it so I could add them to the infoboxes. However, the mods are asking for more permissions even though it's creative commons. Can you help me on that one? Pozdrav! -- Elserbio00 ( talk) 19:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC).
Hey it appears that you and @ WEBDuB: have been attacked on personal level by unsigned IP : 93.142.66.189 on Drazen Petrovic revision history page and on Novak Djokovic talk page. Also there are few broken WP:rules. Thank you. - Theonewithreason ( talk) 11:46, 07 August 2020 (UTC)
The Literary Barnstar | ||
Thank you for the exceptional work and contribution to the articles on Serbian literature! WEBDuB ( talk) 11:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. You asked me a while ago about adding sources to some articles, including Stefan Konstantin. I got interested into this so I finally did something about it and, since I have found some new sources and included those from Serbian Wikipedia, I also prepared an expansion. However, since I don't know whether you had some plans for this article or just wanted more sources, check it first [8]. If it doesn't mess with any of your plans for the article, I will publish it. PajaBG ( talk) 12:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Check this out. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 18:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Take a look at these unsourced additions. [9] [10] Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 12:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
You reverted my edit at Saint Sava's page on the ground that it was wp:primary... OK, I'll back it up with another citation by Noel Malcolm. Do you have any objections on the matter? Edion Petriti ( talk) 12:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not change the embassies with the letter A in the diplomatic missions in Macedonia please do not do it, you can do it in the diplomatic missions in Croatia, Slovenia or other countries where Kosovo has an embassy. If you do it again I will restore my version again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shkupi Kumanova 1234 ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Please do not delete the former embassies, the liaison office to open the reality must be accepted. If you do it again I will report to you and block you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shkupi Kumanova 1234 ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
I start discussion at WP:DRN so it would be nice for you to join us to resolve this in good faith, thank you. Mikola22 ( talk) 17:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
The article cites "Buchenau 2005" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata (
talk)
01:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:78.1.164.190, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot ( talk) 09:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
On the first article you reverted me and wrote: "Why are you removing the picture of children refugees, man?". I have removed the picture you coincidently added when we were discussing them on the Kosovo article, since that article has already a picture of Kosovo there. I sure hope you aren't using the fact that the image included children to advocate for your own POV.
On Kosovo you wrote "numbers are irrelevant", I think some explications are necessary here?? Ahmet Q. ( talk) 23:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Check this out. [14] Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 19:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
I didn’t delete the Greek genocide section. It was another user. And I disagree with its removal as well. But I would violate 3RR and blocked for edit warring. All genocides big or small should be represented given they carry cited sources. It is not Synth as each cited sources specifics genocide. Cheers OyMosby ( talk) 20:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Done. Milo Lompar, Elserbio00 ( talk) 13:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
If you (and native Croat GregorB), continue to delete from the LEDE (GJ is actor, director, convicted sex offender) the fact that Jevtić is a convicted sex offender just like Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, i will demand arbitration from native English speaking editors since you are from the former Yugoslavia just like Croat contributor "GregorB. Moelscene ( talk) 06:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi sadko, I would never put your immaculate knowledge of the subject in question, but during my recent lollygagging on the wiki i stumbled upon a page that you seem to edit quite frequently. Im open to alot of oddities but i found it surprising that there were 2 writers named Petar II. Petrović Njegoš and 2 writers named milica Stojadinović srpkinja (born and died in the same year) so i promptly removed one of each. I was wrong according to your judgement so can you please educate me on the subject. Cheers friend SerVasi ( talk) 19:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
To Mr. Sadko. Keep being cool and thank you for your support Theonewithreason ( talk) 22:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
Hey @ Sadko: I saw your revert today on Pastrovici article and I supported it. After reading materials about them I also could not find any of conformation that they are "Albanian" tribe, not just that I found that lots of members came from old Serbia but we are probably going to have another possible unnecessary edit war. There is this source that describes history of the tribe [ [15]] I dont know how much is considered reliable by Wikipedia standards but it does summarise all the info about them. I would also like to read opinions from @ Amanuensis Balkanicus: and @ Sorabino: about the topic and the source since I consider you 3 the biggest experts about medieval and Serbian history. Thank you. User:Theonewithreason ( talk) 06. December 2020 (UTC)
I have explained why using obscure doodles is wrong. Wikipedia should not promote the use of images that academic sources upon which it relies would never consider using in their works. You might be interested in this discussion on the topic. Surtsicna ( talk) 22:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Was your revert on the HRT page a mistake? I removed what is the same info repeated twice in the same paragraph.... OyMosby ( talk) 23:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I have created a map of serbian tourist attractions ( SerbiaOwnMapEN.jpg on wikimedia ). It is something that I missed when planning my holiday in Serbia last year. I thought about linking it to tourism sections of Wikipedia for Serbia, but I have no permissions to edit. Please take it under consideration - I think Serbia has a lot to offer, but is so much unrecognized. Pborys ( talk) 09:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 15:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Keep up with the good work both in terms of quality and quantity! Alexikoua ( talk) 23:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC) |