ARCHIVED TODAY // Fra nkB 02:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Please do not use swear words on wikipedia, or harass other users [1]. DrKiernan ( talk) 16:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:1632 series books ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:1632 series ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium ( talk) 01:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:1632 series images pages ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:1632 series ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium ( talk) 01:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,
Roger Davies
talk
04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Fabartus, what is your understanding of the proper usage of {{ R to section}}? (I see that you originated it.) I have assumed that it was intended for those redirects that specifically target a section of their target article (and thus have a "#" in the redirect target link). That interpretation seems supported by the redirect's current documentation and it's majority usage (97% meeting this criteria) but it is occasionally being used to tag redirects, such as Around the World Submerged, where (for various reason) it isn't desirable to specifically target a section, even though the topic of the redirect is a minor part of the target article. I ask because I was seeking a means of identifying those redirects that are sensitive to editors changing section titles in the target article. -- ToE T 00:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect David Haydn-Jones. Since you had some involvement with the David Haydn-Jones redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ToE T 15:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey again. Just a coincidence here, as I ran into this while fixing redirects pointing to nonextant sections. As noted at the RfD, a redlink is better than a redirect to a dab page with no entry. The info you added to the dab page back in January was reverted two hours later. I certainly wouldn't object to you stubbing out David Haydn-Jones if you wish. -- ToE T 15:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Voting in the
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,
Roger Davies
talk
22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Sisterheader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. RL0919 ( talk) 12:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:R from talkpage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Cenarium (
talk)
23:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove legitimate fact tags with (condescending) instructions to the person that placed it there to "study some history". If it's so obvious, you should be able to supply a reference yourself. If you can't, or can't be bothered, then leave the tag where it is. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 16:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Interwiki links table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —
SMcCandlish
Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ
Contribs.
08:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
You'd have to put {{ db-author}} on it yourself, I think. Happy new one to you as well. :-) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 03:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I think you have misunderstood the purpose of the introduction for this article which is only meant to succinctly define what constitutes the definition of a generic transcontinental railroad -- i.e. a railroad which completely crosses any recognized continental land mass that connects one ocean to another by rail. The entire first paragraph of the intro that you had replaced it with, however, concerned itself only the First Transcontinental Railroad (originally called the "Pacific Railroad" which became know as the Overland Route) opened in 1869 which connected the United States' existing eastern railroad network at Council Bluffs, IA/Omaha, NE and San Francisco, a subject about which I have also written two published books. While discussed as part of the US subsection of the "Americas" section of the instant Transcontinental Railroad article, this subject is introduced and covered in great detail in two other separate Wikipedia articles. This intro also duplicates detailed information which is already contained later on in the main article itself. The second paragraph you added, while thoughtful and well written, appears to be largely a short essay made up of POV opinions which are made without providing any references that support them.
That being the case, I have thus restored the longstanding introductory paragraph of the article which was developed by consensus of the group of editors that have been the major contributors to this article over the years and have added to this an edited down version of non POV material from your second paragraph. If you wish to propose making major alterations to the longstanding introduction (or other sections) of this mature article, please first take them the entry's talk page for discussion before making wholesale changes that massively alter both its existing substace and character. Thank you. Centpacrr ( talk) 06:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the
coordinator academy course and in the
responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
21:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
FixBunching is the auxiliary template which I use the most often. Just a random thank you for creating it. -- 78.34.249.140 ( talk) 01:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:Tlxw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
14:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the
Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
21:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that Conference seemed to have some content sections after its references section and a stub template. When I went to fix this I found the references section and stub template were actually in another article, which was transcluded.
Reading the talk page, it seems you attempted to "merge" the smaller article into the larger one. But transclusion is not the proper way to do that, because of the weirdness that ensues e.g. two references sections and inappropriate maintenance templates, dablinks etc. You can fix this to some extent with <noinclude> but really, only articles designed to be transcluded (almost always in the Template namespace) should be transcluded into article space. The proper way to do mergers is using the procedure at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. I've done this, adding the appropriate templates, and if you have any comments you can add them at Talk:Committee#Propose merge-in of Conference committee. Hairy Dude ( talk) 01:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:UtComns has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
RL0919 (
talk)
17:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Sisterproject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
RL0919 (
talk)
17:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Category talk:Pharmacy/fragile, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Category talk:Pharmacy/fragile and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Category talk:Pharmacy/fragile during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RL0919 ( talk) 18:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Sisterwikis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
RL0919 (
talk)
18:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:See also W2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:LTACS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:NAMCON has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Cite Sm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -—
Gadget850 (Ed)
talk
20:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Left60 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
21:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:NWBL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
07:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Ibull2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
10:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Ibull has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
10:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Usage div has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
15:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Demon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
15:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Ctempsection has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
16:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Right35 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Cms-catlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Catlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Charmed episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wpd-catlist-up has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Cat see also commons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:55, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wdy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
20:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Bullseealso has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
23:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Also starring has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
02:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Redirect template warning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
08:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:MainBold has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
08:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wiktionarytmp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
08:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:!: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
09:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:GEon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
09:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:•• has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
09:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Top2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Lau has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:OTHERSITE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Left66 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
10:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wpd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
23:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Template:NestTextColors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
09:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Interwikicat-grp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. Axem Titanium ( talk) 10:46, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Template:TIMESTAMP has been nominated for merging with
Template:Currentdate. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Set Sail For The Seven Seas
270° 6' 0" NET
18:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Template:Template list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
11:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the concerns... but TFD and all the xFD's burn my ass in that a few busybodies can undo man-hours, even man-months of work and mistake it for "THE GREATER GOOD"... The WP Project... Really, REALLY, really needs 'a ten 'DELETE' votes to delete quorum' or leave things alone unless it's obvious trash. Which should easily get ten votes in any case--since if more votes were needed, more people would likely patrol and participate in said forums... strengthening the institutional consistencies... Too Often have I seen small CABALs develop that dominate such for a time.
• Hadn't ever heard template space was taking up too many resources (BRIAN AND TIM IN FACT explicitly STATED THE OPPOSITE back when we changed template documentation for the better— and they altered the expansion cap limit), yet that kind of fuzz for brains make work costs gobs of time and makes the place hostile...
• Even should I return these days to make big edits, sometimes half of what I try now no longer works without frustrating effort. Someone wants to patrol and subst some templates to imagine they are aiding the effort, fine... subst... but why make a working tool unavailable?
The relevant discussion has been moved to Template_talk:Anglo-Indian_Wars#.27Indian_freedom_struggle.27
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 21:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
The summary of Kanesville's importance to the overland trails in the 19th century belongs more under the history section as opposed to the introductory, general overview of the city or it needs to be compared with the evolution of the Lincoln Highway and the present-day equivalents of Interstates 80 and 29. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iowaryan ( talk • contribs) 07:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello Fabartus: Your user page [[User:Fabartus/temp7]] may be in violation of WP:USERNOCAT. The Category that it appears in, Category:Periods with timeline in infobox, appears to be a maintenance category, so it seems reasonable to allow user pages to appear in the category while development of a page is proceeding. Your user page in question does not seem to be in active development. Do you think you should comment out or otherwise deactivate the code that is putting this page into a category? Thanks for your consideration. -- Fartherred ( talk) 22:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I liked your tidying up of the lead, though I hope you won't mind my restoring the original wording in the sentence, "Since 2003, Waverley has been listed in the British National Register ..." because it is correct she has been listed in every year since 2003. The alternative, "In 2003, Waverley was listed in the British National Register ..." implies she was listed for only 1 year in 2003. I just wanted to explain why I made the change. 85.94.184.115 ( talk) 04:13, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Fabartus - while your dab-link at Lincoln Highway seems like a good idea, there is no article Old Lincoln Highway. Argyriou (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. If you really paid close attention (which you should have had the time for, since you didn't mind spending it on writing me a fairly long message), and if you knew how AWB worked, you'd see that the primary changes suggested by AWB (and implemented by me) were typos, and the rest (whitespaces, etc.) was a result of genfixes automatically applied. Although I wouldn't waste time/resources on doing genfixes alone, there's a merit in fixing typos, which is exactly what was done there. cherkash ( talk) 19:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Please do not change the content of articles so it addresses a different topic than the title of the article indicates, as you did here. This is particularly inappropriate when an article on the topic that you want to write about already exists ( Pound-force). Jc3s5h ( talk) 21:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco- Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!-- Codrinb ( talk) 03:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 15:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 03:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Tlxm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Tlw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Washington and Jefferson College, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tavix | Talk 00:42, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ring of Fire (anthology)-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 05:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
HI seem to have stumbled upon a couple of your requests Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Natural_sciences#Geologic_time_periods so I've added some comment, hope that's helpful. EdwardLane ( talk) 15:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the thought. Best regards, // Fra nkB 18:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Template:Fix bunching has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) -
talk
13:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Template:Lth has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
05:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:WikiBookscat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
16:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Commons template has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Utility templates used in categories, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address ( talk) 19:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Interwiki utility templates, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address ( talk) 19:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
A page you have edited has been involved in the Wikipedia Dispute Resolution Mechanism. If you wish to take part please click here. Some of the editors working on it have been accused of being sock puppets including myself, information on that can be found here. UrbanTerrorist ( talk) 14:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I have wanted for some time to thank you for the encouraging words about the dispute over Heroes in Hell and associated actions, but was afraid to because I am concerned that anything I say may be considered canvassing. I am not canvassing you, let me make that clear. However, I find this whole matter ironic since I had called out Wikipedia as the single reference source for settling disputes over historical and my6thical characters and places for Lawyers in Hell writers and those engaged in writing for future volumes. Your mention of IAR was comforting, but I would think at this point nearly everyone who was trying to expand the HIH presence on WP has been scared off by people with that intention: people like me are rightly concerned that their work will be unilaterally deleted or they will be charged with some sort of connivance. The chilling effect of blocking people is indisputable. This reminds me of McCarthyism, which shows how old I am: guilty until proven innocent. Much time has been wasted defending specious accusations from an oligarchic group. And yet, I am leaving WP as the reference source for the HIH series, at least for the time being, because when WP is good, it is very good. Since they are deciding whether to block me, and will probably do that, I thought I would thank you while I have the chance. Janet Morris Guarddog2 ( talk) 17:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot ( talk) 17:53, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello FrankB. As you may have seen I have reverted your additions to the Kokoda Track campaign article. As I stated in the edit summary this material probably shouldn't be added to the lead (please see WP:LEAD). Much of it would however be appropriate if you could work it into the body of the article, for instance in the 'Background' section. If you would like to discuss this I would be more than happy to do so. A couple of final points, the article currently uses consistent short citation and date formats so when you come to edit the article again please be mindful to use these formats. For instance the short citations use Author, Date and Page number (i.e. Clown 2011, p. 1.), likewise the date format used is Day, Month and Year, for instance 1 July 1942. A few of your previous additions used different formats. Thanks in advance. Anotherclown ( talk) 08:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Fabartus, I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Weapons Races-- However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the article currently does not contain any references. As a new article, the most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information. It's nice to see you editing! Jipinghe ( talk) 21:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot ( talk) 02:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot ( talk) 08:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from personal attacks. I'm doing standard new page patrol, and that includes maintenance tagging. If you don't want your article tagged, then create them with references. Falcon8765 (TALK) 22:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC
WHAT PERSONAL ATTACK. YOU'RE AN ASS. I'm sharing that opinion in the hopes that you will smarten up. TRY ADDING CONTENT, first comes the prose and then the obfusticating cites. No other way to respect MY OWN TIME... the thing your careless activity disrespected. SO GROW UP, DO SOMETHING USEFUL. Hanging tags is NOT. Try clearing some... add cites. but stay out of the way of people adding to the project. My time is precious. BTW-cites on a television documentary series, like a novel, are pretty much a oxymoron... what are you gonna cite? // Fra nkB 22:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In Clash of Wings (TV series), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Battle of the Atlantic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
admin help}}
Please move Back-story over the redirect Backstory per the stale talk section (and common usage). I'll tidy up the relatively few double redirects unless you care to do so. Change summary suggestion:
Thanks, at times like these I regret never trying for admin! Please post what you are doing, and want me to do here. Thanks. // Fra nkB 00:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Guillaume2303 ( talk) 20:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Thanks Debresser, but it looks like someone is acting as thought police...
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Nominations for the " Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D ( talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Gallery-link. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Gallery-link redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 23:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commons-gallery. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commons-gallery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 20:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:TOC nest right has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (
talk)
10:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Common cats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Common cats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 13:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commoncats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commoncats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 13:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commons cats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commons cats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 14:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commonscats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commonscats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 14:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commonscat-N. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commonscat-N redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 15:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:Adt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -—
Gadget850 (Ed)
talk
19:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GSAR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSAR until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yutsi Talk/ Contributions 16:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:Template documentation, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 01:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Books available as e-books, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 21:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Great American Wiknic - Boston | |
---|---|---|
The Second Annual Great American Wiknic will be an opportunity for Wikipedians across the Greater Boston area to meet for an afternoon of Food, Fun, and Fellowship. Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about upcoming activities, and just enjoy a day at the park! | ||
|
| |
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wiknic/2012! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 14:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC).
A tag has been placed on Template:Interwiki links requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Axem Titanium ( talk) 16:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators ( about the project • what coordinators do) 09:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:S. Since you had some involvement with the Template:S redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 10:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Commons categories, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Commons categories and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Commons categories during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Charles C. Stevenson Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
James086
Talk
13:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Template:Redirect from phrase has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --
Alan Liefting (
talk -
contribs)
22:24, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
The creator of that map is User:Mathiasrex, I've left him a msg at Commons. You can get in touch with me through Wikipedia email if you'd like. I am no longer in Pittsburgh, but in Ansan, Korea :) Long way indeed :) Glad to hear from you, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
First, thank you for the effort you just put in the Honor Harrington article (and I do mean that sincerely); it badly needs to be edited to remove the in-universe.
Now, I happen to have put the tag that the article was in-universe, and it was later moved to the top and problems with the lede added by another editor. In fact, I do check that page whenever there are changes. The entire section from Early life up until In the news is completely in-universe, describing events in the book as if they were real. The rest, down until just before Honor in other media pays lip service to the fact that events occur in books, but continues to describe events in the books as if they were real events (which makes it in-universe). So it's not laziness, but the fact that the article is still heavily in-universe.
Also, I think that a lot of the stuff you just put into the lede does not really belong there. Description of the back-story shouldn't be there, it should be put into a description of the setting in the body of the article. The same on extensive comparisons to Forester's Hornblower books; comments such as what constitutes surprise or not is also better placed in a discussion of the influences of the books, not in the lede of the article.
At best, you could argue that the lead was no longer too long (but now I think you've removed the basis for that argument...), but you also removed the notice that the article is in-universe. Is it your contention that your additions to the lede have now removed the in-universe problem in the rest of the article? Magidin ( talk) 05:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Best wishes, but I have faint hopes for you, Fra nkB 20:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Pierogi Award |
Thanks for your support of my RfA. It didn't succeed this time, but that's no reason not to have some nice pierogi. Cheers, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trainz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boolean ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cumberland, Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Zappa
O
Mati is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Trainz may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Train simulator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
=x=Talkback=x=
As detailed over at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-3RR you are engaged in an edit war over on the Trainz page. Please do not engage in this behavior. Talk about it on the Talk page. TheWizardOfAhz ( talk) 22:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
When you universally reverted all of the edits I made to the Trainz article under the blanket summary of 'I don't like what you did here' - that is an edit war. Edit Wars are not just limited to clicking on undo/revert three times in a row. Reverting content without giving any valid reason also falls within that. Also, re-adding removed content is also the same thing. In a nutshell: Don't use edits to fight with other editors – disagreements should be resolved through discussion. TheWizardOfAhz ( talk) 15:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:TRS2009-SP1 Launcher screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:TRS2009-SP4 Laucher screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:TRS2009-SP1 Main Menu screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Your template notice in my talk page is helpful, but you've gotten harsh on your explanation, calling the subject article "junk". Be polite next time. Ctempire ( talk) 01:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
{{
Lopsided}}
, {{
POV-statement}}
would be okay.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute possible
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Hi there, I noticed your edit to the Service Pack article. In this edit you used an HTML comment to hide two Wikipedia templates with which you disagreed, and to include a personal attack on the editor(s) who added the templates. This is just a reminder to keep these discussions to the Talk pages, to follow normal procedures for removing templates, and to assume good faith by other editors. Proxyma ( talk) 20:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portland & Rochester Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page York and Cumberland Railroad ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Rocket (disambiguation) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Mill pond may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Drainage divide may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Mount Pisgah may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Pisgah Mountain may have broken the
syntax by modifying 3 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Northern Tier (Pennsylvania) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Pisgah Mountain may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Panther Creek (Pennsylvania) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ashley Planes may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Tamaqua, Pennsylvania may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:14, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Just an FYI that we want to keep that refimprove tag on there. I'm probably the #1 editor to contribute actual content, (ah, yes, I am) and I'd prefer to just take the article in chunks as time permits than race around fixing a dozen tags other people could put there randomly. Hope that clears things up, I'm not trolling the article, I'm the main writer there and hope the tag brings in more people willing to help source it. It should be a GA or FA class someday, but in the meantime, I nave 3000 articles on my watchlist and a real life, and WikiProject Equine doesn't have a lot of super active members at the moment, so... Montanabw (talk) 23:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
I think you and the throng of admins here need to come to grip with the reality that all the cross linking is now also referencing... there is plenty to be said for crystallized knowledge as well. How can so prosaic a subject be improved by more citations... IN SHORT WHAT ARE YOU BEING ANAL ABOUT? WHAT IS "IN QUESTION"??? So many cites make editing PROSE a pain. BTW - name just one other encyclopedia with 19 cites for such a short article... just ONE! Enough is enough. Isn't it? // Fra nkB 23:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Frank. Editorial comments such as this need to go on the article talk page, not the article itself-- Jac16888 Talk 16:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beaver Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohawk ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nesquehoning Creek may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nesquehoning Creek may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks,
BracketBot (
talk)
20:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nesquehoning Valley Railroad may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
ARCHIVED TODAY // Fra nkB 02:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Please do not use swear words on wikipedia, or harass other users [1]. DrKiernan ( talk) 16:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:1632 series books ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:1632 series ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium ( talk) 01:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:1632 series images pages ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:1632 series ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium ( talk) 01:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,
Roger Davies
talk
04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Fabartus, what is your understanding of the proper usage of {{ R to section}}? (I see that you originated it.) I have assumed that it was intended for those redirects that specifically target a section of their target article (and thus have a "#" in the redirect target link). That interpretation seems supported by the redirect's current documentation and it's majority usage (97% meeting this criteria) but it is occasionally being used to tag redirects, such as Around the World Submerged, where (for various reason) it isn't desirable to specifically target a section, even though the topic of the redirect is a minor part of the target article. I ask because I was seeking a means of identifying those redirects that are sensitive to editors changing section titles in the target article. -- ToE T 00:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect David Haydn-Jones. Since you had some involvement with the David Haydn-Jones redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ToE T 15:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey again. Just a coincidence here, as I ran into this while fixing redirects pointing to nonextant sections. As noted at the RfD, a redlink is better than a redirect to a dab page with no entry. The info you added to the dab page back in January was reverted two hours later. I certainly wouldn't object to you stubbing out David Haydn-Jones if you wish. -- ToE T 15:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Voting in the
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,
Roger Davies
talk
22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Sisterheader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. RL0919 ( talk) 12:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:R from talkpage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Cenarium (
talk)
23:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove legitimate fact tags with (condescending) instructions to the person that placed it there to "study some history". If it's so obvious, you should be able to supply a reference yourself. If you can't, or can't be bothered, then leave the tag where it is. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 16:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:Interwiki links table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —
SMcCandlish
Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ
Contribs.
08:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
You'd have to put {{ db-author}} on it yourself, I think. Happy new one to you as well. :-) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 03:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I think you have misunderstood the purpose of the introduction for this article which is only meant to succinctly define what constitutes the definition of a generic transcontinental railroad -- i.e. a railroad which completely crosses any recognized continental land mass that connects one ocean to another by rail. The entire first paragraph of the intro that you had replaced it with, however, concerned itself only the First Transcontinental Railroad (originally called the "Pacific Railroad" which became know as the Overland Route) opened in 1869 which connected the United States' existing eastern railroad network at Council Bluffs, IA/Omaha, NE and San Francisco, a subject about which I have also written two published books. While discussed as part of the US subsection of the "Americas" section of the instant Transcontinental Railroad article, this subject is introduced and covered in great detail in two other separate Wikipedia articles. This intro also duplicates detailed information which is already contained later on in the main article itself. The second paragraph you added, while thoughtful and well written, appears to be largely a short essay made up of POV opinions which are made without providing any references that support them.
That being the case, I have thus restored the longstanding introductory paragraph of the article which was developed by consensus of the group of editors that have been the major contributors to this article over the years and have added to this an edited down version of non POV material from your second paragraph. If you wish to propose making major alterations to the longstanding introduction (or other sections) of this mature article, please first take them the entry's talk page for discussion before making wholesale changes that massively alter both its existing substace and character. Thank you. Centpacrr ( talk) 06:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the
coordinator academy course and in the
responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
21:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
FixBunching is the auxiliary template which I use the most often. Just a random thank you for creating it. -- 78.34.249.140 ( talk) 01:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:Tlxw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
14:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the
Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
21:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that Conference seemed to have some content sections after its references section and a stub template. When I went to fix this I found the references section and stub template were actually in another article, which was transcluded.
Reading the talk page, it seems you attempted to "merge" the smaller article into the larger one. But transclusion is not the proper way to do that, because of the weirdness that ensues e.g. two references sections and inappropriate maintenance templates, dablinks etc. You can fix this to some extent with <noinclude> but really, only articles designed to be transcluded (almost always in the Template namespace) should be transcluded into article space. The proper way to do mergers is using the procedure at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. I've done this, adding the appropriate templates, and if you have any comments you can add them at Talk:Committee#Propose merge-in of Conference committee. Hairy Dude ( talk) 01:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:UtComns has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
RL0919 (
talk)
17:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Sisterproject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
RL0919 (
talk)
17:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Category talk:Pharmacy/fragile, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Category talk:Pharmacy/fragile and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Category talk:Pharmacy/fragile during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RL0919 ( talk) 18:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Sisterwikis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
RL0919 (
talk)
18:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:See also W2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:LTACS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:NAMCON has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Cite Sm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -—
Gadget850 (Ed)
talk
20:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:Left60 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
21:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:NWBL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
07:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Ibull2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
10:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Ibull has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
10:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Usage div has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
15:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Demon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
15:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Ctempsection has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
16:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Right35 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:12, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Cms-catlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Catlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Charmed episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wpd-catlist-up has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Cat see also commons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
17:55, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wdy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
20:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Bullseealso has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
23:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Also starring has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Ricky81682 (
talk)
02:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Redirect template warning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
08:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:MainBold has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
08:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wiktionarytmp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
08:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:!: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
09:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:GEon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
09:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:•• has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Chris Cunningham (not at work) -
talk
09:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Top2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Lau has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:OTHERSITE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
23:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Left66 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
10:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Template:Wpd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
23:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Template:NestTextColors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
09:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Interwikicat-grp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. Axem Titanium ( talk) 10:46, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Template:TIMESTAMP has been nominated for merging with
Template:Currentdate. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Set Sail For The Seven Seas
270° 6' 0" NET
18:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Template:Template list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
11:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the concerns... but TFD and all the xFD's burn my ass in that a few busybodies can undo man-hours, even man-months of work and mistake it for "THE GREATER GOOD"... The WP Project... Really, REALLY, really needs 'a ten 'DELETE' votes to delete quorum' or leave things alone unless it's obvious trash. Which should easily get ten votes in any case--since if more votes were needed, more people would likely patrol and participate in said forums... strengthening the institutional consistencies... Too Often have I seen small CABALs develop that dominate such for a time.
• Hadn't ever heard template space was taking up too many resources (BRIAN AND TIM IN FACT explicitly STATED THE OPPOSITE back when we changed template documentation for the better— and they altered the expansion cap limit), yet that kind of fuzz for brains make work costs gobs of time and makes the place hostile...
• Even should I return these days to make big edits, sometimes half of what I try now no longer works without frustrating effort. Someone wants to patrol and subst some templates to imagine they are aiding the effort, fine... subst... but why make a working tool unavailable?
The relevant discussion has been moved to Template_talk:Anglo-Indian_Wars#.27Indian_freedom_struggle.27
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 21:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
The summary of Kanesville's importance to the overland trails in the 19th century belongs more under the history section as opposed to the introductory, general overview of the city or it needs to be compared with the evolution of the Lincoln Highway and the present-day equivalents of Interstates 80 and 29. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iowaryan ( talk • contribs) 07:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello Fabartus: Your user page [[User:Fabartus/temp7]] may be in violation of WP:USERNOCAT. The Category that it appears in, Category:Periods with timeline in infobox, appears to be a maintenance category, so it seems reasonable to allow user pages to appear in the category while development of a page is proceeding. Your user page in question does not seem to be in active development. Do you think you should comment out or otherwise deactivate the code that is putting this page into a category? Thanks for your consideration. -- Fartherred ( talk) 22:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I liked your tidying up of the lead, though I hope you won't mind my restoring the original wording in the sentence, "Since 2003, Waverley has been listed in the British National Register ..." because it is correct she has been listed in every year since 2003. The alternative, "In 2003, Waverley was listed in the British National Register ..." implies she was listed for only 1 year in 2003. I just wanted to explain why I made the change. 85.94.184.115 ( talk) 04:13, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Fabartus - while your dab-link at Lincoln Highway seems like a good idea, there is no article Old Lincoln Highway. Argyriou (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. If you really paid close attention (which you should have had the time for, since you didn't mind spending it on writing me a fairly long message), and if you knew how AWB worked, you'd see that the primary changes suggested by AWB (and implemented by me) were typos, and the rest (whitespaces, etc.) was a result of genfixes automatically applied. Although I wouldn't waste time/resources on doing genfixes alone, there's a merit in fixing typos, which is exactly what was done there. cherkash ( talk) 19:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Please do not change the content of articles so it addresses a different topic than the title of the article indicates, as you did here. This is particularly inappropriate when an article on the topic that you want to write about already exists ( Pound-force). Jc3s5h ( talk) 21:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco- Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!-- Codrinb ( talk) 03:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 15:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 03:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Tlxm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Tlw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Washington and Jefferson College, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tavix | Talk 00:42, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ring of Fire (anthology)-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 05:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
HI seem to have stumbled upon a couple of your requests Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Natural_sciences#Geologic_time_periods so I've added some comment, hope that's helpful. EdwardLane ( talk) 15:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the thought. Best regards, // Fra nkB 18:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Template:Fix bunching has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) -
talk
13:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Template:Lth has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Axem Titanium (
talk)
05:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:WikiBookscat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
16:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Commons template has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
The Evil IP address (
talk)
17:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Utility templates used in categories, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address ( talk) 19:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Interwiki utility templates, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address ( talk) 19:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
A page you have edited has been involved in the Wikipedia Dispute Resolution Mechanism. If you wish to take part please click here. Some of the editors working on it have been accused of being sock puppets including myself, information on that can be found here. UrbanTerrorist ( talk) 14:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I have wanted for some time to thank you for the encouraging words about the dispute over Heroes in Hell and associated actions, but was afraid to because I am concerned that anything I say may be considered canvassing. I am not canvassing you, let me make that clear. However, I find this whole matter ironic since I had called out Wikipedia as the single reference source for settling disputes over historical and my6thical characters and places for Lawyers in Hell writers and those engaged in writing for future volumes. Your mention of IAR was comforting, but I would think at this point nearly everyone who was trying to expand the HIH presence on WP has been scared off by people with that intention: people like me are rightly concerned that their work will be unilaterally deleted or they will be charged with some sort of connivance. The chilling effect of blocking people is indisputable. This reminds me of McCarthyism, which shows how old I am: guilty until proven innocent. Much time has been wasted defending specious accusations from an oligarchic group. And yet, I am leaving WP as the reference source for the HIH series, at least for the time being, because when WP is good, it is very good. Since they are deciding whether to block me, and will probably do that, I thought I would thank you while I have the chance. Janet Morris Guarddog2 ( talk) 17:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot ( talk) 17:53, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello FrankB. As you may have seen I have reverted your additions to the Kokoda Track campaign article. As I stated in the edit summary this material probably shouldn't be added to the lead (please see WP:LEAD). Much of it would however be appropriate if you could work it into the body of the article, for instance in the 'Background' section. If you would like to discuss this I would be more than happy to do so. A couple of final points, the article currently uses consistent short citation and date formats so when you come to edit the article again please be mindful to use these formats. For instance the short citations use Author, Date and Page number (i.e. Clown 2011, p. 1.), likewise the date format used is Day, Month and Year, for instance 1 July 1942. A few of your previous additions used different formats. Thanks in advance. Anotherclown ( talk) 08:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Fabartus, I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Weapons Races-- However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the article currently does not contain any references. As a new article, the most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information. It's nice to see you editing! Jipinghe ( talk) 21:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot ( talk) 02:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot ( talk) 08:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from personal attacks. I'm doing standard new page patrol, and that includes maintenance tagging. If you don't want your article tagged, then create them with references. Falcon8765 (TALK) 22:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC
WHAT PERSONAL ATTACK. YOU'RE AN ASS. I'm sharing that opinion in the hopes that you will smarten up. TRY ADDING CONTENT, first comes the prose and then the obfusticating cites. No other way to respect MY OWN TIME... the thing your careless activity disrespected. SO GROW UP, DO SOMETHING USEFUL. Hanging tags is NOT. Try clearing some... add cites. but stay out of the way of people adding to the project. My time is precious. BTW-cites on a television documentary series, like a novel, are pretty much a oxymoron... what are you gonna cite? // Fra nkB 22:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In Clash of Wings (TV series), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Battle of the Atlantic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
admin help}}
Please move Back-story over the redirect Backstory per the stale talk section (and common usage). I'll tidy up the relatively few double redirects unless you care to do so. Change summary suggestion:
Thanks, at times like these I regret never trying for admin! Please post what you are doing, and want me to do here. Thanks. // Fra nkB 00:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Guillaume2303 ( talk) 20:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Thanks Debresser, but it looks like someone is acting as thought police...
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Nominations for the " Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D ( talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Gallery-link. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Gallery-link redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 23:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commons-gallery. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commons-gallery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 20:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:TOC nest right has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (
talk)
10:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Common cats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Common cats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 13:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commoncats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commoncats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 13:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commons cats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commons cats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 14:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commonscats. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commonscats redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 14:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Commonscat-N. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Commonscat-N redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 ( talk) 15:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:Adt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -—
Gadget850 (Ed)
talk
19:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GSAR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSAR until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yutsi Talk/ Contributions 16:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:Template documentation, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 01:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Books available as e-books, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 21:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Great American Wiknic - Boston | |
---|---|---|
The Second Annual Great American Wiknic will be an opportunity for Wikipedians across the Greater Boston area to meet for an afternoon of Food, Fun, and Fellowship. Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about upcoming activities, and just enjoy a day at the park! | ||
|
| |
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wiknic/2012! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 14:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC).
A tag has been placed on Template:Interwiki links requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Axem Titanium ( talk) 16:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators ( about the project • what coordinators do) 09:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:S. Since you had some involvement with the Template:S redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 10:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Commons categories, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Commons categories and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Commons categories during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Charles C. Stevenson Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
James086
Talk
13:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Template:Redirect from phrase has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --
Alan Liefting (
talk -
contribs)
22:24, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
The creator of that map is User:Mathiasrex, I've left him a msg at Commons. You can get in touch with me through Wikipedia email if you'd like. I am no longer in Pittsburgh, but in Ansan, Korea :) Long way indeed :) Glad to hear from you, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
First, thank you for the effort you just put in the Honor Harrington article (and I do mean that sincerely); it badly needs to be edited to remove the in-universe.
Now, I happen to have put the tag that the article was in-universe, and it was later moved to the top and problems with the lede added by another editor. In fact, I do check that page whenever there are changes. The entire section from Early life up until In the news is completely in-universe, describing events in the book as if they were real. The rest, down until just before Honor in other media pays lip service to the fact that events occur in books, but continues to describe events in the books as if they were real events (which makes it in-universe). So it's not laziness, but the fact that the article is still heavily in-universe.
Also, I think that a lot of the stuff you just put into the lede does not really belong there. Description of the back-story shouldn't be there, it should be put into a description of the setting in the body of the article. The same on extensive comparisons to Forester's Hornblower books; comments such as what constitutes surprise or not is also better placed in a discussion of the influences of the books, not in the lede of the article.
At best, you could argue that the lead was no longer too long (but now I think you've removed the basis for that argument...), but you also removed the notice that the article is in-universe. Is it your contention that your additions to the lede have now removed the in-universe problem in the rest of the article? Magidin ( talk) 05:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Best wishes, but I have faint hopes for you, Fra nkB 20:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Pierogi Award |
Thanks for your support of my RfA. It didn't succeed this time, but that's no reason not to have some nice pierogi. Cheers, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trainz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boolean ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cumberland, Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Zappa
O
Mati is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Trainz may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Train simulator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
=x=Talkback=x=
As detailed over at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-3RR you are engaged in an edit war over on the Trainz page. Please do not engage in this behavior. Talk about it on the Talk page. TheWizardOfAhz ( talk) 22:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
When you universally reverted all of the edits I made to the Trainz article under the blanket summary of 'I don't like what you did here' - that is an edit war. Edit Wars are not just limited to clicking on undo/revert three times in a row. Reverting content without giving any valid reason also falls within that. Also, re-adding removed content is also the same thing. In a nutshell: Don't use edits to fight with other editors – disagreements should be resolved through discussion. TheWizardOfAhz ( talk) 15:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:TRS2009-SP1 Launcher screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:TRS2009-SP4 Laucher screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:TRS2009-SP1 Main Menu screen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Your template notice in my talk page is helpful, but you've gotten harsh on your explanation, calling the subject article "junk". Be polite next time. Ctempire ( talk) 01:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
{{
Lopsided}}
, {{
POV-statement}}
would be okay.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute possible
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Hi there, I noticed your edit to the Service Pack article. In this edit you used an HTML comment to hide two Wikipedia templates with which you disagreed, and to include a personal attack on the editor(s) who added the templates. This is just a reminder to keep these discussions to the Talk pages, to follow normal procedures for removing templates, and to assume good faith by other editors. Proxyma ( talk) 20:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portland & Rochester Railroad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page York and Cumberland Railroad ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 16:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Rocket (disambiguation) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Mill pond may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Drainage divide may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Mount Pisgah may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Pisgah Mountain may have broken the
syntax by modifying 3 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Northern Tier (Pennsylvania) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Pisgah Mountain may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Panther Creek (Pennsylvania) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Ashley Planes may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Tamaqua, Pennsylvania may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:14, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Just an FYI that we want to keep that refimprove tag on there. I'm probably the #1 editor to contribute actual content, (ah, yes, I am) and I'd prefer to just take the article in chunks as time permits than race around fixing a dozen tags other people could put there randomly. Hope that clears things up, I'm not trolling the article, I'm the main writer there and hope the tag brings in more people willing to help source it. It should be a GA or FA class someday, but in the meantime, I nave 3000 articles on my watchlist and a real life, and WikiProject Equine doesn't have a lot of super active members at the moment, so... Montanabw (talk) 23:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
I think you and the throng of admins here need to come to grip with the reality that all the cross linking is now also referencing... there is plenty to be said for crystallized knowledge as well. How can so prosaic a subject be improved by more citations... IN SHORT WHAT ARE YOU BEING ANAL ABOUT? WHAT IS "IN QUESTION"??? So many cites make editing PROSE a pain. BTW - name just one other encyclopedia with 19 cites for such a short article... just ONE! Enough is enough. Isn't it? // Fra nkB 23:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Frank. Editorial comments such as this need to go on the article talk page, not the article itself-- Jac16888 Talk 16:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beaver Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohawk ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nesquehoning Creek may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nesquehoning Creek may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks,
BracketBot (
talk)
20:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Nesquehoning Valley Railroad may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)