![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi, just to let you know I reverted this edit you made to International Space Station as it changed several words to US spellings whereas the article is not written in US English. I note that it was an AWB-assisted edit marked as cleanup, and I'm a little concerned as to how it got into your edit queue for AWB. Could I check what criteria you are using to select pages for these edits? Thanks. -- W. D. Graham 22:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
I thought I replied to this yesterday, but it doesn't seem to have saved. To be honest I'm not really a fan of messing around with dialects either, unless I'm reviewing/cleaning-up spelling in an article or I happen to notice a change being made or proposed without any real need - which I tend to oppose/BRD in the interests of keeping the article stable.
The problem with tagging as an AWB task is that, except for obvious cases such as US-only, UK-only and India-only missions, using a semi-automated tool to make potentially contentious edits could be an issue. That said, I'd be happy to go through and tag the obvious cases in the next couple of days. -- W. D. Graham 09:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Hello N2e: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Fotaun ( talk) 16:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
![]()
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
|
![]() |
A Tesla Roadster for you! |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 ( talk) 14:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
Thanks for sticking up for me when I received personal attacks. You and other superior editors do that thing a lot, but I'd like to say thank you and present you with this barnstar. I hope that you enjoy it as well as the Tesla Roadster. Thanks for standing up for me and other registered Wikipedians. Gg53000 ( talk) 01:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC) |
I'd just like you to know that there is a new Wikipedia user named Ricky13051 and they deserve a warm welcome on their talk page. Start baking cookies, if you know what I mean! LOL!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 00:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in our user study. Please email me at credivisstudy@gmail.com. Wkmaster ( talk) 11:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for the edits to the USS George Washington page. I'm working to update it & being able to look at your edits to see what you pinged on is a big help. Jacob.Allison ( talk) 00:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Falcon (rocket family) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I've got another user who deserves a warm welcome on their talk page! Their names are OllyC1 and Aragorn106. I hope you've still got some cookie dough! LOL!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 00:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
That sounds great! If you can teach me the recipe, I'll be glad to oblige! Thanks!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 20:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
It works perfectly! Even the cookies weren't burnt! Thank you for teaching me how to welcome new users! Happy editing!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 23:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I seem to recall you enquiring about progress with the audit of orbital spaceflights a while ago. I thought you might be interested to know that the first complete report is now available (due to length, each year has its own subpage). The list will be updated by bot such that each article will be re-reviewed at least once every six weeks. -- W. D. Graham 00:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Please remember that you can develop a separate section for Davis' early life biography controversy.-- NK ( talk) 17:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
| Hello, N2e. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for SpaceX reusable launch system development program at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 03:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC) |
You may be interested in a proposal to include that article among the 1,000 Wikipedia:Vital articles. The discussion is here. Thewellman ( talk) 04:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
1720 is just a model of modern hobby sail boat, Blue Steel is just one of them so, yeah, not notable.
I don't doubt though that Blue Steel is a name of a pose in Zoolander, which if true would be a reference to the tempered metal. Notable? The pose is not notable, but that the color is referenced suports the notability of the color and the practice of referencing the color/metal. Blue steel is not only a color, but also a metaphor, with a steely blue stare ... IveGoneAway ( talk) 23:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, I would recommend Being bold and removing the unsupported content. Plot summaries are constantly under revision, and that particular article hasn't had significant changes to the plot since 2011/2012. Moreover, most of it was written in 2006, so hasn't received serious overhaul by a second set of eyes in a while, and there has been very little discussion on it's talk page. Any edits would likely be uncontroversial. In the future, I would recommend relying on the WP:Be Bold policy when working with articles that are underdeveloped or have serious problems. Happy editing! Sadads ( talk) 13:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, after reading about you I thought you might like to have a look at the work a few of us have been doing at List of largest power stations in the world?...I am trying to understand how and why the economies of the world invest in energy infrastructure. You seem to have some wiki smarts and street cred so your help in generating interest among the Wikipedia:Energy community would be great!-- Graham Proud ( talk) 16:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
SpaceX reusable launch system development program you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jamesx12345 --
Jamesx12345 (
talk)
22:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e. Just wanted to swing by and express my thanks for taking the time to read over and endorse our our Reimagining Mentorship proposal. We have a solid team who wants to help better reach out to those who want to learn to be better editors, and your support in this early stage is much appreciated. Take care, I, JethroBT drop me a line 16:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
The article
SpaceX reusable launch system development program you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jamesx12345 --
Jamesx12345 (
talk)
18:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Colonization of Mars is now longer than ever before. Love it! -- 181.47.58.73 ( talk) 04:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
</ref>
tag at its end. As a consequence, everything afterwards, including multiple sections and the list of references itself, were interpreted as parts of one never-ending footnote and were not displayed correctly. I have
fixed that and am rather surprised that even at a second look you didn't notice you had effectively blanked half the article. The
big red error message at the bottom of the page also seems hard to miss.
