![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | Archive 107 | → | Archive 110 |
Hi Ritchie333,
Thanks for pointing out my page /info/en/?search=PickYourTrail. Well, yeah I'm a rookie of wikipedia who is eagerly learning to contribute on wikipedia. I felt worried about the deletion of the page which i have created /info/en/?search=PickYourTrail and also mentioned as advertising. Kindly help me to sort out this. How it is pointing as advertising? I even didn't added eny exxternal links to my website. And I'm sure i didn't wrote it as promotional. I followed the content flow of MakeMyTrip and like wise i was built the page. I believe you are a poet. Please remove or kindly guide me on setting up the page. Or what are the additional information's we need to add in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asrafali ( talk • contribs)
In future, do not refactor a TP contribution of mine by placing your more self-important contribution on exactly the same topic ahead of mine chronologically. WP:TPO applies.
It's bad form. I'm talking about the latest RFA general discussion. Leaky caldron ( talk) 14:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
"<!-- have just watched the biggest car crash political interview in history. The aftermath is much more interesting than this. -->" Leaky caldron ( talk) 19:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Leaky's edit clearly shows them posting below a separator comment
To be clear, it's a comment saying to use a horizontal rule to separate discussions, and not a comment that is separating discussions in itself (which would be pretty useless). Yes, it would have made more sense for Leaky caldron's post to be placed before the comment, leaving it at the end to provide guidance for future editors who might want to start a new discussion. But just as I presume that was a good-faith miscue, I think the subsequent inserted post by Ritchie333 is another good-faith oversight, though one that I think ought to have been corrected once pointed out. (Usually I don't bother pointing it out when it happens to me; it's a bit galling but most of the time it doesn't have much effect. I don't like to fix it myself because some editors get touchy when you move their comments, myself included if it changes the order or the apparent post to which I was replying to something I didn't intend. I appreciate though that people have different ideas about how indenting works.)
isaacl (
talk)
21:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. I have made alot of drafts of actors and actresses. Can I show them to you. I am new and i am learning new stuff around. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.43.108.158 ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
More (soundtrack) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Reaper Eternal --
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
15:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Ritchie333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Holly Butcher".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot ( talk) 16:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The UK glistening like wet otters Award |
![]() - Ritchie333 |
"
Women's Beach Volleyball is at the heart of
the UK's international sporting prowess." " ...and just look at the Belgians" ... and if you find you're really too bored with
UK sport already, you could always try
really radical politics:
pages to choose from, you know where!! Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
|
On 29 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South Audley Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Queen briefly lived at 77 South Audley Street? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Audley Street. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, South Audley Street), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Would you considered revising your decision to merge or redirect? It’s clear that the consensus is that it does not need an article, and there were no policy based reasons presented to keep it. I don’t really see the point of forcing a phony merge discussion per the user that undid my post-AFD merge attempt on something that clearly fails GNG. It’ll literally be either just the two of us, or the same participants of the AfD repeating the same exact discussion. TTN ( talk) 18:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Saw that you deleted the article - I tried to upload it with a less advertising tone. It's pretty big in Israel. I deleted the links you mentioned that led to a payment page. Would love to have your feedback! I'm happy to work on it and improve it. I'm not being compensated for it or anything, it's just something there should be an article about. -- Psychology Forever ( talk) 19:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, can you elaborate on why the information previously on the article is too much. Sgt Pepper, Revolver and Rubber Soul all have more... Isaacsorry ( talk) 16:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Protests of 2019. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Cold Season ( talk) 20:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I just looked at the Afd you closed as no consensus (on my watchlist for opening it) and... it has 9 delete/merge against 4 keep, which is nothing like 50/50. I wouldn't usually challenge a closure or anything but it looks like your counting's a bit off on this one. I know I opened it, but still. Kingsif ( talk) 00:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Larrère claimed that the differences in triggers for the various protests were misleading for understanding the nature of the protests, favouring rebellion against economic austerity programs and calls for more democracy as underlying causes.[5]. So a historian says that claiming that the protests are disconnected is misleading. Anyway, the question is whether Ritchie333 has inaccurately represented what s/he claims is a lack of consensus. To me it seems that the summary is accurate. We cannot pretend to be in agreement when we are not. Boud ( talk) 21:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey mate, was going through my AfD log out of curiosity and it didn't pick up a result for this - would you mind changing your text to (or do I have permission to change): The result was draftify - the page has been moved to... so the XfD stats counter can pick it up? I know it's terribly pedantic, but thought I'd ask anyways. SportingFlyer T· C 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Waffle waffle File:Cassetteboy logo.jpg not used in any article welp yada yada. B-bot ( talk) 03:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I don't think this is a good idea. No problem with the sentiment, but who (not) to vote for in upcoming elections is not something we should have on user pages (and admins are apparently supposed to lead by example). I wouldn't wan't it if half the user pages I go to where plastered with "MAGA" banners, and if we don't want it in such cases, we shouldn't have it for better messages either. Could you please remove it again? Fram ( talk) 14:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Oh, and somewhat related: ever seen this? Some of the best commentary on current British politics you can find nowadays. Fram ( talk) 14:17, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
On 4 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Green Man, Ashbourne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there is a man in tweeds on a gallows outside the Green Man, Ashbourne? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Green Man, Ashbourne. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Green Man, Ashbourne), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I just got the notification for AFD Closure, I think it wasn’t appropriate, Because there was only one user to thought it should be deleted, and nominator was new user, moreover Ekta Jain is not new celebrity she is in the industry since 2000 so and that is the reason why I created an article of her. I would Like a refund for this. Or should I write it again? And then we’ll see if it should be kept or deleted? Ishasalian ( talk) 09:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Can I ask you to relist the AfD once more, since I have planned to comment there, but didn't have time? 2nd relist should be appropriate. Regards, Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mitto Password Manager. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 20:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi there Ritchi333! I'm Shrinkydinks, and I'm doing my very first GA review. It's for country music artist Eddy Raven. Could I ask for a moment of your time? Would you mind giving it a once over?
A couple specific questions:
Would love your insight! — Shrinkydinks ( talk) 01:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333.... here is the pub where a skull from 1857 India was found. Whispyhistory ( talk) 04:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This is a bit long, and please feel free to disregard as it is neither very important nor very urgent. But given your more generous take on speedy deletions, I thought you'd have a good answer to this question: Is there a valid reason to speedy delete Draft:John Zachary Danao? Short version is that someone periodically tries to recreate the page, and someone supports the articles with cheap online PR packages that insert their name into low-quality news stories and contributor articles, all in an effort to promote and, it seems, to try to establish their (apparently fictional) Harvard graduate status on Wikipedia. Last time this happened EEng and I spent some time disassembling the whole thing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Zachary Danao, which also resulted in a sockpuppet investigation and subsequent deletion of subject's similar efforts at Wikidata and Tagalog Wikipedia. I also note that the IP that created the most recent draft asked an admin to hide the AfD discussion. The history of John Zachary Danao is also informative. So, this version is only sort of a hoax, only sort of promotional, and sort of different from previously deleted efforts. I recognize that it can probably just be left to expire as a draft, given that no one is likely to move it to the deleted title if they look at the history, but I was curious if there was a speedy alternative. Thanks, and again, please feel free to archive this and move on if you're not interested. Indignant Flamingo ( talk) 02:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
On 10 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Air Balloon (pub), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Balloon went up in 1784 and added air in 1802, but now Highways England wants to blow it up? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Air Balloon (pub). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Air Balloon (pub)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Could you consider relisting instead? The thing is a bunch of other lists of D&D gods were deleted recently, so it's a bit strange this one would survive ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons gnome deities, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons halfling deities, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Forgotten Realms deities, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragonlance deities. It is no different, content-wise, from those other lists, so the arguments may also IMHO be weighted cross-discussion. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I am somewhat new to Wikipedia so not overly confident not having a direct messaging facility as I would expect, so have been unable to reply to you. From the noticeboard you put me on, I gather you haven't actually accessed the site? That may be useful to understand what it's about. I will try my best to find a timetable for the train, but if this fails you can just look at realtime Trains. The train that is being considered is here: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/W49011/2020-01-09/detailed - as you can see it stops at Wandsworth Road and Clapham High Street. You're welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamMattDavies ( talk • contribs) 07:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter)
Sir Boris ran away.
Bravely ran away away.
When asked to go on GMB
His bouncer swore on live TV.
Brave Sir Boris turned about,
Gallantly chickened out.
"I'm Brave!" He screamed "I'll get Brexit Done!"
Then hid in a fridge 'til the press had gone.
Bravest of the brave, Sir Boris!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Serial Number 54129 ( talk • contribs)
This is my mental image of you, just FYI. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, I wanted to ask you: in your opinion, what language, on what page, would convince a closer to close
this AfD as either a keep or delete? Do we look at modifying
WP:N,
WP:ATH, or
WP:NFOOTY? Or
WP:CONSENSUS or
WP:DGFA or a
WP:CCPOL? Do we see if there's consensus for adding An article meeting an SNG [is/is not] a valid keep rationale
, or something more like Closers [must/are encouraged to/may] [discount/not discount] !votes based on an article meeting an SNG
? Just curious what your perspective is about what change to what page would break the logjam and provide some long-term stability/predictability in these notability discussions. Spanks in advance! –
Leviv
ich
17:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right(emphasis mine) which either needs to be affirmed or modified. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 17:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Well, I went to go merge Stanley Page to List of Mansfield Town F.C. players, and then I realized the list only lists players with 50+ appearances. Stanley Page had one. Doesn't seem like there's anywhere to merge to. Gotta love the logic of NFOOTY: not notable to be on the list, but notable enough for a stand-alone page. Ha. – Leviv ich 04:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | Archive 107 | → | Archive 110 |
Hi Ritchie333,
Thanks for pointing out my page /info/en/?search=PickYourTrail. Well, yeah I'm a rookie of wikipedia who is eagerly learning to contribute on wikipedia. I felt worried about the deletion of the page which i have created /info/en/?search=PickYourTrail and also mentioned as advertising. Kindly help me to sort out this. How it is pointing as advertising? I even didn't added eny exxternal links to my website. And I'm sure i didn't wrote it as promotional. I followed the content flow of MakeMyTrip and like wise i was built the page. I believe you are a poet. Please remove or kindly guide me on setting up the page. Or what are the additional information's we need to add in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asrafali ( talk • contribs)
In future, do not refactor a TP contribution of mine by placing your more self-important contribution on exactly the same topic ahead of mine chronologically. WP:TPO applies.
It's bad form. I'm talking about the latest RFA general discussion. Leaky caldron ( talk) 14:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
"<!-- have just watched the biggest car crash political interview in history. The aftermath is much more interesting than this. -->" Leaky caldron ( talk) 19:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Leaky's edit clearly shows them posting below a separator comment
To be clear, it's a comment saying to use a horizontal rule to separate discussions, and not a comment that is separating discussions in itself (which would be pretty useless). Yes, it would have made more sense for Leaky caldron's post to be placed before the comment, leaving it at the end to provide guidance for future editors who might want to start a new discussion. But just as I presume that was a good-faith miscue, I think the subsequent inserted post by Ritchie333 is another good-faith oversight, though one that I think ought to have been corrected once pointed out. (Usually I don't bother pointing it out when it happens to me; it's a bit galling but most of the time it doesn't have much effect. I don't like to fix it myself because some editors get touchy when you move their comments, myself included if it changes the order or the apparent post to which I was replying to something I didn't intend. I appreciate though that people have different ideas about how indenting works.)
isaacl (
talk)
21:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. I have made alot of drafts of actors and actresses. Can I show them to you. I am new and i am learning new stuff around. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.43.108.158 ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
More (soundtrack) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Reaper Eternal --
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
15:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Ritchie333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Holly Butcher".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot ( talk) 16:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The UK glistening like wet otters Award |
![]() - Ritchie333 |
"
Women's Beach Volleyball is at the heart of
the UK's international sporting prowess." " ...and just look at the Belgians" ... and if you find you're really too bored with
UK sport already, you could always try
really radical politics:
pages to choose from, you know where!! Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
|
On 29 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South Audley Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Queen briefly lived at 77 South Audley Street? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Audley Street. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, South Audley Street), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Would you considered revising your decision to merge or redirect? It’s clear that the consensus is that it does not need an article, and there were no policy based reasons presented to keep it. I don’t really see the point of forcing a phony merge discussion per the user that undid my post-AFD merge attempt on something that clearly fails GNG. It’ll literally be either just the two of us, or the same participants of the AfD repeating the same exact discussion. TTN ( talk) 18:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Saw that you deleted the article - I tried to upload it with a less advertising tone. It's pretty big in Israel. I deleted the links you mentioned that led to a payment page. Would love to have your feedback! I'm happy to work on it and improve it. I'm not being compensated for it or anything, it's just something there should be an article about. -- Psychology Forever ( talk) 19:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, can you elaborate on why the information previously on the article is too much. Sgt Pepper, Revolver and Rubber Soul all have more... Isaacsorry ( talk) 16:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Protests of 2019. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Cold Season ( talk) 20:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I just looked at the Afd you closed as no consensus (on my watchlist for opening it) and... it has 9 delete/merge against 4 keep, which is nothing like 50/50. I wouldn't usually challenge a closure or anything but it looks like your counting's a bit off on this one. I know I opened it, but still. Kingsif ( talk) 00:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Larrère claimed that the differences in triggers for the various protests were misleading for understanding the nature of the protests, favouring rebellion against economic austerity programs and calls for more democracy as underlying causes.[5]. So a historian says that claiming that the protests are disconnected is misleading. Anyway, the question is whether Ritchie333 has inaccurately represented what s/he claims is a lack of consensus. To me it seems that the summary is accurate. We cannot pretend to be in agreement when we are not. Boud ( talk) 21:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey mate, was going through my AfD log out of curiosity and it didn't pick up a result for this - would you mind changing your text to (or do I have permission to change): The result was draftify - the page has been moved to... so the XfD stats counter can pick it up? I know it's terribly pedantic, but thought I'd ask anyways. SportingFlyer T· C 08:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Waffle waffle File:Cassetteboy logo.jpg not used in any article welp yada yada. B-bot ( talk) 03:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I don't think this is a good idea. No problem with the sentiment, but who (not) to vote for in upcoming elections is not something we should have on user pages (and admins are apparently supposed to lead by example). I wouldn't wan't it if half the user pages I go to where plastered with "MAGA" banners, and if we don't want it in such cases, we shouldn't have it for better messages either. Could you please remove it again? Fram ( talk) 14:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Oh, and somewhat related: ever seen this? Some of the best commentary on current British politics you can find nowadays. Fram ( talk) 14:17, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
On 4 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Green Man, Ashbourne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there is a man in tweeds on a gallows outside the Green Man, Ashbourne? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Green Man, Ashbourne. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Green Man, Ashbourne), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, I just got the notification for AFD Closure, I think it wasn’t appropriate, Because there was only one user to thought it should be deleted, and nominator was new user, moreover Ekta Jain is not new celebrity she is in the industry since 2000 so and that is the reason why I created an article of her. I would Like a refund for this. Or should I write it again? And then we’ll see if it should be kept or deleted? Ishasalian ( talk) 09:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Can I ask you to relist the AfD once more, since I have planned to comment there, but didn't have time? 2nd relist should be appropriate. Regards, Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mitto Password Manager. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 20:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi there Ritchi333! I'm Shrinkydinks, and I'm doing my very first GA review. It's for country music artist Eddy Raven. Could I ask for a moment of your time? Would you mind giving it a once over?
A couple specific questions:
Would love your insight! — Shrinkydinks ( talk) 01:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333.... here is the pub where a skull from 1857 India was found. Whispyhistory ( talk) 04:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This is a bit long, and please feel free to disregard as it is neither very important nor very urgent. But given your more generous take on speedy deletions, I thought you'd have a good answer to this question: Is there a valid reason to speedy delete Draft:John Zachary Danao? Short version is that someone periodically tries to recreate the page, and someone supports the articles with cheap online PR packages that insert their name into low-quality news stories and contributor articles, all in an effort to promote and, it seems, to try to establish their (apparently fictional) Harvard graduate status on Wikipedia. Last time this happened EEng and I spent some time disassembling the whole thing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Zachary Danao, which also resulted in a sockpuppet investigation and subsequent deletion of subject's similar efforts at Wikidata and Tagalog Wikipedia. I also note that the IP that created the most recent draft asked an admin to hide the AfD discussion. The history of John Zachary Danao is also informative. So, this version is only sort of a hoax, only sort of promotional, and sort of different from previously deleted efforts. I recognize that it can probably just be left to expire as a draft, given that no one is likely to move it to the deleted title if they look at the history, but I was curious if there was a speedy alternative. Thanks, and again, please feel free to archive this and move on if you're not interested. Indignant Flamingo ( talk) 02:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
On 10 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Air Balloon (pub), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Balloon went up in 1784 and added air in 1802, but now Highways England wants to blow it up? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Air Balloon (pub). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Air Balloon (pub)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Could you consider relisting instead? The thing is a bunch of other lists of D&D gods were deleted recently, so it's a bit strange this one would survive ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons gnome deities, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons halfling deities, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Forgotten Realms deities, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragonlance deities. It is no different, content-wise, from those other lists, so the arguments may also IMHO be weighted cross-discussion. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, I am somewhat new to Wikipedia so not overly confident not having a direct messaging facility as I would expect, so have been unable to reply to you. From the noticeboard you put me on, I gather you haven't actually accessed the site? That may be useful to understand what it's about. I will try my best to find a timetable for the train, but if this fails you can just look at realtime Trains. The train that is being considered is here: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/W49011/2020-01-09/detailed - as you can see it stops at Wandsworth Road and Clapham High Street. You're welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamMattDavies ( talk • contribs) 07:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter)
Sir Boris ran away.
Bravely ran away away.
When asked to go on GMB
His bouncer swore on live TV.
Brave Sir Boris turned about,
Gallantly chickened out.
"I'm Brave!" He screamed "I'll get Brexit Done!"
Then hid in a fridge 'til the press had gone.
Bravest of the brave, Sir Boris!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Serial Number 54129 ( talk • contribs)
This is my mental image of you, just FYI. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, I wanted to ask you: in your opinion, what language, on what page, would convince a closer to close
this AfD as either a keep or delete? Do we look at modifying
WP:N,
WP:ATH, or
WP:NFOOTY? Or
WP:CONSENSUS or
WP:DGFA or a
WP:CCPOL? Do we see if there's consensus for adding An article meeting an SNG [is/is not] a valid keep rationale
, or something more like Closers [must/are encouraged to/may] [discount/not discount] !votes based on an article meeting an SNG
? Just curious what your perspective is about what change to what page would break the logjam and provide some long-term stability/predictability in these notability discussions. Spanks in advance! –
Leviv
ich
17:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right(emphasis mine) which either needs to be affirmed or modified. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 17:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Well, I went to go merge Stanley Page to List of Mansfield Town F.C. players, and then I realized the list only lists players with 50+ appearances. Stanley Page had one. Doesn't seem like there's anywhere to merge to. Gotta love the logic of NFOOTY: not notable to be on the list, but notable enough for a stand-alone page. Ha. – Leviv ich 04:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)