. .
Hi Robert - I have responded to your question about Beyond Curie directly on the page under your comment. To restate it here, Phingbodhipakkiya is the last name of the creator of the portraits. Jasonyshen ( talk) 15:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi again Robert - fixed the other references error you pointed out. Thanks and Happy New Year! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonyshen ( talk • contribs) 06:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert - I wasn't sure if there's anything else you need from me to complete your review of my Beyond Curie wikipedia draft. Appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonyshen ( talk • contribs) 05:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC) Jasonyshen ( talk) 05:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Referring to the motor sports notability guidelines: The subject (Robert Szustkowski) has completed a number of races of worldwide interest, including among others Dakar and Silk Way Rally. He is therefore a person of growing international recognition in the world of motor sports. The list of rallies is included in the article, as well as the list of regattas.
I (the author of the draft) have no connection with the subject, I am just a fan of sport, including regattas (and to some extent also rallies). I have created an article about Robert Szustkowski for Polish edition of Wikipedia, and given Szustkowski's growing list of international successes, I wanted to create similar article for English Wikipedia.
I believe the draft is consistent with all Wikipedia recommendations and requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedteam ( talk • contribs) 14:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for expanding Cecily Jordan's article to include the controversy. It looks like you expanded it as well. Good job. I was considering that move myself, but didn't know if it was appropriate or if I would be dinged for moving so much. There are two issues that I don't see. The precedence setting issue of a woman being sued for Breach of Promise. This was the first such case, and the aftermath. The prohibition, like all prohibitions, didn't hold. There is also the Background, which is not mentioned in any article. That there was a shortage of women in the settlement, the situation was so dire that men of quality were trying to induce their sisters to migrate, and the Virginia Company resorted to bribing women, offering them a dowry and marriage to men of "quality". They recruited almost 200 females that way.
Isn't that significant? Oldperson ( talk) 16:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Twinkle misses the mark again (but is mostly useful).
Robert McClenon (
talk) 01:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
|
---|
Your draft article, User:Simonmaingi/sandboxHello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 23:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC) |
Hi,
I'd like to understand more about why you declined my proposed article Draft:Pixel Slate, especially as it was declined as I was in the middle of working to improve it based on your comments from yesterday.
I wrote a question to the helpdesk earlier about the topic, as I don't understand your assertion about the sources not being independent. The current version of the page includes relevant references to articles from The Guardian, Gizmodo, Mashable, ZDNet, Popular Science, and CNet. Additionally, I don't believe I have a conflict of interest since my only connection to the product is that I happen to own one (which, if this were sufficient for a conflict of interest, I believe we'd have a difficult time finding editors for the iPhone page).
If you don't believe I'll be able to show the page to be notable, I'd like your advice on how best to migrate the relevant info from this page to the Pixel Slate section of the Google Pixel page. It does, however, seem like it would be a strange editorial decision to have this be the one major device on the Pixel page without its own page
Thanks,
Lengau ( talk) 05:20, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert. Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the article: Harry Volpe.
While a seminal figure in early jazz guitar with numerous mentions in print and online--in addition to his many recordings, of course--Volpe is practically a ghost in terms of published biographical information. The two main published sources are William Bay's book, Masters of the Plectrum Guitar, as well as Volpe's out-of-print, impossible-to-find autobiography.
I referenced both of those books. In your comment, "It appears that this subject is likely notable, but that better sources are required", how would I go about improving?
Thanks again. Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alwayslearnedstuff ( talk • contribs) 14:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
The article is being created at mainspace by Jax 0677. Despite my efforts to have it salted as with the draft, another admin disagreed with this. Will have to remind folks that if they want to salt drafts they should salt mainspace as well. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 03:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Onomatowoo (
talk) 14:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Following up on declined article, for Eggersmann [ Küchen]. Any suggestions are welcomed. I originally wrote the wiki as a complete story like the Bulthaup [ [1]] wiki. I discovered from another editor who deleted the article immediately that guidelines had changed since the Bulthaup and Poggenpohl ([ [2]]) were approved. The version that you declined was an attempt to complete the story with facts gathered from company information, clearly identifying them. Those have been removed. Each statement is now supported by one or more citations. Any "subjective" adjectives that might be perceived as "advertising" were pulled directly from the citations. If you are willing, I am open to additional specific suggestions as to how to make this article encylopedic. Thanks in advance for your help. Onomatowoo ( talk) 14:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I have been working on drafting an article for an American Band called Juice. They fit the criterion for musical notability, satisfying the 12th reasoning. Juice was featured on NBC's TODAY show on August 14th, 2018. The segment was televised nationally and was covered on Elvis Duran's iHeart radio program as well.
Should I indicate on the talk page for the Juice draft that it satisfies the 12th reason?
Jtahle ( talk) 18:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Evans (D.C. politician). Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Maclimberr/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 7_ qz ( ゆっくりしていってね!) 16:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Well, well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:142:4201:F4AE:6CDF:AEFF:1A42:5EB8 ( talk) 02:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thanks for your feedback on the article and taking the time to go through it.
Was just wondering if you could clarify your comments a little bit.
Notability criteria is defined as:
A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
I believe that this is certainly the case with Flash Pack. Is your concern that some of the sources I have featured contain quotes from the company founders? As opposed to the information being written by a journalist in their words?
And are you able to read all the articles that are partially hidden behind paywalls?
Thanks
. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bengomori (
talk •
contribs) 09:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
It isn't necessary to compare a discussion of where an RFC should be to animal waste.
Why yes, yes it is, as that would be a fairly precise commentary on the ACTION. It might also apply to your warning, considering that commenting on the action --not a person -- was exactly what I did.
Perhaps before templating the regulars, you ought to understand the actual content of the templates you're using. -- Calton | Talk 14:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I can not understand that at all.[ [3]] Kamberi is an important person representing the interests of the Albanian minority in southern Serbia. Every article about a person is more or less a biography. See athletes, artists or politicians. Yours sincerely-- Špajdelj ( talk) 13:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
I made a small edit here. Does the article, in general, seem promising? I.e. is there a point on working with that. Ivo ( talk) 14:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, I have created this page in collaboration with a friend, and it looks as though we have inadvertenly created two drafts. I can only see one of them so I am not sure how to resolve the conflicts and end up with a single draft. Can you give me some guidance please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigelbmitchell ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thanks for the quick review of my draft article. Could you elaborate on the standard for notability? I included two independent journalistic sources. Also, the brand resulted in multiple awards and of course significant sales results. It's worth mentioning that other snack food brands with less impact do have their own articles, for example, Keebler's own /info/en/?search=Chachos. I appreciate your guidance! Thanks, Sedimentary ( talk) 19:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Hasnt edited since December 2015, if there is something procedural required for the process - great! otherwise it seems odd having conversation with long departed editor! JarrahTree 06:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Draft:James Hird. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – James Hird. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at James Hird. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 98.213.51.34 ( talk) 02:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert. This draft Draft:Jayquan Cutler might be of interest to you, given your participation in investigating sockpuppetry related to it. One of the sockpuppets emailed me, asking me to help them finish with this draft.-- Flooded with them hundreds 09:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 08:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC)You might be interested in reviewing/moving Draft:Joseph_Jenckes_Sr. You moved an article about his son, Draft:Joseph Jenckes Jr., on 25 December 2018. Diogenes99 ( talk) 22:31, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Elaine Herzberg. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thank you for the comment. I posted the answer on my talk page as I am still a beginner on wiki. I think I misunderstood your comment, thinking that the article should be tagged to Willson's book's page, but reading it again it dawned on me that your comment related to a wiki process that needs to happen when a new page title comes that coincides with the book. If this is the case, then my apologies for misunderstanding and thank you for commenting. Ivannaivama ( talk) 21:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Richard Gibb (
talk) 19:38, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Interesting, the Royal Archive, The Vatican, The Heralds and English Heritage etc are not reliable sources??? What planet do you live on? What do you regard as Reliable Sources - Marvel Comics?
Thank you for your comments regarding the article for David E Shaner. I have resubmitted the article, /info/en/?search=Draft:David_E._Shaner. Your further review would be appreciated.
( Ptarry ( talk) 23:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC))
I'm confused the draft is supported by independent secondary references and isn't written from the viewpoint of the organization. I'm asking that you reconsider your assessment. Dan arndt ( talk) 04:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Khan Bank.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
{{SAFESUBST:Void|
Hi and thankyou for your advice, I asked for advice on the live chat and was told there to put the grammy and oscar independent links in which I did and take out the IDMb and Wiki which I did and then I added the songs that were nominated. and external links. I was told on the live chat the page did qualify? Have I put too much info in now? wasnt my intention to make it sound like a resume.. I did check the references on live chat and was informed they would be accepted and were reliable. look forward to hearing from you and receiving you expert advice! at your earliest convenience kindes regards Deb.
