This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I see a couple of my edits have been reverted as unhelpful, I thought I'd seen many people say stuff like that when replying to requests, sometimes even in the decline itself. So could I get insight on which part of what I wrote is the problem? N1TH Music ( talk) 05:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes, while content disputes (e.g. associated acts) are, indeed, not vandalism, removing reasonable templates (e.g. " More citations needed") and adding rightfully challengeable content (e.g. an unsourced birthdate) is, and I'd like to know why you think otherwise. L337m4n ( talk) 22:28, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This help page is a how-to guide. It details processes or procedures of some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms and practices. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, and may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting.ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
Are you filing an SPI? If not, could you email me at least the socks? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Jpgordon. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 03:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC) |
Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.
The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 14:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello - Geldof has said many different things about where he was when he heard about the "I dont like Mondays" thing. Last year he said he was in LA and heard it on the radio. I added "claims" after reading that the small college station did not have a telex machine. Thought I'd explain a bit. Fishplater ( talk) 09:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Immediate reversion would have been my knee-jerk reaction too, so you just beat me to it. But part of me thinks that maybe it should have been allowed to remain, to make it evident that we really are steering an NPOV course and not just being western imperialists determined belittle Asian perspectives. But it was pretty nasty so I'm certainly not going to put it back. Food for thought, though... 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 16:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
A real pain. I thought they must be a sock but hadn't a clue how to prove it. Doug Weller talk 07:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
For my edification, who is the master of Lucy FitzWalter?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 12:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Is WhichUserAmI's username and his troll-like vote at the current RfA enough to warrant a check? To be clear, I'm not suggesting that the user is a sock of Athaenara.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
I was reviewing some very, very old Signpost archives (as part of a project to reconstruct the entire history of the publication), and reading about the ArbCom election of 2006. In your candidate statement you mentioned having posted on the WELL. Cool! I am always on the prowl for people who have been involved with things like that (as my own posting career goes only back to 2003 or so, and all I know of times before that is fragmented from brief snippets I've read in my travels). Would you enjoy being asked a bunch of ignorant questions about it at some undefined future point? jp× g 19:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hi, in the "Openness" paragraph, in the caption, there is an end point. It's correct that captions end without a period, as has always been the case on every page. Thank you. "Differences between versions of an article are highlighted." Name Page: "Wikipedia". 151.68.158.253 ( talk) 12:03, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Hello, Jpgordon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I Got Loaded (Camille Bob song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Please review the template you added here. It doesn't seem to have ended up in the right place. Thanks. General Ization Talk 02:33, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
You blocked this user User:AnimalEditor but you forgot to global block this user and still doing [1] cross wiki edits and also using multiple accounts [2]. 117.227.24.191 ( talk) 09:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey since you don't want to trust my sources, a quick look on Richard Elfman's Facebook shows a photo including Danny and it was taken in 1972. Jan Munroe also posted a promo photo of the group from 1972 with Danny in it. Danny also said in his most recent podcast appearance that he joined the group 6 months after formation. TitanicFog ( talk) 04:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Jpgordon,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 16:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 16:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you blocked User:Lively Toad indefinitely for vandalism. However, I can't find the vandalizing edits? Did you perhaps block the wrong user? Cheers! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 22:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Just a heads up, they broke 3rr editing logged out (🦆), which is why I blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Hi - I noticed you made a review of a request to unblock of the above user. However, I'm a little unsure of the situation. Just wanted to indicate it appears however, they still have access to draft space. I just declined an article on an SS marching song they had been working on and resubmitted. You declined the unblock on 4 November 2022, the user resumbitted the draft for consideration on 5 December 2022. What confuses me is I can find no record in the block log either via the username or the block ID. Is the user actually blocked? Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk) 00:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I read your comment about the sockpuppet on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Is there any chance you could check if the IP editor is the same as the sockpuppeteer? I only ask this because the timing of their edits are close to each other. Thanks, Wow ( talk) 21:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
May I ask why you stripped Corwen of TPA? I understand that sometimes there's a reason that I don't know, but I am still wondering whether some of Corwen's onwiki comments was the reason why their TPA was revoked. Thank you. NotReallySoroka ( talk) 06:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Jpgordon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " I Got Loaded".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
In the Monty Hall problem, where is your proof that there is an edit war? No one has posted anything disagreeing with my changes, except for user:MrOllie who merely said "previous changes are preferable" and did not respond to my points on the contrary. Did you look at the links I provided? The only reason my changes were undone was because of a typo. We confirmed this in EEng's talk page, so reimplementing my changes without the typo is not engaging in an edit war. If you could please revert your undoing, that would be appreciated. GabeTucker ( talk) 10:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Josh. I am hoping you'll be willing to help me update Adam Pritzker's article. Your broad Wiki interests, as well as your participation in WP:JUDAISM sparked my interest. I posted an edit request that is still pending several weeks ago, and would be grateful for your implementation of these changes. My COI keeps me from making these changes directly. Thank you in advance for helping me out. DCBPI ( talk) 14:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
Hello, would you be willing to extend the above for an additional year, as my local library is the only place I can access Wikipedia on a desktop machine? I tried today and see it expired on 18 Jan. Thanks Billsmith60 ( talk) 21:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Great, thank you! Billsmith60 ( talk) 22:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Why didn't you switch to the Russian article? it is also written there that he is 27... And the news says that he died not at 28, but at the 28th year of his life, which means 27 years and a couple of months. Нейроманьяк ( talk) 10:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Zachbarbo is now socking as Factatron - as before, unsourced and malformed common names of species, and wildly flailing around at Peregrine falcon. Do you think you could squash? Cheers -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 09:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Hi, I just blocked and tagged Biglangbuhos8 as a sock of Pinespunned, but I'm assuming there are other accounts. Can you tell me which ones? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 19:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For reverting vandalizing edits on Wikipedia. The person who loves reading ( talk) 00:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC) |
Is there any info still available about Magnoffiq, whom you CU-blocked on 11 October 2021 (either any stashed CU data, or who else was in the pool)? I see a recently-reactivated user that has some username and contribution similarities to Magnoffiq, trying to see what the situation is. DMacks ( talk) 09:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm reviewing a UTRS request to unblock User:Seankelly2002. They were blocked 13 years ago by you, with loss of talk page rights due to persistent vandalism. In reviewing their request, I believe this was the work of younger person who to be blunt wasn't mature enough to edit here, and feel that they could be unblocked with no concerns at this time. I am conversing with them now on UTRS, but wanted to bring this to your attention that I may lift the block on your account. If you have a concern, please let me know. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
um excuse my mr josh p gordon sir. what does this word mean????? 65.121.102.98 ( talk) 16:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
shocked I say! -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
Hey, JP. Did you see that Srj.cooldude denies using an AI to compose the unblock request you declined? "Everything I wrote was 100% my original and no third person or tools used, it's extremely sad to see entire appeal rejected on mere suspicion of chatbot disregarding the points raised in it." (What points? There were no points.) Also, they complain about you assessing their request too soon (some five-six hours after they posted it!), before it was ready. Yes, really. "I felt it was basic like a formal apology without going into the details and I was already in the process of revising and rewriting it but it got rejected before I could update the 1st appeal with description". It's all a very unusual way of proceeding. All I can say about the use of ChatGPT is, if they're telling the truth (frantically assuming good faith here) that they used nothing like that, then they're one of the world's worst actual human writers and thereby not a good fit for Wikipedia. Bishonen | tålk 11:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC).
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I sometimes monitor Wikipedia:Database reports/Ownerless pages in the user space noticed that User talk:Emergency-user-slap was there. I was curious and saw in the logs that it has been deleted four previous times, most recently by you. I wonder if it'd make sense to salt it and/or track down what's linking to that page? I fruitlessly did some searching. (I'm leaving it un-CSD tagged for discussion purposes but I assume I or someone else will CSD it soon.) Thanks. Skynxnex ( talk) 01:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Back in March 2023, you blocked User:Pinespunned as being a sockpuppet of User:Bertrand101, and I believe there could be another sockpuppet, User:Bigbossgab, that has been editing some of the same articles that Pinespunned edited and started two weeks after Pinespuuned was blocked. Here is the Editor Interaction Analyser between the two editors, [3]. I never really know how to deal with sockpuppets and any help you could give me would help out. Aspects ( talk) 18:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
You should see the UTRS ticket. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi JP, could you please run a check on the above account? See the claim of socking at the bottom of their Talk page. They've already evaded their block once with an IP who made the same edit to Talk:Adam and Eve as the master, but because of the dearth of substantive edits to any other article or article Talk page, I doubt I'll find any socks on my own.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
One important moment: some people unironically cook dulce de leche by boiling a whole tin can, that may explode. Yet in 1940's, the Soviets used tin cans as bodies of frag grenades (see RG-42). A recipe-like bit of info is necessary to counter that meme. 2A00:1370:81A2:4AE2:707C:13AC:57F6:698B ( talk) 09:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User%3AHaskko&diff=1159823175&oldid=1159587981. Are you sure this fellow hasn’t been a troll this whole time? Courcelles ( talk) 19:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hey @ Jpgordon, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng ( talk) 02:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Unless there is another much less famous Oliveira e Costa, he's been dead a while. Bizarre. Doug Weller talk 07:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Hey, did you run a check against the user? Their edits scream sock. See also User talk:Drmies#You might wish to check. In case you're wondering, the user I mentioned is Freoh, and for the connection to that user, you'd have to look at the closure by Drmies at ANI last month that almost resulted in a block of Freoh. I can dredge up a link to that if you need it.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Money Slot is not a new user: (1) their creation of a blank userpage and Talk page; (2) their posts to User talk:Ad Orientem's Talk page regarding Lloyd Bentsen, an article they've never edited; and (3) their posts to WP:RFPP regarding Nazi salute.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you blocked Manjuvenjaramoodu on April 30, 2023, as a sock but without identifying the master or any other socks. I'm thinking Bibin7 (created June 11) may be a sock of the blocked user. Can you check? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Josh. I recently topic banned Starkex, and a brand new user, DeshJoShaheed23232, turned up on their page to shout obscenites in Sindhi. I've blocked the likely sock as NOTHERE, but hesitate about indeffing Starkex for the nasty insults (as well as other problems). I probably should, but I got what I thought was an obvious sock wrong a while back, so I'm a little nervous about it. Could you CU please? Bishonen | tålk 16:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC).
Don't you think it's a bit odd to unblock a user and decline their request to be unblocked all at the same time? :p Indeed, the language you use in the decline is accept language. BTW, on the merits, I don't predict good things to come from this user, but I suppose we'll see...or at least someone will.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Sir, you have accepted my request for unblocking, but you appear to have (by mistake?) declined to unblock in the same message. Just notifying politely Galehautt ( talk) 01:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey,
So I Was Gonna Add F9 CUN-MIA Since Its Not There. This Is A Bookable Flight As Flight 202. I Also Understand That You May Be Against It As CUN-MIA Is No Longer Bookable After September 5. Reason Unknown And In The Middle Of Investigating It. Please Add It. Thanks. Mmartinezmdr ( talk) 16:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
Hello, I am unable to access that account anymore I lost my password. I was told by an admin to use the unblock ticket system. When I sent it there they said I needed to put it on my talk page. What if I am unable to login what do I do then? I would like to be allowed back to edit if I do I would probably just create a new account as recovering is really hard I've read.
Also I apologize about the format of my request, I have had to repost it several different times including in the ticket area. I will make it more presentable. I keep getting denied but it seems to be how and where I am entering the unblock request. Everyone's making it seem like I got a chance to edit again, I'm just doing it wrong I guess. If there is no chance of being unblocked please let me know initially, that way I spare my time and yours 🙏🏻 99.242.158.198 ( talk) 01:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC).
