![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Please notice the correct way to fix the controversy section problem. If you had followed what others have done to fix the problem, the dispute might not have arisen in the first place. Hope you will see how others had fixed it and act in similar way at other places where you encounter a CSECTION-- DBig Xrayᗙ 10:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
you were reverted on the same day itself.not really. Winged thanked me for it and he changed it again on 25 November. Hope it clarifies. -_ Harshil want to talk? 11:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Apollo1203. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Is it enough sources now? shoukld i add this one too? (German) https://www.nikolaus-schmid.ch/post/ich-bin-yusuf-und-das-ist-mein-bruder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC) "Wikipedia is not everything" hehe, it is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC) And this source is very authoritative but in Arabic : http://www.wafa.ps/ar_page.aspx?id=FHx6U3a578330806944aFHx6U3 Should I add it? will it fix? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek ( talk • contribs) 16:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
References
IMO, Ramesh Solanki will fail notability if went to AFD. He does not fulfil any criteria listed on WP:NPOLITICIAN or WP:POLOUTCOMES. He is just a minor local politician and had coverage for filing cases and leaving a party. Even if he has some news coverage, he will fail becuase he has not held any office. - Nizil ( talk) 03:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Also, this is certainly not WP:BLP1E. I think significant press coverage in multiple, independent, secondary and reliable sources are enough to pass WP:GNG. Similar page like Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga also exists.-- Harshil want to talk? 03:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi can you explain to me why you have rejected Shubham Mishra article Shub7mishra ( talk) 16:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much Harshil169. I really appreciate you moving the draft forward. -- PaulThePony ( talk) 04:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
I respect your experience and contributions to the project. In the Morari Bapu talk page, you suggested I familiarize myself with reliable sources from India and linked WT:INDIA. I can't seem to find this list and was hoping you could redirect me to it. Thank you. Moksha88 ( talk) 05:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please have a look at
NPOVN#Morari Bapu. -
Nizil (
talk)
06:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
You have not yet replied to my last comment on clarifying your nom. DBig Xrayᗙ 15:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I believe I did as requested, could you have a look? Thanks! Czarek ( talk) 15:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Do you even understand what a WP:POVFORK means ? I hope you know that just using these abbreviations does not make anyone look smarter. It is the weight of the argument that really matters and not how many abbreviations you added. And inappropriate usage of these abbreviations actually makes one appear as a fool to others. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 07:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Satyaprakash at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
23:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
An IP shared these accolades for the Nom of the AfD -- DBig Xrayᗙ 10:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.
Would you like to withdraw the AfD based on the lates updates ? I think you should. what is the point in wasting time at AfD ? -- DBig Xrayᗙ 13:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
On 9 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Delhi factory fire, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 08:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Please be wary of posting links that can reveal a Wikipedia editor's real-life identity. Doing so is considered to be a form of harrassment, even if the editor in question needs to disclose a paid relationship. Yunshui 雲 水 13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
₹ , here it is. Remember in future if you need the ₹ symbol then you can always copy paste the Rs symbol from elsewhere on the page or internet. Template:INRConvert also adds the symbol, without typing it. My keyboard is 4-5 years old now, but I am glad it has the ₹ symbol on button number 4. --- DBig Xrayᗙ 15:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Swami Chakrapani at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk)
05:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Went through thoroughly the one that you sent me :) And yes, I must tell you that the COI won't pertain to me because I do not have a tag or a link with the media house in any way except for the fact that I'm a Bangalore based competative exam cracking STUDENT filling in my NEET Application currently who only keeps a close watch on all news articles and news going on any channel. I've told you my identity openly because the COI Policy asks if I'm associated with or an employee at the Republic Media Network or something. HarshithaHappyGoLucky ( talk) 16:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Also your tp archive duration is very aggressive. I suggest you to keep it a week or 5 days at bare minimum. It is unnecessary trouble to unarchive a thread to reply to it.