![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I took a look at the list of recently active CheckUsers and your name came up. Would you happen to have the time to take care of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Hugo Refachinho, which to my eye is a very straightforward case of a WP:DUCK? TompaDompa ( talk) 16:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
For this, amongst other reasons — Trey Maturin™ 16:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) |
I second that. I thought that that was a very humble thing to do. Not everyone could have made that post. Good on you. - jc37 16:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Can you review my request for rollback thanks not trying to bug you •Cyberwolf• 16:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey Beeblebrox, I hope you don't mind, but notwithstanding TPG etc, I've removed my original (wholly unnecessary remark) and as a result your reply to me. But I'd like to say here that I apologise for tat remark, impuning your integrity. It wasn't personal, just an excuse to lash out. Pretty fraught todauy, with events, although that's no excuse for taking iot out out on you or anyone else. I was completely petty. I hope you can forgive that lapse. I also hope it was a lapse. Apart from that, I hope this finds you well. SN54129 16:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Hello. Are this and this appropriate behavior? Using edits from other articles against you for things unrelated to wiki policy and canvassing people who have nothing to do with the discussion? LittleJerry ( talk) 00:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
LittleJerry You are doing the same thing that you accuse me of! Leo1pard ( talk) 09:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Fair point, and will work on it for future AFDs. I note that your request probably should have been on my talk and not on the AFD itself. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I saw that you started this AfD in 2018 on lists of airline destinations. I was wondering if you could provide some insight into something that has been vexing me for a long time: the Airlines and destinations tables in airport articles. I confess that I recently engaged in an edit war over this table after I tried to replace it with prose. My thinking was that the table is hard to reference and contains excessive detail. Now I'm not sure if removing the table is a good idea. Many in the WP:AIRPORTS community support them; in 2016, I started an RfC over there on these tables, and the consensus was to keep them. The main argument seemed to be that since a key feature of an airport is the flights it offers, all should be mentioned in articles. Then we had an RfC about how to cite them, which determined that "searchable" webpages like flight schedules may be used.
I am now thinking about how to cite the table in the Mehrabad Airport article. My ideas include citing:
I don't think any of those options are good. I'm torn because I understand the argument that I mentioned above, but I don't see how to cite the table appropriately. I would be grateful for any light you could shed on this issue. (Sorry, I know I wrote a lot.) Sunnya343 ( talk) 02:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
FWIW, we courtesy vanished her and I blanked her talk. She remains blocked. A little sad this wound up in a forum outside renamer purview. I only saw it looking at Tamzin's request. Thanks for closing it. Best -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 10:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I am contacting you because 1) you're near the top of the active CheckUsers list, and 2) I've seen you comment multiple times on a user about which I have concerns that I'm not comfortable sharing publicly. Allow me to expand:
There is a well-known Wikipedia user who I believe to have used many sockpuppets to harass myself and others. I have circumstantial evidence tying this user to multiple accounts, including similarities in edit patterns, odd patterns of interaction between SPAs and the alleged sockmaster, edit interaction analyses, testimonies of myself and other users who've experienced harassment who agree that the alleged sockmaster and SPAs act the same, and CheckUser confirmation that multiple accounts that I (and others) suspect of being run by the same sockmaster operate on the same IP range.
The problem is, I don't want to make this allegation public until I have absolute proof. I'd like to submit a CheckUser request to compare the alleged sockmaster to one or more of the suspected SPAs. I'm not sure exactly what evidence is considered the most weighty in regards to a CheckUser request, so I'm not sure which particular SPA to request a CheckUser on. Could you possibly provide some general advice, and/or recommend a venue for bringing this up more candidly off-Wiki, such as via IRC or email to you or the CheckUser team? Thank you. Philomathes2357 ( talk) 05:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Thought you'd want to know that they are back, blocked as a sock, and requesting an unblock as B9Joker108 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). Skyerise ( talk) 10:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
wikipedia user Disdcospinster keeps reverting my meaningful edits. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Torah&oldid=1177858364
I suspect religious motives, ignoring NPOV. Please make him stop. Thank you 2A01:C23:6019:8A00:E19A:5A01:BC9D:CF57 ( talk) 17:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I apologize for bothering you again about the RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables. Some editors have raised concerns about how I formatted the RfC, even though I see no difference between its design and that of the RfC on airline destination lists that you started in 2018. I was wondering if you could share your opinion. The discussion is taking place under the October 14 comments by the editors Steelpillow and Trovatore. Sunnya343 ( talk) 23:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
I seem to remember you writing an essay about how to get an RfC published and set up without descending in a bunch of flames, and could do with some advice. I recently proposed two things I've been mulling over for at least five years, which are :
I think the first one might have a chance of being accepted, though I predict a bunch of "Oppose - it's a discussion, get over it" comments that will miss the point. The second is tricker to sell to people, though I don't believe it would have made any material difference to any RfAs, it might have made a climate on some the more unpleasant ones (eg: MB) a bit nicer. Still, I have mentioned it over several years and not got extensively rebuked for it.
I don't know where to post this, where to publicise it (without accusations of canvassing at least) and how to frame it in a way that people will respond. I think one of the biggest problems we have in enacting change is people tend to oppose specific changes rather than general ideas, so nothing gets done. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Lourdes and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I would have to say things will move on from here but I believe the community should stay vigilant in the future since I wouldn't put it past Lourdes to try sneaking back sometime considering she already did it once. Considering the level of effort she put into creating the Lourdes persona, it's clear that she has the means and patience to evade site bans and indefinite blocks. It's alarming that we never once detected it in the nearly 9 years that she was here. Noah, AA Talk 22:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox, the arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 22:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Bottle of amarone |
Have you ever had an amarone? If not, I recommend one. Thank you for putting in motion one of the weirdest series of events I've seen here. Jip Orlando ( talk) 14:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
May your chalice never run empty! |
What started as a simple run-of-the-mill admin conduct case revealed something much worse. It's not very often that we get to see an actual witch burn, given how many false witch-hunts take place. Whether or not the case was the final blow dealt that resulted in her demise, we will never know for sure, but it certainly revealed the witch's true form as she shed her facade. Take pride in knowing that her house of deception has come crashing down upon her and that she was purged from this plane by the holy light of truth. Rejoice in knowing that you have made Wikipedia a better place through your actions. I figured you deserve this WikiLove given everything you have endured over the years as a result of her. Good luck with the future and I hope more pleasant days await. May your chalice never run empty! Noah, AA Talk 15:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Well i guess the 2020s get crazier by day. To be honest I didn't know that it went down. Also something to note he probably already started a account beforehand to keep doing it after he unmasked so I guess it's just going to continue But let's cheer for the sake he did un mask himself let's have a cheers to lourdgate scandal •Cyberwolf• 23:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks everyone for your messages about the recent ridiculousness.
I made this decision before all of this went down, but with WP:ACE2023 starting tomorrow, I'd like to publicly state that it is not my intent to run again. I feel generally positive about my time on the committee, and I'd like to keep it that way. I also find I increasingly just do not have the time to keep up with all the committee business, and we need and deserve arbitrators that are able to remain engaged with the work they are elected to do.
And we need new blood on the committee, always. If anyone has been thinking of running, I encourage you to consider it, but also read User:Risker/Thoughts for Arbitration Committee Candidates, even if you just read the section titles, you'll have gotten some great advice. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I would have gone with 'Dirk Cjelli' myself... Only in death does duty end ( talk) 10:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I liked your old name better ☹️ 92.40.201.98 ( talk) 12:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Beeb JSS,
I don't understand what just happened, whether you did something wrong or not, whether this sanction was an overreaction or not, etc. But I didn't want to recloak and just let it go by without saying that I always thought - and continue to think - you were one of the better Arbs we've had. Sometimes we strongly agreed, and sometimes we strongly disagreed, but I never doubted your clear thinking, good faith, and interest in the best for WP. Doesn't really affect me much any more, but I hope for the sake of my friends who are still active that you stick around, Arb/CU/OS or not. Cheers.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
18:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I don't know what happened & Arbcom ain't gonna tell me. But, wish you hadn't changed your name ;) GoodDay ( talk) 18:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Ah good, people more eloquent than I have already posted :-) And I see there was something I didn't see. All the same, it's a damned shame you have now joined the ranks of those shafted by Arbcom. I would much rather have been able to vote for you this time around; you might have been my only yes vote.
HJ Mitchell, there are now relatively few banned users on Wikipediocracy, and as Beebs Just Step Sideways says, the moderators are decent sorts; I almost signed up myself a month or two ago, and I am far from a Wikipedia critic.
Yngvadottir (
talk)
10:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I think you're one of the best arbitrators I've seen during my time here and read of in any archives. Your morals were sound and you had the courage to take the right course of action, even if it's transiently unpopular. All the best. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 10:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
You have, of course, written quite extensively on the whole issue -- but if you want to add anything to what's at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/News and notes, let me know, and I can quote you. jp× g 🗯️ 06:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Have you visited Hidden Lake (Alaska) again? -- ARose Wolf 20:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
What's with the username change? :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Yes, even though neither of us is George. Enquiring minds want to know. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Could you update the links in your signature to point directly to the new username instead of the redirect from the old username? Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today would become Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 15:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
It was always my intention to take a prolonged break after my term was up, it's just up a few weeks sooner than expected. I may still upload photos on Commons and add them to article over here, but I will otherwise not be around on-wiki for a while. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 20:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
Hi JSS (do you mind if I just call you JSS?). It's always nice to have another Alaskan to talk with once in a while, and it's nice to see all the great work you've done on articles of local interest. Glad to see you're still around after all these years. I wanted to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas, and may the coming New Year be all you hope for. Zaereth ( talk) 22:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I remember my extensive interaction with this disgusting creature years ago - the ArbCom and a long time before that. Now I just noticed in the Admin newsletter
Lourdes. Also a name I remember. I searched for any interaction between us. There was something years ago, and I'd say I was suspicious. But then I left this place. I'd say they are lucky that I left .. but I know that a new name is looking at this thread now, smiling, making new "friends" on Wikipedia. Internet gives people a chance to show their worst. Some just take the chance. This Wifione/Lourdes creature think they show us how clever they are and don't realize that they actually show us they are utter scum. I almost feel sorry for them - so many years lost in creating false meaningless online reputation ... poor life. They may be smiling but it's them who actually loose. Sorry for my bad English. Best of luck in real life :)
Vejvančický (
talk /
contribs)
15:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Just Step Sideways. I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 13:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Hey, can we add the "In media" section back to the Malassada article? Thanks. Polishedrelish ( talk) 05:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
[1] Is your autocorrect acting up, Just Step Sideways? No sarcasm here. starship .paint ( RUN) 13:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Just Step Sideways, How come you changed your name? You used to be Beeblebrox!! scope_creep Talk 20:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
But, <pedantic> "project space" refers to WP space, not article space. </pedantic> -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 16:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Just Step Sideways. I see that you semi-protected WT:U back in November 2023. That's a long time for a Talk page. Is there any chance you can change the protection to pending changes? -- 62.166.252.25 ( talk) 17:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
...old friend. I'll get used to the name. Good to see you. I'm about to head out and get a beer; you should come. Drmies ( talk) 21:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
I have no objection to closing the 24-hour block issue, but discussion at DYK can't really result in a...well, result. There is an actual problem. Valereee ( talk) 22:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I took a look at the list of recently active CheckUsers and your name came up. Would you happen to have the time to take care of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Hugo Refachinho, which to my eye is a very straightforward case of a WP:DUCK? TompaDompa ( talk) 16:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
For this, amongst other reasons — Trey Maturin™ 16:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) |
I second that. I thought that that was a very humble thing to do. Not everyone could have made that post. Good on you. - jc37 16:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Can you review my request for rollback thanks not trying to bug you •Cyberwolf• 16:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey Beeblebrox, I hope you don't mind, but notwithstanding TPG etc, I've removed my original (wholly unnecessary remark) and as a result your reply to me. But I'd like to say here that I apologise for tat remark, impuning your integrity. It wasn't personal, just an excuse to lash out. Pretty fraught todauy, with events, although that's no excuse for taking iot out out on you or anyone else. I was completely petty. I hope you can forgive that lapse. I also hope it was a lapse. Apart from that, I hope this finds you well. SN54129 16:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Hello. Are this and this appropriate behavior? Using edits from other articles against you for things unrelated to wiki policy and canvassing people who have nothing to do with the discussion? LittleJerry ( talk) 00:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
LittleJerry You are doing the same thing that you accuse me of! Leo1pard ( talk) 09:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Fair point, and will work on it for future AFDs. I note that your request probably should have been on my talk and not on the AFD itself. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I saw that you started this AfD in 2018 on lists of airline destinations. I was wondering if you could provide some insight into something that has been vexing me for a long time: the Airlines and destinations tables in airport articles. I confess that I recently engaged in an edit war over this table after I tried to replace it with prose. My thinking was that the table is hard to reference and contains excessive detail. Now I'm not sure if removing the table is a good idea. Many in the WP:AIRPORTS community support them; in 2016, I started an RfC over there on these tables, and the consensus was to keep them. The main argument seemed to be that since a key feature of an airport is the flights it offers, all should be mentioned in articles. Then we had an RfC about how to cite them, which determined that "searchable" webpages like flight schedules may be used.
I am now thinking about how to cite the table in the Mehrabad Airport article. My ideas include citing:
I don't think any of those options are good. I'm torn because I understand the argument that I mentioned above, but I don't see how to cite the table appropriately. I would be grateful for any light you could shed on this issue. (Sorry, I know I wrote a lot.) Sunnya343 ( talk) 02:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
FWIW, we courtesy vanished her and I blanked her talk. She remains blocked. A little sad this wound up in a forum outside renamer purview. I only saw it looking at Tamzin's request. Thanks for closing it. Best -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 10:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I am contacting you because 1) you're near the top of the active CheckUsers list, and 2) I've seen you comment multiple times on a user about which I have concerns that I'm not comfortable sharing publicly. Allow me to expand:
There is a well-known Wikipedia user who I believe to have used many sockpuppets to harass myself and others. I have circumstantial evidence tying this user to multiple accounts, including similarities in edit patterns, odd patterns of interaction between SPAs and the alleged sockmaster, edit interaction analyses, testimonies of myself and other users who've experienced harassment who agree that the alleged sockmaster and SPAs act the same, and CheckUser confirmation that multiple accounts that I (and others) suspect of being run by the same sockmaster operate on the same IP range.
The problem is, I don't want to make this allegation public until I have absolute proof. I'd like to submit a CheckUser request to compare the alleged sockmaster to one or more of the suspected SPAs. I'm not sure exactly what evidence is considered the most weighty in regards to a CheckUser request, so I'm not sure which particular SPA to request a CheckUser on. Could you possibly provide some general advice, and/or recommend a venue for bringing this up more candidly off-Wiki, such as via IRC or email to you or the CheckUser team? Thank you. Philomathes2357 ( talk) 05:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Thought you'd want to know that they are back, blocked as a sock, and requesting an unblock as B9Joker108 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). Skyerise ( talk) 10:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
wikipedia user Disdcospinster keeps reverting my meaningful edits. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Torah&oldid=1177858364
I suspect religious motives, ignoring NPOV. Please make him stop. Thank you 2A01:C23:6019:8A00:E19A:5A01:BC9D:CF57 ( talk) 17:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I apologize for bothering you again about the RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables. Some editors have raised concerns about how I formatted the RfC, even though I see no difference between its design and that of the RfC on airline destination lists that you started in 2018. I was wondering if you could share your opinion. The discussion is taking place under the October 14 comments by the editors Steelpillow and Trovatore. Sunnya343 ( talk) 23:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
I seem to remember you writing an essay about how to get an RfC published and set up without descending in a bunch of flames, and could do with some advice. I recently proposed two things I've been mulling over for at least five years, which are :
I think the first one might have a chance of being accepted, though I predict a bunch of "Oppose - it's a discussion, get over it" comments that will miss the point. The second is tricker to sell to people, though I don't believe it would have made any material difference to any RfAs, it might have made a climate on some the more unpleasant ones (eg: MB) a bit nicer. Still, I have mentioned it over several years and not got extensively rebuked for it.
I don't know where to post this, where to publicise it (without accusations of canvassing at least) and how to frame it in a way that people will respond. I think one of the biggest problems we have in enacting change is people tend to oppose specific changes rather than general ideas, so nothing gets done. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Lourdes and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I would have to say things will move on from here but I believe the community should stay vigilant in the future since I wouldn't put it past Lourdes to try sneaking back sometime considering she already did it once. Considering the level of effort she put into creating the Lourdes persona, it's clear that she has the means and patience to evade site bans and indefinite blocks. It's alarming that we never once detected it in the nearly 9 years that she was here. Noah, AA Talk 22:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox, the arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 22:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Bottle of amarone |
Have you ever had an amarone? If not, I recommend one. Thank you for putting in motion one of the weirdest series of events I've seen here. Jip Orlando ( talk) 14:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
May your chalice never run empty! |
What started as a simple run-of-the-mill admin conduct case revealed something much worse. It's not very often that we get to see an actual witch burn, given how many false witch-hunts take place. Whether or not the case was the final blow dealt that resulted in her demise, we will never know for sure, but it certainly revealed the witch's true form as she shed her facade. Take pride in knowing that her house of deception has come crashing down upon her and that she was purged from this plane by the holy light of truth. Rejoice in knowing that you have made Wikipedia a better place through your actions. I figured you deserve this WikiLove given everything you have endured over the years as a result of her. Good luck with the future and I hope more pleasant days await. May your chalice never run empty! Noah, AA Talk 15:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Well i guess the 2020s get crazier by day. To be honest I didn't know that it went down. Also something to note he probably already started a account beforehand to keep doing it after he unmasked so I guess it's just going to continue But let's cheer for the sake he did un mask himself let's have a cheers to lourdgate scandal •Cyberwolf• 23:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks everyone for your messages about the recent ridiculousness.
I made this decision before all of this went down, but with WP:ACE2023 starting tomorrow, I'd like to publicly state that it is not my intent to run again. I feel generally positive about my time on the committee, and I'd like to keep it that way. I also find I increasingly just do not have the time to keep up with all the committee business, and we need and deserve arbitrators that are able to remain engaged with the work they are elected to do.
And we need new blood on the committee, always. If anyone has been thinking of running, I encourage you to consider it, but also read User:Risker/Thoughts for Arbitration Committee Candidates, even if you just read the section titles, you'll have gotten some great advice. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I would have gone with 'Dirk Cjelli' myself... Only in death does duty end ( talk) 10:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I liked your old name better ☹️ 92.40.201.98 ( talk) 12:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Beeb JSS,
I don't understand what just happened, whether you did something wrong or not, whether this sanction was an overreaction or not, etc. But I didn't want to recloak and just let it go by without saying that I always thought - and continue to think - you were one of the better Arbs we've had. Sometimes we strongly agreed, and sometimes we strongly disagreed, but I never doubted your clear thinking, good faith, and interest in the best for WP. Doesn't really affect me much any more, but I hope for the sake of my friends who are still active that you stick around, Arb/CU/OS or not. Cheers.
Floquenbeam (
talk)
18:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I don't know what happened & Arbcom ain't gonna tell me. But, wish you hadn't changed your name ;) GoodDay ( talk) 18:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Ah good, people more eloquent than I have already posted :-) And I see there was something I didn't see. All the same, it's a damned shame you have now joined the ranks of those shafted by Arbcom. I would much rather have been able to vote for you this time around; you might have been my only yes vote.
HJ Mitchell, there are now relatively few banned users on Wikipediocracy, and as Beebs Just Step Sideways says, the moderators are decent sorts; I almost signed up myself a month or two ago, and I am far from a Wikipedia critic.
Yngvadottir (
talk)
10:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I think you're one of the best arbitrators I've seen during my time here and read of in any archives. Your morals were sound and you had the courage to take the right course of action, even if it's transiently unpopular. All the best. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 10:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
You have, of course, written quite extensively on the whole issue -- but if you want to add anything to what's at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/News and notes, let me know, and I can quote you. jp× g 🗯️ 06:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Have you visited Hidden Lake (Alaska) again? -- ARose Wolf 20:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
What's with the username change? :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Yes, even though neither of us is George. Enquiring minds want to know. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Could you update the links in your signature to point directly to the new username instead of the redirect from the old username? Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today would become Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 15:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
It was always my intention to take a prolonged break after my term was up, it's just up a few weeks sooner than expected. I may still upload photos on Commons and add them to article over here, but I will otherwise not be around on-wiki for a while. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 20:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
Hi JSS (do you mind if I just call you JSS?). It's always nice to have another Alaskan to talk with once in a while, and it's nice to see all the great work you've done on articles of local interest. Glad to see you're still around after all these years. I wanted to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas, and may the coming New Year be all you hope for. Zaereth ( talk) 22:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I remember my extensive interaction with this disgusting creature years ago - the ArbCom and a long time before that. Now I just noticed in the Admin newsletter
Lourdes. Also a name I remember. I searched for any interaction between us. There was something years ago, and I'd say I was suspicious. But then I left this place. I'd say they are lucky that I left .. but I know that a new name is looking at this thread now, smiling, making new "friends" on Wikipedia. Internet gives people a chance to show their worst. Some just take the chance. This Wifione/Lourdes creature think they show us how clever they are and don't realize that they actually show us they are utter scum. I almost feel sorry for them - so many years lost in creating false meaningless online reputation ... poor life. They may be smiling but it's them who actually loose. Sorry for my bad English. Best of luck in real life :)
Vejvančický (
talk /
contribs)
15:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Just Step Sideways. I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 13:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Hey, can we add the "In media" section back to the Malassada article? Thanks. Polishedrelish ( talk) 05:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
[1] Is your autocorrect acting up, Just Step Sideways? No sarcasm here. starship .paint ( RUN) 13:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Just Step Sideways, How come you changed your name? You used to be Beeblebrox!! scope_creep Talk 20:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
But, <pedantic> "project space" refers to WP space, not article space. </pedantic> -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 16:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Just Step Sideways. I see that you semi-protected WT:U back in November 2023. That's a long time for a Talk page. Is there any chance you can change the protection to pending changes? -- 62.166.252.25 ( talk) 17:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
...old friend. I'll get used to the name. Good to see you. I'm about to head out and get a beer; you should come. Drmies ( talk) 21:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
I have no objection to closing the 24-hour block issue, but discussion at DYK can't really result in a...well, result. There is an actual problem. Valereee ( talk) 22:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)