Huon (
talk)
16:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)The fourth paragraph of the lead appears to be outdated as SpaceX are unlikely to use the LCC. Would reword myself but unsure of the details. Are you able to resolve it? -Arb. ( talk) 09:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
VTVL may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
The Bushranger One ping only 07:08, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey, just an update. Steve Jurvetson is helping me interface with SpaceX, and assuming they don't mind using the OTRS process, we might be receiving some images in the near future. I know this is one of them. — Huntster ( t @ c) 01:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
What article does this refer to? Goustien ( talk) 17:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
"Hello, I'm N2e. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. N2e ( talk) 01:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)"
For various reasons this move poll is being redone, and I'm notifying anyone that voted or commented since then. Please could you !vote again at Talk:Space_Shuttle_main_engine#Requested_move2? Many thanks. GliderMaven ( talk) 15:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SpaceX reusable launch system development program, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that SpaceX is working on bringing orbital rockets back to the launchpad and landing them on landing legs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SpaceX reusable launch system development program. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thanks for helping Victuallers ( talk) 22:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear N2e - I need your help please.
We talked a few years ago and you helped clear up a lot of wikipedia battling going on. Since then I have been traveling and not keeping up with the original "Santur" page. I tried to search the word Santur today and found a bunch of forwarded loops going thru the Hammered Dulcimer page which ended up going to the Iraqi Santur page which is the root of this problem like last time.
Problem is there are 3 different spellings for the same instrument. But each culture took a certain spelling and that is widely used in Universities around the globe.
Santur - is the spelling for the original Persian or Iranian Santur as well as the Iraqi and other Arabic versions of the same instrument.
Santoor - is the spelling of the Indian Santoor (although it has also been used by others as well) - but again it is mainly reverenced by the Indian Santoor players as the correct spelling of their instrument
Santour - is used by both
In the process the Indian Santoor page was deleted and moved.
I tried to restore both pages back to their original edits when it was healthier and I hope my changes are correct and can be continued like before.
can you help me clean up what I tried to fix? I'm not really a good Wikipedia editor as you can see....
thanks,
User:Santurman — Preceding undated comment added 17:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Hey N2E,
long time no talk. thank you for helping. well I'm cool with your edits, but when I didn't hear back from you, I forced myself to keep digging in deeper and try to fix stuff myself. I didn't want two different Santur pages. The one you edited I believe it the new one. This all getting so confusing. Can you look at the original one and combine them into one page? As you know there has been warring going on in the past and keeps happening every few months. when I came back on here last week, the picture of the Persian Santur had been removed *(for no reason). and like I said: everything was in the abyss pointing to nowhere....
Shouldn't we just use the old one and delete the new one I created by mistake?
I thought I was renaming the old page and it created a 2nd copy..... so I just figured I'd fill it up and put it back the way it used to look....
/info/en/?search=Santur_(Persian_instrument) - that's the original one - picture at the top missing/ and map of santurs from around the world disappeared.....
/info/en/?search=Santur (this is the new one you just edited)
can you just combine them into one?
and then here's the Iraqi page: /info/en/?search=Santur_(Iraqi_instrument)
which you put "Citations needed" on the list of Notable musicians & other's have tried to at least make the data look normal, in the Talk page the warring is noticed by others....
The Notable musician's list was removed and replaced a few times by others and someone keeps editing this page with incorrect information and then the same editor comes on to the Santur page and starts eliminating everything they can to make it unsearchable etc...
if you make any changes to their page: it will take a minute, but they will come back and erase everything you do.
thank you for your time.
