![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 12 |
You can see him use a reason that the Chinese and Tamil is not using in Pahang, but actually others Malaysia state do alternative script in infobox.Maybe you have a good guideline to oppose that vandalisme like what you did before. hope you can helping this, Thank You. angys ( Talk Talk) 10:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For all the work you've done on Tottenham Hotspur F.C. And their other pages. Govvy ( talk) 23:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
For completing over 100 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 03:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Rack and pinion | |
For maintaining a streak of at least 25 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the rack and pinion. Thanks for your contributions and keep up the good work! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 03:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about that. But maybe you can leave some tips or suggestion in the article talkpage so any interested editors can fix the problem because an article with good status should not have any maintenance tag that stay too longer. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 10:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
You've labelled a number of revisions for revdel but nowhere does it say what the material is a copyvio of. You need to specify a source so we can be sure that revdel is appropriate. You can add the source into {{
Copyvio-revdel}} using the |url=
parameter. Thanks.
Nthep (
talk)
19:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh, How are doing. I checked it as part of a WP:COIN drive, and it is eminently notable. The notability tag is only there if there is some doubt that the article is notable. It is merely an indication of notabily. Not that the fact it has a lack of references. It does have more than 2 pages of reference of Google Books and several others on various sources, so it can be removed, which is the correct logic for the notability tag. Nothing else. You replacing the tag has merely added extra work onto the next person to come along. Cheers scope_creep ( talk) 16:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have recently created a draft about Abao, the Chinese folk singer /info/en/?search=Draft:Abao . I was wondering if you could help add some more references or any other information to this draft article if you happen to be interested in this particular singer. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canton japan ( talk • contribs) 09:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I just thought I put it forward to GA, I really have no idea how long it will take, but the PR for Tottenham Hotspur F.C. doesn't seem to be going anywhere! :( Govvy ( talk) 11:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
ACTRIAL:
Paid editing
Subject-specific notability guidelines
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
News
Hello, I just received a message claiming that an unconstructive edit of the Kane Brown Wikipedia article was linked to my IP address. I have not made any edits to that article. Thank you for your time. 184.53.33.209 ( talk) 21:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks (before I forget) for all the work you're doing to improve Good Epidemiological Practices. It looked like a WP:TNT to me, but if it can be rescued in its present version, that would be great. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 15:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Your message: Hello, I'm Hzh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tottenham Hotspur F.C. without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hzh (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
My response: The amendments I made did not affect the facts detailed on the page, they simply improved the English grammar, punctuation and syntax of the words, making the article read better. It seemed to have been written by someone for whom English is not their first language, who is still learning how to construct a sentence without repeating themselves. I have been speaking and writing English, my native tongue, for over 50 years. Please restore my changes. Thank you. KinsaleAnnette ( talk) 21:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
That was indeed an error I didn’t even realise I'd made. In which case, thank you for restoring the data I deleted. I find the editing environment totally user-unfriendly, very easy to make mistakes. So frustrating! KinsaleAnnette ( talk) 23:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
ACTRIAL:
Deletion tags
Backlog drive:
Editathons
Paid editing - new policy
Subject-specific notability guidelines
Not English
News
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Alden Shoudy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thanks for the undo. but we as non admin can not overturn a non admin closure under law. wings blades of gothic did it and lots of flak. Even tonyballoti endorsing it people are angry. so this is the poor state of Wikipedia. it's another wrong snow close btw Quek157 ( talk) 17:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr ( talk) 14:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Henshall (photographer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wood Norton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh. I partially reverted an edit of yours where you removed an advert template without an edit summary. [2] I came expecting to find a typical inexperienced, undeclared paid editor. I hope you have enough editing experience to realize why I'd assume that from your edits. Please use edit summaries. Please don't remove templates without clearly addressing the problems. Please work to avoid looking like an undeclared paid editor by declaring any conflicts of interest you may have and following NOT and POV far more closely. -- Ronz ( talk) 03:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Just asking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.250.249.54 ( talk) 11:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
I am the initial author of the current Optical (musician) article. I'm informing you that I will be removing the notability template from the article, and below are the reasons.
His musical partner Ed Rush has had his own Wikipedia entry since 2003 with equivalent notability coverage as do hundreds of other living artists covered on Wikipedia. Previous articles on Optical were constantly being deleted to the point where one could freely suspect malice. The page provides ample external sources (Discogs entries, newspaper articles, production and musicianship credits on notable albums by other artists, among others).