Hello, Jpgordon. Thank you for unblocking me. Actually, I requested that my account, Akevsharma, which has more than 5000 contributions and AFC reviewer rights, be unblocked. After that, I'll just be editing from Akevsharma only. Could you please unblock it? Best wishes. Farzanfa007 ( talk) 02:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, dear Jpgordon! Can you unprotect this article, please? 2403:6200:8871:8B0D:7469:11B8:AA5E:497E ( talk) 18:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not super-familiar or experienced with sock-puppet procedures, but hoping you can expedite and take a look at Chiefofswatis. They added a similar list @21:20, 30 September 2023 to an article about a town and union council as Knightwithsword added to Swati tribe earlier the same day. wbm1058 ( talk) 22:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Hi! I'm not entirely familiar with the guidelines for revoking tp access – would it be appropriate for the user you just blocked? Happy editing, Perfect4th ( talk) 04:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
That wasn't nice - now I won't get to see what they do next. Are they a sock, btw? -- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi – thanks for protecting Yahya Sinwar! You applied semi-protection based on persistent disruptive editing – shouldn't this article have extended confirmed protection based on WP:PIA? It "relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted" (and the disruptive edits related to the conflict). Joriki ( talk) 18:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, JP. Thank you for reviewing the unblock appeal of MarrakechGO. I just wanted to check if you saw the full text of their unblock appeal – they used {{ unblock}} instead of {{ unblock-spamun}}, which meant that the full text did not render properly. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Can you help me understand your comment here? I had suspected this account as a sockpuppet before, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jesteron27/Archive. But as far as I can see they have never been confirmed as a sock of another account. Is there anything public that I can see? ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you declined an unblock request here as "checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts". I'm assuming this means that the account is Confirmed to one or more previously blocked accounts, but you didn't specify the master or the other sock(s). Nor did you change the block to a checkuser block or indicate the master/sock in the block log. I feel like this makes it difficult for patrollers to keep track of which sock is which especially when reporting new ones. (The talk page is on my watchlist because I reported the account to UAA, but was curious if there might be an alternate explanation behind the name that I hadn't considered). If you're going to state publicly that an account is a sock, can you please be kind enough to also state whose sock it is? Thanks. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 17:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Checkusers can block accounts based on technical (checkuser) evidence. They will make clear in the block log summary that they have blocked as a "checkuser action", usually by including the {{ checkuserblock}}, {{ checkuserblock-account}}, or similar templates.You declined the unblock request with the reason of "checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts"; this, to me, indicates that your rationale for declining the unblock involves CheckUser evidence and therefore your decline is a "checkuser action" since non-CUs can't see the evidence/information that led you to make such a conclusion. Therefore the block log should be modified to indicate this. While I can't find any specific policy in regards to identifying the master, I feel like it's just best practice and common sense to make note of this, assuming a specific master is known/can be identified. It probably makes sense not to formally tag the user page in certain situations (especially cases like this where the username is inappropriate), but at least making a note of the master in the block log is helpful for non-CU/non-admins who might have an interest in a particular case for whatever reason.
Malecide ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) look right to you for Galehautt ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)? A bit past 90 (although might be worth checking anyways), but lots of behavioral similarities. -- Tamzin[ cetacean needed (they|xe|she) 20:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Shiv5523, a brand new account, was trying add some unsourced blatantly promotional material to Ben Stokes a couple of days ago. CosmicEntity01, not so new but not very many edits, comes along and adds the same material, this time with a source (not a reliable one, so I've reverted). CE01 has made similar promotional edits to other footballers (I think that's all they do), but I haven't reviewed them for sourcing. They both use the same editing platforms. Socks or coincidence?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 21:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, if you feel that a claim for the reported top speed of the ship is relevant, then I'm not going to get into an editing dispute.
Kind regards
Juanpumpchump ( talk) 12:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Might be time to revoke talk page rights from this editor. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 21:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
What seems to be your issue with the edit in question? Is it not reflective of accuracy? You arent providing any kind of sourcing etc to the contrary to label any of those edits as disruptive. I would argue your dismissal of the factual evidence is far more disruptive, so please explain your actions thank you. 65.93.214.95 ( talk) 16:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you (understandably) removed the accusation of racism from Talk:Greg Abbott, posted by The Sausage Grinder. Although created on November 15, this is not a new editor:
I've asked TSG what other accounts they have. No response as of yet. If they answer, my guess is they'll say something about IP editing in the past. Enough to justify a check?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
A user you blocked for abusing multiple accounts a couple weeks ago is now editing as an IP range. See [4] and [5] for DUCK quacking. The current disruption is minor but this user has displayed some more problematic behavior in the past. Paging EvergreenFir as well, who commented at 3RRN. Thanks, Generalrelative ( talk) 07:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Who's this one, JP? -- Bbb23 ( talk) 19:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Due to budget and procrastination limitations, we've only had time to review the first ~39% of the scripts since last issue. Help us out here! Aaron Liu ( talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
I must have edit conflicted you, sorry. Bishonen | tålk 22:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC).
Hello @ Jpgordon, I noticed a very odd page with bad grammar and little info, House of Romay. I was researching naval officer Ramon Romay. I realized it used to be a proper page but appears to have just been heavily vandalized by user @ Giganoto48 that created the account today and only edited this article removing 90% of its contents and left the article in pieces, I assume hoping for it to be deleted. I looked at the previous version (before the three edits by this user Giganoto48) and there are real sources and content well written. I don't understand, I guess it must be a sort of targeted action to destroy the article as there were no efforts to add to it.
I quickly noticed a similar thing had happened before to this very page, and you @ Jpgordon had the article House of Romay protected after encountering vandalisms by sockpuppets of a user with an entire investigation behind it: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alibarzanjilo/Archive. It seems it is happening in again with this new account, and since you were the protector before with the authority to freeze it, I thought I'd let you do the honors. it seems the previous edit on 4 December was the best final version https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=House_of_Romay&oldid=1188212676.
I also noticed the article has a Spanish version on Wikipedia, went on it and it was also aggressively edited/vandalised today by the same user Giganoto48: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casa_de_Romay
I suggest protecting it indefinitely or for a long period to allow for a proper investigation. Hope this was helpful. Not sure if the Spanish version can be protected too or if its a different jurisdiction. Benzeneshamus ( talk) 22:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Jpgordon,
I was looking at User talk:VonLumina and noticed that when you blocked this editor for block-evasion, you didn't post a block notice on the editor's talk page. That seems to be standard practice for other checkusers and admins who help out at SPI cases and I'd like to ask that you do this as well. If you use Twinkle to impose a block this happens automatically so that might make things easier. I find that I use Twinkle for admin and editor tasks continually when I'm on the project, it really helps because you don't have to go looking for the template you need to use. If you haven't used it, I encourage you to try it out as it makes doing admin tasks so much easier. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
I saw you blocked Mrfritz2000 and a bunch of others that had been active at Talk:Israel saying that German was an official language. I just blocked Baleteesman and Schamuel345 as obvious ducks. I didn't see any tags, and I don't know if you actually CU'd them, so I figured I'd pop by and let you know they're still at it, and you might want to take a peek for any more. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 23:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
FYI, the numbers that you (appropriately) removed were reference numbers to the former discography which was largely removed in Sept, 2023, but the references were *not* removed. I have written to the editor about what discography issues they thought were problematic, because a lot of important releases are no longer included. I did reinstate the publication years of the "Further Reading" section. Finney1234 ( talk) 01:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to "internationalism" from intentionalist is entirely incorrect. The debate is called the intentionalism-functionalism debate. Yes, these words seem odd to non-historians or people without expertise in this subject matter. It centers on the manner in which the Holocaust developed and who was responsible for it. While I realize you're an administrator, I am a subject matter expert, who provided most of the content for this page. Please review the change more carefully, as what you are introducing will only create confusion. Yes, I realize it was wrong in the Summary paragraph, but that likely stemmed from somebody making a similar change to what you did based on their unfamiliarity with the terminology. How it went unnoticed, well...we are only human and busy with other matters. Obenritter ( talk) 20:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Shocked, I say, What is this world coming to? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
--jpgordon Hello, sorry to bother you, but this is a clear violation of the rules Wikipedia:Harassment by this person @ WikiEditor1234567123 1, 2 For my violations, I have already been punished enough and am in an eternal topical ban. In this case I did not violate anything, this is an unfounded accusation. Sincerely. Товболатов ( talk) 15:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Had a look, cos I couldn't resist, and you have my sympathies. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
The 46 second video of the Vietnamese patient exhibiting purported symptoms of hydrophobia is legally problematic for two reasons, and intellectually for a third.
First, it is reuse of CC A4 licensed materials contrary to licensing requirements, specifically, that "anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse, or modify the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited" [See journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.] This video does not properly attribute itself to/cite its source; the author and original source appear nowhere in direct connection to the video. (It is insufficient to expect a connection be understood to apply indirectly, through a Wikipedia editor's or otherwise experienced user's following the video to Wikimedia Commons, and thereafter to its source.) The reasonable expectation of those signing documents assenting to this licensing is that proper citation involves presentation of the PLOS citation in the article, in the legend of the image, or something similar.
Second, and a more serious concern, is whether applicable interpretive frameworks regarding the CC A4 apply to the secondary use of a video in a widely disseminated encyclopedia after its appearance in the PLOS source, given only the statement of informed consent that appears with the video in the original cited article. It is a reasonable ethical concern that the informed consent statement assents to the appearance of the video in that scientific article, without understanding (and therefore without consent) that it might be more widely disseminated as it currently is (e.g., with a thumbnail still of the deceased patient appearing in the article, per se). I am virtually certain this would not be allowed in the West under HIPAA-type privacy interpretations, and so I think it reasonable to question it in this case as well. Hence, this requires someone at the Commons with legal and ethical expertise related to the international equivalents of standard privacy, informed consent, and HIPAA-type patient protections, and review of the wording of that original informed consent statement, and whether it is in compliance with and justifies consent to the release of the medical image and video, as it now appears, in the context of applicable international laws and regulations.
The third, entirely scholarly reason, is that this use is actually a misuse of a primary source, and without indicated support from one or more secondary sources. The interpretation that the symptoms being displayed are of "hydrophobia" from a rabies exposure are those of the primary source author, in a case study. As an assertion of a single primary source, we are to view them as possibly correct, but possibly not; that is, under WP guidelines regarding sourcing, as an assertion of a single primary source, it should not by itself, absent other supportive sourcing, hold a position of significant persuasive power (i.e., regarding how the symptoms of hydrophobia present) as this video presently does.
For any of these reason, the video might be best hidden from view. But until the Commons provides a formal legal perspective on the privacy and informed consent issues raised, until such allows its use, I believe the video should be removed from view.
24.14.18.35 ( talk) 22:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Can you tell me who the above user is confirmed to? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 24th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. Uh-huh, we're finally covering the good ones among the rest! Aren't you excited? Remember to include a link in double brackets to the script's .js page when you install the script, so that we can see who uses the script in WhatLinksHere! The ScriptInstaller gadget automatically does this. Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
After earthly attempts at improving the original have failed...
Unfortunately, this section has remained nearly identical. Help us out here!
Yes, we're just doing 'em as we go now. Thanks for reading through this looong issue, if you did! I'm sure this'll send a record for the longest issue ev-ah. You may need to wait even longer for the last issue, as our reserve of old-y and goodie scripts have ran out... We encourage you to try and do some of the requests or improvement tasks. See you in Summer, hopefully!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
A new user, SigmaGamerBro has been white-washing the article. They were reported to WP:AIV, but it was declined because of insufficient warnings. I left a 3RR warning on their Talk page but did not revert their last edit because I wanted to be able to act administratively had they continued edit-warring. However, another editor reverted them. Then, Bongo0819 reinstated SGB's edit and added some additional white-washing of their own. Bongo is not a new editor, but they have only a handful of edits, and up to now, all their edits have been gnomish and none to controversial articles such as Visegrád 24. Could you check it out (so to speak)? Thanks. Addendum: while I was writing this, Raiden5255 has rather extensively rewritten the article (and not very well). Doesn't look like a sock to me, but I just thought I'd mention it.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi! A little over two months ago, you unblocked Logosx127. This unblock was came following their indef for socking (having previously edited at Br Ibrahim John). I initially did not intervene to prevent this unblock despite receiving a private message from an editor who participates on both EnWikipedia and Malayalam Wikipedia which expressed that I should reiterate my concerns regarding Logosx127 (I can post the contents of that message upon request and I can contact the sender to determine if they are ok sharing their identity). Logosx127 has returned to edit warring and adding unreferenced/poorly referenced content–exactly what got their original account blocked. I remain unconvinced that they did not participate in other instances of socking during their extended vacation, particularly since Logosx127 almost immediately reopened a debate on Syro-Malabar Church previously litigated by a sockpuppeteer that harassed me for months in 2022. I regret not speaking up earlier and request your opinion on what I should do about this. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
I tried to click on your your antiques roadshow youtube video but it doesn't work. If not signed in then it tells me to sign if. If signed in it says I don't have permission.
2A02:8011:EB50:0:39AC:17CB:EEB2:630B ( talk) 21:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, currently on the visa policy pages for countries around the world.. an editor is editing using multiple accounts.
He is [User:DENOSIO] and his puppets, who have already been blocked several times.
When looked at their history, he wrote a lot of inaccurate information, which caused friction with other editors.
First of all, I ask you to block the accounts that appear to be his puppets.
1. Stars678
2. JapanNipponTokyo19
3. 2401:7400:c806:5aa7:6062:6ccd:6241:a643
4. 2401:7400:c806:5aa7:287a:c99e:499d:e34e
5. 203.168.xx
6. 203.81.xx
7. 46.166.xx
8. Enjoy1999
Their speaking style and editing style are similar to the puppets that have already been blocked several times.
If the above measures are difficult, please set the 'VISA POLICY' pages of all countries in the world (198 countries) to allow only long-term certified users to post.
At least I think there will be less writing done by DENOSIO's puppets.
Since I also violated WIKIPEDIA while 'defending' DENOSIO, I am 'prepared' to be punished for it and am posting a message to the administrator.
Thank you. Lades2222 ( talk) 13:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
Hi, I saw your edit even though I cited professional sources from academic scholars. How come? Pier1999 ( talk) 15:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! User:Yfyyejgjwguj seems to be a sock of User:Vwqvj qwhiu. They have nearly identical userpages (see the infobox in particular). The latter is blocked, the former is not. Could you look into this please? GrayStorm( Talk| Contributions) 03:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I see a couple of my edits have been reverted as unhelpful, I thought I'd seen many people say stuff like that when replying to requests, sometimes even in the decline itself. So could I get insight on which part of what I wrote is the problem? N1TH Music ( talk) 05:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Yes, while content disputes (e.g. associated acts) are, indeed, not vandalism, removing reasonable templates (e.g. " More citations needed") and adding rightfully challengeable content (e.g. an unsourced birthdate) is, and I'd like to know why you think otherwise. L337m4n ( talk) 22:28, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This help page is a how-to guide. It details processes or procedures of some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms and practices. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, and may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting.ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
Are you filing an SPI? If not, could you email me at least the socks? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Jpgordon. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 03:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC) |
Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.
The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 14:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello - Geldof has said many different things about where he was when he heard about the "I dont like Mondays" thing. Last year he said he was in LA and heard it on the radio. I added "claims" after reading that the small college station did not have a telex machine. Thought I'd explain a bit. Fishplater ( talk) 09:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Immediate reversion would have been my knee-jerk reaction too, so you just beat me to it. But part of me thinks that maybe it should have been allowed to remain, to make it evident that we really are steering an NPOV course and not just being western imperialists determined belittle Asian perspectives. But it was pretty nasty so I'm certainly not going to put it back. Food for thought, though... 𝕁𝕄𝔽 ( talk) 16:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
A real pain. I thought they must be a sock but hadn't a clue how to prove it. Doug Weller talk 07:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
For my edification, who is the master of Lucy FitzWalter?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 12:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Is WhichUserAmI's username and his troll-like vote at the current RfA enough to warrant a check? To be clear, I'm not suggesting that the user is a sock of Athaenara.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
I was reviewing some very, very old Signpost archives (as part of a project to reconstruct the entire history of the publication), and reading about the ArbCom election of 2006. In your candidate statement you mentioned having posted on the WELL. Cool! I am always on the prowl for people who have been involved with things like that (as my own posting career goes only back to 2003 or so, and all I know of times before that is fragmented from brief snippets I've read in my travels). Would you enjoy being asked a bunch of ignorant questions about it at some undefined future point? jp× g 19:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hi, in the "Openness" paragraph, in the caption, there is an end point. It's correct that captions end without a period, as has always been the case on every page. Thank you. "Differences between versions of an article are highlighted." Name Page: "Wikipedia". 151.68.158.253 ( talk) 12:03, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Hello, Jpgordon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I Got Loaded (Camille Bob song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Please review the template you added here. It doesn't seem to have ended up in the right place. Thanks. General Ization Talk 02:33, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
You blocked this user User:AnimalEditor but you forgot to global block this user and still doing [1] cross wiki edits and also using multiple accounts [2]. 117.227.24.191 ( talk) 09:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey since you don't want to trust my sources, a quick look on Richard Elfman's Facebook shows a photo including Danny and it was taken in 1972. Jan Munroe also posted a promo photo of the group from 1972 with Danny in it. Danny also said in his most recent podcast appearance that he joined the group 6 months after formation. TitanicFog ( talk) 04:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Jpgordon,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See
this for background context.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 16:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 16:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you blocked User:Lively Toad indefinitely for vandalism. However, I can't find the vandalizing edits? Did you perhaps block the wrong user? Cheers! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 22:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Just a heads up, they broke 3rr editing logged out (🦆), which is why I blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Hi - I noticed you made a review of a request to unblock of the above user. However, I'm a little unsure of the situation. Just wanted to indicate it appears however, they still have access to draft space. I just declined an article on an SS marching song they had been working on and resubmitted. You declined the unblock on 4 November 2022, the user resumbitted the draft for consideration on 5 December 2022. What confuses me is I can find no record in the block log either via the username or the block ID. Is the user actually blocked? Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk) 00:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I read your comment about the sockpuppet on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Is there any chance you could check if the IP editor is the same as the sockpuppeteer? I only ask this because the timing of their edits are close to each other. Thanks, Wow ( talk) 21:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
May I ask why you stripped Corwen of TPA? I understand that sometimes there's a reason that I don't know, but I am still wondering whether some of Corwen's onwiki comments was the reason why their TPA was revoked. Thank you. NotReallySoroka ( talk) 06:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Jpgordon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " I Got Loaded".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
In the Monty Hall problem, where is your proof that there is an edit war? No one has posted anything disagreeing with my changes, except for user:MrOllie who merely said "previous changes are preferable" and did not respond to my points on the contrary. Did you look at the links I provided? The only reason my changes were undone was because of a typo. We confirmed this in EEng's talk page, so reimplementing my changes without the typo is not engaging in an edit war. If you could please revert your undoing, that would be appreciated. GabeTucker ( talk) 10:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Josh. I am hoping you'll be willing to help me update Adam Pritzker's article. Your broad Wiki interests, as well as your participation in WP:JUDAISM sparked my interest. I posted an edit request that is still pending several weeks ago, and would be grateful for your implementation of these changes. My COI keeps me from making these changes directly. Thank you in advance for helping me out. DCBPI ( talk) 14:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
Hello, would you be willing to extend the above for an additional year, as my local library is the only place I can access Wikipedia on a desktop machine? I tried today and see it expired on 18 Jan. Thanks Billsmith60 ( talk) 21:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Great, thank you! Billsmith60 ( talk) 22:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Why didn't you switch to the Russian article? it is also written there that he is 27... And the news says that he died not at 28, but at the 28th year of his life, which means 27 years and a couple of months. Нейроманьяк ( talk) 10:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Zachbarbo is now socking as Factatron - as before, unsourced and malformed common names of species, and wildly flailing around at Peregrine falcon. Do you think you could squash? Cheers -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 09:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Hi, I just blocked and tagged Biglangbuhos8 as a sock of Pinespunned, but I'm assuming there are other accounts. Can you tell me which ones? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 19:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For reverting vandalizing edits on Wikipedia. The person who loves reading ( talk) 00:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC) |
Is there any info still available about Magnoffiq, whom you CU-blocked on 11 October 2021 (either any stashed CU data, or who else was in the pool)? I see a recently-reactivated user that has some username and contribution similarities to Magnoffiq, trying to see what the situation is. DMacks ( talk) 09:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm reviewing a UTRS request to unblock User:Seankelly2002. They were blocked 13 years ago by you, with loss of talk page rights due to persistent vandalism. In reviewing their request, I believe this was the work of younger person who to be blunt wasn't mature enough to edit here, and feel that they could be unblocked with no concerns at this time. I am conversing with them now on UTRS, but wanted to bring this to your attention that I may lift the block on your account. If you have a concern, please let me know. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
um excuse my mr josh p gordon sir. what does this word mean????? 65.121.102.98 ( talk) 16:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
shocked I say! -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
Hey, JP. Did you see that Srj.cooldude denies using an AI to compose the unblock request you declined? "Everything I wrote was 100% my original and no third person or tools used, it's extremely sad to see entire appeal rejected on mere suspicion of chatbot disregarding the points raised in it." (What points? There were no points.) Also, they complain about you assessing their request too soon (some five-six hours after they posted it!), before it was ready. Yes, really. "I felt it was basic like a formal apology without going into the details and I was already in the process of revising and rewriting it but it got rejected before I could update the 1st appeal with description". It's all a very unusual way of proceeding. All I can say about the use of ChatGPT is, if they're telling the truth (frantically assuming good faith here) that they used nothing like that, then they're one of the world's worst actual human writers and thereby not a good fit for Wikipedia. Bishonen | tålk 11:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC).
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I sometimes monitor Wikipedia:Database reports/Ownerless pages in the user space noticed that User talk:Emergency-user-slap was there. I was curious and saw in the logs that it has been deleted four previous times, most recently by you. I wonder if it'd make sense to salt it and/or track down what's linking to that page? I fruitlessly did some searching. (I'm leaving it un-CSD tagged for discussion purposes but I assume I or someone else will CSD it soon.) Thanks. Skynxnex ( talk) 01:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Back in March 2023, you blocked User:Pinespunned as being a sockpuppet of User:Bertrand101, and I believe there could be another sockpuppet, User:Bigbossgab, that has been editing some of the same articles that Pinespunned edited and started two weeks after Pinespuuned was blocked. Here is the Editor Interaction Analyser between the two editors, [3]. I never really know how to deal with sockpuppets and any help you could give me would help out. Aspects ( talk) 18:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
You should see the UTRS ticket. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi JP, could you please run a check on the above account? See the claim of socking at the bottom of their Talk page. They've already evaded their block once with an IP who made the same edit to Talk:Adam and Eve as the master, but because of the dearth of substantive edits to any other article or article Talk page, I doubt I'll find any socks on my own.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
One important moment: some people unironically cook dulce de leche by boiling a whole tin can, that may explode. Yet in 1940's, the Soviets used tin cans as bodies of frag grenades (see RG-42). A recipe-like bit of info is necessary to counter that meme. 2A00:1370:81A2:4AE2:707C:13AC:57F6:698B ( talk) 09:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User%3AHaskko&diff=1159823175&oldid=1159587981. Are you sure this fellow hasn’t been a troll this whole time? Courcelles ( talk) 19:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hey @ Jpgordon, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng ( talk) 02:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Unless there is another much less famous Oliveira e Costa, he's been dead a while. Bizarre. Doug Weller talk 07:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Hey, did you run a check against the user? Their edits scream sock. See also User talk:Drmies#You might wish to check. In case you're wondering, the user I mentioned is Freoh, and for the connection to that user, you'd have to look at the closure by Drmies at ANI last month that almost resulted in a block of Freoh. I can dredge up a link to that if you need it.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Money Slot is not a new user: (1) their creation of a blank userpage and Talk page; (2) their posts to User talk:Ad Orientem's Talk page regarding Lloyd Bentsen, an article they've never edited; and (3) their posts to WP:RFPP regarding Nazi salute.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you blocked Manjuvenjaramoodu on April 30, 2023, as a sock but without identifying the master or any other socks. I'm thinking Bibin7 (created June 11) may be a sock of the blocked user. Can you check? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Josh. I recently topic banned Starkex, and a brand new user, DeshJoShaheed23232, turned up on their page to shout obscenites in Sindhi. I've blocked the likely sock as NOTHERE, but hesitate about indeffing Starkex for the nasty insults (as well as other problems). I probably should, but I got what I thought was an obvious sock wrong a while back, so I'm a little nervous about it. Could you CU please? Bishonen | tålk 16:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC).
Don't you think it's a bit odd to unblock a user and decline their request to be unblocked all at the same time? :p Indeed, the language you use in the decline is accept language. BTW, on the merits, I don't predict good things to come from this user, but I suppose we'll see...or at least someone will.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Sir, you have accepted my request for unblocking, but you appear to have (by mistake?) declined to unblock in the same message. Just notifying politely Galehautt ( talk) 01:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey,
So I Was Gonna Add F9 CUN-MIA Since Its Not There. This Is A Bookable Flight As Flight 202. I Also Understand That You May Be Against It As CUN-MIA Is No Longer Bookable After September 5. Reason Unknown And In The Middle Of Investigating It. Please Add It. Thanks. Mmartinezmdr ( talk) 16:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
Hello, I am unable to access that account anymore I lost my password. I was told by an admin to use the unblock ticket system. When I sent it there they said I needed to put it on my talk page. What if I am unable to login what do I do then? I would like to be allowed back to edit if I do I would probably just create a new account as recovering is really hard I've read.
Also I apologize about the format of my request, I have had to repost it several different times including in the ticket area. I will make it more presentable. I keep getting denied but it seems to be how and where I am entering the unblock request. Everyone's making it seem like I got a chance to edit again, I'm just doing it wrong I guess. If there is no chance of being unblocked please let me know initially, that way I spare my time and yours 🙏🏻 99.242.158.198 ( talk) 01:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC).
Hello, Jpgordon. Thank you for unblocking me. Actually, I requested that my account, Akevsharma, which has more than 5000 contributions and AFC reviewer rights, be unblocked. After that, I'll just be editing from Akevsharma only. Could you please unblock it? Best wishes. Farzanfa007 ( talk) 02:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, dear Jpgordon! Can you unprotect this article, please? 2403:6200:8871:8B0D:7469:11B8:AA5E:497E ( talk) 18:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not super-familiar or experienced with sock-puppet procedures, but hoping you can expedite and take a look at Chiefofswatis. They added a similar list @21:20, 30 September 2023 to an article about a town and union council as Knightwithsword added to Swati tribe earlier the same day. wbm1058 ( talk) 22:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Hi! I'm not entirely familiar with the guidelines for revoking tp access – would it be appropriate for the user you just blocked? Happy editing, Perfect4th ( talk) 04:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
That wasn't nice - now I won't get to see what they do next. Are they a sock, btw? -- Bbb23 ( talk) 15:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi – thanks for protecting Yahya Sinwar! You applied semi-protection based on persistent disruptive editing – shouldn't this article have extended confirmed protection based on WP:PIA? It "relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted" (and the disruptive edits related to the conflict). Joriki ( talk) 18:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, JP. Thank you for reviewing the unblock appeal of MarrakechGO. I just wanted to check if you saw the full text of their unblock appeal – they used {{ unblock}} instead of {{ unblock-spamun}}, which meant that the full text did not render properly. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Can you help me understand your comment here? I had suspected this account as a sockpuppet before, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jesteron27/Archive. But as far as I can see they have never been confirmed as a sock of another account. Is there anything public that I can see? ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you declined an unblock request here as "checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts". I'm assuming this means that the account is Confirmed to one or more previously blocked accounts, but you didn't specify the master or the other sock(s). Nor did you change the block to a checkuser block or indicate the master/sock in the block log. I feel like this makes it difficult for patrollers to keep track of which sock is which especially when reporting new ones. (The talk page is on my watchlist because I reported the account to UAA, but was curious if there might be an alternate explanation behind the name that I hadn't considered). If you're going to state publicly that an account is a sock, can you please be kind enough to also state whose sock it is? Thanks. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 17:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Checkusers can block accounts based on technical (checkuser) evidence. They will make clear in the block log summary that they have blocked as a "checkuser action", usually by including the {{ checkuserblock}}, {{ checkuserblock-account}}, or similar templates.You declined the unblock request with the reason of "checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts"; this, to me, indicates that your rationale for declining the unblock involves CheckUser evidence and therefore your decline is a "checkuser action" since non-CUs can't see the evidence/information that led you to make such a conclusion. Therefore the block log should be modified to indicate this. While I can't find any specific policy in regards to identifying the master, I feel like it's just best practice and common sense to make note of this, assuming a specific master is known/can be identified. It probably makes sense not to formally tag the user page in certain situations (especially cases like this where the username is inappropriate), but at least making a note of the master in the block log is helpful for non-CU/non-admins who might have an interest in a particular case for whatever reason.
Malecide ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) look right to you for Galehautt ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)? A bit past 90 (although might be worth checking anyways), but lots of behavioral similarities. -- Tamzin[ cetacean needed (they|xe|she) 20:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Shiv5523, a brand new account, was trying add some unsourced blatantly promotional material to Ben Stokes a couple of days ago. CosmicEntity01, not so new but not very many edits, comes along and adds the same material, this time with a source (not a reliable one, so I've reverted). CE01 has made similar promotional edits to other footballers (I think that's all they do), but I haven't reviewed them for sourcing. They both use the same editing platforms. Socks or coincidence?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 21:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, if you feel that a claim for the reported top speed of the ship is relevant, then I'm not going to get into an editing dispute.
Kind regards
Juanpumpchump ( talk) 12:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Might be time to revoke talk page rights from this editor. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 21:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
What seems to be your issue with the edit in question? Is it not reflective of accuracy? You arent providing any kind of sourcing etc to the contrary to label any of those edits as disruptive. I would argue your dismissal of the factual evidence is far more disruptive, so please explain your actions thank you. 65.93.214.95 ( talk) 16:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you (understandably) removed the accusation of racism from Talk:Greg Abbott, posted by The Sausage Grinder. Although created on November 15, this is not a new editor:
I've asked TSG what other accounts they have. No response as of yet. If they answer, my guess is they'll say something about IP editing in the past. Enough to justify a check?-- Bbb23 ( talk) 17:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
A user you blocked for abusing multiple accounts a couple weeks ago is now editing as an IP range. See [4] and [5] for DUCK quacking. The current disruption is minor but this user has displayed some more problematic behavior in the past. Paging EvergreenFir as well, who commented at 3RRN. Thanks, Generalrelative ( talk) 07:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Who's this one, JP? -- Bbb23 ( talk) 19:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Due to budget and procrastination limitations, we've only had time to review the first ~39% of the scripts since last issue. Help us out here! Aaron Liu ( talk) 13:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
I must have edit conflicted you, sorry. Bishonen | tålk 22:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC).
Hello @ Jpgordon, I noticed a very odd page with bad grammar and little info, House of Romay. I was researching naval officer Ramon Romay. I realized it used to be a proper page but appears to have just been heavily vandalized by user @ Giganoto48 that created the account today and only edited this article removing 90% of its contents and left the article in pieces, I assume hoping for it to be deleted. I looked at the previous version (before the three edits by this user Giganoto48) and there are real sources and content well written. I don't understand, I guess it must be a sort of targeted action to destroy the article as there were no efforts to add to it.
I quickly noticed a similar thing had happened before to this very page, and you @ Jpgordon had the article House of Romay protected after encountering vandalisms by sockpuppets of a user with an entire investigation behind it: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alibarzanjilo/Archive. It seems it is happening in again with this new account, and since you were the protector before with the authority to freeze it, I thought I'd let you do the honors. it seems the previous edit on 4 December was the best final version https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=House_of_Romay&oldid=1188212676.
I also noticed the article has a Spanish version on Wikipedia, went on it and it was also aggressively edited/vandalised today by the same user Giganoto48: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casa_de_Romay
I suggest protecting it indefinitely or for a long period to allow for a proper investigation. Hope this was helpful. Not sure if the Spanish version can be protected too or if its a different jurisdiction. Benzeneshamus ( talk) 22:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Jpgordon,
I was looking at User talk:VonLumina and noticed that when you blocked this editor for block-evasion, you didn't post a block notice on the editor's talk page. That seems to be standard practice for other checkusers and admins who help out at SPI cases and I'd like to ask that you do this as well. If you use Twinkle to impose a block this happens automatically so that might make things easier. I find that I use Twinkle for admin and editor tasks continually when I'm on the project, it really helps because you don't have to go looking for the template you need to use. If you haven't used it, I encourage you to try it out as it makes doing admin tasks so much easier. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
I saw you blocked Mrfritz2000 and a bunch of others that had been active at Talk:Israel saying that German was an official language. I just blocked Baleteesman and Schamuel345 as obvious ducks. I didn't see any tags, and I don't know if you actually CU'd them, so I figured I'd pop by and let you know they're still at it, and you might want to take a peek for any more. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 23:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
FYI, the numbers that you (appropriately) removed were reference numbers to the former discography which was largely removed in Sept, 2023, but the references were *not* removed. I have written to the editor about what discography issues they thought were problematic, because a lot of important releases are no longer included. I did reinstate the publication years of the "Further Reading" section. Finney1234 ( talk) 01:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Your edit to "internationalism" from intentionalist is entirely incorrect. The debate is called the intentionalism-functionalism debate. Yes, these words seem odd to non-historians or people without expertise in this subject matter. It centers on the manner in which the Holocaust developed and who was responsible for it. While I realize you're an administrator, I am a subject matter expert, who provided most of the content for this page. Please review the change more carefully, as what you are introducing will only create confusion. Yes, I realize it was wrong in the Summary paragraph, but that likely stemmed from somebody making a similar change to what you did based on their unfamiliarity with the terminology. How it went unnoticed, well...we are only human and busy with other matters. Obenritter ( talk) 20:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Shocked, I say, What is this world coming to? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
--jpgordon Hello, sorry to bother you, but this is a clear violation of the rules Wikipedia:Harassment by this person @ WikiEditor1234567123 1, 2 For my violations, I have already been punished enough and am in an eternal topical ban. In this case I did not violate anything, this is an unfounded accusation. Sincerely. Товболатов ( talk) 15:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Had a look, cos I couldn't resist, and you have my sympathies. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
The 46 second video of the Vietnamese patient exhibiting purported symptoms of hydrophobia is legally problematic for two reasons, and intellectually for a third.
First, it is reuse of CC A4 licensed materials contrary to licensing requirements, specifically, that "anyone may copy, redistribute, reuse, or modify the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited" [See journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.] This video does not properly attribute itself to/cite its source; the author and original source appear nowhere in direct connection to the video. (It is insufficient to expect a connection be understood to apply indirectly, through a Wikipedia editor's or otherwise experienced user's following the video to Wikimedia Commons, and thereafter to its source.) The reasonable expectation of those signing documents assenting to this licensing is that proper citation involves presentation of the PLOS citation in the article, in the legend of the image, or something similar.
Second, and a more serious concern, is whether applicable interpretive frameworks regarding the CC A4 apply to the secondary use of a video in a widely disseminated encyclopedia after its appearance in the PLOS source, given only the statement of informed consent that appears with the video in the original cited article. It is a reasonable ethical concern that the informed consent statement assents to the appearance of the video in that scientific article, without understanding (and therefore without consent) that it might be more widely disseminated as it currently is (e.g., with a thumbnail still of the deceased patient appearing in the article, per se). I am virtually certain this would not be allowed in the West under HIPAA-type privacy interpretations, and so I think it reasonable to question it in this case as well. Hence, this requires someone at the Commons with legal and ethical expertise related to the international equivalents of standard privacy, informed consent, and HIPAA-type patient protections, and review of the wording of that original informed consent statement, and whether it is in compliance with and justifies consent to the release of the medical image and video, as it now appears, in the context of applicable international laws and regulations.
The third, entirely scholarly reason, is that this use is actually a misuse of a primary source, and without indicated support from one or more secondary sources. The interpretation that the symptoms being displayed are of "hydrophobia" from a rabies exposure are those of the primary source author, in a case study. As an assertion of a single primary source, we are to view them as possibly correct, but possibly not; that is, under WP guidelines regarding sourcing, as an assertion of a single primary source, it should not by itself, absent other supportive sourcing, hold a position of significant persuasive power (i.e., regarding how the symptoms of hydrophobia present) as this video presently does.
For any of these reason, the video might be best hidden from view. But until the Commons provides a formal legal perspective on the privacy and informed consent issues raised, until such allows its use, I believe the video should be removed from view.
24.14.18.35 ( talk) 22:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Can you tell me who the above user is confirmed to? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 24th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. Uh-huh, we're finally covering the good ones among the rest! Aren't you excited? Remember to include a link in double brackets to the script's .js page when you install the script, so that we can see who uses the script in WhatLinksHere! The ScriptInstaller gadget automatically does this. Aaron Liu ( talk) 01:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
After earthly attempts at improving the original have failed...
Unfortunately, this section has remained nearly identical. Help us out here!
Yes, we're just doing 'em as we go now. Thanks for reading through this looong issue, if you did! I'm sure this'll send a record for the longest issue ev-ah. You may need to wait even longer for the last issue, as our reserve of old-y and goodie scripts have ran out... We encourage you to try and do some of the requests or improvement tasks. See you in Summer, hopefully!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
A new user, SigmaGamerBro has been white-washing the article. They were reported to WP:AIV, but it was declined because of insufficient warnings. I left a 3RR warning on their Talk page but did not revert their last edit because I wanted to be able to act administratively had they continued edit-warring. However, another editor reverted them. Then, Bongo0819 reinstated SGB's edit and added some additional white-washing of their own. Bongo is not a new editor, but they have only a handful of edits, and up to now, all their edits have been gnomish and none to controversial articles such as Visegrád 24. Could you check it out (so to speak)? Thanks. Addendum: while I was writing this, Raiden5255 has rather extensively rewritten the article (and not very well). Doesn't look like a sock to me, but I just thought I'd mention it.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi! A little over two months ago, you unblocked Logosx127. This unblock was came following their indef for socking (having previously edited at Br Ibrahim John). I initially did not intervene to prevent this unblock despite receiving a private message from an editor who participates on both EnWikipedia and Malayalam Wikipedia which expressed that I should reiterate my concerns regarding Logosx127 (I can post the contents of that message upon request and I can contact the sender to determine if they are ok sharing their identity). Logosx127 has returned to edit warring and adding unreferenced/poorly referenced content–exactly what got their original account blocked. I remain unconvinced that they did not participate in other instances of socking during their extended vacation, particularly since Logosx127 almost immediately reopened a debate on Syro-Malabar Church previously litigated by a sockpuppeteer that harassed me for months in 2022. I regret not speaking up earlier and request your opinion on what I should do about this. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 22:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
I tried to click on your your antiques roadshow youtube video but it doesn't work. If not signed in then it tells me to sign if. If signed in it says I don't have permission.
2A02:8011:EB50:0:39AC:17CB:EEB2:630B ( talk) 21:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, currently on the visa policy pages for countries around the world.. an editor is editing using multiple accounts.
He is [User:DENOSIO] and his puppets, who have already been blocked several times.
When looked at their history, he wrote a lot of inaccurate information, which caused friction with other editors.
First of all, I ask you to block the accounts that appear to be his puppets.
1. Stars678
2. JapanNipponTokyo19
3. 2401:7400:c806:5aa7:6062:6ccd:6241:a643
4. 2401:7400:c806:5aa7:287a:c99e:499d:e34e
5. 203.168.xx
6. 203.81.xx
7. 46.166.xx
8. Enjoy1999
Their speaking style and editing style are similar to the puppets that have already been blocked several times.
If the above measures are difficult, please set the 'VISA POLICY' pages of all countries in the world (198 countries) to allow only long-term certified users to post.
At least I think there will be less writing done by DENOSIO's puppets.
Since I also violated WIKIPEDIA while 'defending' DENOSIO, I am 'prepared' to be punished for it and am posting a message to the administrator.
Thank you. Lades2222 ( talk) 13:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
Hi, I saw your edit even though I cited professional sources from academic scholars. How come? Pier1999 ( talk) 15:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! User:Yfyyejgjwguj seems to be a sock of User:Vwqvj qwhiu. They have nearly identical userpages (see the infobox in particular). The latter is blocked, the former is not. Could you look into this please? GrayStorm( Talk| Contributions) 03:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)