Santurman ( talk) 07:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Dan Shechtman may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
As a significant contributor to that article, you are invited to participate in a discussion about its title. All input welcome. Thank you, walk victor falk talk 14:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I noted your "thanks" for cleaning up air conditioning. Thanks a lot, glad I could help! You mentioned a "messy merge", however. Were you referring to my (numerous) edits? Should I have done that in a different way? I divided the work into several steps because doing everything in one big edit wasn't feasible for me. Noggo ( talk) 15:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
(N2e: manually archived on 27 Sep 2014; since no date, the archive bot will not do it automagically.)
I don't mean to scare you off. I take your comment to mean you are dissatisfied with the government of Colorado article as is. Do you disagree with my response? Do you still hold your original opinion?
Would a wikitable of offices and a short description be a good alternative to a gallery? I am open to getting some new ideas, and I don't want to shut out other opinions or ideas by dominating too much. Int21h ( talk) 02:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Do you know anything about this launch? It claims on that page that it's scheduled for launch on a Falcon Heavy, but I don't see any evidence of that. — Gopher65 talk 17:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bolivarian Navy of Venezuela may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I came across this today: http://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/2fx2tq/ways_to_increase_the_beo_performance_of_falcon/ckduixs
Don't know if it's accurate or not. — Gopher65 talk 00:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
There might be something in
User:Robertinventor/subpages beneficial to your interest in
space debris or to your more general interest in
spaceflight.
—
Wavelength (
talk)
01:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
I noticed you were in the past an active contributor to WP:ECONOMICS. At the moment it seems rather inactive. Would you want to help me to make it more active again? NotYetAnotherEconomist ( talk) 20:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
FYI, I have recreated the EADS article based on the last revision before the move, as (IMO) "No Consensus" should default to "Keep" (the original article). -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 01:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e you left a message which has since disappeared about you archiving an edit that I didn't make by an IP address that isn't usually mine (might be a shared one when I'm not logged in? I dunno!) on a page /article that I've never even visited. Something about 2010-19 Launches of something or other. Whatever. Anyway your message was on my Samsbanned user page and I'm not logged in now as I send this because I don't know how to reply there to it sorry 49.183.59.50 ( talk) 21:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e! Please see Talk:Commercial Crew Development#Number of operation flights covered by the award for a discussion related to material you added back in September. Cheers! -- ToE 14:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Having dug up NASA's FY 2015 budget request and the OIG report, both of which Foust used to construct the breakdown, I believe that his analysis is spot on and that it should remain in our article as is. I still haven't found any other source that picked up on Foust's analysis, but I don't think that matters. Besides, NASA will publicly release the contract details eventually. Thanks for the quick response. -- ToE 18:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e.
I came on Wikipedia to read up on the 2014 Virgin Galactic crash. I found a couple of articles ( VSS Enterprise and VMS Eve that were useful, but which need a bit of attention.
You previously wrote on the talk page of the VMS Eve article, that you thought there might be too much detail about the test flight program. I do not personally agree with that position, but it was clear that you edit Wikipedia in good faith and also clear that you are knowledgeable on the subject.
With this in the news, I've started a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight called VSS Enterprise explosion - article and VMS Eve article could do with some help.
As you are clearly someone who is interested in improving Wikipedia, I thought it would be good to get your input. Big Mac ( talk) 13:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
While you are working on it, this article could also use a mention.--v/r - T P 20:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I saw and appreciate your thanks for my edit. It looks as if we have some common interests; I invite you to drop me a note at chasrmartin@gmail.com. == Charlie (Colorado) ( talk) 02:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Please be careful in using the automatic revert function, since this removes all changes. In restoring the content I removed from the Falcon 9 article, the revert also undid several other, completely unrelated changes. If an edit or series of edits removes content that should have remained, adding it back in from a previous version with a partial-revert avoids this problem. Cheers! A( Ch) 16:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Autonomous spaceport drone ship at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
05:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
I saw that you added a hidden note for the Thrustmaster information. There is an archived version of that website at https://archive(dot)today/x5xD6, but certain elements of Wikipedia have it in for that website's owner and have set a filter disallowing its links in articles. If you don't mind, I'll set a commented-out archive link within the citation so folks can access it, and that should relieve the need for a long explanatory comment. — Huntster ( t @ c) 15:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that I found your comments in response to the proposal to automatically grant admin tools to be refreshing. Cheers! Az x2 19:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 10 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Autonomous spaceport drone ship, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that rockets can now land on an autonomous spaceport drone ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Autonomous spaceport drone ship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi, just to let you know I reverted this edit you made to International Space Station as it changed several words to US spellings whereas the article is not written in US English. I note that it was an AWB-assisted edit marked as cleanup, and I'm a little concerned as to how it got into your edit queue for AWB. Could I check what criteria you are using to select pages for these edits? Thanks. -- W. D. Graham 22:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
I thought I replied to this yesterday, but it doesn't seem to have saved. To be honest I'm not really a fan of messing around with dialects either, unless I'm reviewing/cleaning-up spelling in an article or I happen to notice a change being made or proposed without any real need - which I tend to oppose/BRD in the interests of keeping the article stable.