I understand that people who are not into drum'n'bass could jump to a hasty conclusion about this person's notability, but one's lack of insight into a complete subculture does not justify putting undue notability requirements that are not put on other artists. Matt Quinn aka Optical is, in drum and bass, and electronic music in general, about as notable as Jimmy Page is in rock music. To me, someone who has been a part of that scene for the last twenty years, having to justify it looks more than ridiculous. But I do understand where the error might have come from as it's not reasonable to expect everyone to know everything about everything. Still, if the genre has the page, the sub-genre he essentially started has it's page ( Neurofunk), his pioneering work has a page ( Wormhole (album)), his peers have theirs ( Dom & Roland, DJ Fresh among others), less notable artists have theirs, many of whom have been his proteges or fans before becoming famous themselves (I'll point some articles: Cause_4_Concern, Noisia), and semi-related significantly less notable artists have theirs ( Fred V & Grafix come to mind, because I personally like their music) then I see no reason to doubt his notability.
If you have concrete, specific objections on the article and specific parts of it please put them in talk page or add specific objection templates where applicable. However, given previous history of attempts to document Optical on this site, without proper reason and notifications, I will object and likely remove any unjustified blanket tagging of the article. -- Bmarkovic.79 ( talk) 08:54, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases.You can therefore create the article Ed Rush and Optical, and Optical can be redirected to that article ( Ed Rush is marginal as a standalone article as there are sources about him outside of the duo). Optical should only be created as an article when the person has done work outside of duo that has received significant coverage. It is why Jimmy Page has his own article (outside of Led Zeppelin, he was part of The Yardbirds and The Firm, and has done solo work that received attention). I'd suggest that you first move the article to Ed Rush and Optical or Ed Rush & Optical, rewrite the article as a duo (information about Optical alone can be a subsection), and when you have found enough sources on Optical alone, then that article can be recreated. Otherwise deletion is the likely outcome for the Optical article if you cannot find independent coverage of him outside of the duo. Hzh ( talk) 09:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
It feels like you're making Northumberland Development Project article redundant, I was wondering if we should cut back a bit the amount of information Hotspur Stadium article. Govvy ( talk) 13:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
MrNigerian ( talk) 16:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Stop threatning. Facts are being added about Mr Singh, as per issues raised by the Sikh community towards him. Not defamation or POV. It does not say he supported the genocide, it states that he was silent about it, when Sikh politicians throughout the world condemned the Indian government for the atrocities. A fact about his life.
Hi there! Thank you for accepting and updating on Cambridge Mosque. Actually, that's my first article, and I translated that from German. Regards. -- Adeninasn ( talk) 05:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
I was just having a read through the GA, I assume that you that put down done, maybe you can change them to {{done}} template and sign each one (~~~~), be much appreciated thanks, Govvy ( talk) 16:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for tidying up the page, HZH - nice one! Deathlibrarian ( talk) 03:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
For completing over 50 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping New Page Patrol and keep up the good work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 19:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC) |
I have had a couple of messages from Govvy a few minutes ago and the user says I may copy the icon to the userspace - {{GA user topicon|article_name=Tottenham Hotspur F.C.|date=7 July 2018}}. I'm not sure if I have full permission to do this or leave it as it is... Iggy ( Swan) 11:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello you recently reversed my edit for Sinhalese People, Since the government of Sri Lanka doesn't provide accurate information on how much Sinhalese people are recorded since the number has been 17 Million for quiet a long time I think its a right time that number increases to 19 million and the cited source says the last time it was recorded was in 1997 same goes for the language too — Preceding unsigned comment added by DLOGLK ( talk • contribs) 10:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have restored this page. Please don't delete it as I am involved in a major promotion for this new album that is pending release.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan-S79 ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Please note that there are rules governing capitalization of titles per WP:NCCAPS. Capitalization should only be used when it is a proper name, and that is not a proper name. Note also the wrong use of capitalization of subheadings in the article. Stop capitalizing everything. Hzh ( talk) 11:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me to avoid typing in bold face at Wikipedia: Articles for deletion. This was just a gut reaction - I get so used to using the bold face at deletion discussions, that it just flowed out of me! I hope that you did not mind my comment saying that I agreed that the article on Simon Friend (Levellers) should just be Simon Friend. I thought that this was just an innocuous way of saying that I agreed with the comment that since we only have one article on Simon Friend, it should just be called Simon Friend. Vorbee ( talk) 14:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my stuff on American Idol season 16 TheBadassNinja ( talk) 23:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I notice you are an occasional Malaysia article contributor. Do you know about the following for the Malaysian state:
There are many articles and categories using 'Malaka'; there are also many articles and categories using 'Malacca'. Articles' text is the same way. I do not find any text saying there was a name change. What is the correct name? Are there any references that discuss a name change or the difference? Also is Malaka simply the name in Malay and Malacca the name in English and as an English encyclopedia should we therefore be using Malacca? Hmains ( talk) 16:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Diving Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biennial ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northumberland Park, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award | |
For over 1000 reviews in the past year. Thanks for your reviews of new articles and redirects; your efforts are appreciated. Keep up the good work. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 01:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC) |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Han Chinese, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Rzzgn (
talk)
10:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
I was thinking after seeing a talk page post on Levy that maybe we should put some focus and work towards improving his article next. Let me know if what you think, cheers. Govvy ( talk) 22:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Inc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Levy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Please expand on why you tagged this article for notability. Noel Conway has had significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources, and I've provided references to two of them (The BBC and The Telegraph). Jdee4 ( talk) 12:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
You did a really good job improving that article. I found a barnstar for you.
—
Frayæ (
Talk/
Spjall)
10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
For significant improvements to Chronicle (UK TV series) while the article was at AfD. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For your excellent work in sourcing and expanding Chronicle (UK TV series). Good job! Simon Adler ( talk) 14:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I was just wondering why you changed the edit on the 92nd Century page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dklover77 ( talk • contribs) 16:53, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
So I used " https://web.archive.org/web/20070710041555/http://www.marco-peuschel.de/simtrans.pdf" as the reference on the page. It talks about the Simultaneous Transits by Meeus and Vitagliano and it has listed on one of those dates that on November 5, 9106, Venus will occult Regulus. Is that link a good source?( Dklover77 ( talk) 17:04, 7 October 2018 (UTC))
Oh I was working on as many as possible. I was gonna edit more centuries and give them more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dklover77 ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh, Thanks for bringing the Someday Cowboy article to my attention regarding notability. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia--I've only written 10-20 articles about indie rock bands and albums so far. But I think the Someday Cowboy meets WP:Album notability, specifically under the first criterion: "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." There are four sources in particular that I think address this criteria: The Edmonton Journal, Vue Weekly, BeatRoute and Earmilk. The Edmonton Journal, Vue Weekly, and BeatRoute all list independent editorial boards on their websites (for example, here: http://beatroute.ca/contact-2). Additionally, Earmilk is a major music blog with a readership of two hundred thousand and they premiered the record. I also noticed in my web searches that the album is charting on some American college radio, so I changed that sentence and added more citations. Tracklan2 ( talk) 16:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! Alizafar567 ( talk) 14:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Chronicle (UK TV series) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
23:43, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
As of 21 October 2018 [update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
On 24 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chronicle (UK TV programme), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 20 million people watched Chronicle during its three-day live coverage of the raising of the Mary Rose in 1982? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Chronicle (UK TV programme)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Books don't need accessdates. They are reserved for webpages only (not pages of books or journals...) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 19:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Sci-Hub shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog ( talk) 01:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I have notice everything have different treatment and rules on wikipedia! Film page of Pratisaad Is marked for deletion and Sorry and Gadbad Gondhal as well. I did research over it for almost hour I found this director is a genuine one apart Pratisaad is worlds first film on homeopathy if you do research in that direction you will get lot of material over it! This film is a biography of world famous doctor. I have tried to find sources given to page but after checking this reliable pages of news papers i found this news papers dont keep old news only ie not before 2016. For this check neatly the reference editors quoted must be genuine but may be archive or deleted . The award mentioned they have won is genuine check IMDB Awards section which us very genuines and reliable source of information for films! The directors page having genuine reference which make clear he made films and SORRY is film he made which is clear on net he is delaying due to may be he wanted to release in festivals. Though I’m marathi I understand marathi film makers ofter do that Sorry has got awards which is not recognised so its not available on IMDB But after research i found the awards official facebook page where film SORRY and Gadbad Gondhal’s nominations and awards announcements are there check page and see post of oct/nov/dec 2017. https://m.facebook.com/ambarbharari/?tsid=0.7972966838332627&source=result
Facebook count as notable reference kindly check Tu Maza Jeev posters reference for it. I have also noticed on IMDB and on net TIVEN2240 is user whos name is listed on Tu maza jeev films IMDB page as Social Media Marketing Manager which is against paid advocacy right??? After raising this many people have got banned. Tiven and userkiran may be misguiding kindly do translation and reckeck links , IMDB , Facebooks of everything they initiate to delete.
Kindly see this issue and sort. 🙏🏻 thanks 49.248.235.233 ( talk) 10:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I thought undergrounding fact you will know seriousness oflobby and say kept on comment! Younerd to check Tiven2240 his pages created and paid advocacy. Though I’m not registered user request you to raise this issue to Admin or Burocat please . — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
49.248.235.234 (
talk)
10:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for your work on Sci-Hub. We all have have lots of options for advancing the article but you are the one making different proposals and talking them through with others. I appreciate that you have been able to convene discussion.
If you did choose to convene an RfC then I expect the Wikipedia community would comment. Elbakyan was a keynote speaker at Wikimania 2017 in Montreal, to which she was invited to speak because of broad community interest in her ideas about providing access to knowledge to the people who request it. Similar to the interest people had for inviting her there, I think there is Wikipedia community interest in making sure that this article presents this topic in the best Wikipedia way. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC) |
@ Bluerasberry: Thank you. There are a few editors who are keen to introduce non-neutral terms into the article, and the problem is quite extensive. I'm not sure an RfC is the best approach at the moment because it is so extensove, but we'll see how it develops. Hzh ( talk) 20:54, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Misrepresenting other users, as you did here, is unacceptable behavior per WP:TPNO. Please stop doing that. If you continue to do that, I will seek community action. Jytdog ( talk) 19:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
you did not actually reply to my point about it not being a summary of the sources. I and others have tried to explain how the content is supported by sources. Just for two examples, at Talk:Sci-Hub#Facts_in_plain_English,_and_ethics and Talk:Sci-Hub#Credentials where I placed discussions of sources and showed how they support the content. You can disagree with the presentation, but your writing
you did not actually reply to my point about it not being a summary of the sourcesis untrue. If you continue making misrepresentations like that I will seek community action. Jytdog ( talk) 22:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I won't respond to the rest"the rest" being that very point. I did not even participated in Talk:Sci-Hub#credentials, which ended before I even started the RfC, so how is that a reply? Furthermore you went off refusing to discuss further in Talk:Sci-Hub#Facts_in_plain_English,_and_ethics (you said
I will not be responding to you further), therefore you certainly did not reply to my more detailed analysis later, and when you went back to it, you still did not respond to all the other points made, such as partisan sources. Hzh ( talk) 22:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello Hzh,
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
This response from you, asking me about why I cited "the word press piece", when I had clearly explained why here, and your note here, distorting what I worte here are both unproductive, not to mention distractions.
I warned you above about your abuse of the talk page.
Your behavior at the talk page has in general been poor.
I have gathered diffs and I will be seeking a TBAN the next time you make a comment on the talk page similar to the ones I have presented here and above. They are your editing privileges to keep or have restricted. Jytdog ( talk) 00:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hzh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying us at the Sci-Hub talk page, that you posted at RSN. In that posting, you misrepresented what the "about" page says, as I pointed out here. Please correct the misrepresentation of the source at RSN. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 01:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Note however that no actual evidence was provided for the charges.The blog post actually shows a great deal of detail - there is some evidence presented. Yes the article says it will not put all its cards on the table. This is a half-truth.
Sci-Hub itself denied that it is involved. This piece published September 18, 2018. I am unaware of any response from Sci-Hub about the SK piece. Perhaps they did, but it is not cited anywhere in WP, and not by you. Yes she did say very specific, careful things in 2016 and 2017. She denied "phishing though the Sci-Hub website". That is a very specific thing. "through the website." Similarly "Sci-Hub is not doing any phishing by itself". That is about Sci-Hub itself - the website/software platform. She said "I did not send any phishing emails to anyone myself". That leaves a huge amount of room for the kinds of activities described in the SK piece.
the source of the activity as being Sci-Hub. There is another quote that says
Sci-Hub is not doing any phishing by itself.Hzh ( talk) 02:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
have been subsequently used by third partiesand are
bought and sold like other personal information in black markets.Subsequently is the significant word there - i.e. it indicates that Sci-Hub obtained credentials first before it spread to third parties and get bought and sold. The wording is not what you claim it to be. Hzh ( talk) 15:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Sci-Hub takes advantage of an active international market in stolen user credentials, where innocent users give up their passwords to phishing attacks targeting the university community.. You are not dealing with this very reliable source. You cannot continue pretending that it doesn't exist. Jytdog ( talk) 20:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jytdog (
talk)
02:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hzh,
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Austral season's greetings |
Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
|
Hi Hzh, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 12 |
You can see him use a reason that the Chinese and Tamil is not using in Pahang, but actually others Malaysia state do alternative script in infobox.Maybe you have a good guideline to oppose that vandalisme like what you did before. hope you can helping this, Thank You. angys ( Talk Talk) 10:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For all the work you've done on Tottenham Hotspur F.C. And their other pages. Govvy ( talk) 23:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
For completing over 100 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 03:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Rack and pinion | |
For maintaining a streak of at least 25 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the rack and pinion. Thanks for your contributions and keep up the good work! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 03:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about that. But maybe you can leave some tips or suggestion in the article talkpage so any interested editors can fix the problem because an article with good status should not have any maintenance tag that stay too longer. Molecule Extraction ( talk) 10:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
You've labelled a number of revisions for revdel but nowhere does it say what the material is a copyvio of. You need to specify a source so we can be sure that revdel is appropriate. You can add the source into {{
Copyvio-revdel}} using the |url=
parameter. Thanks.
Nthep (
talk)
19:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh, How are doing. I checked it as part of a WP:COIN drive, and it is eminently notable. The notability tag is only there if there is some doubt that the article is notable. It is merely an indication of notabily. Not that the fact it has a lack of references. It does have more than 2 pages of reference of Google Books and several others on various sources, so it can be removed, which is the correct logic for the notability tag. Nothing else. You replacing the tag has merely added extra work onto the next person to come along. Cheers scope_creep ( talk) 16:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have recently created a draft about Abao, the Chinese folk singer /info/en/?search=Draft:Abao . I was wondering if you could help add some more references or any other information to this draft article if you happen to be interested in this particular singer. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canton japan ( talk • contribs) 09:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I just thought I put it forward to GA, I really have no idea how long it will take, but the PR for Tottenham Hotspur F.C. doesn't seem to be going anywhere! :( Govvy ( talk) 11:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
ACTRIAL:
Paid editing
Subject-specific notability guidelines
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
News
Hello, I just received a message claiming that an unconstructive edit of the Kane Brown Wikipedia article was linked to my IP address. I have not made any edits to that article. Thank you for your time. 184.53.33.209 ( talk) 21:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks (before I forget) for all the work you're doing to improve Good Epidemiological Practices. It looked like a WP:TNT to me, but if it can be rescued in its present version, that would be great. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 15:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Your message: Hello, I'm Hzh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tottenham Hotspur F.C. without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hzh (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
My response: The amendments I made did not affect the facts detailed on the page, they simply improved the English grammar, punctuation and syntax of the words, making the article read better. It seemed to have been written by someone for whom English is not their first language, who is still learning how to construct a sentence without repeating themselves. I have been speaking and writing English, my native tongue, for over 50 years. Please restore my changes. Thank you. KinsaleAnnette ( talk) 21:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
That was indeed an error I didn’t even realise I'd made. In which case, thank you for restoring the data I deleted. I find the editing environment totally user-unfriendly, very easy to make mistakes. So frustrating! KinsaleAnnette ( talk) 23:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
ACTRIAL:
Deletion tags
Backlog drive:
Editathons
Paid editing - new policy
Subject-specific notability guidelines
Not English
News
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Alden Shoudy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thanks for the undo. but we as non admin can not overturn a non admin closure under law. wings blades of gothic did it and lots of flak. Even tonyballoti endorsing it people are angry. so this is the poor state of Wikipedia. it's another wrong snow close btw Quek157 ( talk) 17:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr ( talk) 14:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Henshall (photographer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wood Norton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh. I partially reverted an edit of yours where you removed an advert template without an edit summary. [2] I came expecting to find a typical inexperienced, undeclared paid editor. I hope you have enough editing experience to realize why I'd assume that from your edits. Please use edit summaries. Please don't remove templates without clearly addressing the problems. Please work to avoid looking like an undeclared paid editor by declaring any conflicts of interest you may have and following NOT and POV far more closely. -- Ronz ( talk) 03:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Just asking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.250.249.54 ( talk) 11:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
I am the initial author of the current Optical (musician) article. I'm informing you that I will be removing the notability template from the article, and below are the reasons.
His musical partner Ed Rush has had his own Wikipedia entry since 2003 with equivalent notability coverage as do hundreds of other living artists covered on Wikipedia. Previous articles on Optical were constantly being deleted to the point where one could freely suspect malice. The page provides ample external sources (Discogs entries, newspaper articles, production and musicianship credits on notable albums by other artists, among others).
I understand that people who are not into drum'n'bass could jump to a hasty conclusion about this person's notability, but one's lack of insight into a complete subculture does not justify putting undue notability requirements that are not put on other artists. Matt Quinn aka Optical is, in drum and bass, and electronic music in general, about as notable as Jimmy Page is in rock music. To me, someone who has been a part of that scene for the last twenty years, having to justify it looks more than ridiculous. But I do understand where the error might have come from as it's not reasonable to expect everyone to know everything about everything. Still, if the genre has the page, the sub-genre he essentially started has it's page ( Neurofunk), his pioneering work has a page ( Wormhole (album)), his peers have theirs ( Dom & Roland, DJ Fresh among others), less notable artists have theirs, many of whom have been his proteges or fans before becoming famous themselves (I'll point some articles: Cause_4_Concern, Noisia), and semi-related significantly less notable artists have theirs ( Fred V & Grafix come to mind, because I personally like their music) then I see no reason to doubt his notability.
If you have concrete, specific objections on the article and specific parts of it please put them in talk page or add specific objection templates where applicable. However, given previous history of attempts to document Optical on this site, without proper reason and notifications, I will object and likely remove any unjustified blanket tagging of the article. -- Bmarkovic.79 ( talk) 08:54, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases.You can therefore create the article Ed Rush and Optical, and Optical can be redirected to that article ( Ed Rush is marginal as a standalone article as there are sources about him outside of the duo). Optical should only be created as an article when the person has done work outside of duo that has received significant coverage. It is why Jimmy Page has his own article (outside of Led Zeppelin, he was part of The Yardbirds and The Firm, and has done solo work that received attention). I'd suggest that you first move the article to Ed Rush and Optical or Ed Rush & Optical, rewrite the article as a duo (information about Optical alone can be a subsection), and when you have found enough sources on Optical alone, then that article can be recreated. Otherwise deletion is the likely outcome for the Optical article if you cannot find independent coverage of him outside of the duo. Hzh ( talk) 09:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
It feels like you're making Northumberland Development Project article redundant, I was wondering if we should cut back a bit the amount of information Hotspur Stadium article. Govvy ( talk) 13:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
MrNigerian ( talk) 16:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Stop threatning. Facts are being added about Mr Singh, as per issues raised by the Sikh community towards him. Not defamation or POV. It does not say he supported the genocide, it states that he was silent about it, when Sikh politicians throughout the world condemned the Indian government for the atrocities. A fact about his life.
Hi there! Thank you for accepting and updating on Cambridge Mosque. Actually, that's my first article, and I translated that from German. Regards. -- Adeninasn ( talk) 05:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
I was just having a read through the GA, I assume that you that put down done, maybe you can change them to {{done}} template and sign each one (~~~~), be much appreciated thanks, Govvy ( talk) 16:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for tidying up the page, HZH - nice one! Deathlibrarian ( talk) 03:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
For completing over 50 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping New Page Patrol and keep up the good work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 19:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC) |
I have had a couple of messages from Govvy a few minutes ago and the user says I may copy the icon to the userspace - {{GA user topicon|article_name=Tottenham Hotspur F.C.|date=7 July 2018}}. I'm not sure if I have full permission to do this or leave it as it is... Iggy ( Swan) 11:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello you recently reversed my edit for Sinhalese People, Since the government of Sri Lanka doesn't provide accurate information on how much Sinhalese people are recorded since the number has been 17 Million for quiet a long time I think its a right time that number increases to 19 million and the cited source says the last time it was recorded was in 1997 same goes for the language too — Preceding unsigned comment added by DLOGLK ( talk • contribs) 10:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I have restored this page. Please don't delete it as I am involved in a major promotion for this new album that is pending release.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan-S79 ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Please note that there are rules governing capitalization of titles per WP:NCCAPS. Capitalization should only be used when it is a proper name, and that is not a proper name. Note also the wrong use of capitalization of subheadings in the article. Stop capitalizing everything. Hzh ( talk) 11:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me to avoid typing in bold face at Wikipedia: Articles for deletion. This was just a gut reaction - I get so used to using the bold face at deletion discussions, that it just flowed out of me! I hope that you did not mind my comment saying that I agreed that the article on Simon Friend (Levellers) should just be Simon Friend. I thought that this was just an innocuous way of saying that I agreed with the comment that since we only have one article on Simon Friend, it should just be called Simon Friend. Vorbee ( talk) 14:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my stuff on American Idol season 16 TheBadassNinja ( talk) 23:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I notice you are an occasional Malaysia article contributor. Do you know about the following for the Malaysian state:
There are many articles and categories using 'Malaka'; there are also many articles and categories using 'Malacca'. Articles' text is the same way. I do not find any text saying there was a name change. What is the correct name? Are there any references that discuss a name change or the difference? Also is Malaka simply the name in Malay and Malacca the name in English and as an English encyclopedia should we therefore be using Malacca? Hmains ( talk) 16:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Diving Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biennial ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northumberland Park, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award | |
For over 1000 reviews in the past year. Thanks for your reviews of new articles and redirects; your efforts are appreciated. Keep up the good work. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 01:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC) |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Han Chinese, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Rzzgn (
talk)
10:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
I was thinking after seeing a talk page post on Levy that maybe we should put some focus and work towards improving his article next. Let me know if what you think, cheers. Govvy ( talk) 22:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Inc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Levy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Please expand on why you tagged this article for notability. Noel Conway has had significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources, and I've provided references to two of them (The BBC and The Telegraph). Jdee4 ( talk) 12:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
You did a really good job improving that article. I found a barnstar for you.
—
Frayæ (
Talk/
Spjall)
10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
For significant improvements to Chronicle (UK TV series) while the article was at AfD. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 10:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
For your excellent work in sourcing and expanding Chronicle (UK TV series). Good job! Simon Adler ( talk) 14:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I was just wondering why you changed the edit on the 92nd Century page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dklover77 ( talk • contribs) 16:53, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
So I used " https://web.archive.org/web/20070710041555/http://www.marco-peuschel.de/simtrans.pdf" as the reference on the page. It talks about the Simultaneous Transits by Meeus and Vitagliano and it has listed on one of those dates that on November 5, 9106, Venus will occult Regulus. Is that link a good source?( Dklover77 ( talk) 17:04, 7 October 2018 (UTC))
Oh I was working on as many as possible. I was gonna edit more centuries and give them more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dklover77 ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Hzh, Thanks for bringing the Someday Cowboy article to my attention regarding notability. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia--I've only written 10-20 articles about indie rock bands and albums so far. But I think the Someday Cowboy meets WP:Album notability, specifically under the first criterion: "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." There are four sources in particular that I think address this criteria: The Edmonton Journal, Vue Weekly, BeatRoute and Earmilk. The Edmonton Journal, Vue Weekly, and BeatRoute all list independent editorial boards on their websites (for example, here: http://beatroute.ca/contact-2). Additionally, Earmilk is a major music blog with a readership of two hundred thousand and they premiered the record. I also noticed in my web searches that the album is charting on some American college radio, so I changed that sentence and added more citations. Tracklan2 ( talk) 16:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! Alizafar567 ( talk) 14:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Chronicle (UK TV series) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
23:43, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Hzh, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
As of 21 October 2018 [update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
On 24 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chronicle (UK TV programme), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that more than 20 million people watched Chronicle during its three-day live coverage of the raising of the Mary Rose in 1982? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Chronicle (UK TV programme)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Books don't need accessdates. They are reserved for webpages only (not pages of books or journals...) Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 19:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Sci-Hub shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog ( talk) 01:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I have notice everything have different treatment and rules on wikipedia! Film page of Pratisaad Is marked for deletion and Sorry and Gadbad Gondhal as well. I did research over it for almost hour I found this director is a genuine one apart Pratisaad is worlds first film on homeopathy if you do research in that direction you will get lot of material over it! This film is a biography of world famous doctor. I have tried to find sources given to page but after checking this reliable pages of news papers i found this news papers dont keep old news only ie not before 2016. For this check neatly the reference editors quoted must be genuine but may be archive or deleted . The award mentioned they have won is genuine check IMDB Awards section which us very genuines and reliable source of information for films! The directors page having genuine reference which make clear he made films and SORRY is film he made which is clear on net he is delaying due to may be he wanted to release in festivals. Though I’m marathi I understand marathi film makers ofter do that Sorry has got awards which is not recognised so its not available on IMDB But after research i found the awards official facebook page where film SORRY and Gadbad Gondhal’s nominations and awards announcements are there check page and see post of oct/nov/dec 2017. https://m.facebook.com/ambarbharari/?tsid=0.7972966838332627&source=result
Facebook count as notable reference kindly check Tu Maza Jeev posters reference for it. I have also noticed on IMDB and on net TIVEN2240 is user whos name is listed on Tu maza jeev films IMDB page as Social Media Marketing Manager which is against paid advocacy right??? After raising this many people have got banned. Tiven and userkiran may be misguiding kindly do translation and reckeck links , IMDB , Facebooks of everything they initiate to delete.