Deejames007 ( talk) 13:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Well, gotta give it to ya, thanks for reviewing my MfD page. TheWinRat ( talk) 17:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
hi i think the other user who created the article just 2 days back, i have started working behind the article on jan 16 of 2019, the user just use the link i have added in each and every page of the person's filmography to create the article. Thats not a fair i have done the most of the edits and now the credit goes on the other user name. can you please view history of both Draft:Pauly_Valsan and Pauly Valsan so you can see the difference. is there no value for my hard work. Vijesh sreenivasan ( talk) 14:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Robert-
I am brand new to wiki as a writer and I seem to be having trouble with me first article that you commented on "Hydraulic Entertainment". I sent multiple submissions of the same article because i wasnt sure it sent the first time and I could not find out how to delete a submitted article. I wasnt trying to "game the system" just trying to figure it out. I am a huge fan and follower of Hydraulic. The music and film that they create give thousands of people incredible enjoyment and I want to publish an article on wiki so more people learn about what they do. This company has created an incredible amount of content in a short amount of time and I hope they continue. I will add more detail to the background section and i know that if published others will add more detail. I have added more references as requested. I am confused that the comment says if I resubmit it will be deleted? It seems I am being punished for being a newbie. I am just trying to be part of the diverse community that is wiki. I would appreciate and help here. Best user CPOlivette
( CPOlivette ( talk) 15:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC))
I observe one COI editor has removed a COI template while it is in draft albeit declaring a COI and then that revised draft has flown through the AfC 'Queue' in almost no time. I'm not 100% convinced it is from a neutral point of view. You previously declined this article ... Any thoughts ? Djm-leighpark ( talk) 07:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
I find this hard to believe. The German edition accepted my article. But maybe it’s substandard
Gee44 (
talk) 04:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
If it’s only a formatting problem... your first objection was different. Yes, my German version is the original and it’s correctly formatted.
Gee44 (
talk) 05:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
hi i need your help in reviewing the article Prasanth Mambully, i hope every thing is ok with the article. Please check and review the article. Vijesh sreenivasan ( talk) 16:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Is it about notability, or tone, or something else? Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert. "unpatrolled"? Fergananim ( talk) 17:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Robert McClenon. sorry about that. I guess the tag on the page got me confused while working with the script. I wondered why the page was submitted for review while there's a tag saying it is a work in progress. I thought the article creator placed that. Mgbo120 ( talk) 22:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
how are your socks User:Dlohcierekim User talk:Dlohcierekim 04:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey. Can I ask why you made this as Wikipedia:Seerefb and not as "Template:Seerefb"? It seems like it should be in the template namespace... thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 04:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Aprimo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ( Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_February_6#Aprimo ) ... courtesy notification Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
You are correct in deducing the IP in the DRN is Prisonermonkeys. I forgot my password when I changed devices a few months ago. Ordinarily I would simply re-register with a new account, but I have had long-standing problems with a blocked editor, User:GeoJoe1000 and his many socks, most of which were created for the sake of harrassing me after I referred him to the admins for uncivil behaviour. If I were to create a new account, I would need to disclose my old identity and I am concerned that that would simply invite another wave of abuse that would spill over into articles. None of the admins I spoke to at the time had any solution except to submit SPI reports as needed, but by the time the SPI was completed, he would have created another sockpuppet which required another SPI. GeoJoe1000 has been quiet for six months or so, so maybe he has given up and I can re-register. Is it possible to do this in such a way that I don't have to disclose my old account on a user page? 1.144.104.49 ( talk) 06:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon,
I shortened the exhibition list of artist Aurélie Pétrel. Is the article seems ok for you with this change ? Thanks a lot for your answer. -- Xosd ( talk) 13:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Xosd
Truly amazing. People actually come along and post their personal attacks and other nonsense directly to a page headed "Personal Attacks and Other Deleted Nonsense", without waiting for you to move them there from this talk page or elsewhere. How very helpful of them. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 16:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon,
You have declined the publication of the article for Danger Close (film) on the basis that 'This film has not yet been released, and unreleased films are only notable if production itself is notable. (Future films sometimes wind up in development hell.) This draft does not indicate that production has been notable." This is the biggest Australian feature film of the past 30 years, the last ones being GALLIPOLI in 1981 and THE LIGHTHORSEMEN in 1987 and it has a rumoured budget of AUD$25m. Many people over 30 years have tried to make a movie on the Battle of Long Tan, to no avail. One even had Russell Crowe attached in the lead. But, this movie was just completed yesterday - https://www.instagram.com/p/BtlWRClHGSo/ and https://www.instagram.com/p/Bthmhtznvd9/. It is definitely not in 'development hell'. The announcement of the film going ahead in Los Angeles in February last year with the Queensland Premiere (head of state) was huge and was on all major Australian Television, radio, print an online publications (I can provide all of these links if you want to see for yourself). The production was very notable, once again achieving wide coverage in the Australian media as it was the first major Australian war film being filmed in Queensland and the production employed real Australian military veterans as part of the crew and cast - https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-09/army-veterans-forging-new-careers-in-movies/10625652 and https://www.abc.net.au/7.30/army-veterans-forge-new-careers-as-movie-extras/10703866. The soon to be Australian Prime Minister Bill Shorten (federal election in 2 months) even dropped into to see some of the film last Friday at Fox Studios in Sydney. I could go on and on, suffice to say this will be the biggest Australian feature film released in Australia and New Zealand for quite a while.
-- BarryCMark ( talk) 12:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Saludos
I just found your messages here as I do not go on Wikipedia that often. Im not exactly a newbie but Im not sure I understand the problem with the submission. The lack of sections is clear enough, but I do not understand why you state that it is written from the point of view of the organization. None of the sources are from Tepito Arte Acá... all of the newspaper articles are specifically about the organization and not published by them. Only the book and the thesis is not focused specifically on the organization, but most of the information is not from those sources. HicksW ( talk) 20:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
@ RhinosF1: Hope I am using this correctly. The idea of it being written by the organization is from what : Robert McClenon wrote here [ [4]] It also says that there are no third-party sources about the topic but all of the newspaper/magazine sources meet that. As for being a sock... I started with WP while I was still in school and havent used this account for awhile. Although I am bilingual, I previously worked mostly or entirely in Spanish Wikipedia. Thus the question. HicksW ( talk) 21:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert - just wanted to make sure I didn't ruffle feathers here. I figured there was a good chance you'd hop back on and moderate the re-open but I wasn't sure if and when so figured it made sense to point out your previous recommendations JIC the filer had not seen them. My intent was just to assist - I hope it was received as such. airuditious ( talk) 06:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Test. 2601:142:4201:F4AE:A9B1:25D9:FADC:3D6B ( talk) 17:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nobuhiro Watsuki. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
I give up. Why are the standards different in the English version?
I gave references from reliable British and American journals and sources. What else do you want? Weird. Gee44 ( talk) 14:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Robert, just wanted to thank you for the speedy and helpful response. I will do my best to edit the draft page for Graham_Boyd to be neutral. You are right, I do have a CoI, as I work with him in Evolutesix. Thank you Nikyta — Preceding unsigned comment added by NikytaGuleria ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! NikytaGuleria ( talk) 17:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, I think Ciara should have her own page, reason being, she's an important character who has been on the show since 2007. I believe the Dool characters list should be for those who have not been on the show for a long time, I.e not longer then 6 months. The page that I've created includes the detailed information which is not meant for the Dool characters list section. So if you could reconsider would be great. Thank you.-- Princessruby ( talk) 12:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the fast turn-around on the InVision draft I will respond to your comments below.
1. I have rewritten the intro to clarify that this page is about InVision the company.
2. A better name for this article would be InVisionApp, as that is the company's web name. This is a new article. The Wiki disambuation page for InVision has no entry for InVision Company but lists first 'UV/UX Prototyping Tool', which again, might confuse readers. InVisionApp would match with the Wiki page title.
3. I am a freelance writer who was paid by InVisionApp to create this page. I have no other affiliation with the company. I have declared that in the talk page, and on my personal page. Is there anything else that I need to do?
Thanks again for your help,
Tlvernon ( talk) 19:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Serenity-Fastest in the Verse | |
Thanks so much for so quickly offering suggestions on my first article submission (on Louis Rosenblum). Shosh2 ( talk) 04:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC) |
Hello Robert. I recently came across Rock it science at NPP and noticed something was... off. It seems you accidentally created a talk page complete with an AFC decline notice in the mainspace as opposed to at User talk:Rock it science. I have flagged the article for speedy deletion, but wanted to give you a heads up. Best.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 03:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words.
Re Oli Chang Wikipedia article
I have revised the Wikipedia Article on Notability requirements for Musicians and edited the article.
I have reviewed aspects of notability for Musicians such as reliable sources, determining that Oli Chang has been the subject of published works that are independent of the musician, I have reviewed Wikipedia pages that he is written about in such as Nomi Ruiz and High Highs and included links to these in the article, I have included the evidence that his music has been performed for a work of media. His Animal Feelings singles are placed in rotation nationally by Triple J in Australia, he has credit for writing music and lyrics in collaboration with artists such as Nomi Ruiz and Thief as Animal Feelings. He is an original performer of electronica as a DJ at Loveless Nights. This music is all his own writing.
He is an artist who has developed a solo career post his famous work with High Highs with Jack Milas as written about in Wikipedia.
I have rewritten the article in a neutral encyclopaedic tone. I have examined other Wikipedia pages of his contemporaries and colleagues such as Paris Wells and Nomi Ruiz to write in a similar manner.
Thank you for re reviewing this article
TAHayward ( talk) 22:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon, Please delete the one which takes longer to get approved. Thank you. Your suraj ( talk) 05:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon, Thanks for trying to resolve the dispute. Could you at least give us your 50 cents on the topic, whether the list of debates could be included like in Michael R. Licona or it should be removed from both? Despite being active elsewhere, I haven't heard back from @ GorgeCustersSabre yet. We could benefit from an external unbiased point of view. Thanks in advance. Ahmed M Farrag ( talk) 13:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry. I misclicked and accidentally removed your post. My apologies. Meters ( talk) 08:49, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert McClenon
Requesting your re-rview of page as its recommended for deletion. But now I have added more citations from news media and other details. I was referring similar kind of people wiki which is approved already.
/info/en/?search=Vini_Viswa_Lal
Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajishev ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " KEN Holdings Berhad".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander ( talk) 00:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
hello dear, thank you for your review on my article but I wrote it on neutral point of view with published source and I don't have any affiliate with Tony Ezenna; I will appreciate if you can guild me in completing this Article successfully.
Nliaustemac ( talk) 02:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
I dont want to redirect it.I only want to make it mainpage.Thanks--- Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
You have a recent habit of stringing the same point, the same sentence even, across dot points. Can you please stop that. For everyone else, a dot point is a standalone point that is individually signed and may be responded to individually. What you are doing is making a mess that is difficult to parse. Single sentences should contain no line feeds, let alone dot point formatted line feeds in places that barely call for a comma. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Badi (App) for example. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 01:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shabir Ally. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Haze_(band)#External_links makes perfect sense for me. Surprisingly, because the submission forms offer no preview or other way to check links etc. in what was submitted, I've only now seen what I posted.
OTOH your closure makes no sense for me: Two editors disagree about
WP:EL—especially {{
Songkick}}
wrt
WP:LINKSTOAVOID— and about the use of undo to get rid of maintenance templates, instead of keeping them in place or fixing the issues (two {{
fact}}
, {{
one source}}
and {{
notability}}
.) –
84.46.52.182 (
talk) 14:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert, I am editing my first draft: Daylight Entertainment. /info/en/?search=Draft:Daylight_Entertainment You left me a message saying "Change the levels, which are too large, of the headings to second-level". Since I am a wiki beginner, could you be more specific about my editing? Is that because the table I made in "TV series" section is too big, too wide? If you can take a look at my draft when you're free and let me know how to improve, that'll be very helpful. Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclinyang ( talk • contribs) 04:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Sir I want to make it to mainpage.If you are manhood person then you can understand how I worked to improve this article at only the age of 15.Please move it to mainpage😭😭😭. Thank You.Reply me soon as possible. Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk)
Thanks for your input on my draft [6]. I have fixed everything you and others have given me advice on, but I still get denied article space. Could you help me by either moving it or explaining what I'm doing wrong? Thank you Mr. McClenon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livonia ainovil ( talk • contribs) 12:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for my double article attempt, it just gets frustrating when you know you've done everything correctly but still can't get it approved. It won't happen again. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livonia ainovil ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Anjana T S ( talk) 18:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
I have given reference and citations for all statements in the article. thank you for guiding me to TEA
Anjana T S ( talk) 18:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for your comments.
I have made the relevant changes - please advise if I need to do anything else or find other sources.
Used the sources I found to be most relevant as the rest are in his official web site and mot 'impartial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mopug ( talk • contribs) 20:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, please run for a third RFA as you are a very experienced editor. Wikipedia needs someone like you as an admin as you will be a very useful addition to the admin group. So please run for a third RFA without delay. 2402:3A80:A7C:1BD7:0:5E:A6B:FF01 ( talk) 14:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
I am an IP editor and I am not blocked I want you to ran a third RFA. 2402:3A80:A7C:1BD7:0:5E:A6B:FF01 ( talk) 17:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Talk page stalkers: Do any of you have any ideas who this is? Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
I hope you have a good day :) and have a good life :D AndreiiPanfilov ( talk) 01:07, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Robert McClenon, This is regarding the page 'Tushar Pandey'. Tushar Pandey is an Indian film Actor. He was a part of the movie 'Pink'. As he is an individual actor we would like you to help us get connected directly to 'Tushar Pandey' page and should not get redirected to the page of the movie 'Pink' Reference links are attached on the wikipedia page of 'Tushar Pandey'. For your reference- IMDB Hindustan Times
Please help us with the same.
Thank You.
TheRock171 (
talk) 07:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRock171 ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xfinity Mobile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xfinity Mobile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
A rather amusing edit summary here [7] from an IP whose sole recent contributions are to add this person to any relevant Wikipedia article: [8]. I'm not completely sure how to proceed and know you do a good job with dispute resolution, so am asking your advice on where to go. SportingFlyer T· C 01:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. I hope we can expand them with their origins and meanings. One thing that troubles me is that at WP Anthroponymy we have decided against making a list of surnames to be created, in case there is no one currently notable with the name, but I regularly come across many surnames like that. I truly feel that is a loss for the encyclopedia. For example Novet. Zigzig20s ( talk) 12:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
User:Zigzag20 You're welcome.
Change your heading to Thousands. Good idea.
Legacypac (
talk) 03:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
As per WP:MEDIATE, "the role of the mediator is to facilitate consensus-building discussion... The mediator is a neutral third-party in relation to both the dispute and all the involved parties." I noted your recent remarks at Talk:Young Living/Archives/2020#Prohibited_marketing_claims discussion under your "fifth statement as moderator" and it seems to me you're overstepping your role as mediator here. You are supposed to facilitate consensus among the participants, and in this case you are expressing your own personal incredulity of the outcome. I would like to respectfully suggest as a moderator you try to be more dispassionate in your remarks. Coastside ( talk) 01:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christopher Nolan. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
"Places with protected status (e.g. cultural heritage sites) and named natural features, with verifiable information" are presumed to be notable according the wikipedia article on place notability. So shouldn't Frenchtown Washington abondantly written about (including many scholar references) be presumed to be notable? I am told in a draft review comment that it is not. French Prairie in Oregon is a very similar heritage area and has a wikipedia entry, thus presumed notable. Am a bit lost, this being my first ever article. LeCanardQuoi ( talk) 04:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Dunn (2nd nomination) nearly the same content was used to create article in 2016 and 2017. And deleted both times. Deletion history got tangled with the fictional character article. Begs the question of who is LandonCharles1 who shows up on 1 March with very first edit being the creation of the draft that was deleted as an article back in 2017 and 2016? David notMD ( talk) 10:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
How do I make the proper declaration that I am a founder of the company, but am not paid for my work? Do I still use the
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by {{{employer}}} for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
tag or something else?
I take issue with your comment about neutral point of view and citing reliable sources. All sources sited are generally considered reliable publications and are not paid advertisements in any way. Each author of each article sited is well known and generally respected in their domain of reporting. Please suggest any edits regarding neutral point of view. I have tried to construct each sentence to be completely factual and without any adjectives or verbs that would be interpreted as having positive or negative bias. Dliccardo ( talk) 17:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Dliccardo
Robert McClenon After reviewing the COI page Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, it seems the more appropriate tag is the general COI connected contributor tag. I have added this to the talk page of that article. I have no idea which statements you do not believe are neutral, but it looks like that comment was removed(?), so perhaps that is no longer an issue. Could you please review your remaining comments at the top of Draft:Catapult Ventures and adjust? You write "...focusing on what the company says about itself." However, all seven references are from independent and respected news publications and those citations are clearly tied to factual statements. You also write "The references are not independent." This is completey false. You also write "This draft reads like an advertisement," Could you please provide a hint to which sentence you believe needs adjustment? Generally, regarding notability, is their a general guideline for how many independence sources should be used? Would adding additional citations/sources convince you that this company is notable? Thank you. Dliccardo ( talk) 05:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)DLiccardo
Hi Robert. I came across this draft while checking on non-free image use. Although you declined it on March 5, 2019, there is already an article about this subject at List of Pokémon: Sun & Moon: Ultra Legends episodes. The article was created on a day after you declined the draft from a redirect and probably still contains the same copyvios you mentioned when declining the draft (it looks like a copy-paste move). What do you suggest doing here? CSD? AfD? WP:DRAFTIFY makes no sense since there's no need for two drafts. Anyway, whatever is done probably should be done soon since any additional editing of the article is likely going to create more work for whomever cleans up the copyvio. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 05:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir...what issues do you have with my article? Kingtd1 ( talk) 06:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Robert. i read your message concerning the duplicate article and i also will improve the current article. However can you help me with the citing style? and in regards to your comment; the i dont have any financial connections with the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingtd1 ( talk • contribs) 06:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Sir,
This is my first effort at creating a page for a public figure in my community, that doesn't have a wiki entry, yet. I only pasted what I have from a charity dinner that gave accolades to prominent benefactors, so I can see why it seemed promotional. I just wanted a jumping off point for the article, so I could revise based on a timeline. I didn't intend for the article to be promotional. If you could please reenter the deleted info. I can rewrite the article this evening and get it back in your hands by tomorrow for a more academic review.
Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gun4Hyr ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Dwayne J. Clark".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 16:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Added clarifying information regarding bibliography v reference. Anacaona ( talk) 19:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Addressed issue of T. Hangbé's political role. Anacaona ( talk) 16:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joshua_Kreithen
Hello Robert, I saw that you commented on this draft that is to be reviewed and I wanted to know your thoughts on it's likelihood to be published. Do you think the subject Dr. Kreithen is not notable enough to be published? Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Dave Dcm207 ( talk) 23:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert, thank you for reviewing my sandbox and leaving me comments. Sorry for bothering you due to submitting the sandbox. I wanna say this draft is totally not an advertisement and written in the same way that other mobile phone brands did, such as OPPO, vivo and Tecno. It just contains the basic information of the company, the business area, the achievements and the expansion history. And the product part is a list of each series and basic specs with no promotional words. OPPO did the same part on its pages. These things are all mentioned and reported by independent reliable media coverage (CNN, Counterpoint Research, Indian Express ), no make-up statements. I am confused which sentence let you feel it is an advertisement. Please help to point out and give me some advice, thank you! Pumkin Ding ( talk) 08:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert. I understand there are some concerns with my financial involvement in Soundwalk Collective. I declare that I am not financially involved with Soundwalk Collective or Stephan Crasneanscki. I have been following their work since 2010 and I was surprised to see the lack of information on them in Wikipedia, also that two of the later joining members of Soundwalk Collective have wikipedia pages and the founder Stephan Crasneanscki has not got one at all. I decided to spend some of my free time fixing this. I am looking for help to shed light on this fascinating artist and collective, what steps do I take? Please understand I am new here and learning as I go along. Sonnenalle44 ( talk) 12:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi! R u sure, that this edit took sufficiently into account, that there was no real discussion of my arguments, and that the so called "editors" obviously have no psychology/philosophy expertise (e. g. on my "rabies" argument they reply with "Xanadu" and "Xenu" (whatever that might mean... for me it is just nonsense or non-science respectively...)...)? I mean: is trolling enough to b an editor? Thx. Bye. -- Homer Landskirty ( talk) 04:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi, thanks for your feedback: it has been a long time since my last edit on Wikipedia. This wasn't meant to be adverting, I just noticed a startup I know was missing: other than the usual guides, can you give me any other specific suggestion to enhance this voice, address problems and submit it for publication again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triplez3 ( talk • contribs) 11:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert McClenon, I hope all is well. I see you rejected User:Julia VanDevelder/sandbox/Jodie Markell as the page already exists (they left me a message on my talk page). If you look at their edit summary, they are a COI editor and per the message I left on their page yesterday they were trying to make an edit request. One of the suggestions from the COI welcome Template was that they create a subuserpage for their edits and have someone review it. Based off this, I believe they were just asking a neutral editor to review it. I don't have time right now but if you are able to re-review the draft, would you be so kind to? They have been very kind and understanding so far. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 17:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon,
I am writing to you about your message to me which said, "Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This is a user page and not a draft."
I agree with you that it is actually a user page. I had erroneously thought that I needed to submit my user page for review and approval also. Clearly, that is not the case. My mistake. I will submit a new article for review soon, which is not a user page type. It appears that I may be auto-confirmed now since I have met the 10 edits requirement. Thanks for your help.
Ghazi Akailvi
Ghaziakailvi ( talk) 03:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Japanese imperial transition. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Can you help me find someone who can explain why the "in Progress" Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard - University of Pennsylvania - Evolution from a Commuter School to a Residential University has disappeared? Thanks! Wa3frp ( talk) 14:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Robert McClenon,
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately
1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert
It looks fine.
Apologies, I thought I had already left you a message about this :( Chaosdruid ( talk) 14:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Detransition. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted and ready for you. -- ferret ( talk) 13:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Hi Mr. McClenon. I’m not sure if you remember me, but you once reviewed an article I had submitted. The article in question was Ragazzi di Livonia in my sandbox, an Italian gang. There has recently been some “mob drama” following the assassination of some top mafia figures, and I was wondering if you could help get my article approved while this new found interest in Italian crime is around. I last submitted my article a few weeks ago, but have not heard anything since. I appreciate your consideration for the increased urgency of the article being made public, and I thank you for your time. Livonia ainovil ( talk) 22:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey, have you noticed the recent articles around foreign relations of Vietnam and Jordan? The conversational edit summaries are reminiscent of User:Abdelkader123456, who was banned for Copyright issues. I'm not 100% about it, but would love another pair of eyes looking into the IPs that are posting the drafts, to see if something quacks. Bkissin ( talk) 17:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I had a friendly question about the denial of the Oklahoma Humanities page that I created and you responded to. Originally, you had said I needed more sources, which I gathered and added. Then it was suggested that OH needs significant coverage by other sources. I modeled my page off the
Missouri Humanities Council page, and I have many more independent sources than that page, so I don't understand how much significant coverage is needed if other Wikipedia pages do not conform to that standard. Please advise what would count as significant coverage for this particular article. Thanks!
Shankyouverymuch08 (
talk) 18:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Shankyouverymuch08
Shankyouverymuch08 ( talk) 18:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The photo is owned by me. Marie Lemelle ( talk) 15:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation about my photo. How do photos appear with the article or maybe I have characterized my submission incorrectly. Please advise. Marie Lemelle ( talk) 15:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert !
Thank you for responding so quickly to my submission
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Bughub#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_sandbox_(March_22)
Yes I understand that I should have asked for help first
But now I have your attention ...
Would you mind having a quick look at the article which I am trying to expand ?
/info/en/?search=Borough_Group
At present it is just a stub
I would like to learn how to correct the errors ...
Bughub ( talk) 07:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for the review. Could you help me understand what specific section of the wiki page created was found to be advertorial? We would essentially delete that content and/or edit it for review again. We definitely want to comply with Wiki's rules.
Thanks.
Nwalavalkar786 ( talk) 14:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
You mentioned that I have not disclosed my COI on my user page. I am a student intern at Plymouth Rock Assurance Corporation (I have mentioned this on my user page) and we(the organization) have significant customer base. In such a scenario, I felt that the company should have a wikipedia page for customers who want to know more about the company. I have included just dry facts as mentioned by the other reviewer (Stevey7788) and am trying my level best to meet wikipedia's policies. Could you help me out set up this page and let me know of whatever changes I have to make to the page in order to get it up.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nwalavalkar786 ( talk • contribs) 19:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you atleast help me understand what's the problem with my COI article as you have mentioned. Thanks. Nwalavalkar786 ( talk) 13:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, As you had mentioned, I have moved my COI from user talk page to article talk page. Let me know if there are any more changes before the draft is moved to articles section. Thanks. Nwalavalkar786 ( talk) 14:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thank you for your comment. I am wondering why is my filmography too long? I am using the same presentation format that other companies are using, such as this page: /info/en/?search=DNEG. I would like to know why is their filmography not too long? Thank you for your collaboration. Best regards! Tyler Durd ( talk) 17:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. FYI. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osmodrama ..... I can't see has advanced since your AFC refusal. In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
. .
Hi Robert - I have responded to your question about Beyond Curie directly on the page under your comment. To restate it here, Phingbodhipakkiya is the last name of the creator of the portraits. Jasonyshen ( talk) 15:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi again Robert - fixed the other references error you pointed out. Thanks and Happy New Year! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonyshen ( talk • contribs) 06:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert - I wasn't sure if there's anything else you need from me to complete your review of my Beyond Curie wikipedia draft. Appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonyshen ( talk • contribs) 05:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC) Jasonyshen ( talk) 05:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Referring to the motor sports notability guidelines: The subject (Robert Szustkowski) has completed a number of races of worldwide interest, including among others Dakar and Silk Way Rally. He is therefore a person of growing international recognition in the world of motor sports. The list of rallies is included in the article, as well as the list of regattas.
I (the author of the draft) have no connection with the subject, I am just a fan of sport, including regattas (and to some extent also rallies). I have created an article about Robert Szustkowski for Polish edition of Wikipedia, and given Szustkowski's growing list of international successes, I wanted to create similar article for English Wikipedia.
I believe the draft is consistent with all Wikipedia recommendations and requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedteam ( talk • contribs) 14:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for expanding Cecily Jordan's article to include the controversy. It looks like you expanded it as well. Good job. I was considering that move myself, but didn't know if it was appropriate or if I would be dinged for moving so much. There are two issues that I don't see. The precedence setting issue of a woman being sued for Breach of Promise. This was the first such case, and the aftermath. The prohibition, like all prohibitions, didn't hold. There is also the Background, which is not mentioned in any article. That there was a shortage of women in the settlement, the situation was so dire that men of quality were trying to induce their sisters to migrate, and the Virginia Company resorted to bribing women, offering them a dowry and marriage to men of "quality". They recruited almost 200 females that way.
Isn't that significant? Oldperson ( talk) 16:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Twinkle misses the mark again (but is mostly useful).
Robert McClenon (
talk) 01:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
|
---|
Your draft article, User:Simonmaingi/sandboxHello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 23:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC) |
Hi,
I'd like to understand more about why you declined my proposed article Draft:Pixel Slate, especially as it was declined as I was in the middle of working to improve it based on your comments from yesterday.
I wrote a question to the helpdesk earlier about the topic, as I don't understand your assertion about the sources not being independent. The current version of the page includes relevant references to articles from The Guardian, Gizmodo, Mashable, ZDNet, Popular Science, and CNet. Additionally, I don't believe I have a conflict of interest since my only connection to the product is that I happen to own one (which, if this were sufficient for a conflict of interest, I believe we'd have a difficult time finding editors for the iPhone page).
If you don't believe I'll be able to show the page to be notable, I'd like your advice on how best to migrate the relevant info from this page to the Pixel Slate section of the Google Pixel page. It does, however, seem like it would be a strange editorial decision to have this be the one major device on the Pixel page without its own page
Thanks,
Lengau ( talk) 05:20, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert. Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the article: Harry Volpe.
While a seminal figure in early jazz guitar with numerous mentions in print and online--in addition to his many recordings, of course--Volpe is practically a ghost in terms of published biographical information. The two main published sources are William Bay's book, Masters of the Plectrum Guitar, as well as Volpe's out-of-print, impossible-to-find autobiography.
I referenced both of those books. In your comment, "It appears that this subject is likely notable, but that better sources are required", how would I go about improving?
Thanks again. Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alwayslearnedstuff ( talk • contribs) 14:00, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
The article is being created at mainspace by Jax 0677. Despite my efforts to have it salted as with the draft, another admin disagreed with this. Will have to remind folks that if they want to salt drafts they should salt mainspace as well. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 03:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Onomatowoo (
talk) 14:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Following up on declined article, for Eggersmann [ Küchen]. Any suggestions are welcomed. I originally wrote the wiki as a complete story like the Bulthaup [ [1]] wiki. I discovered from another editor who deleted the article immediately that guidelines had changed since the Bulthaup and Poggenpohl ([ [2]]) were approved. The version that you declined was an attempt to complete the story with facts gathered from company information, clearly identifying them. Those have been removed. Each statement is now supported by one or more citations. Any "subjective" adjectives that might be perceived as "advertising" were pulled directly from the citations. If you are willing, I am open to additional specific suggestions as to how to make this article encylopedic. Thanks in advance for your help. Onomatowoo ( talk) 14:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I have been working on drafting an article for an American Band called Juice. They fit the criterion for musical notability, satisfying the 12th reasoning. Juice was featured on NBC's TODAY show on August 14th, 2018. The segment was televised nationally and was covered on Elvis Duran's iHeart radio program as well.
Should I indicate on the talk page for the Juice draft that it satisfies the 12th reason?
Jtahle ( talk) 18:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Evans (D.C. politician). Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Maclimberr/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 7_ qz ( ゆっくりしていってね!) 16:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Well, well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:142:4201:F4AE:6CDF:AEFF:1A42:5EB8 ( talk) 02:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thanks for your feedback on the article and taking the time to go through it.
Was just wondering if you could clarify your comments a little bit.
Notability criteria is defined as:
A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
I believe that this is certainly the case with Flash Pack. Is your concern that some of the sources I have featured contain quotes from the company founders? As opposed to the information being written by a journalist in their words?
And are you able to read all the articles that are partially hidden behind paywalls?
Thanks
. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bengomori (
talk •
contribs) 09:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
It isn't necessary to compare a discussion of where an RFC should be to animal waste.
Why yes, yes it is, as that would be a fairly precise commentary on the ACTION. It might also apply to your warning, considering that commenting on the action --not a person -- was exactly what I did.
Perhaps before templating the regulars, you ought to understand the actual content of the templates you're using. -- Calton | Talk 14:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I can not understand that at all.[ [3]] Kamberi is an important person representing the interests of the Albanian minority in southern Serbia. Every article about a person is more or less a biography. See athletes, artists or politicians. Yours sincerely-- Špajdelj ( talk) 13:11, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
I made a small edit here. Does the article, in general, seem promising? I.e. is there a point on working with that. Ivo ( talk) 14:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, I have created this page in collaboration with a friend, and it looks as though we have inadvertenly created two drafts. I can only see one of them so I am not sure how to resolve the conflicts and end up with a single draft. Can you give me some guidance please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigelbmitchell ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thanks for the quick review of my draft article. Could you elaborate on the standard for notability? I included two independent journalistic sources. Also, the brand resulted in multiple awards and of course significant sales results. It's worth mentioning that other snack food brands with less impact do have their own articles, for example, Keebler's own /info/en/?search=Chachos. I appreciate your guidance! Thanks, Sedimentary ( talk) 19:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Hasnt edited since December 2015, if there is something procedural required for the process - great! otherwise it seems odd having conversation with long departed editor! JarrahTree 06:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Draft:James Hird. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – James Hird. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at James Hird. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 98.213.51.34 ( talk) 02:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert. This draft Draft:Jayquan Cutler might be of interest to you, given your participation in investigating sockpuppetry related to it. One of the sockpuppets emailed me, asking me to help them finish with this draft.-- Flooded with them hundreds 09:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 08:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC)You might be interested in reviewing/moving Draft:Joseph_Jenckes_Sr. You moved an article about his son, Draft:Joseph Jenckes Jr., on 25 December 2018. Diogenes99 ( talk) 22:31, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Elaine Herzberg. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thank you for the comment. I posted the answer on my talk page as I am still a beginner on wiki. I think I misunderstood your comment, thinking that the article should be tagged to Willson's book's page, but reading it again it dawned on me that your comment related to a wiki process that needs to happen when a new page title comes that coincides with the book. If this is the case, then my apologies for misunderstanding and thank you for commenting. Ivannaivama ( talk) 21:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Richard Gibb (
talk) 19:38, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Interesting, the Royal Archive, The Vatican, The Heralds and English Heritage etc are not reliable sources??? What planet do you live on? What do you regard as Reliable Sources - Marvel Comics?
Thank you for your comments regarding the article for David E Shaner. I have resubmitted the article, /info/en/?search=Draft:David_E._Shaner. Your further review would be appreciated.
( Ptarry ( talk) 23:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC))
I'm confused the draft is supported by independent secondary references and isn't written from the viewpoint of the organization. I'm asking that you reconsider your assessment. Dan arndt ( talk) 04:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Khan Bank.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
{{SAFESUBST:Void|
Hi and thankyou for your advice, I asked for advice on the live chat and was told there to put the grammy and oscar independent links in which I did and take out the IDMb and Wiki which I did and then I added the songs that were nominated. and external links. I was told on the live chat the page did qualify? Have I put too much info in now? wasnt my intention to make it sound like a resume.. I did check the references on live chat and was informed they would be accepted and were reliable. look forward to hearing from you and receiving you expert advice! at your earliest convenience kindes regards Deb.
Deejames007 ( talk) 13:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Well, gotta give it to ya, thanks for reviewing my MfD page. TheWinRat ( talk) 17:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
hi i think the other user who created the article just 2 days back, i have started working behind the article on jan 16 of 2019, the user just use the link i have added in each and every page of the person's filmography to create the article. Thats not a fair i have done the most of the edits and now the credit goes on the other user name. can you please view history of both Draft:Pauly_Valsan and Pauly Valsan so you can see the difference. is there no value for my hard work. Vijesh sreenivasan ( talk) 14:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Robert-
I am brand new to wiki as a writer and I seem to be having trouble with me first article that you commented on "Hydraulic Entertainment". I sent multiple submissions of the same article because i wasnt sure it sent the first time and I could not find out how to delete a submitted article. I wasnt trying to "game the system" just trying to figure it out. I am a huge fan and follower of Hydraulic. The music and film that they create give thousands of people incredible enjoyment and I want to publish an article on wiki so more people learn about what they do. This company has created an incredible amount of content in a short amount of time and I hope they continue. I will add more detail to the background section and i know that if published others will add more detail. I have added more references as requested. I am confused that the comment says if I resubmit it will be deleted? It seems I am being punished for being a newbie. I am just trying to be part of the diverse community that is wiki. I would appreciate and help here. Best user CPOlivette
( CPOlivette ( talk) 15:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC))
I observe one COI editor has removed a COI template while it is in draft albeit declaring a COI and then that revised draft has flown through the AfC 'Queue' in almost no time. I'm not 100% convinced it is from a neutral point of view. You previously declined this article ... Any thoughts ? Djm-leighpark ( talk) 07:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
I find this hard to believe. The German edition accepted my article. But maybe it’s substandard
Gee44 (
talk) 04:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
If it’s only a formatting problem... your first objection was different. Yes, my German version is the original and it’s correctly formatted.
Gee44 (
talk) 05:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
hi i need your help in reviewing the article Prasanth Mambully, i hope every thing is ok with the article. Please check and review the article. Vijesh sreenivasan ( talk) 16:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Is it about notability, or tone, or something else? Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert. "unpatrolled"? Fergananim ( talk) 17:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Robert McClenon. sorry about that. I guess the tag on the page got me confused while working with the script. I wondered why the page was submitted for review while there's a tag saying it is a work in progress. I thought the article creator placed that. Mgbo120 ( talk) 22:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
how are your socks User:Dlohcierekim User talk:Dlohcierekim 04:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey. Can I ask why you made this as Wikipedia:Seerefb and not as "Template:Seerefb"? It seems like it should be in the template namespace... thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 04:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Aprimo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ( Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_February_6#Aprimo ) ... courtesy notification Djm-leighpark ( talk) 10:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
You are correct in deducing the IP in the DRN is Prisonermonkeys. I forgot my password when I changed devices a few months ago. Ordinarily I would simply re-register with a new account, but I have had long-standing problems with a blocked editor, User:GeoJoe1000 and his many socks, most of which were created for the sake of harrassing me after I referred him to the admins for uncivil behaviour. If I were to create a new account, I would need to disclose my old identity and I am concerned that that would simply invite another wave of abuse that would spill over into articles. None of the admins I spoke to at the time had any solution except to submit SPI reports as needed, but by the time the SPI was completed, he would have created another sockpuppet which required another SPI. GeoJoe1000 has been quiet for six months or so, so maybe he has given up and I can re-register. Is it possible to do this in such a way that I don't have to disclose my old account on a user page? 1.144.104.49 ( talk) 06:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon,
I shortened the exhibition list of artist Aurélie Pétrel. Is the article seems ok for you with this change ? Thanks a lot for your answer. -- Xosd ( talk) 13:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Xosd
Truly amazing. People actually come along and post their personal attacks and other nonsense directly to a page headed "Personal Attacks and Other Deleted Nonsense", without waiting for you to move them there from this talk page or elsewhere. How very helpful of them. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 16:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon,
You have declined the publication of the article for Danger Close (film) on the basis that 'This film has not yet been released, and unreleased films are only notable if production itself is notable. (Future films sometimes wind up in development hell.) This draft does not indicate that production has been notable." This is the biggest Australian feature film of the past 30 years, the last ones being GALLIPOLI in 1981 and THE LIGHTHORSEMEN in 1987 and it has a rumoured budget of AUD$25m. Many people over 30 years have tried to make a movie on the Battle of Long Tan, to no avail. One even had Russell Crowe attached in the lead. But, this movie was just completed yesterday - https://www.instagram.com/p/BtlWRClHGSo/ and https://www.instagram.com/p/Bthmhtznvd9/. It is definitely not in 'development hell'. The announcement of the film going ahead in Los Angeles in February last year with the Queensland Premiere (head of state) was huge and was on all major Australian Television, radio, print an online publications (I can provide all of these links if you want to see for yourself). The production was very notable, once again achieving wide coverage in the Australian media as it was the first major Australian war film being filmed in Queensland and the production employed real Australian military veterans as part of the crew and cast - https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-09/army-veterans-forging-new-careers-in-movies/10625652 and https://www.abc.net.au/7.30/army-veterans-forge-new-careers-as-movie-extras/10703866. The soon to be Australian Prime Minister Bill Shorten (federal election in 2 months) even dropped into to see some of the film last Friday at Fox Studios in Sydney. I could go on and on, suffice to say this will be the biggest Australian feature film released in Australia and New Zealand for quite a while.
-- BarryCMark ( talk) 12:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Saludos
I just found your messages here as I do not go on Wikipedia that often. Im not exactly a newbie but Im not sure I understand the problem with the submission. The lack of sections is clear enough, but I do not understand why you state that it is written from the point of view of the organization. None of the sources are from Tepito Arte Acá... all of the newspaper articles are specifically about the organization and not published by them. Only the book and the thesis is not focused specifically on the organization, but most of the information is not from those sources. HicksW ( talk) 20:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
@ RhinosF1: Hope I am using this correctly. The idea of it being written by the organization is from what : Robert McClenon wrote here [ [4]] It also says that there are no third-party sources about the topic but all of the newspaper/magazine sources meet that. As for being a sock... I started with WP while I was still in school and havent used this account for awhile. Although I am bilingual, I previously worked mostly or entirely in Spanish Wikipedia. Thus the question. HicksW ( talk) 21:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert - just wanted to make sure I didn't ruffle feathers here. I figured there was a good chance you'd hop back on and moderate the re-open but I wasn't sure if and when so figured it made sense to point out your previous recommendations JIC the filer had not seen them. My intent was just to assist - I hope it was received as such. airuditious ( talk) 06:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Test. 2601:142:4201:F4AE:A9B1:25D9:FADC:3D6B ( talk) 17:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nobuhiro Watsuki. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
I give up. Why are the standards different in the English version?
I gave references from reliable British and American journals and sources. What else do you want? Weird. Gee44 ( talk) 14:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Robert, just wanted to thank you for the speedy and helpful response. I will do my best to edit the draft page for Graham_Boyd to be neutral. You are right, I do have a CoI, as I work with him in Evolutesix. Thank you Nikyta — Preceding unsigned comment added by NikytaGuleria ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! NikytaGuleria ( talk) 17:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, I think Ciara should have her own page, reason being, she's an important character who has been on the show since 2007. I believe the Dool characters list should be for those who have not been on the show for a long time, I.e not longer then 6 months. The page that I've created includes the detailed information which is not meant for the Dool characters list section. So if you could reconsider would be great. Thank you.-- Princessruby ( talk) 12:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the fast turn-around on the InVision draft I will respond to your comments below.
1. I have rewritten the intro to clarify that this page is about InVision the company.
2. A better name for this article would be InVisionApp, as that is the company's web name. This is a new article. The Wiki disambuation page for InVision has no entry for InVision Company but lists first 'UV/UX Prototyping Tool', which again, might confuse readers. InVisionApp would match with the Wiki page title.
3. I am a freelance writer who was paid by InVisionApp to create this page. I have no other affiliation with the company. I have declared that in the talk page, and on my personal page. Is there anything else that I need to do?
Thanks again for your help,
Tlvernon ( talk) 19:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Serenity-Fastest in the Verse | |
Thanks so much for so quickly offering suggestions on my first article submission (on Louis Rosenblum). Shosh2 ( talk) 04:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC) |
Hello Robert. I recently came across Rock it science at NPP and noticed something was... off. It seems you accidentally created a talk page complete with an AFC decline notice in the mainspace as opposed to at User talk:Rock it science. I have flagged the article for speedy deletion, but wanted to give you a heads up. Best.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 03:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words.
Re Oli Chang Wikipedia article
I have revised the Wikipedia Article on Notability requirements for Musicians and edited the article.
I have reviewed aspects of notability for Musicians such as reliable sources, determining that Oli Chang has been the subject of published works that are independent of the musician, I have reviewed Wikipedia pages that he is written about in such as Nomi Ruiz and High Highs and included links to these in the article, I have included the evidence that his music has been performed for a work of media. His Animal Feelings singles are placed in rotation nationally by Triple J in Australia, he has credit for writing music and lyrics in collaboration with artists such as Nomi Ruiz and Thief as Animal Feelings. He is an original performer of electronica as a DJ at Loveless Nights. This music is all his own writing.
He is an artist who has developed a solo career post his famous work with High Highs with Jack Milas as written about in Wikipedia.
I have rewritten the article in a neutral encyclopaedic tone. I have examined other Wikipedia pages of his contemporaries and colleagues such as Paris Wells and Nomi Ruiz to write in a similar manner.
Thank you for re reviewing this article
TAHayward ( talk) 22:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon, Please delete the one which takes longer to get approved. Thank you. Your suraj ( talk) 05:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon, Thanks for trying to resolve the dispute. Could you at least give us your 50 cents on the topic, whether the list of debates could be included like in Michael R. Licona or it should be removed from both? Despite being active elsewhere, I haven't heard back from @ GorgeCustersSabre yet. We could benefit from an external unbiased point of view. Thanks in advance. Ahmed M Farrag ( talk) 13:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry. I misclicked and accidentally removed your post. My apologies. Meters ( talk) 08:49, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert McClenon
Requesting your re-rview of page as its recommended for deletion. But now I have added more citations from news media and other details. I was referring similar kind of people wiki which is approved already.
/info/en/?search=Vini_Viswa_Lal
Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajishev ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " KEN Holdings Berhad".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander ( talk) 00:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
hello dear, thank you for your review on my article but I wrote it on neutral point of view with published source and I don't have any affiliate with Tony Ezenna; I will appreciate if you can guild me in completing this Article successfully.
Nliaustemac ( talk) 02:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
I dont want to redirect it.I only want to make it mainpage.Thanks--- Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk) 00:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
You have a recent habit of stringing the same point, the same sentence even, across dot points. Can you please stop that. For everyone else, a dot point is a standalone point that is individually signed and may be responded to individually. What you are doing is making a mess that is difficult to parse. Single sentences should contain no line feeds, let alone dot point formatted line feeds in places that barely call for a comma. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Badi (App) for example. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 01:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shabir Ally. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Haze_(band)#External_links makes perfect sense for me. Surprisingly, because the submission forms offer no preview or other way to check links etc. in what was submitted, I've only now seen what I posted.
OTOH your closure makes no sense for me: Two editors disagree about
WP:EL—especially {{
Songkick}}
wrt
WP:LINKSTOAVOID— and about the use of undo to get rid of maintenance templates, instead of keeping them in place or fixing the issues (two {{
fact}}
, {{
one source}}
and {{
notability}}
.) –
84.46.52.182 (
talk) 14:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert, I am editing my first draft: Daylight Entertainment. /info/en/?search=Draft:Daylight_Entertainment You left me a message saying "Change the levels, which are too large, of the headings to second-level". Since I am a wiki beginner, could you be more specific about my editing? Is that because the table I made in "TV series" section is too big, too wide? If you can take a look at my draft when you're free and let me know how to improve, that'll be very helpful. Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclinyang ( talk • contribs) 04:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Sir I want to make it to mainpage.If you are manhood person then you can understand how I worked to improve this article at only the age of 15.Please move it to mainpage😭😭😭. Thank You.Reply me soon as possible. Bhanwar singh vaish ( talk)
Thanks for your input on my draft [6]. I have fixed everything you and others have given me advice on, but I still get denied article space. Could you help me by either moving it or explaining what I'm doing wrong? Thank you Mr. McClenon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livonia ainovil ( talk • contribs) 12:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for my double article attempt, it just gets frustrating when you know you've done everything correctly but still can't get it approved. It won't happen again. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livonia ainovil ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Anjana T S ( talk) 18:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
I have given reference and citations for all statements in the article. thank you for guiding me to TEA
Anjana T S ( talk) 18:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for your comments.
I have made the relevant changes - please advise if I need to do anything else or find other sources.
Used the sources I found to be most relevant as the rest are in his official web site and mot 'impartial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mopug ( talk • contribs) 20:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, please run for a third RFA as you are a very experienced editor. Wikipedia needs someone like you as an admin as you will be a very useful addition to the admin group. So please run for a third RFA without delay. 2402:3A80:A7C:1BD7:0:5E:A6B:FF01 ( talk) 14:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
I am an IP editor and I am not blocked I want you to ran a third RFA. 2402:3A80:A7C:1BD7:0:5E:A6B:FF01 ( talk) 17:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Talk page stalkers: Do any of you have any ideas who this is? Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
I hope you have a good day :) and have a good life :D AndreiiPanfilov ( talk) 01:07, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Robert McClenon, This is regarding the page 'Tushar Pandey'. Tushar Pandey is an Indian film Actor. He was a part of the movie 'Pink'. As he is an individual actor we would like you to help us get connected directly to 'Tushar Pandey' page and should not get redirected to the page of the movie 'Pink' Reference links are attached on the wikipedia page of 'Tushar Pandey'. For your reference- IMDB Hindustan Times
Please help us with the same.
Thank You.
TheRock171 (
talk) 07:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRock171 ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xfinity Mobile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xfinity Mobile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
A rather amusing edit summary here [7] from an IP whose sole recent contributions are to add this person to any relevant Wikipedia article: [8]. I'm not completely sure how to proceed and know you do a good job with dispute resolution, so am asking your advice on where to go. SportingFlyer T· C 01:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. I hope we can expand them with their origins and meanings. One thing that troubles me is that at WP Anthroponymy we have decided against making a list of surnames to be created, in case there is no one currently notable with the name, but I regularly come across many surnames like that. I truly feel that is a loss for the encyclopedia. For example Novet. Zigzig20s ( talk) 12:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
User:Zigzag20 You're welcome.
Change your heading to Thousands. Good idea.
Legacypac (
talk) 03:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
As per WP:MEDIATE, "the role of the mediator is to facilitate consensus-building discussion... The mediator is a neutral third-party in relation to both the dispute and all the involved parties." I noted your recent remarks at Talk:Young Living/Archives/2020#Prohibited_marketing_claims discussion under your "fifth statement as moderator" and it seems to me you're overstepping your role as mediator here. You are supposed to facilitate consensus among the participants, and in this case you are expressing your own personal incredulity of the outcome. I would like to respectfully suggest as a moderator you try to be more dispassionate in your remarks. Coastside ( talk) 01:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christopher Nolan. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
"Places with protected status (e.g. cultural heritage sites) and named natural features, with verifiable information" are presumed to be notable according the wikipedia article on place notability. So shouldn't Frenchtown Washington abondantly written about (including many scholar references) be presumed to be notable? I am told in a draft review comment that it is not. French Prairie in Oregon is a very similar heritage area and has a wikipedia entry, thus presumed notable. Am a bit lost, this being my first ever article. LeCanardQuoi ( talk) 04:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Dunn (2nd nomination) nearly the same content was used to create article in 2016 and 2017. And deleted both times. Deletion history got tangled with the fictional character article. Begs the question of who is LandonCharles1 who shows up on 1 March with very first edit being the creation of the draft that was deleted as an article back in 2017 and 2016? David notMD ( talk) 10:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
How do I make the proper declaration that I am a founder of the company, but am not paid for my work? Do I still use the
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by {{{employer}}} for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
tag or something else?
I take issue with your comment about neutral point of view and citing reliable sources. All sources sited are generally considered reliable publications and are not paid advertisements in any way. Each author of each article sited is well known and generally respected in their domain of reporting. Please suggest any edits regarding neutral point of view. I have tried to construct each sentence to be completely factual and without any adjectives or verbs that would be interpreted as having positive or negative bias. Dliccardo ( talk) 17:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Dliccardo
Robert McClenon After reviewing the COI page Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, it seems the more appropriate tag is the general COI connected contributor tag. I have added this to the talk page of that article. I have no idea which statements you do not believe are neutral, but it looks like that comment was removed(?), so perhaps that is no longer an issue. Could you please review your remaining comments at the top of Draft:Catapult Ventures and adjust? You write "...focusing on what the company says about itself." However, all seven references are from independent and respected news publications and those citations are clearly tied to factual statements. You also write "The references are not independent." This is completey false. You also write "This draft reads like an advertisement," Could you please provide a hint to which sentence you believe needs adjustment? Generally, regarding notability, is their a general guideline for how many independence sources should be used? Would adding additional citations/sources convince you that this company is notable? Thank you. Dliccardo ( talk) 05:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)DLiccardo
Hi Robert. I came across this draft while checking on non-free image use. Although you declined it on March 5, 2019, there is already an article about this subject at List of Pokémon: Sun & Moon: Ultra Legends episodes. The article was created on a day after you declined the draft from a redirect and probably still contains the same copyvios you mentioned when declining the draft (it looks like a copy-paste move). What do you suggest doing here? CSD? AfD? WP:DRAFTIFY makes no sense since there's no need for two drafts. Anyway, whatever is done probably should be done soon since any additional editing of the article is likely going to create more work for whomever cleans up the copyvio. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 05:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Sir...what issues do you have with my article? Kingtd1 ( talk) 06:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Robert. i read your message concerning the duplicate article and i also will improve the current article. However can you help me with the citing style? and in regards to your comment; the i dont have any financial connections with the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingtd1 ( talk • contribs) 06:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Sir,
This is my first effort at creating a page for a public figure in my community, that doesn't have a wiki entry, yet. I only pasted what I have from a charity dinner that gave accolades to prominent benefactors, so I can see why it seemed promotional. I just wanted a jumping off point for the article, so I could revise based on a timeline. I didn't intend for the article to be promotional. If you could please reenter the deleted info. I can rewrite the article this evening and get it back in your hands by tomorrow for a more academic review.
Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gun4Hyr ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Dwayne J. Clark".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 16:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Added clarifying information regarding bibliography v reference. Anacaona ( talk) 19:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Addressed issue of T. Hangbé's political role. Anacaona ( talk) 16:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joshua_Kreithen
Hello Robert, I saw that you commented on this draft that is to be reviewed and I wanted to know your thoughts on it's likelihood to be published. Do you think the subject Dr. Kreithen is not notable enough to be published? Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Dave Dcm207 ( talk) 23:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert, thank you for reviewing my sandbox and leaving me comments. Sorry for bothering you due to submitting the sandbox. I wanna say this draft is totally not an advertisement and written in the same way that other mobile phone brands did, such as OPPO, vivo and Tecno. It just contains the basic information of the company, the business area, the achievements and the expansion history. And the product part is a list of each series and basic specs with no promotional words. OPPO did the same part on its pages. These things are all mentioned and reported by independent reliable media coverage (CNN, Counterpoint Research, Indian Express ), no make-up statements. I am confused which sentence let you feel it is an advertisement. Please help to point out and give me some advice, thank you! Pumkin Ding ( talk) 08:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert. I understand there are some concerns with my financial involvement in Soundwalk Collective. I declare that I am not financially involved with Soundwalk Collective or Stephan Crasneanscki. I have been following their work since 2010 and I was surprised to see the lack of information on them in Wikipedia, also that two of the later joining members of Soundwalk Collective have wikipedia pages and the founder Stephan Crasneanscki has not got one at all. I decided to spend some of my free time fixing this. I am looking for help to shed light on this fascinating artist and collective, what steps do I take? Please understand I am new here and learning as I go along. Sonnenalle44 ( talk) 12:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi! R u sure, that this edit took sufficiently into account, that there was no real discussion of my arguments, and that the so called "editors" obviously have no psychology/philosophy expertise (e. g. on my "rabies" argument they reply with "Xanadu" and "Xenu" (whatever that might mean... for me it is just nonsense or non-science respectively...)...)? I mean: is trolling enough to b an editor? Thx. Bye. -- Homer Landskirty ( talk) 04:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi, thanks for your feedback: it has been a long time since my last edit on Wikipedia. This wasn't meant to be adverting, I just noticed a startup I know was missing: other than the usual guides, can you give me any other specific suggestion to enhance this voice, address problems and submit it for publication again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triplez3 ( talk • contribs) 11:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert McClenon, I hope all is well. I see you rejected User:Julia VanDevelder/sandbox/Jodie Markell as the page already exists (they left me a message on my talk page). If you look at their edit summary, they are a COI editor and per the message I left on their page yesterday they were trying to make an edit request. One of the suggestions from the COI welcome Template was that they create a subuserpage for their edits and have someone review it. Based off this, I believe they were just asking a neutral editor to review it. I don't have time right now but if you are able to re-review the draft, would you be so kind to? They have been very kind and understanding so far. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 17:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert McClenon,
I am writing to you about your message to me which said, "Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This is a user page and not a draft."
I agree with you that it is actually a user page. I had erroneously thought that I needed to submit my user page for review and approval also. Clearly, that is not the case. My mistake. I will submit a new article for review soon, which is not a user page type. It appears that I may be auto-confirmed now since I have met the 10 edits requirement. Thanks for your help.
Ghazi Akailvi
Ghaziakailvi ( talk) 03:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Japanese imperial transition. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Can you help me find someone who can explain why the "in Progress" Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard - University of Pennsylvania - Evolution from a Commuter School to a Residential University has disappeared? Thanks! Wa3frp ( talk) 14:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Robert McClenon,
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately
1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert
It looks fine.
Apologies, I thought I had already left you a message about this :( Chaosdruid ( talk) 14:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Detransition. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted and ready for you. -- ferret ( talk) 13:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Hi Mr. McClenon. I’m not sure if you remember me, but you once reviewed an article I had submitted. The article in question was Ragazzi di Livonia in my sandbox, an Italian gang. There has recently been some “mob drama” following the assassination of some top mafia figures, and I was wondering if you could help get my article approved while this new found interest in Italian crime is around. I last submitted my article a few weeks ago, but have not heard anything since. I appreciate your consideration for the increased urgency of the article being made public, and I thank you for your time. Livonia ainovil ( talk) 22:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey, have you noticed the recent articles around foreign relations of Vietnam and Jordan? The conversational edit summaries are reminiscent of User:Abdelkader123456, who was banned for Copyright issues. I'm not 100% about it, but would love another pair of eyes looking into the IPs that are posting the drafts, to see if something quacks. Bkissin ( talk) 17:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I had a friendly question about the denial of the Oklahoma Humanities page that I created and you responded to. Originally, you had said I needed more sources, which I gathered and added. Then it was suggested that OH needs significant coverage by other sources. I modeled my page off the
Missouri Humanities Council page, and I have many more independent sources than that page, so I don't understand how much significant coverage is needed if other Wikipedia pages do not conform to that standard. Please advise what would count as significant coverage for this particular article. Thanks!
Shankyouverymuch08 (
talk) 18:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Shankyouverymuch08
Shankyouverymuch08 ( talk) 18:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The photo is owned by me. Marie Lemelle ( talk) 15:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation about my photo. How do photos appear with the article or maybe I have characterized my submission incorrectly. Please advise. Marie Lemelle ( talk) 15:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Robert !
Thank you for responding so quickly to my submission
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Bughub#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_sandbox_(March_22)
Yes I understand that I should have asked for help first
But now I have your attention ...
Would you mind having a quick look at the article which I am trying to expand ?
/info/en/?search=Borough_Group
At present it is just a stub
I would like to learn how to correct the errors ...
Bughub ( talk) 07:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for the review. Could you help me understand what specific section of the wiki page created was found to be advertorial? We would essentially delete that content and/or edit it for review again. We definitely want to comply with Wiki's rules.
Thanks.
Nwalavalkar786 ( talk) 14:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert,
You mentioned that I have not disclosed my COI on my user page. I am a student intern at Plymouth Rock Assurance Corporation (I have mentioned this on my user page) and we(the organization) have significant customer base. In such a scenario, I felt that the company should have a wikipedia page for customers who want to know more about the company. I have included just dry facts as mentioned by the other reviewer (Stevey7788) and am trying my level best to meet wikipedia's policies. Could you help me out set up this page and let me know of whatever changes I have to make to the page in order to get it up.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nwalavalkar786 ( talk • contribs) 19:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you atleast help me understand what's the problem with my COI article as you have mentioned. Thanks. Nwalavalkar786 ( talk) 13:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, As you had mentioned, I have moved my COI from user talk page to article talk page. Let me know if there are any more changes before the draft is moved to articles section. Thanks. Nwalavalkar786 ( talk) 14:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Robert, thank you for your comment. I am wondering why is my filmography too long? I am using the same presentation format that other companies are using, such as this page: /info/en/?search=DNEG. I would like to know why is their filmography not too long? Thank you for your collaboration. Best regards! Tyler Durd ( talk) 17:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. FYI. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osmodrama ..... I can't see has advanced since your AFC refusal. In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)