The problem with tagging as an AWB task is that, except for obvious cases such as US-only, UK-only and India-only missions, using a semi-automated tool to make potentially contentious edits could be an issue. That said, I'd be happy to go through and tag the obvious cases in the next couple of days. -- W. D. Graham 09:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Hello N2e: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Fotaun ( talk) 16:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
![]()
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
|
![]() |
A Tesla Roadster for you! |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 ( talk) 14:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
Thanks for sticking up for me when I received personal attacks. You and other superior editors do that thing a lot, but I'd like to say thank you and present you with this barnstar. I hope that you enjoy it as well as the Tesla Roadster. Thanks for standing up for me and other registered Wikipedians. Gg53000 ( talk) 01:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC) |
I'd just like you to know that there is a new Wikipedia user named Ricky13051 and they deserve a warm welcome on their talk page. Start baking cookies, if you know what I mean! LOL!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 00:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in our user study. Please email me at credivisstudy@gmail.com. Wkmaster ( talk) 11:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for the edits to the USS George Washington page. I'm working to update it & being able to look at your edits to see what you pinged on is a big help. Jacob.Allison ( talk) 00:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Falcon (rocket family) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I've got another user who deserves a warm welcome on their talk page! Their names are OllyC1 and Aragorn106. I hope you've still got some cookie dough! LOL!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 00:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
That sounds great! If you can teach me the recipe, I'll be glad to oblige! Thanks!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 20:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
It works perfectly! Even the cookies weren't burnt! Thank you for teaching me how to welcome new users! Happy editing!-- Gg53000 ( talk) 23:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
I seem to recall you enquiring about progress with the audit of orbital spaceflights a while ago. I thought you might be interested to know that the first complete report is now available (due to length, each year has its own subpage). The list will be updated by bot such that each article will be re-reviewed at least once every six weeks. -- W. D. Graham 00:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Please remember that you can develop a separate section for Davis' early life biography controversy.-- NK ( talk) 17:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
| Hello, N2e. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for SpaceX reusable launch system development program at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 ( talk) 03:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC) |
You may be interested in a proposal to include that article among the 1,000 Wikipedia:Vital articles. The discussion is here. Thewellman ( talk) 04:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
1720 is just a model of modern hobby sail boat, Blue Steel is just one of them so, yeah, not notable.
I don't doubt though that Blue Steel is a name of a pose in Zoolander, which if true would be a reference to the tempered metal. Notable? The pose is not notable, but that the color is referenced suports the notability of the color and the practice of referencing the color/metal. Blue steel is not only a color, but also a metaphor, with a steely blue stare ... IveGoneAway ( talk) 23:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, I would recommend Being bold and removing the unsupported content. Plot summaries are constantly under revision, and that particular article hasn't had significant changes to the plot since 2011/2012. Moreover, most of it was written in 2006, so hasn't received serious overhaul by a second set of eyes in a while, and there has been very little discussion on it's talk page. Any edits would likely be uncontroversial. In the future, I would recommend relying on the WP:Be Bold policy when working with articles that are underdeveloped or have serious problems. Happy editing! Sadads ( talk) 13:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, after reading about you I thought you might like to have a look at the work a few of us have been doing at List of largest power stations in the world?...I am trying to understand how and why the economies of the world invest in energy infrastructure. You seem to have some wiki smarts and street cred so your help in generating interest among the Wikipedia:Energy community would be great!-- Graham Proud ( talk) 16:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
SpaceX reusable launch system development program you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jamesx12345 --
Jamesx12345 (
talk)
22:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e. Just wanted to swing by and express my thanks for taking the time to read over and endorse our our Reimagining Mentorship proposal. We have a solid team who wants to help better reach out to those who want to learn to be better editors, and your support in this early stage is much appreciated. Take care, I, JethroBT drop me a line 16:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
The article
SpaceX reusable launch system development program you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jamesx12345 --
Jamesx12345 (
talk)
18:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Colonization of Mars is now longer than ever before. Love it! -- 181.47.58.73 ( talk) 04:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
</ref>
tag at its end. As a consequence, everything afterwards, including multiple sections and the list of references itself, were interpreted as parts of one never-ending footnote and were not displayed correctly. I have
fixed that and am rather surprised that even at a second look you didn't notice you had effectively blanked half the article. The
big red error message at the bottom of the page also seems hard to miss.
Huon (
talk)
16:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)The fourth paragraph of the lead appears to be outdated as SpaceX are unlikely to use the LCC. Would reword myself but unsure of the details. Are you able to resolve it? -Arb. ( talk) 09:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
VTVL may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
The Bushranger One ping only 07:08, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey, just an update. Steve Jurvetson is helping me interface with SpaceX, and assuming they don't mind using the OTRS process, we might be receiving some images in the near future. I know this is one of them. — Huntster ( t @ c) 01:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
What article does this refer to? Goustien ( talk) 17:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
"Hello, I'm N2e. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. N2e ( talk) 01:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)"
For various reasons this move poll is being redone, and I'm notifying anyone that voted or commented since then. Please could you !vote again at Talk:Space_Shuttle_main_engine#Requested_move2? Many thanks. GliderMaven ( talk) 15:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 May 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SpaceX reusable launch system development program, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that SpaceX is working on bringing orbital rockets back to the launchpad and landing them on landing legs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SpaceX reusable launch system development program. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thanks for helping Victuallers ( talk) 22:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear N2e - I need your help please.
We talked a few years ago and you helped clear up a lot of wikipedia battling going on. Since then I have been traveling and not keeping up with the original "Santur" page. I tried to search the word Santur today and found a bunch of forwarded loops going thru the Hammered Dulcimer page which ended up going to the Iraqi Santur page which is the root of this problem like last time.
Problem is there are 3 different spellings for the same instrument. But each culture took a certain spelling and that is widely used in Universities around the globe.
Santur - is the spelling for the original Persian or Iranian Santur as well as the Iraqi and other Arabic versions of the same instrument.
Santoor - is the spelling of the Indian Santoor (although it has also been used by others as well) - but again it is mainly reverenced by the Indian Santoor players as the correct spelling of their instrument
Santour - is used by both
In the process the Indian Santoor page was deleted and moved.
I tried to restore both pages back to their original edits when it was healthier and I hope my changes are correct and can be continued like before.
can you help me clean up what I tried to fix? I'm not really a good Wikipedia editor as you can see....
thanks,
User:Santurman — Preceding undated comment added 17:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Hey N2E,
long time no talk. thank you for helping. well I'm cool with your edits, but when I didn't hear back from you, I forced myself to keep digging in deeper and try to fix stuff myself. I didn't want two different Santur pages. The one you edited I believe it the new one. This all getting so confusing. Can you look at the original one and combine them into one page? As you know there has been warring going on in the past and keeps happening every few months. when I came back on here last week, the picture of the Persian Santur had been removed *(for no reason). and like I said: everything was in the abyss pointing to nowhere....
Shouldn't we just use the old one and delete the new one I created by mistake?
I thought I was renaming the old page and it created a 2nd copy..... so I just figured I'd fill it up and put it back the way it used to look....
/info/en/?search=Santur_(Persian_instrument) - that's the original one - picture at the top missing/ and map of santurs from around the world disappeared.....
/info/en/?search=Santur (this is the new one you just edited)
can you just combine them into one?
and then here's the Iraqi page: /info/en/?search=Santur_(Iraqi_instrument)
which you put "Citations needed" on the list of Notable musicians & other's have tried to at least make the data look normal, in the Talk page the warring is noticed by others....
The Notable musician's list was removed and replaced a few times by others and someone keeps editing this page with incorrect information and then the same editor comes on to the Santur page and starts eliminating everything they can to make it unsearchable etc...
if you make any changes to their page: it will take a minute, but they will come back and erase everything you do.
thank you for your time.
Santurman ( talk) 07:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Dan Shechtman may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
As a significant contributor to that article, you are invited to participate in a discussion about its title. All input welcome. Thank you, walk victor falk talk 14:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I noted your "thanks" for cleaning up air conditioning. Thanks a lot, glad I could help! You mentioned a "messy merge", however. Were you referring to my (numerous) edits? Should I have done that in a different way? I divided the work into several steps because doing everything in one big edit wasn't feasible for me. Noggo ( talk) 15:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
(N2e: manually archived on 27 Sep 2014; since no date, the archive bot will not do it automagically.)
I don't mean to scare you off. I take your comment to mean you are dissatisfied with the government of Colorado article as is. Do you disagree with my response? Do you still hold your original opinion?
Would a wikitable of offices and a short description be a good alternative to a gallery? I am open to getting some new ideas, and I don't want to shut out other opinions or ideas by dominating too much. Int21h ( talk) 02:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Do you know anything about this launch? It claims on that page that it's scheduled for launch on a Falcon Heavy, but I don't see any evidence of that. — Gopher65 talk 17:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bolivarian Navy of Venezuela may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I came across this today: http://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/2fx2tq/ways_to_increase_the_beo_performance_of_falcon/ckduixs
Don't know if it's accurate or not. — Gopher65 talk 00:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
There might be something in
User:Robertinventor/subpages beneficial to your interest in
space debris or to your more general interest in
spaceflight.
—
Wavelength (
talk)
01:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
I noticed you were in the past an active contributor to WP:ECONOMICS. At the moment it seems rather inactive. Would you want to help me to make it more active again? NotYetAnotherEconomist ( talk) 20:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
FYI, I have recreated the EADS article based on the last revision before the move, as (IMO) "No Consensus" should default to "Keep" (the original article). -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 01:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e you left a message which has since disappeared about you archiving an edit that I didn't make by an IP address that isn't usually mine (might be a shared one when I'm not logged in? I dunno!) on a page /article that I've never even visited. Something about 2010-19 Launches of something or other. Whatever. Anyway your message was on my Samsbanned user page and I'm not logged in now as I send this because I don't know how to reply there to it sorry 49.183.59.50 ( talk) 21:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e! Please see Talk:Commercial Crew Development#Number of operation flights covered by the award for a discussion related to material you added back in September. Cheers! -- ToE 14:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Having dug up NASA's FY 2015 budget request and the OIG report, both of which Foust used to construct the breakdown, I believe that his analysis is spot on and that it should remain in our article as is. I still haven't found any other source that picked up on Foust's analysis, but I don't think that matters. Besides, NASA will publicly release the contract details eventually. Thanks for the quick response. -- ToE 18:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi N2e.
I came on Wikipedia to read up on the 2014 Virgin Galactic crash. I found a couple of articles ( VSS Enterprise and VMS Eve that were useful, but which need a bit of attention.
You previously wrote on the talk page of the VMS Eve article, that you thought there might be too much detail about the test flight program. I do not personally agree with that position, but it was clear that you edit Wikipedia in good faith and also clear that you are knowledgeable on the subject.
With this in the news, I've started a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight called VSS Enterprise explosion - article and VMS Eve article could do with some help.
As you are clearly someone who is interested in improving Wikipedia, I thought it would be good to get your input. Big Mac ( talk) 13:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
While you are working on it, this article could also use a mention.--v/r - T P 20:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I saw and appreciate your thanks for my edit. It looks as if we have some common interests; I invite you to drop me a note at chasrmartin@gmail.com. == Charlie (Colorado) ( talk) 02:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Please be careful in using the automatic revert function, since this removes all changes. In restoring the content I removed from the Falcon 9 article, the revert also undid several other, completely unrelated changes. If an edit or series of edits removes content that should have remained, adding it back in from a previous version with a partial-revert avoids this problem. Cheers! A( Ch) 16:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/Autonomous spaceport drone ship at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk)
05:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
I saw that you added a hidden note for the Thrustmaster information. There is an archived version of that website at https://archive(dot)today/x5xD6, but certain elements of Wikipedia have it in for that website's owner and have set a filter disallowing its links in articles. If you don't mind, I'll set a commented-out archive link within the citation so folks can access it, and that should relieve the need for a long explanatory comment. — Huntster ( t @ c) 15:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that I found your comments in response to the proposal to automatically grant admin tools to be refreshing. Cheers! Az x2 19:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 10 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Autonomous spaceport drone ship, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that rockets can now land on an autonomous spaceport drone ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Autonomous spaceport drone ship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |