This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | Archive 101 | Archive 102 | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 | → | Archive 110 |
|
This is just to make it possible to revdel the previous edit. The system won't let me delete the latest edit. -- MelanieN ( talk) 18:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hey HJ Mitchell,
Do you have any pointers for a new admin looking to working in WP:AIV, WP:UAA, WP:RfP and WP:RfPP? Some advice would be great. Thank you, -- ceradon ( talk • contribs) 21:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for granting my reviewer rights request! GAB ( talk) 22:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC) |
I've semied your tp for a few hours and revdel'd dozens of crap edits. When you wake up in your time zone you can check it out or change it if you wish. Chris. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Mitchell, I am contacting you to lift the lift the recreation protection of Nguyễn Công Phượng since this articles subject did not meet WP:GNG but since has now met Wikipedia's requirements. At this discussion it was suggested for me to contact you on this matter, as the subject already had an article at Công Phượng but since the former is his full name I thought it would be better to move the latter articles content to the former and use the latter as a re-direct. Thank You. Inter&anthro ( talk) 13:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashtul. Thanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the help! Nyttend ( talk) 03:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashtul. Thanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
The IP you just blocked, 70.188.132.66 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · #dnsbl RBLs · block user · block log), is very likely a sock of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Cause of death vandal. Would you please review and see if you agree? General Ization Talk 00:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Could you kindly clarify what was so uniquely WP:REDFLAGgy about a properly sourced clarification of Gibb's sexual orientation? Such information is routinely included in the biographies of out LGBT writers when it can be properly sourced, so I'm not too clear on why Gibb would have to meet some higher standard of sourcing than any other out lesbian writer in the entire history of out lesbian writing. Bearcat ( talk) 17:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, HJ Mitchell. A page you recently protected for 1 day had expired, and persistent vandalism happened again. Fyi, there's people who previously vandalized the article, took a screenshot & put it on the social media, which in turn causes the article to suddenly have a surge in page views and also vandalism edits. There's only a little bit of vandalism at the time of writing, because it's midnight here at the moment. But, I'm pretty sure if unprotected, vandalism will happen again once daybreak.
So, if possible, I would like to request for a longer semi protection duration, perhaps 1 or 2 week(s) until it calms down. Thanks. ( Edward ( talk) 18:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC))
Fyi in case you don't know, this is because the Malaysian PM is currently involved in the 1MDB corruption scandal, which he later announced that the money was actually a donation from someone. That being said, those politically motivated edits still shouldn't be tolerated at all, although I'm siding towards the opposition more.
Please see WP:AN3#User:Cydevil38 reported by User:Ogress (Result: ). This is a guy who engages in very-long-term edit warring about the history of Korea. You blocked him back in February for 72 hours, with the message 'Edit warring: three-month(!) edit war at Template:History of Korea'. If we had any discretionary sanctions for this area, a topic ban might be considered. If the only option is a regular block, perhaps it should be a long one. Would appreciate your opinion on what to do. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Someone listed HJ Mitchell (alt) at WP:UAA. Just thought I'd ask you if this is a legit alternate account or yours, or someone else trying to cause trouble for you. Thanks. -- Drm310 ( talk) 22:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Could you kindly unprotect {{
ISO 639 name cel}}
which I protected in September 2009. Don't know what I was thinking! All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 16:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC).
I have a PR request (links of course at Talk:Susan Gerbic) and given you like biographies, and I'm mainly worried about MoS stuff, you seemed to fit. I'm also looking to learn the peer review process to be able to help out with it myself. Jerod Lycett ( talk) 03:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
This article has been semi - protected since 19 January 2011. Please unprotect. 86.160.51.10 ( talk) 15:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Mike V • Talk 20:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
You recently blocked Invincibleimmortalcannotbestopped. They're back at it with Imperialnoobicus. I'll file an SPI, but it's open-and-shut if you want to handle it. ~ Rob Talk 15:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton ( talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I was wondering if you would be willing to unblock 192.197.54.136. There's a class OUIT class that will be editing Wikipedia from that IP this semester, and the students won't be able to create accounts while in class. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 18:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Ferociouslettuce, who you recently blocked for IP sock block evasion, is now socking with a new account "BezosFanBoy". Not only are they carrying on FL's attacking agenda against me, but on their user page, they blatantly list Ferociouslettuce's Facebook page as their own. Could you please bock this new sock? Thanks. BMK ( talk) 22:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I've reverted the remaining vandal edits of User:109.92.104.76 for you. -- JustBerry ( talk) 18:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Vanjagenije (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Why such weird & specific numbers for expiry? Krett12 ( talk) 14:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.
As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.
An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.
The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.
Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign
If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.
Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (
User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation
Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help
You blocked this IP, but it is back vandalizing pages again. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 04:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:
Thanks! Mike Peel ( talk) 17:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
I noticed your message at Callanecc's talk page and would like ask: what out of this collation of behaviour would suffice for AE? Most of it is editor conduct not related directly to Troubles, but the fourth bullet point especially displays this editor's bias and lack of neutrality on Troubles matters despite their frequent claims of inserting NPOV. Then again I already provided a litany of evidence to AE that resulted in no action in regards to Gob Lofa's behaviour on Troubles articles. There has been plenty of evidence since as well however I no longer bother tracking Gob Lofa's edits unless they appear on my most recent in my watchlist as I don't want to be seen as hounding even if I have just cause. Mabuska (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear HJ. i am informing you that I would duly like to appeal a topic ban imposed by yourself in jan 2014. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_Slovenski_Volk
Thanks Slovenski Volk ( talk) 04:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
On what planet is a single edit worth 6 months of full protection? You didn't even bother notifying the editor. Lazy. -- DHeyward ( talk) 01:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
I just wanted to say thanks for blocking Heilsatan666 ( talk · contribs) earlier. -- Rubbish computer 01:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks re this best wishes DBaK ( talk) 17:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
According to
WP:NAMES my edit didn't improve the article so it was reverted. I agree with decision but I don't agree with full protection of that page. According to
WP:PROTECT: "Wikipedia is built around the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors". Since my edit wasn't a vandalism there is no need to full protect the article. Semi-protection was adequate. Please use {{
re}} Please use
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 01:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 11:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 15:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 16:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 16:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 17:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)The Special Wikipedian Tribble Award | |
HJ, you're a very special Wikipedian in my book. Being a mindful, considerate administrator who consistently makes good decisions, or at least tries, is not an easy task, especially considering some of the
mine fields one has to navigate when settling a dispute. It's not a simple
Tiny Tim
Tiptoe Through the Tulips for sure. Thank you for all you do and all you've done to help keep Wikipedia an enjoyable experience for so many of us.
Atsme
📞
📧 18:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Banners available at [1] |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | Archive 101 | Archive 102 | Archive 103 | Archive 104 | Archive 105 | → | Archive 110 |
|
This is just to make it possible to revdel the previous edit. The system won't let me delete the latest edit. -- MelanieN ( talk) 18:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hey HJ Mitchell,
Do you have any pointers for a new admin looking to working in WP:AIV, WP:UAA, WP:RfP and WP:RfPP? Some advice would be great. Thank you, -- ceradon ( talk • contribs) 21:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for granting my reviewer rights request! GAB ( talk) 22:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC) |
I've semied your tp for a few hours and revdel'd dozens of crap edits. When you wake up in your time zone you can check it out or change it if you wish. Chris. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Mitchell, I am contacting you to lift the lift the recreation protection of Nguyễn Công Phượng since this articles subject did not meet WP:GNG but since has now met Wikipedia's requirements. At this discussion it was suggested for me to contact you on this matter, as the subject already had an article at Công Phượng but since the former is his full name I thought it would be better to move the latter articles content to the former and use the latter as a re-direct. Thank You. Inter&anthro ( talk) 13:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashtul. Thanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the help! Nyttend ( talk) 03:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashtul. Thanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
The IP you just blocked, 70.188.132.66 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · #dnsbl RBLs · block user · block log), is very likely a sock of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Cause of death vandal. Would you please review and see if you agree? General Ization Talk 00:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Could you kindly clarify what was so uniquely WP:REDFLAGgy about a properly sourced clarification of Gibb's sexual orientation? Such information is routinely included in the biographies of out LGBT writers when it can be properly sourced, so I'm not too clear on why Gibb would have to meet some higher standard of sourcing than any other out lesbian writer in the entire history of out lesbian writing. Bearcat ( talk) 17:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, HJ Mitchell. A page you recently protected for 1 day had expired, and persistent vandalism happened again. Fyi, there's people who previously vandalized the article, took a screenshot & put it on the social media, which in turn causes the article to suddenly have a surge in page views and also vandalism edits. There's only a little bit of vandalism at the time of writing, because it's midnight here at the moment. But, I'm pretty sure if unprotected, vandalism will happen again once daybreak.
So, if possible, I would like to request for a longer semi protection duration, perhaps 1 or 2 week(s) until it calms down. Thanks. ( Edward ( talk) 18:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC))
Fyi in case you don't know, this is because the Malaysian PM is currently involved in the 1MDB corruption scandal, which he later announced that the money was actually a donation from someone. That being said, those politically motivated edits still shouldn't be tolerated at all, although I'm siding towards the opposition more.
Please see WP:AN3#User:Cydevil38 reported by User:Ogress (Result: ). This is a guy who engages in very-long-term edit warring about the history of Korea. You blocked him back in February for 72 hours, with the message 'Edit warring: three-month(!) edit war at Template:History of Korea'. If we had any discretionary sanctions for this area, a topic ban might be considered. If the only option is a regular block, perhaps it should be a long one. Would appreciate your opinion on what to do. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Someone listed HJ Mitchell (alt) at WP:UAA. Just thought I'd ask you if this is a legit alternate account or yours, or someone else trying to cause trouble for you. Thanks. -- Drm310 ( talk) 22:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Could you kindly unprotect {{
ISO 639 name cel}}
which I protected in September 2009. Don't know what I was thinking! All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 16:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC).
I have a PR request (links of course at Talk:Susan Gerbic) and given you like biographies, and I'm mainly worried about MoS stuff, you seemed to fit. I'm also looking to learn the peer review process to be able to help out with it myself. Jerod Lycett ( talk) 03:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
This article has been semi - protected since 19 January 2011. Please unprotect. 86.160.51.10 ( talk) 15:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Mike V • Talk 20:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
You recently blocked Invincibleimmortalcannotbestopped. They're back at it with Imperialnoobicus. I'll file an SPI, but it's open-and-shut if you want to handle it. ~ Rob Talk 15:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton ( talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I was wondering if you would be willing to unblock 192.197.54.136. There's a class OUIT class that will be editing Wikipedia from that IP this semester, and the students won't be able to create accounts while in class. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 18:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Ferociouslettuce, who you recently blocked for IP sock block evasion, is now socking with a new account "BezosFanBoy". Not only are they carrying on FL's attacking agenda against me, but on their user page, they blatantly list Ferociouslettuce's Facebook page as their own. Could you please bock this new sock? Thanks. BMK ( talk) 22:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
I've reverted the remaining vandal edits of User:109.92.104.76 for you. -- JustBerry ( talk) 18:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Vanjagenije (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Why such weird & specific numbers for expiry? Krett12 ( talk) 14:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.
As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.
An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.
The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.
Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign
If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.
Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (
User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation
Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help
You blocked this IP, but it is back vandalizing pages again. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 04:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:
Thanks! Mike Peel ( talk) 17:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
I noticed your message at Callanecc's talk page and would like ask: what out of this collation of behaviour would suffice for AE? Most of it is editor conduct not related directly to Troubles, but the fourth bullet point especially displays this editor's bias and lack of neutrality on Troubles matters despite their frequent claims of inserting NPOV. Then again I already provided a litany of evidence to AE that resulted in no action in regards to Gob Lofa's behaviour on Troubles articles. There has been plenty of evidence since as well however I no longer bother tracking Gob Lofa's edits unless they appear on my most recent in my watchlist as I don't want to be seen as hounding even if I have just cause. Mabuska (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear HJ. i am informing you that I would duly like to appeal a topic ban imposed by yourself in jan 2014. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_Slovenski_Volk
Thanks Slovenski Volk ( talk) 04:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
On what planet is a single edit worth 6 months of full protection? You didn't even bother notifying the editor. Lazy. -- DHeyward ( talk) 01:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
I just wanted to say thanks for blocking Heilsatan666 ( talk · contribs) earlier. -- Rubbish computer 01:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks re this best wishes DBaK ( talk) 17:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
According to
WP:NAMES my edit didn't improve the article so it was reverted. I agree with decision but I don't agree with full protection of that page. According to
WP:PROTECT: "Wikipedia is built around the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors". Since my edit wasn't a vandalism there is no need to full protect the article. Semi-protection was adequate. Please use {{
re}} Please use
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 01:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 11:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 15:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 16:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 16:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to}}
Vivil
🗪 17:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)The Special Wikipedian Tribble Award | |
HJ, you're a very special Wikipedian in my book. Being a mindful, considerate administrator who consistently makes good decisions, or at least tries, is not an easy task, especially considering some of the
mine fields one has to navigate when settling a dispute. It's not a simple
Tiny Tim
Tiptoe Through the Tulips for sure. Thank you for all you do and all you've done to help keep Wikipedia an enjoyable experience for so many of us.
Atsme
📞
📧 18:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Banners available at [1] |