Kindly see this issue and sort. 🙏🏻 thanks 49.248.235.233 ( talk) 10:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I thought undergrounding fact you will know seriousness oflobby and say kept on comment! Younerd to check Tiven2240 his pages created and paid advocacy. Though I’m not registered user request you to raise this issue to Admin or Burocat please . — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
49.248.235.234 (
talk)
10:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for your work on Sci-Hub. We all have have lots of options for advancing the article but you are the one making different proposals and talking them through with others. I appreciate that you have been able to convene discussion.
If you did choose to convene an RfC then I expect the Wikipedia community would comment. Elbakyan was a keynote speaker at Wikimania 2017 in Montreal, to which she was invited to speak because of broad community interest in her ideas about providing access to knowledge to the people who request it. Similar to the interest people had for inviting her there, I think there is Wikipedia community interest in making sure that this article presents this topic in the best Wikipedia way. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC) |
@ Bluerasberry: Thank you. There are a few editors who are keen to introduce non-neutral terms into the article, and the problem is quite extensive. I'm not sure an RfC is the best approach at the moment because it is so extensove, but we'll see how it develops. Hzh ( talk) 20:54, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Misrepresenting other users, as you did here, is unacceptable behavior per WP:TPNO. Please stop doing that. If you continue to do that, I will seek community action. Jytdog ( talk) 19:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
you did not actually reply to my point about it not being a summary of the sources. I and others have tried to explain how the content is supported by sources. Just for two examples, at Talk:Sci-Hub#Facts_in_plain_English,_and_ethics and Talk:Sci-Hub#Credentials where I placed discussions of sources and showed how they support the content. You can disagree with the presentation, but your writing
you did not actually reply to my point about it not being a summary of the sourcesis untrue. If you continue making misrepresentations like that I will seek community action. Jytdog ( talk) 22:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
I won't respond to the rest"the rest" being that very point. I did not even participated in Talk:Sci-Hub#credentials, which ended before I even started the RfC, so how is that a reply? Furthermore you went off refusing to discuss further in Talk:Sci-Hub#Facts_in_plain_English,_and_ethics (you said
I will not be responding to you further), therefore you certainly did not reply to my more detailed analysis later, and when you went back to it, you still did not respond to all the other points made, such as partisan sources. Hzh ( talk) 22:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello Hzh,
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
This response from you, asking me about why I cited "the word press piece", when I had clearly explained why here, and your note here, distorting what I worte here are both unproductive, not to mention distractions.
I warned you above about your abuse of the talk page.
Your behavior at the talk page has in general been poor.
I have gathered diffs and I will be seeking a TBAN the next time you make a comment on the talk page similar to the ones I have presented here and above. They are your editing privileges to keep or have restricted. Jytdog ( talk) 00:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hzh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for notifying us at the Sci-Hub talk page, that you posted at RSN. In that posting, you misrepresented what the "about" page says, as I pointed out here. Please correct the misrepresentation of the source at RSN. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 01:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Note however that no actual evidence was provided for the charges.The blog post actually shows a great deal of detail - there is some evidence presented. Yes the article says it will not put all its cards on the table. This is a half-truth.
Sci-Hub itself denied that it is involved. This piece published September 18, 2018. I am unaware of any response from Sci-Hub about the SK piece. Perhaps they did, but it is not cited anywhere in WP, and not by you. Yes she did say very specific, careful things in 2016 and 2017. She denied "phishing though the Sci-Hub website". That is a very specific thing. "through the website." Similarly "Sci-Hub is not doing any phishing by itself". That is about Sci-Hub itself - the website/software platform. She said "I did not send any phishing emails to anyone myself". That leaves a huge amount of room for the kinds of activities described in the SK piece.
the source of the activity as being Sci-Hub. There is another quote that says
Sci-Hub is not doing any phishing by itself.Hzh ( talk) 02:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
have been subsequently used by third partiesand are
bought and sold like other personal information in black markets.Subsequently is the significant word there - i.e. it indicates that Sci-Hub obtained credentials first before it spread to third parties and get bought and sold. The wording is not what you claim it to be. Hzh ( talk) 15:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Sci-Hub takes advantage of an active international market in stolen user credentials, where innocent users give up their passwords to phishing attacks targeting the university community.. You are not dealing with this very reliable source. You cannot continue pretending that it doesn't exist. Jytdog ( talk) 20:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jytdog (
talk)
02:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hzh,
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Austral season's greetings |
Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
|
Hi Hzh, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |