This is Thumperward's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
Hi Thumperward! I see that you did some extensive work over at Buck converter last year. As I know zilch about that subject, could you please check out this recent edit. Cheers! Technopat ( talk) 10:26, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thumperward. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of permaculture projects, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your tireless work! Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 17:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC) |
Regarding Maisonette -- there had been a discussion at Talk:Maisonette (disambiguation) resulting in moving the dab page and making the term into a primary topic redirect (which is still in place as a section hatnote at Apartment#Maisonette. I don't have an opinion as to whether it should be a PT redirect, but you might want to clean up the remaining artifacts (orphan talk page with RM and orphan hatnote). older ≠ wiser 17:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thumperward. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of permaculture projects".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day, Thumperward, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Ezra Cricket ( talk) 07:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Thumperward! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
Category:Imperium (Warhammer 40,000) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 13:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I see for: Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell → Water fuel cell you moved the page and the talkpage archives (good--lots movers forget those!) but did not move the main talkpage itself (I assume it was blocked by actual content existing on Talk:Water fuel cell. But before you figure out how to fix that, the itself had already been proposed at Talk:Water_fuel_cell/Archive_6#Requested_move and found not to have consensus (multiple well-reasoned opposes). That's no prejudice from starting a new RM discussion, but in the mean time please undo the move. DMacks ( talk) 21:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DMacks ( talk) 22:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
You have been indefinitely blocked for openly yearning for the deaths of other Wikipedia editors, and engaging in personal attacks against them. This is a collaborative project. You were given opportinities to explain and apologize and instead you doubled down. You did this twice in 2023. This misconduct is utterly unacceptable. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 ( talk) 02:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Thumperward ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologise for my professed desire that editors with whom I historically disagreed to have died. I realise that this is not in the spirit of collaborative editing.
Furthermore, I apologise for calling other users idiots. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 02:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
An apology is good, though I'm skeptical you have totally seen the light in the 13 minutes between your block and this request. I was surprised to learn that you are an administrator, I don't recall ever running into you previously. Maybe you're right that there is some leeway on talk pages, but you were offered a chance to explain, apologize, and withdraw your comments and declined it, I think that used up your leeway. More is expected of administrators than other editors in terms of behavior. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 10:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Template:Archive has been nominated for merging with Template:Automatic archive navigator. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 12:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there - I see you recently reorganized Endianness, which it no doubt deserved. Any particular reason for removing File:32bit-Endianess.svg in the process? I've found it to be a good visualization that - for me, at least - makes it much easier to quickly see which end is which. -- the Barometz ( talk) 12:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey Thumperward,
I was curious as to why you added the Advert template on the page for REAPER, as I didn't seem to notice any advertising language, besides for:
Extensive customization opportunities are provided through the use of ReaScript (edit, run and debug scripts within REAPER) and user-created themes and functionality extensions.
I feel like it's fine to remove the Advert template, though I'm new, and I would love to learn if I am missing something. Could you take another look and let me know? OnlyNano ( talk) 18:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Thumperward - Hello! I have a Wikipedia process question. Back in December 2023 you merged a bit of the text from the Jonathan B. Postel Service Award (archived version) into Jon Postel#Legacy and made the original article a redirect to the new section. In doing so, you removed the list of past winners. My question is - should there have been a notification that this was going to happen? Or were you just being WP:BOLD?
I ask because that was a page on my watch list, and I had no idea it had been deleted/redirected until I just went to look at it today. And then I was surprised that I hadn't seen any notice on the Talk page or anywhere else about this change? I'm just wondering if I missed something. Thanks!
I do understand that it wasn't much of a page before, but it seemed similar to some of the other pages found on List of computer science awards, such as " Alan D. Berenbaum Distinguished Service Award" and " SIGMOD Edgar F. Codd Innovations Award". The Postel award article had been edited and updated by a number of editors since it was first created in 2008. (I have not edited the Postel award article myself because of WP:COI as I am employed by the Internet Society, the org behind the award.) - Dyork ( talk) 23:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
I'll reiterate that I'm not interested in rehashing any of this but in case it is unclear where I stand WRT your editing pattern of systematically removing what I would consider uncontroversial unsourced material, here's some previous discussion with another editor who practiced this pattern of editing. ~ Kvng ( talk) 21:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
I appreciate your efforts on ELF format article to make it more focused but you have cut the valuable parts from it. Please put them in a collapsable box inside the page or in a new article.
Regards. 88.238.58.190 ( talk) 19:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
This is Thumperward's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
Hi Thumperward! I see that you did some extensive work over at Buck converter last year. As I know zilch about that subject, could you please check out this recent edit. Cheers! Technopat ( talk) 10:26, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thumperward. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of permaculture projects, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your tireless work! Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 17:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC) |
Regarding Maisonette -- there had been a discussion at Talk:Maisonette (disambiguation) resulting in moving the dab page and making the term into a primary topic redirect (which is still in place as a section hatnote at Apartment#Maisonette. I don't have an opinion as to whether it should be a PT redirect, but you might want to clean up the remaining artifacts (orphan talk page with RM and orphan hatnote). older ≠ wiser 17:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thumperward. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of permaculture projects".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day, Thumperward, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Ezra Cricket ( talk) 07:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Thumperward! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
Category:Imperium (Warhammer 40,000) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 13:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I see for: Stanley Meyer's water fuel cell → Water fuel cell you moved the page and the talkpage archives (good--lots movers forget those!) but did not move the main talkpage itself (I assume it was blocked by actual content existing on Talk:Water fuel cell. But before you figure out how to fix that, the itself had already been proposed at Talk:Water_fuel_cell/Archive_6#Requested_move and found not to have consensus (multiple well-reasoned opposes). That's no prejudice from starting a new RM discussion, but in the mean time please undo the move. DMacks ( talk) 21:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DMacks ( talk) 22:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
You have been indefinitely blocked for openly yearning for the deaths of other Wikipedia editors, and engaging in personal attacks against them. This is a collaborative project. You were given opportinities to explain and apologize and instead you doubled down. You did this twice in 2023. This misconduct is utterly unacceptable. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 ( talk) 02:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Thumperward ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologise for my professed desire that editors with whom I historically disagreed to have died. I realise that this is not in the spirit of collaborative editing.
Furthermore, I apologise for calling other users idiots. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 02:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
An apology is good, though I'm skeptical you have totally seen the light in the 13 minutes between your block and this request. I was surprised to learn that you are an administrator, I don't recall ever running into you previously. Maybe you're right that there is some leeway on talk pages, but you were offered a chance to explain, apologize, and withdraw your comments and declined it, I think that used up your leeway. More is expected of administrators than other editors in terms of behavior. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 10:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Template:Archive has been nominated for merging with Template:Automatic archive navigator. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 12:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there - I see you recently reorganized Endianness, which it no doubt deserved. Any particular reason for removing File:32bit-Endianess.svg in the process? I've found it to be a good visualization that - for me, at least - makes it much easier to quickly see which end is which. -- the Barometz ( talk) 12:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey Thumperward,
I was curious as to why you added the Advert template on the page for REAPER, as I didn't seem to notice any advertising language, besides for:
Extensive customization opportunities are provided through the use of ReaScript (edit, run and debug scripts within REAPER) and user-created themes and functionality extensions.
I feel like it's fine to remove the Advert template, though I'm new, and I would love to learn if I am missing something. Could you take another look and let me know? OnlyNano ( talk) 18:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Thumperward - Hello! I have a Wikipedia process question. Back in December 2023 you merged a bit of the text from the Jonathan B. Postel Service Award (archived version) into Jon Postel#Legacy and made the original article a redirect to the new section. In doing so, you removed the list of past winners. My question is - should there have been a notification that this was going to happen? Or were you just being WP:BOLD?
I ask because that was a page on my watch list, and I had no idea it had been deleted/redirected until I just went to look at it today. And then I was surprised that I hadn't seen any notice on the Talk page or anywhere else about this change? I'm just wondering if I missed something. Thanks!
I do understand that it wasn't much of a page before, but it seemed similar to some of the other pages found on List of computer science awards, such as " Alan D. Berenbaum Distinguished Service Award" and " SIGMOD Edgar F. Codd Innovations Award". The Postel award article had been edited and updated by a number of editors since it was first created in 2008. (I have not edited the Postel award article myself because of WP:COI as I am employed by the Internet Society, the org behind the award.) - Dyork ( talk) 23:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
I'll reiterate that I'm not interested in rehashing any of this but in case it is unclear where I stand WRT your editing pattern of systematically removing what I would consider uncontroversial unsourced material, here's some previous discussion with another editor who practiced this pattern of editing. ~ Kvng ( talk) 21:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
I appreciate your efforts on ELF format article to make it more focused but you have cut the valuable parts from it. Please put them in a collapsable box inside the page or in a new article.
Regards. 88.238.58.190 ( talk) 19:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)