![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 |
![]() | On 27 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article White Deer Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a boring mill at the mouth of White Deer Creek in 1776 made gun barrels for the Continental Army? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/White Deer Creek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buck Run (Little Muncy Creek), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pipeline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Nescopeck Mountain you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
17:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can I interest you and page stalkers in participating in April? Up to £200 in Amazon vouchers and books up for grabs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Nescopeck Mountain you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Nescopeck Mountain for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Shickshinny Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
I'll try to find some time to review the list, but unfortunately I can't make any promises. This is my busy season in real life, and I have a couple other outstanding reviews that I have to return to soon. It may be a little while before I can get to your list. Giants2008 ( Talk) 02:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hai, I have put this for FLC. Can you spare some time to take a look at it.-- Inside the Valley ( talk) 12:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Shickshinny Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Shickshinny Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
02:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
03:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Toby Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Abrahams Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I don't agree with you about this one. The guidelines say that "usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA"". This does not fall into that category as it is not "clearly intended" to denote an individual. Deb ( talk) 18:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
05:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
02:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Little Fishing Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Carbrera --
Carbrera (
talk)
17:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Fishing Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Little Fishing Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Carbrera --
Carbrera (
talk)
01:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Abrahams Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Abrahams Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
07:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Fishing Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Little Fishing Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Carbrera --
Carbrera (
talk)
22:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Toby Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Toby Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
13:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jakec, There have been a few comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tributaries of Mahanoy Creek/archive1 which need dealing with if we are to promote the nom. It's been open three months and we normally close at two, so there is some pressure to get the final points sorted. Thanks. - SchroCat ( talk) 07:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, [ [1]] is an example of the extended usage I had in mind when I added the other parameters. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Well thanks, but I didn't write this article, and only nominated on behalf of an IP. -- Jakob ( talk) aka Jakec 01:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
---|---|---|
DYK for Chip Fairway
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herrold Run, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Item. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
On 30 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Silver Creek (Susquehanna River), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Silver Creek was referred to by two different names on the same USGS map—and the locals had never heard of either name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silver Creek (Susquehanna River). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Silver Creek (Susquehanna River)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
12:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
On 5 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fidlers Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the late 1960s, a civil engineer found himself unable to uncover any written information on the spelling of Fidlers Run? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fidlers Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Fidlers Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Keyser Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Music1201 --
Music1201 (
talk)
00:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Keyser Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Keyser Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Music1201 --
Music1201 (
talk)
01:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Big Wapwallopen Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
22:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Boyers Run at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Amgisseman(BYU) (
talk)
22:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Keyser Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Keyser Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Music1201 --
Music1201 (
talk)
01:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Big Wapwallopen Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
01:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
On 21 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boyers Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Boyers Run starts in Pennsylvania and ends up near Liverpool? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boyers Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Boyers Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Little Wapwallopen Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Jakec. I'm just posting to let you know that List of tributaries of Bowman Creek – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 25. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 20:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angelina & Neches River Authority, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Preston Smith and State constitution. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Little Wapwallopen Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
12:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Maile66 --
Maile66 (
talk)
18:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Maile66 --
Maile66 (
talk)
23:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
On 8 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Little Mahantango Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a man received a warranty guaranteeing him Beauty on Little Mahantango Creek in 1793? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Little Mahantango Creek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Little Mahantango Creek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 14:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm startubg a new discussion at WP:CFD about the naming of river categories. Since you have participated in t least one of the recent discussions in the matterm you nay want to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 July 11#Rivers. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 02:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tower Branch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Species of Special Concern. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
On 25 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tower Branch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tower Branch runs near a tract of land home to nine Species of Special Concern in Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tower Branch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Tower Branch), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Is it looking up or downstream? The article photo caption says the former, but the photo description says the latter. Thanks Gjs238 ( talk) 11:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Alexislynn(BYU) --
Alexislynn(BYU) (
talk)
18:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
I see you are presumed a helpful person because you are an administrator. I also see that you have DYK'ed Emily. Under your DYK is one that I submitted. Would you kindly help me make it look better. My formatting is not the same as yours. It lacks bold and other stuff. If you do so, that would be worthy of a barnstar. Thank you. Usernamen1 ( talk) 20:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
11:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Stafford Meadow Brook for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Alexislynn(BYU) --
Alexislynn(BYU) (
talk)
16:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Stafford Meadow Brook for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Alexislynn(BYU) --
Alexislynn(BYU) (
talk)
20:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
21:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
On 18 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emily C. Blackman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Emily Clarissa Blackman became an assistant teacher at age 15, published a book of Susquehanna County history in 1873, and could allegedly read the Bible in ten languages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily C. Blackman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Emily C. Blackman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
19:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
On 22 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nine Partners Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nine Partners Creek has a tributary named Leslie Creek, is also known as "Leslie Creek", and has been called a tributary of Leslie Creek? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Nine Partners Creek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
On 22 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leslie Creek (Nine Partners Creek), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nine Partners Creek has a tributary named Leslie Creek, is also known as "Leslie Creek", and has been called a tributary of Leslie Creek? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Leslie Creek (Nine Partners Creek)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Browsing the web, stumbled on an image of yours adorning a British Government webpage, see here. I was also pleased to see a reasonable attribution there too! The Rambling Man ( talk) 10:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Roaring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
10:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 |
![]() | On 27 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article White Deer Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a boring mill at the mouth of White Deer Creek in 1776 made gun barrels for the Continental Army? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/White Deer Creek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buck Run (Little Muncy Creek), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pipeline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Nescopeck Mountain you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
17:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can I interest you and page stalkers in participating in April? Up to £200 in Amazon vouchers and books up for grabs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Nescopeck Mountain you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Nescopeck Mountain for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Shickshinny Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
I'll try to find some time to review the list, but unfortunately I can't make any promises. This is my busy season in real life, and I have a couple other outstanding reviews that I have to return to soon. It may be a little while before I can get to your list. Giants2008 ( Talk) 02:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hai, I have put this for FLC. Can you spare some time to take a look at it.-- Inside the Valley ( talk) 12:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Shickshinny Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Shickshinny Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
02:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
03:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Toby Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Abrahams Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I don't agree with you about this one. The guidelines say that "usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA"". This does not fall into that category as it is not "clearly intended" to denote an individual. Deb ( talk) 18:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
05:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
02:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Little Fishing Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Carbrera --
Carbrera (
talk)
17:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Fishing Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Little Fishing Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Carbrera --
Carbrera (
talk)
01:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Abrahams Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Abrahams Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
07:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Fishing Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Little Fishing Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Carbrera --
Carbrera (
talk)
22:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The article
Toby Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Toby Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
13:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jakec, There have been a few comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tributaries of Mahanoy Creek/archive1 which need dealing with if we are to promote the nom. It's been open three months and we normally close at two, so there is some pressure to get the final points sorted. Thanks. - SchroCat ( talk) 07:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, [ [1]] is an example of the extended usage I had in mind when I added the other parameters. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 18:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Well thanks, but I didn't write this article, and only nominated on behalf of an IP. -- Jakob ( talk) aka Jakec 01:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
---|---|---|
DYK for Chip Fairway
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herrold Run, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Item. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
On 30 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Silver Creek (Susquehanna River), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Silver Creek was referred to by two different names on the same USGS map—and the locals had never heard of either name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silver Creek (Susquehanna River). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Silver Creek (Susquehanna River)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
12:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
On 5 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fidlers Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the late 1960s, a civil engineer found himself unable to uncover any written information on the spelling of Fidlers Run? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fidlers Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Fidlers Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Keyser Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Music1201 --
Music1201 (
talk)
00:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Keyser Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Keyser Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Music1201 --
Music1201 (
talk)
01:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Big Wapwallopen Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
22:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Boyers Run at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Amgisseman(BYU) (
talk)
22:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Keyser Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Keyser Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Music1201 --
Music1201 (
talk)
01:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Big Wapwallopen Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MPJ-DK --
MPJ-DK (
talk)
01:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
On 21 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boyers Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Boyers Run starts in Pennsylvania and ends up near Liverpool? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boyers Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Boyers Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Little Wapwallopen Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Jakec. I'm just posting to let you know that List of tributaries of Bowman Creek – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 25. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 20:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angelina & Neches River Authority, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Preston Smith and State constitution. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Little Wapwallopen Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
12:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Maile66 --
Maile66 (
talk)
18:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The article
Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Maile66 --
Maile66 (
talk)
23:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
On 8 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Little Mahantango Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a man received a warranty guaranteeing him Beauty on Little Mahantango Creek in 1793? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Little Mahantango Creek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Little Mahantango Creek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 14:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm startubg a new discussion at WP:CFD about the naming of river categories. Since you have participated in t least one of the recent discussions in the matterm you nay want to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 July 11#Rivers. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 02:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tower Branch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Species of Special Concern. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
On 25 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tower Branch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tower Branch runs near a tract of land home to nine Species of Special Concern in Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tower Branch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Tower Branch), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Is it looking up or downstream? The article photo caption says the former, but the photo description says the latter. Thanks Gjs238 ( talk) 11:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Alexislynn(BYU) --
Alexislynn(BYU) (
talk)
18:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
I see you are presumed a helpful person because you are an administrator. I also see that you have DYK'ed Emily. Under your DYK is one that I submitted. Would you kindly help me make it look better. My formatting is not the same as yours. It lacks bold and other stuff. If you do so, that would be worthy of a barnstar. Thank you. Usernamen1 ( talk) 20:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
11:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Stafford Meadow Brook for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Alexislynn(BYU) --
Alexislynn(BYU) (
talk)
16:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Stafford Meadow Brook for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Alexislynn(BYU) --
Alexislynn(BYU) (
talk)
20:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
21:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
On 18 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emily C. Blackman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Emily Clarissa Blackman became an assistant teacher at age 15, published a book of Susquehanna County history in 1873, and could allegedly read the Bible in ten languages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily C. Blackman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Emily C. Blackman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
The article
Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
19:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
On 22 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nine Partners Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nine Partners Creek has a tributary named Leslie Creek, is also known as "Leslie Creek", and has been called a tributary of Leslie Creek? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Nine Partners Creek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
On 22 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leslie Creek (Nine Partners Creek), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nine Partners Creek has a tributary named Leslie Creek, is also known as "Leslie Creek", and has been called a tributary of Leslie Creek? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Leslie Creek (Nine Partners Creek)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Browsing the web, stumbled on an image of yours adorning a British Government webpage, see here. I was also pleased to see a reasonable attribution there too! The Rambling Man ( talk) 10:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Roaring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Miyagawa --
Miyagawa (
talk)
10:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)