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 15:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This is an invitation to participate in the Community Engagement Survey, which is one of the key requirements for drafting the Conference & Event Grant application for WikiConference India 2020 to the Wikimedia Foundation. The survey will have questions regarding a few demographic details, your experience with Wikimedia, challenges and needs, and your expectations for WCI 2020. The responses will help us to form an initial idea of what is expected out of WCI 2020, and draft the grant application accordingly. Please note that this will not directly influence the specificities of the program, there will be a detailed survey to assess the program needs post-funding decision.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil169 Sir, I copied the history data from the same company only I understood and I won't do it again but I didn't understood how it was promotional which is helpful for farmers. I am new I would appreciate the guidance. Thanks in Advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govindbangalore ( talk • contribs) 13:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Please let me know the objection and issues, this is based upon my first hand research about the person who is selflessly working to heal people around the globe
thanks, K Kkumard ( talk) 12:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil, I have added official references and added sadhguru's guru, any reason why you have removed it?-- Mkt1988 ( talk) 08:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
On 16 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Satyaprakash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an article published in the Satyaprakash weekly, which criticised Hindu religious leaders, resulted in a libel case? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Satyaprakash. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Satyaprakash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 01:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
The recent events have further improved the notability. The nominater has withdrawn the nomination. You might want to review your !vote as well. DBig Xrayᗙ 10:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil, I am watching the RFPP page, I have seen multiple failed requests from you on RFPP, can you please familarize yourself with Wikipedia:Protection policy. Article protection prohibits good people from contributing also, so the pros and cons need to be judged. Also see the essay Wikipedia:Make protection requests sparingly-- DBig Xrayᗙ 13:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Harshil169
Thank you for creating Gandhi and Philosophy: On Theological Anti-politics.
User:Winged Blades of Godric, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please see WP:CWW.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
∯WBG converse 08:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I haven't been following the conversation on the talk page of Divya Dwivedi, but if you could be kind in enough to explain in just a sentence or two on what basis the article was blanked/redirected. Just for curiosity sake. Thanks! DTM ( talk) 06:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove reliably-sourced content, as you did here. If any other reliable source contradicts this content, feel free to cite it in the article. Italawar ( talk) 12:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Harshil169: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:45, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil ! Could you please elaborate where this DRAFT does not meet notability criteria? What are the things required to meet the notability criteria in this DRAFT? Please help me. I think I have submitted links from reliable sources.
Chakrisahithi ( talk) 03:09, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Do you even understand what a WP:POVFORK means ? I hope you know that just using these abbreviations does not make anyone look smarter. It is the weight of the argument that really matters and not how many abbreviations you added. And inappropriate usage of these abbreviations actually makes one appear as a fool to others. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 07:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil, AS I noted on the talk page of CAA Protest, while reviewing the history I have found multiple instances where you have removed content that was not COPYVIO with the edit summary "Removing as Copyvio". I have already restored many of them. I am asking you to be more careful. If you continue repeating this, I would be requesting admins to prevent you from editing that page. regards. -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 18:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 00:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil169,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
10:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
The page is already semiprotected for a year, so I'm not sure that further action is necessary at this time. But by all means, feel free to elaborate. Regards, El_C 14:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
On 4 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sonny Mehta, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 06:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
∯WBG converse 10:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Can't those guys "Sheikh Nadeem" be reported ? And is it ok to start conversationa like this in talk page? Anshul k007 ( talk) 10:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Attacker's name is Nadeem or Naeem? The odd human ( talk) 11:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Yes Read it. Thank you brother
The odd human ( talk) 17:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This is the link : /info/en/?search=Laxmi_Agarwal
ERROR 1: [Laxmi, whose face and other body parts were disfigured in the acid attack, had a PIL in 2006. A minor then, Laxmi was attacked with acid by three men near Tughlaq road in New Delhi as she had refused to marry Nadeem Khan aka Guddu, of the trio]
FACT: The mastermind behind the acid attack on Laxmi was one Naeem Khan alias Guddu and the actual act was carried out by Rakhi who was Naeem Khan's brother Imran Khan's wife. Source: Delhi High Court Judgment #28 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/32750721/
There are several other factual errors - please read information in the above link and edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndieG ( talk • contribs) 10:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Swami Chakrapani at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk)
17:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
not seeing any scope for a hooknow that the eatery/hotel has proven problematic. Unless you can come up with something suitable, the nomination will have to be closed, since no hooks remain. Please respond as soon as possible at the nomination page. I'm sorry this hasn't worked out as you were hoping. BlueMoonset ( talk) 17:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
You mean a poem by Faiz Ahmad Faiz is subject to such strict copyrights that it cannot appear on Wikipedia? I find that hard to believe. El_C 16:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Harshil169!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Nizil (
talk)
07:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Relax buddy! Kautilya3 ( talk) 08:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India's Coal Story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India's Coal Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KartikeyaS343 ( talk) 09:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Tulsi Gowda a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 ( talk) 19:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
![]()
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
This constitutes an unprovoked
personal attack on another editor. I see that you already received a recent block for similar behaviour. I suggest you stop immediately and apologise, otherwise the community willl need to take other measures to contain your activity. —
kashmīrī
TALK
12:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
buddy, there is plenty of wrong information i had corrected like my school's name. you can remove other links if u feel it promotional which was frankly i am unaware of the policy but from many published books names to details you have removed too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay vasavada JV ( talk • contribs) 20:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Patient Assassin.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Difficulty Of Being Good.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
You have added (and edit warred over) a controversial addition pertaining to the abovementioned biography which was poorly-sourced and could not be verified. That, in itself, constitutes a serious violation of our
living persons policy. As a result, you've been indefinitely
partially-blocked from editing those two pages. You need to be far more careful with how you edit articles which pertain to living persons from now on. I see you have been given a BLP DS alert back in October. Please go back and review it carefully.
El_C
11:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Note: Partial block lifted on the promise of fully resolving the dispute before re-adding the contentious edits. El_C 11:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
ever seen any positive coverage of AYUSH Ministry or whatever work, that they do? Intending to write a GA and sources welcome over t/p of Ministry of Ayush. ∯WBG converse 14:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Harshil169,
Thank you for creating Sixteen Stormy Days.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Add talkpage with relevant Wikiproject please.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nizil Shah}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nizil ( talk) 12:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Dealing with POV pushers may be draining and tough. I see that you have been targeted for your edits. Hope the tea helps you recharge your spirits. You will need a cool head and patience to deal with the harassment, if it continues. DBig Xrayᗙ 11:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. I'm curious as to why you tagged various innocuous-looking articles by the same established editor as spam, in a short period of time. None of them appeared to me to "require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic" (although I do note that two were deleted by another admin, and Ibrahim Hendal which you tagged A7 probably does qualify under that criterion if we assume that the statement about participation in the IPAF Nadwa does not indicate importance).
I'm truly puzzled here and wondered if I have missed something. -- kingboyk ( talk) 13:50, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jai Shri Ram shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both you and
Edward Zigma are edit-warring; I am placing this message here only because you have already placed a warning on the other user's page.
Dorsetonian (
talk)
09:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
DBig Xrayᗙ 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
The Quint. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
KartikeyaS343 (
talk)
13:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Please be a bit more careful with rollback - this edit really doesn't qualify - with the edit summary, it's a good faith effort to improve the article. Not something I'd agree with and probably revert, but not with rollback which should only be for obvious vandalism. Please be careful. Ravensfire ( talk) 22:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
WikiConference India 2020 team is happy to inform you that the Conference & Event Grant proposal for WikiConference India 2020 has been submitted to the Wikimedia Foundation. This is to notify community members that for the last two weeks we have opened the proposal for community review, according to the timeline, post notifying on Indian Wikimedia community mailing list. After receiving feedback from several community members, certain aspects of the proposal and the budget have been changed. However, community members can still continue engage on the talk page, for any suggestions/questions/comments. After going through the proposal + FAQs, if you feel contented, please endorse the proposal at WikiConference_India_2020#Endorsements, along with a rationale for endorsing this project. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
On 23 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Patient Assassin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Patient Assassin, a biography of Udham Singh by Anita Anand, uses evidence from documents released under the UK's Freedom of Information Act? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Patient Assassin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, The Patient Assassin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Wug· a·po·des 03:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Actually revert was done due to remove OpIndia link. But due to difference of seconds your references were removed as you touch the revert button earlier. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk)
Add info on your user page about yourself Kundan Ravindra Dhayade ( talk) 09:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Why the content I added on the page Hinduism in Pakistan was removed.I wrote it in my own words, so why it is a copyright violation Chillybox ( talk) 05:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
The edit that you made sir has no reference, The reference doesn't mention any of what you have written? Bhattakeel9 ( talk) 15:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Brihaspati
Thank you for creating Krishna Yogeshvara.
User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I hope, you will add synopsis of the book.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Gazal world ( talk) 17:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember
not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a
common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. I don't think
this is a personal attack. Use the talk page of the article to discuss. This user is new and has questions. I got something in the teahaus. Also take a look at
WP:CIR.
A
a
s
i
m
16:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brihaspati, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
— Newslinger talk 22:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Brihaspati/Archives! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
{{
Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Transparency: Pardarshita is not written from a neutral point of view. It was created by you, an editor who's been blocked for undisclosed paid editing, and has since been heavily edited by a single purpose account exclusively dedicated to it and the related draft. These facts suggest a strong likelihood of an undisclosed conflict-of-interest editing. I have, therefore, moved it to draftspace, so that it goes through the WP:AFC process as required by the conflict of interest editing guidelines. Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Brihaspati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Nikhil Chandwani".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ramesh Solanki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Charlieheb ( talk) 00:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Please notice the correct way to fix the controversy section problem. If you had followed what others have done to fix the problem, the dispute might not have arisen in the first place. Hope you will see how others had fixed it and act in similar way at other places where you encounter a CSECTION-- DBig Xrayᗙ 10:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
you were reverted on the same day itself.not really. Winged thanked me for it and he changed it again on 25 November. Hope it clarifies. -_ Harshil want to talk? 11:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Apollo1203. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Is it enough sources now? shoukld i add this one too? (German) https://www.nikolaus-schmid.ch/post/ich-bin-yusuf-und-das-ist-mein-bruder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC) "Wikipedia is not everything" hehe, it is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC) And this source is very authoritative but in Arabic : http://www.wafa.ps/ar_page.aspx?id=FHx6U3a578330806944aFHx6U3 Should I add it? will it fix? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czarek ( talk • contribs) 16:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
References
IMO, Ramesh Solanki will fail notability if went to AFD. He does not fulfil any criteria listed on WP:NPOLITICIAN or WP:POLOUTCOMES. He is just a minor local politician and had coverage for filing cases and leaving a party. Even if he has some news coverage, he will fail becuase he has not held any office. - Nizil ( talk) 03:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Also, this is certainly not WP:BLP1E. I think significant press coverage in multiple, independent, secondary and reliable sources are enough to pass WP:GNG. Similar page like Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga also exists.-- Harshil want to talk? 03:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi can you explain to me why you have rejected Shubham Mishra article Shub7mishra ( talk) 16:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much Harshil169. I really appreciate you moving the draft forward. -- PaulThePony ( talk) 04:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
I respect your experience and contributions to the project. In the Morari Bapu talk page, you suggested I familiarize myself with reliable sources from India and linked WT:INDIA. I can't seem to find this list and was hoping you could redirect me to it. Thank you. Moksha88 ( talk) 05:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please have a look at
NPOVN#Morari Bapu. -
Nizil (
talk)
06:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
You have not yet replied to my last comment on clarifying your nom. DBig Xrayᗙ 15:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I believe I did as requested, could you have a look? Thanks! Czarek ( talk) 15:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Do you even understand what a WP:POVFORK means ? I hope you know that just using these abbreviations does not make anyone look smarter. It is the weight of the argument that really matters and not how many abbreviations you added. And inappropriate usage of these abbreviations actually makes one appear as a fool to others. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 07:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Satyaprakash at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
23:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
An IP shared these accolades for the Nom of the AfD -- DBig Xrayᗙ 10:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.
Would you like to withdraw the AfD based on the lates updates ? I think you should. what is the point in wasting time at AfD ? -- DBig Xrayᗙ 13:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
On 9 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Delhi factory fire, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 08:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Please be wary of posting links that can reveal a Wikipedia editor's real-life identity. Doing so is considered to be a form of harrassment, even if the editor in question needs to disclose a paid relationship. Yunshui 雲 水 13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
₹ , here it is. Remember in future if you need the ₹ symbol then you can always copy paste the Rs symbol from elsewhere on the page or internet. Template:INRConvert also adds the symbol, without typing it. My keyboard is 4-5 years old now, but I am glad it has the ₹ symbol on button number 4. --- DBig Xrayᗙ 15:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Swami Chakrapani at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk)
05:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Went through thoroughly the one that you sent me :) And yes, I must tell you that the COI won't pertain to me because I do not have a tag or a link with the media house in any way except for the fact that I'm a Bangalore based competative exam cracking STUDENT filling in my NEET Application currently who only keeps a close watch on all news articles and news going on any channel. I've told you my identity openly because the COI Policy asks if I'm associated with or an employee at the Republic Media Network or something. HarshithaHappyGoLucky ( talk) 16:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Also your tp archive duration is very aggressive. I suggest you to keep it a week or 5 days at bare minimum. It is unnecessary trouble to unarchive a thread to reply to it.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 15:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This is an invitation to participate in the Community Engagement Survey, which is one of the key requirements for drafting the Conference & Event Grant application for WikiConference India 2020 to the Wikimedia Foundation. The survey will have questions regarding a few demographic details, your experience with Wikimedia, challenges and needs, and your expectations for WCI 2020. The responses will help us to form an initial idea of what is expected out of WCI 2020, and draft the grant application accordingly. Please note that this will not directly influence the specificities of the program, there will be a detailed survey to assess the program needs post-funding decision.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil169 Sir, I copied the history data from the same company only I understood and I won't do it again but I didn't understood how it was promotional which is helpful for farmers. I am new I would appreciate the guidance. Thanks in Advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govindbangalore ( talk • contribs) 13:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Please let me know the objection and issues, this is based upon my first hand research about the person who is selflessly working to heal people around the globe
thanks, K Kkumard ( talk) 12:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil, I have added official references and added sadhguru's guru, any reason why you have removed it?-- Mkt1988 ( talk) 08:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
On 16 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Satyaprakash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an article published in the Satyaprakash weekly, which criticised Hindu religious leaders, resulted in a libel case? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Satyaprakash. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Satyaprakash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 01:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
The recent events have further improved the notability. The nominater has withdrawn the nomination. You might want to review your !vote as well. DBig Xrayᗙ 10:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil, I am watching the RFPP page, I have seen multiple failed requests from you on RFPP, can you please familarize yourself with Wikipedia:Protection policy. Article protection prohibits good people from contributing also, so the pros and cons need to be judged. Also see the essay Wikipedia:Make protection requests sparingly-- DBig Xrayᗙ 13:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Harshil169
Thank you for creating Gandhi and Philosophy: On Theological Anti-politics.
User:Winged Blades of Godric, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please see WP:CWW.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
∯WBG converse 08:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I haven't been following the conversation on the talk page of Divya Dwivedi, but if you could be kind in enough to explain in just a sentence or two on what basis the article was blanked/redirected. Just for curiosity sake. Thanks! DTM ( talk) 06:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove reliably-sourced content, as you did here. If any other reliable source contradicts this content, feel free to cite it in the article. Italawar ( talk) 12:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Harshil169: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:45, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil ! Could you please elaborate where this DRAFT does not meet notability criteria? What are the things required to meet the notability criteria in this DRAFT? Please help me. I think I have submitted links from reliable sources.
Chakrisahithi ( talk) 03:09, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Do you even understand what a WP:POVFORK means ? I hope you know that just using these abbreviations does not make anyone look smarter. It is the weight of the argument that really matters and not how many abbreviations you added. And inappropriate usage of these abbreviations actually makes one appear as a fool to others. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 07:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Harshil, AS I noted on the talk page of CAA Protest, while reviewing the history I have found multiple instances where you have removed content that was not COPYVIO with the edit summary "Removing as Copyvio". I have already restored many of them. I am asking you to be more careful. If you continue repeating this, I would be requesting admins to prevent you from editing that page. regards. -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 18:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 00:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Harshil169,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
10:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
The page is already semiprotected for a year, so I'm not sure that further action is necessary at this time. But by all means, feel free to elaborate. Regards, El_C 14:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
On 4 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sonny Mehta, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 06:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
∯WBG converse 10:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Can't those guys "Sheikh Nadeem" be reported ? And is it ok to start conversationa like this in talk page? Anshul k007 ( talk) 10:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Attacker's name is Nadeem or Naeem? The odd human ( talk) 11:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Yes Read it. Thank you brother
The odd human ( talk) 17:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This is the link : /info/en/?search=Laxmi_Agarwal
ERROR 1: [Laxmi, whose face and other body parts were disfigured in the acid attack, had a PIL in 2006. A minor then, Laxmi was attacked with acid by three men near Tughlaq road in New Delhi as she had refused to marry Nadeem Khan aka Guddu, of the trio]
FACT: The mastermind behind the acid attack on Laxmi was one Naeem Khan alias Guddu and the actual act was carried out by Rakhi who was Naeem Khan's brother Imran Khan's wife. Source: Delhi High Court Judgment #28 https://indiankanoon.org/doc/32750721/
There are several other factual errors - please read information in the above link and edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndieG ( talk • contribs) 10:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Swami Chakrapani at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
BlueMoonset (
talk)
17:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
not seeing any scope for a hooknow that the eatery/hotel has proven problematic. Unless you can come up with something suitable, the nomination will have to be closed, since no hooks remain. Please respond as soon as possible at the nomination page. I'm sorry this hasn't worked out as you were hoping. BlueMoonset ( talk) 17:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
You mean a poem by Faiz Ahmad Faiz is subject to such strict copyrights that it cannot appear on Wikipedia? I find that hard to believe. El_C 16:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Harshil169!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Nizil (
talk)
07:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Relax buddy! Kautilya3 ( talk) 08:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India's Coal Story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India's Coal Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KartikeyaS343 ( talk) 09:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Tulsi Gowda a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 ( talk) 19:12, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
![]()
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
This constitutes an unprovoked
personal attack on another editor. I see that you already received a recent block for similar behaviour. I suggest you stop immediately and apologise, otherwise the community willl need to take other measures to contain your activity. —
kashmīrī
TALK
12:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
buddy, there is plenty of wrong information i had corrected like my school's name. you can remove other links if u feel it promotional which was frankly i am unaware of the policy but from many published books names to details you have removed too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay vasavada JV ( talk • contribs) 20:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Patient Assassin.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Difficulty Of Being Good.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 06:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
You have added (and edit warred over) a controversial addition pertaining to the abovementioned biography which was poorly-sourced and could not be verified. That, in itself, constitutes a serious violation of our
living persons policy. As a result, you've been indefinitely
partially-blocked from editing those two pages. You need to be far more careful with how you edit articles which pertain to living persons from now on. I see you have been given a BLP DS alert back in October. Please go back and review it carefully.
El_C
11:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Note: Partial block lifted on the promise of fully resolving the dispute before re-adding the contentious edits. El_C 11:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
ever seen any positive coverage of AYUSH Ministry or whatever work, that they do? Intending to write a GA and sources welcome over t/p of Ministry of Ayush. ∯WBG converse 14:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Harshil169,
Thank you for creating Sixteen Stormy Days.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Add talkpage with relevant Wikiproject please.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nizil Shah}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nizil ( talk) 12:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Dealing with POV pushers may be draining and tough. I see that you have been targeted for your edits. Hope the tea helps you recharge your spirits. You will need a cool head and patience to deal with the harassment, if it continues. DBig Xrayᗙ 11:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC) |
Hi. I'm curious as to why you tagged various innocuous-looking articles by the same established editor as spam, in a short period of time. None of them appeared to me to "require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic" (although I do note that two were deleted by another admin, and Ibrahim Hendal which you tagged A7 probably does qualify under that criterion if we assume that the statement about participation in the IPAF Nadwa does not indicate importance).
I'm truly puzzled here and wondered if I have missed something. -- kingboyk ( talk) 13:50, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jai Shri Ram shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both you and
Edward Zigma are edit-warring; I am placing this message here only because you have already placed a warning on the other user's page.
Dorsetonian (
talk)
09:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
DBig Xrayᗙ 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
The Quint. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
KartikeyaS343 (
talk)
13:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Please be a bit more careful with rollback - this edit really doesn't qualify - with the edit summary, it's a good faith effort to improve the article. Not something I'd agree with and probably revert, but not with rollback which should only be for obvious vandalism. Please be careful. Ravensfire ( talk) 22:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
WikiConference India 2020 team is happy to inform you that the Conference & Event Grant proposal for WikiConference India 2020 has been submitted to the Wikimedia Foundation. This is to notify community members that for the last two weeks we have opened the proposal for community review, according to the timeline, post notifying on Indian Wikimedia community mailing list. After receiving feedback from several community members, certain aspects of the proposal and the budget have been changed. However, community members can still continue engage on the talk page, for any suggestions/questions/comments. After going through the proposal + FAQs, if you feel contented, please endorse the proposal at WikiConference_India_2020#Endorsements, along with a rationale for endorsing this project. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
On 23 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Patient Assassin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Patient Assassin, a biography of Udham Singh by Anita Anand, uses evidence from documents released under the UK's Freedom of Information Act? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Patient Assassin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, The Patient Assassin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Wug· a·po·des 03:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Actually revert was done due to remove OpIndia link. But due to difference of seconds your references were removed as you touch the revert button earlier. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk)
Add info on your user page about yourself Kundan Ravindra Dhayade ( talk) 09:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Why the content I added on the page Hinduism in Pakistan was removed.I wrote it in my own words, so why it is a copyright violation Chillybox ( talk) 05:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
The edit that you made sir has no reference, The reference doesn't mention any of what you have written? Bhattakeel9 ( talk) 15:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Brihaspati
Thank you for creating Krishna Yogeshvara.
User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I hope, you will add synopsis of the book.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Gazal world ( talk) 17:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember
not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a
common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. I don't think
this is a personal attack. Use the talk page of the article to discuss. This user is new and has questions. I got something in the teahaus. Also take a look at
WP:CIR.
A
a
s
i
m
16:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brihaspati, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
— Newslinger talk 22:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Brihaspati/Archives! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
{{
Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Transparency: Pardarshita is not written from a neutral point of view. It was created by you, an editor who's been blocked for undisclosed paid editing, and has since been heavily edited by a single purpose account exclusively dedicated to it and the related draft. These facts suggest a strong likelihood of an undisclosed conflict-of-interest editing. I have, therefore, moved it to draftspace, so that it goes through the WP:AFC process as required by the conflict of interest editing guidelines. Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Brihaspati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Nikhil Chandwani".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ramesh Solanki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Charlieheb ( talk) 00:37, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging